Bangladesh 2023 Human Rights Report

Executive Summary

There were no significant changes in the human rights situation in

Bangladesh during the year.

Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary or

unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; enforced disappearance;
torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by the
government; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest or
detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; political
prisoners or detainees; transnational repression against individuals in
another country; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy;
punishment of family members for alleged offenses of a relative; serious
restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including
violence or threats of violence against journalists, unjustified arrests or
prosecutions of journalists, censorship, and enforcement of or threat to
enforce criminal libel laws to limit expression; serious restrictions on
internet freedom; substantial interference with the freedom of peaceful
assembly and freedom of association, including overly restrictive laws on the
organization, funding, or operation of nongovernmental and civil society
organizations; restrictions on freedom of movement; inability of citizens to
change their government peacefully through free and fair elections; serious
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 2 of 79

and unreasonable restrictions on political participation; serious government

corruption; serious government restrictions on or harassment of domestic
and international human rights organizations; extensive gender-based
violence, including domestic and intimate partner violence, sexual violence,
workplace violence, child, early, and forced marriage, and other forms of
such violence; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting
members of ethnic minority groups or Indigenous peoples; laws
criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults; crimes
involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender, queer, or intersex persons; significant restrictions on
independent trade unions and workers’ freedom of association; and
existence of the worst forms of child labor.

There were numerous reports of widespread impunity for human rights

abuses. In most cases, the government did not take credible steps to
identify and punish officials or security force members who may have
committed human rights abuses.

Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person

a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and Other Unlawful or

Politically Motivated Killings

There were reports that the government or its agents committed arbitrary

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 3 of 79

or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings. Police policy required

internal investigations of all significant uses of force by police, including
actions that resulted in serious physical injury or death, usually by a
professional standards unit that reports directly to the inspector general of
police. The government, however, neither released official statistics on total
killings by security personnel nor took transparent measures to investigate
cases. Human rights groups expressed skepticism regarding the
independence and professional standards of the units conducting these
assessments. In the few known instances in which the government brought
charges, those found guilty generally received administrative punishment.

Law enforcement raids occurred throughout the year, allegedly to counter

terrorist activity, drugs, and illegal firearms. Suspicious deaths occurred
during some raids, arrests, and other law enforcement operations.

Extrajudicial killings decreased from the previous year. Domestic human

rights organization Ain o Salish Kendra (ASK) reported eight individuals died
from January to September in alleged extrajudicial killings or while in
custody, including two in shootouts with law enforcement agencies and
three due to physical torture before or while in custody. According to
another domestic human rights organization, of 12 incidents of alleged
extrajudicial killings between January and September, four deaths resulted
from law enforcement crossfire killings, four persons were shot to death by
law enforcement officers, and four others died from alleged torture while in

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 4 of 79

custody.

On March 26, Sultana Jasmine died in custody of the Rapid Action Battalion
(RAB) due to brain bleeding. RAB officials said she suffered a stroke and fell
while detained. Family members called the story a cover-up and pointed to
evidence of a head injury. The commanding officer of the RAB unit involved
told media they picked up Jasmine pursuant to a financial fraud complaint.
The case filed against Jasmine under the Digital Security Act (DSA) “for
siphoning money off from job seekers using her Facebook account,”
however, was not recorded until the day after she was picked up. Following
widespread media coverage of the death in custody, the High Court ordered
the government to submit a report detailing the RAB officers involved in the
incident and explaining why the RAB picked up Jasmine before a case was
even filed. In May, the government formed a committee to examine the
death and provide a report within 15 days. The committee turned over a
report of the findings to the High Court in August, but the report was not
made public. In October, two High Court justices stated the report was
unclear and did not provide an adequate explanation of the circumstances
of her arrest and detention. At the time of the justices’ comments, the
report had still not been released to the public.

On March 18, plainclothes RAB officers shot and killed a man and injured
another during an attempt to arrest a murder suspect in Narayanganj’s
Sonargaon sub-district. According to witnesses, the man saw individuals in

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 5 of 79

plainclothes who refused to identify themselves as they detained the

suspect. Fearing an abduction, the man and other neighbors reportedly
tried to intervene and as more individuals joined the commotion, the RAB
resorted to gunfire and shot the man in the stomach. Authorities claimed
”miscreants” opened fire on the RAB officers, injuring four officers and
causing them to return fire in ”self-defense.” Witnesses contradicted that
story and said the individuals were unarmed.

There were no public reports of accountability for RAB officers who

conducted alleged extrajudicial killings in 2022 against Shaheen Miah and
Mohammad Raju.

b. Disappearance

There were reports of disappearances by or on behalf of government

authorities. Human rights groups and media reported disappearances and
kidnappings continued, allegedly committed by security services. Between
January and September, a local human rights organization reported 32
persons were victims of enforced disappearances. The government made
limited efforts to prevent, investigate, or punish such acts. Civil society
organizations reported most victims of enforced disappearance were
opposition leaders, activists, and dissidents. Following alleged
disappearances, security forces released some individuals without charge
and arrested others.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 6 of 79

Freedom House’s Freedom in the World 2023 Country Report noted,

“security agencies continue to commit human rights abuses including
enforced disappearances, the use of secret prisons, arbitrary arrests, and
torture.”

Throughout the year, families of enforced disappearance victims called on

the government to return their family members and prosecute members of
law enforcement agencies involved in their abductions. Mayer Dak, an
organization advocating for victim families, held rallies and issued a
statement saying its members received no legislative, administrative, or
judicial remedy for the incidents of enforced disappearances.

In February, media outlets reported UN rapporteurs, including the UN chair-

rapporteur of the Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary
Disappearances (WGEID), sent a letter to the government in December 2022
expressing concern over harassment of Mayer Dak and local human rights
organization Odhikar.

In March, the government stated it was looking into the cases of 28 victims
of enforced disappearance but criticized civil society organizations for
allegedly providing inflated numbers of enforced disappearance victims to
the United Nations.

In June, opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) leader Salahuddin

Ahmed, who was stranded in India for eight years without valid documents

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 7 of 79

after being forcibly disappeared in Bangladesh, secured a travel pass to

return home. In 2015, Ahmed was abducted from his home in Dhaka and
disappeared for two months before being released across the border in
India.

c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading

Treatment or Punishment, and Other Related Abuses

Although the constitution and law prohibited torture and other cruel,
inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, local and international
human rights organizations and media reported security forces, including
those from the intelligence services, police, and soldiers seconded into
civilian law enforcement agencies, employed such practices. The law
allowed a magistrate to place a suspect in interrogative custody, known as
remand, during which questioning of the suspect could take place without a
lawyer present. Human rights organizations alleged many instances of
torture occurred during remand. Some victims who filed cases under the
Torture and Custodial (Prevention) Act were reportedly harassed and
threatened, while some withdrew their cases due to fear of reprisal.

According to multiple organizations, security forces reportedly used torture

to gather information from alleged militants and members of political
opposition parties. These forces reportedly used beatings with iron rods,
kneecappings, electric shock, rape and other sexual abuse, and mock

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 8 of 79

executions. Organizations also claimed security forces were involved in

widespread and routine commission of torture, occasionally resulting in
death, for the purpose of soliciting payment of bribes or obtaining
confessions. According to civil society and media, impunity was a pervasive
problem in the security forces, including but not limited to the RAB, Border
Guards Bangladesh, Detective Branch of Police, and other units.
Politicization of crimes, corruption, and lack of independent accountability
mechanisms were significant factors contributing to impunity, including for
custodial torture. While police were required to conduct internal
investigations of significant abuses, civil society organizations alleged
investigative mechanisms were not independent.

In July, human rights organizations and media reported a fellow inmate

abused Runa Laila in Dhaka’s Kashimpur prison, with the support of the
prison guards. According to the reports, Shamima Noor Papia, an expelled
leader of the ruling Awami League’s (AL) youth wing, attempted to steal
money from Laila through physical force. Papia and prison guards allegedly
beat Laila, stripped her naked, coerced her to drink sewer water, and
subsequently denied her medical treatment.

In June, media reported Ekramul Hossain Ershad died after alleged beatings
in police custody. Police arrested Ershad on May 31 and took him to the
hospital on June 3 where he was pronounced dead. His relatives claimed he
died after severe beatings following his arrest.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 9 of 79

Also in June, a senior judicial magistrate in Shariatpur asked police to act

against two police officers over the alleged abuse to extort bribes of four
accused persons in custody. The victims alleged the accused officers
blindfolded them, beat them with a hammer, and removed their fingernails
and toenails with pliers.

Prison and Detention Center Conditions

Prison conditions were harsh and at times life threatening due to severe
overcrowding, inadequate facilities, and physical abuse.

Local human rights organization ASK reported 77 prisoners, of whom 42

were on trial and 35 were convicted, died in jail custody from January to
September. Former detainees reported some inmates who died in prison
were transported to a hospital and pronounced dead due to natural causes.
Another local human rights organization claimed 94 individuals died in jail
between January and September.

Abusive Physical Conditions: According to the Bangladesh Prisons

Directorate (BPD), over 80,000 prisoners were held in 68 facilities across the
country designed to hold approximately 42,600 inmates.

Conditions in prisons, and often within the same prison complex, varied
widely. Authorities held some prisoners in areas subject to high
temperatures, poor ventilation, and overcrowding.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 10 of 79

In August, the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General provided a

report to parliament on prison conditions and noted prison meals were
smaller than the minimums prescribed.

Administration: Prisons lacked any formal process for offenders to submit

grievances and authorities rarely conducted investigations of credible
allegations of mistreatment. Prisons had no ombudsperson to receive
prisoner complaints.

Independent Monitoring: The government permitted visits from

government inspectors and nongovernmental observers who were aligned
with the ruling party. No reports on these inspections were released. The
International Committee of the Red Cross continued to support the BPD and
assisted 68 prison centers across the country. According to the BPD, district
and magistrate judges visited the prisons at least once every month.

d. Arbitrary Arrest or Detention

The constitution prohibited arbitrary arrest and detention, but the law
permitted authorities to arrest and detain an individual without an order
from a magistrate or a warrant if authorities perceived the individual might
constitute a threat to security and public order, or if authorities perceived
the individual was involved with a serious crime. The constitution provided
for the right of any person to challenge the lawfulness of their arrest or
detention in court, but the government did not generally observe these

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 11 of 79

requirements. Authorities often held detainees for a few days without

divulging their whereabouts or circumstances to family or legal counsel, or
without acknowledging having arrested them.

Arrest Procedures and Treatment of Detainees

The constitution required arrests and detentions be authorized by a warrant

or occur because of observation of a crime in progress, but the law granted
broad exceptions to these protections.

