0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views16 pages

السلوك القيادي لدى المشرفين التربويين (المفتشين) في التّعامل مع المعلمين. (دراسة استطلاعية لدى مفتشي التربية والتعليم الابتدائي بمديرية التربية لولاية مستغانم)

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
80 views16 pages

السلوك القيادي لدى المشرفين التربويين (المفتشين) في التّعامل مع المعلمين. (دراسة استطلاعية لدى مفتشي التربية والتعليم الابتدائي بمديرية التربية لولاية مستغانم)

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ )ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺸﻴﻥ(‬


‫ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﹼﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ‪.‬‬
‫) ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﻁﻼﻋﻴﺔ ﻝﺩﻯ ﻤﻔﺘﺸﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ﺒﻤﺩﻴﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻝﻭﻻﻴﺔ ﻤﺴﺘﻐﺎﻨﻡ (‬

‫ﻤﺴﻜﻴﻥ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﷲ‬


‫ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﻭﻫﺭﺍﻥ ‪ ) 2-‬ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ(‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻠﺨﺹ‪:‬‬
‫ﻫﺩﻓﺕ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺌﺩ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤـل ﻤـﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤـﻴﻥ؛‬
‫ﻭﺘﻜﻭﻨﺕ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﻥ ‪ 30‬ﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﻭﻤﺸﺭﻓﺔ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﺒﻤﺩﻴﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﺒﻤﺴﺘﻐﺎﻨﻡ‪ ،‬ﺘﻡ ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭﻫﻡ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻋﺸﻭﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﺨـﻼل‬
‫ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﻲ )‪ ،(2014/2013‬ﻭﻝﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻡ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﺘ ‪‬ﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﹼﺤﻘﻕ ﻤـﻥ ﺩﻻﻻﺕ‬
‫ﺼﺩﻗﻪ ﻭﺜﺒﺎﺘﻪ؛ ﻭﺘﻭﺼﻠﺕ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻵﺘﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ - 1‬ﺃﻥ ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻝﻠﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺒﻤﺘﻭﺴـﻁ ﺤﺴـﺎﺒﻲ )‪ (91.47‬ﻭﺒـﺎﻨﺤﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻌﻴـﺎﺭﻱ‬
‫)‪ ،(5.28‬ﻭﺠﺎﺀ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﻴﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 2‬ﻋﺩﻡ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺘﻌﺯﻯ ﻝﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﺠﻨﺱ‪.‬‬

‫ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺎﺤﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ‪ ،‬ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ‬

‫‪Abstract:‬‬
‫‪This study aimed to know the prevailing leadership behavior of educational‬‬
‫‪supervisors in dealing with teachers.‬‬
‫‪The study sample consisted of 30 male and female educational supervisors in‬‬
‫‪Mostaganem Educational Directorate, was selected by the random sampling method for‬‬
‫‪the year (2013/2014), to achieve the study goals, the researcher has used leadership‬‬
‫‪behavior scale, and validity and reliability were tested and affirmed.‬‬
‫‪The study findings were as follows:‬‬
‫)‪1-The prevailing leadership behavior level of the educational supervisors was with (91.47‬‬
‫‪mean and (5.28) standard deviation, where the leadership behavior interested to work was‬‬
‫‪ranked first, then the leadership behavior interested to human relations came last.‬‬
‫‪2-There were no significant differences in the leadership behavior attributed to the sex.‬‬

‫‪Keywords : the leadership behavior, educational supervisors, the teachers‬‬

‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ﻤﻘﺩﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ‪:‬‬
‫ﻝﻘﺩ ﺃﻋﻁﺕ ﺍﻹﺼﻼﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻤﻭل ﺒﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻭﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺘﺼﻭﺭﺍ ﺁﺨﺭﺍ ﻝﻠﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﺒﺤﻴﺙ ﺃﺼﺒﺢ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ " ﺃﻥ ﻴﻜـﻭﻥ‬
‫ﺒﺎﻝﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﻤﺒﺩﻋﺎ‪ ،‬ﻤﺴﺘﻘﻼ ﺒﺫﺍﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻤﺼﻐﻴﺎ ﻝﺘﻼﻤﻴﺫﻩ‪ ،‬ﻤﻨﺸﻁﺎ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻤﻤﺎ ﻫﻭ ﻤﺒﻠﻎ ﻝﻠﻤﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺃﻭ ﻤﺤﺎﻀﺭ ﺃﻭ ﻗﺎﺭﺉ ﻝﻠﻤـﺫﻜﺭﺍﺕ "‬
‫)ﻗﺎﺴﻤﻲ ﺇﺒﺭﺍﻫﻴﻡ‪(15 :2004 ،‬؛ ﻭﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻝﻠﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻭﻁ ﺒﻪ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻁﺭﺍﺌـﻕ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﺩﺭﻴﺱ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻘﺭﺭ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﺘﻘﻭﻴﻡ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺒﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺠﻭﺍﻨﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻭﺓ ﻭﺍﻝﻀﻌﻑ ﻝﺩﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﺘﺭﺍﺡ ﺍﻝﺤﻠﻭل ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺎﺴﺒﺔ‬
‫ﻝﺫﻝﻙ؛ ﻭ ﻴﺭﻯ ﻴﻌﻘﻭﺒﻲ ﺃﻥ " ﻝﻠﻤﻔﺘﺵ‪ ،‬ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﺒﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﻜﻔﺎﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻴﺨﺘﻠﻑ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻠﻴﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﻤﺄﻝﻭﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻤﺜل ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺍﻗﺒـﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺃﻋﻤﺎل ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻭﻤﺤﺎﺴﺒﺘﻪ؛ ﺇﻨﻪ ﻤﻁﺎﻝﺏ ﺒﺄﻥ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﺒﻤﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻝﻭﺍﺴﻊ )ﻴﻌﻘﻭﺒﻲ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﺅﻤﻥ‪(115 :2004 ،‬؛‬
‫"ﻭﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻨﻌﻨﻲ ﺒﻪ ﺫﻝﻙ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺹ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺴﺘﻁﻴﻊ ﻋﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﺫﺍﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﺨﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﺤل ﺍﻝﺘﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻭﺃﻫـﺩﺍﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺅﺴﺴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﺒﻤﺎ ﻴﺘﻤﺘﻊ ﺒﻪ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﻗﺩﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺠﻴﻪ " )ﺃﺒﻭ ﺍﻝﻭﻓﺎ ﺠﻤﺎل‪(159 :2006 ،‬؛ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸـﺭﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ )ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ( ﺒﻭﺼﻔﻪ ﻗﺎﺌﺩﺍ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺎ "ﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻝﺩﻴﻪ ﺍﻝﻘﺩﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭ ﻝﻨﻤﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻬﻨـﺘﻬﻡ ﻋـﻥ‬
‫ﻁﺭﻴﻕ ﺇﺒﺭﺍﺯ ﻗﺩﺭﺍﺘﻬﻡ ﻭﺭﻋﺎﻴﺔ ﻤﻴﻭﻝﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﻭﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺘﻬﻡ ﻓﻲ ﻓﻬﻡ ﺍﻻﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺌﺩﺓ ﻭﺘﻐﻴﺭﻫﺎ ﻭﻓـﻲ ﻭﻀـﻊ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺎﻫﺞ ﻭﺍﻝﺒﺭﺍﻤﺞ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﺤﺎﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻼﻤﻴﺫ " )ﺘﺭﻜﻲ ﺭﺍﺒﺢ‪(484 :1990 ،‬؛ "ﻜﻤﺎ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺃﺴﺎﺱ ﻜـل‬
‫ﺍﻻﺘﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻝﺭﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻤﺤﻭﺭﻫﺎ‪ ،‬ﺤﻴﺙ ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻭﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺴﺘﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻹﺭﺸﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﹼﻭﺠﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﻓـﻲ ﻤﻴـﺩﺍﻥ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻬﻡ" )ﺍﻝﺸﺎﻴﺏ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ ﺍﻝﺴ‪‬ﺎﺴﻲ‪ ،(107 :2007 ،‬ﻭ"ﻤﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻴﺯﺍل ﻴﻘﻠﻕ ﻜﺜﻴﺭﺍ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺒﻴﻥ ﺒﺎﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻔﺘﻴﺵ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻭﻴﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺌﺩ ﻻ ﻴﻬﺩﻑ ﻓﻲ ﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﺤﻴﺎﻥ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺇﺼﻼﺡ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻭﺘﻌﺩﻴل ﻨﻘﺎﺌﺼﻪ ﻭﺘﺯﻭﻴﺩﻩ ﺒﻜل ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤـﺎﺕ ﺤـﻭل ﺍﻹﻨﺠـﺎﺯﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻘﻘﺔ ﻝﻜﻲ ﻴﺘﻤﻜﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﻭﺍﻝﺼﻌﻭﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻌﺘﺭﻀﻪ ﻭﻴﻜﻴﻑ ﻨﺸﺎﻁﻪ ﻭﻓﻘﻬﺎ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﺒﻜل ﺒﺴﺎﻁﺔ ﻻ‬
‫ﻴﺠﺩ ﺍﻝﻭﻗﺕ ﺍﻝﻜﺎﻓﻲ ﻝﻼﺘﺼﺎل ﺒﺎﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻭﺯﻴﺎﺭﺘﻪ ﻋﺩﺓ ﻤﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺴﻨﺔ؛ ﻭﺒﺴﺒﺏ ﺍﻨﻌﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﻐﺫﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺭﺠﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘـﻲ ﺘﺤﻘﻘﻬـﺎ ﻫـﺫﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺯﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻴﺒﻘﻰ ﻤﺤﺼﻭﺭﺍ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻗﺒﺔ " )ﺒﻥ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﷲ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ‪61،60 :2005 ،‬؛ ﻭﻤﻥ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺕ ﺒﺎﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺘﺒﻌﻪ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺘﻪ ﻨﺠﺩ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ‪ (1945) Halpin‬ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺃﺴﻔﺭﺕ ﻋﻥ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ‬
‫ﻨﻤﻁﻴﻥ ﻝﻠﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻫﻤﺎ )ﺍﻝﺤﺭﻴﺭﻱ‪ ،‬ﺭﺍﻓﺩﺓ ﻋﻤﺭ‪:(143 :2010 ،‬‬

