Copyright
Charles 0. Houston, Jr.
1952
T H E P H I L I P P I N E S
COMMONWEALTH TO REPUBLIC
An Experiment in Applied
Politics
P A R T I
The Economic Bases
CHARLES ORVILLE HOUSTON, JR.
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of
the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of
Philosophy in the Faculty of Political Science,
Columbia University
1952
New York
D E D I C A T I O N
TO M Y FATHER
Who taught his son that each of us is
his brother's keeper.
But whereunto shall I liken t h i s
generation? It is like unto children
sitting in the markets, and calling
unto their fellows.
And saying, We have piped unto you,
and ye have not danced; we have mourned
unto you, and ye have n o t lamented.
...Matthew 12:16,17.
II
FOREWORD
*
This brief record of the Filipino people is presented
by one who, until lately, had seen neither the country nor
the people concerned. The prejudices and predispositions of
those who have been concerned intimately with the nation, in
the past, are not, it is hoped, a part of his intellectual
baggage. It would seem that it is now possible to look at the
Philippine scene with less passion and loss of perspective than
has characterized much of the writing on the subject up to
this time. Books that have been written about the Philippines
have been generally of two kinds (with certain notable excep
tions): travel books, or works written by apologists for one
of two opposing sides in the past events in the Philippines.
Books have been written by imperialists and anti-imperialists.
Books have been written which have attempted to portray the
Philippines as a kind of Oriental Central America, with the
inhabitants painted as "typical” lazy peons who seek no more
out of life than full stomachs and roofs over their heads.
Books have also been written by individuals with an axe of
some kind to grind, and these individuals have gone to the
Philippines for a definite end in view and have looked at the
scene there through spectacles colored for this purpose and
this end.
This writer is not concerned with the victorious
individuals and groups in the various contests that have been
waged in the Philippines. Rather he is concerned with how and
ill
why these individuals and groups gained their victories.
As we regard the situation in the Philippines today,
it is possible to state one thing with certainty; Whichever
side wins the victory in the present struggle — the Govern
ment or the Hukbalahaps -- the only sufferer will be the
people at large. It was the people who suffered from inep
titude in the Government before the War; the people who
suffered from the machinations of unscrupulous labor leaders;
the people who suffered from national disasters, in which they
were only partly aided by the Government; the people who
possessed no body of reserve capital to meet the many changes
in the tides of misfortune. When War came, it was the people
who bled, suffered and died - not the politico. whose destiny
was too frequently merely a change of position. It was the
people who were trapped between the Japanese and native
bandits -- both in and out of the Government — and the
conditions of the day. The people who fled from the provinces
to seek haven in Manila, were caught there at the end of the
War, and were either executed by fleeing Japanese, killed by
American bombardment, or starved by the breakdown of military
and civil authority.
Until the people realize their strength, which can
only be accomplished through education, they will continue to
be victimized by those degraded enough to gain power and pelf
through the sufferings of their fellows. A solution to the
nation's ills can never be found through the use of bayonet
iv
and club, for the innocent are injured along with the guilty.
And the innocent are not allowed respite by the opposition
who charge the people with their defeats and grant them nothing
from their victories. The present position of the Government
and its opposition was brought about largely by the War. The
resistance, by the Government, early in the years of the
Republic, to the demands of the opposition, crystallized the
leadership and the objectives of that opposition, allowing it
to develop in a more stable fashion than would have been the
case had they attempted the task in the years of semi-prosperity
before the War.
The present conditions in the Philippines are neither
new nor strange in the Philippine scene. They are the ultimate
outcome of events which run far back into Philippine history
but which may be said to have come into sharper focus from the
birth of the Commonwealth Government. Insurrections and up
risings, so characteristic of the Philippines in the past, will
continue to find their place in the history of the country until
definite and well-integrated measures, so often promised in the
past, are instituted, bringing to the people a sense of security
and well-being.
Because of the excessive sensitivity of many toward
studies of this nature -- seeing a sword concealed in a pen and
animosity in interest — the author feels the necessity of
insisting that this present study be regarded not as an attack
v
upon the Filipino or the Philippine Government or Philippine
institutions, nor against all ideas expressed by the people,
in the Government or through the institutions. It is here
presented only as objective a study as possible -- to review
past accomplishments and failures -- to deepen the understanding
of all observers - American, Filipino, or whomever -- with
regard to the manifold and critical problems facing the Filipino
people, the Philippine Government and Philippine institutions.
A critical, historical examination of events, ideas and facts
is not a guileful "American imperialist" attack nor insinuating
Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist boring from within. The author is
neither an "American imperialist" nor an adherent to Communism
in any of its shadowy filaments ofdisruption. He seeks neither
the economic enslavement of the Filipino people through force
of the dollar nor the overthrow of the Philippine Government and
social system by Marxian violence. The author is by birth a
Republican, by conviction a Democrat, and by practice an indepen
dent neutral. He neither affirms nor denies any religious or
spiritual beliefs or convictions of those with whom he comes
into contact -- either personally or through the printed word.
He is an optimist in believing that Man may yet obtain the
blessings for which humanity has so long striven, and a pessimist
in believing that this can not be achieved through the present
social and economic order whether in Russia or the United States
-- believing that the necessary changes can be achieved almost
wholly through the activities of the United Nations.
He thus demands and expects that this study be accepted
in the spirit in which It is offered.
It is essential to plan intelligently for the future
and not waste our efforts in fruitless recriminations about
the past. Thus, many issues now highly controversial, are
touched upon only as they bear upon the main thread of the
narrative. It is the duty of the present to busy itself with
the enormous task of creating a nation from the stuff of chaos
and not to anticipate the verdict of posterity. Too, the
origins of many of these strife-laden issues are lost in the
past. In all likelihood, the actual story will never be told,
despite the fact that, as Seneca said, "The language of truth
is simple."
This study is presented as a record of the work of two
peoples to create an independent nation in a portion of the
world unkind to independence. It is necessarily an incomplete
story'. However, it is believed that even a portion of that
story needs telling at this time. For one reason, the
material relating to many of the events is fast disappearing.
For another, even a partial story may aid in some small measure
to bring about a better understanding of the Philippines, and
through it, the peoples of Asia, by the people of the United
States. This understanding, so lacking in the past, is
essential for the future. This uneasy, stirring giant that is
Asia -- long ignored by the West save as a servant to direct
vii
and call - now holds the key to the future security and happiness
of Man.
The record of Japan is presented, in this volume, only
by implication. The details of the story must await the second
volume, which will attempt to present all the errors of wish
and deed, the tragic ineptitude of the United States and its
military and diplomatic leaders, which so crippled the future of
a fine people and the peace of the day. The Occident has had
its last warning. If it ignores the present and forgets the
past it will have no future in Asia.
The Filipino people are a fine people, hospitable,
friendly, gracious and talented. As musicians, they are skill-
#
ful; as dancers, they are graceful; as artisans they are peers
of any people. Their manual dexterity is the admiration of all
Americans who have the opportunity of working with them. They
are agile of wit and brilliant of Intellect. They live in some
of the most pleasant isles in the world with a beneficent,
though capricious, climate. Why then are they unhappy today?
An anthropologist might say, because of the conflicts engendered
by the attempts to impose upon them an alien economy and
political system. The average Filipino farmer, however, would
says Government. Perhaps we may be able to find the answer in
studying in detail the developing events from 1934.
Much of the blame for the post-war unstable condition
of the country can be laid with justice at America's door. The
viii
Tydings-McDuffie Independence Law, the various Revenue Laws of
the United States Government and the ambivalent attitude of
the American people toward the Philippines, brought great dis
turbance and eventual disaster to much of the nation's economy.
At present, plans are afoot to hold an economic conference
between the two Governments, to stabilize the economy of the
country. This will be the second attempt. It may be as un
successful as the first unless the mistakes committed by both
Governments are remembered. It Is impossible to blame the
people of the Philippines for the failures of the Commonwealth
-- for there were failures. The United States must assume a
portion of the burden of these failures and, In fairness,
mistakes committed by the commonwealth must be reviewed.
It is clear that, by 1950, the failure of the Philip
pine Administration to understand the basic requirements to
achieve its expressed goals as well as the fantastic fiscal
policies pursued after 1946 comprise the reasons for the
terrible conditions of the early years of the Republic.
In addition, they may well spell increased unrest and
disorder in the future,as well as permanent harm to the
agrarian economy of the nation, unless the Administration takes
some giant steps to implement existing social, economic and
political programs. These require money. Where Is it to come
from?
The economy, civilization and stability of the Government
lx
of the Philippines rests upon five major items I rice (associa
ted with corn), abaca (Manila hemp), coconut products, sugar
and tobacco. Associated with these five is the fishing indus
try, important as a food item and supplementary domestic
industry, and other agricultural and mineral products. The
present volume examines each of the major five items in detail,
and surveys the fishing industry, and the production of cash
crops such as cotton, rubber, minor fibers, vegetables, fruits,
and livestock. Since a majority of the economic problems of
the Philippines is tied to public health, the discussion is
terminated with an examination of nutrition, public health,
and relief activities. Since rice, is by all odds, the most
important item in the nation's domestic economy, a large portion
of this work is devoted to an intensive discussion of its
importance in the history of the Philippines from 1934 to 1950,
the problems connected with its production and distribution,
and the efforts of the Government to meet these problems. The
four major export items are then treated in a similar, but
less detailed, fashion.
In the course of preparing this work during the last
three years, it was early discovered that it would be necessary
to spend much time gathering and assembling references and
other materials pertinent to the subject due to an extraordinary
lack of normal reference material. Hie author, therefore,
x
found it necessary to travel widely throughout the Philippines,
seeking and asking aid wherever necessary* Much of the history
of the Commonwealth still rests in the hands of individuals who
have collected and managed to preserve letters, documents and
other material throughout the past trying years. For the aid
freely offered, the author wishes to express his deep apprecia
tion for the interest and help received from: Edward Sf. Mill,
and Catherine Lucy Porter of the American State Department,
Washington; J. Weldon Jones (formerly Auditor of the Common
wealth, acting High Commissioner and longtime friend of the
Philippines); Mr. Evatt D. Hester, formerly of the American
Embassy, Manila, friend and critic of the Philippines; Dr. Jack
Y. Bryan, Cultural Attache of the American Embassy; Dr. Alfredo
Morales, Secretary of the U.S. Educational Foundation, American
Embassy, Manila; the late Chief Justice Frank L. Murphy;
Senator Lorenzo M. Tafiada; the Hon. Cesar Fortich of Bukidnon,
Mindanao; the Hon. Francisco A. Perfect© of Catanduanes; the
late Justice Gregorio Perfecto; Dr. Jose P. Laurel; Dr. Jorge
Bocobo; Mr. Tomas V. Benitez, Second Secretary, Philippine
Embassy, Washington; Consul Leopoldo T. Ruiz, Philippine
Consulate General, Chicago; Mr. Pablo A. Pefia, Vice-Consul,
Chicago; Mr. Anastacio B. Bartolome, of the Department of
Foreign Affairs; Dr...Adeudato Agbayani, Adviser to the Philip
pine Consulate General, Sydney, Australia, who generously loaned
the author a portion of his valuable collection of Filipiniana
and offered much valuable advice; Jose Q. Dacanay, Editor of
xi
the Plant Industry Digest; Director Deogracias V. Villadolid,
of the Bureau of Fisheries; Jose R. Montilla, of the Bureau of
Fisheries who made available, and helped with preparation of
charts, graphs and maps; Attorney I.A. Villanueva, Bureau of
Fisheries for freely aiding the author in acquiring material on
the Bureau's activities; Dr. Juan Salcedo, Jr., Director of the
Philippine Institute of Nutrition and Secretary of Health for
his invaluable aid in gathering information on public health
and nutrition; Dr, Isabelo Concepcion, of the Bureau of Health,
longtime leader in Philippine scientific research; Dr. T.
Elicafio, Director of Hospitals; Director Eduardo Qnisumbing, of
the Philippine National Museum, guiding spirit in Philippine
science and world authority on orchids; Dr. Canuto G. Manuel,
Chief of the Museum's section on Zoology; Mr. Robert Fox,
anthropologist-ethnologlst-botanist-explorer extraordinary,
close friend and sharp critic; Professor E. Arsenio Manuel,
the Department of History, University of the Philippines, for
invaluable assistance and information; Director Luis Montilla,
of the Philippine National Library, for his many kindnesses; Mr.
Alfredo Reyes, Assistant to the Director of the National Library,
for his unfailing enthusiasm in rescuing fugitive reference
material; Professor Gabriel Bernardo, Librarian of the University
of the Philippines; Mr. Tiburcio Tumaneng, formerly Chief of
the Filipiniana Section of the National Library; Juan C.
Apostol, Chief, Inspection Division, Fiber Inspection Service;
Dr. Vicente Aldaba, Manager of the National Abaca and Other
xii
Fiber Corporation; Mr. Robert V. Terhune, of the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; Professor Carlos X. Burgos, Bureau of Animal
Industry; Eduardo Taylor, Manager, Cebu Portland Cement Company;
Zosimo Montemayor, Superintendent, Bukidnon National Agricul
tural School, Musuan, Bukidnon, Mindanao; Director Leon Ma.
Gonzales, of the Bureau of Census and Statistics; Assistant
Director Manuel E. Buenafe, formerly of the same bureau, for
constant aid in supplying statistics; Col. Pedro C. Medalla,
Chief of the Manila Harbor Police; Ramon A. Alegre, Bureau of
Immigration; Lieutenant-Commander Charles Pierce, U.S. Coast
and Geodetic Survey for special assistance; Dr. J. Canuto, Chief
of the Disaster Relief Service, Philippine National Red Cross;
Mr. Edward H. Cavin, Disaster Service, American National Red
Cross; Mrs. Virginia A. Pefia, Field Director, President's
Action Committee on Social Amelioration; Miss Fanny Adarna,
Philippine Community Chest; Mr. Guillermo Torres, President,
Mindanao Colleges; Dr. Ricardo Guinto, Leonard Wood Memorial
Foundation (for research on Hansen's disease); Fr. Rector
Daigler, S.J., Ateneo de Davao; Fr. Rector James Haggerty, S.J.,
Ateneo de Cagayan; Fr. William Masterson, S.J., Ateneo de
Manila; Fr. Ralph Lynch, S.J., Del Monte, Bukidnon; Fr. Pollock,
S.J., T§galoan, Occidental Misamis, Mindanao; Mr. J. MacNeill
Crawfurd, President, Philippine Packing Corporation, Del Monte;
and Dr. Andres Castillo, of the Central Bank of the Philippines,
for much advice and criticism on present-day Philippine economics.
I wish to express an additional word of deep appreciation
xili
for the many months of advice, criticism and teaching on the
part of H. Otley Beyer, grand old man of Philippine science
and education. One of the outstanding figures in the Philip
pines as well as in international science, the author is
deeply indebted for the patience and kindness with which Dr.
Beyer has shared a portion of his vast and unique knowledge
of the Philippines and the Filipino peoples. Possessor of
the greatest collection of documents and reference material
extant in the Philippines, he has been most gracious in his
permission to the author to consult and utilize this treasure
trove.
A special word of thanks is due to Jose P. Santos, for
his great assistance and kindness in sharing with the author
his invaluable collection of Filipiniana. To Father Walter
B. Hogan, S.J., a soldier of Christ in the front ranks of
society, the author is indebted beyond repayment, as well as
to Fr. Francis X. Lynch, S.J., whose generosity and friendship
has enriched the work and life of the author. Special apprecia
tion is expressed to President Mariano V. de los Santos, of
the University of Manila, for his sympathy and forbearance in
assisting the author in countless ways. Without his invaluable
aid, this work could not have been possible. To Lloyd Millegan,
special thanks are due for aid and suggestions. Thanks are
expressed also to Miss Carmen Alfonso and Attorney Felipe
Eloisida, of the University of Manila, for their special
assistance, and to the constant comfort of my wife, Flor de Lys,
xiv
is due whatever merits this work may possess.
A final word of appreciation must be expressed to my
professor, Allan Nevins, for his criticisms and suggestions.
Heedless to say, all opinions expressed in the book,
while possibly reflecting those of other individuals with
whom the author has talked, are those only of the author.
C.O.H.
The University of Manila
Manila
1950
xv
TABLE OP CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD ............... iii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED ........................ xix
INTRODUCTION ...................... 1
I. THE PLACE OF RICE, CORN, AND ABACA IN
THE PHILIPPINE ECONOMY .................... 25
II. THE PLACE OF COCONUT PRODUCTS AND SUGAR
IN THE PHILIPPINE E C O N O M Y ................ 58
III. EARLY EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE RICE INDUSTRY. 93
IV. EARLY EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE RICE
INDUSTRY (Cont’d.) ........................ 137
V. EARLY EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE RICE
INDUSTRY (Concluded) .......... 168
VI. DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ABACA INDUSTRY:
1934-1941 .................................. 194
VII. DEVELOPMENTS IN THE COCONUT INDUSTRY:
1934-1941 .................................. 229
VIII. DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SUGAR INDUSTRY:
1934-1941 .................................. 267
IX. THE RICE INDUSTRY: 1941-1950 .............. 315
X. THE ABACA AND COCONUT INDUSTRIESj
1941-1950 .................................. 350
XI. THE SUGAR INDUSTRY: 1941-1950 ............. 378
XII. THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY: 1934-1950 ........... 394
XIII. CERES’ HORNS COTTON-RUBBER-VEGETABLES
AND OTHER PLANTS-FRUITS-COFFEE-THE ROXAS
FOOD PRODUCTION CAMPAIGN ................. 416
xvi
Page
XIV. THE TWO BOWERS: .......................... 444
1. THE LIVESTOCK INDUSTRIES
2. THE FISHING INDUSTRY
XV. NUTRITION AND PUBLIC HEALTH ............. 471
CONCLUSION .......................................... 512
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE ............................... 525
B I B L I O G R A P H Y ................................. 533
APPENDICES
Table 1. Rice Prices: November, 1933- September,
1935.
GRAPH 1. Comparative Monthly Sales of Rice by the
NARICl 1946-1949.
2. Comparative Monthly Average Quotations
of Rice, Macan No. 2: 1946-1949.
3. Coconut Oil and Copra Production.
4. Sugar Production and Exports of the Philip
pines.
5. Agricultural Production.
6 . Merchandise Exports and Imports.
7. Wholesale Prices.
8 . Physical Volume of Production.
9. Individual and Corporate Incomes.
10 . Wage Rates of Laborers In Public Works.
11 . Money and Real Wage Rates of Selected
Industrial Workers in Manila.
12 . Wage Rates of Laborers in Manufacturing
and Commercial Firms.
13. Cost of Living and Food Costs of Wage
Earner's Family in Manila.
14. Retail Prices of Strategic Commodities in
Manila.
15. Retail Cost of Food in Manila (For Wage
Earner1s Family).
16. Gross Income from Agricultural Crops and
Their Products.
17. The Nation's Gross and Net National Product,
18. Classification of Arrests for Juvenile
Delinquency: 1945-1949.
19. Analysis of Arrest Records of Juveniles.
20 . Classification of Arrests, by Age, for
Juvenile Delinquency: 1945-1949.
21. Population, Rice and Flour Importation
and Rice Production.
xvii
CHARTS 1. Licensed Fishermen and Total Invest
ments in Commercial Fishing Boats :
1945-1949.
2. Quantity of Catch at Landing Points;
1948-1949.
BUREAU OF HEALTH
TABLES I. Average Annual Death Rate per 100,000
Population From Beriberi.
II. Cases and Deaths and Morbidity and
Mortality Rates from Beriberi per 100,000
Population; 1924-1940; 1946.
III. Deaths and Death Rates From Beriberi per
100,000 Population for the City of Manila;
1926-1940; 1946.
IV. Reported Number of Deaths From Beriberi
(Adults and Infants), Scurvy, Rickets,
Other Avitaminosis, Inanition Under One
Year, and Inanition One Year and Over, and
Rates per 100,000 Population in the Philip
pines and City of Manila; 1938-1947.
V. Estimated Population, Cases and Deaths
From Selected Diseases; Morbidity and
Mortality Rates per 100,000 population;
1946.
VI. Report of Cases, Deaths and Rates per
100.000 Population, From Selected Causes
in 1947 and 1948.
VII. Infant and Maternal Mortality Rates per
1.000 Live Births for 1940, 1946, 1947,
and 1948.
MAPS 1. Four Climatic Types of the
Philippines ................ fa cing-page 35a
2. Major Fishing Areas of the
Philippines ................ faoing page 456a
3. Major Sport Fishing Areas of
the Philippines ........... ffoolng page 458a
xviii
ABBREVIATIONS USED
AAAPSS -- - Annals of the American Academy of Political
and Social Sciences
ACIL — - Agricultural-Commercial-Industrial Life
CIMP ------ Commercial and Industrial Manual of the
Philippines. 1937-1938; 1958-1939: 1940.
FEQ. ---- — Far Eastern Quarterly
F E S ------- Far Eastern Survey
JPIMA ----- Journal of the Philippine Islands Medical
Association
M.O.P. --— Messages of the President
NACOCO ---- National Coconut Corporation
NAFCO ---- National Abaca and Other Fibers Corporation
NARIC ----- National Rice and Corn Corporation
NASB --— -- Natural and Applied Science Bulletin
PJC ----- Philippine Journal of Commerce.
PRATRA ---- Philippine Relief and Trade Rehabilitation
Administration.
xix
INTRODUCTION
America's attitude toward the Philippines may be
summarized in the following apt phrase: "The Philippines is
foreign for domestic purposes and domestic for foreign."^
This has been true since the acquisition in 1899 of the
Islands. There was a strong undercurrent of opinion in the
United States in early days that the United States should
never have acquired the Philippines in the first place, and
that the sooner the American rule was removed the better it
would be. One may note that this meant it would be best
for the interests of the United States rather than for t h e
Filipinos. Whenever questions were placed before Congress with
regard to policy in the Philippines, It invariably resulted in
the preparation of several bills for the granting of indepen
dence to the Islands. In the words offormer Governor General
Forbes, "these bills always received enough support in both
Houses of Congress to cause more or less embarrassment to the
Administration, which found it the best policy not to seek
Congressional legislation for the Islands."2
Coupled w i t h this is the lack of information a n d
interest of theaverage American with regard to the Filipinos
■h/lf.L. Holland and Kate Mitchell: P r o b l e m s o f the
Pacific. (New York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1940), p . 99.
2W.C. Forbes, The Philippine Islands. (Boston: Houghton
Mifflin Co., 1928, 2 vols.}, Vol. II, pp. 311, 312.
1
2
and Philippine affairs. He knew little and cared less about
these Islands so far away on the other side of the Pacific. In
addition, the United States in 1899 was in no position to care
adequately for the dependencies it acquired, and the possession
of such was never envisaged by the framers of the American
Constitution nor by individuals in early American administrations.
Partly due to these facts, and partly for other reasons, the
United States never had a concrete opinion with regard to the
ultimate disposition of the Philippines. Those individuals who
did, and who chose to make their homes and fortunes in the
Islands, were never completely comfortable since they always
had hanging over their heads the threat of eventual independence
and possible discriminatory legislation. For this reason as
well as the half-hearted efforts of the American Congress to
legislate for the Philippines, the colonial policy of the United
States was never endorsed by Americans in the Islands.
There is no doubt that American policy in the Philip
pines could easily have been conducted on a higher plane of
altruism. Many Individuals have believed, and have pointed out,
that whatever was done with regard to the Philippines was
motivated by the desires of special groups in the United States
who hoped to derive benefits from whatever course of action
was taken. Many Filipinos, however, have believed that the
United States offered the outstanding example of altruistic
colonialism by being true to its word with regard to the
3
preparation for, and eventual granting of, independence to
their country.®
Since Americans were not trained for the manifold prob
lems attendant upon the administration of a dependency, it
is not surprising that American policy has always been of an
experimental nature. These experiments have irritated more
than they have pleased the Filipinos and have been the cause
for much friction between the two countries. Several individ
uals connected with the administration of the Philippines,
such as Worcester, Forbes, Williams, and Malcolm, in tune with
the social and economic beliefs of their day, held to the view
that a government should be operated like a business. This
entailed a well-organized,highly departmentalized governmental
structure which would work in cooperation with the Filipinos
in developing the country socially, economically, and polit
ically. These men believed in policies which were designed,
said Worcester, to "encourage the development of the unused agricul
tural, mineral, and forest lands of the Philippine Islands with
the assistance of foreign capital, energy and technical skill.
While this undoubtedly was true to a certain extent, few there
have been who have raised the question as to whether it was
absolutely necessary to utilize all the natural resources of
3
Loc. clt.
^Dean C. Worcester* The Philippines Past and Present.
(New York* The Macmillan Co., 1930), p. 51.
4
the land, especially in the absence of concrete and specific
plans of development. Observers have pointed with a feeling
approaching horror to the profligacy of the United States,
for example, in the utilization of its natural resources and
have raised the question as to whether or not it might not be
wiser, if not so comfortable perhaps, to accept a lower standard
of living if thereby one’s natural resources are strengthened
rather than diminished. Would it not be wiser, they ask, to
wait until governments and peoples can determine sanely a
revolving system of utilization of their resources: that is,
in exploitation coupled with regeneration.
In addition, little thought was given to the future
problem of whether or not the Filipinos would be able to admin
ister this complex type of Government planned by early American
administrators for a country wholly dissimilar in nature,
economy, traditions and attitudes in government. Judge Malcolm
stated that "tested by the colonial standards of other govern
ments, the United States failed miserably in her Philippine
adventure."® One may agree with his opinion but for different
reasons than he has stated. His analysis is correct in so far
as it goes. It is quite possible, however, that the American
rule in the Philippines was overly concerned with the superficial
material aspects of living and life, that is, in the establish
ment of roads, health systems, domestic order, etc. Despite the
®G.A, Malcolms The Commonwealth of the Philippines.
(New Yorks Appleton-Century, 1936), p. 85.
5
fact that the most Important legacy of the American rule Is the
educational system of the Philippines, it Is very true that the
United States failed in inculcating into the minds and spirits
of the majority of Filipinos an adequate and lasting realization
of what "democratic” meant and means. It may be true as
Malcolm stated, that ”no city, county, or state within the
United States has a system of government better concentrated or
more harmoniously administered than the Philippines has had,”®
but this, even if true, is no guarantee of success in the
experiment of applied government. Recent history could feasibly
show that the above statement is a weak description of govern
ment in the Philippines. Americans took to the Philippines the
materialistic techniques, the technical superiority, and the
insistence upon order and peace In all phases of existence
characteristic of their own land, but they could not take with
them an Anglo-Saxon heritage nor a Western European type of
culture alien to the Philippines and outside their immediate
experience and understanding.
The ladings-McDuffle Law of 1934 was but one of a series
of similar laws which had been drafted and presented to the
Congress of the United States. Ever since 1900, the United
States had listened to the reiterated demands of Filipinos, in
the government, requesting first immediate independence,
secondly more autonomy, thirdly still greater autonomy, and
6Ibid.. p. 88.
6
again immediate and complete independence. For some thirty
years those in the United States believing in slow and careful
development of institutions and governments had turned deaf
ears toward these importunities. At the same time, the
Democrats in Congress encouraged the Filipino in these importu
nities with the result that the Filipino politico sought to
gain more and more autonomy and more and more independence from
these benevolent, tolerant friends. However, it was not until
the infant nation began sending its parent ever increasing
amounts of coconut oil, copra, sugar and cordage, that much
attention was paid to this riotous infant. Such organizations
as the Crude Cottonseed Oil Tariff Committee, the National
Board of Foreign Organizations, the American Farm Bureau
Federation, the Cordage Association, the National Dairy Union,
the National Grange, the National Cooperative Milk Producers
Federation, the Southern Tariff Associations, the American
Dairy Federation, and other "anti-imperialist" groups, began to
cast a weather eye toward the far horizon.
In their solicitude for the well-being, prosperity, and
happiness of their young charge, they began making representations
I
to Congress explaining carefully that the charge had now grown
to m a n ’s stature and deserved mature treatment. With their
defeat in the Fordney-McCumber Tariff, they became more and
more insistent and by 1933 had prevailed upon Messrs. Hare,
Hawes, Cutting, McDuffie and Tydings to make new provisions
respecting the future of this obstreperous, overgrown youngster.
7
President Hoover said that economic independence of the Philip
pines must first be attained before political independence
could be successful.7 However, there were many who gratui
tously pointed out to the President that the economic factor
was not of great importance in considering the future of the
Philippines. In support of this point of view, the Hare-Hawes-
Cutting Bill, of January 13, 1933, passed over Presidential
veto, provided for a transitional period of but twelve years for
the n e w Philippine Nation, headed by a Filipino executive, but
remaining under the tutelage of the United States. In October,
1933, however, the Philippine Legislature rejected the Hare-
Hawes-Cutting Bill on the ground that it was not an independence
bill but a tariff and immigration bill against their products
and their labor.
It has been suggested that this rejection was engineered
by Manuel Quezon due to the fact that the bill had been sponsored
under the aegis of Sergio Osmefia and Manuel Roxas. Quezon, it
is said, now saw his opportunity to seize and consolidate a
superior position in Philippine politics. Grasping at the
provision granting military reservations to the United States,
he persuaded the Philippine Legislature to reject the bill. He
then sailed for the United States to secure a "better" law. He
7
Herbert Hoover. Veto Message Relating to Philippine
Independence. 72nd Congress, Second Session, House Document No.
524. IkJanuary 13, 1933. - ordered to be printed, with bill."
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1933,
13 pp.
8
had been informed by Osmefia that the Hare-IIawes-Cutting Bill
was the best that could be obtained from Congress at that time.
Upon his arrival in Washington, he found little enthusiasm for
reopening and going through the same old process of preparing
and passing a new Independence bill. He spent many hours
talking with Senator Millard E. Tydings, then Chairman of the
Senate Committee on Territorial and Insular Affairs. Senator
Tydings told (Quezon that he would undertake the repassing of
the Hawes-Cutting Bill if he could be given a guarantee that it
would be accepted by the Philippine Legislature. Quezon, in
turn, pointed out to Senator Tydings that in order to guarantee
this acceptance he would have to show some "improvements" in
the bill. Section 10 of the bill was then rewritten, providing
mainly that the United States would give up its military bases
in the Philippines upon independence and that a conference
would be held within two years following independence to deter
mine the future of American Naval bases in the Islands. With
this exception, the original bill remained unchanged.
It would be unjust to ascribe to Quezon only political
reasons for his desire for a "better" bill. He was as worried
as Osmefia had been with regard to its provisions for the control
of Philippine imports into the United States. However sincere
Quezon may have been, it is undeniable that the economic
provisions remained in his "better" bill. The Philippines, how
ever, had little chance in 1934 of securing a bill which would
9
have liberalized America's control of Philippine economy. The
United States was in the depths of its greatest depression and
the farm groups, as well as others, were loud in their demands
for protection and support. President Roosevelt needed all the
support he could muster in the first critical years of his
administration to stabilize the American economy and the farm
groups were vital to this support. Had another bill been
passed, contrary to the desires of these special interests,
the President’s task would have been rendered more difficult
than it was. Too, any other sort of bill would, in all like
lihood, never have received sufficient support to ensure its
passage.
On March 2, 1934, President Roosevelt had urged Congress
to revise the Hare-Hawes-Cutting Bill with the removal of the
provisions for American military reservations and to make
subject for further negotiations the subject of naval bases and
economic readjustment. This was done, the Tydings-McDuffie
Act adopted, modified in accordance with these recommendations.
The difficult days were still to come. The Philip
pines had the independence act Quezon wanted, but it was now up
to the Philippine Legislature to accept and Implement it. On
this question was to arise the most bitter struggle in Philip
pine political history until that time.
Upon his return to the Philippines, receiving a h e r o ’s
welcome, Quezon found two groups in opposition to the Tydings-
10
McDuffie Act* The first was led by Osmefia who believed that
Quezon had secured the Act for his own political advantage and
that it was essentially the same as the H-H-C bill of the
previous year. The coldness which had developed between Quezon
and Osmefia over the fight with regard to the acceptance or
rejection of the H-H-C bill had now deepened, and the two
leaders were further apart than at any previous time in their
political careers. The second group was the increasing number
of discontented peasants as well as the more literate socialists
under the leadership of Pedro Abad Santos. The first group’s
opposition was soon dissipated. The second group, however,
was not so easily handled. The Sakdal uprising of 1935 will be
treated in subsequent pages; we may mention here, however, that
one of the surprises provided by the election of 1934 was the
strength shown by the Sakdalistas. Enough of them voted to
elect three members to the House of Representatives, one
provincial governor, and numerous municipal presidents, vice-
presidents, and councilors.
Both Quezon and Osmefia realized the necessity for a
unified approach to the problem of drafting a new government.
They, therefore, initiated a movement among their followers
for a fusion of the two opposing parties and a renewal of their
friendship. The late J.R. Hayden pointed out that the avowed
purpose of this fusion, which was finally achieved on June 16,
1935, was to secure agreement among the growing elements of the
nation for the establishment of the Commonwealth and the future
11
Republic, and to place the execution of that program in the
hands of the same leaders who had in the past directed previous
campaigns for Independence.® In all likelihood, this fusion was
at best only one of expediency. It was not approved by the
great body of adherents in either of the two camps, many of
whom were left to shift for themselves with the unification of
the two parties.
Whether or not the critics of such a program approved
the mechanics of this fusion, it is undeniable that both
Quezon and Osmefia were being realistic in their approach to the
problem of organizing a government that was to prepare the
nation for ultimate Independence. American democracy, as such,
cannot be transplanted bodily from an indigenous environment
to a strange one, without suffering In the change many modifica
tions of form and principle. Dr. Hayden repeatedly points out
that the Philippine Government has been, and always will be, a
government by Filipinos to satisfy Filipino requirements. It
is possibly quite true that had Osmefia remained in opposition
to Quezon and cooperated only in so far as it was necessary to
get the government started, the existence of a two-party system
might have prevented the growth of many forces which tended
during the period, and Immediately following the War, to promote
®For Dr. Hayden's acute analysis of the Coalition
Government, see his The Philippines: A Study in National
Development. (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1947), pp. 367-375;
436; 543; 914-915; 920.
12
weakness and disunion. It is interesting to note, in this
connection that, in 1940, Quezon went so far as to propose the
abolition of the multiple party system and a general revision
of democratic practices involving the surrender of a great
portion of individual liberties.
On May 1, 1934, the Philippine Legislature accepted
the Independence Act, and on July 30, a constitutional convention
convened to frame an organ for the Commonwealth as required by
the Act. After six months of labor, the convention completed
its task on February 8, 1935. On May 14, the Constitution was
presented to the people for their approval and as expected
was accepted by a vote of 1,157,962 against 39,920. Nine days
later, President Roosevelt approved the Constitution as submitted.
The following September, elections were held to select
a president, vice-president, and National Assembly which was to
be unicameral. Manuel L. Quezon was elected president by a
large majority but Sergio Osmefia received more votes for his
office than did Quezon. In addition, ninety-six assemblymen
were selected eliminating many members of the former Legislature
which had included a Senate of 24 and a House of 94. This was
to find an echo in an amendment of 1940 providing once again
for a bicameral legislature.
As constituted, the new government was provided with a
presidential term for six years and no re-election; the United
States retained control of defense and foreign relations,
13
continued to exercise supervision over financial matters and
reserved the right to intervene to preserve the Commonwealth
Government. Appeals from decisions of courts in the Philip
pines were to be carried to the United States Supreme Court.
The six years of the Commonwealth leading to the out
break of war, were occupied with attempts at establishing the
new government and seeking means of laying a strong foundation
under the nation's economy in preparation for eventual indepen
dence. The first act of the new National Assembly was the
National Defense Act providing for compulsory military training
supplementing the Constitutional provision for compulsory
civil service to the state. The third act of the Assembly was
to provide for the reorganization of the judiciary, reducing
the Supreme Court membership from nine to seven and creating
a Court of Appeals of fifteen members. A year later Courts of
First Instance were reorganized with the nation being divided
into nine judicial districts and an act was passed requiring
all justices of the peace to be duly qualified lawyers.
The main divisions of the Government were also re
organized, the number of executive departments being increased
to nine, comprising: Interior, Finance, Justice, Agriculture
and Commerce, Public Works and Communications, Public Instruc
tion,. National Defense, Labor, and Health and Public Welfare.
Within and under these were created many new commissions,
bureaus, councils and institutes having to do with national
14
defense, economics, education, relief and public welfare,
special commissions for Mindanao and Sulu, the census, private
education, adult education, civil service, cooperatives, anti
usury activities, national language and scientific research.
Filipino women had long held great prestige socially
and economically so with the emergence of the new government a
need was felt for their participation in the direction of their
national life. Therefore, in 1937, by a vote of ten to one,
the women of the nation ratified a national plebiscite providing
for woman suffrage. This had as a main result the increasing
appearance of women in the political life of the nation.
Despite warnings by opponents of the measure, there was no
appreciable change in political morality.
The structure of the Government was changed in 1940 by
the adoption of three amendments to the constitution. The
first, said to have sprung from "popular" demand for the re-
election of President (Quezon, provided that the tenure of
office of the President and Vice-President was to be four years
with an additional four years permitted if re-elected. The
second re-established a bicameral legislature springing from a
popular demand of unemployed representatives and the third
created an "independent" Commission on Elections composed of
three members. This Commission was not given coercive power.
A national plebiscite on June 18, 1940 approved these amendments
which were then submitted to President Roosevelt who approved
them on December 2, 1940.
15
The first election, under the new provisions, was held
November 11, 1941, with President Quezon re-elected as President
and Sergio Osmefia re-elected Vice-President. It was the last
election in President Quezon's career. Both the President and
Vice-President were inaugurated in a solemn ceremony conducted
by General Douglas MacArthur on the Island Corregidor under
the fire of Japanese batteries on Bataan, following which the
Philippine Commonwealth Government went into exile in the United
States where, in 1944, shortly before the invasion by MacArthur
of the Philippines, President Quezon succumbed to the disease
which had steadily sapped at his incredible vitality throughout
his life. Sergio Osmefia assumed the office of President and
held it until the election of Manuel A. Roxas, in 1946, as first
President of the Philippine Republic.
The political history of the Commonwealth was char
acterized by the alarums and excursions and teapot tempests so
much a part of the Philippine local scene. The greater portion
of these centered around the personality of President Quezon
whose brilliant, mercurial temperament became the focus for
everything that occurred during his administrations. Quezon was
the Government and every statement, every utterance, became the
occasion for analysis and evaluation which was to produce the
political currents of the period.
16
He started his administration, in typical fashion, with
a quarrel with the Manila press. He attacked their reporting
mere rumors as fact and stated that if they were unable to get
the facts straight, he would take over the local radio station
and broadcast night and day. His charges were true, but the
press was not wholly to blame since the President had altered
the method of disseminating news following his assumption of
office. Former governors-general had met the press daily but
Quezon decided on a weekly conference. In order to have
interesting developments with which to keep their readers’
attention, the newspapers were reduced to securing information
from whatever source was available.
Continuing his attention to every detail of the life
of his nation, Quezon next attacked oil exploration grants which
had been given to American and Filipino firms. He cancelled
thirty-one of the total of sixty-three on the ground that their
fiscal organizations were inimical to Philippine interests and
were in violation of Philippine corporation laws. He indicated
that his next step would be a similar attack on the mining
companies. The fact that these were the largest dollar-producing
businesses in the Philippines remained outside the question and
the fact that the Philippines was unable to find and develop oil
resources has been ascribed to many reasons, none of which
considered the antipathy of the Government.
Quezon’s approach to local problems many times took
strange forms. Concerned with the peace and order situation he
exerted strenuous efforts to capture a notorious outlaw, one
Kulas Encallado, only to release him a day later to secure the
surrender of his followers. The bandit returned to his province
not a public enemy, said the Manila Bulletin, but "Public Hero
No. 1." This, the newspaper said, indicated that a half
starved, aged bandit was recognized by the Government as being
more efficient in maintaining law and order than all the forces
of the Government. There were many serious problems facing the
country at this time: banditry was rampant, the Sakdals
represented a constant possible threat and profound agrarian
unrest was deepening throughout Luzon. The financial position
steadily deteriorated, with the main attention of the President
directed toward attacks on investments to curb oil speculation.
The President, whether from design or accident, continued to
meet such situations by an attention-getting move which
distracted the public and made it appear as though more efforts
were being exerted to solve the situation than was actually
the case. He resorted time and again through the years to
these tactics and was enormously successful in drawing attention
and criticism away from the central points by emphasizing
peripheral incidents which always captured the fancy of the
public.
Observers watched with appreciation and anxiety the
activities of High-Commissioner Frank Murphy, in whose person
they saw the only hope of maintaining stability in an uncertain
situation. The problems of protection of American property
18
rights, the external and domestic stability of the country and
the worsening conditions in the Par East all demanded the closest
attention from the American executive in the Philippines. The
anxiety was caused by persistent reports that Mr. Murphy was to
be recalled to the United States to lend support to President
Roosevelt in Michigan and most observers believed that were
this done the strong, able hand needed would be difficult to
replace. That these fears were not unjustified became apparent
after the removal of Mr. Murphy with the appointment of Paul
McNutt, a statesman being replaced by a politician.
In February, the first step was taken by what was to
become a large group of Filipinos desirous of a continuation of
the Commonwealth status when Pedro Guevara, former Resident
Commissioner in Washington, advocated such a relationship in a
speech before the students of the College of Law, of the
University of Manila. He also warned against any alliance with
Japan which would mean "political, economic, and social
absorption."® Only by a maintenance of the existing relations,
he said, could the economic, social and cultural salvation of
the Filipinos be assured. The move to continue the Commonwealth
gained increasing strength until, by 1939, one group, the
Commonwealth Association, Inc., reported a membership of over
three thousand. Landowners, planters, merchants and labor
organizations joined the movement. One labor leader called on
®The New York Times. February 15, 1936.
19
President Quezon in October, 1939, stating that more than indepenr
dence the Filipinos loved liberty. Quezon was reported to have
stated in reply that not all who talked of independence were the
real patriots. Whether this movement would have resulted in any
thing concrete is difficult to say, for the High Commissioner,
Paul V. McNutt, felt called upon to render his opinion which
immediately aroused opposition and President Quezon who was far
from friendly with the High Commissioner, despite his private
leaning toward a continuation of the Commonwealth status, joined
the fray and succeeded in ending for the remainder of the
period any serious discussions about a movement which would
have been of the greatest benefit to the United States and the
Philippines.
President Quezon and President Roosevelt had issued a
joint memorandum on April 5, 1938, which, in essence, postponed
the economic independence of the Philippines until 1960. The
program embodied in the memorandum anticipated the conclusions
of the Joint Preparatory Committee which were released in May,
providing for an annual reduction of five per cent in the
American trade preferences for the Philippines, until by 1960
full duties would be imposed. The Report was endorsed by both
Presidents shortly after it was released and since 1960 seemed
far in the future, the Report marked the end of any further
serious economic planning in the Philippines to prepare for
that day.
Domestic conditions both with regard to peace and order
20
and with regard to the nation's economy, continued to dete
riorate steadily until by 1940 the President felt it necessary
to be granted emergency powers. These powers permitted the
President to control almost every aspect of the nation's
economy: farming industries, wages, profits, hours of work,
distribution of labor, transportation (including shipping),
public services, rents, and prices of primary necessities. The
days of the Commonwealth were numbered, however; the Japanese
effectively ended speculations as to the future in 1941. The
results of their occupation unquestionably completely altered
whatever plans were made for the future of the nation and with
economic problems not fully understood either in the United
States or the Philippines, the future existence of the nation
became questionable and highly problematical.
In his inaugural, President Quezon had announced a
three-fold program for the Commonwealth. The first, and
supposedly the most important, was the creation of a Philippine
Army and the drafting of a plan for national defense. The
second was a solution to domestic disorders through the "social
justice" campaign. The third was economic planning for the
purpose of establishing the Commonwealth on the road to
stability and progress. Through a series of events which may
or may not have been preventable, none of these three can be
said to have met with undivided success. The problem of national
defense, largely evolved by General Douglas MacArthur, was the
object of the first act of the special session of the National
21
Assembly, mentioned above. This was to provide a standing army
of 19,000 men, of which 3,500 would be detailed to perform
functions of the Philippine Constabulary of glorious history.
The standing army was to be supplemented by a citizen reserve
which was expected to reach 500,000 men through the institution
of universal compulsory training. It was manifestly impossible
for the then existing armed forces of the Philippines to train
adequately the large number of men who were to be called
through the first registration; so it was planned that the
private colleges and universities of the nation would aid in
the training by the establishment of ROTC units, at their own
expense. This was expected to handle a considerable percentage
of the men to be trained. We shall speak of the social and
military implications and weaknesses of this plan in subsequent
pages. It need only be mentioned here that this plan created
much resentment, brought about real financial difficulty to
educational institutions affected and weakened morale in the
army in the early difficult days of the war. This situation
was responsible for much of the lack of coordination which
existed in the Philippine campaign of 1941 and 1942, and was
a characteristic of the army of the Republic. No army can be
completely democratic, but that is not to say that any army
cannot be trained democratically. The fact that a selected few
were given an opportunity for higher education and a greater
majority were trained in a helter-skelter, and many times in
competent, fashion would not redound to the benefit or
efficiency of the Philippine Army. Too many of these ROTC-trained
22
youths treated the men around them as though the latter were
their personal servants. Many a Filipino soldier felt that he
would be glad to die for his country but not for the benefit of
an "illustrado". President (Quezon refused to entertain
objections to this plan.
The peace and order problem was "settled" in a similar
desultory fashion. Bandits were slain, Sakdal leaders were
imprisoned, but the bandits remained and discontent and murmurings
arose from all corners of the nation increasing steadily, in
fact, from 1934 to 1941. It is never possible to solve an
agrarian problem by the imprisonment of a few leaders, ill-
advised as these leaders may be. Despite the passage of the
Minimum Wage Act, the Eight-Hour Labor Act, the Tenancy Act,
Public Defender Act, and the establishment of the Court of
Industrial Relations, the failure of adequate implementation of
these and allied measures illustrated the very real lack of
understanding on the part of Quezon and other government figures
as to the depths of the discontent in the agrarian regions.
This lack of understanding was responsible for the genesis of
the Hukbalahap of 1945 and following years.
New chartered cities were brought into existence, there
being eleven by 1941. The educational system of the nation was
the subject of some thought and consideration, resulting in the
Educational Act of 1940 which had not been suggested by the
special committee on education appointed by the President to
advise the Government on educational policies and necessary
23
reforms in the existing system. This Educational Act provided
for the reduction of the elementary course from seven to six
years and provided for the adoption of what was called the
"double-single-session” whereby one teacher handled two separate
sets of students in one day. It raised the entrance age into
the school system to over seven but not more than nine years of
age and fixed the school year to run from July to April rather
than from June to March as formerly. It was agreed In later
years that while these were changes they were not accomplish
ments. In addition, the Commonwealth instituted four broad
programs in public education. These were: the Piliplnization
of the system; emphasis on vocational education; stress on
character education, and establishment of free, compulsory
primary instruction. Educators in the early years of the
Republic were highly critical of the nature of these changes,
the consensus being that the program was a failure. Defenders,
on the other hand, point with some justice to the relatively
short period of time in which these were allowed to operate.
This defense, however, has not weakened the position of critics.
The most important task facing the Commonwealth lay In
developing a sound economy and solving the ever-present
agrarian problem. We shall discuss these in subsequent pages
at great length because of their supreme importance. 'We need
only say here that whether or not the programs envisioned by
the Commonwealth leaders would have succeeded, the outbreak of
the great Pacific War completely altered the circumstances and
24
brought to a tragic halt the efforts begun with so much
enthusiasm. The War proved the greatest and most enduring
disaster in all Philippine history. The economy was utterly
disrupted. The face of the nation was scarred and maimed. A
moral decay infected like a virus the body politic and so
wasted the vigor of the nation that it was ill-prepared to
face the manifold challenges of independence which was
achieved July 4, 1946. Thus, Philippine history to be under
stood or appreciated in the days of the Republic must be
examined in the light of the erections of plans and programs
which were either successes or failures. We thus begin by
studying in the following pages the folk economy which is the
life-blood of the Philippine nation.
CHAPTER I
THE PLACE OP RICE, CORN, AND ABACA IN
THE PHILIPPINE ECONOMY
The Philippines might present, to an economic deter-
mlnist, a prime example illustrative of his theories. The
history of the Philippines is the history of the land and the
people; the history of the economic development and attendant
problems and how these problems have been faced or avoided.
Economics, particularly the economics of the land, has been the
mainspring which has moved the wheels of Philippine history,
since agriculture has been and will continue to be, the chief
source of wealth. An analysis of Philippine political events
and institutions would be worthless without a clear under
standing of the economic forces at work in the land, since as
Ellen C. Semple says, "A land is fully comprehended only when
studied in the light of its influence upon its people, and a
people cannot be understood apart from the field of its
activities.
The Philippines, in common with other Oriental nations,
has been plagued for generations with a land problem,2 and this
•^Influences of Geographic Environment. (New York* Henry
Holt & Co., 1947), p. 51.
o
Bernard H.M. Vlekke, Nusantara. (Cambridge, Mass.* Harvard
University Press, 1943), p. xvl 11The land system is derived
undoubtedly from the fact that the Philippines belonged to the
island world of Eastern Asia but they are, however, historically
only loosely connected with it.”
25
26
problem during the period or the Commonwealth was seriously
heightened. The future seems to hold little promise that it
will be adequately solved under present or immediately foresee
able conditions.
Studies have been made which are interpreted as
indicating that the Philippines can support a population six or
seven times greater than the present number. Despite the fact
that these and other theorists have said the land of the Philip
pines can support this or that many millions of people, in
actuality it cannot. In 1941, the Philippines consumed 58
million bushels of rice and produced less than 54 million,
importing from Southeast Asia around 2 million bushels. Since
the land is at present incapable of supporting the needs of
its people with the basic food commodity of rice, needing in
fact, to import from other Oriental countries and the United
States vast amounts of the cereal, it Is flying in the face of
fact to state boldly that is now possible to support Its
population. The possibility the theorists have in mind can only
come about with a vast increase in the amount of tillable land,
the wider utilization of fertilizers and modern methods of
agricultural production, the settlement of age-old problems of
land-ownership, and the improvement of methods of distribution.
The average Filipino farmer is land-hungry and nearly desperate.4
^1948-49 production was 56,620,000 cavans representing a
deficiency from requirements of more than 8,000,000 cavans.
4Florence Horn, Orphans of the Pacific. (New York:
Reynal, 1941), p. 111.
27
Despite the congestion of population in Central Luzon, for
instance, the nation as a whole is relatively underpopulated
If one compares its 147 persons per square mile to that of
Japan with 488, Java with 822, and Belgium with 712. The fact
is that population is very unevenly distributed. This may be
attributable in some measure to the natural features of the
land, but there is no question that the undeveloped road
system and the deadening nature of the tenancy system have
contributed greatly to this condition.
Despite the fact that early in the American regime an
effort was made to redistribute the centuries-old church lands
and feudal estates, the divisions of these areas proceeded
slowly and spasmodically. It was upon these lands, more than
anywhere else in the Philippines that conditions which can be
described only as slavery and peonage were bo be found.®
American authorities and enlightened Filipino public servants
bent every effort to encourage the acquisition of such lands by
people working on them. However, they were able to accomplish
very little because of the apalling ignorance, and the even
more appalling poverty, of those they hoped to benefit. Couple
5
Apart from the Moro territories where slavery is
sanctioned both by religion and custom and is mitigated by
special provisions in the Koran and the Lawarn Code.
Over one-third of the population in 1939 belonged to a
group of laborers ten years old or over, of which two-thirds
were engaged in agriculture. Of this latter figure, less than
half were farmers and owners, the remainder being mere laborers.
Catherine Porter. Crisis in the Philippines. (New York: Knonf.
1942), p. 64. ----
This will be treated in detail in the second volume.
28
these facts with the reluctance of the great landed proprietors
to sell their properties at less than exorbitant sums, their
corruption and power, the inadequacy of the educational system,
and the general ignorance of the historical forces at work in
East Asia and we get a picture which helps explain the eruptive
nature of the Philippine scene during and after the war years.
Mindanao, the second largest island, contains 36,292
square miles. This is 14,000 square miles less than the area
of Java, which contains, however, a population of 42 million,
while that of Mindanao has but 1,828,071. The island of
Bantayan contains 640 persons per square mile; Luzon, 180; and
Mindanao but 49. These figures indicate the maldistribution
of population in the Philippines; they, however, apply only to
the country as a whole since many of the provinces have now
reached the saturation point.® Some shifting of the population
has occurred since the war, but not enough to change signif
icantly the picture. Whatever fertile and empty land is
available will be much needed in the future, for the population
has been increasing at a somewhat greater rate than was
characteristic of Western countries in the Nineteenth Century.7
®Cebu had a population, in 1939, per square mile of
628; Iloilo, 576; La Union, 422. Trinidad A. Rojo, "Philippine
Population Problems," Philippine Social Science Review. XI,
No. 2 (May, 1939), 135-136, passim.
7Warren Thompson, Population and Peace in the Pacific.
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press7TT946), p7~275T See also
pp. 274-282 for an excellent discussion of currents In Philip
pine economy which bode ill for the prosperity of the country.
29
The Philippines has a favorable soil, temperature and
rainfall which would guarantee an excellent production of
agricultural commodities. Though not so fertile as the Island
of Java, it is rich enough, with a greater use of fertilizers
and with more economic farming methods, to provide adequately
for the needs of the nation.® Those areas in which the
population is concentrated, largely river valleys, seashores
and watered plains, have been cultivated intensively for many
generations. So great has been the industry of the people that
even the forested and almost inaccessible mountains have been
forced to yield their share. The chief concern of the population
is with the production of rice. This cereal, in the Philippines
as in other Eastern nations, is more than a mere agricultural
commoditys it is currency, and it is the basis of many
religious ceremonies. Many varieties are grown, ranging from
the brown and red rice consumed by the poorest to the purple
and black rice available only to the wealthy. So important is
rice to the Filipinos that at each stage of its growth and
production it receives a distinct name.
Rice Is found in almost every portion of the archipelago,
both In the lowlands and on terraced slopes. Most of it is the
so-called "wet rice” so common to monsoon Asia. However, it Is
also grown as a dry crop, the original method in the Philippines,
in the mountainous regions and in areas in which irrigation is
8 Ibid.
30
impracticable or impossible. Both types of cultivation, in all
regions, have traditions and customs which have become an
integral part of the Philippine scene. Many of the customs are
derived from the Malayan heritage of the Filipino people, some
have been borrowed from Indo-China and China, while others are
indigenous to the Philippines.
In addition, many of the techniques are quite dissimilar.
They are fascinating and illustrate the tenacity of ancient
tradition and the effects of differing cultures in the native
milieu. For instance, in some sections of the province of
Batangas, survivals of ancient practices are merged with
activities illustrative of the Catholic influence in the life
of the peasant.
Nothing is more interesting to the Western observer
in the Philippines than the many customs and traditions
associated with this rice culture. It is evident to the most
casual eye that this cereal is the very backbone of Philippine
civilization and economy. To a nation such as the United States
such dependence upon one crop is almost unbelievable, and this
along with other great economic and cultural differences between
the two countries must be constantly kept in mind if we are to
appreciate the nature of the relations between the two countries.
Despite the fact that the Philippine archipelago has
31
land available for an appreciable increase in the production
of rice, it has never been able to raise enough for its own
needs.^ In the rice-growing provinces of Ilocos 3ur, Ilocos
Norte, and Abra, ninety per cent of the farms are below one
hectare in size and ninety-nine per cent under five hectares.10
It is obviously impossible to expect much increase in the
yield of this section of Luzon, without an intensive adoption
of new methods of agriculture. Under the present system, an
individual is obviously limited in the amount he can produce
from one to nine acres.
Investment in farm industries has largely been in the
hands of the Filipinos, especially with regard to investments
of land and improvements.^^- The Filipino Investment in 1935
was well over ^3,000,000,000, the greater part of which was
represented by native farming. Rice showed an investment of
12
one and one-half billion pesos.
The area of rice lands, some 1,900,000 hectares before
the war, represented nearly half of the area planted to all
other crops. The production, before the war, of around fifty
®See above, p. 26.
Importer, L o c . cit.. quoting Horacio Lava, Levels of
Living in the Ilocos Region. Philippine Council, Institute of
Pacific Relations (Manila, 1938), 91 pp.
11This was shown by a survey conducted in November
1935. See the Philippine Statistical Review. No. 4, 1935
(Manila, 1936), Department of Agriculture and Commerce.
-*-2Porter, op cit. . p. 76.
32
million cavans (or one hundred million bushels) had a value
exceeding that of any other product, including sugar. Produc
tion increased from 19,000,000 cavans in the five-year period
1910-1914,^® to 54,129,940 cavans in 1 9 4 1 . ^ The production
for the year 1946 was reported as 36,000,000 cavans,^® some
what less than the figures reported for the period 1920-1924.^-®
The increase was traceable to the encouragement given by the
Government during the First World War to rice growers, to the
imposition of a high tariff on imported rice, to the opening
of homestead lands, to the institution of much needed irrigation
facilities in some sectors, and to the use of improved seeds,
many types of which were developed by scientists in the Depart
ment of Agriculture, the Bureau of Science and the University
13
Department of Agriculture and Commerce, Rice
Industry in the Philippines (Manila, 1939), p. 15.
-^Bureau of Census and Statistics, Yearbook of Phillp-
Statistics| 1946 (Manila, 1947), p. 145. This latter figure
is disputed by some officials of the former Department of
Agriculture and Commerce.
15Ibld.
l^Rlce industry in the Philippines, loc. cit. It is
interesting to compare figures of area, production and value
during post-war years: 1945-46: 1,649,960 (hectares),
36,893,940 (cavans), ^553,409,100; 1946-47: 1,879,600 (has.),
47,460,030 (cavans), ^679,519,400; 1947-48: 2,026,380 (has.),
50,928,480 (cavans), ^656,431,390; 1948-49: 2,164,100 (has.),
56,620,000 (cavans), ^772,682,800. It is estimated that the
crop year, 1949-1950, will produce 58,000,000 cavans, which
however will represent a deficiency of 8,000,000 cavans from
demand and consumption. Manila Bulletin. Vol. 141, No. 73,
(March 27, 1950), Section 6, p. 3.
33
of the Philippine^.
The people of the Philippines, then, before the war
17
consumed more than one billion kilos of clean rice. This
figure included imported rice, which item, the Department
believed, could be eliminated by increasing the rice producing
areas some 16,500 h e c t a r e s . ' T h e belief of the Department
that the entire needs of the country could be met through the
utilization of large tracts of land available for rice in
19
Cotabato, the Bicol region, Nueva Viscaya, Samar, etc., was
based largely on wishful thinking, as events since have proven.
So, too, was their bald statement that "the problems of making
the country self-sufficient in rice would take care of them
selves."^ Agricultural problems never take care of themselves;
they must be directed through continuing processes -- in the
Philippines, by paternalism on the part of the Government. Too
much reliance was placed on the mere opening of vacant land to
production, notably in Mindanao. A fault common to all peoples
is the belief that a projected program is consummated when it
is formulated and presented for action. Between the dream and
reality a wide gulf exists. Many critics of Government,
particularly in the Philippines during the Commonwealth period,
pointed to the common belief that a problem was solved at the
moment of drawing up plans for its solution. Filipinos as well
as Americans commented, half bitterly and half in amusement, on
170£. cit.. p. 17. 18Ibld. 19Ibld
20Ibid., p. 18.
34
the initial enthusiasm of "la Government bureau for a projected
task and the subsequent collapse of this enthusiasm when
21
confronted with the necessity of implementing the program.
The Department suggested certain steps to be taken in
increasing the production of rice in the country:
....greater efforts should be made in the direction of
replacing the low-yielding varieties of rice with the
superior seeds in certain provinces. By this means
alone, a general increase of 10 per cent in the produc
tion can be expected.
Green manures or planting of secondary crops in
rotation with rice should be practiced.... In the same
manner, proper fertilization.with mineral fertilizers
should be taken up gradually.
Large tracts of rice lands may be grown to peanuts,
beans... and cotton....
Prom social and economic aspects the area of the
tenant's holding should be made larger than it is at
present to provide him and his family with an indepen
dent source of i n c o m e . 2 2
Some steps were taken to implement this program during the
Commonwealth period, but, in the main, its application lies in
the future.
The greatest concentration in rice production lies
within the Central Plain of Luzon. This area, before the war,
was responsible for the production of over two-thirds of the
nation's crop. The vicinity of Lingayen Gulf, in Northern
Luzon, the southern areas of the island of Panay (in the
2lfhis characteristic is called "Niflgas Kugon" ("burns
like cogon"), i.e.. it burns quickly and dies quickly. See
Mang Kiko (Francisco B. Icasiano), Horizons from My Nlpa H u t .
(Manila, 1941), pp. 33-37.
22T . a.
Loc. cit.
35*-a.
FOUR CLIMATIC TYPES OF THE PUILIPPINES
TVPMOONS
v VBEV
>PR*.QueHT
»it TYPE
ZnJ TYP»
3rd TYPE
4<K TYPE VER.V
FtEausNr
> vl '/o
FREQUEMT
19^
&
FftlftUIMT
35 -b
Visayas), and the region surrounding Lake Lanao in Mindanao,
are other important sources. Incorporated within these areas
are the two main climatic zones responsible for the varying
methods of cultivation. One zone has definite wet and dry
seasons, the other has a maximum rainfall with no perceptible
dry season. Two other types of climate exist in the Philip
pines, but because of the year-round intermittent rainfall,
those areas which fall within them are more suited to the
production of crops other than rice, such as corn and abaca.
In the areas of pronounced variation in annual precipitation,
only one crop a year is produced, while, in the other major
type areas, two crops a year are usual. With the extension of
irrigation facilities, lands lying within the first category
will also be able to produce two crops, thus considerably
increasing the yearly production of grain. The zone in which
two crops are grown with the aid of irrigation is called palagad.
which can be translated, "short crop.” Grain is planted In
May and harvested In July, after which a second crop is planted.
The present Government is laying plans for an extension of
irrigation in Central Luzon, in the hope of easing the almost-
desperate situation in this region and Northern Luzon.
23
See map indicating climatic regions. Rainfall, In
both major climatic regions, is ample, the precipitation in
the first (wet and dry) averaging around 82 inches and in the
second (no dry) 71 inches. Months taken are June to October in
the first and November to March in the second. O p . cit.. p. 6.
36
Coupled with rice as an important commodity is corn.
The problems of the two grains can be considered together and
were so considered by President Quezon and the Government; for
those to whom rice was not the main staple depended upon corn
as a source of food and income. In Cebu the lives of t h e
people are as closely bound to the success or failure of
corn as people in other parts of the land are bound to rice.
When the corn crop fails, as it did in 1948-1949, in Cebu, the
people suffer semi-starvation, imposing an additional burden
24-
upon the already overtaxed Philippine economy. ^ A short trip
through the rough interior of the island, and along the sharp,
spiny regions marking its center, is enough to illustrate the
importance of corn in the life of the people. Hillsides of
terrifying steepness, small plateaus jutting out from the
ridges,narrow stream bottoms and the tiny cleared yards around
the homes are all planted to corn.
This great dependence upon corn did not always exist.
At the time of the Rebellion in 1898, corn was raised only in
scattered localities by comparatively few people. It had been
brought to the Philippines during the great galleon
^ I n May of 1949, the author spent some time in Cebu at
which time the corn crop was causing some anxiety because of
dry weather and the resultant stunted nature of the crop. It
was learned, through conversations with people in the barrio
markets, that the price was rising rapidly causing great hard
ship to individuals most of whom are earning from between
thirty and fifty centavos a day (fifteen to twenty-five cents).
37
trade with Mexico.25 It had never gained much popularity among
the people; but since officials during the American regime
recognized that rice had to be supplemented in the diet of the
people, it became the policy of the Government to encourage corn.
With the establishment of barrio schools, the opportunity
presented itself and students were instructed in the techniques
of planting and cultivating corn in school gardens, the
produce being distributed to the families of the students. By
the time of the Commonwealth, enough corn was grown to provide
26
three million people with the main staple of their diet.
Despite this encouragement, the yields have generally been low.
According to a recent survey by American and Filipino agricul
tural experts three main factors are responsible: "the use of
poor seeds, inadequate preparation of the land, and lack of
mineral or organic fertilizers."27 In addition, they commented
there is "great difficulty in reducing the moisture content of
25For a remarkable and fascinating account of this
galleon trade, see W. Lytle Schurz, The Manila Galleon. (New
York: E.P. Dutton and Co., 1938), 453 pp.
Pfi
Porter, o p . cit.. p. 66.
Production, in 1940, was 10,038,340 cavans of 57 kilos.
This was increased slightly in 1942 but production dropped off
during the years between 1942 and 1946, in which latter year,
production was estimated at almost 6,000,000 cavans. Yearbook
of Philippine Statistics: 1946 (Manila, 1947), p. 149.
27Report. Philippine-United States Agricultural Mission,
Office of Foreign Agricultural Relations, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, I.A.C. Series No. 3, June 1947, Washington D.C.,
p. 18.
38
the grain for safe storage. Production could be increased by an
expanded extension program of demonstration on private farms to
encourage adoption of improved practices."^8
The present indications are that corn is increasing as
one of the principal foods of the Filipinos, some 28 per cent
of the population, in 1950, using it as their principal item of
diet. This represents an increase of 6 per cent since 1937. Its
use will, in all likelihood, increase in the years to come,
as the Bureau of Plant Industry is conducting a campaign to
make the Filipino corn conscious. The main purpose is, of
course, to wean some of the people from too much dependence
upon rice as their main food, but there are other objects as
well. Corn has a higher calorie value than rice, is richer in
vitamin A, and it has a higher percentage of protein and fat
than rice, while the corn germ is an excellent source of
vitamin B^.
In 1949, production was about 88 per cent of the last
prewar year, 1941, falling short by 2,155,527 cavans of the
goal of 10,391,053 cavans. Production, by 1950, had not yet
reached consumption requirements, but with the high price of
corn it was expected to increase rapidly. The FAO hoped to
reach an annual production of at least 13,603,544 cavans by
1954, which may well be actual requirements by that date. A
complicating factor here lies in the fact that the Philippines
2 8 Ibid
39
PAO Committee has set definite targets of acreage production
which differ rqther sharply from those established by the Depart
ment of Agriculture and Natural Resources. For instance, the
PAO wished to reduce the per capita daily consumption of 300
grams, while the Department desired an increase in consumption
for the reasons just mentioned.
The Bureau of Plant Industry, in 1949, stated also: "It
would be to the great advantage of the corn industry and of the
country if the various plans and work, present and future, of
the different government entities on the corn industry are
properly coordinated or integrated."99 This rather wistful
hope should be implemented. As the Bureau stated, "Except that
there is, by common consent, a plan to increase corn production,
we find no integrated plan of doing this, neither a plan for
the improvement and development of the corn industry in general."
That too many cooks were concerned seems plain. There is the
Bureau of Plant Industry, which is the most concerned since it
is in charge of production in general; the National Development
Company, more particularly its subsidiary, the RICPA (The Rice
and Corn Production Administration); the NARIC; and the PRATRA
(Philippine Relief and Trade Rehabilitation Administration).
The NARIC is concerned with procurement and Manila distribution,
^ Annual Report of the Bureau of Plant Industry Including
Progress in the Rehabilitation of Plant Industries for the Crop
Year Ending June 30. 1949. (Manila, 1949), p. 25. MS Copy loaned
the author by M. Manas y Cruz and Jose Q. Dacanay, Nov., 1949.
40
and the PRATRA with price regulation, while the RICPA was charged
with the production of corn in certain specific areas on a large
scale.3^ Such duplication defeated the basic purpose of all
these agencies, which was to better the lot of the individual
Filipino, both as producer and consumer.
In the production of corn, many of the same problems as
in rice cultivation are met. The Bureau and other agencies have
drawn up plans to meet them. The distribution by the Bureau of
better varieties alone increased, by 1949, the average yield per
hectare, where used, from 9.72 to 15.6 cavans per hectare. It
is to be hoped that the Bureau will receive the appropriations
to carry out its excellent program and that the proposed
streamlining of the Government will eradicate the duplication of
effort.
3
Abaca, "the most valuable of all fibers for cordage,"31
is generally known as "Manila" or "Manila hemp." It resembles
the banana plant so closely that to unskilled eyes the plants
appear identical. The Philippines are thought to have been the
original home of the plant but it thrives even there only under
limited conditions: in clay loam soil, in regions of evenly
distributed rainfall.
3®For an excellent discussion of RI C P A fs weakness in
this respect, see: L.O. Ty, "So Far - So Bad," Philippines
Free Press. Vol. XLI, Nos. 17-20 (April - May, 1950, pp. 4,
57; 38-40; 16, 52; 16, 40.
31Encyclopedia Brltannica. (Chicago; Encyclopaedia
Britannica, Inc., 1947 edition), Vol. 1, p. 5.
41
The Philippines produce fifty-seven varieties, of which
eight are commercially important and thirty-five sold. It
early became the leading export of the country holding that
position until 1920. In 1937, it ranked fourth among the major
crops, covering 502,700 hectares, eleven per cent of the total
cultivated area, and was valued at ^95,000,000. Exports for
that year were valued at 1=43,279,373, an increase over the year
1934, of 125,976,237. It supported some 2,500,000 people and
brought revenues of12,000,000, to the Commonwealth Government.
During the Commonwealth period, it was the third largest export
item, representing twelve per cent of the total exports by
value. The leading abaca producing provinces were Davao, Albay,
Sorsogon, Leyte, Camarines Sur, Samar, and Surigao. Albay,
Sorsogon, and Camarines are parts of the Bicol district, the
large peninsular-like portion of Luzon running to the south-east.
Abaca was exported to some thirty countries, the leading
customers being the United States, Japan and Great Britain.
This investment, the experts declared, was in danger unless
planters would be willing to allow their plantations to lie
fallow and open virgin lands every twenty-eight years. Unless
this were done, production would inevitably decline and disaster
result to the industry. Whether for this reason or not, by
June 30, 1947, hectarage had fallen to 280,840, and production
I-.*-
to 82,000 metric tons worth 125,891,040. The 1937 hectarage had
produced 3,171,170 piculs.
42
.The total average planted in Davao, Albay and Sorsogon
amounted to 259,690 hectares, equivalent to 53 per cent of the
national total and was worth over 67 per cent of all total value.
These areas produced no less than thirty-five grades.
Costs of production throughout the Islands were general
ly about equal. In Davao, however, new machinery advanced
methods of production and lowered costs while stripping eight
piculs an hour per machine. While it reduced costs per bale,
it also reduced the number of grades. The average cost per
hectare, in the leading provinces, was 184.00, and the net
average income was 152.50.
Abaca produced four major products: cordage, knotted
abaca, thread, and twine. Before the War (using 1937 as a base
year), there were five cordage factories, with a total invest
ment of 1=4,900,000, fifty per cent of which was American. The
total spindle capacity was 125,450,000 kilos, consuming annually
38,247,000 kilos of fiber (about 600,000 piculs). Costs of
producing one short ton of cordage (1931-1935), ranged from
1=92.00, to 1108.00. The making of cordage is an old industry in
the Philippines and is as old as the earliest people In the
country. Still today there are many areas In which machine-made
•?2
The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philip
pines . 1937-1938. (Manila: Publishers Inc., 1938), p. 283.
35Ibid.. p. 284.
43
cordage has not been introduced and ropes are made by hand, from
the bark of trees, shrubs, rattan and other material. In many
towns near the City of Manila, ropes are made from cabo-negro
(a type of palm growing in marshy places), lubirin, bamboo and
other local materials, besides, abaca, maguey, and sisal.
The development of the industry had three stages:
hand-made, the rope-walk method introduced late in the Nineteenth
Century, and the machine method begun at the beginning of the
present century. The first rope factory was established about
the end of the previous century, but it was only in 1909 that the
first modern factory was established by Juan Feliciano and
Sisters, a Filipino concern now long out of business. Other
factories, such as the Johnson-Pickett Rope Company (1911), the
Elizalde Rope Factory (formerly Ynchausti Rope Factory, 1917),
the General Manufacturing Company (1923), and the Manila
Cordage Factory (1924), gradually assumed the leading position
they held throughout the Commonwealth. The number of persons
employed averaged around 1,030, and the number directly dependent
upon the industry averaged around 5,000.
Knotted abaca was generally shipped to Germany and
France, with the United States taking 4 per cent of the average
total value (1927-1936). The manufacture of thread and twine
was and is in its Infancy. In 1930, they were valued as
export, at 1*15,000, and in 1936, at only 1*10,000, with the United
^ Philippine Journal of Commerce. Vol. XIV, No. 2
(February, 1938), p. 29.
44
States taking 77 per cent of the average total value. The
Bureau of Plant Industry conducted experiments in the manufacture
of sacking and encouraged the production of this item in those
areas periodically haunted by unemployment. Before the far, the
BIcol region took the lead in this industry, which, fortunately,
became an important household handicraft item during the lean
years immediately preceding and following the War. This Industry,
if continued and expanded, as a household craft would Immeasur
ably lift the living standard of the people in areas of decreasing
quantity production of the fiber. The Bureau of Plant Industry
also exhibited the possibility of manufacturing a type of linen
for men's suits from abaca, and encouraged the development of
minor industries to provide cheap consumer goods, such as mosquito
nets, uppers for slippers, shoes, sandals, cushions, doilies,
vanity cases, belts, purses, billfolds, cigarette cases, ties,
hats, rugs, doormats and mops. The development of these items
had barely begun at the outbreak of the War but showed consider
able importance for future encouragement and attention.
The local consumption of abaca was low. While local
cordage firms consumed about 8,000 short tons annually, only
30 per cent of the total production was consumed locally. The
10-year average production (1927-1936) of 183,700 short tons,
after deducting local consumption, showed an export balance of
175,000 short tons. The average value for these exports over
the same period was 3*36,026,545, with the United States taking
an average of 36.7 per cent of the total. The average value,
45
over the same period, of fiber imports was 151,066,992, the
United States supplying 47.7 per cent of the total. These
imports consisted of brooms, brushes, miscellaneous fibers,
silk (Natural and artificial), cotton and its manufactures,
and wires and cables. The United States, then, enjoyed a
favorable balance of trade amounting to some 111,000,000, which,
if invisible items (such as interest, profits, and freight
charges and insurance) were included, would be considerably
greater.
While this was tragic enough, the picture was hardly
improved by the provisions of the Tydings-McDuffie Law. The
Law provided that the United States would permit the exporta
tion of three million pounds of cordage annually which would
be admitted free of duty during the first five years of the
Commonwealth. This amount represented but half the average
annual shipments for the 10-year period, 1927-1936. Then,
beginning the sixth year, in addition to this limitation, the
United States would impose import taxes increasing progressive'
ly from 5 per cent of the full duty (2 cents) per pound, to
25 per cent in the tenth year. This would amount, in the latter
year, to 188.00, a ton. This wouild mean that it would be
impossible for the Philippines to ship and sell even to U.S.
Pacific Coast ports, since the lowest possible price per ton
(3/4 inch and up) was 1160.00. The cost of manufacture was
approximately 1100.00 per ton, freight rates to Pacific Coast
ports were 1=47.30, per ton, making the total delivered cost
46
^253.30 per ton, representing a loss to the manufacturer of over
1*75.00, aside from the additional payment of a local sales tax
of one and a half per cent. Only the finest grades, selling for
£300.00 a ton, would survive, but these grades were in limited
production.
The Cordage Act of June 14, 1935, effective on May 1,
1936, amended the Tydings-McDuffie Law by permitting the annual
quota, admitted duty-free, to be set at six million pounds;
above this, however, none could be shipped even upon payment of
the full duty. At the expiration of this Act, the provisions
of the Independence Law would become again effective. Mr.
Antonio Vallejo, Vice-president of the Philippine Fiber Products,
Inc., believed that the only course open to Philippine abaca
producers was research. He cited the growing use of rayon as
illustrative both of the results of research and the dangers
facing the industry outside the field of governmental limita
tion. There were many disturbing factors within the industry
it seemed.
The culture, as carried on by individual producers,
was and Is inefficient and wasteful. The average small
producer plants on a hillside, first removing the valuable
forest cover; the plants are set out before weeds can grow and
then are cultivated with a bolo. On the large Japanese-owned
plantations, before the War, tillage was quite a different
matter, and it was there that the best abaca was produced, the
^ Op. cit.. pp. 299-300.
47
type that established the reputation of "Manila hemp."
The process of "stripping" the fiber from the stalk is
the determining factor in the quality of product achieved. The
individual producer draws the leaf petioles, from which the
fiber is obtained, through a roller across a knife edge. As the
covering is drawn away from the fiber, It acts as a polishing
and softening agent which gives it its high, golden gloss so
admired by manufacturers. In one producing section of Albay,
the producers are so jealous of their product that they never
allow the fiber to touch the ground. It is drawn from the
stripper on to wooden supports, and is then hung up to dry
being handled with extreme care by the stripper.
While this method requires much hand labor and Is
relatively expensive, no mechanical stripper, or decorticator,
has been invented which produces the same high quality fiber.
The machine-produced fiber is baled and shipped with short,
broken and weakened strands which must be discarded before a
quality cordage is manufactured. Each strand, in the hand-
stripping method, is carefully handled and graded before it is
baled and shipped. Despite the mechanization employed by
Japanese producers, this stage of its production was always
accomplished by hand labor (except on the Furukawa plantation).
The NAFCO (National Abaca and Other Fibers Corporation) is
reluctant to allow the use of mechanical decorticators in
48
rebuilding the industry.'-*® What is apparently needed is a
mechanical decorticator which will strip the fiber and discard short
weak strands at the same time.
Despite the importance of abaca to the export trade of
the Philippines, the growth of the industry was slow and uneven.
The area planted and the annual production was determined by
price fluctuations. When the price rose producers hurriedly
stripped and sold as much of t he fiber as possible, thus glutting
the market and causing prices to fall. This resulted in the
limiting of production, the laying-off of workers and general
instability of the industry.
Plantations, before the War, were generally divided into
three groups: industrialized holdings, big haciendas and
This is not the official position of NAFCO but, in
1950, they exhibited no enthusiasm when the subject was
discussed. For a popular presentation about the modernization
of the industry, see Jose B. Santos: "A Close Up of Our Post
War Abaca Industry," The Evening News (Supplement), Vol. 140,
Sept. 30, 1949, p. 6. The main reason for the championing of
machinery for stripping, in this article, seems to be the fact
that it will produce "daily ten to twenty times the amount" of
fiber produced by the old hand method. Mr. Santos states "it
will produce uniform grades through the exercise of a little
care," but inspectors, with whom the author has discussed the
problem, are unanimous in stating just the opposite. From
personal observation, the author agrees with these inspectors.
The most casual eye, in comparing machine-stripped and hand-
stripped abaca, readily sees the tremendous difference in
quality. The most cursory examination reveals the superiority
of the hand-stripped product. The admonition, by Mr. Santos,
to the planters to keep their plantations clean, however, is
excellent advice as the mosaic disease now attacking so much of
the country's abaca is attributable to unclean plantations and
careless production.
49
ordinary small plantations. In the first group were large
plantations applying modern methods of agriculture, using
mechanical devices and artificial methods of drying. The
second group comprised large haciendas operating in the old
ways but using some machinery and animal power and efficient
methods of drying the fiber. The third group, by far the
largest, consisted of plantations owned by small farmers who
operated only in traditional ways. They did no plowing, had
little idea about the best planting methods, and stripped the
fiber by hand using a bolo or other knife edge. In drying,
they utilized only sunshine. If it rained after the fiber was
hung, they had to await the uncertain reappearance of the sun.
While hand-stripping produces the best fiber, it is tedious,
hard work, and the stripper can work only three or four days
at a time.
With the Japanese preoccupation of Davao as a major
producing area, the important portion of the industry shifted
from its old home, the Bicol region, to Mindanao. The
increased production of the fiber in Davao resulted from
modernization of financing, cultivation and production, which
reduced costs as well. In most areas, outside Davao, workers
cleaned only the ground immediately around the plants to be
stripped, whereas Davao workers before the War methodically
cleaned the entire plantation until it took on the appearance
of a well-kept garden. The dried and yellowed leaves of the
abaca plants were carefully strewn on the cleared areas so as
50
to fertilize and inhibit the growth of weeds. Small producers
also overcut, that is, they stripped both the mature and immature
plants which returned a temporary profit but eventually lowered
the standard of the fiber.
As early as 1937, planters in the Visayan and Bicol
regions were warned that unless improvement was made in the
production of the fiber, these plantations would probably be
forced to suspend operations. This prediction was borne out
during the Commonwealth period when the price of abaca dropped
alarmingly, causing acute distress in the Visayas and Bicol.
When, after the War, the price of abaca was high, and the Davao
area was practically at a standstill, these marginal producers
reaped large profits, but seriously damaged their holdings. If,
as is hoped, the Davao area regains its leadership the producers
in these marginal areas will be hard-pressed to meet the situation.
Manila hemp, before the War, was marketed under three
classifications: '’ordinary'’ (also known as Manila or "open-
grade"); "housemark," and "Davao.” "Ordinary" hemp was produced
in the provinces of Leyte, Samar, Albay, Sorsogon, Camarines
Norte, Camarines Sur, and other minor districts. Hemp which was
sold in loose form to exporters who themselves supervised the
grading and classification was baled and sold under the buyer's
mark and was denominated "housemark." "Davao” grade was produced
in Davao and immediately surrounding areas, almost exclusively
by Japanese. It ordinarily sold at much higher prices than the
51
others despite its harshness of texture. Many manufacturers
learned to prefer the heavier Davao grade to the finer, silkier
product of other regions. The preference, in 1950, seemed to
be toward the latter, with the increasing use of other materials
in cordage manufacture, such as cellulose substitutes (Nylon,
etc.), setting the competitive standard.
Before the War, marketing was carried on in two ways.
One was the method of Japanese producers and the other was that
of Filipino planters. The Filipino method returned to the
small grower only a fraction of what the product brought on
the market. The hemp was first bought by rural buyers, general
ly Chinese and "sari-sari" store owners, who acquired the fiber
as payment for loans to the needy farmer. These buyers then
sold to provincial merchants, also generally Chinese, in large
towns or provincial capitals. These, in turn, disposed of the
product to the wholesale traders in shipping centers or to
branches of exporting houses in Manila. After reaching the
export point, it was sold to exporters directly or through
brokers. In a few cases, the planter sold directly to wholesale
merchants and in very rare cases directly to exporters. Thus,
the fiber passed through four intermediary hands after leaving
the small producer.
The Japanese method illustrated the superiority of a
systematic procedure in marketing. The planter sold his fiber
almost always to the exporter., eliminating three wasteful steps
52
and bringing to the producer the highest return for his labors
and investment.
The NAFCO upon its establishment sought to educate the
small producers to sell through the corporation, duplicating
the Japanese method for the benefit of small farmers who were
continually cheated of a just return for their labors. This
was no small task and was in 1950 one of the major raisons
d'etre of the NAFCO.
Another factor that favored the Japanese producer was
his participation in cooperative marketing associations.
Despite the efforts of various Government entities to persuade
the Filipino to organize such associations, little success was
37
achieved along this line.
Other problems which hindered the optimum operation of
the industry were the lack of a recognized basis for grading
the fiber in the hands of the producers, financial insolvency
during the periods of price fluctuations, cut-throat competition
37
° As a general rule, the Filipino is traditionally dis
interested in cooperative enterprises. (For an excellent
illustration of this characteristic, sees Juan Cabreros Laya,
His Native Soil. University Publishing Co., Inc., Manila, 1941,
424 p p .) There are, of course, several exceptions, such as a
farming cooperative in Surigao and the Bicol, and a marriage
cooperative elsewhere, but these are of little economic
importance, taking the economy as a whole. The continuing
failures of Government-sponsored cooperatives has been a major
factor in prolonging this attitude. Cooperative members have
seen their investments frittered away in frivolous projects or
by outright malversation of funds. For a recent example, see;
The Sunday Times. Vol. V, No. 284 (May 28, 1950), p. 1. An
exception to the general rule, is the CAPCA (See below).
53
in the local market, an unequal position vis-a-vis the merchants
and a general lack of concerted effort to withstand financial
reverses. All these demanded organization and cooperative action.
The failure to take advantage of the provisions of the Cooperative
Marketing Law (Act No. 3425, as amended) kept the industry from
achieving the stable basis needed for the best return to producers.
Producers were not lacking in initiative. Poor prices forced
those in the industry to seek other methods of increasing their
financial position; in the Bicol, for example, they turned to
the production of abaca twine, rugs, shoes, slippers, sandals,
market bags, sacking, belts, curtains and many other items for
local consumption as well as export. A factory was established
in Manila for the manufacture of household articles and souvenirs
but was never very large, the industry largely in the household
stage. The opportunity for an expansion of household industries
remains great.
Late in 1937, Mariano Garchitorena, manager of the Fiber
Inspection Service of the Department of Agriculture and Commerce,
reminded producers of the opportunities for the utilization of
abaca in the production of cellulose and alpha-cellulose. Paper-
making, he pointed out, was also a market for abaca wastes and
was an industry sorely needed in the Philippines. Mr.
Garchitorena pointed out that one advantage of manufacturing
cellulose in the Philippines would be the great lowering of costs,
"because we would avoid many burdens that now weight heavily on
our exported bales of abaca, such as the intervention of middle
54
men, the speculators, cartage, transhipment, and local freights,
and above all, the exorbitant and execrable ocean freight charges
we pay at present."®®
Dr. P.M. Clara, plant pathologist of the Bureau of Plant
Industry, reported to his chief, Hilarion Silayan, that the
vascular bundle disease had reached, by 1937, such threatening
proportions in Davao that, unless very energetic measures were
taken, the entire industry there would be heavily damaged. While
some measures taken by the Bureau were successful in controlling
the disease, a continuing policy of watchfulness would be
necessary. In addition, the industry was threatened also by the
"bunchy-top" and "mosaic" diseases, the latter a newly-discovered
danger. The extension of these disease was becoming so serious
that many Japanese plantation owners were considering removing
their investments elsewhere, and some had sent experts to study
the possibilities of Borneo. These diseases could only be met
and stopped by the institution of more abaca centrals under the
watchful care of government bureaus charged with such problems.
Secretary of Finance De las Alas had planned to use a portion of
the coconut oil excise tax fund for this purpose and the Philip
pine National Bank expressed its interest in the plan by
offering cooperation with the National Development Company in
®®"Cellulose Manufacturing from Abaca Fiber is Urged,"
P J C . Vol. XIII, Nos. 10-11 (October-November, 1937), p. 4.
®$>The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philip
pines. 1957-1938. p. 303.
55
establishing centrals in Davao. If such a plan were to materialize
the Bank said that they would also consider doing the same thing
in the Bicol provinces.
Assemblyman Norberto A. Roque, of Sorsogon (one of the
major Bicol provinces), however, pointed out certain serious
problems which might prove a hindrance to such a plan. One of
the major difficulties was the problem of adopting a basic
share plan between the government corporation and the abaca
planters, the latter being reluctant to cooperate unless assured
of a 60 per cent share. Assemblyman Roque also pointed to the
different physical conditions in the Bicol; in the Davao area
roads were frequent and good, whereas in the Bicol the reverse
was true.
Similar difficulties were discovered in Leyte which had
the reputation, deservedly, of producing the worst abaca in the
Philippines. Agents who were sent there to investigate discovered
that farmers did not use proper instruments in stripping the
fiber, with the result that it was short and coarse. Suggestions
were advanced for the introduction of the famous Benito bolo
which produced such excellent fiber in Davao, as well as for the
introduction of better varieties.^
However, M.M. Saleeby, an abaca fiber expert, exporter
and organiser of the Government's floor inspection division,
stated that the need was not for direct government subsidies and
40
Ibid., pp. 303-304.
56
establishment of centrals. He produced facts to show that the
major problem would be the organization of a government campaign
among abaca planters in the Bicol and on Samar and Leyte to
change their antiquated systems of planting and production. Be
fore doing anything else, Mr. Saleeby believed, the farmers
should be instructed to clean their lands entirely and plant new
shoots which would take about three years. With the exception
of but four or five plantations in all of the Bicol, Samar, and
Leyte regions, the planters had been retaining the same old
trees that had been planted many years ago. worse than this, he
said, was the fact of the careless, slipshod and unscientific care
given the plantations by owners in these regions, contrasting
sharply with the Japanese in the Davao area who plowed fields
and planted new stocks as often as p o s s i b l e . ^ Mr. Saleeby's
competence in the field, and the mass of evidence he presented in
proof of his statements, should have invited the closest attention
and interest on the part of the government and other interested
parties. This was not the case.
Members of the industry throughout the Commonwealth
continued to demand aid from the Government for the rehabilita
tion of their industry. Why this was so is difficult to say.
They realized, it is hoped, that the industry would be limited
for the remainder of the Commonwealth period in the amount of
abaca they would be allowed to ship to the United States. The
provisions of post-Independence relationships with the United
42)Ib i d .. p. 303.
57
States were repeatedly reiterated and elucidated. Less and less
Philippine abaca would be allowed entry into the United States
following Independence until eventually it would have to compete
in that market on an equal basis with other nations, unprotected
by a price differential and special legislative rescue missions.
In their jealousy of the sugar industry, no doubt well-founded,^
they lost their perspective and failed to realize that the
rehabilitation or survival of the industry lay in their own hands.
A scientific program of research leading to the develop
ment of better and better fiber as well as research into lowering
costs and improving all phases of the industry, from selection
of variety to marketing, grading and selling, was demanded.
This, of course, entailed the expenditure of reasonably large
suras of money. The sugar industry in Hawaii should have proven
an excellent example to the abaca men. They chose, however,
throughout the remainder of the Commonwealth, to bewail their
miserable position, to plead for more and more Government aid,
and as a last resort, to prostrate themselves before the American
Congress with piteous supplications for rescue from the
inexorable provisions of coming legislation. As a natural
result, the industry, in the early years of the Republic, was
faced with the identical problems of the early Commonwealth, now
complicated by additional factors resulting from the War and a
general lack of comprehension of the ddmands of the world of mid
century.
^ C f .i "The Jealous Industry," a reprint of an editorial
from The Manila Bulletin. June 10, 1937, in: Ibid.. pp. 305-306.
CHAPTER II
THE PLACE OP COCONUT PRODUCTS AND SUGAR IN
THE PHILIPPINE ECONOMY
The third element of the Philippine economy is the
important industries derived from the coconut. The coconut
palm (Cocos nuclf era) is found in abundance throughout the
tropics all over the world and finds a favorable home in the
Philippines. Every portion of the tree has its utility -- the
nut, the leaves, the trunk -- and it has occupied a position of
importance in the native economy of all the tropical Asiatic
countries. In the Philippines,it has been of primary importance
since man first appeared there. The nuts supply food, with many
different methods of preparation, and several kinds of drinks,
from the pleasant unfermented water (erroneously called flmilkM
by Westerners) taken directly from the nut, to less pleasant
beverages produced by fermenting and distilling.1 The juice is
drawn from the unopened flowers and is boiled down to sugar or
is fermented and distilled producing a drink called "arrack” in
certain parts of the world and "tuba", in the Philippines. The
young bud, cut from the top of the tree, produces a "cabbage"
highly esteemed by the people. The trunk yields soft lumber
much used throughout the Islands for furniture and firewood. The
leaves are woven into a great variety of useful products, fans,
^"Milk" is expressed from the nut and is not the fluid
found in the hollow of the kernel.
58
59
baskets, receptacles of one sort or another, and finds a
further use as roofing. The shell of the nut is made into
household vessels, utensils and a few implements. The external
husk is excellent for polishing floors, being cut in half,
turned face down, and then briskly rubbed back and forth. The
husk also provides coir from which ropes, cordage, brushes,
door-mats, and many other articles are produced. The meat of
the nut is the source of oil widely used for spap and margarine
making. When broken into small pieces and dried (either in the
sun or in ovens) it becomes copra. A general rule of the thumb
is that 1,000 nuts will produce around five hundred pounds of
copra, from which is extracted about twenty-five gallons of o i l ?
In the Philippines, at least 4,000,000 people are wholly
or partially dependent upon the coconut industry. The average
annual value of coconut products exported in the period, 1927-
1936, was $34,832,455, or 27 per cent of the total value of all
exports, and represented some 34 per cent of the world’s
3
production of copra.
In 1936, the Philippines, being the second largest
producer of coconuts in the world, had a total of 600,000 hectares
2
The Encyclopaedia Britannica. (Chicago* The Encyclopaedia
Britannica^ Inc^, 1947 edition)'^ VolT 5, p. 950.
3
For information with regard to the industry and production
practices in the Philippines, sees The Coconut Industry in the
Philippines. Department of Agriculture and Commerce, (Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1939), 19 pp.
60
containing over 115,000,000 trees, of which 75,500,000 were
bearing. Of the world's total of over three million hectares,
the Philippines thus had nearly 20 per cent. The most
important producing provinces were, in that year, Tayabas,
Laguna, Cebu, Oriental and Occidental Misamis, Albay, Samar,
Leyte, Negros, Bohol, Camarines Sur, Romblon and Pangasinan. The
total of the provinces of Laguna and Tayabas alone was about
210,000 hectares, or 35 per cent of the national total.
There are listed over one hundred variety names for the
coconut in the Philippines many of which undoubtedly refer to
the same variety in various areas of slightly different dialectical
change. There are probably no more than thirty distinct varieties,
of which the most important for copra are the Romano and the
Laguna. Other varieties serve various local purposes, some like
the Macapuno. being used for ice cream and other delicacies.
Costs of production varied widely throughout the Philip
pines, depending, naturally, upon local conditions. In Tayabas,the
leading producer, the total average cost, in 1936, of producing
100 kilos of copra was 1=5.60. This resulted in a net average
income of 169.58 per hectare. The situation of the coconut
planters in 1933 and 1934, when prices dropped to 14.48 and 13.98
per 100 kilos are better imagined than described.
For domestic purposes, the Philippines manufactured four
important products from the coconut: oil, shredded coconut,
soaps, and vegetable lard. As a by-product in the manufacture
61
of oil, copra cake and meal were of some importance at various
periods. This item ranked third in the list of coconut export
products. Other minor products were fatty acids, glycerine,
charcoal and coir. Margarine, during the early Commonwealth,
was rather inferior in quality, and had a difficult time
competing with foreign products. Patty acids were the subject
of much discouragement and agitation in the United States, and
glycerine and charcoal had only been in demand during the First
World War.^ The coir industry, while capable of expansion, was
believed only able to succeed when costs were reduced to levels
prevailing in India.® A writer, in 1937, believed that the
domestic consumption of coconut products was "so tremendous
that evidently, it has virtually reached the saturation point."
Therefore, for it to survive, he believed, "it must at least
maintain its export trade."® From the vantage point of later
years, there seems little reason to believe that domestic
consumption had reached the saturation point.
Since the coconut industry was particularly geared to
American economy, its fate was determined by far-away men whose ir
responsibility often brought confusion, frustration and destruc
tion to many. The coconut industry was most sensitive to
stimuli from abroad. The value of the product in 1929 was
P89,093,620; it declined to ^27,146,650, in 1934. It then rose
^Domingo B. Paguirigan: "Philippine Coconut Industry,"
The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
1937-1958. p. 246.
5Ibid. 6 Ibid.
62
to £92,126,490, in 1938, the greatest rise taking place in home
made oil and the utilization of nuts for food, and then dropped
to £=28,013,002 in 1939, a fall of over £64,000,000 in one year.
In that year, the production of copra fell off £56,000,000,
home-made oil some £200,000, and the utilisation of nuts for
food some eight million, while the production of tuba increased
almost £1,000,000.^
The first blow struck at the Philippine coconut producer
was delivered by the American Congress (at the instigation of
domestic oil producers) through the Revenue Act of 1934 (H.R.
7835). Aside from the selfish motives which inspired such a
step,® it was disastrous to the economy of the Islands,
contrasting sharply with the "altruistic11 motive which supposedly
inspired the Tydings-McDuffie Act. Observers have pointed to
the fact that the processing tax provided by the Act was to be
returned to the Philippine Commonwealth Government, thus
providing that Government with a handsome revenue. It is
interesting to note, as Professor Kirk points out, a provision
in that amendment which stipulated that such payments were to
cease if the Philippine Government provided any subsidy to be
paid the producers of copra, coconut oil, or allied products.9
^Yearbook of Philippine Statistics: 1946. (Manila:
Bureau of the Census and Statistics"' 1947), p. 153.
p
°Grayson L. Kirk, Philippine Independence. (New York:
Farrar and RInehardt, 1936), Chapter V, pp. 102-135.
9Ibid.. p. 133.
63
A writer heatedly termed this act "The Congressional
Vendetta," calling the legislation senseless and unjust.
"Even when considering the economic unwisdom of such a tax,"
he said, "and questioning the legal right of Congress to impose
it, the question of the morality of such an action stands fore
most.... Never in the 35 years of American sovereignty over the
Philippines has the United States Government ever perpetrated
an act of unmitigated injustice.... But of recent years, the
United States Government, particularly the congressional branch,
has passed or has sought to pass laws in utter disregard of the
interests of the people over whom or against whom these laws
c.
apply."11 Under the circumstances, this must be considered a
temperate statement. Governor-General Murphy was moved to wire,
on February 24, 19341 "intimate contact with the situation
locally forces me to the conclusion that the unlimited application
of the tax will provoke a near disaster in the economy of the
Philippines. The general feeling is pronouncedly against the
moral right of the United States to legislate so severely against
a territory under the flag as practically to destroy an industry
on which more than 3,000,000 people are dependent."12 But, in
1934, the United States Congress was not interested in morality
nor in the future of a people, of whom, President McKinley
stating the reason for acquiring the country in 1898, said:
^-^The Congressional Vendetta", Editorial, Philippine
Magazine. XXXI, No. 3 (March, 1934), p. 108.
11Ibid. 12Ibid.
64
"...there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all,
and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and
Christianize them, and by G o d ’s grace do the very best we could
1g
for them, as our fellow-men for whom Christ also died."
In January, 1934, the copra market was noted for its
instability and most crushers were unwilling to enter into
further contracts due to the unfavorable world market conditions.
Spain had placed restrictions upon copra imports and it was
rumored that France would take similar action. The excise tax
by the United States, capped the climax and forced the exporters
and oil millers to curtail purchases while they awaited further
developments. The continuing uncertainty was greatly influenced
by developments in Washington. One bill after another was
introduced into Congress, providing for Philippine independence,
which generally was welcomed by Filipinos, but all these bills
were distinguished for their vagueness with regard to the
future of Philippine economy or their stringent provisions with
regard to it. This state of affairs was not conducive to calm
ness in the Philippines and brought about a general instability
in those export products most sensitive to conditions in America.
The remarks of men like Rep. Harold Knutson of Minnesota and
Rep. E.P. Burke of Nebraska, upon the independence question and
the restriction of coconut oil created panic in business
circles in the Philippines. For example, Rep. Knutson opposed
the Hawes bill for independence, because it did not offer
13Kirk, 2£L* ci t ., p . 17
65
sufficient protection for the dairy interests in the United
States* Rep. A.C. Schallenberger of Nebraska stated that
coconut oil was largely replacing beef and pork products and
should be greatly restricted in any independence measure. The
movement for granting Independence became a stampede, and
Representative Magnus Johnson introduced a bill calling for
independence within thirty or forty months but saying nothing
definitive with regard to the economy of the country.
Mr. H.M. Cavender, President of the American Chamber of
Commerce in Manila, declared that the Chamber should maintain
an aggressive policy in opposing the inimical measures that were
being considered in W a s h i n g t o n . T h e Philippine Chamber of
Commerce went on record against the excise tax, stating that it
would cause hardship to some 4,000,000 people, affecting an
even larger number than ’'unfair” restrictions on the sugar
industry. Governor-General Murphy proposed that either all
Philippine oil and copra used for non-edible purposes be exempted
from the tax, or that a quota of 200,000 long tons of oil be
exempted. The Secretary of War, George C. Dern, addressed a
letter to the House Ways and Means Committee, objecting strongly
to the tax on oil and copra.1® On February 1, the directorate
of the Coconut Planters Associations adopted a resolution which
14Phlllppine Magazine. XXXI, No. 3 (March, 1934), pp.
90-92.
15 16 -
Ibid. Ibid.
66
declared that while a solution of the Philippine-American
relationship was pending, the Filipinos were entitled to the
’’full enjoyment of economic opportunity under American sovereignty"
and that the proposed tax ’’would be a flagrant violation of this
fundamental right, "■*‘7
In spite of these objections and proposals, the House
Ways and Means Committee refused to reconsider its action and
endorsed the proposal to levy an excise tax on copra and oil.
On February 4, Dern again protested against the tax, stating
that it would defeat its purpose of raising revenue by destroying
Filipino purchasing power. The Committee, however, countered
with the statement that it was motivated as much by the desire
to remove competition from the field of animal and vegetable
fats as by the idea of raising revenue.'*-® As pointed out by
Professor Kirk, this argument was without adequate basis and had
been repeatedly refuted by experts who appeared before the
C o m m i t t e e . T h e Governor-General again, on February 6 and 9,
protested the tax stating that it was equal to 200 per cent of
the current price and would work "incalculable harm to the
Philippines without advantage to continental United States...."
It meant, he said financially, the "bankruptcy of eight Impor
tant provinces...questionable solvency for ten others....
Socially It will entail widespread distress and disaffection
among the people." He asked for a two or four years’ trial of
1 7 Ibid. 1 8 Ibid. 19Note 8 above
67
the limitation plan previously proposed by him. The House
Committee, at that time, had voted three times to sustain the tax.
On February 15, President Quezon stated that he had
received tie promises of Tydings and McDuffie to oppose the
excise tax and Representative R.R. Eltse, of California, sharp
ly attacked the measure, stating accurately that "American
farmers and all our people have been misled by false propaganda...'.1
"The tax", he continued, "would be detrimental to business
generally on the Pacific coast and also to the dairy industry
in all parts of the country since the Philippines is the
largest export market for American canned milk.... It seems
strange to me that the predominantly Democratic i/Vays and Means
Committee should have given birth to this renegaadfes high
tariff measure."^®
In the Philippines, Under Secretary Vargas appointed a
committee to study the possibilities of utilizing coconut by
products in local industries, realizing that there was little
chance that the tax would be defeated.
Rumors were circulated, following the approval of the
Tydings-McDuffie Independence Act, that Congress would fail to
enact the excise tax. The rumor was started, it was reported,
to bring about a rise in prices, which, however, failed to
materialize. Two days after the passage of the bill, the Senate
finance committee voted to retain the excise tax but to reduce
20
Philippine Magazine. XXXI, No. 3 (March, 1934), p. 94.
68
it from five to three cents a pound. Local producers saw no
relief in this, however, and predicted the destruction of the
industry.
Major William B. Anderson, Manila businessman, stated
that ten or twelve years of slow economic strangulation was
worse than a quicker death in three years. He predicted that
invested capital would liquidate and that new capital would not
enter, and that the only certainty was that the Japanese would
soon control the interior trade held by the Chinese and also
the import and export trade of the Islands. "It will probably
be found highly inimical for Americans to continue."2-*- Mr.
S. Dazai, manager of the Yokohama Specie Bank and head of the
Japanese Chamber od Commerce, in Manila, stated happily: I am
glad that the Philippines is now to obtain her independence.
No, I don't think Japanese capital will fly away; on the
contrary, there will be greater inducement for it to come into
the Philippines. I am afraid that it is the American capital
which will fly away. I am glad of independence because I believe
that the Orient should be for Orientals. We are like one people.
Oriental capital will come to the Philippines. Japan will play
pp
a great part in the economic development of this country." No
prophecy was ever more accurate and none received les3 attention
21Ibid.. XXXI, No. 5 (May, 1934), p. 179.
*^Ibld. Since this bank was subsidized by the Japanese
Government, Mr. Dazai’s comments conceivably represented the
official position on the subject.
69
on the part of those most concerned. How short the years were
until fulfillment arrived with the checks of Japanese Government
subsidies and the bayonets shining under a December sun.
The excitement over the excise tax, which manifested
itself largely in restricted buying and which had brought a
gradual decline in the market, gradually subsided at the end of
i
1934. The lowest ebb was reached in May, June, and July, of
1934, after which the market gradually recovered. During this
lowest period, the industry might well have come to a complete
halt had it not been for the development of factors outside the
immediate Philippine economy. The most important of these, and
the one which permitted the industry to regain its feet, was
the advantage derived from an inflated currency. This enabled
the Philippines to undersell all other producers. An American
economist in the Philippines at the time stated that with the
former gold currency, the Philippines would have been unable to
continue production, as European price equivalents would have
been lower than the production cost.^3
Despite the slight advantage gained by inflated currency,
the price was so low that many planters in areas where transporta
tion and marketing costs were high, found themselves unable to
sell at cost and fed the nuts to their hogs or extracted oil for
their own consumption. In so doing they withdrew from the
^ N o r b e r t W. Schmelkesj "The 1935 Prospects for the
Coconut Grower," Philippine Magazine . XXXII, No. 3 (March,
1935), p. 136.
70
market a considerable quantity of copra. Since trees increase
in the Philippines by from two to three million annually, the
amount of copra which normally would have been shipped was
considerable, one estimate placing it at 60,000 tons.
At this point, fate stepped in. In 1934-35, the
American farmer faced one of the worst droughts in history. In
addition, the United States was experimenting with crop reduction
programs under the AAA. Until this time, the United States had
provided but a small market for Philippine copra meal. But with
the farmers unable to feed their cattle with home-produced feeds
and facing the possible loss of entire herds they frantically
turned to copra meal. The tremendous increase in consumption of
a commodity which had been selling in the Philippines at prices
barely above its value as fuel, increased prices some 250 per
cent to the delight of the starving coconut producers. This
naturally increased the value of copra and as soon as the
shortage in fats became evident and previous stocks of oil were
consumed, the market boomed.24
This would have been enough to bring a certain prosperity
to the producer, but fate again intervened in a typhoon which
swept through the major coconut-producing provinces, causing
prices to soar again. By the beginning of 1935, prices were hi$i
enough to be considered '’spectacular" and caused considerable
speculation whether the level could be maintained. In addition,
2 4 Ibid.
71
the two-cent excise tax differential in favor of the Philippines
had the effect of shutting out other copra producing countries
and undoubtedly brought benefits to Philippine producers. Had
the excise tax not been imposed, there is little doubt that the
crisis of 1934-1935 in oil and copra meal could have been avoided,
which would have meant a considerable saving to American farmers—
one of the major groups eager for the imposition of the tax.
The Joint Preparatory Committee received a brief, in
1937, on the state of the coconut industry, setting forth its
nature, history, activity, importance to Philippine economy,
extent of dependence upon the American market, and the probable
fate of the industry as a result of the Tydings-McDuffie Act and
other possible future legislation leading to Philippine Indepen
dence. Unless favorable amendments were added to the Independence
Law, the excise and export taxes as provided therein would be
disastrous to the Industry, It was believed. It would result,
they said, in the withdrawal of three-fourths of hectarage from
cultivation, adversely affecting some three million people and
lowering the revenues of the Philippine Government from the
5^7,000,000, of 1935, to a probable ,750,000.25
The industry believed that it was mutually beneficial
for the status quo to be maintained, since the trade In oils
and their derivatives was supplemented by certain advantages to
2 ®,fBriefM , edited by D.B. Paguirigan, The Commercial
and Industrial Manual of the Philippines. 1937-1938. p. 249.
72
America, such as freight, insurance, continued purchases by
the industry in America, and interest payments on rather
extensive American investments. And since the United States
had to import seeds and oils from other countries because of the
excise taxes reducing imports of Philippine oil into America,
this showed that the United States had to import these items
because of industrial demands. Since this was so, and because
of the long association of the two countries, coupled with the
mutual trade advantage "and the responsibility shared by
American capital in the promotion of the Philippine coconut
industry", there should exist sufficient motive to waive any
discrimination against an industry so vital to the Philippines
and its people.26
The people of t h e Philippines were growing sugar cane
at the time of Magellan's arrival. Its development as a
national industry passed through three stages after the coming
of the Spanish. Under them, it constituted from 30 to 50 per
cent of the value of agricultural products exported. During
the second phase, the first ten years of American occupation,
it continued in a distressed condition resulting from the
Revolution and subsequent War. The last phase was that char
acterized by free trade, the last limitation on exports being
2 6 Ibid.
73
ended in 1913. Under encouragement from the Government and the
initiative of private capital, both Filipino and American, the
industry gradually began to assume its economic primacy in the
Philippines.
At San Jose, on the Island of Mindoro, an American
company established the first modern factory in 1910, and two
years later another American company began operation at the
first cooperative central at San Carlos, on the H a n d of Negros,
and another at Calamba, Luzon. These companies pioneered in the
modernization of manufacturing methods and pointed the way for
the many others which were to follow shortly.
With the creation of the Sugar Control Board in 1915 by
the Philippine Government and the creation in 1916 of the Philip
pine National Bank, the change from old methods to new was
greatly accelerated and sugar production Increased by leaps and
bounds. The Sugar Control Board was to promote the industry
through financial aid by means of loans to corporations and the
purchase of bonds, while the Bank utilized the greater majority
of the funds at its disposal in aiding the industry. This
intimate association of Government and private initiative in the
industry was to increase as time passed and became one of the
major factors in the development of political, economic and
social control so characteristic of the emerging feudal economy
of the nation.
Sugar was the premier export item of the Philippines
74
before World War II, the cane being grown in every province in
the country, though large cultivation was generally confined to
Occidental Negros, ihmpanga, Tarlac, Batangas, Laguna and Iloilo,
which comprised three-fourths of the total sugar land. Until
1941, the Philippines was the fifth largest sugar producer in
the world, exceeded by India, Java, Japan and the United States.
Since 1920, sugar had been the leading export crop of t h e
country, its value representing one-third of the total exports.
During the War, the industry suffered somewhat from neglect and
a great number of centrals were destroyed — although not nearly
so many as reported. The remaining centrals generally produced
muscovado sugar, primarily for home consumption.^^
The year 1934 was the peak year in the production of
sugar, with 305,890 hectares planted, producing 1,449,650,150
kilos (centrifugal), 21,172, 940 kilos (muscovado), 28,399,880
kilos (panocha), 6,868,270 liters of basi (an intoxicating
beverage), and 258,029,100 liters of molasses. By 1940, the
hectarage had fallen to 166,942 hectares, with a production of
947,067,288 kilos (centrifugal), and 36,842,827 gallons o f
2ft
molasses. ° The total value of all cane products in 1934 was
J^l62,784,310. In 1947, the hectarage was 40,990 hectares,
27
The Philippines (A Brief Historical and Factual
Survey) reprint from Trade Directory of the Philippines. Philip
pine Embassy (Washington, D.C.), p . 6. (N . d .1
pp
Yearbook of Philippine Statistics: 1946. pp. 152-153.
75
producing 119,670 metric tons worth ^60,071,840.29
The quota permitted by the Tydings-McDuffie Law was
952,000 short tons, some 60 per cent of the normal milling
capacities of the centrals. About two million people, before
the War, were directly dependent upon the sugar industry,
whose capital investment was estimated at some ^450,000,000,
and represented some 40 per cent of the total revenues of the
Government. It represented the major source of tax income
for five provinces, and the Manila Railroad received 40 per
cent of its total revenue from hauling sugar. Florence Horn
observed that the people who depended "on the sugar crop for
their living include the mill-owners and the planters, whose
profits in sugar are still great, the lowly sharecroppers, and
the 15 cents-a-day laborers. Only half as many live from
sugar as live from the coconut, but the coconut people are
scattered throughout every inhabited island in the archipelago.
The sugar people are concentrated.. . . There were forty-six
centrals (mills) operating, on a supposedly cooperative system,
with some 23,000 farmers most of whom owned only a few hectares
of land. The land laws in the Philippines allow a mill to own
but 2,500 acres of public lands. A central, therefore, was
forced to purchase its cane from nearby planters who, in turn,
subdivided their fields and let them out to some 175,000 tenants
29Journal of Philippine Statistics. Vol. IV, Nos. 1-6
(January-June, 1949), p. 13a.
3^Horn, o£. cit.. p. 245.
76
who were the actual cultivators
Cultivation methods on these small farms were and are
far from efficient, and this was one reason for the poor quality
of Philippine sugar when compared with the Javanese or Cuban
product. Many small farmers still produced sugar in the age-old
fashion used by the Chinese during the Spanish era. There were
three steps in the process. First, blocks of hardened sugar,
called "pilones” , were taken from molds, the white sugar which
formed on top being separated from the lower portion, which was
usually heavy and wet. This lower portion was replaced in
molds and stored in a wooden shed for drying. The "pllones"
were then set on earthenware jars into which the molasses dripped.
A layer of mud was generally placed atop the "pilones" for a
period of about twelve days, in order to purify it as much as
possible. The sugar was also boiled in large kettles for the
same purpose. The final stage was to spread the sugar out on
mats, exposing it to the sun until dry. It was then packed into
"bayones" and stored in warehouses for export. The juice of the
cane was, in many parts, extracted by running the cane through
hard-wood rollers. The land was often cultivated with simple
plows, some hard wood and others of iron. On large haciendas,
after 1920, more modern and scientific methods were introduced,
accounting for the great increase in production despite the
dwindling hectarage planted to cane. The great bulk of small
producers throughout the Islands In 1950 still produced their
5 1 I b i d . . p. 241.
77
sugar with primitive, inefficient and wasteful methods.
Whereas in other sugar-producing areas the mills are
owners and operators of plantations, in the Philippines,
corporations generally operate the mills and individual planters
produce the cane on their lands. The system divided the income
from the sugar between two groups of entrepreneurs, causing high
production and distribution costs. This factor was of great
importance to the future of the industry, since it meant that
the Philippine producers were not able to meet the competition
in other areas, such as India and Java, as well as Cuba, where
costs were lower. The same situation existed in 1950. It was
estimated before the War that it cost a Philippine producer
1=8.19 per picul for production (or 3.66 US cents per pound).
At the same time, the cost of production in Hawaii and Cuba was
but 3.39 and 1.74 cents per pound respectively.^ it was only
because the sugar industry in the Philippines had been developed
for American consumption and protected by a price differential
that the industry was able to survive.
Under the provisions of the Independence Law, the sub
sequent legislation in the United States, and the world sugar
agreements emanating from London, the doom of the industry was
sealed. Its continued existence, following the Second World War
32Juan Z. SyCip: Sugar Industry in the Philippine Is
lands . Senior thesis for B. b Ta ., University of Manila, 1934,
MS, pp. 21-23, passim.
78
was due entirely to the world shortage of sugar, which enabled
producers to profit despite the rising costs of production.
Unless further protective legislation were passed by the United
States congress, the termination of arrangements (in 1950) and
the imposition of projected duties would mean the end of the
Philippine sugar industry. This will be particularly true when
the large producing countries such as Java and India recover
from the effects of war and enter once more as active competing
agents in the world market.33 Would there be any hope for
Philippine sugar in other markets? Sugar men realized there
would be none. Since Cuban and Javanese sugar costs were so
much lower, they could easily capture the markets of the world.
In fact, the costs of production of sugar in Java were so low
that "but for the Flag Law and in spite of tariff barriers,
Java sugar can even undersell native sugar locally."3^
Relations between millers and planters were governed by
contracts, generally for thirty years1 duration. Planters
delivered cane to millers, who processed and sometimes, though
not generally, distributed it. For this service, the central
ordinarily levied a charge in cane of from 35 to 50 per cent
of the sugar processed. Investments In centrals before the
War were estimated at $84,000,000, of which 43 per cent was
■'V -" :
3 *7 >7
C f . entries entitled "Sugar" in the Brltannlca Book of
the Year for 1947, 1948, and 1949.
S^The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
1937-1938. p. 226.
79
owned by Filipinos, 33 per cent by Americans, 23 per cent by
Spaniards, and 1 per cent of what is euphemistically termed
"cosmopolitan" -- meaning Chinese or Chinese-other nationalities
partnerships. Central owners were organized into the Philippine
Sugar Association.
The planters held investments in land and its improve
ments as well as annual crop loans amounting to some $203,000,000,
and employed laborers who with their dependents numbered some
610,000. In the words of Oscar Ledesma, President of the
Confederation of Sugar Planters before the War, these constituted
the "middle class of the three important economic elements
making up the industry."33 He was undoubtedly referring to the
planters and not the laborers, who could not be considered
"middle class" in any sense. Thirty centavos a day hardly placed
one in a middle class.
Generally, planters organized themselves into associations,
the purpose of which was to deal with the millers and the
protection of their interests. During the Commonwealth, partic
ularly, when the industry was faced with what was believed total
extinction, these local groups formed themselves into a national
body called the Confederation of Planters Associations
(Confederacion de Assoclaclones y Plantadores de Carla Dulce).
This confederation had a membership of 16 local planters1
associations as well as many individual planters not members of
35,1Some Facts About the Philippine Sugar Industry,"
The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines. 1938-
1939. p. 169.
80
any organization, and represented some 60 per cent of the total
producers of centrifugal sugar in the Islands., This confedera
tion represented the planters in the industry's councils and
in matters of governmental actions, both in the Philippines and
the United States.
The planters expressed as much dissatisfaction with
their treatment by the centrals as the laborers with their treat
ment by the planters. They continually demanded a larger share
in the division of the crop, this being the original reason for
the organization of their associations. Just before the begin
ning of the Commonwealth period, this discontent reached such
a high pitch, that many of the planters themselves became
alarmed and took steps to enlist the aid of the Government in
their campaign.
The system outlined above was originally developed by
the planters, who realized that their old methods of production
and distribution were outmoded and costly. They interested
capitalists and the Government in erecting centrals; these
centrals were expected to operate so efficiently that the
resulting division of profit would leave the planter a larger
income than heretofore. The central would rent railways which
would be maintained by the planters for the length of their
milling contracts. The central served from fifty to five
hundred planters who owned land varying in size from one to
three hundred hectares. Most of this land was not owned by
81
the planter. It waa rented for an agreed percentage of the
crop, ranging from 8 per cent as a minimum to as high as 20 per
cent, depending upon the productivity of the land. As a natural
result, a great number of these planters did not live upon their
lands, and rarely saw them, spending most of their time in
Manila or the larger cities in their province. They enjoyed the
fruits of the labors of others they never saw or cared about.
The plantation was left in charge of an overseer, who had
complete control over the lives and fortunes of the individuals
living on or near the plantation, wholly dependent upon it for
labor and the needs of their families. Too often, these over
seers were of the type so familiar in absentee-landlord systems.
They were descendants of the cacique class, with all their
faults and few if any virtues possessed by that class. The main
center of the industry, the island of Negros, was particularly
cursed with this system, and figured large in the election of
1949 as the major source of terrorism, fraud and corruption.
When it is realized that fully 80 per cent of sugar land
was worked by tenants, wholly dependent upon the caprice or
whim of the owner, or renter, that the tenants had to provide
themselves with the necessary equipment, and that they received,
before the War, but thirty centavos per day, the weakness of
the industry can be understood more clearly. Prom the financial
point of view the planter took a greater risk than the miller
since the former was dependent upon the fertility of his land
and the vagaries of the weather — which in the Visayas means
82
intermittent typhoons during the rainy season. The centrals
were insured against all risks beyond their control except the
fate of sugar in the world market.
The lowly tenant was the only one wholly unprotected,
because even the protection of the law has been denied him in
the great majority of cases where he has sought it. In those
areas in which the doctrines of Socialism, expounded by the
Filipino Socialist leader Pedro Abad Santos, attracted the
attention of the sugar workers, the labor situation became
explosive. In the province of Pampanga, the year 1939 saw a
wave of strikes unparalleled in the history of the country,
accompanied by the burning of the cane fields, with about
18,000 out of 40,000 voters of the province members of the
Socialist party.
The most authoritative study of these sugar tenants was
made in 1939 by I.T. Runes for the Institute of Pacific
Relations.®® He found that during the milling season, from
October to March, in the province of Occidental Negros, more
than 50,000 male laborers migrated from Iloilo, Antique, Capiz,
Cebu, and Oriental Negros. Most of them returned to their homes
at the end of the season, although a few remained to prepare the
land for the next planting. The capacity of the mills was so
36I.T. Runes: General Standards of Living and Wages of
Workers in the Philippine Sugar Industry. International Research
Series. (Manila* Philippine Council, IPR, 1939), 29 pp. This
study was never challenged and remains today one of the most
objective and informative labor studies made in the Philippines,
being supplemented by the study of the Ilocos region by Horacio
Lava (1938).
83
great that this large force of laborers was required each year.
The work was done on a contract basis, the workers paid by the
ton. The planters assumed no responsibility with regard to
conditions of labor since the job was let out to imported labor
on a piece-work basis under the supervision of a contractor.37
The contractors rounded up the men and returned them to their
homes upon completion of the contract. For those laborers, on
the plantation the entire year, the average daily income was
3K5.371 to 3K).189, between the months of July and October. When
the milling season began, the laborer went on a piece-work
basis, his average earnings being a maximum of 1=0.868, a day,
to a minimum of 10.341 a day, at the end of the milling season.^®
Mr. Runes stated that these wages just cited "were evidently
higher than in most of the other plantations” since there were
no middlemen employed to contract laborers from other places.38
The laborers were paid irregularly; for saLthbu^ba law was
.passed later that year providing for prompt and regular payment
to workers, it was honored as much in the breach as in the
observance. Out of the thirty-four haciendas studied, Mr. Runes
discovered that nine paid them weekly while five paid once a
month. Four paid very irregularly, sometimes delaying payment
until after the passage of three or four months. One hacienda
paid at intervals of every five weeks, while at another it was
once in every four or five days. He also discovered that several
3 7 Ibid., p. 8. 5 8 Ibld.. pp. 10-11. 39lbid.
84
haciendas in Occidental Negros {aid their laborers thrice yearly
With regard to hours of work during the off-season,
his findings were as dismal. Of the total number of haciendas
studied, eleven employed their labor for ten and one-half hours
a day, and seven employed them for eleven hours a day. Three
employed laborers for eleven and one-half hours while one
kept them working for twelve hours. One farm was discovered
which had no fixed opening and closing hours for work, the work
starting at sunrise and ending at sunset. The planters1
association claimed that "during the milling season the laborers'
full day's work may...- be as long as eight or nine or ten
hours" but Mr. Runes discovered that, on the contrary, the
laborers during that difficult season of the year worked with
great exertion "for as long as sixteen hours." Despite these
long hours and hard work, they would still fail to earn as
much as SKL.50 per day, a condition which was "also contrary to
the association's report to Judge Francisco Zulueta." During
more than half of the milling season, the laborers worked as long
as fifteen hours and only one hacienda had adopted the eight-
hour day during the milling season. This exception was the
La Granja Sugar Cane Experimental Station, "then of the
^ I b i d ., Since the War, on one or two plantations in
the same province, the laborers were not paid at all. They
were granted credit at the plantation store, owned either by
the overseer or by the landowner. At the expiration of a year,
the books were totalled and it was learned that the laborers
had either broken even for the year or were slightly in debt
to the store. A similar system has long been known in certain
areas in the United States.
85
Government, which is however, considered in this survey only
for comparative purposes.”41 For this labor, Mr. Runes found
that the highest registered income for the year was P295.07
while the lowest was f'QG.SO. From the earnings, about 90 per
cent of the total was expended on food and clothing, food
alone receiving 79 per cent of the total of the entire family.
The average daily expense for food, for a family of 4.6 persons,
was 3K).415, the average daily expenditure for an individual
being 3K>.03 per meal. For this sum, the average family
consumed about a ganta of third-class rice, worth thirty-three
centavos. Five centavos went for fish and the remaining three
centavos went for salt or, occasionally, sugar or bananas.
His survey showed that "bread, butter, milk or cream, coffee,
i«42
and chocolate are unknown among the plantation workers...."
The personal possessions of the family, existing on
such a scale, could not be large, and Mr. Runes states that
seldom did they reach the value of twenty pesos per family.
Mr. Runes' report was published in 1939 and excited a
certain amount of comment, the burden of which was generally to
the effect that he was a communist and had selected the worst
areas for study. Few attempts were made before the War to
rectify conditions and reports trickling through the "brqss
curtain1' of Occidental Negros, in 1949, indicated that the
situation in many large areas had deteriorated. These reports
41Ibid., pp. 14.^15, passim.
42
I b i d .. pp. 15-20, p a s s i m .