Under the constitution detainees had to be brought before a judicial officer

to face charges within 24 hours, but this was not regularly enforced. The
government or a district magistrate could order a person detained for 30
days to prevent the commission of an act that could threaten national
security; however, authorities sometimes held detainees for longer periods
with impunity.

There was a functioning bail system, but police routinely rearrested bailed
individuals on other charges, despite directives from the Supreme Court’s
Appellate Division prohibiting rearrest of persons on new charges without
first producing them in court.

Authorities generally permitted defense lawyers to meet with their clients

only after formal charges were filed in the courts, which in some cases
occurred weeks or months after the initial arrest. Detainees were legally
entitled to counsel even if they could not afford to pay for it, but the country
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 12 of 79

lacked sufficient funds to provide this service. Many detainees were not
permitted to communicate with others outside of detention.

Arbitrary Arrest: Arbitrary arrests occurred, often in conjunction with

political demonstrations or speech, or as part of security force responses to
alleged terrorist activity, and the government held persons in detention
without specific charges, sometimes to collect information regarding other
suspects. The expansiveness of the 1974 Special Powers Act granted legal
justification for arrests that would often otherwise be considered arbitrary,
since it removed the requirement that arrests be based on crimes that have
occurred previously. Human rights activists claimed police falsely
constructed cases to target opposition leaders, workers, and supporters,
and that the government used law enforcement agencies to crack down on
political rivals.

Police continued to arbitrarily arrest members of opposition political parties.

In August, the Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) and CIVICUS Monitor
issued a joint statement noting media had reported police sent over 800
BNP leaders to jail prior to protests at the end of July. The statement called
on authorities “to release all those arrested for exercising their peaceful
right to protest and to undertake a prompt and independent investigation
into human rights violations and abuses committed by security forces and
ruling party activists.”

Pretrial Detention: Arbitrary and lengthy pretrial detention continued due

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 13 of 79

to bureaucratic inefficiencies, limited resources, lax enforcement of pretrial

rules, and corruption. Lawyers attributed the overuse of laws such as the
DSA, some of which had provisions that generally did not allow for bail, as
another explanation for the high numbers of pretrial detentions. In some
cases, the length of pretrial detention equaled or exceeded the sentence for
the alleged crime.

In July, the Bangladesh Appellate Court extended the pretrial detention

without bail of Khadija Kubra for four more months. Khadija, age 17, was a
university student arrested in September 2022 under the DSA after a guest
on a webinar she hosted in 2020 made remarks critical of the ruling party.
In February, the High Court granted bail to Khadija but the state appealed
the decision. In November, she was released on bail, but the charges
against her remain.

e. Denial of Fair Public Trial

The constitution provided for an independent judiciary, but corruption and

political interference compromised its independence. The government
generally did not respect judicial independence and impartiality.

Human rights observers maintained that lower courts often ruled based on
influence from or loyalty to political patronage networks, particularly in
cases filed against opposition political party supporters. Observers claimed
judges who made decisions unfavorable to the government risked transfer to

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 14 of 79

other jurisdictions.

Observers alleged judges sometimes accepted bribes from attorneys or

other court officials for bail or acquittal in criminal cases.

Corruption and a substantial backlog of cases hindered the court system,

and the granting of extended continuances effectively prevented many
defendants from obtaining fair trials. In some cases, defendants remained
in custody during trial for longer than the maximum sentence of the crime
for which they were charged. Media reported in June over 500,000 cases
were pending with the High Court alone, with around 90,000 new cases filed
every year. According to the Supreme Court Annual Report, the High Court
disposed of 690 pending cases annually on average since 2018.

Defendants who could not afford an attorney or chose to remain

undefended were not eligible for bail during proceedings. The National
Legal Aid Services Organization offered some services to defendants who
could not afford private attorneys, but access to those services often
required burdensome formalities and extensive periods of time. Many
defendants were unaware of these services.

Trial Procedures

The constitution provided for the right to a fair and public trial, but the
judiciary did not always protect this right due to corruption, partisanship,
and weak human resources. Legal experts noted prosecution witnesses
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 15 of 79

often did not show up in court to give oral testimony and there were
insufficient judges to handle the pending caseload in a timely manner.

Defendants did not have the right to a timely trial. Indigent defendants had
the right to a public defender, but in many cases public defenders were not
well prepared or adequately acquainted with details of the case. Trials were
conducted in the Bengali language; the government did not provide free
interpretation for defendants who could not understand or speak Bengali.

The government frequently did not respect the rights of accused persons to
confront prosecution or plaintiff witnesses and present their own witnesses
and evidence. Authorities did not always respect the right not to be
compelled to testify or confess guilt, and defendants who did not confess
were often kept in custody. Some defendants claimed police pressured
them to confess under duress.

The administrative process by which lower court and jail authorities were
notified of the outcome of High Court appeals was very slow.

Mobile courts headed by executive branch magistrates rendered immediate

verdicts that often included prison terms for defendants who did not have
legal representation.

In October, media reported the court granted the RAB additional time to
submit its probe report in a high-profile case involving the killing of two
journalists in 2012. This was the 104th deferral of the probe deadline. Law
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 16 of 79

enforcement officials arrested and charged eight individuals with the double
murder, but the RAB had not submitted its report.

Political Prisoners and Detainees

There were reports of political prisoners or detainees. Political affiliation

was often a factor in claims of arrest and prosecution of members of
opposition parties, including through spurious charges under the pretext of
responding to national security threats.

Former prime minister and chairperson of the lead opposition political party
BNP Khaleda Zia remained confined to her home. She was barred from
receiving needed medical treatment abroad but was being treated in a
Bangladeshi hospital. In 2018, she was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment
on corruption and embezzlement charges first filed in 2008. Zia was
transferred from prison to a hospital in 2019 and released to house arrest in
2020. International and domestic legal experts noted the lack of evidence to
support the conviction and suggested a political ploy to remove the leader
of the opposition from the electoral process, even as multiple corruption
charges against Prime Minister Hasina were dropped by prosecutors.

The Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal, established in 2010 to

conduct trials of those accused of war crimes and atrocities that took place
during the 1971 War of Independence, continued to issue sentences,
including the death penalty, to those accused of crimes during the war.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 17 of 79

Many observers viewed the proceedings as politically motivated, as the

court had almost exclusively indicted members of opposition political
parties.

f. Transnational Repression

The government used transnational repression to intimidate or exact

reprisals against individuals outside its sovereign borders, including against
members of diaspora populations, such as political opponents, civil society
activists, human rights defenders, and journalists.

Threats, Harassment, Surveillance, and Coercion: According to the press,

police and intelligence agencies continued to threaten, harass, and surveil
human rights defenders, civil society leaders, and the family members of
critics based outside of the country. Journalists living abroad continued to
report police and intelligence agencies harassed and intimidated their
relatives in the country to silence criticism. In March, four men allegedly
associated with the ruling party attacked the brother of London-based
journalist Zulkarnain Saer Khan, beating him with iron rods in retaliation for
Khan’s Al-Jazeera reporting on the prime minister.

In July, the prime minister instructed the country’s overseas diplomats to

“be vigilant” against persons spreading “antistate” propaganda so that the
international community would not be “misled.”

In August, police arrested and detained Anisha Siddika on charges of

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 18 of 79

conspiring to commit sabotage, three days after a widely shared Facebook

post by her U.S.-based son, Michigan State University graduate student
Tanzilur Rahman, criticizing the trial process of late war crimes convict
Delwar Hossain Sayedee, an Islamic leader. A court granted her bail eight
days later, after first denying it twice.

Misuse of International Law Enforcement Tools: There were credible

reports that the government attempted to misuse international law
enforcement tools for politically motivated purposes against specific
individuals located outside the country. In July, media reported police
flagged three journalists for Interpol as “cyber terrorists” propagating
antigovernment propaganda.

Bilateral Pressure: There were credible reports the government, for

politically motivated purposes, attempted to exert bilateral pressure on
other countries aimed at having them take adverse action against specific
individuals. In May, media reported the Ministry of Home Affairs sent
Bangladesh missions abroad a list of those spreading “propaganda against
the country” in foreign countries, instructing those missions to pressure host
governments to take legal action against them under their existing laws.

g. Property Seizure and Restitution

The government did not implement a 2001 act to accelerate the process of
return of land primarily to Hindu individuals. The act allowed the

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 19 of 79

government to confiscate property of anyone whom it declares to be an

enemy of the state. It was often used to seize property abandoned by
minority religious groups when they fled the country, particularly after the
1971 independence war.

Minority groups continued to report land ownership disputes that

disproportionately displaced members of Indigenous communities and
ethnic minorities, especially in areas near new roads or industrial
development zones. They also claimed local police, civil authorities, and
political leaders were sometimes involved in evictions or shielded politically
influential land grabbers from prosecution. While the law allowed for land
restitution for Indigenous persons living in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT),
this rarely occurred.

h. Arbitrary or Unlawful Interference with Privacy, Family,

Home, or Correspondence

The law did not prohibit arbitrary interference with private correspondence.
Intelligence and law enforcement agencies could monitor private
communications with the permission of the Ministry of Home Affairs, but
police rarely obtained such permission when monitoring private
correspondence. Human rights organizations alleged police, the National
Security Intelligence, and the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence
employed informers to conduct surveillance and report on citizens

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 20 of 79

perceived to be critical of the government.

There were reports that government authorities arbitrarily entered homes;

accessed, collected, or used private communications or personal data of
targeted individuals based on exercise of their human rights; and punished
family members for offenses allegedly committed by relatives.

In January, Israeli newspaper Haaretz alleged the country’s National

Telecommunication Monitoring Center purchased vehicle-mounted
surveillance devices from an Israeli company. As the two countries did not
have diplomatic ties, the purchase was allegedly conducted via a firm
registered in Cyprus.

Section 2. Respect for Civil Liberties

a. Freedom of Expression, Including for Members of the

Press and Other Media

The constitution provided for freedom of expression, including for members

of the press and other media, but the government frequently contravened
this right. There were significant limitations on freedom of expression.
Members of media and bloggers self-censored their criticisms of the
government due to harassment and fear of reprisal.

Freedom of Expression: The constitution equated criticism of the

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 21 of 79

constitution with sedition. Punishment for conviction of sedition ranged

from three years to life imprisonment.

The law limited hate speech but did not clearly define it, which permitted
the government broad latitude to interpret it. The government could
restrict speech deemed to be against the security of the state; against
friendly relations with foreign states; and against public order, decency, or
morality; or which constitutes contempt of court, defamation, or incitement
to an offense. The law criminalized any criticism of constitutional bodies.

The DSA, passed ostensibly to reduce cybercrime, provided for sentences of

up to life imprisonment for spreading “propaganda” against the Bangladesh
Liberation War, the national anthem, or the national flag. Throughout the
year the government widely used the DSA against persons criticizing the
government. Media and the law minister reported over 7,000 DSA cases
pending across the country, with one nongovernmental organization (NGO)
reporting police brought cases against 20 children aged 13 to 17 years.