‫ﺃ ـ ﻨﻤﻁ ﻴﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ‪ :‬ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﻴﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﻤﺸﺎﻋﺭ ﻤﺭﺅﻭﺴﻴﻪ ﻭﻴﺄﺨﺫﻫﺎ ﺒﻌﻴﻥ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ‪ ،‬ﻓﻬﻭ ﻴﻘﻴﻡ ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺇﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﻤﻌﻬﻡ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﻭﺍﻻﺤﺘﺭﺍﻡ ﻭﺍﻝﺜﻘﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﺒﺎﺩﻝﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺽ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭ ﻋﻥ ﻤﺸﺎﻋﺭ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﻭﻅﺭﻭﻓﻬﻡ ﻭﺍﺤﺘﻴﺎﺠﺎﺘﻬﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺏ ـ ﻨﻤﻁ ﻴﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل‪ :‬ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻁ ﻴﺭﻜﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻹﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺒﻐ ‪‬‬
‫ﻭﺘﻬﺩﻑ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻜﺸﻑ ﻋﻥ ﻫﺫﻴﻥ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻴﻴﻥ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﻥ ﺘﺘﻁﻠﺏ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻤﻌﻤﻘﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺠل ﺍﻝﻭﺼﻭل ﺒﺎﻷﺘﺒﺎﻉ ﻝﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻴﺼﺒﻭ ﺇﻝﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻴﺔ؛ ﻓﺎﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻓ ‪‬‬
‫ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﻭﺘﺭﻀﻲ ﺍﻝﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﻭﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﺍﻹﺠﻤﺎﻉ ﻝﺩﻴﻬﻡ‪.‬‬

‫ﺃﻭﻻ‪ :‬ﺇﺸﻜﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ‬


‫ﻴﺭﻯ ﺯﺒﺩﻱ )‪ (2002‬ﺃﻥ " ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﻔﻨﻲ ) ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﻔﺘﻴﺵ ( ﻴﻤﺜل ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻬﻭﺩ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺒﺫﻝﻪ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺌﻭل ﻋﻥ ﻫـﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﻤـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﻻﺴﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻭﺘﻨﺴﻴﻕ ﻭﺘﻭﺠﻴﻪ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭ ﻝﻠﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﺔ " )ﺯﺒﺩﻱ ﻨﺎﺼﺭ ﺍﻝـﺩﻴﻥ‪(143 :2007 ،‬؛ ﻜﻤـﺎ‬
‫ﻴﺭﻯ ﻋﺒﻭﻱ " ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﻔﻨﻲ ﻴﻌﻨﻰ ﺒﻪ ﺃﻨﻪ ﺍﻝﻭﺴﻴﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻴﺘﻡ ﺒﻬﺎ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻭﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﺠﻬﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼل‬
‫ﻤﺎ ﻴﻘﻭﻡ ﺒﻪ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻋﻤﺎل ﻤﺘﻨﻭﻋﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺼﻠﺔ ﺒﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﺘﺨﺼﺼﻪ ﻭﺘﻬﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻝﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺎﺴﺒﺔ ﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﺒﻨﺠﺎﺡ " )ﻋﺒﻭﻱ ﻤﻨﻴﺭ ﺯﻴﺩ‪،‬‬
‫‪" ،(31 :2007‬ﻭﺇﻥ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻬﺭﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻤﻲ ﻓﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺫﻝﻙ ﺃﻥ ﻝـﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍ‪ ،‬ﻭﻝﻠـﺩﻭﺭ ﺘﻭﻗﻌـﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻝﺴـﻠﻁﺔ‬
‫ﻀﺭﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﻝﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺘﻭﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺩﻭﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﻝﻜﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻗﺎﺩﺓ ﻴﺤﻘﻘﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﻭﻗﻌﺎﺕ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻕ ﺍﻹﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﻭﺒﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺴﻠﻁﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻜـﺯ‪ ،‬ﻗـﺩ‬

‫‪2‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻁﺔ ﻀﺭﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﻭﻝﻜﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻻ ﻴﺴﺭﻑ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻤﻥ ﻴﺭﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺴﻠﻁﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻜﺯ ﺘﻌـﻭﻕ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﻷﻥ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺘﻬﺩﻴﺩﺍ ﻝﻠﻤﺩﺭﺱ ﺒﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻹﺒﺩﺍﻉ ﻴﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺨﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﻬﺩﻴﺩ" )ﻋﻁﺎﺭﻱ ﺘﻭﻓﻴـﻕ ﻋـﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺁﺨـﺭﻴﻥ‪،‬‬
‫‪(86 :2005‬؛ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺃﻨﻪ "ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻭﺼﻑ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻴﺔ ﺒﺄﻨﹼﻬﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﺒﺎﻷﻫـﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴـﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺨﺒـﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺒﺎﻝﻁﺭﺍﺌﻕ ﻭﺍﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﻭﺍﻁﹼﻼﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺎ ﺘﻭﺼ‪‬ل ﺇﻝﻴﻪ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻡ ﺍﻝﺤﺩﻴﺙ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻭﺴﺎﺌل ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻨﻴﺔ " )ﺭﻴ‪‬ﺎﻥ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ ﻫﺎﺸﻡ ﻭﺁﺨﺭﻴﻥ‪:2010 ،‬‬
‫‪ ،(105‬ﻭﺍﻝﻨﻤﻁ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﻔﻌﺎل ﻏﺎﻝﺒﺎ ﻤﺎ ﻴﻅﻬﺭ ﺃﺜﺭﻩ ﻓﻲ ﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺃﺩﺍﺌﻬﻡ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻓﻌﺎل‪ ،‬ﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻨﻪ ﻴﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻝﺩﻴﻬﻡ ﻭﺭﻀﺎﻫﻡ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻘﻠﻴل ﻤﻥ ﺘﻌﺭﻀﻬﻡ ﻝﻺﺼﺎﺒﺔ ﺒﺎﻻﻀﻁﺭﺍﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺅﺜﺭ ﺴـﻠﺒﺎ ﻋﻠـﻰ‬
‫ﻤﺴﺎﺭﻫﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﻨﻲ ﻭﻓﻲ ﺘﻌﺎﻤﻠﻬﻡ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﺘﻼﻤﻴﺫ‪ ،‬ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻝﻪ ﺍﻝﻘﺩﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﻬـﻡ ﺍﻝﺨﺼـﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴـﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻝﻠﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﺠﻬﻭﺩﻫﻡ ﻭﺍﻻﻋﺘﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﻘﺩﺭﺍﺘﻬﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺘﻘﺒل ﺁﺭﺍﺌﻬﻡ ﻭﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭﻫﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﻋﻁﺎﺌﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺼﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺠل ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻭﻀﻊ‬
‫ﺤﻠﻭل ﻝﻠﻤﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻭﺍﺠﻬﻬﻡ؛ ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﺤﺘﻰ ﻴﻌﺯﺯ ﺍﻝﺭﻭﺍﺒﻁ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻜﺎﻓﺔ ﺃﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ؛ ﻭ ﻤﻥ ﺨـﻼل ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻴﻭﻤﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺅﺴﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﻗﺩ ﻻﺤﻅ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻗﺩ ﻴﺭﺘﻜﺏ ﻫﻔﻭﺍﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻤلﺀ ﺩﻓﺘﺭﻩ ﺍﻝﻴﻭﻤﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻴﻨﺴﻰ ﻜﺘﺎﺒﺔ ﻤﺫﻜﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻼ ﻴﺠﻌﻼﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﻴﻌﻁﻲ ﻜﺎﻤل ﺍﻨﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺘﻪ ﻝﻠﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﺒﺴﺒﺒﻬﻤﺎ ﻤﺘﻨﺎﺴﻴﹰﺎ ﺍﻝﻁﺒﻴﻌﺔ ﺍﻹﻨﺴـﺎﻨﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻴﻭﻤﻴﺔ ﻝﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﻤﺎ ‪ ...‬ﻫﺫﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺨﻁﺄﻴﻥ ﻤﺜ ﹰ‬
‫ﻝﻠﻔﺭﺩ ﻭﻅﺭﻭﻓﻪ ﺨﻼل ﺫﻝﻙ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻗﻑ؛ ﻭﻗﺩ ﻴﺤﺼﺭ ﺘﻘﻭﻴﻤﻪ ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼﻝﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻓﻲ ﺫﻝﻙ ﺍﻝﻴﻭﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﺫﺍﺕ؛ ﻨﺎﻫﻴﻙ ﻋﻥ ﻗﻠـﺔ ﺍﻝﺯﻴـﺎﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﻝﻠﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻨﺤﺼﺭ ــ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻐﺎﻝﺏ ــ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻻﻨﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻝﻬﺩ‪‬ﺍﻡ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﻜﻭ‪‬ﻥ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﺍﺘﺠﺎﻫـﺎﺕ ﺴـﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﻨﺤـﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪ .‬ﻫﺫﺍ ﻤﺎ ﺃﺜﺎﺭ ﻓﻀﻭل ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻝﻠﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺒﻬﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺒﻬﺩﻑ ﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﻨﻭﻉ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻴـﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺴـﺎﺌﺩ ﻝـﺩﻯ‬
‫ل ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺘﺩﺍﻋﻴﺎﺘﻪ ﻭﺍﻨﻌﻜﺎﺴﺎﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﻨﻲ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ؛ ﻷﻥ ﻝﻜ ّ‬
‫ﻭﻝﻘﺩ ﺘﻤﺤﻭﺭﺕ ﺇﺸﻜﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺴﺅﺍﻝﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺎﻝﻴﻴﻥ‪:‬‬
‫‪ 1‬ـ ﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺌﺩ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺠﻬﺔ ﻨﻅﺭﻫﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺒﻌﺩﻱ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤـل‬
‫ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ؟‬
‫‪ 2‬ـ ﻫل ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺘﻬﻡ ﻝﻠﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴـﺎﺩﻱ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤـل ﻤـﻊ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ؟‬

‫ﺜﺎﻨﻴﺎ‪ :‬ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ‬


‫‪ 1‬ـ ﺘﺘﺠﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ ﺘﻌﻁﻲ ﻨﻅﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﺤﻭل ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺴ‪‬ﺎﺌﺩ ﻝﺩﻴﻬﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 2‬ـ ﺘﺯﻭ‪‬ﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﺒﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻨﻅﺭﻴﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻝﻔﻌﺎﻝﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 3‬ـ ﻗﺩ ﺘﺅﺩﻱ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻜﻭﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﺃﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﺨﺩﻤﺔ ﻭﺘﺯﻭﻴﺩﻫﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻤﻥ ﺃﺠل ﻗﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻨﺤﻭ ﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺸﻭﺩﺓ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺘﺤﺩﺙ ﺘﻭﺍﺯﻨﹰﺎ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺇﻤﻜﺎﻨﺎﺘﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻗﺩﺭﺍﺘﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪.‬‬

