VAPING
MARIEL BATAJOY
The advent of vaping, particularly in the form of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes),
has sparked considerable debate and controversy in recent years. Proponents argue that
vaping offers a less harmful alternative to traditional tobacco smoking, potentially aiding
smokers in cessation efforts. Concurrently, opponents express concerns regarding the long-
term health effects of vaping and its potential to serve as a gateway to nicotine addiction
among youth. Understanding the multifaceted nature of this issue requires a nuanced
examination of its various dimensions, encompassing public health, regulatory frameworks,
social perceptions, and individual behavior.
In recent years, vaping has gained popularity as an alternative to conventional
smoking, with proponents highlighting its potential as a harm reduction tool. Studies such as
those conducted by Public Health England (PHE) have suggested that vaping is significantly
less harmful than smoking tobacco, citing reduced exposure to harmful chemicals and
carcinogens. Proponents argue that promoting vaping as a smoking cessation aid could
potentially save millions of lives by transitioning smokers away from more harmful tobacco
products (McNeill et al., 2015). However, concerns persist regarding the lack of long-term
research on the health effects of vaping, particularly given the emergence of vaping-related
lung injuries and the potential for unknown risks associated with prolonged use (Miyashita et
al., 2020).
Vaping has shown promise as an effective tool for smoking cessation, with many
smokers reporting successful transitions to vaping and eventual cessation of tobacco use
(Hajek et al., 2019).
Some argue that promoting vaping as a cessation aid may normalize nicotine use and
perpetuate addiction, particularly among youth who may view vaping as a socially acceptable
behavior (Rigotti, 2018).
Vaping presents a harm reduction opportunity by providing smokers with a less
harmful alternative, potentially reducing the incidence of smoking-related diseases and
premature deaths (Britton et al., 2014).
Critics argue that the long-term health effects of vaping are still unclear, and the use
of e-cigarettes may perpetuate nicotine addiction, ultimately undermining public health
efforts (Gornall, 2015).
Implementing regulations to restrict access to vaping products among youth and
ensuring product safety standards can mitigate potential harms associated with vaping
(Gostin et al., 2019).
Excessive regulation may hinder adult smokers' access to vaping as a harm reduction
tool and stifle innovation in safer nicotine delivery methods (Glantz & Bareham, 2018).
Addressing misconceptions and providing accurate information about the relative
risks of vaping compared to smoking can help shape positive social perceptions and
encourage responsible vaping behavior (Brose et al., 2017).
The marketing tactics employed by vaping companies often glamorize and target
youth, contributing to the normalization of vaping and undermining public health efforts to
prevent nicotine addiction (Vasiljevic et al., 2018).
In conclusion, the debate surrounding vaping encompasses a range of complex issues,
from public health considerations to regulatory challenges and social perceptions. While
vaping holds potential as a harm reduction tool and smoking cessation aid, concerns
regarding its long-term health effects, particularly among youth, remain paramount. Moving
forward, a balanced approach that promotes informed decision-making, stringent regulation,
and targeted public health interventions is essential to maximize the potential benefits of
vaping while minimizing its risks. Continued research, evidence-based policymaking, and
public education efforts will be critical in navigating the evolving landscape of vaping in the
years to come.
REFERENCE
Britton, J., Arnott, D., & McNeill, A. (2014). E-cigarettes: a report commissioned by Public
Health England. Public Health England.
Brose, L. S., Brown, J., Hitchman, S. C., McNeill, A., & West, R. (2017). Perceived relative
harm of electronic cigarettes over time and impact on subsequent use. A survey with 1-year
and 2-year follow-ups. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 179, 244-247.
Gornall, J. (2015). Vaping: how popular are e-cigarettes? BMJ, 351, h5353.
Gostin, L. O., Glasner, A. Y., & Javitt, G. H. (2019). E-cigarettes: A rapidly growing Internet
phenomenon. American Journal of Public Health, 109(1), 134-136.
Glantz, S. A., & Bareham, D. W. (2018). E-cigarettes: use, effects on smoking, risks, and
policy implications. Annual Review of Public Health, 39, 215-235.
Hajek, P., Phillips-Waller, A., Przulj, D., Pesola, F., Myers Smith, K., Bisal, N., ... & Parrott,
S. (2019). A randomized trial of e-cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy. New
England Journal of Medicine, 380(7), 629-637.
McNeill, A., Brose, L. S., Calder, R., Bauld, L., & Robson, D. (2015). Evidence review of e-
cigarettes and heated tobacco products 2018: A report commissioned by Public Health
England. Public Health England.
Miyashita, L., Foley, G., Bhattacharyya, N., & Turner, J. (2020). E-cigarette and vaping
product use-associated lung injury: a review. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery,
146(5), 438-443.
Rigotti, N. A. (2018). Balancing the benefits and harms of e-cigarettes: a National Academies
of Science, Engineering, and Medicine report. Annals of Internal Medicine, 168(9), 666-667.
Vasiljevic, M., Petrescu, D. C., Marteau, T. M. (2018). Impact of advertisements promoting
candy-like flavoured e-cigarettes on appeal of tobacco smoking among children: An
experimental study. Tobacco Control, 27(6), 689-695.