The law was used against speech found on social media, websites, and other
digital platforms, including for commentators living outside of the country.
From January 2020 to March 2023, international rights organization Article
19 reported 229 journalists were indicted and 56 arrested under the DSA.
The Centre for Governance Studies reported journalists made up 27 percent
of those accused under DSA.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 22 of 79

In May, the United Nations’ special rapporteur on extreme poverty and

human rights expressed grave concern over the DSA’s misuse to create a
climate of fear and censorship. Recommending immediate suspension of
the law, he stated journalists, human rights defenders, opposition
politicians, and academics were detained under the DSA for exercising their
rights to freedom of expression and opinion.

Human rights organizations protested news in February that Hindu teen

Poritosh Sarkar was put into solitary confinement for eight months after
facing DSA charges for “hurting religious sentiments” through a 2021 social
media post. Prison authorities told Sarkar’s family he was being kept in a
solitary confinement cell without windows “for his safety” from local
individuals offended by his post. The Rangpur Cyber Tribunal denied him
bail three times before finally granting it in May 2022. In February,
however, the court revoked his bail and sent him back to jail.

In August, the government announced it would replace the DSA with the
Cyber Security Act (CSA); parliament passed the CSA in September. The CSA
reduced penalties for many crimes, made some crimes bailable that
previously were not, and eliminated jail time as a punishment for
defamation. The CSA, however, recycled almost all DSA sections, and the
law continued to allow police the power to search, seize, and arrest suspects
without a warrant. Observers charged the CSA was simply the same law
with a new name and that the law continued to criminalize free speech.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 23 of 79

Cases initiated under the repealed DSA continued under the CSA.

Violence and Harassment: Authorities, including intelligence services and

student affiliates of the ruling party, subjected journalists to violence,
harassment, and intimidation, especially when tied to the DSA, which
human rights activists called a government and ruling party tool to
intimidate journalists. Individuals faced the threat of being arrested, held in
pretrial detention, subjected to expensive criminal trials, fines, and
imprisonment, as well as the social stigma associated with having a criminal
record.

ASK reported 119 instances of journalist harassment from January to June.

Another local human rights organization reported 309 cases of attacks on or
harassment of journalists between January and September, including 138
journalists injured.

In late March, an allegedly pro-ruling party lawyer filed a DSA charge against
the editor and a reporter of prominent newspaper Prothom Alo, accusing
them of using print, online, and electronic media to “tarnish the image and
reputation of the state.” Police detained the reporter, Shamsuzzaman
Shams, for 20 hours on unclear grounds. The charges against Rahman and
Shams stemmed from a March 26 story Prothom Alo published on the
country’s 52nd anniversary of independence. The situation sparked a public
outcry against the DSA, as students, lawyers, human rights activists, civil
society organizations, the Editors’ Council, and political parties
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 24 of 79

demonstrated across the country to demand the law’s amendment or

repeal.

In June, the RAB arrested a union council chairman in Jamalpur, and police
arrested several others accused of the murder of journalist Golam Rabbani
Nadim. On June 14, a group of men ambushed Nadim, a correspondent for
website Banglanews24 and broadcaster for Ekattor TV, while he was
traveling home on his motorcycle. The men beat Nadim and left him
unconscious; bystanders took him to the hospital. After he died the next
day from a severe head injury, his family said he was targeted in retaliation
for a series of reports in May for Banglanews24 about Mahmudul Alam
Babu, chair of a local government unit and member of the ruling AL party.

Censorship or Content Restrictions for Members of the Press and Other

Media, Including Online Media: Both print and online independent media
were active and expressed a variety of views; however, media outlets that
criticized the government were pressured by the government. Independent
media could not operate freely or without restrictions.

The government maintained editorial control over the country’s public

television station and allegedly mandated private channels broadcast
government content for free. Civil society organizations stated political
interference influenced the licensing process, since all television channel
licenses granted by the government were for stations supporting the ruling
party.
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 25 of 79

In January, the government ordered the closure of 191 websites it accused

of publishing “anti-state news.”

In February, the government shut down Dainik Dinkal, a broadsheet Bengali-

language newspaper and the only paper of the main opposition BNP. Dhaka
district authorities first ordered the shutdown of the paper in December
2022, saying the paper violated the country’s printing and publication laws.
Dainik Dinkal continued to publish, however, after lodging an appeal at the
Press Council. The council rejected the appeal, upholding the district
magistrate’s order to the paper to stop publication. Two Dhaka-based
journalist unions issued a joint statement that the decision was a “reflection
of the repression of opposition voices.”

Prothom Alo journalist Rozina Islam continued to face charges in an Official

Secrets Act case. In January, police opened further investigation into the
case despite having submitted to the court a report in October 2022 stating
that police found no evidence against her. The government arrested Islam
in 2021 under the 1923 Official Secrets Act and sections of the penal code
for investigating a corruption story involving the Ministry of Health, accusing
her of taking photographs and stealing official documents from the ministry.
If convicted, Islam could be sentenced to up to 14 years in prison or the
death penalty.

Independent journalists and media alleged intelligence services influenced

media outlets in part by withholding financially important government
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 26 of 79

advertising and pressing private companies to withhold their advertising.

The government penalized media that criticized it or carried messages of the
political opposition’s activities and statements.

Privately owned newspapers usually were free to carry diverse views except
on politically sensitive topics or those that criticized the ruling party.
Political polarization and self-censorship remained a problem. Investigative
journalists often complained of their management and of editors “killing”
reports due to fear of pressure from the government and intelligence
agencies. Some journalists received threats after publishing stories.
According to journalists and human rights groups, journalists engaged in
self-censorship due to fear of security force retribution, prosecution under
the DSA, and the possibility of being charged with politically motivated
cases. Although public criticism of the government was common and vocal,
some media figures expressed fear of harassment by the government.

Libel/Slander Laws: Libel, slander, defamation, and blasphemy were

treated as criminal offenses, most often employed against individuals
speaking against the government, the prime minister, or other government
officials. Laws referring to defamation of individuals and organizations were
used to prosecute opposition figures and members of civil society.

Minority rights organizations criticized the arbitrary detention under the

DSA of minority community members on the pretext of blasphemy.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 27 of 79

National Security: Authorities stated the DSA was essential to protect

national and cyber security and prevent communalism, though they
allegedly used the law to arrest or punish critics of the government or deter
criticism of government policies and officials.

Nongovernmental Impact: Societal pressures limited freedom of

expression. Atheist, secular, religious minority, and lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI+) writers and bloggers reported
they continued to receive death threats from extremist organizations.

Internet Freedom

The government restricted and disrupted access to the internet and

censored online content in numerous incidents. Laws banned virtual private
networks and voice-over-internet-protocol telephone, but authorities rarely
enforced the prohibition.

In a number of incidents, the government interfered in internet

communications, filtered or blocked access, restricted content, and
censored websites or other communications and internet services.
Throughout the year, the government blocked or slowed internet services in
cities and neighborhoods where opposition parties held rallies. It
suspended or closed many websites based on vague criteria, or with explicit
reference to their pro-opposition content being in violation of legal
requirements.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 28 of 79

Local NGOs reported at least 17 internet shutdowns since 2012 under

various circumstances, including communal riots, civic and political protest,
and elections. In a survey, 88 percent of respondents said they had
experienced an internet shutdown in the past three years and 50 percent
said they had had such an experience within the previous year.

The Bangladesh Telecommunications Regulatory Commission was charged

with regulating telecommunications. It carried out law enforcement and
government requests to block content by ordering internet service providers
to act. The commission regularly ordered social media companies to take
down content it deemed critical of the ruling party or harmful to religious
beliefs. Sweden-based website Netra News remained blocked since 2020
after it published reports alleging corruption by a government minister.

b. Freedoms of Peaceful Assembly and Association

The government restricted freedoms of peaceful assembly and association.

Freedom of Peaceful Assembly

The law provided for the right to peaceful assembly, but the government
generally did not respect this right. The law gave the government broad
discretion to ban assemblies of more than four persons. The government
required advance permission for gatherings such as protests and
demonstrations.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 29 of 79

Press reporting documented authorities often prohibited gatherings by

opposition groups and imposed unreasonable requirements for permits.
Police and especially ruling party activists in many instances used force to
block or disperse demonstrations assembled by opposition parties,
organizations, and activists.

Government authorities frequently denied the lead opposition BNP and

other opposition parties permission to hold events. Government authorities
allowed ruling party activists to intimidate and attack opposition supporters
at their events.

In August, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch called on

authorities to end use of excessive force against protestors following clashes
during BNP sit-ins on July 28 and 29. Human Rights Watch reported police
indiscriminately fired rubber bullets, tear gas, and water cannons, and beat
opposition party supporters with batons during protests.

Media reported over 300 persons were injured on August 19 as BNP leaders
and activists clashed with police during the party's road march in Habiganj.
BNP marchers allegedly hurled brick chips at police, and police officers
opened fire and used tear gas. The BNP claimed their leaders and activists
sustained bullet injuries, but police claimed they fired rubber bullets.

Freedom of Association

The law provided for the right of citizens to form associations, subject to
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 30 of 79

“reasonable restrictions” in the interest of morality or public order, and the

government generally respected this right. The law restricted the receipt of
foreign funds by NGOs and provided for punishment of NGOs making
derogatory comments regarding the constitution or constitutional
institutions. The government’s NGO Affairs Bureau increasingly withheld or
delayed approval for foreign funding to NGOs, especially those working on
matters the bureau deemed sensitive, such as human rights, labor rights,
Indigenous rights, LGBTQI+ rights, or humanitarian assistance to Rohingya
refugees. Activists and NGOs in-country reported increasing instances of
government scrutiny and bureaucratic restrictions and delays, including
restricting funding to NGOs and use of other coercive tools such as bank
account freezes, tax audits, and summary tax judgments.

c. Freedom of Religion

See the Department of State’s International Religious Freedom Report at

https://www.state.gov/religiousfreedomreport/

d. Freedom of Movement and the Right to Leave the

Country

The law provided for freedom of internal movement, emigration, and

repatriation, and the government generally respected these rights, except in
three sensitive areas: the CHT, Rohingya refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar, and

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 31 of 79

on the island of Bhasan Char in the Bay of Bengal.

In-country Movement: The government enforced restrictions on access to

the CHT by foreigners and restricted movement of Rohingya refugees. The
refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar were surrounded by barbed and concertina
wire fencing with few pedestrian gates to allow Rohingya to move among
the camps or into the local community. Bhasan Char, an island with no
regular transport links to the mainland, sheltered over 30,000 Rohingya
refugees who voluntarily relocated there at the urging of the government.
Authorities caught and detained many Rohingya who tried to leave Bhasan
Char or camps in Cox’s Bazar and returned them to the registered camps.