‫ﺜﺎﻝﺜﺎ‪ :‬ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ‬


‫‪ 1‬ـ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺌﺩ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 2‬ـ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﻭﻕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺠﻨﺴﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ‪.‬‬

‫ﺭﺍﺒﻌﺎ‪ :‬ﻓﺭﻀﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ‪:‬‬


‫ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼل ﻤﺎ ﺘ ‪‬ﻡ ﻋﺭﻀﻪ ﻤﻥ ﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﺩﺒﻴﺔ ﺘﻡ ﺼﻴﺎﻏﺔ ﻓﺭﻀﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻜﻤﺎ ﻴﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪ 1‬ـ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺌﺩ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺠﻬﺔ ﻨﻅﺭﻫﻡ ﻴﺘﻤﺜل ﻓﻲ ﺒﻌـﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤـﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﺜ ‪‬ﻡ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﻭﺍﻝﻲ‪.‬‬

‫‪3‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫‪ 2‬ـ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺘﻬﻡ ﻝﻠﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴـﺎﺩﻱ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤـل ﻤـﻊ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻝﺼﺎﻝﺢ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ‪.‬‬

‫ﺨﺎﻤﺴﺎ‪ :‬ﺤﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ‬


‫ﻴﺘﺤﺩﺩ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻲ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝﻪ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺘﻤﺜل ﻓﻲ "ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻑ )ﺍﻝﻤﻔـﺘﺵ( ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒـﻭﻱ ﻓـﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ"‪ ،‬ﻭﺒﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻫﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺸﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﻌﻤﻠﻭﻥ ﺒﻤﺩﻴﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻝﻭﻻﻴـﺔ ﻤﺴـﺘﻐﺎﻨﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺒـﺎﻷﺩﺍﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺘﻤﺜﻠﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺴﺘﺒﺎﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ‪ ،‬ﻜﻤﺎ ﺘﺘﺤﺩﺩ ﺃﻴﻀﺎ ﺒﺎﻝﺯﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻝﻠﺫﺍﻥ ﺴﺘﺠﺭﻯ ﻓﻴﻬﻤـﺎ ﻭﻫﻤـﺎ ﺍﻝﻌـﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﻲ )‪ 2013‬ـ ‪ (2014‬ﺒﻤﺴﺘﻐﺎﻨﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺴﺘﻨﺎﻗﺵ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭ ﺇﻤﻜﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻀﻭﺀ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﺤﺩﻭﺩ ‪.‬‬

‫ﺴﺎﺩﺴﺎ‪ :‬ﺍﻝﻤﺼﻁﻠﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ‬


‫ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ‪ :‬ﻫﻭ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﺃﻨﺸﻁﺔ ﻭ ﻤﻬﺎﻡ ﻴﻘﻭﻡ ﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ )ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ( ﻭﻓﻕ ﺃﻨﻤﺎﻁ ﺴﻠﻭﻜﻴﺔ ﻤﺤـﺩﺩﺓ ﻓـﻲ‬ ‫‪.I‬‬
‫ﺘﻌﺎﻤﻠﻪ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭ ﻴﺘﺄﺜﺭ ﺴﻠﻭﻜﻬﻡ ﺒﻬﺎ؛ ﻭﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼﻝﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺴﻠﻭﻜﺎﺘﻪ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺴﻴﺘﻡ ﻗﻴﺎﺴﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼل ﺍﻝﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺴﺘﺘﻀﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺩﺓ ﻝﻬﺫﺍ ﺍﻝﻐﺭﺽ؛ ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﻓﻲ ﺴﻠﻭﻜﻴﻥ ﻫﻤﺎ‪:‬‬
‫‪ / 1‬ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﺤﻴﺙ ﻴﻘﻭﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﻜﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺒﺈﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻴﺼﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﺇﺘﺒـﺎﻉ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤـﻴﻥ‬
‫ﻝﻘﻭﺍﻋﺩ ﻭﻁﺭﻕ ﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﻭﻨﻤﻁﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻓﻲ ﺃﺩﺍﺌﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻭﻴﺘﺩﺨل ﻓﻲ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺫﻝﻙ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ ﻭﻜﻴﻑ ﻴ‪‬ﺅﺩﻯ ‪.‬‬
‫‪ /2‬ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺤﺎﺠﺎﺘﻬﻡ‪ ،‬ﺤﻴﺙ ﻴ‪‬ﻅﻬﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﻜﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺍﻤﺘﻨﺎﻨﻪ ﻝﻤﻥ ﻴﺅﺩﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﺒﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﺠﻴـﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻴﺭﻜـﺯ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺃﻨﻪ ﻤﺤﺏ ﻝﻬﻡ ﻭﻤﺤﺒﻭﺏ ﻤﻨﻬﻡ‪.‬‬
‫‪ .II‬ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ )ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ(‪ :‬ﻫﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﺒﺼﻔﺔ ﺍﺨﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﺍﺩ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺯﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻭﺁﺨﺭ ﻝﺘﻭﺠﻴﻪ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻭ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭ ﻝﻠﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ‪.‬‬
‫‪ .III‬ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ‪ :‬ﻫﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺌﻭل ﺍﻷﻭل ﻋﻥ ﺘﻨﺎﻭل ﺍﻝﻤﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺘﻭﻓﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﺠﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺎﺴﺏ ﻻﺴﺘﻐﻼﻝﻬﺎ ﻝﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻨﻤﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﻼﻤﻴﺫ ﻭﺍﻻﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ‬
‫ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻓﻀل ﺼﻭﺭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻁﺒﻘﺎ ﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻭﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ) ﻨﺎﺼﺭ ﺍﻝﺩﻴﻥ ﺯﺒﺩﻱ‪.(46 :2007 ،‬‬

‫ﺴﺎﺒﻌﺎ‪ :‬ﺍﻹﻁﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭﻱ‬


‫‪.I‬ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ /1‬ﺘﻌﺭﻴﻑ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻴﻌﺭﻑ ﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ " ﺒﺄﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺴﺘﻤﺎﻝﺔ ﺃﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻝﺠﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻝﻠﺘﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻫﺩﻑ ﻤﺸﺘﺭﻙ ﻴﺘﻔﻘﻭﻥ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﻭﻴﻘﺘﻨﻌﻭﻥ ﺒﺄﻫﻤﻴﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻴﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﻭﻥ ﻤﻌﺎ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﺘﻤﺎﺴﻙ ﺍﻝﺠﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺴﻴﺭﻫﺎ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻻﺘﺠـﺎﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺤﺎﻓﻅ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻜﺎﻤل ﻋﻤﻠﻬﺎ ؛ ﻭﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﺃﻴﻀﺎ ﺒﺄﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﻘﻭﻡ ﺒﻪ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺩ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻴﻭﺠﻪ ﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺠﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻨﺤﻭ ﻫﺩﻑ‬
‫ﻤﺸﺘﺭﻙ " )ﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﻗﺎﺴﻡ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ‪(116 :2011 ،‬؛ ﻜﻤﺎ ﻴﻌﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﻌﻴﺎﺼﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺒﺄﻨﻬﺎ "ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻝﻠﻘﻴﺎﻡ ﺒﻌﻤﻠﻬﻡ‬
‫ﺒﺤﻤﺎﺱ ﻭﻁﻭﺍﻋﻴﺔ ﺩﻭﻨﻤﺎ ﺤﺎﺠﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻁﺔ ﺍﻝﺭﺴﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﺎﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺤﻘﻴﻘﻴﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺴﺘﻤﺩ ﺴﻠﻁﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﻔﻌﻠﻴـﺔ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﻭﺨﺒﺭﺘﻪ ﻭﻗﺩﺭﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺠل ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻤﺔ " )ﺍﻝﻌﻴﺎﺼﺭﺓ ﻤﻌـﻥ ﻤﺤﻤـﻭﺩ‬
‫ﺃﺤﻤﺩ‪(25 :2008 ،‬؛ ﻭﻴﻌﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﻌﺠﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺒﺄﻨﻬﺎ " ﺍﻝﻘﺩﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌـﺩ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺘﻭﺠﻴﻬﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﻭﺠﻴﻪ ﺍﻝﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻝﻴﺤﻘﻘﻭﺍ ﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺸﻭﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻔﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻅل ﻋﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺇﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺠﻴﺩﺓ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﻭﺘﺎﺒﻌﻴـﻪ "‬
‫)ﺍﻝﻌﺠﻤﻲ ﺤﺴﻨﻴﻥ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ‪(22،19 :2008 ،‬‬

‫‪4‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫"ﻓﺎﻝﻘﺎﺩﺓ ﻫﻡ ﺃﻨﺎﺱ ﻴﻌﻁﻭﻥ ﺸﻜﻼ ﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻵﺨﺭﻴﻥ ﻭﺤﻭﺍﻓﺯﻫﻡ ﻭﺃﻓﻌﺎﻝﻬﻡ ﻭﺒﺸﻜل ﻤﺘﻜﺭﺭ ﻴﺒﺎﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺒﺈﺤـﺩﺍﺙ ﺍﻝﺘﻐﻴﻴـﺭ‬
‫ﻝﻠﻭﺼﻭل ﺇﻝﻰ ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﻭﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺠﺩﻴﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺘﺘﻁﻠﺏ ﻗﺩﺭﺍ ﻜﺒﻴﺭﺍ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﺎﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻁﺎﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻬﺎﺭﺓ " )ﻤﻴﺩﻝﻭﻭﺩ ﺩﻴﻔﻴـﺩ‪،‬‬
‫ﺒﻭﺵ ﺘﻭﻨﻲ‪.(17 :2010 ،‬‬