86
did not find their way into the large metropolitan newspapers
of Manila. While the revelations in' Mr. Runes* report should
have been frightening to alert observers, little permanent
attention was paid to it. The rising unrest, during the two
years immediately preceding the War and the first years of the
Third Republic, raised questions in the minds of many, but the
Government could still querously demand why the people should
consider revolt since, President Quirino declared, ’’there is no
suffering, no calamity, and no act by the Government to make
.47
the people feel downtrodden.
The Philippine sugar industry had been developed by
the United States for the United States market and became wholly
dependent upon the market for its existence. Yet, in 1934,
before the ink was dry on the Tydings-McDuffie Law, the United
States Congress passed legislation seriously hampering the
sugar industry. The reason for the legislation, as Professor
Kirk points out,^4 was the increasing competition between
American insular sugar areas and Cuban sugar. This raised
doubts in the minds of those interested in the Cuban industry
as to its ability to meet the rising competition of Philippine,
Puerto Rican and Hawaiian sugar.
Since the Cuban sugar industry is, for all intents and
^ S t a tement of President Quirino, reported in The Philip
pines Free Press. Vol. XL, No. 49 (Dec. 3, 1949), p. 5.
44Kirk, o£. c i t .. p. 128.
87
purposes, owned by American interests in the East (in which the
majority of refineries were located) and it was to the East
coast that the greater part of Philippine sugar was shipped and
processed, it was not particularly surprising that the powerful
lobby operated by these interests should engage in a campaign
to eliminate this rising competition. Upon the recommendation
of the Tax Commission and the President, Congress enacted the
V v* ■ ■
Jones-Costigan Act of May 9, 1934, which established quotas for
domestic producers, allowing the Secretary of Agriculture to
fix quotas for other areas. Secretary Wallace fixed the Philip
pine quota for the year 1934 at 1,015,185 short tons, which
was t o be retroactive to January 1, that year. Since the
Philippine producers had already sold more than the maximum
amount by the time of the quota establishment, they were faced
with a surplus of 500,000 tons. This had to be carried over
to the following year, the quota for which was fixed at 991,307
short tons, a further reduction. Thus, during 1935, Philippine
producers were able to send to the United States but one-third
of their crop for the preceding y e a r . 45
Sugar men realized that the application of American world
price rate would close the American market and bring collapse
to their industry. The U.S.-Cuban Reciprocal Trade Agreement
of September, 1934, brought further worries to Philippine sugar
men. By this agreement, a duty of nine-tenths of a cent a
pound was imposed on Cuban sugar, with the proviso that at the
4 5 I b l d .. p. 131.
88
expiration of the Jones-Costigan Act, December 31, 1937, the
rate would revert to one and a half cents a pound. Since the
delivery cost of Philippine sugar into the United States was
1*7.59 per picul, in 1937, and the cost of Cuban sugar delivered
was ^5.35, the danger to Philippine sugar was evident since
the Philippine preferential price was but 27 centavos less.
This price differential would be eliminated after the sixth
year of the Commonwealth. .Since the Tydings-McDuffie Act
provided that after the tenth year of the Commonwealth, a duty
equivalent to 100 per cent of the world rate would be imposed
on Philippine sugar (which would amount to 1*5.25 per picul),
the extension of the Cuban agreement would mean the end of the
Philippine sugar industry.
The industry therefore requested that since it was
"very young", and had not "as yet fully recovered the capital
invested in it", in "all fairness, the limitations imposed on
exports during the Commonwealth be either modified or removed."
The Philippine Sugar Association stated it was "asking only for
a slight increase of 244,080 short tons", bringing the total
to 1,200,000 short tons which was "still much below Philippine
normal production.” Also, "the United States, not being self-
sufficient in sugar production, can perform another altruistic
act by maintaining the present trade arrangement in Philippine
sugar, even after independence, instead of obtaining sugar from
other countries."^® It did not mention how much this altruism
4*5The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philip
p ines. 1937-1958. p. 228.
89
would cost the American housewife, nor did it take into account
the evolving Latin-American policy of the United States.
Sugar men continued to agitate for a change in the
situation, but to no avail. Many believed that independence
would be disastrous to the Philippines, since no less than
600,000 short tons would have to be exported yearly for the
survival of the industry,47 and worked for an extension of the
transition period, or for closer relations with the United
States than was actually provided in the Independence Law.
Rafael Alunan, President of the Philippine Sugar Association
and the Philippine American Trade Association at that time,
addressed the students of the University of the Philippines, on
November 22, 1934, comparing the advantages of trade with the
United States to that with Japan. He concluded his address by
declaring that the very existence of the Philippine civilization
depended upon the continuing close relations with the United
States. Yet, all were agreed that continuing relations based
upon the Jones-Costigan act, and other expected acts, would mean
the practical dissolution of the sugar industry in the Philip
pines. He stated that "considered from the viewpoint of the
present laws the prospect is rather gloomy. There exists however
the hope that these laws may be amended."4®
47Ibid.. p. 226.
48Rafael Alunan: "The Sugar Industry Under the Common
wealth," The Philippine Commonwealth Handbook. 1936, p. 267.
90
President Quezon, departing from the United States for
the Philippines on November 30, 1934, (accompanied by former
Senator Harry B, Hawes, Washington representative for the
Philippine Sugar Association) stated that the aim of the Philip
pines was to maintain "as far as possible the present economic
relations with the United States." Continuing, he said:
We have been the seventh best customer of the United
States and produce chiefly the things which America must
buy. Our economic relations are mutually advantageous.
We are concerned over the limitations of our sugar and
coconut oil exportations provided in the Tydings-McDuffie
Law and hope that the people of this country will realize
that in buying our goods they are establishing one of
their best markets.... The Philippine people have great
faith in the integrity and good faith of the American
people.49
On December 8,1934, a Congressional Committee, headed by
Tydings, McAdoo, McKellar and Gibson, arrived in Manila, and
declared they had come to listen to complaints about the Indepen
dence Law so as to "be helpful in solving our mutual problems and
to correct in so far as we may such inequalities and imperfections
as will conduce to the most successful Philippine Independence."
Several days later, in Iloilo, they listened to a frank
complaint from Don Esteban de la Rama, delivered at a banquet
in their honor. Don Esteban vigorously attacked the economic
provisions of the Independence Law and called them "cruel and
unjust." He invited the mission to return to the Philippines
in ten years and witness the ruin that this act would have wrought.
49Phillpplne Magazine. XXXII, No. 1 (January, 1935), p.4.
^ S e n a t o r Tydings did return in 1945 for that purpose
but stayed only a week, and only in Manila.
91
In addition, Don Esteban attacked General Aguinaldo for a state
ment the latter had made two days before in which he had
advocated a shorter transition period. De la Rama stated
pointedly that Aguinaldo still thought as in days of yore "when
governments could be run without a budget and men hanged if
they refused to work for the government free."
The same day Senator McAdoo was taken ill and rettirned
to Manila by plane.
The mission continued to be bombarded with the complaints
they came after, throughout the month. Recommendations most
often given them were for the elimination of the export taxes,
increase In the sugar and cordage quotas, repeal of the coconut
oil excise tax, tariff autonomy during the Commonwealth period
and tariff reciprocity with the United States.
During this time, apparently no one considered the fact
that although they were complaining about the great dependence
of the sugar industry on the American market, and were faced with
Its possible collapse after independence and the end of the free-
entry period, they were making no efforts at limitation of
production. This great dependence of the country upon an
Industry based on such weak foundations contained the seeds for
the great economic confusion existing in the Philippines at the
beginning of the Third Republic. Many observers pointed to the
fact, agreed to by many producers, that the Philippine sugar
industry was Inefficient and costly and could not hope to meet
92
the competition of other foreign sugars in the American market
after, as later developed, 1961. Yet no attempts were made
seriously to turn sugar lands, which were of marginal value
only, to the production of other more necessary domestic crops
- rice, for example. Year after year the production of sugar
increased, and year after year, the representatives of the
industry said the peak had been r e a c h e d . ^ Limitation was only
reached with the application of the Tydings-McDuffie, Jones-
Costigan, and Tydings-Kocialkowski Laws.
Despite the sufferings of the industry, so piteously
expressed in publications throughout the Commonwealth period,
the beginning years of the Republic saw the frantic efforts of
the industry to regain its prewar status in the American
market, a status it could hold only if arrangements were made
for future free-trade relations between the United States and
the Philippines. The hope, in 1950, was that the industry would
be able to achieve its favorable prewar position by raising the
increasingly important bogey of communism, which, unfortunately,
was sweeping Southeast Asia, by saying that unless aid were
given the industry more and more of the peoples of the Philip
pine s would be attracted to the siren song of communism thus
depriving the United States of the "only Christian nation in the
Orient." Any suggestions to defeat communism within the country
by changing the appalling conditions of the workers on the
haciendas and elsewhere were not considered seriously.
51.Frederic g # Marquardt: Before Bataan and Aft e r . (New
Yorkj Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1943), pp. 129-134, passim.
CHAPTER III
EARLY EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE RICE INDUSTRY
Since the cultivation of rice requires some fifty per
cent of the total agricultural labor and forty per cent of
cultivated land, and is the mainstay of the Filipino's diet,
some government bureaus early in the Commonwealth period
became concerned with the problems affecting this staple. It
must be emphasized that whatever achievements were made, and
there were some despite the blackness of the picture,were made
not because of any effective efforts by the Government itself
but were the result of selfless labor on the part of the many
humble and sometimes insignificant individuals within some of
these bureaus and in private enterprise who worked long and
hard with no recognition and little appreciation in the form of
adequate appropriations on projects the importance of which
they alone recognized.
The aim of the Commonwealth, President Quezon said,was
’’the maintenance of a special commercial relationship,not only
during the transition, but also afterwards...." with the United
States.^- He listed three main objectives for the first year
of the Commonwealth. These were: a plan for national defense;
the creation of the national economic council (which, the
^To Mr. Harry Frantz, Chief of the United Press Bureau
in Washington, D.C., reproduced in The Commercial and Industrial
Manual of the Philippines. 1957-1938. p . 7.
93
94
President said, "would survey the economic resources of the
country and submit a plan for their proper and coordinated
development" showing that "we are getting ready to stand on our
own feet..."); and, the reorganization of the Government.
Prom these objectives, he derived the achievements for
the first years "We have provided the country with defense,
we have adopted a plan for the reasonable use and conservation
of our national resources so as to make the country self-
dependent, and lastly, the government has been reorganized on
simple and efficient lines, capable of performing the tasks of
p
a progressive, strong, and just government." The problem of
national defense will be discussed later. As far as the re
organization of the government was. concerned, it evidently was
not so simple and efficient as the President believed, since
in 1940 it again underwent "reorganization", and later in 1947
and 1951 similar "reorganizations" took place, with no appre
ciable increase in either simplicity or efficiency. We are
concerned here with the "plan for the reasonable use and
conservation of" the natural resources.
But what was this "plan"?
The seriousness of the situation was reiterated by
bureau chiefs and specialists many times. The noted progress
which had occurred in education and the acquisition of wealth
with the accompanying rise in the standard of living, Director
2 Ibid.
95
Hilarion S. Silayan of the Bureau of Plant Industry stated,
"has not reached the farmers who supply the food, but has been
confined among the merchants, the financiers and the producers
of export crops, such as sugar and copra."® He believed that
Philippine agriculture, while still in a pioneering stage, was
"facing economic problems of such magnitude and extent" that
any venture was no longer "a mere problem of seeds, soil,
climate, pests, diseases, and typhoons", but was a matter
"principally of economics."
And how was this problem being met? He stated precisely,
if gloomily, that no "facilities have been given or developed
for conducting research and survey in agricultural economics in
the same manner that laboratories and field stations are
provided at present for the studies of chemistry, agronomy,
horticulture, and animal h u s b a n d r y . H e made this accurate
statement, three years after the beginning of the commonwealth,
and two years after the submission of President Quezon’s "plan".
The problem was economic -- the economics of agriculture —
what it composed-and how to meet it. Yet, the most important
bureau organized for this purpose, the Bureau of Plant Industry,
had "no section of Agricultural Economics," Director Silayan
stated. Yet, he believed, as did other scientists, that the
greatest problem facing Philippine agriculture at the beginning
^"Agriculture,” Ibid., p. 159.
4 Ibid.. p. 156.
96
of its most critical period, was "whether it can prosper under
the prevailing condition affecting cost of production, taxation,
present market prices, current rates of interests, present rural
unrest, international relations, in other words, under the
present pressure of economic conditions." At that time, there
was no government institution fitted to carry on well organized
research activities with regard to these determining economic
factors other than the College of Agriculture and allied
colleges, of the University of the Philippines which did so as
a part of its curricula.6 Director Silayan believed that
conditions with regard to food supply would be somewhat
ameliorated if the public lands then available for use, in
Agusan, Cotabato, Davao, Occidental Misamis and Surigao were
used. These lands were located in regions free of typhoons and
drought, and would assure a steady supply of food "provided,"
he said, "that the country adopts and follows a national policy
of land use."6
His final recommendation was the suggestion for the
establishment of a well planned adult farm instruction program.^
The restrained observations of Director Silayan seem to
^Ibld.. p. 158. 6Ibid.. p. 159. Italics supplied.
'''Some halting steps were taken in this direction, but
since they were carried on by various -understaffed and under
financed government agencies, they were never very successful.
Had they been encouraged to organize, such as the Grange in
the United States, with the direction coming from the people,
the chances would have been much more favorable for t h e
achievements of this vital program in Philippine rural life.
97
indicate that "national planning" was far from adequate or even
that it existed. Other scientists were in agreement. A
prominent scientist believed that these "plans" of the Govern
ment would be far from adequate, if the work in progress was
taken as typical of the program and the thinking. When the
Government spoke of "planning,” he said, it undoubtedly referred
to "scientific planning." This involved thinking which was
experimental and objective. However, he believed, that many
were "not interested in experiments to get a direct reply from
nature" and only wished to broadcast their ideas and receive
"popular acclaim and credit for conceiving them regardless as to
Q
what nature herself has to say about them."
The economic situation in the Philippines, he thought,
was characterized by extreme conservatism in industrial develop
ment. This conservatism was found both in the ranks of local
capitalists and those who were to be responsible for promotion
of new industries. This produced two schools of thought. One
believed that only those industries which resulted from free
trade should be continued while the other believed that the
Government should encourage the development of industries in
the Philippines which would supplant foreign goods. However,
he stated, “both schools are effusions from the swivel chair."
He pointed ironically to the impossibility through inductive
reasoning alone, of ascertaining, "with any degree of reliability,"
®Dr. Manuel L. Roxas: "Science for the New Commonwealth,"
Ibid., p. 61.
98
whether the country could establish in a short period of time
new industries which would supply local demand. This could
only be discovered by scientific planning, which, he believed,
was absent.
Furthermore, science in the Philippines, he believed,
was at the mercy of politics and "political expediency," which,
he said, "is poison to scientific methods." For this reason,
as well as others, scientific endeavor in the Philippines should
be removed "from the destructive influence of politics."
What should be the first steps in planning? He stated
flatly that the most urgent problems -- more urgent than the
usual temporizing expediencies of politics in industry -- were
those of discovering the nourishment standard of the population,
of eradicating the excessive infant mortality, removing
susceptibility to tuberculosis, and discovering how to control
Q
the high incidence of deficiency diseases. Since Dr. Roxas
was at that time chairman of the National Research Council, he
was thoroughly familiar with the scientific work in progress.
His discouraged observations on the 3tate of this work had little
effect upon the "planners", however, and throughout the Common
wealth period, and the early years of the Republic,
scientific research into the main problems facing the country
9 Ibid., p. 62
99
remained at the mercy of political expediency .^
A specialist in Philippine agrarian problems, Jose L.
Celeste, the Executive Secretary of the National Research
Council, pointed in similar fashion to the necessity of careful
and thorough planning. This involved, he believed, not only
planning to meet domestic needs, but also the question of
supplying the world market with various export items. The same
old problems hindering the best development of Philippine
agriculture -- farm credit, marketing, opening of new lands,
etc. — he said, should be met and solved before any hope were
expressed of becoming self-sufficient. Of these, he believed,
one of the most important involved the settling of farmers on
new tracts. This had been unsuccessful largely because of
"disease, lack of capital", and the lack of "titles to cleared
land."H With regard to industrialization, he warned that too
much attention was being given to creating industries which
were supposed to supplant imported commodities. The real need,
-^Scientists in the early years of the Republic continued
to regard with dismay the totally unscientific methods of
planning resorted to by the various bureaus charged with discover
ing methods of meeting the critical conditions of 1949 and 1950.
Throughout the period, theories and assumptions were the basis
for all emergency measures, since all "plans" were drawn up by
politicos who scorned, and continue to scorn, the opinions and
ideas of men trained and concerned in the various disciplines of
science which, when understood and utilized humanistically, bring
so much happiness and well-being to mankind. This tragic
condition was complicated by the insistence of the "planners" in
regarding problems in the country as political in origin.
i:LIbid., p. 71.
100
the real goal, he said, "should not be to produce everything
that we now import but to manufacture only those articles to
which the resources of the country are well suited.... He
suggested the creation of an Industries Board to study the
problem and make specific recommendations.
Antonio de Las Alas, Secretary of Finance, and Chairman
of the National Economic Council, recognized the need of
establishing local industries to meet local needs, and mentioned
several his Council were considering: meat packing, dairy
products, canning, development of fisheries, and the manufacture
of cotton yarn. Others, while needed, were not so immediately
essential, he believed. These were: manufacture of glass and
clay products, sack making and pulp and paper, industrialization
of coconut products, and manufacture of tanning extracts and
leather. He believed that these necessary industries could be
initiated with but an appropriation of 3^1,500,000, "which could be
easily set aside from the public treasury."-^ The National
Development Company, he said, would be the parent body to
initiate these industries. However, he warned, these industrial
products would not become realities, until cheap power was
available. While the National Economic Council had recommended
the establishment of hydro-electric plants, and the Assembly had
created the National Power Corporation with an appropriation,
the power program of the Philippines was interrupted by the
12Ibid. 15Ibld.. p. 196
101
outbreak of the War, and because of its cost, was delayed for
many years after the establishment of the R e p u b l i c . ^
In 1934, the Philippine Economic Association presented
a program to be followed by the Commonwealth with regard to
planning. This association was composed of fourteen committees
with a total membership of eighty-five, with Cornelio Balmaceda
as Secretary and Elpidfo Quirino as President. Mr. Q,uirino,
later second President of the Philippine Republic, in his
introduction to the report of this Association, said:
We have entered upon a stage of development in which
economics plays a dominant role.... While we have en
riched our culture with the assimilation of the arts and
sciences of other countries, we have failed, however, to
grow commensurately in economic substance and this is
due, not precisely to the little importance we have
placed in the past upon our agriculture, commerce and
trade, or upon the various economic activities that would
turn into material values our rich potential resources,
but to the lack of a well-defined and consistent scheme
of development. Today we realize... we have to awaken,
on the one hand, national consciousness and, on the other
hand, contend with a vast territory of virgin lands and
unexplored natural and industrial resources which we could
hardly hope to develop without government help and direction.
l^The Chairman of the National Power Board, Mr. M.
Jesus Cuenco, stated that water power development was
"confronted with complex economic problems." Amplifying this
statement, he said: "Ordinarily, as a wise business venture,
capital investments in this enterprise must ultimately sell
the power produced at a cost below or equal to that at which
it can be purchased and higher than that at which it can be
produced, in the same manner that a local manufacturer's sale
price for his articles must be set between the selling price of
imported articles of the same quality and the cost of manufac
ture. It is, however, obvious that prevailing rates for power
cannot be taken as our higher limit in our calculations, but
rather the raise at which our industries may be enabled to lower
production costs, and thus to capture trade and thrive." Ibid..
pp. 205-206.
102
We must not be satisfied with piece-meal develop
ment.... We are faced with the problem of making the
necessary readjustments in our political, social and
economic life. Our national economic structure...
must claim our attention. A comprehensive program of
economic planning for the nation is imperative....
The special attention paid to the cultivation o f
export crops, like sugar, copra, tobacco and abaca,
has produced an agricultural problem in the Philip
pines which has well-nigh endangered our economic
stability. While these export crops have taken big
strides progress in other crops has remained
practically stationery.... Recently, the government
has embarked on a campaign of diversification, but it
will be some time before we learn of its results.15
To put whatever planning into effect that was adopted,
Mr. i^uirino suggested three stages in development. The first
would be the "Period of General Preparation", which would
encompass the delimitation, survey and subdivision of public
lands; the speedy disposition of cadastral and land registra
tion cases; the colonization of public lands; and, extensive
vocational education. The second period would be the "Period
of Planning under the Commonwealth." This would involve
"agricultural readjustments"; "rural problems"; the develop
ment of forest resources; the development of mines and
minerals; the promotion of manufacturing industries;
development of fisheries; "labor and population"; domestic trade;
transportation and communication; banks and credit facilities
including the creation of a Central Bank; currency; and, public
finance. The third would be the "Period of Planning under the
Republic." This would involve only foreign trade and trade
Philippine Economic Association; Economic Problems
of the Ph ilippines. (Manilas Bureau of Printing, 1954), p p .
iii-iv, p a s s i m . Italics supplied.
103
reciprocity treaties; immigration, and, neutrality.-^
In addition to this program, each of the fourteen commit
tees submitted its recommendations. The committee on agricul
tural readjustment had this to say:
"1. Separation from the United States will create
problems in agricultural readjustment; namely, the reduction
of export crops and the consequent decrease of imports.
"2. These readjustment problems will produce a most
difficult situation in agriculture. The principal problems
are: (a.) concentration of our export crops in regions where
these are best adapted, and the production of substitute crops
In regions from which crops for export are withdrawn; (b) the
expansion of production of crops now in the Islands in limited
quantities but which are imported in large quantities; and the
adaption of other local products to local uses so as to lessen
importation.
"3. The task of the Government in effecting these
needed readjustments is a very Important one. The Government
should coordinate the various processes as well as give
intelligent direction to the movement so that the changes may
be made with certainty, speed and with the minimum of economic
disorganization.
"4. The greatest and most important task of readjustment
rests with Individuals. With the individual farmer and capitalist
16Ibld., pp. viii-Ix.
104
rest the responsibility of effecting the necessary changes in
the farm business. On the individual consumers as well as
organizations rest the equally important task of cooperating
with the Government program in the work."-^
Since this "program11 was an official one, it must be
supposed that it was to represent the future planning of the
Commonwealth. Whether or not it was specifically effectuated
can only be determined by studying the situation as it developed
throughout the years of the Commonwealth, with reference to the
various programs, policies, and projects.
The dangers inherent in a heedless program of national
planning were pointed out as early as 1936 by H.V. Hodson who
said that national planning "without international cooperation
in the essential matters of currencies, tariffs, markets, and other
sources of supply is a movement of mass suicide...."1® There
was really no reason to suppose that the Philippines would be
able to find its path toward economic security in the future
by unilateral action. Both the planners in the Philippines and
those in the United States should have realized this. Each,
however, was handicapped by domestic-mindedness exemplified in
the quasi-mercantilist theory of one Filipino observer who
17
I b i d .. p. 42. Incidentally, the committee on rural
problems suggested as its major recommendation that "the rural
population should be enlightened about the problems of rural
life." This is undoubtedly not deliberately ironic.
18i»The Nemesis of National Planning," Pacific AfEiirs.
IX, No. 1 (March, 1936), p. 59.
105
suggested that the Philippines "lay down a solid economic
foundation, conceived in che principle of nationalism, as the
lasting and permanent basis of our political edifice."1® Since
this unfortunate and questionable objective lay in the minds
of planners on both sides of the Pacific,the misunderstanding,
mistakes and misery that were to characterize the life of the
nation in later years were inevitable.
The Situation. 1954-1958 :-
If the agricultural situation in the Philippines were
looked at solely from the viewpoint of high-level observers,
concerned only with Government policies and activities (as so
much of recent writing on the Philippines has been), the true
story would not emerge. The lives of the people were in actuality
little affected by Goverment programs and plans except in a negative
fashion. The people were most concerned with how the development of
events touched their own lives and fortunes. Their reactions to these
developments would give us the full picture, but it is difficult
now, long after the events described, to recapitulate the moods
and feelings of the populace as they faced the situation except
in the most general way. However, to understand even a little
of the pressures and problems which determined the economic
development of the Commonwealth and its influence upon political
19
Manuel V. Gallego, Philippine Commonwealth Journal.
Vol. II, Nos. 7-8 (July-August”] 1955), p. 73.
106
events, we should review largely for illustration, the shifting
current of events in these first few years of the new Govern
ment.20 We shall examine market activities, price fluctuations,
natural influences and follow this with an examination of
Government policies and attitudes.
One of the many problems lay in the differential
existing between the prices given the grower for palay (from
provincial centers)2 ^ and the prices quoted on the central
markets -- sometimes as much as two pesos a sack and occasional
ly much more. Also, prices fluctuated greatly from season to
season and from month to month, with the consumer and small
producer completely at the mercy of the weather and the middle
men. The table®2 indicates the serious condition (rather
sketchily, it is true) existing in 1934-35 -- a condition which
it behooved the Government to rectify if unrest was to be
allayed in the provinces.
By June, 1934, the planting of the new crop of rice was
under way in Central Luzon, but was greatly retarded by drought
except in the few irrigated districts. It was hoped that the
seasonal rains would come in time for extensive planting. Many
2 0 The story of the year3 1939-1941 must be held in
abeyance until material is found relative to this period. It
is astonishing for the researcher to see the almost complete
la@k of sources for the period after 1939 to the outbreak of
the War .
2 1 Palay is the unhusked "raw" rice.
22 Table I, Appendix.
107
requests had come from the United States for export supplies
which some observers believed indicated a possible market for
transshipment to Puerto Rico, Cuba, and other rice-consuming
markets. However, little attention was given by the dealers to
the problem of grading for export. Quality grading did not
exist except for the limited luxury market. It was stated by
qualified observers that any Improvement in the export trade
would depend upon the exchange situation as well as supply.2 ^
By the end of 1934, the estimates of observers24
pointed to the increasing seriousness of the situation. The
crop for 1934-35 was expected, for example, to be small
because of plant diseases and the effects of a typhoon at the
flowering period in certain districts. The carry-over was
small, and milling recovery was low because of these diseases.
During this same period, when many families were un
able to procure the rice they needed, the Philippines shipped,
in the first nine months, some 2,866,000 kilos of rice, worth
5=328,000 to the United States, chiefly for brewing purposes
(the price of Philippine rice at that time being cheaper than
the American product). This figure contrasted sharply with the
56,000 kilos, worth 55,000 shipped in the corresponding period
of 1933. Coincident with the rise in amount shipped to the
23
Much of the material in this section is drawn from
detailed reports in the Philippine Magazine as well as from
summaries found in The Philippine Journal of Commerce. 1934-38.
2 4 S e e : "Business and Finance Summary" section, Philip
pine Magazine. XXXI, No. 1 (January, 1934), and the following
numbers, for monthly resumes end observations with regard to
the developing situation.
108
United States, the Bureau of Commerce issued new regulations
effective November 1, 1934, governing the exportation of rice
aimed at maintaining a high standard of quality. While this
was designed to increase the export business of the country,
the domestic problem of production and consumption was far
from a solution.
Surprisingly, the price of rice' in November declined,
despite the effects of a typhoon. At the same time it w a s
pointed out that the estimated figure of 1,400,000 tons for
the new crop was reduced by seme 250,000 tons because of the
weather and disease, particularly in Central Luzon. During
the month, the receipts of the cereal in Manila markets were
some 25,000 sacks less than in the corresponding period for
the previous year.
The end of November and the beginning of December saw
the Philippines swept by typhoons, causing extensive damage
and some fatalities in the Visayas and Luzon. As a result,
by January, reports from agents of the Bureau of Commerce
indicated that the rice crop in Central Luzon then being
harvested would be from ten to fifty per cent lower than the
1933 crop. It was reported that the crop was 50 per cent lower
in Bulacan, 40 per cent lower in Nueva E cija and 10 per cent
lower in Pangasinan. The total crop estimate was accordingly
reduced from 1,400,000 tons to 1,150,000 tons. Official and
private reports of the year's production were at variance,
109
causing the Government to urge a thorough survey of crop
conditions, and particularly with reference to the effects of
the typhoons.
During January, 1935, rice prices continued firm be
cause of reports of ample supplies, but it soon became clear
that these reports were either inspired by sources anxious to
steady the market or were erroneous. Although new supplies
became available in fair quantities, most holders were not
prepared to dispose of their stocks because of indications of
another shortage. This situation naturally resulted In sharp
advances during the last two weeks of the month, when specula
tors began active buying of palay in the provinces. The
market remained firm and active with demand far exceeding supply.
Palay prices ranged from 51.60 to 51.85 per sack while market
prices ranged from 55.90 to54.70.
Late February and early March saw a decline in the
prices of luxury grades and in macan and palay prices. The
market constantly fluctuated due to the Inability of buyers to
estimate supplies, the small amount available in the markets,
and the weak demand due to the low purchasing power of consumers.
Informed observers pointed to the likelihood that this situation
would continue with no immediate stabilization of prices. Prices
remained steady until the reserves from the old crop were
disposed of, when they began to rise rapidly as it became clear
that the new crop was far below expectations. Althoagji some commit
ments were made on the basis of the old price, the consumers
110
refused to meet the advance, with a resulting falling of demand
and prices. In addition, great uncertainty again existed as to
the size of the crop, though it was generally agreed that it had
been considerably reduced by disease and typhoon damage. The
farmers, realizing the situation, held their stocks and preferred
to borrow against them in hopes of a general price rise of rice.
It was estimated that about 60 per cent of the crop was so held.
Merchants expressed the belief that extensive buying from Saigon
would be necessary and negotiations for such imports were reported.
However, the high price of Saigon rice, and the refusal of the
consumer to meet these costs made such importation unprofitable.
Late March and April saw the steadying of the prices of
rice as it became evident the crop was to fall below that of the
previous year. An increase in demand was also expected because
of the distribution of the sugar processing tax (under the U.S.
AAA). Some rice exporters protested against the imposition of
a one cent-a-pound compensatory tax by the American Government
to balance the one-cent-a-pound processing tax on American rice.
However, as it became clear that there would be no appreciable
surplus available for export during the year, little attention
was given this protest.
During April, a much larger volume of business was
contracted than in March resulting from the good demand from
the southern islands as a result of the typhoons there late in
1934 and early in 1935.
Ill
During May and June, growers continued to hold their
crops, unwilling to sell at current prices any more than was
absolutely necessary. In addition, the June planting advanced
slowly, because of lack of rain, which indicated that the early
crop would be of moderate size. Expectations were that increased
planting would ultimately take place, however, mainly due to
the contracting of export c r o p s .
This continued through August, with prices of macan
rising as high as 1=6.50 a sack by the middle of September. By
that time, the Government was definitely alarmed over the
possibility of macan increasing in price beyond the ability of
the poorer people to pay, and it took steps to prevent a
further advance by setting up a revolving fund of 1=30,000, with
which the Manila Trading Center was to buy rice for resale in
the poorer districts of the city. The Trading Center had no
facilities, however, for extending this necessary service out
side the city, and so was not able to keep prices down to proper
levels.
Again, there was wide variance of opinion with regard
to stocks. The Bureau of Commerce reported that the crop
planted during the summer would be lower than the last crop,
2S
but also said that supplies were ample. ° Other authorities
expected a shortage, estimating that the floods In Central Luzon
In July and August had destroyed 165,286 hectares of newly
2 ^Fhillpplne M a g a z i n e . XXXII, No. 11 (November, 1935),
p. 526.
112
planted palay, of which 95,000 hectares were in the province of
Pangasinan.26 This meant about a quarter of the Central Luzon
hectarage. Seed-beds had also been destroyed which meant that
much of the affected area would not be replanted during 1935.
The stocks in warehouses were believed to be considerable
but there was no accurate information with regard to either the
amount or ownership. The Bureau of Commerce, replying to
complaints that the rice growers should not be deprived of their
first opportunity in four years to realize a good profit (while
they said hemp growers and others were reaping rich dividends),
maintained that at least 75 per cent of the rice was in the hands
of dealers and millers. Representatives of the latter, however,
claimed that the proportion was just the opposite: the growers
holding at least 75 per cent.27 The growers warehoused their
rice with the millers, in some instances borrowing against it
from the banks, and it was suggested by observers that the
millers, in many cases, were being wrongly accused of withholding
their stocks from the market, when they were actually only
warehousemen with no say as to its disposition.
Saigon rice, in Manila, was still above the Philippine
price and imports, as a result, were negligible. It was hoped
that if prices continued to rise the Government would ultimately
take the step of reducing the import duty temporarily.
26Ibid. 27Ibid
113
In August a typhoon caused considerable damage to growing
crops, losses being estimated at over three million pesos.
Several hundred lives were reported lost in the subsequent
floods in Central Luzon. Transportation and communication
facilities were paralyzed, further complicating the situation.
Throughout September, rising prices failed to bring out
supplies to meet the needs of the people and considerable
distress resulted. On September 20, due to the growing unrest
among the people, the Cabinet decided to import rice free of
duty. Two days l a t e r the Governor-General issued a proclama
tion declaring that an emergency existed, and designating the
Bureau of Commerce as a relief organization to import rice free
of duty, In any quantity necessary to sell to the public at
cost. Unrest and violence were reported from several provinces
28
as prices continued to soar.
On September 27, with conditions still serious, the
Governor-General issued an executive order requiring a report
to his office within five days of all stores of rice and
29
imposing restrictions on transfers and sales of the commodity.
The first of October saw a temporary relief from high prices as
a shipment of rice arrived from China, but two weeks later, on
October 14, a mob of hungry people raided the Goseco camote
plantation in Pampanga, and beat the overseer. Robheries and
assaults were reported from other places in Pampanga and Nueva
2 8 Ibid.. p. 526-527. 29Ibid., p. 528.
114
Ecija. The emergency relief administration of the Bureau of
Commerce rushed sacks of rice to various points for distribution
to persons reported on the verge of starvation. w
Two days later, an armed mob of hungry people at Macabebe,
Pampanga, raided a number of fish-ponds, and a week later, the
Secretary of Labor, Ramon Torres, stated that landlords and
hacenderos were taking advantage of the misery of the people by
exactions of as much as five cavans of rice in repayment for
one cavan advanced, and blamed them for the unrest in many parts
of Luzon.
Luxury stocks increased to ^6.65 per sack by the end of
the month, while macan (the. staple of the people) went from
^5.90 to 1*6,00 to as high as 5^7.25. The Secretary of Agricul
ture and Commerce, who had declared that ^6.00 was an ample
price for macan, tried at first to get rice to the poorer people
in Manila (naturally the great majority of the people), by buying
it in the provinces and reselling it through the Manila Trading
Center. This being completely ineffectual, it was finally
decided that the Government should admit a limited amount (as
mentioned above), free of duty, for distribution through the
provincial treasurers. It arranged to bring in some 60,000
sacks from Hongkong* As a result, a good deal of rice which had
been in storage appeared on the market and lowered prices some-
50I b i d . 310£. eft., No. 12 (December, 1955), p. 595.
115
what. Local merchants had been encouraged to negotiate for
200,000 sacks from French Indo-China; but as a result of the
price-reduction, none of the tenders for Saigon rice were
accepted. &y the end of the month Government rice was selling
at from §*6.25 to 3^6.50. Then a rising tendency was noted early
in October.
Despite the efforts of the Bureau of Commerce to obtain
a reliable estimate, there was as yet no definite information
as to the amount of rice stored. Their agents discovered that
the new crop would be from 15 to 20 per cent below that of the
previous year in Central Luzon, because of the recurrent floods
and disease. However, private observers placed the estimate
considerably lower. Reports from the Visayas indicated a lower
crop in that area, particularly on Negros.
At the end of September, imports temporarily eased the
fear of a shortage, with a resultant small drop in prices.
However, when the Government refused all tenders of Saigon rice,
and the scarcity of the cereal became apparent in many sections,
prices quickly rose to around ?7.50 for macan and ?7.80 for
luxury grades. They remained at this level for the remainder of
the month despite the fact that the Government imported 78,000
duty-free sacks for distribution by the Manila Trading Center
and the Provincial treasurers. This Government rice was sold
in small quantities to the needy at 3^5.50 per sack. There was
some importation of Saigon rice, by local merchants, at the
116
duty-paid rate which, however, meant it was unavailable for the
average customer.
It was also evident that further Imports would be
necessary in the coming year (1936) because of the damage
*Zp
inflicted by floods and plant disease. The rice was attacked
again by rust rot, and authorities continued to state that until
the problem of disease was solved the Philippines could not
count upon producing sufficient quantities to meet domestic
needs. One or two halting steps had been taken in this direction,
the Legislature having voted 3^200,000 before its adjournment
the previous July, for the extermination of locusts. But many
scientists felt this was far from adequate and campaigned for
more money to seek remedies for the diseases which took such
heavy toll of the crop each year.
On November 30, 1935, President Quezon, recognizing the
"state of emergency with respect to rice because of drought,
typhoon, flood, and similar conditions..." issued Proclamation
No. 11, which authorized "the importation of rice...for
distribution among distressed people, free of duty....'
Despite this move, the rice situation grew more serious
at the end of 1935. Although harvesting had begun, little rice
had appeared in the markets of Manila because of the heavy local
3^0p. c l t .. XXXIII, No. 1 (January, 1936), p. 4.
35M . 0 . P .. Vol. I (rev. ed.) 1938, pp. 214-215.
117
demand in the provinces, where the shortage had been felt the
most. In addition, the crop harvested was small. The heavy
typhoon which struck the principal growing districts in the
middle of November was particularly destructive, since the crop
was in the process of pollination. Together with the resultant
flood and increased damage by insects, this reduced the estimated
crop to a 280 days' supply. It was apparent that during 1936
great stocks would have to be imported to avert almost certain
hunger. Following President Quezon's proclamation with regard
to the importation of duty-free rice, suggestions were made
that he be empowered to lower the tariff as the situation
demanded.34 But strong objections were raised by large growers,
who felt that this would permit private traders to Import and
distribute rice to their disadvantage.
In December, the price of rice eased as the new crop
began to appear in Manila markets, so the Government discontinued
sales of imported duty-free stocks. However, observers pointed
out that the crop was considerably smaller than the average for
previous years, and that no reserve existed to carry over until
the next season.33 The Government stated that it was prepared
to take immediate action should a shortage again become apparent,
and was holding for that emergency some 50,000 sacks of Saigon rice,3 3
34L o c » cit.
330p. c i t .. No. 2 (February, 1936), p. 54.
3 6 Ibid. . p. 55.
118
However, no bills stabilizing the price of rice were
passed in December, 1935. Many authorities suggested that a
permanent solution would necessitate the study of plant diseases
which had been cutting the production of the cereal.37 The
Bureau of Plant Industry pointed out that, because of diseases
and other natural calamities, the crop would reach only
42,282,260 cavans of palay, as against an average for the
preceding four years of 48,981,676 (two cavans of palay yield,
on the average, one cavan of 57 kilos of cleaned rice). Thus,
the absence of a reserve clearly indicated another shortage for
the year 1936, requiring imports of from three to four million
sacks.
Rice dealers were jubilant over the price of rice, which
opened on the market in January of 1936 at from f=7 to £=7.10 per
sack of luxury grade, with macan offered at §=6.25 to 1*6.35. This
price, however, placed great numbers of people at a disadvantage
since it was well out of their reach.
Rice prices continued high during most of April, but
eased off at the end of the month when imports were begun by the
newly-founded National Rice and Corn Corporation (see below).
'These imports were expected to relieve the domestic shortage and
keep prices from rising to excessive levels. The National Rice
and Corn Corporation was designated a relief agency by President
Quezon ("in view of the serious shortage of rice and the imminent
37
Ibid., p . 57.
119
danger of the inflation of prices as a result of manipulations
resorted to by those in control of the limited stocks."), on
April 23, and started selling on May 5, at 1*0.28 a ganta, which
was later reduced to UK).26. Dealers who purchased stocks from
the Corporation were forbidden to sell at higher r a t e s . L a t e r ,
during the month, prices steadied after a brief flurry caused
by the raising of the question whether the Corporation was
entitled to import rice free of duty. It was hoped that the
price would continue around the level set earlier in the month.
During the month of August, some optimism was expressed over
the rice prospects for the next year because of improved rain
fall. The value of commercial letters of credit was unusually
high partly due to the credits opened for importation of rice
by the Rice and Corn Corporation. However, during September,
to the dismay of the dealers, the price fell off because of the
lowered selling price of Corporation rice. And, again, disaster
struck. Toward the middle of October, typhoons and floods
caused heavy damage to the Central Luzon crop, and some 400
persons were said to have lost their lives in floods (October
12), in Nueva Ecija, Pampanga, Tarlac and Zambales. The
damage to crops was estimated at over ^1,000,000.39
On October 14, more than 20,000 people were made home
less, 235 were known dead, and 612 were missing as a result of
the floods in Pangasinan and Pampanga, where a number of dikes
5 8 0 p . c i t .. No. 6 (June, 1936), p. 279.
590 p . c i t .. No. 11 (November, 1936), p. 526.
120
gave way. Some 150 persons, mostly mine laborers, drowned
while leaving Barrio Tatay Masinloc. They were crossing the
Salasa River when the flood overtook them. Health forces were
mobilized to inoculate the people against cholera and dysentery
which immediately spread throughout the stricken area. Com
plicating the situation, agitators took advantage of the
suffering to instigate further disorders. A serious local food
shortage threatened because of the wholesale drowning of pigs
and chickens.
On October 15, President Quezon visited the flood area,
and his sudden appearance in Cabanatuan quieted a crowd of 7,000
persons demanding food and clothing from wealthy residents. The
President promised all necessary Government aid to the sufferers.
The heavy damage and loss of life arose from the freak nature
of the typhoon which crossed north Central Luzon from Isabela
to Zambales and then, instead of continuing out to the China Sea,
retraced its course, sweeping down upon the unsuspecting
populace who were still recovering from its first blow.
On December 19, President Quezon, in a report to the
Secretary of War, placed the casualties at 74 dead and 200
missing, and the number of sufferers at 50,000. He estimated
property and crop damage at ^4,500,000, and expressed appreciation
for the aid rendered by the United States Army and American Red Cross.^
^^In the years 1934 to 1941, the American Red Gross extended
aid amounting to $127,500.00, the largest expenditures being made
in the period October, 1934 - April, 1935 ($75,000), and October
and December*, 1936 ($35,000).
121
This latest flood was the worst in the Cagayan Valley, inhab
itants of which had long pleaded for control works and irrigation
d a m s .41
In November, the Rice and °orn Corporation moved to
stabilize palay prices by offering 3^2.25 to!P2.50 a cavan at
producing centers. Despite the typhoon and subsequent floods,
it was hoped that it would be unnecessary to import large
quantities in 1937.
...... The year 1936 saw an increasing frequency of unrest and
disorder rising in pitch by June because of attempted ejection
of tenants by landlords in various places. The most immediately
menacing situation arose in Nueva Ecija, Rizal, and Iloilo.
The middle of June saw a ’’higher w a g e 1' campaign initiated at a
mass meeting in Manila, in preparation for a demonstration
before the Assembly later. Leaders of the disaffected pointed
out that with the price of rice constantly beyond the reach of
most laborers, it was imperative that a living wage be granted.
However, although the justice of this demand was apparent, action
toward granting higher pay proceeded slowly. Since rice prices
^ T h e Cagayan River, flowing north, is the largest river
in the Philippines, and drains almost one-fourth of the island
of Luzon. Its valley, some fifty miles wide, is one of the most
fertile in the Philippines. This region, also, has some of the
most tropical weather in the country with almost unendurable heat
throughout most of the year. Lying between two ranges of mountains,
the Caraballo and the Central Cordillera of the Sierra Madre, it
does not receive the cooling effect of the monsoons; so that the
region is excellent for tobacco production but very uncomfortable
for the people living there. Despite the fact that this important
region is but 400 kilometers from Manila, the area is periodically
cut off from the rest of Luzon by the floods that sweep through
the valley carrying away bridges and washing out roads.
122
continued steady throughout the same month at the level deter
mined by the prices charged by the Rice and Corn Corporation
for imported rice, Government leaders and others replied to
these wage demands by saying that the problem was nearly solved.
It had, however, only begun.
Throughout the early months of the year 1937, unrest
continued to grow in certain areas over the division of harvest
and the question of evictions. On March 13, for example,
twenty-two farm tenants were arrested in Pampanga charged with
"robbery in band" with bail set at 16,000 each, which might just
as well have been 1=60,000. The men were harvesting rice which
they had planted but upon land from which they had been evicted.
Speculation continued to injure the population. On
April 16, President Quezon released a proclamation declaring the
city of Manila to be in a "state of calamity", making it
possible for the Government to control prices. This was
necessitated by reports of "unreasonable and conscienceless
speculation" in land rents and foodstuffs in the Tondo fire area,
where 16,000 sufferers were without means of subsistence other
than those furnished them by the various relief agencies.
Contrary to the hopes expressed at the end of 1936, in
May of 1937, it was estimated that it would be necessary, again,
to import as much as one million sacks of rice to meet the
demand. The Rice and Corn Corporation at the same time released
its report for the preceding year showing a net profit of
12,500,000, 131 per cent of the paid-up capital stock, for the
123
period April 31 to December 31, 1936. On May 23, rice dealers
protested against the free importation of stocks by the Corpora
tion as interfering with the laws of supply and demand (!),
this (they said) depriving them of business and materially
affecting Government income. •‘■hey stated that instead of the
1=2,421,551 netted by the Corporation the preceding year, the
Government would have collected customs duties of over 1=5,000,000
on the rice imported from Saigon and could also have realized
around 1148,000 from sales tax proceeds. Corporation officials
replied that the benefits to the general public from the
establishment of the NARIC could not be measured in t erms of
revenue foregone by the Government. Whether or not this was
true, and some observers doubted it,42 it was undeniably true
that the dealers continued to display a complete disregard for
the welfare of the general public throughout the Commonwealth
period and into the Republic. At the same time, such business
men were unable to understand the appeal of agitators and
communists who sought power from the dissatisfaction and unrest
of the public.
On May 25, the justice of the peace at Licab, Nueva Ecija,
sentenced Lucia Vda. de Tinio, wealthy landowner, to a month's
imprisonment and the payment of 139.30 to the aggrieved party,
Gaudencio Lina, for violating the Tenancy Law and appropriating
the 15 per cent share of the rice crop due the complaining tenant.
42
See: Manuel V. Gallego: Economic Em an cipation, pp.
22-30.
124
Three days later, the Board of Directors of the Philippine
National Bank approved the proposal of the Secretary of Ag ricul
ture and Commerce, Bulogio Rodriguez, to grant loans to rice-
land owners at 7 per cent so that these owners could in turn
loan it to their tenants at not more than 10 per cent!
During July, 1937, prices increased steadily because of
the rising demand, the destruction of stored as well as growing
rice, and floods in Central Luzon. August saw additional floods
there, causing further damage to crops and taking a score of
lives. In September, it was reported that, despite the damage,
the country would be self-sufficient in rice during the year
1938. The following month, however, prices rose due to the
report that the new crop would be considerably below estimates
as a result of drought and plant d i s e a s e s . 43 gy the end of that
month, famine was threatening in Nueva Ecija as the drought
began to affect some 50,000 hectares of rice land. On November
11, a typhoon passed over Luzon doing considerable damage.
Several scores of persons were drowned or killed, some
electrocuted b y wires blown down, and other thousands rendered
homeless. Crop damage was heavy and the towns of Infanta and
Polillo were practically wiped out.
The weather continued to give the lie to optimists.
During the month of November, clear days were the exception,
with two additional typhoons causing considerable damage to rice,
45PJC. XIII, Nos. 10-11 (October-November, 1937), p. 27.
125
sugar, coconuts, and other crops. The rice crop was seriously
depleted by the drought which was too far advanced to be
checked by the persistent rains of November. It became n e c e s
sary for the National Assembly again to pass a typhoon bill
appropriating 1=500,000 for relief, the bill being signed by
President Quezon while in the hospital recovering from an
appendicitis operation. A few days later the President issued
a proclamation declaring the existence of a state of calamity
in Samar, Cebu, Iloilo and Bulacan. During the last days of the
month, the price of palay advanced as a result of speculation
which was encouraged by rumors that the Rice and Corn Corporation
would increase its buying price for palay, causing further har d
ship to the already suffering body of poor consumers.
One observer44 pointed out that business generally
declined during December, 1937, with a concomitant accumulation
of stocks and a deterioration of credit conditions. Rice prices
increased, due to speculative activity, which was encouraged by
rumors again that the Rice and Corn Corporation would increase
its buying price for palay. Alleviation of conditions was still
dependent upon public works projects and the distribution of oil
excise tax funds from the United States.
By March, 1938, rice prices continued their rise due to
a belief that the recent harvest would be inadequate for domestic
requirements, with the consequent necessity for imports from Saigon,
4 4 J. Bartlett Richards, in Philippine M a g a z i n e . XXXV, No.
2 (February, 1938), p. 72 and f f .
126
Typhoons and drought had reduced the crop up t o .30 per cent in
many areas.4® During the month, the Assembly approved a public
works bill which authorized the President to spend at once
some forty per cent of the 1=97,000,000, four-year public works
appropriation, to meet the low level of living in the nation.
It was also disclosed that the NARIC was "considering
the adoption of certain measures" in the provinces as a step
toward "stabilizing and nationalizing" the industry. What
these measures were was not disclosed.4 ® Another factor of
importance, they were considering, was the suggested adoption
of price schedules for various localities by the Corporation
as well as a suggested appropriation of 1=200,000, for a palay
census "with a view to limiting over-production of palay greatly
In excess of consumption requirements."47 In connection with
this, the NARIC planned to limit production to only a few
varieties which would give high yields, the object being "to
compel farmers to discontinue inferior grade production."
There is no evidence that any of these programs proceeded farther
than the planning stage, just as there is no evidence that there
had ever been an "Overproduction greatly In excess of1 con
sumption requirements” .
April saw a continuing rise in prices and reports were
received from primary sources indicating that stocks were running
46PJC, XIV, No. 3 (March, 1938), p. 21
4 6 Ibid., p. 30. 47 I b l d . (!)
127
low and were being held by strong hands. It was believed that
prices would continue their rise until the Corporation began
selling. In the third week of the month, prices rose as much
as 25 centavos for macan and 60 centavos for Elon-elon, rising,
in the last week, from ^6,40 to 1^6.60 for the former and 3^7.00
to §=7.20 for the latter. Prices for palay registered similar
gains increasing 25 to 35 centavos for all varieties.
Despite a drop of around five centavos the following
month, and some arrivals of Ilocano rice from Cagayan and red
rice from Central Luzon, prices held steadily through the month
of June. During the last week of that month, prices rose 10
to 15 centavos, due to the activity of speculators who antici
pated a shortage because of greater demand. Most large sellers
held onto their stocks hoping for further increases in prices.
In July, conditions continued much the same, with
rising prices for the first two weeks. The last two weeks of
the month saw the rise checked as the corporation started selling
macan at 3^6.67. Palay prices, however, continued to rise, with
all varieties increasing from 10 to 15 centavos. Heavy rains
and storms of July were largely responsible for this increase.
Iloilo, Capiz, and Pangasinan saw the heaviest increases as well
as the city of Manila. Floods, a few days later in Laguna,
caused heavy damage to crops there, and reports from Occidental
Negros and Capiz indicated acute shortages in those provinces,
with the Corporation board hardpressed to meet the emergency.
128
On the 11th of July, despite the warning of the Corporation
that it would undersell millers and rice merchants if they
refused to lower prices, the price of rice soared to 35 cent
avos per ganta. It was officially reported that the efforts
of the Rice and Corn Corporation to keep prices normal in all
parts of the Philippines were meetinp; with support from all
municipal and provincial authorities; but prices continued to
rise, to the disgust of the average consumer, who complained
that local officials paid little attention to the situation.
The middle of July saw a threat of drought to the rice
crop in Nueva Ecija, the condition being aggravated by worm
infestation. It was reported in the middle of the month that,
although the price of rice was higher than for the previous
year, it had stabilized somewhat. This provided small comfort
to the consumer. Officials reported that the Inability of the
Corporation to fix the "normal" price of rice was due to in
complete data about rice stocks and surpluses. This lack of
reliable statistics, in all phases of Philippine economic life,
was to be a major perplexity throughout the Commonwealth period.
Toward the end of the month of July, reports from
Albay indicated that, because of typhoons and the eruption of
Mayon volcano, rice was being sold at from f‘7 to 1*7.20 per
cavan, with the retail price fixed at 35 centavos per ganta.
This price was more than 50 per cent greater than the average
consumer earning one peso a day could afford. Provincial officials
were seeking the aid of the Corporation to meet the situation.
129
At the end of July, the Corporation reported that the
condition of the new rice crop in the provinces of Pangasinan,
Tarlac, Pampanga and Bulacan was "normal11 -- indicating, some
critical observers said, that they would be insufficient. The
Corporation stated that the local stocks of rice and palay
would be adequate to meet trade requirements until the next
harvest, and began wholesale shipments to the provinces in order
to bring down prices. This was not accomplished.
The first of August, the Rice and Corn Corporation,
announced that the first modern rice warehouse in the Philip
pines had been constructed in Nueva Ecija. This, it was hoped,
would help meet the marketing and storage problems in the
industry and eventually bring about a general amelioration of
40
conditions. This hope went unrealized, and, as if to mock
these efforts, it was soon discovered that the provinces of
Isabela and Pangasinan faced poor crops for the coming year as
a severe drought had destroyed seedlings. Ten days later,
farmers in Nueva Ecija expressed fear that drought was gradually
killing; their rice seedlings as well. Later in the month
government agencies began laying plans for taking precautionary
measures to protect the public against manipulation of the
price of rice and profiteering. To indicate the seriousness of
the situation, in addition to the Corporation and the Bureau of
Commerce, the Bureau of Internal Revenue took an active part in
48PJC. XIV, No. 9 (September, 1938), p. 14.
130
the program. However, the lack of adequate bureau personnel in
the provinces, as well as those invisible determining factors
prevalent in the country, precluded any effective control over
the situation -- a condition which still prevailed in 1950.
By the twenty-fourth, hopes were that the excellent corn
production in the Central Luzon provinces as well as the early
harvest of upland rice in Camarines Sur, Albay, and Palawan,
might help ease the situation which had grown very serious in
Central Luzon particularly. At the end of the month, the
special committee of the National Economic Council, created by
direction of the President to inquire into the rice situation
and determine whether price levels were reasonable, began its
work. The Philippine Rice Growers Association, at a special
meeting of its board of directors at the same time, went on
record as being opposed to price fixing of rice of the grade
"macan segundo" or better, unless the prices exceeded the landed
cost of imported rice of the same quality.
August, in the Philippines, is generally a quiet trade
month, because rains make the roads impassable, or nearly so.
This discourages the movement of goods. However, August, 1938,
saw just the reverse of the normal condition, for the severe
drought caused no interference to trade movements. It did,
however, restrict trade because of the fear by rice farmers of
crop failures. Shopkeepers restricted credit purchases, by
rice farmers, who normally live on credit granted by retailers
until their rice crops are harvested and sold. This cut sharply
131
the purchasing power in districts devoted to export crops. In
view of the low world prices of abaca and copra, and the high
price of rice, both the rice producer and abaca and copra
producers found their economic position shaky indeed. Since a
small rice crop was expected, little relief appeared possible.
And there was none.
Rice prices continued high throughout August, but the
offer of the Rice and Corn Corporation to sell second class
macan at 1*6.65 kept prices in some districts from mounting un
reasonably. However, in those areas where arrangements had not
been made for the distribution of NARIC rice excessively high
49
prices prevailed. New crop prospects were poor since the
drought continued causing severe damage to unirrigated fields,
particularly in Central Luzon.
On August 17, provincial governors meeting in Manila
urged the NARIC to peg the price of second class rice at ^5.50
-- from 1*1.00 to 1*2.00 less than the current price. Dr. Victor
Buencamino, head of the Corporation, stated that, in Its
efforts to stabilize the industry, the NARIC acted as a
moderator between the producers who wanted high prices and the
consumers who wanted low prices, and that the prevailing price
was normal on the basis of general averages.50 This statement
was made In answer to charges that the NARIC was responsible for
49Philippine Magazine. XXXV, No. 10 (October, 1938),
p. 452.
50Ibid.. p. 453.
132
the high rice prices. President Quezon instructed the National
Economic Council to inquire into the matter, and upon receiving
its report declared that the NARIC, for good and sufficient
reasons, had established the price at a level which was complete
ly justified. The President refused to interfere with the
situation and encouraged the NARIC to continue meeting the
problem as it saw fit.5^- Although this failed to satisfy the
NARIC's critics, it silenced most of them, and three days after
the President's statement, the NARIC announced that it was ready
to sell rice at 29 centavos per ganta, considerably below the
prices of private dealers.
The scarcity of rain continued throughout September and
even the "oldest inhabitants" found difficulty in recalling so
eg
dry a season. Reports from Central Luzon indicated, however,
that earlier reports with regard to the damage to the rice crop
were somewhat exaggerated. The damage had undoubtedly been
considerable and it was seen that the crop would be appreciably
below the 1937-38 crop; certainly it was inadequate to meet the
needs of the domestic market.^3
The tone of the market was set by the Rice and Corn
5 1 Ibid., p. 454.
52
The newspapers must retain a supply of "oldest inha
bitants", for particular information on climate and crops, as
well as other items. An observer might say that this indicates
the fact that statistics, to the general public, are regarded
as a government affectation and that they prefer their own
sources of information.
550p. clt.. No. 11 (November, 1938), p. 500
133
Corporation: It sold second class macan throughout the month
at 1=6.65 per sack, but reduced the price to 16.50 early in
October at the request of various c on s um er s1 organizations.
The Corporation augmented its stocks by importing 46,000 sacks
from Saigon and made plans to place orders for American rice.
The Philippine-Chinese Rice Merchants Association had
promised the Corporation that it would lower gradually its
prices of second class macan and ramay to 16.65 and 16.60
respectively. During the second week of September it did so,
prices dropping as much as 30 centavos.^4 Buyers increased
their bids during the rest of the month, but holders continued
indifferent expecting higher prices since the stock of palay
in the provinces was reported to be quite low. Private dealers
made capital of the fact that the Corporation had sustained an
operating loss of 116,000, during 1937, which fact was reported
55
early in September. The Corporation, however, remained
undisturbed and countered by instructing its agents, as well as
those of the Bureau of Commerce, to watch more closely the
56
price situation in the provinces.
'The Director of Commerce, in order to fix rice prices
in different municipalities, ordered a nation-wide survey by
Bureau agents of the stock of palay and rice in their districts
and instructed them to make immediate reports to Manila. Partial
54PJC, XIV, Nos. 10-11.. (October-November, 1938), p. 5.
5 5 Ibid., p. 33. 5 6 Ibid.
134
reports on September 11, indicated sufficient stocks for
domestic needs, but most of the reports were retained by the
Bureau pending the receipt of the remainder. The survey had
been ordered to facilitate an even distribution of supply, this
according to the Bureau being the major problem. If even
distribution could be attained not only would stocks be suffi
cient for the whole country but the price would be greatly
reduced. For this reason the Bureau urged the establishment
of warehouses throughout the country and the extension of means
of transportation.
Readers of the Philippine Journal of Commerce were
surprised on September 21, to note in the newspapers for that
day, that the Rice and Corn Corporation announced that construc
tion was under way of the first Government rice central with
complete mills, warehouses and rolling equipment in Cabanatuan,
Nueva Ecija. Since this project had been announced In terms
indicating its completion in August the surprise was justified.
The central was expected to be completed by February, 1939, in
time for the harvesting of that year's crop. Taking no chances,
however, the Corporation Imported four days later, 46,000 sacks
(2,600,000 kilos) of rice from Saigon, paying the full duty of
^2.50 per 100 kilos. This duty-payment was necessitated by the
fact that a state of emergency had not been declared, which
would have permitted the importation free of duty.
57Ibid.. p. 63
135
The last day of September saw the reduction by the
Corporation of the price of rice because the harvest was well
under way in the Southern provinces, and it promised to lower
prices further in the coming months. Prices continued their
decline in October as the Corporation released its Imported
stocks. It continued to make additional purchases to meet any
shortage likely to occur prior to the arrival on the market of
the new crop of domestic rice. However, in view of the low
supply of the old crop, most sellers held their stocks despite
the lower prices of the NARIC, and the start of trading in the
new crop in Tarlac, Pampanga and Pangasinan at prices 30 to 40
centavos lower than the old crop.
In the same month, the Department of Agriculture and
Commerce announced that the rice acreage of the Philippines had
increased considerably, with several provinces, in the past
non-producers, now yielding large quantities. These provinces
included Lanao, Cotabato and Agusan. The Department, therefore,
expected a production of 49,000,000 cavans for the 1937-38
season.8® It was not stated whether this was to be production
of palay or finished rice. According to the Bureau of Census
and Statistics, in its Yearbook for 1946, the actual area
planted for 1937 was 2,060,960 hectares, with a production of
rough rice (palay), of 55,015,730 cavans of 44 kilos. The area
for 1938 was lower, 1,912,050 hectares and production dropped to
580p. cit.. No. 12 (December, 1938), p. 12.
136
52,345,210 cavans of 44 kilos (rough rice).8® If the Department
figure is taken to mean finished rice, then the actual production
was below its prediction.88 Census figures, for 1939, showed a
production of only 41,491,990 cavans from 1,829,990 hectares,
which may be taken as a bit more accurate than figures released
by other agencies. The point to remember, and which the Depart
ment of Agriculture failed to consider, is that while production
might increase population increases in the Philippines at more
than two per cent a year.
Floods, during October, continued to damage property and
crops, so the NARIC continued its importation of rice to meet the
situation. On November 1, it imported 63,000 sacks and a few
days later President Quezon reduced the import duty to ^2.00 per
100 kilos.
59Page 145.
60According to several Individuals connected with the
Department at that time, the figure referred to rough rice only.
CHAPTER IV
EARLY EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE RICE INDUSTRY (Cont.)
The above review of the situation, 1934-1938 may seem
overly concerned with the month to month fluctuations of the
market. However, this may be justified if we realize that it
represents the pattern of economic development generally through
out the Commonwealth. Prices of rice continued their upward
spiral through the years, and since the economy of the people
was geared to rice they were at the mercy of these fluctuations
in price and supply. Since rice prices increased as the years
passed,other items and consumer goods marched upward with them.
The wages the workers in industry and on the farms received,
however, remained the same. The rise, from 3^3.90 to 1=7.20, in
rice, from 1934 to 1938 was not accompanied by a similar rise
in earnings. Whether or not this situation would have been
changed had there bean no war is impossible to say. We may note ,
however, that a similar situation occured, on a higher level,
in the years after the war and during the early life of the
Republic. Disaffection and rebellion may perhaps have their
root s in this fact rather than in an adherence to new and
dangerous ideologies -- although there is no question but this
latter phenomenon took place.
The Government Programme
In the first session of the National Assembly, the Commit
tee on Agriculture introduced a bill entitled "An Act providing
for the stabilization of the supply and price of rice and corn,
137
138
creating a rice and corn stabilization board to carry out such
a policy, appropriating funds therefor, and for other purposes.
It was supported by a special message from President Quezon who
appeared in person on December 19, 1935, before the Assembly
and expressed the hope that it would "insure at all times an
ample supply of these commodities at reasonable prices to the
consumer while at the same time enabling the producer to
receive an adequate return for his investment and efforts so as
to encourage him to continue producing locally these products
thereby making our country self-sufficient in this respect.”^
Because of the destruction of rice and corn crops in 1935 by
typhoons, drought, and pests, President Quezon hoped for speedy
action by the Assembly. At the same time, he requested passage
of a bill appropriating 1=500,000, for flood control works In
Pampanga and P a n g a s i n a n , ^ a measure essential to the success of
the f o r m e r .
However, despite the urgency of the situation, and the
introduction of the bill (165) by the agricultural committee,
the Assembly closed its 25-day Inaugural session at midnight,
December 21, after passing only 19 of the 26 measures recommended.
ICommonwealth Act No. 165, First National Assembly,
Inaugural Session, Messages of the Pr es ident. Vol. 1 (Revised
edition, 1938), pp. 98-99.
2
M.L. Qu e zon, Message to the First National Assembly on
"The Rice and Corn Problem,” December 19, 1935, I h i d . , p. 97.
5
Commonwealth Act No. 122, Ibid.. p. 89.
139
Among the bills passed were those providing for ^100,000
typhoon relief, creation of the National Economic Council,4
and the establishment of the National Loan and Investment
Board.®
Act No. 165, as introduced, provided for a Rice and Corn
Stabilization Board, to be composed of five members, one of
whom should represent producers and another the consumers.
They were to be appointed by the President (with the consent
of the Commission on Appointments) and were to hold office as
prescribed by him. It was to be their duty to "carry out the
declared policy of this Act" by administering and investing the
fund appropriated "for the purchase, sale, barter and distribution
of husked and unhusked rice and corn." In so doing, they were
empowered to enter into contracts, court actions, and all other
activities needful for the operation of a corporation. They
were further empowered to conduct an investigation into the
problem of stabilizing prices, and were to present recommenda
tions to the National Economic Council, who would consider them
and then suggest a program to be effected through the President.
The Act appropriated ^2,000,000, for this purpose.
However, since the bill was not passed during this
session, President Quezon, on February 17, 1936, published an
4See below, pp. 142-145.
^The flood control bill and rice stabilization bill
were finally passed later in the following year (1936).
140
executive order meeting the emergency (for an emergency had
been declared),® by creating a Rice Commission "for the purpose
of studying and making recommendations on ways and means to
solve the present rice crisis and to insure a permanent supply
of rice at reasonable prices.,,r^ The President stated that the
Assembly had failed to enact the necessary legislation; that
the Secretary of Agriculture and Commerce had certified the
necessity of immediate action because of the rice shortage; that
the production and distribution of rice was one of "the most
important problems of this government", that it was necessary
"to provide adequate means for a steady and sufficient supply
of this commodity at prices reasonable to consumer, producer
and trader and thereby afford relief to hard pressed small
farmers and k a s a m a s . and the large body of consumers";® and that,
therefore, he was creating this Commission. The work of the
Commission, he stated, was "to make a careful investigation
and a study of the rice problem and recommend measures for
immediate r e l i e f .^ including the proper distribution of rice
throughout the Philippines at reasonable prices."-*-® They were
to "study further ways and means to insure at all times a steady
and sufficient supply of this commodity so as to prevent the
recurrence of a rice shortage"-*--*- and were to report the result
®Both in the act and in Q u e z o n ’s message with regard to it.
7
Executive Order No. 18, M . O . P .. Vol. II, Pt. I (rev.ed.,
1938), pp. 802-803.
8Ibid. ^Italics supplied. ~LQIbid. ^Ibid.
141
of their findings as soon as practicable to the President.I**
Despite the organization of this Commission and other
steps by the Government, it became necessary just two months
later for the President to take further action. On April 23,
1936, he issued Proclamation No. 58, "Designating the Rice and
Corn Corporation (which had been formed a few days earlier)
13
as a Relief Organization to import rice, free of duty." The
Proclamation stated: "Whereas, official reports show that
there exist a serious shortage of rice and there is imminent
danger of inflation of prices as a result of manipulations
resorted to by those in control of the limited stocks at
present available for the local n e e d s , t h e President was
designating the Corporation as a relief agency to import what
ever quantities were necessary. The Corporation was granted
the powers of the Director of Commerce with regard to the
issuance of rules and regulations for "the purchase, sale, and
hoarding of palay and rice...."15 The Bureau of Commerce had
been made the Government relief organization during the annual
rice crisis in the later part of 1935, and the handling of
importation and distribution had been its province until the
establishment of the National Rice and Corn Corporation to
fulfill this function. During the Bureau's period of administration
12
This Commission was composed of Manuel A. Roxas as
Chairman (he was at that time a member of the National Assembly),
Assemblyman Felipe Buencamiho, the Director of Commerce, Hon.
Vicente Singson Encarnacion, and Dr. Nicanor Jacinto.
150£. clt. . p. 610. 14Ibid. 15Ibld.
142
it imported a total of 16,480,369,45 kilos of rice at a total
cost of I>=1,259 ,120.86. It realized a profit in its operation
of 1=231,191.08, which was turned over to the Insular Treasury.
This sum would have provided an additional amount of some four
million kilos which could well have been distributed at low cost
to indigent fami li es . ^
Quezon was well aware that his Government could succeed
only if the country enjoyed continued peace and order, and that
good order hinged upon a solution of the agrarian ills that
plagued the nation. In his inaugural address, November, 1935,
he had pointed to the necessity of raisin;; the living conditions
of the people in order to meet the responsibilities posed by
the establishment of the Commonwealth. He told his listeners
that the only way these responsibilities could be met was by increas
ing the wealth of the nation through giving ”,
g reater impetus
to economic development, improving our methods of agriculture,
diversifying our crops, creating new industries, and fostering
our domestic and foreign commerce.
A month later, in his message to the First National
16PJC, XIII, No. 1 (January, 1937), p. 26.
17
Few observers pointed to the fact that a relief organ
ization, if it makes a profit on its activities,is not fulfilling
to the fullest extent, its main function,which is to afford relief.
1 ft
M.O.P.. Vol. 1 (rev.ed., 1938), p. 16.
Assembly on December 18, 1935, he had asked that it consider
certain legislative proposals which he thought as urgent and
important as national defense (which had been the topic of his
first message to the Inaugural Session of the Assembly). He
stated that the country had largely solved Its political
problems, the government was organized satisfactorily, the
national defense was being provided for -- there remained little
to do In preparing the country politically for independence.
However, the economic problem was more urgent than any other
since it affected "directly the lives of our p e o p l e . . . . It
was necessary that plans be formulated for economic adjustment,
and that means of implementing them be provided. He said:
Our objective is clear and definite. We want to
build up a reasonably stable economic structure capable
of serving the financial and other needs of the nation,
supplying the masses of the people with the basic
social requirements and the essentials in food, clothing,
and shelter, and providing them with the opportunities
to toil and earn a decent livelihood.
The President believed these objectives were attainable
without changing the democratic Institutions of the country or
undertaking any too-radical departures in experimentation with
social control. Only the "sure and trodden paths" were to be
followed. He pointed out that, from the very nature of Philippine
economy, rapid changes were not to be expected - nor could they
be achieved. The people were to remain patient during the period
Ibid.., message on the "Creation of the National Econo
mic Council,11 p. 80.
144
of planning and by lending every aid to their government they
would eventually reap the benefits so ardently desired. But,
he s aid, it was necessary to lose no time, and f o r this
reason he was suggesting the creation of a National Economic
Council whose duties would be "the task of planning our national
economy, giving our economic development a rational and
definite direction, and coordinating the efforts of the Govern
ment w i t h private initiati v e .. .. "2 -*- The Council, to be
composed of not more than fifteen members, was to advise the
Government "on economic and financial questions, Including the
improvement of existing industries and the promotion of new
ones, diversification of crops and production,tariffs,taxation,
and...other matters."22
This suggestion of the President was heeded by the
Assembly, which passed and approved such an act Decemher 23,
1935, appropriating £=150,000 for its operation. It is signif
icant that this act, creating the National Economic Council,
was t h e second a c t passed b y the Philippine Commonwealth
National Assembly.
The highly directive nature of this council was
emphasized several times by the President, who said, "We do not
believe in the economic philosophy of 'laissez f a i r e 1. We
favor government leadership in production activities. We
21Ibid., p. 82. 22Ibid.. pp. 82-83
145
believe in planning the national economy. He told them they
were free to express whatever opinion they held regarding the
problems to be solved, but that any one who "believed in good
faith...in the economic philosophy of 'laissez f a i r e 1, or in
the inherent unfitness of a government to own and operate an
industry...1,24 had no place on the Council.
Thus was the future direction of the Commonwealth pointed
out by its chief architect.
The rice problem became one of Q u e z o n ’s major headaches.
On December 7, 1935, he directed the Secretary of Agriculture
and Commerce, Eulogio Rodriguez, to investigate Director
Cornelio Balmaceda of the Bureau of Commerce, in connection with
the reported admission of shipments of Saigon rice. Meanwhile,
Balmaceda was suspended. He was charged with negligence on
signing affidavits with regard to contracts of Florencio Reyes,
rice dealer, with the Government. Three days later, Quezon
named Judge Sabino Padilla of the Court of First Instance of
Nueva Ecija to act as special investigator into the charges against
Director Balmaceda. On February 26, 1936, the President ordered
the reinstatement of Balmaceda, the investigation having shown
23 m .0 .P.. Vol. II, Pt. 1 (Rev.ed., 1938), "Economic
Planning and Progress"; speech before the National Economic
C o u n c i l ’s first meeting at Malacahan, March 30, 1936; p. 74.
2 4 Ib i d. . p. 76.
146
that he was guilty of negligence in signing papers without
investigation, but not of dishonesty. The suspension, without
pay, for a period of two and one half months, was considered
sufficient punishment. ‘
The incident was illustrative of the
pressure under which Government officials were working during
this critical period.
On March 5, 1936, President Quezon lifted the ban on
accumulating large quantities of rice, as it was now available,
he found, in much more liberal quantities and also, he said,
because the original executive order (No. 872, 1935) "disturbs
the normal and orderly marketing of the new crops." This,
despite the fact that the "normal and orderly" methods, hereto
fore in practice, had been considered by the President to be
disadvantageous to the economy.25
The following day the Rice Commission reported to
Malacahan, recommending that a national rice and corn corporation
be organized as a subsidiary of che National Development Company,
to engage in buying and selling rice, to maintain prices at a
level sufficient to cover the cost plus a reasonable profit,
and when necessary, to import rice free of duty, to be sold
through regular trade channels. They recommended that the
Philippine National Bank and the National Loan and Investment
Board grant crop loans and other credit facilities to relieve
growers from usurious practices, that to prevent over-production
2 ^-In speeches during the years 1934-35, and early 1936.
C f . Speech on National Economic Council, O p . c i t .. Vol. I, pp.
78-86.
147
the Government adopt a land policy in relation to rice production,
and that for the present it withhold from occupation, except '
through homesteading, such public lands as were peculiarly adapted
to lowland rice culture. They recommended further that the Govern
ment study new commercial uses for rice and Its by-products; that
the following year, a tax of f=0.03 a cavan of palay milled In
any power-driven mill be levied, payable by the miller, the
proceeds from which should be used for the benefit of the indus
try and to finance exports of rice if there were unmanageable
surpluses; that legislation be adopted placing owner-tenant
relations on a fair and equitable basis; that a cavan of palay be
standardized at 44 kilos and a cavan of rice at 57 kilos, with
official standards for different grades; and that the recommenda
tions be applied to corn also, in case of emergency.26
Two portions of these recommendations are puzzling to
the observer: that with regard to the prevention of "over
production11, and that on exporting "unmanageable surpluses."
There can be no over-production of any food crop where there is
hunger and want. Economists make the mistake of regarding as
over-production conditions in which a "normal" price for the
commodity is not maintained. One of the chief characteristics
of the American system of free enterprise is, that the more one
produces per unit, per man-hour of labor, the greater will be
the production and the lower will be the cost to the consumer
26Philippine Magazine. XXXIII, No. 4 (April, 1936),
p. 167.
148
and the higher will be the return to the producer. There are
those who prefer a lower production with a high return to the
producer but this brings dissatisfaction to the consumer and
eventual disaster to the producer, whether it be a nation or an
individual. In a country such as the Philippines, which never
produced enough rice to meet the demands of Its people, there has
never been a case of over-production. Prices have nothing to do
with the case, basically. It is a case of sheer need and the
supplying of this need. If the supply falls below the demand,
there is hunger and unrest, whether the producer receives a
large return for his product or not. The lower the consumption,
the lower the profit.
One of the difficulties that has hindered the peoples of
Southeast Asia in taking a more beneficial part In world affairs
has been the concern of the middlemen for high prices with no
regard to the needs of the people. The basis for the standard
of living In an agrarian country such as the Philippines, is the
supply of food available to the people, and not an artificial
price standard established for the benefit of a few producers
or economists. Too often, the economy of colonial areas has
been based upon B i e r c e ’s definition of "economy'1: "Purchasing
the barrel of whisky that you do not need for the price of the
cow that you cannot afford."
Cases of supposed "over-production" and "unmanageable
surpluses" in the Philippines have been due to maldistribution.
149
On March 11, 1936, at the election of a new board of
directors for the Philippine National Bank, President Quezon
spoke of the necessity of studying "the feasibility of
establishing credit facilities for small merchants and small
farmers, especially to those tenants who depend exclusively on
their landlords for money advances." "The Bank," the President
continued,"lfrill be rendering a great service If by such credit
facilities, the social conditions of these tenants are improved
and the evils of usury eradicated in our rural communities...."27
Despite the urgency of the situation, the Bank moved very
slowly toward effecting such a program. Some half-hearted
efforts were made toward solving the problem, primarily through
the NARIC and several cooperative credit associations, but the
problem, in 1950, still faced the country at the same level of
1936.28
On March 17, 1936, it was announced that the President,
following the recommendation of the Rice Commission would order
pQ
the organization of a rice corporation. The two successive
years of bad harvest pointed to the necessity for an agency to
deal with the grave problem. The already over-burdened Bureau
of Commerce had been charged with relief activity, and when the
crop of 1935-36 proved a bigger failure than that of the p r ec ed in g
year, it was realized that an agency to enable the Government to
2 7 Ib id . 2 8 Jacoby, o p . c i t .. p. 211.
2 ^0]3. c i t . . No. 5 (May, 1936), p. 223.
150
deal more effectively with the rice problem was required. So,
while other more fundamental problems were basically responsible
for the creation of the National Rice and Corn Corporation, the
rice crises of 1935 and 1936 were the immediate precipitators.
The National Rice and Corn Corporation (to be known as
NARIC) was thus organized on April 7, 1936, the responsibility
for its operation to rest in the manager*s office and five
subordinajfcfe departments: field and inspection, accounting,
administrative, warehouses and mills, and purchase and sales.
Its two main objectives were: to insure a steady and permanent
supply of rice and corn, and to stabilize their prices at levels
mutually beneficial to producers and consumers.
It was capitalized at §=4,000,000, and came into being
with half its capitalization paid up, one half of which came
from the Commonwealth Treasury and one-half from the Cebu Port
land Cement Company, which was to act as the holding company.
Vicente JSingson Encarnacion was elected Chairman of the Board
of Directors and President of the Corporation. The directors
were: Assemblyman Manuel A. Roxas, Director of Commerce Cornelio
Balmaceda, Dr. Nicanor Jacinto, Mrs. Narcisa Vds. de Leon,
Maximo Noel, and Dr. Victor Buencamino, the last acting as Vice-
President and Manager.
Particular emphasis was to be laid upon ameliorating
the condition of the rice and corn producers, especially small
farmers and tenants. Since this was a social as well as
151
economic problem, and since this class of producer was never
represented on either the Rice Commission or the NARIC, it is
not particularly surprising that by 1950 this improvement was
still far from attainment.
The first objective, however, was partially met in 1936
and 1938 by importing 2,245,000 bags of rice from Siam, Indo
china and Burma, as well as some from the United States.
Stabilization of prices was reached somewhat haphazardly. NARIC
would set the price for retail selling; demand would level off,
price restrictions would be removed; a shortage would develop
with an increased demand over-night, market prices would rise
suddenly, the NARIC would be caught napping, and with its next
price-fixing, the general level would be somewhat higher than
before. It was never able to get ahead of this system, and the
price of rice continued to rise, by fits and starts, throughout
the period preceding the outbreak of the War. Taking into
consideration the effects of the War, it is significant that
whereas the average price of palay for the years 1937-40 was
§=2.70, the price as of July 31, 1946, was 1=23.06, almost ten
times the prewar average. As of 1949, the price of rice continued
its rise, and, in the month of November, doubled over that of the
preceding month.
In an article of the NARIC in 1939, the following
questionable conclusion was stated;
The second aim of the Corporation of stabilizing prices for
the benefit of producers, particularly tenants and small
152
farmers, was similarly accomplished with apparent
success in 1937 when because of an extremely abundant
harvest, the Corporation had to embark on an exten
sive program of palay purchases. All told it acquired
about 2,000,000 cavans of palay which, withdrawn from
the market, helped considerably in stabilizing prices
profitable to p ro du ce rs . The Corporation paid a
minimum price of ^ 2 . 50_for all varieties equal to or
better than second-class Macan and 1=2.25 for palay
inferior to them. For the first time in many years
farmers were paid a price which covered production
costs plus a reasonable margin of profit at a time when
palay should have sold even below 12.00 a cavan be
cause of the exceedingly large harvest. That farmers
everywhere received the benefits of NARIC prices was
proved by the fact that quite a large number of them
were able to pay off their debts, acquired work animals
for their use and still kept a little cash and palay.30
The second aim of the Corporation was to stabilize rice
and corn prices at levels mutually beneficial to producers and
consumers. The benefits mentioned above refer to producers
only. It can be noted, also, that statistics with regard to
these "benefits" are conspicuous by their absence. "Quite a
large number" hardly seems statistical. It should be noted
further that the farmers who received the greatest benefits were
the large producers and hacenderos and not the tenant farmer
toward whose welfare the program was supposedly directed.
The Rice and Corn Corporation was to provide relief for
the consumer and farmer, who, Andres V. Castillo said, were
both "helplessly exploited by rice merchants and speculators."3 -1-
"NARIC", The Tribune. XIV Anniversary Number, June 17,
1939, p. 129. Italics supplied.
3l l n : Pedro de La Liana and F.B. Icasiano: The Philip
pine Commonwealth Han db oo k. (General Printing Press, Manila,
1936), p. 166.
153
It was hoped that stable rice prices could be attained through
the corporation's power to buy and sell rice at a standard rate
fixed at the beginning of the season. Its task Dr. Castillo
said, was admittedly "gigantic and delicate with all the dif
ficulties that have to be met In connection with the fixing of
the standard price of rice.... On the supply side the Corpora
tion will have to make a thorough study of cost which varies
in different regions and with different farmers; and on the
demand side It will have to consider the purchasing power of
consumers and the cost of living...."
The plan of the Corporation was to deal only with rice
in bonded and licensed warehouses which, Dr. Castillo pointed
out, "would still leave out the small farmer who needs help
m o s t ...because he does not avail himself of the services of
bonded warehouses. He has to sell his crop at once and at the
prevailing price fixed by rice dealers." Dr. Castillo suggested
that the Corporation make arrangements to buy from the small
farmers and operate Its own warehouses so as to widen the
protection envisaged for the small producer. He freely admitted
that the Corporation would lose money. But, he pointed out, it
was not expected to make a profit. It was to be a public service
and as such it "might as well be socialized for the sake of the
well-being of the whole population."32
Mr. Victor Buencamino, Manager of the NARIC, in 1937,
3^Ibld.. pp. 166-167, passim.
154
reviewed the work of the Corporation since its founding and its
accomplishments. Its most important function, in his belief,
was to give preference to Filipinos in the distribution to
consumers of rice. "Rice," he said, "occupied an unusual
position In the economic life of the country," for which reason
"the control of this industry by the Filipinos Is indispensable
for the national security of our country."33
He divided the industry into three economic stages;
production, distribution and consumption. The first was totally
In the hands of nationals, and while it was the most tedious and
the least rewarded little attention was given this phase for
which reason it was "no wonder that the rice regions have become
the cradle of radicalism and the source of social unrest."
Following production, it was seen that distribution was
unevenly divided between aliens and nationals, with the Chinese
handling 90 to 95 per cent. Since this stage was the most
profitable, "it Is in this particular phase where the National
Rice and Corn Corporation has to play its decisive part if it
is to be useful at all." It was, he said, "the key that will
open the door to the complete nationalization of the rice industry."
Some 2,500 Filipino dealers were handling NARIC rice,
but still Mr. Buencamino believed, there were not enough. Some,
3 3 "The NARIC and the Nationalization of the Rice Indus-
try," The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
1937-1938. p. 334.
155
then handling NARIC rice, were expected to drop out, but he
hoped that a substantial portion would remain and that others
could be induced to enter the trade although "many Filipino
businessmen and capitalists have, unfortunately, not yet
considered the possibilities of the trade." The fact that some
had been so persuaded, he believed, would give the NARIC cause
to state that "it has already taken a forward step in laying
the foundation for the nationalization of the distribution of
rice "34
President Quezon felt strongly about the Rice and Corn
Corporation and its task. Much concerned with the situation,
he was willing to try anything to seek a solution. "We have
to try new things in the Philippines," he said, "if we wish to
accomplish something." Despite the fact that they had been
talking "about economic development during the last 35 or 40
years," they were almost where they had been at the beginning.
The country had "immense possibilities" and needed development.
But nothing new had been done "or very little that is new."
"Of course," he said, "I am not infallible. It is possible
that some of the things that my administration has undertaken
will turn out to be a mistake or a failure, but unless we try
I b i d .. pp. 334-335, p a s s i m . In the year, 1949-1950,
there were 5,971 licensed rice dealers, who were required to
operate only with a NARIC license. The system was criticized
and following the end of the fiscal year a policy was begun of
granting licenses only during times of scarcity and the market
was opened to all who wished to sell.
something, we will never accomplish anything.
Continuing he said: "We have started our economic
policy by creating the Rice and Corn Corporation and we have
been bombarded from every source." These attacks came, he said,
from "rice producers, who themselves will be benefitted, by
the consumers who will be protected, if this is a success, from
possible future exploitation by unscrupulous merchants." What
was the situation? "Everybody," he said, "is criticizing.
Nobody is suggesting anything n e w . ... We are trying to do some
thing to remedy this situation, and we think this is the remedy.
And what I have just said about the Rice and ^orn Corporation I
am saying of everything that we can attempt h e r e . "36
In further attempts to meet the many criticisms directed
at the NARIC and Its operations, President Quezon tried to
explain the situation to the farmers in his own province of Tayabas
"Let me inform you that the Government has established
the NARIC so that the price of palay will not be so low nor the
price of rice so high. One of our shortcomings is that we
permit others to hold the rice industry for us, and they are the
ones who make a lot of profit. The profiteers are like a saw:
35
How like the words of President P.D. Roosevelt under
similar circumstances 1 Cf. Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.: "'It
is common sense to take a method and try i t , ’ he said in
ushering In the New Deal. 'If it fails, admit it frankly and
try another.'" "Roosevelt and His Detractors," H a r p e r 's
M a g a z i n e . Vol. 200, No. 1201 (June, 1950), p. 64.
*^M . O . P .. Vol. II, Pt. 1 (rev.ed., 1938), p. 107, pass 1 m .
In a speech before the Rotary Club, June 4, 1936.
157
the saw eats be it pulled up or pushed down, and weFilipinos
are the ones being eaten."
He went on to say that the "NARIC cannot immediately
remedy the present rice situation because retailing rice Is not
in the hands of the Filipinos..."3,7 but the more basic issues
involved were not touched upon.
Following the establishment of the NARIC, President
Quezon announced the reservation of several thousand hectares
of land in the richest agricultural section of Davao for home
steaders and announced that the penal colony there would be
used as a nucleus for the development of the region. This was
to effect the resettlement of farmers from overpopulated areas,
and to open new lands for rice and other staples. This plan
had been devised by Senators Elpidio Quirino and Claro Recto
who suggested the allocation of 3KL,000,000 for the development
of the region as had been envisioned in an act passed at the
last session of the old Legislature (pre-Commonwealth). One of
the main objectives for the establishment of the project was to
restrict further expansion of alien holdings there (mainly by
Japanese) and discourage large tract sales and leases. It was
hoped that with the extension of small holdings there a step
38
would have been taken toward the solution of the rice problem.
Such a hope was never realized and, indeed, the original
317I b i d . . Vol. 4, Pt. 1, p. 216. Speech delivered at
Tayabas Provincial Capital, Lucena, September 20, 1938.
^ Philippine Magazlre . XXXIII, N o . 5 (May, 1936), p. 225.
158
appropriation was diverted to building and improving roads
since it was realized that the original sum was quite inadequate
for its purpose.39
On May 8, 1936, President Quezon caused consternation
in some quarters through a casual interview with the press in
which he stated that while he favored agricultural stations
he believed those which were not rendering real service should
be closed.4® Some feared, as a result, that the research
program, particularly with reference to rice, would be endangered
and observers commented that in scientific research immediate
results were not always attainable. They deplored any move to
close these stations, and hoped that the President would consider
the long-range value of their programs. The President, however,
had no intention of ending research and the incident served as
a reminder to him of the great import any of his observations
had to his people.4^-
The economic situation increased in seriousness but, by
the end of 1936, the National Economic Council which was to
direct the economic readjustment of the nation, had been
^ Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
1 9 57 -1 95 8. p. 61.
4°0p. c i t .. No. 6 (June, 1936), p. 280.
4^That such a danger is a real one in the Philippines,
however, was proved by the action of the Quirino administration
in 1950, when it cut off appropriations for the Bureau of
Science and the National Research Council as well as the National
Library (whose books, incidentally, were classified by the
Budget Commission as "furnishings, ) — thus leaving the Philip
pines destitute of all organized research with the exception of
the Institute of Nutrition.
159
consulted on only one issue. This was the advisibility of
creating the NARIC. Their consent to this measure was obtained
only after a long debate, and they stated that they approved
the "creation of an entity to put into effect whatever plans
may be definitely decided hereafter", but they were "not in
accord with the recommendations of the (Rice) Commission."4^
Though members of the Council expressed many doubts as to
effectiveness of the Corporation, the President was confident
that it would ultimately solve the rice problem.45 jje
expressed himself quite strongly upon the criticism directed
against the Corporation. He agreed that it was only natural
that there should be doubt, fear, and even resentment over the
action of the Government, coming mainly from "those who expected
to make unreasonable profit from the rice crisis,"44 and who
because they were unable to do so declared that the Corporation
was established for dishonest purposes. But, he added, all
these objections "did not deter the Administration from carrying
out the plan especially because no alternative had been suggested."45
President Quezon was to return frequently, during the
years before the War, to the adverse criticism of the Govern
m e n t ’s program. He stated many times that he welcomed criticism,
but only if alternative and practicable plans were offered.
■ ^ Philippine M a g a z i n e . XXXIII, No. 5 (May, 1936), p. 224.
45M . P . P .. Vol. 2, P t . 1 (rev.ed.), speech on "Country's
Conditions and Problems" delivered before the National Assembly,
June 16, 1936; p. 167.
44Ibid.. p. 168. 45Ibid
160
If none were forthcoming, he continued unruffled by opposing
views. It is also true that he often paid no heed even to well-
founded suggestions in his desire to see that a particular
program he started was carried through, but his bitterness and
anger over unjustified criticism seems to have been well founded.
He did not hesitate to use his power to carry through a
project, and when the Collector of Customs stated that he would
collect duty on rice imported by the Corporation, since he
claimed it was being sold at a profit, Quezon told him to do
nothing of the kind so long as the rice was utilized in meeting
the emergency.4®
When it was seen that farmers were still handicapped
in getting a fair return for their rice crop, because of market
ing difficulties, President Quezon in a special message proposed
the creation of the National Produce Exchange.47 The operation
of such a body would obviate the necessity of the producers
disposing of their produce through middlemen, and would offer
them "the necessary credit facilities to finance their crops in
advance of actual harvesting and delivery."4 ® It would also
supervise effectively the produce exchanges, offering protection
to all. Since "the establishment of such produce exchanges will
be an important progressive step in the development of our trade,"
he urged, "the immediate enactment of the attached bill Into law."
46Ibid. 47Ibid.. pp. 344-345. (October 27, 1936).
48Ibid. 49Ibid.
161
Acting upon his recommendation, the National Assembly
soon drafted the act for such a corporation. This National
Produce Exchange5® was to "establish and maintain a central
produce exchange in the bj.ty of Manila" and such other places
in the Philippines as the corporation considered necessary; "to
encourage and promote the establishment of cooperative market
ing associations" before establishing exchanges in areas served
by such associations; "to establish rules and regulations
governing transactions"; to fix the necessary fees; and "to
establish uniform grades of classification of agricultural
products and a system of inspection thereof and to acquire and
disseminate market i n f o r m a t i o n . " ^ It was to see that all
exchanges organized under it were organized according to its
rules and regulations, and render reports to the President and
the National Assembly. It was to regulate subsidiary exchanges
so that no false Information could be disseminated and prevent
the manipulation of prices or the cornering of any product by
dealers and operators of such exchanges(Section 4). It was
empowered to suspend any exchange violating the rules established
(Section 5) and, on its own initiative, was to Investigate
marketing conditions from producer to consumer (Section 6).
President Quezon approved the bill on November 14, 1936.
As the year wore on, it became apparent that the weaknesses in
the system of distributing rice and corn were likely to cause
SOM.O.P.. Vol. 2, Pt. 2, pp. 1242-1246, ,CA No. 192,
First National Assembly, Special Session.
51Ibld.. pp. 1242-1243.
162
further difficulties unless something were done to assist the
small farmers in disposing of their crops. Ore of the largest
hindrances to the Government's plan for aiding in this problem
lay in the inadequate marketing facilities of the country.
This subject will be treated in detail (in Part II), but we
might mention, in passing, the following.
In pre-Commonwealth days, acts^^ had been passed by the
Legislature creating a rice and corn fund, from which loans were
to be made to agricultural credit cooperative associations.
Another act5^ dealt with the organization and operation of
cooperative marketing associations. However, the situation, in
1936, showed clearly that cooperatives were at a great dis
advantage in competition with private commercial businesses.
The National Assembly therefore passed an act54 making the money
appropriated under the rice and corn fund act available to
cooperative marketing associations, "not only for the purpose
of increasing the production of rice and c or n. ..but also for
the stable, orderly, and profitable marketing of agricultural
p r o d u c t s ...."55 This Agricultural Cooperative Fund was made a
revolving fund for the exclusive purposes of the act. The
National Loan and Investment Board was to issue "rules and
regulations for the proper loaning, collecting and protecting
52
No. 2818, as amended, and No. 2508, as amended.
53N o . 3425, as amended. 54Commonwealth Act No. 116.
55M . 0 . P .. Vol. 2, Pt. 2, p. 823.
163
of moneys belonging to the said fund, upon the recommendation
of the Office in charge of the supervision of agricultural
cooperative marketing and credit associations. This act was
approved by the President on November 3, 1936; he had been for
several months requesting immediate action, saying (on September,
23) that it was one of "several measures of importance and of
urgent necessity to the welfare of the co untry....115?
Sine e the aim of the NARIC was to stabilize the industry
allowing a reasonable margin of profit for producers but at the
same time establishing a price level which would not be burden
some on the consumer its activities were in line with the
objectives of cooperative marketing associations organized under
Act 3425, as amended.^8 Since these aims were so similar, Mr.
de Castro suggested the necessity of both coordinating their
56 ,. ,
Ibid.
^ I bi d .. Vol. 2, Pt. 1, (rev.ed.), p. 250. The same
statement could be made with even more accuracy with reference
to similar conditions under the Republic. Many observers, in
the early years of the Republic, were hopeful that similar
action would be taken by the Government, being convinced that
such a step would be a prerequisite to the solution of many of
the country's economic ills.
58
A. de Castro: "Rice and Corn Cooperative Marketing,"
The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the P hilippines. 1937-
1 9 3 8 , p. 335. Mr. de Castro was connected and concerned with
various phases of the cooperative movement for almost twenty
years. Despite the innumerable reverses this movement has
suffered in that period of time, his enthusiasm and optimism
appeared as strong in 1950 as in this article in 1937 when he
was Chidf of the Cooperative Marketing and Credits Division of
the Bureau of Commerce. Unfortunately, despite his and other's
efforts, the movement in 1951, was still at the place it held
in 1934.
164
activities and operations. He stated a fact which, in 1937 as
in 1951, was barely appreciated: "The stabilization of the
rice industry whether along the lines of production or of price,
cannot be obtained without organized producers and a controlled
marketinp^ agency, operated and managed by the farmers themselves.it59
Unquestionably one of the major factors in the un
certain price field was the effect of disorderly marketing,
with producers disposing of their products without taking into
consideration the operation of supply and demand. It was true,
of course, that many had no other course left to them since
dispose their goods they must in order to have funds on which to
exist until the next harvest. The cooperative marketing law
required that all members of an association deliver all or a
specified part of their products to their associations for a
period not exceeding ten years. The pooling of these supplies
would then, it was expected, result in an equitable price. The
law also provided for the establishment by the Director of
Commerce of marketing districts or territories. He was given
authority to refuse permission for an association to establish
itself in a territory in which it might enter into competition
with another. i/ftiether this would eliminate the good elements
of competition along with what was considered "harmful" is
impossible to determine precisely. One may note, however, that
wherever such a situation has existed, "harmful" competition has
been avoided, but equitable prices for consumers have been
59Ibid., italics supplied.
165
extraordinarily difficult of attainment.
Mr. de Castro suggested that the NARIC act as the
national manager or financier for municipal and provincial
cooperative marketing associations. If this were done, he
believed, the NARIC would then be assured of a sufficient volume
to enable it to control the major portion of the rice trade.
However, it could not enter into any agreements with merchants,
millers, producers or bonded warehouses, for the purpose of
monopolizing the trade, this being forbidden by Act 3247. But
cooperative marketing associations were exempt from the provisions
relative to restraints of trade except that they were forbidden
to restrain trade by an arbitrary fixing of price or "unduly
enhancing the price of agricultural products."69 Since the law
exempted such associations from merchants' sales taxes and
Income taxes, it was extraordinary that the major problem in
forming such associations was lack of sufficient capital.
At the same time as these measures were being taken,
the Bureau of Commerce began the rehabilitation of the Rice and
Corn Fund to renovate old loans and lend new life to old
cooperative marketing and credit associations. ‘
The fund,
originally consisting of 1=1,000,000, appropriated to encourage
farmers in the production of better varieties of rice and corn,
had fallen by 1933, to 1=40,000, in cash. The fund had at first
(in 1919) been entrusted to the Department of Agriculture and
60Ibid., p. 336.
166
Commerce and then to the old Bureau of Agriculture for adminis
trative purposes. In April, 1933, the collection and administra
tion passed to the Bureau of Commerce, with a total In out
standing loans of 1=924,353.29, with 193 associations indebted
to the fund.6-*-
By 1937, the Fund had been increased to 1170,000, in
cash, from which 134,000 yearly was deducted for salaries and
operating expenses. The major function of the Bureau was to
collect loans due from the associations, amounting, in 1937, to
1828,061, some 1100,000 having been collected following the
assumption of this duty by the Bureau. These funds were in the
hands of 180 associations in thirty-two provinces. To enable
collection work to proceed with as little pain as possible, the
Bureau wisely decided on a policy of rehabilitating the associa
tions, believing that were this accomplished, the Fund itself
would be rehabilitated. In this work the Bureau extended aid
in the collection of funds from individual members of associations
having difficulty in making collections. This work was done by
field agents of the Bureau, generally four men handling the
affair in each area. One was the collecting officer who kept
ledgers and was paid from the general appropriation of the
Bureau. It was exacting work since constant supervision was
necessary over both t h e 'associations concerned as well as the
agents themselves. In addition, the agents were charged with
the duty of supervising the operation of the associations acting
61Ibid., pp. 279-282.
167
as representatives of the Director of the Bureau. Another task
with which they were charged was the organization, promotion,
and supervision of cooperative marketing associations, existence
of which was necessary for the optimum collection of outstanding
funds. The reason for this was obvious, since if a farmer were
a member of a well managed rural credit association, and an
equally well administered cooperative marketing association, h e
would have ]ess difficulty in solving his financial problems, thereby
ultimately strengthening the Fund itself and its larger program.
Naturally, this entailed a large amount of educational work by
agents of the Bureau, and this part of their work was the most
difficult and frustrating.
In any event, two years later, in July, 1938, President
Quezon reorganized the National Economic Council which thereafter
was to consist only of public officials. Although strictly a
governmental body, the NEC was expected to rely upon the co
operation and advice of private industry'and individuals. The
old Council was never active. The reason was that it was felt
best to await the completion of the work of the Joint Preparatory
Committee before formulating an economic program. The Report
of this Committee, on May 20, 1938, was never fully Implemented,
possibly because of the outbreak of the War in 1941, and, as a
result, no comprehensive program was ever worked out during the
Commonwealth period leading to economic readjustment.
^ Philippine Magazine, XXXV, No. 9 (.September, 1938),
p. 408.
CHAPTER V
EARLY EFFORTS TO IMPROVE THE RICE INDUSTRY
(Concluded )
Opinion and Attitudes
The seriousness of t h e rice situation was recognized by
all thoughtful observers, yet, during this critical period,
there was little self-criticism of the operations of the various
Government agencies charged with meeting the many problems. The
NARIC was generally praised for its efforts by individuals in
the Government and by some private observers, although many
others were highly critical and remain so. These critics, h o w
ever, were less vocal than supporters, and few of their
criticisms appeared in print. Not a few of these believed that
while an infant Government undoubtedly needs all the support it
can muster and should be praised forits successes, yet self-
evaluation from a critical standpoint should always be present.
It is of some v a l u e , then, in this study to survey
briefly this aspect of the situation during these few prewar years.
The Philippine Commonwealth J ou rn al , a supporter of the
Administration, in February, 1936, observed that the efforts of
the Government to find a solution to the rice problem was part
of the campaign to maintain law and order, "which is threatened
whenever the masses of the people go hungry." It optimistically
stated that rice producers were "ready and willing to help",
168
169
which would mean that the Government "can effectively ward off
a rice crisis this year, and, therefore rice riots are very
unlikely.This shortage, it added, was the “one problem the
new regime has to tackle seriously, if it is to have smooth
sledding, without annoyance at least from within, through the
next 10 years." It stated the obvious fact that "no government
can expect perfect p e a c e ...however efficient and experienced
its leaders...if hungry mobs in the urban and rural centers,
especially in the hotbeds of sakdalism and communism, become
desperate due to lack of food...."^ The Journal predicted
that the year 1936 would see an increasing seriousness in the
situation, especially with the normal price of rice, per ganta,
rising from 17-20 centavos to 30-35. There is no explanation
for the apparent contradiction between this latter statement
and the one quoted earlier in the paragraph.
The Chinese dealers, the usual whipping boy for
demagogues and politicos, were blamed for the situation, without,
however, said the Journal. "any facts whatsoever to prove the
charge."® Government investigators discovered no evidence of
hoarding or illegal activity. The p o l i t i c o s 1 view was disputed
by what the Journal called "ostensibly well-founded criticism,"
1 V o l . II, No. 9, p. 53.
2 3
Ibid., italics supplied. Ibid.
170
which correctly attributed the crisis to "unsystematic produc
tion and distribution or marketing, and to shortage of crop
and consequently to poor adjustment of Inadequate supply t o
increased demand."4
With respect to the problems of "unsystematic produc
tion and marketing, for which lack of coordination of agencies
handling these phases of the industry is blamed," the Journal
observed that two Government bureaus were established to meet
them. The Bureau of Plant Industry was concerned with the
production a n d the Bureau of Commerce with marketing. B y
inference, and here the Journal was in agreement with others,
it believed that were these two bureaus to function as had been
planned,the problems could be solved. The J o u r n a l , discussing
a report of the Bureau of Plant Industry which revealed that "30
per cent of the rice crops in Laguna, 50 per cent in Tayabas
and 75 per cent of the 8,000 hectares of lowland palay In the
Bicol Valley were destroyed," stated! "Evidently, the Bureau...
did not foresee the acute rice crisis in spite of the destruc
tion of the crop in most places." The Bureau had stated that
"production will be equal to that of last year in spite of
typhoons and pests because of bigger areas cultivated and better
growth of the rice p l a n t s . "5 The invalidation of this prediction
should have served as a lesson to the Bureau with regard to pro
phecy.
4 I b i d . The same situation largely applied to conditions
in the early years of the Republic complicated by other, new,
factors.
5Ibid.j p. 54.
171
The Journal concluded its analysis inconclusively:
Rice as an industry is not organized.... Probably
the reason is chat it is not a leading export product,
and the only elements of the community, aside from
the nationals, interested in the industry are the
Chinese; who control distribution.
If rice could be industrialized to the extent of
any of the principal export products and if the govern
ment would take a hand in the problem of storage or
warehousing, it is believed that 90 per cent of the
rice problem would be solved. The nationalization idea
would not cure the ills of our rice industry.
A plan has been proposed in the National Assembly
seeking to place the industry under government control
for which 1=2,000,000 is also asked. Mr. Jose Palarca...
has written extensively on the rice problem and offered
3 formulas to solve it: complete control of the
industry through ownership of its agencies of produc
tion, manufacture, and distribution; state purchase of
locally grown rice; and creation of a government office
to act as intermediary between the producer and consumer....®
On November 24, 1935, the National Congress of Filipino
Businessmen closed a five-day session by adopting a resolution
pledging support to President Quezon, and favoring the simpli
fication of the Government, the creation of a national economic
council and an economic planning commission, a central bank, an
agricultural bank, cooperative marketing associations, a tariff
commission and a national credit bureau.7 Many of these were
later to be created by the Government, but President Quezon found
it necessary several times in the years before the War to remind
businessmen of their stated support of his program and their
suggestions with regard to the creation and operation of these
SIbid.. italics supplied.
^Philippine Magazine, XXXIII, No. 1 (January, 1936),
p. 4.
172
various organizations. He called them to task, from time to
time, for failing in their support of his program and for
criticizing the very organizations they had previously suggested
be created.
February 15, 1936, saw a national convention of rice
planters, who adopted a resolution pledging support of the
Government's rice control plan. Conventions find no difficulty
in adopting resolutions such as these; their subsequent adherence
to them offers the only proof of their sincerity to the principles
expressed. Beyond question, had these large planters faith
fully adhered to the principles they expressed, much of the
unrest which was to be so costly to the Commonwealth and the
subsequent Republic might have been avoided. Men too often
forget the injunction of Pascal that those who seek good in
humanity find that it should be such as all can possess at once
without envy and which no one can lose against his will. It
would be incorrect to say that these rice planters, and others
like them, were evil men; but they were socially naive. They
were certainly childlike in their belief that, as late as the
third decade of the Twentieth Century, in a country where
agrarian discontent was almost as old as the country itself,
with the ideals of American democracy being taught in schools and
expressed in many other ways, with the growing demand of peoples
the world over for a share in the benefits of their labor, with
the deep land-hunger of the Filipino, they could pay lip-service
to ideals or an expressed national policy and ignore their
effectuation, without sowing seeds of discord and revolution.
Their failure to understand the currents of the day and
the real desires of the people brought about the conditions of
1939 and the post-war period as surely as the monsoon brings
rain. This agrarian unrest which lay all over the Philippines
and which was to break into violence later in the Commonwealth
period and in the post-war era had deeper roots than political
subordination. J.B. Condliffe stated that it was "in fact a
phase of the economic dislocation caused by the breakdown of
the nineteenth century world trading system.... There is a common
cause of economic dislocation underlying the various forms of
Q
local agrarian discontents throughout Southeast Asia." The
failure of the landlord to realize this was mirrored by the
refusal of the Government, when it_ later became a landlord, to
understand the same conditions. As a result, E.H. Jacoby has
stated, "the Government was confronted by a hostile tenant
class, which identified it with the hated landlords."®
Bruno Lasker, one of the foremost authorities on South
east Asia, points to a characteristic of the people which was
understood neither by the Americans nor by the Filipinos themselves
It is amazing, (he says) what men will bear -- and
not only Orientals -- as long as their faith in the
social system...remains unshaken. It is equally amazing
how quickly conditions no worse than those borne with
fortitude by many generations -- even conditions consider
ably better than those tolerated half a century ago --
^J.B. Condliffe, in the Foreword to Erich H. Jacoby:
Agrarian Unrest in Southeast A s i a . (New York: Columbia University
Press, 1949), p. vii.
174
are felt to be intolerable when men have caught a glimpse
of a possible alternative for which they can work and
fight. Few economists believe that, unless other
social changes are carefully contrived to increase the
productivity of labor, political independence will im
prove the lot of native peoples. But millions do
believe it. They see things, as simple people do, in
personal terms.... Taxation, the sale of government of
land previously held in common, compulsory labor
services, foreign competition with home products in
the domestic market -- any one of a number of immediate
irritations may become the cause of a violent agitation
when conditions are ripe. Back of it all is the new
born consciousness of poverty -- the sense of injury
and also the sense tha t there is no need for so much
suffering. U5
These almost obvious facts were either not grasped or
were ignored by the leaders of the Government and the powerful
upper classes. The tragic situation of 1946-1951 was the result.
Any attempt to justify the situation along theoretic lines must
be regarded in the light of Lasker's observation that "good
government in a tropical region where a large part of the
population still dwells mainly in the pre-industrial era obviously
means something different from good government in a region far
advanced in the mastery of modern techniques. Vi/hat this
means to the Philippines in the light of modern necessities is
put succinctly by Lasker, who Is convinced that "the attempt to
bring the brown man of the tropics into the realm of world
economy on a basis of free participation and adequate compensation
cannot succeed if at the same time he is to be held within the
confines of his traditional culture."'*-®
■^Bruno Lasker, Peoples of Southeast A s i a . (New York:
Knopf, 1944), pp. 219-220. Italics supplied.
1;LIbid., p. 248. 12Ibld. . p. 257.
175
President Quezon, in his speech before the National
Assembly, June 16, 1936, failed to state the main causes for
unrest and disturbances. Ke believed that, although order had
been largely achieved, some danger from "sporadic public
disturbances" was still traceable to "professional demagogues
who make their living by exploitating the patriotism of the
uninformed or the real or fancied grievances of the discontented...."-*^
He believed that there was not "the slightest danger of any
general uprising," but was determined that no "serious
disturbance" should take place, despite the activities of the
Communists whose propaganda, at the same time, was not
"particularly effective."-*-^ He seemed worried over the
possibility of adverse criticism from America, and stated that
the "confidence and respect which in the future the nations may
have in the Philippine Republic will depend...in our ability to
maintain peace and order and to extend effective protection to
all the residents of the Island s . . ..11-*-** He held, therefore, that
it was "better that preventive measures be taken," and hoped
that the National Assembly would carry through appropriate
legislation without delay.
With regard to social injustices, he believed that the
importation of legislative measures from abroad would not solve
-*~^M . P . P .. Vol. 2, Pt. 1, (rev.edJ), p. 160. Italics supplied.
14Ibid.
15
I b i d ., italics supplied. How ironic these words seemed in 1950.
1 6 I b i d .. pp. 160-161.
176
the situation, and advocated a "policy of progressive conser
vatism b a sed upon the recognition_of th e essential and fundamen
tal rights of l a b o r . H e pointed to the peculiar local
conditions in the Philippines which, with the low status of
industrialism and "the almost primitive state of our agricul
ture," demanded a solution of the country's problem within the
framework of the existing system. The President was advocating
in "progressive conservatism" what Count Carlo Sforza^® called
the most difficult job of all, in a country the leaders of
which showed only slighb awareness of the difficulties facing
them -- either under the old oligarchic system or the new
conservatism of Quezon.
Illustrative of this was the outcry raised when, on
August 19, President Q,uezon issued an executive order fixing
minimum wages for Government employees, stating that tuberculosis
was caused by malnutrition, which in turn, was caused by low
wages. This was greeted with the same hostility as faced the
support of collective bargainning in the New Deal of President
F.D. Roosevelt.
The picture facing the country at the end of 1937 was
not a pleasant one. Yet, the Acting Director of Commerce wrote:
^ I b l d .. p. 161. Italics supplied.
18"rjihe Most Difficult Job," Harper's Magazine. Vol.
199, No. 1190 (July, 1949), p. 33.
177
The year 1937 witnessed marked improvements in the
general business situation in the country. The cloud
of uncertainty which usually hovers over a new govern
ment just reeling itself towards political and economic
stability, has practically cleared away, and the out
look has been more promising than ever. The two most
unfavorable factors -- the drop in the prices of export
staples and the damages wrought by the year-end typhoons
and floods -- failed to exercise any substantial effect
on the rapid rate of recovery.... There is a feeling
that the year just closed marked a very active and
successful year. A general feeling of optimism prevails
in practically all lines of business.... Employment
has been generally higher than in previous years, labor
disturbances were net of much importance and did not
give much cause for worry. With the creation by the
President of a committee on unemployment, the labor
situation seemed bo b e well in h a n d . Agrarian disturb
ances in most cases have been amicably and satisfactorily
settled.... The agricultural output was well maintained
in spite of the year-end floods and the ravages of
plant pests. And the yellow metal continued pouring out
from the bowels of the earth -- this year to the tune
of ^=50,000,000 — which is a great stabilizing factor in
the economy of the country.... The general price levels
for the staple products declined somewhat, although
still satisfactory to dealers and producers and was not
accompanied by a slackening of demand. Sales volume was
thus more than maintained and farm income was satis
factory.... The market (r i c e ) was firm and notwithstanding
the importation of rice to the amount of 3P=4,748,215
during the first ten months of the year, the price
leaped to 1=5.44 in June and 1=6.06 in November. The
destruction of the rice plantations by the various
typhoons which swept the eountry coupled with the drought
and plant pests in some sections, probably might have
acted favorably on the rice situation.... Viewing the
progressive behavior of the fundamental factors of
business in the country particularly agriculture and the
continuing expansion of local industry... the Commonwealth
seems to be on the road to prosperity and well balanced
economy. The factors that should cause hesitation and
uncertainty was the undeclared Sino-Japanese 'War and its
threat upon our door, the mixed expectations on the Joint
Committee Report, and the continued Congressional tamper
ing with the established relations of the two countries
— all these have no dampening effect on the continued
improvement of the business and economic situation of the
country. In spite of them our progress has paced steadily
and in rapid strides. The New Year undoubtedly starts on
fair weather, and we have every reason to be optimistic.19.
■^Anastacio de Castro} "Review of Business Conditions for
1937 " Philippine Journal of Commerce. Vol. XIV, No. 1 (January,
1938), pp. 7-8. Italics supplied.
178
However, another source pointed to the facu that
business in 1937 could have been much better.^0 jn January,
1938, Director Balmaceda, writing in a local magazine, stated
that export prices of major Philippine commodities suffered
severe set-backs during 1937 as a result of "uncertainties and
various adverse factors." The serious fall in value, however,
was more than compensated for, he stated, by the increase in
the quantity of goods exported.
He examines the conditions existing in the main export
items (sugar, copra, hemp, tobacco) and finds that in each
there had been a noticeable, and sharp, decline in their
prices. For example, copra dropped from ^21.00 per hundred
kilos to "about 1N3.00 at the end of the year." After noting
this, and mentioning the fact that plans were being made to
relieve the situation, he concludes by saying: "The healthy
advance in the country's b u s i n e s s ...affords a sound background
for further progress in 1938. Of course, the big uncertainties
in the present situation cannot be ignored, and more unforeseen
events might arise to impede the course of business, but special
efforts are being made by the government to foster and develop
the country's economic life, and with its determination to
accomplish Its objectives in this field, coupled with the strong
fiscal position it now enjoys and the fundamentally sound
business situation which prevails, there is no reason why
20
It is Interesting to note the method so often used in
analyzing the economic situations after stating all the factors
that would indicate dangers aheqd, the analyst invariably ended
with an optimistic summary.
179
further progress in 1938 should not be expected."21
The average small producer and farmer, who did not read
this and similar publications, felt quite differently. Dis
satisfaction with their conditions continued to increase, and
unrest and disorder, in various sections of the country,
continued, with little real understanding shown by individuals
in the Government and other observers of its causes.
The official reports for the year were, almost without
exception, very optimistic , ^ but these reports seem to have
been made on the basis of a general volume of business and its
benefits to distributors rather than on the basis of the
standard of living for the small producer and consumer. There
would seem to be no other explanation for the fact that while
unrest was mounting throughout the country and reports were being
made of t h e difficult situation of the farmer at the same time,
the observers in the Bureau of Commerce and elsewhere were
optimistic over the situation.
Progressive Farming*^ had this to say of the operations
of the NARIC: "The National Rice and Corn Corporation...has
PI
Progressive Farming. Vol. II, No. 1 (January, 1938),
p. 30. Italics supplied. To many observers, this reasoning
seemed vague, but It apparently satisfied the readers of the
magazine, the majority of whom were businessmen and sugar planters.
22
P J C . XIV, No. 1 (January, 1938), pp. 11-12, 28-29.
2^Vol. ij^ No. 1 (January, 1938), p. 28. Italics supplied.
180
brought into a minimum rice profiteering and has stabilized the
price of rice at a level which is fair to both producer and
consumer. At the same time consummating rice shortage by a
steady supply the NARIC has, by the aid of the Philippine National
Bank and the rural credit associations, encouraged farmers and
small tenants to increase farm production without assistance of
unscrupulous usurers." In the same issue, three pages later, it
was reported that "Because of a new buying and selling policy
of the National Rice and Corn Corporation, an upward revision
of the prices of palay and rice is highly expected with the new
crop season this year."^^ The article stated that the reason
for the high price of the cereal was the havoc caused by the
drought and the typhoons of the previous year, and that expecta
tions were definite that the new crop would be more than thirty
per cent under the level of the previous harvest. It added
that the NARIC "should have decided this matter at its regular
meeting on December 21 but for the lack of final statistics on
the crop losses and reduction. However, said matter may be
taken up this month.11 The NARIC had authorized the erection of
warehouses in Panay and Cotabato, and was buying palay at the
"normal” price, when it was being sold below the old government
price for the protection of the producers.
The following month, February, 1938, the province of
Albay appropriated some eighteen thousand pesos for the salaries
of agricultural inspectors to look after the development
P4.
Ibid., p. 31. Italics supplied.
181
program of the p r o v i n c e . I t was reported that "the campaign
for agricultural development being waged by the field men of
the Bureau of Plant Industry has awakened the interest of the
people, and crop diversification, crop improvement, promotion
of local agricultural Industries and the systematic control
of plant diseases are being carried out successfully...and, as
the rice grown locally could not supply demands, rice produc
tion will also be increased. A study as to what rice varieties
are suitable for growing in the provinces is being undertaken."
It is interesting to note, in this connection, that Albay
produced (as an average, 1938-42) 817,100 cavans (of 44 kilos)
of palay, and in 194-6, 808,900 c a v a n s . ^ The figure reported
for the year 1942, is larger than either of the above figures,
but the statistics cannot be relied upon, particularly in view
of the fact that the crop year was to end June 30, which
coincided with a period of great disruption to the entire
economy of the islands as a result of the titer.
The same publication released an article of some vague
ness with regard to the "stabilizing m ea sure...being considered"
by NARIC:
The National Rice and corn Corporation is now con
sidering the adoption of certain measures in the
provinces, as a further step toward stabilizing and
nationalizing the rice industry.
The adoption of a schedule of prices for different
localities in order not to disturb unnecessarily the
rice market is another stabilizing measure which the
NARIC will have to decide in the near future. It is
25 PJC. XIV, No. 2 (February, 1938), p. 10.
^ Yearbook Qf Philippine Statistics. 1946, p. 146.
182
believed that the board would make it effective with
the present harvest.
The NARIC board of directors has also under study
the m an a g e m e n t ’s request for the appropriation of at
least ^200,000 for taking a census of palay produc
tion with a view to limiting overproduction of palay
greatly in excess of consumption requirements.
The NARIC has a l s o made arrangements with the
National Research Council for the purpose of conduc
ting research work on the industrialization and wider
utilization of rice and its b y - p r o d u c t s . In con
sonance with the limitation scheme it is planned to
limit palay production to only a few high-yielding
commercial varieties . which the government corporation
plans to buy in the fu t u r e . The object is to compel
farmers to discontinue the cultivation of palay o f
inferior grades and substitute them with varieties
which will give not only greater yields but also better
monetary returns.*”
We noted above that the NARIC had authorized the erection
of warehouses in Panay andCotabato. In the same issue of March,
1958, an article is headlined as follows: "NARIC Erects Ware
houses in Lanao and Cotabato." A casual reader immediately
concluded that the plans were carried through and the warehouses
built. A closer examination of the article reveals, however,
the following:
"The NARIC board of directors has recently approved the
plan to construct warehouses in Dansalan, Lanao and Cotabato,
inline with its policy to help rice planters and consumers. The
warehouses to be constructed in Dansalan next February would
have a capacity of 40,000 cavans of palay. The construction of
the Cotabato warehouse will begin as soon as the land on which
pO
it is to be erected is acquired.
2 70p. cit.. XIV, No. 3 (March, 1938), p. 30. Italics supplied.
2 8 I b l d .. italics supplied.
183
The article continued*
In deciding to construct these warehouses, the
NARIC took into consideration the reasons given by
the rice planters in those provinces; namely, that
for lack of government protection they are obliged
to sell their palay at P0.80 a cavan, and, in spite
of this low price the merchants are selling rice at
exorbitant price. After a careful investigation,
it was found out that these allegations are true.
In the entire island of Mindanao, Lanao and
Cotabato are the biggest rice-producing provinces,
and they have been supplying Misamis Oriental, Misamis
Occidental, Bohol, and Cebu with this cereal, but
since the big rice merchants of Cebu established
agencies and rice mills the production has declined.
The merchants, it is alleged, enjoyed all the benefits,
first the payment of the freight on rice, and second,
as they control the market, they can dictate the price
in the absence of any competitor.29
Aside from the interesting picture this gives of actual
conditions at that time, it is interesting to see the presenta
tion of a belief, half expressed, that with the drawing up of
plans the end is achieved. Individuals in the Government
deplored this mode of thinking, but the psychology being unchanged
by the passage of time and event, the condition remains.
In May, it was announced that "Authority to import rice
early next year as an emergency measure will be asked by the
National Rice and Corn Corporation, if the present survey of the
rice situation regarding the present harvest available stock would
show a serious shortage, it has been reliably learned. Unless
the President declared a state of emergency, under which
importation of rice becomes imperative, the NARIC can not buy
rice, from foreign countries, it was explained."^8
29Ibld. 50PJC. XIV, No. 5 (May, 1938), p. 44.
184
Yifriat is puzzling to an observer is that plans to restrict
the production of rice (above, page 182) were made at the same
time as plans to import the product. If overproduction did
exist, and there is no reason to believe that it did, then the
problem would undoubtedly be one of maldistribution. The
solution, then, would be along lines of easing the flow of
commodity from one region to another, and not along lines of
importation at higher prices than those prevailing in many sections
of the country.
In June, it was announced that Assemblyman M.A. Roxas
would study rice problems in America, supposedly to aid in the
solution of such problems at home. That they were serious, and
were to become pressing as time passed, is shown by an article
in the Philippine Journal of Commerce on the rice industry in
Leyte. The article is interesting in that it; portrays as well
the situation existing in other similar regions. The island of
Leyte is one of the major agricultural provinces covering an
area of 624,180 hectares of rice lands "especially adapted to
the growth and cultivation of abaca and coconuts." These last
two items were the principal means of livelihood of the people
but when the prices of these items dropped disastrously "the
farmers, through sheer dismay and utter disappointment, destroyed
their copra and abaca plants and substituted them with rice and
corn in the cultivation and production of which they now pin
their hope to recuperate all they have lost in their abaca and
copra industries...." Despite, however, the fact that rice
185
cultivation became one of the principal industries, the total
harvest was not enough to last until the next harvest and to
supply local demand. As a result, during these months of
shortage, the province had to import rice from Cebu or Manila.
The province had an actual harvest of 793,522 cavans
of palay for 1937. The province in 1938, produced a total of
436,438 cavans of palay, approximately 45 per cent below the
harvest of the previous year. The poor harvest was due, the
observer said, "to the following factors: (1) floods as caused
by heavy rains, (2) intermittent rains followed by intense heat
of the sun and (3) heavy damage caused by rats and night birds
locally known as 'hanao', not to mention the havoc wrought on
the rice plants by rice bugs, turtles, slugs, crickets and fresh
water mollusks." The total population, for the year 1938, was
855,000, and the average monthly per capita consumption of rice
was about .427 cavan. Since the rice-eating population is
approximately 60 per cent, or 483,000, the total consumption was
estimated at 206,000 cavans per month or 2,472,000 cavans a year.
The shortage was thus around 2,000,000 cavans. Thus the produc
tion for 1938, of 436,438 cavans lasted but two months necessita
ting large imports from Cebu or Manila to meet requirements.
In addition, Leyte suffered a poor corn harvest for
1938, caused "by the following factors: (1) rats and crows...,
(2) new plantings have been damaged by unfavorable weather
conditions, such as (a) floods... (b) intermittent rains followed
by intense heat..., and (3) damage caused by mildew." As a
186
result, Leyte would continue to import a large proportion of
its food.5 "*"
On the same page with the above article we find a
short note that "Economists Plan Agricultural Reforms for the
Philippines." The reformsmentioned include the correlation of
agriculture with the advances of modern sciences, a production
control system ("similar to the United States farm program"),
land reforms, and the establishment of larger land units (for a
"more efficient basis"),52 and a farm credit system to further
the purchase of lands in new areas. It is interesting to note
that these identical reforms were being proposed in 1949-1950;
as they xvere proposed by the Report of the Philippine-United
States Agricultural Mission in 1947, by President Roxas in
various messages to Congress, and by President Quirino.