Foreign Travel: While foreign travel was allowed, some senior domestic civil
society and international NGO representatives, as well as opposition party
members, reported harassment and delays when applying for a visa,
entering, or departing the country. The government prevented war crimes
suspects from the 1971 independence war from leaving the country.

CEOs of privately-owned banks reported they were not permitted to leave

the country without obtaining express governmental permission, which was
on occasion withheld. Some opposition political leaders also reported
delays and harassment on attempting to leave the country.

e. Protection of Refugees

The government cooperated with the Office of the UN High Commissioner

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 32 of 79

for Refugees (UNHCR) and other humanitarian organizations in providing

protection and assistance to Rohingya refugees.

The government was not a party to the 1951 Convention Relating to the
Status of Refugees or the 1967 Protocol. As a result, the government
claimed it was not under legal obligation to uphold the basic rights
enshrined in this treaty.

Prior to the 2017 Rohingya arrivals, the government and UNHCR provided
temporary protection and basic assistance to approximately 33,000
registered Rohingya refugees from Burma living in two official camps
(Kutupalong and Nayapara), while the government and the International
Organization for Migration aided approximately 200,000 undocumented
Rohingya living in makeshift settlements in Cox’s Bazar. In 2017, more than
750,000 Rohingya fled genocide in neighboring Burma to seek safe haven in
Bangladesh. As of September 30, because of this influx, 965,467 registered
Rohingya refugees were living in refugee camps. The government claimed
actual numbers totaled more than 1.2 million. The government did not
recognize the arrivals as refugees, referring to them instead as “forcibly
displaced Myanmar nationals,” but abided by many of the established UN
standards for refugees. One notable exception was that Rohingya did not
enjoy full freedom of movement throughout the country. Government
officials stated repatriation was the government’s only goal, stressing
privileges such as freedom of movement, postsecondary education, or

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 33 of 79

livelihood opportunities could not be afforded to the Rohingya population.

A National Task Force of 25 ministries and department representatives and

chaired by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs provided oversight and strategic
guidance for the overall Rohingya response. The Ministry of Home Affairs
coordinated and maintained law and order for the response, with support
from the Armed Police Battalion. At the local level, the Refugee Relief and
Repatriation Commission, under the Ministry of Disaster Management and
Relief, was responsible for the management of the camps.

As of September 30, Bhasan Char hosted 30,748 Rohingya refugees. Media

reported the government spent 31 billion taka ($310 million) to prepare for
the eventual transfer of 100,000 refugees to the island. Programs operated
under a 2021 memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the
government and UNHCR that outlined the humanitarian and protection
framework underlying UN operational engagements on the island. The
MOU had provisions to improve protections and services for Rohingya
refugees on Bhasan Char. It proposed expanded access to services, such as
education, skills and vocational training, livelihoods, health care, and
uninterrupted telecommunication services, which were funded by some
international donors through the 2023 Joint Response Plan.

In July, the High Court dismissed a bail application for a suspect in the
murder of Mohammad Mohib Ullah, chairman and founder of the Arakan
Rohingya Society for Peace and Human Rights. In 2022, the government
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 34 of 79

brought charges against 29 Rohingya in connection with the September

2021 killing. In October, authorities arrested a suspect for his alleged role in
Mohib Ullah’s murder.

Access to Asylum: The law did not provide for granting asylum or refugee
status, nor had the government established a formal system for providing
protection to refugees. Nonetheless, the government provided significant
protection and assistance to Rohingya refugees residing in the country.
Prior to 2017, the government cooperated with UNHCR to provide
temporary protection and basic assistance to registered refugees residing in
two official camps. After the 2017 arrival of more than 750,000 additional
Rohingya refugees, the government started to register the refugees
biometrically and provided identity cards. UNHCR continued to operate
registration centers to update individual and family status due to marriages,
divorces, births, and deaths.

Abuse of Refugees and Asylum Seekers: The government mostly

cooperated with UNHCR and other humanitarian organizations in providing
protection and assistance to Rohingya refugees, despite security concerns in
the camps. Observers reported human trafficking and smuggling were
common in the camps, with few cases prosecuted. When discovered,
government officials returned trafficking victims to the camps.

International organizations reported gender-based violence directed against

women in the camps. Intimate partner violence comprised 81 percent of
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 35 of 79

the cases for the first half of the year.

Accountability for crimes against refugees remained a problem. Rohingya

relied on government officials responsible for each camp (also known as the
Camps in Charge, or CiC) to address allegations of crime. The CiCs were
largely autonomous and varied in terms of responsiveness to camp needs.
According to international organizations, some CiCs were susceptible to
corruption. Observers alleged some border guard, military, and police
officials were involved in facilitating trafficking of Rohingya women and
children, ranging from “looking the other way,” to bribes for allowing
traffickers to access Rohingya in the camps, to direct involvement in
trafficking.

The NGO Fortify Rights reported in August that members of the Armed
Police Battalion, a specialized unit of the Bangladesh police with
responsibility for security in the Rohingya camps, arbitrarily detained and
allegedly tortured refugees while systematically extorting camp residents.
According to media reports, battalion officers killed four Rohingya in
crossfire gunfights.

Police arrested at least 924 Rohingya outside the camps throughout the
year. News sources reported that as of October 1, at least 54 Rohingya,
including 19 Rohingya leaders (Majhis), 18 gang members, and a Rohingya
volunteer worker, were killed in clashes or gunfights between gangs in the
camps.
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 36 of 79

Freedom of Movement: There were restrictions on Rohingya freedom of

movement. According to the 1993 MOU between the government and
UNHCR, registered Rohingya refugees were not permitted to move outside
official camps. After the 2017 influx, police set up checkpoints on the roads
to restrict travel by both registered refugees and arrivals beyond the Ukhiya
and Teknaf subdistricts. Rohingya located at Bhasan Char had little means
to exit the island or travel to camps in Cox’s Bazar, where many claimed to
have family members, leading some human rights groups to label the
situation on the island as “detention.”

The government allowed at least two trips per month from the island to the
camps in Cox’s Bazar for family visits. Regular and reliable connections to
and from the mainland for logistics, trade, family visit, medical, and other
reasons did not exist. Refugees complained to donor representatives that
they often had to wait months for an opportunity to visit Cox’s Bazar, that
visits were only permitted when deemed “urgent,” and that unpaid
government-appointed Rohingya community leaders had to be bribed to
certify a visit request as urgent enough to merit approval and vouch for the
visitors’ intent to return to Bhasan Char.

Many camp authorities conducted curfews and law enforcement patrols,

particularly at night, in response to reported concerns regarding violent
attacks, abductions, or kidnappings in the camps. Stating a desire to better
secure the camp and protect Rohingya from migrant smuggling, the

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 37 of 79

government maintained watchtowers and fencing in the camps in Cox’s

Bazar. Humanitarian agencies said fencing hindered delivery of services to
refugees and exacerbated tensions between refugees and host
communities.

Employment: There were credible reports the government imposed

restrictions on refugees’ ability to work. The government did not formally
authorize Rohingya refugees in the country to work, although it allowed
some volunteer opportunities with small stipends and limited cash-for-work
activities for Rohingya to perform tasks within the camps. A skills
development framework endorsed by the National Task Force outlined the
skills and training that could be provided to refugees and host communities,
with UN support, based on assumptions of the kinds of livelihoods generally
available to Rohingya in Rakhine State.

On Bhasan Char, skills development and livelihood opportunities were

limited but appeared to increase during the year.

Despite movement restrictions, some refugees worked illegally as manual

laborers on the informal economy, where some were exploited as labor
trafficking victims.

Access to Basic Services: While agencies made significant efforts to support

those refugees who were most vulnerable, the shortage of land remained a
central problem hindering the ability of Rohingya to access basic services.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 38 of 79

During the year, multiple cuts to food rations due to funding shortfalls
dramatically reduced refugees’ access to adequate and nutritious food. This
increased food insecurity throughout the camps.

Public education remained a problem. Higher education remained out of

reach of most of the population, but in July, UNICEF completed
implementation of the Burmese curriculum and reported over 300,000
Rohingya children were enrolled in kindergarten and grades one through 10.
The government continued to forbid education outside this program.

Government authorities allowed registered and unregistered Rohingya

regular access to public health care, but the Rohingya needed authorities’
permission to leave the camp. Humanitarian partners ensured their health-
care expenses were covered and that they returned to the camps. The
health sector maintained information on all the health facilities within the
camps and the surrounding areas. Based on available data, overall coverage
met the minimum requirements.

Bhasan Char had primary healthcare facilities but lacked secondary and
tertiary facilities, necessitating referrals to medical facilities off the island for
advanced-level care. The transfer of patients to mainland facilities was
hampered by required authorizations to depart the island, weather
conditions, and boat availability.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 39 of 79

f. Status and Treatment of Internally Displaced Persons

Societal tensions and marginalization of Indigenous persons continued in the

CHT because of a government policy initiated during an internal armed
conflict from 1973-97. This policy relocated landless ethnic Bengalis to the
CHT with the implicit objective of changing the demographic balance to
make Bengalis the majority. The most recent national census revealed
Indigenous people were now a minority in two of the three CHT districts.

The internally displaced persons (IDPs) in the CHT had limited physical
security. Community leaders maintained Indigenous persons faced
widespread violation of their rights by settlers, sometimes supported by
security forces.

The number of IDPs in the CHT was in dispute. NGOs estimated the number
could exceed 500,000, which included non-Indigenous as well as Indigenous
persons. In 2020, the independent CHT Commission estimated slightly more
than 90,000 Indigenous IDPs resided in the area.

For further information about IDPs in the country, please see the materials
of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Center: https://www.internal-
displacement.org.

g. Stateless Persons

Rohingya in the country were legally or in fact stateless. They could not
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 40 of 79

acquire Bangladeshi citizenship, nor did the government of Burma recognize

them as citizens.

Every individual born in Bangladesh was a citizen of the country by birth by

law. This provision, however, was not afforded to Rohingya. A 2009
amendment to the law allowed anyone born in the country to either a
Bangladeshi mother or father the right to claim citizenship. This
amendment was not retroactively applied to Rohingya children born in the
country to stateless fathers prior to 2009, so these children remained
stateless. There were cases in which children born to one Bangladeshi
parent and one Rohingya parent were not recognized as citizens, despite the
2009 amendment.

Section 3. Freedom to Participate in the Political

Process

The constitution provided citizens the ability to choose their government in

free and fair periodic elections held by secret ballot and based on universal
and equal suffrage. International observers reported recent elections were
neither free nor fair because they were marred by serious irregularities.