‫‪ /2‬ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻜﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ‪ :‬ﺘﺭﻜﺯ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻜﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﻭﻝﻴﺱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺴﻤﺎﺘﻪ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻤﻥ ﺃﻫـﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻨﺎﻭﻝﺕ ﺍﻝﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻜﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺃﻭﻫﺎﻴﻭ )ﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﻗﺎﺴﻡ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ‪:(157 :2011 ،‬‬
‫)ﺃ( ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺃﻭﻫﺎﻴﻭ‪ :‬ﻗﺎﻡ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺜﻴﻥ ﻭﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺱ ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺃﻭﻫﺎﻴﻭ ﺒﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺅﻭﺴﻴﻥ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺎ ﻴﻘﻭﻡ ﺒﻪ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺃﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﻗﻴﺎﻤﻪ ﺒﺎﻝﻭﻅﺎﺌﻑ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﺼﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻷﻓﻌﺎل ﺩﺍﺨل ﺍﻝﻤﺅﺴﺴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻝﻘﺩ ﻗﺎﻤﺕ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋـﺔ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺜﻴﻥ ﺒﺘﺨﻴل ﺒﻌﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺘﻴﻥ ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﺤﻴﺙ ﻴﻘﻭﻡ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺒﺈﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل‪ ،‬ﻭﻴﺼﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻀﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﺇﺘﺒﺎﻉ ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻝﻘﻭﺍﻋﺩ ﻭﻁﺭﻕ ﻤﺤﺩﺩﺓ ﻭﻨﻤﻁﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻌﻤل ﻭﻴﺘﺩﺨل ﻓﻲ ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﻤﺘﻁﻠﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل ﻭﻤﻥ ﻴﺅﺩﻴﻪ ﻭﻜﻴﻑ ﻴﺅﺩﻱ ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﻭﺤﺎﺠﺎﺘﻬﻡ‪ ،‬ﺤﻴﺙ ﺃﻅﻬﺭﺕ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﻴﻅﻬﺭ ﺍﻤﺘﻨﺎﻨﻪ ﻝﻤﻥ ﻴﺅﺩﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻪ ﺒﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﺠﻴﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻴﺭﻜـﺯ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻭﺃﻨﻪ ﻤﺤﺏ ﻝﻠﻨﺎﺱ ﻭﻤﺤﺒﻭﺏ ﻤﻨﻬﻡ ‪.‬ﻭﻤﻥ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻨﺘﺎﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻭﺼﻠﺕ ﺇﻝﻴﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻁ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﻭﺍﻷﻫﺩﺍﻑ‪ ،‬ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺭﻀﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺅﻭﺴﻴﻥ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل ﻏﻴﺭ ﺜﺎﺒﺘﺔ ﻭﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﺘﻭﺍﻓﻘﺔ ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻁ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺤﺎﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ‪ ،‬ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺭﻀﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺅﻭﺴﻴﻥ ﻋﺎﻝﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺒﺸﻜل ﺨﺎﺹ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﺒﻤﺩﻯ ﺤﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻔـﺭﺩ ﻓـﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻌﻤل ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﻝﻘﺩ ﺍﻨﻌﻜﺱ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺨل ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻜﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺒﺩﺍﻴﺎﺘﻪ ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼل ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺃﻭﻫﺎﻴﻭ ﻭﺘﻤﺜل ﻫﺩﻑ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴـﺔ ﻓـﻲ ﺘﺤﺩﻴـﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺍﻝﻔﻌﺎل ﻭﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺭﻀﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺅﻭﺴﻴﻥ ﻭﻤﺴﺘﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﺃﺩﺍﺌﻬﻡ ‪.‬‬
‫)ﺏ( ﻝﻴﻜﺭﺙ ﻭﻨﻅﻡ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺘﻁﺭﻕ ﻝﻴﻜﺭﺙ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺃﺭﺒﻌﺔ ﺃﻨﻅﻤﺔ ﻝﻠﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻜﺎﻝﺘﺎﻝﻲ )ﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﻗﺎﺴﻡ ﻤﺤﻤـﺩ‪،‬‬
‫‪:(159 :2011‬‬
‫ ﺍﻝﺘﺴﻠﻁﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﺒﺩ ‪ : Exploitive Autocratic‬ﻴﺭﻜﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻁﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﺨﻭﻴﻑ ﺍﺘﺠﺎﻩ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺅﻭﺴﻴﻥ ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻷﻭﺘﻭﻗﺭﺍﻁﻲ ﺍﻝﺨﻴﺭ ‪ : Benevolent Autocratic‬ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺒﺴﻴﻁﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﺔ ﻭﺃﻗل ﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯﺍ ﻝﻠﺴﻠﻁﺔ ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﺭﻙ ‪ : Participative‬ﻴﺘﻤﻴﺯ ﺒﺄﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﺔ ﻭﺜﻘﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺭﺌﻴﺱ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺭﺅﻭﺴﻴﻥ ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻝﺩﻴﻤﻘﺭﺍﻁﻲ ‪ : Democratic‬ﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺜﻘﺔ ﻤﻁﻠﻘﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺭﺌﻴﺱ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺭﺅﻭﺴﻴﻥ ﻭﻫﻭ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻁ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﻀـل ﻋﻨـﺩ‬
‫ﻝﻴﻜﺭﺙ‪ .‬ﻭﻝﻘﺩ ﺍﺴﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﻝﻴﻜﺭﺙ ﺒﺄﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺩﻴﻤﻘﺭﺍﻁﻴﺔ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻷﻭﺘﻭﻗﺭﺍﻁﻴﺔ ‪.‬‬
‫)ﺝ( ﻨﻅﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺸﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﺴﺘﻁﺎﻉ ﻜل ﻤﻥ ﺒﻠﻴﻙ ﻭﻤﻭﺘﻭﻥ ‪ Robert Blake et Mouton‬ﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺒﻴﻥ ﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ‬
‫ﻭﻫﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ‬
‫ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻹﻨﺘﺎﺝ‬
‫ﻭﻓﻲ ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻴﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻭﻝﻨﺄﺨﺫ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ )ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ( ﻜﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻓﻘﺩ ﻴﺘﺨﺫ ﺃﻨﻤﺎﻁـﺎ‬
‫ﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩﺓ )ﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﻗﺎﺴﻡ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ‪:(162،161 :2011 ،‬‬
‫ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺴﺤﺏ‪/‬ﺍﻝﺘﺴﻴﺒﻲ ‪ :‬ﻴﺘﺼﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﺒﻌﺩﻡ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻤﻪ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﻋﺩﻡ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻤﻪ ﻜﺫﻝﻙ ﺒﺘﺤﺼﻴل ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﻲ ﻝﻠﻁﻼﺏ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﻋﺩﻡ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻤﻪ ﺒﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﻜﺫﻝﻙ ﻤﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺘﺤﺼﻴل ﺍﻝﻁﻠﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﻬﻡ‬
‫ﻭﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺘﺴﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺒﺎﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺍﻝﺘﺴﻴﺒﻲ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺴﺤﺏ ‪.‬‬

‫‪5‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺎﻹﻨﺘﺎﺝ‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﻴﺘﺼﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﺒﺎﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﺎل ﺒﺘﺤﺼﻴل ﻭﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻨﻌﻜﺎﺴﺎﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺩﻯ ﺘﻘﺩﻡ ﺍﻝﻁﻠﺒـﺔ‬
‫ﻨﺤﻭ ﺍﻷﻓﻀل ﻤﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺘﺤﺼﻴﻠﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﻲ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺍﻻﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ‪ :‬ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﻓﻲ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﺍﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻤﻪ ﺒﺤﺎﺠﺎﺘﻬﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺍﻝﻭﺴﻁ‪ :‬ﻭﻴﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻁ ﺒﻤﻨﺘﺼﻑ ﺍﻝﻁﺭﻴﻕ ﺤﻴﺙ ﻴﺘﺼﻑ ﺒﺎﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﺒﺄﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺇﻨﺘﺎﺠﻬﻡ‬
‫ﻭﻤﺎ ﻴﻘﺩﻤﻭﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺇﻨﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺠل ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﻭﺘﻘﺩﻡ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺍﻝﻁﻠﺒﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﺜﺎﻝﻲ‪ :‬ﻭﻴﺴﻤﻰ ﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻁ ﺒﻘﺎﺌﺩ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﻴﻕ‪ ،‬ﺤﻴﺙ ﻴﺘﺼﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﺒﺎﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﺎل ﺒﺎﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﻤﻌﻬﻡ‬
‫ﻭﺘﻠﻤﺱ ﺍﺤﺘﻴﺎﺠﺎﺘﻬﻡ ﻭﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﺘﻬﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ‪.‬‬

‫ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‬ ‫‪.II‬‬


‫‪ /1‬ﺘﻌﺭﻴﻑ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪:‬‬
‫ﻴﻌﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﻌﻴﺎﺼﺭﺓ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺒﺄﻨﻪ " ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻗﻴﺎﺩﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺇﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺘﻌﺎﻭﻨﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺘﻭﺠﻴﻬﻴﺔ ﺘﺴﻌﻰ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻤﺴـﺎﻋﺩﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻨﻤﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﻨﻲ ﻝﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻨﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻡ " )ﺍﻝﻌﻴﺎﺼﺭﺓ ﻤﻌﻥ ﻤﺤﻤـﻭﺩ ﺃﺤﻤـﺩ‪(66 :2008 ،‬؛ ﻭﻴﻌـﺭﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻌﺠﻤﻲ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺒﺄﻨﻪ "ﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺍﻝﺠﻬﻭﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﺒﺫﻭﻝﺔ ﻝﻠﺘﺄﺜﻴﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺠل ﺘﺤﺴﻴﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻡ " )ﺍﻝﻌﺠﻤـﻲ‬
‫ﺤﺴﻨﻴﻥ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ‪(84 :2008 ،‬؛ ﻜﻤﺎ ﻴﻌﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﻌﺒﻴﺩﻱ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺒﺄﻨﻪ "ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻬﻭﺩ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺒﺫل ﻹﺜﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻫﺘﻤـﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤـﻴﻥ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺘﻨﺴﻴﻕ ﻭﺘﻭﺠﻴﻪ ﻨﻤﻭﻫﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭ ﻜﺄﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻭﺠﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺤﺘﹼﻰ ﻴﻤﻜﻨﻬﻡ ﻤﻥ ﻓﻬﻡ ﻭﻅﻴﻔﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﺤﺘﹼﻰ ﻴﻤﻜﻨﻬﻡ ﻤـﻥ ﺃﺩﺍﺀ ﺃﻋﻤـﺎﻝﻬﻡ‬
‫ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺃﻜﺜﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﻴﺔ" )ﺍﻝﻌﺒﻴﺩﻱ ﺠﺎﺴﻡ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ‪.(80 :2010 ،‬‬
‫ﻭﻤﻥ ﺨﻼل ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺭﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﻭل ﺒﺄﻥ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﻫﺎﺩﻓﺔ ﺘﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﻝـﻰ ﻗﻴـﺎﺩﺓ ﻓﻌﺎﹼﻝـﺔ ﺘﻬـﺘﻡ‬
‫ﺒﺎﻝﺠﺎﻨﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻲ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻬﻨﻲ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺠل ﺇﺤﺩﺍﺙ ﺘﻐﻴﻴﺭ ﺇﻴﺠﺎﺒﻲ ﻴﻤﻜﹼﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﻤﺨﺭﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﻴﺤﻘـﻕ ﺍﻝﺭﻀـﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻬﻨﻲ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻭﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺤﺎﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻠﻤﻴﺫ ﻭﺍﻝﺭﻗﻲ ﺒﻤﺴﺘﻭﺍﻩ‪.‬‬