The same issue of the Journal contained an announcement
that the NARIC had fixed the price of second class macan palay
at 1=2.50 a cavan. "The Board also declared that the corpora
tion w i ll not import foreign rice in the meantime, nor Intervene
in lowering the price of r i c e . The price...was adopted by the
corporation in conformity with the suggestion of President
Quezon to the effect that in fixing the prices of palay and rice,
there should always be taken into consideration the two interests
5 l p p . c i t ., XIV, No. 6 (June, 1938), p. 15: Vicente F.
Jaca, "Rice Industry in Leyte." (A Provincial Commercial Supervisor).
32
Yet, plans were made for opening new lands in Davao to
many small producers with the object in view of restricting large
land units. See above, p. 157.
187
which should be protected -- those of the producers and those
of the consumers. In case a need for the importation of
foreign rice arises,the rice that will be imported will be the
it33
class that will not compete with the macan.
In August, it was reported that the NARIC was "taking
steps to carry out the recommendations of Assemblyman Manuel
Roxas...for the rehabilitation of the rice industries." These
recommendations dealt with "the drying and storage of rice by
the use of machines and methods which are employed in the most
progressive rice producing states of America." The NARIC
reported that they had appointed an engineer to "study" the
situation so that "steps can be taken as soon as possible to
purchase machines of this kind for the provinces." The
advantages to be derived from such new methods were pointed
out. "What Mr. Roxas found in these states will be gradually
adopted in the Philippines to improve the local rice industry,"
ran the statement. "NARIC officials and those of the Bureau
of Plant Industry will cooperate to carry out the plans into
effect
In September, it was announced that the "first modern
warehouse in the Philippines built by the NARIC, equipped for
long storage, has been completed in Cabanatuan, Nueva Ecija,
where the corporation is establishing its first rice central."
It was announced that another was under construction and work
^ I b i d . . p. 16. Italics supplied.
340£* d t . . XIV, No. 8 (August, 1938), p. 14
188
on a third had been started, the capacity of the three, when
completed, to be some 300,000 cavans. "The entire plan calls
for the construction of about ten warehouses, a modern rice
mill and other departments.... According to recent reports,
plans for the construction of warehouses in several provinces
have been cancelled by the NARIC as a result of the establish
ment of the National 'Warehousing Corporation, a new subsidiary
of the National Development Company, which would undertake the
warehousing projects of the Government.
In its issue for October-November, the Journal announced
that rice-producing provinces in Luj^on and as far down as
Marinduque, Iviasbate and Mindoro had suffered from drought
during the recent months. "Due to thedrought, Nueva Ecija,
the rice granary of Central Luzon, has encouraged the develop
ment of the irrigation system. This system is expected to help
solve the problem of farmers during the planting season in
years of d r o u g h t . " ^ in 1950, the development of this irrigation
was still expected.
On the whole, agricultural conditions for the year 1938
were unsatisfactory. Despite programs and plans, the rice crop
fell below normal for the second consecutive year. As result,
prices were rather high, but the returns to the producers were poor.^7
350jp. c i t ., XIV, No. 9 (September, 1938), p. 14.
560p . c i t ., XIV, Nos. 1 0 - 1 1 , (October-November, 1938) p. 8.
57Paul P. S t e i n d o r f : "Annual Economic Review for 1938,"
C o r n e j o ’s Commonwealth Directory of the Philippines, 1959-1940,
p. 2392.
189
In his survey of the conditions for the year, Mr. Paul P.
Steindorf, American Trade Commissioner, stated:
It is believed that there was some improvement
in minor agricultural products concerning which
accurate information i s not procurable. However,
this improvement was hardly sufficient to offset the
depression in the principal crops...which represent
the main source of livelihood of a large part of the
population.
Some indication of the unsatisfactory level of
agricultural prices._may be secured from the fact
that average prices of the four principal products,
namely, sugar, rice, abaca, and copra, were about 25
per cent lower than in either of the two preceding
years. This must have had an adverse effect on
general purchasing power and it is quite remarkable
that there has not been a corresponding reduction in
the volume of business. Apparently, the effects of
these low prices have been minimized by heavy govern
ment expenditures, for publ i c works and other purposes.
Contributing factors were "the increases in mineral
production and the building boom which helped cushion
the shock and prevent a too rapid fall in buying power....®®
Unlike individuals in the Government, Mr. Steindorf was
not sanguine with regard to the prospects for the coming years.®®
He thought it somewhat difficult to make any definite predictions
concerning the outlook, owing to the large number of factors.
In general, he saw no basis for marked optimism. It was certain
that the then-existing low prices of Philippine products were
an unfavorable factor. Unless they advance, he wrote, "general
prosperity is practically impossible."4®
®®Ibid., italics supplied.
■*Q
Newspapers and periodicals were full of optimistic fo re
casts for the coming years. All that was disappointing or disas
trous lay in the past. Pew, if any, individuals connected with
any of the government agencies wrote articles other than panegyrics
of the efforts of the Government and paeans of praise for the most
modest achievements. A spirit of quiet self-criticism and scien
tific analysis was conspicuous by its absence.
40Ibid.. p. 2396.
190
President Quezon, in 1939, initiated "Rice Planting
Day." On the occasion of the first such day, the President
delivered a speech to the tenants of bhe Buenavista Estate, San
Ildefonso, Bulacan, and planted a few stalks of rice himself.
What he said there has been forgotten by all but a few of the
people to whom he talked. Many who listened to him are now to
be found among the ranks of the disaffected — with the Hukba-
lahaps. Since the speech is typical of what the Government
promised the people so freely and since it illustrates the extra
ordinary power of President Quezon as an extemporaneous speaker,
we reproduce it in extenso.
I have set this day for the celebration of the rice
planting season in the Philippines.... I have designated
this date as Rice Planting Day so as to familiarize the
people of the Philippines with the importance of this
plant in this country. It is also my desire to extol
the dignity of the tillers of the soil, who are the
source of our livelihood.
In the past, we felt ashamed if we were seen with
our clothes stained with mud, our pants rolled up, and
our work was in the rice fields. We were showing then
that a farmer occupies a lowly position. The truth is
that there is no man in our country more honorable than
the tiller of the soil....
This day is also significant to the residents of this
place -- the Buenavista Estate — because to them this
is the beginning of a new life. I have been informed
that there are still a few persons here who do not
believe in what the Government of the Philippines is
actually doing and in what it will do for the Buenavista
Estate and for your own well-being in the near future.
I have the information that some people here regret the
intervention of the Government in your affairs.
Countrymen of San Ildefonso a n d San Rafael :
Have you not noticed the new movement which has been
initiated in your place? Do you not see that we are
constructing roads leading to your barrios? Are you not
aware that you will soon have a road which will be wider
than those in Manila? Do you not know that on this
day we will lay the cornerstone of a new hospital which
will be built here? Do you not understand that even
n ow you can borrow money which can be paid in install-
191
ments and at a low rate of Interest; and that this
facility will greatly help you In the cultivation of
your land? Do you not realize that from now on you will
acquire a bigger and better share from your cultivated
lands than that acquired by tenants of other estates?
And that,believing that the judicial tribunal will recog
nize these lands as yours or as belonging to the Govern
ment,is a mis cake? Have you seen the decisions of the
Court of First Instance,and of the Supreme Court? You
wasted time, you wasted money, you wasted energy —
all for what? .Simply for you to find out that the courts
cannot help but recognize the Torrens title....
As all troubles have now ended, let us start a new
life. You have no more Constabulary soldiers who used
to watch you hourly in the past. When there are soldiers
around, it seems as If you a r e not as good Fil
ipinos as the rest. I hope that you will now not
only live peacefully, but also happily. I fail to
recall what I told you when I came here before. Do
you remember? (Laughter) (A man In the platform said:
'You told u s that you will not return anymore') Ah,
you really do not remember what I told you then. I
said that I would resign if I could not effect any change
towards prosperity in your economic status. Do n o t
think that I have intentionally forgotten what I told
you. If I only told you that I would not return here,
anymore, what is that to me? That is not a difficult
task to fulfill; but what concerns me most is your
prosperity which should be brought about by this n e w
movement which the Government has started.
My countrymen: within a few years we shall see
major changes in your barrios. You will have good roads
in this place. You know that landowners in the different
provinces are disgusted with the activities of the
Government here, for they fear that their tenants would
demand for the same concessions as you have been given
in this estate. My reply to those landowners and to
their tenants is that what the Government is doing in
the Buenavista estate cannot be asked of the property
owners,for their lands do not belong to the Government....
The day will come when she Government will have no
more funds, because I am afraid that all the people
will clamor from the state management the same improve
ments as are being done here. You are lucky because
the Government has aided you first. I advise those who
still nurse a grudge against the Government to remedy
their own headaches; and I hope those who do not belong
to this place, but are living only through your generosity,
will not create further trouble, since I will not tolerate
any disorder here.
Countrymen: I shall now plant rice. Rice planting
is a serious task, although I am telling you now that
my rice planting at this moment will just be a joke,
192
because this noble work does not belong to us who are
quite advanced in years.... It is really a difficult
task— a task which should only be performed by young
men and women for their bones are still soft and they
can stoop without feeling any pain in the back. But
an old person gets easily tired and fatigued in plant
ing rice.
iky countrymen* I implore God to give you His Grace,
and may all things which I have been doing in Buenavista
Estate become the source of peace and prosperity to the
farmers here.41
In 1950, tenants of uhis Buenavista Estate were still
awaiting- the disposition of these lands. Their disposal still
lay in the hands of the Courts. We shall discuss the fortunes
of this estate later and we need only mention, in passing,
that the activities of the Government with regard to this one
estate engendered as much ill-feeling and positive hate as
any one thing the Government engaged in from 1934 to 1950.
S u m m a r y :-
We have seen that the rice industry was one of the
major props of Philippine economy with at least 75 per cent
of the population directly dependent upon it for their liveli
hood. We have seen that it was the basis for the standard of
living of the vast majority of the population. We have
observed that at the opening of the Commonwealth period, in 1934,
vast problems of distribution, marketing, diversification,
modernization and control demanded solution. Vtfe have seen the
existence of a price differential between prices paid for raw
palay at producing centers and for finished rice at consumption
centers. We have seen the price standard at the mercy of large
^ M.O .P .. Vol. 5, Pfc.l, pp. 141-146. p a s s i m . Delivered
July S, 1939.
193
distributors. We have noted the early eiTorts of the Government
to meet the situation by iihe creation of such official bodies as
the National Economic Council and the National Rice and Corn
Corporation. we have further observed that despite these bodies
the retail price of rice continued to mount beyond the ability
of the people to purchase, with wages and salaries remaining at
pre-Commonwealth levels.
The situation, then, at the outbreak of the War, was more
serious than at any time previous and was rapidly deteriorating.
We noted that, by 1941, the Government still had not formulated
an extensive and practicable program to meet the problems posed
by deteriorating conditions within the industry. The conclusion
is inescapable, therefore, that even without the enormous dis
locations caused by the ravages of war and occupation in the
Philippines, the economy faced probable collapse and society great
disruption. The critical period approached as the years before
Independence shortened. As it h a pp e n e d ,this critical period
coincided with the post-war period, with little, if any, of the
pre-war economy of the nation intact. The manner in which the
Government was to meet the situation was to be the determining
factor in the future stability of the nation.
It should have been obvious to friends of the Philippines
in the United States that the nation was entering its independence
at the worst possible time and under the worst possible conditions.
Such a situation demanded sympathetic understanding and aid. It
is regrettable that this was not to be the case. We shall examine
the efiorts of the Government to obtain order from chaos and the
misdirected efforts of the United States in later chapters.
CHAPTER VI
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ABACA INDUSTRY: 1934-1941
In December, 1937, the usual optimistic observations
with regard to industry in the Philippines -- this time the abaca
industry -- were presented in the Philippine Journal of Commerce.
It noted that the United States Cordage Institute had offered to
cooperate with the Government in the rehabilitation of the indus
try. It suggested that an abaca advisory committee be appointed
by the President (which was done) and this committee, in coopera
tion with the Institute should study the possibilities of widening
the market in the United States."^ At the same time, the Journal
reproduced the statement of James Fyfe, director and New York
representative of Wigglesworth & Co., Ltd., London, the largest
buyer of Manila hemp, who said that prospects for the product
were bright "in spite of the reverses it has suffered lately."^
He suggested an international limitation of fiber production, but
saw no immediate need for such a step.
The following May, the special committee on hemp in the
National Assembly held hearings on the industry, in which the dealers
and manufacturers pleaded for Government aid to the industry and
specifically requested the formation of a national hemp corporation
which would purchase surplus hemp directly from the producers and
1PJC, XIII, NO. 12 (December, 1937), p. 16.
^Ibid ., p. 30.
194
195
regulate prices, In the same fashion as the NARIC with rice.
They also agreed that the production should be limited to
1,100,000 bales a year, some 400,000 bales less than the aver
age annual production, and to take other measures to halt the
continuing drop in prices. They deplored the high cost of
transportation to the United States and Europe, alleging that
shipping costs "are about twice those in effect years ago when
hemp prices abroad were high."5 Secretary Eulogio Rodriguez,
of the Department of Agriculture and Commerce, however, vigorous
ly opposed limitation of production and exportation, stating in
a letter to Mariano Garchitorena, that such a step might work
more harm than good.4 He made the point that the Philippines
no longer held a monopoly on the production of abaca, and if a
limitation plan were put into operation, those countries not
bound by the scheme would be stimulated into serious competition
with Philippine trade. He stated that the Philippines could not
bind other countries to the plan, as had been done with regard
to the sugar industry; and since it would be an artificial
control it would be economically unsound and impracticable. The
price of hemp, he added, was not dependent upon supply in the
Philippines but was regulated by the world demand which fluc
tuated with no relation to the situation in the Philippines.
Limitation would thus be a useless sacrifice. He concluded by
intimating that it would be well were the local producers to
solve the internal problems of the industry first.
30£. cit.. XIV, No. 5 (May, 1938), p. 7
4Ibld.. p. 8.
196
Garchitorena, however, apparently held a different
point of view, which he expressed in a latter to Speaker
Montilla of the National Assembly. He stated that an inter
national limitation plan would be preferable to a purely local
approach, and continued, "An international limitation of abaca
and other hard fibers production is furthermore more feasible,
much more feasible than the international limitation on sugar
which has rendered such rich rewards...."® He concluded! "I
see no reason why the sugar producers...are able to maintain so
successfully their agreement on international limitation whereas,
on the other hand, the producers of abaca...(produced only in
the Philippines) cannot reach the same successful result. The
Philippines, with a monopoly in the production of abaca, which
is the queen of all fibers, is in a position to head the inter
national limitation of fibers. I congratulate Speaker Montilla
for the movement that he has just initiated."®
Elsewhere in the same periodical, Garchitorena addressed
an appeal to abaca producers, those "millions of small, suffering,
poor and destitute planters." He wished them to remember, in
the midst of their poverty and distress which "they so stoically
suffer" that they were remembered and that there was awaiting
them "a world of hopes and rehabilitation." This was because the
5Progressive Farming. Christmas edition, 1937, p. 30.
6Ibld.. italics supplied. The Secretary points out that
the nation had lost its monopoly of abaca; his division chief
states the opposite. It is possible that herein lies the explana
tion for the failure of the Government’s program for strengthening
the industry.
197
Government, “like a kind and solicitous parent,” was willing
to take them under its protection and to provide them with all
the "cares and attentions" needed, awaiting only the "collective
voice" of the producers who were "united in a strong and legal
association." His advice to the sufferers was to "associate
themselves without hesitation" into the National Association of
Abaca producers. This would entail no extra suffering since the
"dues are so small that they are within the reach of the most
modest citizen." This was because the association’s aim was
"not to amass big sums of money” but only to gather sums
sufficient for its efficient and economical operation. If this
were done, and if these dues were collected, they would be able
to form an association 4,so conscious and so numerous that their
petitions and recommendations may have sufficient weight in
obtaining from the government all the support and help that
they need."
Any project the Association would wish to carry out
should cause the members no worry about funds since "the govern
ment is sufficiently strong and powerful to carry them out in
all those cases where it is considered reasonable and just."
The producers, however, should see to it that the Government was
aware of their existence, of their "legal" association, of the
fact that the voice of the association was the voice of the
entire abaca population "as numerous as it Is indigent and as
worthy as it is numerous." No other message, he said, could he
send to his colleagues "with deeper conviction."7
?Ibid.. p. 17.
198
The fact that the Philippines’ monopoly of abaca was
more apparent than real was appreciated by a few government
experts in the Bureau of Plant Industry. It should have been
apparent to more individuals that the Philippines faced
challenges In its abaca market from competition in metal cordage
and various other vegetable fibers. In addition, the Bureau of
Plant Industry had conducted experiments, in cooperation with
the College of Agriculture of the University of the Philippines,
which indicated that two dangerous factors were at work in the
Philippines which would limit both the yield and quality of
abaca there: plant diseases, particularly the "bunchy-top" and
rapidly falling yields in old plantations which would make
further maintenance unprofitable.® In addition, these experts
were beginning to cast wary eyes toward the experimental work
In the East Indies, as well as British Borneo, which if success
ful would exert a serious depressing action on the value of
Philippine abaca.
While these facts were recognized by experts, others in
the industry were reluctant to face facts. They, along with
representatives of the other export items, presented a plea to
the members of the Joint Preparatory Committee, for the amend
ment of the provisions of the Tydings-McDuffie Law affecting
their industry. They declared that so long as no substitutes
SDomingo B. Paguirigiua. (ed.): "Philippine Monopoly of
Abaca More Apparent Than Real," The Commercial and Industrial
Manual of the Philippines. 1937-1938. p. 283.
199
existed, raw abaca fiber’s position In the American market would
be secure "because thus It shall always remain in America’s
free llst."^ Manufactures of abaca, however, consisting al
most wholly of cordage, would barely survive, they believed,
the last year of the Commonwealth. This inevitable loss could
only be avoided with the favorable amendment of the Law. Unless
a preferential rate were established, three major adverse
effects would be produced in the Philippines: " (a) The Common
wealth will lose about 1*50,000 of revenue yearly. (b) More
than one-half...of the people now dependent upon cordage manu
facture must look for other means to earn their livelihood.
(c) The reduction of abaca production by more than 10 per
centum will mean also that a quarter of a million people now
dependent upon abaca plantations must look for other crops to
plant."-*-® Also, they asked, since the United States imported
great quantities of cordage and twine in addition to raw fiber
(the Philippines supplying 12 to 32 per cent), would it not be
"just and proper that America should at least continue to
tolerate this, if for no other reason than that the cordage
supplied by the Philippines, is equivalent to about one-half
only of the output of American-owned cordage factories?" And,
lastly, in the same vein as the others, they stated: "Like the
sugar centrals the Philippine cordage factories are relatively
young and were developed through American encouragement.
9"Brief", presented to the Committee, in: Ibid., p. 287.
10Ibid.
200
Consequently, they should be given every opportunity at least
to recover the capital invested in them.
Tjfeje industry and every other Filipino would have been
much better off had the people dependent upon abaca plantations
looked for other crops to plant, especially rice and other food
items.
12
Executive Order Mo. 36, (3 June 1936) allocated the
cordage allotments for 1936-1937, to four cordage companies.
The allocation was made to off-set the surplus shipment during
the previous fiscal year of 1,538,600 pounds over the permitted
6,000,000 pounds. The quota for the next year was thus reduced
to 4,461,400 pounds. Later, Mr. H.T. Edwards, of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, predicted a bright future for Philip
pine abaca and expressed the opinion that it would not suffer
13
the same fate as sugar and other local products. That this
prediction was not far-fetched was seen as the allotment plan
continued to allow Philippine abaca producers to sell six
million pounds in the American market, duty free, being extended
14
on a yearly basis until the passage of the Tydings-KocialkowskL
i:LIbid. 12M.0.P.. Vol. 2, Pt. 1, pp. 658-660.
ISpp. cit.. p. 302.
^ E x e c u t i v e Orders 101, 4 June 1937, and 150, 28 April,
1938.
201
Act of August 7, 1939. This Act provided for the continuation,
until July 4, 1946, of the annual quota of six million pounds,
duty-free, and exempted abaca from the payment of any export
tax. While this undoubtedly was a reduction from what the
industry had hoped in its appeals to the Joint Preparatory Commit
tee, it was much more than they would have received had the
Independence Law gone unamended, and provided them with at
least an assured market at a fixed rate for the remainder of the
Commonwealth period. Their plea had been answered and the
major aid to the industry came again from the United States
rather than the Commonwealth Government, despite the latter's
reiterated promises for future aid. Some halting steps, how
ever, were taken.
The first of these steps was taken by President Quezon
when on November 9, 1937, he created the Advisory Abaca Commit
tee composed of eleven members, in addition to the Secretary
of Agriculture and Commerce, the Director of Plant Industry and
the Manager of the Fiber Inspection Service. This committee
was to serve in an advisory capacity to the Government, and Its
duties were "to study and submit recommendations as to best
economical method of stripping and preparing abaca fiber for the
market; (b) To study foreign market requirements as to quality
and classification of fiber; (c) To serve as liaison between
local abaca dealers and foreign buyers...; and (d) To study and
submit recommendations on all other matters affecting the abaca
industry."^5
15M . Q . P . , Vol. 3, Pt. 2, 1938, p. 769
202
In April, 1938, Mariano Garchitorena, Manager of the
Fiber Inspection Service, expressed alarm over the Increased
production of abaca, saying that It might lead to a situation
"worse than communism" unless remedial measures were taken.
He observed that, with high costs of production, the excess
would lead to lov/er prices and producers would be faced with
possible ruin.!6
In the same month, a special committee of the National
Assembly, headed by Assemblyman P.B. Asanza, held hearings on
the hemp situation, which indicated that the industry was In
grave danger of extinction unless remedies were forthcoming.
Various proposals were advanced. One was the organization of
a National Hemp Corporation, with a capital of 1*20,000,000, to
be financed by the Government. Another was the establishment
of hemp centrals controlled by the Government and employing
laborers at a wage of 1*1.00 per day instead of the usual low
wages paid in the industry. These centrals would, it was
suggested, control the production and sale of the fiber, thus
eliminating the middlemen. Members of the committee were
inclined to favor the abolition of the assessment tax on lands
planted to hemp and shift the burden of taxation instead from
the producer to the exporter.
Another suggestion was that the Government establish its
own merchant marine, or at least charter bottoms for the exporta
16PJC. XIV, No. 4 (April, 1938), p. 18.
203
tion of the fiber. This, it was argued, would bring about a
reduction In freight rates charged by foreign carriers which
amounted annually to some ^10,000,000. It was pointed out that
the hemp industry had sunk from first to fifth place In the
country1s exports, while the Industry was fast passing into the
hands of the Japanese, who were reported to control some 60 per
cent of the output.
On June 10, 1938, in a speech in Tacloban, Leyte, the
President assured the people of that province that he would do
all he could to bring relief to the industry. "In its last
session," he stated, "the National Assembly passed a law
designed to help the hemp industry. Although I am not sure
that the bill will remedy the situation, yet I will approve it
in an effort to do something to help the hemp industry in the
Philippines. We must do something for this very important
industry."!7 Two days later, speaking in Maasin, Leyte, the
President referred to the expenditures he planned for public
works, particularly the construction of roads. This was to
serve two purposes, he said* "Aside from the fact that roads
in themselves constitute the best means of promoting the material
development of a country, at this particular time appropriations
for roads and public works for Leyte are of great significance
in that you need employment because of the bad price of hemp."
He went on, however, by pointing out the necessity of meeting
the problem by otha* means than appropriating money for public works.
17M . 0 . P .. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, 1939, p. 80
204
The problem, he said, was to find means of aiding the
industry to "get a better price." This was, he admitted, a
hard problem to solve. He mentioned that the assemblymen from
the abaca regions had secured legislation authorising the use
of "several million pesos" to aid the Industry. But he was
not sure, in fact he had “very serious doubts", that the
corporation to be created would produce the expected results.
However, despite these doubts, he would sign the bill and
organize the corporation since he wanted to see whether the
project would be successful. It was quite possible, he said,
that they might lose “a few million pesos" but it was worth it
since the hemp Industry, in his opinion, "is the most important
Industry In the Philippines.” In fact, he declared, it was
"much more important than the sugar industry" and was at least
as important as the copra and rice industries. The reason for
this was, he said, because the sugar industry, "by its very
nature, tends to accumulate money in the hands of a few and
leave very little to the workingmen." This resulted in a
situation in which the "owners of the sugar centrals make more
money than the owners of the land, and the owners of the land
make more money than the men who work the land." The hemp
industry, however, was differently organized. The ownership of
the land was hot confined to the few as In the case of sugar
land, but was "divided among small landowners who work on the
land themselves." This insured a wide prosperity when prices
were good -- the benefits accruing to more people "than do the
205
benefits from the sugar industry•"■*-8
Making allowance for the facts that he was speaking not
to sugar producers but to hemp producers, and that this was a
political speech, we still may see one of the reasons for the
tremendous popular appeal of President Quezon. His frankness
in expressing whatever opinions he held, whether based on any
thing more than subjective reasons or not, appealed as much to
the people as his promises and his tremendously effective
oratory. His observations on the differences between the sugar
and hemp industries were not only effective but had much truth.
We might mention, however, that the sugar industry was far more
pampered by the Government than the hemp industry (despite
Quezon's expressed belief that it was "more important than the
sugar industry"),^9 withstood the ravages of the War better,
and in 1950, was in a far more favored position than the hemp
industry. It is, of course, true that the individuals in policy
making positions in the Government have been those individuals
more closely connected with the sugar industry than with any
other.
-*-Q Ibid.. pp. 89-90, passim.
■*-9For example, despite the unstable condition of the
hemp industry, the City of Manila, In March, 1938, proposed
the Imposition of a fee on the storage of hemp. This was
protested vigorously by hemp dealers and the various chambers
of commerce, who said the proposal "involves excessive taxation,
both at present and possible (sic) still more In the future it
is discrimination; it is without adequate reason from fire or
other risks; and it will result in a restraint of trade which
at present needs encouragement instead of repression." P J C .
Vol. XIV, No. 3 (March, 1938), p. 30. No such action was taken
against the sugar industry which was far wealthier and better
able to absorb such an additional tax.
206
The President continued, speaking in Maasin:
Well, that Is the advantage of the hemp industry.
If the price of hemp is good, those people who own
small lots can make money, be prosperous relatively,
and contented and happy.... 20
He then ventured on to more precarious ground*
In two ways at least, I believe that this law
will be beneficial. For one thing the corporation
can buy the hemp directly from the farmers them
selves, and thus offer competition to the middlemen,
-- those merchants who are exploiting the farmers.
Then there is another thing that we can do through
this corporation. The freight rate on hemp from
Manila to Europe or America is very high. This
corporation after buying a sufficient quantity of
hemp, could export it directly. By getting Its own
ships the corporation would save in transportation
expenses, which would redound to the benefit of the
farmer himself.21
The original doubts the President had about the effective
ness of this bill were well-founded. The corporation had
difficulties in buying the fiber directly and in offering
effective competition to the merchants, and never was able to
secure its own ships.
The following day, June 13, President Quezon spoke to
the people of Ormoc, Leyte. He told them much the same thing
but added another detail omitted In his two previous speeches.
"We are going to do the best we can to help you. But you know
hemp is sold outside the Philippines and the purchase price of
hemp dutside does not depend upon us. In one way we can be of
help to you. We are going to organize in this province agencies
2 0 0p. c l t .. p. 91. Italics supplied. 2 1 Ibid.
207
through which we can buy hemp so that your local merchants, if
they pay too low, may pay a little bit better with our competi
tion." And then concluded by sayings "With regard to roads
and schools, this is Santa Claus time for the Philippines—
you will have more money for roads and schools than you have
ever dreamed of. (Applause) This will b e one way of solving
the employment problem, and I expect the engineer, the governor,
and the municipal mayors, to give work to everybody without
discrimination as to party affiliations."22
The bill passed by the National Assembly was Common
wealth Act No. 332 which established the National Abaca and
Other Fiber Corporation. In his message of approval, the
President mentioned his doubts concerning the effectiveness of
the act but stated that since the industry was in need of help
he was approving it. However, he continued, "The Secretary of
Finance is of the opinion that it may take some time before it
can be certified that there are funds available in the National
Treasury for this purpose. And, until this certification is
made, the company as provided in the law will not be organized.
However, the National Development Company might organize a
Q%
subsidiary company along the lines provided in the measure."
The interesting point here is that despite the fact that the
National Treasury had enough funds to make it "Santa Claus tf.me"
22Ibld., p. 103. This last expectation of the
President was never fulfilled. Many of President Quezon’s
speeches are valuable to us for the things they leave unsaid.
23_, . , _
Ibid.. p. 491.
208
for public works, and despite his eloquently expressed interest
in the hemp industry, despite the shaky condition of that
industry and the passage of an act which the National Assembly
considered the best method of remedying the situation, there
were no fluids available for the purpose. Had the National
Assembly believed that a subsidiary company of the NDC would
have been able to accomplish the ends of the NAPCO, it seems
reasonable to suppose they would have so provided.
The NAPCO was formed With a capital stock of 1*20,000,000
and was to have the same powers over abaca as the NARIC possessed
over rice and corn. It was also authorized to prevent specula
tion and to stabilize prices. The corporation was to have
three aims: (1) to assure a permanent and sufficient produc
tion of abaca for domestic consumption and export; (2) to
prevent speculation in the fiber and to stabilize prices in
such a manner as to cover cost of production, plus a reasonable
profit; and (3) to improve the conditions of the producers and
laborers, dependent upon the industry for their livelihood. To
attain these purposes, the NAPCO was given the power to purchase
sell and export abaca as well as to grant loans under reason
able conditionsto producers.24
The importance of this corporation to the industry lay
24PJC, XIV, No. 6 (June, 1938), p. 8.
209
in the fact that the plight of the industry was due to internal
rather than external causes. The industry itself was respon
sible for the condition in which it found itself. A Bureau of
Commercle fiber agent spoke of "the antiquated practice of
producing hemp by Philippine farmers, their haphazard and lazy
plantation methods, resulting in low yield, inferior fiber and
unnecessary waste.”25 Figures were presented to show the
tremendous disparity, in the production of damaged grade fibers,
between Albay and Leyte on the one hand, and Davao on the
other. Where the first two produced, in 1937, some 21,000 and
81,000 bales, damaged fiber, respectively, Davao produced but
1,367 bales. It seemed clear that the alien producers in
Davao would soon wipe out the producers in other parts of the
country unless the local farmers did away with their old
methods and turned to an emulation of the Japanese. The point
that the principal problems of the industry were agricultural
and industrial was emphasized. The farmers paid little
attention to breeding better fiber and to the research work
conducted by the Government along other lines of production.
Three things that should be accomplished before the ameliora
tion of the industry could be achieved were, according to Mr.
Lomat: ”The organization of cooperative marketing association
of Filipino planters, granting of credits by a governmental
agricultural bank, the organization of a national abaca company."
25Venancio Lomat: "The Abaca Industry -- Its Funda
mental Problem,” Ibid.. p. 13.
210
These, the writer believed, might "alleviate the conditions
temporarily but for these entities to succeed, the agricul
tural and industrial defects must first be surmounted." He
too, brought out the point that the fiber was an export
product and for it to sell successfully in the world it would
have to meet the growing competition of other fibers, such as
sisal, and the increasing production threat of hemp in Borneo
and Java. The low prices of the day, he added, were causing
the farmers to complain, particularly because of the high
cost of production.
"But," he asked, "do we hear any complaints from the
Davao planters? No, because at the present level they can
still make a profit because of their low production costs due
to modern and advanced farming methods.*1 The Government, then
should first attack the problem from the agricultural and
industrial phases before going on to the secondary problems of
marketing and distribution.*^
In July, upon the recommendation of Mariano Garchitorena,
the Undersecretary of Agriculture and Commerce created a fiber
improvement section in the Fiber Inspection Service. This was
to take complete charge of all activities concerned with the
instruction of fiber producers and dealers with regard to the
proper manner of grading and preparation for sale. It also
was to advise on the improvement of the grade and quality of
2 6 j b i d . , p. 38. Italics supplied.
211
fibers through the introduction of modern methods as provided
by sections 1786 and 1796-B of the Revised Administrative Code.
On the fifteenth of July, President Quezon ordered
the transfer of £5,500,000 from the NDC to the hemp and ware
housing corporations to be established a few days thereafter.
&y the twenty-fourth, the NAPCO had a paid-up capital of
£1,275,000 out of the subscribed capital stock of 1*2,000,000,
and the following day the U.S. Department of Commerce announced
that the NDC had been authorized to allocate £5,000,000 of a
3*17,000,000 cash balance to organize the NAPCO. The twenty-
sixth saw the approval of the Warehousing Corporation by the
President, who, however, (as mentioned above) delayed action
on the fiber firm.
President Quezon, on September 15, released a state
ment to the press with regard to this corporation. The reason
for the delay in the organization was "the designation of
former Governor Locsin of Albay by the National Development
Company to first make a study and submit a report as to the
best means of helping the hemp i n d u s t r y . T h i s , in spite
of the numerous studies completed by various agencies of the
Government and interested i n d i v i d u a l s .28 in his "State of the
87M.0.P.. Vol. IV, Pt. 1, 1939, p. 703.
28cf.: Gregorio Anonas; "The Role of the National Develop
ment Company in Our Economic Readjustment." P J C . Vol. XIV, No.
12 (December, 1938), p. 16. The personal aouETfrs the President
held as to the effectiveness of the NAPCO were undoubtedly factors
in the delay. The reason given, a shortage of funds, is surpris
ing, in view of the fact that at the end of the year 1937, it
was reported by Auditor-General Jaime Hernandez to the President,
that the Philippine Commonwealth Government had ended the year
with a surplus of £=117 ,525,814.45. P J C . Vol. XIV, No. 3 (March,
1938), p. 29.
212
Nation” address to the National Assembly, January 24, 1939,
President Quezon mentioned the work of the Joint Preparatory
Committee on Philippine Affairs and their recommendations with
regard to future Philippine-American trade relations. One
recommendation was ”to bind copra and abaca free of United
States duty during the Commonwealth period."**® He suggested
that the Assembly formally endorse the recommendations so that
the U.S. Congress would early approve legislation effectuating
them ”in order to place American-Philippine trade relations on
a more fair and equitable basis, and to permit the Philippines
properly and intelligently to plan its economic adjustment in
preparation for independence."3®
The following month, he addressed the convention of
coconut and hemp producers in Manila upon their problems. He
told them that the Government could do little with regard to
world prices since these ”are influenced wholly by the laws
of supply and demand, and by the competition offered by
substitute articles•"31 There was an "abundance of fibers
competing with hemp" and when hemp prices rose its users
utilized these substitutes "thereby forcing...prices down to
the competitive level." However, the Government might control
the speculatory activities of dealers and brokers. "Proposals
have been made for the establishment of a single agency...so
as to eliminate objectionable speculatory transactions....
89M.O.P.. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, 1941, p. 251
30Ibld.. p. 252. 31Ibid., p. 34.
213
The question of excessive transportation rates...is also
being considered."38
There were, he pointed out, steps the producers could
take to aid themselves. These were improvement of the quality
of the products and the introduction of greater efficiency.33
"This field," he continued, "is entirely within our control;
and we can effect improvements through our own initiative and
effort.” He then mentioned the fate of the NAFCO. "I have
refrained from authorizing the organization of the National
Abaca and Other Fiber Corporation until the studies and
Investigations now being made should reveal the practical steps
that ought to be taken not only to remedy some of the problems
facing the hemp industry but also to lay out a specific
program of activities for the corporation.... I am prepared
to aid these industries, upon the formulation of a workable
plan which would insure a substantial and permanent benefit to
producers."®4
The chairman of this convention a day or two later
referred inadvisably to the President as one of the Horsemen
of the Apocalypse. This was with specific reference to the
President's program for the expenditure of the coconut excise
tax fund. The coconut industry was not to be aided by this
tax, and Assemblyman Lavides of Batangas ascribed the plight
of the coconut and hemp industries to the President's attitude.
38 Ibid. 55I b l d .. p. 35.
3 4 Ibid. Italics supplied.
214
Quezon's reply was sharp. He pointed out that the use of the
excise tax in the coconut industry was specifically prohibited.
Discussing what the attitude of the U.S. Congress would be
were he to allow any of the ^80,000,000 to be thus expended,
he asked: "Is there any one here who dares assert that he
would rather see enacted a bill which, in my judgement, might
be construed by the United States Government as a violation of
the law?" He continued: "I am responsible. My conscience
alone, not that of others, is responsible for whatever I do."
Turning his attention to the industries under discus
sion, he said: "The Philippine Government stands ready to
aid the two following industries: the copra and the hemp....
From the standpoint of the nation, it is evident that the
hemp and coconut industries are more important than the sugar
industry.... The Government is interested in both the hemp and
coconut industries, but so far the most effective way of
aiding you has not been found."36 He then placed the onus for
this situation on the individuals concerned.
You are to blame in the first place. You blame
us for aiding the sugar industry. But the sugar
growers know how to organize, while you do not.
Assemblyman Kalaw has quoted me as being opposed to
blocs. I have not changed my mind on that score, and
when I say that you ought to organize, I have in mind
an organization like this. I mean this organization,
and not the one in the Assembly. (Laughter) This
association should have been formed earlier. You
should do more than merely hold conventions. Nothing
is accomplished in these conventions except speeches,
3 5 Ibid., pp. 40-41. 3 6 Ibld
215
promises, no more.... You must organize yourselves in
your own provinces in the same way as the sugar
growers have done.... We have been unable to do any
thing for you because you are not organized and you
have not presented the problems confronting you....
In order to force your assemblymen, you do not have to organize.
These assemblymen are interested in the needs of their
respective districts. They are not going to forget
you. But the first thing you ask from them is the
condonation of your land taxes. Do you take this
petition seriously? Can there be anything more terrible
than this? Do you mean by this that the salvation of
the industry lies in the nonpayment of the required
taxes? Gentlemen, land taxes are the most equitable
of all taxes. I trust you will not make such a
petition again. It Implies a terrible psychology....
It seems as if the impression proposed to be created
is that your worst misfortune is to be obliged to pay
taxes.... Do not fight your assemblymen: fight me
over this question of taxes.
Returning to the plan for the excise tax, he stated
that it was the most important part of the report of the Joint
Preparatory Committee. 11If this portion of the Report be
approved,** he promised, "the money will be spent for your own
good; that is, the hemp and coconut planters.... More for the
coconut than for the hemp planters. I am in favor of helping
the coconut planters more because they pay the taxes....'1
Speaking directly to the hemp planters, he mentioned the
probable effect of the act passed to control the price of hemp.
I now reiterate my statement made at the time I
signed the Act, that the same would not guarantee
the rise in the price of hemp. To be able to control
it, we would be compelled to have a huge capital
available, which we do not have. You, hemp and coco
nut planters, forget that the Government has lost a
great deal of money in helping you out. The Philip
pine National Bank lost millions of pesos when It
attempted to maintain hemp prices at a high level....
37
Ibid., pp. 41-44, p a s s i m .
216
I am still ready to carry out the idea of the abaca
corporation.... We are deeply interested in extend
ing aid toiyou, but you must not expect us to do the
impossible. You must forget all about tax-delin-
quency condonations. You all know that the Tayabas
students gave a party at the Manila Hotel one night
and I suppose each one of them spent 3^25 and upwards.
Not even their parents can afford to spend so much
for a party. In order to be able to be present at
this convention, many of you have had to spend more
than enough to enable you to pay your taxes. The
Government will help you, but you must try to convince
us that you are ready to help yourselves.38
When the President had finished, the applause was polite
but unenthusiastic.
The President mentioned that, if necessary, he would
send abroad individuals to study the situation with regard to
the abaca industry. Subsequently, on May 17, he sent a short
message to the National Assembly suggesting that two of its
members go on separate missions to investigate abroad the best
means of promoting the abaca and coconut industries in the
Philippines.®9 This was necessary, he believed, because the
solution of the problems confronting these industries required
a knowledge of foreign markets.
The President continued to assure those dependent upon
abaca that the Government was trying to alleviate their plight.
The omission of any export tax on hemp (and copra) in the
Tydings-Koclalkowski Act was mentioned as one of the urgent
reasons for the acceptance of this act by the National A s s e m b l y . 40
5eIbid.. pp. 44-45, passim. Italics supplied.
®9Ibld.. p. 306. 40Ibld.. pp. 328 and ff.
217
Speaking of the NAPCO, he said that he could not offer any
guarantee that this corporation would give relief to the hemp
provinces.41 Yet, he believed, that the creation of this
corporation was an earnest and intelligent attempt to place
the industry on a stable basis, and "it is certainly a duty
which the Government of the Commonwealth cannot s h i r k . H e
expressed confidence that somehow the hemp industry could be
placed on a profitable basis, for this had already been
achieved in Mindanao.4® He appointed Assemblyman Sabido to
head the corporation because he was familiar with the trials
of the hemp farmers.44
On November 25, he sent a message to Mr. Sabido notify
ing him that he had just authorized the release of 1*2,550,000
as the initial payment from the sum of 1*10,250,000 subscribed
by the Commonwealth Government, and reminding him that the
corporation was expected to alleviate the "precarious situation
of the Filipino abaca producer" and "was not organized for
purposes of profit.”4® He urged the producers to organize
themselves as soon as possible to improve the industry and
eliminate undue manipulations.46
41Ibid., p. 209. 48Ibid. 4® Ibid.. p. 210.
44Ibid., "Address of His Excellency Manuel L. C&iezon...
on National Abaca and Other Fiber Corporation and the Hemp
Industry, delivered during the Induction into office as Manager...
of Hon. Pedro Sabido, at Malacafian, November 4, 1939." Pp.
208-210.
45I b i d .. p. 217. 46Ibld.. p. 218.
218
Placed on its own the NAFCO immediately set to work.
It sent observers abroad (and did so after the War, the most
recent appointee being sent to Costa Rica on a UN scholarship,
60 per cent of the expenses paid by the organization and 40
per cent paid by the Government) to study foreign methods of
production, grading and preservation. Meanwhile, it addressed
Itself earnestly to the problems at home. In a statement of
Its aims addressed to the ^’Ilipino Abaca Planters47 It declared
that their abaca plantations which had been in previous years
a source of wealth and happiness had "ceased to be so, because
of your indifference and inaction." This indifference had
permitted others to "reap the fruits of your labor and exploit
the precious heritage" of their forefathers. Coupled with
this Indifference, the planters instead of fighting “the
forces which oppress you" had been contented "with merely
complaining and reciting your grievances."46
However, this lost heritage could be regained if the
planters would work with the NAFCO and form cooperatives.
They would "gain nothing by just folding" their arms, "doubting
and vacillating." They were warned not to ally themselves
with private traders but to concentrate their energies upon
helping the c o ^ v . - f ion,
The purposes of the corporation were fourfold. It was
47Reproduced inj The Commercial and Industrial Manual
of the Philippines. 1940-1941. (Manila: Publishers Inc., 1941),
pp. 846-859.
48Ibld.. p. 846.
219
first of all to insure the producer the maximum share in the
value of abaca after considering the world market prices.
Secondly, it was to provide the producer with facilities
leading to the improvement of his plantation and the methods
of harvesting. Thirdly, it was to "make of the Filipino abaca
planters real farmers and organize them solidly under the
leadership of the Corporation, so that, the thousands of abaca
plantations may be managed and operated as one single planta
tion and the millions of Filipinos who depend upon this
industry for their livelihood, may be directed in their
activities as one man, insuring in all their moves UNITY OF
PURPOSE, UNITY OF ACTION AND UNITY OF MEANS." And, fourthly,
to arouse a sense of fairness and justice in the minds of
consuming nations who had arbitrarily created boards of control
over the prices of abaca.
In attempting to achieve the last two objectives, the
Corporation was moved rather by optimism than by realism. To
attain a spirit of oneness among the myriads of small, indepen
dent (and independently-minded) producers, scattered from
southern Luzon, through the Visayas, to the southermost shores
of Mindanao was certainly a task of enormous and extraordinarily
complicated proportions. And to create a sense of "fairness
and justice" in the "mind of consuming nations" was a task
which the League of Nations could not achieve and which the
United Nations has found difficult.
4 9 I b l d .. p. 847.
220
The NAFCO believed there were t hree major problems
facing the abaca industry. The producer actually did not
receive the share to which he was entitled from the price paid
by the consumer. Secondly, "due to the shortage of labor caused
on the one hand by the low prices...and on the other by the
increased rate of wages fixed by certain Corporations many
abaca plantations are rapidly deteriorating, causing great
losses to the owners." And, thirdly, few "are the abaca
producers who are real farmers.1' ^
It recognized that these were complicated problems
There were, it was discovered, five causes for the first
problem: unscrupulous middlemen; unreasonably high freight
charges; lack of liaison agencies in the world markets between
producer and consumer; a lack of organization among the
producers and "the absolute absence of a sound constructive
leadership, the apathy of some and the lack of understanding
by others of the economic dislocation which the world has
suffered...the last few years"; and "the arbitrary control of
abaca prices by the boards of control created by England and
Japan to protect their interests, absolutely disregarding the
interests of the abaca producers•"®1
Unscrupulous middlemen had flourished, the Corporation
stated,because the abaca producers were small farmers "who are
unorganized and more often than not are without resources."
50Ibid. 51Ibid.
221
They were compelled to turn to the middlemen for working
capital to develop their plantations. Since the interest on
such loans was generally one hundred or two hundred per cent,
compounded annually or semi-annually, the producer was never
able to emerge from debt. This situation the corporation had
power to change and the justification for its continued
existence lay in the fact that it was able, in many areas, to
liberate the producer from these usurious middlemen.
To reduce high freight charges the corporation stated
it would appeal to the sense of justice of the shipping
interests. A formidable task! It stated that "we are mindful
of the difficulties Involved in trying to secure renunciation
of privileges and advantages which time, practice and above
all, acquiescence of the abaca producers have sanctioned in the
last six years," but "we have faith in the justice of our cause
and shall fight until the end to correct this injustice."
The corporation intended to establish agencies in the
principal abaca markets of the world. In this it was partial
ly successful, having (by 1949) branches In the United States
and England.
The organization of cooperative associations was
expected to meet the evils springing from lack of unity.
Because of sad experience and the impelling force of necessity,
the corporation was confident that every abaca planter would
understand the necessity of joining solidly together, with full
222
faith in the management of the Corporation, and of placing all
their material and human resources at its disposal for more
effective direction. "I know,** the head stated, ’’that many
persons will grin skeptically when they read this. I would
ask them, if I may, to give the Corporation sufficient time
to evolve and carry out its plans." If readers of the article
did grin, their skepticism was justified by events. "Once
bitten, twice shy," is the attitude of the average Filipino
to cooperative ventures. Too many times in the past had he
entrusted his savings and labor to such enterprises, only to
see them dissipated by dishonest or inept leaders.
In dealing with arbitrary foreign control of prices,
the corporation showed naive optimism and an unrealistic
appraisal of the situation. It said:
Against the illegitimate speculations and unjust
control of the prices of abaca by the nations
consuming our product we should bring into play the
combined forces of the organized planters on the one
hand, the economic help of the Corporation and un
wavering support of the government on the other.
In a struggle of money against money, in other
words, of the National Abaca and Other Fibers Corpo
ration on one side and the powerful exporting
Corporations on the other, backed by their respective
governments, the Corporation is bound to lose. But
with the backing of our government and the solid
determined support of th e abaca planters, the strength
of the Corporation will b e evenly matched with that
of the elements of the other side, and it will not
then be difficult to obtain a just and equitable deal
for our abaca.bS”
The "other side" mentioned here were the governments and corpo
rations of England and Japan.
^ Ibid.. p. 851. Italics supplied.
223
The second problem, the shortage of labor coupled with
the rise in wages in other industries, would, the Corporation
stated, "automatically solve itself" as soon as the problem
with regard to the price situation was solved. "This does not
mean...that t h e . . .Corporation will patiently wait for the
prices of abaca to go up before tackling the problems of the
lack of workmen." A cause forthe lack of labor was the low
wages of fifteen centavos a day. To solve the labor problem
the Corporation would use mechanical strippers. How this
would benefit the individual workmen, receiving fifteen cent
avos a day, was not mentioned. The Corporation said it would
pay the stripper operators, "if possible, from 40 to 50 cent
avos a day," and hoped to "carry out this plan with the un
selfish cooperation of the abaca producers."^® Since mechanical
strippers would deprive many thousands of individuals, depen
dent upon plantation labor, of their livelihood, the solution
of this problem, then, would result in the creation of another.
This, however, is rather academic, since few mechanical
strippers were ever put into operation in the areas of concern
to the Corporation.
The solution of the third problem (too few producers
were real farmers) was expected to b e found in the establish
ment of model plantations and an attempt by the Corporation to
secure loans for planters from the Agricultural and Industrial
53ibid.. p. 852.
224
Bank Tor the improvement of their lands. Unfortunately, the
mere granting of loans, highly speculative under Commonwealth
conditions, could hardly result in producing automatically
farmers from non-farmers. It would seem that education had a
role to play but this was not considered in the analysis of
the situation by the Corporation. In 1950, most plantations
were still being operated in the age-old fashion and the
problem was still far from solution. The following statement
was as true in 1950 as in 1941, and, until the basic socio
economic problems of the nation approach a satisfactory solu
tion, will remain true.
Under existing circumstances, it is utopic to
expect abaca planters in the old regions to invest
money in the improvement of their plantations. No
man would spend his money and exert his energy
without well-grounded assurance that he would obtain
a fair return. If the Corporation were to advance
money for the improvement of these abaca plantations,
we are certain that the planters or producers will
spend the money in any other activities than in the
development of their plantations.54
S u m m a r y :-
We have attempted to relate in this chapter the major
developments in the abaca industry during the years of the
Commonwealth immediately preceding the War. It should be
apparent that the pattern presented in the early chapters on
the rice industry of the serious problems confronting this
basic industry and attempts to meet these problems, is duplica
ted in an almost Indentical fashion in attempts to meet the
54Ibld.. p.853
225
the problems in the abaca industry. It should also b e apparent
that these problems are also almost identical to the problems
of the former. As we proceed with this analysis we shall note
that similar patterns and similar problems are to be found in
the remainder of the subjects under discussion.
It was early suggested —that a special abaca advisory
committee be formed to investigate conditions within t h e
industry and make recommendations which would become the basis
for Government plans and programs. Such a body was created
after many similar requests by the industry for aid were made.
The members of the industry also requested the Government to
form a special corporation to look after the industry and to
raise the general level of prosperity within the indus
try. We have noted that there existed throughout t h e
Commonwealth a large amount of misunderstanding as to the exact
position of the industry in the world, with some prominent
officials reiterating the old cliche of the Philippine monopoly
of abaca and others attempting to point out the fallacy of
this belief. During this period, when many in the industry
were comfortably ensconced behind this fallacious belief,
specialists in other countries such as Borneo and Indonesia,
were conducting experiments in the production of the fiber in
those regions. Happy in their ignorance of this or blind to
its meaning, the members of the industry made no attempts
during this period to meet a probable future competitor.
The representatives o f the government encouraged
226
individuals In the industry.to associate themselves together
for purposes of unified action, in groups similar to those in
the sugar industry, promising if this were done Government
aid and assistance. At the same time, warnings by government
specialists that grave internal dangers of disease and falling
productivity of old plantation lands were spreading throughout
the industry, were Ignored. Instead, members of the industry
appealed to the United States, through the Joint Preparatory
Committee, for the extension of the status quo in exports to
America. In answer to this appeal, there was passed the
Tydings-Kocialkowski Act which permitted the continuance of
duty-free exports in a specified generous amount to the United
States until July 4, 1946. This additional aid granted the
industry was in contrast to the passivity of the Commonwealth
Government. The real tragedy lay In the fact that while the
legislators in the United States believed they were aiding the
Philippines, they were, in reality doing the reverse since
this aid encouraged the abaca planters to continue iron-clad
patterns of poor production methods, satisfied with their
immediate profits and content to let the future care for itself.
Hearings were held by the National Assembly leading,
it was hoped by some, to solutions to many vexing problems.
As a result of these hearings, proposals were made for the
creation of an abaca corporation similar to the National Rice
and Corn Corporation, the establishment of government-owned
abaca centrals and the establishment of a domestic merchant
227
marine. These were notable for their theoretical rather than
practical or effective nature.
President Quezon continued to reiterate throughout the
Commonwealth period his assurances to the people that something
would be done for the industry and expressing his personal
desire to help the people in the industry. He expressed, how
ever, grave doubts as to the effectiveness of what was to
become the National Abaca and Other Fiber Corporation although
he said that he would bring it into existence if only as an
earnest of the desire of the Government to aid. The President
also warned representatives of the industry that much of the
faults of the industry could be laid at their doors and demanded
that they begin thinking of self-help. It was up to them, he
believed, to solve the major portions of the problems facing
their industry and that he would refrain from implementing
programs and plans until he was convinced that they were work
able and practical. 'These were never provided the Government
by members of the abaca industry and with the creation of the
NAFCO, they believed that there remained nothing for the
Industry to do. This the NAFCO deplored but It, itself, un
fortunately, suggested a program that was distinguished more
for its unrealistic appraisal of most of the industry’s prob
lems and h o w they were to be solved than by Its achievements.
In addition, there was created, within the Fiber Inspection
Service of the Government, a Fiber Improvement section whose
program unnecessarily duplicated what should have been some of
228
the major aims and objectives of the Corporation. This costly
and inhibiting duplication of effort was to become a character
istic of the Commonwealth Government and, indeed, of the
Republic.
It was repeatedly pointed out by a few government
experts that the major problems facing the abaca industry were
internal, with particular emphasis on the weak marketing
practices and poor or destructive production methods. Their
accurate recommendation that the major necessity was to meet
these agricultural and industrial defects before proceeding
to secondary problems was ignored. As a result, by 1941, the
Industry was in the midst of a decaying phase, with a highly
problematical future and with no actual working plans or
programs to meet this condition. In addition there was no
cooperation by the planters themselves with even the preliminary
program of the NAFCO. The period of preparation for indepen
dence In the abaca industry, then, was spent in idleness and
vague dreams of future prosperity.
CHAPTER VII
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE COCONUT INDUSTRYi 1934-1941
During the early years of the Commonwealth, unit
prices of copra continued to rise until, by 1938, they had
reached the highest annual level since 1930. The quantity of
copra exported was lower, but the total shipped to the United
States was greater than at almost any time in a decade.
The United States, however, continued to legislate
against Philippine oil, altering its competitive position
adversely, with the Revenue Acts of 1935 and 1936. According
to the Joint Preparatory Committee Reports
The Revenue Act of 1935 amended that of 1934 so
as to place a compensatory tax on imported articles
manufactured or produced in chief value from taxable oils.
The rates were substantially the equivalent of the
excise taxes which would have been collected had the
oil ingredients been imported Into the United States
in the form of oil. The principal effect of this
law on the Philippines was to subject Philippine-made
fatty acids, vegetable lard, soap and other products
made from coconut oil to the equivalent of the excise
tax imposed on coconut oil.
The Revenue Act of 1936 amended both of the pre
ceding revenue acts. The most important changes,
from the standpoint of the Philippines, were the
extension of the list of taxable oils and the increases
in rates on some of the oils already taxed. The rate
on coconut oil was not changed.1
The Joint Preparatory Committee also pointed to the
fact that the so-called preferential position accorded Philip
pine coconut oil did not work "as much to its advantage as
1 Joint Preparatory Committee on Philippine Affairs,
Report of May 20. 1938. Vol. I, pp. 63-64. The change in the
act of 1935 went into effect September 30, 1935, and the second,
August 21, 1936.
229
250
might appear to be the case11 since "it is still obliged to sell
in the world market...."*2
Although the Revenue Act of 1934 did not change the
status of Philippine copra, experts believed that its effect
had been favorable because it tended to equalize the competi
tive position of copra and oil "relative to other articles on
which new or higher taxes have been imposed."^
During 1936, for the first time in some years, the
European buyers were very active and offered better prices
than the United States* market. However, uncertainty prevailed
and the market fluctuated widely, with speculative buying and
selling controlling the situation to a large degree. After
May, a general rise in price took place reaching levels which
had not been considered possible earlier in the year, with a
peak in October of a monthly average price of 1=14.25 for
resecada (dried). The market for coconut oil was much quieter
with little business for bulk shipments. Price fluctuations
occured over a narrow range, with quotations at 10 .20 for
January and 10.36 for December. Copra cake and meal showed
substantial increases, with the continued drought in the United
2 Ibid.
^"U.S. Revenue Act Boosts P.I. Oil," Philippine Journal
of C o m m e r c e . XIII, Ho. 1 (January, 1937), p. 13. The subtitle
of this article reads "Revision Apparently Gives Advantage to
a Number of Products." The reservation was well taken in view
of later developments. See also: "Review of Coconut Products
for 1936," The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philip
pines . 1 9 3 7 - 1 9 3 8 . p. 250.
231
States driving prices for foodstuffs to new highs. While
this normally would have meant a boom to planters, disturbing
factors entered the picture. With the boom in prices, due to
the sanctions applied against Italy, and the consequent heavy
demand for Philippine oils, many planters, in order to take
advantage of the high prices while they lasted, harveste'd all
the nuts possible, Including green ones which they converted
into low quality copra. This practice usually results in
injuries to the trees and lowers the bearing capacity.4 In
addition, a severe typhoon in December swept across South
eastern Luzon causing extensive damage to trees in Albay,
Sorsogon, and Camarines. These areas had barely recovered
from the severe typhoon of 1934. Also, Pacific coast crushers,
in the United States, faced difficult days because of the
great shipping strike which paralyzed both current and future
operations.
In an effort to aid the shaky coconut industry, the
National Assembly, on October 14, 1936, passed Commonwealth
Act No. 50, "directing the Secretary of Agriculture and Com
merce, the Philippine National Bank and the National Develop
ment Company to establish, operate and maintain warehouses for
copra and other marketable products," Any municipality wishing
such a warehouse erected was directed to apply to the Govern
ment through these agencies which would examine the request
and, if justified, invest funds in the enterprise. The
4Ibid.
232
municipality would make the proper arrangements with the Bank
or the NDC for reimbursement of the money invested. The
problem of adequate storage plagued the coconut producer
throughout the period. It had always been a source of dis
satisfaction, since so much of the planter's profits were
eaten away by storage charges, and with the unstable conditions
facing planters during the Commonwealth period, it added fuel
to discontent. The problem was never solved.
In 1937, ohe better prices the industry hoped for were
not forthcoming because of a shipping strike on the Pacific
Coast. The bulk of the copra exports to the United States
normally went to these Pacific Coast ports. It so happened
that at that time stocks on the coast were low and prices were
gradually rising. The benefits to be derived from the situa
tion, however, were denied the Philippine producers as they
were unable to get their shipments to the buyers. Hemp and
cordage were little affected by the strike since the demand
for lower grades of fiber generally came from Europe and from
the eastern United States.
It is diffucult in the United States to appreciate
the tremendous importance of a single crop in the life of the
people of the Philippines. Americans could not understand
why such an outcry was raised in the Philippines over the
control of coconut oil and copra. It should be realized that
at the time of the beginning of the commonwealth, there were
233
some 115,312,400 coconut trees In the Philippines, of which
about 75,414,200 were bearing and were distributed over
608,360 hectares or about 15 per cent of the total cultivated
area of the Philippine lands. when we say that about four
million people were wholly or in part dependent upon the coco
nut industry it is difficult to grasp just what this means to
the country. It may be better appreciated if it is realized
that over 75 per cent of the taxes of the province of Tayabas
(now Quezon) came from the assessment on coconut lands and
trees; between 50 and 75 per cent for Laguna, Marinduque,
Masbate, Oriental MIsamis, Romblon and Zamboanga; and between
25 and 50 per cent for Agusan, Bohol, Camarines Norte, Camarines
Sur, Gapiz, Cotabato, Lanao, Mindoro, Palawan and Surigao. The
government assessment, in 1933 amounted to ^327,099,255, from
which the government derived a direct land tax of 1*2,872,599,
excluding revenues from industries resulting therefrom. It
was estimated that over 4 million pesos was derived from the
coconut industry annually by the government. To a large extent,
inter-island shipping depended upon the coconut Industry.®
Imagine, for a rough comparison, seventeen of the
states, of the United States, containing some 33,000,000 of
the population of the country in 1940, with all rail, truck,
bus and water lines of transportation between New York and Los
Angeles, wholly or in part dependent upon one crop. Imagine
^"Philippine-American Trade Relations," Bureau of
Commerce, P J C . XIII, No. 2 (February, 1937), pp. 12-13.
234
further what the fate of these states, transportation facil
ities, and people would be were their future dependent upon
Europe as the major buyer for the crop (sone 96.5 per cent).
Imagine still further that while-this crop, corn for example,
was selling in the American export centers at ten to fifteen
cents a bushel, a tax was imposed in Europe of eight cents a
bushel, this tax then being remitted to the United States
Government with the proviso that it was not to be used, in any
way, to aid the corn producers or those engaged in the corn
business, directly or indirectly.
This, in effect, was the fate of the coconut producers
In the Philippines. Coconut producers, in 1937, were making
a profit of $0.0006 per pound on coconut oil. A five per cent
export tax was provided by the Tydings-McDuffie Law (Section
6), to be levied during the sixth year following the inaugura
tion of the Commonwealth Government, which amounted to $0,001
per pound. It was further provided that, in the tenth year,
the export tax would amount to 25 per cent or $0,005 per pound.
The reason for the panic in the coconut-growing regions when
these provisions were announced should be self-evident. They
believed that, with the imposition of this export tax, their
industry was faced with extinction. The situation was sadly
ironic in that the industry had been developed largely through
the Initiative of buyers in the United States who were now
attempting to destroy it — each of which actions taking place
with no thought, of resultant effects upon Philippine economy,
either in the United States or In the Philippines.
235
In order to meet a highly uncertain future, the old
Philippine Coconut P l a n t e r s 1 Association was reorganized into
the Philippine Coconut Association, including for the first
time exporters, millers and industrialists. The new organiza
tion petitioned the Government for the reservation of £=1,000,000,
from the proceeds of the excise tax fund, for research,
educational promotion of the industry and publicity in the
United States. Their hopes, however, were thwarted. This
Association was formed at the initiative of the Bureau of
Plant Industry who had arranged a meeting of interested parties
at the time of the 1937 Philippine Exposition. Its aims were
to improve generally the industry through seed selection,
fertilization, cover-cropping, research into methods of
improving the quality of copra and to encourage industrializa
tion and commercialization of the numerous by-products.
Another purpose was to keep members informed about developments
in the industry and, of course, one of its major objectives
was to fight and eliminate the objectionable provisions in the
Independence haw and other American tax legislation. The
Director of the Bureau, Hilarion Silayan, instructed field men
in the Bureau to aid in all possible ways in the organization
and direction of local chapters of the Association.
On October 18, 1937, President Quezon addressed a
message to the National Assembly. In the course of this
famous speech, dealing primarily with the demand for indepen
dence in 1939, he touched upon the subject of social justice
236
under the Commonwealth and the means of carrying out this
program. Since the main problem was one of finance, he
mentioned that "fortunately for us a new source of income has
come to our hands that will facilitate the carrying out of our
program of social justice and economic readjustment." This
was the proceeds of the excise tax (amounting to §=95,507,227.30
at the end of June , 1937) in the American Federal Treasury,
"the transfer of which amount to the Treasury of the Philip
pines I had secured before I left America on my last trip."®
He stated that the sum was then ready for appropriation.
The final decision as to how the fund shall be
spent is, of course, yours. But in the exercise of
my constitutional prerogatives I shall take the
liberty of making some suggestions regarding the
purposes for which this money should be spent.
The first thing that we must bear In mind is
that this fund does not constitute an ordinary in
come of the Government upon which we may depend for
recurring obligations. When independence shall
have been granted, this source of our income will
cease. Were we to defray from this fund services
that we cannot maintain once this Income is
terminated we would have thrown away this money
thus spent. ’
We must therefore limit the use of
this fund for what might be termed capital invest
ments or for self-supporting enterprise. Above all
we should use this fund for national objectives,
for purposes where the greatest good may be derived
by the Filipino people.
Concretely, I recommend that this fund be
devoted to the following p u r p o s e s :
1. To improve the sanitary condition of centers
of population by constructing water systems
or artesian wells.
2. For combating malaria where there is
assurance that it can be done at reasonable
expe n s e .
3. For the prevention of tuberculosis and the
®P J C . XIII, Nos. 10-11, (October-November,1937), p. 15.
This was not accurate. The transfer of funds was automatic.
The President had nothing to do with the transaction.
237
establishment of more sanatoriums, as it is well
known the white plague Is the worst scourge
afflicting our race.
4. For the building of leprosariums....
5. For extending free dispensary service to the
poor not only in centers of population but
also in outlying barrios....
6. For building public schools in every barrio
where there is a sufficient number of
children justifying the opening of the school.
7. For opening national highways and helping in
the construction of provincial and even
barrio roads whenever the respective
provinces and municipalities pledge themselves
to maintain the roads constructed, and in the
case of barrio roads, where the volume of
traffic on said roads also justifies their
construction.
8. For construction of office buildings for the
National Government so as to reduce, if not
eliminate, the continued expense in rents.
9. For the purchase of large landed estates and
their resale in small lots to the actual
occupants thereof.
10. For the development of water power, the
reforestation of denuded areas, the coloniza
tion and development of Mindanao; and
11. For the financing of a long range program of
economic adjustment necessary to prepare the
country for the new industries which at the
same time will give work to the unemployed.?
The disposition of these funds was to provide many
heated discussions for the remainder of the Commonwealth
period. Q u e z o n ’s eleven objectives were never reached, nor,
with the exception of a few enterprises touching immediately
upon the benefits to a few branches of the government and the
construction of one highway in Mindanao, were they ever
seriously started.
7
I b i d . Italics supplied. W'e may consider that the
money was thrown away since the services organized were unable
to continue in operation without extensive appropriations by
the Government, k great portion of such services, begun with
these funds, have long since disappeared.
238
There was much objection to using the funds for the
redemption of the nation's bonded indebtedness as had been
suggested by many in the Government. Secretary of Finance
Antonio de las Alas, Auditor General Jaime Hernandez, and
Executive Secretary Jorge B. Vargas, suggested that the funds
be set aside for the creation of a merchant marine. The Auditor
General stated that all Philippine bond issues had fixed dates
of maturity, and were provided with sinking funds adequate
for the purpose. Suggestions were made by the others also
that the funds to establish the capital stock of the National
Development Company would probably come from the excise tax
funds. The Company was to be capitalized at ^20,000,000, half
of which had been provided. However, even the entire amount
would be insufficient, some stated, to meet the demands of a
merchant marine, necessitating application of excise tax funds.®
A Filipino columnist in America, Vicente Villamin,
claimed that the application of the excise tax upon Philippine
copra was beneficial and would prove a godsend to the industry
and the Government.® The Secretary of Finance, however, felt
differently, and immediately began laying plans to initiate
strengthening measures for other industries as well as remedial
measures for the coconut industry itself. His first plan was
the establishment of abaca and coconut centrals which would be
charged with research and other activities leading to a general
improvement in the respective industries. He instructed
®Tha Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philip
pines. 1 9 5 7 - 1 9 3 8 . p. 270.
9 Ibid.
239
Dr. M.L. Roxas, Agricultural adviser in Malacafian, to proceed
to the Bicol and Tayabas to select localities.
The B u l l e t i n , in an editorial of May 8, 1937, suggested
that a large portion of the funds be used to strengthen and
rehabilitate the government pension system to reward faithful
and suffering employees.^® President Quezon never considered
this suggestion.
High Commissioner McNutt counselled the wise spending
of the funds whatever was done with them, and Assemblyman
Felipe Jose and former Representative Francisco Varona
suggested that a portion of the funds be utilized for the
development of agricultural colonies in Mindanao. 'This
suggestion, too, received short shrift.
The Department of Interior announced that it would
submit a plan to the cabinet suggesting the use of P=10,000,000,
of the fund, for the improvement of sanitary facilities in
various communities throughout the nation. This worthy plan
was also Ignored.
Secretary Vargas, replying to requests of planters,
stated definitely that the President would not approve the use
of any portion of the funds for aiding the coconut Industry,
either directly or indirectly. One definite plan, he stated,
would be the extension of the railroad lines to Legaspi, Albay;
10Ibid., p. 271
240
since this line would extend rail service for planters, he
believed it would be of benefit to them. In addition, he
suggested that some way might be found to use a portion of the
funds for the introduction of new drying methods for copra.
If this proved impossible, he thought that perhaps a portion
of the funds provided by the New Industries Act could be made
available for that p u r p o s e . ^
Manuel de la Fuente, president of the Manila city
board, advanced an excellent suggestion for the disposition of
the funds. This was to provide a revolving calamity fund of
1*10,000,000, for the improvement of housing conditions in
Manila, the extension of small loans to laborers and low
salaried employees, with preference to be given to victims of
calamities. Councilor Hermenegildo Atienza declared that the
proposal was "one of the most progressive measures to amelio
rate conditions of masses" yet advanced. "We cannot talk of
social justice and reform," he said, "without taking the first
step essential to any program of this nature — the improve
ment of the housing conditions of the m a s s e s . " ^ Councilor
Jose Advincula declared that such a fund would be "providential"
and Councilor Celestino Ramos said that it was "a right step
in the right direction." He was supported by Councilor Vicente
Alindada who declared that it was an excellent investment
"from which not only the government but the nation may profit
considerably in the form of a healthy and contented populace.
11Ibld.. p. 272. I2 Ibid. 15Ibid.. pp. 272-273
241
The city councilors, however, spoke In vain.
Secretary Eulogio Rodriguez, of the Department of
Agriculture and Commerce, stated that the funds accruing from
the excise tax belonged to the people at large and would be
spent for the economic development of the country as a whole,
the funds being apportioned to the different provinces. He
believed that the plan to use 1=23,657,000, for the realization
of a five-year road and highway construction program in
Mindanao and Sulu, was excellent, and should be supplemented
b y aid to the fishing industry and other infant industries.14
The Philippines Herald pointed to a danger not
thoroughly understood by most observers of the time. This
fund would accrue to the Government only so long as Philippine
copra and oil were sold in the American market. As early as
1937, signs were apparent that exports to the United States
were decreasing in value. If this trend were to continue,
naturally the amounts accruing to the fund would decrease.
Since the end result would be the crippling of the coconut
industry as well as bringing serious injury to the financial
structure of the government, the paper counselled full support
to the Filipino members of the Joint Preparatory Committee in
their struggle to adjust satisfactorily the economic relations
between the two nations.
, In September, 1937, the Philippine-American Joint
14Ibid., pp. 273-274. 15Ibid.. p. 274
242
Preparatory Committee returned to Manila after a tour of
inspection and investigation in the Bicol, Visayan and Mindanao
provinces. It then conducted its third and last series of
public hearings. Various briefs, prepared by the different
chambers of commerce, were submitted, supplemented by oral
arguments delivered by the authorized representatives of these
organizations. fhe general tenor of the pleas was for an
indefinite continuation of the free-trade relations. If this
proved unacceptable, men advocated a reasonable period of time
for readjustment before the free-trade period was terminated.
The first day of hearings was given over to the coco
nut industry, the representatives of which pleaded for a
fairer treatment through the abolition of the excise tax and
the continuation of existing trade arrangements between the
two countries, even after independence.
The Philippine Coconut Association recommended that
copra should continue on the free list; that no excise tax
which did not apply equally to Philippine and foreign products
be levied; and that a duty-free quota of coconut oil and
desiccated coconut, after independence, be established to
continue as lone; as the United States needed to import these
commodities. Mr. Maximo M. Kalaw, acting president of the
Association, appealed to the committee, saying: "We do not
wish to infringe upon the American farmers or upon the profits
derived by them, but in view of the fact that the United States
243
does not and cannot supply its own industrial oils and fats,
the Philip p i n e s ... should be entitled to even more advantageous
position than that of any competing oils and fats produced in
other countries not under the American flag."16
Mr. Kenneth B. Day, spokesman for the industrialists,
said:
The Philippine coconut oil industry is before
you today to fight for its life. Ours is not a
question of increased advantages--we ask none. It
is not a question of special privileges. It is
rather a question of non-discrimination. Our busi
ness is already limited in volume by the Tydings-
McDuffie Act. All we are asking is the right to
continue to operate on this limited basis, not only
through the period of the Commonwealth but thereafter.17
The coconut oil mills recommended the annual admittance
of two hundred thousand long tons of coconut oil to the United
States "under the same conditions and terms as those given to
oil made from duty-free copra shipped...to the United States."
This meant that such oil would be free of export taxes and
import duties. They also suggested "a readjustment of the
excise taxes to permit Philippine coconut oil to recover its
position as American oil in the American market, which position
had been adversely affected by the products of American agricul
ture rather than by competing vegetable oils and fats imported
from foreign countries.rt They concluded by advocating "a
continuation of this arrangement not only during the Common
wealth period, but also indefinitely thereafter."-1-8
160p. cit.. p. 61. 17Ibid. 18Ibld
244
The condition of the local market during the last
quarter of 1937 was very quiet the Bureau of Commerce stated,
"as traders' ideas drifted far apart under the influence of
two factors: the absence of encouragement from the American
oil market which prevented the mills from raising bids
materially, and the higher copra market in Europe which enabled
exporters to offer better prices than the mills."-*-9 Europe
continued to outbid America, but the industry gained little
advantage thereby because of the great lack of shipping. The
market was a source of disappointment to those who had believed
that year-end trends would be better. They drew their idea
from market activities in 1936 and did not consider the opera
tion of entirely different factors. The previous year had
seen a shortage of fats and oils in the United States arising
from a larger demand due to the industrial revival and greater
purchasing power. This was also true in Europe . At the same
time, the local supply was materially restricted aiding in the
rise of prices. While this was temporarily beneficial, it had
the ultimate effect of encouraging buyers in the States to
look elsewhere for such cheaper oils as palm, kernel, and babasu
oil from Brazil, Europe, and European dependencies. By the
middle of the year, consumers had bought coconut oil, as well
as cheaper oils, heavily, to last them through the year. So
adequate were the stocks that large soap manufacturers held
19PJC, XIII, Nos. 10-11 (October-November, 1937),
p. 54.
245
aloof from the Philippine market from July forward. In
addition, large cotton and corn crops in the United States
hit Philippine oil heavily, with cotton-seed oil in abundance
and its price dropping considerably below coconut oil. The
outlook, then, was far from bright, despite the rosy picture
painted by Bureau of Commerce in its review of business
conditions for the year.2^
The Bureau of Plant Industry pointed out to the indus
try the importance of coir (coir is the dried outer husk of
the coconut) as an additional source of income, able to bring
21
in annually over three million pesos. It was important to
consider such other products E.E. Cruz, the Bureau spokesman
said, "in the face of the impending ruin of the coconut indus
try which is brought about by world competition, recurring
typhoons, pests and diseases, excise tax, plus the present
pp
limitation and forthcoming export taxes that will be levied....”
Some coir was consumed locally by furniture factories and auto
mobile industries. The foreign market, if properly developed,
would undoubtedly take the remainder of the annual production,
2*3
or so the Bureau predicted. The many uses of coir, if the
industry had developed them, would have provided a considerable
cushion for the tired industry. Actually, despite the abun
dance of coir in the Philippines, the country imported coir mats
from other countries.
20S u p r a . pp. 176-177
2 ^Eugenio E. Cruz: "Coir Industry of the Philippines'’
P J C . XIV, No. 1 (January, 1938), p. 9.
2 2 Ibld. 2 3 Ibid.
246
The rising discontent with the condition of the indus
try was brought’ to a head in the convention held by the hemp
and coconut producers in February, 1938. President Quezon
urged an educational program to acquaint the public, both in
the Philippines and the United States, with the problems facing
the industry thus removing the indifference or hostility
directed against it. He went on to say, however, that although
the government was prepared to give as much aid as possible,
the main task was the industry's and the salvation of the
industry lay within itself.24 Cornelio Balmaceda, at that tirae
acting manager of the National Produce Exchange, told the
convention, that the elimination of the middlemen "would tend
to increase the prices which the local producers will get If
the plan for an organized system for handling local commodi
ties presented to the convention is carried out."2 ^ He pro-
posed a system which would place the producers, large or small,
close to the exporters or manufacturers; the small farmers
being organized into effective groups for the cooperative
selling of their products. A system of farm credit would
enable these small producers to get loans at low interest
enabling them to meet the demands of the market. The system
would necessitate a chain of warehouses for the convenience of
the small producers. At the top, the National Produce Exchange
would act as an organized central market. While not enthusias
tic, the convention was interested. It adopted a policy of
wait-and-see, and the program was never effectively carried out.
24Supra. pp. 214-216.
25PJC, XIV, No. 3 (March, 1938), p. 38
247
The Coalition Platform, in 1938, had promised that
"we shall support the organization of the producers of abaca,
coconut, tobacco, rice, and other articles for the defense and
promotion of their interests...* We shall help industries
based on the coconut and its derivatives, and we shall continue
w o r k i n g for the elimination of unjust burdens imposed in the
United States upon those products. We shall exert our utmost
wi t h a view to finding a sure and profitable market for...
c o conut...and other important p r o d u c t s ...and if necessary with
the financial assistance of the government.
In his budget mes s a g e to the National Assembly, In
1938, President Quezon stated, however, (referring to the
excise tax): "This means that not only the proceeds of the
said excise tax, but even the funds derived from the local
revenue of this Government cannot be used for aiding the coco
nut industry as long as we continue receiving the benefits of
the coconut oil excise tax."2^ He concluded by saying that he
was transferring, from the proceeds of the excise tax,
1*26,840,000, for the purpdses of "replenishing the current surplus,”
to certain "extra-ordinary purposes." These were: Subscription
of stock of the National Development C o m p a n y ,1=10 million; sub
scription of stock of the Manila Railroad Company, f=l million;
for the acquisition of land and construction of building for
laborers, 1*250,000; a loan to the Manila Railroad Co., 1*9,990,000;
o ft
^ Messages of the Presi d e n t . Vol. I (rev.ed.), pp.
250-251. Italics supplied.
27
M.O »P.. Vol. 3, Pt. 1, p. 234. Italics supplied.
248
for the purchase of homesites, 11 million; for reforestation
and afforestation, 1250,000; for organizing the National Power
Corp., 1*250,000; a revolving fund for the construction of
water works, 1*2 million; for stabilizing prices of buntal
fibers, 1=500,000; for a survey and subdivision of public
agricultural lands, 1=100,000, and, for the new census,
11,500,000.2 ® He concluded, by emphasizing the need for
continued economy.
The excitement and anger of the coconut producers,
expressed in their convention, in February, 1938, can be readily
understood. They saw the appropriation of twenty-six million
pesos, for enterprises many of which were considered needless,
and they were unable to touch a centavo of it, either directly
or indirectly.
President Quezon addressed a tea party of coconut
planters and municipal mayors at Malacafian, on February 19.
Here he discussed the resolution passed by the planters asking
for the abolition of the excise tax. He did not believe that
Congress would act on the resolution but continued; "I am
willing, nevertheless, to support you in your request.... I
have not changed my attitude in this respect although I confess
that I am not as positive today as I was before that the tax
had done any harm to the industry, or that If it did, the harm
was not so much as I had thought it to b e . " 29 He stated that
28Ibid., pp. 249-251. 29M.0.P.. Tibi. 4, Pt. 1, p. 27
249
he thought it was unfair to those who were taxed not to
derive benefits from their taxation and promised to support a
movement aimed at the abolition of the proviso prohibiting
the use of excise tax funds to aid the coconut industry, were
they unable to secure the abolition of the entire tax. But,
he continued, "as long as the law exists, I will continue
complying with the law honestly and strictly."30
The storm of indignation and discontent that arose
throughout the country grew so intense that President Quezon
went to some pains to explain the situation, particularly in
his home province of Tayabas, a large coconut-producing region.
He told his people of the difficulties facing him in this
problem, saying frankly that there was little he could do.
The solution, he said, lay in part with the planters. He was
particularly interested in seeing that the people learned new
uses for the coconut and that they increased their consumption
of Its products. The President believed there were great
possibilities for the coconut industry in utilizing coconut
for bukayo (the meat of the nut cooked with sugar) and matamis
3a bao (coconut jelly).3^ "The trouble with us Filipinos,"
the President said, "is that we forget what is truly our own.
We have so many needs and uses for our coconut. Why don't we
rediscover them so as to increase not only our export but also
30 I b i d . , p. 30.
3 -*-The first has become a specialty of Pangasinan province
and is eaten with relish by Americans in the Philippines. The
second has extraordinary possibilities as it tastes like honey
when spread on warm toast.
250
our local consumption of coconuts? The National Development
Company has several expert chemists studying the different
uses of the coconut; more important, however, is to have our
ii 3 2
coconut planters take full initiative in this matter.
During the Japanese occupation, with food a major problem,
many Filipinos rediscovered the coconut, and the consumption
of its fats and oils staved off starvation for countless
thousands living in areas where the nuts were available.®®
In April, 1938, the National Assembly, fearful that
the coconut Industry would suffer complete destruction,
created a committee to study means of improving it, with
Assemblyman Lavides of Tayabas as Chairman. The committee was
charged with conducting a survey and recommending measures for
Increasing production. The Assembly hoped that immediate
action would be taken. It was pointed out that the industry
had but one good year (1936) since 1930, and the warning of
H.B. Pond, In 1934, was recalled; he had stated that under the
provisions of the Independence Act and the Revenue Act of 1934,
coconut profits would be eliminated after the fifth year of
the Commonwealth or surely after the sixth year.®4
5 8 Ib id.. p. 213.
33
That the industry is capable of great extension is
unquestioned but Filipino capital will have to lose Its
timidity and its desire for high returns on Investment before
the industry can stand steadily on its own feet.
34,,The Future of Our Basic Industries,11 The Philip
pines Herald Y e a r b o o k . 1954-1955. pp. 101, 110.
251
The Philippine Coconut Association, in May, called a
meeting of two hundred planters in Siniloan, Laguna. Governor
Bonifacio extolled the advantages of the association and urged
the planters to take united action to meet the crisis. He
stated that the problem could be solved only if the planters
pledged, before adjourning, a contribution of two centavos per
one hundred kilos of copra sold, for a working fund.
The same month it was reported that Governor Bonifacio
was starting a campaign to educate the people of his province
to look for a new industry to replace the coconut, the major
source of their inconB . With representatives from the Bureau
of Commerce, Bureau of Plant Industry and the Bureau of Fores
try, he visited some twenty-eight municipalities for this
purpose and at the same time initiated a study of the economic
conditions existing in the province. This was believed
essential since the continuing poverty produced a rising trend
In discontent and lawlessness and weakened the Government's
general economic program.
On May 20, the Joint Preparatory Committee released
its report, in which it made the following recommendations;
Coconut oil should be exempt from Philippine
export taxes but, in lieu thereof should be subject
to annually declining duty-free quotas commencing with
200,000 long tons (of United States imports) for the
calendar year 1940. This amount should be reduced
by 5 per cent for each succeeding calendar year until
it equals 150,000 long tons for the calendar year
1945. For the period January 1, 1946, through July
3, 1946, the quota should be one half of the quota
for the preceding year, or 75,000 long tons. Ship
ments in excess of the aforementioned quotas should
be subject to whatever United States duty may be in
force at the time.
252
The Committee also recommends that the Imposition
of full United States duties should be postponed from
July 4, 1946, to January 1, 1961, during: which
interim United States imports of coconut products,
except coconut oil, should be subject to preferential
tariff r a t e s , commencing with 25 per cent of the
United States tariff rates in force on July 4, 1946,
and increasing on each subsequent January 1, by 5 per
cent of the then-existing rates. Coconut oil should
be subject to the above duties only on those amounts
In excess of declining, duty-free quotas, fixed a s
follows; for the period July 4, 1946, through December
31, 1946, the quota should be 75,000 long tons; for
the following calendar year,it should be 140,000 long
tons; and thereafter it should be reduced annually by
10,000 long tons (5 per cent of 200,000 long tons)
until 1961....
The Committee believes that if the above recom
mendations were adopted, the Philippine Coconut indus
try would have an adequate opportunity to adjust i t
self to a position independent of the preferential
tariff and excise tax treatment in the United States
m ar k e t .35
The Report met wi th an unenthusiastic reception in the
Philippines.
By October, 1938, some P128 million in coconut oil tax
money had been placed to the credit of the Philippine Common
wealth in the United States Treasury, a sum which excited the
politicos in the Philippines to a fever pitch. Elaborate
plans were laid for spending It, but little of permanent value
resulted. The money was used to develop the future capital
site, Quezon City (at the end of the war, a wasteland and no
money for development), a new legislative building, a Jai Alai
palace, the hemp industry, the NARIC, cooperative enterprises,
the purchase of the Buenavista estate, the Koronadal Valley
settlements,a fruit and fish cannery,a textile mill, two sugar
550p. eft., pp. 66-67.
253
refineries, and others. In 1950, the Quezon City capital site
was still largely on paper, the war-ruined legislative building
was being rebuilt, the Jai Alai palace (in sharp contrast to
the rest) had been the first repaired and started in operation,
the hemp business was almost prostrate, the NARIC a practical
failure, cooperatives in their fetal stage, the Buenavista
estate still in the courts, Koronadal settlements barely begun,
the fish and fruit canneries but fond memories, the textile
mill at a standstill facing disposal, and the sugar refineries
producing spasmodically, and likewise facing disposal.
A sharp critic of the Commonwealth at that time had
*2£
this to say of the oil money:
® 6 In a message to the Second National Assembly, on the
budget for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1940, President
Quezon referred to the fund, in a special section. He stated
that, at the end of 1937, there existed a cash surplus in this
fund of 1*82,669,860.82, and with additions and interest, the
total amount available for 1938 amounted to over 3*103 million.
The unexpended cash balance for 1938 was over P=71 million, with
total outstanding balances of authorized appropriations made
against the fund as of that date being ff lO million, which was
3*39 million greater than the available balance in the fund.
However, no deficit was incurred, he said, because he had
authorized the release of only some 1=44 million. The total
income expected for the six months ending June 30, 1939, was
3*21 million, the total amount available for release at that
time being ^=48 million. The estimated income from the fund
for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1940 would amount to 3^25
million. iSIth authorized expenditures, In the budget for that
year, there would remain, he said, only a n unappropriated
surplus of 3*6 million. Therefore, he concluded, there could
be no further appropriations made from the fund, especially
when It was realized that the fund Income would not be avail
able until it was actually accredited to the Philippine
Treasury. For this reason, he stated, to maintain the balanced
budget presented, it was necessary to effect substantial
economies, "limiting salary increases as well as creation of
n ew positions to only those found to be absolutely necessary
to insure the efficient operation of the government." M . O . P ..
Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 274-275, p a s s i m .
254
In the opinion of some critics, the money should
be used to pay off all the bonds of the government-
owned Manila Railroad,37 and all the Commonwealth's
public debt--which is not large.... However, Manuel
Quezon is a politician, and he may want to be Presi
dent again after this term is over. It is normal
for politicians, in any country, to use available
funds in the showiest possible way. Building an army
and paying off the public debt are gestures that do
not impress the electorate half as much as public-
work3 funds scattered liberally In the proper
geographical places.... When the President of the
Commonwealth is asked about the probable shrinkage in
the government budget after 1946, he cooly answers
that it won't shrink. He or his successor will soak
the rich by heavy taxation. (The rich, unhappily,
will be fewer and less rich). Quezon also says that,
beginning in 1946, he (or another) can make his own
tariff, unhampered by the U.S. He will then put
heavy import duties on all sorts of things--and
thereby tax his people in other ways. He seems to
have extremely optimistic ideas about the capacity of
his people to pay....38
Although there was some truth in what Miss Horn had to
say, few of these predictions were validated by events. The
rich increased in numbers and wealth and the budget continued
to -exp a n d . „ The question of taxation remained unresolved.
On May 17, 1939, the President requested the National
Assembly to send an observer abroad to study foreign coconut
industriesThe Assembly approved Resolution No. 23, and
Maximo M. Kalaw was designated as observer. Five days later,
37
By 1950, a steady money-loser.
38
Florence Hornj Orphans of the Pacific. (New York,
1941), pp. 230-231. See also, J.R. Hayden: The Ph il ip pi ne s.
(New York, 1947), pp. 157-160, and note 23, pp. 888-889.
59Supra.
255
the President discussed briefly the excise tax. He repeated,
by implication, what he had to say earlier, on February 22,40
and then gave his opinion with regard to the repeal of the
excise tax. The proposal was that the tax be collected only
for coconut oil to be used for edible purposes. He expressed
the opinion that this would complicate the situation for the
large American buyers would purchase only non-edible oils and
"pocket the difference in prices." He continued; "In other
words, the benefit to be derived from the elimination of this
tax, instead of aiding the producers of copra, will only go
to the pocket of the purchaser in the United States. The
benefit may go to the soap distributor in America and, in turn,
to the consumer: but I am not sure that it will b e of any
h41
good to the producer in the Philippines.
The President, it is evident, had now lost his enthu
siasm for abolishing the excise tax, despite his promises to
producers that he would support any movement to do away with
it. The returns from the United States were too great to be
thrown away carelessly. He presented the other side of the
picture skillfully;
On the other hand, what will be the result if
that tax is removed? Our income will be reduced
annually by over ^20,000,000, an amount that comes
from the excise tax. This yearly income, after
1940...or after seven years, will mean a loss of
3r140,000,000 in our income. How will such reduction
affect our finances? In the first place, I will be
forced to veto a large proportion of appropriations
for public works, and I may have to suspend many of
40Supra. 41M.0.P.. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 129-130
256
the constructions under way which are for the improve
ment of our means of communication and the economic
development of the country. And I want you to remember,
gentlemen, that I will not leave my successor in office
empty-handed, much less leave the government of the
Philippines...with a problem in its hands; the lack of
funds in the Treasury. No matter how much it may
affect the success of my administration, even if it
should mean the difference between a successful Presi
dent and a failure, I would prefer to leave my office
and be pointed out as a man who had failed rather than
have t h e future of the Philippines exposed to
bankruptcy. (Applause)42
As a result of this statement, the campaign for the
removal of the excise tax was conducted with little vigor,
except by a few die-hards in the coconut industry. The Govern
m e n t ’s position was clear: it would like to help the coconut
industry but not to the detriment of the country as a whole.
Twenty million pesos annually was a sum to be regarded with
appreciation.
This rather equivocal campaign (equivocal in the sense
that the industry was promised aid but not at the expense of
the excise tax fund) was continued throughout 1939.43 President
Quezon returned to his home province to allay the fears of his
constituents, showing them the benefits to be derived from the
excise tax fund. He pointed to the roads being constructed,
and said that it was important that such work be done for the
benefit of the country at large. Nothing should be done, he
4aibia.
4^ C f . telegraphic correspondence between Quezon and
Roosevelt during February and March with reference to proposed
legislation in the U.S. Congress leading to an increase in the
excise tax. M . O . P .. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 432.
257
believed, which would benefit a section of the nation at the
expense of other sections. He suggested that it was important
to seek means of stabilizing the economy. "The Filipino must
be taught to be self-reliant. We must know that we can
realize profits if we have exportation, and we export those
products whichwill give us profit even if a tariff duty or
excise tax is levied. That is what we should ponder upon.
Hence we must look for other native products which we can
profitably sell abroad, even if they are levied a tariff duty
or an excise tax."44 Such words were cold comfort to a region
dependent upon the coconut industry for its livelihood. It is
difficult for the people of a certain section, even in the
United States, to accept a diminution in their prosperity on
the ground that it is good for t h e whole nation.
What was wrong, then, with the c o u n t r y ’s economy? The
middlemen, according to the President. "One of the reasons
why the Philippines remains poor," he stated, "is the fact
that the man who tills the soil does not receive his just
profits from the sale of his crops. Take the copra producers,
for insta.nce. The lack of proper commercial facilities compels
them to pass their copra through the hands of many middlemen
before they finally sell it. Each one of these middlemen
engaged in the copra trade derives profit therefrom, and their
profits, combined, take so much away from the amount that should
44M.0.P.. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 164-172, 158-163, passim.
258
go to the copra producer. Likewise, it is not only the poor
sales made by the planter from his copra which gives him
financial difficulties, but also the fact that he pays more
for his daily purchases than city r es id e n t s ...because every
day commodities pass through so many middlemen.... To end
this, I have caused a thorough study of the best plan by
which small farmers may form cooperatives so that they can
sell their products direct to the dealer without passing them
through many middlemen. I have also advised the study of the
means by which trading in commodities of prime necessity in
the Philippines could be handled exclusively by Filipinos.
(Shouts of ' M a b u h a y ! ’ )11.45 While this may have been a popular
analysis of the c o u n t r y ’s economic ills, it was far from
being completely accurate. If nothing more than the existence
of many middlemen plagued the nation, the solution of its
problems would have been immeasurably simplified. Basic ills
demanded remedy, and while the middlemen contributed to the
uncertain state of the economy, ills arising from antiquated
traditions and techniques needed attention before much lasting
good could be accomplished.
There was no lack of information as to these ills.
In January, 1940, Assemblyman Kalaw, who had been selected by
the National Assembly, to go abroad to study foreign methods
45M .0.P.. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 214. Speech on the
occasion of the fourth annual celebration of the establishment
of the Commonwealth, New Luneta, Manila, November 15, 1939.
259
of coconut production, submitted his report to the Assembly.
He presented seven "salient points." He noted that "one of
the greatest economic wastes of the Philippines is the poor
preparation of our copra.*1 He stated that despite the fact
that the Philippines was the largest copra-producing country
in the world, its quality of copra was among the worst and as
a result the country lost an estimated ten million pesos every
year. He pointed to the waste of over three hundred thousand
tons of coconut fiber with a value of 1*75,000,000 each year.
The Ceylon planter, he said, produced smaller nuts than his
Filipino counterpart but received from nine to sixteen pesos
more per thousand nuts than the Filipino planter. "The
reason is that he produces very good copra and utilizes the
by-products." He mentioned the well-known fact that, in 1939,
the Philippines was the fifth best customer of the United
States, and the United States would continue to need coconut
products, thus maintaining a market for Philippine products.
He suggested that "if there is to be some further reciprocal
agreements effective after independence, coconut products should
be given favorable treatment" in the American market. He
predicted that the coconut industry would withstand the shock
of independence much easier than others and that, if the
necessary steps were taken by the Government, it would be "our
greatest bet in the open markets of the wor ld .” Finally, he
referred to the fact that the diet of the Filipinos was
deficient in fats, a situation w h ich would be remedied wit h an
260
increased home consumption of coconut products. The force of
this statement was illustrated by the experience during the
Japanese occupationvhen the population, in many parts of the
country, existed largely on coconut products.
The solution of these problems, the Assemblyman believed,
lay in industrial!za t i o n , socialization and cooperation of and
in the industry. "The Government must lead the way," he said,
"but the cooperation of the planters themselves is indispensable."
He specifically recommended that after the creation of a
government body similar to the National Coconut Corporation
(which was then before the Assembly for approval) six steps be
taken by that or another corporation. These steps were: the
establishment of drying plants and coconut centrals aided by
government standardization to improve the n a t i o n ’s copra; the
utilization of husks and shells and other b y-products, through
industrialization; the establishment of cooperatives with the
purpose of eliminating middlemen and improving credit facil
ities for the benefit of planters; establishment of "regular
freight and shipping service to foreign countries"; establish
ment of a research and experimental station devoted exclusive
ly to problems facing the coconut industry, preferably on a
Government-owned plantation; and the "fostering of a greater
home consumption of coconut products". If these steps were
taken, he believed, the industry would "stand the shocks of
political and economic separation from America" and would fur
nish the c o un tr y’s leading export. The cost of this program
261
he estimated at 1*20,000,000 for the remainder of the Common
wealth period. This was to be spent on 5,500 copra driers,
twenty provincial centrals, five national centrals, the coco
nut research institute, and loans to planters, the last item
bulking the largest, amounting to ^9 million.
On May 7, 1940, the National Assembly passed, and the
President approved, Commonwealth Act No. 518, creating the
National Coconut Corporation (known as the NACOCO). The
corporation was to be organized within six months to exist for
thirty years. It was to "establish, keep, maintain and operate
or help establish, keep, maintain and operate drying plants,
or copra driers, or coconut centrals with a view of adjusting
the coconut Industry to a position independent of trade
preferences In the United States and to provide facilities
for the better curing of copra products and the proper utiliza
tion of coconut by-products, provided that no subsidy, direct
or indirect, shall be paid to producers, or processors of
c o p r a . coconut oil and allied products."4^ Section 2 of the
act also provided that the corporation was "to afford facilities
for bona fide production loans to Philippine coconut planters
and copra producers." In addition, the act provided for a
"Coconut Industry Promotion Fund" which was to be derived from
the coconut oil excise tax collected after January 1, 1939,
4 ®Maximo M. Kalaw: The Coconut Industry, (Manila,
1940), pp. vii, ix, p a s s i m .
4^ The L a w y e r s 1 J o u r n a l . VIII, No. 22 (November 30,
1940), p. 882. Italics supplied.
262
two million pesos of which was appropriated with the approval
of the act and the total not to exceed twenty million pesos.
This fund was to b e utilized hy the directors as provided by
the act and all moneys accruing to the corporation were to
flow Into it.
The stipulation with regard to subsidies to producers,
was included with an eye to the American Congress which had
imposed the excise tax at the insistence of the American farmer.
In the years following the imposition of this tax, there was,
in the words of Grayson Kirk, a "steady increase In American
Imports of coconut oil..i'which proved that the Philippine oil
was "not Interchangeable" with any American oil.4 ® Professor
Kirk demonstrates that the result of the tax was only a
charge to the American public of seventeen million dollars a
year which benefitted neither the public nor th e farmer. The
sole benefits derived from the tax went to the Philippine
Commonwealth as a "windfall,” which enabled the Commonwealth
to balance its budget at the expense of the American housewife.
The suspension of this tax was asked by Commissioner Elizalde,
in 1940, and was so provided in the bill introduced by Senator
Tydings on June 11. The bill, however, was not passed until
after the outbreak of the War.
According to the Philippine Trade Act of 1946 (the Bell
48
Grayson Kirks "Philippine-American Relations:
Recent Trends," Political Science Quarterly. LIV, No. 3
(September, 193 9), p. 336.
263
Act),to anticipate events for a moment,the amount of duty-free
coconut oil exported to the United States was set at 200,000
long tons and "during the effectiveness of the agreement the
United States will not reduce the preference of 2 cents per
pound provided in section 2470 of the Internal Revenue Code...
except that It may suspend the provisions of...such section
during any period as to which the President of the United
States, after consultation with the President of the Philip
pines, finds that adequate supplies of neither copra nor coco
nut oil...are readily available for processing in the United
States.4® This hostile attitude of the United States toward
the Philippine coconut industry, expressed in all legislation
between 1933 and 1941 (and 1946), was directly responsible for
the critical situation which arose at the outbreak of the war
in the American supply of coconut oil. Since more than half
of the U.S. imports of fats and vegetable oils came fr om the
Philippines, the prices of edible coconut rose to fifteen cents
a pound in December, 1941, more than twice the price of the
preceding December. The price of oil rose proportionately,
while coconut meal Increased almost five times during the same
period.®®
4®Public Law 5 7 1 . 79th Congress, 2nd session, H.R.
5856, Chapter 244, Section 403, subsection (d). The tax is
still collected but is, of course, not returned to the Philip
pine Government.
50
Britanniea Book of the Y e a r . 1941. p. 178; 1942.
p. 186.
264
Summary
Coconut industries were generally profitable during
the early years of the Commonwealth but remained at the mercy
of disease and natural disasters which, with important foreign
developments, slowly ate away the high returns hoped for by
planters. In general, the major profits were gained by proces
sors and shippers. In an effort to aid planters, the G o v e m
inent began a move to provide warehotises for cheap storage. It
had little effect, however, on the situation since the ills
of the industry centered around poor production habits and im
proper drying and processing methods.
Since so much of the prosperity of the Philippines
depended upon a prosperous coconut industry, the many adverse
factors - uncertain legislative practices in America, shipping
strikes in America, natural disasters and disease, lack o f
well-directed research or, indeed, any research, passivity of
producers in remedying the manifold problems, excessive
dependence upon the American market, confusion within the
industry, confusion in the Government as to programs of solu
tion - which were characteristics during this period led to
a general retrogression within the industry with a resultant
decay throughout the nation's economy.
Associations were formed and re-formed in feeble
attempts to m e e t an increasingly uncertain future but the
members had a general lack of understanding as to proper
procedures for action and, indeed, disagreement as to what was
actually needed. As a result, they became more and more
265
concerned with securing assistance from the United States and
the Commonwealth Government. Their meetings soon fell into
the usual pattern of forums for complaint and passing of
meaningless resolutions although the expenditure of more funds
and energy in research was needed.
The enthusiasm for ending, by the Government, un
certainty that existed for the industry, was soon dissipated.
This occurred when individuals in the Government began to
appreciate what the oil excise tax would provide in cash for
the Government. Although the representatives of the Government
had loudly protested the imposition of this tax, they soon
realized that the treasury would be increased each year by
^20,000,000, a sum whose magnitude eventually obscured the
vision of Philippine legislators. Many proposals were made as
to the expenditure of these funds but no concrete steps were
taken to utilize them in solving the basic economic problems
of the nation. The industry, therefore, had to rely upon the
uncertain generosity of the American Congress.
Members of the industry, realizing this if nothing
more, appealed to the United States, through the Joint Prepara
tory Committee, for succor by the extension of free-trade
relations for an indefinite period or a longer Commonwealth
period of transition. They failed to secure this objective,
through the opposition of politicos at home and '*anti-
imperialists" in America, and were urged to bear up under adverse
conditions since their sacrifice was made, they were told, in
266
the interest of the whole country. Actually, only a few
benefitted and these only temporarily.
The President suggested that the difficulties were
caused by the activities of middlemen and told the members of
the coconut industry that he had directed a study be made with
regard to the development of marketing and cooperatives. How
ever, the difficulties of forming such cooperatives were
either not appreciated or were ignored. In any event, it was
the exception to the rule which succeeded.
A n observer was sent abroad to study production and
marketing methods in competing countries but his report, pub
lished after his return, was largely ignored. The only result
was the establishment of the National Coconut Corporation
which was to prove to be one of the most dismal of failures.
The industry, then,was hardly in any position to face
the disruption of a major war and its pre-war weaknesses fore
shadowed the dark developments of the post-war period. One
can not escape the conclusion that the industry continued to
wait passively for some foreign miracle to occur to bring the
industry back to prosperous days and preferred domination to
determination.
CHAPTER VIII
DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SUGAR INDUSTRY J 1934-1941
The sugar Industry was the subject of much the same
plans and objectives on the part of the government as others
treated. It received much the same treatment as the others
and received much the same hasty action. The United States,
asking the sugar producers to limit their production, remit
ted to them relief under the Agricultural Adjustment Adminis
tration, amounting to 3^30,719,000, by 1936, in which year the
AAA in the Philippines was liquidated. This large sum, which
could have benefitted the industry in turning the sugar lands
to food crops, in preparation for the promised liquidation of
the industry, found its way an American observer stated,
"mainly into the mining share m a r k e t . T h i s happened, he
believed,because the payment was made "largely to a class of
people who were already in good financial condition and who
had no incentive to expand their productive capacity...."2
Prior to November 15, 1935, all sugar limitation
authority was supervised b y the Governor-General. He adminis
tered exports to the United States as a representative of the
Secretary of Agriculture, exercising his authority by virtue
of the Jones-Costigan Act. He also administered the sugar
^■J. Bartlett Richards, "Philippine Economic C ondi
tions, Annual Report for 1936", Cornejo's Commonwealth
Directory of the Philippines. 1 95 9-1940. p. 608.
2 Ibid.
267
268
produced for local consumption and reserve. After the establish
ment of the Commonwealth, the High Commissioner continued to
administer the allotments and shipments of sugar to the United
States, but the administration of local consumption and
limitation was transferred to the Commonwealth Government.
The Government, to meet this change, created, on January 21,
1936, the Domestic Sugar Administration to take charge of
domestic allotments and release of sugar for consumption and
reserve. This administration came under the Office of the
President and under the control and supervision of the Secretary
to the President who became "Domestic Sugar A dm in is tr at or .
The President of the Philippine Sugar Association stated;
"So far these two governmental agencies have worked in very
close cooperation and, except for the slight additional work
involved in working with two agencies instead of one, this
division of authority has caused no disturbance whatsoever in
the sugar industry."^
The Sugar Limitation Act of December 4, 1934, had
declared a state of national emergency resulting from the
provisions of the Tydings-McDuffie Act and other Congressional
legislation. Section 19 of that act, provided for a three-
year period of enforcement. Section 15 provided that all
^Messages of the President. Vol. 2, Pt. 1, pp. 794-
798. This was created by Jixecutive Order No. 14, of that date.
4
Rafael Alunan; "The Sugar Industry Under the Common
wealth," The Philippine Commonwealth H a n db oo k. 1936, p. 264.
269
sugar produced in excess of the allowed amounts was to be seized
and destroyed by the government. In September, 1956, President
Quezon sent a message to the Assembly urging the passage of a
bill which would amend the Sugar Limitation Act because he said
the "state of national emergency declared in Act No. 4166
continues to exist, in view not only of the limitation imposed
by the Gostigan-Jones Act, but also of the possible application
of the limitations contained in the Tydings-McDuffie Law."6 The
President also believed that the lifting of limitations would
bring about "such an over-production of this commodity as to
result in a huge surplus of unmarketable sugar here with the
consequent reduction in price, to the great disturbance of the
national economy." He also requested the Assembly to amend
section 15 and give the Office of the President the necessary
authority to dispose of the excess sugar. "I believe," he
stated, "that the seizure and destruction of such excess sugar
is a great economic waste, considering that such sugar may
profitably be devoted to other useful purposes not inconsistent
with the policy contained in the A ct."6 He urged the granting
of permission to dispose of excess stocks "in a manner not in
consistent with such policy." On September 23, and October 7,
he sent messages to the Assembly to speed up their work and
enact "several measures of importance and of urgent necessity
to the welfare of the country as a w h o l e . . .and...as the Assembly
5
Messages of the Pr es id en t. Vol. 2, Pt. 1, pp. 242-243.
6Ibid.
270
has only a few days of session left, I hope that special
attention will be given to these measures with a view to their
immediate consideration."7 Among these measures, was this Bill
No. 2305, which was passed and approved, October 26, 1936.
The following year, 1937, President Quezon went to the
United States. While there, he made several famous speeches
on the future of the Commonwealth, and asked for an easing of
the economic restrictions imposed on the country by the various
Congressional acts since 1934. He also proposed, if such
amelioration was not forthcoming, that the United States grant
independence to the Philippines in 1939, rather than in 1946,
as provided by the Independence Act. On April 3, 1937, the
President spoke at a luncheon of the Foreign Policy Association
on the "Phture of the Philippines.11 During the course of this
luncheon, various Individuals spoke on the subject, among them
Major General William Rivers, Oswald Garrison Villard, and Dr.
Stephen P. Duggan, Director of the Institute of International
Education. Dr. Duggan, in the course of his speech, mainly
concerned with the economic aspects of the situation, said, with
regard to the American policy at the times
Now, to carry out that policy at the present time
simply means the doom of the Philippines....
The reason for that is, as I said in the beginning,
and as President Quezon said, that the sole market at
the present time is the United States.... There is no
other, and moreover, there c a n ’t be any other. We have
raised wages in the Philippines. We have introduced
a standard of living in the Philippines in such a way
7Ibld. . pp. 250-257, 304-312, passim.
271
that the cost of production of practically everything
that is p ro du ce d. ..is higher than that of surrounding
territories....
The result of that is...that there is no market
for thb Philippine products outside. Now, for this
policy to be followed, therefore, it simply means un
employment for the thousands of tens of thousands of
Filipinos employed in producing the goods that we have
wanted in this country.
Unemployment means unrest. For the first time
since we were in the Philippines, last year there was
an uprising..., that was due to the depression and the
results of the depression. But consider what might
happen if this policy that we have introduced were to
be followed and the depression multiplied manyfold as
a r e s u l t . ...8
President Quezon spoke in support of the statement by
Dr. Duggan, saying "that is not only in the Interests of the
Philippines to have these trade relations with America; it will
also be profitable to the United States. For as we sell to
you, we buy from you, and the Philippines is a growing country.
The Philippines In time to come, will mean in terms of trade
for the United States, if you were to get that trade., ten times
as much as Hawaii, Puerto Rico and Cuba combined."®
In the question period that followed, a question was
asked of Dr. Duggan! "Does he believe that we should make a
permanent trade treaty with the Philippines similar to one we
have with Cuba, which means a preference position in the A m e r
ican market, or does he believe In gradually cutting them off
altogether?" Dr. Duggan's reply mirrored the uncertainty in
the minds of many who were to make American policy with regard
to the Philippines.
8M . 0 . P .. Vol. 3, Pt. 1, p. 77. 9Ibid.. p. 78.
272
It would' be very difficult to say what would be the
best policy that should be adopted. All I contend for
is this one thing, that having developed the peculiar
relationship that exists between the Philippines and the
United States to da y . ..whatever policy we are going to
adopt ought to take into consideration a long-range policy.
The sugar interests in this country are primarily
the cause of the Independence Act. Now, no long-range
policy was adopted by our sugar interests, namely, the
beet sugar interest....
Now, what I mean is that whatever policy is going
to be adopted at the present time, it should take in a
long enough range so that the destruction of Filipino
standards of living and the resulting destruction of
Filipino civilization should not follow.10
The following day, President Quezon addressed the Philip
pines, by radio, on the subject of woman suffrage and indepen
dence. He disposed of the former in one paragraph; the second
was the heart of the speech and demonstrated fully his reasons
for advocating early independence. He felt that his people
should not have been surprised at his stand on early indepen
dence since, to anyone who had followed his career, it should
have been expected. He then stated that the Filipino people
accepted the Independence Law '’upon the assumption that none of
its provisions would be amended except with the consent of the
Filipino people.” Since, he said, immediately following the
acceptance of the law, the American Congress began to amend the
law freely, “it would a p p e a r ...that Congress feels that it has
the right at any time to amend the trade r e la ti on s...regardless
of the provisions of the Independence Act." Such a course,
should it continue, would mean economic ruin to the Philippines
and necessitated the placing of trade relations on a more
10Ibid., p. 83
273
stable basis. This could be achieved, he was convinced, only
by making a treaty "between the Governments of the United
States and the independent Philippine Republic. So long as the
Philippines remains under the American flag, Congress will
always feel at liberty to amend any of those laws affecting the
Philippines."
He referred, then, to the opposition to his proposal by
sugar men who believed that such a step would ruin them. His
analysis of the situation was exact.
...I want to say that this present status affords
them no guaranty that during the transition period...
they will be allowed to sell in the United States the
amount of sugar that is allowed free of duty.... Even
now there is pending before Congress a law taxing the
sugar coming from the Philippine Islands--a tax which
is greater than the tax which has been levied hereto
fore and which, under the previous Act, was to return
to the Filipino farmer and sugar producer. The tax
has not only been raised but also there was no p ro vi
sion in that bill for this tax to be returned to the
Philippines.
Who can assure you, sugar barons of the Philippines,
who are now protesting against what I am doing, which
is for your own protection--who can assure you that
next year the Congress of the United States will not
further increase the tax on your sugar? iliho can assure
you that next year the Congress of the United States
will not further reduce the amount of sugar that you
can sell free of duty to this country? The suggestion
that we should remain under the present status is
tantamount to an economic suicide on your part. It is
only under my proposal that you can find safety and
security in your investments. But do not forget that
I am prepared, if necessary, to get independence for
the Philippines even if I fail to secure for our
products the benefit of the market of the United States.
The time has come when the Filipino people must decide
whether they shall be masters of their own destiny or
not. If we are not willing to assume all the responsi
bilities of a free people, then let us quit talking
about freedom and independence and let us sell our birth-
274
right for one million tons of s u g a r . H
The sugar producers continued to confuse the situation,
either deliberately or through honest error. Accurate statis
tics, In the Philippines, have been difficult to secure, even
by the Government. It was noted, by the Domestic Sugar Adminis
tration, in 1937, that there was a great discrepancy between
the statistics of the Philippine Sugar Association and the Con
federation of Sugar Planters Asso ci at io ns . The Administration
sought to fix the quota for domestic consumption and called in
the representatives of these two organizations for advice. The
former stated that domestic consumption amounted to 70,000 short
tons, which production would be sufficient only to operate
centrals at five per cent capacity^2 while the second gave a
figure of 100,000 short tons. The Sugar Administration, seeking
to find the causes for the fall in prices, soon discovered that
the actual domestic consumption was nearly 150,000 short tons.
Representatives of the two organizations were then called into a
conference to explain the great variance between their figures
and those indicated by the Administration. A satisfactory
explanation was never received, the respective representatives
of each claiming their statistics to be accurate while those of
the other were f a u l t y . T h e activities of these organizations,
I bi d.. pp. 88-90, p a s s i m .
1 2 The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
1 937- 19 38 . p.~24l'. -----
l^The Philippine Sugar Association was interested, possibly,
in showing that domestic consumption could be insufficient to
maintain the Industry - hence the expressed desire for retention
of free trade. See I b i d .. p. 51 and ff., and 242.
275
through the Commonwealth period, hardly brought credit to them
selves and increased the restiveness of the people who bore the
brunt of a difficult situation.
This restiveness was felt by the President who had
expressed as one of his major concerns, for the Commonwealth
period, the institution of a program of social justice. He took
occasion to remind landlords and other wealthy men, who held so
much of the economy of the country in their all too-grasping
hands, of the seriousness of the situation -- with little effect,
however. At the inauguration of the City of Iloilo, August 25,
1937, he spoke to the sugar men directly:
We must all cooperate to find the means and to use
them to improve the lot of the working classes in the
Philippines. Particularly should the provinces enjoy
ing the benefits of the sugar industry immediately and
substantially raise the wages of labor. No industry
in the Philippines is being benefited by our trade
relations with America nearly so much as the sugar indus
try. There have sprung in Negros, Iloilo and Pampanga,
in the last few years, millionaires as we have never
had before. They have palaces, automobiles, and live
a life of comfort and luxury here and abroad. I am not
criticizing them; it is their privilege to spend their
money as they please. I am merely stating a fact, for
I want to point out that we are doing everything we can,
not only to prevent the collapse, but to maintain in
full blast, the prosperity of the sugar industry. But
the government demands that this prosperity be shared
with the workingmen in the sugar fields and inthe sugar
centrals. Very little, if any, of the immense profits
of the sugar industry, has gone into the pockets of labor.
I say, in all earnestness, to the owners of sugar
centrals and to the proprietors of sugar lands, that
unless they raise the wages of their laborers and treat
them better, the Government and the country may lose
Interest in the defense of the sugar industry.
We cannot be the servants of a privileged class.
We are the servants of the whole people and weshall not
permit an injustice to be done, much less perpetuated,
against any constituent part of our community. Unless
the sugar Industry, of its own accord, increases
276
immediately the wages of its workingmen, I shall ask
the National Assembly to enact legislation that will
compel that industry to do so.
We are living in an age in which civilized society
can only endure If justice Is accorded equally to the
rich and to the poor. Those who have can only hope to
keep their possessions indefinitely, if they share
part of their profits with those who work for them.
This is a question of justice, not of charity. A man
Is more entitled to the fruits of his labor than the
proprietor to the rent of his property.14
Had these words been taken seriously by the men to whom
they were addressed, the organizations of the PKM, the Communist
Party, and, after the war, the Hukbalahap, might never have
attained the strength they did nor have appealed with so much
force to so many people. The history of the early years of the
Third Republic might have been far different and its future far
more secure. But these words were ignored and the backs of the
people continued to provide a cushion for t he barons who could
not understand why dissatisfaction, growing unrest, outright
rebellion and lawlessness were the characteristics of the Philip
pine social scene.
The words of President Quezon bore bitter fruit in
1938-1939. The workers in Pampanga, Iloilo, and other sugar
areas presented wage demands, peaceably at first. They were
encouraged In this action by the President's words, immediately
quoted above, as well as similar statements he had made from
the time of his inauguration. They were also encouraged by
Pedro Abad Santos, Socialist leader in the Philippines, and
1*Ibid.. pp. 119-120.
277
representatives o f •the growing Communist Party. These demands
were not met by the centrals and landowners who refused even
to listen to the demands. Failing to gain any response, the
workers went on strike and, with emotions running at fever pitch,
burned the cane fields. Governor Baluyot, of Pampanga, then
known as the "General Franco of the Philippines," and later
Secretary of Interior under President Roxas and President Quirino,
called on the President, to report on the serious situation in
his province--a situation which was not helped by his attitude
to the strikers. It was reported, in the press, that President
Quezon "assured Governor Baluyot that he will receive all the
help and support of the National Government in his efforts to
stop the burning of sugar cane and every other violation of the
law In his province."1®
The social justice program was hardly Implemented by
the statement also made by the President who told the governor
"to inform labor people in Pampanga that the Government will
not be in a position to help them so long as they use violence
or any other kind of unlawful means to secure redress for their
alleged grievances." He continued, by advising the governor,
"to reassure the laborers in Pampanga of the desire of the
government to improve the lot of the workingmen, not only In
Pampanga but throughout the Philippines, by every means at the
command of the Government, but that the cause of labor will be
15M.O.P.. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, p. 615.
•^Ibid. Italics supplied.
278
prejudiced, rather than promoted, should the working people
resort to violence; and that the Government must, above every
thing else, maintain peace and order, and suppress violence
and lawlessness 7 The people who had heard this story over
and over, were impatient and restless and now felt that the
Government neither understood their complaints nor meant to do
anything about them. They were threatened into submission, and
their complaints and grievances went unheard. The situation
was far from solved, although the Government believed It to be
so, which fact was highlighted by the very serious strike, in
the same area, the following year.
The strike of 1939 was the most serious in the history
of the Philippines after 1900, and was far-reaching in its
effects, since the complaints of the people were again ignored.
This fact caused much satisfaction to the communists, and other
less extreme political and economic agitators, in the province,
who made capital out of the situation, resulting in the organi
zation of a movement which, in 1942, became the Hukbalahap.
The situation was not confined to Pampanga. As the President
had indicated, in his speech of August 25, 1937, the "millionaires"
of Negros and Iloilo brought down upon themselves, by their
actions, the wrath of the people In those areas. The general
attitude toward the situation, particularly in Pampanga, was
revealed in an editorial of the Philippines Herald (which
generally supported the Administration) entitled, "investigate
17Ibid.
279
the Situation:”
From some quarters comes the suggestion that while
the government should be firm with the Pampanga strikers
and agitators, some concessions should be made to them
Immediately. Nothing more short-sighted than t h i s
could be adopted as a policy. For if the agitators and
working men alike see that violence pays, then they
will adopt the policy of violence for all it is worth.
The contrary lesson should be taught to our citizens
who are inclined to take the law into their own hands;
namely, that this course of action does not pay. We say
this without necessarily believing that the strikers and
agitators have no cause. They may, Indeed, be right and
the landowners and the government all wrong. But under
our laws, citizens, individually or in band, are not the
judge of right or wrong. The courts have been set up for
this purpose so that grievances may be properly aired and
redressed. Any one who takes the law into his own hands
places himself beycnd the pale of the law— becomes a public enemy.
We indorse the policy of using the power and strength
of the government to uphold peace and order in Pampanga.
But we also urge that a thorough and impartial investiga
tion of the situation be undertaken by a commission especial
ly appointed for the purpose with a view to arbitrating
the differences of the contending parties. The government,
if it must preserve the harmonious relationship between
labor and capital in the future,cannot do less than this.
The troubles in Pampanga constitute, the first mani
festation of mass unrest under the Commonwealth. It is
Important that the situation be so handled that the con
fidence of both parties in the government will be Increased
rather than lessened. This is, so to say, a test of the
ability of the Commonwealth to preserve peace and order
on the one hand, and to assure all elements of the popu
lation their rights on the other. It is urgent that the
situation be met as such.
The most unwise way of handling the situation would
be to ifake concessions to the strikers first and arbitrate
afterwards. Before we know it, violence will break out in
all the provinces because labor everywhere will have been
convinced that it pays to resort to v i o l e n c e . 18
This is rather a remarkable editorial for readers of
today but we must remember the attitude of many people in t h e
18
Reproduced in Progressive Farming. Vol. II, No. 1
(January, 1938), p. 44. Ihis journal was an organ of the
planters and landowners and was far from "progressive."
280
United States toward labor unions in 1937. Opinion, in the
Philippines, among Americans as well as Filipinos, was always
well behind that of' the United States. It lags farther in
certain of the ideological fronts and, in labor ideas, at least
a generation. In many ways, the above editorial was quite
progressive, i . e . . in its expressed idea that perhaps the
laborers had some right on their side, -- not much, the
editorial believed, hut enough to demand an investigation. At
least, the editorial refrained from suggesting that the govern
ment should give the strikers a "whiff of grapeshot", as so
many others -- notably most planters and many Americans in the
Islands -- had suggested angrily.
The strikers replied, not only to this editorial, but
to others like it, that, before they would consent to risking
their fortunes further, they demanded a formal quid pro quo
from the government or the owners. They replied that they
recognized the dangers of force and violence, that they wanted
to avoid them bub that they were protecting not only their
lives but their future since they were attacked by private
guards as well as the forces of the governor; that if the
strikers received no guarantees they would lose their jobs at
the conclusion of the strike and their families be rendered
homeless. They said that the courts were denied them, as
individuals and as a group. As individuals they were coerced
or threatened to drop whatever suits they wished to press
against harsh and abusive landlords; as a group their petitions
281
before the courts went unheard with opposing lawyers, who many
times were government officials, winning postponement after
postponement from the courts while their cases went unsettled.
These charges were true. The opposition was never able to deny
them to the satisfaction of an impartial observer. The people
were losing faith in the government and in the courts. The
President, had, on January 22, 1937, a year before, directed
the Court of Industrial Relations, to conduct a survey "of all
the facts relating to the sugar industry and to determine the
necessity of adopting a minimum wage or share of laborers or
tenants working in the sugar producing areas."-*-® At the time
of the strike, the people had seen no results from this survey,
and many were coming to the conclusion, borne out by fact, that
such surveys dragged on at length for interminable periods, and
some, were never finished apparently. The laborer could not be
blamed for casting a jaundiced eye at the promises of the
government and of President iuezon--great promises of sweeping
social changes, a vast social justice program which would
completely change the face of the Philippines. In the three
years of the Commonwealth, the laborers could not point to one
instance which one could call an implementation of "social
justice." Their sense of injustice continued to rise, and was
never stilled, even by the war, for it was during the Japanese
occupation, with the organization of guerilla bands, armed, for
the first time, that they struck back actively at their former
1Q
M.O.F.. Vol. 3, Pt. 2, p. 1154. Executive Order No. 32.
282
masters and drove the landlords from the haciendas to the
shelter offered by the Japanese.
The laborers could point to the fact that the "impartial"
investigations mentioned in the editorial were always made by
individuals having an interest in the industry investigated.
It is a fact that as Ihr as can be determined from existing
records and the memories of individuals concerned, every
investigation body appointed to survey this and similar situa
tions, was always composed of representatives of the "illustrados",
with never a representative that could be called "popular"-- a
representative of the people. Many were said to be such but in
each case they owed their position to the individuals most
concerned with retaining the status q u o , or were politicians who,
by no stretch of the imagination, could be called representatives
of the people. The appointment of a survey board was always
regarded by people, and was in 1950, as a method of delaying
the proceedings until the public had lost interest or had forgot
ten completely what the shouting was about. The board then
brought their "investigations" to a close and the subject was
never heard of again, unless those most concerned once again
took the law into their hands for a redress of their just
grievances. If one became a "public enemy" by taking the law
into his own hands after all else has failed, as the editorial
brings out so clearly, then the Founding Fathers of the Amer
ican Federal system were public eneraies--certainly the British
crown so considered them. It has been axiomatic in Western
283
political thought that the people delegate their authority to
selected individuals and to the State but always retain the
right of rebellion, referendum and change. Rousseau, for
example, believed that, since the people were sovereign, revolu
tion was an inalienable right and the people could revoke the
contract existing between them and their government. Elizabeth
A. Weber has stated that "Jefferson felt that rebellion is a
medicine essential to the health of a government and that there
is nothing so dangerous to the general welfare as 'the dull
lethargy that creeps upon and paralyzes the public spirit.1 He
felt that it is not possible to preserve the liberties of the
people unless those who govern are made aware of dissent and
resistance among the citizens against policies which they con
sider detrimental to their good."2®
When the people begin to feel that the courts are being
denied them, and this was a growing conviction under the Common
wealth and was in 1950 an established belief, they tend to
ignore the courts and the law. One scholar brings out the
essential point that "a law must first be fixed as a group habit
of conduct before it can command obedience, and any law which
violates this principle is certain of defeat."21 The government
20Elizabeth A. 'Weber; "Political Ideas and Folklore,"
Introduction to Poli ti cs . Roy V. Peel and Joseph S. Roucek (eds.),
(New York, 1946) p"I 45. The present author in repeating these
views, is not advocating the violent overthrow of the governments
or political systems of the United States or the Philippines, and
is not a member, nor ever has been, of any Communist party anywhere
in the world.