Elections and Political Participation

Abuses or Irregularities in Recent Elections: National elections were widely

reported to not be fair or free of abuses and irregularities. Observers
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 41 of 79

considered 2018 parliamentary elections neither free nor fair and marred by
irregularities including ballot box stuffing and intimidation of opposition
polling agents and voters. During the campaign leading to the election,
there were many credible reports of harassment, intimidation, arbitrary
arrests, and violence that made it difficult for opposition candidates and
their supporters to meet, hold rallies, or campaign freely.

Intimidation, irregularities, and violence during campaigns and voting

marked almost all parliamentary by-elections and local government
elections during the year.

Campaigning for a July 17 parliamentary by-election, independent candidate

and social media star Ashraful "Hero" Alam was attacked, reportedly by AL-
aligned activists. Local police officials refused to accept his filing of a case
against his attackers. On election day he was attacked again and
hospitalized after police ejected him from a polling station and, according to
reporters present, refused to protect him from a mob of governing party
supporters. Authorities arrested 10 suspects in relation to the second
assault.

Political Parties and Political Participation: The government mobilized law

enforcement resources to level civil and criminal charges against opposition
party leaders and activists. Press reporting supported claims by the BNP and
other parties that police criminally charged thousands of BNP members
related to political demonstrations during the year and detained many of
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 42 of 79

the accused. Human rights observers claimed most of these charges were
baseless.

Opposition activists faced criminal charges. Leaders and members of

Jamaat-e-Islami (Jamaat), the largest Islamist political party in the country,
said they could not consistently exercise their constitutional freedoms of
speech and assembly because of harassment by law enforcement
authorities. The police granted Jamaat permission to hold rallies in a few
instances but frequently denied it in others. As it was not registered as a
political party, Jamaat candidates were prohibited from seeking office under
the Jamaat name.

AL-affiliated organizations, particularly its student wing, the Bangladesh

Chhatra League, carried out violence and intimidation around the country
with impunity against nonpartisan individuals as well as opposition groups
and others deemed critical of the government. On April 10, after the prime
minister's denunciation in parliament of the country's leading newspaper
Prothom Alo, AL youth activists broke in and vandalized the newspaper's
offices, livestreaming their actions on social media.

A series of BNP and AL rallies in July saw clashes as BNP activists tried to
stage sit-ins at main roads and entry points to Dhaka and met with pushback
from police and reportedly AL affiliates. In a common pattern, police
withdrew from a BNP protest site and allowed AL activists to attack. In the
July clashes scores of persons were injured, including some BNP leaders.
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 43 of 79

Political rallies sparked violence again in late October, as the police and BNP
supporters clashed, resulting in more than 13,700 arrests, and leaving at
least 14 dead as of November.

Press reported in June that police headquarters ordered units across the
country to speed up pending criminal cases – often dormant or old – to
legally entangle potential candidates from the BNP and Jamaat-e-Islami
ahead of possible national elections. Potential candidates reportedly faced
dozens or hundreds of cases. Minutes of a July 6 meeting leaked to the
press documented officials from police headquarters instructing police
around the country to implicate BNP and Jamaat supporters in criminal
cases filed since 2013, stating, "BNP and Jamaat have to be declared
disqualified for the election...all BNP and Jamaat leaders who are expected
to contest elections are accused in some cases.” Police were instructed to
collaborate with the judiciary to speed up cases and coordinate witness
testimony.

In August, Human Rights Watch reported authorities filed cases against

more than 1,500 named opposition leaders and activists and 15,000
unnamed individuals in the weeks leading up to BNP rallies at the end of
July. In October, less than 90 days before expected elections and ahead of
major political rallies in Dhaka, the BNP claimed authorities detained 200 of
its leaders and activists within a 15-hour period.

In numerous instances, the government interfered with the right of

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 44 of 79

opposition parties to organize public functions and restricted broadcasting

of opposition political events. Press reported that government authorities
hindered telecommunications connectivity for rallygoers attending
opposition events, even as ruling party rallies on the same day were
undisturbed.

Participation of Women and Members of Marginalized or Vulnerable

Groups: No laws limited participation of women or members of minorities
in the political process, and they did participate. Freedom House noted in
its annual report that societal discrimination against women, as well as
against LGBTQI+ persons, limited their participation in politics. Religious,
ethnic, and other marginalized groups remained underrepresented in
politics and state agencies.

Section 4. Corruption in Government

The law provided criminal penalties for conviction of corruption by officials,

but the government did not implement the law effectively. There were
numerous reports of government corruption during the year, and officials
frequently engaged in corrupt practices with impunity.

The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC), set up in 2004 to serve as an

independent monitoring mechanism, was mandated to focus on
investigating cases of corruption, including but not limited to bribery,
embezzlement, extortion, abuse of discretion, and improper political

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 45 of 79

contributions. Local human rights organizations questioned the

independence and effectiveness of the ACC, which they claimed was
evidenced by the acquittal of most cases brought against ruling party
officials and bureaucrats, while legal processes, investigations, and filing of
cases against leaders of the opposition parties continued. In August, media
sources reported the ACC faced a backlog of over 6,500 cases.

Corruption: Corruption remained a serious problem. Freedom House’s

annual report noted “corruption is endemic, and anticorruption efforts have
been weakened by politicized enforcement.”

In January, the ACC opened an inquiry based on allegations Dhaka Water

Supply and Sewerage Authority managing director Taqsem A. Khan bought
14 houses and several cars in the United States during his 13-year tenure as
the authority’s managing director. According to the allegations, Taqsem
stole money from foreign-loan funded projects to fund his luxury purchases.

In February, media outlets broke news of an internal government report

outlining corruption allegations against the former mayor of Gazipur,
Mohammad Zahangir Alam. Corruption claims included payments for
garbage pickups which never took place, road construction projects which
were not performed, skimming lease payments owed to the Gazipur City
Corporation, and charges for public events which did not take place. The
government did not publicly release the internal report.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 46 of 79

For additional information about corruption in the country, please see the
Department of State’s Investment Climate Statement for the country, and
the Department of State’s International Narcotics Control Strategy Report,
which includes information on financial crimes.

Section 5. Governmental Posture Towards

International and Nongovernmental Monitoring and
Investigation of Alleged Abuses of Human Rights

Several domestic and international human rights groups investigated and

published their findings on human rights cases, but they generally operated
with significant government restrictions. Government officials were rarely
cooperative and responsive to their reports, occasionally verbally attacking
critical organizations and activists by name.

Although human rights groups often sharply criticized the government, they
also practiced self-censorship. Observers alleged the government
strategically reduced the effectiveness and inhibited operations of civil
society through restrictions. Even civil society members affiliated with the
ruling party reported receiving threats of arrest from the security forces for
public criticism of government policies.

The government continued to restrict the funding and operations of the

human rights organization Odhikar following its rejection of the

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 47 of 79

organization’s registration in 2022. The organization’s officials continued to

report harassment, intimidation, and surveillance by government officials
and security forces.

The Dhaka Cyber Tribunal continued to conduct hearings in a case against

Odhikar’s secretary Adilur Rahman Khan and director Nasiruddin Elan over
alleged violations in 2013 of the Information and Communications
Technology Act. In July, three UN special rapporteurs called on the
government to stop harassing Odhikar and ensure respect for due process,
calling the case emblematic of the use of criminal proceedings to silence
human rights defenders and organizations. On September 14, the tribunal
convicted Khan and Elan and sentenced them each to two years in prison
and a fine of 10,000 taka ($90). On October 15 authorities released them on
bail for one year and stayed the fine, following their appeal to the High
Court and its subsequent ruling.

The government required all NGOs, including religious organizations, to

register with the Ministry of Social Welfare. Some local and international
NGOs working on human rights issues claimed intelligence agencies
monitored them. The government sometimes restricted international
NGOs’ ability to operate through delays in project registration, cease-and-
desist letters, and visa refusals.

The NGO Affairs Bureau continued to block project approval and release of
funding to several NGOs. Several NGOs said they received informal
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 48 of 79

notification from the government to cease or slow down activities. Others

faced repeated formal roadblocks to get projects approved despite
submitting all the required paperwork. In some cases, banks refused to
release funds to NGOs working on sensitive governance and rights issues.
Lengthy delays caused some NGOs to curtail activities as they could not pay
their staff.

The law included what rights groups reported were punitive provisions for
NGOs making “derogatory” comments regarding the constitution of the
country, its founding history, or constitutional bodies.

Retribution against Human Rights Defenders: The government filed

numerous cases against human rights defenders. Human rights defenders
claimed they were under constant government surveillance and they and
their family members experienced frequent harassment.

In July, the Centre for Governance Studies released a report on the status of
human rights defenders in the country. The report found at least 65 percent
of surveyed human rights defenders said that the ruling AL party, law
enforcement, and intelligence services obstructed their work. The report
noted 62 percent of those surveyed claimed the overall environment of their
work was “very unsafe” or “unsafe,” and 42 percent noted threats,
intimidation and persecution from sources connected to the state, including
law enforcement, state intelligence agencies, and government officials.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 49 of 79

The United Nations or Other International Bodies: Since 2013 the

government had not responded to a request from the UN WGEID to visit the
country. The Office of the UN Resident Coordinator in the country reported
several other pending requests for UN special rapporteurs to visit the
country since 2017, including the special rapporteur on extrajudicial,
summary, or arbitrary executions; the special rapporteur on the rights to
freedom of peaceful assembly and of association; and the special rapporteur
on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental
freedoms while countering terrorism. Some UN special rapporteurs visited
throughout the year, including the rapporteur on extreme poverty and
human rights in May and the rapporteur on the human rights of migrants in
January.

Government Human Rights Bodies: The National Human Rights

Commission’s primary activities were to investigate human rights abuses,
address discrimination in law, educate the public on human rights, and
advise the government on key human rights matters. Most human rights
organizations questioned the independence and effectiveness of the
commission, alleging the government used state institutions including the
commission to implement its political agenda.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 50 of 79

Section 6. Discrimination and Societal Abuses

Women

Rape and Domestic Violence: The law prohibited rape of girls and women
by men and physical spousal abuse, but the law excluded marital rape if the
girl or woman was older than 13. Conviction of rape was punishable by life
imprisonment or the death penalty. The government did not enforce the
law effectively.

Human rights organizations found rape remained a serious issue in the

country. There were allegations of rapists blackmailing survivors by
threatening to release the video of the rape on social media. There were
many reports of sexual violence committed with impunity.

In February, police arrested five men for the gang rape of a woman the
month prior. According to news reports, the woman hired a rickshaw pulled
by one of the accused, who then abducted her and took her to a building
under construction where a group of five men raped her. In July, police
arrested a man for raping a woman college student in Dhaka. According to
police, the accused lured the student to the third floor of a shopping mall
where he raped her.