‫‪ /2‬ﺃﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪:‬‬


‫ﺃ ـ ﺍﻝﺯﻴﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺼ‪‬ﻔﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺘﻌﺭ‪‬ﻑ ﺍﻝﺯﻴﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺼ‪‬ﻔﻴﺔ ﺒﺄﻨﹼﻬﺎ " ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻭﺴﺎﺌل ﺍﻝﻤﻬﻤ‪‬ﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺭﻜﹼﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺘﺼﺎل ﺍﻝﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸـﺭﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻭﻋﻨﺎﺼﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻗﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ ﻜﻜل " )ﻋﻭﺩﺓ ﺃﺤﻤﺩ ﺒﻼل‪.(27 :2009 ،‬‬
‫ﺏ ـ ﺍﻝﻠﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ‪" :‬ﻴﻭﺼﻑ ﺍﻝﻠﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﺒﺄﻨﻪ ﺍﺠﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻫﺎﺩﻑ‪ ،‬ﻴﻘﻭﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺒﺩﺃ ﺍﻝﺜﻘﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﺒﺎﺩﻝﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ؛ ﻴﺘﻡ ﻋﻘﺩ ﺍﻝﻠﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻗﺒل ﺃﻭ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻝﺯﻴﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺼﻔﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻓﻲ ﺒﺩﺍﻴـﺔ ﺍﻝﻌـﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﻲ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻲ ﺃﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﺘﺩﺭﻴﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺃﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ " )ﻋﻁﺎﺭﻱ ﺘﻭﻓﻴﻕ ﻭﺁﺨﺭﻴﻥ‪.(240 :2005 ،‬‬
‫ﺕ ـ ﺍﻝﻨﺩﻭﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺘﻌﺭ‪‬ﻑ ﺍﻝﻨﺩﻭﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﺒﺄﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺠﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻴﺨﻁﻁ ﻝﻪ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻭﻴﺘﻨﺎﻗﺵ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﺤـﻭل‬
‫ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺫﻝﻙ ﻭﻓﻕ ﺠﺩﻭل ﺯﻤﻨﻲ ﻴﺴﻤ‪‬ﻰ ﺒﺨﻁﹼﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻜﻭﻴﻥ‪ ،‬ﻴﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﺨﻼل ﻜل ﻓﺼل ﺩﺭﺍﺴﻲ؛ ﻭﻴﺠﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻤﺭﺍﻋﺎﺓ ﺃﻤﻭﺭ ﻫﺎﻤﺔ ﻝﻀﻤﺎﻥ ﻨﺠﺎﺡ ﺍﻝﻨﺩﻭﺓ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ )ﻋﻁﺎﺭﻱ ﺘﻭﻓﻴﻕ ﻋﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺁﺨـﺭﻴﻥ‪:(274 :2005 ،‬‬
‫ﺍﻹﻋﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻝﺠﻴﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ‪ ،‬ﻭﻜﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ﺍﻷﺩﻭﺍﺭ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺃﻋﻀﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﻨﺩﻭﺓ‪ ،‬ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﺴﻴﻕ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺒﻴـﻨﻬﻡ‬
‫ﻝﺘﺠﻨﺏ ﺍﻝﺘﻜﺭﺍﺭ‪ ،‬ﻭﺘﺤﺩﻴﺩ ﺍﻝﺯﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺭﺭ ﻝﻜل ﻤﺸﺎﺭﻙ؛ ﻭﺍﻝﻌﻤل ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﺄﻜﻴﺩ ﺍﻝﻨﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻝﺭﺌﻴﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺇﺒﺭﺍﺯﻫﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻨـﺩﻭﺓ ﺒﺸـﻜل‬
‫ﻤﻠﺨﺹ‪ ،‬ﻤﻊ ﺘﻭﺠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﺍﻹﺤﺎﻁﺔ ﺒﻤﻭﻀﻭﻉ ﺍﻝﻨﺩﻭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﺠﻤﻴﻊ ﺠﻭﺍﻨﺒﻪ؛ ﻭﺍﻝﺤﺭﺹ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻀﺒﻁ ﺍﻝﺯﻤﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺭﺭ ﻝﻜل ﻤﺘﺤﺩﺙ ﻭﺍﻝﺯﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺨﺼﺹ ﻝﻠﻨﻘﺎﺵ‪ ،‬ﻭﺇﺘﺎﺤﺔ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺼﺔ ﻷﻜﺒﺭ ﻋﺩﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﻴﻥ ﻹﺒﺩﺍﺀ ﺁﺭﺍﺌﻬﻡ‪.‬‬

‫‪6‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ﺙ ـ ﺍﻝﻭﺭﺸﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻴﻌﺭﻓﻬﺎ ﻋﺎﻴﺵ )‪ (2010‬ﺒﺄﻨﻬﺎ "ﺍﺠﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻴﺘﻴﺢ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺼﺔ ﻝﻬﻡ ﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻤﺸـﻜﻠﺔ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻋﻼﺠﻬﺎ ﺘﺤﺕ ﺇﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﻴﻌﻤل ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺘﺭﻜﻭﻥ ﺃﻓﺭﺍﺩﺍ ﺃﻭ ﺠﻤﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻭﻗﺕ ﻭﺍﺤﺩ‪ ،‬ﺒﻌﻴﺩﺍ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﹼﻘﻴ‪‬ﺩ‬
‫ﺒﺎﻝﺸﻜﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺭ‪‬ﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺼﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻝﺘﺩﺭﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ" )ﻋﺎﻴﺵ ﺠﻤﻴل ﺃﺤﻤﺩ‪.(309 :2010 ،‬‬
‫ﺝ ـ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﻭﺱ ﺍﻝﺘﻭﻀﻴﺤﻴﺔ )ﺍﻝﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ(‪ :‬ﻴﺭﻯ ﺍﻝﻌﻴﺎﺼﺭﺓ ﺃﻨﻬﺎ " ﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻴﻘﻭﻡ ﺒﻪ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺃﻭ ﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻤﺘﻤﻴﺯ ﺩﺍﺨل ﺍﻝﺼﻑ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺒﺤﻀﻭﺭ ﻋﺩﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻝﻌﺭﺽ ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺘﺩﺭﻴﺱ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺃﻱ ﻤﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻴﺭﻏﺏ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﻓﻲ ﺇﻗﻨﺎﻉ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﺒﻔﺎﻋﻠﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺃﻫﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻤﻬﺎ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻤﺤﺴﻭﺴﺔ " )ﺍﻝﻌﻴﺎﺼﺭﺓ ﻤﻌﻥ ﻤﺤﻤﻭﺩ ﺃﺤﻤﺩ‪.(71 :2008 ،‬‬

‫‪ /3‬ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺘﻜﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻴﺔ ﻝﻺﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪ :‬ﻴﺨﺘﺼﺭ ﺍﻝﻌﻴﺎﺼﺭﺓ ﺃﺴﺎﺴﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﻘﻴـﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻠﻤﺸـﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒـﻭﻱ )‪(2010‬‬
‫)ﺍﻝﻌﻴﺎﺼﺭﺓ ﻤﻌﻥ ﻤﺤﻤﻭﺩ ﺃﺤﻤﺩ‪ (90،87 :2008 ،‬ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻴﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃ ـ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺘﻜﺯ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﺒﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻡ‪ :‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﻭﻜﺫﻝﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻔﻬﻤﻭﺍ ﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻬﺎﺝ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺩﺭﺱ‬
‫ﻓﺎﻝﺘﺭﻜﻴﺯ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻨﺸﺎﻁ ﺍﻝﺘﻼﻤﻴﺫ ﻓﻲ ﺴﻌﻴﻬﻡ ﻝﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻔﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻀﻤﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻭﺤﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻬﺎﺝ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺏ ـ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺘﻜﺯ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﻨﻬﺎﺝ‪ :‬ﺇﻥ ﻤﺭﺍﺠﻌﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﻝﻨﻭﻉ ﺍﻝﻨﺸﺎﻁﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻴﻌﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻭﻨﻭﻋﻴﺔ ﺍﻻﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ‬
‫ﻴﻀﻌﻬﺎ ﻝﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﺘﻌﻠﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﻼﻤﻴﺫ ﻗﺩ ﺘﻜﺸﻑ ﻝﻪ ﺍﻝﻜﺜﻴﺭ ﻋﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺃﺒﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻬﺎﺝ ﺍﻝﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺨﻁﻴﻁ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻡ ‪.‬‬
‫ﺕ ـ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺘﻜﺯ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﺒﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ‪ :‬ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﻤﻌﻨﺎ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﺍﻝﺼﻔﻲ ﻨﻼﺤﻅ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻴﻘﻭﻡ ﺒﻨﺸـﺎﻁﺎﺕ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺩﺍﺨل ﻏﺭﻓﺔ ﺍﻝﺼﻑ ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼل ﺘﺨﻁﻴﻁﻪ ﻝﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﻨﺸﺎﻁﺎﺕ ﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﺇﻴﺠﺎﺩ ﺠﻭ ﻤﺭﻴﺢ ﻝﻠﻌﻤل ﻴﺤﻔﺯ ﺍﻝﺘﻼﻤﻴﺫ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻡ‪،‬‬
‫ﺃﻭ ﻝﻤﺴﺎﻋﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﻼﻤﻴﺫ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻴﻜﻭﻨﻭﺍ ﻤﺸﺎﺭﻜﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺇﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪ /4‬ﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪ :‬ﺘﺘﻌﺩﺩ ﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ؛ ﺤﻴﺙ ﻴﺤﺼﺭﻫﺎ ﺒﻭﺴـﻌﺩﺓ )‪) (2010‬ﺒﻭﺴـﻌﺩﺓ ﻗﺎﺴـﻡ‪،‬‬
‫‪ (122،119 :2010‬ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻴﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫‪ 1‬ـ ﺍﻝﻌﺩﺩ ﺍﻝﻀﺨﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺨﺘﻼﻑ ﺤﺎﻻﺘﻬﻡ ﻜﺎﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﻝﻤﻐﺭﻭﺭ ﻭﺸﺩﻴﺩ ﺍﻝﺤﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻘﺩ‪‬ﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺴ‪‬ـﻥ‬
‫‪ ...‬ﺍﻝﺦ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 2‬ـ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺎﺠﻤﺔ ﻋﻥ ﻜﺜﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻨﹼﺯﺍﻋﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺃﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻐﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻘﺼﻴﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻝﻁﻭﻴﻠﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺩﻯ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻷﻤﻭﻤﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﺴﺘﻴﺩﺍﻉ ‪ ...‬ﺍﻝﺦ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 3‬ـ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺼ‪‬ﺔ ﻭﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻤﻜﺎﺘﺏ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻭﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻝﻭﺴﺎﺌل ﺍﻝﻀﺭﻭﺭﻴﺔ ﻝﻌﻤﻠﻪ ‪ ...‬ﺍﻝﺦ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 4‬ـ "ﺘﺸﺘﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺍﺭﺱ ﻭﺘﺒﺎﻋﺩﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺘﹼﺴﺎﻉ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺍﺭﺱ ﻤﻤ‪‬ﺎ ﻴﺸﻜﹼل ﺼﻌﻭﺒﺔ ﺍﻻﻨﺘﻘﺎل ﺒﺴـﺭﻋﺔ ﻤﻤ‪‬ـﺎ ﻴﻘﻠـل ﻋـﺩﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺯ‪‬ﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺒﺎﻝﺘﺎﻝﻲ ﻴﻘﻠل ﻤﻥ ﺍﺤﺘﻤﺎل ﺍﻻﺘﺼﺎل ﺍﻝﻤﺒﺎﺸﺭ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺩﺍﺭﺱ" )ﺯﺍﻴﺩ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﻁﺎﻑ‪.(120 :2008 ،‬‬