21Ibid.. p. 56.
284
did not preserve the "harmonious relationship between capital
and labor" and in the early years after independence was still
unable to do so because it failed to understand the needs of
the people and their desire for immediate aid and not attractive
Op
plans for a future not certain of attainment. ° The fiasco
brought about by the mishandling of the Hukbalahap situation in
1947 and 1948 drove deeper the wedge between capital and labor--
the communists unfortunately the only group which profited from
the situation.
Herald was only partly correct in saying that the
Pampanga troubles constituted the first manifestation of mass
unrest. (The isakdal rising of 1935 was the first but it was
not primarily a labor question). It was important that the
situation be handled to increase the confidence in the govern
ment but the corollary was too true: this confidence was
lessened because of the way the situation was treated. The
Commonwealth passed its test with regard to maintaining peace
and order but failed miserably in assuring "all elements of the
population" their rights.
22
During 1948-51, Manila newspaper columnists and
Nacionalista opponents of the Liberal Administration asserted
numerous times that the government will continue to fail in
this respect until it understands the above principle of the
operation of belief and law in a people and understands the
necessity of bringing about the desired changes in the social
order by taking definitive steps in that direction. The people
must be given concrete proof that the government is sincere in
its expressions of sympathy for the "masses"— which proof was
sadly lacking.
285
To the amazement of workers and students of labor in
the Philippines, the Negros sugar planters, in a report submit
ted to Malacafian, stated that they had long been pursuing a
program of social justice -- even before the policies advocated
by President Quezon early in the Commonwealth. They spoke of
the most "commendable generosity" towards their workers, whose
wages had, they said, been improved commensurate with the rise
of sugar prices. The wages, they said, had risen from twelve
and a half to fifteen centavos a day to thirty to fifty centavos
a day.^ This, the planters said, had worked a great hardship
for them as they paid higher interest rates for capital invest
ment than central owners; were handicapped in marketing facil
ities, and did not receive premium prices for their produce
since they were unable to ship their sugar directly to the
United States. Since they felt that they were receiving lower
prices than their high cost of production warranted, they
believed that the lot of the planters and the laborers would
not be benefited were the situation to continue. They thus
demanded "that any measure adopted hy the government to raise
the wage standard for sugar laborers should be accompanied by a
readjustment of milling contracts so as to increase the planters'
milling share."24
The workers apparently were in disagreement, f or, on
January 25, 1938, President Quezon received a telegram from
2 5The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philip
p i n e s . 1 9 37 - 1 9 3 8 . p. 235.
24
Progressive Farming. Vol. I, No. 5 (October-November,
1937), p. 26.
286
Jose M. Nava, of the Labor Federation from Iloilo, announcing
the existence of a strike which was in the words of his telegram,
"due miserable situation laborers for many years neglected by
authorities so that earning forty centavos daily many working
fourteen hours a day and are subdued and exploited."2 5 Since
the complaints, mentioned in this telegram, were standard and
typical, it is worth reproducing.
Laborers sugar centrals in Barotac Nuevo and
Janiuay have declared strike last Tuesday which
remains unsettled.... Strikers all members Labor
Federation ask only minimum wage of one peso and
social justice as sponsored by you. These centrals
do not comply labor laws on wages eight hours free
medicine and others. Although conflict unsettled
central in Janiuay resumed milling yesterday due
terrorism constabulary policy headed by Governor
Confesor who employed strike-breakers (esquiroles)
and defied strikers who until now eight day strike
have maintained peace without provoking any disorder.
Abuses constabulary police reached such extreme in
which they throw away inoffensive placards and appro
priate federation flags which is provoking disorder but
strikers submit. We ask protection and explanation
whether to ask peacefully minimum salary and social
justice the constabulary police and governor are
justified to ignore our grievances hurt without motive
and protect capitalists not complying laws by facil
itating them with strike-breakers protected by
Government. With this inquisitorial procedure
laborers do not get support of Government and social
conflicts and mass discontents aggravating. Oppres
sion exploitation Barotac Nuevo Janiuay confirmed
Labor Bureau and resumption milling Janiuay increases
discontent aggravating strike. ’
We would like to get
minimum salary and social justice as preached by Your
Excellency and we are losing faith in local authorities
who cripple your great program.2 ®
President Quezon replied:
Answering your telegram... I have ordered Governor
25Messages of the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, p. 626.
2 6 Ibid., pp. 626-627.
287
Confesor and Provincial Commander to desist from inter
vening strike laborers and above all not to aid central
find (s i c ) strike-breakers while strikers not using
violence or* provoking disorder. I advise you tell
labor strikers not commit any act of violence or in any
manner violate the laws. As you have assured me that
strikers are maintaining peace Government will take
immediate action to investigate causes strike and
protect rights laborers if damaged. Inform the strikers
that any public disorder or violence or threats commit
ted by them damages their cause.
To Governor Confesor, the President sent the following telegram;
Nava telegraphed me complaining of terrorism on
your part and that of Provincial Commander against
strikers sugar centrals.... You are directed not to use
Government forces unless acts of violence or violation
of law are committed by strikers. You should be im
partial in this conflict until the Department of Labor
has had occasion to Investigate and the Court of Indus
trial Relations determine which side is in the right.
Adopt a policy of watchful vigilance and warn strikers
as well as owners of centrals against any use of force
or threat of public disorder. I am directing the
Provincial Commander not to use Constabulary force
except in case of public disorder or actual violation
of law.28
The President sent a similar telegram to the Provincial
Commander warning him against the use of force against strikers.
The same day, the President received a telegram from Governor
Confesor which said:
Nava complaint terrorism unfounded. I mobilized
State Police with Constabulary cooperation only after
several sugarcane fields were set on fire. Full detail
my actuation on strike will be forwarded your office
by air mail tomorrow. Strike situation under full
control. Peace and order prevail strike area.2 ®
President Quezon then sent a telegram to Nava quoting
C o n f e s o r 1s reply and warning against use of violence on the part
2^ Ibid. 28lbid.. p. 628. 2 ® Ibid.
288
of strikers. He then sent a final telegram to Confesor:
Upon receipt of your report I will send representa
tive of National Government to investigate and report
on whole situation. Of course no violation of law must
be tolerated but at same time you should bear in mind
that the right to strike Is recognized by existing laws.
The facts of the case were contrary to the governor's
telegram. Terrorism on the part of the Provincial Government
did occur and cane fields were not set a f i r e . S t r i k e r s
claimed that if the fields were burned it was done by other
parties seeking to place the onus on the strikers and thus
justifying the use of force to restrain the strikers. Strike
breakers were hired by the central. The charges, in N a v a ’s
telegram, with regard to the position of the centrals, were
true. The complaint of central owners that such strikes were
instigated by racketeering labor leaders, while true in many
instances, in this case was not borne out by facts.®2 Racketeer
ing labor leaders have been all too common In Philippine labor
but the strike at Janiuay grew from the rising discontent of
the workers, whose position was stated with force and clarity
by Runes (in the report mentioned above) and who were angered
at the statement of planters and owners that Q u e z o n ’s social
justice program was being fully implemented in their haciendas.
N a v a ’s statement with regard to the fact that Q u e z o n ’s program
®°I b i d . . p. 629. 3 ^Quezon, I b i d .. p. 21.
3 2The author, in May, 1949, talked personally with
individuals who, at the time, were representatives of the Depart
ment of Labor. They are responsible for the last statement.
289
33
was being sabotaged by local leaders was all too t r u e . ^
President Quezon appointed Judge Manuel V. Moran, then
of the Court of A p p e a l s , as special investigator of the Janiuay
strike. This action was attacked, in the press and elsewhere
as improper and illegal. The L a w y e r s r Journal charged that it
was unconstitutional "as it seeks to charge a member of the
judicial branch of the Government with the performance of duties
non-j ud ic ia l.*34 claimed that such a task was executive in
nature and such an appointment of a member of the judiciary
"removes him...from the bench where the Constitution contemplates
he should stay with permanence." Such an act, the article
continued, "places the investigator judge in a position where
he has to make conclusions and recommendations that vitiate his
consideration of industrial and labor cases that may come up
before him to judge.... It is radically inconsistent with the
independence of that judicial power which is vested in the
courts, and, consequently, with that important principle of the
separation of powers consecrated in all republican constitutions."
President Quezon, in a letter to Chief Justice Avancefta,
requested an official statement "to serve as a guide for future
3 3It is difficult to assess, in 1950, the main factors
in the failure of this program but present members of the Govern
ment as well as individuals, now no longer with the Government
who were connected in varying capacities with various govern
mental agencies during the Commonwealth, all indicate with vary
ing degrees of intensity that local officials were hostile to
Quezon's program and either ignored or militated against it when
ever possible.
3 4Vol. VI, No.7 (March 10, 1938), p. 220. This is a
professional journal of generally high calibre. Many times during
the Commonwealth period it became one of the most effective
critics of governmental programs.
290
action" with regard to the exchange of views on the subject bet
ween the Justice and the P r e s i d e n t . ^ Whatever the legality of
the act, the President acted with dispatch with regard to the
strike. There were no significant results from the investigation.
On February 14, he sent a letter to Secretary Quirino
dismissing the chief of police of Janiuay and a secret service
agent. This letter is of great value to a student of labor in
the Philippines and of the social justice program advocated by
President Quezon. It presents a picture of the great forceful
ness of the President in such matters as well as the character
of local (and sometimes national) activity with regard t o
strikes and labor. Because many of t h e things mentioned in the
?.etter occurred with monotonous regularity from 1934 to 1950
and because it lays down the program President Quezon wished to
see followed by his country, we quote at length:
After careful consideration of the complete report
of Investigation of the complaint against the Chief of
Police of Janiuay, conducted under my instruction by
Judge Enage, I have concluded that the facts of the case
are as follows:
On January 22nd a strike by laborers was declared
in the centrals of Janiuay and 3arotac, Province of
Iloilo. Upon learning of the strike, the Governor...
proceeded a t once to order the mobilization of the
State P o l i c e , of seven municipalities and requested the
Provincial Commander of the province to give him a
Constabulary force--all for the purpose, according to
the Governor, of maintaining peace and order.
The Provincial Commander Iloilo gave the soldiers
as r eq u e s t e d , and these, together with the State Police,
were placed around the two above-mentioned centrals. A
man who was not one of the strikers, for he was not a
laborer in any of those centrals, was found with a bolo
55M.0.P.. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, p. 567.
291
and thereupon arrested by Captain Tando, Chief of Police
of the City of Iloilo, and a secret service man by the
name of Crispin Adelantar. By order of Captain Tando
the arrested man, whose name is Leonardo Diaz, w a s
turned over to Paclfico Abordo, Chief of Police of
Janiuay.
While secret service man, Crispin Adelantar, had
Leonardo Diaz under his custody, he struck Diaz twice.
After Leonardo Diaz had been t\irned over the Chief of
Police of Janiuay, he was kept in the municipal jail....
By order of...Abordo leg irons were placed on him.
According to Leonardo Diaz, during the whole time that
he was in the municipal jail, he was made to wear leg
irons day and night....
It is immaterial whether leg Irons were placed on
this prisoner all the time or only while he was out of
jail. In either case the prisoner was treated with
cruelty. The length of time he had on the leg irons
is merely a question of degree of cruelty inflicted.
The Government cannot afford to have in the service a
Chief of Police so inhuman as the Chief of Police of
Janiuay....
The same thing Is to be said of the secret service
man.... I am therefore, of the opinion, and I so order,
that both the chief of police and the secret service
man be immediately dismissed from office. You will
please execute the order by telegraph....
I may state that, in my opinion, the Governor of
Iloilo allowed himself to be unduly excited by this
strike. The mobilization of the Constabulary and the
State Police...was unnecessary and ill-advised. The
right to strike has not been declared illegal either
by the Constitution or by any act of the L egislature.
In cases of strikes where public interest is not
directly or indirectly affected, an untimely interven
tion by the armed forces of the Government, even if only
for purposes of preventing violations of the l a w , places
the Government in a position that would justify the
belief that armed forces have been called in the
interest of one or the other side. The Governor of
Iloilo should have been on the alert, but he did not
have to mobilize the State Police...as the police of
the City of Iloilo and the Constabulary...were more
than sufficient to maintain order and suppress lawless
ness in the region where the strikes were taking place.
Knowing the Governor of Iloilo personeLly, I have no
doubt that he acted In good faith. It is his vigor and
energy that impelled him to act hastily.
If there is going to be faith in the justice and
impartiality of this Government in cases arising between
capital and labor, or between the different constituent
parts of the community, we must at all times not only
act justly and impartially, but also be careful that our
292
actions have no appearance of partiality. Social justice
can only mean .justice on each and every social group. If
my administration is placing special emphasis on the need
for ameliorating the conditions of the laboring class, it
is not because we are against the capitalists or the rich,
but it is because the laboring class in the Philippines
has not received its due, and therefore stands in need of
the help and protection of the Government in order that
its rights may be properly recognized and acco r de d.
It would be national suicide to persecute capital. In
our age, capital, and in large amounts, is necessary for
the economic development aTnd the social welfare of the
people. Capital is entitled to a reasonable profit, and
this reasonable profit must not be denied ic under any
pretext. So long, as capital is not unmindful of the
social purposes and duties of property, so long will our
Government give it wholehearted support and protection,
but not otherwise.
In the case of the strikes in Iloilo, especially
considering the abuses actually committed by the Chief of
Police of Janiuay and a secret service man, as well as
the negligence of the fiscals of that province in not
properly Investigating and reporting these abuses, it would
not be surprising if the people of that province came to
the conclusion that the Government, before it was estab
lished which side was right, had taken the side of the
sugar centrals as against the"strikers. c
The second from the last paragraph is a noteworthy state
ment, by the President, on the meaning of' his social justice
program--noteworthy in that it was, unfortunately, observed In the
breach. ^
At the same time that the President suspended the
individuals mentioned in the foregoing letter, he also suspended
the provincial fiscal and the assistant provincial fiscal of
^ ^ I b i d .. pp. 562-565. Italics supplied.
37
That little progress In thinking took place since Quezon
wrote this letter, may be observed readily by reading decisions of
the Court of Industrial Relations and the opinions and actuations
of employers in 1947-1950. The reaction, to strikes, did not
change. Force was yet the only a p p a r w n t answer. Intimidation and
maneuvering close to the edge of Illegality were yet the hallmarks
of Industrial relations. ihe words of Quezon were forgotten and
the handwriting on the wall ignored.
293
Iloilo for negligence in the performance of their duties.
Quezon said, "if I were to be very strict in passing judgement
upon the conduct of Fiscal Blanco, I should declare him guilty
as an accomplice of the same offense committed by his assistant,
but I think the interest of justice will be served sufficiently
by merely declaring Fiscal Blanco negligent in the performance
of his duties, and ordering, as I hereby order, that his resigna
tion be demanded with the understanding that upon his refusal
to submit it, he would be removed from office.1'^® President
Quezon was shocked, he said, "to learn of the defense presented
by the fiscals...to the effect that they give no importance to
the illegal and cruel treatment given to a prisoner accused of
only such a crime as carrying a bolo." Their conduct, he
declared, "reveals an attitude of mind towards defenseless
people who may be arrested for some offenses that can not be
tolerated.
It was noticed that, despite the large production of
^®In a letter to Secretary Yulo, February 14, 1938.
I b i d . . p. 561.
^®This "attitude of mind", so shocking to Quezon, was
apparently of great persistence since the papers, throughout the
year 1949, were full of repeated such instances, and worse, on the
part of local officials whose sympathy, an observer would imagine,
should lie with the people from whom they have sprung and for whom
they have pledged their service and protection. Despite the fact
that these instances were fully documented and proven to the satis
faction of the most disinterested observer, official documents of
the Republic presented no evidence that any action, not even an
official reprimand, was taken to remedy a situation growing more
serious. The Free Press for the years 1949 and 1950 is a storehouse
of such unrsmedied instances of brutality and callousness to a
long-suffering people.
294
sugar in 1938, local consumers paid more for their sugar than
those in the United States which was one of the reasons advanced
for the low per capita consumption in the Philippines. This
fact, it was believed, was due to faulty methods of distribution
which were controlled by middlemen seeking the highest profit
possible. It was felt that local consumption could be increased
with the institution of a more efficient system of distribution
and control, bringing about a reduction in price and thus
enabling the working people to buy greater quantities. A plan,
therefore,of a selling agency operated by the Government, was
conceived by Rafael Alunan, then Sugar Administrator. This
agency was to have control over the local distribution of sugar.
This, it was felt, could be achieved only through the purchase
of a sugar refinery. This resulted in the purchase of the
Insular Sugar Refining Corporation and the Malabon iiugar Company.
The f\mction of t h e agency would also include endeavors to
establish foreign markets outside the United States and the
establishment of an institute to conduct research for the
benefit of the industry and the country. It was recognized
that these activities would require large sums of money, which,
it was believed, could be secured through the estimated earnings
of the refineries. The sum paid for the refineries, which was
to have been repaid before July 4, 1946, from their earnings,
was 1*4,200,000.
This step was not regarded with much favor by the press
nor by other sugar refineries, and was characterized as a
295
reckless waste of public funds. A statement, criticizing this
action, was published by the opposition which said the sum
invested in the refineries "would have been sufficient for the
establishment of coconut centrals and of factories for the
manufacture or production of coconut products which find ready
acceptance in the outside market."^® The opposition stated
that "instead of employing the money for the stabilization of
the sugar industry, which is already enjoying a reasonable
margin of profit, why was not the money invested to bolster up
the coconut industry or such other industries as the abaca and
tobacco which need just as much if not more protection?" The
opposition claimed that, despite the protestations to the
contrary, the administration was favoring the sugar industry
and the barons, who Quezon claimed were not running the govern
ment, and pointed to the fact that it was even grooming a
speaker of the Assembly from the sugar regions. They pointed
to the fact that the coconut industry was providing the Govern
ment with large revenues and received nothing in protection or
services in return, while the sugar industry, which Quezon had
stated was not so important as the coconut and abaca industries,
was at the peak of its prosperity. The opposition asked: "Are
the sugar men the only children of God In this blessed earth
of ours? And what mysteries are involved in this deal of the
sugar refineries in which the government apparently paid double
40 h why Does Not the Government Speak?", The Lawyers 1
Journ al . VI, No. 32 (November 20, 1938), p. 1021.
296
what they were really worth? Who recommended the purchase of
these refineries by the National Development C o . ? " ^ The
opposition pointed to the fact that this act showed "that while
there is enough money wasted in doubtful investments...while
there is money to maintain a luxurious government, money to
cover the transportation expenses...fabulous salaries, of high
public officials who make pleasure trips to Europe, all at the
expense of poor Juan de la Cruz, there is no money to remedy
the precarious situation of 160,000 people who are without work
and live in misery and p r i v a t i o n . C o n s i d e r i n g it only from
a business point of view, they claimed, it was wasteful and ill-
considered, since, after the transaction had been completed,
it was discovered that the Government could not operate these
refineries without violating the provisions of the law limiting
the production of sugar in the Philippines. Their interpreta
tion of this was held to be correct by High Commissioner McNutt,
in that, while the refineries were purchased with the end in
view of increasing the cultivation of cane, the law provided
that no such increase in assigned quotas could be made. The
Journal in its editorial, supported the opposition saying that
it was the duty of the Government to reply to its critics,
especially because of the grave nature of the charges as well
as the fact that the people had a right to "know whether they
are supporting a wise and responsible administration whose pre
occupation for social justice is sincere and real, or whether
a reckless and irresponsible administration who plays with
41 4?
Ibid. Ibid
297
favorites and sacrifices the general interest for the sake of
a favored few."45
These charges were never answered to the satisfaction
of the opposition nor to that of other more impartial observers.
They remained, in 1950, unanswered, and it is of interest to
note that late in 1949 the Government expressed the desire to
sell its central and refinery.
Throughout the remainder o f t h e year 1938, efforts were
made to establish effective policies with regard to the sugar
industry. President Quezon, on August 12, 1938, sent a message
to the National Assembly on the situation of the industry and
suggested remedies. He stated that there were two problems
facing the industry: its preservation, and the distribution of
profits In a more equitable fashion. To achieve this, he r ecom
mended that the Assembly enact a law, or laws, to eliminate from
the industry unsuitable lands and uneconomic centrals. He
suggested that such a law should compel the central and planters
to pay higher and more appropriate wages to laborers; give
benefit payments to planters not receiving the share they should
from their cane; provide funds for the amelioration of social
and labor conditions in the industry and carry out a sound
program for its adjustment and stabilization. He concluded by
certifying the necessity of immediate enactment of such legislation.44
On August 17, he issued a press statement with regard to
45Ibid. 44M.0.P.. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 535-538.
298
45
the creation of the National ougar Board. He stated that,
since the industry itself evinced little desire to solve the
problems facing it, he was creating this board to make a survey
of the industry and recommend measures to the Government for a
remedy of the situation. Five days later, he made a speech, at
the oath-taking of the members of this board at Malacanan, in
which he advised them that they must investigate the industry
and recommend measures which would enable the Government and the
industry to adjust itself to the situation, with regard to the
future loss of a free market, and to effect an equitable
distribution of profits.4 ® The President was particularly con
cerned over the latter because of the rising tide of discontent
among the laborers in the industry which came to a head the
following year.
Later in the year, certain quarters in the country
produced a rumor to the effect that the Government was seeking,
and would probably receive, a larger free quota of refined
sugar for export to the united States. The President angrily
received this rumor by issuing a statement to the press that the
rumor was groundless and that the Government was not seeking an
increase either in the amount of refined or raw sugar to be sold
in the United States market. He stated also that the Government
had purchased the two refineries for the purpose of protecting
45Executive Order No. 157, (as corrected and amended by
Executive Order No. 168) same date. Ibid.. Vol. 4. Pt. 1. -d p .
689-690; 1332-1334.
46Ibid., pp. 158-160.
299
consumers from the unfair practices of the speculators (who he
believed had a hand in the rumor) and to assist in the readjust
ment of the industry.4?
On October 19, 1938, President Quezon made a speech, on
the occasion of the Inauguration of the City of Bacolod, Occiden
tal Negros, in which he reiterated his stand with regard to the
sugar industry and its contributions to his program of social
justice. He told the people of Bacolod that they should con
sider themselves fortunate, In that they lived in one of the most
prosperous regions in the Philippines. Yet, he said, "it is
through the sweat of the working man that Negros is now one of
the richest provinces in the Philippines.... But not all those
who live in Negros now can say that they are living in plenty.
On the contrary, while there are some F H i p i nos and foreigners
here who make big amounts every year from the sugar industry,
yet the men in the fields are not getting their due share."48
He went on to analyze the industry and warned the
planters and central owners of their duty to their laborers and
c ou ntry:
In the business of the sugar centrals, there are
three parties~-the capital, represented by the central;
the capital and the land, represented by the hacenderos
or the planters; and the labor, represented by the
workingmen. The centrals have been getting the most
out of the sugar business. It is true that in the begin
ning those who invested in these centrals took some
risk.... But, during all these years, these centrals
have been making money in enormous amounts; some sugar
centrals have already recovered their Investments; it
47Ibid., p. 707. 48Ibjd.. p. 233.
300
is, therefore, time for chem to give greater partici
pation to the men who administer the land and to those
in the field--the laborers. It is my hope that the
board, which I have created to get the central, the
hacienda owner, and the laborer to agree on an equit
able distribution of the profits among themselves, will
succeed in Its all-important mission. But if these
entities do not do it voluntarily, it is my intention
to recommend to the next National Assembly the imposi
tion of a tax for centrals which will be used by the
Government to serve the interests of the workingmen. (Applause)
The people of Occidental Negros are the most
privileged people of the Philippines today, mainly
because you have the only basic industry that is still
making money. My own province is in a terrible plight;
for In Tayabas we have only copra to sell, and the price
of copra has gone down so much that we do not even
have enough money to buy a rope with which to hang our
selves. This is also the situation of the people who
live in the hemp-producing regions--they are in the
same plight. On the other hand, you can still make
money, as you are actually making money, in the sugar
industry. You are blessed, exceptionally blessed! Now
you must use the wealth that you have to benefit the
p e o p l e . Make everybody in Negros happy and contented;
let Negros be the paradise of the Philippines.49
The year 1939 saw the outbreak of the greatest strikes
and unrest in the history of the sugar regions. This will be
treated later In more detail. Suffice it to say here that the
mis-handling of the situation in Pampanga, In 1939, by the
Government and the wealthy resulted in the formation of a semi
secret organization known as the PKM (Kalipunang Pambansa Ng
Ibid., pp. 234-235. Negros, in the elections of
November, 1949, was the scene of the greatest frauds, intimida
tions, disorder and strife, with a private police force of some
three thousand well-armed, young, irresponsible men, under the
Governor of the Province. fven inspectors of the Nacionalista
Party apparently voted Liberal, for in many areas, despite their
presence as required by law, no votes were cast for the defeated
party. The fraud and anomalies in the province were so well
established that the President himself mentioned the fact that
"even without" the votes in that province he still would have
won. See Manila press for November-December, 1949.
301
Ivlga Magbubukid sa F il ip in a s; National Association of Farmworkers
of the Philippines) and the AMT (Aguman Ding Maldang Talapagobra;
Association of General workers), in Pampanga and Bulacan. Later
in the year, these organizations went underground and formed
themselves on a military basis, into a group, which later in
1942, was called the Hukbo Ng Bayan Laban sa H a p o n , the Hukbalahap.
The Governor, Sotero Baluyot, had organized a group
pledged to oppose strikes, clothed in a blue-grey uniform set
off by a cap and bugle made from carabao horn. During the
strike, the constabulary worked in cooperation with this organi
zation but were unable to check the movement completely despite
the terrorism that occurred. The strike, which was led by
Pedro Abad Dantos, became so widespread and so serious that the
President went to Pampanga to investigate. On February 14,
1939, he addressed a mass meeting of laborers and farm tenants
at San Fernando, Pampanga, in his usual brilliant style. He
deplored the necessity for a strike and reminded the workers of
his sympathy for them and his desire to use the full implementa
tion of his social justice program.
He stated, in agreement with them, that he did not
believe that the laborers in the Philippines received a share
of profits which corresponded to their labor, "especially in
the sugar industry" where of all the industries the laborers
should receive good pay. This was because of all the industries
it was the one making the greatest profits. These profits came
to the industry not only from capital invested by local
303
individuals but also from the aid and protection extended to it
by the Government which permitted them to export duty-free to
the United States. He mentioned the fact that the industry had
a permanent representative in the United States whose duty it
was to work toward the granting of protection to the industry.
It was recognized, the President said, that at the time he was
speaking,the entry o f Philippine sugar into the United
States should not be stopped suddenly and for that reason, he
believed that it was only just that the Government should
expect the sugar owners and landlords "to give a decent share
of their profits” to workers since these profits were obtained
through the aid of the Government. This statement received
applause from the assembled workers. He went on to say that he
had once before reminded the central owners on Iloilo of their
duty with regard to the well-being of their laborers.
Yet, the solutions to the problem were not all simple.
He mentioned, for instance, the vexing problem of the share
plan in the industry and explained its operation to his
listeners. He stated that the share which the central owners
remitted to landowners in Pampanga was smaller than that given
in Negros, being only fifty per cent, although, he said that he
had heard "long ago" that it would be increased "eventually” .
He believed it necessary, therefore, for new contracts to be
drawn up but it was not yet possible to renew these contracts
"even by order of the court or by using the powers of the Govern
ment." It was, he stated, the duty of the Government to respect
303
these contracts but also he believed that the central owners
should take initiative and should "of their own accord" increase
the planters' and landowners' share. These individuals in turn
should then increase the share of the laborers. He mentioned
that there were other provinces where "those who work the land
hardly get a share sufficient for their subsistence"; this
statement was applauded by his audience who well knew the situa
tion. So, while he could not force the centrals to renew their
contracts nor the landowners to improve immediately the treatment
of their workers, if they did not take the initiative he was
"ready to ask the National Assembly to pass a law increasing
their taxes, from which will be taken what I would give you."
He then spoke of the situation then existing in Pampanga
and addressed the strikers and their leaders directly. He
earnestly pleaded with them to "have a little patience." He
pleaded with them not "to resort to the burning of sugar-cane
fields" or to harvesting a crop and taking it as they wished—
including portions which did not rightfully belong to them.
Instead, he asked, 11give another his rightful share." He asked
them, in order to avoid strikes which were harmful to the indus
try and to the workers, to allow him some time -- "at least six
months" -- "to study all the means which could solve your
problem and remedy your situation." If that were done they
would then be able to receive their "rightful share" and he
promised them that he would utilize the powers of the Government
to "induce" the centrals to increase the shares of the landov/ners
304
so that they in turn could increase the pay of the w o r k e r s . He
promised them that before the "close of the present session of
the National Assembly, we shall enact a law increasing taxes,
and collections therefrom will be used by the Government to
help ameliorate the conditions of the laborers."
He concluded his long address with the following words;
I wish to state once more what I said a while ago;
may all the sugar centrals in Pampanga, at their own
initiative, increase the share of the planters or land
owners, so that the latter...may voluntarily increase
the wages they pay the laborers. Enough of this practice
of charging usurious interest on loans to laborers 1
What interest can a person pay when he is hungry and has
nothing to eat? (A p p l a u s e ) May the landowners in Pampanga,
as well as throughout the Philippines, grant you what you
rightfully deserve in your livelihood without waiting
for the law compelling them to do so; and may this be
their constant thought, so it could be shown in deeds
that they also have hearts which are charitable to the
suffering of the laborers in our country.50
But it was too late. When nothing concrete was done and
the President merely reiterated these vague promises in another
speech, Pedro Abad Santos declared that the President's speech
was "plainly reactionary" and disclosed no constructive program.
He stated that now more than ever "workers and peasants must
unite and stand together in their struggle for amelioration of
their living and working conditions...and to shake off the bonds
of feudal landlordism and peonage under which they are oppressed
ii51
and starved. The workers were convinced that the centrals
50
Ivi.Q .P.. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 20-32, passim.
^ Philippine Magazine . XXXVI, No. 4 (April, 1939),
p. 150.
305
would not Increase the share of the landowners. They were also
convinced that the National Assembly would not pass new tax
legislation or new legislation leading to better collection of
existing taxes. They were convinced that the centrals, the
landowners, the Government, would not do anything ,rvoluntarily"
for the workers. Whether or not they were justified in these
beliefs, they maintained them and it is interesting to note
that the centrals did not increase the shares to landowners;
the landowners did not increase the shares to workers; the land
owners continued usurious practices; the Government did not
pass legislation remedying the revenue system; and wages were
not increased. While the workers applauded the speech of their
President, respectfully, their leaders as well as the words of
Quezon himself had convinced them that they were not receiving
their just dues, that they would in all likelihood never receive
them -- and for that and that alone they would hold out. They
were not seeking charity. They wanted at least ten per cent
of the profits of the centrals since they claimed the sugar
industry was at a peak of prosperity to which point their labor
had contributed the major share. The President for once had
underestimated the temper of his people. They had had enough
of plans, programs and promises; they wanted action, immediate
and just. They received neither in the years before the War,
so the movement spread throughout the province as well as
neighboring provinces.
The month after the speech by the President, an encounter
306
between five hundred tenants and ’'vigilantes" sent by the
Governor to "maintain order", resulted in injuries to twenty of
the strikers. On hay 9, the President placed two municipalities
under the conorol of the constabulary and later made a trip to
his own hacienda in Pampanga to make a speech of conciliation
and appeasement--to which the tenants listened with scant
courtesy. The movement spread to Bulaean, especially to the
Buenavista hstate where the tenants claimed ownership of some
70,000 acres. In the same month, it was announced that Filipino
labor was to be organized under a single governing unit, the
National Commission of Labor. This was done under the leader
ship of Jose Avelino, then Secretary of Labor, who, on July
16, announced the formation of the National Commission of
Peasants. These organizations accomplished nothing, due,
primarily, to the opposing ideas represented between them and
the others mentioned above. The workers were further convinced
of the hopelessness of the situation the following year, after
the elections returned to office Governor Baluyot, whose
temporary suspension had been asked by the strikers in Pampanga
as a condition which would ease the situation. The defeated
candidate, their leader Pedro Abad Santos, ascribed his defeat
(by some seven thousand votes) to the tightly-controlled
governmental machinery as well as the lack of eligibility of
his supporters who, he claimed, were largely illiterate. The
danger inherent in such a situation, which should have been
obvious to the most insensitive observer, was ignored by the
307
Government and central owners who, thus sowed the seeds of
dissension which were to bear* such bitter fruit in the years
1945-1S50.
In August, the national Sugar Board submitted its report
to the President, who, the following month, sent a letter to
Placido L, hapa, President of the Philippine Sugar Association,
with regard to an equitable adjustment of "participation ratios*1
This had been suggested by the Board, the President stated, so
that the centrals would "adjust their participation ratios with
their planters' share to 60 per centum of the sugar m i l l e d . ...
By so doing, the President said, "it would greatly facilitate
the proper solution of this phase of the Philippine sugar
problem...” and suggested that he be informed as to whether the
centrals "would agree voluntarily to revise t h e i r ... contracts
with their planters along the lines indicated by t h e ... Board."
This problem remained unsettled during the remainder of the
Commonwealth period and through the first years of the Republic.
Late in 1950 talk was resumed on the subject.
Throughout the rest of the Commonwealth period, until
the outbreak of the dar, unrest continued to grow in sugar and
rice-producing regions, being most acute in the provinces of
Pampanga, Bulacan and Nueva Ecija. The Department of Labor was
kept busy investigating complaints from both sides, and the
picture continued to be one of the laborers demanding better
treatment and the landowners and central owners resisting as
520p_. cit., p. 417.
308
as much as possible these demands. In many instances, the
courts found for the laborers but difficulties were encountered
in enforcing the decision of the courts or of the Department
of Labor. The sugar men grew in wealth, some building residences
which became showplaces in the Orient while underneath was the
constantly rising pressure of unrest and discontent.
The only noteworthy event by the United States, before
the War, affecting the sugar industry, was the passage of the
Tydings-Kocialkowski Act, amending che Independence Act. This
was done, partly in response to President Roosevelt's promise
that the imperfections and Inequalities of the Independence
Act would be remedied, and partly in answer to a desperate
appeal by the Government, backed by the recommendations of the
Joint Preparatory Committee. Under the new law, the all-
inclusive export tax was dropped substituting, instead for the
four principal exports, a quota arrangement, beginning January
1, 1940, with the quota to be decreased by five per cent each
succeeding year.
The Philippine .Sugar Association, in its report to the
Joint Preparatory Committee, had introduced three propositions
with regard to any future American legislation directed at
Philippine sugar. These were:
Free trade between the United States and the Philip
pines in the volume permitted by the Tydings-McDuffie
Law is of such advantage to both parties, and Its termina-
tion would work such disaster upon the people of the
Philippines, that it should be continued, in at least
that volume, indefinitely.
As a corollary to the foregoing, raw and refined
309
sugar produced in the Philippines should have free
access to the American market in at least the amount
permitted by the Tydings-McDuffie Law, because the
United States unquestionably fostered the developr® nt
of the Philippine sugar industry, and because of the
importance of that industry in the export trade of
the Philippines.
The graduated export taxes upon the Philippine
sugar, as well as upon other Philippine exports to
the United States, imposed under the terms of the
Tydings-IvIcDuffie Law during the last five years of
the Commonwealth period for the purpose of providing
a sinking fund for the payment of principal and
interest on uhe bonded indebtedness of the Philippines,
its provinces, municipalities and instrumentalities,
should be abolished.53
Under the first proposal, the Association pointed to the
lack of reciprocity in trade relations as provided by the
Independence Lav/, by which American articles could enter the
Philippines subject to duty, whereas Philippine articles would
enter the United States subject only to "quantitive limitations."
The Association stated that there was a complete unanimity of
opinion upon this proposition -- this opinion being that these
provisions would be a "death penalty for the Philippine sugar
industry, as well as for most of the other leading industries
of the Philippines."
The United States was limiting the entry of Philippine
sugar Into its market. 1Yiiho had encouraged the phenomenal
development of the industry by che imposition of free trade?
"It is of record," the Association stated, "that this status
was imposed by the United States over the protest of the Philip
pine Assembly." This protest was due to the belief that free
5sTjie Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philip
pines . 1937-1938. p. 51 and f f .
310
trade would mean the establishment of an economy so dependent
upon the American market that the stability of the economy
would be questionable to say the least.^4 What then would be
the result of the new provisions? The Association stated flat
ly: "It Is thus not too much to say that after 1940,the principal
effect of the Tydings-McDuffie law will be to destroy approxi
mately 60 per cent of the present export trade of the Philip
pines because that trade is dependent upon free trade with the
United States." This,it believed, would result in "disastrous
economic, social and political consequences to the people of the Riilip-
pines."
Therefore, the obvious step would be to continue free
trade relations.
Under the second proposition, the Association stated
that the argument advanced, suggesting the reduction of costs
so as to enable It to compete in unprotected markets of the
world could be met with "several complete answers." They
mentioned two. "One is that the unprotected sugar markets of
the world are and probably will be fully occupied. Another is
that such a radical reduction In costs of production would in-
g c
volve reducing wage scales to an impossible extent."____
Since, as it stated, the United States had fostered the
sugar industry»s development making possible thereby a higher
standard of living in the country, did the United States
54
It may be, of course, that this protest was more
vocal than meaningful.
®5Italics supplied.
511
then wish this admirable aim to be abandoned? Did the United
States wish the standard of living to sink to the level prior
to American occupation? It asked: "Lust schools be abandoned,
roads to go into disrepair, and all the public services
deteriorate and perhaps disappear? Must all that has been done
by America in the Philippines be undone?"
If the answer to these questions were "No", then, the
Association believed, it had sacrificed enough in the reduction
of its export (from 1,428,000 long tons to 850,000 long tons)
so should be permitted free access of 850,000 long tons in the
fu ture.
As far as the third proposition was concerned, the
Association stated simply that if adequate sinking funds "are
maintained through ordinary appropriations" the purpose for
which this provision had been inserted would be accomplished
"without endangering any Philippine industry." It therefore
requested the abolition of the graduated export taxes imposed
by the Independence Law.
Manuel A. Roxas, at the time a member of t h e National
Assembly, in discussing the economic future of the country, was
concerned with the problem of lowering production costs to meet
competition. This, he believed, "should be attempted and
systematically pursued."^® However, he warned of the danger
inherent in the usual process of cutting production costs by
56Ibid.. p. 172.
512
lowering wages, stating that in doing so, "there often arise
social and economic problems of greater gravity than those
sought to be remedied." Above all, the maintenance of the
standard of living of the people could not be overlooked,
particularly in the case 01 the majority of Philippine indus
trial workers whose wages were "already below what may be
considered sufficient to supply the minimum living requirements...."
In any event, no matter what was done or planned, it
would have to radically change the economic picture in the
Philippines, which, he believed, was not in any position to
stand economic separation from the United States.57
Despite the passage of the Tydings-Kocialkowski Act the
two years immediately preceding the War saw a continued collapse
of the Philippine economy. On June 10, 1941, Resident Commis
sioner xilizalde, appealed in a letter to Senator Tydings, for the
suspension for a year of the collection of export taxes on
Filipino products imported Into the United States. The reasons
given to support this request were: "(1) the war then current
in Europe and the unsettled conditions in the Far East which
disrupted the economic readjustment program of the Philippines;
, (2) the war in Europe and the fact that the resultant loss to
the Philippines of European markets had accentuated the depen
dence of the Islands on the American market; (5) the extension
'Ibid., p. 175. However, whenever suggestions are
advanced for lowering costs, the first item approached is wages.
Salaries, of management, are never reduced.
315
to the Philippines of the export control law which dealt a
death blow to trade with Japan; (4) the acute shortage of ship
ping in the Pacific, which raised freight rates and insurance
charges to prohibitive proportions thereby threatening Philip
pine trade with the United States, the very lifeblood of the
Islands, and (5) the fact that the money originally intended
to fortify the economic structure of the country was diverted
to other channels."^8 This interesting admission has apparent
ly slipped the attention of most observers who have sought
reasons for the failure of the Commonwealth in more attractive
but less accurate activities.
The action that was finally taken on this request, after
months of Congressional wrangling, came too late -- the War had
come .
Summary
It is in the prosperity of the sugar industry, in the
manifold activities of its members, in the protection and
interest offered it by the Government, in the reactionary nature
of its members' beliefs and actions, in their wrong headedness
and blindness, that we discover most easily the seeds for the
almost inevitable collapse of Philippine economy and society.
No other industry maintained its prosperity for so long a time
and no other industry was so reluctant to share its prosperity.
^®Pedro E. Abelarde, American Tariff Policy Toward the
Philipp ine s. 18S 8-1946. (New York; 1947), p. 186, italics
supplied.
514
t'jo31 of the labor problems in the Philippines can be traced to
this reluctance on the part of the large producers to permit
their workers a more reasonable share in the profits of the
industry. It was in the areas controlled by the sugar industry
that the most serious labor troubles of the Commonwealth
originated and it was these areas that produced the worst
excesses of the Hukbalahap and the armed private groups opposed,
during the opening years of the Republic.
Coupled with this blindness was the industry's endless
optimism with regard to its future. The course of the future
was made very clear by American legislation after 1933 but the
members of the industry continued to hope and even expect that
the United States would, ultimately, never actually impose the
restrictions provided by every piece of legislation referring
to the Philippines. As a result, nothing was done, during the
Commonwealth, to prepare the industry to meet the great changes
that would come with Independence. That the industry would not
prepare could be expected. That the Government did not prepare
is the tragedy. Too, despite ius enunciation of a "social
justice" program, it is quite clear that, by 1941, with special
reference to the sugar industry, the government's policies had
produced no change either in bringing a better life to the
workers or in preparing a new future for the industry.
CHAPTER IX
THE RICE IKDUS TRY : 1941-1950
Despite all these efforts to solve the situation, general
economic conditions went from bad to worse, and, in the years
immediately preceding the outbreak of the War, cultivation of
rice actually decreased from a maximum hectarage in 1935-1936
of approximately 2.05 million to 1.9 million in 1939. In the
following two years, production increased to 2.20 million in
1941, but the value of the product dropped from P I 52,000,000
in 1939 to 5151,000,000 in 1941. Production figures, for
periods after that year until 1947, cannot be relied upon.
In methods of production, there was little change as
late as 1949. In 1939, but 20 per cent of the lowland rice
hectarage was irrigated by a technical irrigation system,-^- and,
indeed, by 1949 this figure had declined due to the effects of
the war upon the system in operation. The f,pri mitive” systems
in use in the mountain Province and other areas were badly
damaged by the war, and as late as 1950 were not back into
adequate operation.
Up to the War, the average yield, per hectare, was some
23 cavans (of 44 kilos), with some minor exceptions in parts of
^Karl J. Pelzer: Pioneer Settlement in the Asiatic
T ropics . Studies in Land Utilization and Agricultural Coloniza
tion in Southeastern Asia. American Geographical Society,
(New York: 1945), pp. 52-54.
315
Mueva hcija (36). According to recent figures (1947), prod u c
tion with the institution of double crops in some portions of
the country had reached some 25 cavans.^
Other factors -- tenant-landlord relations, marketing,
credit, etc. -- will be discussed l a t e r . ^
The 0 c cup a 1 1o n :-
The outbreak of the war came at a critical period in
the agricultural development of the country. None of the plans
laid down had time to become effective (if effective they ever
would have become because of other than agricultural factors);
the economy was unsteady, and the people unprepared. The openin
campaigns were devastating in certain areas and the ps ycholo
gical upheaval ac companying defeat was equally crushing. feany
people, for several crucial months, laid down their tools, fled
their homes, and pursued anything but a settled agricultural
existence. 'The pr o g r a m the Japanese followed was equally
destructive. They looted and burned, homes, farms and all the
little possessions the people had acquired. They confiscated
crops, in fields and warehouses, and imposed ne w restrictions
wi th regard to every aspect of daily life. The economy was
drained to feed the occupation troops as well as the mainland
of Japan itself. The contrast between the declarations of the
^ Journal of Philippine S t a t i s t i c s . Vol. IV, Nos. 1-6
(Januar y - J u n e , 1949), p. 15.
5In Part II.
317
Japanese -- that they had come to stay -- and their policy of
taking everything, movable and shipping it to Japan became all
too clear to the Filipino populace. Those who planted export
crops saw them taken by their masters; if they planted food
crops to stave off starvation, these too were appropriated. It
soon became clear that the Japanese realized their stay was to
be short, and they wanted to take as much as possible.
The Japanese introduced a new species of rice, called
H o r a i . but few ever tasted it. Rice fields were burned by
troops to smoke out guerrillas and to deprive them of badly-
needed food. By 1943, starvation faced the majority of the
populace, and at the time of liberation fully ninety per cent
of the population was malnourished and half-starved. In addition,
some were always ready to take advantage of their f e l l o w s '
need. Profiteering was rampant, encouraged by the Japanese
who saw to it that the profits passed through their ever-ready
hands. In mid-November, 1944, the Rice and Corn Ad min istration
was organized, supplanting the Bigasang Bayan (National Rice
Corporation, the "NARIC" of the early Occupation), as the
control agency of the Government over all staples -- par ticular
ly rice. The reason given by an observer writing in a semi
official publication, was that this step had become ne ce ssar y
in view of the critical situation, but it was also true that
the Japanese felt that it would enable them to reap larger
benefits. It was estimated that the crop for that year in
Central Luzon would amount to some 450,000 cavans, plus an
318
additional hoarded amount of some 50,000 cavans.^ The author
of this article advanced two reasons for che hoarding of rice.
One was "the steady and swift climb of prices," and the other
was "the difficulty of transporting the grain from farmer to
buying center due to risks on the road." These risks were of
two kinds: the guerrillas and the Japanese, each wanting the
rice for his own needs. The farmer was threatened with p u n i s h
ment by the guerrillas if he gave the rice to the Japanese, and
the Japanese threatened the farmer if he aided the guerrillas.
Caught between the two, the farmer led a miserable existence,
ending all too frequently in tragedy.
P o s t - W a r :-
For one reason or another, the rice hectarage had
decreased some 1.5 or 2 million hectares. By 1946, the figure
had risen to some 1.64 million hectares, still far below the
1941 figure of 2.3 million. The production in 1948 was some
2.24 million metric tons, an increase of 382 thousand metric
tons over 1936, but still far b elow the min imu m requirements
for the country. By the end of the War, the pop ul at ion had
increased some two million over the last census of 1939, and
the fact that the rice hec tarage was inadequate even for the
earlier population indicates the critical situation at the end
of the War. In 1949, many rice fields wdiich had been tilled in
4Antonio Paulino: "Our Staff of Life," Philippine
R e v i e w . Vol. II, No. 10 (December, 1944), p. 38 and p a s s i m .
319
1941 were not yet restored because of the uncertain conditions
in Central Luzon and elsewhere.
The situation in 1946 was almost desperate, wi th an
estimated shortage of some 6 million cavans. The original
estimate had been some 12 millions, which, however, was reduced
by UN RRA importations. President Roxas requested an allocation
of 4.5 million cavans from the International Emergency Food
Council, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture stated that the
country would have to depend almost completely upon imported
stocks until November. However, the appraisal was in reality
an understatement, since it left out of the re ckoning those
variable factors which always determine the situation. The
typhoon that swept northern Luzon in July destroyed some 85 per
cent of the crops in the Cagayan Valley and in the province of
La Union. In the words of a reporter, "what remained of the
1,619,950 hectares of upland rice of both provinces after the
storm, was n e g l i g i b l e . " 5 In Central Luzon the situation was
even more serious, the frequent clashes betwe en Huks and
Constabulary and "civilian guards" driving the farmers from
their fields. As a result, in Pampanga only 197 out of the
79,768 normally arable hectares (which is less than one-third
of one per cent) were planted to rice; in Tarlac, 1,342 out of
77,145; in Bulacan only 237 of 78,561 hectares, and in Nueva
Ecija less than one per cent (1,699) of the 215,200 hectares
^"The Rice Shortage," Sunday Post M a g a z i n e , Vol. I,
No. 46 (August 4, 1946), pp. 3, 22.
320
of arable land was cultivated. Even Pangaslnan,which had been
comparatively undisturbed by the Huk problem, cultivated only
about one-ninth of its total hectarage of 260,246.® An alLevia-
ting factor in the otherwise gloomy picture was an increase in
the hectarage of c o m and camotes (or sweet potatoes),the latter
an important item in the diet and almost a substitute for rice.
The price of rice, per ganta, had increased ten times
over the price before the War, retailing at £2.00 per ganta in
the city of Manila. As a measure of relief the Government re
instituted a rationing system, giving the NARIC charge of
apportioning some 240 grams per person per day to 200,000 needy
families in Manila. This revival of the rice rationing system,
which a reporter said was "ironically reminiscent of the
occupation," was a recognition by the government of the serious
ness of the rice problem. The next logical thing to do he said
was "to restore peace and order in Central Luzon soon so that
planting may be undertaken Immediately...."7
Two and a half months following the printing of the
article above, a dispatch from Cagayan stated! "People...are
eating camotes, tubers and grasses as substitute for rice. The
prevalent stomach ache and beri-beri in some places is attribu
ted partly to tagulao. a wild grass grain. As a consequence of
the existing famine in the whole province, mortality has Increased.
6 Ibld. 7 Ibid
321
In Cattaran alone, a local doctor reports that about fifty to
sixty deaths occur every da y . . . . 11®
The Government and private individuals rep eat edl y
announced that conditions would improve as soon as conditions
returned to normal. But how "normal" was the prewar normal?
J.E. Spencer writes! "Examination of the figures for rice im
ports in the late 1930s m i .ht convey the impression that the
basic food deficiency then was unimportant and that its present
liquidation is merely a question of re turning to pre-war
'normalcy'. But when the general increase in food imports,
partic ula rly of wheat flour, is examined the nominal deficit of
the 1930s is seen to be very real. In 1938 the rice equivalent
to the wheat flour import had risen to approximately 275,000,000
pounds.... The 1946 wheat flour import was equivalent to about
380,000,000 pounds of rice."^
A common error with regard to diet in the Philippines
should be noted here. Professor Spencer stated that food
products shared in a general price increase and that although
"prices are mu ch higher than in prewar years, most of the people
are eating better than ever b e f o r e . This last statement may
run counter to subjective opinion, of course."^0 Taking beri-
^"They Eat Grass in Cagayan," This h e e k , The kanila
C h r o n i c l e . Vol. II, No. 32 (November 24, 1 9 4 6 ) , ~p. 14. A re
print fr om the Evening News of November 11.
®J.E. Spencer! "The Philippine Rice Problem," Far
,
E a s t e r n .S u r v e y , 18 Mo. 11 (June 1, 1949), p. 125.
-^I b i d . Italics supplied.
322
beri alone as an example, objective statistics, however, show
us the following picture. A m ong adults, the rate of death
from beri-beri increased fro m 4,365 (or 29.65 per 100,000) in
1934, to 8,276 (or 45.67 per 100,000) in 1946 .11 By 1948, the
number of deaths had dropped to 7,687, which, however, is still
3,322 over the 1934 figure and in 1949 the death rate was 43.59
— almost double that for 1934. A m ong infants, the deaths f r o m
beri-beri present an even more tragic picture. In 1934, out of
18,691 cases of infant beri-beri, 17,054 (or 115.85 per 100,000)
resulted in death. In 1946, out of 20,913 cases, 18,583
resulted in death. By 1948, the picture for infants had
brightened somewhat since despite the increase in cases (22,419),
only 18,130 (or 96.95 per 100,000) resul ted in d e a t h , ^ the
drop in mortality being due to the excellent educational
prog ram of the Institute of Nutrition. However, note that the
number of cases increased and, in 1949, the rate was still
99.64 per 100,000. Since beri-beri is a disease of malnutrition,
it hardly seems possible that "most of the people are eating
better than ever before."
It may be true, quantitatively, that; if an individual
was accustomed to eating one bowl of rice and one fish and n ow
eats one bowl of rice and two fish, he may be eating better,
but hardly from a qualitative point of view. One of the
Bureau of He alth S t a t i s t i c s . Table II. Copy given the
author by Dr. J u a n " S a l c e d o , Jr., Direc tor of the Institute of
Nutrition.
12
See Health Tables, Appendix.
323
inescapable facts in Philippine society is the fact that the
great majority of the popu l a t i o n live dangerously nea r the
starvation level. In some areas, such as the I ountain Province,
for instance, starvation lies much nearer than in other regions
but throughout the na ti on the last meal of the day is many
times the prelude to hunger
Objactive : Increased P r o d u c t i o n .-
In August, 1947, the Under-Secretary of Agric ult ure and
Commerce, Jose Camus, stated that "Self-sufficiency in rice
for the country's population beginn ing with next year's harvest
Is certain at the rate the rice industry is getting r e h a b i l
itated."^^ F o rgettin g the Increase in population, he stated
.that the 7,000,000-sack shortage of the previous year, some 12
per cent below the point of self-sufficiency, was certain of
Improvement in the coming year. This was, he said, because of
the "recent arrival of 3r6,000,000 wo rth of UNRRA agricultural
machineries and equipment...." Whether the im provement would
be due to the "arrival" or the machi ner y itself is not clear.
In any event, the statement itself seems tinged with magical
significance.
He mentioned also that a "five-point p r o g r a m for the
rehabi lit ati on of the rice industry towards self -sufficiency has
■^"Next Rice Yiel d Enough, Camus," ACIL, IX, Wo. 8
(August, 1S47), p. 34.
324
been going on for some time now.... It includes the following;
(1) rapid use of machineries instead of work animals; (2) p l a n t
ing of better-yielding varieties of rice; (3) repair of
Irrigations; (4) importation of work animals to supplement
machineries and depleted work animals during the war; and
(5) control of p e s t s . A s i d e from some of the inconsistencies
in the statement, it can hardly be considered as something new,
since the identical p r o g r a m had b e e n in progress since 1934,
with minor variations, with little effect toward reso l v i n g the
problem. It must be noted here that the rice yield for the
fol lowing year was not enough.
'This same pu bli cation noted, in the same m o n t h in 1948,
that the "big problem" was still rice. A shortage had been
hinted in July, but in August it became "fr igh ten ingl y real."
Rice prices climbed steadily to the ceiling of 1*1.60 a ganta and
the NARIC hastily stepped in to arrest the climb at f*1.30.
Profiteers, it was noted, who had considerable stocks In their
possession hoping “to corner the market w i t h the coming of the
rainy season", withdr ew these stocks and panicked the people.
NARIC resumed rationing, the Government confiscated stocks, but
the situation, the magazine believed, was a cause fo r concern
and demanded correction. As a step in this direction, they
called for the b u i ldi ng of a "nation of in dependent f a r m e r s . " ^
Since this would require a complete impl emen tat ion of the social
•^I b i d .
"I C
"Across the Editor's Desk," ojd . ci t . . Vol. X, No. 8
(August, 1948), p. 1.
325
justice pr o g r a m -- something the Commonw eal th found impossible
in times of peace -- the semi-paralyzed condition of the
Republic Indicated the staggering task facing the nation.
An editorial in the public ati on examined the pr o b l e m in
greater detail. The cause, it believed, for the recurrent rice
shortage lay in the "dislocated economy" of the nation and
especially In the "unsettled peace problem." It noted that In
Central Luzon, considered the rice granary of the country, men
who should have bee n tilling the fields were "conspicuous by
their absence". These men, the editorial stated, were either
"spending their time in idleness" or were w i t h the "Huks and
PKMs" who were engaging in an "obvious sit-down strike" until
"the government could carry out its social amelioration pr o g r a m
as enunciated by President Quirino." It expected that the
situation, if uncorrected, would "dog our footsteps again next
year". Stat ing that it was too late to till these idle fields,
the editorial bluntly said that it was not too late, however,
to realize that "we have noth ing but ourselves to blame" for
all these difficulties. One thing that the na t ion failed to do,
it said, was to carry through the food p r o duction campaign of
the late President Roxas, ascribing the re as on for this to a
pr eocc upation wi th other "more important" things -- "politics;
for Instance." It stated bitterly that the government k n e w
that Central Luzo n wo uld not be able to produce its normal
quota of rice and should have launched a campaign for the pro duc
tion of supplementary food items. But, the editorial stated,
326
"nobody seemed to care" since "whether we produce enough food
or not, the high officials in the government will always have
enough to eat." It was this attitude, it stated, that was
responsible for the continuing deterioration in peace and order
which would continue until the government realized that the
country "is for the r i c h and the poor, the high and the low."^-6
Such bitter editorials continued to appear in the
various newspapers and magazines throughout the succeeding
years. They curiously compare in many details wit h editorial
comment In the Commonwealth period.
The above editorial contrasts sharply with the re as
surances given the people, earlier in the year, by President
Roxas in his annual message to Congress. He at that time
denied the validity or persistent reports of an impending rice
shortage, and declared that the Government had in storage over
a million bags, emphasizing that he expected no shortage in
the "foreseeable future." Chairman De la Cruz, of the NARIC,
echoed the President, stating that this quantity would be
sufficient to meet the short term requirements until the arrival
of foreign shipments. Despite the loss of some three million
cavans of p a lay from typhoons, he expressed optimism over the
increase in area planted. A bright rice prospect was envisioned
16
Ibid., p. 18
327
for every Filipino for one year 1S48.^^
During 1948, however, the Philippines experienced, di f
ficulty in securing foreign rice because of shortages in
countries supplying the cereal, so, as a result, President
.yiir ino issued Executive Order bo. 184, on November 19, 1948,
creating the Rice Emergency Board. This board was directly
under the Office of the President and was composed of the
Se cretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources as Chairman,
the Secretary of Commerce and Industry, the Secretary of Labor,
the President of the National Rice G r o w e r s ’ Association, and
a private rice-g rowi ng citizen. As happened during the Comm on
weal th period, the two latter places fell to hacenderos f r o m
Central Luzon who could hardly be considered representatives
of the people. The Order abolished a free market and placed
complete government control over procurement and distribution.
1 *7
Pedro S. de Jesus: ’’Ticklis h R i c e ” , Evenin g News
Saturday M a g a z i n e , Vol. 3, No. 22 (February 21, 1948), pp. 10-
11, 26-27. By March, 1950, Placido L. Mapa, Sec ret ary of
Agriculture and Natural Resources, viewed the situation then
thus: "Impressive as the rate of i n c r e a s e ...has been, n e v e r
theless, we are still far fr om catching up with our consumption
requirement w h ich increases at the rate of 1,380,000 cavans a
year. For instance, while our 1948-49 production was 56,620,000
cavans, our present requirements aggregated 61,000,000 showing
a deficiency of more than 8,000,000 cavans.... This accounts
for the fact that despite this rapid increase in production, we
still had to import rice -- valued at 1*46,000,000 in 1S48 and
1:49,000,000 In 1949. Beginning 1950, however, importation is
expected to be substantially redu ced each year." Mani la B u l l e t i n .
Vol. 141, No. 73 (March 27, 1950), Section 6. p. 3. Anoth er
factor not mentio ned here was the Increasing rise in the importa
tion of flour which had increased steadily to a figure of 5.8
kilograms per capita during the period 1936-1940, and at a mu ch
greater rate during 1945-1950. (See graph 18.) Importation of
flour in the latter peri od increased 500 per cent. Since the
consumption of flour is a substitution for rice consumption, the
true picture is obvious.
328
The Board was to utilize the NARIC for its operations and was
empowered to establish prices and issue licenses to millers and
dealers.
Professor Spencer observed that this might "serve very
well as a purely temporary m e a sure,” but that doubts existed as
to its longterm value. He noted three major defects in the plan;
First, the sheer insufficiency of rice will continue
for at least some years. Second, the p r o g r a m seems
geared to the interest of the large land-owning produce r
group of Central L u z o n . ... The ceiling price for gove r n
ment purchase of rice is defined at fourtee n pesos per
c a v a n ... second g r a d e .. . (U. S. £7.00 per nin ety -sev en
pounds unmllled). This will set the retail price for
clean rice at a ceiling of about 1.32 pesos per ganta
(equivalent to about b.S. £<0.13 per pound), w hich will
provide the large Central Luzon rice growers wi th a
handsome profit, since the chief market zone is near to
hand and the price is higher than for imported rice.
Purchase prices set for small farmers in the surplus
regions of Mindanao, southeastern Luzon, or Panay are
theoretically prop erl y adjusted, but in actual fact they
leave these areas at a disadvantage. Retail prices are
too high, and the p r o g r a m is not defined in terms of the
small-town and urban consumer, or for the farmer who
raises commercial crops and buys his rice supply.
Third, the NARIC, the operating organ of the n ew
program, was pre viously unable to cope w i t h the rice
problem, and its staff and facilities n o w are quite in
adequate to handle the whole of the crop that should go
through government monopoly ma chi ner y without loss, leak-
age, graft, or a serious black market.... An y failure
will open the way for serious rep erc uss ions socially,
economically, and politically, since the rice pr o b l e m
will continue for several years under ideal conditions.... ®
This acute analysis was borne out by the events of 1949-
1951, when unrest continued to mount, net only over other
socio-economic problems, but over the rice prob lem itself w h ich
18
Spencer, op. c i t . . pp. 127-128, passim.
was called, in 1949, one of the "colossal failures" of the
19
adrnini s t r a z i o n .
A Pro g r a m Suggested and Influencing Factors :
Professor Spencer discusses six steps required to solve
the p r o b l e m of adequate rice production. "First," he states,
"is a series of steps in the improvement of rice varieties
grown by the general farmer.... Second is a progr am of pest
elimination.... Third is the broa den ing and diversification of
general agriculture.... The fou rth is the question of m echaniza
tion by whic h the very great volume of human labor now being
used in rice culture can be turned to other ends.... The fi fth
need is for the development of irrigation systems to provide
the water for most of the lowland rice acreage not no w being
irrigated.... Sixth, and last... concerns the fertilizer problem.
This is two-fold, teaching its pr op er use and pr ovi ding the
volume and variety needed...."
Other observers recommended the following: (1) Use of
mechan iza tion especially in those areas best adapted to such
farming; (2) the improvement of varieties through breeding;
(3) the introduction of leguminous crops into rotation w i t h
■^"Even in Apo's Own Province 'Q,uirino Rice' Finds No
Buyers," The Star R e p o r t e r . Vol. V, No. 93 (October 28, 1949),
pp. 1 and 3. This newspaper throughout the early years of the
Republ ic was a sharp critic of the Administration.
330
rice and corn; (4) a more extensive use of fertilizers; and (5)
the development of a grain drier using locally available fuel.^
Both these prescriptions generally agree on what i s
needed. A portio n of the recommendations has been embodied in
a p rogram for action by various government entities, part i c u l a r
ly the Department of Agriculture and Natural R e s o u r c e s but,
unfortunately, very little of the p r o g r a m was ever effectuated
to the degree necessary or with the required technical base.^^
Experiments conducted by the De partment and its agencies all
pointed to the feasibility of its plan, but outside its
various experiment stations little, w i t h certain later-noted
exceptions, was actually accomplished by 1951. 'Ihis was not
due to any special lack of energy with in the Department but to
the increasing lessening of appropriations with which to carry
out its program and the pre sum pti on of man:/ of its functions by
other more political and less technically pro ficient bodies.
One other step is necessary before the chronic rice
shortage can be met satisfactorily, and that is pro vis ion for
proper distribution. Transportation and communication were di f
ficult in the Philippines of 1945-1950, and constituted a major
21
R e p o r t of the Ph ilippine-United States Agricul tur al
fission, p. 4-2.
See its Reports, 1935-1939.
23
C f . the observations commenting on the failure of the
RIPCA p r o g r a m by Leon 0. Ty. "So Par - So Bad," The Philip-
pines Free P r e s s . XLI, No. 17 (April 29, 1950), pp. 4, 57; No.
18 (May 6, 1950), pp. 38-40; No. 19 (May 13, 1950), pp. 16, 52;
No. 20 (May 20, 1950), pp. 16, 40.
331
barrier to the free flow of goods. In 1938, there were 19,174
kilometers of roads in the Philippines, of which 10,408 kil o
meters were classified as first-class. By 1946, this latter
figure had risen to 12,709, but as a result of the War, they
could ha rdly be classified as good. The estimated cost for
recons tru cti on was some $100,000,000. If we measure the miles
of road per 1000 square miles of territory, the Philippines
falls below Korea and Palestine, both smaller in area. By the
same measurement, the Philippines stands below British Malaya,
Ceylon, and Formosa, all smaller, and considerably below Japan,
with an area some 30,000 square miles greater (the Philippines:
approx. 102 per 1,000; Japan: 3,623 per 1,000). The quality of
roads in the Philippines in 1950 was considerably be low what
it should have been. Travel was still a hardship and costs
were h i g h . 2 ^
Durin g the Commonwealth period, no agency of the Go vern
ment was more conscientious in its labors or more productive
of good than the Dep artment of Ag riculture and Natural Resources.
It was well-est abl ish ed and well-directed, and its personnel
had a high morale and level of efficiency. Its labors were
truly herc ulean even If they fell below their objectives. One
P A.
Public La w 370 of the 79th A m e rican Congress set
aside $40,000,000, for reconstruction of Philippine highways
and bridges. This was matched w i t h $12,000,000, bjr the Phi lip
pine Congress. The program, which was to have been completed
by June 30, 1951, was to provide for a total of 81 highway
projects totalling 580 kilometers of bituminous and concrete
pavement; 218 bridges totalling 36 kilometers, and 226 small
bridges. By March, 1950, 99 per cent of the pr o g r a m m i n g had
been completed; 82 per cent of the plans; 70 per cent of bids
taken; 28 per cent completed projects; and 35 per cent under
construction.
332
of its most effective branches was the Bureau of Plano Industry,
composed of six divisions: administration, agronomy-horti-
culture research, agricultural extension, farm management and
seed production, plant pest and disease control, and plant
utilization. The Bureau in 1950 had seventeen experiment sta
tions and seed farms and forty- sev en provincial and municipal
nurseries and demonstration stations, situated ac strategic
points throughout the Islands. The functions of the various
divisions have been the following:
a. To undertake the investigation of soil and
climatic conditions in relati on to crops adapted to
these conditions and the methods of pr oducing and
hand lin g agricultural products;
b. To introduce, raise and distribute improved
seeds and plants;
c. To establish, equip, maintain, operate and
administer agricultural experiment stations for p u r
poses of agricultural research;
d. To control and eradicate plant pests and
diseases; and
e. To per form all tasks pres cribed by law or
regulation as essential for the pr omotion and develo p
ment of the agricultural resources of the Philippines.
The activities of the Bureau may be grouped as
follows:
a. Rese arc h work, in agronomy, horticulture plant
breeding, plant pathology, entomology, plant physio-
logy, soil, agricultural chemistry, plant utilization,
rural economic, and agricultural engineering.
b. Ex tension work al ong extensive and intensive
crop pro duction and improvement, control of plant
pests and diseases, betterment of rural conditions
through f ar m and home improvement, soil maintenance
and improvement with f a r m and green manures, cover
crops and fertilizers, crop diversification, crop
rotation, establishment of new plant industries
development of home industries, operation of demonstra
tion farms, gardens and orchards, organization of
agricultural fairs and cooperative farmers' associations,
rural relief work and findi ng of markets wh ere to sell
the c r o p s ;
c. Regulatory work whic h consists of the enf orc e
ment of laws and regulations affecting agriculture,
335
especially foreign and domestic plant quarantine and
inspection activities, special drives against locusts,
leaf-miners, and other outbreaks of pests and diseases
of major importance;
d. Establishment and operation of experiment
stations, seed farms and nurseries for purposes of
propagation and distribution of improved seeds and plant
materials ;
e. Industria liz ati on and utilization of farm products. ®
Possibly the major factor inhibiting its earnest work
has been the apathy or resistance on the part of individual
farmers, to the introduction of new rice varieties and methods
of production.
The Bureau experimented constantly wit h new varieties
of rice, seeking a species which would give a higher yield per
hectare and bear earlier in the season. It was believed that
if such a variety could be developed and placed in wide use,
the planting of a second crop in many areas would be possible,
thus enormously increasing the annual production. Informa
tion wi th regard to the introduction of such varieties during
the Commonwealth period Is difficult to obtain, but a recent
report mentions the major varieties introduced generally since
about 1919, some 13 in all.*'®
The chief importance of this work lies not merely in
26
"A Guide to Visitors to the Bureau of Plant Indus t r y , ”
Bure a u of Plant Industry, Manila, 19 48, 5 pp. (Mimeo.), pp. 2, 3.
26
fo. Manas y Cruz and Fabian 0. Solpicio; Plant
Exploration and Introduction Work of the Bureau of Plant Indus
try," MS copy loaned author, Novembe r 28, 1949, 10 pp.
334
the introduction, but ir the establishment of the variety.
This, in many instances, is another story. Ivajor varieties
introduced and established include the following: Ra m a i .
which was introduced from Cochin-China in 1919, is considered
the heaviest yiel din g variety in the Philippines, producing
in 195 days, a yield per hectare of 77 cavans (average). It
requires much water, its product is considered as second class
rice, has a fair eating quality, and is "extensively grown
in the provinces of Pampanga, Bulacan, Tarlac, Nueva Ecija and
some parts of Pangasinan". Seraup KechiJ^ 36, is a "recently
introduced" variety from the Federated Malay States, maturing
in about 200 days, yi elding from 50 to 90 cavans per hectare,
excellent eating quality and resistant to drought, and is
extensively grown in Laguna, Pampanga, Pangasinan and Isabela.
Others are Seraup Besar 1 5 . K hao Bai Sri (Siam), K ra-Suey
(Siam-"floating rice"), Malagkit Sungson (China), Delhinla
(Siam), Ketan Koet oek (Siam), Taichu 65 (Formosa), Taichu Q.46
'(Formosa), Taichu Q.62 (Formosa), Tosa Mo chi (Formosa), and
Kokkukko hochi (Formosa). The last three but one are used
generally in the pr eparation of native delicacies and pastries.
This experimentation with n ew varieties and their sub
sequent introduction into the culture are really two distinct
processes, since many farmers are reluctant to change from
their old methods and their old varieties. The economic factor
enters at this point, since if farmers and tenants had to
purchase the n e w seed varieties, they would be unde rstandably
355
reluctant to take the risk attached to the cultivation of a
new and unknown variety at their own expense. Were seeds
fu'rnished the farmer free of charge by the Government, the
situation would be different, as has been shown in areas where
this has been done. As a general rule, the establishment of
new varieties in the culture has been accomplished on large
estates or haciendas rather than on small plots owned by
individual farmers.
By 1949, the replacement of old varieties with new
h i g h -yielding ones was about one-fourth of the goal, with some
675,000 hectares of lowland, upland and palagad areas replaced
out of a total of 2,164,100 hectares planted. The Bureau
stated; "The average produc tio n of lowland and upland fields
of these productive varieties was in order of 3 to 8 cavans
Or?
according to variety per hectare, more than ordinary v a r i e t i e s . 1
It was hoped that this pointed to the achievement of self-
sufficiency in five years. The goals in rice pr oduction were
as follows: area; 2,176,910 hectares; production: 64,255,570
cavans; yield per hectare: 29.5 cavans. By June, 1949, progress
was reported as follows: Area: 2,164,100; production: 56,620,200
cavans; yield per hectare: 25.6 (approx.).^e
27
An nual Report of the Bureau of Plant Industry
Including Progress in the R eh a b i l i t ation of Plant Industries
for the Crop Year binding June 50. 1949. MS file copy loaned
the author by J.CJ. Dacanay, September 21, 1949. Typescript,
pp. 3, 6.
OD
Ibid . , p. 4, and Plant Industry Digest, Vol. XII,
No. 5 (May, 1949), cover.
336
While optimistic of the future, the Bureau was realistic
in its appraisal of the existing situation.
During the year (19 48-1949) under review, there was
a shortage of roughly, 10,959,000 cavans of palay on
this staple food and this was made up p a rtl 3^ by rice
importations from abroad and partly by making use of
supplementary food crops. With the present prod uction
of 56,620,200 cavans there would be around 52,656,786
cavans available for consumption after deducting the
seeds, wastes, etc. Consid eri ng our consumption require
ments of 62,763,980 cavans for 1949-50 based at 340
grams clean rice per capita per day, there will be a
shortage of about 10,107,194 cavans for the next yea r. ...^ ®
Three hundred and forty grams of clean rice per person
per day is the equivalent of 10 . S troy ounces, and the
nutritional requirements demand a minimum of 360 grams, if not
supplemented by other foods. This amount would give less than
1300 calories which is quite insufficient to maintain good
health. In the city of Manila, many families have been found to
be existing on as low as 405 calories per d a y . ^
One of the most difficult steps in the solution of the
rice problem is the elimination of control of pests and diseases
which annually take a h e avy toll of production. During 1949 a
great infestation of army worms (Spodoptera mauritia Boisd.)
invaded some forty provinces. Hardest hit were the provinces
in Central Luzon, Mindoro, Antique, Batangas, Cavite, Laguna,
Quezon, Aorsogon and Camarines S u r . Of 75,760 hectares infested,
some 58,000 were reported freed and the rest were either
30
Dr. Juan Salcedo Jr., Philippine Institute of
Kutrition, in conversation with author, January 21, 1950.
337
pa rtially or completely destroyed. Some 60 per cent of the
damaged crops was estimated to be recoverable if normal ra i n
fall was experienced, and a greater percentage if extensive
fertiliza tio n occurred. This out-break was the most damaging
ever recorded. Rice seedbeds, sugarcane plantations and corn
fields were destroyed, as well as pasture areas. The Bureau
exerted heroic efforts to bring it under control, using every
method from hand-p ick ing to dusting by helicopter, and fo llo w
ing the campaign carried on an extensive education p rogram
encouraging farmers to request aid and information wi th regard
to methods of control and destruction. Much yet remains to be
done in this matter and the Bu reau is seeking constantly cheaper
and more powerful insecticides and means of making them a v a i l
able to farmers.
The third step, that of b roade nin g and diversifying
agriculture, is more difficult. The utilization of leguminous
plants on idle fields has been stressed repeatedly by the Bu rea u
but wi th little general success. In 1950 mu ch of the Phi l i p
pine land still lay Idle for a great portion of the year between
the harvest and the next planting. Rotatio n of crops, and the
ins titution of cottage industries alone would enormously
increase the food potential of the country. However, unless
the basic social and economic problems of the general Philippine
system were radically changed, there could be little productive
development.
Mech ani zat ion is pro po sed as the fourth step, but it is
338
hardly feasible wi th the present system of land ownership. On
large haciendas, mechanization has pr ove d successful, but in
such regions as the Ilocos with its farms of an average si^e
of a hectare or less, and in Central Luzon wi th its tenancy
problem, the story- is quite different. Individuals who cannot
afford a carabao can hardly afford a tractor and other eq uip
ment, and for small farms (and Philippine farms are small), the .
cost far o u t w e i g h s the advantages. Since the present trend
is away from large haciendas towards individual ownership, the
prospects for a considerable development of mechanized farming
would seem remote indeed. One technical writer states:
But mec hanizing a primitive system of tropical
agriculture requires not only know-how, but also wi sdom
and patience. For instance, it would do no good to
dump tractors, plows, harrows, combines and the like,
let us say, in Bulacan province and elsewhere in Central
Luzon and expect to mechanize the pro d uction of lowland
rice there. Bot h social and technical problems are
involved.
In the first place, It is not a wise policy to
displace labor, particularly peasant labor, suddenly
and without giving a chance to those men whose labor
will be displaced, an opportunity to readjust them
selves. In the second place, the areas of the average
rice paddies and their water supply are such that
prese nt- day mechanized equipment are not suitable in
working them economically.... It may be considered,
therefore, that the effort to substitute the small
tractor for the carabao is not yet a definite p o s s i b i l i t y . ...31
The w i s d o m in this analysis is obvious.
Irrigation, the fifth step leading toward a solution of
the rice problem, being more expensive and more subject to
^ D r . Santiago R. Cruz: "Essentials in PI Fa rm
M e c h a n i z a t i o n , ” Plant Industry D i g e s t . Vol. XII, ho. 6 (June,
1949), pp. 15, 17, p a s s i m .
339
political pressures, has barely begun in the Philippines. On
October 26, 1936, an act was passed by the First National
A s s embly "giving the President authority tc administer the
irrigation systems constructed by trie g o v e r n m e n t ...and to effect
adjustments in the payment of irrigation charges, to suspend
pendi ng judicial proceedings for the collection of unpaid
charges and penalties, and to grant the right of repurchase."
This authority was sweeping since he could, ”by executive
order, effect such changes and reforms In the administration
of the irrigation systems, increase or decrease the irrigable
area of any Irrigation system or close any or all of those that
are already existing, fix the rate of the irrigation charges and
the manner of payment thereof, and exempt from payment of
irrigation charges any land or lands included within the irriga
tion systems} Provided, however, that on fixing the annual
irrigation charge per hectare, which shall include the cost of
operation, maintenance, equipment, insurance and reasonable
amortization on the cost of construction, the President shall
take into consideration the economic situation and ability to
pay of the persons owning land wi thin a given irrigation system. »33
Such an act gave the President all the powers needed to
extend as far as was possible the nee ded Irrigation system in
the Philippines. Since the President repe atedly spoke of his
great interest in seeking all poss ible solutions to the vexing
•^ Co mmonwealth Act No. 87, M.Q .P. . Vol. 2, Pt. 2, p. 749
33
I b i d .. pp. 749-750.
340
problems facing Philippine agriculture, upon which the future
of the Commonwealth and the Republic rested, it is surprising
that so little was accomplished through executive action.
In vetoing Commonwealth Bill No. 1536, which provided
for the extension of the Angat irrigation system, President
Quezon wrote; "When it is intended to construct irrigation
systems for the benefit of landowners, it has been the policy
of the Government to float bonds for the purpose of financing
such projects with the idea that the Government will be re
imbursed by the landowners of at least the cost of the operation
and maintenance of such irrigation systems (Act 4185). The
proposed measure is a departure from that policy as it seeks to
extend the Angat River Irrigation System in Bulacan to certain
barrios in the Municipality of Malolos at the direct expense
of the National Government in the amount of .
f 8,000. I do not
see any special reason in the present instance to justify depart
ing from the established policyr of the Government In the matter
of construction of extending irrigation systems. If it is
intended to extend the Angat Irrigation System, as proposed in
the bill, resort should be made to the Irrigation fund
established under the Irrigation Act and not to the general
funds of the National Treasury which are needed to finance more
urgent government activities.
The National Assembly, on November 13, 1936, also
passed an act^° providing for an irrigation insurance fund,
54M . Q . P ., Vol. 2, P t . 1, pp. 381-382. Italics supplied.
35
Commonwealth Act No. 176.
341
from which damaged irrigation systems would draw funds for
repairing and reconstruction, so that owners would not be
charged for such repair work. Unfortunately, this fund never
acquired the appropriation to meet the provisions of the act.
Since the act provided that if at any time irrigation works
"constructed by the National Government" shall be damaged or
destroyed, "or shall be in danger of destruction, or serious
damages by earthquake, fire, lightning, flood, tornado, typhoon,
hurricane, war or by other fortuitous events or force majeure.
the same shall b e ...repaired", and since these were of common
occurrence and the works constructed by the Government were only
a small percentage of the total irrigation facilities in opera
tion, the total effort of the Government contributed little to
the solution of this aspect of its agricultural program.
Over a period of years, the Government acquired rather
extensive land holdings through confiscation of land for reason
of non-payment of irrigation charges. On August 24, 1937,
President Quezon issued Executive Order No. 108, authorizing
the repurchase of lands levied and sold for failure to pay
irrigation charges. Owners of such land could repurchase them
by payment of a price "which shall not be less than the total
of all the unpaid irrigation charges, and the penalties due on
the land...and the costs of judicial proceedings, with interest
at the rate of four per centum per annum," provided that the
repurchase "shall be made within one year from the date of the
promulgation of this Order, and that at least ten per centum
342
of the repurchase price shall be paid within thirty days..."
and that the "balance of the repurchase price shall be paid in
cash or in not more than two annual installments."
Further, Quezon directed that "all installments due
and payable shall draw interest at four per centum per annum"
and if the purchaser failed to pay any installment "within the
period of six months from the time it Is due," all amounts
would be forfeit to the Government and the sale c a n c e l l e d . ^
From a business point of view, this was an excellent order but
it hardly was In the spirit of the social justice program
promulgated by the Government. It was actuations such as this,
contrasting so sharply with the promises of the Government,
that lost the Government support and cooperation on the part of
the people concerned.
President Quezon, in May, 1938, received a petition
from the people of Nueva Ecija requesting; an irrigation system
and the sale, to the tenants, of the oabani Estate landholdings.
On June 1, 1938, the President sent a letter to the Hon. Felipe
Buencamino, Jr., in which he expressed his regret that the
pressure of official business compelled him to decline the
invitation to meet with these people. "I hope you will under
stand and will present my excuse to the people who expect to
meet me there on that day." He continued:
With regard to the petition of the people of several
towns of Nueva Ecija for an irrigation system, please
56M.O.P.. Vol. 3, Pt. 2, p. 643.
343
tell them that I am in thorough sympathy with their
desire, as I have set forth in a former letter to you.
kith respect to the petition of the tenants of
Sabani Estate that the Government sell to them on
installment plan their present holdings, you may assure
them that their petition meets with my approval, and
that I have conferred with h r . Anonas, manager of the
National Development Company, who will give early
attention to this subject. Only bona fide tenants
will be given preference to have the land they are
occupying sold to them.37
The tenants in 1950 were still awaiting their irrigation
system and the sale of the Estate, which was owned, at that
time, by the National Development Company.
Before the Jar, some 670,000 hectares of rice land were
irrigated, of which 370,000 hectares were covered by private
systems owned by individuals or by communal irrigation. Portions
of this communal irrigation, largely found in the Mountain
Province, particularly among the people of Bontoc and Ifugao,
have been in operation for many hundreds, possibly thousands,
of years. The systems operated by the Bureau of Public Works,
TO
as late as 1938, served only 75,000 hectares. Thus, of the
total lowland areas, 60 per cent depended solely on rainfall
for irrigation purposes, and an adequate good irrigation system
was to be found on only 20 per cent.*-*9
The Bureau of Lands administers the irrigation system
57 m .P.P.. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, p. 577.
38
Erich H. Jacoby; Agrarian Unrest in Southeast A s i a .
(New York; Columbia University Press , 1949), p. 177.
39Ibid.
344
contained within the former Friar Lands, -which were purchased
by the Government, but the total of such lands amounts only to
some 30,000 hectares. These are to be found in Cavite, Laguna,
Rizal and Buiacan provinces, planted to rice and sugar. In
Ilocos Norte there exists an interesting organization, a hold
over from the period of Spanish regime. This system is called
zanjero (ditch owner) and consists of privately-owned irriga
tion systems. The zanjero operates and maintains the systems
but in most cases, does not own the land irrigated. For their
services, they are permitted to cultivate and sell the produce
of usually one-half the land served, the landowner being
furnished water free for the remaining portion. Heedless to
say, the landowners are far from satisfied with this situation
and have been agitating for its elimination for many years.
The method of operating irrigation systems by the Govern
ment was originally established in 1922 with a twenty-million
peso bond issue. Charges were fixed so as to amortize this
issue, funds accruing through the charges to repay the cost of
construction, the amortization charge, and a contingency charge.
This was developed so as to turn over, to the landowners, after
amortization, the irrigation systems removing them from the
control of the Government. This resulted in the construction
of eleven systems, with two that were built during the Japanese
occupation (the Rizal system in Nueva Ecija and the Hanagdung
in Quezon, both constructed of semi-permanent materials). The
collection of irrigation charges became exceedingly difficult
345
during the Commonwealth period, and the National Assembly
passed several amendments to the original act of 1922. The
most important was one which abandoned the idea of turning the
systems over to the landowners, the Government retaining them
and charging owners a flat assessment rather than an amortisa
tion fee. This fee was fixed at six pesos per hectare in 1935,
but collections lagged. It was for this reason that Commonwealth
Act No. 87 was passed giving the President authority to
administer the systems.
During the Commonwealth period, day laborers were paid
a maximum daily wage of one peso; thus, according to the
Government, the six-peso fee was barely sufficient to cover
the operation and maintenance costs and far below the amortiza
tion needs. Following the war, laborers' wages increased some
four times making it even more difficult to meet operating
expenses. Shortly after assuming office, President Roxas, on
July 22, 1946, fixed the annual fee at twelve pesos per hectare.
The size of the tracts within Government-owned systems
is very small, the average holding being 2.9 hectares, and, in
the Ilocos regions, within the Laoag-Vintar, the Dingras, the
Amburayan River and Tagudin systems, the holding averages six-
tenths of a hectare. McNutt and Fernando stated, in an article
in a Manila newspaper that "before the war, with the low price
of rice, the l/2 (s i c ., should read 12) paid by the landowners
as Irrigation fee to the Government represented the equivalent
of over 2 cavans of palay, or 10 per cent of the average difference
34-6
in production between irrigated and unirrigated lands. Today
it takes only 1 cavan of palay or 5 per cent of the excess
production attributable to the irrigation service, to cover the
new 12 peso irrigation f e e . " ^
Realizing the importance of irrigation to the future
of Philippine agriculture, Congress in 1947 set aside eighteen
million pesos, in the Public Works Appropriation Act, for
irrigation purposes. The problems, however, were still far
from solved. The agricultural experts brought over by the
Government presented the best analysis of post-war irrigation
systems in the Philippines. t'diatever progress to be made in
the future, must be directed from these observations of the
situation and the recommendations for a successful program
embodied in the Repor t . They stated:
Interest in irrigation was found in all parts of the
Islands. The principal interest was in large gravity
systems. The Mission observed that the systems already
established had rarely been provided with adequate
storage, that usually an attempt had been made to irrigate
too much land, and that the water had not been properly
distributed. The construction of large gravity systems
with supporting reservoirs is expensive. A number of
small systems privately operated were observed, but many
small streams desirably located, with a year-round flow
of water, were not being used. The primary interest in
the utilization of irrigation water appeared to be
through construction by the Government. Not a sin gle
instance of ground-water resources being utilized through
pumping was noted, and yet there was evidence of an
abundance of ground water.
For an irrigation system to be most satisfactory, it
must be possible to remove the water at will. This cannot
40
Paul V. McNutt and Isaias Fernando: "Irrigations in
the Philippines," The Sunday Post Magazine. Vol. II, No. 38
(June 8, 1947), pp. 21-22, p a s s i m .
347
be done without drainage. The Mission heard many com
plaints of irrigation systems that flooded the land in
some seasons and dried up during others. While it may
be too expensive to modify systems already established,
in all future construction the drainage aspect should
be given equal consideration with that of water supply.
There are also areas of good land that need drainage
for maximum crop production. Some of these lands are
very fertile.
It is recommended that:
CL ) Every encouragement possible be given indivi
duals or corporations^ bo develop small gravity-irriga
tion systems: (2) a program of research be instituted
to determine the relative costs of gravity systems
versus pumping from ground water; (3) a program of
research be instituted to determine the most economical
use of irrigation water; and (4) if drainage equipment
is available In the army surplus, the Bureau of Public
’
Works should consider the advisability of establishing
an experimental drainage system.41
Coupled with irrigation was the encouragement which the
Bureau of Plant Industry gave farmers to practice what is called
palagad production of rice, i.e., second planting. This
program met with some success in areas containing efficient
irrigation facilities or where new irrigation was introduced.
The crop year ending June 30, 1949, saw an increase of almost
two million cavans (from 2,596,511 to 4,006,500) on a hectarage
that increased from 121,197 to 191,496 hectares.42 If this
progress can be continued, and it can be continued only with
increasing irrigation and fertilizer facilities, the Philip
pines will be well started on the road to self-sufficiency in
rice.
4-^-Report of Philippine-United States Agricultural
Mission, pp. 21-22.
42Report. 1949, Bureau of Plant Industry, p. 5.
348
In the past, little fertilization could be found in the
Philippines. After harvesting a crop of rice, the stubble was
burned or otherwise destroyed and not left to enrich the soil.
As a resiilt of this practice, and of the ever-increasing use of
the land, fertility was greatly weakened in many places, with
a dropping yield or even total exhaustion. home lands cannot
now be reclaimed for rice cultivation, but, fortunately, these
represent less than half the acreage. The Bureau of Plant
Industry accomplished the most in this respect. Through Its
efforts, and its efforts alone, the Filipino farmer was gradual
ly educated in many districts to the necessity of using
fertilizers. In some instances, as often happens, fertilizers
were used where they should not have been, or the wrong kind
was used.
Striking evidence of the truly magnificent work of the
Bureau was revealed in 1949, when 61,000 hectares of rice fields
were fertilized with commercial fertilizer, comparing most
favorably with the previous y e a r ’s total of but 18,200 hectares.
This use of fertilizers was almost wholly confined to a few
provinces. They chiefly employed ammonium sulphate, although
the use of guano, principally in the VIsayas, was gaining in
popularity. The guano is obtained locally, a few islands in the
west VIsayas being particularly rich in deposits.4^
Jose Armando Villegas: "Boosting the Guano-Mining
Industry," ACI L i f e . Vol. XI, No. 10 (October, 1949), pt>. 24,
26; "Guano Fertilizer," Ibid.. Vol. X, No. 10 (October,
1948), p. 15.
349
Perhaps one reason for ohe increased use of fertilizer
was the high price of palay. Although fertilizers In the Philip
pines have been almost beyond the reach of the majority of small
farmers, the recent high prices of palay (ten times prewar, 1946
-1950), permitted such expenditures and gave them a profit at
the same time. <»hen the establishment of fertilizer plants, one
of the projects of the Government, becomes a reality, it is
hoped that prices will fall within the reach of all farmers.
The rice problem, as Professor Spencer stated, can be
solved: "If all-out effort went Into almost any one of the
shorter-range Items listed above,44 self-sufficiency as a temporary
measure could be reached in a very few years. 'The mere cultiva
tion of all possible rice land could do it, given social co
operation and good weather. Distribution of even a small volume
of commercial phosphate of fertilizers by the government could
do it. Growth of high-yield rice varieties could provide the
needed yield. Taken alone, however, each of these steps is but
a temporary prop to the crop total, as Indicated by the falling
per-acre yields on many kinds of land. Only the combined and
well-integrated efforts of the government and the farmer along
all the above lines will produce a real solution.1,45
In 1950, it appeared that "social cooperation" and
"well-integrated efforts" were still to be achieved since the
basic social, economic, and psychological problems were as yet
not fully realized.
44Spencer, o p . c i t .. pp. 127-128.
4^Ibid., p. 128. Italics supplied.
CHAPTER X
THE ABACA AHD COCONUT INDUSTRIES J 1941-1950
The War proved disastrous to the abaca industry, with
the plantations lying idle or being overrun by guerrillas
harrassing the Japanese and the Japanese burning the fields to
smoke out the guerrillas. Losses suffered by the industry
during the Occupation are estimated at £>79,000,000, with some
103,783 hectares of land destroyed through effects of war,
abandonment, neglect, depletion and the replanting to food
crops.^ In June, 1947, 150,000 was set aside for a campaign to
improve the fiber and disseminate instructions on new methods
of stripping. The estimated production in 1947 was 730,000
bales worth about JT52,000,000, or 60 per cent of the average
prewar productions.^
In Davao, before the War, the Japanese held some 60,000
hectares of land, about two-thirds of the cultivated area, of
which it was estimated that 32,000 hectares were held illegally.^
At the end of the War, these former Japanese lands were
expropriated by ex-guerrillas (and "guerrillas’1)4 who occupied
^Antonio Lejano: "Premium on Quality Hemp," evening Hews
Saturday Magazine. Vol. II, No. 47 (August 16, 1947), pp. 14-15, 29.
2
C f . Karl J. Pelzer: "Philippine Abaca Industry," Far
Eastern Survey. Vol. 17, No. 6 (March 24, 1948), pp. 75-76.
3 "There is a Davao Problem," (Editorial), Philippine
M a g azine. Vol. XXXIII, No. 7 (July, 1936), p. 338.
4We use the word "guerrilla" to Indicate individuals in the
Philippines similar to the "P-X Commando” in the United States Army.
350
351
them and immediately began stripping operations on the plants
available for the operation. This was the major factor in the
large production for 1947, but It seriously Injured the planta
tions since stripping was carried too far. Many plants that
should have been allowed further maturation were rendered u s e
less. As lace as November 30, 194-9, a writer warned that the
toleration by the Government of these inexperienced squatters
was spoiling the plantabions and unless it corrected the situa
tion soon the abaca industry in Davao would sooner or later be ■
paralyzed.°
Pelzer stated that."the havoc that has beset Philippine
abaca... during the last six years has made it questionable
whether the industry will be able to regain Its prewar strength."®
If one takes into consideration the increasing competition
offered by Indonesian and Central American fiber, the future of
the industry becomes even more questionable, m/ith the destruc
tive exploitation practiced in the Philippines, replacing what
Pelzer calls "the principle of an economy of sustained yields",
many observers foresaw the doom of the industry. The Govern
ment observers 'were more sanguine but thej^ gave the impression
of whistling in the dark. The Ghta Plantation, a former ’
Japanese holding owned as a subsidiary of the N A P O O , was held
up as a model of what could be done in rehabilitating the industry
but t h i s plantation comprises on ly 1,016 hectares and is
5
Lincoln A. Manapat: "This Valuable Abaca," The Manila
Times Mid w e e k . Vol. 4, No. 13 (November 30, 1949), p. T~.
6 0p. c i t . , p. 75.
352
far from typical.1''
It was announced on December 5, 1S49, that 2,500 hectares
of the Davao Penal Colony land, owned by the NAFCO would be
converted Into productive abaca land by a corporation under the
leadership of Jan H. Marsman, a local financier. hars m a n ’s
corporation would lease from the NAFCO some 7,500 hectares,
clearing the forest, planting, cultivating and developing this
land, which is a portion of 10,000 hectares allotted to the
NAFCO. For the privilege of developing it, Iv.arsman would pay
the NAFCO two pesos per hectare annually, and when the land
reaches productivity, fifty centavos per picul of processed
abaca. Governor Miguel Cuaderno of the Central Bank hailed the
plan for its utilization of local capital and initiative, and
expressed the hope that other capitalists would imitate it.
Senator Cabili, however vigorously opposed the plan as ’'un
constitutional'1 and typical of alien exploitation of Philippine
natural resources.® This objection was quite contrary to the
Government's expressed desire to regain its leading: position
in the world market,® as stated by President ^uirino, and the
7
For an excellent and authoritative discussion, with
regard to the postwar conditions characterizing the industry,
see Pelzer, l o c . ci t . Also see: G-ervacio C. Acay: ’‘Davao Abaca
Can Come Back’j11 The Philippines Free Press. Vol. XXXIX, No. 1
(January 3, 19487, p p .34, 35, for a contrasting, more subjective
view; Leon 0. T y : “N A F C O : Lore Dead Than Alive," Ibid., Vol.
XLI, No. 18 (May 6, 1950), p. 4.
O
Teodoro F. Valencia: "2 500 Hectares of Davao Penal Area
to be Converted into Productive Land,” The Philippines Herald.
Vol. 83, No. 102 (December 3, 1949), pp. 1, 4. See below, Note 16.
®The Manila T i m e s . Vol. 5, No. 113 (December 8, 1949), p. 3.
353
confusion caused by similar hasty objections on the part of
various officials was not calculated to attract the capital,
both Filipino and foreign, so urgently needed to rehabilitate
the Philippine economy in general and the abaca industry in particular.
It was estimated that, for the three years of’ Japanese
occupation, the value of fiber production was roughly some
eighty million pesos. As a result of damages to plantations,
during the three years following the War, the Industry suffered
a forty per cent reduction, amounting to some thirty million
pesos. The estimated amount needed to restore the plantations
to their prewar productivity was forty million pesos. The
property destroyed included warehouses to the value of six
million pesos; five thousand stripping sheds, with a value of
one million pesos, five thousand spindle machines, valued at
five hundred pesos each; and hemp presses valued at one million
pesos. Cordage factories were also destroyed, representing a
loss of five million pesos, with other factory and warehouse
equipment valued at five million pesos. 'The loss in government
revenue for the three years following the War was some six
million pesos. The total damage to the industry, including
funds necessary for rehabilitation, amounted to 3^176,500,000.
Progress in the industry following the War was slower
than in any other major industry with the possible exception
of tobacco. Since Davao had been the major producing area, the
-*-^Placido L, Mapaj "Abaca: Our No. 2 Export Industry,"
ACIL, Vol. XI, No. 5 (May, 1949), p. 15.
354
situation in that region was the determining factor. It was
complicated by the land system. Before the War, the Japanese,
limited by the Philippine land laws in the amount of land they
could own, hired Filipinos to act as “dummies” and acquire land
for their use. The Bureau of Lands and other agencies became
exercised, and a tempest in a teapot occurred just before the
War, with the Bureau ordering the cancellation of the lease and
sales applications. The commonwealth Government never seized
the lands because, some say, of the intervention of the American
State Department 'which was nob disposed to displease a potential
enemy.H
Following Liberation, these lands, as well as other
alien holdings, were turned over to the Philippine Government
by the Alien Property Custodian of the United States. They
represented two-thirds of the b e s t land In Davao. The former
Japanese “dummies" re-occupied them and reasserted their titles;
veteran guerrillas (and "guerrillas") also sought to occupy them,
both by right of conquest and as a reward for their efforts
during the Occupation. In addition, new settlers from the
Visayas also attempted to settle on them. Complicating the
situation was the lack of activity on the part of various
government agencies. As a result, bitter quarreling broke out
among the interested parties and resulted in some bloodshed.
The situation became so serious that President Roxas appointed
Jaime N. Ferrer: "Tug of rfar in Davao,” The Saturday
Evening News Magazine. Vol. 3, No. 38 (June 12, 1948), p . 6.
355
Ruperto T. Lstanislao of Bataan as a special investigator. He
spent a considerable period in Davao and eventually submitted
his report to the President. In accordance with it, the Presi
dent on February 10, 1947, issued an order designating the KAFGO
as the exclusive agency to administer the properties in question.
At the same time, he announced that she protection of the
Philippine GI Bill of Rights (Republic Act No. 65) was to be
extended to individuals seeking Davao lands and that veterans,
former guerrillas, and tenants who were actually workin'; the
lands on or before December 12, 1946 should be given preference
in occupying and purchasing public and alien lands.
It seems, however, that a number of elements both in and
out of the Government silently attempted to undermine the policy
laid down by the President.^ Much was said of the activities
of former "dummies’* in seeking to regain these lands. In 1946,
the Bureau of Lands, had ordered the Immediate seizure of lands
the application for possession of which had been cancelled in
1934. A lessee ("dummy") filed a motion for reconsideration,
but it was disapproved by the Bureau. He appealed to the
Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources who sustained
the B ureau’s decision. The lessee then asked the courts for a
preliminarj7- injunction against the Bureau and the Secretary to
enjoin them from seizing the lands. This case was still pending
in 1950. Meanwhile, about two hundred and fifty veterans had
settled and tilled the plantation in question.13 The lessee,
13Ibld. 13I b i d .
356
according to reports, the*, formed an association, composed, it
was said, of relatives and laborers who supposedly falsely
claimed they were occupying and working the land in question
before December 12, 1946. Armed men were also employed and
maltreated veterans working on the plantations.**-4
The :.Ax Cu came in for bitter criticism for the manner
in which they administered the lands under their jurisdiction.
NAFCO managers were said to be importing civilians, recently
arrived from the Visayas, as old tenants. The veterans also
protested against the terms for the lease of the lands, the
practice being to require a share of seventy-five per cent for
the NAFCC, with all expenses for working the land borne by the
tenants from the remainder. This, the veterans asserted was
excessive, since they received but five per cent gross profit
while the NAFCO, acting only as administrator, received 25 per
cent.
According to NAFCO officials, in 1950, the situation
was that these lands were sold to the veterans who were to pat
ten per cent down, the rest payable in ten years. As soon as
the title was cleared, the Philippine National Bank and the
Rehabilitation Finance Corporation were to give loans of 1*800
per hectare as each hectare was developed. The joker is,
apparently, that the 33,000 hectares of abaca land occupied by
these veterans, was worn out land which would, in all likelihood,
14Ibid.
357
repay neither their labors nor the loans received -- if such
loans were received. In addition, the stipulation with regard
to the clearing of titles deepened the pessimism of many, since
this process, tenants claimed, all too frequently extended over
a long period of years.
In February, 1949, abaca men from Davao and Cotabato
came to Lanila to appeal for more aid to the industry. They
specifically requested that, in addition to the loan for develop
ment of each hectare, they be granted a crop loan of twenty
pesos per picul on strippable abaca. This meant an Initial
loan of from seven to ten million pesos for the ten thousand
hectares owned by members of this Mindanao Abaca Planters
Association, which hoped to absorb all of the five thousand
independent planters in Davao and Cotabato. The great need for
the rehabilitation of the industry, as for so many others, was
capital. It required approximately 1700 to plant a hectare of
land to abaca and 18 months of hard labor to get it into shape
for the first stripping. Following the first stripping, the
plants may then be stripped for a period of from fifteen to
twenty years, yielding annually an average of from thirty to
fifty piculs per hectare based on prewar experiences. The
return for this labor is large, amounting to as much as three
thousand pesos per hectare per year.
Because of the need for capital and labor, many indivi
duals in the Government and the NAFCO, welcomed Karsman's offer
with regard to developing the penal colony lands. Placido L.
358
Mapa, Secretary of Agriculture and Natural Resources, wrote in
1949 that the plan "deserved the sympathetic consideration of
the Government;, if only the conditions were modified to give
the Government a larger share in the profits. President Quirino
stated that the proposed agreement was not in violation of the
Constitution as it followed a pattern established in 1939 by a
contract between the National Development Company and the
Philippine Packing Corporation with regard to the operation of
a pineapple plantation in Mindanao (one of the largest in the
world--one field containing fifteen million pineapple plants).
Secretary I.apa endorsed the President's view, stating that it
was the President’s plan that any contract which might be ap
proved between NAFCO and Marsman would serve as a model for
additional investments by others interested in the abaca industry.
The major opposition came from Senator Cabili, of Lanao,
who in 1949 said that the plan was unconstitutional and unneces
sary. The senator declared that the lease would be in excess
of the 1,024 hectares allowed an individual or corporation,
and would violate the constitutional restriction against the
exploitation of the nation's natural resources by aliens. He
said that the proponents of the plan "have cleverly cloaked
the transaction under the guise of operational management" which
"could be the initial wedge that alien interests might drive
^ Manila Bulletin. Vol. 140, No. 74 (December 26, 1949),
p . 5.
-|g
Jesus Bigornia: "Cabili Hits Abaca Land Lease Plan,"
Manila Bulletin, Vol. 140, No. 69 (December 8, 1949), p. 1.
359
into our protective laws." ’’Before you know it, we will wake
up some fine day to find that we are strangers in our own
country." He held that the NAFCO could well carry out the plan
of t h e administration to rehabilitate the industry17 and that
the §*2,500,000 advanced the NAFCO with an indicated loan of
some 1*9,000,000 from the RFC, would be more than adequate for
rehabilitation. The industry, supported by the Department of
Agriculture and Natural Resources estimated, however, that at
least forty million pesos was needed; so that that the senator’s
statement, while undoubtedly patriotic, was in contradiction to
his Government’s stand.
Veterans' groups also opposed the plan, stating that
1 fi
it would virtually exclude native capital which, however,
has shown a marked reluctance to invest in any enterprise in
which profits are separated from investment by any considerable
period of time.
Conclusion:-
The Joint Agricultural Mission recommended in 1947 that
"large holdings in the hand of competent operators with sufficient
capital to employ efficient decorticating equipment should not
17
For a critical view of the N A F C O 's ability to carry
out the administration's plans, see Eugenio Boadoj "Bad Manage
ment Responsible for Projects' Failure," Philippines H e r a l d .
Year 30, No. 87 (January 20, 1950), p. 2. This was one of a
series of three articles on Davao, with particular regard to
anomalies in the rehabilitation of the government-owned abaca
plantations. Also see: Ty, l o c . c i t .. Note 7.
•^Manila Bulletin. Vol. 140, No. 74 (December 26, 1949), p. 5.
360
be discouraged."19 It also advocated a long-range program for
the rehabilitation of the industry, a part of which should be
devoted to intensive research. Such research and such a program
demand large capital investments and the elimination of marginal
lands and producers. Unless such investments come from native
capital (which seems unlikely in view of its reluctance in the
past) or unless foreign capital is encouraged to enter the field
with assurances of reasonable profits and tenure, the industry
will not be able to meet the goals set by the Government and
regain ics once commanding position in the world market.
The plan advocated by the Department of Agriculture and
Natural Resources, of sub-dividing 10,000 hectares of public
lands into lots of twenty, fifty and one hundred hectares, to
be distributed to individuals under the close supervision of
the Department, is sound if carried through with vigor, honesty
and imagination. The Department hoped that if the plan carries,
such grant-holders would form cooperatives for the development
of lands assigned them, with a minimum holding of hectares.
But the past history of such movements offered slight encourage
ment that such a plan would work to the benefit of the industry,
and, with rising labor costs, rising costs of equipment of all
kinds, the competition offered by Central American and Javan
abaca, the necessity for large capital investment was recognized
by all observers in and out of the (hvernment.20
190p. cit., p. 17.
20The industry has a bright future, nevertheless, but
half-measures will not do. The high mortality of past olans,
drawn up with eagerness and enthusiasm, offers a plain warning.
361
The outbreak of the European ear In 1939-1940 dealt a
serloua blow to the coconut Industry. The Philippines had
such large stocks of coconut products that copra prices In
August of 1940 dropped to an all-time low. Copra cake, normal
ly exported for cattle feed, was used for fuel, the require
ments beingfhr below the supply. The normal American market
for copra and oil was greatly reduced by an abundance of domestic
oils and the export trade to Latin America was hurt by lard
exports from the United States. In addition, the great increase
in ocean freight charges restricted shipments abroad. Rates,
for copra, from Manila to American Pacific coast ports, in
creased from $9.50 to $13.50 per ton; for copra meal, from $8.00
to $11.50 per ton, and, for oil, from $15.50 to $20.00 per ton.
This, naturally, cut sharply the profits of local producers.
The Japanese reaped the benefit of this situation when they
entered the Philippines, acquiring at one stroke a considerable
portion of the oil needed for the year 1942. With the outbreak
of the War with Japan, the United States, which had already
felt a need for oils and fats because of defense preparations,
found Itself cut off from its largest and most faithful producer
of these necessities. During 1941, the United States had
increased its consumption of Philippine oil through the new
federal regulations (the McNutt standard) which encouraged
margarine producers, oil consumption increasing some three
362
million pounds in one year.2^ Had the United States taken
advantage of the low prices for Philippine coconut products
after 1939 (a step which was never considered by Congress) it
might well have faced December 7, 1941, with more confidence
than was the case.
In 1946, the United States, returning to its position
as the world’s largest consumer of coconut products, signed an
agreement with the Philippines by which it agreed to buy all
the surplus copra and coconut oil for the year beginning July
1, 1946 at $103.56 per long ton for copra and 7.1 cents per
pound for coconut oil.2® During the first six months of that
year, the Philippines exported 190,000r000 pounds of copra in
terms of oil, about two-thirds going to the United States.
While this meant prosperity for the long-suffering coconut
products producer, the iniquitous economic system, as usual,
robbed the small producer and enriched the middlemen and the
large producers.
The outbreak of the War halted plans for carrying out
Assemblyman Kalaw's recommendations for stabilizing the industry.
As provided in the act creating the NACOCO, most of his recom
mendations would have had to be executed by other agencies than
that provided by the Government. The end of the War gave a
second chance for the stabilization of the industry which, as
had been predicted, weathered the conflict more easily than the
21Encvclopaedla Brltannlca Book of the Year. 1942.
p. 186.
S2Ibid.
363
other major industries* While some damage was suffered by
equipment and buildings, the trees still remained* There was
a world-wide demand for coconut products at the end of the War
and prices soared to unbelievable heights*
During the transition period, between the end of mil
itary rule and the beginning of private trading, the American
need for coconut products was illustrated by the special
arrangements made by the Foreign Economic Administration for
the procurement of coconut products in 1945* The FEA announced
the signing of an agreement between the U*3. Commercial Company
and the Copra Export Management Company, a corporation formed
by representatives of five producing companies engaged in the
business before the war.**® This agreement gave an impulse to
the rehabilitation of the industry which enabled it to achieve
an early prosperity not shared by other Philippine exports*
Prosperity was not immediately achieved, however.
International agreements, following the War, had placed the
price at P12.00 per 100 kilos of resecada (which Is the dried
husked flakes of meat)* TheGepra Export Management Co. (called
the CEMCO) authorized buyers to pay no more than P10.50, with
the result that few producers would sell at this price claiming,
with justice, that the price did not cover the cost of produc
tion. Late in 1945, buyers offered as high as P15.00 per 100
kilos, but most producers continued to hold their stocks* In
February, 1946, CEMCO then announced that copra would be paid
23Reported in Far Eastern Survey* 114-,, No. 15 (August 1,
1945), p. 214.
364
for on the basis of 35 to 40 per cent cash, 30 per cent in
textiles, 20 per cent in rice, and 15 per cent in beans, canned
fish, milk, sugar, flour, etc. This offer was attractive
enough to bring into the market increasing quantities of copra,
the price rising to around P16.00 per 100 kilos. Buyers,
during this period, paid higher than the authorized price;
because, according to one source, they were selling the products
on the black market at prices high enough to cover the high
copra costs.
In August, 1946, the Copra and Coconut Oil Agreement
was signed between the Philippines and the United States fixing
the price at $103.50 per long ton in bulk. In October, it was
announced that the copra ceiling was $116.20 per short ton at
Atlantic and Gulf ports. This fixed the price at around P20.00
per 100 kilos, buyers' prices in Manila being about 3P16.00 per
100 kilos, delivered. This agreement also stipulated that the
Philippines should sell its entire crop to the United States
at these OPA ceiling prices, the Philippines to receive in
addition, a loan of $2,000,000 to be used in the rehabilitation
of the hemp plantations. The United States also agreed to
transfer to the Philippines some is ,500,000 worth of trade
goods, including textiles, rice and sugar. The American embassy
announced that the Commodity Credit Corporation in the United
States would allocate shares of copra from the Philippines and
Java to other foreign nations, and would appoint companies in
the United States as authorized buyers of Philippine copra.
365
This agreement was basically unfair to copra producers
in the Philippines, who were thus deprived of an opportunity,
quite necessary for the stabilization of their Industry, to
sell their stocks in the open world market where they could
get higher prices than those provided in the Agreement. It is
difficult to understand the motives of the President of the
Philippines, who was quite conscious of the necessity of finding
world markets for Philippine products to prepare the country
for the day when the protected market in the United States would
be closed. Producers and exporters in the Philippines raised
loud outcries, but with little immediate effect. They realized
that free trade would have a marked effect upon the development
of their industry.in the crucial years following the War, and
were faced with the fact that the United States, although
stating that it was working toward the establishment of free
world trade, was engaged in activities exactly opposite in
practice to its announced policy. The copra producers hoped to
be able to sell enough stocks in the free world market to acquire
sufficient strength to meet an uncertain future when prices might
again tumble to the level of 1934.
Evidently the Philippine Government hoped to receive
concessions from the United States of a general nature, even
at the expense of one of its hard-pressed industries. Its
eagerness to rehabilitate the hemp industry, while laudable,
should not have obscured the need of stabilizing the vital
coconut industry. The Government replied, to domestic critics,
366
by saying that it was duty-bound to share with other nations
the commodities it had in abundance in order to receive such
needed supplies as sugar and rice. It pointed to its member
ship in the International Emergency Food Council and the neces
sity of abiding by international agreements. The producers,
however, suggested that a food emergency existed in the Philip
pines, and that it could partly be met by raising the prosperity
of one industry, thus benefiting others and the people as a
whole•
One author, writing in the Philippines, pointed to hard
facts as proof that the Government's argument was specious.
The Emergency Food Council had allocated, in 1946, 145,000 tons
of rice for the Philippines, 45,000 tons of which was to come
from Siam and the remainder from the United States and South
America. However, 1946 saw a serious shipping strike in the
United States, the result of which was to deprive the Philip
pines of rice supplies for a period of over three months. In
addition, the price of rice rose in South America, to a point
where NARIC officials stated they would lose money by selling
at the ceiling price in the Philippines. Since the country was
in dire need of rice, it had to continue buying the cereal from
South America necessitating either a rise in the celling price
at home or the assumption of a loss in the operations of the
NARIC: "There is no parity," this observer stated, "In the
prices of the commodities we export and those that we badly
need in terms of the i n d e x of the cost of living
367
in either c o u n t r i e s . S i n c e the Philippines had no control
over the prices in the American countries it was at their
mercy, for the United States held the balance of trade through
the pegged prices of copra. Thus, the Philippines continued
to ship copra to the United States disadvantageously a n d
received in exchange consumer goods which, however, remained
1 argely on paper because of the great delay in shipping
articles to the Philippines.
Then, on October 29, 1946, the OPA decontrolled all
fats and oils, with the result that the price of coconut oil
soared from eight cents a pound to twenty cents a pound. A
great rush of buyers scoured the world market for available
supplies. Copra dealers demanded, and received, as high as
twenty-two cents a pound. The planters, however, were bound
to continue selling at prices ranging from *17.00 to *20.00 per
100 kilos, which meant a price of eight cents a pound for oil,
whereas the actual market value of the product, on the basis
of twenty cents a pound for oil, was *46.00 per 100 kilos.
Thus the individuals who benefited were not the planters, but
the exporters and middlemen. It was quite clear that if the
stabilization of the industry was to be achieved,it only could
be done through the abrogation of the Agreement.
On November 22, 1946, abrogation was announced, with
the result that buyers* bids rose 76 per cent over the level
®*Domingo C. Abadllla: "Confusion in the Copra market,"
The Sunday Post Magazine. Vol. II, No. 8 (November 10, 1946),
p. 24.
368
of mid-October. The price reached ?30.00 per 100 kilos, and,
with the release of controls on fats and oils, domestic bids
topped quotations in the United States.
During 1931-1936, the average exports to the United
States were 64.9 per cent of the total. In the period up to
December 31, 1946, of the total shipment of 599,000 long tons,
74 per cent went to other countries, such as the United Kingdom,
Prance, Poland, Belgium, Norway, the Netherlands, Canada,
Sweden, Denmark and Panama. The percentage of price Increase
in copra was the second highest of the four major export products,
being 376 per cent.^®
During the first six months of 1948, copra prices
reached an all-time high of 1*65.00 per 100 kilos and coconut
oil reached &1.10 per kilo. By the end of July, copra dropped
to ^40.00 and oil to ^0.90. During the first half of the year
export sales dropped more than 30 per cent indicating that the
goose was dying. Although the value was higher than in the
preceding year because of the increase in prices, it was feared
that the producers and sellers had priced themselves out of the
market. American Importers stated that costs were too higjh for
soap and margarine and the United States forbade the sixteen
nations then using ERP funds to purchase Philippine copra.
American importers, affected by the high prices, had requested
25
Sugar rose 654 per cent, hemp 279 per cent, and leaf
tobacco 150 per cent over prewar levels. Since sugar had
practically disappeared from the export market, copra by 1950 re
presented the greatest export item in quantity as well as value.
369
the Government to take this step*
In addition, a new and disturbing factor entered the
copra and coconut oil picture* With the loss of copra and oil
during the War, American manufacturers had turned in Increasing
numbers to use of soy bean oil, cotton-seed oil, and tallow.
New techniques developed by American research enabled manufac
turers to utilize oils which a few years earlier they used with
reluctance* This meant eventually a declining demand for coco
nut oil, since its price was determined by prices of other oils.
Demand slackened also as a result of the American development
of synthetic detergents and substitutes for soap, made previous
ly with coconut oil. While soap-makers of the United States
before the War utilized 70 per cent of imported coconut oil,
the post-war period showed a drop of from 10 to 15 per cent be
cause of synthetic oils* This was expected in 1950 to continue,
thus presenting a gloomy prospect to Philippine copra producers.
Complicating the situation was the activity of certain
exporters who, in 1947, were found to have misrepresented the
weights of their shipments and their classification. Some
foreign importers had complained of shortages of as much as 25
per cent in actual received weight compared to manifests. In
addition, fresh copra had been deliberately classified as
resecada. When it is realized that prewar shrinkage in weight
was allowed a maximum of 5 per cent, the seriousness of the
complaints can be understood. The Philippine Coconut Planters
Association adopted a resolution requesting President Roxas to
370
order the prosecution of these exporters.^® Many foreign im
porters expressed dissatisfaction year after year with the poor
quality of Philippine copra, and the planters feared that un
less the unscrupulous exporters were curbed, great harm would
befall the industry. IfVhile the situation was ameliorated
slightly by the threats of the Government, few individuals were
actually prosecuted and the Bureau of Commerce in 1950 was still
seeking means of controlling the classification of the product.
The NAC0C0 was supposed to exert efforts with regard to this
problem, but complaints of this body's inefficiency and ineffec
tiveness were widespread throughout 1948 and 1949.
Although the NAC0C0 met with some success in stabilizing
copra prices, it encountered sharp criticism from many quarters
for its apparent inability to handle its work to the benefit of
the industry and the nation. In January, 1948, for instance,
local copra dealers were loud in their complaints that it had
failed to make deliveries on contracts for September and October;
this had "adversely affected commitments of large amounts of
the product to buyers abroad and disrupted dealings in this
Philippine export product."^ Five large dealers were hurt, and
one began court proceedings for damages suffered as a result of
NACOCO's failure. One dealer who was reported to have made a
commitment of son* $345,000 had been waiting since October for
NACOCO to make the delivery. Dr. Kalaw, general manager of the
26
Manila Chronicle. Year 3, No. 207, (December 12, 1947),
p. 11.
^ Manila Bulletin. Vol. 133, No. 6 (January 7, 1948), p.1.
371
NACOCO, admitted the failure In deliveries, which he said was
caused by typhoon damage to NACOCO stocks* While there was
some truth In this statement, it did not wholly cover the
situation* A Canadian representative reported that confidence
in the corporation had suffered severely in the Dominion as a
result of the "ragged business methods" of the NACOCO. He
mentioned that, In one transaction with the corporation,
involving 2000 tons of copra at $165 a ton, the delivery was
delayed over a month, and It was discovered that a shrinkage
of 13*84 per cent had occurred. In addition, he said, the
company experienced difficulty In obtaining a rebate on the
freight charges* The whole transaction was considered highly
unbusinesslike, with the result that his company would have no
further dealings with the NACOCO.
Later in 1948, the trading activities of the NACOCO were
suspended because of the heavy losses incurred in buying,
selling and research. Its personnel was reduced 70 per cent
and its agencies in the provinces were closed. The corporation,
in the three years following its resumption of business in
1946, in the words of an outstanding Manila reporter, had
"squandered more than three and a half million pesos of the
people's hard earned money,"28 it was charged that Kalaw had
been dealing in futures, entering into contracts with foreign
buyers during a period of constantly rising prices* He failed
®®Leon 0. Tyj "Another Kalaw Fiasco," The Philippines
Free Press. Vol. 39, No. 26 (June 26, 1948), p. 4.
372
in deliveries because he could not secure stocks from producers,
who refused to sell at the low early price. To remedy the
situation, it was charged, Kalaw bought stocks at the higher
price and sold at a loss of one and a half million pesos nto
save his face...."9® It was further charged that large amounts
were paid as commissions. One broker was to receive nearly
¥“20,000 when payment was stopped by the Government Enterprises
Council as being "anomalous.”®® The director replied that he
could have made a profit for the corporation had the Philippine
National Bank granted him a requested loan. The Bank replied
that it had refused to grant the loan because the corporation
was "mismanaged.” Since the function of the NACOCO was not
to act as a dealer and exporter, Mr. Kalaw’s defense of his
position was assailed by many critics; among them former
Representative I. Vameta, one of the authors of the bill
creating the corporation.®^-
The critics of Kalaw and the NACOCO continued to search
for evidence of mismanagement. Eventually, the Philippines
Free Press’s reporter, Leon 0. Ty, secured a copy of the report
of the Jimenez Committee which had been appointed by Malacafian
to investigate the Corporation. T y ’s findings stirred the
entire reading public. He stated flatly that the bankruptcy
of the NACOCO was caused directly by the mismanagement of Maximo
g9Ibld. 30Ibid.
®-l "N o Fiasco Says Maximo Kalaw," Philippines Free Press.
Vol. 39, No. 28 (July 10, 1948), pp. 26-277 Cf. "Kalaw Stresses
NACOCO Services," Manila Times. Vol. 4, No. 32 (September 18,
1948), pp. 1, 12.
373
Kalaw and by "acts that were not only reprehensible but also
of questionable legality." It was charged by the paper that
Kalaw had been selling, through his daughter, large quantities
of copra to the NACOCO; the amount sold between December 6,
1946 and March 26, 1947 being a total of 776,324.12 kilos of
copra with a value of 1*333,120.79.
The Jimenez investigation revealed that Miss Kalaw had
apparently shipped copra from Mindoro at a time when copra was
priced at ¥37.00 per 100 kilos, yet she was paid ¥44.00 per
100 kilos for her shipment. The committee charged that the
seller requested liquidation of her shipment at the higher
price although according to regulations such a liquidation was
forbidden by Resolution No. 166 which stated that copra
deposits should be valued at the prevailing price at the time
of shipment. Yet, the records revealed, on April 10, 1947,
Director Kalaw Issued a general circular letter authorizing
the liquidation applied for by his daughter. It was stated
further, by the committee, that the director had been selling
copra regularly through his daughter to the NACOCO. Had the
copra sold been all his, the transaction would have seemed
regular, but the committee disclosed that the quarterly produc
tion of Kalaw»s trees amounted to no more than 240,000 kilos,
while copra deposited in the NACOCO warehouse in the period
under question by Miss Kalaw amounted to 776,324.12 kilos.3®
520p. clt.. Vol.39, No.39 (September 25, 1948), p. 4.
®®Ibld.. pp. 4-5, passim.
374
Mr Kalaw*s response to this article was a declaration
of intention to file a suit for libel against reporter Ty.
The case was set for hearing. Mr. Ty appeared, and while
waiting for the complainant filed a motion to subpoena eighteen
witnesses, together with documents and official papers relating
to the case. Mr. Kalaw and his lawyer failed to appear in
court. Mr. Ty received support from all over the country, with
offers of bail and of free legal assistance from many indivi-
•ZA
duals as well as the entire Cebu Bar Association. This case
was never pursued by the complainant. On September 28, a news
story appeared in Manila papers to the effect that Director
Kalaw had submitted his resignation to Malacafian because,
among other reasons, he had been unable to secure the necessary
funds to "revitalize" the corporation.
While this sordid story was little different in nature
from other scandals In the Government and its agencies through
out 1948 and 1949, It differed from the others in the fact
that it concerned a very important Government Corporation
charged with the direction of one of the most important Philip
pine industries. It strengthened the opponents of government
participation In business, and deepened the disillusion of many
observers with the post-war policies of a government which
could not afford to waste even the most insignificant funds.
The cause of the Hukbalahap and the Communist was thereby aided,
and the cynicism of the citizen made more profound.
®40jd. cit.. Vol. 39, No. 41 (October 9, 1948), p. 26.