According to guidelines for handling rape cases, the officer in charge of a

police station had to record any information relating to rape or sexual

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 51 of 79

assault irrespective of the place of occurrence. Chemical and DNA tests had
to be conducted within 48 hours from when the incident was reported.
Guidelines also stipulated every police station was required to have a
woman police officer available to survivors of rape or sexual assault during
the recording of the case by the duty officer. The statements of the survivor
had to be recorded in the presence of a lawyer, social worker, protection
officer, or any other individual the survivor deemed appropriate. Survivors
with disabilities were supposed to be provided with government-supported
interpretation services, if necessary, and the investigating officer along with
a woman police officer was required to escort the survivor to a timely
medical examination.

According to human rights monitors, many survivors did not report rapes
due to lack of access to legal services, social stigma, fear of further
harassment, and the legal requirement to produce witnesses. The burden
was on the rape survivor to prove a rape occurred, using medical evidence.

Other Forms of Gender-based Violence or Harassment: Some NGOs

reported violence against women related to disputes concerning dowries,
despite dowry demands being illegal. By law, an individual convicted of
demanding or giving a dowry could be imprisoned for up to five years, fined,
or both, but the practice remained common throughout the country. From
January to September, ASK found 114 incidents of dowry-related violence
against women, with 51 women killed because of dowry disputes.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 52 of 79

In late July, six persons allegedly beat four girl soccer players in Khulna for
wearing shorts during soccer practice. Though one of the victims filed a case
with the police against the attackers, the alleged attackers continued to
threaten the girls with promises to file false cases against them, acid attacks,
harm to their family members, and death. Police arrested the main accused
individual and pledged to provide security to the victims and other players;
however, half of the players at the academy stopped attending practice due
to the threats.

ASK reported five incidents of fatwas (religious edicts) used to target women
between January and August. A Supreme Court Appellate Division ruling
allows the use of fatwas only to settle religious matters; fatwas could not be
invoked to justify punishment, nor could they supersede secular law.
Nevertheless, in some cases, these declarations resulted in extrajudicial
punishments, often against women, for perceived moral transgressions.

Cases of vigilantism against women occurred. The incidents included

whipping, beating, and other forms of physical violence.

Assailants threw acid in the faces of survivors, usually women, leaving them
disfigured and often blind. Acid attacks were in some instances related to a
woman’s refusal to accept a marriage proposal or to land or other money
disputes.

Although sexual harassment was prohibited by a 2009 High Court ruling,

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 53 of 79

harassment, also known as “Eve teasing,” was common according to

multiple NGOs.

Discrimination: The constitution declared all citizens equal before the law
with entitlement to equal protection under the law. It also explicitly
recognized the equal rights of women to those of men “in all spheres of the
state and of public life.” According to NGOs, the government did not always
enforce gender equality laws effectively. Women did not enjoy the same
legal status and rights as men in family, property, and inheritance law.
Family and inheritance laws varied by religion.

The labor law prohibited wage discrimination based on sex, but it did not
prohibit other forms of labor-related discrimination. Women were generally
underrepresented in supervisory and management positions and earned less
than men counterparts even when performing similar functions.

Reproductive Rights: There were no reports of coerced abortion or

involuntary sterilization on the part of government authorities.

A full range of contraceptive methods, including long-acting reversible

contraception and permanent methods, were available through
government, NGO, and for-profit clinics and hospitals. Low-income families
were more likely to rely on public family planning services offered free of
cost. Government district hospitals had crisis management centers
providing contraceptive care to survivors of sexual assault. These facilities

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 54 of 79

did not provide postexposure prophylaxis. Due to cultural and religious

factors, many women were unable to access contraception without their
husbands’ permission. The UN Population Fund’s (UNFPA) State of World
Population 2023 report claimed contraceptive prevalence rate was 64
percent, but that two-thirds of women lacked decision-making authority on
sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Weaknesses in the public-health system, such as lack of trained providers

and equipment in rural areas, resulted in inequitable access to information
and services.

Taboos and stigma surrounding menstruation created social and religious

barriers for menstruating women. In conservative communities some
menstruating women could not use the kitchen or observe religious
practices due to fear of contamination. A civil society organization
estimated one in four girls stayed home from school while menstruating.
The cost of menstrual products was relatively high compared to average
wages, due in part to being heavily taxed, prompting some women to use
potentially unhygienic materials while menstruating.

Civil society organizations reported survivors of child marriage had less

negotiating power to make family planning choices.

LGBTQI+ groups reported nonmale persons faced legal, cultural, and social
barriers that impeded access to sexual and reproductive health services. In

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 55 of 79

many cases, there were requirements for a third party, such as a spouse or
male guardian, to authorize access to health-care services.

Many health practitioners expressed discomfort in discussing sexual activity,

and shamed patients that discussed sexually transmitted infections.
Discussions of women’s sexuality were particularly taboo. Civil society
organizations and LGBTQI+ activists often cited social stigma against HIV and
AIDS and against higher-risk populations as a barrier for accessing health
services, especially for the transgender community.

Systemic Racial or Ethnic Violence and Discrimination

The law provided for the protection of members of some marginalized

ethnic or racial communities; however, these laws were rarely enforced.
NGOs reported national origin, racial, and ethnic minorities faced
discrimination. For example, some Dalits (lowest-caste Hindus) suffered
from restricted access to land, adequate housing, education, and
employment.

Members of the estimated 300,000 Urdu-speaking population (known as

Biharis, originally Urdu-speaking Muslims who migrated to then East
Pakistan before the Bangladesh Liberation War) stated their requests to
obtain passports were sometimes rejected by immigration officers due to
their lack of a permanent address. Almost all of this population still resided
in refugee-like camps established by the International Committee of the Red

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 56 of 79

Cross in the 1970s, when Biharis believed they would return to Pakistan
following the 1971 war. In 2008, a High Court ruling that the Bihari
community had rights as citizens prompted the international donor
community to cease support because the community was technically no
longer stateless. While the government provided some basic services,
including water and electricity, Biharis reported social and economic
discrimination as well as a lack of initiatives integrating them into society,
leaving them isolated in crowded camps.

Indigenous Peoples

The Indigenous communities of the CHT and other areas throughout the
country experienced widespread discrimination and abuse despite
nationwide government quotas for participation of Indigenous residents in
the civil service and higher education. These conditions also persisted
despite provisions for local governance in the 1997 Peace Accord, which was
not fully implemented. Indigenous persons were unable to participate
effectively in decisions affecting their lands due to disagreements regarding
land dispute resolution procedures under the Land Commission Act. Local
organizations claimed the army and intelligence forces carried out
extrajudicial killings and arbitrary arrests; beat, harassed, threatened, and
jailed Indigenous people on false charges; and labeled rights activists as
terrorists and extortionists.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 57 of 79

Indigenous activists claimed ethnic minorities were drastically undercounted

by the census, impacting land rights and the development budget of the CHT
and other Indigenous lands. The official census reported 1.65 million
minority persons, while the Bangladesh Indigenous Peoples’ Forum
estimated there were around three million ethnic minority persons. While
the country had a 20 percent poverty rate, poverty in the plains, where
some Indigenous persons lived, was more than 80 percent and more than 65
percent in the CHT. Organizations corroborated health care available to
Indigenous persons was well below the standard available to non-
Indigenous persons in the country.

Human rights organizations continued to allege evictions and communal

attacks occurred against local populations in the CHT, often at the direction
of the government, army, and intelligence agencies. To mark International
Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples on August 9, the Bangladesh Adivasi
Forum organized a discussion to demand constitutional recognition of ethnic
minorities as “indigenous people.”

In January, media reported 100 persons armed with sticks attacked an Mro
village in the CHT’s Bandarban district. Attackers vandalized and burned a
dozen Mro houses, and looted the homes for mobile phones, household
utensils, clothes, cattle, and poultry. Community members alleged the
attackers were affiliated with Lama Rubber Industries and sought to drive
villagers from the area. The rubber plantation company responded that

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 58 of 79

Indigenous people were building houses on company land. Indigenous

communities in areas other than the CHT reported the loss of land to
Bengali Muslims, and Indigenous peoples’ advocacy groups reported
deforestation to support Rohingya refugee camps and other commercial
pursuits caused severe environmental degradation in their land, adversely
affecting their livelihoods.

In January, CHT political group the Parbatya Chattagram Jana Samhati Samiti
(PCJSS) noted in an annual report 235 incidences of human rights violations
by security forces, armed extremist groups, and land grabbers in the CHT the
previous year. The PCJSS also stated the government escalated “military
measure” to manage the situation in the CHT, instead of using political and
peaceful means through the implementation of the 1997 accord.

Reports of sexual assaults on Indigenous women and children by Bengali

neighbors or security personnel remained unresolved.

Children

Birth Registration: The government did not register births for nor extend
citizenship to Rohingya refugees born in the country, although it permitted
UNHCR to register births within the refugee camps.

Education: Education was free and compulsory through eighth grade by

law, and the government offered subsidies to parents to keep girls in class
through 10th grade. Enrollments in primary schools showed gender parity,
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 59 of 79

but completion rates fell in secondary school, with more boys than girls
completing that level. Early and forced marriage was a factor in girls’
attrition from secondary school.

Child Abuse: Many forms of child abuse, including sexual abuse, physical
and humiliating punishment, child abandonment, kidnapping, and
trafficking, continued to be serious and widespread. The law prohibited
child abuse and neglect with the penalty for conviction of up to five years’
imprisonment, a fine, or both. The Department of Social Services operated
“Child Helpline – 1098,” a free telephone service designed to help children
facing violence, abuse, and exploitation. The hotline received approximately
80,000 calls a year on average and was accessible from anywhere in the
country. The hotline center provided services such as removal, referral, and
counseling.

During the year, former students detailed multiple allegations of sexual

abuse at the hands of teachers and older pupils in Islamic madrassas. In
February, a Dhaka court sentenced a madrasa teacher to life in prison on
charges of raping a student, age nine, in 2019. In May, a madrasa teacher
reportedly raped a girl, age eight, after calling her to his room when she
went to the madrasa to study around 4:00 p.m. In May, the AL student
league suspended a local leader after police arrested him on charges of
raping two teenage boys. In July, media reported police recovered the body
of a girl, age eight, from a pond in Rajshahi after she was kidnapped from

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 60 of 79

her house. Her body showed signs of rape.

Despite advances, trafficking of children and inadequate care and protection

for survivors of trafficking continued to be problems. Child labor and abuse
at the workplace remained problems in certain industries, mostly in the
informal sector, and child domestic workers were vulnerable to all forms of
abuse.

Child, Early, and Forced Marriage: The legal age of marriage was 18 for
women and 21 for men. The law included a provision for marriages of
women and men at any age in “special circumstances.”