‫ﺜﺎﻤﻨﺎ‪ :‬ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ‬


‫‪ .I‬ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺩﺍﺭﻭﻱ )‪ :(1988‬ﺒﻌﻨﻭﺍﻥ "ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺠﻬﺔ ﻨﻅﺭ ﻤﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻓﻲ ﺒﻐﺩﺍﺩ"؛‬
‫ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻫﺩﻓﺕ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻹﺠﺎﺒﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﺴﺅﺍﻝﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺎﻝﻴﻴﻥ‪:‬‬
‫‪ 1‬ـ ﻤﺎ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻭﺠﻬﺔ ﻨﻅﺭ ﻤﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﻤﻌﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺒﻌـﺩﻱ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻌﻤل ﻭﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ؟‬

‫‪7‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫‪ 2‬ـ ﻫل ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻨﻅﺭﺘﻬﻡ ﻝﻠﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒـﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻓـﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺒﻌﺩﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺫﻜﻭﺭﻴﻥ ﺁﻨﻔﺎﹰ؟‬
‫ﺘﻜﻭﻨﺕ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻤﻥ ‪ 700‬ﻓﺭﺩ ﺒﻭﺍﻗﻊ ‪ 200‬ﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻭ‪ 500‬ﻤﻌﻠﻤﺔ ﻴﻌﻤﻠﻭﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺩﺍﺭﺱ ﺒﻐﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻝﻨﻬﺎﺭﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺴـﺘﺨﺩﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﻝﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺘﻡ ﺒﻨﺎﺅﻩ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻤﻥ ﺼﺩﻗﻪ ﻭﺜﺒﺎﺘـﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺴـﺘﺨﺩﻡ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤـﺙ ﺍﻝﻭﺴـﺎﺌل‬
‫ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﻤﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﻭﺴﻁ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺠﺢ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﺎﺌﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﺒﻴﺭﺴﻭﻥ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺘﻭﺼ‪‬ل ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ "ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺘﺎﻝﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺇﻥ ﻭﺼﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻝﻠﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴـﺎﺕ ﻜـﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻝﻴـﹰﺎ ﻷﻏﻠـﺏ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻘﻊ ﻀﻤﻥ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل‪ ،‬ﻜﺫﻝﻙ ﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻝﻴﹰﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻘﻊ ﻀﻤﻥ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﺎ ﻴﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻭﻥ ﻭﻤﺎ ﺘﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺒﺎﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻝﻠﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺹ ﺒﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﻤـل‬
‫ﻭﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﻝﺼﺎﻝﺢ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫‪ .II‬ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺎﺩ )‪ :(1989‬ﺒﻌﻨﻭﺍﻥ "ﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻪ ﺒﺎﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻨﺤﻭ ﺍﻹﺸـﺭﺍﻑ"‪ ،‬ﻭﻫـﺩﻓﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﺎ ﺒﺎﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻨﺤﻭ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒـﻭﻱ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺘﻜﻭﻨﺕ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﻥ ‪ 20‬ﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎ ﺃﺨﺫﻭﺍ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻋﺸﻭﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﻁﺒﻘﻴﺔ ﺤﺴﺏ ﺍﻝﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﺨﺼﺹ ﻭﻤﻥ ‪ 120‬ﻤﻌﻠﻤﹰﺎ ﻭﻤﻌﻠﻤﺔ‬
‫ﺒﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺜﻼﺙ ﻤﻌﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻭﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻝﻜل ﻤﺸﺭﻑ؛ ﻭﻝﻺﺠﺎﺒﺔ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﺴﺅﺍل ﺍﻝﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﺒﺘﺴﺠﻴل ﺃﺭﺒﻌﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺜﻤﺎﻨﻴﻥ ﻤﺅﺘﻤﺭﹰﺍ ﺇﺸﺭﺍﻓﻴﺎ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ‪ ،‬ﺤﻠﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﻓﻕ ﻨﻅﺎﻡ ﺒﻠﻤﺒﺭﻍ ﻝﻠﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺍﻝﻠﻔﻅﻲ‪ ،‬ﻭﻓﺭﻏﻬـﺎ ﻓـﻲ ﻤﺼـﻔﻭﻓﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﻝﻠﺘﻔﺎﻋل )‪ ،(15 × 15‬ﺜﻡ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺒﺩﻤﺠﻬﺎ ﺠﻤﻴﻌﹰﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺼﻔﻭﻓﺔ ﻝﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺏ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻤ‪‬ﺔ ﻝﻠﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﺴ‪‬ﻠﻭﻜﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸـﺭﺍﻓﻴﺔ‪،‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﹼﺴﺏ ﻝﻭﺼﻑ ﺍﻝﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﺴ‪‬ﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺤﺩﺩﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﻴﺔ؛ ﻭﻻﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﻀﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻗـﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤـﺙ‬
‫ﺒﺎﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻌﺩﺩ ﺍﻝﺘﺩﺭﺝ‪ ،‬ﻝﻠﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺴ‪‬ﺕ‪ ،‬ﻭﺨﺒﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﻤﻥ ﺠﻬﺔ ﻜﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﻤﺴﺘﻘﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻨﺤﻭ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﻤﻥ ﺠﻬﺔ ﺃﺨﺭﻯ ﻜﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﺘﺎﺒﻊ؛ ﻭﺘﻭﺼﻠﺕ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ‬
‫ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺘﺎﻝﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ ﺇﻥ ﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﺘﻤﻴل ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻋﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﺩ ﺍﺘﹼﺼﻑ ﺍﻝﺴـﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻹﺸـﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺒﺎﺸـﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻝﺸﹼـﺭﺡ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻻﺴﺘﺌﺜﺎﺭ ﺒﺎﻝﺤﺩﻴﺙ‪ ،‬ﻜﻤﺎ ﺍﺘﹼﺼﻑ ﺒﺎﻝﻼﻭﺩ‪‬ﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻨﻘﺩ ﻭﻋﺩﻡ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﺭﺘﺒﻁﺕ ﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﺒﺎﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺴﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻨﺤﻭ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺇﻥ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺒﺎﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺸﺭﺤﺘﻪ ﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺴ‪‬ﺕ ﻭﺨﺒﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﻤﻥ ﺠﻬﺔ ﻜﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﻤﺴـﺘﻘﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﺒﺎﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻨﺤﻭ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺒﻠﻐﺕ )‪ (%57‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﻝﻴﺴﺕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺘﻤﻴ‪‬ﺯ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺩﺡ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﻭﺘﻭﺠﻴﻪ ﺍﻝﺴﺅﺍل ﻭﺘﻘﺒل ﺃﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﻤﺸﺎﻋﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤـﻴﻥ؛ ﺍﻗﺘـﺭﻥ ﺒﺎﺘﺠﺎﻫـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺇﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻨﺤﻭ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ‪.‬‬
‫‪ .III‬ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺒﻭﺤﻔﺹ ﻤﺒﺎﺭﻜﻲ )‪ :(1993‬ﺒﻌﻨﻭﺍﻥ "ﺤﻭل ﺍﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺸﻴﻥ )ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ( ﻨﺤﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ"‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺩﻓﺕ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻭﻗﻭﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤـﺩﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﺴـﻴﺔ )ﺍﻝﻁـﻭﺭ‪1‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻝﻁﻭﺭ‪ ،(2‬ﻭﻤﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﺩ‪‬ﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﻠﻌﺒﻪ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻘﻭﻴﻡ ﻭﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﺍﻨﻁﻼﻗﹰﺎ ﻤﻥ ﺍﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻜل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒـﻭﻱ‬
‫ﻨﺤﻭ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺃﺴﺱ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻭﻴﻡ‪ .‬ﻭﺃﺒﺭﺯﺕ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﺎ ﻴﺄﺘﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ـ ﺘﺭﻯ ﻓﺌﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ ﺒﺄﻥ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺫﻭ ﻁﺎﺒﻊ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻭﻴﻡ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻌﺎﻤﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺠﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ‪،‬‬
‫ﻓﻲ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻴﺭﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺸﻭﻥ ﺒﺄﻥ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﻓﻲ ﺤﻘﻴﻘﺘﻪ ﺇﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻨﻅﺭﹰﺍ ﻝﻠﻨﻘﺹ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﻭﻨﺔ ﻝﻪ‪ ،‬ﻤﻥ‬