375
By contrast, the activities of one of the few success
ful private cooperative business enterprises In the country
made cheerful reading for those interested in the healthy growth
of Philippine economy. The CAPCA (Camarines Norte Copra and
Abaca Producers Cooperative Association), of Daet, Camarines
Norte, in the words of its supporters, belled "the charges
that no cooperatives can prosper without government support
and that no Filipino business enterprise can succeed in a field
dominated by aliens."35 jts activities were successful in
bringing a good life to the people it served. It aided In the
stabilization of copra and rice prices and broke the alien
monopoly of rice. It ended the hoarding of gasoline, and
attacking the age-old problem of usury, opened credit facil
ities to tenants and landowners alike. Its activities in the
copra field have been noteworthy. Small as it was, according
to one writer, it could have aided NACOCO in its difficulties
had "Dr. Maximo Kalaw...been farsighted."®6 The CAPCA had
repeatedly asked financial assistance from the NACOCO but In
each Instance such assistance was denied and Instead the
activities of NACOCO were "entrusted...to personnel of doubtful
ability in Tabaco and Legaspi." Hie writer pointedly referred
to the fact that NACOCO spent "millions for the Improvement of
the quality of copra," whereas the CAPCA, with a fraction of
the capital of the corporation, achieved the utmost in such
35Julio Q. LIwag: "CAPCA— A Great Success," The Philip
pines Free Press. Vol. 39, No. 45 (November 6, 1948), p. 18.
®6Ibld.
376
improvement, according to statements of various Bureau of Com
merce inspectors in the region.
Conclusion
The drop in copra prices early in 1949 caused some
apprehension among producers and sellers. Many observers
believed, however, that the situation would be of material
assistance in the devebpment of better methods of production
and the eventual stabilization of the industry. Local business
men repeatedly pointed to the fact that the industry could not
be aided as long as its raw materials were shipped out of the
country for processing. They hoped that the 1949-1950 slump
In prices would encourage producers and capitalists to improve
methods of production and the quality of the products, leading
to a standardization of product that would bring continuing
better prices in the world market.
One writer accurately stated, in 1949, that "if we are
really set upon industrialization, we should first learn to
discard antiquated agrarian concepts, accept transitory dis
locations and prepare to fight for world markets against
established industrial nations. "37 country and its
businessmen were not prepared to do that, he added, "let us
stop kidding ourselves and chasing the rainbow of industrial
competency." "Let us instead concentrate on our traditional
3*7
Hernando G. Cosio: "Cushioning Copra Prices," Manila
Times Midweek Review. Vol. 2, No. 27 (February 2, 1949), p. 5.
377
agricultural economy and do a good job of producing raw
materials from our bountiful natural resources for the endless
ly hungry machines of the Industrial w o r l d . N o more
accurate observation has been made with regard to any of the
country*s industries and It should have been taken as a motto
by a Government seeking a pathway out of the tangled jungles
of its economy.
Since the hectarage of coconuts was constant since
1948, and since production steadily declined because of disease
and other factors, and since no decisive steps had been taken,
up to 1950, to meet the situation, most observers predicted
that no change could be expected for at least five years.
58Ibid.
CHAPTER XI
THE SUGAR INDUSTRY: 1941-1950
Occupation, and post-war developments were much the
same in the sugar industry as in the others. The fields and
centrals continued to operate, if not at full strength, through
out the Japanese occupation. Many of the "collaborators"
were to found in the ranks of sugar men, which fact increased
the hatred felt by the peasants toward these individuals.
Whether or not they were all "collaborators of the tongue,"
the average Filipino--guerrilla or not— believed that they
were traitors to their country and oppressors, under a new
aegis, of the people. They pointed to the fact that many of
these sugar men continued to live in ease and comfort through
out the trying days of the occupation and claimed that many
even increased their fortunes by dealings with the Japanese
and in dealings on the black market. Observers have stated
that a great majority of the largest centrals were undamaged
by the Japanese during the War and even after Liberation, with
its attendant destruction, many particularly In certain portions
of Negros remained relatively undamaged. Old hatreds die
slowly and many were fanned into bright, burning blazes by the
War and the early days of the Republic, and the embers still
burn despite the quenching attempts during 1949-1950.
A Continuing Pattern:-
Liberation was hard, generally, on the centrals. Vast
378
379
stretches of cane fields on Negros, Cebu, Leyte and In Pampanga,
Bulacan, Laguna, Panay, Tarlac, Pangasinan and Batangas were
laid waste. One writer states that thirty-three centrals were
burned and thirteen damaged heavily .^ Despite the fact, stated
time and again by observers, Filipino and American, that the
country should attempt to wean itself away from its heavy
dependence upon the industry, which faces hard days following
1954, rehabilitation was begun and encouraged by the Govern
ment as soon as possible following the war. In February, 1948,
the National Congress of Sugarcane Planters met in Manila and
received from the Government its assurance for aid in the full
rehabilitation of the industry and the stabilization of prices
and controls. President Roxas, who spoke on the opening day,
assured the planters of full government support and announced
the Governments plan to construct a fertilizer plant costing
some twenty-two million pesos. This was suggested by the
Westinghouse Electric International Company which had been
called in by President Roxas to draw up a power program for
the Philippines. The erection of this plant hinged upon the
harnessing of the Maria Cristina Falls and the Agus River, in
Mindanao. Since the completion of this program lies yet in
womb of the distant future the benefits to be derived therefrom
will not occur for the immediate need of an industry faced with
^Rosendo Balinas s "What of Our Sugar Industry?" This
Week Magazine. Manila Chronicle. Vol. 3, No. 12 (March 21,1948), p. 10.
^Electric Power Program for the Republic of the Philip
pines . (New York, December, 1947).
380
declining production from a soil characterized by erosion and
costly loss of fertility. This fertilizer plant, the Presi
dent believed, would make it possible for the sugar men to
purchase essential fertilizer material at a low cost thus
lowering the price of their sugar. Similar plans, so many of
them, drawn up in the past all nod their ghostly heads upon
hearing these words. The President also mentioned the fact
that the Philippines had been approached by SCAP in Japan with
regard to a purchase of 150,000 tons of sugar at a cost
approaching §*30,000,000. The light in the eyes of the sugar
men dimmed at the great, outraged cry of the people who were
appalled at the idea of dealing with a former enemy for whom
they felt nothing but the deepest hatred.
Senate President Jose Avelino, Speaker of the House
Eugenio Perez, Secretary of Interior Zulueta, Secretary of
Agriculture and Natural Resources Garchitorena, Secretary of
Labor Magsalin, Secretary of Commerce and Industry Mapa, Jose
Yulo, President of the Philippine Sugar Association (and,
interestingly enough, a governor of the RPC) and Vicente
Carmona, of the Philippine National Bank (which still carries
77 per cent of its total loans, overdrafts and advances in
sugar money), all spoke to the convention assuring it of their
interest, promising financial and other aid. They also pleaded
for harmony and cooperation among the various elements in the
industry. The people watched, glumly.
381
The planters recommended to the Government the creation
of a special body, to be called the Sugar Reconstruction Comis
sion which would have powers "to undertake an exhaustive study
of the problems present and future, of the industry, to recom
mend measures for their solution and make the measures
effective,"3 This plan was endorsed by the Beyster Report
which expressed the belief that the time was propitious for
"insuring the position of all phases of the sugar industry by
the institution of a sound, well planned and efficiently
executed overall policy."4
To achieve this, they made three suggestions: First,
the Sugar Administration should work in close cooperation with
representatives of the Philippine Sugar Association and the
Confederation of Planters and form a special committee whose
function would be to study needs of all the domestic phases of
the industry. The object of this study would be the "accel
erated rehabilitation and expansion" of the industry as well
as to survey accurately its future potential with regard to
"world conditions, United States and world markets, future
price possibilities, new inventions and sugar substitutes."
Secondly, as a result of this survey and study, the
Government should enter into conferences with the survey group
2
Balinas, op. cit.. p. 11.
4
Proposed Program for Industrial Rehabilitation and
Development of the Republic of the Philippines, prepared bv the
technical staff of the National Development Company under the
supervision of the H.E. Beyster Corporation, Consulting Engineers,
Detroit, Michigan, USA. (Manila, October 28, 1947), pp. 167 and ff.
382
and "other members of the Sugar Association and Confederation"
to establish a definite plan "equitable and agreeable to all
regarding expansion of the industry, production control,
licensing of centrals, quotas, price control, marketing
procedures, reparations and war damage claims, financial
assistance and future policy."
Thirdly, this projected policy should be "kept current
by the continuance of a survey group whose responsibility"
would be the recommendation of all measures, "legislative and
otherwise," which were believed to be in the best interests
of the industry and the government. If all these were done it
was "sincerely felt that the cooperative attitude and the joint
assuming of responsibility will be of definite and incalculable
value to each and every phase of the industry and to Philippine
economy in its entirety."
No word with, regard to labor in the industry. Else
where,® the report suggests a labor truce for a three-to-five
year period during which labor would agree not to strike.
Management apparently was not to agree to anything. The belief
expressed in the Report with regard to labor is well summarized
in the following paragraph:
"A plan has recently been formulated for the unifica
tion of all the trade unions into a Philippine Federation of
Labor, indicating that some responsible leaders recognize the
5Ibid.. pp. 59-60.
383
necessity for a unified labor organization. There is no
doubt that such an organization may become a stabilizing force
providing it formulates policies which are founded on sound
economic principles in the best interests of national unity.
The mere indication that labor will abide by contract agreements
and the maintenance of discipline within its ranks is a funda
mental which it must assume for the realization of the
industrialization program."®
This remarkable paragraph illustrates many things in
the Philippine scene not the least of which is the assumption
that the best interests of capital are in the best interest
of "national unity" and that a maintenance of discipline should
result in no demands and no strikes. As far as abiding by
contractual agreements is concerned, labor would welcome such
a condition wholeheartedly.
The general weaknesses of the Report are well illus
trated by the above as well in its unrealistic appraisal of a
situation based wholly upon known potentialities and not upon
possibilities.7 Miss Jenkins, of the Institute of Pacific
g
Italics supplied.
7See, for example, discussions by N.V.M. Gonzalez,
"The Beyster Report," Saturday Evening News Magazine. Vol.
Ill, No. 7 (November 8, 1947); Shirley Jenkins, "Financial
and Economic Planning in the Philippines," Pacific Affairs.
Vol. XXI, No. 1 (March, 1948), pp. 33-45., esp. 43-44, for
an excellent discussion of the Report. as well as the
"Hibben Memorandum," a more realistic appraisal of the
situation. See also, V.D. Wickizer’s review of the Report,
Far Eastern Quarterly. Vol. IX, No. 1 (November, 1949), pp.
103-106, for a further discussion of the weakness of the Report.
384
Relations, whose various authoritative articles on this and
similar subjects, with reference to economic planning In the
Philippines, are in great contrast to the general run of poorly
based and developed analyses of the subject, points out that
the Report advocates the complete rehabilitation of an Industry
which cannot be considered well-adjusted to its parent economy.®
The 1948 convention went on to approve the organization
of a body called the National Federation of Sugarcane Planters
which was formed to handle the sale and distribution of all
sugar produced and pooled by Its member centrals and planters.
It was hoped that the activities of this organization would
stabilize prices and insure good profits for the industry by
eliminating "alien middlemen who are held responsible for the
high cost of domestic sugar sold to the general public."® Ap
parently the hope expressed by the Government when it purchased
its refineries In 1938 was never realized for here the same
old complaint is voiced and additional action taken to remedy a
situation the basic cause of which still remained unknown and untouched.
O
It is believed, by those whose understanding of Philip
pine problems goes beyond the headlines of newspapers, that if
the economic program of the Philippine Republic is based upon
such shaky ground as exemplified by the Beyster Report and
similar hastily and inadequately drawn plans, the future economy
of the nation will be little benefited or rehabilitated with any
hope for a good life for all its Inhabitants.
Q
Balinas, op. cit.. p. 23.
^®If these "alien middlemen" are the cause for high pricey
as claimed, then their opponents must, in the future, organize
themselves and their businesses as efficiently as the whipping-
boys have done and, in addition, must work as earnestly.
385
An article In the Free Press, is of interest in this
connection. PRATRA General Manager Coscolluela had been sharply
criticized, In 1948, for selling some 70,000 sacks of sugar to
a Chinese firm, Kim Kee Chua Yu, following which transaction,
the price of sugar in the markets rose to seventy centavos a
kilo. Then, in the spring of 1949, a similar transaction,
involving some 50,000 bags, occurred. Approached by a reporter
of the Free Press, the Manager denied anything anomalous in the
sale (a denial fully verified by subsequent Investigation).
Why, the reporter inquired, were these sales made only to the
Chinese retailers? The manager replied that Kim Kee was the
largest sugar dealer in the country and “complied with our
requirements." The reporter inquired as to the nature of the
requirements; these, the manager replied, entailed merely the
submission of a list of the dealer retailers and the posting
of "a performance bond equal to 20 per cent of the entire cost
of the stock...." The reporter then inquired why this large
amount was sold to Kim Kee and but five thousand bags were sold
to Filipino dealers. The answer is illuminating: "Because
Kim Kee is a big distributor. He has an excellent retailing
system and can pay the price of 50,000 sacks at any time. If
there are Filipino dealers who want to buy...I am ready to
deal with them. But the trouble Is that they don't come to us.
And when they do, they fail to comply with our rules. For
Instance, many of those who have applied...could not prove to
me that they had ready retailers. If I allow them to buy with
out the list of retailers, I'm sure that tha sugar will go
386
straight to the bodegas of hoarders and blackmarketeers." He
then revealed that PRATRA was able to sell directly to the
public no more than 5,881 bags of refined sugar, in three months.
The reason, according to the manager, and other authorities
questioned, was that Kim Kee extended credit to customers,
taking a chance on the repayment which enabled him to dispose
of his sugar faster than the Government. "On the other hand
PRATRA sells only on cash basis. Then there is the government
red tape that you must consider. To sell even just a bag of
sugar entails many requisites. The public hates red tape and
delay. At Kim K e e ’s there’s no delay.
Conclusions: Problems and Plans.
The sugar industry, in 1949-1950, was almost wholly
devoted to the production of centrifugal sugar and efforts to
restore it to Its prewar status had the end in view of satis
fying the export quota of 16,000,000 piculs and domestic needs
of over 2,000,000 piculs. Rehabilitation, in contrast to other
basic industries,was not as slow as has generally been believed.
The production, for the crop year 1946-47 was but 13,000 short
tons, which increased, for the crop year 1948-49, to 705,000
short tons, an Increase of more than 5,400 per cent. Area
planted to cane in 1949 amounted to 117,000 hectares, represen
ting 72 per cent of the prewar hectarage. Production amounted
to about 75 per cent of the average prewar production. It was
■^Leon 0. Ty: "Another Sour Note on Sugar," Philippines
Free Press. Vol. 40, No. 20 (May 14, 1949), pp. 10-11, passim.
387
believed, by the Bureau of Plant Industry, that, by the end of
1940, the industry would be totally rehabilitated in the Visayan
producing regions and the industry, as a itiole, would be complete
ly recovered In less than three years. This prediction is based
upon the assumption that peace and order will have been sufficient
ly restored by that time to permit rehabilitation to continue.
The 1949-1950 wholesale price was placed at thirteen
pesos per picul, for export sugar. This meant that, for a few
years at least, the question of markets would be no problem to
the industry. With the exception of marginal producers, the
Bureau stated, most producers enjoyed a comfortable margin of
profit at the stated price level, "although the producers them
selves would not say so...."^® Also, the combined quota for
export and domestic consumption was still only 64 per cent
filled at the volume of 705,000 short tons. The wholesale
price, In addition, of sugar in the local markets was no less
than seventeen pesos per picul, a price which insured a profit
for even marginal producers. However, a few producers were
worried about the future of the Industry when it will be faced
with a gradually Increasing import duty in the United States
(beginning July 4, 1954). This will Increase the local cost
by the equivalent amount of duty-protection removed in the U.S.
market. The industry Is thus faced with the problem of survival,
without protection, In the markets of the world.
^ B u r e a u of Plant Industry, Annual Report for Crop
Year Ending June 30. 1949. typescript p. 46, MS copy.
388
There are seven major problems facing the Industry, in
addition to the above: The renewal of milling contracts between
planters and central which are due to expire shortly; the
ownership of the sugar quota; the need for an overhauling of
the operational organization of the Industry; the reduction in
the cost of production; the control of pests and disease ; the
development of subsidiary industries; and the development of
markets outside of the U.S.^3 The first has become a thorny
problem because of the inability of the parties involved to
agree as to terms relative to the division of the finished
product and by-products. The planters, during the post-war
period, insisted upon receiving no less than 75 per cent of
the main product. Planters insisted that, in the case of the
Central Azucarera de Bais, the central owners had fully re
covered their capital Investment so that their production
represented only accumulating profits. Thus, the central owners
need no longer carry depreciation and interest charges In their
operation, enabling them, were they willing, to return a
larger share to the planters--who, President Quezon had hoped,
would do the same to their laborers. There seems to be no
question but that the central owners enjoyed a greater degree
of prosperity than the planters.
Another problem associated with milling contracts was
the refusal of some of the centrals to renew such contracts or,
13Ibid., pp. 47-51
389
if willing to renew, to do so for a few years only. The
planter was clearly at a disadvantage here, since he was at
the mercy of the central which made the agreements only on
its own terms. Thus, the planter was hindered from making any
definite long-range plans for future production, In the dif
ficult times that are to come.
At present (1950), the sugar quota is divided and
allocated among mill owners as well as planters. The planters
claim that they should be the ones to receive any allocation
made. The outcome of this struggle will determine the bargain
ing position of the planters with the centrals over the
question of larger shares. Logically, the planters are correct
in their position which, however, is no guarantee that they
will receive their demands.
The operational organization of the industry, at
present, is inefficient and costly with two capital entrepreneurs
dividing the profits. In order to make a larger profit, under
this system, costs are cut at the lowest level, that of the
workers. It is essential for the future stability of the
industry that this situation be changed to a single operating
system in which both the milling and planting falls under a
single ownership. Coupled with this, Is the necessity for a
more efficient and centralized operation of marketing, to
eliminate the high costs caused by the great number of middle
men through whose hands the sugar passes before reaching its market.
390
The p ro blem of reducing costs of operation is a serious
one and the most difficult of satisfactory solution. In the
Philippines, reduction of costs is generally accomplished when
it is accomplished, by cutting wages of workers, a process which,
eventually, produces only more problems. It Is the exception
rather than the rule, that lowering of costs is attempted by
l owering the salaries of high-paid management. This is equally
true of Government Corporations, which, with few exceptions,
operate at a loss, and of private enterprise. In American-owned
business, for example, the salaries of management in 1949-50 were
extraordinarily dis proportionate to the wages and other benefits,
if any, of laborers and other w o r k e r s . T h e more effective means,
of achieving a lowered production cost would lie in the elimination of
marginal and sub-marginal areas and the consolidation of mills into large
14
In thirty-eight businesses, total remuneration was
between P=l,100 to 1^3,290, per month, for senior married staff
members. For junior staff members, the pay was between
3r880.00 to fr2,250.00 per m o n t h (1949). These salaries included:
average base pay, high-cost-living allowance, rent allowance,
special allowances for wife and children, transportation a l l o w
ance, commission allowance, home leave, home leave pay, and
was b a se d on the estimated cost of living for single and married
men. The United States State Department estimated that a m i n i
m u m of 3r800.00 per month was necessary for an Am erican family
of three, the preferred average being around 1*1500.00. Since
Americans are generally accustomed to living surrounded by
accepted means of enjoying life, at a much higher level than
even their Filipino counterparts, these salaries are necessary
if businesses are to attract qualified employees. The point
may be raised that the pay of Filipino employees should be based
on comparative estimates. Businessmen, however, point wi th
some justice, to the fact that the average Filipino employee is
m u c h less productive in his labor than his Amer ic an counterpart.
Several busines sm en have told the author that they are willing
to raise salaries of Filipino employees as soon as their p r o d u c
tivity justifies an increase in income. The pr o b l e m is a
thorny one, and would provide an interesting field for r esearch
for any A m e r i c a n student interested in labor-relations and
Ame ri ca n foreign enterprise.
391
units to secure greater economy of operation. In addition,
extensive mechanization methods should be adopted coupled with
the planting of superior varieties of cane, such as the
Hawaiian 37-1933. The present average yield is around a
hundred piculs per hectare which is insufficient to enable the
industry to compete in an unprotected market, unless labor
costs were kept at a permanently low level. The Bureau of
Plant Industry has shown that, by planting new and improved
varieties, the yield may be doubled over the present average.
Pests and disease control, while not serious, if allowed
to go unchecked through motives of false economy may seriously
affect the Industry. Recently (late 1949), an outbreak of
"Fiji disease" was noted in Negros and while not serious at
present requires vigilance and cooperation with the Government.
The development of subsidiary industries may well
determine the future prosperity of the industry if accomplished
with vigor and imagination. The production of alcohol for
motor fuel would Increase the value of the industry, aid it in
meeting an uncertain future and benefit greatly the general
economy of the country which, In 1948, imported motor fuel in
the form of gasoline, kerosene and fuel oils to the value of
£■106 million. This figure will increase with any advance in
mechanization which will mean a serious drain in foreign ex
change, now a subject of planning and control. This drain
could be minimized with the development of fuel oil from sugar.
Were only half of the nation’s requirements for fuel met in
392
this fashion, the stability of the industry would b© increased
comfortably.
The final problem, of finding other foreign markets,
lies entirely in the hands of the Government, "Success in
this endeavor will depend a great deal upon the ability of the
industry to reduce its cost of production."^®
Whatever plan is adopted for saving the industry would
have to include the following factors to be sound and practic
able: The rehabilitation of the industry should have the end
in view of enabling it to compete on a stable and permanent
basis in the unprotected open markets of the world; as an
export dollar producing crop, attempts should be made to make
of it a dollar-saving crop, the organization of the industry
should be modified accompanied by an increase in the share of
the profits by labor; great attention should be paid to the
improvement of the living standards of labor which, in the past,
has given no evidence that it has shared in the prosperity of
the industry; that, since the industry is one of the very few
that would respond to mechanization, such a program should be
started at the earliest opportunity; the fact should be borne
in mind that other sugar producing countries in the Orient
will, in all likelihood, succeed in rehabilitating their indus
tries and thus enter into serious competition with many
prospects of success, and, despite the present high standards
of living of workers in this country (when compared to workers
15Ibld.. p. 51
393
in other Oriental countries), this should not be taken as a
motive for lowering wages of Filipino workers who are faced
with a higher cost of living; the fact must be realized that
the Income derived from the industry is greater per unit than
any of the major crops; that Government aid, in some form,
should be made available coupled with a close supervision and
it should also take steps to open other foreign markets; and,
that immediate use should be made of the "Sugar Readjustment
and Stabilization Fund" created by Commonwealth Act No. 567.
Thirty per cent of this fund should be granted to the
Bureau of Plant Industry for study and research in cane; thirty
per cent should be granted for research leading toward the
development of subsidiary industries utilizing major products
and by-products. The remaining forty per cent could be used
for research in problems affecting the manufacture and utiliza
tion of sugar, the main purpose of which should be the reduc
tion in the cost of its manufacture.
The initiation and continued operation of these plans,
undisturbed by political and self-seeking interference, if
carried through with vigor and maintenance of policy, will
enable the industry to achieve a stability which will bring
prosperity to it and to the country at large. It Is to be
hoped that past history will not repeat itself in this respect.
CHAPTER XII
THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY.* 1934-1950
At one time, the Philippines produced the best cigars
in the world. Authorities, such as the Encyclopaedia Britannica.
claim that the Cuban leaf is unexcelled for aroma, which may
be true, but to enthusiasts of Philippine cigars the flavor
of the latter is considered far superior to any other leaf,
especially when utilizing the fine wrappers produced in Java
and Sumatra. While there is no disputing of tastes, it must
be admitted that the Philippine cigars have found a world-wide
reception and the large quantities of five cent cigar 1 consumed
in the United States were products of the Philippine market.
Tobacco growing has an ancient and honorable history in the
Philippines, Pigafetta giving the earliest account of its
introduction by the Spanish from Central America as early as
the last quarter of the 16th Century. Some believe that a
variety of tobacco was already present in the Philippines since
N« suaveolens. and related species, are native to Australia.
Whether this species was to be found in the Philippines, and
whether it was utilized by the peoples there in any fashion is
another question that remains lost in the misty sbaiows of the past.2
^Encyclopaedia Brltamlca. 1947 edition, Vol. 22, p. 260.
2Pipe» have been found and tentatively dated at Ca.
1480 by H.Otley Beyer. These show such find workmanship and are
so sophisticated in design and detail as to suggest a consider
able period of development. Whether they were used for tobacco
or some other plant, such as hemp, is an intriguing question
for further study and research.
394
395
During the Spanish period, the production of tobacco
was a state monopoly until the year 1882, after which many
tobacco companies sprang up, the most prominent survivors to
day being the Compafia General de Tabacos de Filipinas (Tabaca-
lera) and La Insular Cigar and Cigarette Company. These two
companies still produce some of the finest cigars procurable
anywhere in the world. The original production of tobacco
was limited to the cigar-filler type but, in the years pre
ceding the Commonwealth, the Government sponsored research and
experimental work which led to the development of the wrapper
and aromatic cigarette leaf tobacco industry. The production
of the last two types, however, was unable to supply local
demand, necessitating the Importation from the United States
of large quantities of this type of tobacco. The principal
manufactures, in the order of their importance, based on yearly
averages, 1925-1935, were} cigars (310,000,000 units),
cigarettes (4,306,000,000 units), chewing and smoking tobaccos
(650,000 kilos). Major exports were cigars, leaf and semi
manufactured tobacco in the form of stemmed leaf, cigar butts,
cutting and scraps (yearly average, same period, 1,500,000 kilos).
Various sections of the country, with their varying
climatic characteristics, produce the distinctive tobacco of
each climatic region. Sun-grown wrapper types are produced In
Mindanao, the BIcol, and southern portions of Laguna. Shade-
grown wrapper types are produced in the Ilocos and the Tagaytay
region of Batangas. Cigar-filler types are produced in the
396
Cagayan Valley which is the greatest area of production in the
Philippines, and the aromatic fillers are produced In the
Central Luzon provinces.
The tobacco industry was the chief source of direct
governmental revenues, nearly 50 per cent of taxes being
collected from it alone. The average yearly collection, 1930-
1935, was ^8,858,689.20, which represented only direct collections
from specific and sales taxes and did not include revenues
indirectly derived, such as land and income taxes since these
were difficult to determine.^ Perhaps some 600,000 people were
dependent upon the Industry which had a capital investment of
between PBO million and 3NS0 million ranking third in capital
Investment in the country with its products exported to 44
foreign countries, more than any other export Item (abaca went
to 25, copra to 10 and sugar to 2).4 While It represented but
two per cent of the total cultivated area, it occupied the
fifth place in the export list, It ranked first as employer
of labor in the city of Manila, with about 50 per cent of the
industrial laborers In the city being employed in the Industry,
and some 80,000 agricultural laborers in the provinces. It
paid the highest average monthly wages of any industry in the
Philippines despite high costs and taxes.
3
Domingo B. Paguirigan (ed.)j "Philippine Tobacco Indus
try ....", The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philip
pines. 1937-1948. p. 287.
^Department of Agriculture and Commerce, The Tobacco
Industry in the Philippines. (Manila, 1939), pp. 3-11, passim;
and, Manuel V. Gallegot Economic Emancipation. (Manila, 1939),
p. 257; 0 £. cit., p. 288.
397
The production of cigar filler tobacco generally was
a losing proposition with profitable enterprise dependent al
most exclusively on the vagaries of the weather. When floods
and typhoons reduced the crop, prices rose, but, normally, the
selling price barely covered the cost of production. The
relatively high prices of 1936, for example, only brought the
producer a net income per hectare of 3*20.20, or Tsarely a 4
per cent profit on investment. Cigar wrapper tobacco, in
favorable season, of either the shade-grown or open varieties
were more profitable, returning to the producer about §=308.00,
per hectare for the former and §=148.25, per hectare for the
latter. Aromatic cigarette filler production realized a normal
profit of §29.60 per hectare, while batek tobacco was always
profitable since the minimum price per picul of §20.00,
provided a profit of some 10 per cent on investment, with the
net income per hectare being §17.50.^ The costs, from which
these profits were derived, were very high. Filler tobacco
production costs averaged §220.00, per hectare, sun-grown
wrapper, §704.00, shade-grown wrapper, §200.00, aromatic
cigarette filler, §174.50, sun-cured Virginia, §200.00, flue-
cured Virginia, §250.00, and miscellaneous types, §172.00.
These are pre-war costs and are considerably lower
than post-war averages. These costs did not include Interest
on capital nor depreciation of equipment. The crop was general
ly sold at the farm, so baling and marketing expenses were
5Paguirigan, o£. cit.. p. 289.
398
nominally not borne by the farmer. In actual practice, however,
these costs were included since the buyer added them to the
price paid the farmer for his product. The gross value of
§5,000,000, for the 1938 crop was considered by some government
theorists and In other quarters as being a direct income for
the planters. However, if the labor costs are taken into con
sideration, which was infrequently done, and translated into
actual cash value, It becomes quite clear that the grower re
ceived barely enough to carry him through the year. Needless to
say, the average farmer-producer made little if any profit. In
the case of the cigar-filler growers, this is particularly true
since the market quotations for this product were alarmingly low.®
The Philippines ranked seventh In the world in produc
tion of tobacco, producing, in 1935, 623,160 quintals from
61,600 hectares with a gross value of §5,000,000.7 During the
same yeatf, the ranking provinces were: Isabela, Cagayan, Panga-
sinan, La Union, Cebu, Oriental Negros, Iloilo, Ilocos Norte,
Occidental Negros, Leyte, Ilocos Sur, Nueva Ecija, Cotabato,
Surigao, Abra, Nueva Vizcaya,and Occidental Misamis. Isabela and
Cagayan alone produced in the same year around 300,000 quintals
which was 42 per cent of the total. By 1935, the leaf tobacco
production had dropped from 64,000,000 kilos in 1920, to but
g
See comment of Governor Fortuna to M. Bulan of Isabela
on this in Ibid., pp. 338-339.
7A quintal is 46 net kilos
399
28,665,360 kilos. It ranked sixth among crops in amount of
area cultivated, following palay, corn, coconuts, abaca, and
sugar.
In addition to the cigar filler, cigar wrapper and
aromatic cigarette filler varieties produced, four other minor
varieties were raised. However, they were important only
locally, with the exception of the Ilocano batek, grown
especially in La Union, which had risen to some importance be
cause of the demand on the Japanese market.
The cigar filler was the most important product,
especially the varieties Marogue. Viscaya. and Repollo from
the Cagayan Valley. The product from the Cagayan valley was
the best, being of the mild sub-type.
Growers habitually continued producing the same
quantities of tobacco year in and year out, with the result
that by the beginning of the Commonwealth there wassurplus
of stock which accounted partly for the very low prices then
current. Isabela alone produced some 233,500 quintals a year,
which was just 45,000 too much. There was, in addition, in
other areas, an over-production of some 94,000 kilos. "Over
production" here was precisely the case, since the market as
then organized was in no position to absorb that much tobacco.
However, the production of cigar wrapper tobacco was
still short by five or six thousand quintals of the demand.
The Bureau of Plant Industry made attempts to encourage the
400
further developments of this type in those areas where the
filler was in over-production, but with little success through
the Commonwealth period.
The best varieties &>r Philippine production were the
Sumatra for "open culture", and the native Vlscaya and Marogue
for shade grown cultures. The latter was the most dependable
since it was less influenced by the vagaries of the weather.
Sfilth respect to the production of aromatic cigarette
filler tobacco, the picture was not good. Local factories had
consumption requirements of over 25,000 quintals, but produc
tion barely reached 200 quintals -- and this largely on an
experimental basis.
Some 113,160 quintals were grown of the minor types,
such as the Sulcok grown in the Ilocos regions, the batek (a
spotted variety) grown in La Union, Pangasinan, and some
Visayan regions, and the Romero from the Itawis district in
southwestern Cagayan province. All these varieties were
strong, dark and heavy and had only local importance.
The inception and gradual adoption of cellophane wrap
pers was a step forward in some ways in the progress of the
industry, since they preserved the freshness of cigars for
longer periods of time and insured the sabker of a hygienic
product. On the other hand, when cigars ar © stored for any
length of time in cellophane they lose their flavor and
fragrance since tobacco requires slow "ageing" with each cigar
401
imparting and extracting flavor from all the others in the
box* For this reason, cigar enthusiasts prefer the unwrapped
cigar which because of the vagaries of fashion is usually
obtainable also at a much lower price than the others.
Philippine cigarettes are produced in a great variety
of shapes and sizes with both white and licorice paper, as
well as certain varieties which are specially flavored for
local demand. Smoking and chewing tobacco are completely
different from American varieties since the smoking tobacco
is the same cut tobacco used in manufacturing Spanish-style
cigarettes, while the chewing tobacco is nothing more than a
flattened cigar using the coarser, and therefore the stronger,
leaves*
For the ten-year period 1925-1936, the United States
took 84 per cent of the total production of cigars, 89 per
cent of fillers and scrap, 10 per cent of cigarettes, less
than one per cent of leaf tobacco and smoking tobacco, and
13 per cent of all others. Cigars, which constituted the vital
item in the trade, were therefore largely dependent upon the
American market. As a result of an increase in the importa
tion of American tobacco products, particularly cigarettes,
the value of Philippine tobacco exports declined steadily
after 1927, from 1*18,000,000, to PO.0,500,000, in 1933. Since
this was parallel to exports to the United States, the health
of the trade was obviously dependent upon the American market*
The value of this trade declined from i?9,000,000 in 1927 to
402
barely over 15,000,000, in 1956. Obviously, if the situation
would not improve, it would be necessary for the country to
increase its exports to some of the remaining 43 nations.
Cigars were shipped, in addition to the United States, to
China, France, the Straits Settlements, England aid Spain;
leaf tobacco to Spain, Korea, Japan, China, France and North
Africa; scraps to Holland, China, Gibraltar and Belgium;
cigarettes to China, Japan, the Canary Islands and France;
and smoking tobacco to the Canary Islands, Gibraltar and China.
Despite the large production of tobacco, the Philip
pines was a heavy importer of tobacco products. The average
yearly imports far the period 1927-1936 continually Increased,
with the United States supplying 85 per cent of leaf tobacco,
worth 11,087,938, 74 per cent of cigars worth 1976.00, 99.51
per cent of cigarettes worth 1=4,062,495, 99.99 per cent of
chewing tobacco worth 1=739,495, 60 per cent of smoking
tobacco worthl75,470, and 96 per cent of all other imports
worth 12,340.00. A limited quantity (15 per cent) of leaf
imports came from the East Indies. The value of these imports
from the United States rose from 15,0p0,000 in 1927 to
17,400,000, in 1936.
The balance of trade had been in favor of the Philip
pines until 1935, when it shifted to the United States and
remained there for the remainder of the Commonwealth period
and the early years of the Republic. By 1936, the balance
in favor of the United States amounted to 12,722,141, and
403
with the usual invisible items included the figure would
rise to 53,389,871. That the trade was more heavily weighted
in favor of the United States than the figures indicate, can
be seen from the fact that the United States in 1934 imported
a total of 71,748,699 pounds of tobacco of which only 7 per
cent came from the Philippines, ifith the imposition of the
provisions of the Independence Act, those cigars which had
been selling in the United States at two for five cents would .
be raised to about twelve cents a piece. Since costs were
high, any additional burden imposed by duties and special
imports would automatically wipe out the Philippine trade.8
In their appeal to the members of the Joint Prepara
tory Committee, the representatives of the Philippine tobacco
industry, cited these as well as numerous other facts to plead
for consideration. They were convinced that the full applica
tion of the Independence Law provisions would mean the extinction
of their industry which would reduce hectarage in the Philip
pines by 13 per cent, affecting 65,000 planters and their
dependents, throwing out of work some 65 per cent of factory
hands and 65,000 provincial laborers, and reduce by 54,000,000,
the annual revenues of the Philippine Government. For these
reasons, as well as the fact that the tobacco trade between
the United States and the Philippines was "mutually advants^geous"
®Seej M.V. Gallego: "The Paradox of the Tobacco
Indus try," The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philip
pines. 1937-1938. pp. 337-338.
404
aa well as the fact that the balance of trade had shifted
definitely in favor of the United States by nearly three
and a half million pesos yearly, the industry requested the
maintenance of the status quo. They stated that there was actual
ly no competition since nAmerica supplied the Philippines
with Virginia and wrapper leaf tobacco and aromatic cigarettes...
while the Philippines supplies America with cigars and
«Q
stripped filler which she must import anyway from other countries"*^
Since the tobacco industry provided the Philippine
Government with tax funds which amounted to almost 20 per cent
of its annual expenditures, the possible extinction of the
industry was a problem the Commonwealth had to solve quickly.
The industry was faced with three major problems: over-produc
tion of cigar filler, excessive taxation of cigarettes, and
inadequate knowledge with regard to the proper methods of
treating cigarettes to prevent molds. There werd also three
possible ways in which the standards of the industry could be
raised: limiting the area planted by individual farmers
(under Spain each family was limited to planting 6,000 plants),
strict enforcement of regulations with regard to classifica
tion, and, coordination of government activities with regard
to promotion.^-®
9paguirigan, oja. clt.. p. 293.
1° Jose C. Ramos: ”E canonic Aspect of the Tbbacco Industry In the
Riilippines," Ibid.. pp. 293-299; Department of Agriculture and Commerce,
opuolt.. p.12; and, Gallego,(1939). op. clt.. p. 259. The present observer
might also suggest the fact that a stable 'industry requires the extension
of wider credit and marketing facilities, for smaller producers, a more
definite classification of varieties, research into the development of
better varieties, establishment of more practical classificatory and re
gulatory measures, and the utilization of mare modern culture and
curing methods.
405
The industry, then, faced in general almost the same
problems which were approached in much the same way by the
Government, as the other major export items.
A major problem was represented by the American
attitude. The United States was the best customer as in other
products and the imposition of the provisions of the Tydings
-McDuffie Act, Tydings-Kocialkowski Act, various U.S. Revenue
Acts, brought confusion and despair to the industry which,
by 1941, was in such precarious situation that the future was
despaired of by even the most optimistic. The war decimated
the industry. No other major export industry was so badly
damaged. Of all the major export items, the tobacco industry,
following the war made the least progress and faces the most
uncertain future.
The tobacco industry was also one of the most heavily
taxed -- the taxes amounting to actual discrimination. Each
time a factory processed a hundred pounds of leaf tobacco it
paid to the government at least 139.00. Since the price of
leaf tobacco during most of the commonwealth period was about
1=12.00 per hundred pounds, the factory paid about one-third
of the tax for its supply of tobacco. In addition, the
specific tax was based on the selling classification of 1,000
cigarettes, which applied to all sizes, large and small. The
income to a factory owner was 117.50 (or 30 per cent of the
selling price) per one thousand packages, and 118.50 per 1,000
406
cigars. While the cigarette producer made ¥0.33 per thousand,
the Government earned ¥39.00, thus collecting for Its efforts,
sixty-seven times more profit than the manufacturer, who paid
70 per cent of the total cost of manufacturing in excise
taxes. From cigars the Government received three times the
income of the manufacturer who received but 11 per cent of
the net profit from his investment.H
The following typical cases of cigarette and cigar
costs of manufacture are illustrative of the uneasy position
of the industry during the Commonwealth. The factory price
for 1000 packs (30,000 cigarettes) was ¥=56.00; expenses were
as follows; specific tax of ¥1.30 per 1,000 cigarettes,
¥39.00; cost of leaf tobacco, ¥11.25; two rolls of paper,
¥2.20; machine and hand packer’s labor, ¥2.02; cost of
package paper, ¥0.05, and cost of lithographed pack, ¥1.15.
The total expense, then, was ¥55.67, leaving ¥0*33, as a
balance for overhead, interest, and profit. Class A cigars,
selling in the United States at two for nineteen centavos,
returned a balance of ¥2.70 for overhead, interest, and
profit. Higher profits were returned from higher priced
shapes or brands but the sale of these was not large.
It was thus possible for foreign cigarettes, largely
imported from the United States, to enter into serious
^Ma n u e l V, Gallego: "Problems of the Philippine
Cigarette Industry," The Philippine Journal of Commerce.
Vol. JCCII, No. 1 (January, 1937), pp. 15-16, 20.
407
competition with native Philippine brands which, being heavily
discriminated against through taxation, could only be manu
factured and sold clandestinely (i.e., to avoid the high taxes). 12
Critics of the Government tax scheme protested against
the discrimination against Philippine cigarettes as well as
the price differential between cigarettes and cigars. The
Government responded by passing Commonwealth Acts 95 and 203.
The first authorized the Philippine National Development
Company and the Secretary of Agriculture to establish and
maintain warehouses for tobacco and "other marketable products.
The second, increased the fixed tax on retail leaf tobacco
dealers from twenty to thirty pesos per annum.^4 The first
was to benefit the entire industry, the second was to lower
the differential between cigarettes and cigars, and, at the
same time, eliminate dishonest trading in the commodity. The
Collector of Internal Revenue, in 1936, pointed to the fact
that retail leaf tobacco dealers paid to the government
¥72,000.00 in taxes. At the rate of ¥20.00 per dealer, there
were about 3,000 dealers who, if they handled a conservative
estimate of 20 quintals of tobacco each, the total volume
handled would amount to 60,000 quintals. dince the 170,000
quintals handled by licensed manufacturers netted the govern-
12 Ibid.
•^Messages Qf the President. Vol. 2, Pt. 2, pp. 763-764.
14Ibld.. p. 1263.
408
ment 3^5,000,000 in revenue, the amount handled by the retail
dealers would have brought in an additional ^2,000,000.00.
This represented both a discrimination against manufacturers
and increased possibilities of illicit manufacture. This is
not the entire picture since many cases went unreported due
to the lack of men in the field of the Bureau of Plant Indus
try and Internal Revenue, the latter, In many cases, being
represented in the province by only one man. Thus, the
manufacturer, with a restricted market, could 111 afford to
pay good prices for the product, with the result, that the
farmer suffered. In 1936, It was estimated that the tobacco
Industry paid 55.8 per cent of its earnings in taxes to the
Government, while the sugar industry paid but 1.18 per cent.
The need for better legislation was evident to the critics
who attacked the Government for Its weak handling of the problem.
The critics also called for a new appreach to the
cigarette problem, one authority demanding uniform, equitable
and lighter taxes; production of cheaper and better aromatic
tobacco; protective legislation for cigarettes; higher
standards for local brands, and effective propaganda for native
cigarettes through Government Intervention and finance.1®
It was generally conceded that labor, In the tobacco
^5Isayas R. Salonga, The Present Problems of the
Tobacco Trade. (Manila, 1938), p. 18, quoting from The Tribune.
July 16, 1935.
•*-6Gallego, op. cit.. p. 20.
409
industry, received fair wages, running near the one peso-a-day
mark. Of course, this was really not sufficient upon which
to live a good life, but it was considered high for the
Commonwealth period. The main problem here seemed to be un
employment rather than low wages. The great and continuing
importation of foreign cigarettes meant a continuing drop in
employment which brought about dissatisfaction among labor in
the industry. President Quezon believed that "the cigar-
makers do not earn enough," but that if wages were to be in
creased, "there will be no money available for the purpose."^7
He suggested that they "wait for the ultimate solution of
this matter by the Government" — hardly encouraging to workers
face to face with unsatisfactory living conditions. He had
no objection to the cigar-makers striking for better wages
but wondered what they would get out of it. "Though you
demand higher wages, if the employers cannot meet them
financially, you will not get anywhere.” The capitalist, he
said, invested his money to make a profit and sine e he could
not make the profit he wanted under the conditions in the city
the manufacturers "send their tobacco to the provinces...
because the wage scale there is low..,." He suggested that,
to solve the situation, the laborers migrate to Mindanao and
^ Messages of the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 22-23.
Speech on Social Justice for the Laborers, delivered at a
luncheon in honor of the representatives of labor under the
leadership of Mr. Cresenciano Torres, Malacaflan, Manila,
February. 17, 1938.
410
work on Government roads there. If they did this, he promiied
to increase their wages, "because I have set aside £2,000,000
for such public works projects." He also suggested that a
reason for the difficulty facing cigar-workers was the large
number of women employed in the industry "and this is not
easy to solve." He did not explain this rather ambiguous
statement further, beyond saying that he had mentioned it
because "I am in the habit of broaching only those questions
which are capable of solution and not of being simply spoken
about, or of making promises which I would not be able to
keep."'*’8 One need not be a confirmed sceptic to raise eye
brows at this statement.
The basic problems facing the tobacco industry could
not be solved in such a fashion. A more definite and energetic
program was demanded, a program such as the sugar Industry
men p l a n n e d . T h i s program was not forthcoming during the
Commonwealth, despite the creation of the National Tobacco
Administration, which had been sponsored by the Special
Tobacco Committee of the National Assembly In 1938. It was
sponsored by municipal councils, provincial boards, and The
Tribune -- and the cigar workers agreed to check a general
strike pending the passage of the bill. There was a definite
need for such legislation since the previous laws enacted to
18Ibid.
l3Domingo Paguirigan: "Problems and Adjustment in
Philippine Tobacco Production," National Research Council,
Bulletin. No. 1 7 . (September, 1938), pp. 21-24.
411
aid the industry had not brought the needed results. Observers
pointed to the fact that the country produced a surplus of
cigar filler leaf tobacco amounting to some five million kilos
which was due to unrestricted production in some 10,000
hectares. The country imported annually some six million
pesos1 worth of Virginia and wrapper leaf tobacco used by
local manufacturers. It was pointed out that, with the
termination of the trade relations with the United States,
the tobacco export trade in cigars, stripped filler and
cigarettes the equivalent of four million kilos of leaf tobacco,
was likely to disappear completely. Prices of leaf tobacco
had dropped so low that the producers were unable to recover
costs of production. The bill was introduced, by the comit-
tee, with the hope that its operation would promote, reha
bilitate and regulate the Industry as well as to promote
President Quezon’s social justice campaign insuring the well
being and economic security of the people engaged In the
industry. It was hoped that the bill would foster the growth
of only leaf tobacco of the best quality at a quantity
insuring the equilibrium of prices and orderly, efficient
trading.
In creating the National Tobacco Corporation^0 the
former Tobacco Board, created by Act No. 2179, amending Act
No. 2613, was abolished and its functions, duties and porers
20cA N o . 5 1 9 , 1 9 4 0 . The creation of this body had
been recommended by the National Tobacco Administration.
412
were transferred to the Corporation, for which seven million
pesos, together with collections received from the activities
of the Corporation, was provided* This was later modified
so that a "Tobacco Industry Promotion Fund", with an initial
appropriation of 1*2,000,000, with possible further appro
priations to a maximum of §=10,000,000, was to carry out the
provisions of the act. The Corporation was to deal in leaf
tobacco and its m a n u f a c t u r e s ; operate transportation facil
ities, establish warehouses, purchase machinery and equipment
for storage, handling, utilization and selling of manufactures;
provide credit facilities to planters, and organize cooperatives
supplying them with capital and assisting them in selling.
This corporation suffered the same fate as others
similarly created and the industry continued to decline to the
point of stagnation although President Quezon said that "tobac
co exporters are comparatively better off than our copra or
sugar exporters,"22 a statement which displeased the indivi
duals referred to. i/hether this was true or not, the tobacco
planters' condition was deplorable, with no relief during the
remainder of the Commonwealth period.
The Post-gar Period:-
The war proved disastrous to the Industry, planting in
Andres V. Castillo: Philippine Economics. 1949,
pp • 230-231•
22
Messages of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 166,
July 23, 1939, his speech on the ^Benefits Derived from the
Coconut Oil Excise Tax."
415
1945 being 40 per cent below prewar production. The original
12,125,000 working capital of the National Tobacco Corpora
tion, was greatly depleted, causing it to adopt a wait-and-see
policy. The Corporation made strenuous representations to
the Government for aid, resulting in the passage of Republic
Act No. 302, which provided the sum of 13,000,000 as additional
capital. This enabled the corporation to resume its activi
ties which, however, are still far from even the meagre
goals established in 1948. It provided for more provincial
branches and buying stations which, it was hoped, would be
able to secure at least 20 per cent of the crop. Out of the
total production, in 1947, of 17,654,800 kilos, it was able
to secure only 1,146,805 kilos.
Conclusioni-
Ihe industry faces a definite crisis. This is due
to many things: the conservatism of growers and capitalists;
the fact that the bulk of leaf production is in the hands of
small independent growers and tenants having little or no
capital; persistent inequalities among various elements of
the industry; its sole dependence upon cigar filler tobacco;
lack of understanding of the changing trends and demands of
the smoking public; enormous influx of American cigarettes
worth 1=57,000,000 in 1948; unfavorable weather for the last
three years reducing by one-third to one-half the normal
23
Vicente Formoso: "Tobacco: Its Rehabilitation,"
Evening News Supplement. Vol. 140, No. 6 (September 30, 1949),
pp. 4, 22.
414
production; and the desire of most growers to produce food
crops to get cash (since tobacco is no longer a cash crop
for them) .^4 prospect, says the Bureau of Plant Indus
try, for the Industry during the next few years, ”13 gloomy.
The industry must produce more wrapper tobacco, more
Virginia aromatic, must regulate more closely the growing of
native tobacco, must introduce the manufacture of cigars by
machinery to make cheaper cigars while retaining hand-manu-
facture for the better classes, and must receive more
adequate aid from the government. The restriction of importa
tion of American cigarettes is vital necessity, both for the
rehabilitation of the industry as well as a conservation
measure for dollar reserves. The present import control laws
are Ineffective despite the restrictions placed upon dollar
expenditures in December, 1949. The present (1950) result
of the latter step has been to encourage a black market in
American cigarettes and an enormous increase in their prices,
without diminishing their consumption and without concomitant
increase in the consumption of native brands. Much remains
yet to be accomplished before the situation can be considered
well In hand.
More funds should be allotted by the Government to
the Bureau of Plant Industry for research in tobacco varieties
and methods of production, and the National Tobacco Corporation
^ Annual Report. Bureau of Plant Industry, 1949,
p. 31.
415
must engage in a more active and energetic program of aid to
growers and the elimination of the many inequalities existing in
the industry. The Corporation should buy tobacco stocks from
small planters directly and by classes, offering bonuses for the
best classes and establishing a descending scale of prices for
lesser grades. The Corporation should also engage in a well-
integrated program of seeking more foreign markets and should
encourage the production of Virginia cigarettes which could be
sold at more reasonable prices throughout the sterling areas as
well as to the United Kingdom. In addition, the various govern
ment agencies charged with activities in relation to the industry
should be consolidated under the Tobacco Administration Office.
The Tobacco Inspection Service and the Tobacco Agency in the
United States, now under the Bureau of Internal Revenue, and the
Tobacco Research Section of the Bureau of Plant Industry should
all be administered by the Tobacco Administration Office. Tobac
co promotion abroad should be handled, in cooperation with this
office, by the foreign service, of the Republic. The special
inspection fees collected for the promotion of the Industry,
should be supplemented by a fund derived from five per cent of
the collection of internal revenue and specific and privilege
taxes. This should be allotted as an additional fund to support
the Tobacco Administration Office.
If these, and other measures which have been proposed by
various government agencies and observers, are carried out
vigorously and with imagination, the industry may once again
regain its important position in the Philippine economy.
CHAPTER XIII
CERES’ HORN:
COTTON-RUBBER-VEGETABLES AND OTHER PLANTS-
FRUITS-COFFEE-THE ROXAS FOOD
PRODUCTION CAMPAIGN
Although the economy of the nation rests upon the five
bases treated above, the rich resources of the country produce
many other crops necessary in the livelihood of the people.
One important item in the diet of the people is the camote. or
sweet potato. Almost a million people consider this their main
item of diet, and although enough camotes are raised to feed
these people, an extension of this crop is necessary if the
Philippines is to achieve a certain degree of self-sufficiency.
Realizing this, in 1940-41, the Commonwealth Government attempted
to encourage the cultivation of sweet potatoes and corn, but its
efforts were largely nullified by the outbreak of the War.
During the Occupation, many people were forced to exist on
camotes. since so many other footls were lacking. Today, many
have no liking for the crop. The camote is generally grown in
those areas in which the winds are too strong for the production
of corn and, in some areas, the camote is a cash crop before
rice planting.
The importance of cash crops to the Philippine economy
cannot be over-estimated, but many experts feel that they should
be planted in conjunction with the main food crops. Uiis has
not yet been done to any great extent. Catherine Porter has
noted that "about one-third of the cultivated land was planted
417
to cash crops, most Important of which was sugar, next in
importance, coconuts and hemp. Comparatively good prices paid
for these commodities in the past made it far more rewarding for
the farmer -- or his landlord -- to concentrate on them, rather
than to devote his land and time and energy to raising food
crops. If the large number of rice tenants or small landowners
had had more land of their own on which to work, and if they
would have been assured of enjoying the fruits of its product,
the whole agricultural situation would have been far different
today.Because of the high cost of agricultural land there
has been a tendency to cultivate cash crops rather than to rotate
crops for the greatest good both of the farmers and the country.
Although the country grows a great variety of vegetables, fruits
and nuts, production has been far from adequate for domestic
needs, let alone for export.® Miss Porter points out that, with
the exception of wheat, dairy products, and beef, which have
been generally imported from the United States and Australia,
the Philippine land and waters could supply the entire food
needs of the nation.
Cotton
The Government and its major economic planners seem to
have recognized the serious situation into which Philippine agri
culture had fallen by the time of the Commonwealth and, in order
to alleviate the situation, hoped to introduce various cash crops
which the average farmer could produce in addition to rice or com.
^Porter, op. cit.. p. 67. 2Ibid.
418
The cash crops these planners had in mind were cotton and rubber.
Since the Government had established several textile mills, it
was hoped that the farmers would be able to cultivate the 7,000
acres needed to supply them. In 1939, however, less than 2,000
hectares had been planted to cotton and although later the acre
age increased, there was still too little to supply the demands
of the local cotton industry.® The Japanese organized the
Philippine Cotton Association, shortly after the beginning of
the Occupation, and large cotton companies in Japan came to the
Philippines to aid in the development'of the industry. It was
hoped that this would make the country self-sufficient in clothing
which, in the past, had represented an import of some 1*40,000,000
worth annually.^ April, 1943, saw the first crop in the five-
year plan for the industry, which was manufactured at the
National Development Company's mill near Manila. Locally-grown
cotton was said to compare favorably with that of other comtries,
being, the reporter stated, '’decidedly better than American-
grown varieties.”5
The cotton industry has had a respectable history in the
Philippines. Weaving has been a major cottage industry of the
women since the most ancient times and, in Mohammedan areas, the
5 Ibid.
^See Cornelio Balmacedaj "The New Philippine Economy,"
Philippine Re v i e w . JTol. 1, No. 1 (March, 1943), p. 53.
5Shln Seiki (New Era), Vol. I, No. 10 (July, 1943), re
verse of cover. Pages 1-5 were devoted, in this number, to a
pictorial story on the cotton industry revived by the Central Adminis
trative Organization "at the instance of the Japanese Military
Administration."
419
men have produced a fine cloth universally worn by both men and
women in the South. Woven cloth has been found in the Philippine
Iron Age sites by Professor H. Otley Beyer, wrapped around short,
dagger-like swords of bronze. There seems little doubt that
the Chinese (at least the Southern Chinese) received their first
cotton stuffs from the Philippines as early as the 3rd Century
A.D. It is, of course, true that Sir Aurel Stein found the
earliest-known Chinese woven, patterned stuffs, dating from
around the 2nd to the 4th Centuries B.C., in the Lop Desert of
Chinese Turkestan, but there is a gap between that period and
the next reference, in the T'ang Dynasty, when woven stuffs
achieved a real artistry.® It is quite possible that the southern
Chinese received their cotton from the Philippines during this
period and we know certainly that throughout most of the pre-
Spanish period the Chinese came regularly to the Philippines to
trade for raw cotton and cotton cloth.7 The region contiguous
to Lingayen Gulf, the western shores of Luzon facing the
China Sea and the Eastern s h o r e s, on the Pacific, have
since time Immemorial seen the bulky Chinese junks come
to trade. The Ilocos region, Abra and F a n g a slnan,
today, are r i c h in remains of this great trade, and
®A.F* Kendricks "Textiles and Embroideries," Japanese
A r t . Britannica Booklet Ho. 6, Encyclopaedia Brltannlca. 14th
Edition, 1933, p. 59.
7See Berthold Laufer:
Laufer: P f t fre Cblpf a e tp
, Reprinted from the Smithsonian Miscel-
>tember 13,
~ Series XV,
— - — — , Beyer,
unpublished MS on the "Pre-Spanish History of the Philippines,"
ana C.O. Houston, Jr., unpublished MS on "Some Suggestions on
Southern Influences In Chinese and ifepanese History."
420
the culture of this general area still reflects the influences
felt during the long trading period.
Filipino women have long been noted for their skill in
weaving, despite the fact that their looms and equipment have
altered little through the centuries. The legislature In 1936
proposed a bill appropriating funds for the manufacture of improved
hand looms for distribution to weavers throughout the country.
This was vetoed by President Quezon on the grounds that funds
were not available, and that the ends desired could be achieved
by the "Secretary of Agriculture and Commerce by using either
the fund appropriated by Act No. 3953, or the Fiber Research Fund
under section 1796-B of the Revised Administrative Code."8
Since the greater development of cottage industries was one of
the goals of the economic program of the Commonwealth, and since
It could have saved many millions of pesos for the Commonwealth,
this was false economy. Dr. Vicente Aldaba, Chief of the
Fiber Research Section, Bureau of Plant Industry (now Manager of
the NAFCO), developed an improved hand loom which increased the
efficiency of the industry wherever it was adopted, but, un
fortunately it did not have a distribution wide enough to bring
lasting benefits to the industry and the people. The textile
industry was a treasure house for Japanese business during much
of the Commonwealth period.
Through the efforts of the "NEPA" campaign, during the
8M . 0 . P .. (Vetoing Bill No. 332, Nov. 7, 1936), Vol. 2,
Pt. 1 (rev.ed.), p. 360.
421
Commonwealth period, instituted to encourage home industries,
many women turned to wearing the "patadiong" and the "carabaya."
These garments, generally home-made, composed the dress of the
rural women, and were comfortable and attractive despite their
ankle-length. Known during the Commonwealth period as the "Nepa"
dres3, this was increasingly worn by the socially "elite.”
Victoria L. De Araneta, a member of one of the most influential
and industrious families in the Philippines, appealed to women
to adopt the native dress to aid the protectionism instituted
by the National Economic Protectionism Association (known as
the ”N E P A " ) s
Once a flourishing industry...is the weaving of
sinamay, of jusi, of pifia; it is now slowly dying out
and we are not lifting a finger to save it. Nay, daily
we contribute to the death of this industry, and to the
death of our ’forgotten w o r k e r s ’ there, as daily we
help the textile workers of Japan, China, England and
Prance whose products we buy....
Many of us do not care to wear our native materials
because they have not the shine nor the sleek appearance
of satin, the softness of crepe...*
We thus fail, I am sure, not because we are selfish,
but only because in our own atmosphere of ease and
comforts, we fail to realize that other people are
suffering.... It is high time that we awake to the fact
that we and not foreigners, should benefit from our
national heritage, and this will come to pass only if
we daily remember and act to patronize it in full measure....9
The Iloeano "cambaya” and the Tagalog and Visayan "patadiong"
becoming popular, demand rose to unprecedented heights. Un
fortunately, the great benefits went to Japanese textile dealers
who began to sell imitations of these articles. While the cloth,
9The Philippines Herald Yearbook (14th Anniversary
Supplement), September 29, 1934, p. 95.
422
like most Japanese textiles, was of good quality, the floods of
cloth produced on machine-looms greatly restricted the home
manufactures. During the Commonwealth period, the Japanese
textile trade increased enormously, largely at the expense of
American textiles. In 1936, for example, imports from Japan
amounted to 48,669,638 square meters, while imports from the
United States fell (from 35,250,190 square meters in 1935) to
27,583,336 square meters. This drop in the imports of American
textiles, of course, was also due to the terms of the Tydlngs-
McDuffie Act. The cotton-seed interests in the United States
had been one of the major groups demanding independence for the
Philippines and the accompanying restriction on Philippine oil
exports.
The above figures do not include textiles transshipped
from Japanese-owned mills in Hongkong, amounting to an additional
11,336,505 square meters. In an agreement signed with the United
States, the Japanese agreed to limit their export of textiles to
the Philippines to 45,000,000 square meters a year. This they
easily evaded by selling through Chinese and "dummy” firms.
Those principally aided by this agreement, which was designed to
benefit the American textile manufacturers, were the Hongkong and
Chinese cotton industry and the Japanese rayon industry. With
the restriction of the purchasing power of the Filipino by the
Tydings-McDuffle Act and subsequent laws, the Japanese, under
selling American textiles with ease, practically pre-empted the
market. By 1941, they were in practical control of textiles In
423
the Philippines, and had peace lasted a few more years,
American textiles would have disappeared.
Hie big mistake Japan made in 1941 was going to war.
Had she refrained from violence, she would have attained her
objectives by economic penetration.-1-® The American attempts
to restrict the Japanese trade had only the effect of turning
the Japanese away from the American supply of cotton to other
regions — particularly India and Brazil. The loss of these
markets during the war encouraged the Japanese to Increase
cotton lands in the Philippines.
Plans were made by the National Development Company to
erect a modern cotton mill to attempt to meet the domestic
demand for cheaper cotton goods. This plan was doomed from the
start. Dr. Aldaba pointed out that the cost per spindle for a
modern mill capable of weaving and finishing, including equip
ment, buildings and power, would be approximately ^180. He
further estimated that to replace imported stocks alone would
require almost 400,000 spindles. To raise the cotton necessary
to supply these spindles would require 200,000 hectares of land.
To train the agricultural force, the personnel for the mills and
distributors, would also require many years and the outlay of
•^This was apparently the original plan proposed in the
"Tanaka Memorial" which was taken by the militarists and twisted
to suit their own designs. This was revealed In a conversation
between Count Tokugawa and several Americans in the Philippines
in the late f20s, or early '30s, at the time that the Count
visited the Philippines. Related to the author by one of the
participants in that conversation. This was later confirmed by
a Japanese "cultural" official sent to the Philippines during the
Occupation in conversations with Filipinos then in the "cultural
affairs" section of the Government.
424
millions of pesos. In 1937, there was but one domestic mill
turning out coarse cotton goods, with 323 looms and 8,000
spindles. Maximum capacity was reported at 10,000 yards daily,
but, in actuality, it produced not more than 4,800 yards, the
equivalent of 1,500,000 yards anually. Thus, to meet domestic
requirements for textiles, the development of widespread cottage
industries would be the prime necessity. This the Commonwealth
was unable to achieve and, so far, the Republic has ignored the
entire question.
R u b b e r ;-
Rubber production has even a sadder history than that
of cotton. Experts had declared that nearly five million acres
of land in Mindanao were suitable for the production of rubber,
but by 1939, only 3,640 hectares were planted. The Goodyear
Plantation in Bukidnon is at present nothing but a wild jungle.
Carmi A. Thompson had suggested in 1926 that the rubber In the
Philippines could be at least as profitable as In Java, Sumatra
and the Malay Peninsula. He mentioned, however, that before
it could be brought into profitable production, the Philippines
would have to alter Its land laws and its attitude toward
foreign e n t r e p r e n e u r s A l t h o u g h this step is absolutely
For an excellent picture of the situation in 1937, see
Troadio Millora: "Cotton and Textile Industry," The Commercial
and Industrial Manual of the Philippines. 1957-38. pp. 307-309;
Hilarion S. Silayans "Philippine Cotton Facts and Figures,"
I b i d .. pp. 310-312; and shorter notes, pp. 312-321.
12
Appendix VI, Dean C. Worcester, The Philippines Past
and Present. 1930, pp. 827-828.
425
necessary, any suggestions along such lines produces a storm,
of protest and oratory from members of C o n g r e s s . W i t h
adequate capital and a sympathetic attitude by the Government
toward foreign investors, the rubber industry could be extended
to provide amounts sufficient for the domestic needs of the
nation. A suggestion was made several years ago that in areas
suitable for rubber trees, each farmer, by planting three or
four close to his home, could provide himself with an increased
income and the nation with a comfortable supply of raw material.
Hilarion Silayan, then Director of the Bureau of Plant
Industry, stated that Mindanao and Mindoro could produce some
200,000 tons of raw rubber a year. He pointed out that a
capitalization of only ^845 per hectare would be necessary,
including modern equipment, working capital, and care for stocks
at full maturity. This compared with the !P914 to ^1,235 per
hectare a year required in the Federated Malay States. Para
rubber seeds had been introduced as early as 1904, but progress
was slow. He advanced four reasons: the land laws which made
it difficult for corporations to acquire the holdings they
desired; Increased production from the British and Dutch East
Indies, causing rubber prices to decline; the difficulty of
marketing raw rubber in the Philippines; and the erroneous
impression that rubber could be produced profitably only on
I S c f . statement by Senator Cabili with regard to the
Marsman abaca plan above.
1^"P.I. Potential Source of Rubber," The Philippine
Journal of Commerce. Vol. XIV, No. 12 (December, 1938), p. 12.
426
large plantations. At the time he spoke, there were three large
rubber plantations In operation: the American Rubber Company,
at Latuan, Isabela de Basilan, Zamboanga (949.3 has., capitalized
at 1*500,000); the Rio Grande Rubber Plantation, Kabansalan,
Zamboanga (1,024 has., capitalized at ¥=13,230) and the Basilan
Plantation Company, Isabela de Basilan, Zamboanga (1,024 has.,
capitalized at ¥500,000), the oldest operating plantation in
the country, having begun in 1914.
It has been estimated that the Philippines could pro
duce enough rubber to supply one-fifth the requirements of the
United States, and this could replace much marginal sugar land
and other weak export Items as an excellent source of r e v e n u e . ^
There is no doubt that, with Government sponsorship and research,
rubber could become an Important item in the economic life of
the Philippines.
Vegetables and Other P l a n t s :-
Other crops can well be developed as part of the Philip
pine economy. The principal vegetables are cow peas, lima
beans and soy beans, which with some sixty fruit and tree crops
had a value, in 1939, of ¥35,615,068. This figure represents
one-tenth of all crops, livestock and poultry, by value, in the
country. In addition, many fiber plants and root plants are
important to the diet of the people and represent a large portion
of the national Income. Maguey, known also as the century plant
15Gallego, 0 £. c l t .. p. 214.
427
or* agave, was introduced by the Spanish from Mexico. It is of
some importance in those areas where the soil is less productive
of the major crops, as in Ilocos Norte, Cebu and Bohol.
Maguey suffered the same reverses of fortune as abaca during
the Commonwealth, dropping from a production of 21,281,730
kilos worth 13,538,030, in 1929, to 6,460,917 kilos worth
1=340,000, In 1939. Like abaca it was sold largely in bulk to
Japan. It Is supplemented by sisal, kapok and pifia (the fiber
woven from tne pineapple plant). Cassava is grown extensively
in the Sulu Archipelago, and represented, in 1939, a production
value of one and a half million pesos.
The peanut is of some importance. Its production in
creased from 6,441 hectares producing 3,638,680 kilos worth
1345,420, in 1934, to 12,173 hectares producing 6,528,524 kilos
worth 1537,777, In 1939. In 1939, it was estimated that some
20,000 people were engaged in field production, manufacture and
traffic in peanuts, with Lanao, Leyte, Pangasinan, Cagayan, La
Union, Isabela, Nueva Ecija, Ilocos Norte, Batangas and Cebu
as ranking areas of production. The main problems facing this
potentially important industry, are inadequate supply and high
cost of production. These may be solved by extending the area
of production to regions most suited for successful cultivation
and to marginal lands in sugar-producing areas, by the intensive
use of green manures on worn-out soils, and by mechanizing
production.16 Because of its high food value and its importance
16Department of Agriculture and Commerce: The Peanut
Industry in the Philippines. (Manila, 1939), p. 10.
428
as a source of valuable oil, the peanut should be encouraged
by the Government--partieularly in view of the low nutritional
standards of the people*
Fruits:-
There is no reason why the Philippines should not be
able to produce all the fruits and vegetables needed, and,
indeed, be able to export to other less fortunate countries.
The soil is fairly good in most places, and produces vegetables
fully as good as those from such fabulous vegetable-producing
areas as California and Texas. The people, not realizing the
importance of vegetables, have produced them only spasmodically,
in an off-hand fashion, as they were needed. Before the war,
the best were grown by the Japanese around Baguio, in the
Trinidad Valley. Since the war, the lands have been reappro
priated by the natives of that region (Benguet and Kankanai
peoples) whose standard of living, as a result, has risen
wonderfully. Baguio is still famous for its vegetables and
fruits. A traveler through the Mountain Province as a whole is
struck with the excellence of the vegetables, fruits, and
poultry, produced there, largely by graduates of the La Trinidad
Agricultural School, one of the most efficient institutions in
the P h i l i p p i n e s * ^
Despite the ability of the country to produce all needed
l^From an educational point of view, its work in the
total has not been so successful, through no fault of its own.
We will attempt to treat this in more detail later.
429
vegetables and fruits, before the war it imported quantities
of both, its annual imports amounting to over 1*3,000,000.xo
Citrus fruits, apples, grapes, etc. were the main items of
importation. In the case of vegetables, beans, particularly
the soybean, was the main item of import, Als o imported were
considerable quantities of onions, Irish potatoes, garlic,
cabbage and a few minor vegetables,^9 The Philippines is
particularly adapted to fruit raising. Mangoes are highly
esteemed by fruit lovers, and could form a valuable item for
export, either fresh or canned. A goal has been set of 760,000
trees, or 30,000 hectares, attainable only if extensive research
is conducted to determine causes for low yield and irregularity
in bearing and the selection of the best strains for propagation
purposes.PO
Citrus fruits also grow well in the Philippines and
their production should be increased. The culture already has
become quite profitable, with present market prices in excess
of 550.00 per 100 kilos. Orchards, in Batangas, the major
source of the mandarin orange in Luzon, return 1*4,000 to 1*5,000
per hectare per year. Costs run between 1*400 and 5=500 per
hectare per year.2 -*- The production should be extended and
•*-®1949 Re p o r t . Bureau of Plant Industry, p. 55.
1 9 Ibid., pp. 55-56.
2®Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines: Philippine
Business Guidebook. 1 9 4 9 . p. 141. This book is an excellent
source of information with regard to various aspects of Philippine
economy, and it is hoped that it will be published regularly by the
Chamber•
21I b l d .. p. 144.
430
r e s e a r c h should be conducted by growers in cooperation with the
Bur ea u of Plant Industry, leading to a general improvement in
the industry. The Government could well engage in a broad e d u
cational pr o g r a m informing interested citizens of the profits to
be derived from the industry, and the best methods of production
and distribution. The annual food bill could easily be reduced
by the increased consumption of local fruits. The Bureau has
done excellent work in its experimental station at Lipa, Batangas,
e stablished in 1931.
Other fruits gro w in profusion. The papaya, of which
there are many excellent varieties in the Philippines, is one of
the queens of fruits. It is delicious and has the virtue of a i d
ing digestion. Bananas are found throughout the Islands, in the
backyards of homes and beside roads and h i g h w a y s . No other fruit
is more ubiquitous, b ei ng eaten b y r i c h and po or alike. Indeed
the banana and the papaya are the basis of the fruit diet of the
people. P r o m 1928 to 1939, an average of 110,000 hectares was
p la nt ed to the banana, the average yield per year during the same
p e r i o d being 49 million bunches w o r t h P 8 , 500,000. Despite this
app ar en tl y large production, the per capita consumption was but
one banana every two days. It Is often extremely difficult to
find bananas in the markets. There are five ma in commercial
varieties, the Latundan, Saba, Lacatan, Bongolan and Tomok.
A me ri c a n s generally prefer the Bongolan and Tomok, although a
n e w variety recently introduced from Java,
the Ambon, has been growing in favor. The peop le general
ly eat the Saba and Lacatan, whic h have a drier, tarter
431
flavor than the others. As in other Oriental countries, the
people prepare the banana in a great variety of ways — boiling,
frying in strips as fritters, and so on. Mindanao is considered
the ideal location for the commercial prod uc ti on of the banana
because it is relatively untouched by typhoons. The banana
cannot be considered a commercial crop in the Philippines, in
the strict sense of the word, and represents me re ly another
petty cash crop for the farmer who happens to have a few plants
around his home. But even as a household crop it has large
possibilities for expansion, and could provide an excellent
source of income for many families. One hectare pl anted at
present prices returns the owners fr om 3^918 to iKL,836 per year,
and there is no apparent danger of saturating the market for
22
years to come.
M a n y other fruits might be mentioned: the pineapple
(important as well for the luxurious cloth woven from its leaves),
caimito, avocado, muskmelon, watermelon, pili, ka soy (cashew —
a source for native cocoa as well as the nut), and so on. The
fruit industry only needs extensive planting to repla ce destroyed
plaints as well as extensive pla n ti ng of short-season crops,
r ejuv en at i on of old plantations, the establishment of large-
scale regional orchards to assure a steady supply the entire
year, and extension of research.
Coordinate in importance w i t h an increase in the produc-
22P.A. Rodrigo i "The Lowly Banana," ACIL, Vol. XI,
No. 4 (April, 1949), p. 22.
432
tlon of these and other foodstuffs Is the p r oblem of p r e s er va
tion. As early as 1937, Dr. Manuel L. Roxas, then Chairman of
the National Research Council, insisted upon the early consi
deration and Initiation of canning and other methods of
preservation saying that no "consideration whatever must delay
their e s t a b l i s h m e n t . He pointed out r ig htly that the majority
of Imported canned comestibles figured very low in the diet of
the average Filipino, with the exception of condensed milk,
dried beans and canned meat. The development of a local
canning industry was not only necessary to reduce the u n f a v o r
able balance of trade, but was also most essential to reduce
and eventually eliminate the great waste of valuable food items
through the lack of methods of preservation. Such an Industry,
Dr. Roxas believed, should cater to the needs and tastes of the
people and he declared that many local vegetable dishes were
susceptible to sale in preserved form.
The principal limitation upon such an industry would be
the supply of raw materials. This would necessitate the
institution of scientific plans to elasticize local produce so
that Immediate, daily needs would be met and a regular flow
would also be assured to provide quantities insuring the running
at normal capacity of packing units.
Three major items demanded p r es ervation methods and
each of the three w o ul d provide great future possibilities.
2 ^"Sanitary Canning and Pr es ervation of Philippine Foods,"
The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the P h i l i p p i n e s . 1937-
1 9 3 8 . p. 323.
433
These were: hogs, fish, and vegetables. In 1932, it was
pointed out, the entire hog p op ulation of the country was around
two and a half million heads, with 670,527 heads of this
number being slaughtered. This r esulted in a per capita con
sumption of 2.4 kilos of pork per year for the entire population
and less than four kilos per capita per year for the adult
population. This was a very low figure considering the fact
that the rice diet should have been supplemented with twenty-
four kilograms of meat a year for the normal Individual. These
figures suggest one of two things: either the government
figure was badly out of balance (which would mean that the
total number was higher and slaughtered animals, as recorded
by municipal t r e a s u r e r ^ did not reflect the possible home
slaughtering by barrio folk), or, the people depended m u c h more
on fish as a source of protein f ood.24 It is possible that
b ot h these conditions were true.
Dr. Roxas po inted to the fact that if pork canning were
Instituted it would utilize only a small percentage of the
total hog population, since packing plants could handle 100
hogs daily w hich would hardly effect the flow of hogs for fresh
meat purposes (700 daily, 80 per cent slaughtered), but would
materially meet the demand for processed meat. Yet that figure,
he warned, should not be taken as a m a x i m u m since nutritional
requirements were such that a further consumption of meat should
be encouraged by all possible means.
2 4 Ibid.. p. 324
434
As far as the consumption of fish was concerned, canning
would be of even greater service. At the beginning of the
Commonwealth period, the nation was importing some 25,000,000
cans of preserved fish annually while the average consumption
per ye ar of fis h was about a half million tons, using as a
base the estimated consumption of 40 kilos per person. It is
thus apparent that the amount of imported fish was but a fraction
of the total consumed.
As far as vegetables were concerned, the possibilities
for the development of a canning industry were and are enormous.
Coffee and Cocoa
W it h the investment of around five million pesos, the
coffee and cacao p r o b l e m in the Philippines could be met ad
equately. Cocoa should be consumed by a larger group who are
n o w dependent upon the native variety made from the roasted,
crushed kasoy seeds (a bitter beverage for a Westerner). The
area planted to cacao in 1939, was 4,558 hectares, producing
548,999 kilos w o r t h 3^327,674, a decrease from the h i g h of 1930
(3=*1,240,000). It has profitable opportunities for production,
the provinces of Mindoro, Cagayan, Bicol regions, Mindanao,
Batangas, Tayabas, Leyte, and Negros Oriental being most suited
for its production.
Coffee was apparently introduced Into the Philippines
f r o m Brazil in 1740, legend having it that a Franciscan friar
was the responsible party. It was first produced in Batangas,
435
and shortly after this friar's death, it became so popular
there that in the space of four years almost 25 per cent of the
total area of LIpa was covered with plantations. By 1779, al
most every town in Batangas produced coffee in such quantities
that the demands of the nation were easily met. Before the
end of the Spanish period, the coffee industry was fourth in
importance among Philippine Industries, following tobacco. It
represented over seven per cent of the entire value of exports
in 1888, w i t h 7,136,303 kilos w orth 11,354,547, exported to
Spain and the United Kingdom.
The years between 1880 and 1890 were bo om years for the
industry. However, at the end of that period, a great blight,
coupled wi th pests and diseases springing fr om careless p r o d u c
tion methods, practically wiped out the industry in a few short
months. By 1909, the export of coffee totalled but 1,454 kilos
w o r th only F I , 138, and by 1911, the country exported only 610
kilos w o r t h 1576.00. In the years 1935 and 1936, the Bureau of
Customs recorded shipments w o r t h only §=332 and 1 1 6 8 r e s p e c t i v e
ly. This naturally resulted in an enormous increase of imports,
1910 seeing the importation of 1,150,928 kilos valued at 1558,988,
mostly f r o m the United States and Hawaii. Imports continued to
rise until, by 1936, 3,712,829 kilos valued at 1=1,302,200, were
Imported. The average annual pr oduction for the pe ri od 1927-
1936, was 1,205,770 kilos while, during the same period, the
average annual Importation amounted to 2,612,988 kilos.
The Bureau of Plant Industry, in 1934, suggested two
436
major steps in a program of reviving the industry. These werej
(1) It should be industrialized to the extent of satisfying
local demand since it was and is doubtful whether it could meet
foreign competition; (2) the government should inaugurate a
p ro gr am having as its purpose the following! (a) greater selec
ted hectarage, (b) better organized management, especially in
the control of pests and diseases, (c) improvement of the
product for export, (d) p lanting of the same variety In a
district in order to achieve uniformity; and (3) the standardi
zation of product according to grade.
The planting of but 6,000 hectares w ould meet local
consumption requirements.
The area planted to coffee, in 1939, was 7,093 hectares,
producing 1,969,365 kilos worth ^678,011. Leading coffee-growing
provinces are Batangas, the Mountain Province, Iloilo and
Tayabas. To increase local consumption, Dr. Andres Castillo
says, "disease-resistant varieties must be introduced."26
Batangas produces an excellent local variety (from Arabia), but
it must be ground and roasted by the consumer, since retailers
grind it m u c h too coarsely and roast it to the point of burning.
It Is sometimes possible to get excellent coffee in the Mountain
Province, if the consumer grinds and roasts his own, the
varieties grown on the slopes of the mountains, in the Ambura ya n
2 5 Ibld.. p. 327. 26Castillo, ojd. cit.. p. 208.
437
River range, being especially good. It is difficult to purchase
good ready made coffee in restaurants in the Philippines, since
the makers invariably produce a mixture one-third coffee,
one-third milk, and one-third sugar. In some places in the
provinces, the coffee is placed in a pot along wit h milk and
native sugar and then boiled. A n extensive educational p ro gram
should be undertaken to teach the population the best method of
p reparing cocoa and coffee.
The fruit and vegetable industries are faced wit h
problems tending to limit their culture and p r o d u c t i o n . 2,7 In
the words of the Bureau, "the most important of these problems
relate to the planting materials and seed supply, absence of
standard and superior varieties and strains, and the abundance,
of repressive agencies."2 ® The Bureau of Plant Industry, as
the only source of p lanting materials, has performed heavy
labors to get the best seeds to the farmers. There are no
commercial seed or supply h o u B e s . This one agency of the
Bu re au would be of immense economic and social value to the
nation were it to receive the funds and facilities needed.
Since the budget of 1951 p rovided only .38 per cent for plant
and animal Industries, it is not surprising that plans of the
a dministration for b ringing about economic security fell far
short of realization. The budget for 1951 provided, that 16.62
per cent be spent on "national defense" (although it had been
27
Bureau of Plant Industry, R e p o r t . 1949, p. 58.
2 8 Ibid.
438
officially stated that peace and order had been attained through
out the country), yet provided only .63 per cent for the develop
ment of natural resources and .38 per cent for the plant and
animal Industries. For food production, only ?500,000 was
provided although the "peace and order fund" of the President
was to be increased to some four million p e s o s . ^
A number of vegetables are grown in the Philippines
whose seeds must be imported, such as the cabbage, cauliflower
and onion. The Bureau of Plant Industry has endeavored to select
the best strains for growth, finding, for instance, that only
two varieties of onion flourish, the Yellow Bermuda and the Red
Globe. It also has pointed out constantly, in its reports and
educational programs, that as in other agricultural crops,
truck farming requires extensive fertilization, stating flatly
that "quality is directly associated with the use of fertilizers."
Through experimentation, the Bureau has been able to report that
the locally grown seed of the Red Globe onion, in Ilocos, produces
better than the imported variety. Its research and experimenta
tion In vegetables and fruits has been truly something of which
the country can be proud. For instance, it has developed a
"carabao mango" which bears seedless fruits (a most important
discovery in view of the fact that the ordinary mango is two-
thirds seed.)
W i t h the recognized need for expansion of food crops,
29
Hon. Arsenio Lacson, The Star Reporter. Vol. V, No. 171
(February 14, 1950), p. 2.
439
the importance and value of this Bureau cannot be over-emphasized
At the very least, its annual appropriation should be doubled
if the goals that the administration has established are to
become more than mere dreams.
The Roxas Food Production C a m p a i g n :-
The activities of the Roxas administration in increasing
the food supply of the nation were apparently forgotten during
the following administration. The critical situation, in 1946-
47, brought to the attention of President Roxas the fact that the
country, after all, was agricultural, and should be able to
solve its own food problems without importation. Therefore, on
June 17, 1S46, President Roxas officially launched the National
Pood Production Campaign.
He declared that the entire forces of t he Government
would be mobilized in the food drive and enjoined all govern
ment officials, employees and workers to cultivate their own
home gardens to set an example for the country. He hoped that
the mass of the population would aid in the p r o g r a m and that
''rapidly improving conditions in Central Luzon would help
improve the critical food situation...."*^ He urged schools to
extend the idea throughout the nation, and instructed the
Department of Agriculture to instruct the people as to the
n e ce ss it y and methods of the campaign. To set a n example,
^ " P r e s i d e n t Roxas Leads in Nation's Pood Campaign,"
This Week Magazine. Manila C h r o n i c l e . Vol. II, No. 10 (June
2 3 , ” 1946), p. 3.
440
President Roxas (like President Laurel during the Occupation)
began work on his own plot of ground across the Pasig from
Malacafian. Witnesses to the ceremony included Secretary of
Agriculture G-architorena, Presidential adviser Julius Edelstein
("who kept on whispering 'You are an excellent farmer, Mr.
P r e s i d e n t '") and Malacafian Press Secretary Modesto Farolan
(later editor and publisher of the Philippines H e r a l d ) who
later informed the press that the President would continue his
31
gardening work.
Pressure of work, however, prevented the President from
carrying on the garden. However, he had not forgotten the
necessity of saving food supplies. The following week he ordered
that Malacafian would serve only one-course meals which had the
effect, also, of reducing kitchen expenses fifty per cent. He
also ordered that the daily allowances for flowers be stopped,
saying: "The nation needs all the money it could have for its
vital functions. We cannot afford to waste money in unimportant
things.Mrs. Geronima Pecson (later Senator), the palace
social secretary, was asked to convert linen tablecloths into
napkins for the July 4th celebrations. Old curtains, purchased
during the Quezon administration, were remodeled, and washed.
Frayed chairs and sofas were re-upholstered with old curtains,
and the President refused to allow the installation of new
carpets on the palace stairs and new rugs in his study. Up on
51Ibid.
5^Manlla C h r o n i c l e . This Week M a g a z i n e . Vol. II, No. 11
(June 30, 194 6), p"I 3^
441
the tragic d e at h of President Roxas, the "austerity" campaign
was discarded and the palace was refurbished from top to bottom
with fair taste, but at great expense.
The food campaign achieved some success. Jose Camus
stated that "the area planted to beans was 122 per cent of the
prewar area and that planted to other vegetables, 248 per
cent."^ In the course of the campaign, 422,960 home projects
and 940 commercial projects in chicken-production were established
15,611 home projects, and 1,001 commercial projects concerned
with ducks; 26 4,606 home and 401 commercial projects with swine;
and as many concerned wi th turkeys, goats and s h e e p . T h e
Bureau of Plant Industry, during the period May, 1946 to May,
1948, purchased (locally) a total of 79,233 seeds worth
3^90,233 and 19,692 kilos (abroad) w or th 1*155,457. These were
either sold to farmers at cost or loaned, to be paid in k i n d
upon h a r v e st in g. 35 in one year, the production of sweet potatoes
amounted to 556,173 tons; cassava, 363,512 tons; peanuts,
8327; gabi, 68,311, and other roots 29,745 tons. The aggregate
amount of beans produced amounted to 21,451 tons, of w h i ch
5,573 tons were mongo; cowpeas, 5,446; soy, 3,440, and other,
6,992. Despite this good showing, prices were still high, a
33
Jose Camus, "One Year of Our Food Production Campaign,"
ACIL, Vol. IX, No. 7 (July, 1947), p. 15.
54Ibid.
3 ^J.J. Bunag: "Highlights in Food Production," ACIL.
Vol. X, No. 10 (October, 1948), p. 31.
36
I b i d . (The mongo is a ty^e of bean.)
442
fact ascribed to the activities of middlemen. It was shown,
for example, that the wholesale price of cabbage, in Baguio,
was 8 centavos per kilo. Transportation costs amounted to 2 to
5 centavos per kilo, yet the retail price in Manila was never
be low 50 centavos per kilo.'-*7
The Bureau of Plant Industry conducted research into
the fuller utilization of farm products. Projects were planned
for the utilization of several native fruits for wine; ut i l i z a
tion of kasoy pulp for vinegar; extraction and preservation of
calamansi juice; conversion of native tomato into ketchup;
preservation of mangoes; and soon the Bureau b egan studies of
the quick freezing of fruits and vegetables; studies of dehydra
tion of fruits and vegetables; studies of the utilization of
tobacco wastes for insecticides; further studies of utilization
of fruits for liquors, and studies of extraction of citrus
juices, and the possibilities of popping glutinous, aromatic
rice for breakfast c e r e a l s . ^8
C o n c l u s i o n ;-
Yet the food p r od uction campaign, by 1950, was still
far from its goal. Following the death of President Roxas, the
campaign fell into the background and the Quirino administration,
by 1950, had failed to rejuvenate this most vital aspect of the
n a t i o n ’s economy. With an appropriation of only P=500,000 for
37Ibid.
Philippine Business Guidebook. 1949, p. 143. See
alsos Bureau of Plant Industry, R e p o r t . 1949, pp. 59-62.
443
food production and funds amounting to only .38 per cent for
the plant and animal Industries, the administration seemed
entirely unconscious of the need for solving the basic problems
before it could hope to achieve the goals outlined by President
Q,uirino in his "State of the Nation" and "Budget" messages to
Congress.
It was clear, by 1950, that the future of the Republic
would bedim indeed unless the serious food problem, together
wi th other basic factors in a na ti on which can be characterized
only as agricultural, was faced and solved. Mi li ta ry assistance
loans from the United States, the participation In a "Southeast
Asia Union", establishment and maintenance of import controls
and currency restrictions -- these would have no effect in a
n ation of half-starved, restless and rebellious people. Before
the Republic could hope to achieve prominence in the councils
of the world and stability at home to enable it to face the
challenge of communism sweeping East and Southeast Asia, it has
first to solve its Internal basic economic problems. The words
of Panglosse should form the motto for the Philippine Republic:
"Let us cultivate our garden."
CHAPTER XIV
THE TWO BOWERS
1. The Livestock Industries
The Philippines has available some forty per cent of
its land for grazing purposes, and the Bukidnon highlands of
Mindanao, before the war, was the scene of efforts to produce
cattle on a large scale. This was largely the work of a few
wealthy ranchers, the most prominent of which was the Fortich
family. In 1939, the value of all livestock and poultry was
^142,138,260, of which sum the carabao represented a value of
ir-78 million. (No recent figures are available with regard to
value.) The principal items of importance, following the cara
bao, are: hogs, cattle, chickens, horses, goats, ducks, buf
faloes, sheep, turkeys, pigeons, geese and guinea fowl. The
stocks of each were greatly depleted by the war and this was
a contributory factor in the retarded progress of Philippine
farming in the post-war period.
Animal production was first undertaken by the Govern
ment in 1768, when a Royal Order was promulgated requiring each
family to tend 2 pigs and a flock of 12 chickens. During the
A m e r ic an period, the first steps were taken in 1903, with the
^Livestock was lost,in percentage to prewar population
as follows: carabaos, 47%; horses, 57%; cattle, 80%; h o g s ,
61.5%; chickens, 70%. Report of the Philippines-U.S. A g r i c u l
tural Mission, p. 4. Most of the livestock breeding stations
of the Dept, of Agriculture were also destroyed, in addition to
Its other facilities. It was estimated, by the Department, that
it would require 1*51,830,267 for the rehabilitation of its
p l a n t and equipment. I b i d .. p. 5.
444
445
importation of two Jersey bulls and five Jersey cows, two
Chester White and two Berkshire boars from the United States,
and one Jersey and one Shorthorn bull from Australia. The
origin of the horse is lost in antiquity, some authorities
stating that it was brought from China, some stating that there
had been a native breed in the Philippines f r o m early times,
and others stating that the Spanish first introduced the breed.
Pr om the prese nt characteristics of the breed, many observers
lean toward the China theory since the Filipino horse is of
small s i ze and short-coupled, with other features reminiscent
of the horse to be found in Western China today. However, the
short stature may well be attributable to diet. D u r i n g the
early A m e r ic an period and the Commonwealth, Ar a b i a n stallions
were imported to improve the breed, and this work was stepped
up by the popular interest in the National Charity Sweepstakes.
Local fanciers of horseflesh, as well as followers of the track,
were instrumental in importing Ar a b i a n stallions fr om time to
time. The results of this breeding are interesting in that,
while the offspring possess the beauty and grace of Arabian
ancestors, the stature has remained below 57 inches. The horse
is used largely by calesa owners and almost never for draft p u r
poses. It furnishes a means of transportation in the Mountain
Province where distances are great and roads few. A non
productive function is the races run in Manila and polo--although
the prewar polo enthusiasts (particularly the Elizalde brothers)
have not as yet resumed this sport.
446
The breeding of improved strains of cattle has been
difficult. Despite the efforts of the College of A griculture
of the University of the Philippines, w h ich from the bi bl io
graphy on the subject seems to have done the most work in the
introduction and improvement of foreign breeds, the work has
b e e n proceeding slowly. This is because in every instance in
w h i c h a breed was introduced from a temperate country such as
o
the United States,it did not long survive its introduction.
The breeds were easy prey to diseases, lost weight under the
h i g h humidity, became weak, and eventually died. The most r e
sistant strains came fr om India, particularly the Nellore
breed which were better foragers and more hardy than the native
stock. The Bureau of Animal Industry conducted a campaign to
upgrade the stocks, attempting to retain the blood of the Im
ported stocks and to improve the animals w i t h which they were
bred. Fairly good results were obtained by using the Nellore,
Ayrshire and Sussex breeds. A n e w breed was developed, called
the Philamin, the aim of which Dr. Villegas said was "to blend
into one breed the hardiness, good grazing qualities and r e s i s
tance to disease of the Nellore; the docility, efficiency as
work animals and prolificacy of the Philippine Native; and the
rapid rate of maturity and excellent beef conformation of the
Hereford.
O
Valente Villegas: "Animal Husbandry Investigations
in the Philippines," Bulletin No. 6 . National R e s e a r c h Council,
Annual Report for 1 9 3 4 - 1 9 5 5 , p . 542.
^Villegas, I b i d . . p. 543, quoting Miguel Manresa: "A
quarter century of work on animal improvement," 1934.
447
To further improve cattle, the B u r e a u worked through a
process of br eeding by selection, using for this purpose a dairy
breed, the Scindi, f r om India. To aid In this work, studies
were conducted on forage feeds--the local cogon grasses and
other upland grasses being unsuited for dairy herds (due largely
to the hig h acidic character of such grasses). Feeds fr om corn
and sugar cane tops, prawns (Palaemon lanceifrons Dana, commonly
called shrimp in the Philippines), palay, mongo (a bean), copra
meal, fish meal, snails, etc., have been studied and developed.
A growing body of literature on the subject attests to the
yeoman work carried through by the Bu re au of Animal Industry.
Studies were made on the methods of w eighing and selecting large
farm animals; height, age, weight, conformation of horses in
Laguna and Batangas; the feeding and man ag e me nt of calesa and
race horses on the performance of the latter at the San Lazaro
track; the f e r t i l iz in g value of solid excreta of horses; the
breeding habits of the horse, ox, carabao, sheep, goat, chicken;
the dentition of carabaos and cattle in relation to their age;
the duration of service of work cattle; inheritance of color in
cattle; dairy qualities of native cows and goats; crossing the
zebu w i t h carabao; chemical composition of the milk of native
carabaos and Indian buffaloes; on contro l li ng intestinal parasites
of sheep and goats; growth and m aturity of swine and
chickens; improvement of Philippine swine; the construction
of s t r u c t u r e s and equipment for f a r m
448
animals, etc., etc.^
Similar work has been conducted with regard to chickens,
swine, goats, sheep and other livestock and poultry. Scattered
results have been excellent although the bulk of work remains
yet to be accomplished. A n important portion of the work
devoted to livestock and the animal industry in general is re
search leading to a fuller utilization of animal by-products.
Official Ac t i v i t l e s : -
In December, 1929, the former Bureau of Agriculture was
divided into a Bureau of Animal Industry and a Bureau of Plant
Industry. The latter bureau received all extension personnel.
The ravages of communicable diseases throughout the Islands
soon pointed to the fact that an extension service was most
necess ar y for the Bureau of Animal Industry. On July 1, 1937,
this was organized, with funds to be appropriated under Common
wealth Act No. 118, known as the Livestock Promotion Fund. In
1938, this section was converted into the Livestock Extension
Division. The main purpose of this division was to acquaint
the people with its services and place at their disposal the
results of its research. The Division established a fourteen-
^ I b i d . , p. 545. See also; Bulletin No. 2 . NRC Report
for 1934-35, pp. 36-40; ’’The Livestock Industry in the Philip
p i n e s , ” The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the P h i l i p
pines . 1 9 3 8 - 1 9 3 9 . p p . 197-212; Gregorio San Agustin, nMaking
the Country Self-sufficient in Farm C o mm od it i es ,” The Com
mercial and Industrial Manual of the P h i l i p p i n e s . 1 9 4 1 . p p .
892-894; C a s t i l l o . op. clt.. pp. 237-244; Annual R e p o r t s . Bureau
of Animal Industry, 1934-1941, 1947, and various periodicals
such as the Philippine Journal of C o m m e r c e , Progressive F a r m i n g .
Agricultural-Commercial -Industrial L i f e . etc. It Is hoped that
a bibliography on this and allied subjects will be forthcoming
within the near future.
449
point program;
1. Make a detailed survey of livestock conditions
in each province.
2. Select centers suitable for livestock raising
in connection with extension work.
3. Encourage the establishment of different back
yard units of poultry, swine, and milk goats by m ak i n g
house-to-house visits and by frequent follow-ups to
check...the progress and improvements made.
4. Help those who engage In commercial, backyard
and farm p r o d u c t i o n . ..by guiding them in the selection
.*.oi s t o c k . ...
5. Stimulate the improvement of horse and cattle
r a n c h e s ....
6. Assist the people in the purchase of good l i v e
stock feed and equipment.
7. Help disseminate information to prevent the
spread of animal diseases.
8. Help the people...In selecting and culling stock....
9. Show them the need of k ee pi ng records....
10. Suggest means to improve the marketing of l i v e
stock, poultry and animal products.
11. Deliver lectures in community assemblies or by
radio to keep the people in touch w i t h the progress in
animal science....
12. Participate in livestock exhibits in nation,
provincial, and municipal fairs....
13. Distribute pamphlets and other printed matters....
14. In general, to help increase the income and thus
enable the people to make homes, especially f a r m homes,
more pleasant to live in.5
The Division was partly successful in some parts of this
program, but m u c h remains to be done, and the road is difficult.
During the Commonwealth period, the Government aided the in dus
try, largely by providing the authority and facilities ne ed ed by
the Department of Agriculture an d Its subsidiary bureaus. Some
measures were questionable with regard to long-range development.
For example, on July 29, 1936, the Secretary to President Quezon,
5llThe Livestock Industry in the Ph il ippines,1* The C o m -
mercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines. 1 9 3 8 - 1 9 & 9 .
pp. 211-212.
450
Jorge B. Vargas, transmitted a memorandum to the Secretary of
Agriculture and Commerce, in which he expressed the desire
that small landholdings be interspersed between large areas of
public land used as pasture. The reason was, he said, to
"prevent the pasture permittees or leasees from extending
their h o l d i n g s .. .in violations of the area requirements on
the Public Land Law and the Forest Law and also to provide
available areas for small pasture landholders." Since normal
requirements for grazing per head demand at least one and a
half hectares of land (improved land could support an average
of one and a half head per hectare), this restriction would
limit, to the detriment of the industry, its proper development.
The land laws of the Philippines, while laudable in
intention, too often defeat the various programs for the
development of the Philippine economy drawn up by private as
well as governmental parties. Commonwealth Act No. 100
authorized the Director of Forestry with the approval of the
Secretary of Agriculture and Commerce, to lease forest lands
or vacant public lands "not declared agricultural land" to
the amount of two thousand hectares for pasture land.7 On
June 21, 1938, an Animal Utilization Service was created in
the Bureau of Animal Industry, to further strengthen its
6M . 0 . P . . Vol. 2, Pt. 1, p. 423.
7,1A n Act to further amend section 1838 of Act No. 2711
known as the Revised Administrative Code as amended by Act No.
3820," First National Assembly. First Session, M.O.P., Vol. 2.
Pt. 2, pp. 773-774. October 28, 1936.
451
extension service and aid in the widening of far m income.® On
June 8, 1939, 1*500,000 was appropriated for the promotion of
the livestock industry, authorizing the Director of Animal
Industry to "equip, maintain, and operate br eeding stations
and stock farms...and to carry on compulsory castration of
undesirable livestock unfit for breeding purposes."®
The same day, the National Assembly, passed the Pasture
Land Act, which assessed a rental of three p er ce n t u m of the
appraised value of the land, for not more than two thousand
hectares, applicable only to Philippine citizens or corporations,
sixty per cent of the stock of w hich belonged to Philippine
citizens. Su ch leases were to run for twenty-five years, r e n e w
able for an additional twenty-five years. At the expiration of
the required time-limit, "all immovable and other permanent
improvements made on the land" were to revert to the Government.
The disposition of such lands was placed under the Director of
Forestry.-1-® On the day of the passage of these two acts,
President Quezon sent a letter to the Secretary of Agriculture
and Commerce stating that "no steps be taken to carry out the
provisions of this law without the previous approval of my
Office.Truly, the ways of the powerful are strange I
®CA No. 340, First National Assembly, 4th Special
Session, M . O , P .. Vol. 4, Pt. 2, pp. 902-903.
9
CA No. 450, Second National Assembly, First Session,
M . O . P .. Vol. 5, Pt. 2, p. 458.
-*-®CA No. 452, Second National Assembly, First Session,
I b i d . . pp. 462-465.
.P.P.. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 402, italics supplied.
452
The final step of the National Assembly, before the
war, was the passage of an act requiring the b r a n di n g of all
cattle privately owned. Itprovided that "large cattle kept by
the National Government need not be branded or registered,"
and all large cattle in private hands should be branded and
registered, except those Imported for immediate slaughter.
A primary reason for this act lay in the activity of cattle
rustlers, who were causing serious depletion of some stocks,with
no method available for proving the theft or for recovery.3-2
The war was particularly destructive of livestock since
the Japanese lived off the land as m u c h as possible, a n d
there was no importation of foreign food stuffs. At the end of
the war, the people were destitute, and a critical situation
existed In the absence of work animals as well as food stock.
Through the heroic efforts of Professor Carlos X. Burgos, Chief
of the Livestock Extension Service, important steps were taken
in the rehabilitation of the industry. Dr. Burgos as soon as
possible following the end of hostilities, journeyed to the
United States and on December 29, 1946, through the aid of the
Philippine Purchasing Agency, he sent the first post-war ship
ment of 84 Berkshire hogs. Airborne chicks were brought in by
the hundreds of thousands on January 18, 1947, and 76 Berkshires
out of 84 arrived on the SS Marine S t a r . On M a rc h 7, 1947, the
SS St. Angelo Victory unloaded about 200 Berkshires and Duroc-
1 2CA No. 632, Official G a z e t t e . Vol. 40, No. 1 (July 5,
1941), pp. 52-53.
453
Jerseys, 100 goats, 40 sheep and 40 broad-breasted turkeys.
These were followed by scores of Poland Chinas and a dozen
Hampshires on the SS V i t o , The freighter h e w Zealand V i c t o r y ,
on April 5 brought pigs and gamecocks. L ea ving America, after
his purchasing mission, Professor Burgos brought wi th h i m pigs,
rabbits, a prize Hereford bull, goats and an A r ab ia n stallion.
Dr. Estafano C. Farinas, of the Bureau, was sent to India and
purchased there Red Scindi and Tharpakar cattle and Murrah
buffaloes.
Additional shipments were brought from Australia. The
Bureau requested an allotment of 1*5,000,000 for the importation
of breeding stocks, and received §=500,000 (the usual meagre
response of the Government to the agencies devoted to solving
Philippine economic problems.) As of September, 1947, this
sum was sufficient to buy only 100,000 day-old chicks, 284 head
of cattle, 50 buffaloes, 869 pigs, and a few other animals.
Many attempts have been made b y the Bureau to improve
the swine in the country, with particular emphasis on native
stocks. However, these hogs are allowed their freedom and are
penned only before killing, the result of which is the transmit
tal of trichinosis and other diseases. The finest por k in the
Philippines, excepting imported breeds, is to be secured on
the island of Palawan, where large numbers of wi ld pigs subsist
in the countryside, largely on fruits. The only individuals
1^
Celso Dans j "The Long Voyage H o m e , 1' E v e n i n g Mews
Saturday M a g a z i n e . Vol. II, No. 51 (September 13, 1947), p. 29.
454
who obtain the benefits from these excellent pigs are the
inhabitants of the island and the few sportsmen who journey
there for that purpose.
The number of chickens is great. Eggs are small because
a great portion of the breeding has been confined to a small,
tough chicken which has more value as a combatant than for the
diet of the farmers. Additional stocks, introduced by the
government, have raised the quality of many chickens and some
produced in the Mountain Province from Rhode Island Red strains,
thrive particularly well and provide a welcome addition to the
diet of those fortunate enough to secure them. During 1947-48,
590 chicken projects wit h 47,779 purebred and grade chickens
were established, and a large scale production of eggs is now
being carried through in Bulacan and RIzal provinces. For
breeding purposes, during the same period, the Bureau of Animal
Industry loaned to farmers 22 bulls, 5 bucks, and 550 boars.
From the 9,453 breeding services of the latter, 22,629 pigs were
produced, and granting that each pig gained a value of 3^15.00,
the Bureau gave to the people ^339,430 worth of pork during that
period. Over 600,000 head of animals were vaccinated during
the same period and a total of 959,429 doses of fourteen kinds
of veterinary biologic&Ls and chemical preparations were dis
seminated. A survey showed that 20 provinces had sufficient
stocks of carabaos, 15 experienced shortages, and 5 had surplus.
The strict enforcement of Republic Act No. 11, p rohibiting the
slaughter of carabaos still fit for work and bree di ng purposes,
455
aided greatly in increasing the stock of this invaluable animal.1^
C o n c l u s i o n ;-
The increase in the livestock industry will benefit the
country in two ways: it will reduce the enormous sums spent
for imported foodstuffs and raise the standard of living of
farmers engaged in the industry. The Joint Agricultural Mission
in 1947 observed that farmers "who no rmally include livestock
in their farming program, appeared to have better homes and a
higher level of living than was common e l s e w h e r e • It sugges
ted that the "dairy industry and the production of other live
stock products" should receive special consideration from the
Government to aid in the reduction of several millions of pesos
in import items. The Mission suggested five objects:
(1) To increase support for the livestock-
improvement pr o g r a m of the Bureau of Animal Industry
and the animal-breeding progr am at the College of A g r i
culture; (2) to institute a pr ogram of research on
pasture and range development and management; (3) to
encourage private breeding work in order to make a v a i l
able larger numbers of superior livestock for breeding
purposes than can be supplied by the Government; (4) to
expand research and extension programs on the control
of insects and diseases, particularly on cattle ticks;
the development and use of minerals in livestock feeding;
and in the use of molasses, copra meal, etc., in feeding
both on the range and in the feed lots; and (5) to study
the possibilities of canning m e a t . 16
As we have mentioned above, the Government by 19 50 had
failed to implement the p r o g r a m recommended by the R e p o r t .
l^Vicente Ferriols: "important Post Liberation A c c o m p l i s h
ments of the Bureau of Animal Industry, A C I L . Vol. X. No. 10
(October, 1948), p. 14. See also: Alfonso L e c a r o s : The Need to
Rehabilitate Cattle Raising," The Evening News (Supplement), Vol.
5, No. 6 (September 30, 1949), p. 6.
15Report. p. 20. 16Ibld.. p. 21.
N
ti -
- 4?(.-a
LEGEND U. S. C O A S T AND GEODETIC SURVEY
PHILIP PINE I S L A N D S
MEMMGSAMD
mackerels
t
H P 1 MINOR S I A PRODUCTS
® Jm ?A r t N K i S . P EA R LS
SPORT PIS H E S
(SAN. PISM. t w o s o P m ,
u u m u i . SPANISH
• M C H iS lL S . tA V A U A S ) CP
G O BIES A N D
OO BV PRY
MULLETS
C R O A K E R S AND
GRUNTS
<s> FRESHW ATER
C A T R IS H E S
G O B P IS H
PONDS)
ROUNDscads
SEAWEEDS
(ij)^S_TUATLE
456 *k
2. The F i sh in g Industry
The Republic of the Philippines is composed of 7,083
islands, containing about 115,000 square miles having a co ast
line of about 11,444 miles (slightly less than that of the
United States). The territorial waters of the Philippines
contain about 705,000 square miles, or about six times the total
land area. These waters are inhabited by about 2,000 kinds of
fishes, one-tenth the total known fishes in the world. These
fish are sufficiently large and abundant (until recently in
some parts) to have great commercial and industrial p o s s i b i
lities. They range in size f r o m the smallest fish in the world
found in a lake In Camarines Sur province (sinarapan, L. B u h i )
to the great aquatic mammal, the whale, sometimes found in
Philippine waters.
One of the favorite and most important f is h is the so-
called milkfish, kn own to the people as b a n g o s . It represents
an important element in the diet of those who can afford it and
more than 58,000 hectares of foreshore land is devoted to its
culture, representing, in 1939, an Investment of over 1*60,000,000.
Anchovies are caught in great numbers especially off Samar and
Mindanao and are called d i l i s . They are sold largely in the
l^Since whales have been considered long extinct in
the Philippines, for the benefit of the sceptical, the author
can supply proof of having seen two whales in the waters off
the southern shore of the Island of Luzon near the Island of
Burias, the last week of July, 1948, aboard the De La Rama
ship Doha Anicefca. The Second Officer, Mr. Salih, and Mr.
Stig Nordberg, of the Swedish East Asiatic lines, Gothenburg,
Sweden, were with the author at the time.
457
form of a salted product known locally as b a g o o n g . Some twenty
species of sardines and herring are caught in large quantities,
but are eaten largely in the cured and dried state be ing known
locally as tuyo and t i n a p a . The mackerel is very important as
food and game, local varieties known as hasa-hasa and alumahan
being moderate in size and found in large schools. The ta ng i n g u e .
also a mackerel, is quite large and is undoubtedly one of the
greatest game fishes In the world. The sea bass, or grouper,
known locally as l a p u - l a p u , is found in great size and forms
an important item for all banquets and special occasions. The
snapper, known by various names (such as m a y a - m a y a , iso or a l s o .
dolesan and b a m b a n g i n ) . is widely distributed and in prewar
years was caught by Filipinos with native gear and by the
Japanese with the beam-trawl and "muroami" nets. The pampano
family, including the talakitok of local importance, is a
first-class fish for the table and is an exciting game fish
generally encountered in the ocean.
The l o c k - b r e a k e r s , or barracudas, are widely distributed,
are great fighters and favorite food and are a danger to the
unwary reef swimmer, although they are generally found In open
sea in large schools. The mullet (known as a l i g a s i n . banak
balanak, a g u a s ) is an excellent food b e i n g largely free of
bones and is found generally in fresh and brac ki sh water. The
tunas, which include the bonito, skip-jack, yellowfin and
albacore, are strong, carnivorous pelagic fish (known locally
as tulifigan). are found In enormous quantities off the Davao
coast near the great Mindanao Deep, and have great industry
No 3082 r *-.i a
MAJOR SPORTFISHING AREAS PHILIPPINE ISLANDS
U. S. C O A S T AND GEODETIC SURVEY
SPORTFISHING AREAS
I CASIGURAN PENN.
PHILI P P I N E I S L A N D S
E POLILLO IS.
3 FORTUNE is! B SIMO BANKS
4 LEGASPI PENN
9 GATO, CHOCOLATE. CARNASA IS
• LEYTE GULF
T MALAMPAYA SOUND
6 TUBATAHA REEF
9 CAGAYAN IS
10 TAWITAWI. SIBUTU IS.
II JOLO IS. 1
IE SARANGANI IS
; Iy .
458 -lo
possibilities for table use, both fresh and canned.
Others, such as the slipmouths, surgeon fishes, gobies,
dorabs, catfish, are found in great numbers in all the waters
surrounding the islands, in addition to a great abundance of
sharks, ranging from the small sand sharks to the fierce tiger,
leopard and hammer-head, all dreaded by the pearl diver in the
Sulu Sea.
The waters surrounding the Philippines offer the best
game fishing in the world, Dean Worcester calling them a
fisherman's paradise. Most game fishing has been done by trol
ling from small launches or from sailing bancas using a spoon
hook. A small but enthusiastic group of sport fishermen,
organized into a rather informal club, represent the only
major group devoted to this sport. Most of their activities
are confined to the waters in and around Manila Bay, but
occasionally they make a journey to the greatest game fishing
waters in the world -- San Bernardino Straits and the bays off
1Q
Legaspi. ° Sailfish, measuring as much as nine feet in length,
and swordfish w eighing as much as five hundred pounds, have
been hooked in the waters around Al bay Gulf. To sportsmen who
have fished in the famous waters off Florida and Bermuda, the
waters and fish of the Philippines offer a real challenge.
Since game fish are not disturbed by the all-too-prevalent
I®The aubhor had the thrilling experience of watching a
school of blue ma rl in sporting in the waters off San Bernardino
Strait, one of the rare experiences that can come to man. Seven
or eightfin the excitement of the moment It was Impossible to
make an accurate count) plunged and leaped about forty feet from
the side of the ship, one monster in particular leaping into the
air at least twenty vertical feet. They ranged in length from
six or seven feet to over fifteen, and the beauty of their p o w e r
ful grace was never to be forgotten.
459
dynamiting, they offer opportunities for years to come to those
who enjoy seeing the best that nature offers at the end of a
rod and line.^9
Since so mu ch of the livelihood of the people is
dependent upon the sea, the Filipinos have developed a wide
variety of gear and methods for fishing. Much of It is unsuited
to commercial fishing on a large scale and the Bureau of
Fisheries has devoted m u c h time and energy to the question of
new and efficient methods of catching, preserving, and culture.
Oysters are also widely distributed (there b e i ng twenty-three
known species, four of w h i c h are of economic importance) and
the Bureau has attempted to educate the people in the proper
methods of culture and preparation. By-products as well as
pearl fishing, medicinal and edible s e a w e e d s , trepang, turtle
and tortoise shell, and sponges are all of some economic
importance in the economy.
Problems of the I n d u s t r y t-
The major problems of the fishing industry fall general
ly under two heads: during pre-war years it was conducted on a
"folk" basis, and in post-war years It suffered at the hands of
monopolists.
At the opening of the Commonwealth period, there were
19
D ea n C. Worcester and former Governor-General W.C.
Forbes initiated game fishing in the Philippines and Worcester
has an excellent chapter on the subject (Chapter XXVII, 1930).
Enthusiasts are u rg ed to write the Bureau of Fisheries, Manila,
as to the best locations and optimum months for sport fishing.
460
but 1,000 licensed fishermen in the Philippines (contrasting
sharply w i t h the 1,483,000, in Japan), with 150 boats engaged
In off-shore and deep-sea fishing (while, at the same time in
Japan, there were 361,000 of such boats). Capital, too, was
small; it was estimated that at this same period, Japan had
more than 48,000,000 pesos Invested in its fishing indus
try (or over 1=0.68 per capita) whereas in the Philippines
there was less than 2,000,000 pesos so invested (or less than
10.13 per capita). Despite the continuous growth in p op u l a
tion, the former methods of fishing had not changed, with old
implements which were inefficient as well as destructive being
used over and over again in the same waters that had provided
fish in diminishing numbers for many hundred of years. As a
result, many bays, rivers and lakes, formerly well supplied with
fish life were p ractically depleted; this was due not only to
the over-fishing but to a lack of knowledge of matters a f f e c t
ing conservation as well as to the almost universal disregard
20
for official rules and regulations aimed at preventing depletion.
^°Since “comparisons are invidious" it might be well
to point out that the difference in investment b et we en Japan
and the Philippines would be little affected by establishing
a point with regard to the difference in population, nature of
government or industry of the peoples. Despite the large sub
sidies provided by the Japanese Government, at no time during
the period 1934-1941, did they have available in "hard" cur
rency the funds the Philippines received as a result of the
coconut oil excise tax. Too, the figure referred to here was
that of private investment since official p ar ticipation in the
industry, on the part of the Japanese Government, was largely
in the nature of intelligence surveys of the Navy. It is true
that it is rather difficult to separate "private" investments
from official "subsidies" during this period but it seems
reasonable to state that the result of the comparison made is
not injudicious as a characterization of the emphasis toward
a basic industry important Internally and externally.
461
The problems of proper fish handling, transportation
and prese rv at io n were acute demanding immediate and definite
action. In addition, while along the coastal towns fish sup
plies were generally available in one quantity or another, the
interior towns and districts subsisted largely on either canned,
imported fish or locally dried fish. Proper refrigeration
facilities as well as proper handling and transportation would
eliminate the shortage of fresh fish in those areas badly
needing this important protein food. Hilario A. Roxas, then
Chief of the Pish and Game Administration, Bureau of Science,
in 1937, called the attention of the Government to many of these
problems and suggested that the Government create a central
agency w h i c h should have two aims: the p l a c i n g of the a d m in is
tration of fishery resources on a "basis of established facts"
and to coordinate the direction of various enterprises "so that
all shall be wisely and harmoniously developed, av oi di n g the
p romotion of any of them to the detriment of others." Dr. Roxas,
immediately before the .iar, felt that the possibilities of the
country ever produ ci ng enough fis h were h i g h l y problematical al-
21
though, if an energetic p r o g r a m was established, not impossible.
To develop the industry further, m od e r n and sanitary
units for salting, drying, smoking and p i c k li ng fish were needed
in those areas of abundant supply as well as factories for the
u ti li za ti on of f i s h by-products such as fi sh meal, oil and
fertilizer. All these have been barely begun. It is a sad fact
pi
The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Phi li p
p i n e s . 1 9 3 7 - 1 9 5 8 . p. 329, 1 9 4 1 . pp. 870-872.
462
that by the end of the Commonwealth period, immediately prior
to the War, few changes for the better had taken place.
O fficial A c t i v i t i e s :-
In 1957, the total annual consumption of fresh fish was
approximately 959,719,230 kilograms; based on a mi n i m u m price
of ten centavos per kilo, this represented 1*95,271,923. In
addition, the country imported 1*3,152,196 w o r t h of fish and
fish products since p ro duction was Insufficient to meet the
demand.22 Prewar fishing was not on a commercial scale outside
the Japanese ventures in the Islands, As in most other aspects
of Philippine economy, fishing on a "folk” basis, represented
the occupation of a few to support their own needs. If a
surplus existed, it was sold in the market, but an industry as
such did not exist until after the War. The growth of the
post-war industry was due almost entirely to dy n amiting which,
while highly profitable, was wasteful and damaging to the
ultimate development of the industry. As pointed out by Dr.
Roxas, even in the p re -w ar years the fishing p r o b l e m was not a
happy one with the constant depletion of resources growing apace.23
On February 1, 1933, the F i s h and Game Ad mi ni stration
was organized as a distinct agency u nder the De partment of
Agriculture and Commerce. It took over the work of the Division
of Forest, Fauna and G ra zi ng of the Bureau of Forestry, with
2 2 I b i d . . p. 328; 1 9 3 8 - 1 9 5 9 . p. 212. The average y e a r
ly importation for thirty-three years was 3*2,343,015.
2 3 Loc. cit.
463
regard to the conservation of wildlife. The Fi sh and Game
A dmin is tr a ti on operated under the prov is io n s of Act No. 4 0 0 3
(known as the Fisheries Act), and Act No. 2 5 9 0 , as amended,
entitled "An Act for the protection of game and fish. On
September 1 7 , 1 9 3 4 , this A dm in istration was placed under the
B ureau of Science.
The Fisheries Act ( 4 0 0 3 ) divided the national fisheries
into three sections; insular, municipal, and reserve. Since
the Philippines is an island nation, most of the fisheries came
under the administration of municipalities and, despite the
fact that the Government shouldered the expenses of promoting
the industry, the bodies charged w i t h carrying out the necessary
measures were powerless, Dr. Villadolid said, to "prevent
wasteful and destructive methods of exploitation of our aquatic
resources because of the dual auth or it y. "^ 4 He continued by
saying: "A centralized control and ad mi ni stration of our
fishery resources is the best remedy for the apparent anomalous
situation."^5 To achieve this, the Second National Assembly,
First Session, passed two acts; No. 4 7 1 , amending 4 0 0 3 , empower
ing the Secretary of Agriculture and Commerce to "issue instruc
tions, orders, rules and r e g u l a t i o n s . . .as may be neces s ar y and
p r o p e r ...." an{j 4 9 1 ^ amending 2 5 9 0 , empowering the same
07
individual to protect game fish.
24 it
Deogracias V. Villadolid; Government Activities in
the Promotion of Philippine F i s h e r i e s , " I b i d . . p. 3 3 0 g Dr.
Villadolid is now D irector of the Bureau of Fisheries.
25Ibid. 26M . 0 . F . . Vol. V, Pt. 2, p. 88.
2 7 ibid.. pp. 951-955.
464
The Secretary was given power to deputize additional
personnel to carry out the provisions of the a c t and enforcing
agencies were widened to include the Philippine Constabulary,
municipal district police, secret service men, the customs,
internal revenue, officers of the coast guard cutters, light
house keepers and "other competent officials" "as might be
designated in writing by the Secretary of Agriculture and Com
merce." It specifically prohibited dynamiting, except for
certain specific purposes, to be determined by the Secretary,
and established penalties for the possession and sale of dynamited
p p
fish as well as establishing fees and licenses for fishing.
In spite of the difficulties due to lack of adequate
personnel, the old Insular government had encouraged its p e r s o n
nel in planning and executing programs that would be of ultimate
benefit to the nation. In the Philippines, as in any country,
a Government bureau is only as efficient and vigorous as its
director, and the Philippines was fortunate in having as
directors of its Bureau of Fisheries extraordinarily able men,
during the American period, the Commonwealth and the Republic.
^®It had been pointed out by Dr. Hilario Roxas that Act
No. 4003 had serious defects in the protection of fi sh and game,
and had the particular defect of giving authority to municipal
councils to impose taxes on fishing. This, he said, brought
about grave abuses, and he pointed to the fact that, in many
places, the councils had pl ac ed a tax of 1*200 a quarter for one
f is hing boat. This placed such a burden upon the individual
fisherman that he was forced to use dynamite to rega in even the
cost of his license. He also pointed to the great lack of
wardens, there being at that time only 10 provincial wardens to
cover the entire Philippines--a patent impossibility. P J C . Vol.
XIV, No. 2 (February, 1938), p. 10. This situation had not im
proved to any great extent in the early years of the Republic.
465
The fact that the fisheries program fell short of the goals
these men established was not due to any lack of ability or
planning. It is generally true In the Philippines that if able
men are appointed to important Government bureaus, these bureaus
function well. Failures are due to two other factors beyond
the control of many directors: lack of understanding on the
part of the National Assembly and the Congress, and the con
sequent lack of appropriations ; and, secondly, the use by
individuals in the Government of the various bureaus as political
footballs. In too many instances during the Republic, for
instance, were bureau directors hampered by the appointment of
protegees and untrained constituents. Indeed, it is difficult
for the observer to point to any bureau du ri ng the early years
of the Republic which was not overloaded with "dead" personnel.
In many cases this became too m u c h of a millstone for efficient
operations of the bureaus concerned, with the disastrous results
in managing the economy of the nati on so m u c h discussed,
deplored and protested by Philippine n e ws me n and observers of
all political casts and affiliation. A large proportion of the
work accomplished was done so despite r a n d o m appointments or
was the result of the m o m e n t u m of a p r o gr am w h i c h carried
through until Inertia set in. '
While the Bureau of Fisheries failed to receive all the
help needed for an optimum program, they carried through as best
they might on various projects, with more or less success.
Fish farms, for experimental purposes, were opened as funds
466
permitted, one important one b eing located at the Estancia
Station in one of the richest centers of the Visayas. Another
Pish Preservation Station was opened, in 1934, at Catbalogan,
Samar, and various regulations established by the F i s h and Game
Administration were enforced as funds permitted to protect
y oung and breeding fish.
The Bureau of Science continued to add to its ichthyo-
logical collection, having in the early years of the Commonwealth
no less than 1,700 distinct species and about 100 specimens of
economic crustaceans. Some surveys of fishing banks were u n d e r
taken and investigations were conducted into fishing methods
so that further regulatory measures for pres er va ti on could be
established. Sources of water pollution were examined. In
addition, the Bureau of Science as funds permitted from time to
time, introduced n e w species, such as ornamental fish, carp
and gourami (in the years immediately preceding the Commonwealth).
The Bureau of Science conducted experiments in the production
of milkfish as well as various varieties of oysters, mullet,
shrimp, crabs, and edible seaweed.
All the activities with w h ic h the Bu r e a u of F'Isherles
was charged were financed from a fund of but !*100,000, ap pro
p ri ated by the National Assembly annually, f r o m funds accruing
to the Treasury through fines and forfeited bonds. This
meagre appropriation was to accomplish the f o ll ow in g ends:
scientific and economic r e s e ar ch relative to fishes, sponges
and other resources; the "diffusion of knowledge" among fishermen;
467
the study, improvement and propagation of fishes and aquatic
resources; the establishment, maintenance and operation of
experimental stations, farms, aquariums, and fish culture
laboratories; for all other purposes the object of wh ich was
to foster, propagate and protect fishes, shells, sponges and
other resources. The fund would be available, also, for: the
construction, maintenance and repair of buildings, vessels, dams
and other necessary structures; the leasing, purchase or r e
servation of necessary land and buildings; the purchase of
apparatus, instruments, chemicals, supplies and other necessary
material; the salaries, wages and traveling expenses of the
necessary personnel, and such other expenses as were deemed
necessary "to carry out the purposes of this Act in an effective
and adequate manner: P r o v i d e d . that any unexpended balance of
the fund collected and herein appropriated at the end of each
year shall not revert to the National Treasury but shall be
used for the purposes for w hi ch it was ap pr op ri at ed ." ^ 9 All
this on f a 00,000!