UNFPA’s 2023 report assessed 51 percent of girls married before the age of
18. High rates of child marriage resulted in girls leaving school at a higher
rate than boys. UNICEF noted girls who marry in childhood were less likely
to remain in school.

The government’s own statistics were lower than UNFPA’s estimate but still
high. In June, the BBS reported the number of early marriages involving girls
under 15 and 18 years of age increased significantly in 2022. According to
BBS, 40.9 percent of girls under 18 years of age married in 2022, compared
to 32.4 percent in 2021. The rates were higher in rural areas than urban
ones. The statistics further showed that 6.5 percent of girls under the age of
15 married in 2022, up from 4.7 percent in 2021.

To reduce early and forced marriages, the government offered stipends for
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 61 of 79

girls’ school expenses beyond the compulsory level. The government and
NGOs conducted workshops and public events to teach parents the
importance of their daughters waiting until age 18 before marrying.

According to the Ministry of Women and Children’s Affairs, two mobile

services were available to report cases of child marriage and provide other
services; the Joya App and a “109 Hotline.” The ministry’s website hosts a
digital library to provide information on existing laws and other resources to
prevent child marriage.

Sexual Exploitation of Children: The law prohibited sexual exploitation of

children; the penalty for conviction was 10 years to life imprisonment. Child
pornography and selling or distributing such material was prohibited. Child
sex trafficking victims in brothels were able to produce notarized certificates
stating they were older than age 18, and some observers claimed corrupt
government and law enforcement officials condoned or facilitated these
practices. In addition to cross-border trafficking, traffickers lured girls from
around the country into domestic commercial sexual exploitation in legal
and illegal brothels and hotels.

Antisemitism

There was no Jewish community in the country. Politicians and imams made
antisemitic statements, reportedly to gain support from their constituencies.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 62 of 79

Trafficking in Persons

See the State Department’s Trafficking in Persons Report at

https://www.state.gov/trafficking-in-persons-report/.

Forced Organ Harvesting

Organ harvesting continued in the country. In July, the RAB publicized the
arrests of suspects in a kidney trafficking ring. The accused leader of the
ring claimed he was underpaid for his own kidney by a broker in India in
2019. According to the RAB, the man noted the huge demand for kidney
transplant patients in India and started the organ trafficking ring. After
finding wealthy clients who needed kidneys online or through local brokers
from different areas, the accused arranged for donors to be sent to India.
During the arrests, the RAB recovered fake certificates for kidney donors
and recipients, passports, bank cards, Indian rupees, and Bangladeshi taka.
The organ traffickers allegedly charged recipients as much as five million
taka ($45,000) per kidney, but paid donors 500,000-600,000 taka ($4,500-
$5,400). The RAB estimated the organ trafficking ring sold 50 kidneys before
the arrests.

Acts of Violence, Criminalization, and Other Abuses Based

on Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity or Expression, or

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 63 of 79

Sex Characteristics

Criminalization: Same-sex sexual conduct was illegal under the penal code,
which carried with it punishment up to life imprisonment. The government
did not actively enforce the law. Members of LGBTQI+ groups reported the
government retained the law because of societal pressure. There were no
credible efforts to rescind discriminatory laws that targeted LGBTQI+
persons.

Violence and Harassment: Members of LGBTQI+ communities received

threatening messages via telephone, text, and social media, and some were
harassed by police. They stressed the need for online and physical security
due to continued threats of physical violence. The government and police
took few official actions to investigate, prosecute, and punish those
complicit in violence and abuses against LGBTQI+ persons. LGBTQI+
advocacy organizations reported police used the law as a pretext to harass
individuals who were perceived to be LGBTQI+ regardless of their sexual
orientation. Some groups reported harassment under a suspicious behavior
provision of the police code. LGBTQI+ individuals experienced high levels of
fear, harassment, and law enforcement actions taken in the wake of violent
extremist attacks in the past decade.

On August 20, media reported Islamic extremists killed Golam Kibria, a gay
schoolteacher in Savar, claiming Kibria’s sexual orientation contradicted

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 64 of 79

their beliefs. Human rights groups emphasized this incident was not an
isolated occurrence but rather emblematic of the broader human rights
abuses faced by LGBTQI+ individuals within the country.

NGOs reported high levels of sexual and gender-based violence against

Rohingya LGBTQI+ individuals living in the refugee camps, who stated their
ongoing physical and psychological needs were not adequately met.

Discrimination: The law did not prohibit discrimination by state and

nonstate actors based on sexual orientation, gender identity or expression,
or sex characteristics. LGBTQI+ groups reported official discrimination in
employment and occupation, housing, and access to government services,
including health care and access to justice. Though the government offered
limited training and employment opportunities to help third-gender persons
gain employment, rights activists stated only a small number of third-gender
persons worked in the manufacturing and service sectors, and many faced
workplace discrimination.

Mental health care was a top concern and, according to these groups,
mental health-care providers tended to use moralistic terms to shame
LGBTQI+ persons. Access to preexposure and postexposure medications
that prevent transmittal of HIV during sex was limited. HIV testing was free,
but stigma regarding testing and seeking treatment remained strong.

While some transgender women in the country identified as hijra (a cultural

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 65 of 79

South Asian term for some transgender women as well as some intersex and
gender-nonconforming individuals), due to an affinity for the hijra
subculture or a desire for increased social protection, not all chose to do so.
Many transgender women asserted their transgender identities and
corrected those that identified them as hijra. Meanwhile, transgender men
received little support or tolerance, particularly in poor and rural
communities. Transgender rights advocates claimed the government
conducted genitalia checks on hijra in some cases, before allowing them
access to services.

Availability of Legal Gender Recognition: Passports and legal identification

documents, including voter registration forms, included the option to select
“X” or “Hijra” as a third gender. The most recent national census included a
“third gender” category. Although the government made some progress in
promoting social acceptance of hijra persons, the government made limited
efforts to promote the rights of others in the LGBTQI+ community and did
not offer legal recognition.

Involuntary or Coercive Medical or Psychological Practices: LGBTQI+

activists reported so-called conversion therapy practices were widespread.
Lesbian women and gay men recounted stories of being sent by their
parents to drug rehabilitation facilities and forced to take sedatives, wear
traditional clothing, and recite the Quran. The government did not
condemn these practices.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 66 of 79

Restrictions of Freedom of Expression, Association, or Peaceful Assembly:

Organizations working on LGBTQI+ topics in the country faced major hurdles
to fund and implement projects due to their inability to register with the
government as formal LGBTQI+ NGOs and thus receive international
funding. Organizations specifically assisting lesbians were rare, though
programming by LGBTQI+ organizations continued to expand beyond
traditional male and hijra participants. Severe social stigma regarding sexual
orientation was common and prevented open discussion of the subject.

Persons with Disabilities

The law provided for equal treatment and freedom from discrimination for
persons with disabilities, and the government took mostly effective
measures to enforce these provisions.

The law required physical structures be made accessible to those with

disabilities, but the government did not implement the law effectively and
government buildings had no accommodations for persons with disabilities.
The law required persons with disabilities to register for identity cards to
track their enrollment in educational institutions and access to jobs. This
registration allowed them to be included in voter lists, to cast votes, and to
participate in elections. Local NGOs estimated 50 to 60 percent of those
with disabilities were unable to exercise their right to vote, as voting centers
lacked accommodations for persons with disabilities.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 67 of 79

According to NGOs, some children with disabilities did not attend public
school due to lack of accommodation. The government trained teachers on
inclusive education and recruited disability specialists at the district level.
The government also allocated stipends for students with disabilities.

Many organizations reported persons with visual disabilities experienced

difficulties accessing technology. While individuals reported government
websites contained more user-friendly services for persons with disabilities,
they also reported information for persons with disabilities was usually
uploaded on portals as scanned documents, which made it incompatible for
software used by persons with visual impairments. The government
provided students with visual impairments with accessible books every year.

The government took some action to investigate those responsible for

violence and abuses against persons with disabilities.

Government facilities for treating persons with mental disabilities were

inadequate.

Section 7. Worker Rights

a. Freedom of Association and the Right to Collective

Bargaining

The law provided for the right to join and, with government approval, to

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 68 of 79

form unions. The law did not cover workers in the informal sector, who
make up about 85 percent of the labor force. The legal definition of workers
excluded managerial, supervisory, and administrative staff. Civil servants,
firefighters, security guards, and employers’ confidential assistants were not
allowed to join unions. Unions were not permitted in export processing
zones (EPZ) and special economic zones. The law provided for workers in
unions to bargain collectively and engage in legal strikes and prohibited
antiunion discrimination.

The law provided for workers in a collective bargaining union to have the
right to strike in the event of a failure to reach settlement, but the law
placed limitations on this right. At least 75 percent of union employees had
to support a strike action. The government could prohibit a strike deemed
to pose a “serious hardship to the community” and could terminate any
strike lasting more than 30 days. The law additionally prohibited strikes for
the first three years of commercial production if the factory was built with
foreign investment or owned by a foreign investor. Few strikes followed the
cumbersome legal requirements, however, and strikes or walkouts often
occurred spontaneously. Work stoppages, strikes, and workplace actions
regarding wage arrears, improper or illegal shutdowns, layoffs, terminations,
and discrimination were prevalent in several sectors during the year.

The law required every factory with more than 50 employees to have a
participation committee. The law stated there was no requirement for a

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 69 of 79

participation committee if a trade union existed in the establishment.

Employers often selected or appointed workers to participation committees
rather than allowing worker elections to those positions as required by law.
Employers also failed to comply with laws and regulations that provided for
the effectiveness and independence of participation committees.

The law severely restricted the right to organize and bargain collectively for
the nearly 488,000 workers in the EPZs. EPZ workers could establish worker
welfare associations (WWA), but the law did not empower WWAs to
independently represent workers in collective bargaining. WWAs were
prohibited from establishing any connection to outside political parties,
unions, federations, or NGOs.

WWAs remained dominated by the Bangladesh Export Processing Zones

Authority (BEPZA) and continued to supplant independent unions. Among
the 456 operating enterprises in the eight EPZs, WWAs were formed in only
288 enterprises. The law gave BEPZA discretion to ban any strike in EPZs it
views as prejudicial to the public interest. The Ministry of Labour and
Employment’s Department of Inspection for Factories and Establishments
(DIFE) continued to face obstacles to conducting inspections in the EPZs,
including the requirement to obtain prior approval from the BEPZA
Executive Chairman. Following the issuance of the October 2022 EPZ Labor
Rules, the DIFE conducted roughly 45 inspections in EPZ factories. The law
provided for EPZ labor tribunals, appellate tribunals, and conciliators, but

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 70 of 79

those institutions were not established. Instead, 13 labor courts and one
appellate labor court heard EPZ cases. The law did not empower the DIFE to
file cases in the labor courts or give notice to an establishment for violations
in EPZs factories, but the law required DIFE to send its observations directly
to the BEPZA. More than 50 percent of WWAs in any particular zone of an
EPZ were required to approve a federation.