‫‪8‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ﺘﻜﻭﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺸﻴﻥ ﻭﻗﻠﹼﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻠﺘﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺨﺼﺼﺔ ﻝﻬﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻨﻘﺹ ﺍﻝﻌﺩﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻝﻨﹼﻭﻋﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﻔﺘﺸﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﹼﺫﻱ ﺘﺘﻁﻠﺒـﻪ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻭﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﺤﺎﻝﻴﹰﺎ‪.‬‬
‫ـ ﺘﺭﻯ ﻓﺌﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ ﺒﺄﻥ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻲ )ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻭﻴﻡ( ﻴﺭﺘﻜﺯ ﺃﺴﺎﺴﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺠﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻲ‪ ،‬ﺒﻌﻴﺩﹰﺍ ﻋﻥ ﺃﺴـﺱ ﺍﻝﻘﻴـﺎﺱ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤﻲ‪ ،‬ﻓﻲ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻴﺭﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺸﻭﻥ ﺒﺄﻥ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ )ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻭﻴﻡ( ﺒﻌﻴﺩ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﺩ‪‬ﻗﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻨﻅﺭﹰﺍ ﻝﻼﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺫﻜﻭﺭﺓ‬
‫ﺃﻋﻼﻩ‪.‬‬
‫‪ .IV‬ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺯﺒﺩﻱ ﻨﺎﺼﺭ ﺍﻝﺩﻴﻥ)‪ :(2002‬ﺒﻌﻨﻭﺍﻥ " ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﺼﻔﻴﺔ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭﻱ "؛ ﻭﺍﻝﺘـﻲ ﻫـﺩﻓﺕ ﺇﻝـﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺭﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺴﺎﻫﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺇﻴﺠﺎﺩ ﻋﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻠﻕ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭﻱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﺍﻨﻌﻜﺎﺴﺎﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺤﻴﺎﺘﻪ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻭﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺘﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﺒﻴﺌﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ؛ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺘﻬﺩﻑ ﺃﻴﻀﺎ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻝﻔﺕ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻨﻴﻴﻥ ﺒﺸﺅﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴـﻴﻥ‪ ،‬ﺒﻀـﺭﻭﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻌﻨﺎﻴـﺔ‬
‫ﺒﺎﻝﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺠﺴﺩﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﺴﺘﺨﺭﺠﺕ ﺍﻝﻌﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﻭﺴﺔ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻋﺸـﻭﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﻤـﻥ ﺒـﻴﻥ ﻤﺩﺭﺴـﻲ ﻤﺨﺘﻠـﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺅﺴﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺤﻴﺙ ﺘﻜﻭﻨﺕ ﻤﻥ ‪ 754‬ﻤﺩﺭﺴﺎ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺠﻨﺴﻴﻥ‪ ،‬ﺃﻓﺭﺯﺕ ﻜﻤﺎ ﻴﻠﻲ‪:‬‬

‫ﺍﻝﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺃ ‪ :‬ﺘﺘﻀﻤﻥ ‪ 523‬ﻤﺩﺭﺴﺎ ﻤﺼﺎﺒﺎ ﺒﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻷﻤﺭﺍﺽ ﺍﻝﺠﺴﻤﻴﺔ‪.‬‬


‫ﺍﻝﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﺏ ‪ :‬ﺘﺘﻀﻤﻥ ‪ 231‬ﻤﺩﺭﺴﺎ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﺼﺎﺏ ﺒﺄﻱ ﻤﺭﺽ ﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﺤﺴﺏ ﺘﺼﺭﻴﺤﻬﻡ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻭﺴﺎﺌل ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺎﻝﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ 1‬ـ ﺍﻝﻤﻼﺤﻅﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻀﻤﺕ ﺒﻁﺎﻗﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻼﺤﻅﺔ ﺃﺭﺒﻌﺔ ﻓﺌﺎﺕ ﻜﺴﻠﻭﻜﻴﺎﺕ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﻀﺒﻁﻬﺎ ﻝﻠﻤﻼﺤﻅﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻝﺤﺭﻜﺎﺕ ـ ﻤﻼﻤﺢ ﺍﻝﻭﺠﻪ ـ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻌﻭﺍﻁﻑ ـ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺀ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 2‬ـ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﻨﻭﻋﺎﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺃﻨﻭﺍﻉ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺒﻼﺕ؛ ﺤﻴﺙ ﻁﺒﻘﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﻴﺩﺓ ﺒﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻝﺘﺴﺎﺅﻻﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺤـﺩﺩﺓ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺴﻁﺭﺓ ﻤﺴﺒﻘﺎ‪ ،‬ﻜﻤﺎ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻡ ﺍﻝﻨﻭﻉ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ ﻭﻫﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺠل ﺘﺭﻙ ﺍﻝﺤﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻁﻠﻘﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﺴﺘﺠﻭﺏ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺠل ﺇﻀﺎﻓﺔ‬
‫ﻭﺘﻭﻀﻴﺢ ﺒﻌﺽ ﺍﻝﻘﻀﺎﻴﺎ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻨﻬﺩﻑ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻤﻌﺭﻓﺘﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻝﻭﺼﻭل ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼﻝﻬﺎ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺒﻨﺎﺀ ﺃﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﺍﻝﻜﺘﺎﺒﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻜﺎﻻﺴﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻅﺎﻫﺭ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻜﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 3‬ـ ﺍﺴﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻝﻠﻜﺸﻑ ﻋﻥ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺍﻝﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻝﺠﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻝﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺅﺜﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 4‬ـ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻅﺎﻫﺭ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻜﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﺘﻜﻭﻨﺕ ﻤﻥ ‪ 55‬ﺒﻨﺩﺍ ﻤﻭﺯﻋﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺜﻼﺜﺔ ﻤﺤﺎﻭﺭ ﺭﺌﻴﺴﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫• ﻤﺤﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻋﺭ ﻭﺍﻷﺤﺎﺴﻴﺱ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻨﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ‪.‬‬
‫• ﻤﺤﻭﺭ ﺍﻷﻋﺭﺍﺽ ﺍﻝﺠﺴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫• ﻤﺤﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻜﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻴﺘﺼﺭﻑ ﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ ﺩﺍﺨل ﺍﻝﻔل ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﻲ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 5‬ـ ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺴﺒﻠﺒﻴﺭﺠﺭ ﻝﻠﻘﻠﻕ "ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺴﻤﺔ"‪ :‬ﻭﺘﻀﻡ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺴﻴﻥ ﻤﻨﻔﺼﻠﻴﻥ ﻝﻠﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﺫﺍﺘﻲ ﻝﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺤﺎﻝﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﻠﻕ ﻭﺴـﻤﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻘﻠﻕ؛ ﻭﻴﺸﺘﻤل ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺤﺎﻝﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﻠﻕ )ﺍﻝﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﻱ ‪ (1‬ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 20‬ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺘﻬﺩﻑ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ "ﻤﺎ ﻴﺸﻌﺭ ﺒﻪ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺤﻭﺹ ﻓﻌﻼ ﺍﻵﻥ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ‬
‫ﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻠﺤﻅﺔ"‪ ،‬ﻭﻴﺸﺘﻤل ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺴﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﻘﻠﻕ )ﺍﻝﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﻱ ‪ (2‬ﻋﻠﻰ ‪ 20‬ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺘﻬﺩﻑ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ "ﻤﺎ ﻴﺸﻌﺭ ﺒﻪ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺤـﻭﺹ‬
‫ﺒﻭﺠﻪ ﻋﺎﻡ"‪.‬‬
‫‪ 6‬ـ ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﺃﻴﺯﻨﻙ ﻝﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﺍﻝﺼـﻭﺭﺘﺎﻥ )ﺃ( ﻭ )ﺏ(‪ :‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺼﻭﺭﺓ ﻤﺘﻁﻭﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺴﺎﺒﻕ ﻝﻠﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﻭ ‪ ،MPI‬ﻭﻫﻭ‬
‫ﻴﺤﺎﻭل ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺒﻌﺩﻴﻥ ﺃﺴﺎﺴﻴﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺒﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻫﻤﺎ‪ :‬ﺍﻻﻨﺒﺴﺎﻁ ﻭﺍﻝﻌﺼﺎﺒﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻤﻥ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻭﺼﻠﺕ ﺇﻝﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﺎ ﻴﻠﻲ‪:‬‬
‫ـ ﺘﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻝﻤﻬﻨﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻀﺎﻏﻁﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺤﻴﺎﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ‪ ،‬ﺤﻴﺙ ﺃﻥ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪ %71.80‬ﻤـﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴـﻴﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻀﻰ ﻴﺭﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﻻ ﺘﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺎﻗﺘﺭﺍﺤﺎﺘﻬﻡ‪ ،‬ﻜﺫﻝﻙ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪ %64.80‬ﻤﻥ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻷﺼﺤﺎﺀ ﺘﺭﻯ ﻨﻔﺱ ﺍﻷﻤﺭ‪ .‬ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﻤﻘﺎﺒل ‪ %28.20‬ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻀﻰ ﻭﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪ %35.20‬ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﺼﺤﺎﺀ ﻴﺭﻭﻥ ﻋﻜﺱ ﺫﻝﻙ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺒﻘﻭﻝﻬﻡ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺘﻬـﺘﻡ‬

‫‪9‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ﺒﻤﻘﺘﺭﺤﺎﺘﻬﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗﺩ ﺃﻅﻬﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻲ ﺒﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﻜﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺴﺎﻭﻱ )‪ (910.690‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺠـﻭﺩ ﻓـﺭﻭﻕ ﺒـﻴﻥ ﻋﻴﻨﺘـﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ ﺩﺍﻝﺔ ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﺩ ‪.(0.001)= α‬‬
‫ـ ﻴﻌﺘﺒﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﻔﺘﻴﺵ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻜﺫﻝﻙ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻝﻀﺎﻏﻁﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤـﺩﺭﺱ؛ ﺤﻴـﺙ ﺃﻥ ‪ %54.80‬ﻤـﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴـﻴﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻀﻰ ﻴﺭﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﻔﺘﻴﺵ ﻻ ﻴﺘﻡ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻲ ﻭﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﺇﻝﻰ ﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪ %54.70‬ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﺼـﺤﺎﺀ‪ .‬ﻓـﻲ ﻤﻘﺎﺒـل‬
‫‪ %45.20‬ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻀﻰ‪ ،‬ﺇﻝﻰ ﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪ %45.30‬ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﺼﺤﺎﺀ ﺘﺭﻯ ﻋﻜﺱ ﺫﻝﻙ‪ ،‬ﺃﻱ ﺃﻨﻪ ﻤﻭﻀﻭﻋﻲ ﻭﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﻭﻗـﺩ‬
‫ﺃﻅﻬﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻲ ﻝﻬﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺒﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﻜﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺴﺎﻭﻱ )‪ (09.966‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﻭﻕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻔﺌﺘﻴﻥ ﺩﺍﻝﺔ ﺇﺤﺼـﺎﺌﻴﺎ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺩ ‪(0.01) = α‬؛ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪ %62.60‬ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻀﻰ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺠﺎﻨﺏ ‪ %56‬ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﺼﺤﺎﺀ ﻴﺭﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸـﺭﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻔﻨﻲ )ﺃﻱ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ( ﻻ ﻴﻌﻤل ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻭﺠﻴﻪ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ ﺒﺸﻜل ﺴﻠﻴﻡ‪ ،‬ﻤﻘﺎﺒل ‪ %37.40‬ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﻀﻰ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺠﺎﻨﺏ ‪%44‬‬
‫ﻤﻥ ﺍﻷﺼﺤﺎﺀ ﻴﺅﻜﺩﻭﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻹﻴﺠﺎﺒﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻭﺠﻴﻬﻬﻡ؛ ﻭﻗﺩ ﺃﻅﻬﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺌﻲ ﺒﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﻜﺎ‪ 2‬ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﺴـﺎﻭﻱ )‪(30.194‬‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﺠﻭﺩ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻔﺌﺘﻴﻥ ﺩﺍﻝﺔ ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﺩ ‪.(0.001) = α‬‬