We have said that the second major p r o b l e m was the
control of the industry b y monopolists. This is clearly shown
in p ost-war activities within the industry. Since dynamiting
was the great danger facing the industry, the Dir ec to r of the
Bureau of Fisheries (Deogracias V. Villadolid) conducted an
intensive campaign to eradicate this destructive practice.
pQ
^ C o m m o n w e a l t h Act No. 471, Second National Assembly,
First Session, M . O . P .. Vol. 5, Pt. II, p. 899. Approved,
June 16, 1959.
468
Progress was slow. Individual fishermen were at the mercy of
those controlling the distribution of fish in markets, who
demanded large stocks which were to be obtained by any means.
Since these individuals controlled all nets and equipment, as
well as explosives, and since the price of fish paid to the
f ishermen was very low, the latter were entirely dependent
upon the capitalist who would supply these materials and then
direct his work. Individuals who attempted to compete were
driven out, one particular instance being two veterans who
p urchased an airplane, refrige ra ti ng facilities in Albay, and
subsidized individual fishermen. As soon as their shipments
reached respectable p r o p o r t i o n s , they found the markets closed
to their.fish w hich rotted on their hands. They were forced to
sell their equipment at exceedingly low prices, quit the i n d u s
try, desert their fishermen--thus strengthening the hold of the
fishing czar over the entire supply of fish for the Manila and
Luzon markets.
In attempting to control dynamiting, the Bureau of
Fisheries made many arrests, only to see the culprits go free
or be let off with light fines. Sums involved were large,
profits were great, and fines were no protection for the indus
try. The major violators of the fishing laws were well known,
but action seemed difficult to obtain, and It was the general
impression that these individuals were well protected. The
number of licensed fishermen steadily declined, in the years
after 1947, when there were some 7,000. It had fallen, in 1949,
469
for Instance, to 4,430, the majority of w h o m in L uzon were
controlled by one man. Investments In fishing boats of over
three tons increased, and were valued at ^4,137,298, in the
same year.
The rehabilitation of the fishing industry procee de d
slowly. The problem was acute since the po pulation was in dire
need of this important source of protein. Their fishing boats
had been sunk in the War, fish-ponds were neglected, nets and
other equipment destroyed. In July, 1946, the Philippine
Institute of Fisheries Technology was established to train men
and women in the various techniques and phases of the industry.
The Government appropriated 1*400,000 annually for this purpose.
In three years, the Institute graduated sixty-eight; fifty-five
were granted scholarships to study in the Un it ed States (in
cooperation with the U.3. F i s h and Wildlife Service, which did
y e o m a n service in the Philippines, particularly after L i b e r a
tion) ; and some of these trained Individuals are n o w serving
the Government In many fields.
A demonstration school for fisheries was established at
Catbalogan, Samar, a n d Republic Act No. 412 authorized the
establishment of a similar school in Tabaco, Albay. The co
operation between the Philippine Fishery Program and the U.S.
Wildlife Service was of tremendous importance to the Philippine
economy. Ne w fishing grounds were discovered, n e w methods of
30
Figures kindly supplied by Mr. J. Montilla, Bureau of
Fisheries.
470
capture were demonstrated, and some experiments were successful
ly completed with regard to the economic utilization of fish and
by-products. The Uni te d States Government, by 1 9 5 0 , had sent
1 0 1 students to the United States for training; b y that year,
forty-three had returned, of wh om twenty-six were employed In
the Bureau of Fisheries, seven in the U.S. Fi sh and Wildlife
Service, and eight with private companies as master fishermen
and technologists.
Efforts continued to be made to stamp out dynamiting,
and a bill was Introduced in Congress (S. 3 8 4 ) p ro vi d i n g heavy
penalties for this practice. By 1 9 5 0 , the House had yet to act
on the bill, which was of the most vital n ec es si ty if the Philip
pine Fishery Program was to meet w i t h success. It was hoped
that the appropriation for this vital bu re au would be doubled
in succeeding budgets, but the pu blication of the 1 9 5 1 Budget
gave little encouragement to those interested in the sound
development of the Philippine fishing i n d u s t r y . 31
31
AA measure which would be of great benefit to the
Philippines would be the extension of the period of service of
the U.S. Fis h and Wildlife Service, whose term of service was
to expire, July, 1 9 5 0 .
CHAPTER XV
NUTRITION A N D PUBLIC HEALTH
The progress of the country rests not only on a c hi ev e
ments in economic affairs but upon the general standard of
public health. It has been a common error of Amer ic a n observers
to assume that the Philippines, wit h its '’h i g h ” standard of
living, has had a satisfactory health standard. Advances have
bee n made over conditions existing in 1898, but they are far
from satisfactory. A 1949 survey by the United Nations shows
that the Philippines in 1939 was only on a par, in h e a l t h
standards, wi th the rest of Asia.l The advance in control of
epidemics has been notable, but basic nutritional problems
have yet to be solved to the satisfaction of the Philippine In
stitute of Nutrition. Public he al t h has been in the hands of
bo th governmental and private agencies. A m on g the public
entitles are the Bureau of Health, the Bureau of Quarantine
Service, the Philippine General Hospital, and the Bureau of
Public Welfare. A m on g the semi-public and private o r g a n i z a
tions, the most prominent arej the Philippine An ti - Tuberculosis
Society, the Philippine National Red Cross, the National Federa
tion of Wonen's Clubs, and the A s s o c ia ci on de Damas Filipinas.
On January 2, 1934, the first health center was
^Peter K i h s s : "Food and Pe o p l e , ” Current A f f a i r s .
No. 86, August 6, 1949, (A UNESCO Project), London, Map,
pp. 10-11.
471
472
established in Manila, followed in 1936 by two others in Manila,
one in Iloilo, one in Cebu, four in Negros Occidental, and one
in Zamboanga.2 In 1936, there were 154 hospitals in the Philip
pines, 54 of w hich were maintained by private organizations, 93
by the Government and 7 supported by the U.S. Government. The
number of beds available was 9,782. Out of this total, 4,429
were general and 5,553 special. The number of beds per 1000
population, therefore, was 0.34, or one bed for each 3,000 of
population.^ As a result of this inadequacy, Dr. Jose Fabella
has stated, "over 60 per cent of all deaths occur without proper
i»4
medical assistance." A sanatorium for the treatment of tuber
culosis, a great destroyer in the Philippines, was erected In
the suburbs of Manila with provision of 300 beds. Since the
annual deaths fr om tuberculosis amounted to over 30,000 (in 1936),
the p r ob le m is self-evident. Facilities for the treatment and
care of the insane were scanty, provi di ng for the care of but
1,000. Leprosaria were established in Manila, one in Albay, one
in Iloilo, one in Cebu, one in Zamboanga, and one each in
Lanao and Jolo, in a ddition to the main colony at Culion.^
The inadequacy of funds was the greatest handicap to
the solution of health problems, municipalities allotting but 5
or 10 per cent of their general funds for he al th work. This was
supplemented (theoretically) by an equal amount from the
2Dr. Jose Fabella: "Public Welfare." The Philippine
F o r u m . Vol. I, No. 4 (March, 1936), p. 43.
5 Ibid. 4 I b l d . . p. 44. 5Ibld.
473
Provincial government and represented the total amount for
h ealth in the province.® Dr. Fabella concluded that "unless,
therefore, a more stable fund is made available, centralized
and placed under the direct control of the insular authorities,
no effective health work can be o bt ained."7 The Government
appropriated an average of P 3 million annually for h ea l t h work,
supplemented by an additional 1*1,500,000 from the provinces but
Dr. Fabella stated "the ideal amount that should be made a v a i l
able is 1*9 ,000,000."8 One of the complicating factors in the
hospital p r o g r a m of the country was the initial reluctance of
provincial people to go to the hospital when they needed
attention. The educational work carried on through the Common
we al th period by various Government entities bore fruit after
Liberation. The great response n o w is a severe burden on the
national he a l t h service since 90 per cent of all cases are
charity in the Government h os p i t a l s . 9
The death rate in 1896, 34.60 per 1,000, was reduced
by 1934 to 25.49; infant mortality, 421.69 per 1,000 to 150.19.
As result of increasing health facilities, as well as the
natural vigor of the population, the popu la ti on increased from
a bare six million in 1896 to 13,099,405 In 1934, and 19,000,000,
in 1949. All elements need greater health services, however.
Miners, for instance, are susceptible to hookworm, w h i c h can
only enter the system through the foot. With proper foot protection
and disposal of human waste this disease could easily be
6I b i d .. p. 47. 7 I b i d . . p. 48. 8 Ibid.
^ r o m a conversation with the Director of Hospitals, May.
1949.
474
eradicated from this one group. Mu ch of the population is
infested with intestinal parasites w hich are introduced through
polluted water or infected foods. Sanitary toilet facilities
are conspicuous by their absence, largely because of the absence
of running water in most localities.
Malaria is also a great destroyer in the Philippines,
annual deaths amounting to some 10,000. At a prewar evalua
tion of fifty centavos per work-day, the loss to the nation fran
this cause in terms only of money was ^ 2 0 m i l l i o n . ^ Certain
sections of Mindoro, for example, have bee n practically u n
inhabitable because of this disease. A study conducted In the
Naujan-Calapan area of Eastern Mindoro disclosed that malaria
had caused more deaths than any other prevalent disease in the
preceding five years. It was found that no home was free f r o m
the disease, and that It was the real hindrance to the a g r i
cultural development of that portion of Mindoro. Homeseekers
were forced to sell their holdings at great losses when they
were no longer able to endure its ravages. Despite the proximity
of that region to a heavily populated area of southern Luzon,
the entire area was spar se l y populated. The disease was found
to be hyper-endemic in the Naujan-Ca la pa n plain, traversed by a
first-class road. Of the 55 families surveyed (comprising 305
persons), who had migrated to that region either on their own
■^°Dr. Regino G. Padua: "Some Fundamental Health P r o b
lems," The Philippine F o r u m . Vol. I, No. 7 (June, 1936), p. 34
and p a s s i m .
475
or* through Government aid, 181 persons, or 59 per cent had
died (in the period observed). Thirty-two per cent were
complete orphans. In spite of the general use of nets, the
volume was still insufficient to offer proper protection against
the mosquito (Anopheles minimus var. flavirostris the principal
carrier, supported by Anopheles m a n g y a n u s ). A l t h o u g h malaria
control stations were being established f o r easy access, it
was recommended that malaria-proof ho using be encouraged by the
Government. It was further recommended that agricultural
settlers be concentrated in townsites and barrio sites to facil
itate the institution of hea lt h measures,-1-'1-
Malaria-free regions did not go unaffected by this
scourge. In a study made of a non-malarious barrio in Talim
Island, Binahgonan, Rizal, it was discovered that an epidemic
involving 200 persons was caused by an infection traced to a
far locality where the people had been going to work on
caifigins for several years pr ior to the outbreak of the disease.
Fr om 1933 to 1936, on the estate of the Sacred Heart Novitiate
in Novaliches, Rizal, experiments were conducted in malaria
control, since scientists were aware that the agricultural
development of the country was being restricted seriously by
11
Cornelio M. Urbinos
„
"Malaria: Its Problems and Control
in Relation to the Agricultural Development of Eastern M i n d o r o , ”
NRC, Bulletin No. 2 3 . December, 1939, pp. 129-130, abstract.
^ A m a d o r P. P a h a t i : "The Epidemiology of Malaria in a
Non-Malarious Barrio of Talim Island," I b i d . . p. 130, abstract.
476
malaria. Despite the application of control measures, it was
discovered that the disease had not bee n eliminated success
fully at the end of the third year. The density of the m o s q u i
to population was reduced, however, and morbidity among the
novices was thus decreased. The reductions were achieved by
the destruction of adult harborages and the gradual agricul
tural development of the estate. The report pointed to the
necess it y of nation-wide utilization of nets and wire screening.
These, however, are to be found only in limited use in the
c o u n t r y .IS
Another preventable disease of great destructiveness is
beri-beri. In 1939, it was taking 20,000 lives a y e a r ; ! 4 by
1949, approximately 25,000 were ill with the d i s e a s e . I t
ranked second to pulmonary tuberculosis, during 1946 and 1947,
as a cause of death, with a mortality rate of 148,21 per 100,000
population. Dr. Salcedo, of the Institute of Nutrition has
observed that "about two-thirds of the deaths are infants." The
cause, he said, has be en found in the "consumption of large
quantities of highly polished rice," and it is "endemic in
certain a r e a s .. .where rice is the chief staple food" wit h the
1
Cornelio M. TJrbino! "Malaria-Control in Agricultural
Settlements", Proceedings of the F ou r t h Philippine Science C o n
v e n t i o n . NRG, Bulletin No. 19, November, 1948, Abstract No.
271, p. 115.
14
Padua, op. c i t .. p. 35.
15
Juan .Salcedo, Jr.; E.O. Carrasco, F.R. Jose and R.C.
Valenzuela: "Studies on Beriberi in an Endemic Subtropical Area,"
reprint from The Journal of N u t r i t i o n . Vol. 36, No. 5 (November,
1948), p. 561.
477
mortality "highest in those provinces where rice is grown most
intensively."16 Some believe that the disease takes more lives
than are known, since many hospitals and physicians fail to
report cases of beriberi to the health au th orities.1^ An
experiment was conducted in Bataan Province, an endemic area,
between July 1, 1947, and June 30, 1949, to determine the
influence of artificially enriched rice on mortality from b e r i
beri. Two areas were studied, one given enriched rice on
October 1, 1948 (Area "A") and the other given ordinary polished
rice throughout the experiment (Area " B " ). The results were
significants In Area "A", the mortality rate between July 1,
1947, and June 30, 1948, showed an increase of 5.66 per cent;
during the period July 1, 1948, to June 30, 1949, after the
introduction of enriched rice, the mortality rate showed a
decrease of 72.40 per cent! These findings are not considered
final and the investigators stated that they would have to be
"strengthened with the findings of the clinical beriberi r e
survey now going on, studies on food consumption as well as
income levels w h ic h are to be undertaken in the near future...."
"However, the present authors would like to invite attention to
the apparently favorable influence of artificially enriched
rice on beriberi mortality in Bataan P r o v i n c e . 1,18
16Ibid. 1 7 I b i d . . p. 569.
18
Juan Salcedo Jr., E.O. Carrasco, F.R. Jose and R.C.
Valenzuela: "The Influence of Artificially Enriched Rice on
Beriberi Mortality in Bataan Province." Read before the Manila
Medical Society Monthly Meeting, September 14, 1949. MS copy
given the author by Dr. Juan Salcedo Jr., September 21, 1949.
478
This survey was supplemented by another, in the same
province, with relation to the thiamine content of rice, vege
tables and other foods. It was noted that 30 per cent of the
rice consumers washed the rice twice before cooking, 55 per
cent washed it three times, and 15 per cent four times. In 81
per cent of the surveyed groups, the rice washingswere d i s
carded; two-thirds used meat only once a week; fish was eaten
by 90 per cent of the families six or seven times a week, and
vegetables were used by more than half not more than twice a
week.
Dr. Salcedo, pointing out the value of enriched rice
in the diet of the Filipino, stated that in all studies made
before and after the War it was discovered that 33 per cent of
the population had a deficiency of thiamine in their diet.
However, enriched rice in itself is not the only method of
improving the nutritional standard of the population. The use
of brown rice, undermilled, parboiled, and malekized rice would
be of great value. ‘
This is true because not all the vitamins
removed by milling can be restored by artificial enrichment;
the "Hoffman-La R o c h e ” process provi di ng only thiamine, niacin
and iron p y r o p h o s p a t e s . However, the efficacy of enriched rice
has been amply shown by experiments outside the Bataan study.
19
Juan Salcedo Jr., Isabela Concepcion, Araceli F.
Guerrero, E.C. Pascual and R.C. Valenzuela: "Studies on The
Thiamine Content of Rice, Vegetables and Other Foods in Bataan
Province." Read before the 42nd Annual Meeting of the P h i l i p
pine Medical Association, Bacolod City, May 1, 1949, and r e
printed from the Acta Medica P h i l i p p i n a . Vol. V, No. 4 (April-
June, 1949). Given the author b y Dr. Juan Salcedo Jr.
479
It was provided in the diets of children at Welfareville, and
of Philippine Army personnel. In the Philippine A r m y ,beriberi
was cured and a great increase in the height and weight of
children fed on the rice was achieved in Welfareville and among
the families of Government employees. Thus, in the words of
Dr. Salcedo, "clear reasoning and practical demonstration in
dicate that artificial enrichment of white rice Is the rational
and logical solution to the beriberi problem and thiamine and
iron deficiency in our country."20
The deficiency of iron in the Filipino diet is serious.
Detailed studies of Philippine vegetables show that they are
poor sources of iron as used in present diets. Results from 25
vegetables produced locally show that 14 give Iron values
comparable to those In lettuce and spinach. While this may
seem contradictory, Drs. Geronimo and Bendafia-Brown found it
interesting to note that the amount of available Iron, which is
the important factor from a nutritional standpoint, "does not
always parallel the total iron content and thus it is impossible
to draw accurate conclusions from the total iron values."®^
Other sources are available, particularly for Vitamin
A, which could be of great benefit to the population. The devil
2 0 Juan Salcedo, Jr.: "Rice Enrichment as a Practical
Nutrition Measure in the Philippines," MS given the author by
Dr. Salcedo, September 21, 1949.
21
Felicidad Geronimo and Adelaida M. Bendafia-Brown:
"The Total and Available Iron Content of Some Typical Philip
pine Foodstuffs," NRC, Bulletin No. 23. December, 1939, p. 157.
480
ray (sometimes known as the "sea bat") has been found to be an
excellent source of this vitamin. Its liver was found to
contain 2,400 U.S.P. XI Vitamin A units per gram, whose potency
compared favorably with that of several brands of medicinal cod
liver oils and exceeded by four times the m i ni mu m required by
22
the U.S. Pharmacopoeia for cod liver oils. The excellent
work formerly conducted under the Bureau of Science could be
continued and would undoubtedly provide many further answers to
nutritional problems in the Philippines, were the Bureau to
receive adequate appropriations.
Tuberculosis, the major killer in the Philippines, is
a disease also derivative in part from poor nutrition. Rough
ly 40,000 lives are taken each year by this dread ailment. The
prewar situation, while serious, cannot be compared to the
ravages of the disease during and following the Occupation. In
1947, there were not more than 600 beds to accommodate the
500,000 open tuberculosis cases in the Philippines, w i t h in
fectious cases doubled following invasion and the m or tality rate
trebled.Before the War, there were 350,000 active cases.
The Philippine Tuberculosis Society had 12 regional dispensary
clinics equipped with X-ray and laboratory facilities, operated
a central dispensary clinic in Manila, four small regional
pavilions and the Quezon Institute for Tuberculosis w i t h a
2 2 M. Gutierrez: "The Vitamin A Potency of ’Safiga*
Liver Oil," Ibid., p. 128.
^^Dr. Carmelo P. Jacinto: "The Tuberculosis P ro blem
in the Philippines," The Manila C h r o n i c l e . This Week Magazine.
Vol. II, No. 40 (January" 19, 1947), p. W.
481
700-bed capacity. In 1941, the number of pneumo refills and
initials performed on 1,547 patients reached 66,959, more than
90 per cent being out-patients. During the 12 months prior
to 1941, a total of 114,620 home visits were recorded. This
campaign had been started only four years prior to the outbreak
of hostilities and progress seemed good. But the War saw the
destruction of 12 dispensary clinics, 2 regional sanatoria, as
well as almost all of the original equipment of the Quezon
Institute with, in the words of Dr. Jacinto, "not even a h y p o
dermic needle belonging to the Quezon Institute proper"
remaining. Lore than $2 million w orth of property belonging
to the Philippine Tuberculosis Society was destroyed, along
wit h case records and reference materials.
If the Philippine p op ulation is to retain its vigor
needed to meet the challenging demands of the future, this
dread disease must be checked, and eventually eliminated. The
task ahead is an appalling one, and the country cannot afford
to lose 40,000 of its inhabitants every year if it is to meet
the economic demands of the future. The generosity and skill
of the United States should be drawn upon to aid the P h i l i p
pines to meet and destroy this killer. The Philippines can
meet the challenge by seeing that the population's nutritional
standards are raised as much as possible. Education, as well
as governmental action, is one of the answers. The all-too-
prevalent habit of expectoration in public places should be
discouraged sharply, both by punitive measures on the part of
482
the Government and as an intensive educational p r o g r a m beginn in g
in the primary grades and carried through all levels of the
population, from the ordinary citizen to the highest government
official. Philippine medical men are unanimous in bewai li n g
this nasty habit, which is as prevalent in the halls of the
mighty as in the hovels of the poor.
Undernourishment is a national characteristic. About
42 per cent of children b e tw ee n the ages of 15 days and 2 years
who received a milk allowance from the Associated Charities
(in 1936) were undernourished, and this, Dr. Ruiz stated, ’’may
be taken as an index to the prevalence of under no ur is hm en t. "24
Pour steps were suggested to meet this p ro blem in 1936; the
’’material increase of puericulture and social he a l t h centers,
(2) Nationalization of the Associated C h a r i t i e s ...(3) E s t a b l i s h
ment of a dairy farm managed by the Bureau of Prisons w i t h the
cooperation of the Bureau of Animal Industry, to distribute
milk to indigent families at reasonable rates, and (4) More
strict marriage requirem en ts ." 2 ^ Puericulture centers would
be charged with pre-natal and post-natal care as well as
providing basic education on hygiene and sanitation. Strict
marriage requirements are more difficult of attainment, wi th
the prevalent restrictive attitude toward b i r t h control and the
large number of common-law marriages. Needless to say, it would
be pr actically impossible to institute b ir t h control or even
2 4 Juan M. Ruiz; "Undernourishment — A Social P r o b l e m , ”
The Philippine F o r u m . Vol. I, No. 7 (June, 1936), p. 49.
25Ibid.. p. 50.
483
conduct discussions about the subject in the Philippines -
despite the desire of many women to restrict child-bearing.26
Mr. Ruiz suggested merely physical examinations p rior to
marriage. Dr. Padua states, "birth c o n t r o l .. ,w ould have its
limitations if practiced at all."'^
Mrs. Margaret Sanger attempted to go to the Philippines,
in 1937, for the purpose of lecturing on this subject but was
refused permission by Mayor Juan Posadas of Manila because, as
he said, "I am strongly opposed to birth control."2 ® The mere
fact that the good Mayor was "opposed" seems very weak grounds
for such a step. The Mayor, amplifying his remarks, stated
that he believed "birth control is both Immoral and impractical,
especially for the Philippines," -- a statement, the Editor
p £»
Many instances could be cited. A woman of thirty-two
having borne nine children, of whom three survived; a woman of
forty, having borne fourteen, two of who m survived. 'The author
talked with many women, particularly in the Visayas, who were
desirous of limiting the number of children they bore, since so
many die, and since each one sapped so mu c h of the woman's
vitality, leaving her an old woman at thirty-five. They ex
pressed a desire to learn even in secret--which, of course,
would be the only way. This applies, naturally, only to women
in the lower economic brackets, since the women in "society"
have solved this to their satisfaction through the benefits
derived from their economic status.
27
O p . c i t ., p . 38. In March, 1936, the authorities of the
University of the Philippines cancelled a lecture to be given by
Dr. Edith How-Martyn, Director of the International B i r th Control
Bureau of London, which was to be delivered in the auditorium of
the School of Hygiene and Public Health. Dr. Hcw-Martyn delivered
her lecture in the home of Rev. Samuel Stagg. She advocated birth
control as more "civilized than such natural checks as famine,
pestilence, war and infanticide." Dean Calderon stated he had
cancelled the lecture "so as not to bring added worry to President
Jorge Bocobo." Philippine Magazine. X X X I I I . No.5(May, 1936), p. 223.
2 ®Editorial: "Mrs. Sanger and the Mayor of Manila,"
Philippine Magazine. XXXIV, No. 8 (August, 1937), p. 346.
484
pointed out, which was "obviously confused" since if it was
immoral from the M a y o r ’s point of view it should "make no d i f
ference whether it is impractical or not; and why should it be
immoral and impractical, especially for the Philippines, -- more
so than for any other country?" Mrs. Pilar Hidalgo Lim, Presi
dent of the National Federation of W o m e n ’s Clubs, wrote to Mrs.
Sanger expressing regret for "our inability to cooperate with
you" in spreading the movement throughout the Philippines,
because, Mrs. Lim said, "our objective now is for better and
more intelligent parenthood." Since this was the objective of
Mrs. Sanger, it seems that some confusion existed as to Mrs.
Sanger's p r og ra m in the minds of those individuals who expressed
the same objective.
The general attitude of Filipinos toward such campaigns
as this undoubtedly stems from the stand of the Church, which
believes that the goals of society can be met in other ways.
While the ultimate ends of the Church may well bring about the
good life for the peoples of the world, present conditions
demand more practical action.22
on
This restrictive attitude toward the improvement of
woman's condition was further illustrated in 1949, when the new
Civil Code was before Congress for approval. The Commission
had further improved the lot of Filipino women, in the past e xt ra
ordinarily hi gh for the Orient, by pr ov iding for divorce In
certain instances as well as legal separation. Various Church
organizations marshalled their women members and in close-packed
battalions descended upon the terrified legislators demanding the
removal of these provisions. Citing the United States as their
horrible example they predicted the ultimate degradation of the
Filipino family and brow-beat Congress into expunging these
h ig h l y beneficial provisions from the Code.
485
Nutrition studies are still in their infancy in the
Philippines, although great progress was made after 1934. Stu
dies were carried along six general lines? general surveys of
nutrition and metabolism of the people; general nature of foo d
stuffs; vitamin and beriberi studies; mineral and vitamin
content of foodstuffs; preparation and preservation of food,
and dissemination of nutritional information.^® The most d i f
ficult relates to the sixth point- -propaganda. This has been,
Dr. Concepcion stated, because the greater part of nutrition
education has been carried on through the medium of the English
language, which "can reach only a relatively small part of the
population, because while a limited amount of knowledge of
conversational English is quite widespread, an intelligent
r ea ding knowledge appears to be quite limited." Therefore, Dr.
Concepcion stated, nutrition information should be more widely
disseminated in dialect. Important strides were taken along
this line and it is true that "the country is now more
nutrition-minded than it has ever been in the p a s t . " ^
Credit for this advance must go to the small group of
quiet, conscientious workers in the various governmental agencies
charged with the work? the Division of Organic Chemistry,
Bureau of Science; the Department of Agricultural Chemistry,
College of Agriculture, University of the Philippines; the
Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, College of IViedicine,
30
Isabelo Concepcion: "The Development of Nutrition Work
in the Philippines," NRC, Bulletin No. 5 . 1935, p. 503.
31
Ibid., p. 506.
486
University of the Philippines, and, more recently, the Institute
of Nutrition, headed by Dr. Salcedo, under the Office of the
President of the Republic. The author echoes the sentiments of
Dr. Concepcion: "Judging from the past accomplishments, the
future of nutrition work may be considered bright. What is
only needed is more encouragement to those who are devoting
their time and energies to the subject. They should be given
more generous support not only in the acquisition of more facil
ities and equipment but also in the maintenance of those al
ready on hand. Furthermore, expectation of Immediate utilitarian
results should not be the main objective for which such support
if ^ P
is to be given. This last statement cannot be overemphasized.
The general attitude in the Philippines toward research work of
all kinds is to expect Some immediate, tangible result which can
be instantly put to work wi th expectations of immediate pecuniary
returns. Appropriations for nutrition work should be doubled,
at the least, and if possible trebled.
The work done in biological chemistry has been signif
icant and highly important. Early activities in this field
centered around the chemical analysis of agricultural products
particularly food and feeds.^3 These publications contain
information on proximate proteins, fats, carbohydrates, minerals
^ I b l d . . italics supplied.
^ A d r i a n o , 1925; 1929; Adriano, Ramos and Ynalvez, 1932;
Adriano and de Guzman, 1932; Santos and Adriano, 1929; Santos
and Ascalon, 1931; and Hermano, 1934.
487
and water content or most of the Philippine foods, feeds, and
agricultural products in general. Experiments leading to the
selection of plants rich in specific foods, in sweet potatoes,
were made by Sabayan (1914); in bananas, by Martinez (1932);
certain varieties of rice, Santos (1934.). Since most studies
indicate an important lack of calcium in the Filipino diet,
34
studies were made to locate foods of high calcium content.
Food poisoning, contracted from eating certain varieties of
cassava and patani, was studied and materials published show
ing safe varieties (Santos, 1S34, Serrano, 1923). Studies were
made with regard to the sugar content of Philippine cane show
ing that the native varieties were lower in content than
foreign strains which were suggested as replacements for native
stock. Studies were conducted in the utilization of copra
meal as food (Santos, 1920, Derecho, 1921, Sulit, 1926). Basic
nutrition requirements were established by research. It was
found that the average adult P'ilipino requires (for medium
work) 80 grams protein, 40 grams fats and 450 grams carbohy-
drates daily (Santos and Pidlaon, 1933). Many more studies
were conducted along the general lines outlined herein, but a
study of these works indicates that biological chemistry, in
the words of Dr. Santos, "was used more as a tool than as a
science to be developed....”36 -- a useful tool, nonetheless.
34
Roxas and Collado, 1922; Adriano and Tavanlar, 1925.
35F.Q. Santos: "Biological Chemistry in Philippine A g r i
culture and Filipino Nutrition,” NRC, Bulletin No. 5 . 1935, p.
396. This article supplies material for this summary of biological
chemistry, pp. 394-400, p a s s i m .
56Ibid.. p. 398.
488
More significant for our purposes has been the work
conducted in analyzing the nutritive value of food consumed by
various elements of the Philippine population. Since the
studies were made of a cross-section of the population, their
results are important in indicating the general level of nutrition
throughout the country. How, for example, did the Government,
in its national defense p rogram provide for the nu tr ition of
trainees? A study was conducted at Camp Murphy: random samples
of food were analyzed which yield ed an average per capita
intake of 95 grams of protein, 38 grams of fats and 523 grams
of carbohydrates, which together furnished 2807 calories, and
0.481 gram of calcium, 0.74 gram of phosphorous, and 0.004
gram of iron. The values, thus, for proteins and calories were
below the standard specified by Bulletin No. 61 of the P h i l i p
pine C o n s t a b u l a r y . The daily per capita allowance was 10.30,
which, however, was not all spent for the purchase of food
mat eria ls. 57
Nutrition standards varied widely throughout the
country. A study of laborers, in Leyte, revealed an average
cost for food of ten centavos daily per man. Rice, corn, and
sweet potatoes were the principal sources of carbohydrates and
the most common viands were ”g u i n a m o s " (a generic term for
salted preserved fish), "soli d-s oil ” (Caesio caerulaureus
S^F.O. Santos and M. G u t i e r r e z : "A Study of the Pood
Served to the Trainees and Enlisted Men of the P.I. Ar my in
Camp M u r p h y , ” NRC. Bulletin No. 2 5 . December, 1939, p. 127
(abstract).
489
Lacepded), sugar, "mangko" (tulingan or tuna), onions, "bolinao"
(a small dried fish), and tomatoes. Out of the 106 families
studied, 49 per cent had a daily man unit protein intake of 70
grams or above; 18 per cent had a fat intake of 30 grams or
above; 35 per cent had a carbohydrate intake of less than 350
grams, and 42 per cent had an energy intake of less than 2000
calories. Of the calories, 14 per cent were derived from
protein, cereal grains supplying 80 per cent of total calories,
10 per cent supplied by fruits and vegetables and 7 per cent by
meat, fish and eggs. The use of dairy products and milk was nil.^®
In Sta. Catalina, Ilocos Sur, 47 families were studied;
59 families in Paoay, Ilocos Norte, and 182 families in Pototan,
Iloilo. It was found that when compared to other dietaries,
"the percentage of calories from cereal foods was much higher;
and that of the other food materials, lower," Milk and dairy
products consumed was nil; two-thirds of the protein intake came
from plants and one-half from rice a l o n e . A study made in
Calabanga, Camarines Sur, revealed that, in the 165 families
studied, the daily food, per man unit, cost from 6 to 22 centavos,
with an average of 12 centavos. The fat, carbohydrate and
calorie intake was higher than in the previous study. Seventy-one
^ 8F.O. Santos and J.K. Demeterio: "Studies in the Pood
of 106 Families of Laborers in Macrchon, Leyte," I b i d . . pp. 127-
128 (abstract).
39
P.O. Santos, I.E. Villanueva and P. Silvas "Studies of
of the Plane of Nutrition of Families of Laborers in Sta. C a t a
lina, Ilocos Sur; Paoay, Ilocos Norte; and Pototan, Iloilo."
NRC, Bulletin No. 1 1 . App endix B . (September, 1936), pp. 32-36,
(five tables; abstract).
490
per cent of the prote in was from plants, 63 per cent from rice
alone. Cereals furnished 79 per cent of calorie intake; fruits
and vegetables, 13 per cent; meat and fish and eggs, 4 per
cent; sweet and fatty foods, 3 per cent, while meat and dairy
products were almost non-existent. The coconut was a popular
food furnishing 69 per cent of the fat and 11.6 per cent of
the total calorie intake in 92 f a m i l i e s . ^
Other similar studies were made for Lanao, the Tondo
district in Manila, nutrition and cost of Consta bula ry ration,
nutritive value of the n a t i o n ’s fish and rice diet, the
importance of the soy-bean in the diet of the people, and many
others.it was found that the average Filipino was eleven
centimeters shorter in stature than the average American (males,
1939) and weighed ninete en kilograms less. That this was b e
cause of the different level of nu trition is amply shown by the
40
F.O. Santos: "Studies on the Plane of Nu trition of
Families of Laborers in Calabanga, Camarines Sur," NRC,
Bulletin No. 1 9 . Proceedings of the Fourth Philippine Science
Convention, pp. 95-96 (abstract, 1937).
^ F . O . Santos and P.S. Hamoy: "The Food of 158
Families in Ramain, Lanao," NRC, Bulletin No. 25. (December,
1939), pp. 173-174; M. Gutierrez: "11The Diet of Low-Income
Families in Tondo District, Manila," Ibid., p. 175; Isabelo
Concepcion: "The Nutritive Value and Cost of the Constabulary
Ration," NRC, Bulletin No. I I . Appendix A, (September, 1936),
pp. 28-31; Isabelo Concepcion; "The Inadequacies of the Polished-
Rice and Fi sh Diet and Recommendations for its Improvement In
the Philippines," Reprint from P r o c e e d i n g s . 6th Pacific Science
Congress, Berkeley, Stanford and San Francisco, 1939, Vol. VI,
pp. 287-298, and by the same author, same source: "Significance
of Soybean in the Dietary of the Fi lipinos," Vol. VI, pp.
437-447.
491
height and weight of Filipinos born and raised in the United
S t a t e s .^
Florence Horn was too hasty in her a n a l y s i s : "The
Filipino is lazy. There is no blinking the fact. Y o u can
blame the tropics to a certain ex t e n t . ”4^ The Filipino is not
lazy--no more so than any other people. Undernourishment is a'
deterrent to physical and intellectual vigor and the Filipino
is undernourished. There has been too much unscientific talk
on the effects of the tropics on m a n ’s activities. A man is
lazy either because he is constitutionally inclined thereto or
because his diet fails to give hi m the energy so much admired
by A nglo-Saxons in our Western civilization. The tropics place
certain demands upon the human body which can be met by proper
rest and avoidance of the hurry-skurry of America n life. But
the tropics are no more debilitating to the individual who
expends his energy wisely and takes proper precautions with his
diet than the long, cold winters of the northern United States.
Althou gh no studies, to the knowledge of the author,
have been conducted along these lines, the statement can be
easily verified by checking school, university and health
records, particularly in California, where, ac cording to the
a u t h o r ’s observation, the children of Filipino parents are, in
all cases, much greater in height than their parents. In May,
1949, the author learned, in a conversation with Fr. James
Haggerty, the Fr. Rector of the Ateneo de Cagayan, that Filipino
male students showed remarkable growth and weight achievements
after residing in the Ateneo and eating Am erican-style food
according to American nutrition standards. This subject would
be an interesting one for study. See, for height and weight, as
well as other points: Narciso Cordero? "Clinico-Fhysiolcgical
Standards for Filipinos--A Preview," NRC, Bulletin No. 23. pp.
13 4-135.
^Horn, 0£. c i t . . p. 51.
492
Public health administration in the Philippines was
hig hly centralized and this was both its strength and weakness.
Too many of the public services started during the Commonwealth
were backed by funds accruing from the coconut oil excise tax,
the benefits of which were to last only until the end of the
Commonwealth. The financial and economic retrenchments of the
Republic, naturally, would curtail many of these services to
the great detriment of the population and eventually the vigor
of the Government itself, weakening its position to meet the
challenge of independence and an un cer tai n post-war world.
Many of the prewar public services died quickly in the
Republic and were later incorporated under the general public
welfare work of the President's Act i o n Committee on Social
Ameli ora tio n--w hic h unfortunately became the source of much
log-rolling; during the campaign year 1949, thereby wea kening its
effectiveness and the ultimate solution of both the hea lth and
peace and order situation.
The social welfare work of the Commonwealth was an
integral portion of President Quezon's "social justice"
campaign and as such needed sufficient financial backi ng to
make it effective and thereby aid in the attainment of the
social justice goals. Dr. Hayden pointed out a serious question,
for the Commonwealth: "What would be the effect upon the
pol itical stability of an independent Philippine Government,
493
should the national income rapidly shrink to a point at whic h
the social justice program, of which the health-welfare agencies
are an essential part, would have to be rigidly curtailed for
lack of financial support?"44 The answer to this question is
to be found in the debacle of 1947-1950.
The data already available, (Dr. Ha yden said) are
sufficient to show that with this 'w in dfal l1 money
the Commonwealth is building up in the field of public
health and welfare a physical plant and administrative
services, the operation of which will require large
and, for some time to come, increasing annual a ppro
priations ... figures illustrate the unsound position
into which the Commonwealth is drifting in this one
department of government.... Consideration of these
facts leaves a strong impression that the Commonwealth
is placing itself in a precarious position by b uil d
ing upon insecure and inadequate economic foundations
a very large and costly superstructure of social,
services which, should independence be attained in 1946,
might have to be abandoned or radically cur tailed.4 ^
Dr. Hayden's acute analysis of the situation was borne
out by developments in the early years of the Republic. Unless
these problems are solved satisfactorily and quickly, in ad di
tion to the great host of others as important, the future
stability of the Republic will be questionable. In educating
the populace to expect social- and welfare aids, a tacit contract
is established between the Government and the people that these
aids will be easily available to the populace and will continue
with an increasing degree of permanence throughout the future.
As Dr. Hayd en says, the Government and the people "will
have to effect drastic changes in their national economy and at
4 4 J.R. Hayden, The Philippines. 1942, p. 674.
45I b i d . . p. 675.
494
the same time increase their p r o d u c t i v i t y and per capita
wealth" in order that they may maintain "their racial and
cultural identity" by a "display of physical and spiritual
vigor" and meet the population and political pressure from the
Chinese, Japanese, and other over-populated countries so near
the shores of the Philippines. "Should they fail to do this,"
Dr. Hayden says, "they will be unable to maintain the govern
mental establishment and services which have been developed
during the past forty years and would soon be faced with serious
m 4 6
internal dangers, which, in turn, would invite foreign aggression,
The internal conditions of 1950 are amply illustrative of Dr.
Hayden's acute analysis.
The highly centralized nature of public heal th work,
which had been a goal laid down by Dr. Padua (above), worked to
the great disadvantage of the population at the outbreak of the
War. With the collapse of the central government, all the
dependent units in the country collapsed, taking a heavy
eventual toll in the health and stamina of the p eopl e.4 ^ At
the time of the Liberation, the population was in dire straits,
both from the economic and health points of view. So great was
the damage done to individual and national health standards and
levels that the condition, Dr. Cohen stated, "will not be
corrected for years to come."48 The work of the Institute of
46I b i d . . p. 685.
^ N a t h a n i e l A. Cohen: "Public He al th In the Philippines,"
Far Eastern S u r v e y . Vol. 15, No. 6 (March 27, 1946), p. 87.
48Ibld.. p. 90.
495
Nutrition, under the Office of the President, in the post-war
years has been of great social and material value and its
effectiveness will be a gauge of the stability of the future of
the n a t i o n . 49
The social justice campaign demanded ever-growing
attention to the welfare of the people. A great part of social
welfare work has been carried on by private agencies, such as
the Asso ciated Charities of Manila and various small bodies
organized by "society" leaders. The Government established in
a suburb of Manila, a children's village called Welfareville, for
the care of dependent and delinquent children. Reformation is
carried on by educational and industrial means as well as
medical care for those whose condition was derived from disease.
A probation system was organized under Act No. 3203, and
retained in the revised Penal Code for the rehabilitation of
minors. It achieved some success in Manila but its progress in
the provinces was slow because of the lack of p e r s o n n e l .50
49p0r the work of this Institute, Sees Isabelo Con
cepcion: "Scientist Discusses Science of Nutrition, Pood
Production," The Manila C h r o n i c l e , This yVeek M a g a z i n e , Vol. II,
No. 16 (August 4, 1946), pp. 8-9; Dr. Juan Salcedo, Jr.;
"Educating the Filipino on N u t rition,” popular article, loaned
the author by Dr. Salcedo, 21 September 1949, to be published;
Report of the Institute, July 1, 1948, to June 30, 1949, MS copy
loaned the author by Dr. Salcedo: Nutrition N e w s , monthly (Mimeo),
the journal of the Philippine Association of Nutrition, Vol. I,
No. 1 (February, 1948)---. Dr. Antonio Villarama, as Chief
Delegate of the Philippines to the Fifth Plenary Meeting of the
Second World Health Asse mbl y (WHO), R o m e , June, 1948, delivered
a rather non-informative speech on "Philippine Health", The
Manila Times (Independence Supplement), Vol. IV, No. 321 ("July 4,
1949), p. 16A. Recent material on the level of Philippine
health is scanty.
50Fabella, ojc. c i t ., p. 45.
496
The traffic in women and children has always been a
serious p roblem in the Orient, and the no w defunct League of
Nations conducted inquiries into the situation existing in 1936,
with regard to it. The United States had agreed provisi ona lly
to join a conference of central authorities with the League on
the subject but later informed the League that its interest had
been predicated upon the situation existing in the Philippines.
After the Institution of the Commonwealth therefore, the League
authorities sent an invitation to the Philippines to join the
conference. The invitation was declined on the ground that
"traffic in women and children is pr ohibited and pen ali zed by
Philippine law..." and "the probl em in the Philippines is a
police rather than a social one..." this being solved by "the
deportation of foreign p r o s titutes."51 Whether this statement
was window-dr ess ing is difficult to say. Welfare leaders were
not all in accord wi th the statement or its interpretation of
the problem. If the traffic in women and children is to be
treated as a police prob lem rather than a social problem, there
would seem little hope for ibs eventual solution.
Relief and Public Welfare A c t i v i t i e s :-
On October 19, 1936, a special session of the National
Asse mbl y was called by President Qpezon to consider relief for
storm-hit provinces and other important matters. Two days later,
the Assembl y pass ed a 3*1,500,000 re lief bill on the second reading.
SlMemor and um on the Work of the League in Rel ation to
the P a c i f i c , prepared for the 6th conference of the Institute of
Pacific Relations, Geneva, 1S36, p. ICO.
497
In a special message, almost a year before, the President had
requested from the Assembly an appropriation of 3*100,000 for the
relief of typhoon sufferers, this being appropriated in Co mmon
wealth Act No. 13, December 31, 1935. Such a sum was quite
insufficient, and when, a year later, It became necessary again
to provide this relief, the President was determined bo meet
criticisms and make more systematic preparations for such
emergencies.
He, therefore, on November 3, 1936, issued Executive
Order No. 61, creating a National Relief Board, "For the purpose
of carrying out the provisions of Commonwealth Act Numbered
Ninety, approved October t w e n t y - s i x t h . . . . "52 This board was to
investigate the damages caused by natural disasters and determine
the amounts needed for relief. It was to be aided by provincial
relief boards who would make pr eliminary appraisals and r e c o m
mend necessary action. President ^uezon hoped thus to be able
to meet disasters quickly.
Commonwealth Act No. 90 (appropriating 3*1,500,000) and
Act No. 239 (appropriating 3*500,000, November 29, 1937) for
relief work was implemented by President Quezon with Executive
Order No. 139 (January 14, 1 9 3 8 ),53 w h i c h created a National
Relief Administration. This Ad ministration was to consolidate
the various relief activities of the Government and coordinate
52M . 0 . F .. Vol. 2, Pt. 1 (Rev.ed.), p. 878.
55M . 0 . P .. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 1298-1300.
498
them with those performed bjr private relief organizations. It
superseded t h e National Relief Board and the Nati ona l Unemp l o y
ment Board (created by Executive Order No. 122, October 8,
1937). It was empowered to "investigate the extent of damages
caused by typhoons, floods and other public c a l a m i t i e s . . .deter
mine the amounts needed for relief an d reh abi litation work...to
take a census of all the une mployed and indigent p e r s o n s ...and
ascertain their needs and determine upon ways and means for
ameliorating their condi tio n.1,54
The Commissioner of He alth and Welfare headed this
office as National Relief Administrator, and his posi tio n was
of great importance to the economy because of the frequency of
many types of disasters. He had an additional function as head
of a national placement agency for the unemployed, the creation
of which, President Quezon believed, was "conclusive pr oof that
the Government has the welfare of the masses at heart."
By 1938, most of the amounts appropriated under Acts 90
and 239 had been expended. The President, therefore, requested
the National Assembly to make an additional app rop riation of
^1,000 ,00 0 "or so much thereof as may be ne ce ssary for the re
lief of communities and indigent sufferers from typhoons and
other public calamities and also for the succor of pers ons in
distress due to unemployment or otherwise deserving of material
aid." "Needless to state," the President concluded, "the a p p r o
priat ion of said amount is nece ssary to further the ends of
54I b l d .. p. 303.
499
ti55
social justice which we are commicted to promote.
To supplement the work of this Relief Administration,
the National Assembly appropriated, from time to time, various
funds at the call of the President, who would designate calamity
areas for relief and commodity price control .^6 It was felt,
parti cul arl y with the beginning of the War in Europe, that the
President would need greater powers for emergency relief and
the control of commodity prices to prevent speculation during
periods of public suffering. To achieve this purpose, the
National Assembly, on September 30, 1939, passed Commonwealth
Act No. 498, which authorized the President "to purchase
articles of prime necessity" and "to store them for the purpose
of stabilizing prices and for distribution to th e public in case
of emergency," appropriating for this purpose, 1^10,000,000.^
By August, 1940, the situation was believed serious
enough to warrant an increase in the P r e s i d e n t ’s powers and as
a result, Commonwealth Act No. 600 was passed on the nineteenth
55
Ibid., p. 304. Executive Order No. 139 was revised
by Executive Order No. 188 (23 February 1939), Executive Order
No. 197 (24 Ma rch 1939), and Executive Order No. 216 (28 July
1939). No. 197 placed the Administration under the Board again.
No. 216 merely added another member to the board. See Ivi.O.P..
Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 895-896; 960-962; 990.
c £*
See for example: Proclamations No. 4-8, 22 November
1935 to 26 November 1935, M . O . P .. Vol. I, (revised edition),
pp. 206-210.
5*7
Asterio Saquing: "Emergency Relief," The Evening
News (S u p p l e m e n t ). Vol. V, No. 6 (September 30, 1949), pp. 18-20.
500
of that month. This act declared the existence of national
emergency and granted the President extraordinary powers, "among
w h ich was the sole authority to prevent scarcity, monopoly,
hoard i n g and injurious speculation" over the various commodities
c:p
enumerated in the preceding Act. The President created an
Emergency Control Board (Executive Order No. 335, April 1, 1941),
whose duty was to recommend the prices to be fixed on these
commodities. Two months before the Japanese attack, the
President fixed the price of sixty-five commodities by Executive
Order No. 371, and, after the attack, delegated his powers to
the Emer gency Control Administration. The effective life of
the latter body was short, for, after the entry of the Japanese
into Manila, and the extension of their control throughout the
Islands, the control of prices an d commodities passed into
their hands -- although theoretically special boards, estab
lished under the Military Government, were to handle the situation.
P o s t w a r :-
The situation, upon Liberation, demanded again a
central authority to furnish relief and control commodity prices,
which had risen to fantastic levels. This authority was
centered in the Philippine Civilian Ad min istration Unit (PCAtl)
of the 1 J . B . Army. President Osmefia, on November 6 , 1944,
issued Executive Order No. 24 which amended the commodity prices
established by President Quezon in October, 1941. The r e
instituted Philippine Commonwealth, however, was powerless to
58Ibid.
501
control the situation, and was forced to rely upon the PCAU for
support in this emergency. This Executive Order was later
amended by Executive Order No. 29 (March 7, 1945), to extend
its effectivity. An Emergency Control Administration, tinder
Tomas Confesor was established on March 2, 1945, to enforce
prices fixed by the Order. This Administration had the power
to commandeer housing, public utilities and prime necessities
and to distribute goods at controlled prices. The ECA was to
succeed the PCAU, taking over the latter!s functions whenever
civil government was re-established.
Executive Order No. 29 also appropriated ^1,000,000 to
finance the operations of the ECA which, however, had to remain
under the PCAU for some time, receiving the bulk of material
from this organization as well as the UNRRA. The ECA organized
seven subsidiary offices to carry out its duties: The Civilian
Relief Supply Distribution (CRSD); the Civilian Emergency Trans
portation (CET); Petroleum Products Control Administration (PEPCA);
Committee for Control of House Rentals (CCHR); Emergency Relief
Office (ERO); Economic Planning Board (EPB),and a purchasing
office in Tarlac for procuring rice and other cereals. The CRSD
had charge of the distribution of relief supplies; the CET's functions were
to regulate public transportation in Manila and the running of trucks
for relief distribution; the PEPCA rationed gasoline and oil; CCHR
supervised rentals in Manila, the rate being set a t 125 per cent of
the 1941 rates; the ERO distributed relief to destitute indivi
duals and various relief establishments, and the EPB, which was
502
still functioning in 1950 under a different structure, was to
CQ
prepare plans for the economic rehabilitation of the country. ^
The ECA was abolished on November 28, 1945, with the
creation, by the National Assembly, of the Philippine Relief
and Rehabilitation Admi nistration (CA No. 718) which was later
(August 1, 1947) changed to the Philippine Relief and Trade
Rehabilitation Administration (PRATAA). The main purpose of
abo lishing the ECA and creating the PRRA was to eliminate the
idea of relief from the minds of the people and to recreate a
sense of individual responsibility toward the critical problems
facing the country.
President Quezon, at the time the country was prep aring
to enter the Commonwealth period, wanted to establish a National
Red Cross, independent of the Am erican Red Cross. However,
according to t h e terms of the Geneva Convention, a nation, to
establish an independent society, had to adhere to an Interna
tional Red Cross Treaty. Since the Co mmonwealth Government was
not empowered to negotiate treaties, the country had to await
independence before this dream of Quezon could be realized.
Thus, duri ng the Commonwealth period, the American Red Cross had
charge of all disaster relief in the Philippines. This worked
somewhat to the disadvantage of the country during the Occupation,
because the Japanese were reluctant to allow the Society to
operate freely, saying it was an extension of the services of
the United States.
59Ibid. 60Ibid.. p. 20
503
At the outbreak of the A'ar, the Red Cross had been
incorporated into the Civilian Emergency Administration, and,
in December, the staff of 700 men and women engaged in war
relief. The Philippine Red Cross became responsible for the
evacuation of civilians and the maintaining of public morale.
It evacuated successfully some 90,000 civilians to 40 di f
ferent evacuation centers in the provinces near Manila, and
undertook the cask of general r e l i e f - d i s t r i b u t i n g food and
medical supplies. It established, for the first time, a
Medical Service Department, installing eight emergency hospitals
in Manila and operating hundreds of first aid units. The
Compana Maritima, a private shipping concern, turned over to
the Red Cross the S.S. M a c t a n , for the transport of wounded
military to Aus tralia and was manned largely by the Phi l i p
pine Red Cross. It was faced with the problem of caring for
Americans and other allied natio nali tie s— French, British,
Dutch, Chinese--who were to be interned for the duration of
the war. It undertook the iob of preparing Santo Tomas Uni ver
sity for the reception of these individuals, and, until June 30,
1942, supplied all the food for this internment center, sup
pl ementing this with medical services. In May, 1942, the
Japanese abolished the organization and created an ’’ind epen den t”
Philippine Red Cross, wh ich was now forbidden access to Santo
Tomas. It continued to operate as best as it could during the
remainder of the occupation pe riod--often at great personal
risk to p e r s o n n e l - a i d i n g civilians and, secretly, Ameri can
soldiers and civilians in hiding them from the Japanese.
504
Liberation saw a heart-breaking task facing the
organization which, however, immediately began the task of r e
building, aiding the suffering population, and cooperating with
the Ame ric an Red Cross units attached to the United States
armed forces. The American Red Cross generously extended f i n a n
cial assistance and loaned trained personnel to assist in the
re habilitation of the organization.
On February 14, 1947, President Roxas signed the treaty
of Geneva and the Prisoners of War Convention as the first step
in the founding of an independent Philippine Red C r o s s . A
month later the Congress passed an act granting the official
charter for the organization, re ceiv ing presidential approval
five days later. On the same day, an application was cabled to
the International Red Cross for recognition as an independent
society. A week later, Mrs. Aurora A. Quezon, the widow of the
late President, received a cable I n f o r m i n g her of the official
recognition of an independent status for the Philippine National
Red Cross which was proclaimed an independent body on April 15, 1947
The Philippine National Red Cross, had, by 1950, 212,000
volunteer workers and a professional staff of 410 men and women.
It operated 36 chapters, 14 sub-chapters and six sub-offices.
Its membership, in 1948, was 1,376,232. The society, since its
establishment, has rendered valuable assistance to the p o p u l a
tion, particu larl y in disaster relief. From March, 1946, to
August, 1949, the Philippines was visited by 1,246 disasters
505
&X
(in the months of February to hay, 1948, over 400 fires alone).
As a result of these disasters, 1,033,301 individuals and
195,968 families were extended disaster relief, during the
period, by the Red Cross - these figures excluding all socio
economic cases wh ich are more difficult to tabulate. From the
reconstruction of the Red Cross up to 1948, more than 67,000
families had been given home-relief aid by the organization, as
well as extensive work for the military services, safety
services, nursi ng services and the Junior Red Cross. Another
important service was the institution of a blood bank, which has
f?0
saved countless lives.
61
In the pe riod M a r c h - D e c e m b e r , 1946, 7 fires, 4 typhoons;
January-March, 1947, 26 fires, 1 typhoon; A p r i l - D e c e m b e r , 1947,
87 fires, 16 typhoons, 7 floods, 1 disastrous explosion, 1 land
slide, 1 tidal wave and 2 shipwrecks; the twelve-month period of
1948, 426 fires; 14 typhoons; 16 shipwrecks; 14 floods; 4 w h irl
winds; 3 great explosions; 2 hurricanes; 1 cave-in; 1 earthquake;
1 landslide; 1 volcano eruption; Januar y-A pri l, 1949, 442 fires;
5 shipwrecks; 3 explosions; 2 landslides; 1 earthquake; 1 cyclone
and 1 flood; Iviay-August, 1949, 276 fires; 9 shipwrecks; 3 to rna
dos; 2 typhoons; 2 landslides; 1 flood; 1 waterspout: 1 explosion.
Disastrous fires are the most common--the towns of Tarlac, Cota-
bato and Legaspi being almost totally destroyed by fires as well
as many others— the cause of which seems generally to be careless
ness and incendiarism. Typhoons always take their toll and are
followed by floods and landslides. Explosions are generally due
to undiscovered bomb caches as well as carelessness around stored
ammunition and explosives. The control of fires is one of the
serious social and economic problems at present and, despite the
heroic educational efforts of the various Fire Departments in the
country, is difficult to eradicate. Many fires are started by
arsonists who are failing in business and hope to recoup their
losses through their fire insurance. These figures were kindly
supplied by Dr. J. Canuto, of the Disaster Relief Service Depart
ment of the Philippine National Red Cross.
^ Report of the Philippine National Red Cross to the XVI Ith
International fied Cr oss Conference. Stockholm, 1948 18 pp.; Dr.
Manuel Lim: Red Cross 1949 Accomplishments," The Manila Times
(Independence Day Supplement ), V o l . IV, No. 321 (July 4, 1949), p p .
14B-15B, 1SB.
506
The Philippine National Red Cross, as well as the
Community Chest (established in 1949), has had great difficulty
in securing the financial assistance necessary for optimum
service because the average Filipino has never acquired the habit
of giving to public welfare societies. Since the family system
is so strong in the Philippines, the Filipino has been a c c u s
tomed in the past to take care of all needy individuals in the
family without outside assistance. Other, unfortunate, indivi
duals are left to their own devices since the ordinary individual
feels that he has enough to do to provide for his own family.
This task of educating the Filipino to community welfare work
Is a difficult one, although it has shown some signs of success
In the recent past. The road ahead, however, is a difficult one
in this respect.
The task wit h relation to child and youth welfare has
been difficult In the post-war years. The most critical period
was immediately following Liberation. Widespread poverty, the
psychological release from repression during the Occupation, the
general lowering in public morality as a result of war conditions,
the attractions offered by American soldiers with money--all
these contributed to an alarming increase In juvenile delinquency.
Prostitution, pa rticularly of minor girls, increased at the time
of liberation because of the poverty of the people as well as
the lure of adventure offered by liaisons with Amer ica n soldiers.
The resultant spread of venereal disease offered serious problems.
The year 1945 saw the highest number of cases committed to the
507
Philippine Training School for Boys and Girls at vtfelfareville.
The total number admitted was 401 (358 boys and 43 girls); in
1946, 381 (336 boys and 45 girls), and in 1947, 361 (313 boys
and 48 girls). These figures reflect only those delinquents
apprehended by social welfare authorities and placed in the
correctional institution in the City of Manila. No figures are
available for the rest of the country.
General criminality has increased sharply over prewar
years (in reported cases). Crimes against persons and against
chastity rose particularly, with 205 cases reported (in the
period Ma y 1945-April, 1947) and 130 arrests for rape, and 2,575
cases of prosti tuti on reported with 5,577 arrests made. The
total number of cases for the period (involving seven major
crimes: murder and homicide, rape, robbery upon persons,
aggravated assault, robbery upon things, prostitution and
commercialized vice and gambling and betting) was 12,607 with
16,976 arrests. P r o m May, 1945, to May, 1946, 39,070 crimes
were committed by males and 7,012 by females; from May, 1946,
to May, 1947, 24,511 by males and 5,146 by females. No recent
figures have been made available but the general impression is
that, during 1949, criminality had a general increase with the
police forces hard pressed to keep abreast of the s i t u a t i o n . ^
63Reported in The Sunday T i m e s . Vol. II, No. 295 (June
8, 1947), pp. 3-5.
64
United Nations, Department of Social Affairs: Annual
Report on Child and You th W e l f a r e . 1948, Lake Success, N.Y.,
based upon information received fro m Member Governments betw een
April 1, 1947, and M a rch 31, 1948, 236 pp. See particularly:
pp. 180-187, for Philippine Report on this subject.
508
General welfare work, after the inception to the
P r e sidency of Elpidio Quirino, was conducted under the auspices
of the President's Act i o n Committee on Social Amelioration,
k n o w n generally as the PACSA. This was created, by the P r e s i
dent, by Executive Order No. 68 (August 3, 1948). The C o m m i s
sioner of Social Welfare, Mrs. Asu ncion A. Perez, was named
chairman of the committee, wh ich was composed of one represents
tive each fr om the Departments of Agric ultu re and Natural
Resources, Public Works and Communications, Education, Health,
Justice and Labor, the National Land Settlement Ad ministration
and the PRA'TRA. Mr. Hilar ion S. Silayan, formerly Director of
Plant Industry, was named executive officer. The functions of
this committee were:
1. To coordinate and supervise the activities of
the different branches instrumentalities and agencies
of the government with a view to promo t i n g most
efficie ntl y the welfare of the people in the rural
districts.
2. To administer and supervise the distribu tio n
of governmental aids in order that the funds may be
spent pro pe rly for the purposes for w h i c h they are
intended.
3. To initiate measures in addition to activities
n o w being ixndertaken, calculated to attain the objective
of he l p i n g the small farmer in order to make of h i m a
productive, contented, and peace - l o v i n g citizen.
4. To b r i n g every facility of the government into
p l a y for the purpose of effe cti vely he lping those who
are coming into the fold of law under the President's
A mnesty Proclamation.
5. To administer the funds assigned by the P r e s i
dent from tine to time for social ame lioration work.®®
The activities of this committee, especially under point
President's A c t i o n Committee on Social Ameliora tio n:
"Handbook on the President's Acti o n Committee on Social A m e l i o
ration," (Manila, February, 1949), p. 14. Italics supplied.
509
"2" have been the subject of much adverse criticism--not by
many members of the Government, however. The distribution of
governmental aids, as provi de d in that point, has, the critics
said, been mal-administered, since they were used for political
purposes during the campaign of 1949. This claim was not re
futed by the Administration, and the PACSA coincidentally
found itself critically short of funds at the end of 1949.
The provision in the Budget for 1951 appropriating several
million pesos for this fund came under sharp criticism in
Congress--not only from the opposition but also from many
members of the party in power.
The basic weakness of the PACSA, outside its unfortunate
political aspect, is that it is a costly duplication of the
efforts of the other branches of the Government. The "six-point
program" of the President, which led to the formation of the
PACSA, as expounded by the Executive following a meeti ng of his
cabinet in August, 1948, provi ded the following:
1. The agricultural aspect will include the a c q u i
sition of some existing haciendas, the opening of
agricultural colonies, and the furnishing of seedlings,
implements and perhaps worki ng animals;
2. The public works aspect will include the
launching of a full-dress p rogram of road, bridge and
other construction for whic h appropriations are a v a i l a b l e ;
3. The educational pro g r a m whic h will mean the
immediate opening of extension classes for the children
of displaced persons, the organization of vocational
training and the Institution of adult education;
4. The financial aspect which will include crop and
home-buil din g loans from the Philippine National Bank;
5. The relief aspect w h ich will consist of the
distribution of food, clothing and other immediate
assistance to all those who are In need through the
Social Welfare Commission; and
6* The medical aspect w hich will include the r e
activa tio n of the mov ing clinic p rogram of the provincial
510
and national health se rvi ces.66
E a c h of these points duplicates the established programs
of various governmental agencies which are better equipped, have
the necessary trained per sonnel and bett er- organized programs
for the attainment of each of these objectives. The PACSA, in
order to attain these aims, must draw upon these agencies thus
drai nin g their effectivity and already over-worked personnel
down to a point dangerously near stagnation. These agencies
should be strengthened.
The program, under che PACSA, was begun from a political
point of view--not an economic nor social one. The country was
faced with the pro ble m of eliminating, if possible, the ac tivi
ties of the Hukbalahaps and other dissident groups. The PK3V:
had been outlawed by President Roxas, so President Q,uirino,
"taking a more unde rst andi ng appro ach to the pro bl em of the
H u k b a l a h a p ,"^7 promulgated P roclam ati on No. 76 (June 21, 1948),
giving amnesty to Huks and PKMs who would "register w i t h the
gove rnment and return to their homes." The amnesty program, as
even the most ardent supporters of the A d ministration admitted,
was a pra ctical failure. It merely allowed the leaders of the
organizations time to receive their b ackpay as members of
Congress, and a bre athing spell for more efficient organization
of their armies. ;¥hen this was felt to be su fficiently acco m
plished, they melted from the purlieus of the powerful and
disap pea red into the an ony mit y of t h e general po pul ation and
6 6 Ibid., p. 13. 67Ibid. . p. 32.
511
the depths of jungle and swamp -- in which they remain.
Since the relief work of the PACSA was accompanied by
political pressure of one sort or another, its effectiveness
was limited and it was suspect by the very individuals it was
organized to aid. It is to be hoped that the functions of
public welfare and relief may be allowed to re m ain the
province of those best fitted for the task and who have the
confidence and gratitude of the populace.®®
68p 0r a more detailed account of the activities of the
PACSA, seej PACSAj Social Amelio rat ion and Y o u . Report of the
PACSA to the People of the P h i l i p p i n e s , (Manila, October, 1949}^
41 pp."; PACSA: First Annual R e p o r t . TManila, August 31, 1949),
31 pp., 3 appendices, (Mimeo.).
CONCLUSION
The Philippines lie, like a great "S” , off the eastern
shores of Asia, a part of the great Southeast Asia culture
world. As far as our present knowledge is concerned, the
Philippines were only spasmodically associated hi sto rica lly
with this great Malays ian world In the past. However,
sufficient contacts were established In certain periods, notably
during the Madjapahit and Sri-Vi jaya n empires, to create a
culture whose roots extend back Into early Indian history and
w hic h was strong enough to maintain itself in the Philippines
with few basic changes until the present. The country acted
as a receiver and transmitter of its Indian heritage, as I t
had earlier during one of the great waves of migr a t i o n that
swept the peoples of Asia throughout the Eastern World, Into
the Pacific and on to the Amer ica n continents. Remnants of
this earlier culture are still present in the Philippines and
are at present bein g modified by the action of the later
Hi ndui zed Malayan culture, the S pan ish encomlenda system and
the A m e r i c a n culture wave. The last has swept over the peoples
in the Philippines like a gigantic spray of varni sh adherin g
the least where the oil of the past still clings.
The contribution of Spain has generally been noted as
cons ist ing In the introduction of the Christian r e l i g i o n and
the colonial system which reached its lowest level in Central
and South America. As to the first, mo d e r n scholars must still
512
513
decide whether the Introduction of Christianity ever became more
than just that. Has it really altered the “world v i e w ” of the
Filipino? Has it really changed significantly the folk-culture
of the past? It has been the custom of Spanish apologists and
Filipino antiquarians to assume that this introduction has had
a lasting, deep ly-ingrained effect upon the life of the people.
Few concrete facts, however, have been presented to maintain
successfully this as su mption whose strength lies in a se nti
mental na t i o n a l i s m w h ich has attempted to portray the Philip
pines as the "only Ch ri stia n na tio n in the Orient" -- a popular
catchword with no more meaning than such slogans ever possess.
This has found expression in the publi cat ion of textbooks on
history for Catholic schools w h i c h very fact is expressive of
the nature of the "historical" thinking in the Philippines. In
reality, there is pra cti cally no "historical" thinking among the
majority of peoples in the Philippines, the only exceptions
b e ing found in the so-called non-Christians, and even there it
is weak and becoming weaker with the impact on their societies
by "mod ern” forces.
The people, generally speaking, have little sense of
time-space relationships and live in the present to a greater
degree than is the case in Asia Major. Sup er fici all y this
statement will appear as a "value judgment" but Is certainly
borne out by experience in the educational system of the nation.
There is, at present, as an adjunct of the "new nationalism",
a hearke nin g back to the "good old days" when all Filipinos
514
were hard-working, honest and possessors of all the virtues
the present generation is said to lack. This has received
official recog nit ion ir. the instructions given to would-be
writers of Philippine h i s t o r y for the public schools In which
the injunction is given to present all the characteristics of
the Filipinos which are, because of the absence of sources,
impossible to ascertain wi th any correctness. Most histories
of the Philippines begi n with the pre - S p a n i s h history In great
detail, the information for which Is derived fro m secondary
sources wr itt en in the main by padres whose training was in
dogma and ritual. The majority of primary sources on the early
Filipinos were all destroyed by missionaries -- Catholic and
Protestant -- and others still remain untrans lat ed from the
Chinese and Arabic. Several years ago, a text wr itten by one
of the most informed scholars in the Philippines contained a
brief reference to this destr uc tion of the old bamboo and bark
writings which resulted in the banni ng of the text fro m schools
until this offending passage was removed. Vi/hat is actually
available Is highly fragmentary in nature and conclusions
derived therefrom are subjective in the extreme. A few ex cep
tions may be found In the early volumes of Bl air and Robertson^-
which, however, are too scanty for co nstructing a detailed
history of p re-Spanis h times.
The history of the Philippines began wit h the coming of
the first humans but who they were, from whence they came, and
^ The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898. 55 v o l s ., 1903-1907.
515
at what time is a matter for conjecture only. We k n o w that a
large pop ulation inhabited the Philippines during Iveolithic and
Iron Ag e times, with these terms having specific meanings for
the Philippines not related to those periods in Europe and the
Middle East. A great over-lapping of pre-historic periods in
the Philippines makes it difficult to do more than conjecture
a datum-level for them. The province of Batangas was heavily
populated for long periods during the late Neolithic and Iron
Ages, as was the area around the present locality of Novaliches.
This was discovered by H. Otley Beyer, who has gathered together
some half mill ion artifacts from these localities, the majority
of which remain unclassified. Professor Beyer has estimated
that the po pulation of Batangas during those periods was at the
same level sustained by the province today. Other, perhaps
earlier perhaps later, peoples, members of the jar-burial
culture of East Asia, have left their mark upon numerous, widely-
scattered areas fr om Luzon to Mindanao.
The popul atio n consists of Negritos, whose date of
arrival will perhaps forever remain a mystery, the Malayans
(divided by Pro fessor Beyer into Proto-Mialayan and Malayan),
the Indonesians (divided into "A" and "B" types), some Tibeto-
Burmese stocks, possibly some SInitic and unspeci ali zed
"Mongoloid" types, and some probable Iranian types still un
classified and tt.urdescribed. The modern popu lat ion contains
also a wide mixture of Papuan, Austronesian, Melanesian,
Polynesian, Caucasian peoples in a bewildering array of languages
(or dialects) and communities.
516
Upon all these peoples, their customs, traditions, b e
liefs, modes of action, societal structure, was Imposed first
a medieval S panish system w h i c h was largely concerned with the
economy of the Islands and the co nversion of the people to the
Christianity of Spain, and secondly, the increasingly complex
system of the United States. For most of the Sp a n i s h period,
the Philippines were ad ministered from Ne w Spain, the auth o r
ities of which gradually imposed restrictions upon what could
be produ ced and sold abroad, bringi ng about the first of many
attempts at circumv ent ion of governmental plans, programs and
edicts. Later, the Islands were adminis ter ed f r o m Spain
directly and in the latter part of the Span ish period attempts
were made to derive some pr o f i t from this far-awa y possession.
Whether or not the encomienda sy ste m would have be nefitted the
people, w hich was not con sidered in erecting or adm ini ste ring
the system, it left scars In the eco nomy and the psyche of the
people whic h have never disappeared. Today, the cacique is
still as much a part of the Philippine scene as in days of yore
and gore.
It is amaz ing that the Uni ted States accompli she d as
m u c h as it did. But the leaders were men of vigor and d eter
mination, if they were weak In kn ow led ge and u n d e r s t a n d i n g , and
they were aided by the desire of the Filipinos to achieve an
independent stabus and an international position. That Is to
say, they were aided by politicos who desired these things.
517
Whatever the ordinary Filipino believed is impossible n o w to
determine but certainly it is true that they engaged in the
Revolution primarily because of their hatred for the friars and
Spain. Unpubli she d documents clearly indicate what the leaders
of the Revolution were seeking while the works of Rizal present
a picture quite different fro m what is alleged by the nationalists of
today.
An early observer stated: "No serious attempt had ever
been made, at least none at all commensurate with the vastness
of the interests at stake, to lay down those principles whic h
should control in future relations between powerful Western
nations and the primitive savagery or part iall y-c ivi liz ed
inhabitants of the tropical regions. Constructive sta tesman
ship was n e e d e d . 11^ The United States came to the Philippines
as a result of the operation of forces dominant in the nations
of the world at the end of the Ninetee nth Century with practical
ly no ideas how such a dependency should be governed but
determined to procee d as an experiment in applied politics.
With a mixture of altruism, self-s eek ing commercial interests
and Congressional bungl i n g it began its task. President
McKinley's desire to " u p l i f t 11 and "Christianize" the Filipinos
found its ex pression in the formation of the First Philippine
Commission w hich arrived in Manila March 4, 1899. It issued
a proclam ati on of friendship to the people and upo n the
p
Homer C. Stuntz, The Philippines and the Far E a s t .
1904, p. 156.
518
conclusion of its survey recommended to the President that a
territorial form of government be organized with an elected
lower chamber and an upper house partly elected and partly
appointed. It also reported that in the view of the Commission
the people were as yet unprepared for independence. In
December of 1899, President McKinley stated that the United
States would not await the end of the strife then existing but
would continue in its task of opening schools and churches,
f os te ri n g industry, trade and commerce and "in every way in our
power to make these people whom Providence has brought within
our jurisdiction feel that it is their liberty and not our
power, their welfare and not our gain, we are seeking to enhance.'
Our flag, he said, "has never waved over any community but in
blessing." It has b e e n the fashion in following years for many
writers to deride the views held in the early years of the
century by the President and those associated w i t h h i m in this
new task in A m e r i c a n history. These writers have been unwilling,
apparently, to credit the individuals of that day with sincerity
and good-will. President M c K i n l e y ’s appreciation of the
workings of Providence was real and sincere, as it was for many
individuals of that period. The scepticism of our day had not
yet touched the simple faith of our fathers and latter-day
writers have- erred in reviewing the ideals of sincere men by the
standards of another generation.
The Philippine Bill of 1902, sponsored by Congressman
H.A. Cooper, p rovided for the government until 1916. For the day,
519
it was a good bill and the administration worked under it
successfully and established in the Philippines for the first
time a government of law. It was a government of personalities
a3 well as a personal government but It was primarily a govern
ment of law and worked well. Certainly the American spirit
has seldom been better expressed than In the administration of
the first fourteen years of the American period.
The Jones Law of 1916 granted self-governing powers to
the Filipinos and it was at that time that the serpent entered
the new Eden. Fr om 1916 until the formation of the Common
we al th in 1954, American-Philippine relations entered upon a
n ew phase, and one bhat was disturbed frequently by an increas
ing variance in opinion as to the optimum methods of attaining
the commonly-held objectives. This was heightened by the
controversy centered around the person of Governor G-eneral
Leonard hood, one of the ablest of A merican administrators and
certainly one of the most misunderstood. The student is left
w i t h the impression, after studying the events of that unhappy
day, that this mi su nderstanding was deliberately fostered by
certain individuals as a means of securing more firmly the reins
of control at certain levels of determination of policy. One
of the results of this controversy would become important in
later Philippine history associated with the personality of
Jose P. Laurel.
Of the many errors committed by various Ame ri ca n
administrations, none was more lasting in its effects or more
520
productive of difficulties than the policy of free trade begun
after 1913. This resulted, briefly, In the establishment of
Philippine industries whose prosperity was dependent upon the
continuation of such a policy. It meant great p ro sperity for
the Filipinos although it benefitted more directly the cacique
class and brought about the growth of a n e w class whose fortunes
were tied to these m ajor industries. This p ro sperity achieved
by the four major export industries, as a result, actually
hindered the normal domestic development and entrenched the
economic problems which were remnants of the S p an is h period and
results of free trade. During the years of prosperity, the
Filipinos continued to seek Independence, sending between the
years 191S and 1934 twelve missions to the United States. A
f ew observers pointed out that independence would have as one of
Its main results the loss of the free trade and preferential
p osition in the Ame ri ca n market, a statement which was always
countered by vague statements with regard to developing new
industries, finding other markets or maintaining the status
quo In one way or another.
W i t h the Tydings-McDuffie Act a n d the establishment of
the Commonwealth, the leaders in the government were at last
confronted with the necessity of provid in g a ne w Philippine
economic structure in pr ep ar a ti on for independence in 1946.
Some experimental steps were taken be tween 1934 and 1938 in
this direction, and their general failure resulted In pi nning
the hopes of the industries in the Joint Prepara to ry Committee.
681
Its report in 1938 tried to please all elements on both sides
of the Pacific, and provided that economic independence would
not be a reality until 1960, This extension of the dread
day for a period of two decades so lulled the sensibilities of
the planners that for the remainder of the Commonwealth period
the plan ni ng continued to be vague, general and theoretical.
No positive steps were taken to divert the n a t i o n ’s resources
from the four main export items to an intensive development of
domestic industries and even the special report made by a
technical committee appointed by President Quezon in Washington
d uring the war was ignored by the first ad mi ni stration of the
infant Republic.
One of the main difficulties which lay in the path of
the planners of the Commonwealth was their failure to understand
the exact nature of the Philippine economy. It was a colonial
economy whose continued prosperity was to be determined by a
continued close association with the colonial power. The
leaders of the Commonwealth were apparently unaware of the fact
that the severing of the colonial ties would bring problems
which were impossible of solution so long as the colonial nature
of the economy was maintained. Despite their elaborate planning
and programming, which during the pre-war years was more
theoretical than practical, they took, actually, no steps to
alter the nature of the economy. The natural result was that
the Republic was faced wit h the necessity of m a i n t ai ni ng a
complex governmental structure f r o m an economy w hich was still
522
colonial but which was soon to lose the protection of the
colonial power.
Realizing this finally, the only recourse for the Govern
ment was take steps to maintain in some fashion the previous
close relationship, secure aids from the United States in reha
bilitating the war-ravaged nation and to hitch the Philippine
wagon to the American star. This added fuel to the discontent
already present in the nation and was utilized by the Communist-
inspired Hukbalahap, who were fomenting discord rather than seek
ing a positive way out of the muddle, for their own propaganda
purposes. It Is undeniably true that political independence with
out economic independence is but half a loaf but half a loaf Is
better than none in what was becoming an increasingly uneasy
world. The old idea of neutrality for the Philippines was revived
by some who did not realize that in mid-century, neutrality, In
the greatest ideological conflict of history, was possible only
for the dead. If one appreciates the nature of the economy, the
events of 1934-1946, the failure of the Commonwealth to produce
a workable plan, it becomes quite clear that the only course of
action possible for the Republic was the one actually taken.
There is no doubt whatever that the fruits of this
course of action would have been more easily attained had the
individuals In the early administration of the Republic been
less concerned with self-aggrandizement and enrichment. The
frauds and corruption which so rotted the fabric of the nation
523
from 1946-1950, in which Americans, Chinese, Spanish and
others, as well as P'ilipinos participated, were almost insuper
able deterrents to the establishment of sound economy, sound
government, sound planning and sound thinking
’
w hat was developing from an emergent feudalistic gov er n
ment was an oligarchic-socialism which, following the withdrawal
of a foreign colonial power, replaced it with Manila, the
capital, as the new colonial power. The rest of the Philippines
became colonies of Manila -- the locus of power -- with
individuals in an out of the central Government receiving
portions of the nation as new encomiendas as rewards for party
fidelity, personal loyalty to the powerful and special services
rendered. Manifestations of this n e w movement are to be found
in the naming of municipalities after certain individuals still
alive and connected in one way or another with the Government.
The sources of wealth and power were cartelized among the
powerful and the provinces became the happy hunting grounds and
special preserves of the elect.
It is doubly tragic that those who should have aided the
Filipinos were tarred with the same brush. It is excusable
perhaps that individuals from the United States should not have
known m u c h about the Philippines; it is inexcusable, however,
that so many Americans in the various hierarchies of off ic ia l
dom, should have been associated so closely and intimately with
those individuals in Philippine society not representative of
the people and well-known as perpetuators of the iniquitous social
524
and economic system. One of the greatest tragedies which
emerged from American bungling in East Asia was the identifica
tion of Americans and America with the very elements in society
and government which the United States should have aided the
Filipino people to eradicate. The propaganda of the Communists
was enriched by the many false steps taken in the early post
war period by responsible Americans and this disastrous pr o
paganda was not destroyed by official United States policies
and programs which being theoretical, based upon insufficient
knowledge and understanding of t h e Philippine (and East Asian)
scene, and vacillating in the extreme weakened the position of
the United States in the eyes of the Orient. Had the policies
been less anti-Communist (which too readily becomes anti-liberal,
e.g. attitude toward Fr. Hogan) and more pro-democratic and
pro-American (in the Jeffersonian not the McCarthy sense), the
Filipino and American peoples would have benefitted a great
deal more. This lack of a sound, well-constructed policy on
the part of the United States was as evident during the Common
wealth period as during the Republic and undoiibtedly caused a
great portion of the indecision and procrastination of the
Commonwealth Government. The observer of the history of these
years much conclude that the United States failed in its mission
in the Philippines at the very time that success was demanded and
could have been achieved.
That a rocky road lies ahead for the nation cannot be
denied by even the warmest supporter of the Philippines, and many
observers in the years 1949-1951, expressed fears that the vehicle
which must travel this road may not be so sturdy as "The One-Hoss Shay."
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE
Reference material is scanty, poorly organized,
difficult to obtain and poorly cared for in the Philippines
making general problems of research difficult in the extreme
and presenting a discouraging prospect for the student. The
Pilipiniana Division of the Philippine National Library lost
95 per cent of its collection - some 76,000 volumes, and
countless manuscripts. This loss has not been recovered and,
with the present attitude of the Philippine Congress and the
General A ud it i n g Office, the rehabilitation of the Library in
all likelihood wil3 long be delayed.
Since this loss can be duplicated in most of the
major universities, colleges and academies of the country,
the picture is one of desolation to the researcher. This
necessitated an unending search for surviving materials. Some
were located in a few private libraries that miraculously
remained untouched by the torch of war. Some material was
located accidentally in second hand book stores or on the
counters of small stores where the leaves of the books and
manuscripts were being used for wrapping paper. The picture for
recent, post-war material is not much more encouraging. In the
many government bureaus visited, it was seen readily that govern
ment employees and directors have little or no appreciation for
the need of preservation of public documents. Materials of
great value to the researcher are carelessly stored and used.
525
526
M an y public documents are used as scratch paper or for sanitary
purposes. The National Library is greatly handicapped in its
efforts of preservation by the unbelievable inattention and lack
of perspective of the Congress wh ich appropriates money annually
for purposes other than for the repository of the Government
where books are denonimated as "furniture" by the budget commission.
The situation with regard to materials in the United
States Is little better. Important papers with reference to the
Philippines are almost unobtainable. Other materials are
scattered throughout the n a t i o n ’s libraries, the use of w h ic h
places a considerable financial burden on the average researcher.
The L i b r a r y of Congress is several years behind in its task of
sorting collections in which m u c h material on the Philippines
must lie. The valuable collection gathered together b y the
arduous labors of the late Dr. J. R al s to n Hayden and his staff,
during the Aar, has vanished like the snows of yesteryear in
the vast, murky, uncharted wastes of Washington bureaucracy.
Since the author was not able to spend much time at the Library
of Congress because of reasons familiar to every student sans
grant, the bibliography following has b e e n gathered together
from the four corners of the world.
Through the fine cooperation of other individuals
Interested In the relatively untouched area that is the Phi li p
pines, the author hopes to be able to present in a year or two
a bi bl iography of available material on the Philippines - supple
menting the bibliographies of Griffin, Pelzer, Kolb and Ann
Du nc an Brown.
527
The present bibliography has been divided, for the
author's convenience, into sections on books, pamphlets and
other materials, articles, periodicals, official publications,
propaganda, dictionaries and grammars, manuscripts and atlases.
It will be noted that the bibliographic information on the
various periodicals is still limited. This is due to the
h ighly fugitive nature of such material and the spasmodic
nature of their appearance. The author has been unable so far
to locate any library containing all or a great portion of
titles listed. Many serials are published in the Philippines.
Their lives, however, are as evanescent as that of the May fly -
many of them being published but once. Since Philippine
officials write extensively in these publications, many
important articles are to be found in magazines whose births were
their deaths. The author has not attempted to annotate these
publications nor to indicate those materials of more scholarly
nature. The author is aware that this is a weakness, but the
limited time for preparation of this work has precluded the
completion of this task at present; it will be accomplished for
a later publication. Therefore, the reader is requested to
assume that each article cited, or each pamphlet listed, has
some value other than antiquarian. In even the most ’’popular"
of articles in Philippine serials is to be found material of
u tility and scholarly value. This, the author realizes, can be
a ppreciated only by a study of these articles. The author has
endeavored to be as selective as possible in the listing of
articles and has not included in this present work a listing of
528
about 800 articles w h i c h are of value, in one way or the other,
to one Interested in the shifting currents of the Philippine
stream of e v e n t s .
The author wishes that the listing of primary sources
were more complete. This is difficult in the Philippines b e
cause of the methods employed in pre se rv in g public documents.
It has been a source of frustration to others attempting a study
of the Philippines. Many important, unrestricted, public
documents are difficult to secure because "they can not be located"
- a phrase used by clerks, bureau chiefs, etc., etc. This is
naturally very convenient for the individuals treated or
affected by the material but hardly for the serious student.
sShether they will ever be obtainable is questionable.
Secondary sources are numerous and varied. Only a few,
however, are authoritative. The present listing should be
annotated, and the author hopes to accomplish this in a year or
two. This list is merely a preli mi n ar y one.
The reader will note numerous publications in the section
on "Official Publications." They represent really the core of
any study of the Philippines. The old Insular Government and
the Commonwealth took their tasks seriously and in the p u b l i c a
tion of circulars, pamphlets, etc, provided the really only
authoritative sources for recent Philippine history. The
p u bl ic at io ns of the various departments and bureaus are all
valuable as sources for official attitudes and programs as well
529
as much information on events and developments. x'he Republic
so far has failed to measure up to the work of the p as t in this
respect, as well, indeed, in many ethers.
There has been little published of Importance to the
researcher in the Philippines since the War - either in p e r i o d
icals or books. One of the extraordinary phenomena w i t h regard
to research in the Philippines, is the lack of material for the
years 1939-1941. The answer probably lies in the fact that
since this material appeared just shortly before the outbreak of
the war, there was no opportunity for a wide distribution.
What is more extraordinary is the disappearance of materials
fr om the old bureau of Insular Affairs, p ar ti cularly the dis
appearance of Philippine newspapers. They probably lie in some
anonymous warehouses in the Federal district in the trust of an
aged employee kn own only to God.
The graphs have been prepared by Itr. Gil Llanes of the
University of Manila, being gathered by the author from various
reports of the Central Bank of the Philippines, the Bureau of
the Census and Statistics, the Bureau of Commerce and special
articles fro m the press of the Philippines. The author cannot
guarantee the exactitude of each graph wit h the exception of
those on fisheries. They are presented here largely as guides
and Illustrate the statistical work of various Government
bureaus. Statistical information in the Philippines in the past
has been capricious and confusing and, as a science, is still
in its infancy. In analyzing statistics in the Philippines,
530
the necessity of' striking averages becomes quickly apparent.
The Philippines present a fertile field to a student
interested in problems and methods of statistics.
Sources of Table I on p alay were scattered available
numbers of the Philippine Magazine . Graphs 1 and 2 were prepared
from information contained in the "Rice Supplement" of the
Philippines Herald for October 1, 1949. Graphs 3-17 are re
produced from Economic Indicators, published by the Central Bank
of the Philippines, Manila, 1949. This latter public at io n was
prepared by the Department of Economic Research whose director
is Leonides S. Virata. Members of this Department arei Horacio
C. Lava, Economist; Cesar M. Lorenzo, Chief Statistician, and
R. Marino Corpus, Economist. This publication states that the
statistical sources used were reports of government bureaus and
offices; "statistics on cost of living index are obtained f r o m
the Bureau of Census and Statistics, with 1941 as the base year
shifted by the Central Bank to 1937 b a s e . ” Wit h regard to units
used, it states: "in consonance with the practice of the
United Nations, all index numbers are p u b l i s h e d ...w i t h 1937 as
base period. Gregorian calendar years and months are used.
Data for fiscal years ending June 30 are properly noted....
Owing to the rounding of numbers, totals do not always tally
w it h their component parts."
W it h regard to the series used by the Central Bank, the
p ublication stated that "in computing the wholesale price index,
the fo ll o w i n g products were taken into consideration: for
531
export--copra resecada, coconut oil, hemp, almaciga, logs, lumber,
maguey, tobacco, and gum elemi; for domestic consumption products
--palay, rice, sugar, corn, mongo, peanuts and rattan. The
index of wholesale prices are of the weighted aggregative type.
The indexes are still preliminary and are subject to r e v i s i o n . ”
W i t h regard to the cost of living index, in Graph 13, the Bank
states that it is "for Manila only." "There are no indexes for
other cities as yet." With regard to retail prices, it states:
"The 'over-all' index of retail prices of strategic commodities
in Manila is the geometric mean of all the price relatives of
commodities quoted by the Bureau of Commerce. About 100 com
modities are included in the index."
The Central Bank estimates the average number of persons
in a Manila family at 4.9. "The following weights were used in
computing the 'over-all* index: before 1947: F o o d s t u f f s - -59.15,
House rent--8.43, C lo th i n g - -0*62, Fuel, Light, W a t e r - - 1 3 .94, and
M i s c e l l a n e o u s - - 1 7 .86; from and after 1947: Foo ds tu ff s- -6 3. 43,
House fient--11.96, Cloth in g --2.04, Fuel, Light Water--7.73, and
Miscellaneous--14.84.
With regard to material contained in Gr aph 17, the Bank
states: "The term Gross National Product as understood in the
computation of the National Income is the market value of the
output of goods and services produced by the nation's economy
before deducting allowances for depreciation, maintenance and
obsolescence. The nation's economy in this instance refers to
labor and property supplied by the residents of the nation."
532
It thus appears that the Bank has adopted the disastrous
"National Income" t h e o r y of Keynes and U.S. Government theorists.
Wage rates refer to a daily wage "derived from pay rolls
of commercial manufacturing and mining firms in Manila and
represent the average rates of pay of all classes of workers in
each group." The "money wage rate is the weighted average
monetary wage rate of eac h group of laborers." The real wage
"is obtained by using the cost of living index as deflators."
Tables 1 and 2 on fisheries were secured through courtesy
of Director Villadolid and Mr. Jose R. Montilla of the Bureau of
Fisheries. Tables I-VII were given the author by Dr. Juan
Salcedo, Jr. of the Philippine Institute of Nutrition. Graphs
18-20 were adapted from information contained in. The Sunday Times
for June 8, 1947, the Annual Report on Child and Y o ut h W e l f a r e .
1 9 4 8 . United Nations Department of Social Affairs, and the
Annual Report of the Social Welfare C o m m i s s i o n . Manila (Welfarevill
1948. Graph 21 was taken from the Manila Tine s Midweek R e v i e w .
December 27, 1950, page 6.
The map on climate is reproduced from Climate of the
P h i l i p p i n e s . published by the Department of A griculture and
Commerce, 1939; the two maps on Philippine fishing were supplied
by Mr. Jose R. Montilla of the Bureau of Fisheries.
B I B L I O G - R A P H Y
BOOKS
Abaya, Hernando J. Betrayal in the P h i l i p p i n e s . New York:
A.A. VVyn. , 1946, 272 pp.
Abelarde, Pedro IS. American Tariff Policy Towards the P hi l i p
pines: 1 8 9 8 - 1 9 4 6 . New York: King's Crown Press,
1947, 233 pp.
Abend, Hallett. Reconquest. Garden City: Doubleday, 1946,
305 pp.
Aldana, Benigno. The Educational System of the P h i l i p p i n e s .
Manila: The Univ er si ty Publishing Co., 1949, 453 pp.
Alejandrino, Jose. The Price of F re edom (La Senda Del
S a c r i f i c i o ) . translated from the Spanish by Jose Pi.
Alejandrino. Manila: Author (?), 1949, 236 pp.
Alvero, Aurelio S. (M. Asa). Moo n Shadows on the W a t e r s . P re
face by J.J. Siler. 2nd edition. Manila: Par Eastern
Publishing Co., 1950, 185 pp.
Alvero, R.L. Sevilla de. Critica Sobre El Actual Sistema
Educacional en P i l i p i n a s . Ph. D. dissertation, Sto.
Tomas University, 1935. Manila: Imprenta de Santo
Tomas, 1936, 218 pp.
American-Philippine Trade R e l a t i o n s . TC-1. Report of the
Technical Committee to the President of the Philippines.
Washington D.C. : n.p. 1944, 255 pp. (Iviimeo.).
Anderson, William. ■‘■'he Philippine P r o b l e m . N.Y.: G.P. P u t n a m ’s
Sons, 1939, 338 pp.
A ng 25 Pinakamabuting Maikling K at hang Pilipino ng 1 9 4 5 . (25
Best Filipino Short Stories of 1943). Selected by a
special committee in short stories under the general
direction of G. Kin-iti Isikawa, General editor of
"Philippine Publications," and G. Jose Esperanza
Cruz, Manila: Philippine Publications, 1944, 255 pp.
A n g P i l i p i n o . A d u l t Education in the Philippines. Social
Justice Series (No. 4). Manila? Dep ar tm en t of Public
Instruction, 1940, 107 pp. (in Tagalog, Illus.}.
("On the occasion of the F i f th A nn iv er sa ry of the Common
w ealth of the Philippines").
533
534
Arguilla, Manuel E . , Esteban Nedruda, Teodoro Agoncillo (eds.),
Literature Under the C o m m o n w e a l t h . Manila: Philippine
W r i t e r s ’ League, 1940, 131 pp.
Aruego, Jose M. The Framing of the Philippine C o n s t i t u t i o n .
2 Vols., Manilas University Pu blishing Co., 1936,
1094 pp.
_________ . International Documents for the Philippines: Treaty
Series No. 1 . M a n i l a : Uni ve rs it y P u bl i sh in g Co.,
1948, 187 pp.
A sian R e l a t i o n s . Being Report of the Proceedings and D o c u m e n t a
tion of the First As ian Relations Conference, New
Delhi, March-April, 1947, New Delhi: Asian Relations
Organization, 1948, 314 pp.
A Survey of the Educational System of the Philippine I s l a n d s .
By the Board of Educational Survey created under Acts
3162 and 3196 of the Philippine Legislature. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1925, 677 pp. ("The Monroe Report.").
Bailey, Thomas A. A Diplomatic History of the A merican
P e o p l e . 3rd Edition. New York; F.S. Crofts & Co.,
1946, 937 pp.
Ball, W. Macmahon. Japan: Enemy or A l l y ? N e w York. John
Day and IPR, 1948, 224 pp.
Banas, Raymundo C. Brief Historical Sketches of Philippine
Catholic C h u r c h e s . Manila: Commonwealth Press, Inc.
1 9 3 7 , 9 2 p p .
B a q a i , I.E. Books on A s i a . A Bibliography. New Delhi:
Indian Council of World Affairs, 1947, 111 pp.
Bartlett, Ruhl J. (ed.). The Record of American D i p l o m a c y .
N e w York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1947, 731 pp.
Barton. Roy F. Hie Half-Way Sun. N e w York: Brewer & Warren.
1930, 315 pp.
______ . The K a l i n g a s ; Their Institutions and Custom Law.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949, 275 pp.
Bausor, Sydney C., and Teodulo Protomartir. Glimpses of the
P h i l i p p i n e s . Omaha, Nebraska: Lensor Publ is hi ng Co.,
1948, 57 pp.
Bazaco, E. Historla Documentado Del Real Coleglo de San Juan
de Letran. Manila: Santo Tomas Press, 1933. 282 pp.
535
Bemis, Samuel Flagg. A Diplomatic History of the United S t a t e s .
Rev. ed. New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1942, 934 pp.
Bergsmark, Daniel R. Economic Geography of A s i a . New York:
P r e n t i c e - H a l l , Inc., 1944, 618 pp.
Bernstein, David. The Philippine S t o r y . New York: Farrar,
Straus, Inc., 1947, 27 6 pp.
Beukema, Herman, and Geer, Willi am M., et a l . Contemporary
Foreign G o v e r n m e n t s . Ne w York: Rinehart & Co., 1946,
3 62 p p .
Bierce, Ambrose. The D e v i l ’s D i c t i o n a r y . New York: World
Publishing Co., 1942, 376 pp.
Bisson, T.A. Amer ic an Policy in the Far East; 1951-1940.
I.P.R. Inquiry Series. New York: IFR, 1939, 146 pp.
_________ . A m e r i c a ’s Far Eastern P o l i c y . I.P.R. Inquiry Series.
New York: "The MacL'illan Co., 1945, 235 pp.
. J a p a n ’s War Economy. N ew York: IPR, distributed
by The Macmillan Co., 1945, 267 pp.
Blount, James H. The A merican Occupation of the P h i l i p p i n e s :
1 89 8 - 1 9 1 2 . New York; G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1913, 664 pp.
Boeke, J.H. The Interests of the Voiceless Far E a s t . Leiden:
Leiden University Press (Under the joint auspices of
the Institute of Pacific Relations and the Netherlands-
Netherlands Indies Council, IPR), 1948, 92 pp.
Bok, F. (Flaviano P. Boquecosa). Anf
g Palad ni P e p e . C’J o e 1s
Fate"). Manila: VIsayan Book Co., 1937, 320 pp.
(Novel in Visayan).
Buenafe, Manuel E. (ed.). The Voice of the Veteran. Manila:
Republic Promotion Publishers, 1946, 90 pp.
Buencamino, Victor. The National Rice and Corn Corporation.
Annual Report to the U.S. Department"”of the Interior,
Division of Territories and Island Possessions.
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1940, 134 pp.
Bulosan, Carlos. America is In the Hea r t . New York: Harcourt,
Brace & Co., 1946, 326 pp.
Bufiag, Daniel M. and Lucretia Belting. Philippine Insect
Stories. Manila: Progressive Schoolbooks, 1937,
167 pp. Paper.
536
Buss, Claude A. War and Diplomacy in Eastern A s i a . New Yorks
The Macmillan Co., 1941, 570 pp.
Bustos, Felixberto G. And Now Ccttnes R o x a s . Manila: C.Z.
Bustos & Sons, 1945, 253 pp.
_________., and Fajardo, Abelardo J. New Philippines. Manila:
Carmelo and Bauermann, Inc., 1934, 530 pp.
Cady, John F., Barnett, Patricia G., and Jenkins, Shirley.
The Development of Self-Rule and Independence in Burma,
Mal a y a , and the Philippines. New York: Institute of
Pacific Relations, 1948, 104 pp. (Mimeo.).
Calderon, Sofronio G. Mga Alamat Ng Pilipinas. (Philippine
Mythology, Traditions and Legends;. Manila: M. Colcol
& Co., 1947, 95 pp.
_________. Ang Mga Kawikaan. (Philippine Proverbs). Manila:
M. Colcol & Co., 1947, 97 pp.
Camus, Jose 5. Rice in the Ph i l ippines. Department of Agri-
Culture and Natural Resources, Bureau of Agriculture,
Bulletin No. 5 7 . Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1921,
87 pp.
Carter, T.D., J.E. Hill, G.H.H. Tate: Mammals of the Pacific
World. New York: The Macmillan Co., 1945, 227 pp.
Castillo, Andres. Philippine Economics. Manila: Author, 1949,
778 pp.
Certain Phases of Philippine Relief and Rehabilitati o n . TC-2
Report of the Technical Committee to the President of
the Philippines. Washington, D . C . : n.p., October,
1944, 194 pp. (Mimeo.).
Chapman, James and Ethel. Escape to the H i l l s . Lancaster,
Pennsylvania: The Jaques Cattell Press, 1947, 247 pp.
Chunn, Calvin Ellsworth (Ed.). Of Rice and Mien. Rev.ed. Los
Angeles and Tulsa: Veterans1 Puolishing Co., 1947,
230 pp.
Clifford, Hugh: Further India. New York: Frederick A. Stokes
Co., 1904, 378 pp.
Clyde, Paul Hibbert. A History of the Modern and Contemporary
Far E a s t . New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1937, 858 pp.
_________• The Far E a s t : A History of the Impact of the West
on Eastern A s i a . New York: Prentice-Hall, 1948, 862 pp.
537
Cohen, Jerome B. J a p a n ’s E conomy in War and R e c o n s t r u c t i o n .
Minneapolis: U ni versity of Minnesota Press, under
the auspices of IPR, 1949, 545 pp.
Cole, Pay-Cooper. The P e o n ies of Malaysia. New York: D. Van
Nostrand Co., Inc., 1945, 354 pp.
Commercial and Industrial Manual of the P h i l i p p i n e s . 1 9 3 7 - 1 9 5 8 ;
1 9 3 8 - 1 9 5 9 ; 1 9 4 0 - 1 9 4 1 . Manila: The Publishers Inc.,
1938, variously paged; 1939, 1136 pp.; 1940, 1073 pp.
Commercial and Trade Directory of the Philippines, 1 9 4 8 . M a n i 1 a :
Islanders Publishing Co., 1948, 224, 192, 350, 192 pp.
Corne.jo's Commonwealth Directory of the Philippines. 1959-1940.
M a n i l a : Miguel H. Corne jo", 1939 , 2626 p p .
Cornish, Louis C. The Philippines C a l l i n g . Philadelphia:
Dorrance & Co., 1942, 313 pp.
Cortez, Pedro J. Philippine Geology and Mineral R e s o u r c e s .
3rd Edition"! M a n i l a : Garcia Bookstore (author?),
1948(?), 161 pp.
Craig, A us t i n (ed). The Philippine s and the Filipinos of
Yesterday. (""Three" books in One V ol u m e 1') , contains:
"Travels in the Philippines in 1859-1860," by P. Jagor;
"Country Life in the Philippines in 1876-1878," by
W.G. Palgrave; and "Present-Day Philippines in Pictures."
Manila: Oriental Commercial Co., 1934, 632 pp.
Cuenco, Jesus ivl. Roma. Cebu City: Republic Publishing House,
1949, 206 pp.
Curran, C.H. Insects of the Pacific World. New York: The
Macmillan Co., 1945, 317 pp.
Das, Taraknath. Foreign Policy in the Far E a s t . New York:
Longmans, Green & Co., 1936, 272 pp.
Delacour, Jean. Birds of M a l a y s i a , N e w York: The Macmillan
Co., 1947, 382 pp.
_________ ., and Ernest Mayr. Birds of the P h i l i p p i n e s . New
York; The Macmillan Co., 1946, 309 pp.
De la Liana, Pedro, and Icasiano, F.3. The Philippine Co mm on
w ealth H a n d b o o k : A Cultural and Economic Survey of
Present-Day Philippines Wi th Sketches of the Outstanding
Builders of the C o m m o n w e a l t h . Manila: General Printing
Press, 1936, 522 pp.
538
De Las Barras De Aragon, Francisco. Craneos de F i l l p i n a s .
Madrid: Consejo Superior De Investigaciones Cienti-
ficas Instituto Bernardino De Sahagun. Serie A-
Num, 2. 1942, 1S7 pp., 31 plates.
Del Castillo, Jose Lopez. Orientaciones D i p l o m a t ! c a s . Manila:
A u t h o r (?), 1939, 354 pp.
De Veyra, Jaime C. Tandaya 0 K a n d a y a : Algunos ensayos
h i s t o r i c o - l i t e r a r i o s . Manila: A u t h o r (?), 1948, 89 pp.
Dietrich, Elthe1 3. Far Eastern Trade of the United S t a t e s .
IPR, Inquiry Series. New York: IPR, 1940, 116 pp.
Doveglion (pseud., J.G. Villa). P o e m s . 2nd edition, Ivanila:
The Philippine W r i t e r s ’ League, 1941, 107 pp.
Ealdama, Eugenio. Alameda. Manila: Philippine Commonweal,
1948, 149 pp.
Economic R e p o r t . Salient Features of the World Economic S i t u a
tion, 1945-47. Lake Success: UN, Department of
Economic Affairs, January, 1948, 354 pp.
Edwards, E.O. (ed.). Bamboo, Lotus and P a l m : A n An th o lo gy of
the Far East, Southeast Asia and the Pacific. London:
Hodge, 1948, 377 pp.
Electric Power Program for the Republic of the Philippines.
N e w York: Westinghouse Electric International Co.,
December, 1947, unpaged.
Elmer, Emma Osterman. Our Philippine F o r e s t s . Manila:
Oriental Commercial C o . , 1 9 3 9 , 206 p p .
Embree, Edwin R., Margaret S. Simon and A.B. Mumford. Island
India Goes to S c h o o l . Chicago: The University of
Chicago Press, 1934, 120 pp.
Embree, John F . , and L.O. Dotson. Bibliography of the Peoples
and Cultures of Mainland Southeast A s i a . N e w Haven:
Southeast Asia Studies, Yale University, 1950, 821 pp.,
and 12 pp. of addenda.
Encyclopaedia Britannica Book of the Year: 1941. Chicago:
Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1941, 748 pp.
: 1942. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.,
1943, 756 pp.
_________ : 1 9 4 7 . Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.,
1947, 876 pp.
539
_________ : 1 9 4 8 . Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.,
1948, 842 pp.
_________ : 1 9 4 9 . Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.,
1949, 810 pp.
Encyclopedia of the P h i l i p p i n e s . The L ib rary of Philippine
Literature Art and Science. 10 volumes, Edited by
Zoilo Ivl. Galang. Manila: P. Vera and Sons Co, 1935.
Enosawa, G.H. Manuel L. Q,uezon: Prom Nipa House to Malacahan.
Tokyo: Japan Publicity Agency, 1940, 178 pp.
Fabia, Aniceto B. The Teaching of H i s t o r y . Manila: Uni
versity of the Philippines Press, 1931, 256 pp.
Farley, Mir ia m The Problem of Japanese Trade Expansion
in the Post-War Situation. IPR, Inquiry Press. New
York: IPR, 1939, 93 pp. Paper.
Field, James, A., Jr. The Japanese At Leyte G u l f : The Sho
Operation. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
1947, 162 pp.
Firth, Raymond. Malay F i s h e r m e n : Their Peasant E c o n o m y .
London: Kegan Paul, in cooperation with the Royal
Institute of International Affairs and the IPR, 1946,
354 pp.
Follett, Helen. Men of the Su lu S e a . New York: Charles
S c r i b n e r ’s Sons, 1945, 250 pp.
Forbes, A. Cameron. The Philippine I s l a n d s . 2 vols. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin Co., 1928. Vol. I, 620 pp.; Vol. II,
636 p p .
_________ . The Philippine I s l a n d s . Rev. ed. Cambridge,
Mass.: Harvard U n i ve rs it y Press, 1945, 242 pp.
Fowler, Henry W. Contributions to the Biology of the Phi li p
pine Archipelago and A d j ac en t R e g i o n s . Smithsonian
Institution Bulletin 100, Vol. 13. Washington, D.C.:
U.S. Government P rinting Office, 1941, 879 pp.
Furnas, C.C., and S.M. Man. Bread and D e s t i n y : '
l'he Story of
Man and His Food" New Y o r k : 'The N e w Home Library,
1943, 364 pp.
Furnivall, J.S. Educational Progress in Southeast A s i a . N e w
York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1943, 186 pp.
_________ • Colonial Policy and P r a c t i c e . A Comparative Study
of Burma and Netherlands India. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1948, 568 pp.
540
Gallego, Manuel V. Economic Emancipation; An Independent View
of Philippine Economic Problems and Their Solution.
Manila; A u t h o r (?), 1939, 376 pp.
_________ . The Price of Philippine Independence under the
Tydl'ngs-McDuffie Act (An A nt i-View of the so-called
Independence L a w ) • Manila: Author, 1939, 732 pp.
Garcia, Candido Fernandez (Fr.). La Doc tr in a de la Iglesla
Flliplna In de p e n d l e n t e . Exposicion y critica. Manila;
Tip. Pont. De La Universidad De Santo Tomas, 1924,
542 pp.
Gonzales, Alfredo Q. The Bamboo F l o w e r .Philadelphia; Dorrance
& Co., 1949, 204 pp.
Gonzales, N.V.M. The Winds of A p r i l . Manila; Un iversity of
the Philippines Press, 1941, 423 pp.
Gourou, Pierre. Les Pays T r o p i c a u x ; Principes D'Une Geographie
Humaine et Economique. Paris; Presses Universitaires
de France, 1947, 196 pp.
Gregorio, Herman Cruz. Principles of T e a c h i n g . Manila:
R.P. Garcia Publishing Co., 1948, 332 pp.
Griffin, A.P.C. Bibliography of the Philippine I s l a n d s . 57th
Congress, Second Session, Senate Document No. 74.
Published under the direction of The Library of
Congress and The Bureau of Insular Affairs, War Dep ar t
ment Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office,
1903, 397 and 439 pp.
Griswold, A. Whitney. The Far Eastern Policy of the United
S t a t e s . New Y o r k ; H a r e o u r t , Brace & cQ ., 1938, 530 pp.
Gunnison, Royal Arch. So Sorry. No P e a c e . New Yorks The
Viking Press, 1944, 272 pp.
Gunther, John, Inside A s i a . Ne w York; Harper and Brothers,
1939, 599 pp.
Gwekoh, Sol H. Manuel L. Q u e z o n : His Life and Career.
Manila: Univ er s it y Publishing Company, 1948, 302 pp.
Haas, William H. (ed.). The Ame ri ca n Empire. A Study of the
Outlying Territories of the Un i te d S t a t e s . Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press, 1940, 408 pp.
Haggerty, Edward. Guerrilla Padre in M i n d a n a o . Hew York:
Longmans, Green & Co. Inc., 1946, 257 pp.
541
Hamilton, Esther Yerger. Ambassador in B o n d s . East Stroudsburg,
Penna.j Pinebrook Book Club, 1946, 264 pp.
Handbook of Philippine Agriculture, A. Manila: College of
Agriculture, University of the Philippines, 1939,
8 0 3 pp.
Harrison, Francis Burton. The Cornerstone of Philippine
I nd ep e n d e n c e . A Narrative of Seven Years. N e w York:
The Century Co., 1922, 343 pp.
Hawes, Harry B. Philippine Un certainty: An A merican Problem.
New York: The Century Co., 1932, 360 pp.
Hayden, Joseph Ralston. The P h i l i p p i n e s : A Study in National
Development. Ne w York: The Macmillan Co., 1947,
984 pp.
Herre, Albert i». Philippine Fish T a l e s . Manila: Oriental
Commercial Co., 1935, 302 pp.
_________ . , and Umali, Agustin F. English and Local Common
Names of Philippine F i s h e s . U.S. Department of In
terior Fish and Aildlife Service, Circular 14,
Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office,
1948, 128 pp.
Hill, Percy A. Philippine Short S t o r i e s : In Two Parts.
Manila: Oriental Commercial Co.. 1934, 352 pp.
Hind, R. Renton. Spirits U n b r o k e n . San Francisco: John
Howell, 1946, 291 pp.
Hirippin H e n . Tokyo: To-A Keizai Chosa-Kyoku, 193S, 439 pp.
Holland, II'.L. and Mitchell, Kate (Eds.). Problems of the
Pacific. 1 9 3 9 . Proceedings of the Institute of Pacific
Relations, New York: 1940, 299 pp.
Horn, Florence. Orphans of the P a c i f i c . New York: Reynal,
1941, 316 pp.
Hough, Frank 0. The Island W a r . Philadelphia: Lippincott,
1947, 413 pp.
Hudson, G-.F. The Far East in World P o l i t ics: A Study in Recent
History. 2nd Edition, London: OxTord University Press,
1945, 250 pp.
Hurley, Vic, Southeast of Z a m b o a n g a . N e w York: E.P. Dutton
& Co., 1935, 240 pp.
542
_________ . Jungle P a t r o l : The Story of the Philippine
Constabulary. New York: E.P. Dutton a: Co., 1938,
397 pp.
Hutchinson, J.B., R.A. Silow, and S.Cf. Stephens. The Evoln-
tion of Gossyplurn and the Differentiation of the
Cultivated C o t t o n s . Empire Cotton Crowing Corporation.
New York: Oxford University Press, 1947, 160 pp.
Ind, Allison. Bataan: The Judgement S e a t . New York: The
Macmillan Co., 1944, 395 pp.
Interrogations of Japanese O f f i c i a l s . 2 Volumes. U.S.
Strategic Bombing Survey, Naval Analysis Division.
0PNAV- P-03-100. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government
Printing Office, 1946, 576 pp, (continuous for 2
v o l u m e s .).
Isaacs, Harold (ed.). Ne * Prple.i n Asia : Selected Documents
on Major International Developments in the Far East.
New York: Institute of Pacific Relations and the
Macmillan Co., 1948, 212 pp.
No Peace For Asia. New York: The Macmillan Co.
1947, 295 pp.
Jacobs, Joseph E., and Richards, J. Bartlett. The Economy and
Trade of he P h i l i p p i n e s . 2 voliames. Washington, D.G.:
U.S. Department of State, Office of the Philippine
Affairs, 1940.
Jacoby, Erich H. Agrarian Unrest in Southeast A s i a . New
York: Columbia University Press, 1949, 287 pp.
Javellana, Stefan. Without Seeing the D a w n . New York: Little
Brown &: Co., 1947, 359 pp.
Jenkins, Shirley. Our Far Eastern Record: The War Y e a r s, Vol.
III. N e w York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1946,
96 pp.
Joint American-Philippine Finance Commission. Report and
Recommendations of the Joint Phillppine-American
Finance C o m m i s s i o n . Communication from the President
of the United States, transmitting the report and
r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s . ..dated June 7, 1947, and a technical
m em orandum entitled "Philippine Economic Development.'1
U.S. 80th Congress, First Session, 1947, House D o c u
ment, No. 390. Washington, D.C.: 1947, 222 pp.
Joint Education Committee of the Philippine Legislature. Join t
Legislative Committee Report on E d u c a t i o n . Manila;
Bureau of Printing, 1926, 395 pp.
543
Joint Preparatory Committee on Philippine Affairs. Report of
May 20, 1 9 3 8 . 3, volumes. Department of State,
Publication 1216, Conference Series 36. Washington,
D.C.i U.S. Government Printing Office, 1938. Vol.
I, 215 pp.; Vol. II, 664 pp.; Vol. Ill, 1429 pp. (in
2 groups): Group I - Briefs submitted in printed form,
and Group II - Briefs submitted in typewritten form.
Kalaw, Maximo Manguiat. The Development of Philippine
Politics (1872-1920). A n Account of the p a r t p l a y e d
by the Filipino leaders and parties in the political
development of the Philippines, Vol. I. Manila:
Oriental Commercial Co., Inc., 1926, 491 pp.
_________ . A n Introduction to Philippine Social .Science.
Manila; Philippine Education Co., 1939, 790 pp.
_________ . The Coconut I n d u s t r y . Report of a Special Mission
Abroad in Pursuance of Resolution ho. 23 of the
National Assembly. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1940,
140 pp.
_________ . Philippine Government, Its Development. Org an iz a
tion and A c t i v i t i e s . Manila: Author, 1948, 351 pp.
Kalaw, Teodoro M. The Philippine R ev o l u t i o n . Manila: Manila
Book Co., 1925, 335 pp.
_________ . Cinco Reglas de Nuestra Moral A n t i g u a . 2nd revised
edition. Biblioteca Nacional de Filipinas, Kanuales
de Informacion. (No. 5 de la serie). Manila: Bureau
of Printing, 1947, 158 pp.
Karig, Walter, Russel L. Harris and Frank . Kanson. battle
R e p o r t : The End of A n E m p i r e . Vol. IV of record of
U.S. Navy in the Pacific War. New York: Rinehart,
1948, 532 pp.
Kato, Masuo. The Lost w a r . N e w York: Knopf, 1946, 264 pp.
Keesing, Felix Maxwell. The Philippines; A Nation in the
Making. N e w York: Institute of Pacific Relations
wi th the University of Hawaii, 1937, 136 pp.
_________ . Taming Philippine Head h u n t e r s . Stanford U n i v e r
sity: Stanford University Press, 1934, 288 pp.
_________ . Education in Pacific C o u n t r i e s . Interpreting a
Seminar-Conference of Educators and Social Scientists
conducted by the University of Hawaii and Yale U n i
versity, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1936. Shanghai: K elly
and Walsh, Ltd., 1937, 22 6 pp.
544
_________ . The South Seas in the Modern W o r l d , with a Fore
word by J.B.~ C o n d l i f f e . Ne w Y o r k : The John Day Co.,
(Institute of Pacific Relations International Research
Series), 1941, 391 pp.
_________ . Native Peoples of the Pacific W o r l d . Mew York:
The Macmillan Co., 1946, 144 pp.
Keers, W. A n Anthropological Survey of the Eastern Little
Sunda Islands, the Negritos of the Eastern Little
Sunda Islands, the Proto-Malays of the Netherlands
E a s t - I n d i e s . Amsterdam: Indisch Institut, 1948,
19 6 pp.
K i r k , Trayson. Philippine Independence. Motives. Problems and
Prospects. New York: Farrar and Rinehart, Inc.,
1936, 278 pp.
Kitredge, Joseph. Forest I n f l u e n c e s : The Effects of Woody
Vegetation on Climate, Water and Soil, with A p p l i c a
tions to the Conservation of Water and the Control
of Floods and Erosion. New York: McGraw-Hill Book
Co., 1948, 394 pp.
Kolb, Albert. Die P h i l i p p i n e n . Leipzig: K.F. Koehler Verlag,
1942, 503 pp.
Krisger, Herbert W. People of the P h i l i p p i n e s . Washington:
Smithsonian Institution, 1942, 86 pp.
Kurihara, K en neth K. Labor in the Philippine E c o n o m y . Stanford:
Stanford Un iv ersity Press, under the auspices of the
Institute of Pacific Relations, 1946, 97 pp.
Lasker, Bruno. Filipino I m m i g r a t i o n . To Continental United
States and to Hawaii. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1931, 445 pp.
_________ . Peoples of Southeast A s i a . New York: Knopf, 1944,
288 pp.
Lattimore, Owen. Solution in A s i a . An Atlantic Monthly Press
Book. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1945, 214 pp.
Laubach, Frank C. Teaching the World to R e a d . New York:
Friendship Press, 1947, 246 pp.
Laufer, B e r t h o l d . S i n o - I r a n i c a . Anthropological Series XV,
No. 3, Chicago: The Field Museum of Natural
History, 1919, 185; 360 pp.
Laurel, Jose P. Gems of T h o u g h t . Ed. by B.P. Dionisio. Manila:
Author, 1949, 155 pp.
545
Lava, Horacio. Levels of Living in the Ilocos R e g i o n .
Manila: Philippine Council, Institute of Pacific
Relations, 1938, 91 pp.
Laya, Juan Cabreros. His Native S o i l . Manila: U n iversity
Publishing Co., 1941, 424 pp.
League of Nations, The. Memorandum on the fork of the League
in Relation to the Pacific. Prepared for the Sixth
Conference of the Institute of Pacific Relations.
Geneva: 1936, 102 pp.
Lee, Clark. They Call it P a c i f i c . New York: The Viking
Press, 1943, 374 pp.
Le Roy, James, A. Philippine Life in Town and C o u n t r y . New
York: G.P., Putnam's Sons, 1905, 311 pp.
Levy, Roger. Extreme Orient Rt P a c l f i q u e . Paris: Armand
Colin, 1948, 200 pp.
Lichauco, Marcial P. Dear Mother P u t n a m . A Diary of the War
in the Philippines. Manila; Au th or (?), 1949 (?),
219 p p .
Linton, Ralph (ed.). Most of the W o r l d . New York; Columbia
University Press, 1949, 917 pp.
Lippincott, Benjamin E. From Fiji Through the P h i l i p p i n e s .
San Angelo, Texas: Newsfoto Publishing Co.,
Distributed by Macmillan, New York. 1948, 191 pp.
Lopez, Cecilio. A Manual of the Philippine National
L a n g u a g e . 3rd Edition. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1941, 327 pp.
Luthringer, George F. The Gold-Exchange Standard in the
P h i l i p p i n e s . Princeton: Princeton Univ er si ty Press,
1934, 291 pp.
Major Problems of United States Foreign Policy. 1 9 4 8 - 1 9 4 9 .
A Study Guide. Prepared by the Staff of the Inter
national Studies Groups of the Brookings Institution.
Washington: The Brookings Institution, 1948, 246
pp.
Malcolm, George A. The Commonwealth of the P h i l i p p i n e s .
New York: A p p l e t o n - C e n t u r y , 1936, 511 pp.
Mallari, I.V. The Birth of D i s c o n t e n t . Manila: Progressive
Schoolbooks, 1940, 165 pp.
Mang Kiko (pseud. F.B. Icasiano). Horizons from My Nipa H u t .
Manila: Nipa Hut Publishing, 1941, 169 pp.
546
Manuel, E. Arsenio. Chinese Elements In the Tagalog L a n g u a g e ,
With some Indications of Chinese Influence on other
Philippine Languages and cultures, and an Exciirsion
Into Austronesian Linguistics. With a Historical
Introduction by H. Otley Beyer. Manila: Filipiniana
Publications, 1948, 139 pp.
Marina. (Mrs. Maria Luga Ferrer). Lo Qpe Ellas Dicen. Reco-
pilacion de entrevistas publicadas en La Vanguardia
durante los anos 1934-1935-1936-1937. Manila: Author,
1938, 435 pp.
Marion, George. Bases and E m p i r e . Ne w York: Fairplay, 1948,
199 pp.
Marquardt, Frederic S. Before Bataan and A f t e r . New York:
Bobbs-Ivlerrill Co., 1943, 315 pp.
MaulIt, D i m a s . Introduction to Agricultural Economics in the
Philippine s . Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1936, 317 pp.
Mayo, Katherine. The Isles of F e a r . New York: Harcourt,
Brace & Co., 1925, 372 pp.
McCall, James E. Santo Tomas Internment Camp. Lincoln,
Nebraska: The Woodruff Printing Co., 1945, 146 pp.
McCoy, Mel v in H. and S.M. Mellnik. Ten Escape from To.jo. As
told to Lt. W el bo u r n Keeley. New York: Farrar &
Rinehart, Inc., 1944, 106 pp.
McDonald, A.H. (ed.). Trusteeship in the P a c i f i c . Sydney:
Angus and Robertson (under the" auspices of the
Australian Institute of International affairs and the
Institute of Pacific Relations), 1949, 171 pp.
McWilliams, Carey. Brothers Under the S k i n . Boston: Little,
Brown &■ Co., 1946, 338 pp.
Meek, C.K. Land Law and Custom in the Colonies. N e w York:
Oxford University Press, 1947, 337 pp.
Mendiola, Pedro. The L a w of the Justice of the Peace C o u r t s .
2nd Edition. Manila: University Publishing Co.,
Inc., 1940, 259 pp.
Merrill, Elmer D. Plant Life of the Pacific W o r l d . New
York: The Macmillan Co., 1945, 295 pp.
Miller, Francis T. General Douglas M a c A r t h u r . Revised Edition.
Philadelphia's The John C. Winston Co., 1945, 295 pp.
Millet, Frank D. The Expedition to the P h i l i p p i n e s . N e w York:
Harper & Bros., 1899, 275 pp.
547
Mills, Lennox A, and Associates. The New '/forId of Southeast
A s i a . Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota
Press, 1949, 445 pp.
Milner, Ian F.G. h e w Zealand's Interests and Policies in the
Far E a s t . IPR Inquiry Series. New York: IPR, 1939,
131 pp. Paper.
Monaghan, Forbes J. Under the Red S u n . A Letter From Manila.
New York: The Declan X. McMullen Co., 1946, 279 pp.
Moncado, Hilario C. America, the Philippines and the O r i e n t .
N ew York: F l eming H. Re veil Co. , 1932", 214 pp.
Morin, Reiman. Circuit of C o n q u e s t . New York: Knopf, 1943,
152 pp.
Mori son, Samuel Eliot. The Rising Sun in the Pacific. 1931 -
April 1942. Vol. Ill of the History of the United
States Naval Operations in World Tar I T . Boston:
Little, Brown, 1948, 411 pp.
Nearing, Scott. The Tragedy of E m p i r e . New York: Island
Press, 1945, 168 pp.
Nellist, George F. (ed.). Men of the P h i l i p p i n e s . Vol. I.
Manila: The Sugar News Co., 1931, 360 pp.
Nichols, John T. and Paul Bartsch. Fishes and Shells of the
Pacific W o r l d . New York: The Macmillan Co., 1945,
201 pp.
Newbigin, Marion. A New Regional Geography of the W o r l d . 3rd
Ed., New York; Harcourt, Brace V Co., 1940, 440 pp.
Orendain, Juan Claro. Philippine W o n d e r l a n d . Baguio:
A u t h o r (?), 1940, 334 pp.
Osborn, Fairfield (ed.).‘The Pacific W o r l d . N ew York: W.W.
N orton & Co., Inc., 1944, 218 pp.
Osias, Camilo. Barrio Life and Barrio E d u c a t i o n . Yonkers-on-
Hudson: World Book Co., 1921, 175 pp.
The Filipino Way of L i f e . Boston: Ginn & Co., 1921,
175 pp.
Jose Rizal; His Life and T i m e s. Manila: Osccl
Educational Publishers, Inc., 1948, 479 pp.
and others. The Philippine R e a d e r s . Book Three,
“revised edition. Boston: C-inn & Co., 1932, 184 pp.
Illustrated by Fernando C. Amorsolo.