There were 10 economic zones in operation under the Bangladesh Economic

Zones Authority. The DIFE, however, did not have the authority to inspect
enterprises in the economic zones. Workers in the economic zones were
prevented from forming trade unions and were not permitted to establish
communication with external worker rights organizations.

The government did not effectively enforce laws protecting freedom of

association, the right to bargain collectively, and the right to strike.
Penalties for unfair labor practices and antiunion discrimination were not
commensurate with penalties for other laws involving denials of civil rights.
Penalties were sometimes applied against violators, more often against
workers than employers. The Department of Labor (DOL) within the
Ministry of Labour and Employment reported that between January 2022
and August 2023, workers filed 17 complaints regarding unfair labor
practices and antiunion discrimination, and as of November all complaints
remained under investigation.

The law did not allow workers to file unfair labor practice or antiunion
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 71 of 79

discrimination cases directly with the labor courts. Workers first had to file
complaints with the DOL alleging unfair labor practices. The DOL first
investigated and attempted to bring the parties to consensus through
arbitration. DOL’s decisions were not binding. The DOL could file cases with
the labor court if arbitration failed to reach a resolution between the
parties. A labor court could order reinstatement of workers fired for union
activities, but reinstatement was rarely awarded. The DIFE had authority to
mediate wage-related disputes. Labor organizations reported the
conciliation process slowed down workers’ access to justice.

While the law allowed for more than one union in a factory, the DOL did not
allow more than one union per factory in the garment industry. Labor
leaders continued to report that only management-supported unions
received quick union registration credentials.

Barriers to union formation remained in law and practice. The law required
a minimum of 20 percent of workers at an enterprise for union registration.
According to labor leaders and labor organizations, unions in large
enterprises faced significant difficulties meeting the 20 percent membership
threshold. From January to August, the DOL rejected 37 registration
applications for not meeting the membership threshold. Labor groups also
cited practical barriers to registration beyond the law, including the DOL’s
failure to review and issue registration certificates to unions within the 55-
day legal limit, comparing worker signatures, and requiring unions to hold

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 72 of 79

two general meetings for registration. Labor rights organizations reported

that politically affiliated factory owners interfered with the union
registration process and trade union activities. The International Trade
Union Confederation noted the labor law did not align with international
labor standards and raised concerns over obstruction in forming trade
unions and police interference with peaceful workers protests. The
confederation also called for stronger measures to restrain interference in
union elections.

Labor leaders, organizers, and workers faced violence, threats, and unfair
labor practices for exercising the rights to freedom of association and
collective bargaining. On June 25, assailants killed prominent labor
organizer Shahidul Islam after he attempted to resolve a labor dispute over
two months of unpaid wages and holiday bonuses at the Prince Jacquard
Sweaters factory near Dhaka. Islam was the president of the Gazipur branch
of the Bangladesh Garment and Industrial Workers Federation. According to
press reports, an autopsy report from August 9 indicated he died from profuse
bleeding after sustaining a blow to his head. The Industrial Police, the lead
agency on this case, reported the arrest of nine individuals and confessional
statements from key suspects.

Following attempts by workers to organize at the Fashion Forum Limited

factory, in March factory management beat three organizers of the
proposed union and forced them to resign. The following day, workers

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 73 of 79

protested and clashed with the management. On March 31, factory

management filed a criminal case against Bangladesh Garment and
Industrial Workers Federation general secretary Babul Akter for supporting
union activity at the factory and allegedly encouraging workers to engage in
violence in the factory. Criminal charges against Akter remained pending as
of November.

Labor groups reported violence, intimidation and unfair labor practices

against organizers, union leaders, and workers following the second
attempted union registration of the Sommilito Sramik Union at Mondol
Fashion. According to reports, on July 15, Mondol Fashion factory
authorities detained, beat, and threatened union leaders and members. On
July 29, factory management forced three union leaders to sign employment
termination orders. Labor groups reported that at least six union leaders
and members took shelter in the Sommilito Garment Shromik Federation
office while others left the area in fear for their lives.

During the year, the Ministry of Labour and Employment reported the
garment sector had 1,203 active trade unions and around 450 active
participation committees. Labor leaders, however, claimed much lower
numbers of trade unions, asserting intimidation, corruption, and violence
suppressed union organizing. The ministry reported the fisheries sector had
71 active unions. Only 70 tanneries were unionized under the sector’s single
union. The tea sector had one union, the largest in the country,

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 74 of 79

representing around 150,000 workers at 167 plantations.

b. Prohibition of Forced or Compulsory Labor

See the Department of State’s Trafficking in Persons Report at

https://www.state.gov/trafficking-in-persons-report/.

c. Prohibition of Child Labor and Minimum Age for

Employment

See the Department of Labor’s Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor at
https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/resources/reports/child-labor/findings.

d. Discrimination (see section 6)

e. Acceptable Conditions of Work

Wage and Hour Laws: The National Minimum Wage Board established
minimum monthly wages by sector. The minimum wage was not indexed to
inflation, but the board occasionally made cost-of-living adjustments to
wages in some sectors. None of the set minimum wages provided a
sufficient standard of living for urban dwellers, but many were above the
poverty level. Failure to pay the specified minimum wage was punishable by
imprisonment up to one year, a fine, or both, and the employer was
supposed to repay owed wages. There were 42 sectors under minimum
wage regulation. During the year, the government did not include any new
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 75 of 79

industrial sectors under the minimum wage regulation. Despite a labor law
requirement to revise the minimum wage every five years, wages in many
sectors long remained unchanged. Wages received little attention in sectors
lacking strong trade unions or labor organizations.

By law a standard workday was eight hours. A standard workweek was 48

hours, but the workweek could be extended to 60 hours subject to payment
of an overtime allowance double the basic wage. Overtime could not be
compulsory. Workers had to have one hour of rest if they worked for more
than six hours a day, or a half hour of rest for more than five hours’ work per
day. The law stated every worker should be allowed at least 11 festival
holidays with full wages in a year, fixed by the employer in consultation with
the collective bargaining agent, if any. Factory workers were supposed to
receive one day off every week. Shop workers received one-and-a-half days
off per week. The labor law did not specify a penalty for forced overtime or
failing to pay overtime wages.

Occupational Safety and Health: The law establishes occupational safety

and health (OSH) standards, and amendments to the law created mandatory
worker safety committees. The labor law specified sanctions when failure to
comply caused harm. Penalties for violations of OSH laws were
commensurate with those for crimes such as negligence.

Labor law implementing rules outlined the process for forming OSH
committees in factories. The committees included both management and
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 76 of 79

workers nominated by the collective bargaining agreement or, in absence of

an agreement, worker representatives of the factory’s participation
committee. Where there was no union or participation committee, the
Ministry of Labour and Employment was responsible for arranging
participation committee elections.

The highest number of workplace accidents took place in the transport,

construction, production, and service sectors. The construction and clothing
sectors were reportedly the deadliest for workers.

On May 4, a boiler explosion at the Rahima Industrial Complex Limited killed

seven workers. According to the fire service, the explosion occurred due to
excess temperature in the boiler chamber. During the investigation, the
DIFE found several safety violations including absence of safety equipment.

In 2022 the Ministry of Commerce approved and issued a framework

between the DIFE and the Ready-Made Garment Sustainability Council
(RSC), a private, tripartite organization with a mandate to oversee safety
standards at garment factories. Under the framework, the DIFE held
meetings with RSC; shared data and reports in prescribed format; conducted
technical discussion on safety monitoring; and established a joint working
group. The Ministry of Commerce supervised the activities of the RSC
through the Government Coordination Council. The council included
participation from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Textiles and
Jute, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Ministry of Industry, Bangladesh
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023
United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 77 of 79

Economic Zones Authority, and BEPZA.

The building code failed to meet basic international fire safety standards,
and government oversight of building safety outside the garment export
sector remained limited. Although prior work under the brand-led Accord
and similar programs improved structural, fire, and electrical safety
conditions in 2,300 ready-made garment factories producing for Western
brands, safety auditors reported fire detection and suppression systems in
these factories often did not work because they were not maintained
properly. The government’s National Initiative covers 1,549 additional RMG
factories producing for domestic sale or for export to other foreign markets.
Under the DIFE, the government formed a Remediation and Coordination
Cell to monitor and remediate National Initiative factories. The DIFE
oversaw an Industrial Safety Unit, consisting of seven engineers, to oversee
the National Initiative factories. The Industrial Safety Unit worked closely
with the RSC to monitor and remediate industrial safety standards in the
garment sector.

Wage, Hour, and OSH Enforcement: DIFE labor inspectors only had the
legal authority to make unannounced inspections in establishments outside
the EPZs. Within EPZs, the DIFE could only conduct announced inspections,
with limitations. The government did not effectively enforce minimum
wage, overtime, and OSH laws. Penalties for violations were not
commensurate with those for similar crimes and were rarely applied against

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 78 of 79

violators.

DIFE inspectors did not have authority to issue penalties or initiate

sanctions; they could notify establishments of violations in writing and file
complaints with the labor courts. The DIFE regularly filed cases with the
labor courts against employers for administrative violations of the law, such
as not maintaining documents. The Ministry of Labour and Employment
reported the DIFE filed cases against some factories for failure to pay
minimum wages and overtime during the year, but labor organizations saw
no cases.

There were criticisms regarding the DIFE’s complaint mechanism. A worker

had to enter their name, position, and identity number in the complaint
form. Once the complaint was received, the DIFE issued a letter to factory
management with reference to the complaint form, which identified the
complainant. This mechanism provided inadequate protections to workers
and raised doubts on efficacy. BEPZA maintains a helpline telephone
number for EPZ workers.

DIFE’s resources were inadequate to inspect and remediate problems

effectively. The factory inspection department had only 401 inspectors and
31 inspectorate offices to review safety matters in more than 530,000
production units and shops.

Although increased focus on the garment industry improved safety

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
 Page 79 of 79

compliance, resources, inspections, and remediation across other sectors

were inadequate. Legal limits on hours of work were routinely violated and
a labor rights NGO found 95 percent of factories did not comply with
overtime limits. Employers often required workers, including pregnant
women, to work 12 hours a day or more to meet quotas and export
deadlines, but they did not always properly compensate workers for their
overtime. Employers in many cases delayed workers’ pay or denied full
leave benefits.

According to the Labour Force Survey 2016-2017, of a total of 61 million

employed persons, 85 percent worked in the informal sector. Legal
protection for workers in the informal sector was inadequate although most
OSH incidents occurred there.

Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023

United States Department of State • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor