0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views5 pages

Public Communique United States of America

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views5 pages

Public Communique United States of America

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA

PUBLIC COMMUNIQUE

Response to Allegations made by the Russian Federation in the


Public Communique released on 19th of October 2024

This public communique is made by the United States Department of State on 20 October 2024
to address the vile allegations made by the Russian Federation in their Public Communique
made on 19 October 2024, where it was stated that “the U.S. continues to pursue unilateral
actions that destabilize entire regions under the guise of peacekeeping”. Following are the
Multilateral Groups Formed by or involved with the United States and Multilateral Actions the
United States took and/or supported to facilitate the stabilization of other nations:-

Multilateral Groups Formed by or Involved with the U.S.

1. NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)

Formed: 1949

Purpose: NATO provides collective security and has evolved to engage in crisis management
and peacekeeping beyond Europe.

Key Positive Outcomes:

Kosovo War (1999): NATO’s intervention successfully stopped ethnic cleansing in Kosovo,
leading to the establishment of the UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), which
provided governance and stability. Kosovo’s situation remains stable compared to the volatile
1990s.
Afghanistan (2001–2021): While NATO’s long-term success in Afghanistan was mixed, for many
years the presence of NATO forces significantly weakened al-Qaeda and provided space for
democratic governance to develop, stabilizing parts of the country.

2. United Nations (UN) and UN Peacekeeping

Formed: 1945

Purpose: The UN facilitates global diplomacy and peacekeeping to prevent wars and resolve
conflicts through negotiations and international cooperation.

Key Positive Outcomes:

Korean War (1950–1953): UN-backed U.S. forces successfully defended South Korea from a
North Korean invasion, establishing a stable and democratic South Korea, which has become
one of the world’s leading economies.

First Gulf War (1990–1991): A UN-approved coalition led by the U.S. liberated Kuwait from Iraqi
occupation, restoring its sovereignty and stabilizing the region. The swift end to the war
prevented broader regional destabilization.

Peacekeeping in Liberia (2003): The U.S. supported a UN peacekeeping mission in Liberia,


helping to end a 14-year civil war and bringing relative peace to the country, which has
remained stable since.

3. The Coalition Against ISIS

Formed: 2014

Purpose: A U.S.-led coalition to defeat ISIS and restore stability in Iraq and Syria.

Key Positive Outcomes:

The coalition succeeded in largely defeating ISIS’s territorial control in Iraq and Syria, freeing
major cities like Mosul and Raqqa from extremist rule. This allowed for the rebuilding of war-torn
communities, provided a measure of security, and reduced ISIS’s global influence.

4. G7/G8 and G20

Formed:

G7: 1975

G20: 1999
Purpose: Economic governance and stabilization of global financial systems.

Key Positive Outcomes:

Sanctions on Russia (2014): Following Russia’s annexation of Crimea, the G7 imposed


sanctions, helping to contain Russian aggression and prevent further destabilization in Eastern
Europe. Although the situation remains tense, the sanctions have exerted significant pressure
on the Russian economy, discouraging wider regional conflict.

5. The Organization of American States (OAS)

Formed: 1948

Purpose: To promote peace, democracy, and human rights in the Americas.

Key Positive Outcomes:

Mediation in Central America (1980s–1990s): The OAS helped facilitate peace agreements in
Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Guatemala, which brought an end to decades of civil war and
contributed to the gradual democratization and stabilization of these nations.

6. The Six-Party Talks

Formed: 2003

Purpose: To diplomatically resolve the North Korean nuclear issue.

Key Positive Outcomes:

While these talks did not fully eliminate the North Korean nuclear threat, they helped reduce
tensions during volatile periods in East Asia. The multilateral format also encouraged
cooperation between the U.S., China, and other regional powers, preventing conflict escalation.

Key Multilateral Actions Led and/or Supported by the U.S. to Stop Wars and Stabilize
Regions:-

1. Bosnian War and the Dayton Accords (1995)

Action: The U.S. brokered the Dayton Peace Accords, which ended the Bosnian War.
Positive Outcome: The accords created a framework for peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina,
effectively ending ethnic violence and stabilizing the region. NATO-led peacekeepers ensured
security, and Bosnia has remained at peace, though political tensions persist.

2. Libya Intervention (2011)

Action: The U.S. and NATO intervened in Libya to prevent the mass killing of civilians during
the Libyan Civil War.

Positive Outcome: NATO’s intervention successfully protected civilians in Benghazi and other
cities, toppling the Gaddafi regime. Although Libya has faced post-conflict challenges, the
intervention prevented what could have been a much larger humanitarian disaster at that time.

3. Iran Nuclear Deal (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action - JCPOA) (2015)

Action: The U.S. and its P5+1 partners negotiated an agreement with Iran to prevent it from
developing nuclear weapons.

Positive Outcome: The deal significantly reduced the likelihood of nuclear conflict in the Middle
East for several years. Iran dismantled much of its nuclear infrastructure and complied with
international inspections, leading to a period of relative stability in the region until the U.S.
withdrawal from the agreement in 2018.

4. The Camp David Accords (1978)

Action: U.S. President Jimmy Carter facilitated historic peace talks between Egypt and Israel.

Positive Outcome: The Camp David Accords ended decades of war between Egypt and Israel,
making Egypt the first Arab country to recognize Israel. This has led to enduring peace between
the two nations and improved regional stability in the Middle East.

5. Kosovo Intervention (1999)

Action: The U.S. led NATO airstrikes to stop ethnic cleansing in Kosovo.

Positive Outcome: NATO’s intervention successfully ended the humanitarian crisis in Kosovo.
The region has since moved toward independence and self-governance under UN supervision,
with no large-scale conflict since 1999.

6. Sanctions Against Apartheid South Africa (1980s)

Action: The U.S. supported international sanctions against apartheid-era South Africa.
Positive Outcome: The sanctions, combined with domestic and international pressure, helped
bring an end to apartheid. Nelson Mandela’s election and the transition to democracy in 1994
ushered in a period of peace and reconciliation in South Africa.

7. The First Gulf War (1990–1991)

Action: A U.S.-led coalition liberated Kuwait from Iraqi occupation under the authorization of the
UN.

Positive Outcome: The successful liberation of Kuwait restored the country’s sovereignty and
deterred further aggression by Iraq in the region. The war’s quick resolution also prevented
broader instability across the Middle East.

The aforementioned points strongly contradict the Baseless and Senseless Allegations made by
the Russian Federation towards the United States of America. Unlike The Russian Federation
who have misused their VETO power on resolutions aimed at providing solutions to end the
Syrian Civil War, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the Georgian conflict and the Libyan Civil War; The
United States has a firm belief that the world should collaborate to ensure that wars and
conflicts are resolved without having to escalate to more violence and bloodshed. The United
States only takes Unilateral actions if the United States’ sovereignty is at risk, provided that
Article 51 of the UN charter permits the United States to do so without violating any other
Articles of the charter.

You might also like