548
_________, and others. Philippine Minin and Mining L a w s .
Manila: P. Vera & Sons Co., 1936, 390 pp.
Our Islands and Their People as Seen with Camera and Pencil.
Introduced by Major General Joseph .-.heeler, U.S.A., with
special matter and narratives by Jose de Olivares.
"Embracing Perfect Photographic and Descriptive Repres
entations of the People and the Islands Lately Acquired
from Spain, Including Hawaii and the Philippines; also
Their Material Resources and Productions, Homes of the
People, Their Customs and General Appearance, with Many
Hundred Views of Landscapes, Rivers, Valleys, Hills
and Mountains, so complete as to Practically Transfer
the Islands and their People to the Pictured Page.
With a special consideration of the Conditions That
Prevailed Before the Declaration of Tfar, By Senators
Proctor, Thurston, Money, and Numerous Prominent Writers
and Correspondents, and a Comparison with Conditions
as They Now Exist." 2 Vols. in one. Edited and
arranged by William 3 . Bryan. N.D. Thompson Publishing
Co., St. Louis, New York, Chicago, Atlanta; 1899, 776pp.
Palma, Rafael. Pride of the Malay R a c e . Translated by Roman
Ozaeta. New York; Frentice-Hall, 1949, 385 pp.
Panikkar, K.M. The Future of South-East A s i a . An Indian View.
New York; The Macmillan Co., 1943, 26 pp.
Parmelee, Maurice. Oriental and Occidental Culture. New York;
The Century Co., 1928, 379 pp.
Pascal, Blaise. Thoughts. Translated by W.P. Trotter, The
Harvard Classics. Vol. 48, New lro r k ; P.F. Collier
& Son, 1910, p. 139.
Payne, Robert. The Revolt of A s i a . New York: The John Day Co.,
1947, 305 pp.
Peel, Roy V., and Roucek, J.3. (eds.). Introduction to
Politics . New York; Thomas Y. Crowell ~Xro ., 1946, 587 pp.
Peffer, Nathaniel. Basis for Peace in zhe Far E a s t . New York;
Harper R Bros., 1942, 277 pp.
Pelzer, Karl J. Agriculture and Land Settlement in Southeast
Asia. New York; IPR, 1943.
________ . Pioneer Settlement in the Asiatic Tropics, Studies
in Land Utilization and Agricultural Colonization in
Southeastern A s i a . New York: Institute of Pacific
Relations, in cooperation with the American Geographi
cal Society of New York, 1945, 290 pp.
549
Perkins, Dexter. The Evolution of American Foreign Pol i c y .
New York: Oxford University Press, 1948, 187 pp.
Philippine Business Guidebook: 1 9 4 9 . Man i l a : Chamber of
Commerce of the Philippines, 1949, 380 pp.
Philippine Economic Association, The. The .lieo non ic Problems
of the Philippines. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1934, 270 pp.
Philippine Economic Survey Commission. Philippine Agriculture
and Industrial Development Program. Revised, 19 50.
Manila: Bookman, Inc., 1950, 516 pp.
Phillips, Claire and Myron B. Goldsmith. Manila Espionage.
Portland, Oregon: Binfords and Mort. 1947, 226 pp.
Pillai, P.P. Labour in South East A s i a . A Symposium. New
Delhi: Indian Council of world Affairs, 1947, 277 pp.
Poblador, Filemon. Philippine Chronology: January 1 to July
5, 1946. Manila: Philippine Liberal Publishing Co.,
1946, 155 pp.
Porter, Catherine Lucy. Crisis in the Philippines. New York:
Knopf, 1942, 156 pp.
Postwar Problems of Migration. Papers presented at the Round
Table on Population Conference of the Iviilbank Memorial
Fund, October 29-30, 1946. New York: I,ilbank
Memorial Fund, 1947, 173 pp.
Pratt, Fletcher. The Marines* W a r . New York; William Sloane,
1948, 456 pp.
Preger, W. Dutch Administration in the Netherlands Indies.
Melbourne. F.W. Cheshire Pty., Ltd., 1944, 119 pp.
President of the Philippine Commonwealth. Budget for the
Fiscal Year 1941. Submitted to the National Assembly,
February 6, 1940. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1940,
721 pp.
Proposed Program for Industrial Rehabilitation and Development
of the Republic of the Philippines. (’’The Beys ter
Report’1). Prepared by the Technical Staff of the
National Development Company, under the supervision of
the fl.E. Beyster Corporation, Detroit. Manila:
October 28, 1947, variously paged.
Quezon, Manuel Luis. The Good F i g h t . New York: D. Appleton-
Century Co., 1946, 336 pp.
550
Quirino, Carlos. The Great Malayan. Manila: Philippine
Education Co., 1949, 317 pp.
Quirino, Sliseo (ed.). The Nepa Handbook. Manila: National
Economic Protectionism Association, 1938, 211 pp.
Recto, Claro M. Monroismo Asiatico (Articulos de polemica)
y Otros ensayos. Manila: Imprenta de Juan Fajardo,
1929, 133 pp.
____ . The Law of Belligerent Occupation. (With particular
reference to the Japanese occupation of the Philip
pines) and the Effect of the Change of Sovereignty on
the Commonwealth Treason Law. Submitted to the Supreme
Court of the Philippines, in support of oral argument,
Manila: Author, 1946, 434 pp.
________ . A Word More on the Law of Belligerent Occupation,
etc"! (Being a Refutation of the Government’s
Contentions.). Manila: Author, 1946, 177 pp.
Three Years of Enemy Occupation. The Issue of
Political Collaboration in the Philippines. Manila:
People's Publishers, 194 6, 189 pp.
________ . Validity of Occupation Payments Made to the
Liquidator of |TEnemy™ B a n k s . Vol". 1*1 Manila: General
Printing Press, April 29, 1947, 242 pp.
________ . Vol. II. (Reprinted from the Counter-Reply Memo
randum....). Manila: General Printing Press, July
2, 1947, 86 pp.
Report of the Committee on Reorganization of Governtre nt-Owned
or Controlled Corporations. Manila: August 18, 1950,
239 p p ., (Mimeo.).
Report on Destruction of Manila and Japanese Atrocities.
Washington, D.C.: Office of the Resident Commissioner
of the Philippines to the United States, February,
194 5, 114 pp.
Report of the Special Mission to the United States: 1938-1959.
Submitted to President Manuel L. Quezon by Vice
President Sergio Osmeha, November 1, 1939. Manila;
Bureau of Printing, 1939, 334 pp.
Report of the Working Group for Asia and the Far East. By
the Temporary Sub-Commission on Economic Reconstruc
tion of Devastated Areas. United Nations Econo
mic and Social Council. Lake Success: March 4,
1947, 42 pp.
551
Rizal, Jose. The Reign of Greed (El Flllbusterlsmo), translated
from the Spanish by Charles E. Derbyshire. Second r e
vised edition. Manilas Philippine Education Co., Inc.,
1949, 367 pp.
_________. The Social Cancer (Noli Me Tangere), translated from
the Spanish by Charles E. Derbyshire. Second revised
edition. Manila: Philippine Education Co., Inc., 1949,
502 pp.
Robequain, Charles. Le Monde Malals. Peninsule Malaise, Sumatra,
Java, Borneo, Celebes, Bali et les Petites lies de la
Sonde, Moluques, Philippines. Paris: Payot, 1946, 510 pp.
Romulo Carlos Pefia. I Saw the Fall of the Philippines. Garden
City: Doubleday, Doran & Co., 1943, 323 pp.
_________. Mother A m e r i c a s A Living Story of Democracy. Garden
City: Doubleday, Doran & Co., 1943, 234 pp.
_________. I See the Philippines Rise. New York: Doubleday,
1946, 273 pp.
. My Brother Americans. New York: Doubleday, Doran &
Co., 1945, 212 pp.
Roosevelt, Nicolas. The Philippines: A Treasure and a Problem.
New York: J.H. Sears & Co., Inc., 1926, 315 pp.
Roy,D.N. The Philippines and India. Manila: Author, 1930,
2 1 1 "pp. (with an Introduction by Rafael Palma.).
Rubens, Doris. Bread and R i c e . New Yorks Thurston Macauley
Associates, 1947, 235 pp.
Russell, Charles Edward and E.B. Rodriguez. The Hero of the
Filipinos. The Story of Jose Rizal Poet, Patriot and
Martyr. New York: The Century Co., 1923, 392 pp.
Schurman, J. Gould. Philippine Affairs. A Retrospect and Out
look. New York: Charles Scri b n e r ’s Sons, 1902, 109 pp.
Schurz, Wm. Lytle. The Manila Galleon. New York: E.P. Dutton
& Co., 1939, 453 pp.
Second Yearbook of the Philippine Council in Education. (1937),
The. Manila: 1937, 120 pp.
Security in the Pacific. A Preliminary Report of the Ninth Con
ference of the Institute of Pacific Relations. Hot
Springs, Virginia, January 6-17, 1945. New York: IPR,
1945, 169 pp.
Semple, Ellen C. Influences of Geographic Environment. New
York: Henry Holt & Co., 1911, 683 pp.
Sevilla, Jose N., and Paul R. Verzosa, Ang Aklat ng Tagalog.
("The Pioneer Bilingual Text-book on Tagalog Philology
and Literature")* Manila: Imprenta y Librerias de
J. Martinez, 1923, 108 pp.
Sexton, William T. Soldiers in the Philippines: A History of
the Insurrection. Published in 1939 as Soldiers in
the S u n . Washington, D.C.: The Infantry Journal, 1944,
246 pp. Paper.
Sinco, Vicente G. A Primer of the Philippine Constitution.
Manila: Community Publishers, 1935, 27 4 pp.
________ . Philippine G o v e r m e n t and Politics for Liberal Arts
Courses. (revised). M a n i l a : Community” Fubl Ishers,
194-7, 192 pp.
Smith, Warren D. Geology and Mineral Resources of the Philip
pine Islands. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1924,
559 pp. (Department of Agriculture and Natural
Resources, Bureau of science Publication No. 19.
A c t u a l l y p r i n t e d April 20, 1925.)
Soliven, Benito T. Parliamentary Law, Procedure and Forms and
Legislative Technique in the Philippines. Hani1a :
Author, 1941, 149 pp.
St. John, Joseph P. Leyte Calling. As told to Howard
Handleman. New York: Vanguard Press, 1945, 220 pp.
Sta. Romana, Osmundo 0. The Best Filipino Short Stories.
Manila: Wightman Printing Co., Inc., 1935, 151 pp.
Stamp, L. Dudley. Chisholm*s Handbook of Commercial Geography
(Re-written edition). London: Longmans, Green" & Co.,
1937, 884 pp.
Stevens, Prederic II. Santo Tomas Internment Camp: 1942-1945.
Limited Private Edition, New York(?): Stratford House,
Inc., 1946, 569 pp.
Stevens, Joseph Earle. Yesterda:rs in the Philippines. New
York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1898, 232 pp.
Storey, Moorfield and Marcial P. Lichauco. The Conquest of
the Philippines by the U.S.: 1898-1925. New York:
G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1926, 274 pp.
Stuntz, Homer C. The Philippines and the Pnar East. Cincinnati:
Jennings and Pye, 1904, 514 pp.
553
Subido, Abelardo. The Term of Office of Civil Service Officers
and Employees. Manila: Editorial Services, 1950,
230 pp.
_________., and Tarrosa Subido. Two Voices. Manila: The
Manila Post Publishing Co., 1945, 104 pp.
Tate, O.H.H. Mammals of Eastern A s i a . New York: The Macmillan
C o ., 1947, 366 p p .
Taylor, Carl K. Odyssey oT the Islands. New York; Charles
Scribner's Sons, 1936, 284 pp.
Ter Haar, B. Adat Law in Indonesia. (Translated by George C.O.
Haas and Margaret HordykTTT Edited with an Introduc
tion by i£. Adamson Hoebel and A. Arthur Schiller. New
York: Institute of Pacific Relations, in cooperation
with the Southeast Asia Institute, 1948, 255 pp.
Thompson, Virginia. Labor Problems in Southeast A s i a . New
Haven: Yale University Press, under the auspices of
the IPR, 1947, 283 pp.
Thompson, Warren S. Population Problems. New York: McGraw-
Hill Book Co., 1942, -471 pp.
_________. Population and Peace in the Pacific. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1946, 397 pp.
Umali, Agustin P. Guide to the Classification of Fishing Gear
in the Philippines. Research Report 17, Fish and
Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior.
Washington, D.C.: U.S. (Government Printing Office,
1950, 165 pp.
United Nations, Department of Social Affairs: Annual Report
on Child and Youth Welfare. Lake S\iccess: 1948, 236 pp.
United Nations. Non-Self-Governing Territories - 1947. Lake
Success: 1948, 509 pp.
_________. Non-Self-Governing Territories - 1948. Lake S u c c e s s :
1949, 686 pp.
United States High Commissioner to the Philippine Islands.
The First Report... covering the Period From November
15. 1955, to December 31. 1 9 3 6 . Washington, D.C.:
U.S. (Government Printing Office, 1937, 138 pp.
_________. The Second Annual Report... covering the Calendar
Year 1957 with a Review of the Government Finances
for the Years 1955. 1936. and 1 9 5 7 . Manila: September
1, 1938. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1939, 184 pp.
554
________ . Third Annual Report...covering the Calendar Year
1958 and the First Six months of 1959. Mani1a :
October 1, 1940. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government
Printing Office, 1945, 197 pp.
Fourth Annual Report... covering the Fiscal Year
July 1. 1939 to June 50. 1940. Manila: September
1, 1941. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1945, 270 pp.
________ . Fifth Annual R e p o r t ... covering the Fiscal Year
Ending June 50. 1 9 4 1 . 'Washington, D.C.; July 51,
1942. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1943, 147 pp.
_________. Sixth Annual Rep o r t ... covering the Fiscal Year
July 1. 1941 to June 30. 1942. ’ W ashington, D.C.:
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1943, 228 pp.
_________. Seventh and Final Report... covering the Period
From September 14. 1945, to July 4. 1 9 4 6 . Washing
ton, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1947,
181 p p .
Utinsky, Margaret. “Miss U Tt. San Antonio, Texas: The Naylor
Co., 1948, 172 pp.
Venkatassubbiah, H. Asia in the Modern World. New D e l h i :
Asian Relations Conference, Indian Council of World
Affairs, 1947, 118 pp.
Villa, Jose Garcia. Many Voices. Manila: Philippine Book
Build, 1938, 206 pp.
Villamor, Gayetano IVi. Filipino Courage and Heroism. Cebu City:
The Villamor Publishing House, 1947, 200 pp. Paper.
________ . Senator Cuenco As I Know H i m . Cebu City: The
Villamor Publishing House, 1947, 136 pp. Paper.
________ . Ang Gugma sa Mga Bantugang Lider (The Love of
Famous Leaders). Cebu City: The Villamor Publishing
House, 1948, 200 pp. Paper.
________ . Quezon, Patriyotang Palaran, (Quezon, the Gifted
Patriot). Cebu City: The Villamor Publishing House,
1948, 219 pp. Illus. Paper.
_________. Mga Buruka Sa Yuta (The Agrarian Troubles). Cebu
City: The Villamor Publishing House, 1949, 220 pp.
Illus. Paper.
________ . Pillars of Strength. Cebu City: The Villamor
Publishing House, 1949, 208 pp. Index, Illus. Paper.
ktc;
u Jc
O;
_________. Criminal Procedure and Legal F o r m s . Cebu City:
The Villamor Publishing House, 1950, 228 pp. Paper.
________ . Mga Sugilanon sa Karaang Panahon (Stories of
Ancient Times). Cebu City: The Villamor Publishing
House, 1950, 208 pp. Illus. Paper.
_________. Osmefla Luba sang Llder (Osmena The Seasoned Leader) .
Cebu City: The Villamor Publishing House, 1950,
180 pp. Illus. Paper.
_________. Your Town Officials and Their Du t i e s . Cebu City:
The Villamor Publishing House, 1950, 208 pp. Paper.
Vincent, John Carter, et a l . A m e r i c a ’s Future in the Pacific.
New Brunswick, N.J.: Kutgers University Press, 1947,
247 pp.
Viray, Manuel A. (ed.). Heart of the Island. Manila; Uni
versity Publishing Co., 1947, 159 pp.
Vlekke, Bernard H.lvl. Nusantara. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press, 1943, 439 pp.
Mar and Peace in the Pacific. A Preliminary Report of the
Eighth Conference of the Institute of Pacific Rela
tions on Martin© andPost-War Cooperation of the
United Nations in the Pacific and the Par East.
Mont Tremblant, Quebec, December 4-14, 1942. New
York: IPR, 1943, 164 pp.
Weinstein, Alfred A. Barbed-Wire Sur.geon. New York: The
Macmillan Co., 1948, 310 pp.
Weissblatt, Franz J. (ed.). W h o ’s Who in the Philippines,
1936-1937. Vol. I. Manila: McCullough Printing Co.,
1937, 175 pp.
Wentworth, Edna Clark, Filipino Plantation Workers in Hawaii.
Studies of the Pacific, No. 7, International Research
Series of the IPR. New York: IPR, 1941, 245 pp.
Wilcox, Harry. The White Stranger - Six Moons in Celebes.
London: Collins, 1949, 384 pp.
Williams, Benjamin Ii. American Diplomacy: Policies and
Practice. New York: Me Draw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1956,
517 pp. —
Williams, D.R. The United States and the Philippines. Garden
City: Doubleday, Page & Co., 1925, 335 pp.
556
Wilson, Laurence L. Apayao Life and Legends. Baguio: Author,
1947, 195 pp.
Ilcngot Life and Legends. Baguio: Author, 1947,
190 pp.
Winstedt, Sir Richard. The Malays: A Cultural History. (Rev.ed.).
London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd., 1950, 19.8 pp.
Wolfert, Ira. American Guerrilla in the Philippines. New York:
Simon and Schuster, 1945, 301 pp.
Wood, Gordon L. and Patricia McBride. The Pacific Basin. A
Human and Economic Geography. 3rd Edition. Melbourne:
Oxford University Press, 1950, 393 pp.
Woodward, G.V. The Battle for Leyte Gulf. Hew York: Macmillan,
1947, 244 pp.
Worcester, Dean C. The Philippines Past and Present. One
Volume edition, edited by J.R. Hayden. Lev/ York: The
Macmillan Co., 1930, 862 pp.
_________. The Philippines Past and Present. 2 Vols. (New
edition"). New York: The Macmillan Co., 1914, 1024 pp.
‘
Wright, Philip G. The American Tariff and Oriental Trade.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1931, 177 pp.
Yabes, Leopoldo Y. A Brief Survey of Iloko Literature. From
the Beginning to Its Present Development, with a Biblio
graphy of Works Pertaining to the Iloko People and
Their Language. Manila: Author, 1936, 155 pp.
Younghusband, G.J. The Philippines and Round A b o u t . New York;
The Macmillan Co., 1899, 230 pp.
Zulueta da Costa, R. Like the Molave and Other Poems.
Introduction by S. P . Lopez. Ma n i l a : Author, 1940,
100 pp.
557
Of some value for quick reference; to be used with caution.
Abiva Publishing House: Outline of Oriental History. Enlarged
Edition. Manila: 1950, 189 pp.
________ . Outline of Philippine History. Enlarged Edition,
Manila: 1949, 170 pp.
Alip, Eufronio M. Tagalog Literature: A His torico-Critlcal
Study. Manila: University of Santo Tomas Press,
1930, 164 pp.
________ . Philippine Government: Origin, Development, Organi
zation, and Functions. Manila: Author, 1938, 450 pp.
________ . Philippine History. Political, Social, Economic.
CBased on the Course of Study of the Bureau of Public
Schools). 4th revised edition. Manila: Alip and
Brion Publications, Inc., 1948, 457 pp.
________ , Political and Cultural History of the Philippines.
(Since the British~Occupation}, M a n i l a : Alip and
Brion Publications, Inc., 1949, 354 pp.
________ Political and Cultural History of the Philippines.
(VoT~, Ti Since Time Began to British Occupation).
Manila: Alip and Brion Publications, 1950, 348 pp.
Eohol, Ernesto D. Outline on Oriental History. Manila:
Bohol Colleges, 1949, 227 pp.
_________. Outline on Philippine History. Manila: .Bohol
Colleges, 1948, 195 pp.
Eckel, Paul E. The Far East Since 1500. New York: Harcourt,
Brace. 1947, 820 pp.
Lynip, Louise G. On Good Ground. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm.
B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1946, 149 pp.
Philippine Book Company. Outline of Oriental History. Manila:
1949, 126 pp.
_________. An Outline of Oriental History. (High School
Outline Series). M a n i l a : 1949, 265 pp.
________ . An Outline of Philippine History. (High School
Outline Series). Manila: 1949, 201 pp.
_________. An Outline of Philippine Social Life and Progress.
(High School Outline Series). ManilaV 1949” 263. pp.
558
________ . An Outline of Philippine Government. (High School
Outline Series). Manila: 1950, 2 3 2 pp.
________ . Outline of Philippine History. Manila: 1950,
235 pp.
Zaide, Gregorio F. The Philippine Commonwealth. Manilaj
Author, October, 1938, 15 pp.
_________. The Philippines Since the British Invasion. Manila:
R.P. Garcia Publishing Co., 1949, 507 pp.
________ , and Arturo M. Tolentino. The Government of the
Republic of the Philippines: Origin, Development, Organ
ization and Functions. Manila: R.P. Garcia Publishing
Co., 1948, 415 pp.
559
PAMPHLETS AND OTHER MATERIALS
A Critical Analysis of the Proposed 1939 Constitutional
Amendments. Manilas Liga Constitucional," Novem
ber 15, 1939, 48 pp. (Contains speech of Juan
Sumulong, October 22, 1939: "The Two-Party System
as the Mainstay of Constitutional Government"; speech
of Jose Alejandrino, same date: "For a Rational
Interpretation of the Constitution"; speech of Bishop
Gregorio Aglipay, same date: "Reject the Proposed
Amendments"; four resolutions approved at this meeting
sponsored by the League, and one resolution adopted by
the Young Philippines Party, November 1, 1939, xvi pp.)
A New Nation is Born: "The Republic of the Philippines."
Filipino Bulletin. Special Philippine Independence
Edition, Honolulu, T.H.: July, 1946, 140 pp.
A Survey of Reconstruction Problems and Needs. United Nations,
Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East.
Annexes to Document E/CN. 11/39. November, 1947.
Philippine Republic. Annex "L", 41 pp., (Mimeo.).
Abella y Casariego, Enrique, Jose De Vera y Gomez and
Anacleto Del Rosario y Sales. Estudio Descrlptlvo
de Algunos Manantlales Mlnerales de Flliplnas. Manila:
Administracion Civil, 1893, 156 pp.
Addresses Before the Assembly of Greater East-Aslatlc Nations.
Tokyo: Ministry of Greater East-Aslatlc Affairs,
November, 1943, 65 pp. in English, 97 pp. in Japanese.
Address of His Excellency Egldio Vagnozzl. Archbishop of Mira.
Apostolic Delegate to the Philippines" Delivered to:
The Knights of Columbus, November 30, 1949, Manila.
Printed by the Delegate's Office. This address was
refused space in Manila Newspapers, apparently at the
request of various Knights, (unpaged).
Administration Presents Its Record. The. (Roxas) Record from
May ^8, 1946 to October 4. 1947. Manila: The Liberal
Party (Bureau of Printing), 1947, 36 pp.
Ahern, George P. The Uses of Philippine Woods. Department of
Interior, Bureau ofForestry, Bulletin No. 11. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1912, 50 pp.
Aldana, Benigno V. "Curriculum Development of the Public Schools,"
Reprint of Chapter VII of Education in the Philippines,
edited by Antonio Isidro, and others. Manila: University
of the Philippines, 1939, pp. 163-184.
560
Alicante, Marcos M., et. al. Soli Conservation and Our
Republic. Manilas Bureau of Printing, 1948, 43 pp.
American^Philippine Trade Relations. TC-1. Summary of the
Report of the Technical Committee to the President of
the Philippines. Washington, D.C.: n.p., October,
1944, 12 pp., (Mimeo.).
Annual Report for the Year 1939. Mineral Resources, Inc.,
Myers Building, Manilas February 26, 1940, unpaged.
Apostol, Jose P. Some Effects of the War on the Philippines.
Tenth Conference of the Institute of Pacific Relations,
Philippine Papers No. 2 . Manila: Philippine Council,
I.P.R., 1947, 16 pp.
________. "The Economic Policies of the United States in
Their Effect on the Philippines." Prepared for the
Sixth Conference of I.P.R., Yosemite Park, California,
August 15 to 29, 1936. Philippine Council Papers q-No. 3.
Manilas Philippine Council, IPR, 1936, IS pp.,(Mimeo.).
Aruego, Jose M. Constitution of the Republic of the Philip-
pines. (Being the original Constitution with the
Amendments integrated therein and with notes.) Manila:
University Publishing Co., Inc., 1947, 32 pp.
Asian Relations Conference. Documents prepared for and
published under the auspices of the Indian Council of
World Affairs. New Delhis March, 1947. (Mimeo.)•:
"Cooperation Among Aslan Countries in Agricultural
Research," By J.N. Mukerjee, 10 pp.
"Cooperative Economic Development of Asian Countries,”
By P.S. Narayan Prasad, 31 pp.
"Cultural Problems of India and East Asia." By O.C.
Gangoly, 6 pp.
"Demographic Trends In Asian Countries." By B.
Ramamurti, 18 pp.
"Filipino Women and the Progress of the Nation." By
Paz Pollcarpio-Mendez, 21 pp.
"Freedom Movement In South-East Asia." The Gokhale
Institute of Politics and Economics, Poona, 56 pp.
"Freedom of Press in the Philippines." By Mauro Mendez,
12 pp.
"Peasant Economy in the Middle East and Southeast Asia."
K.6. Slvaswamy, 12 pp.
"Philippine National Economy." Anastaclo P. de Castro,
12 pp.
"Racial Problems in the Philippine s." Manuel S. Enverga,
14 pp.
Asuncion, Silvestre. The Growing of Sugar Cane in the Philip
pines . Bureau of Agriculture, Circular No. 167, Manilaji
Bureau of Printing, 1926, 20 pp., 8 plates.
561
Bailey, Thomas A. America’s Foreign Policies. Past and
Present. Headline Books No. 46. New York: ^reign
Policy Association, 1943, 96 pp.
Beyer, H. Otley. "Outline Review of Philippine Archaeology
By Islands and Provinces." Separate froms The
Philippine Journal of Science. Vol. 77, Nos. 3 and 4
(July-August, 1947), Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1949, pp. 205-374.
________. Early History of Philippine Relations with Foreign
Countries. Especially 6hlna. (Originally printed as
an "Historical Introduction", to E. Arsenio Manuel's
Chinese Elements in the Tagalog Language. Manila,
1948)• Manila: National Printing Co., April, 1948,
17 pp.
________. Origin Myths Among the Mountain Peoples of the
Philippines. Reprinted from fee Philippine Journal of
Science. Vol. VIII, No. 2, Sec. D, General Biology,
Ethnology and Anthropology, April,1913. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1913, pp. 85-117.
________ . Philippine and East Aslan Archaelogy. and Its Rela
tion to the Origin of the Pacific Islands Population.
Reprinted from the National Research Council of the
Philippines, Bulletin No. 29, pp. 1-130. Quezon City:
December, 1943.
________ . Philippine Tektites and the Tektite Problem in
General. From the Smithsonian Report for 1942, pp.
253-260. (Publication 3715). Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1943.
________• Population of the Philippine Islands in 1916.
English-Spanish edition. Manila: Philippine Education
Co., Inc., 1917, 95 pp.
________. Supplementary Illustrations to the "Outline Review
of Philippine Archaeology By Islands and Provinces.111
Supplement No. 1 Manila: Author, 1949, 18 pp., 18 plates.
________. The Non-Christian People of the Philippines.
"Separate from the Census of the Philippine Islands:
1918, Volume Two." Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1921,
pp. 907-957.
Bisson, T.A. American Policy in the Far East: 1931-1940. I.P.R.
Inquiry Series. New York: IPR, 1939, 146 pp.
Blake, Frank R. Selected List of Materials for the Study of the
Tagalog Language. New iTork: Southeast Asia Institute,
Language Series No. 4, 1947, 13 pp. (Mimeo.)•
562
Blanco, Guillermo J. "Aquatic Resources of the Philippines."
Reprinted from On National Food Production Campaigi.
Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1949, 11 pp.
Blanco, Pedro M. The Philippine Problem. A Compromise Proposal
for the Consideration of those in Favor and those
Against the Hare-Hawes-Cutting Act. Manila: Dominion
Government League, 1933, 30 pp.
The Philippine Problem: A Dispassionate and Non
partisan Analysis of the realities of Philippine
Independence. Second edition, revised. Manila:
Dominion Government League, 1934, 32 pp.
Book of Needs. II. The. In Education. Science and Culture of
War-Devastated Countries. Paris: UNESCO, 1949, 140 pp.
Bulosan, Carlos (ed.). Chorus For America: Six Philippine
Poets. Los Angeles: Wagon and Star Publishers in
collaboration with H. Parker and Craftsmen, 1942, 39 pp.
Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes For the Philippine Islands, The.
Circular of Information. Instructions for Field
Workers. The Museum of Ethnology, Natural History and
Commerce. Manila: December, 1901, 16 pp.
Burgos, Carlos X. Brief Notes on the Carabao. Bureau of Agri
culture, Circular No. 184, Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1925, 5 pp.
Calip, Jose R. Iloko Ornaments. Manila: Author, 1938, 38 pp.
Caltex Official Philippine Motor Road and Touring Guide: 1948-
1949. 37th Edition. Formerly: "Official Philippine
Motor Road and Touring Guide." Published by Percy
Warner Tinan, in 1911 as the "Philippine Motor Car Blue
Book", later changed to "Mlchelin Guide.” As the
"Official" guide its value was recognlz0^ by the Japanese
in their invasion of 1941. Manila: Caltex (Philip
pines) Inc., 1948, 218 pp.
Castillo, Andres. Economic Reconstruction Problems in the
Philippines. Tenth Conference of the Institute of
Pacific Relations, Philippine Paper No. 1 . Manila:
Philippine Council, I?R, 1947, 27 pp. (Mimeo.)•
"Catholic Hour" Pamphlets: 1940-1941. Manila: Chesterton
Evidence Guild, 1941. 25 pamphlets bound in one volume.
Cherian, T.O. Handbook of Aslan Statistics. New Delhi: Indian
Council of World Affairs, n.d., 73 pp., 28 tables.
563
Clapp, Walter C. A Vocabulary of The Igorot Language as
Spoken by the Bontok Igorots. Bureau of Science, Division
of Ethnology Publications. Vol. V - Part III. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1908, 236 pp.
Clara, Feliciano M. Culture of Edible Mushrooms in the Philip
pines. Bureau of Plant Industry Farmers* Circular No.
28. Manila: Department of Agriculture and bommeree,
Bureau of Printing, 1937, 19 pp.
________. Diseases of Tobacco (NIcotiana Tabacum L.) In the
Philippines. Bureau of Agriculture, Circular No. 171,
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1926, 10 pp.
Clark, E.A. Peoples of the China Seas. Edited by M.S. Stewart.
"Cooperative Project between American Council, Institute
of Pacific Relations and Webster Publishing Co. St.
Louis: 1942, 94 pp.
Commercial and Trade Directory of the Philippines. 1948. "Third
year of Publication.* Manila: "Published Annually" by
The Islanders Publishing Co., 1948, variously paged,
224, 192, 350, 192 pp.
Commonwealth Progress. "Reference Materials to be used in class
rooms and Public Meetings in Connection with the Annual
Celebration of the Commonwealth Anniversary on November
15." Manila: The Commonwealth Anniversary Committee,
1937, 18 pp.
Conklin, Harold C. Preliminary Report on Field Work on The
Islands of Mindoro and Palawan. Philippines. Reprinted
from American Anthropologist. Vol. 51, No. 2 (April-
June, 1949), pp. 268-273.
Constitution of the South East Asia League. Bangkok South-
East Asia League, September 8, 1947, 19 pp.
Craig, Austin: Gems of Philippine Oratory. "Selections Repre
senting Fourteen Centuries of Philippine Thought, Care
fully compiled from Credible Sources in Substitution
for Pre-Spanish Writings Destroyed by Missionary Zeal,
to Supplement the Later Literature Stunted by Intolerant
Religious and Political Censorship, and as Specimens of
the Untrammeled Present-Day Utterances." Manila: The
University of Manila, 1924, 96 pp.
________ . South and Eastern Asia From the Earliest Times to
the Present Day. Manila: The University of Manila,
1926, 80 pp.
Dalisay, Armando M. The Level of Public Spending and National
Prosperity. Manila! Philippine Council, IPR, 1950, 12 pp.
564
Dalupan, Francisco. Modernize the Philippine Tax System.
Delivered before the Manila Rotary Club, August 31,
1950. Manilas Author, 1950, 12 pp.
Delgado, Francisco A. "Speech Against Compensatory Tax on
Coconut Oil," (Sec. 402, Revenue Bill of 1935), Satur
day, August 24, 1935. Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1935, 16 pp.
________. "Excerpts from the statement b y ...Resident Commis
sioner to the United States from the Philippine Islands,
on May 16, 17 and 29, 1935, Before a House Sub-Commit
tee on Agriculture, in Opposition to the Kleberg Bill
(H.R. 5587), which Proposes to Levy an Additional Tax
of 10 cents per Pound on Oleomargarine Containing
Foreign-Grown or Foreign-Produced Fats or Oil Ingredient."
Washington, D.C.ij U.S. Government Printing Office,
1935, 31 pp.
. Memorandum on the Policies of the Commonwealth
Government Regarding the Collaborators of the Japanese.
Presented to Hon. Tomas Confesor, Secretary of Interior,
Manila, April 3, 1945. Manilas n.p., 1945, 26 pp.
Djajadiningrat, Raden Loekman. From Illiteracy to University.
Educational Development in tlie Netherlands Indies.
Bulletin 3 of the Netherlands and Netherlands Indies
Council of IPR, Prepared for the Eighth Conference of
the IPR, Mont Tremblant, Canada, December, 1942. 68 pp.
Doryland, E.D. Green Manure, Soiling and Cover Crops. Bureau of
Agriculture, Circular No. 61, Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1925, 8 pp.
Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East. Lake Success:
United Nations, Department of PublicInformation, 1949,
19 pp.
Economic Survey of Asia and the Far East 1948. Prepared by the
Secretariat of ECAFE. Lake Success: Department of
Economic Affairs, U.N., 1949, 289 pp.
Events Leading Up to World War II: Chronological History, 1931-
1944. 78 Congress, Second -Sevalon, House Document No.
541. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office,
1945, 421 pp.
Fabia, Aniceto. The Development of the Teaching of History.
Civics, and Current Events in Philippine Schools.
Manila: Imprenta bDia Filipino", 1928, 76 pp.
Fansler, Dean S. Metrical Romances in the Philippines. "Re
printed from The Journal of American Folk-Lore. Vol.
XXIX, No. CXII., April-June, 1916." Pp. &03-281.
565
FAQ Community Series. Rice Bulletin No. 1 . Washington: Food
and Agricultural Organization of the UN, May 1948,
32 pp.
Far Eastern Culture and Society. Princeton University Bi
centennial Conferences. Series 2, Conference 7.
Princeton, N.J., 1946, 35 pp.
Far Eastern Research In the United States. N.Y.j IPR, January,
19487 31 pp. (Mimeo.5•
Filipino Observer. The. Special edition (M.A. Roxas, Birthday
Celebration), Manila, January, 1948, 100 pp.
Final Act and Proceedings of the Baguio Conference of 1950.
Published by the Secretariat of the Baguio Conference
of 1950. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1950, 72 pp.
First Nutrition Conference of the Philippine Association of
Nutrition-! Villamor Hall, University of the Philip-
pines. November 21-22, 1947. Program and Messages.
30 pp.
Fish and Future of the Philippines. Gift of the Philippine
Fisheries Program, u7s. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Manila: American Embassy, USIS, March, 1949,
60 pp., (Mimeo.).
Foley, Walter Brooks. Democracy Expands in the East. Re
printed by ’’The Committee for Philippine American
Cultural Relations," From the summer number, 1940,
of "Religion in Life."
Food and Agricultural Data for Selected Far East Countries.
Washington: U.S. DEpartment of Agriculture, November,
1947, 45 pp.
Fooklen Times Yearbook. The. 1949. A yearly supplement to
frhe Fooklen times. Manila, September, 1949, 44 pp.
English-Chinese.
. 1950. Manila: The Fooklen Times. September, 1950,
110 pp. English-Chinese.
Forbes, W. Cameron. Notes on Early History of Baguio. "Re
printed from the Manila Daily Bulletin. 193&." (First
text page says "Reprinted from t!he ’’Baguio Bulletin").
Manila: Krledt Printing Company, 1933, 47 pp.
"Frequency Distribution of Offenses of Minors Admitted in the
Philippine Training Schools For Boys and Girls in 1945,
1946 and 1947." From The Annual Report of the Social
Welfare Commission. Welfareville: 1^48, unpaged.
566
Galang, F.G. Cultural Directions For Cacao (TheobroiMi Cacao).
Bureau of Agriculture, Circular No. 12fe, Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1926(?), 9 pp.
________. The Planting of Fruit Trees. Bureau of Agriculture*
Circular No. 180, Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1926(?),
6 pp. Contains an excellent list of most Philippine
fruits.
Gallego, Manuel V. The Language Problem of the Filipinos.
Speech delivered...in the House of Representatives,
September 7 and 8, 1932. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1932, 63 pp.
Garside, B.A. The Effects of the Slno-Japanese Conflict on
American Educational and Philanthropic Enterprises in
China: II. Higher Education. (A preliminary report}•
^For Private circulation only.” New York: IPR, Nov.
18, 1939, 12 pp. (Mimeo.)•
Gibson, lf.B. Skyways of the Pacific. IPR Pamphlets No. 27.
New York: American Institute of Pacific Relations,
1947, 48 pp.
Gourou, Pierre, Joseph E. Spencer and Glenn T. Trewartha. The
Development of Upland areas in the Far East. Vol. I.
New York: IPR, 1949, 82 pp.
Greene, Katrine R.C. "Transportation”, Part II of An Economic
Survey of the Pacific Area. Shanghai: IPR, 1941, 101 pp.
Grove, David L. and John Exter. The Philippine Central Bank
Act. Washington: Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System, 1949, 36 pp.
Guerrilla Days in North Luzon. Camp Spencer, Liana, La Union:
USAFIP, NL (Volckmann’s Guerrilla Forces), Historical
Records Section, July, 1946, 123 pp.
Hainsworth, R. G., and R.T. Moyer. Agricultural Geography of
the Philippine Islands. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Depart
ment of Agriculture, Office of Foreign Agricultural
Relations, 1945, 72 pp.
Hamm, Mbi. S. Purer Salt for the Philippines. Institute of
Science, October, 1949, Special Bulletin. In Coopera
tion with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Manila:
Bureau of Prihting, 1949, 12 pp.
Handbook for Sarl-Sarl Store Owner. Prepared by: Bureau of
Commerce and Industry, Philippine Executive Commission.
Manila: 1942, 33 pp.
567
Handbook For the Uae of Workers In Adult Education, Depart-
merit of Public Instruction, Office of Adult Education.
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1937, 97 pp.
Heine-Geldern, Robert. Research on Southeast Asia: Problems
and Suggestions. Reprint from American Anthropologist.
April, 1946, pp. 149-175 "Based on a Memorandum
written for the Southeast Asia Institute describing
part of the Institute's research program." New York:
Southeast Asia Institute, 1946, 31 pp.
Hernandez, Amado V. Philippine Labor Demands Justice. Manilas
Pilipino, April, 1949, unpaged (13 pp. (Communist
material)•
________ . Progressive Philippines. Manila: Pilipino, July,
1949, 43 pp. (Author was President of Philippine
Congress of Labor Organization, apparently Communist-
dominated. )•
Herre, Albert W. Current Philippine Problems. Manila:
Philippine Council, IPR, n.d. (probably 1939-1940),
7 pp., (Mimeo.)•
Hibben, Thomas. Economic Development in the Republic of the
Philippines^ feeprlnt from Foreign Commerce Weekly.
A U.S. Department of Commerce Periodical, September
13, 1947, 5 pp.
________• Philippine Economic Development: A Technical Memo
randum. Joint Philippine-American Finance Commission.
Manila: Bureau of Printing, June 7, 1947, 66 pp.
Printed also as a part of the Commission's Report.
Housing and Town and Country Planning. United Nations, Depart
ment of Social Affairs, Bulletin No. 2, Lake Success:
April, 1949, 61 pp.
Huxley, Aldous and Sir John Russell. Food and People. Current
Affairs Pamphlet No. 77. Sponsored by UNESCO. London:
The Bureau of Current Affairs, April 2, 1949, 26 pp.
(Aldous Huxley, "The Double Crisis", pp. 3-12; Sir
John Russell, "The Way Out," pp. 13-23.).
In Memoriam: Manuel Roxas. Manila: Bureau of Printing, April
19, 1948, unpaged.
Independence Day Souvenir: Republic of the Philippines.
Manila: July 4, 1946, 82 pp.
568
Institute of Nutrition. Anim na Pangunahlng Pagkain na
Nagblblgay ng Ganap at Wastong Kalusugan. ( T h e Basic
Six Pood Groups that Supply an Adequate and Well-
Balanced Diet). Primer No. 1. "Printed Thru a Grant
From the United States Public Health Service in the
Philippines." Manila: 1949. 31 pp. (In English and
Tagalog). (Illus. in color.).
________ • Fish as You Like It. Prepared for Fish Conservation
Day. Institute of Nutrition Leaflet No. 11, "Printed
Under a Grant from the U.S. Public Health Service in
the Philippines". Manila: 1949, 11 pp.
________ . Mga Paala-ala sa Paggawa ng Talapagkaln (Points in
Menu Making) . Leaflet 4. Manila: 1949, 6 pp•
________ . Nutritive Value of Fish. Manila: 1949, 4 pp.
________• Simplified Artificial Infant Feeding: Leaflet No. 3
(Revised). Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1949, 19 pp.
• Food For the Pre-School Child. Leaflet No. 5.
Manila: 1950, 9 pp.
________ . What Shall We Eat Today? Leaflet No. 10. "Printed
under a grant from the U.S. Public Health Service."
Manila: 1950, 4 pp., 9-1/4 x 12, in colors.
________ • Pointers for Housewives on Conserving Minerals and
Vitamins. Leaflet No. 16. ^Printed under a grant from
the U.S. Public Health Service." Manila: 1950, 4 pp.
8-1/2 x 12-1/g.
________ • Moderate Cost Menus For the Family. Revised Leaflet
No. ""17• Manila: 1950, 2 pp.
________ • Low Cost Menus For the Family. Revised Leaflet No.
18. Manila: 19&0, 2 pp.
________ . Ang Anim na Pangunahang Pagkain (The Basic Six Food
Groups.}• Poster No. 1 (Revised). "Printed under a
grant from the U.S. Public Health Service." 18-1/2
x 24-3/4, in color.
Institute of Pacific Relations. The. Manila: Philippine
Council, 1938, 15 pp.
Invitation Program to the "Ceremonies Accompanying the unveiling
of the Tablet marking the Site of the Inauguration of the
Commonwealth of the Philippines." Thursday, November 14,
1940. Printed by the Commonwealth Anniversary Committee,
Rafael R. Alunan, Chairman, and the Philippine Historical
Committee. 4 pp. Contains message by President M.L. Quezon,
on "Preservationcf Our Historic Antiquities."
569
Janse, Olov R.T.: Archeology of the Philippine Islands.
"From the Smithsonian Report for 1946, Pages 345-
360 (with 15 Plates)", (Publication 3883). Washing
ton, D.C.s U.S. Government Printing Office, 1947.
Jenkins, Shirley. Trading With Asia. I.P.R. Pamphlets No. 18.
New York: IPR, 1946, 64 pp.
________ . United States Economic Policy Towards the Philip
pine Republic. "Tenth (Conference. Institute of Pacific
Relations. United States Paper No. 1 . New York*
Institute of Pacific Relations, 1947, 72 pp.
Johnston, W.C. The Changing Far East. Headline Series No. 41.
New York: Foreign Policy Association, August, 1943,
96 pp.
July 4th Official Souvenir Program: "Republic*s Commemorative
Guide of Events." Vol. Ill, No. 3. Dedicated to the
Third Anniversary of the Philippine Republic." Manila:
Defender Publishing Co., July 4, 1949, 168 pp.
Kalaw, Pura Villanueva. El Proceso De "El Renaclmlento".
Manila: author: 1947, 48 pp.
Kihss, Peter. Food and People. "U.N. Tackles the Problems,"
Current Affairs. No. 86 (A UNSSCO Project), London:
August 6, 1949, Map, pp. 10-11. Map is entitled:
"A Difference of Calories-1939".
Koneko, Hidezo and Kozo Kaito. Our Mission Today. Nippon Bunka
Kaikan, 1943, 61 pp.
Krieger, Herbert W. Peoples of the Philippines. Smithsonian
Institution War Background Studies N o . 4. Publication
3694. Washington, D.C.: The Smithsonian Institution,
1942, 86 pp.
Lattimore, Eleanor. Decline of Empire in the Pacific. I.P.R.
Pamphlets No. 25. New York: IPR, 1947, 64 pp.
Laufer, Berthold. "The Relations of the Chinese to the
Philippine Islands•" Reprinted from the Smithsonian
Miscellaneous Collection (Quarterly IssueT^ Vol. 50,
1908, pp. £48-284.
Lawrence, Chester H. New World Horizons: Geography for the
Air Age. Maps by Ray Ramsey. Text edition. New York:
Silver Burdette Co., by arrangement with Duell, Sloan
and Pearce, 96 pp., 38 maps.
570
Lilienthal, Philip E. and Oakie, John H. Asia1a Captive
Colonies. Pamphlet No* 6 (Rev.ed.), New York:
Institute of Pacific Relations, 1944, 46 pp.
Living Conditions in Under-Developed Countries and Territories.
UNESCO, Social Commission. Document E/CN. 5/106.
Lake Success: UNESCO, March 11, 1949, 14 pp.
Lockwood, W.W. (ed.). Our Far Eastern Record. Vols. I and II.
New Yorks IPR, 1640, 76 pp.
“MacArthur Reports on National Defense.”Special supplement
to The Philippines Herald. Manila; Friday, June 19,
1931^ 4 pp.
Magtanggol Asa (Aurelio S. Alvero)! A Matter of Nomenclature.
TAGALA. New Bilibid Prison in Muntinglupa, Rizal:
29 November, 1945, 23 pp.
________. Basic For Unity. Manila: M. Colcol & Co., 1947,
22 pp. (Written In New Bilibid Prison, Muntinglupa,
Rizal.)•
Majumdar, D.N. and Irawati Karve. Racial Problems in Asia.
New Delhi! Indian Council on World Affairs, 1947,
54 pp.
Manila and the Philippines. 1938 edition. Manila! American
Express, 1938, 128 pp.
Marquez, Severo L. Sugar Cane Smut. Bureau of Agriculture,
Circular No. 176, Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1926, 2 pp.
Mead, Margaret; ”The Family's Food." Current Affairs
Pamphlet No. 85. Food and People series, sponsored
by UNESCO. London: The Bureau of Current Affairs,
23 July i'949, 19 pp.
Merrill, Elmer D. A Review of The Identifications of the
Species Described in Blanco's Flora de Pilipinas.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Government Labora
tories, No. 27, Manila: Bureau of Public Printing,
1905, 126, plus, pages (my copy Incomplete at p. 126.).
Migration. Background Paper No. 41, Lake Success; UN, Depart
ment of Public Information, Research Section, April
26, 1948, 15 pp.
Moncado, Hilario C. ”100# Cooperation With the United States."
A speech, delivered in Honolulu, June 7, 1941, over
station KGMB.
571
Nabong, J. Did Rizal Retract? Manilas Villamor Publishing Co.,
Inc., 1950, 8 pp.
Nagata, H. To The Young Men and Women of the Philippine Islands.
Tokyo* May, 1936, 9 pp.
Nannetti, Guillermos Alphabet of the Soil. Current Affairs Pam
phlet No. 82, second pamphlet in series on Pood and
People, sponsored by UNESCO. Londons The Bureau of
Current Affairs, June 11, 1949, 19 pp.
National Cooperatives Administration. Primer on Cooperatives.
Prepared by the Research and Publicity Section, Promotion,
Organization and Supervision Division, NCA. Manilas
National Cooperatives Administrations 1947, 64 pp.
National Economic Protectionism Association. NEPA Day 1940.
Bulletin No. 12. Manila: 1940, 20 pp.
National Foods. A prospectus of the National Pood Products
Corporation, a subsidiary of the National Development
Company. Manilas 1938, 48 pp.
National Research Council of the Philippine Islands.
Bulletin No. 1. Record of inaugural meeting of the Council,
April 3, 1934, Manila: NRC, 9 pp.
Bulletin No. 2 . Separate from Report No. 1 . Manilas NRC,
February, 1935, 76 pp.
Bulletin No. 3 . Separate from Report No. 1. Manilas NRC,
February, 1935, pp. 77-226.
Bulletin No. 4 . Separate from Report No. 1. Manila: NRC,
February, 1935, pp. 227-358.
Bulletin No. 5. Separate from Report No. 1 . Manilas NRC,
February, 1935, pp. 359-507.
Bulletin No. 6 . Separate from Report No. 1 . Manilas NRC,
February, 1935, pp. 508-609.
Bulletin No. 7. Separate from Report No. 1. Manila* NRC,
February, 1935, pp. 611-902d. (Contains bibliographic
data of members to that date).
Bulletin No. 8 . Separate from Report No. 1. Manila: NRC,
Feb*fcary, 1935, pp. 903-994.
Bulletin No. 9 . Separate from Report No. 1 . Manilas NRC,
February, 1935, 42 pp. Proceedings. Second Philip
pine Science Convention, February 14-18, 1935.
Bulletin No. 11. Second Annual Report, 1935-1936, Manilas
NRC, September, 1936, 42 pp.
Bulletin No. 14.Manila: NRC, December, 1937, 88 pp.
Bulletin No. 15.Manila: NRC, December, 1937, 85 pp.
Bulletin No. 16.Manilas NRC, September, 1938, 101 pp.
Bulletin No. 17.Manilas NRC, September, 1938, 169 pp.
Bulletin No. 18. Manila* NRC, November, 1938, 41 pp.
Bulletin No. 19. Manila: NRC, November, 1938, Proceed
ings of the Fourth Philippine Science Convention,
February 23-27, 1937, 154 pp.
572
Bulletin No. 20, Manila*NRC, November, 1938, 285 pp.
Bulletin No. 21. Manila:NRC, December, 1938, 101 pp.
Bulletin No. 237 Manila*NRC, December, 1939,
Proceedings of the Fifth Philippine Science Convention,
February 21-26, 1939, 210 pp.
Bulletin No. 25. Manila:NRC, December, 1940, 119 pp.
Bulletin No. 29. Quezon City* NRC, December, 1948,
130 pp. (Contains * H.O. Beyer, Philippine and East
Asian Archaeology....).
Bulletin No. 30. Quezon City: NRC, July, 1950, 184 pp.
The Proceedings and Abstracts of the Philippine Science
Conventions are compiled and published. The Bulletins
said Reports present contributions and reports other than
proceedings. The bulletins and reports are published
irregularly; an annual report was published each year be
fore the War. Since the War, the Council has been
practically inactive.
Nicholson, Marjorie. Self-Government and the communal Problem.
London* Fabian Publications and Victor Gallancz Research
Series No. 125, 1948, 45 pp.
Octubre, Francisco P. A Catechism on Mongo Production. Bureau
of Agriculture, Circular No. 164, Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1926, 6 pp.
Official Program Second Anniversary Celebration of the Republic
of the Philippines. Manila, July 4, 1948. Manila*
Bureau of Printing, 1948, unpaged.
Official Souvenir Program. "Republic^ Commemorative Guide of
Events, Vol. I, No. 1, July 4, 1947. Manila* Defender
Publishing Co., 152 pp.
Orosa, Maria Y. Rice Bran: A Health Food and How to Cook jt.
Bureau of Science, Popular Bulletin 15, Manila. Bureau
of Printing, 1932, 22 pp.
Otanes, Faustino <Q. Rice Cut Worms. Bureau of Agriculture,
Circular No. 83 (Revised), Manila* Bureau of Printing,
1925, 6 pp.
________• "The Toy Beetle.” (Leucopholls Irrorata Cheor.) In
the Philippines. A Serious Pest. Bureau of Agriculture,
Circular No. 166 (Supplementary to Circular No. 135).
Manila* Bureau of Printing, 1926, 4 pp.
Pendleton, Robert L. Training for Agricultural Research in
Humid Tropical Asia. N.Y. Southeast Asia Institute,
1 9 4 7 , 1 0 p p . ( M i m e o •)•
573
Perez, Gilbert S. From the Transport Thomas to Sto. Tomas.
The History of the American Teachers in the Philippines.
Manila: Author, n.d. (1949), 30 pp.
Philippine Economic Association, The. The Economics of the
Hare-Hawes-Cutting Act. An Analysis. "Reprinted from:
The Herald. (April 21. 1933)." 42 pp.
Philippine Exposition Commercial and Industrial Fair.
January 30-February 14, 1937, Manila: Commercial
Handbook, 1937, unpaged•
Philippine Independence Day Supplement. Printed by The China
£ress, in Commemoration of the Second Anniversary of
the Republic of the Philippines. Published under the
Auspices of the Filipino Community Association of
Shanghai. July 4, 1948, 36 pp.
Philippine Research Bureau. The Philippine Islands and the
United States. The Philippine Research Bureau,
New York, in cooperation with the Royal Institute of
International Affairs, London: 1935, 49 pp.
Philippines1 City Directory. Manila: Pan-Oriental Publishing
Co., 1946, 140 pp., (Mimeo.).
Phillips, George. lfWhat Price Philippine Independence?” New
York: New Century, 1946, 32 pp.
Porter, Catherine LUcy. Filipinos and Their Country. IPR
Pamphlet No. 13, New York: Institute of Pacific
Relations, 1944, 64 pp.
Prautch, A.W. "Co-operative Marketing of Tobacco." Lecture,
broadcast, October 12, 1927. Manila: Bureau of
Agriculture, 4 pp., (Mimeo.).
President Quirlno^ Birthday Commemorative Green Book. On the
occasion of his birthday, November 16, 1949. "Published
Annually." Vol. II, No. II (November 16, 1949),
Manila: Defender Publishing Co., 160 pp.
President Sergio Osmefia. The Highlights of a leadership un-
equalled by that of any living Filipino. Manila:
Nationalists Party(?), 1946, 22 pp.
Price and Exchange List of Philippine Bird Skins In the Collec
tion of the Bureau of Science. Manila. P.I. "The
Philippine Journal of Science." Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1911(?), 12 pp. "This list contains the
names of all Philippine birds known at date of issue."
574
Problems of Economic Reconstruction In the Far East* Report
of the Tenth Conference of the Institute of Pacific
Relations, Stratford-on-Avon, England, September 5-20,
1947. New Yorki IPR, 1949, 125 pp.
Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science. Presented
at the Annual Meeting, November 12, 1947. Vol. XXII,
No. 4 (January, 1948). New Yorks Academy of Political
Science, Columbia University, 124 pp.
Proceedings of the Second Philippine Science Convention, held
under the auspices of the National Research Council
of the Philippines and the Philippine Scientific
Society, Manila, February 14-18, 1935. Bulletin No. 9 .
separate from Report No. 1 . Manilas National
Research Council, 1935, 42 pp.
Proceedings. Fourth Philippine Science Convention...February
23-27, 1937. Bulletin No. 19. Manilas National
Research Council, November, 1938, 154 pp.
Proceedings of the Fifth Philippine Science Convention..•
February 21-26, 1939. Bulletin No. 23. Manilas
National Research Council, December, 1939, 210 pp.
Program of the Silver Jubilee Anniversary Celebration of the
Philippine Library Association. November, 1948-August,
1949. Biennial Conference, Manilas Benipayo Press,
August 22-25, 1949, 76 pp.
Qulrlnos The Leader...The Statesman. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1948, 59 pp.
Razon, Benito. NEPA Bulletin. "Report of the Work and
Activities of the NEPA for the Year 1935." No. 3,
January 31, 1936. Manilas 12 pp.
Recto, Claro M. The Philippine Constitution. And other
Addresses delivered in connection with the 22nd
Commencement Exercises of The University of Manila,
March 24, 1936. Manilas The University of Manila,
1936, 45 pp.
Regala, Roberto. Neutralization of the Philippines. Prepared
for the Sixth Conference of the Institute of Pacific
Relations, Yosemlte Park, California, August 15 to 29,
1936. Philippine Council Papers. No. 2 . Manilas
Philippine Council, IPR, 1936, 9 pp. TMimeo.)•
575
Report and Recommendations on Training of Technical Personnel
In the Economic Field and the Use of Expert Assistance
by Governments, United Nations Economic and Social
Council, Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East,
Document E/CN. 11/83, May 26, 1948, 122 pp.
Report and Recommendations Regarding Trade Promotion. UNESCO,
ECAFE, Document E/CN.11/84. Lake Success; UNESCO,
April 30, 1948, 103 pp.
Report of the Bureau of Non-Christian Tribes of the Philippine
Islands For the Year Ended August 51. 1902. (From the
Report of the Philippine Commission). Bureau of
Insular Affairs, War Department, Washington, D.C.t
n.d., pp. 679-688, 5 plates.
Report of the Mission to the Philippines. UNESCO Educational
Missions. UNESCO Publication 669. Paris: UNESCO,
1950, 75 pp.
Report of the Philippine National Red Cross to the XVIIth
International Red Cross Conference, Stockholm, 1948.
Manila: 1948, 18 pp.
Report of the Philippine-United States Agricultural Mission.
International Agricultural Collaboration Series. No. 3 .
June, 1947. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office
of Foreign Agricultural Relations. Washington, D.C.:
1948, 50 pp.
Report of the Secretary-General on Establishing United Nations
Research Laboratories! United Nations Economic and
Social Council. Document E/620. January 23, 1948,
356 pp. (Mimeo.).
Report of the Survey Mission to the Far East (Other than China).
International Children's Emergency Fund, Programme
Committee. Document E/lCEF/72. Lake Success: UNESCO,
July 1, 1948, 83 pp.
Report of the Third Session of the Economic Commission For Asia
and tke Far East. Document E/839. Lake Succelrs:
UNESCO, July 1, 1948, 77 pp.
Report of the Working Group for Asia and the Far East of the
Temporary Sub-Commission on Economic Reconstruction "of
Devastated Areaa. Lake Success: UNESCO. Document
E.30^/Rev.l, March 4, 1947, 81 pp.
Reyes, Jose S. Legislative History of America's Economic Policy
Towards the Philippines. Studies in History, Economics
ani Public Law, Edited"by the Faculty of Political
Science of Columbia University. Vol. CVI, No. 2, “Whole
Number 240", New York: Columbia University, 1923, 205 pp.
576
________• What American Policy In the Philippines would Do
Most to Relieve Potential Sources of International
Friction? Prepared for the Sixth Conference of the
IPR, Yosemite Park, California, August 15-29, 1936.
Philippine Council Papers,, Number 1, Manila:
Philippine Council, IPR, 1936, 4 pp. (Mimeo.).
Reyes, Jose de los: Biography of Senator Isabelo de Los
Reyes. Father of Labor and Proclalmer of the Philip
pine Independent Church. Manila: Nueva Era Press,
April, 1947, 33 pp. TaIso published in Spanish).
Robinson, C.B. and Dean C. Worcester. Rubber Growing Industry
of the Philippine Islands. Manila: probably Bureau
of Printing, 1910 (?), §*4 pp. (Monograph is in
form of letter written to Mr. M.E. Springer, Secretary
of the Manila Merchants' Association.).
Rodrigo, P.A. "A General Review of Research Work on Philippine
Crops with Special Reference to Vegetables." Separate
from: The Philippine Journal of Agriculture. Vol.
IV, No. 1, First quarter, 1949. Manila, pp. 85-94.
Rodriguez, Eulogio B. The Philippines and Mexico. Documentos
de la Biblloteca Nacional de Filipinas. Manila;
National Library, 1941, 52 pp.
Romualdez, Eduardo Z. A Critique of Post-War Financial
Policies in the Philippines. Tenth Conference,
Institute of Pacific Relations• Philippine Paper No. 3 .
Manila: Philippine Council, IPR, 1947, 70 pp.
Romualdez, Norberto. The Culture of the Filipinos. Baguio:
Catholic School Press, 1925, 74 pp. Title page has
title: "The Psychology of the Filipino." Lecture
delivered at Ateneo de Manila, February 13, 1924.
Author was associate justice of the Supreme Court of
the Philippine Islands.
Romulo, Carlos P. The East and West Have Met. "A reprint of
the article which appeared in the June issue of the
Red Barrel, house magazine of the Coca Cola Company."
No date, unpaged.
Rosinger, Lawrence K. "The Philippines: Problems of Indepen
dence," Foreign Policy Reports. Vol. XXIV, No. 8
(September 1, 1948), pp. 82-95.
"Roxas Can't Be Replaced - Quezon". 4-page leaflet, 8 x 12 Inches,
purporting to show that the subject was needed by the
Philippine Government so should be cleared of charges
of collaboration. Probably printed by Liberal Wing of
Nationalist Party, 1946.
577
Roxas, Manuel A. (Pres.) and Salvador Araneta: The Parity
Question: A Presentation of Arguments For and Against
This Momentous Issue in Our National Life. Manila:
Philippine Journal of Education, January, 1947, 64 pp.
(Reprinted.).
Rules and Regulations for the Organization and Training of
Volunteer Guards and the Air Raid Wardens Service.
Civilian’Emergency Administration^ Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1941, 60 pp. (Contains Executive Order
Creating the C.E.A.).
Runes, D.T. General Standards of Living and Wages of Workers
in the""Philippine Sugar Industry. Manila: Philippine
Council, Institute of Pkcific Relations, September,
1939, 42 pp. 5 tables.
Salcedo, Juan, Jr., Carrasco, E.O., Jose, F.R., and Valenzuela
R.C. Studies on Beriberi in an Endemic Sub-tropical
Area. Reprinted from the Journal of Nutrition. Vol.
36, No. 5 (November, 1948)7 pp. fe(Si-578.
Salcedo, Juan, Jr., Concepcion, I., Guerrero, A.F., Pascual,
E.C., and Valenzuela, R.C. Studies on the Thiamine
Content of Rice. Vegetables, and Other Foods in Bataan
Province. Reprinted from the Acta Medlca Philippina.
Vol. V, No. 4 (April-June, 1949), Read before the 42nd
Annual Meeting of the Philippine Medical Association,
Bacolod City, May 1, 1949. Manila! 1949, 19 pp.
Saleeby, M.M. Kapok Culture. Bureau of Agriculture. Circular
No. 21, Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1924(?), 14 pp.
Saleeby, Najeeb M. Studies in Moro History. Law, and Religion.
Department of the Interior, Ethnological Survey Publica
tions, Vol. IV, Part. I, Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1905, 107 pp.
. The History of Sulu. Department of the Interior,
Ethnological Survey Publications. Vol. IV, Part II.
Manila! Bureau of Printing, 1907, pp. 109-376.
Sands and Coral. Literary Magazine of Slliman University.
Dumaguete City, 1950, 66 pp.
Santos, Joseflna L. and Amparo R. Asuncion. A Manual For
Teaching The Filipino National Language in Grade One.
Department of Instruction. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1946, 120 pp.
Scheerer, Otto. Kallnga Texts From the Balbalasong Glnaang
Group. Separate from ftbe Philippine Journal of Science.
Vol. 19, No. 2 (August, 19&1J, 175-667. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1921.
578
. The Batan Dialect as A Member of the Philippine
Group of Languages (Fart I ). and. HFb< and HV In
Philippine Languages (Part II), by Carlos fe. Conant.
Bureau of Science, Division of Ethnology Publications,
Vol. V - Parts I and II. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1908, 141 pp.
Security in the Pacific. A Preliminary Report of the Ninth
Conference of the Institute of Pacific Relations,
Hot Springs, Virginia, January 6-17, 1945. New York:
IPR, 1945, 169 pp.
Seeman, Bernard, and Salisbury, Lawrence. Cross-Currents in
the Philippines. IPR Pamphlet No. 23, New York:
institute of Pacific Relations, 1946, 63 pp.
Series of Three Letter^, during February and March, 1947,
printed in a magazine entitled Adventure. issue of
April or May, on the subject of the Hukbalahap. Cor
respondence is between Sgt. Blair Robinett and E.
Hoffman Price. Letters are printed on pages 135-137
of that issue. No other bibliographic information.
Serrano, F.B. Banana Diseases in the Philippines. Bureau of
Agriculture, Circular No. 176, Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1926, 8 pp.
Silayan, H.S. Practical Suggestions for Rural Improvements.
Bureau of Plant Industry Farmers ' Circular No. 36
(Revised). Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1938, 35 pp.
Simmons, Pauline. Chinese Patterned Silks. New York: The
Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1948, 40 pp.
Sinco, Vicente G. Alien Sovereignty in the Philippine Republic.
Manila: Author, 1947, 61 pp. ’
Sitsen, Peter H.W. Industrial Development of the Netherlands
Indies. Bulletin No. 2 of the Netherlands and Nether
landsIndies Council of the Institute of Pacific Rela
tions. Batavia(?): 1940(?), 65pp.
Smith, Warren D. The Mineral Resources of the Philippine
Islands For the Year 1911. Bureau of Science, Division
of Mines. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1912, 99 pp.
Souvenir Philippine Baguio Conference of 1950. Baguio:
Division of Cultural Activities, Department of Foreign
Affairs, May, 1950, 37 pp.
Sprout, Harold. "America's Problem of National Defense."
Alumni Lectures. Princeton University. Princeton, N.J.:
Princeton University Press, 1939, 22 pp.
579
Stein, Gunther. American Business with Ea3t Asia. Tenth
Conference of the IPR. United States Paper No. 3 .
New YorkI IPR, 1947, 36 pp. (Mimeo.).
Study of Future Organization In the Field of Inland Transport
In Asia and the Far East! United Nations, Transport
and Communications Commission. Second Session,
Geneva. April 1948. Document E/CN.2/34. February
18, 1948, 57 pp. (Mimeo.).
Sullivan, E. Poetic Memoirs of Manila. Manila* n.p., n.d.
(probably 1945), 15 pp. 4-1/4 x 5-1/2 inches, paper.
Supplement to Major Economic Changes in 1948. Lake Success s
United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs, 1949,
119 pp.
Swerling, B.C. International Control of Sugar. 1918-41.
Stanford! Stanford University Press (for the #ood
Research Institute), 1949, 69 pp.
Tagle, Salvador P. Dei The Reconstruction of Lost and
Destroyed Documents and Records. (Act 4il6; Philippine
Legislature)• "Cum Notes Variorum". Manila* Author,
1945, 72 pp.
Teodoro, Nicanor G. Aeglnetla Indlca In Cane Plantation.
Bureau of Agriculture, Circular No. 157, Manilas
Bureau of Printing, 1925, 2 pp.
________ • Coconut Diseases and Their Control. Bureau of Agri-
culture, dlrcular No. 179, Manilas Bureau of Printing,
1926, 13 pp.
. Rubber Tree Diseases and Their Control. Bureau of
Agriculture, Circular No. 187, Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1927, 11 pp.
Ter Braake, Alex L. Mining in the Netherlands East Indies.
Bulletin 4 of the Netherlands and Netherlands Indies
Council, IPR. New Yorks IPR, 1944, 110 pp.
The Case of Madame Marie Louise Fernandez. Manilas Far Eastern
University, August 5, 1949, 14 p p .
The Economic Situation in Indonesia. The Netherlands Government
Information Service. The Hague* General State Printing
Office, 1948, 32 pp.
The Filipino Great. Released by the Division of Cultural
Activities, Department of Foreign Affairs, July 4, 1950.
Manila* Bureau of Printing, 1950, 50 pp.
580
The International Trade of Rice with Special Reference to Asia
and the Far East, UNESCO, ECAPE, 3rd Session,
Ootacamund, India. Document E/CN.11/94. Lake Success,
UNESCO, June 3, 1948, 37 pp.
The Japanese Student P y t y Visiting the Commonwealth of the
Philippines, tinder the auspices of the Osaka Manlchi
and the Tokyo Nichl Nichl. Summer, 1936. 4 pp.
Contains list of 81 visiting students.
The Philippine Weather Bureau and the United States Weather
Bureau Working together to provide You an efficient
Weather Service. Manilas n.d. (probably 1948), 6~pp.,
5 x 8 inches.
The Philippines (A Brief Historical and Factual Survey).
Philippine Embassy, Washington, D.C.: 1946, 21 pp.
Reprinted from* Trade Directory of the Philippines.
The Philippines. 1948. A Handbook of Trade and Economic Facts
and Figures. Manila: Department of Commerce and
Industry, 1948, 73 pp.
The University of the Philippines Presents An Historical
Pageant at the Manila Carnival Commercial and Industrial
Fair. Manila: February 8, 1922, unpaged program. The
Committee Chairman was H. Otley Beyer; the plan of H.
Fernandez. Pageant represented the reception of
Legaspi by Manila in 1571.
Thibert, Marguerite. Training Problems in the Far East.
Geneva: International Labour Office, 1948, 160 pp.
Thompson Virginia and Richard Adloff. Empirefs End in South
east Asia. Headline Series Number 78. New York:
Foreign Policy Association in cooperation with the
IPR, November-December, 1949, 62 pp. Contains also:
Blair Bolles, "U.S. Policy in Southeast Asia."
Treacy, Gerold C. (S.J.). Industry at the Crossroads. New
York: The Paulist Press, 1946, 32 pp.
Tuason, Alfonso. Poultry Notes. (third Revised Edition).
Bureau of Agriculture, Circular No. 94, Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1925, 38 pp.
Umali, Agustin F., and Werfel, H.E. Reef Fishing. U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Philippine Bureau of Fisheries,
Manila: USIS, July, 1949, 36 pp.
581
United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Par East.
Interim Report and Recommendations on Industrial
Development by the Working Party. Document E/CN
11/82. May 6, 1948, 75 pp., (Mimeo.).
UNRRA Activities In and For the Far East. First Quarter 1947.
Washington! United Nations Relief & Rehabilitation
Administration, 1947, 27 pp. (Mimeo.).
UNRRA in the Philippines. 1946-1947. Operational Analysis
Papers, No. E>0. Washington! United Nations Relief
and Rehabilitation Administration, April, 1948, 5 pp.
Valkenburg, S. Van. Pacific Asia! A Political Atlas. Head
line Series No. 66. New York! Foreign Policy
Association, 1947, 62 pp.
Van Naerssen, F.H. Culture Contactg Social Conflicts
in Indonesia. Translated by A.J. Barnouw. (Through
the courtesy of J.M. Meulenhoff, Amsterdam). South
east Asia Institute Occasional Papers No. 1 . New
York! Southeast Asia Institute, 1947, 18 pp.
Verzosa, Paul Rodriguez. Ang Pambansang Wlka! The National
Language. (In English)• Manila! Author(?J 1940,
22 pp.
________. The Psychology of Tagalog Proverbs. Introduction
by Lope K. Santos. "Polyglot Eldition." Manilas
Author, 79 pp., (Mimeo•)•
Villanueva, Francisco Jr. Brief Commentaries on the War
Damage Law. Manila! Author, 1946, 102 pp.
War and in the Pacific. A Preliminary Report of the
Eighth Conference of the Institute of Pacific Relations
on Wartime and Post-War Cooperation of the United
Nations in the Pacific and the Far East. Mont Tremblant,
Quebec, December 4-14, 1942. New York! IPR, 1943,
164 pp.
Wester, P.J. Pineapple Culture (Revised). Bureau of Agri
culture, Circular No. 16, Manila! Bureau of Printing,
1923, 19 pp.
________ • Shade Trees For Streets and Roads. Bureau of
Agriculture, Circular No. 132, Manilas Bureau of
Printing, 1926, 7 pp.
.. The Pill Nut. Bureau of Agriculture, Circular No.
44, Manila! Bureau of Printing, 1925(?), 5 pp.
582
What Lies Ahead For the Philippines? EM 24, GI Roundtable.
Prepared for the U.S. Armed Forces by the American
Historical Association. Washington, D.C.i] War
Department, 1945, 49 pp.
What to Read About the Philippines. A Bibliography. N.Y.
East and West Association, 1943.
"What Will Your Country Be? If you Vote ’NO' - If You Vote
’YES' in the Plebiscite on October 24, 1939."
Cartoon Broadside,8x 11, issued by Office of Adult
Education, 1939.
White Book of the Coalition. Coalition Headquarters. Manila:
1935, 60 pp. Back page contains "Coalicion Marcha".
White Book of the Commonwealth of the Philippines. Published
by the National information Board for tide-Common
wealth Anniversary Committee. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1937, 142 pp.
Why Teachers Should Support the Coalition. National Coalition
Headquarters. Manila: Rivera Bros., August 15,
1935, 14 pp.
Windows on the Pacific. Biennial Report of American Council,
institute of Pacific Relations, 1944-1946. New York:
1946, 63 pp•
Worcester, Dean C. "The Philippine Islands", The Mentor.
Department of Travel, Vol. 3, No. 13 (August 16, 1915,
Serial No. 89), 12 pp. (Published twice a month, by
the Mentor Association, New York.).
World Economic Report: 1948. Lake Success: United Nations.
Department of Economic Affairs, 1949, 300 pp.
Wright, Philip G. Trade and Tariffs of Certain Pacific Countries.
Proof Edition. Honolulu: IPR, 1933,' 279 pp.
Wright, Quincy. The Existing Legal Situation as It Relates to
the Conflict in the Far Eas*t^ I.P^R. inquiry Series.
New York: 19&9, 129 pp.
Yabes, Leopoldo Y. The Ilocano Epic. Manila: Carmelo and
Bauermann, Inc., 1955, SO pp.
Zaide, Gregorio F. The Philippine Commonwealth. Manila:
Author, 1938, 15 pp.
583
ART I CLES
"Abaca”. Encyclopaedia Brltannlca. Vol. I. Chicago* Ency
clopaedia Brltannlca, Inc., 1947 edition, p. 5.
Abadilla, Domingo C. "Confusion in the Copra Market." The
Sunday Post Magazine. Vol. 2, No. 8 (November 10,
1946), pp. 5, 24.
Abitona, Fabian V. "The Beyster Report - A Proposed Program
for Industrial Rehabilitation and Development." The
Philippine Educator. Vol. II, No. 2 (February, 194§7,
pp. 39-41.
Ablang, Leandro. "The Corral Method of Fishing in the Ilocos,"
Agricultural-Commercial-Industrial Life. Vol. IX,
No. 3'(March, 1947), p. 16.
Acay, Gervacio C. "Davao Abaca Can Come Back," Philippines
Free Press. Vol. 39, No. 1 (January 3, 1948), pp. 34-35.
"Across the Editor's Desk," Editorial: ACIL. Vol. X, No. 8
(August, 1948), p. 1.
Adams, Inez. "Rice Cultivation in Asia," reprinted from:
American Anthropologist. Vol. 50, No. 2 (April-June,
1948), pp. 256-282.
"A Denial of Some Statements by J.S. Allen," Pacific Affairs.
Vol. XI, No. 4 (December, 1938), pp. 493-495.
Adevoso, Terry. "The Customs Patrol Service." Service Journal.
Vol. I, No. 2 (October, 1949), pp. VIII, XVI, XX.
Agbayani, Adeudato. "The Century-old Filipino Colony In the
United States," Journal of the Philippine Historical
Society. Vol. I 7July, 1941), pp. 54-64
Agorilla, Amado L. "Adult Schools in Action," Philippine Life.
Vol. I, No. 2 (November, 1938), pp. 31-34.
"Agriculture," The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the
Philippines. 1957-1958. pp. 156-165.
Allen, James S. "Agrarian Tendencies In the Philippines,"
Pacific Affairs. Vol. XII, No. 2 (June, 1939), pp. 191-
193. ’
584
Alunan, Rafael R. "The Sugar Industry Under the Commonwealth,”
pie Philippine Commonwealth Handbook. 1936, pp. 261-
269. (Set citation under De la Liana.)•
________. "Philippine Sugar Industry Must Live," The Philip
pine Forum. Vol. I, No. 1 (December, 1935), pp. 71-74.
________. "The Problems of the Sugar Industry," Bulletin No.
17, Manila: National Research Council, September,
1938, pp. 160-164.
Alvarado, Eduardo R. "The Scope of Activities of the Depart
ment of Agriculture and Commerce," ACIL. Vol. IX,
No. 4 (April, 1947), p. 13.
Anonas, Gregorio. "The Role of the National Development
Company In Our Economic Readjustment," The PJC. Vol.
XIV, No. 12 (December, 1938), pp. 15, 16, 34-35, 43, 44.
Araneta, Salvador. "Basic Problems of Philippine Economic
Development." Pacific Affairs. Vol. XXI, No. 3
(September, 1948), pp. 280-285.
________. "Our International Trade Problems," Philippine
Rehabilitation Journal. Vol. I, No. 7 (September,
1949), pp. l2, 34,'"35, 36-37. Speech delivered before
the Harvard Club, August 25, 1949.
Araneta, Victoria L. De. "Use of Native Dress Urged Upon
Women to Help Economic Protectionism," Philippine
Herald Yearbook. 1954-1935. p. 95.
"A Report on Abaca," The Manila Times Mid-Week Review. Vol. 3,
No. 2 (March 9 7 1949), p.' 3.
Arguelles, A.S. "Scientific Research Applied to Industry and
Natural Resources," Philippine Rehabilitation Journal
of Philippine Problems? Vol. I, No. 10 (December,
1949), pp. 28, 50-51, 52-53.
Arizabal, Antonio L. "Enriched Rice Experiment Successful,"
ACIL. Vol. XI, No. 4 (April, 1949), p. 16.
Asis, Zoilo B. "The Evils of Dynamite Fishing," ACIL. Vol.
XI, No. 8 (August, 1949), p. 8.
Aquino, E.G. "An Outline of Our Economic Objectives and the
Present Governmental Set-Up," Bulletin No. 17.
National Research Council, Manila, (September, 1938),
pp. 139-148.
585
Balinas, Rosendo, "What of Our Sugar Indus try?1* This Week
Magazine. The Manila Chronicle. Vol. 3, No. 12
(March 21, 1948), pp . 10- 11~“23.
Balmaceda, Comello. "Review of Business Conditions in the
Philippines." Progressive Farming. Vol. II. No. 1
(January, 1938), p. 30.
________ . "The New Philippine Economy," Philippine Review.
Vol. I, No. 1 (March, 1943), pp. 49-53.
________ . "The Rehabilitation of Philippine Commerce and
Indus try," Philippine Rehabilitation Journal of
Philippine Problems. Vol. I. No. 10 (December. 1949),
pp. 18, 66-67.
Balmaceda, Cornelio and Eduardo L. Romualdez. "The Terms of
Foreign Capital Investment in the Philippines,"
Philippine Rehabilitation Journal. Vol. I, No. 7
(September, 1949), pp. 10-11, 30, 32, 33, 34. Speech
delivered at the Round The World Town Meeting of the
Air, August 24, 1949.
Bautista, Ambrosio. "The Planting of Palagad Rice," ACIL.
Vol. XI, No. 8 (August, 1949), pp. 14-15, 31, 35, 38, 39.
Bekker, Konrad and Charles Wolf, Jr., "The Philippine Balance
of Payments." FES. Vol. 19, No. 4, (February 22, 1950),
pp. 41-43.
Belshaw, H. "Races, Lands and Foods," Review article of
book by that title, by R. Mukerjee, New York: Dryden
Press, 1947, 107 pp. Pacific Affairs. Vol. XX, No.
1 (March, 1947), pp. 71-80.
Benitez, Conrado. "The Human Factor in Our Economic Readjust
ment," Bulletin No. 17. National Research Council,
Manila: September, 1948, pp. 165-168.
Bernardo, Gabriel A. "Sungka - Philippine Variant of a Widely
Distributed Game," The Philippine Social Science
Review. Vol. IX, No. ~1 (March, 1937), pp. 1-36.
Bernstein, David. "America and Dr. Laurel," Harper1s Magazine.
Vol. 197, No. 1181 (October, 1948), pp. 82-88.
Bernstein, Joseph. "The Future of the Philippines and the
Netherlands East Indies." Amerasla. 7 (October 25.
1943), pp. 354-362.
586
Bigornia, Jesus. "Cablli Hits Abaca Land Lease Plan," The
Manila Daily Bulletin. Vol. 140, No. 59 (December 8,
1949), pp. 1, 20.
Bisson, T.A. "The United States in the Pacific," Pacific
Affairs. Vol. V, No. 12 (December, 1932), pp. 1047-
10&6 .
Boado, Eugenio. "Bad Management Responsible for Projects
Failure," Philippines Herald. Year 30, No. 87,
(January 20, 1950), p! 2.
Bocobo, Jorge (Secretary of Public Instruction). "Streams in
Philippine Education," The Teachers College Journal.
Vol. II, No. 1 (July-September, 1940), pp. 1-5.
Boericke, William F. "Philippine Mines: Recent Progress,"
FES. Vol. 17, No. 17 (September 8, 1948), pp. 202-205.
________ . "Philippine Mine Labor," FES, Vol. 15, No. 3
(February 13, 1946), pp. 37-39.
_____ . "Rehabilitation of Philippine Mining," FES. Vol.
16, No. 10 (May 21, 1947), pp. 113-115.
Borromeo, Horacio Q. "The 100 Decisive Days," Manila Times
Mid-Week Review. Vol. Ill, No. 25 (February 22,
1950), pp. 4-5.
Buaken, Manuel. "Our Fighting Love of Freedom," Asia. Vol.
43 (June, 1943), pp. 357-359.
Buencamino, Felipe, Jr. "Greater Rice Output Goal," The
Philippines Herald (Rice Supplement), Vol. 87, No. 48
(October-1, 1949)", pp. 1, 2, 6.
Buencamino, Victor. "Problems and Adjustments in the Rice
Industry," Bulletin No. 17. National Research Council.
Manila: September, 1938, pp. 46-49.
. "The NARIC and the Nationalization of the Rice
Industry," The Commercial and Industrial Manual of
the Philippines. 1937-1938" pip. 334-335.
Bunag, J.J. "Highlights in Food Production," ACIL. Vol. X, No.
10 (October, 1948), pp. 4, 31.
"Bureau Backs Copra Rules," Manila Chronicle. Year 4, No. 36
(June 1, 1948), pp. 9-10.
Bureau of Commerce. "Philippine-American Trade Relations," The
PgC.J o l . XIII, No. 2 (February, 1937), pp. 4-18,
587
"Business Conditions In the Provinces During 1937," PJC.
Vol. XIV, No. 1 (January, 1938), pp. 11-12, S?P29.
Buss, Claude A. "The Philippines in Ibrld Politics," World
Affairs. Vol. 5, No. 1 (January, 1951), pp. 37-47.
"Busuanga Island: Leading Source of Philippine Manganese."
The globe (Shanghai), Vol. I, No. 5 (November 15, 1941),
pp. 31—35.
Calderon, Fernando. "Why Not a Dominion Status?" Commonwealth
Advocate. Vol. 7, No. 5 (June, 1941), pp. lT'-'le, 37.~
Calinisan, Melanio R. "The Tambolilid Coconut," Philippine
Educator. Vol. IV, No. 2 (August, 1949), pp. “
51-53.'
(Reprinted from the Plant Industry Digest. Vol. VI.
No. 7, July, 1948.).
"Camarines Sur Has No Food Problems," Administration Magazine.
Vol. I, No. 4 (December 15, 1948), pp. ^3, 74.
Camus, Jose S. "One Year of Our Food Production Campaign,"
ACIL. Vol. IX, No. 7 (July, 1947), pp. 15, 34.
________ . "Aerial Survey of Philippine Lands," The Philip
pines Herald (Rice Supplement), Vol. 87, No. 48 (Oc
tober 1, 1949), pp. 6, 7, 11.
________. "Next Rice Yield Enough, Camus," ACIL. Vol. IX,
No. 8 (August, 1947), p. 34.
________ . "Of Filipinos and Fisheries," ACIL. Vol. XI, No.
9 (September, 1949), pp. 9, 34.
Cariaga, Roman R. "Rice Economy: A Private View," The
Philippines Herald (Rice Supplement), Vol. 87, No. 48
(October 1, 1949), pp. 1, 9, 11.
Castillo, Andres, "Central Banking In the Philippines."
Pacific Affairs. Vol. XXI, No. 4 (December, 1948),
pp. 360-371.
________ • "Economic Upbuilding of the Philippines." In:
New Philippines. 1934, pp. 65-81. (See citation:
________ • "Important Economic Accomplishments of the Common
wealth. A Resume of Notable Achievements during the
Last Five Years " The Campus Leader. Vol. 10, No. 7
(December, 1940), pp.-7, 29. (The organ of The
University of Manila).
588
________ . "The New Economic Policy of the Philippines," The
Philippine Commonwealth Handbook (1936), pp. 157-177.
(See citation under De La Liana.).
Castillo, Teofilo del. "The Dawn Civilization," The Teachers
College Journal. Vol. II, No. 1 (July-September, 19407,
pp. 57-64. (Continued article).
Celeste, Jose L. "The Economic Bases of the Commonwealth of
the Philippines." UNITAS. Vol. XIV, No. 7 (January,
1938), pp. 405-410. (The Organ of Santo Tomas
University.).
"Cellulose Manufacturing Prom Abaca Fiber is Urged," PJC. Vol.
XIII, Nos. 10-11 (October-November, 1937), p. 4.
Clmazala, C*0. "The Legal Personality of Philippine Labor
Unions," Philippine Law Journal, Vol. XX, (October,
1941), pp. 138-153.
"Coco Planters Wage War on Bad Copra Exporters." Manila
Chronicle. Year III, No. 207 (December 12, 1947), p. 11.
"Coco-nut Palm." Encyclopaedia Brltannlca. Chicago? Ency
clopaedia Britannica, Inc., 1947 edition, Vol. 5, p. 950.
Cohen, Nathaniel A. "Public Health in the Philippines," FES,
Vol. 15, No. 6 (March 27, 1946), pp. 87-90.
"Commonwealth Economic Review," Progressive Farming. Vol.
II, No. 1 (January, 1938), p. 28.
Concepcion, Isabel and Juan Salcedo Jr., "A Rational Food
Program For the Republic," Journal of the Philippine
Pharmaceutical Association. VolY XXXIII7No. 6 (December
15, 1 9 4 6 ) , (Author should be: Isabel Concepcion.).
Concepcion, Isabelo. "The Development of Nutrition Work in
the Philippines," Bulletin No. 5. National Research
Council. Manila: 1935, pp. 563-507.
________ • and M. Ocampo. "The Normal Pelidin Index of the
Filipinos," NASB. Vol. II, No. 1 (January, 1932),
pp. 33-42.
________• "Nutritional Requirements of Filipinos," Journal
of Philippine Medical Association. Vol. XIII, No. 1
(January, 1933).
________ • "The Physical Growth of Filipinos." Bulletin of
San Juan de Dios Hospital. Vol. 8, No. 5 (May, 1934).
589
. and Juan Salcedo, Jr. and E. Bulatao. "Studies
on Growth of Filipinos. I. Hie Post-Natal Ponderal
Growth From Birth to_Twelve Months," Bulletin No. 9.
National Research Council, Manila: February, 1935,
pp. 6-7. Separate from Report No. 1. 42 pp. Abstract
of paper read at the Second Philippine Science
Convention, Manila* February 14-18, 1935.
. "Have the Filipinos Increased in Size in the Last
Twenty Years?" JPIMA.. Vol. XV, No. 4, (April, 1935).
"Food Intake of Filipino College Students," JPIMA.
Vol. XVI, No. 3 (March, 1936).
"The Nutritive Value and Cost of the Constabulary
Ration," Bulletin No. 11. National Research Council.
Manilas September, 1936. Abstract, Appendix A.
pp. 28-31.
• "A Study of the Food Intake of the Inmates of
Welfareville," JPIMA. Vol. XVII, No. 4 (April, 1937),
pp. 197-209.
. "Diet and the Nation's Health," JPIMA. Vol. XVII,
No. 5 (May, 1937), pp. 303-304.
• "The Vitamin C Content of Normal Filipino Blood,"
'JPIMA. Vol. XIX, No. 6 (June, 1939), pp. 337-344.
• "The Inadequacies of the Polished Rice and Fish
Diet and Recommendations For Its Improvement In the
Philippines. Reprint from Proceedings. Vol. VI,
pp. 287-298, of the Sixth Pacific Science Congress
held at Berkeley, Stanford and San Francisco, July
24-August 12, 1939.
. "Significance of the Soybean in the Dietary of the
’Filipinos." Reprinted from Proceedings. Vol. VI,
pp. 437-447, of the Sixth Pacific Science Congress.
"The Need for a National Campaign Against Malnutri
tion," JPIMA. Vol. XXI, No. 1 (January, 1941), pp. 35-37.
"Malnutrition As A Public Health Problem in the
Philippines and Means of Correcting It," Santo Tomas
Journal of Medicine. Vol. Ill, No. 6 (September, 1948).
and P. Paulino. "The Influence of Certain Dietary
Supplements on the Growth of Filipino Children."
Natural and Applied Science Bulletin. Vol. VI, No. 4
(December, 1938), pp. 337-356.
590
Cordero, N., M. Ocanqpo, E. Bulatao. "A Table of Body Weight
In Relation to Age and Height for Filipino Men,**
Natural and Applied Science Bulletin. Vol. I, No. 2
(January, 1931;, pp. 163-171.
Coscolluela, Ildefonso. "The Responsibility of the Public in
the Enforcement of Price Control Regulations," Philip
pine Rehabilitation Journal of Philippine Problems.
Vol. I, No. 10 (December, 1949), pp. 4&, 44, 9b.
Coslo, Hernando G. "Cushioning Copra Prices," The Manila
Times Midweek Review. Vol. 2, No. 27 (February 2, 1949),
p. 5.
Croft, Louis. "The NUPC in Philippine Rehabilitation,"
Philippine Rehabilitation Journal of Philippine
Problems. Vol. I. No. 10 (December. 1949). ppV 26. 54.
(The NUPC is the National Urban Planning Commission).
Cruz, Cornello C., Luis S. Borja and Hfai. H. Haas. "The
Commonwealth of the Philippines," ins Wm. H. Haas
(ed.). The American Empire. 1940, pp. 306-370.
Cruz, Eugenio E. "Coir Industry in the Philippines," PJC.
Vol. XIV, No. 1 (January, 1938), pp. 9-10.
Cruz, Santiago R. "Essentials in P.I. Farm Mechanization,"
Plant Industry Digest. Vol. XII, No. 6 (June, 1949),
pp. 14-SS.
Cruz, Santos V. "Quezon Report," Sunday Post Magazine. Vol.
II, No. 28 (March 30, 1947), pp. 23-24.
Cuenco, M. Jesus. "Industrial Power Problem," The Commercial
and Industrial Manual of the Philippines. 1937-1938.
pp. 205-207. ---------
Cullum, Robert M. "End of Oriental Exclusion?", FES. Vol.
17, No. 21 (November 3, 1948), pp. 247-251.
Cutshall, Alden. "The Philippine Islands and Their People,"
Journal of Geography. Vol. 41 (September, 1942),
pp. Sbl-Sil.
Dalisay, A.M. "Blueprint For An Agricultural Economy," Sunday
Post Magazine. Vol. I, No. 44 (July 21, 1946),
pp. 9-10, 15-16.
Dans, Celso. "The Long Voyage Home," Evening News Saturday
Magazine. Vol. II, No. 51 (September 13, 1947), pp. 14-
15, 16, 29.
591
De Castro, Anastacio. "Review of Business Conditions For
1937," PJC, Vol. XIV, No. 1 (January, 1938), pp. 7-8.
________• "Existing Abuses in the Marketing of Philippine
Staple Products," Bulletin No. 17. National Research
Council, Manila:September, 1936, pp. 82-87.
________. "Rice and Corn Cooperative Marketing," The Com
mercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
3.937-1958: pp. 535-536. ~
De Castro, Manuel. "Towards Self-Sufficiency in Tobacco
Products," The Manila Times Midweek Review. Vol. 2,
No. 26 (January 26, 1949), p. 3.
"Defects of Fish and Game Law Pointed Out by Dr. H. Roxas,"
PJC. Vol. XIV, No. 2 (February, 1938), p. 10.
De Guzman, Tesoro. "Angels and Tobacco," The Manila Times
Midweek Review. Vol. 3, No. 6 (March 30, 1948)7 pp. 3-4.
_______ . "Of Taxes and the Rope Industry," ACIL, Vol. XI,
No. 7 (July, 1949), p. 8.
De Jesus, Pedro S. "Ticklish Rice," livening News Saturday
Magazine. Vol. 3, No. 22 (February 21, 1948), pp.
10-11, 26, 27.
De Las Alas, Antonio. "Planned Industrialization," The
Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
1937-1938. pp. 196-197.
De Peralta, Fernando. "Sunlight and the Wrapper of Cigar,"
ACIL. Vol. XI, No. 4 (April, 1949), p. 2.
"Developing Livestock in the Islands," Philippines Herald
Yearbook. 1934-1935. pp. 103-104.
Dionido, Ponciano B. "Cavite Can Be Self-Sufficient in Rice,"
ACIL. Vol. XI, No. 6 (June, 1949), pp. 23, 26-27.
Dizon, Vicente Alvarez. "Art in Philippine Life," The Teachers
College Journal. Vol. II, No. 1 (July-September, 1940),
pp. 82-88.
Dizon, Santiago. "Manobo Life," Philippine Life. Vol. I,
No. 2 (November, 1938), pp^ 21-24, 43.
Domantay, F.S. "Mechanization Methods Tried Well in Ala Valley,"
The Philippines HSrald (Rice Supplement), Vol. 87,
No. 48 (October 1, 1949), pp. 4, 5.
592
Domantay, Jose S. "Notes and Observations on the Effects
of Dynamite and Other Explosives on Marine Fauna and
the Determination of Fishes Caught by Explosives,"
Bulletin No* 2 5 t National Research Council, Manilas
December, 1939, pp. 168-169.
________ . "Preliminary Report on the Culture Pearl Produc
tion in Zamboanga," Bulletin No. 2 5 , National
Research Council. Manila? December, 1939, p. 171,
"Economic Conditions in the Philippines," F E S . Vol. 15, No.
4 (February 27, 1946), p. 62. Sources Foreign
Commerce Weekly. Vol. XXII, No. 3, Washington, Jan
uary 19, 1946.
"Economic Forecast for 1949 " A C I L . , Vol. XI, Nos. 1-2 (Jan-
uary-February, 1949), p. 3.
Elizalde, Joaquin M. "The Quirino Administration," Philippine
Rehabilitation Journal of Philippine Problems, Vol. I,
No. 10 (December, 1949), pp. 9, 48-49.
Emerson, Rupert. "American Policy Toward Pacific Dependencies,"
Pacific Affairs. Vol. XX, No. 3 (September, 1947),
pp. 259-275.
________ . "Destinies for Southeast Asia," Pacific Affairs.
Vol. 16, No. 1 (March, 1943), pp. 73-79.
Espenshade, Ada. "A Program For Japanese Fisheries," The
Geographical Review. Vol. XXXIX, No. 1 (January, 1949),
pp. 76-85, Maps "Japanese Fisheries," p. 77.
Executive Economy Moves "One-Course Meals at Palace," This
Week, The Manila Chronicle. Vol. II, No. 11 (June 30,
1946), p. 3.
Fabella, Jose. "Public Welfare," The Philippine Forum. Vol.
I, No. 4 (March, 1936), pp. 41-49.
Falconer, Boliver Lang. "40 Years o f Philippine Progress,"
Bulletin of the South Seas Association. Vol. I, No. 4
(December, 1938), p p . 50-56.
Ferrer, Jaime N. "Tug of War in Davao," The Saturday Evening
News Magazine. Vol. 3, No. 38 (June 12, 1948),-p p . 6-7.
Ferriols, Vicente. "Important Post-Liberation Accomplishments
of the Bureau of Animal Industry," A C I L . Vol. X, No.
10 (October, 1948), p. 14.
"Fiber Inspection Manager Congratulates Montilla," Progressive
Farming. Christmas Edition (1937), p. 30.
595
Fields, John E. "Far Eastern Trade - 1948," FES, Vol. 17,
No. 18 (September 22, 1948), pp. 209-215.
Fifield, Russel H. "Philippine Foreign Policy," F E S , Vol.
XX, No. 4 (February 21, 1951), pp. 33-38.
________ . "The Hukbalahap Today," F E S . Vol. XX, No. 2
(January 24, 1951), pp. 13-18.
Finkelstein, Lawrence S. "U.S. At Impasse in Southeast Asia,"
F E S . Vol.19, No. 16 (September 27, 1950), pp. 165-172.
"Fishery Expert Outlines Problems of Industry Including Distri
bution," A C I L . Vol. XI, No. 4 (April, 1949), p. 23.
(Dr. Hilary J. Deason, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service).
Formoso, Vicente. "Tobacco: Its Rehabilitation," The Eve
ning News (Supplement), Vol. 5, No. 6 (September 30,
1949), p p . 4, 22.
Gallego, Manuel V. "Problems of the Philippine Cigarette
Industry," P J C . Vol. XIII, No. 1 (January, 1937),
pp. 15-16, 20.
________ . "Our Future Economic Structure," The Philippine
Commonwealth Journal. Vol. II, Nos. 7-8 (Juiy-August,
1935), p” 73.
________ . "The Paradox of the Tobacco Industry." CIMP,
1957-1938. pp. 337-338.
Garchitorena, Mariano. "An Appeal to Abaca Producers,"
Progressive Farming. Christmas Edition (1937), p. 17.
________ . "On the Problems and Adjustment in the Abaca Indus
try," Bulletin No. 1 7 . National Research Council.
Manila: September, 1938, pp. 149-155.
. "A Pattern For Rehabilitation of Our Agricultural
Resources," A C I L . Vol. IX, No. 4 (April, 1947),
pp. 4-5, 23.
Geronimo, Felicidad and Adelaida M. Bendafia-Brown. "The Total
and Available Iron Content of Some Typical Philippine
Foodstuffs," Bulletin No. 2 3 . National Research
Council, Manila: December, 1939, p. 157.
Glazer, -Sidney. "Hie Moros as a Political Factor in Philip
pine Independence," Pacific Affairs. Vol. XIV, No. 1
(March, 1941), pp. 78-90.
594
Gonzales, B.M. and P.M. Fronda, "Problems and Adjustments in
Philippine Animal Industries," Bulletin No. 17.
National Research Council. Manila: September, 1938,
p p . 1-7.
Gonzales, Leon Ma. "Philippine Progress Toward Economic Self-
sufficiency," Philippine Rehabilitation Journal of
Philippine Problems. Vol. I. No. 10 (December. 1949),
pp. 30, 77, 78-79.
Gonzales, N.V.M. "The Beyster Report," Evening News Satur
day Magazine. Vol. 3, No. 7 (November 8, 1947),
pp. 5, 6, 7.
Gonzales, R.L. "How Sound Are Juan's Finances,” Sunday Post
Magazine. Vol. II, No. 36 (May 85, 1947),pp. 3-4.
Gordon, G.G. "The Philippine Sugar Industry," The Evening
News (Supplement), Vol. 5, No. 6 (September 30, 1949),
p. 16.
Grattan, C. Harley. "Those Japanese Mandates," Harper *s
Magazine. Vol. 188, No. 1124 (January, 1944), pp.
145-153.
"Greater Rice Output Goal," The Philippines Herald (Rice
Supplement), Vol. 87, No. 48 (October 1, 1949), pp.
1, 2 , 6.
Greene, Marc T. "I Am Back From the Philippines," Free Hbrld.
(February, 1944), 125-129.
"Guano Fertilizer," ACIL. Vol. X, No. 10 (October, 1948), p. 15.
Gutierrez, Mariano E. "Virginia Tobacco Culture," Plant
Industry Digest. Vol. XII, No. 5 (May, 1949), pp. 10-17.
Gutierrez, M. "The Vitamin A Potency of 'Saflga' (Mobula
eregoodoo-tenkee) Liver Oil," Bulletin No. 23.
National Research Council. Manila: December, 1939,
p. 128.
________ . "Thb Diet of Low-Income Families in Tondo District,
Manila, Bulletin No. 23. National Research Council.
Manila: December, 1939, p. 175. (Also published in
Acta Medlca Phlllpplna. Vol. I, No. 2 (1939), 171.).
Hall, H. Duncan, "Zones of the International Frontier,"
The_Geographlcal Review. Vol. XXXVIII, No. 4 (October,
1 9 4 8 ) , pp. 6l5-625.
595
Hall, Monroe. "Collaborators’ Candidate," FES. Vol. 15,
No. 5 (March 13, 1946), pp. 72-73.
Halsema, J.J. "Development Plans in the Philippines," FES.
Vol. 18, No. 20 (October 5, 1949), pp. 233-239.
________. "Philippine Financial Policies," FES. Vol. 18,
No. 9 (May 4, 1949), pp. 97-102.
Handy, E.S. Craighill. "The Insular Pacific, Ethnic Fugue
and Counterpoint," Pacific Affairs. Vol. V, No. 6
(June, 1932), pp. 487-496.
"Hemp Export Limitation Plan Opposed," PJC. Vol. XIV, No.
5 (May, 1938), p. 8.
Hermano, A.J., and Gavino Sepulveda, Jr. "The Vitamin
Content of Philippine Foods. II. Vitamin £ in Various
Fruits and Vegetables," Bulletin No. 9 . National
Research Council. Manila: February, 1935. Separate
from Report No. 1 . 42 pp., Abstract, pp. 12-13.
Hernandez, F. "With the Philippine-American Trade Conference,"
PJC. Vol. XIII, Nos. 10-11 (October-November, 1937),
pp. 61-62, 80.
Herre, Albert W.C.T. "Outlook for Philippine Fisheries,"
FES. Vol. XVII, No. 23 (December 8, 1948), pp. 277-278.
Hester, -fcl.D. "Footnotes to Philippine Economics,0 Philippine
Social Science Review. Vol. 12 (1940), pp. 131-141.
________. "Outline of Our Recent Political and Trade Rela
tions With the Philippine Commonwealth," Annals of
the American Academy of Political and SocialT Science.
Vol.2^6, (March, 1943), pp. 73-85.
Hodson, H.V. "The Nemesis of National Planning." Pacific
Affairs, IX, No. 1 (March, 1936), pp. 53-59.
Hyde, Edward H., and Felipe Roman. "Industrialization in the
Philippines," Contes-Rendues du Congres International
de Geographie. IIIc, Vol. 2, Amsterdam: 1938, pp.
559—563.
"Import Check is Defended by President," The Manila Times.
Vol. 5, No. 113 (December 8, 1949), pp. 1, 3.
Infantado, S.M. "Adult Education In the Philippines," The
Teachers College Journal. Vol. II, No. 1 (July-
September, 1940), pp. 11-15.
596
"Investigate the Situation," Editorial from The Philippines
Herald, reproduced in Progressive Farming, Vol. II.
No. 1 (January, 1938), p. 44.
"Irrigation to Boost Rice Production," A C I L , Vol. XI, No. 5
(May, 1949), p. 3.
Jaca,Vicente P. "Rice Industry in Leyte," PJC. Vol. XIV,
No. 6 (June, 1938), p. 15.
Jacinto, Carmelo P. "The Tuberculosis Problem in the Philip
pines," This Week. The Manila Chronicle. Vol. II,
No. 40 (January 19, 1947), p. 5.
Jenkins, Shirley. "Our Ties With the Philippines," F E S , Vol.
15, No. 10 (May 23, 1945), pp. 121-125.
_____ . "Great Expectations in the Philippines," F E S . Vol.
16, No. 15 (August 13, 1947), pp. 169-174.
________ . "Financial and Economic Planning in the Philippines,"
Pacific Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 1 (March, 1948), pp.
33-45.
________ . "Philippine White Paper," F E S , Vol. 20, No. 1
(January 10, 1951), pp. 1-6.
Johnstone, William C. "Regionalism in the Pacific," F E S . Vol.
14, No. 13 (July 4, 1945), pp. 169-171.
Kalaw, Maximo M. "international Aspects of Philippine Indepen
dence, A Filipino View,' Pacific Affairs. Vol. 6,
No. 1 (January, 1933), pp. 17-21.
________ . "Kalaw Stresses NACOCO Services," The Manila Times
Vol. 4, No. 32 (September 18, 1948), pp. 1, 12.
Kalaw, Moises M. "The Case of Philippine Copra," The Manila
Times Midweek Review. Vol. I, No. 15 (November 10, 1948)
p . 4.
Kapf, Ruth. "Romulo Speaks Out, An Interview." UN World. Vol.
3, No. 6 (June, 1949), pp. 58-59, 60.
Kaesing, Felix M. "Education and Native Peoples, A Study in
Objectives," Pacific Affairs. Vol. 5, No. 8 (August,
1932), pp. 675-688.
Ke ndrick, A.B. "Textiles and Embroideries," Japanese A r t .
Brltannlca Booklet No. 6, Encyclopaedia, Brltannlca.
14th edition, 1933, p. 59"
Kimhoko, Salvador U. "The Manunungkit," Saturday Graphic
Magazine. Vol. XVI, No. 1 (August 28, 1948), p. 34.
597
Kirk, Grayson. "Philippine-American Relations: Recent
Trends," Political Science Quarterly. Vol. LIV, No.
3 (September, 1939V, pp. 321-342.
Kramer, Dale. "Mr. Tuason." Harper's Magazine. Vol. 191,
No. 1145 (October, 1945), pp. 377-3847
Kurihara, Kenneth K. "Economic Nationalism in the Philippines,"
Philippine Social Science Review. 12 (1940),pp. 147-152.
"L'Accroissement de 1* extraction miniere dans la zone du
pacifique," Journal de la Marine Marchande. Vol. 24,
(July 16, 19427^ pp. 815-816.
Lacson, Arsenio. "In This Corner,” The Star Reportert Vol.
5, No. 171 (February 14, 195077 p. 2.
Ladrido, Wilfrido J. "President Quezon's Partyless Democracy:
Is It Practicable?" The U.M. Law Gazette. Vol. II,
No. 3 (September, 1940), pp. 6-8, 52-537
Lansang, Jose A. "The New Education," Philippine Life. Vol.
I, No. 2 (November, 1938), pp. 19-20.
Lara, Hilario. "Our National Economy and the Public Health,"
Proceedings of the Fifth Philippine Science Convention,
Bulletin No. 2 5 . National ResearchCouncil. Manila:
December, 1939. Abstract No. 345, p. 106.
Lasker, Bruno. "Population Shifts in Southeast Asia," FES.
Vol. XIII, No. 22 (November 1, 1944), pp. 201-205.
Laurel, Jose P. (Justice). "A Longer Lease of Life For
Democracy," The Teachers College Journal. Vol. II,
No. 1 (July-September, 1940), pp. 6-7•
Lava, V.G. "Some Solutions to the Problems of the Philippine
Coconut Industry," Bulletin No. 23. National Research
Council. Manila: December, 1939. Abstract No. 334,
pp. 95-100.
Lecaros, Alfonso. "The Need to Rehabilitate Cattle Raising,"
The Evening News (Supplement), Vol. 5, No. 6 (September
30, 1949), p. 6.
Ledesma, Oscar. "Some Facts About the Philippine Sugar Indus-
try," The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the
Philippines. 1938-1959. pp. 169-170.
Lee, Douglas H.K. "Thoughts on Housing for the Humid Tropics,"
Geographical Review. Vol. XLI, No. 1 (January, 1951),
pp. 124-147.
598
Lejano, Antonio. "Premium on Quality Hemp," Evening Newa
Saturday Magazine. Vol. 2, No. 47 (August 16, 1947),
pp. 14, 15, 29.
________. "The Outlook of the Philippine Abaca Industry,"
The Manila Times Midweek Review. Vol. 1, No. 7
^September 22, 1948T, p. 7.
Levi, Werner. "Union in Asia?" FES. Vol. 19, No. 14, (August
16, 1950), pp. 144-149.
Lillico, Stuart. "Pan-America or Pan-Malayaj Which Will the
Filipino Choose?" Asia. Vol. 43, No. 3 (March, 1943),
pp. 148-150.
Liwag, Julio Q. "CAPCA - A Great Success," The Philippines
Free Press. Vol. 39, No. 45 (November 6, 1948), p. 18.
Lobregat, Celso. "La Carlota Forges Ahead," The Evening News
(Supplement), Vol. 5, No. 6 (September 30, 1949), p. 23.
Lockwood, W.W. "New Estimate of U.S. Investments in the
Philippines," FES. Vol. 6, (1937), pp. 92-93.
Lomat, Venanclo. "The Abaca Industry - Its Fundamental Problem,"
PJC. Vol. XIV, No. 6 (June, 1938), pp. 13, 88.
________. "The Present Abaca (Manila Hemp) Situation," PJC.
Vol. XIV, No. 7 (July, 1938), pp. 13, 14, 17, 32.
Lopez, Maria Luna. "The Testimony of P.I. Folklore," The
Herald Mid-Week Magazine. July 5, 1939, p. 3. (Paper
read at the session on Folk Literature of the Third
American Writers1 Congress, Sunday, June 4, 1939.) No
other bibliographic Information.
Luna, Miguel G. "Progress Report on the Department of Commerce
and Industry," Administration Magazine. Vol. I, No. 4
(December 15, 1948), pp. 46-48.
Mabilangan, Felipe. "Merits of Unicameralism," The Philippine
Social Science Review. Vol. VI, No. 3 (July, 1934),
pp. 202-206.
Magbag, C.S. "Commonwealth in Retrospect," Sunday Post
Magazine. Vol. I, No. 41 (June 30, 1946), pp." 6-7,
19-20.
Magsino, Homobono. "Problems In Economics in the Philippine
Islands," Philippine Social Science Review. Vol. VI,
No. 3 (July, 1934), pp. 110-140. Tables.
599
Malcolm, George A. "On Governments in General," The Philip
pine Social Science Review. Vol. IX, No. 1 (March,
193777 pp. 44-48.
. "Suggestions Concerning the Constitution of the
_
Philippine Commonwealth," The Philippine Social Science
Review. Vol. VI, No. 3 (July, 1934), pp.~l62-167.
Mamisao, Jesus P. "Good Upland Rice Cultivation is Outlined
Here," The Philippines Herald. (Rice Supplement),
Vol. 87, N o . 48 (October 1,19 4 9 ) , p. 12.
Manabat, E.L. "Cost of Living and the Common Tao," Philip
pine Rehabilitation Journal of the Philippine
Problems. Vol. I~ No. 10 (December. 1949), pp. 46, 84.
. "PRATRA-NCA Partnership on the Retail Trade,"
_
"Coordination of the two agencies will wrest from the
aliens the control of Filipino Retail Trade," Philip
pine Rehabilitation Journal. Vol. I, No. 7 (September,
1949), pp. 15, 38. (The NCA referred to is the
National Cooperatives Administration).
Manaligod, Pedro M., and Jesus 3. Perpifian. "Vocational Edu
cations A Survey," The Teachers College Journal. Vol.
II, No. 1 (July-September, 19397, pp. 65-75.
Manapat, L. Lincoln A. "This Valuable Abaca," The Manila
Times Midweek Review, Vol. 4, No. 13 (November 30,
19 491, p ."7 .
Mane, Andres, M. "Stocking Inland Bodies of Water With Fish,"
A C I L . Vol. IX, No. 7 (July, 1947), pp. 16, 28.
"Manila Hemp in Davao," Bulletin of the South Sea Association.
Vol. I, No. 4 (December, 1938), pp. 23-30.
"Manila Today," F E S . Vol. 14, No. 11 (June 6, 1945), pp. 149,
150. Source: Foreign Commerce Weekly. Vol. 19, No. 6,
Washington, May 5, 1940.
Mapa, Placido L. "Our Total Economic Mobilization Program,"
Service Journal. Vol. I, No. 2 (October, 1949), pp. 10,
40,55. (Speech delivered at a convocation sponsored
by the Philippine Country Life Association, at Univer
sity of Philippines, College of Agriculture, Los Bafios,
Laguna, August 29, 1949.).
. "Abaca: Our No. 2 Export Industry." ACIL. Vol.
XI, No. 5 (May, 1949), pp. 14-15, 21.
600
________ . "Agriculture Secretary Reports on Rice Production
Notes Rapid Progress Since Period of Liberation,*1
The Philippines Herald (Rice Supplement), Vol. 87,
So." 48 (October 1, 2.949), pp. 1, 11.
________ . "REB Organized to Bring Stable Conditions to Trade,"
The Philippines Herald (Rice Supplement), Vol. 87,
No. 48 (October 1, 1^49), p. 6.
________ • "Objective: More Production," Manila Times Mid-
Week Review. Vol. Ill, No. 25 (February 22, 1950),
p. 13.
________ • "Philippine Agricultural Rehabilitation," Manila
Bulletin. Vol. 141, No. 73 (March 27, 1950), Section
6, p. 3.
Maramba, Felix D. "Farm Mechanization In the Philippines,"
A C I L . Vol. IX, No. 4 (April, 1947), pp. 2-3.
________ • "The Effects of U.S.-P.I. Trade Relations on
Philippine Agriculture," Philippine Rehabilitation
Journal. Vol. I, No. 7 (September, 1949), pp. 16, 38.
Speech delivered at the Round the World Town Meeting
Seminar No. 1, August 22, 1949.
________ . "Mechanization Advance Noted," The Philippines
Herald (Rice Supplement), Vol. 87, N o . 48 (Octobe'r
1, 1949), pp. 1, 3, 4, 5.
Marquez, Antonia. "Japan Over the Philippines," Commonwealth
Advocate. Vol. 7, No. 5 (June, 1941), pp. 5-8, 24,
26, 34.
Marsman, Jan H. "Forecast of Economic Conditions in 1947,"
Philippine Magazine. Vol. XXXIII, No. 4 (336) (April,
1956), PP. 182, £03-207.
Martin, Claro. "The Fisheries of the Province of Oriental
Negros, Cebu, and Bohol," Proceedings of the Fourth
Philippine Science Convention, Manila: 1937, pp. 121-122.
. "Important Contributions of the Bureau of Fisheries
to the Fishery Industry Along Technological Lines,"
A C I L . Vol. X, No. 3 (March, 1948), pp. 6, 7, 31.
(Radio Interview, KZFM).
Maulit, Dimas A. "Rice Economy: A Government View," The
Philippines Herald TRice Supplement), Vol. 87, No. 48
(October 1, 1949), pp. 1, 10.
601
Maurer, Isabel A. "The Fulbright Act in Operation," FES.
Vol. 18, No. 9 (May 4, 1949), pp. 104-107.
McNutt, P.V., and Isaias Fernando. "Irrigations in the
Philippines," Sunday Post Magazine, Vol. II, No.
38 (June 8, 194777 ppT 5-6, 21-22.
Mendoza, Guillermo. "The Revival of Home Industries," Manila
Times Mid-Week Review. Vol. Ill, No. 26 (March 1,
1950), p. 7. (Refers to Republic Act 414 which has
never been implemented).
Mendoza, Policarpio B. "The Black Spot in Our Agricultural
Pattern, Manila Times Mid-Week Review. Vol. Ill,
No. 21 (January 25, 1950), p. 7.
Merino, Gonzalo. "Some of Our Plant Pest Disease Problems in
the Philippines," Bulletin No. 1 7 . National Research
Council. Manila: September, 1938, pp. 33-40.
Millegan, Lloyd, S. "Census of the Philippines: 1939," FEQ.
Vol. II, No. 1 (November, 1942), pp. 77-79.
Miller, Agnes R. "American Investments In the Far East,"
F E S . Vol. 19, No. 9 (May 3, 1950), pp. 81-89.
Miller, Hugo. "Restless Giant of the Philippines," Natural
History. Vol. 49, (January, 1942), pp. 40-50.
Mlllora, Troadio. "Cotton and Textile Industry," The Com
mercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
1957-1938! pp. 367-309.
Mills, Lennox A. "Some Problems or Southeastern Asia and the
Philippines," Amerasla. 6 (January 25,
1943), pp. 530-540.
________ . (ed.) Southeastern Asia and the Philippines. AAAPSS,
226 (March, 1943), pp.” 1-150. Phila. 19437“
"Mindanao Has Extensive Public Lands for Rubber Cultivation,"
P J C . Vol. XIV, No. 9 (September, 1938), p. 14.
"Mindanao Must Be Seat of Granary," A C I L . Vol. XI, Nos. 1-2
(January-February 1949), p. 35.
Mirasol, Jose J. "The Effects of U.S.-P.I. Trade Relations on
Philippine Agriculture," Philippine Rehabilitation
Journal. Vol. I, No. 7 (September”, 1949)7 pp. 18, 39,
4 0 . Speech delivered at the Round the ^brld Town
Meeting, August 22, 1949.
602
Montilla, Luis. "The Philippines After Liberation," Philip
pine Rehabilitation Journal of Philippine Problems.
Vol. I, No. 10 (December, 1949), pp. 21, 57, 58-1©,
60-65.
"Mrs. Sanger and the Mayor of Manila," Editorial, The Phlllp-
pine Magazine, Vol. XXXIV, No. 8 (352) (August, 1937),
p. 346.
Murphy, Irene E. "By Rice Alone," Philippine Rehabilitation
Journal of Philippine Problems. Vol. I, No. 10
(December, 1949), pp. &6, 96.
"NACOCO Pails to Deliver," The Manila Bulletin. Vol. 133,
No. 6 (January 7, 1948), pp. 1~ 6.
"NACOCO Article Draws Libel Suit." The Philippines Free Press,
Vol. 39, No. 41 (October 9, 1946), p. 26.
"NAPCO Carries Out Principles of NEPA," ACIL. Vol. XI, No. 3
(March, 1949), pp. 7, 25.
"National Abaca Company Bill Approved," P J C . Vol. XIV, No. 6
(June, 1938), p. 8.
"National Companies," Editorial, The Manila Times. Vol. 4,
No. 211 (March 16, 1949), p. 4.
"Naturalization of Filipinos," F E S . Vol. 14, No. 1 (January
17, 1945), pp. 9, 10. Sources 78th Congress 2nd
Session, House of Representatives Report No. 1940,
Authorizing the Naturalization of Filipinos.
Neri, Felino. "Philippine Foreign Policy," Philippine Reha-
bilitation Journal of Philippine Problems. Vol. I,
No. 10 (December, 1949), pp. 13, 74-75,76-77.
"New Tobacco Officials Lay Down Rules for Revival of Industry,"
ACIL. Vol. XI, Nos. 1-2 (January-February, 1949), p. 15.
"Newspaper Distribution in Manila," F E S . Vol. 14, No. 19
(September 26, 1945), p. 278. Source: Foreign Commerce
Weekly. Vol. XX, No. 9, Washington, August 25, 1945.
Nieva, Jose, Sr. "Five Year Plan for the Coconut Industry,"
The Evening News (Supplement), Vol. 5, No. 6 (September
30, 1949), pp. 16, 19.
________ • "Effects of the Pound Devaluation on Our Coconut
Industry," Service Journal. Vol. I, No. 2 (October.
1949), pp. 37, 56. '
603
"No Fiasco Says Maximo Kalaw," The Philippines Free Press,
Vol. 39, No. 28 (July 10, 1948), pp. 26-27.
Ocampo, Feliciano. HThe Rehabilitation of Philippine
Transportation and Public Utilities," Philippine
Rehabilitation Journal of Philippine Problems. Vol.
I, No. 10 (December, 1949}, p. 33.
Octubre, Francisco P. "Kra Suey Good for Deep Water," The
Philippines Herald (Rice Supplement), Vol. 87, No.
48 (October 1, 1949), p. 11.
Olver, A.S.B. "The Special Commission in South-East Asia,"
Pacific Affairs. Vol. XXI, No. 3 (September, 1948),
pp. 285-291.
"Organizational and Functional Set-Up of the Bureau of Customs,"
Service Journal. Vol. I, No. 2 (October, 1949), pp.
li, vi, i; Xii, xiv.
Osborn, Fairfield. "Crowded Off the Earth," The Atlantic.
Vol. 181, No. 3 (March, 1948), pp. 17-23.
Osmefia, Sergio. "Quezon of the Philippines," Foreign Affairs.
Vol. 21, (January, 1943), pp. 289-296.
Padilla, Pablo S. "Philippines Most Model Abaca Plantation,”
The Manila Times Midweek Review. Vol. 4, No. 11
(November 16, 1949), pp. 5-6.
Padua, Regino G. "Some Fundamental Health Problems." The
Philippine Forum. Vol. I, No. 7 (June, 1936), pp. 33-38.
Paguirigan, Domingo B. "Problems and Adjustments in Philippine
Tobacco Production," Bulletin No. 17, National
Research Council, Manila: September, 1938, pp. 21-24.
. (ed.). "Philippine Coconut Industry," The Com
mercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines. 1957-
1958. (Manila: Publishers Inc., 1938), pp. 243-2’49.
________ • (ed.). "Philippine Tobacco Industry is Country's
Big Source of Revenue," CIMP. 1937-1958. 287-293.
________ . "Abaca," ACIL. Vol. X, No. 3 (March, 1948), pp. 16-17.
. "Burl (Corvpha elata Rxb.)" ACIL. Vol. XI, No. 8
(August, 1949), p. 26.
604
________ • "Ways and Means of Rehabilitating the Tobacco In
dustry," Manila Times Mid-Week Review. Vol. Ill,
No. 21 (January 25, 1950Tj pp. 4-5.
________ . (ed.). "Philippine Monopoly of Abaca More Apparent
Than Real," The Commercial and Industrial Manual of
the Philippines. 1957-1938. pp. 283-287.
Pahati, Amador P. "The Epidemiology of Malaria in a Non-
Malarious Barrio of Talim Island," Bulletin No. 2 3 .
National Research Council. Manilaj December, 19^9,
p. 130. (also published in Acta Medica Phillppina.
Vol. I, No. 1 (1939), pp. 37-46.)
Pamintuan, Mariano G. "Davao’s Abaca Industry Can Be Saved,"
The Philippines Free Press. Vol. 39, No. 51 (December
18, 1948), pp. 18-19, 54.
Parker, T.C. "The Subterranean River of Palawan, Philippine
Islands,® U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings. 68
(November, 1942T, 1530-1533.
Paulino, Antonio. "Our Staff of Life," Philippine Review.
Vol. 2, No. 10 (December, 1944), pp. 38-40.
Pelzer, Karl J. "Philippine Abaca Industry," FES. Vol. 17,
No. 6 (March 24, 1948), pp. 75-76.
Pefia, Virginia A. "PACSA in Action," Service Journal. Vol.
I, No. 2 (October, 1949), pp. 17, 67, 68.
Pendleton, Robert L. "Land Use in Southeast Asia," FES.
Vol. 16, No. 3 (February 12, 1947), pp. 25-29.
Perez, Gilbert S. "The Type A Schools and 1946," The Teachers
College Journal. Vol. II, No. 1 (July-September, 1940),
pp. 16-21.
"Philippine Fish and Game Resources," The Commercial and In
dustrial Manual of the Philippines. 1958-1939. pp.
212-218.
"Philippine Independence," from the Osaka Mainichi. January
20, 1933. Ins Pacific Affairs. Vol. VI, Nos. 2-3
(February-March, 1933), pp. 109-110.
"Philippine Islands." Btacyclopaedla Brltannlca. Chicago:
Encyclopaedia Brltannlca, Inc., 1947 edition, Vol. 17,
pp. 725-733.
"P.I. Potential Source of Rubber," PJC. Vol. XIV, No. 12
(December, 1938), p. 12.
605
"Philippine Rice Problem and Peace," Editorial, A C I L . Vol.
X, No. 8 (August, 1948), p. 18.
"Philippine Tobacco," F E S . Vol. 15, No. 21 (October 23,
1946), p. 335. Sources Foreign Crops and Markets.
Vol. 53, No. 13, Washington, D.C.: Office of
Foreign Agricultural Relations, Department of Agri
culture, September 23, 1946.
Phlehn, Carl C. "Taxation in the Philippines," Philippine
Social Science Review. Vol. XIII, No. 1 (February,
1941) , pp“. 79-117•
Pitt, Harold M. "The Philippinee-fhe United States," Reveille.
Vol. 16, No. 1 (April, 1940), p. 8. (Reveille,
"The Awakening," Official publication of the G.O.
40 Association and American Defenders Association. Los
Angeles, California. Veterans of America's Wars.)
Porter, Catherine. "Japan's Blue-Print for the Philippines,"
F E S . 12, (May 31, 1943), pp. 109-112.
Powell, Ifor B. "The Commonwealth of the Philippines."
Pacific Affairs. Vol. IX, No. 1 (March, 1936), pp.
33-43.
Pratt, Fletcher. "The Big Pacific Push. Is The Turkey-shoot
off Saipan," Harper's Magazine. Vol. 190, No. 1140
(May, 1945), pp. 541-555.
________ • "The Big Pacific Push. II: Bigger than Midway,"
Harper's Magazine. Vol. 190, No. 1141 (June, 1945),
pp. 635-645.
________ . "The Great Victory of Leyte Gulf. Is Brought to
Action," Harper's Magazine. Vol. 191, No. 1146
(November, 1945), pp. 431-444.
. "Death to the Japanese Fleet. The Great Victory
of Leyte Gulf. Part II," Harper's Magazine. Vol. 191,
No. 1147 (December, 1945), pp. 537-552.
"President Roxas Leads In Nation’s Food Campaign." This Week
Magazine. Manila Chronicle. Vol. II, No. 10 (June 23,
1949), p. 3l
Purcell, Victor. "Overseas Chinese and the People's Republic,"
F E S . Vol. 19, No. 18 (October 25, 1950),pp. 194-196.
Putong, Cecilio. "Why Adult Education." Service Journal. Vol.
I, No. 2 (October, 1949), pp. 27, 53, 67.
606
Puyat, Gil. "Is a Pacific Union Possible and Practical Now?"
Service Journal, Vol. I, No. 2 (October, 1949),
p p . 8, 42.
Qjiezon, Manuel L. "Message of the President of the Philippines
to the National Assembly," P J C . Vol. XIII, Nos. 10-11
(October-November, 1937), pp. 11-16.
Quirino, Elpldio (President). "Accomplishments of the Adminis
tration," Philippine Rehabilitation Journal of Philip
pine Problems. Vol. I, No. 10 (December, 1949), p. 6.
"Quirino Gives Naric Full Control of Rice Distribution All Over
P.I.," ACIL; Vol. XI, Nos. 1-2 (January-February,
1949), pp. 27, 21 (in that order).
Ramiro, Mariano P. "Bagasse Into Paper," Manila Times Mid-Week
Review. Vol. Ill, No. 25 (February 22, 1950), p. 7~.
Ramos, J.C. "Economic Aspect of the Tobacco Industry in the
Philippines," CIMP. 1937-1938. pp. 293-299.
Ramos, R.R. "RCPA Buys M-M Tractors for Production Products,"
The Philippines Herald (Rice Supplement),Vol. 87, No. 48
(October 1, 1949), p7 5.
"Reaction to Marsman Offer Varied: Mapa Urges Approval of
Proposal," The Manila Bulletin, Vol. 140, No. 74
(December 26, 1949), p. 57
"Red Cross 1949 Accomplishments Recited by New Chairman: (From
the Annual Report)," (Dr. Manuel Llm). The Manila
Times (Independence Day Supplement), Vol. IV, No. 321
(July 4, 1949), pp. 14b - 15b, 19b.
"Report of the Section of Animal Production," Bulletin No. 2 .
National Research Council, Manila: February, 1935,
pp. 36-40.
"Republic of the Philippines," Ten Eventful Years. Vol. 3,
pp. 523-531 (by Manuel Roxas)• Chicago: Encyclopaedia
Brltannlca, Inc., 1947.
Reubens, Edwin P. "Asia and Truman's Fourth Point," FES.
Vol. 18, No. 6 (March 23, 1949), pp. 61-67.
"Review of Business Conditions During the Year 1936," P J C . Vol.
XIII, No. 1 (January, 1937), pp. 3, 4, 5.
"Reviewing the Sinamay Industry," ACIL. Vol. X L , No. 6 (June,
1949), pp. 18-19. ("Reprinted from Times Midweek")
607
Richards’, J. Bartlett, Philippine Economic Conditions,
Annual Report for 1936," Cornejo’s Commonwealth
Directory of the Philippines. 1959-1940. pp. 667-662•
(American Trade Commissioner, U.S. Department of
Commerce.}
R igSa # Fred W. "U.S. Legislation Affecting Asiatics - I,"
FES. Vol. 16, No. 8 (April 23, 1947), pp. 88-91.
"U.S. Legislation Affecting Asiatics - II," F E S .
_
Vol. 16, No. 10 (May 21, 1947), pp. 115-117.
Rivera, L. Ma. "How We Could Boost Our Local Industries,"
Manila Times Mid-Week Review. Vol. Ill, No. 23
(February 8, 1950), p. 6.
Rodrigo, P.A. "The Lowly Banana," A C I L . Vol. XI, No. 4 (April,
1949), p. 22.
Rojo, Trinidad A. "Population Problems," Philippine Social
Science Review. Vol. X L , No. 2 (May, 1939), pp. 135-136.
Romulo, Carlos P. "An Analysis of American Foreign Policy,"
Service Journal. Vol. I, No. 2 (October, 1949),
pp. 24, 29, 50.
________ . "The Southeast Asia Union," Service Journal. Vol.
I, No. 2 (October, 1949), pp. 9, 42, 46, 52.
Ronquillo, Bernardino. "Business Review of 1948," A C I L .
Vol. XI, Nos. 1-2 (January-February, 1949), pp. 2,
3, 18, 19, 23.
Roxas, Hilario A. "Developing the Fishing Industry," Philip
pine Forum. Vol. I, No. 4 (March, 1936), pp. 28-33.
________ . "Philippine Fish Industry," The Commercial and
Industrial Manual of the Philippines. 1937-3.938. pp.
o28—329. ' _ ~
________ . "Our Capacity of Producing Sufficient Supply of
Fish Still Problematical - But Not Impossible," The
Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
1941. p p 7 870-872.
Roxas, Manual A. "Science for the New Commonwealth," The
Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
1957-1938J pp. 61-62. ----
. "Sanitary Canning and Preservation of Philippine
Foods," CIMP. 1937-1938. pp. 323-325.
608
Roxas, Nicanor. "Philippine Local Government in Action,"
Philippine Rehabilitation Journal of Philippine
Problems. Vol. I, No. 10 (December, 1 9 4 9 ) , pp. 14,
49, 68, 70-71, 72.
"Rubber in the Philippines," The Globe (Shanghai), Vol. I, No.
5 (November 15, 1941), pp. 37-38.
Ruiz, Juan M. "Undernourishment - A Social Problem," The
Philippine Forum. Vol. I, No. 7 (June, 1936), pp.
49-52.
Sabido, Pedro. "The Abaca Industry in the Philippines," The
Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philippines.
1940-1941. Pp. 846-8^9^
Sacay, Francisco M. "Agricultural Planning and Extension
Teaching at the Community Level: I. Community Survey
and Program Planning," ACIL. Vol. IX, No. 4 (April,
1947), pp. 6, 23, 26.
Salcedo, Juan, Jr. "P.I. Undertakes Seriously Rice Enrichment
Project," The Philippines Herald (Rice Supplement),
Vol. 87, No. 48 (October 1, 1949), p. 12.
Salvador, Celedonio. "The Training of Teachers," The Teachers
College Journal. Vol. II, No. 1 (July-September, 1940},
pp. 31-35.
Salvosa, Benjamin. "The Coconut In War and Peace," Adminis
tration Magazine. Vol. I, No. 4 (December 15, 1948),
pp. 53, 68.
San Agustin, Gregorio. "Problems of Control of Animal Diseases,"
Bulletin No. 17. National Research Council. Manila:
September, 1938, pp. 14-20.
________• "Making the Country Self-Sufficient in Farm Commo
dities," The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the
Philippines. 1941. pp. 892-894.
Sanidad, Prospero C. "Rehabilitation of Philippine Public
Works," Philippine Rehabilitation Journal of Philip
pine Problems. Vol. I. No. 10 ^December. 1947) . pp.
10, 49.
Santos, Blenvenido. "Filipinos in War," FES. Vol. 11,
(November 30, 1942), pp. 249-250.
Santos, F.O. "Biological Chemistry in Philippine Agriculture
and Filipino Nutrition," Bulletin No. 5 . National
Research Council. Manila: 1935, pp. 394-400.
609
________ . I.E. Villanueva, and P. Silva. "Studies of Plane
of Nutrition of Families of Laborers in Sta. Catalina,
Ilocos Sur; Paoay, Ilocos Norte; and Pototan, Iloilo,
Bulletin No. 1 1 . National Research Council. Manila;
September, 1936. Abstract, pp. 32-36; 5 tables.
________ . "Studies on the Plane of Nutrition of Families of
Laborers in Calabanga, Camarines Sur," Bulletin No. 1 9 ,
National Research Council. Manila; November, 1938,
pp. 95-96. From; Proceedings of Fourth Philippine
Science Convention, February, 1937.
________ . and J.K. Demeterio. "Studies in the Food of 106
Families of Laborers in Macrohon, Leyte,” Bulletin N o .
2 5 . National Research Council. Manila; 1939, pp.
127-128. (Also published in Philippine Agriculturist.
Vol. 28, No. 1 (1939), p. 1575
________ . and M. Gutierrez. "A Study of the Food Served to
the Trainees and Enlisted Men of the P.I. Army in Camp
Murphy," Bulletin No. 2 3 . National Research Council.
Manila; December, 1939, p. 127. (Also published in
Acta Medica Philippine. Vol. I, No. 2 (1939), p. 195).
________ . and P.S. Hamoy. "The Food of 158 Families in Ramain,
Lanao," Bulletin No. 2 3 . National Research Council,
Manila; December, 1939, pp. 173-174.
Santos, Jose B. "A Close Up of Our Postwar Abaca Industry," 'Ihe Eve
ning News (Supplement). Vol. V, No. 6 (Septenbsr 30, 1949), p. 6.
Saquing, Asterio. "Emergency Relief; From 1939 to 1945,"
The Evening News (Supplement), Vol. V, No. 6 (September
30, 1949), pp. 18, 20.
Sauer, Carl 0. "Environment and Culture During the Last
Deglaciation,11 Proceedings of the American Philoso
phical Society. Vol. 92, (1948), pp. 65-77.
Sayre, Elizabeth E. "Submarine From Corregidor. Manila Goes Under."
The Atlantic. Vol. 170, No.2 (August, 1942), pp. 22-28.
________ . "Submarine From Corregidor - II. The Escape." The
Atlantic, Vol. 170, No. 3 (September, 1942), pp. 40-46.
Sayre, Francis B. "Freedom Comes to the Philippines," The
Atlantic. Vol. 175, No. 3 (March, 1945), pp. 82-88.
Schmelkes, Norbert W. "The 1935 Prospect for the Coconut
Grower," Philippine Magazine. Vol. XXXII, No. 3
(323) (March, 1935), pp. 136, 153-154, 158.
"Scientist Discusses Science of Nutrition, Food Production,"
(Isabelo Concepcion), This W e e k . The Manila Chronicle.
Vol. II, No. 16 (August 4, 19465, pp. 8-9.
610
Serrano, Paquito. “Rice Fertilization Project in Albay,"
A C I L , Vol. XI, No. 8 (August, 1949), p. 13.
"Seven Major Crimes," The Sunday Times. Vol. II, No. 295
(June 8, 1947), pp. 3-5.
Sforza, Count Carlo. "The Most Difficult Job,11 Harper *s
Magazine. Vol. 199, No. 1190 (July, 1949^, p. 33.
Sharp, Lauriston. "Colonial Regimes in Southeast Asia,"
F E S . Vol. 15, No. 4 (February 27, 1946), pp. 49-53.
Silayan, Hilarion "Philippine Cotton Facts and Figures,"
The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the Philip-
pines, 1937-1938. pp. 3 1 0 ^ 1 2 .
________ . "What Shall We Do With Our Idle Sugar Lands?"
Bulletin No. 1 7 . National Research Council. Manilas
September, 1938, pp. 41-45.
Spencer, J.E. "The Philippine Rice Problem," F E S , Vol. 18,
No. 11 (June 1, 1949), pp. 125-128.
________ • and W.L. Thomas. "The Hill Stations and Summer
Resorts of the Orient," The Geographical Review.
Vol. XXXVIII, No. 4 (October, 1948), pp. 637-661.
"Standardization of Export Copra to Help Industry," Manila
Times Midweek Review. Vol. I, No. 21 (May 26, 1948)
p. 14.
Steindorf, Paul P. "Annual Economic Review for 1938,"
Cornejofs Commonwealth Directory of the Philippines.
1939-1940. pp. 2392-2397.
Stephens, Robert P. "The Prospect for Social Progress in the
Philippines," Pacific Affairs. Vol. XXIII, No. 2
(June, 1950), pp. 139-152.
Stephens, S.G. "Cytogenetics of Gossypium and the Problem of
the Origin of New World Cottons," Advances in Genetics.
Vol. I, 1947, pp. 431-442. (Academic Press, New York).
Stine, Leo C. "Philippine Labor Problems and Policies," FES.
Vol. 18, No. 14 (July 13, 1949), pp. 162-167.
"Sugar," The Manila Times Midweek Review. Vol. I, No. 11
(October 13, 1948), p. 4.
"Sugar Research", Manila Times Midweek Review. Vol. Ill, No.
25 (February 22, 1950), p 12.
611
Sulit, Pablo F. "Problems of and Adjustment in the Coconut
Industry," Bulletin No. 17. National Research Council,
Manila: September, 1938, pp. 156-159.
Sulit, Mamerto D. "Possibilities of Some Philippine Plants for
Medicinal Uses," Reprinted from the Journal of the
Philippine Pharmaceutical Association. Vol. XXXVII,
Nos. 11 and 12, (1950) ppT 434-448.
"Summary of Accomplishments of the Bureau of Commerce During the
First Year of the Commonwealth," PJC. Vol. XIII, No. 1
(January, 1937), pp. 25-26.
Swope, Gerard. "Standards of Living in Asia," The Atlantic.
Vol. 186, Np* 6 (December, 1950), pp. 55-$6.
"Synopsis About the Future of the Philippines," The Globe
(Shanghai), Vol. I, No. 5 (November 15, 1941), pp.
4-8. (Includes a reprint of speech by Cornelio Balmaceda,
Director of Commerce, March 10, 1941.).
Taruc-Roxas Correspondence," FES. Vol. 15, No. 20 (October 9,
1946), pp. 314-317.
Tejam, Montano A. "Tariff and Customs Administration in the
Philippines," Service Journal. Vol. I, No. 2 (October,
1949), pp. 30, 50, 62.
"That Abaca Loan,” The Saturday Evening News Magazine. Vol. 4,
No. 2 (February 12, 1949T] pp. 5, 29.
"The Ala Valley Region," by members of the Mindanao Reconnaissance
Party. The Philippines Herald (Rice Supplement), Vol. 87,
No. 48 (October 1, 1949), pp. 2, 11.
"The Congressional Vendetta," Editorial. Philippine Magazine.
Vol. XXXI, No. 3 (311) (March, 1934), p.' 108.
"The Far East", Ihe Atlantic Report on the Wbrld Today. The
Atlantic. Vol. 177, No. 3 (March, 1946), pp. 3, 5, 7.
________ • The Atlantic Report on the World Today. The Atlantic.
Vol. 177, No. 6 (June, 1946), pp. 3, 5, 7.
________. The Atlantic Report on the World Today. The Atlantic.
Vol. 178, No. 2 (August, 1946), pp. 15, 17, 18.
________. The Atlantic Report on the World Today. Eie Atlantic.
Vol. 178, No. 5 (November, 1946), pp. 3, 5, 7.
________. The Atlantic Report on the World Today. The Atlantic.
Vol. 182, No. 4 (October, 1948), pp. 10, 12-13.
§12
"The Future of Our Basic Industries," The Philippines Herald
Yearbook (14th Anniversary Supplement), September 29,
1934. pp. 101, 110. (Summary of speech by Horace B.
Pond, before the Rotary Club, Manila, 1934.).
'^The Livestock Industry In the Philippines,” The Commercial
and Industrial Manual of the Philippines. 1938-1939.
pp. 197-212.
“The Moran Appointment," Editorial, The Lawyers1 Journal. Vol.
VI, No. 7 (March 10, 1938), p. 220.
"The Philippine Islands, Economic Problems of Independence,"
(A.S.B.O.). The World Today. Vol. IV, No. 11 (November,
1948), pp. 488-496.
"The Philippines," The Atlantic Report on the World Today. ..
The Atlantic. Vol. 182, No. 4 (October, 1948), pp. 10, 12,
13.
________ . The Atlantic Report on the World Today. The Atlantic.
Vol. 186, No. 6 (December, 1950), pp. 16-17, 18-19, S(5.
"The Port of Cebu," Service Journal. Vol. I, No. 2 (October,
1949), pp. XIII, XXV.
"The Port of Davao," Service Journal. Vol. I, No. 2 (October,
1949), pp. XIX, XXII, XXV.
"The Port of Iloilo," Service Journal, Vol. I, No. 2 (October,
1949), p. XVIII.
"The Port of San Fernando," Service Journal. Vol. I, No. 2
(October, 1949), pp. XXVI,XXVII.
"The Port of Zamboanga," Service Journal. Vol. I, No. 2
(October, 1949), pp. XXI, XXIV, XXV.
"The Rice Shortage," Sunday Post Magazine. Vol. I, No. 46
(August 4, 1946)1 pp. 3, 22.
"Theories of Coral-Reef Developments." The Geographical Review.
Vol. XXXVIII, No. 2 (April, 1948),pp. 332-334.
"There is a Davao Problem," Editorial, Philippine Magazine.
,)
Vol. XXXIII, No* * {a5 9 (July, 1936), p. 338.
"They Eat Grass in Cagayan," This Week. The Manila Chronicle.
Vol. II, No. 32 (November 24, 1946), p. 14, (Re
printed from The Evening News. November 11, 1946.).
613
"Tobaccof!l Encyclopaedia Brltannlca. Vol. 22, Chicago I Ency-
clopaedia Brltannlca, Inc., 1947, pp. 260-263,
Ty, Leon 0. "Another Kalaw Fiasco," Philippines Free Press.
Vol. 39, No. 26 (June 26, 1948), p. 4. :
________. "Why the NAC0C0 is Bankrupt," Philippines Free
Press. Vol. 39, No. 39 (September 25j 194(3), pp. 4-5.
________. "Another *Sour Note on Sugar," Philippines Free
Press. Vol. 40, No. 20 (May 14, 1949), p p . 10-11.
________• "So Far - So Bad," The Philippines Free Press. Vol.
XLI, No. 17 (April 29, 1950), pp.“4, 57; No. 18 (May
6, 1950), pp. 38-40; No. 19 (May 13, 1950), pp. 16,
52; No. 20 (May 20, 1950), pp. 16, 40.
________• "NAFCOs More Dead Than Alive," The Philippines Free
Press. Vol. XLI, No. 18 (May 6, 195077 P« 4.
Urblno, Cornelio M. "Malaria Control In Agricultural Settlements,"
Bulletin No. 19. National Research Council. Manilas
September 1938, p. 115. Abstract No. 271 of the
Proceedings of the Fourth Philippine Science Convention.
________. "Malaria: Its Problems and Control In Relation to the
Agricultural Development of Eastern Mindoro," Bulletin
No. 23. NRC, Manilas December, 1939, pp. 129-130,
abstract.
"U.S. Revenue Act Boosts P.I. Oil," PJC. Vol. XIII, No. 1
(January, 1937), p. 13.
Vak, S.P., Jr. "Third Conquest of the Philippines." Paclf1 c
Affairs. Vol. XiV, No. 3 (September, 1941), pp. 287-
299. Also Ini The Commonwealth Advocate. Vol. VII,
No. 5 (June, 194l), pp. 9-11, 28, 30-32.
Valencia, Teodoro F. "2,500 Hectares of Davao Penal Area to be
Converted Into Productive Land," The Philippines Herald.
Vol. 83, No. 102 (December 3, 194977 P P • 1* 4.
Venkatasubbiah, H. "The Place of Asia in History and in the
Contemporary World, Asian Horizon. Vol. I, No. 1
(Spring, 1948), pp. 23-31.
Vllladolid, Deograclas. "Problems In Philippine Fisheries
Including Icthyology and Herpetology," Bulletin No. 5 .
National Research Council, Manila: 1935, pp. 437-446.
________. "Government Activities in the Promotion of Philippine
Fisheries," The Commercial and Industrial Manual of the
Philippines. 1937-1938. pp. 329-333.
614
"Problems and Adjustment In the Fishing Industry,"
Bulletin So. 17. National Research ^ouncil, Manila*
September, 1938, pp. 25-29.
_. "What You Shoiili Know of the New Bureau of Fisheries,"
ACIL. Vol. IX, No. 7 (July, 1947), p. 14.
"Let Us Stop the Use of Explosives and Poisons in
Fishing," ACIL. Vol. No. 3 (March, 1948), pp. 7,
29, 31.
Villanueva, Jesus H. "Our Presidential Candidates," Service
Journal. Vol. I, No. 2 (October, 194S), pp. 33, 67.
Villarama, Antonio C. "Medical and Dental Activities in the
Scheme of Philippine Rehabilitation," Philippine
Rehabilitation Journal of Philippine Problems. Vol.
I, No. 10 (December, 1949)^ pp. 22, 89.
"Villarama Informs WHO Assembly of P.I.’s Health Accomplish
ments, The Manila Times (Independence Day Supplement),
Vol. IV, No"/ 321 (July 4, 1949), p. 16a.
Villa-Real, Antonio (Justice). "Labor Legislation In the
Philippines," Philippine Law Journal. Vol. XIX, No. 8
(February, 19407^ pp. 357-367.
Villegas, Jose Armando. "Boosting the Guano Mining Industry,"
ACIL. Vol. * 1 , No. 10 (October, 1949), pp. 24-26.
Villegas, Valente, "Animal Husbandry Investigations In the
Philippines," Bulletin No. 6 . National Research
Council Annual Report for 1934-1935. Manila* 1935, p.
542. (A portion of Bulletin No. 2 . February, 1935.).
VInacke, Harold M. "Implications of Japanese Foreign Policy
For the Philippines and Southeastern Asia." AAAPSS.
226 (March, 1943), pp. 50-61.
________ • "United States Far Eastern Policy," Pacific Affairs.
Vol. XIX, No. 4 (December, 1946), pp. 351-363“.
Vivencio, Macario T. "Prospects of Our Tobacco Industry,"
The Manila Times Midweek Review. Vol. 2, No. 20
(December 15, 1948), p . <22.
Weber, Elizabeth A. "Political Ideas and Folklore." Intro
duction to Politics. 1946, pp. 34-61. (See citation
under Peel.)•
Why Does Not the Government Speak," Editorial, The Lawyers1
Journal. Vol. VI, No. 32 (November 20, 1938), p p . 1021 -
1022 •
615
Wickizer, V.D. Review of ’’The Beyster Report," FEQ, Vol. 9,
No. 1 (November, 1949), pp. 103-106. -
Wilk, Kurt. "The International Sugar Regime," The American
Political Science Review, Vol. XXXIII, No. 5 (October,
1939), pp. 860-878.
Yenko, F.M. "Certain Industrial Possibilities of Coconut and
Nipa Sap," Bulletin No. 9 . National Research Council.
Manila: February. 1935, p. 5 (Separate from Report
No. 1, 42 pages.)•
Zelinsky, William. "The Indochinese Peninsula: A Demographic
Anomaly," F E S . Vol. IX, No. 2 (February, 1950),
pp. 115-145.
616
PERIODICALS AND NEWSPAPERS
Administration Magazine. Vol. I (1948). Published monthly
In Manila.
Adult Education in Action. Monthly. Manila. Vol. I, No.
1 (January, 1939) — --— ? (Mimeo.). By the Office
of Adult Education.
Agr i cultural-Commerclal-Indus trial Life. Vol. IX, No. 1
TJanuary, 1947) (First volume and number
after the war. Formerly Agricultural Life. February,
1934 -— to war.) Published monthly in Manila.
American Chamber of Commerce Journal. The. Monthly: Manila:
Vol. XXI, No. 1 (December, 194 5 V , ------ .
Asia. Monthly. New York. Vol. XXXIII, No. 1 (January, 1933)
Vol. XLVI, No. 12 (December, 1946). Variant
title: Asia and the Americas. (Began publication as
United Nations World. February, 1947).
Baguio Midland Courier. Vol. I, 1947 Weekly. Baguio.
Baguio Reporter. The. Baguio, Quarterly. ? - Christmas Number
(December, 1948 - January, 1949) ?
Bulletin of the South Sea Association. Vol. I, No. 1 (Septem-
b a r V 1938) ------? Tokyo: No. 6 Marunouchi 3-Chome,
Kojimachi-ku.
Business Digest and Buyer's Guide. Vol. I, No. 1 (May, 1947)--
Campus Leader. The. Vol. I, No. 1 (1931) ------ .
City Gazette. The. Published Fortnightly by the Office of the
Mayor of the City of Manila. Vol. I, No. 1 (October
10, 1 9 4 2 ) ------?
Commerce. Monthly: Published by Chamber of Commerce of the
Philippines (Manila) Vol. 40, No. 8 (October, 1946)----
Commerce and Industry Bulletin. Published quarterly by the
Department of Commerce and Industry. Manila: Vol. I,
No. 1 (Third Quarter, 1 9 4 9 ) ------ .
Commonwealth Advocate. The. Monthly (Manila): Vol. I, No. 1
(February, 1934)
Critics Review. The. Vol. I (1947) ? Monthly, English-
Spanish.
617
Current Affairs. Published by the Bureau of Current Affairs,
United Kingdom, for UNESCO.
Current Events Review. Monthly except May and June. Manila.
Vol. I, No. 1 (November, 1945) — .
Dally Mirror. The. Vol. I, No. 1 (May 2, 1949)
Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources News Bulletin.
Issued bi-monthly. Manilas Vol. I, N o . 1 (January-
February, 1946) --
Employee, The. Official organ of the Philippine Government
Employees Association. Monthly. Vol. Ill, No. 1
(July, 1947) (Notes Entered as second class
mail Matter in Manila Post Office, July 12, 1947.)
Far East Advertiser. Monthly, New York. Vol. I, No. 1 (July,
1946| .
Far Eastern Survey. Published fortnightly by the American
Council, Institute of Pacific Relations. Vol. I, No. 1
( 1932)------ .
Farming and Cooperatives. Monthly. Official organ of the
Philippine Farmers' Association. Vol. I, No. 1
(January, 1946) ------.
Fillpina. Monthly. Manilas Vol. I. No. 1 (July, 1944) ----
Vol. I, No. 4 (October, 1944?? In English and Tagalog.
Flliplnlana Reference Shelf : A compilation of Selected
Speeches, Orations, Debates, Articles and Essays about
the Philippines. Vol. I, No. 1 (December, 1 9 4 0 ) --- -
Vol. I, No. 10 (September, 1941). Ed. by Federico
D. Sales. (Periodical, ended with last issue).
Filipinos Contemporary Verse and Prose. Number 1, Manilas
September, 1946. Only issue.
Filipino Observer. The. (Quarterly) January, 1948, Manilas
special edition. (Vol. I, No. 29 (December 7, 1945) ---?
Weekly. Possibly another publication.)
Filipino Teacher. The. Manila. Monthly. Vol. I, No. 1
(September(?), 1946) ---- .
Filipino Youth. English-Tagalog, intermittent. Vol. I, No. 1
(October, 1946) ---- ?
Fookien Times. Pie. Daily, except Sunday. Manilas Vol. I, No. 1
August *23 ( 1 9 4 7 ) -- - . Post war numbers. English
edition is weekly.
6X8
Free Worker. The. Official organ of the Federation of Free
Workers. (Anti-Communist Union). Vol. 1, No. 1
(March, 1951) ------.
Geographical Review. The. Quarterly. New York. Vol. XXIV,
No. 1 (January, 1934) --- -.
Graphic. Vol. XII, No. 13 to Vol. XII, No. 29 (September 1,
1938, to December 29, 1938). Weekly. Generally
unavailable.
I.P.R. Bulletin. Published by the Philippine Council Institute
of Pacific Relations, Manila. (No. 1, 1937.) Began
publication as monthly with No. 3, January 20, 1938.
(Mimeo.) ------?
Labor. Quarterly Bulletin of the Bureau of Labor. Manilas
Vol. I, No. 1 (June, 1 9 1 9 ) ------?
Labor Bulletin. Manila. Monthly. Published by the Department
of Labor. Vol. I, No. 1 (October, 1945)----- ? (Mimeo.).
Lawyers* Journal. The. Vol. VI, No. 1 (January 10, 1938)----
Vol. VIII, No. 23 (December 25, 1940); Vol. X, No. 1
(September, 1945) — --— .
Local Government Review. The. Vol. I, No. 1 (January, 1949)
------? Manila: Monthly.
Manila and the Philippines. Published by: The American Express.
(1938 edition) 128 pp.
Manila Bulletin. The. Vol. 126, No. 1 (February 25, 1946)------.
________. 51at Anniversary Edition. Vol. 145, No. 73 (March
26, 195^), 5 SectionsJ Section I, "Looking to the
Future, 32 pp.; Section II, "A Year of Reexamination,"
32 pp.;' Section III, "Barometers of Advancement,"
32 pp.; Section IV, "Filipinos at Work and Play,"
32 pp.; Section V, "Enterprise and Point Four," 32 pp.
Manila Chronicle. The. Vol. I, No. 1, (April 21, 1945) ------ .
Manila Times. The. Vol. I, No. 1 (September 5, 1945) -- —
Marsman Magazine. The. Monthly. Manila. Vol. I, No. 1 (July,
1936) — -- ?
Mindanao Times. The. Davao. Published every Wednesday and
Saturday. Vol. I, No. 1 (1946 - January ?)
Mining Newsletter. Bi-monthly, published by the Philippine
Society of Mining, Metallurgical and Geological Engineers.
Manila: Vol. I, No. 1 (September-October, 1949) -— — -.
619
Minlsphil Tokyo Fortnightly. Official organ of the Philippine
Mission in Japan, Tokyo, Vol. I, No. 1 (March 10,
1950) .
Monthly Review of Philippine Business Conditions. Bureau of
Commerce. Manila: (Scattered numbers, 1940-1941.)•
Newspaperman. The. Monthly. Published by Philippines News
paper Guild. Vol. I, No. 1 (July, 1947) --- -?
Nippon Times Weekly. Tokyo. Scattered numbers for 1944.
Nutrition News. Vol. I, No. 1 (February, 1948) ----- • Issued
monthly by the Institute of Nutrition, Manila. (Mimeo.)
Official ■Souvenir Program. Third Anniversary of the Republic
of the Philippines. Vol. Ill, No. 3, (July 4, 1949),
P.D. Aveo, Publisher: Defender Publ. Co., Manila,
168 pp.
Pacific Affairs. Monthly, from 1927 to 1933 (Honolulu).
Quarterly, from First Quarter (Vol. VII), 1934
(March) ------ . (New York).
Pacific Discovery. Bi-monthly. California Academy of Sciences,
Berkeley. Vol. I, No. 1 (January-February, 1948)------ .
Pacific Frontiers and the Philippines. Monthly. Los Angeles,
Vol. I, No. 1 (April, 1945) -----.
Panorama. Vol. I, No. 1 (January, 1936).
People’s Review. The. Fortnightly. (Formerly published in
Iloilo City as a weekly newspaper.) Vol. I, No. 43
(November, 1946). (First issue, post-war.) ------?
Philippine Accountants1 Journal. The. Monthly: Official Organ
of the Philippine Institute of Certified Public
Accountants. Vol. I, No. 1 (January, 1938) --
Vol. I, No. 10 (October-November-December, 1938).
Philippine Agricultural Review. The. Manila: Vol. I, No. 1
(January, 1907) — — Vol. VII, Nos. 10, 11, and 12
(October, November, December, 1914). Published quarter
ly beginning with first quarter, 1915. Later: The
Philippine Journal of Agriculture.
Philippine Almanac: 1958-1939. M. Farolan, ed. Manila. (1939),
18, A456 and A140 pp. Business and General Reference
Book on the Commonwealth of the Philippines.
Philippine-American. T h e . Vol. I, No. 1 (September, 1945)— --- ?
620
Philippine Armed Forces Journal. Monthly, Camp Murphy,
Quezon City. Vol. I, No. 1 (November, 1947) -—
Philippine Bank of Commerce Monthly Letter. The. Manila:
Philippine Business Digest. Vol. I, (1946) ----- ? (Weekly)
Manila.
Philippine Business Journal. Fortnightly. Vol. I, No. 1
(September 15, 1945) ------? Manila.
Philippine Commerce Magazine. The. (Monthly) Manila, Vol. I,
NoV 1 7August, 1947) — ?
Philippine Congressional Recorder. Monthly. Manila: Vol. I,
No. 1 (August, 1946) — — — ?
Philippine Educator. The. "Organ of the Philippine Public
School Teachers Association." Vol. I, No. 1 (July,
1 9 4 5 ) ------ .
Philippine Forum. The. Vol. I, No. 1 (December, 1935)
Philippine Leprosy News. Monthly. Manila: Vol. I, No. 1
(July, 1928) — --- ?
Philippine Life. Monthly. Manila: Vol. I , No. 1 (October,
1938) --- Vol. I, No. 3 (December, 1938).
Philippine Magazine. Vol. XXX, No. 1 (June, 1933) ----
Vol. XXXVIII, No. 12 (December, 1941). Monthly, Manila,
A.V.H. Hartendorp, ed.
Philippine Minins News. Monthly. Manila. Vol. I, No. 1
(October, 1 9 3 2 ) ......?
Philippine Newspic. Vol. I, No. 1 (December, 1946) — -?
(Monthly).
Philippine Outlook. Published monthly excepting February and
March which are combined in one issue: The "Anniver
sary Issue". Vol. I, No. 1 (January, 1948) — —
Philippine Progress. Vol. I, No. 1 (July, 1947) ----- ?
(Official organ of the Philippine Contractors Associa
tion, Inc.) Monthly.
Philippine Relief and Trade Rehabilitation Administration
Journal. Shorter title: Philippine Rehabilitation
Journal. Variant title: PRATRA Philippine Rehabilita
tion Journal of Philippine Problems. Official journal
of that Administration. Monthly. Manila: Vol. I,
No. 1 (March, 1 9 4 9 ) ------?
621
Philippine Review, Vol. I, No. 1 (March, 1943) ----- Vol. II,
No. 10 (December, 1940).
Philippine Social Science Review. The. Vol. I, No. 1 (January,
1929) . CJuarterly, Manila. Intermittent, post
war. First published by The Philippine Academy of
Social Sciences. Now published by the University of
the Philippines, College of Liberal Arts, as The
Philippine Social Sciences and Humanities Review.
Philippine Trader and Investor. The. Weekly. An economic
bulletin published by Securities Service Corporation,
Manila: Vol. I, No. 1 (June 7, 1 9 3 7 ) ----- ?
Phlllppines-China Cultural Journal. The. Published monthly by
the Philippines-China Cultural Association. Vol. I,
No. 1 (February, 1 9 4 7 ) ------?
Philippines Free Press. .Vol. 37, No. 1 (March 2, 1 9 4 6 ) ------ .
Weekly.
Philippines Herald Yearbook. The. (14th Anniversary Supplement).
Vol. II, September 29, 1934, 160(?) pp.
________. 1935-1936. Vol. Ill, (November 1, 1935), 224 pp.
Philippines Herald. The. (Rice Supplement). Vol. 87, No. 48
(October~T^ 1949)•
________. Year XXX, Vol. 87, No. 1 (August 9, 1 9 4 9 ) ------ .
(evening edition). (Formerly, morning and evening).
Phi 1lppines-Japan♦ Monthly. Tokyo: Vol. I, No. 1 (January,
1935) -----?
Philippines Today. The. Vol. I, No. 1 (April, 1 9 4 6 ) ------?
Bi-monthly.
Popular Newspic. Vol. I, No. 1 (July, 1947) ----- ? Monthly.
Post. The. Manila. Vol. I, No. 1 (March 6, 1945) ---- Vol.
Ill, No. 275 (November 23, 1947). Published daily as
the Manila Post. Sundays as the Sunday Post, with
magazine section.
Post Yearbook. The. 1945-1946. 1st Anniversary edition of the
Manila Post. 134 pp., Manila, (1946). Now defunct.
Progressive Farming. (Combined with The Philippine Tobacco
JournalJ (begun about 1935). Year I, No. 1, (June,
1937) “-----?
622
Promenader. The. Manila, weekly (entertainment). Vol. I, No.
1 (July 21, 1945) ------ ?
Recorder: The Magazine the Nation Knows. Quarterly. "Depart
ment of Finance Special Number." Manilaj Recorder
Publishing Co., Vol. XII, No. IV (December, 1947),
202 pp. "The National Mouthpiece of Governmental
Affairs," "Devoted to Publicizing the Activities and
Achievements of the Government. Prewar publication,
reissued after the ifar with the issue of May, 1946,
"The Special General Douglas MacArthur Number,"
Followed by: "Office of the President of the Philip
pines Special Number"; "Yuletide Special Number" (1946);
"Philippines Special number" (Philippine-American
Relations); a special issue for the first anniversary
of the Republic; and, the "President Roxas and His
Cabinet Special Number", 1947.
Saturday Graphic Magazine. Weekly, Manila. (Scattered numbers,
1935-19397)
Service Journal. Manila, quarterly. Vol. I, No. 1 (July, 1949)
Shin Selki (New Era). (August, 1942 - November 1, 1944).
South East A s i a . Monthly. Published by South East Asia
Association. Manila. Vol. I, No. 1 (October, 1949) — .
Star Reporter. The. Vol. I, No. 1 (June 9, 1945) ---- — .
Teachers College Journal. The. Published by the National Tea
chers College. Quarterly. Manila; Vol. I, No. 1
(July-September, 1939) ------ ?
Tokyo Gazette. Monthly. Published by the Foreign Affairs
Association of Japan. No. 1, July, 1937 ------ ?
Tribune. The. XIV Anniversary Number (June 17, 1939), 161 pp.
(TVi Corporation, Manila).
U.M. Law Gazette. The. Published monthly by the College of Law,
The University of Manila. Vol. I, No. 1 (September,
1939) Vol. I. No. 6 (February, 1940); Vol. II,
No. 1 (July, 1940) ---- Vol. II, No. 9 (March-April,
1941). No Numbers after the war.
United Nations World. Monthly. New York. Vol. I, No. 1
(February, 1947) ------ .
Weekly Business News Review. Central Bank of the Philippines, Depart-
ment ^ f alconomic Research. No. 1, June 10, 1949 ---- .
World Today. The. Published monthly by the Royal Institute of Inter
national Affairs, London. Vol. I, No. 1 (January, 1944)------.
623
OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS
Administrative Report of the Commission of the Census.
December 4. 1936 - December 51. 1940. Manilas 1941,
392 pp., typescript.
Alphabetical List of Political Subdivisions. Census of the
Philippines. 1939. Special Bulletin No. 2 . Manilas
Commission of the Census, 1940, 138 pp.
Annual Report of the Bank Commissioner of the Philippines to
the Honorable the Secretary of Finance, for the Fiscal
Year Ended June 30, 1940. Department of Finance,
Bureau of Banking. Manilas Bureau of Printing, 1941,
66 pp.
Blue Book of the First Year of the Republic. Manilas Bureau
of Printing, July 4, 1947, 405 pp.
Bureau of Agriculture. Suggestions for the Selection and
Saving of Garden S e e d s . Circular No. 40, Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1925, 5 pp.
. A Descriptive List of Some Forage Grasses for Dis
tribution by the Bureau of Agriculture for Trial
Planting. Circular No. 162, Manila: Bureau of Print
ing, 1926, 3 pp.
. A Descriptive List of Some Sugar Cane Varieties
Recommended for Trial Planting by the Bureau of Agri
culture. Circular No. 163, Manilas Bureau of Printing,
1926, 6 pp.
________ . Cultivation of H a n g - H a n g (cananglum adoratum).
Circular No. 59, Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1925, 2 pp.
________ • Descriptive List with Cultural Directions of Tobacco
Varieties Grown and Distributed by the Bureau of Agri
culture . Circular No. 186, Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1926 (?), 7 pp.
_____ • How to Select and Store Seed Corn by the ”Halayhaytt
Method. Circular No. 58, Manilas Bureau of Printing,
1925, 2 pp.
________ • Increasing Rice Crop by Seed Selection. Circular
No. 41, Manilas Bureau of Printing, 1925, 5 pp.
________ . Instructions for Planting Lowland Palay. Circular
No. 4V, Manilas Bureau of Printing, 1925, 2 pp.
_________. Instructions for Planting Upland Palay. Circular No.
46, Manilas Bureau of Printing, 1925, 3 pp.
624
________ . Pointers on Goat Raising. Circular No. 185. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1925, 7 pp.
________ . Propagation of Peanuts and Their Preparation for
Market (arachis Hypogea). Circular No. 52 (Revised),
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1925, 1 p.
________ . Selected Radio Lectures on Agricultural Topics.
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1925, 54 pp. Contains:
"Some Suggestions for Eruit Growers," by Jose S. Camus;
"The Importance of a Nursery,” by Marcelino Constantino;
"Improvement of Livestock in the Philippines," by Alfonso
Tuason; "The Swine Industry in the Philippines, by
Jose G. Guevara; "The Soil Fertility Problem in the
Philippines," by Gregorio Santos y Ciocon; "Insects and
Their Control,” by Faustino Q. Otanes, and "Locust
Pest and Its Control," by Nicanor G. Tpodoro.
_________. The Most Common Dangerous Communicable Diseases of
Animals in the Philippines and Their Prevention. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1929, 16 pp.
_________. Valuable Forage Crops For the Philippines. Circular
No. 50, Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1925, 6 pp.
Bureau of Animal Industry. Annual Reports. 1934-1949. Depart
ment of Agriculture and Commerce. Manila.
Bureau of Census and Statistics. A .Social Census of Vigan.
Ilocos Sur and Llpa. Batangas. A study of Postwar Human
Resources of the PhilippinesBased on Data secured from
the Population of Two Communities December, 1947.
Conducted jointly as an Inter-Governmental Project with
assistance of three consultants on social welfare from
the United Nations, Lake Success. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1948, 167 pp.; 52 tables. (Mimeo.).
. Bulletin of Philippine Statistics. Vol. II, No. 1
_
(March, 1946), 267 pp.; 113 tables. (Mimeo.). (First
post-war number). Published quarterly by the Bureau,
under the Office of the President. (This number apparent
ly the only number after the War).
• Facts and Figures about Economic and Social Conditions
_
of the Philippines. 1948-49. Manila: Bureau of Print
ing, 1950 , 303 pp.
Bureau of Commerce. Trade Directory of the Philippines: 1946.
Manila: 1946, 298, A-108 pp.
Bureau of Health Statistics. 1949, 7 tables. (Mimeo.). Secured
from Dr. Juan Salcedo, Jr., Institute of Nutrition,
Manila.
625
________ . Journal of Philippine Statistics. Vol*. IV, Nos. 1-6
(January-June, 1949J. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1949, 267 pp.; 186 tables, (Mimeo.). (First Post-war
edition). Published irregularly.
________ . Yearbook of Philippine Statistics: 1940. Manila:
Bureau of Census and Statistics, 1941, 485 pp.
________ . Yearbook of Philippine Statistics. 1946. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1947, 4§&,_pp_^_;__ 291_tables; 2
appendices. Published irregularly.
Bureau of Commerce. Trade Directory of the Philippines: 1946.
Manila: 1946, 298, A-108 pp.
Bureau of Health Statistics. 1949, 7 tables. (Mimeo.).
Secured from D r . Juan Salcedo, Jr., Institute of Nutrition,
Manila.
Bureau of Plant Industry. Report for August. 1946. Manila:
November 1, 1946. Unpaged, typescript, MS File copy
loaned by Mr, Jose <q. Dacanay and M. Manas y Cruz,
September 21, 1949.
_________ . A Guide For Visitors to the Bureau of Plant Indus
try! Manila: 1949, 5 pp.", (Mimeo.)•
________ . Annual Report for Period ending June 30. 1947.
Manila: 1947, 30 pp., typescript. MS File copy loaned
by Jose Q. Dacanay and M. Manas y Cruz. September
21, 1949.
________ . Annual Report for Year ending June 30. 1948. Manila:
1948, unpaged, typescript. MS File copy loaned by
Jose Q. Dacanay and M. Manas y Cruz.
________ . Annual Report. Including progress in the Rehabilita
tion of Plant Industries for the ^rop Year ending June"
30. 1949. Manila: 1949, 86 pp., typescript. Loaned
by Jose q. Dacanay and M. Manas y Cruz, November, 1949.
Census of the Philippines: 1939. 5 volumes.
Vol. I. Census of Population. Reports by Provinces Part
I. Abra to Camarines .Sur; Part II. Capiz to Lanao;
Part III. Leyte to Palawan; Part IV. Pampanga to Zam
boanga. Manila: Bureau of Printing, September 16, 1940.
Variously paged.
Vol. II. Summary for the Philippines and General Report
for the Census of Population and Agriculture. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, May 2, 1941, 1752 pp.
626
Vol. III. Reports by Provinces for the Census of Agri
culture. Manila; Bureau of Printing, December 16, 1940, ISIS pp.
Vol. IV. Reports for‘Economic Census. Forestry. Transportation.
Fisheries. Mines. Electric Light and Power. Washington.
D . C . * 1943, 678 pp. Photo reproduction. Paper.
Vol. V. Census Atlas of the Philippines. Manila; Bureau
of Printing, January 14, 1941. 42 maps; 13 and 95 pp.;
and various lists.
Central Bank of the Philippines. Statistical Bulletin December.
1949. Vol. I, No. 1. Prepared by the Department of
Economic Research. Manila: 1949, unpaged, (Mimeo.).
_________. Economic Indicators. Manila; 1949, 55jp., Photo-offset.
Civil Code of the Philippines. .(Republic Act No. 386). Manila;
Bureau of Printing, 1949, 426 pp.
Debate on Philippine Independence. "Extract from Congressional
Record of Tuesday. January 17. 1933." 72nd Congress,
Second Session. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government
Printing Office, 1933, 18 pp.
Department of Agriculture and Commerce. Annual Reports. 1934-
1949. With the institution of the Republic, in 1946,
the Department was reorganized into two: The Department
of Agriculture and Natureal Resources, and The Depart
ment of Commerce and Industry. Each Department published
its own reports after 1946, beginning in 1949.
. Atlas of Philippine Statistics. Manila; Bureau of
Printing, 1939, 42 pp.; maps.
_________. Climate of the Philippines. Manila; Bureau of
Printing, 1939, 31 pp., 10 plates and 4 tables.
_________. Perris Industry in the Philippines. Manila: Bureau
of Printing, 1939, 10 pp.
_________. Economic and Social Conditions of the Philippine
Islands: 1955^ Special Supplement to the Philippine
Statistical Review. Vol. 2. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1935, 84 pp.
_________. Facts and Figures About the Philippines. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1939, 102 pp. Revised Edition;
Information Division, Office of the Resident Commissioner
of the Philippines, Washington, D . C . ; 1942, 64 pp.
. Fish and Game Resources of the Philippines. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1939, 38 pp.
627
________ . Forest Resources of the Philippines, Manila: Bureau
of Printing, 1939, 46 pp.
________ • Land Resources of the Philippines. Manila: Bureau
of Printing, 1939, 28 p p .
________ . Mango Industry in the Philippines. Manila* Bureau
of Printing, 1939, 10 pp.
________ . Mining Industry in the Philippines. Manila: Bureau
of Printing, 1939, 22 pp.
________ . Peanut Industry in the Philippines. Manila: Bureau
of Printing, 1939, 10 pp.
________ . Philippine Statistical Review. No. 4. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1936.
________ . Rice Industry in the Philippines. Manila: Bureau
of Plant Industry, 1939, 18 pp.
________ . The Abaca Industry in the Philippines. Manila;
Bureau of Printing, 1939, 12 pp.
________ . The Coconut Industry in the Philippines. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1939, 19 pp.
________ . Tobacco Industry in the Philippines. Manila: Bureau
of Printing, 1939, 12 pp.
Department of Commerce and Industry. First Annual Report of
the Secretary of Commerce and Industry: October 21,
1947, to June 30, 1948. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1949, 56 pp.
Department of Interior. The Philippines. Second Edition.
National Information Office. Manila: Bureau of Print
ing, January, 1939, 111 pp.
Director of Education. Thirty-fifth Annual Report. For the
Calendar year 1934. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1935,
210 pp.
________ • Thirty-sixth Annual Report. For the Calendar year
193£u Manila; Bureau of Printing, 1936, 232 pp.
________ • Thirty-ninth Annual Report. For the Calendar year
1938. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1939, 185 pp.
Hoover, Herbert. Veto Message Relating to Philippine Independence.
72nd Congress, Second Session, House Document No. 524.
"January 13, 1933.-ordered to be printed, with bill." Vfeishing-
ton,D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1933, 13 pp.
628
Institute of Nutrition. Report for the Period July 1. 1948 to
June 30. 1949. Manila: 1949. MS. File copy loaned
by Dr. Juan Salcedo, Jr.
Memorandum No. 1. s. 1940. "Suggestions gathered by President
Quezon1s Committee on Earthquake Study." Signed by G.R.
Maflalac. Office of Private Education, Department of
Public Instruction. Manilas February 1, 1940, 8 pp.,
(Mimeo.).
Memorandum of Secretary Rafael R. Alunan Defining His Policies
in the Department of Agriculture and Commerce. Manila:
Office of the Secretary, September 16, 1941, 4 pp.
Message on Fishing. Fish Conservation Day Program, October
29, 1949. Manila: 1949, 14 pp. ( "Proclamation No. 101").
Messages of the President. 8 volumes. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1935-1951.
Vol. I, (1935), 786 pp.; (Revised edition, 1938, 344pp.).
Vol. II, Pt. 1, (rev.ed.), (1938), 987 pp.
Vol. II, Pt. 2, (1937). 1373 pp.
Vol. Ill, Pt. 1, (1938), 409 pp.
Vol. Ill, Pt. 2, (1938), 1192 pp.
Vol. IV, Pt. 1, (1940), 1754 pp.
Vol. IV, Pt. 2, (1939), 1247 pp.
Vol. V, Pt. 1, (1941), 1373 pp.
Vol. V, Pt. 2, (1941), 1071 pp.
Vol. VIII, (1951), 285 pp.
The Office of the President has apparently assumed that
the collection of public addresses by President Roxas
(The Problems of Philippine Rehabilitation and Trade
Relations) forms Vol. VI. and the collection of public
addresses by President Quirino (The New Philippine
Ideology). forms Vol. VII. The most recent volume, Vol.
VIII, contains only public addresses of President Quirino,
a departure from the pre-war policy of the Commonwealth
which printed all public statements of the President, as
well as Acts of the National Assembly. The attempt is
made to justify this new, unsatisfactory policy "owing to
lack of sufficient funds." The patent absurdity of this
is obvious and the observer is left with the impression
that in actuality the creeping paralysis affecting the
Executive Department is responsible.
National Cooperatives and Small Business Corporation. Philip
pine Laws on Cooperatives. Manila: International
Printing, 1948, 259 pp.
Official Program. Third Anniversary of the Commonwealth of the
Philippines, November 15, 1938. Commonwealth Anniversary
Committee. Unpaged.
629
Fourth Anniversary of the Commonwealth of the
Philippines, November 15, 1939. Commonwealth Anniver
sary Committee, Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1939, 32 pp.
Philippine Journal of Agriculture. The. Issued Quarterly by the
Department of Agriculture and Commerces 1933-1941;
1947---. Third Quarter, 1947, Vol. 13, No. 1 - - First
issue after 6 years. Last issue before war was 3rd
quarter, 1941, Vol. 12, No. 3.
Philippine Journal of Animal Industry. Issued Quarterly by the
Department of Agriculture and Commerce: 1933-1941;
1947-— . Vol. 9, No. 1, (July-September, 1947)---. 1st
issue since Vol. 8, No. 5, (September-October, 1941).
Philippine Journal of Commerce. The. Vol. X, No. 1 (January,
1934) ---- Vol. XVII, No. 6 (June, 1941). Issued
monthly (sometimes 2 numbers one month), published by
the Department of Agriculture and Commerce.
Philippine Statistical Review. Manila, 1934 -----? Published
quarterly by the Department of Agriculture and commerce.
Philippines. (Monthly or intermittently): Published by:
Department of Information and Public Relations, Common
wealth of the Philippines. Vol. I, (1940) -----?
Philippines. The. Second edition. Published-by: The National
Information Office, Bepartment of Interior. Manila,
(January, 1939), 111 pp., (Pamphlet).
Plant Industry Digest. Vol. I, No. 1 (January, 1933) --- Vol.
VII, No. 11 (November, 1941); Vol. VIII, No. 10
(October, 1945) ----- . (1st vol. after war.) Published
monthly, in Manila, Bureau of Plant Industry. Preceded
by Fortnightly News. Vol. I, No. 1, (September 16, 1930)
which was generally circulated only within the Bureau.
Population by Provinces and Municipalities. Census of the
Philippines. 1939. Special Bulletin No. 1 . Manila:
Commission of the Census, 1941, 9 pp.
Population of the Philippines. Special Bulletin No. 1, Bureau
of the Census and Statistics. Manila: Bureau of Print
ing, October 1, 1948, 84 pp. Supplement to Special
Bulletin No. 1, 32 pp. The Supplement preceded, in
publication, Special Bulletin No. 1 . The date, October
1, 1948, is used In these publications as the basisfor
the population figures.
650
President's Action Committee on Social Amelioration. First
Annual Report. August. 1948 to July 51. 1949. Manila:
1949, 51 p p .; 5 appendices, (Mimeo.f.
________ . "Handbook on...." Manila: February, 1949, 59 pp.,
8 appendices.
________ • Social Amelioration and You. Report of the PACSA to
the People of the Philippines. Manila: August 51,
1949, 41 pp.
President of the Philippines. First Annual Report... to the
President and Congress of the United States covering
the Period November 15. 1955. to December 51. 1956.
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1958, 79 pp.
______ Second Annual Report.. .Covering the Period January
1 to December 51. 1957. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1958, 55 p p .
________ . Third Annual Report.♦.Covering the Period January
1 to December 51. 1958. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1940, 64 pp.
________ . Fourth Annual Report...Covering the Period January
1 to June 50. 1959. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1940,
69 pp.
Public Law Ho. 511. 72nd Congress, H.R. 7255. "An Act To
enable the People of the Philippine Islands to adopt
a Constitution and form a government for the Philippine
Islands, to provide for the independence of the same,
and for other purposes." Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1955, 11 pp., (overriding
veto of President; passed in House of Representatives,
January 15, 1955, in the Senate, January 17, 1955.).
Quezon, Manuel Luis (President). Proclamation Nos. 4-8.
November 22 to 26, 1955: Designating calamity areas.
Messages of the President. Vol. I (rev.ed.) pp. 206-210.
________ • Proclamation No. 11, November 50, 1955: Lifting
the tariff on rice imported by the Government as a
relief measure. Messages of the President. Vol. 1
(rev. ed.), pp. &14-215.
________ • Message to Legislature: Creation of National Economic
Council, December 18, 1955. Messages of the President.
Vol. 1 (rev. ed.), pp. 79-86.
________ . Message to Legislature: On the Hice and Corn Problem.
December 19, 1955. Messages of the President. Vol. 1
(rev. ed.), p. 97.
631
Letter to the High Commissioner, Prank Murphy.
January 11, 1936: Benefit Payments to Sugar Planters
of the Philippines Affected by the Sugar Limitation
Act of the United States Congress. Messages of the
President. Vol. 2, Pt. 1, (rev. ed.T]] (1938), p • 400.
Executive Order No. 14, January 21, 1936: Creating
a "Domestic Sugar Administration." Messages of the
President. Vol. 2, Pt. 1 (rev. ed.), (1938), pp. 794-798.
_. Executive Order No. 18, February 17, 1936: Creating
"a Rice Commission for the purpose of studying and
making recommendations on ways and means to solve the
present rice crisis and to insure a permanent supply of
rice at reasonable prices. Messages of the President.
Vol. 2, Pt. 1 (rev. ed.), p. 610.
Proclamation No. 58, April 23, 1936: Designating
“the National Rice and Corn Corporation as a Relief
Organization to import rice, free of duty. Messages of
the President. Vol. 2, Pt. 1 (rev. ed.), p. 610.
Memorandum, July 29, 1936: Interspersion of small
“landholdings between large areas of public land applied
for pasture purposes. Messages of the President. Vol.
2, Pt. 1, p. 423.
Executive Order No. 52, September 8, 1936: Consoli
dation of Official Warehouse Receipt-Permit for Domestic
Consumption or Emergency Reserve Sugar. Messages of the
President. Vol. 2, Pt. 1, (rev.ed.), (1938), p. 8&9.
JExecutive Order No. 54, September 14, 1936: Domestic
Consumption and Emergency Reserve Sugar Allotments for
1937. Messages of the President. Vol. 2, Pt. 1, (rev.ed.)
CL938), pp. 861-869.
Message to First National Assembly: "Disposal of
Excess Sugar." Messages of the President. Vol. 2, Pt. 1,
(rev. ed.), (1938T, pp. 242-243. September 15, 1936.
Amendment of Act 4166, the Sugar Limitation Law, which
had been approved on December 4, 1934.
Message to Legislature: Vetoing Bill No. 332,
“providing for appropriation of funds for the manufacture
of improved hand looms and accessories. November 7,
1936. Messages of the President. Vol. 2, Pt. 1, p. 360.
Message to Legislature: Vetoing of Bill No. 1536,
providing for extension of the Angat Irrigation System,
November 29, 1936. Messages of the President. Vol. 2.
Pt. 1, pp. 381-382.
632
_. Executive Order No. 75, December 7, 1936;
Authorizing the Domestic Sugar Administrator to Issue
Necessary Rules and Regulations. Messages of the
President. Vol. 2, Pt. 1 (rev. ed.T^ (1938), p. 912.
Administrative Order No. 32, January 22, 1937s
Directing the CIR to conduct an immediate investigation
of all the facts relating to the sugar industry and to
determine the necessity of adopting a minimum wage
or share for laborers or tenants working in the sugar-
producing areas. Messages of the President. Vol. 3, Pt.
2, p. 1154.
Speech: Philippine Constitution and Policies of the
"Commonwealth Government, April 3, 1937, Hotel Astor,
New York City, at a Luncheon Meeting of the Foreign
Policy Association on "The Future of the Philippines,"
Messages of the President. Vol. 3, Pt. 1, (1938),
pp. 64-87.
_. Speech* Woman Suffrage and Philippine Independence,
April 4, 1937. Radiocast from Washington, D.G., to
Philippines. Messages of the President. Vol. 3, Pt. 1,
(1938), pp. 88-92.
Press Statement, July 6, 1937: Quota of Domestic
"Consumption Sugar for 1937. Messages of the President.
Vol. 3, Pt. 1, (1938), p. 324.
Administrative Order No. 41, August 24, 1937* Author
izing the Tabacalera Insurance Company to Become a
Surety Upon Official Recognizances, Stipulations, Bonds,
and Undertakings. Messages of the President. Vol. 3,
Pt. 2, pp. 1166-1167.
Speech* Creation of Chartered Cities and Social
Justice, Delivered Upon Inauguration of the City of
Iloilo, Iloilo City, August 25, 1937, Messages of the
President. Vol. 3, Pt. 1, (1938), pp. 115-120.
_• Executive Order No. 118, September 16, 1937* Creating
a "Philippine Sugar Administration." Messages of the
President. Vol. 3, Pt. 2, (1938), pp. 663-665.
Speech* Early Independence, October 18, 1937* National
Assembly, 2nd Session. Manila, Bureau of Printing, (1937),
32 pp. Reprint.
Executive Order No. 127, November 9, 1937* Creating
"an Advisory Abaca Committee. Messages of the President.
Vol. Ill, Pt. 2, (1938), p. 6791
633
Executive Order No. 139, January 14, 1938: Creating
a National Relief Administration. Messages of the
President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 1298-1300.
Press release: January 27, 1938: Alleged terrorism
against strikers in the sugar centrals of Barotac Nuevo
and Janiuay, Iloilo. Messages of the President. Vol. 4,
Pt. 1, pp. 626-629.
Message to the B’irst National Assembly: Legislation
Confirming the International Agreement Regarding the
Regulation of Production and Marketing of Sugar, February
10, 1938. Messages of the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1,
(1939), pp. 290-291.
Speech: Government Policies and Relation Between the
National Government and the Provinces, February 14, 1938,
Malacaftan, Manila. Messages of the President. Vol. 4,
Pt. 1, pp. 3-16. Delivered before provincial governors
and city mayors.
Speech: Social Justice for the Laborers, February
17, 1938, Malacaftan, Manila, Delivered at a luncheon
given in honor of the representatives of labor under
the leadership of Mr. Cresenciano Torres. Messages of
the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 17-25.
. Letter: Secretary of Justice Jose Yulo, February 14,
1938: Removal from the Service of provincial Fiscal
Blanco and Assistant Provincial Fiscal Debuque of Iloilo.
Messages of the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 559-561.
Letter: Secretary of the Interior, Elpidio Quirino,
February 14, 1938: Dismissal of the Chief of Police of
Janiuay, Iloilo and of a secret service agent of the
city of Iloilo. Messages of the President. Vol. 4, Pt.
1, pp. 562-565.
_• Speech: Excise tax on coconut oil, National Language,
and Social Justice.... Malacaftan, Manila, at tea party
in honor of coconut planters and municipal mayors....
Messages of the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 26-38.
_. Message to Legislature: Additional Appropriation for
relief work, March 3, 1938. Messages of the President.
Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 303-304.
. Letter: Ramon Avancefia, Chief Justice. March 9,
1938: Designation of Judge Moran as special investigator
of Labor Conditions in the sugar industry. Messages of
the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 566-567.
634
Executive Order No. 146, April 1, 1938s Enforce
ment of the London Sugar Agreement. Messages of the
President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 1308-1309.
_. Letters Hon. Felipe Buencamino, Jr. June 1, 1938;
Petitions of people of Nueva Ecija for an irrigation
system and of tenants of the Sabani Estate on sale of
the landholdings to them. Messages of the President.
Vol. 4, Pt. 1, p. 577.
_. Speech: Hemp Industry and Government Policies...
"June 12, 1938, Public Plaza, Maasin, Leyte. Messages
of the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 88-95.
Message to the First National Assembly: Situation
of the Sugar Industry, August 12, 1938. Messages of
the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 535-538.
m. Press statement, August 17, 1938s Creation of the
"National Sugar Board. Messages of the President. Vol.
4, Pt. 1, pp. 689-690.
Executive Order No. 157 (as corrected and amended by
"Executive Order No. 168.). August 17, 1938; Creating
the National Sugar Board. Messages of the President.
Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 1332-1334.
Speech; National Sugar Board and the Sugar Industry,
"Malacaftan, Manila, Delivered at the oath-taking of the
members of the board. Messages of the President. Vol.
4, Pt. 1, pp. 158-160.
Speech: Excise Tax on coconut oil, the coconut in
dustry, and the rice situation... September 20, 1938,
at Tayabas provincial capital, Lucena, Tayabas.
Messages of the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 209-217.
Press statement; October 7, 1938; Larger free
quota of refined sugar for exportation to the U.S.
Messages of the President. Vol. 4, Pt. 1, p. 707.
Speech; Government policy, progress of Occidental
Negros and the sugar industry, October 19, 1938,
Bacolod, Occidental Negros, Inauguration of the City
of Bacolod, Occidental Negros. Messages of the Presi
dent, Vol. 4, Pt. 1, pp. 229-236.
_. Message to the Second National Assembly; National
"Budget for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1940, February
7, 1939. Messages of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1,
(1941), pp. 263-275.
635
Speech: Labor Conflicts, Social Justice, and the
Amelioration of the Laboring Class, February 14, 1939,
San Fernando, Pampanga, Delivered before a mass
gathering of laborers and farm tenants. Messages of
the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, (1941), pp. 20-32.
Message: Solution of Problems Confronting the Hemp
and Coconut Industries, February 18, 1939. Messages
of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, (1941), pp. 33-35.
Read at the convention of coconut and hemp producers
held in Manila.
Speech: Government Aid to Coconut and Hemp Indus
tries, the Coconut Oil Excise Tax, and Payment of Land
and Income Taxes. February 22, 1939, Philippine
Chamber of Commerce Building, Manila. Delivered before
the joint convention of coconut and abaca producers.
Messages of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 36-45.
Executive Order No. 188, February 23, 1939: Revising
"Executive Order No. 139 (January 14, 1938), creating a
National Relief Administration. Messages of the Presi
dent . Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 895-896.
Press statement, March 8, 1939: Support of President
Roosevelt on Proposed Legislation to Increase the Coco
nut Oil Excise Tax. Messages of the President. Vol. 5,
Pt. 1, (1941), p. 432.
Executive Order No. 197, March 24, 1939: Revising
"further Executive Order No. 139 (January 14, 1938)
creating a National Relief Administration, as revised
by Executive Order No. 188 (February 23, 1939).
Messages of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 960-962.
Proclamation No. 393, March 29, 1939: Reducing
"during a certain period the import duty on husked (non-
glutinous) rice from 5 to 4 centavos a kilo. Messages
of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 560.
Proclamation No. 401, May 9, 1939: Reducing during
a certain period the import duty on husked non-glutinous
rice from 5 to 4 centavos per kilo. Messages of the
President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 575.
Message to the Second National Assembly: Sending of
Two Members of National Assembly Abroad to Study Best
Means of Promoting Abaca and Coconut Industries, May
17, 1939. Messages of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1,
(1941), p. 306.
Speech: Cooperation between the chief executive and
"the National Assembly; coconut oil excise tax; and consti
tutional amendments.... May 22, 1939, Malacafian, Manila,
Delivered at the farewell banquet for Quintin Paredes.
Majority leader of the 2nd National Assembly. Messages
of the president. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 125-135. ---- ~—
636
. Letter: Secretary of Agriculture and Commerce,
June 8, 1939, Approval of bill providing for promotion
of the livestock industry through establishment of
breeding stations and stock farms. Messages of the
President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 402.
Speech: Significance of rice planting day.... July
9, 1939, Buenavista, San Ildefonso, Bulacan, on the
occasion of 1st rice planting day. Messages of the
President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 141-146.
. Proclamation No. 418, July 13, 1939s Reducing
during a certain period the import duty of husked non-
glutinous rice from 5 to 4 centavos per kilo. Messages
of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 598.
• Speech: Benefits Derived from the Coconut Oil
Excise Tax, Antimonan, Tayabas,"July 23, 1939. Messages
of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 164-172.
Speech: Effect of the Excise Tax on Coconut Oil on
the People of Tayabas, July 23, 1939, Quezon National
Park, Antimonan, Tayabas, Delivered at the inaugura
tion of the Quezon National Park. Messages of the
President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, (1941), pp. 158-163.
Executive Order No. 216, July 28, 1939s Composition
of the National Relief Board, created by Executive Order
No. 197, (March 24, 1939). Messages of the President.
Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 990.
_. Message to the Second National Assembly: Tydings-
Kocialkowski Act, August 15, 1939. Messages of the
President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 326-332.
_. Proclamation No. 449, September 6, 1939: Reducing
during a certain period the import duty on husked non-
glutinous rice from 5 to 4 centavos per kilo. Messages
of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 698.
_. Proclamation No. 453, September IS, 1939: "Publishing
the Proclamation, dated September 11, 1939, of the
President of the United States Regarding the Suspension
of Operation and Title Two of the Sugar Act of 1937.“
Messages of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 713-714.
Letter: Placido L. Mapa, President of Philippine
Sugar Association: Equitable Adjustment of Present
Participation Ratios of Sugar Centrals with Planters,
September 16, 1939. Messages of the President. Vol. 5,
Pt. 1, pp. 417-418.
637
_________. Proclamation No. 475, October 27, 1939* Reducing
during a certain period the import duty on husked non-
glutinous rice from 5 to 4 centavos per kilo.
Messages of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, p. 791.
________ • Address: National Abaca and Other Fiber Corporation
and the Hemp Industry, November 4, 1939, Malacafian,
Manila, Delivered during the induction into office as
Manager of the NAFCO of Hon. Pedro Sabido. Messages
of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 208-210.
_________. Speech: Accomplishment of the Commonwealth and
Government Aid to Philippine Industries and Business,
New Luneta, Manila, Delivered on the occasion of the
fourth annual celebration commemorating the establish
ment of the Government of the Commonwealth, November
15, 1939. Messages of the President. Vol. 5, Pt. 1,
pp. 211-216.
________ . Message: Improvement and Stabilization of the Abaca
Industry, November 25, 1939. Messages of the President.
Vol. 5, Pt. 1, pp. 217-218. Sent to Mr. Pedro Sabido,
manager of the NAFCO, on the occasion of the conference
of the abaca producers, at Legaspi, Albay.
Real Property. Census of the Philippines. 1939. Special
Bulletin No. 5 . Manila: Commission of the census,
1941, 635 pp.
Report of the Special Mission to the United Statess 1938-59.
Manila, bureau of Printing, (1939), 334 pp.
Social Welfare Commission. Annual Report... for the Fiscal Year
1948-1949. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1950, 57 pp.
638
PROPAGANDA
A Christmas Message From President Qsmefia to President Roosevelt.
Leaflet, with "A Christmas Message Prom President
Roosevelt to President Osmefta” on reverse. 5 x 7
inches (app.). 1944.
A Dedication to the People of the Philippine Republic. Pro
bably an insert in The Tribune. Issued, September 24,
1944, celebrating the day of the "Declaration of War
by the Philippine Republic.” Signed: "The Editorial
Staff." 8 x 12 inches.
A Government of Law. Speech by Sergio Osmefia delivered over
11The Voice of Freedom", November 23, 1944. Leaflet,
5 x 7 inches.
"America Challenged! The Philippines Accepted!1", Leaflet,
5 x 7 inches, Filipino artist, cartoon shows bombing
effects.
Asia is Combined. Poster, in colors, 16 x 22 inches, by M.
Tsurui.
Blackout First For Safety First. Poster, 15 x 22 inches,
probably 1944.
Ever Victorious Nippon Paratroops - Winged Knights of Liberation.
Large photographic broadside, 14 x 22 inches.
First Anniversary of the Republic of the Philippines. Broad
side, 6 x 11-l/2 inches. Reverse contains: "Our flag
is calling, red above blue,/ To ev'ry Filipino true./
The time has come for all to stand/ To defend our
motherland.
Forever Shall It W a v e ! Broadside, in color, 8 x 12 inches.
Issued by the Bureau of Information and Public Security,
Manila, 1943, in English, Sugbuanon, Ilocano, Pampango,
Bicol, Samar-Leyte, Ilongo (Iloilo dialect) languages -
possibly others.
45 years Ago "The Filipino Congress at Malolos declared War
against the United States in 1899 for the defense of
the Philippines from American invasion." Contains
photograph of that session, and further text referring to
September, 1944. Photopics No. 122. Broadside, 10 x 15
inches.
659
Free Philippines (airborne Edition) For the Provinces. Pub
lished every Wednesday and Saturday by the U.S.
Information Service. Vol. I, No. 1 (September 15,
1945) -----? Published originally in photo offset,
2 pages, 8 x 11 inches.
Free Philippines (airborne Edition). Published weekly by
P.W.B., G.H.Q., O.W.I. Unit. Vol. I, No. 1 (March
25, 1945) ---— -? Photo offset, 2 pages. Manila.
7 x 10 inches.
Fundamental Japanese For Filipinos. Manilas The Department
of Information, Imperial Japanese Forces, July 7, 1942,
92 pages.
Handbook For the Organizers of "Kabataang Pangarap ni Rlzal".
Manilas Bureau of Printing, 1944, 66 pages.
Ideals of the New Philippines. "Edited by the Propaganda
Corps, Imperial Japanese Forces." Manilas 1942 (?),
37 pages.
Inaugural Address of Jose P. Laurel, delivered October 14,
1943 at the Legislative Building, Manila. Printed in
major dialects and English. English pamphlet contains
16 pages.
Japanese leaflet addressed to American soldiers in Philippines
threatening them with loss of supply lines.
Ki KImura. Aguinaldo’s Independence A r m y . Kanda, Tokyo:
Daitoa Shuppan Kabushlki Kaisha. 1943, 41 pages.
Kokuroin Slngun Ka (The Song of the Nation’s March). Issued
as broadside, 5 x 7 , words with Music, on face, in
Japanese with "red ball" superimposed. Words in
English on reverse.
Koodoo Seisin, by Lieut. Mochizuki. Contains two articles, the
second entitled, "The Nippon Spirit: The Fundamental
Motivating Force." Author was apparently a certain type
of Shinto-Christian. Uses Tenno Helka as personifica
tion of Christian God. Probably 1943, 32 pages.
Issued probably by Bureau of Information and Public
Security, Manila.
Large Broadside, 12 x 17 Inches, of Philippine Flag. Reverse
contains Injunction to respect the Flag, and paste it
on front of residence. Issued for First Anniversary
of the "Republic",, 1944.
640
Let There Be Peace-Join the Constabulary. Large poster, in colors,
28 x 35 inches. Issued by "Republic of the Philippines,
Board of Information." Probably issued in 1943.
Many small leaflets, 2 x 3 inches to 8 x 1 0 inches, in Japanese,
dropped by U.S. planes in Japanese-held territories.
Martza ng Bagong Pilipinas (The New Philippine March). By
Ismael Blanco and Lucie D. San Pedro. In Tagalog.
Issued as broadside 8 x 12.
Mochizuki, S. The Function of the "Bun" or Definition of One's
Position in Nippon Spirit. ("Second lecture delivered
at the Philippine Normal Institute, Philippine Public
Officers' Institute, On November 4, 1942. ) Manilaj
1942, 19 pages.
New O r d er: Short Assays (Parts I-II). "Edited by the Imperial
Japanese Forces in the Philippines.11 Manila: 1943(?),
117 pages.
1943 Calendar. Japanese-Tagalog. Contains listing of official
holidays or special events. Days of the week in Kata-
kana, Arabic numerals, months in Tagalog and Kanji.
1944 Calendar, in color, by A.S.Vel. Message from President
J.P. Laurel on bottom border of picture: "Our Salvation
Lies in the Soil. We Must Plant, Sweat and Work."
1944 Calendar, in quarters. Excellent art work by four Japanese
artists and A.S.Vel. Japanese artists: M. Tsurui, Kazu,
Nonaka and (illegible). Calendar cover contains Message:
"Without the Victory of Japan, the Independence of the
New Philippines Can Not Exist," by President J.P. Laurel.
Each quarterly page contains hortatory captions: "The
New Philippines Like the Bright Sky"; "To Work Hard
makes You Happy and Gives Glory to Your Country"; "Chil
dren are the Jewels of the Country. Let's Look after
them to Be Healthy” ; "Close cooperation with Japan
Makes Our Country Prosperous and Happy".8 x 10 inches.
One Nation. One Heart. One Republic. "Speech delivered extem
poraneously by Hon. Jose P. Laurel, President of the
Preparatory Commission for Philippine Independence, at
the special General Assembly of the KALIBAPI, held at
the Session Hall of the Legislative Building, Manila,
on September 7, 1943." Manila: Bureau of Information
and Public Security Ministry of the Interior, 1943."
18 pages. Also printed in dialects and Japanese.
641
Pambansang Awlt N r Pilipinas, by Julian Felipe and the Surian
NgWikang^Painbansa (Institute of the National Language).
Issued as a four-page leaflet, 1943, in color. Cover
by Tony Velasquez.
Photoplcs No. 124. Contains selected passages from American
magazines illustrating shortages in U.S. "Increasing
shortage of Both manpower and material Has Driven
America to a Desperate Attempt to Bring the War to a
Quick Termination. Nippon Calmly Awaits the Enemy to
Fall into Death Traps.” Ca. August, 1944. 10 x 16
inches.
Presidential Proclamation of Independence. Broadside, 8 x 12-1/2
inches. Designated: BIPS-Sp 4. October 14, 1943.
"Speech Delivered by the Commissioner of the Interior, Honor
able Benigno S. Aquino before the Officers of the
USAFFE in Camp Stotsenburg, Pampanga, on July 31, 1942."
Issued probably by Bureau of Information and Public
Security, Manila, 1942. 13 pages.
The Phllippine-Nlppon Alliance. Broadside, 8 x 12-1/2 inches.
Designated: 4016-BIPS-H3 (English). Issued probably
about November, 1943.
The Propagation of the Filipino Language. Published by the
"Kalibapi". In English and Tagalog.Manila: Bureau
of Printing, 1944, 85 pages.
The Voice of the New Philippines. A Collection of Lectures on
Current Topics. Manila: Department of Information,
November, 1942, 73 pages.
"To Deal the Foe the Fatal Blow" - Photopics, No. 123. Large
photographic broadside, no date.
United States and Nine-Power P a c t . Broadside, 12 x 16 inches,
published by The Shlun-So. Tokyo, November, 1938.
Also published in "four leading vernacular newspapers
in Japan."
642
DICTIONARIES AND GRAMMARS
Arte D e La Lengua Tagala. y Manual Tagalog. Pray Sebastian De
Totaries. Binondo (Manila): Imprenta de Miguel
Sanchez y Cie., 1865, 131, 166 pages.
A Tagalog-English Vocabulary. Published by the Institute of
National Language, Commonwealth of the Philippines.
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1940, 180 pages.
Calderon, Sofronio G. Tagalog-English Vocabulary and Manual
of Conversation. 4th Edition! Manila: M. Colcol &
Co., 1947, 163 pages.
Del Mundo, Clodualdo and Amor Tablan. TalatInigang Panlukbutan
(Pocket Dictionary: Tagalog-English. Engllsh-Tagalog),
Manila: Abiva Publishing House, 1949, 144 pages.
Dlcclonario Bisaya-Espaflol« by Fr. Juan Felix De La Encarnacion.
3rd Edition. Manila: Tipografia De "Amigos Del Pais,"
1885, 437, 349 pages.
Enriquez, Jacobo P. and Maria Odulio Guzman. Pocket Dictionary
An JBnglish-Tagalog Vocabulary. Manila: Philippine
Book Co., 1949, 156 pages.
Enriquez, Jacobo, P., Jose A. Bautista and Francis J. Jamolangue,
Jr. Pocket Dictionary: Engllsh-Tagalog Visayan
(Cebuano-11ongoT! Manila: Philippine B00k Co., 1949,
249 pages.
Gramatica Hispana-Visaya-Panayana. by Fr. Raymundo Lozano (San
Miguel, Iloilo). Valladolid: Imp., Lib., Heliografia
y Taller de Grabados De Luis N. De Gavira, 1892,
278 pages.
Vocabulario De La Lengua Tagala. edited by P. Juan De Noceda
and P. Pedro De Sanlucar. Manila: Imprenta De
Ramirez y Girandier, 1860, 642 pages.
645
MSS
Abe, Terukichi. MRice Cultivation in the Philippines."
Manila: Spring, 1942, 10 pp., typescript.
Adams, D. Inez. The Role of Rice Ritual in Southeast A s i a .
Ph. D. dissertation submitted to Faculty of Political
Science, Columbia University, New York, 1949. 158
pp., typescript.
’’Articles of Incorporation of the Philippine Institute of
International Affairs.11 Manila: 19 October, 1940,
3 p p ., (Mimeo.).
Balcos, Simplicio S. The Filipino Fight Against Communism.
MA. Thesis in Political Science, College of Liberal
Arts, The University of Manila. 1949-1950. 199 pp.
Barcelo, Angel J. The Foreign Relations of the Philippines:
A Historical Study. MA. Thesis in Political Science,
College of Liberal Arts, Graduate Studies, The Uni
versity of Manila, 1949-1950. 153 pp.
Beyer, H. Otley. Pre-Spanish History of the Philippines.
Manila.
________ . ’’Notes on the Bearing of Recent Investigations Into
Philippine History and Racial Origin on the Question
of the Present and Future Status of the Philippine
Peoples.” Appendix A to "Wood-Forbes Report, un
published. Manila: August, 1921, 29 pp., typescript.
________ . ”Notes for Fr. Ewing Regarding Burial Caves in the
Philippines.” Manila: October 24, 1940, 11 pp., typescript.
________ . ”The Christian Population of the Philippines in
1939." Revision of 1916 study printed in Census of
1918. Manila: 63 pp., typescript, with one map.
Published only in Japanese.
"By-Laws of the Philippine Institute of International Affairs."
Formed from membership in Philippine Council, IPR.,
Manila: December 2, 1940, 4 pp.. typescript. (To
supersede the Philippine Council.;.
Castillo, Andres V. "What is Expected of the Philippines
Economically?" Manila: n.d. (1942 ?), 16 pp., type
script.
Cumulative Index to Commonwealth Acts Nos. 1-669. University
of Manila, n . d . , i>4 pp. , typescript.
644
•'Description of Organization of Philippine Council, Institute
of Pacific Relations." Manila: Philippine Council,
1957(?), 7 pp., typescript.
"invitation" by the Department of Information The Nippon
Imperial Army in the Philippines, to a Conference,
held at the Manila Hotel, September 11, 1942 "to
create and to accelerate the general culture movement
in the New Philippines...." (Lt. Col. Katuya).
I.P.R. Public Opinion Survey. June.1959. Philippine Council,
IPR. "Not-For" Publication.h Manila: 5 pp., type
script.
Jimenez, Damian L. The Political Development of the Philip
pines. MA Thesis in Political Science, College of
Liberal Arts, Graduate Studies, The University of
Manila, 1949-1950. 145 pp.
Lerma, Deogracias E. The Evolution of Agrarian Laws in the
Philippines. Ll.M. Thesis submitted to the Faculty
of the Graduate School, College of Law, The University
of Manila: March 27, 1948, 116 pp., typescript.
Letter of Edward C. Carter to Conrado Benitez, dated April
2, 1941, on subject of Change of Status of the
Philippine Council, IPR, and character of its work.
Manas y Cruz, M., and Fabian 0. Solpicio. Plant Exploration
and Introduction Work of the Bureau of Plant Industry.
Manila: 1949, 10 pp., typescript. Loaned by Mr.
Jose Q. Dacanay, November 28, 1949.
Marte, Gonzalo S. Foreign Relations of the Philippines Under
the Puppet Republic. M.A. Thesis in Political Science,
College of Liberal Arts, The University of Manila,
1949-1950, 99 pp.
"Minutes of the 57th Meeting of the Board" (Philippine Council,
IPR), June 27, 1958. Contains: "Proposal for the
Formation of Groups in some Philippine Cities under the
Auspices of the Philippine Council," unpaged, type
script. Also contains letter from E.C. Carter to
Vicente Madrigal, dated, June 28, 1958, on subject of
forthcoming 1959 Conference.
Montilla, Virginia. The Educational Ideas of Manuel L. Quezon.
MA. Thesis in Education, University of the Philippines,
March, 1950. Manila: 1950, 171 pp., (Mimeo.).
645
Report by a committee of the Philippine Delegation to the
Virginia Study Meeting on business meetings of the
Pacific Council, the International Research Committee
and the International Finance Committee of the
Institute of Pacific Relations. Dated, December 16,
1939, signed by Camllo Osias, Federico Mangahas and
Mauro Baradi. Incorporates alsos "Report of the
Philippine Delegation, Philippine Council, Institute
of Pacific Relations," submitted by Camilo Osias,
dated December 2, 1939, Virginia Beach, Maryland. 13
pp., typescript, submitted to Board Meeting of Feb
ruary 27, 1940, Manila.
Salcedo, Juan Jr. "Rice Enrichment as a Practical Nutrition
Measure in the Philippines." Secured from author,
September 21, 1949. 7 pp., typescript.
"Educating the Filipino on Nutrition," popular
article, loaned by author, September 21, 1949, 15 pp.,
typescript.
Salonga, Isayas R. The Present Problems of the Tobacco Trade.
Senior Thesis, B. Bus. Ad., The University of Manila.
March 15, 1938, 42 pp., 6 tables, typescript.
Second Annual Report of the Philippine Council, Institute of
Pacific Relations, 1939, Manilas unpaged, typescript.
Containss "Condensed Report of the Philippine Delegation
to the Virginia Study Meeting of the Institute of
Pacific Relations, November 22, to December 2, 1939."
Siayngco, Antonio V. The National Assembly; An Appraisal. MA.
Thesis in Political Science, College of Liberal Arts,
Graduate Studies, The University of Manila, 1949-1950.
14 7 pp., typescript.
Signed letter of Emilio Aguinaldo to U.S. Army CIC, dated 25
April 1945, 7 typewritten pages, comprising General
Aguinaldo's defaise against charges of his alleged collaboration.
SyCip, Juan Z. Sugar Industry in the Philippine Islands.
Senior Thesis, B. Bus. Ad., tfhe University of Manila.
1934, 97 pp., typescript.
Temprosa, Tomas A. Philippine Rehabilitation Reviewed. MA. Thesis
in Political Science, College of Liberal Arts, Graduate
Studies, The University of Manila. 1949-1950. 119 pp.,
typescript.
Villanueva, Mariano B. A Comparative Study of the Citizenship
Laws of the Philippines and the United States. Master
of Laws Thesis, College of Law, Graduate School of Law,
The University of Manila, 1949-1950. 193 pp.
646
SPEECHES
Sergio Osmefia
Sergio Osmefia (Vice. Pres.). "The Role of Teachers in Nation
Building." Delivered at the Baguio Vacation Normal
School Commencement Exercises, Teacher’s Camp, May
22, 1937. Manila! Bureau of Printing, 1941, 11 pp.
_________. (Vice Pres.). "I am Glad to Be Back," at the
Luneta Grandstand upon His Arrival from the United
States, October 23, 1939. Manilas Bureau of Printing,
1941, 7 pp.
. (Vice Pres.). "The Commonwealth: A Year of Accom
plishments (1938-1939)." Delivered over Station KZRH,
on the occasion of the Fourth Anniversary of the
Commonwealth, November 14, 1939. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1941, 15 pp.
_________. (Vice Pres.). "Philippine-Araerican Trade: Its
Relation to Our Economic Problems." Delivered at a
convocation held at the University of the Philippines,
December 12, 1939. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1941,
15 pp.
________ . (Vice Pres.). "Rizal as the Father of Filipino
Nationalism." Delivered at the Rizal Day Program,
Manila, December 30, 1939. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1941, 11 pp.
________ • (Vice Pres.). "On the Accomplishments of the Common
wealth." Delivered at the Rotary District Conference,
Baguio, February 23, 1940. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1940, 22 pp.
________ . (Vice Pres.). "The Moral and Spiritual Influence of
Filipino if/omen." Delivered before the Catholic W o m e n ’s
League, February 25, 1940. Manila: Bureau of Print
ing, 1941, 11 pp.
_________. (Vice Pres.). "National Defense and Philippine
Democracy." Delivered at the Commencement Exercises
of the Philippine Military Academy, Baguio, March 15,
1940. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1941, 15 pp.
________ . (Vice Pres.). "The Filipino Teacher: His Contri
bution to Philippine Democracy and Nationalism." Delivered
at the Commencement Exercises of the National Teachers
College, Manila, March 25, 1940. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1941, 11 pp.
647
(Vice Pres.). ’’Economic Adjustment and Philippine
Economy.” Delivered at the Commencement Exercises,
Manila College of Pharmacy and Dentistry, June 23,
1940. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1941, 17 pp.
(Vice Pres.). “Social Justice and Institutions of
Higher Learning.1* Delivered at a banquet given by
The University of Manila, on the occasion of its 27th
Anniversary, October 6, 1940. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1941, 13 pp.
(Vice Pres.). “Philippine-American Collaboration
Past, Present, and Future." Delivered over Station
KZIB, on the occasion of the Fifth Anniversary of the
Commonwealth, November 15, 1940. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1940, 14 pp.
(Vice Pres.). “Our Forests,” Delivered at the
'Thirtieth Anniversary Celebration of the School of
Forestry, University of the Philippines, Makiling
National Park, Los Barios, Laguna, November 30,1940.
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1941, 14 pp.
(Vice Pres.). "Cooperation and the Independence
"Program.” Delivered before the Convention of Provincial
Governors and GIty Mayors. Manila, February 17, 1941.
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1941, 9 pp.
_. (Vice Pres.). “The Architect: His Services to the
Community.” Delivered at the First National Convention
of Architects, Club Filipino, Rizal Avenue, Manila;
February 21, 1941. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1941,
13 pp.
(Vice Pres.). "Francisco Dagohoy: His Place in
Philippine History." Delivered at a banquet in com
memoration of Dagohoy Day, sponsored by the Bohol
Association, Manila, March 2, 1941. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1941, 10 pp.
(Vice Pres.). “Manuel L. Quezon: Patriot and States
man.” Delivered on the occasion of the 63rd birthday
of the President, over radio station KZRM, August 19,
1941. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1941, 10 pp.
_. (Vice Pres.). “The Gity Hall and a New and Beautiful
Manila." Delivered at the Inauguration of the New City
Hall of Manila, August 19, 1941. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1941, 12 pp.
648
(Vice Pres.). "Philippine-American Collaboration."
Delivered at the Rizal Day Program held by the Filipino
Community of Chicago, 111., on January 2, 1944. Re
printed from the Congressional Record of the 78th
Congress, Second Session, Monday, January 17, 1944.
("Extension of Remarks of Eon. Millard E. Tydings.")
Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1944, 7 pp.
. (Vice Pres.). "Dewey’s Naval Victory and the
American Pioneers in the Philippines." Delivered before
the Naval Academy Women’s Club at Annapolis, Md.,
April 3, 1944. Reprinted from the Congressional Record
of the 78th Congress, Second Session, Thursday, April
13, 1944. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office,
1944, 8 pp. ("Extension of Remarks of Hon. Richard J.
Welch of California in the House of Representatives,
Wednesday, April 12, 1944").
(Pres.). "On the Occasion of the Induction Into
"Office of the Members of His Cabinet." Manila: U.S.
Office of War Information, March 8, 1945, 12 pp.
(In Spanish, Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1945, 11 pp.
"A Department of Instruction and Information Publication").
(Pres.). "Message...to the First Congress of the
Philippines, convened in Special Session, June 9, 1945."
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1945, 24 pp. ("A Depart
ment of Instruction and Information Publication").
(Pres.). "Manuel L. (Quezon, In Memoriam." Delivered
on the First Anniversary of the Death of President
Manuel L. Quezon on August 1, 1945. In English and
Tagalog. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1945, 14 pp.
("A Department of Instruction and Information Publication").
(Pres.). "On the occasion of President Quezon’s
“Birthday, August 19, 1945, at the City Hall, Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1945, 10 pp. ("A Department of
Instruction and Information Publication").
(Pres.) "The New Philippine Ideology." "with an
Exposition by Maximo M. Kalaw, Secretary of Instruction
and Information." Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1945,
32 pp. ("A Department of Instruction and Information
Publication")•
649
SPEECHES
Elpidio Quirino
Elpidio Quirino. (Pres.). ’’Independence Address." Delivered
July 4, 1948. Manila* Bureau of Printing, 1948, 8 pp.
________ . The New Philippine Ideology. Collection of 61
speeches and 4 appendices. Manila: Bureau of Print
ing, 1949, 312 pp.
________ . "Address to the U.S. Senate." and "Address to the
U.S. House of Representatives." August 10, 1949.
Manila: Bureau of Printing, printing order No. 8358,
11 pp. (Contains also joint statement of Presidents
Truman and Quirino).
________ . "Letter of Instructions... to Hon. Carlos P. Romulo
...and Other Documents on the Proposed Pacific Union."
Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1949, 14 pp.
________ . "Message on the State of the Nation." To the First
Congress of the Republic of the Philippines, Fourth
Session, delivered at the Joint Session of Congress,
Manila, Monday, January 24, 1949. Manila: Bureau of
Printing, 1949, 31 pp.
________ • Message delivered at the opening of the Third
Special Session of the Second Congress, December 4,
1950. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1950, 10 pp.
________ • "On the State of the Nation." To the Second
Congress of the Republic of the Philippines, Second
Session, delivered at the Joint Session, Monday,
January 22, 1951. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1951,
15 pp.
650
SPEECHES
Carlos P. Romulo
Carlos P. Romulo (Res. Comm.}• "The Liberation of the Philip
pines - A Report to Congress from the Front Line s of
Democracy." Delivered in the House of Representatives,
December 7, 1944. Reprinted frpm Congressional Record.
78th Congress, Second Session. Washington, D.C.s U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1944, 4 pp.
_________. "The New Filipino Genius." Extension of remarks of
Hon. Harry R. Sheppard of California, in the House of
Representatives, December 19, 1944. Speech was
delivered before the National Press Club, Washington,
D.C., December 14, 1944. Reprinted from Congressional
Record, 78th Congress, Second Session. Washington:
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1944, 2 pp.
________ . (Res. Comm.). "United Nation's Conference on Inter
national Organization." Extension of Remarks in the
House of Representatives, July 20, 1945. Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1945, 12 pp.
(Contains also: address as Chairman of the Philippine
Delegation to the United Nations, delivered at Civic
Auditorium, San Francisco, Tuesday, May 8, 1945; Press
statement in relation to debate on the trusteeship
formula, May 30, 1945; Statement of the position of
the Philippine delegation on the trusteeship formula;
Remarks before Committee 4, Commission II, June 18,
1945; Address delivered before Commission II (on
trusteeship), June 20, 1945; Statement on the signing
of the Charter.).
• (Res. Comm.). Philippine Independence and Rehabil
_
itation. A collection of 8 speeches on the topic.
Delivered in the House of Representatives, September
11 and 12, 1945, January 23, and February 7, 1946.
Washington, D.C,j U.S. Government Printing Office,
1946, 30 pp.
_______ • (Res. Comm.). "The Filipino Veteran"; "A Nation is
Born"; "The Immediate Problems of Asia"; U.S.-Philip
pine Trade Relations"; "A Filipino Hero"; "The
Filipino Disabled Veterans"; and "The American Conscience
Speaks." Speeches, as Resident Commissioner in the
House of Representatives, September 24 and December 18,
1945, February 27, 28, and March 4, 1946. Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1946, 19 pp.
651
(Delegate to UN). ’’On the Southeast Asia Union.”
Delivered at a convocation of' the Student Body of the
University of the Philippines, August 26, 1949,
Manilas Bureau of Printing, 1949, 11 pp.
(Delegate to UN). The Battle for Peace At Home and
Abroad. Contains the text of an address delivered at the
Commencement Exercises of the Arellano University on
April 17, 1950, his address before the Joint Session of
Congress on April 18, 1950, and reprints of various
honors, citations, resolutions and editorials citing
his achievements at home and abroad. Manila: Bureau
of Printing, 1950, 52 pp.
SPEECHES
Manuel A . Ro xas
Manuel A. Roxas (Pres.). ’’Inaugural Address” . Delivered
May 28, 1946, ”at the grounds of the Former Legislative
Building." Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1946, 18 pp.
. The State of Nation Message. Delivered to Second
_
Congress, First Session, June 3, 1946. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1946, 55 pp.
. ’’Extracts From the Final Speech on Parity." Delivered
_
March 10, 1947, at Plaza Miranda, Manila. Manila;
Bureau of Printing, 1947, 16 pp.
_________. "Message to the Filipino People Urging Approval of
the Constitutional Amendment on Parity at the Plebis
cite, March 11, 1947.” Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1947, 34 pp.
________ . On the University of the Philippines. Delivered
April 19, 1947. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1947, 7 pp.
_________. "Important Speeches. Messages and Other Pronounce
ments." Malacaftan, May 28, 1947. A Collection of 33
speeches and 6 appendices, Manila: Bureau of Printing,
1947, 507 pp.
________ . The Problems of Philippine Rehabilitation and Trade
Relations. Collection of seven speeches, with four
appendices. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1947, 208 pp.
_________. "Message on the State of the Nation." Delivered
before the First Congress, January 26, 1948. Manila:
Bureau of Printing, 1948, 49 pp.
652
SPEECHES
Others
Araneta, Salvador. "An Outline For a Five-Year Plan." Pre
liminary Study drafted before assuming Office. Manila:
1950, 22 pp., (Mimeo.).
. "First Statement of Dr. Salvador Araneta Upon His
Assumption of Office as Secretary of Economic Coordina
tion." Issued as DEC Memorandum Circular No. 11,
September 15, 1950. Manilas Department of Economic
Coordination, 3 pp. (Mimeo.).
. "Policies in the Direction, Supervision and Co
ordination of Government Enterprises," before Junior
Chamber of Commerce, September 19, 1950. Manila: 1950,
9 pp. (Mimeo.).
_________. "On the Department of Economic Coordination," radio
address, DZFM, sponsored by the Department of Foreign
Affairs, October 5, 1950. Manila: 1950, 8 pp. (Mimeo.).
_________. "On The Bell Report," delivered before the Chamber
of Commerce of the Philippines, October 30, 1950.
Manila* 1950, 9 pp. (Mimeo.).
________ . "We Can Reform Our Country I" Delivered before the
Knights of Columbus, November 8, 1950. Manila: 1950,
10 pp. (Mimeo.).
________ • "On Independence and the Economy," delivered before
the Convocation of the Central Student Organization of
Far Eastern University, November 15, 1950. Manila*
1950, 13 pp. (Mimeo.).
________ . "On Industries," delivered before the Philippine
Chamber of Industries, Manila Hotel, November 24, 1950,
12 pp. (Mimeo.).
_________. "Family, The Foundation of Strength," delivered at
the First Annual Meeting of the Council of Welfare
Agencies, November 25, 1950. Manila* 1950, 7 pp. (Mimeo.).
________ . "The Attitude of Filipino Women in These Troublous
Times," delivered before the Rotary Anns of the Manila Rotary
Club, December 14, 1950. Manilas 1950, 4 pp. (Mimeo.).
_________. "Is Our Temper Attuned to These Parlous Times?"
December 29, 1950. Manilas 1951, 6 pp. (Mimeo.).
_________. "Creating Prosperity Through Taxation," delivered
before the Economics Club of the University of the East,
January 22, 1951. Manila* 1951, 15 pp. (Mimeo.).
655
. "Practical Implementation of Vocational Education
by the Government," delivered at the Reunion Forum
on Vocational Education of the Graduate School of the
Centro Escolar University, February 3, 1951. Manila:
1951, 9 pp., (Mimeo.).
________ . "Philippine-American Relations," delivered as
Administrator of Economic Coordination, at a Symposium
held by the College of Law, Ateneo de Manila, February
23, 1951. Manila| 1951, 14 pp., (Mimeo.).
Cases, Manuel T. "Road to Economic Recovery, ("suggested
financing program to enable the National Government
carry on its Social, Industrial and other economic
problems"). Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1947, 20 pp.
Garcia, Leon T. "The Meaning of the Flag". Delivered in
Commemoration of the Second Anniversary of the Repub
lic, July 4, 1948, Shanghai. (Formerly Administrative
Officer, Philippine Consulate General, Shanghai).
2 pp., (Mimeo.).
Gillie, George W. "A Tribute to General Romulo". Extension
of Remarks of Hon. George W. Gillie of Indiana, in the
House of Representatives, Friday, December 14, 1945.
Reprinted from Congressional Record. 79th Congress,
First Session. Iflashington: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1945, 1 p.
Lacson, Arsenio H. "The Junsay Case". Delivered in House of
Representatives, January 25, 1950. Manila: Bureau of
Printing', 1950, 50 pp.
Laurel, Jose P. "inaugural Address." Delivered October 14,
1943. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1943, 20 pp.
Paredes, Quintin. "Amnesty Proclamation". In the House of
Representatives, Friday, February 13, 1948. Contains
an extract from a written statement by Representative
Paredes submitted to American C.I.C. on April 23,
1945. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1948, 51 pp.
Zulueta, Jose C. "Inaugural Speech" as Speaker of the House
of Representatives, Special Session, First Congress,
9 June 1945. Manila: Bureau of Printing, 1945,
13 pp. (In Spanish).
654
ATLASES
Atlaa de Fllipinas. Goleccion de 30 Mapas.
*’Trobajades por delineantes filipinos bajo
la direccion Del P. Jose Algue, S.J.,
Director Del Observatorio De Manila. Baltimore:
A. Hoen & Co., Litho, 1899. Published also
as Atlas of the Philippine Islands. Treasury
Department, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey.
Special Publication No. 3. Washington: Govern
ment Printing Office, 1900. In addition to the
30 maps, there is included 24 pages of statisti
cal data, by the U.S.C.G.S. Some of the maps
were redrawn at the Coast and Geodetic Survey
Office '’owing to the contradiction involved in
the arbitrary scale and projection of the original
drawings.”
Census Atlas of the Philippines. Vol. 5, Census of the
Philippines: 1939. Manila: Bureau of Printing,
January 14, 1941. 42 maps; 13 and 95 pp., and
various lists.
Encyclopaedia Brjtannica World Atlas. G. Donald Hudson,
Editor, Unabridged. Chicago: Encyclopaedia
Britannlca, Inc., 1947, 223 map plates, 284,
8, and 154 pp.
in M» » ■A
•a ct o*
£ r1 K I0T S
^
1
S
&i lo O 41 l
y o» k»
II
0I
0 s» KS
*. a
m 0 In
K» 4: 0 0
A d kS
p»
1 1 rs
1 o ks r> 1
1 <4 r- o X
5a ct fci ks
~3 As 4* 6-
o
4
n- r s
o» T o
ipn
os
»
k
rss m
n- 0
o
«* * o <4 16 IP
! T 1 o m 1 1 1
vi ! t X o «o' 2 ks © X
ors ■r* pj o
id O In 00
o -o csi
SACKS
*- & <*- A- £
to m o Os ks
■
lT
O «o to <4 r
£ \ «
4“ <£ ci Mi r-
7 I 1 l 4
60,000
X o> X > ks 1
o r ■4 © O m X
0 m d 4“
0 tO z ci Mi
<£ *- <&- <2
OP
in m rs ks 0
to r* Os m d
TABLE. I
» ci » ci
GOv'T. IMPORTATION
-i N • in
Ml 1 X i j m 1 X
m o IP Of X M»
2 r-. in h- 2 T
a
-o £ £ < <£
AVAU-AfcLE.
<2
* M 0 KS rs
n 3 o P» • Os Ks
2 ci o o c4
2 I X o 1 41* 1
o o X 2 m MS X
o oK-
-<
c CO s < Of PS
AFTER.
X £ Z <£ it
NOT
£
0 fes 0 •O o
i* m 0 O OS «o I i
p> o » ci
2 C\j 4 ★ X
1 X X 0 1 1 t
J 6 to o X
2 O N hi Irn
-
< *! 01 IL •
n
£ •! £
p»
in Ml o
n O 0 rs.
2 Cl o P) •
o 2 c4 4
1 X t
> O X o' a 1 X o X
o m lO m o*
ci ■4 nr n
2 "3 Ax
v» ■'tf *«
u) t
wfl 2 o Ul a
o 2 > 2 “ < Sj
2 > 2
2 < £ ** <
a
A.
& 5 <
v»
la ;> H x
35
o
■<
s|
S
-1 2 3
<
X
X
si
■*x
•<
-1
£ X
x
-<x
a&ssssss
Ul
o__
a
BY TUE.
T*
AI^
O
—
Ul ~
tU
o
*% o
Ml
I ^ Z
J ul
SALES OF RICE
5 s
Ck. t f l
id ;n
2-
-1 9 4 6 -1 9 4 9
3
O
CO
NARIC
MONTULY
ES2SS
COMPARATIVE
B^sssaaa^ask
Ul
o
<n 9*61
2 I I I ^ « 6 I ■4
O
SSiKSSSSSSSSSSSS^^ 9KI <rt
+ +
4V6I
j r ov
§ * *>w
cr ^—
2
ui 2
•* i
5 3 n
s *
2 2 8SS5S
I- <*
2 «-J SSSSSSSSSSS:
SSSSSSSSSSj
O <
s s
ul
>
—
I-
< aassss
t£
<
o.
J* | BAA * 100 LOS*
OWt
r 8Hlj (0
o
u SSSaSK 9t6l
LUlui
SSSSSSKSS
COCONUT OIL AND COPRA PRODUCTION
SUGAR PRODUCTION AND EXPORTS OF THE PHILIPPINES
HUNDRED THOUSAND METRIC TONS HUNOREO THOUSAND METRIC TONS
O
«
ul
to
X
1929 1530 1931 1932 1333 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 194 * 1946 1947 1948 1949
I S l S e S S g S J r S1 < 2 o
3
}9fO
&
£
•U
O
1949
je
Mi
a
1948
\ N N
\ \\ *
j »/v I \V £
at- 3X
I94T
^**1 X ' ■
'-.
5
* N^VN.
A ,
„j ■v 'V
-N m
a N X.
(94G
A
Q 0 i W 3 d H V M
1941
/ ---
/x'
'
s
/
1940
■"
i*" s'"
>
V
V —
<
v\
M
v
s
« &
PRODUCTION
£
\X K I
V
1939
%«
c ■
< / i w*'
N.
5
%
% / |4 /
/ M
**
1938
\ \ l
V \
. . /*
■
\ ' A>-
\\
»937
s' N k .
3 \ .
...
..1
---
----
/
\ X s
*
I93C
*
**•
»,< \
.
..\ X
' \ /
1935
X/
OF SELECTED PRODUCTS
/
X.
\/y
AGRICULTURAL
1934
s
'* *
»
,
s X
" X 3
9
/
/ r'
X
J\
i
X
.
%
I9S3
-
---
-4 f 3—
O / ©i<
v/ o5
i
1931
S /
K s'
4-\ /
fc
. *4
£ '
5
3 /
\ ' N
<
/
i93i
•
*
/
/ / / 4
9
t
/
/
t930
-
----/ /{ < '
/
*
/
i
/
9
\ \
192*
c* ---- . ----
4 9 o
. o o < c C £» £ < -
aK
---
--5
MERCHANDISE EXPORTS AND IMPORTS
J
M
8
z
O
u.
a.
fi
_>
J_ _L
I
-u-mndfiiia
J__ L
-Mmnumnnnniui
8
(9
X
*
s
o
z
Ui
s
»-
-t
i
-rrjnTmTrmTnnTff
J__ L
iitinli li
8
X
B
s
* RECORDED GENERAL MERCHANDISE IMPORTS
R ecorded m e r c h a n d is e ix p o Rt s , in c l u d in g reexports
WHOLESALE PRICES*
MANILA PRICES FOR DOMESTIC PRODUCTS: EXPORT PRODUCTS AMD CONSUMPTION GOODS.
m
IL
U»
(9
*
9>
2
o
o
g
Ck
u.
S
:? ici i
1 s
«8 2
2 £
2
Ul
■x %a
3 *■
PHYSICAL VOLUME OF PRODUCTION
1937
oi
u.
00
»o
at
o
X
tf> at
uJ 0
S 01
o o
(A
o
2 o
o
o
ul
»- a ui
o2
AC 10 2
o
Ch
o
o
GC CO
O co
O o
at
(9
3
2 0-
«n
J
3
O
>
X
o
Ul
n
<0
Ml
<n
X
WAGE RATES OF LABORERS IN PUBLIC WORKS
2
<
<
o
o
o
*
at
at
at
UI
cn
z
(O
C/7
c£
ul
cO
-I
-j
C/7
<11
ul
ui
w
I
I94T 1948 1940 1946 1947 1948
K>
O
IN MANILA
RATES
Ul
UJ
o
lil
(O
WORKERS
CO
in Le
WAGE
ar
REAL
<*>
0 3Tlt M S NO
*■
INDUSTRIAL
<n
1941 PRICES
| 03111)1 8
■ M i
AND
UJ
CD G3TTIMSNn | | | | | | | |
<
oc A
a 3 T 1 IM 8
UJ
IllllllllS b
AT
MONEY
>
<
SERVICES
OF SELECTED
aaniMSNn <0
>-
*
X 0)
a3TTIM s
J—
2
O m AND
0 3 T 1 I MS NO
2
OF GOODS
i I
0 3 “I H M8
Ul
19 ul
(9
I $ UaiUXSNn,
TERMS
<u bJ .Ul
o (D Z < <r>
<n Ui o flm im s v
•J x lil
CC
*IN
10 in fO cl
WAGE RATES OF LABORERS IN MANUFACTURING AND COMMERCIAL FIRMS
IN MANUFACTUMNQ FIRMS in THE PHILIPPINES IN MANUFACTURING AND COMMERCIAL FIRMS IN MANILA
10
<A
0»
fel
Ui
Ui
V
CD
<o
QC
X
X
Oi
Ui
tO
cr»
*
*
0
b-
K)
Ot
o»
-♦
w-
Ol
<®
01
t-
«■
<J»
o»
a>
<7»
<0
kAO,
RETAIL PRICES OF STRATEGIC COMMODITIES IN MANILA
* INDEX NUMBERS ARE THE UNWEIGHTED GEOMETRIC
MEAN OF PRICE RELATIVES
Ml
© o
o
o
o
o s
•
%
CD
O
o 1 I & I 1
T
0»
A *ov
2
CD
%
2
**
05 A
° 5*
o
U-cO
il S ©
o S *
<« A
h *}■ ©
a
O f (W
o o*c >
o
-J “■ J
2
s
S
©<
H g ■
a
ut
ui *-
IX ■X
tf
,1
*«
a S
Ui
o la
<h v
■<
a
UI
£ A
K)
2
OC
S
8
1 X
5
X
H S i
Z
0 - 2
z i-
»o
e
5
1 1 1 1 ------ 1
— ., £ *
GROSS INCOME FROM AGRICULTURAL CROPS AND THEIR PRODUCTS
I9U 1946 194T Ittt
GROSS INCOME FROM AGRICULTURAL CROPS AND THEIR PRODUCTS
THE NATIONS CROSS AND NET NATIONAL PRODUCT
GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT NET NATIONAL PRODUCT
• -as .jo .75 i.o i.as a us 1iL{?NS.x»F i.o 115 as t-rv 4.0 4.2.5 as
’ 1 ■
. I 1-
---1-
---T
---
- r
---1-
---f
---
-1-
---1-
---1-
---r-
--1-
---1-
---1
1938
1946
3.74
I9 4 T
3.37
4.07
1948
M
1948 GROSS NATIONAL PRODUGT
0 i0 P fR C lu T
t IT T | r 1 ITT-I M i l l n -TT V l IT T T I | T M ° n H I II I |4n | I | | I | | I5|°l I I I I I I I 1*1
AGRICULTURE
IN C I.U O IM 4
LIVESTOCK 55.6
APRODUCT
FOREST
pr o d uc ts i M 2.. 5
• u ilo ih o
FISHERIES 6.3
MIMIUC H | 0
UARUFACTut-
NC.Mr ELSE* 3.5
WHU*IMUtfCf
VALUE ADOI
servkcs
Mtcupce
CLASSIFICATIOM OF ARRESTS MADE OKI JUVENILE
DELINQUENCY TO SEX FROM 1945 (SINCE LIBERATION)
TO APRIL OF 1949 INCLUSIVE
1945 1946 1947 1948 1949
ANALYSIS OF ARREST RECORDS OF JUVENILE
ACCORDING TO OFFENSES OF NION FREQUENCY
(A) ILLEGAL PotiESilON OF FIARAfcW
CLASSIFICATION! OF ARRESTS ON JUVENILE DELINQUEN
CY TO ACJE FROM 1945 (SINCE LIBERATION) TO APRIL
OF 1949, INCLUSIVE
wuHftiAi or Anaem M U M 6W OF Afcltgm
legend
MALS
----------- FEMALE
4o 4®®o
3600
3* 3200
41 2-Boo
24 2400
I* 2000
1600
It l2«6
8oo
400
1945 1946 1947 1949 1949 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1945 >946 1947 194$ >949
UNDER. 9 YEARS 9 -1 4 YEARS 15-17 YEARS
1910 1915 ig20 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1949
CHART I
LiCEIvoEij l/’ISKiRLElv
1945 ................. 744 Fishermen
1946 ................ 6,064 "
7
( j1
X77
•/j
_ n
1948 ................. 3,699
1 CAC 4,430
•-n r.m • ;T n ~ -.m yi-''
i l / i rlo_ Jljl* -I xxrj_Liji.^ x >wJ
0 L-a-Uii xjii'iCXi*iL ITiuHxi.^-r SlATio U'JHii xXirCCxj GiiCoG Ci^i-*x
3
1 9 4 5 . . . ....................... 226,505.00
1946 .............................................................. 3,157 ,555.00
1947 .............................................................. 3,486,757.00
1948 ................................ 4,601,109.00
1949 ................. 4,137,298.00
CHART II
QUANTITY OF F I S H CATCH AT T I E L A L u I L G P OI NT S
' I S I I CAUGHT I N ALL LANDINGS OF BOATS OF THREE TONS GROSS
1948
January ............................. . ............................. 2,636,499
February ........................... 2,407,22?
March. ........................................................ 2,953,836
A pril ........................................ 4,674,925.5
-ay ................. 3,573,004.5
June ....................... .............................................. 3,836,475
July ................................... .. .......................... 3,667,372
August „ .............................................................. 3,178,518
Septem ber ................................... 3,767,265
O ctober ......................................... .. 4,388,871
November ..................... .. 3 ,401,682
December ............................................ 3,599,256
T O T A L ............... 41 , 9 9 5 , 4 6 1
January to June ......................................... 20,081,967
July to December ............ 21,913,434
T 0 T A L ........................... 41,995,461
1949
January ........................................................ 2,73 5 ,8 5 7 .5
February ........................................................... 3,227,544
M arch ................................................................... 4,548,915
A pril .............................................................. 3,832,851
May ......................................................................... 5,152,617
June ...................................................................... 5,975,136
July ........................ .. ........................................... 4,590,627
f
BUREAU OF HEALTH STATISTICS
Table I
AVERAGE ANNUAL DEATH RkTE PER 100,000
POPULATION IN THE PHILIPPINES
FROM BERIBERI (INFANTS AND ADULTS)
Year Number Rate/lOO.OOO
1906 3,541 69.93"
1907 1,752 27.35
1908 3 ,3 8 0 5 2.49
1909 3,620 53.14
1910 5 ,6 0 6 76.47
1911 6,009 78.89
1912 5,462 69.59
1913 8,023 ...... 49.84
1914 5,144 ...... 62.60
1915 5,516 66.03
1916 6,773 79.72
1917 7,953 86.93
1918 12,597 135.29
1919 12,387 130.68
1920 13,036 135.44
1921 15,847 157.19
1922 16,270 154.25
1923 18,100 163.55
1924 19,013 160.07
1925 18,541 152.45
TABLE II
CASES AND DEATHS AND MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY RATES FROM BERIBERI PER
100,000 POPULATION IN THE PHILIPPINES FROM 1924 to 1940 and 1946
BERIBERI INFANTS BERIBERI ADULTS
Cases Deaths Cases Deaths
YEAR Number R/100.000 Number R/100.000 Number R/100.000 Number R/100.000
1924 - 14,388 121.13 13,193 111.07 7,363 61.99 5,820 49.00
1925 - 14,449 118.80 13,493 110.94 6,969 57.30 5,048 41.51
1926 - 14,486 116.39 14,027 112.70 6,712 53.93 5,182 41.63
1927 - 13,384 105.13 12,575 98.77 6,220 48.86 4,500 35.35
1928 - 13,145 101.00 12,291 94.-44 5,950 45.71 4,492 34.51
1929 - 16,646 125.16 15,141 113.85 6,965 52.37 5,084 38.23
1930 - 18,290 134.65 16,485 121.36 7,291 53.67 5,089 37.4,6
1931 - 16,904 121.89 15,018 108.29 6,522 47.03 4,520 32.59
1932 - 14,963 105.73 13,202 93.99 5,949 42.03 3,871 27.35
1933 - 15,918 110.26 14,720 101.96 5,785 40.07 3,963 27.44
1934 - 18,691 126.97 17,054 115.85 5,968 40.54 4,365 29.65
1935 - 15,733 104.85 14,299 95.29 7,449 49.64 4,315 28.76
1936 - 12,378 80.96 11,316 74.01 5,001 32.73' .'3,506 22.93
1937 - 14,164 90.95 13,004 83'.50 5,603 35.98 3,793 24.35
1938 - 13,871 87.43 13,217 83.94 7,063 44.54 3,834 24.24
1939 - 16,847 104.37 14,612 90.52 9,995 61.92 4,146 25.61
1940 - 14,227 85.32 4,318 26.05
1946 - 20,912 115.39 18,582 102'.54 14,668 80.94 8,276 45.67
1947 - 21,223 115.51 is;163 98.62 16,863 91.56 7,973 43.29
1948 - 22,419 119.88 18,130 96.95 18,345 98.10 7,687 41.10
TABLE III
DEATHS AND DEATH RATES FROM BERIBERI PER 100,000 POPULATION FOR
THE CITY OF MANILA FROM 1926 to 1940 & 1946
BERIBERI INFANTS BERIBERI ADULTS
YEAR Number - R/100.000 Number - R/100.000
1926 495 129.68 31 8.12
1927 258 64.79 30 7.53
1928 340 81.89 28 6.74
1929 519 119.94 33 7.63
1930 286 63.47 40 8.88
1931 173 36.88 23 4.90
1932 200 40.97 22 4'.51
1933 196 38.61 10 1.97
1934 116 21.99 11 2.09
1935 340 62.04 34 6.20
1936 350 61.51 16 2.81
1937 298 50.47 13 2.20
1938 425 69.40 15 2.45
1939 472 74.13 32 5.03
1940 431 65.16 33 4.99
1946 595 79.30 55 ■ 7.33
^ 0 )1 O CO On
0) -p|
> rt!
I I I I I so II t I I I I CM IO £ I cn
O P^| rH
c3 I on
• u
U
>-> *Q
CD I I I I I -st I I I t I I I CM I CO
CM 4
c
CM
o
•rH
P
•H • tuI CM . CN tr\ MD . U N
U -P
§ >-* nil I I I I I I I£ O• t o-
•
J -3-
• 1 o*
• I -it
& 8 U
g NO CM {>- CM CM
^r\ ■oo to
W
ui
>
O
k]
H
MV -t- On
§5 £h I I
T) ® I I I U N I I I Os I CM I N O
vC *--* o *3 ON CN- 1O
nd1
£ -9 a n
*N Pi-,
^ E? on on NO NO O CM
g
o
S sM
C/0PH CO CO ■Z) U 'S un c— UN NO .''O
^o Pti
■H -P
CO rt I I I I I I I I I fr•- un I ON I CM UN CM I U N
O
VO t- u c P3 cm
ON
rH
3
o 1
rC ‘El
H rt U
O -p o I I I I I I Io ut I CO NO CM
spaces mean data not yet available vjhen this table was made
P ^ I I
■<—ir—
rU
t i
—( cn- cm cn
I U N
cn
8
i>-
-4" -< 3 r~l CO
ON
rH <H
'"3 ('01 .X,
a, o
po -4-j ci>
k-4
P I I I I I I I I I wH\ I On I I no cn INO
:3
oj
CN_* p
•
ON)
•
•n
m O• H• CM
d >h
3 O
rH p
CO
1
O o O H O
o
■.:} :z: CzOm
•- r id o o 1 I I I I I I I I rH I cm I CM I I CM r I CM
■•i ■H Xj
n a- C3
S'
H
E~* r ' j l'3~j
-3 B :
r3
o
F-
- _n
O o
p I I t I I UN I I I f I I I I
rd rNDS
r - *8 3•3 •
G3
O & I o o rH O
. --. O 3 fc
MO CO o i I I I I UN t I I I I rH I CM I I I I
-iO *t -Q S H
f
!.
HO O
o
CM
S9 '",
<M UN on I I I t-
a M S t.o• C-•
- CO c &: ‘ ©• 1£
ON On
Q) • • a s
^ C- P ti— vo ir\nf CN- to UN
rt O r- 3*0 £ NO
^ m a *H cd rH
u n
S p"\ 3 ®
> p- 0) 1
P
r-« •rH u rH O to UN NO ST
nd CP a> ir\C'- UN CN 3 *
I t I CO
o
I O n
On 100
8 £
CO 0 0
un cn cn On
0> p O•»-3- UN CON HO m NO cn
rrj £ * •» •S CO NO
•N
r-T
•L
CO CO CM NO
rH rH
CM
nO
CM
~ « » .
01 cn « to (0 (0
NOTE: — Blank
CO CO CO CO
a o
G
’ci
a, rt
£
•H
a.
a, <xj
O
c
"o.
a
p,
o. rt
| _
a, os
3
0)
c
•H
O h
9* ^t
fX ctf
o, r
.5
oa,
* rt a
■H
O,
cd
V
3
O,
0)
C
•H
O*
O 0) (I)
■r| r—! *H rH a 3 , 'H H °*3
rH *rH
- -H G -
tH .......
H I
. rH *H .
•H d CM I 3 ^ ^ 3 3 i 3 3 i 3 d 3 3
cS ,.
cn x: J3 cn -c
O' Oh g ON CU
ut x:
On CL. g^GSOjft.SCNft.s;
sisa;
a, a on ex, a on E s* $m
I1 rH rH rH H H rH cH rH rH
ESTIiiAT-ijD POPULATION, CASES jJ:D FROL SELECTED DISEASES; MORBIDITY
AND MORTALITY RATES FSR 100,bOO POPULATION IK THU PHILIPPINES* 1946
(Bureau of Health Statistics)
---- i-------------- s 1
t : CASES , DEATHS
TYPE OF DISEASE : Estinntod : 1 t s
: Population t Number * Rate S Number t Rate
* July 1. 1946 ----- --- !_ _L
t i
Beriberi Adults * ie,132,550 t 14,666 : 60*94 * 6,276 45.67
j _____________ J______ s_____
t t
Beriberi Infants t 16,132,550 t 20,912 t 115.39 * 18,582 102*54
j_____________ 1_________ * _______
Diarrhea ana Ehtcritis t i
Under 2 Years i 18,132,550 * 13,420 t 74.05 « 5,527 30.50
j_________ J,_______ !______
Diarrhea and Enteritis I i «
Over 2 Years : 18,132,550 * 32,065 * 176*93 * 5,295 29.22
j _____________ J________ J_______ L______
I I
Pulmonary Tuberculosis . t 18,132,550 i 44,390 t 244.94 t 30,819 170.06
_____________________ I_______
*
J
S
____ t».___
T.B. of Other Organs t 18,132,550 : 1,809 t 9.98 * 1,460 8.07
J ______ !____ i
TABLE VI
REPORT OF C*SES, DEATHS AND '.iATES FUi 100,000 POPULATION
(FOR TIE '..HOLE PHILIPPINES), FROM SELECTED CAUSES
IN THE YEARS 1947 AND 1948:
t 1947 t 194^
C A U S E S t Cases t Deaths t Cases > Deaths
: No. t Rate t No. t Rate t No. x Rate t No. t Rate
(x) Tuberculosis (all
forms end a/.os) :48.873x265.37*30,983:168.23:27.338x292.36*15.424*164.95
Beriberi (adults and
Infants) i38.O86t2O6.07l26.136tUl.91t4O.764t217.98x25.a7tl38.O5
t 2 t t t I t t
Adults t!6.863t 91.56i 7.973t 43.29x16.345t 98.10t 7.687t 41.10
t t t t t t t t '
Infants t21.223tll5.51tl8.l63t 98.62t 22.419* H9.88tl8.130t 96.95
t 1 t t t t t t
Congenital Debility » — , — 1— *15.8991 85.01
t : 1 t t t t t
Prematurity t — t — t — t t 1 — 1 2.237t 11.96
* t t t t t t 1
(x) Dia^rhea-Ent^ritis
|<i3.087j248.30jlO.499j 57.0o|26.855|286.19! 6.7471 72.15
From Epidemiology Section, Bureau of Health, Manila,
(Blank spaces - no data,)
(x) Data for 1948 arc for first six (6) months only.
<fi
5 vr
a
H>0
vr
*
n
g*
S3 -4
E-» M m (3
c- • •
I- st r-
-4
r~3 r-l
r-Ja:
o «0
r-f O
i
n
& o i
u>
C3 S
e- e-
* a
£ ‘-
S W
3 <r>
:e
:-*o-i
q r-;
•“ i— i cS
«
ITl >o
*-1 i rH
.5 ^
R&
«*> H
1§ » •*
*£*
Cm
UN
I I
«£ «. I I
I I
:ON
..
O r-f & II
e2 eo AnJ 0 I
a
'3 ^ f •
t
sa £
E-< !*
I 10
1
tj
T>
a a
II
0
V I T A
Date of Birth: November 9, 1918
Place of Birth: Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
Education: Wittenberg College, Springfield, Ohio; Miami
University, Oxford, Ohio
Degree: ‘ Bachelor of Arts, 1942
Army Service: U. S. Air Forces, 1942-1945; CBI Theater
Present Position: Dean, School of Foreign Service, The U n i v e r
sity of Manila, Manila, Philippines