‫‪ .V‬ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻗﺭﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﻝﺤﺴﻴﻥ)‪ :(2008‬ﺒﻌﻨﻭﺍﻥ " ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ﺤﺴﺏ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ"‪.‬ﻫﺩﻓﺕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻜﺸﻑ ﻋﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭﻱ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ﺤﺴـﺏ‬
‫ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﻥ ﻭﻤﺩﻯ ﺍﺤﺘﺭﺍﻤﻪ ﻝﻤﻌﺎﻴﻴﺭ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺍﻝﺤﺩﻴﺙ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺘﺭﺤﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺴﺘﻤﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﻤﻥ ﺨﻼل ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ‬
‫ﻤﻴﺩﺍﻨﻴﺔ ﺒﻭﻻﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﻴﻠﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﺘﻜﻭﻨﺕ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﻥ ‪ 128‬ﻤﻌﻠﻤﺎ ﻭﻤﻌﻠﻤﺔ ﺘﻡ ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭﻫﻡ ﻁﺒﻘﻴﺎ ﻭﻋﺸﻭﺍﺌﻴﺎ ﻴﻤﺜﻠﻭﻥ ﺤﻭﺍﻝﻲ ‪15‬‬
‫‪ %‬ﻤﻥ ﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﻤﺜل ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻉ ﻤﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻭﻤﻌﻠﻤﺎﺕ ‪ 06‬ﻤﻘﺎﻁﻌﺎﺕ ﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺘﺎﺒﻌﺔ ﻝﻤﺩﻴﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻝﻭﻻﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺴـﻴﻠﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺴﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻤﻜﻭﻥ ﻤﻥ ‪ 03‬ﻤﺤﺎﻭﺭ‪:‬‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻭﺭ ﺍﻷﻭل‪ :‬ﻴﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻤﻥ ‪ 15‬ﻓﻘﺭﺓ ﺘﻤﺜل ﻤﺅﺸﺭﺍﺕ ﺃﻭ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻋﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻜﻔﺎﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺭﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘـﻲ ﻴﺠـﺏ ﻋﻠـﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻤﺘﻼﻜﻬﺎ ﺤﺘﻰ ﻴﺴﺘﻁﻴﻊ ﺘﺄﺩﻴﺔ ﻤﻬﺎﻤﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺤﺴﻥ ﻭﺠﻪ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻲ‪ :‬ﻴﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻤﻥ ‪ 35‬ﻓﻘﺭﺓ ﺘﻤﺜل ﻤﺅﺸﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻥ ﻜﻔﺎﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻹﺸـﺭﺍﻓﻴﺔ ﺒﻔﺎﻋﻠﻴـﺔ ﻭﺘﺘﻤﺜـل ﻫـﺫﻩ‬
‫ﺍﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺯﻴﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺼﻔﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻝﺯﻴﺎﺭﺓ ﺃﻭ ﻤﺎ ﻴﺴﻤﻰ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺩﺍﻭﻝﺔ ﺍﻹﺸـﺭﺍﻓﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻝﻨـﺩﻭﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴـﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻝـﺩﺭﻭﺱ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺤﻭﺭ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻝﺙ‪ :‬ﻴﺘﻜﻭﻥ ﻤﻥ ‪ 13‬ﻓﻘﺭﺓ ﺘﻤﺜل ﻤﺅﺸﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻥ ﻜﻔﺎﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻭﻴﻡ ﺍﻝﻔﻌﺎل ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻴﺠﺏ ﺃﻥ ﺘﺘﻭﻓﺭ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺒﺼﻔﺘﻬﺎ‬
‫ﻤﻬﻤﺔ ﺃﺴﺎﺴﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻤﻬﺎﻤﻪ؛ ﻭﺘﻭﺼﻠﺕ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺭﺌﻴﺴﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺎﻝﻴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫ﺃ ـ ﻴﺭﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻭﻥ ﺃﻥ ﻀﻌﻑ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺘﺭﺠﻊ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻀﻌﻑ ﺍﻝﻜﻔﺎﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻨﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻑ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺠﺎﻻﺕ )ﺍﻝﻤﺠﺎل ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺭﻓﻲ‪ ،‬ﺍﻝﻤﺠﺎل ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻲ‪ ،‬ﺃﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﺍﻝﺘﻘﻭﻴﻡ(‪.‬‬
‫ﺏ ـ ﻻ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻬﻡ ﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺍﻝﻤﻁﺒﻘﺔ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠـﻴﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ﺘﺭﺘﺒﻁ ﺒﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﻗﻊ ﺍﻝﺠﻐﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﺩﺭﺴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺕ ـ ﻻ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻬﻡ ﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺍﻝﻤﻁﺒﻘﺔ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠـﻴﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ﺘﺭﺘﺒﻁ ﺒﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺅﻫل ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺇﻻ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﺒﺎﻝﻜﻔﺎﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺭﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪.‬‬
‫ﺙ ـ ﻻ ﺘﻭﺠﺩ ﻓﺭﻭﻕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻤﻬﻡ ﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺍﻝﻤﻁﺒﻘﺔ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠـﻴﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ﺘﺭﺘﺒﻁ ﺒﻤﺘﻐﻴﺭ ﺍﻷﻗﺩﻤﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻬﻨﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻴﺘﻌﻠﻕ ﺒﺎﻝﻜﻔﺎﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺭﻓﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪.‬‬

‫‪10‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ﺘﺎﺴﻌﺎ‪ :‬ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ‪:‬‬


‫ﻨﺴﺘﺨﻠﺹ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺒﻘﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ )ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ( ﻴﻐﻠﺏ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻝﻁﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻓـﻲ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ؛ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻝﻨﻭﻉ ﻻ ﻴﺭﺍﻋﻲ ﺍﻝﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻐﺎﻝﺏ ﺒل ﻴﻐﻠﺏ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﻴﺅﺜﺭ‬
‫ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺇﻝﻴﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺯﺒﺩﻱ )‪ (2002‬ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻭﺼﻠﺕ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻴﻌ ‪‬ﺩ ﻤﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻌﻭﺍﻤل ﺍﻝﻀﺎﻏﻁﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ ﻭﻻ ﻴﻌﻤل ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻭﺠﻴﻬﻪ ﺒﺸﻜل ﺴﻠﻴﻡ؛ ﻭﺃﺸﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻜل ﻤﻥ ﻤﺒﺎﺭﻜﻲ )‪ (1993‬ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺴﺎﺩ‬
‫)‪ (1989‬ﻭﻗﺭﺴﺎﺱ )‪ (2008‬ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﻴﻠﺠﺄ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﺠﺘﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺹ ﻨﻅﺭﹰﺍ ﻻﻓﺘﻘـﺎﺭﻩ ﻝﻠﺘﻜـﻭﻴﻥ‬
‫ﻭﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﻠﺘﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺇﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻨﻘﺹ ﺍﻝﻌﺩﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻝﻨﻭﻋﻲ ﻝﻠﻤﻔﺘﺸﻴﻥ‪.‬‬
‫ﺃﻤ‪‬ﺎ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺎﺩ )‪ (1989‬ﻓﻘﺩ ﺃﺒﺭﺯﺕ ﺃﻴﻀﺎ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺘﻤﻴ‪‬ﺯ ﺒﺎﻝﻤﺩﺡ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﺸﺠﻴﻊ ﻭﺘﻘﺒـل ﺍﻷﻓﻜـﺎﺭ‬
‫ﻭﻤﺸﺎﻋﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ )ﻭﻫﻭ ﻤﺎ ﻴﻌﺒ‪‬ﺭ ﻋﻥ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ( ﻗﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺭﻥ ﺒﺎﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺇﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴـﺔ ﻝـﺩﻯ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻨﺤﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ‪ ،‬ﻭﺃﻭﺠﺩ ﺍﻝﺤﺩﺍﺭﻭﻱ )‪ (1988‬ﻓﻲ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺘﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻠﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒـﻭﻴﻴﻥ‬
‫ﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻝﻴﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺃﻏﻠﺏ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻘﻊ ﻀﻤﻥ ﺒﻌﺩﻱ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ؛ ﻓﻲ ﺤﻴﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﻭﻕ‬
‫ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻝﻤﺎ ﻴﺭﻭﻨﻪ ﺒﺎﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﻝﻠﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺹ ﺍﻝﻤﺫﻜﻭﺭﻴﻥ ﺴﺎﺒﻘﺎ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ ﻝﺼﺎﻝﺢ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﺎﺕ‪.‬‬
‫ﻋﺎﺸﺭﺍ‪ :‬ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﺒﺤﺙ‬
‫‪ .I‬ﻤﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ‪ :‬ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻬﺞ ﺍﻝﻭﺼﻔﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﻝـﺫﻱ ﻴﻘـﻭﻡ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻝﻭﺼـﻑ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻘﺎﺭﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﻜﻤﺎ ﻴﻌﺭﻑ ﺒﺄﻨﻪ "ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻤﻥ ﻁﺭﻕ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻠﻴل ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ‪ ،‬ﻝﻠﻭﺼﻭل ﺇﻝﻰ ﺃﻏـﺭﺍﺽ ﻤﺤـﺩﺩﺓ‬
‫ﻝﻭﻀﻌﻴﺔ ﺍﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻤﻌﻴﻨﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻭ ﻫﻭ ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﻝﻭﺼﻑ ﺍﻝﻅﺎﻫﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﻭﺴﺔ ﻭﺘﺼﻭﻴﺭﻫﺎ ﻜﻤﻴﺎ ﻋﻥ ﻁﺭﻴﻕ ﺠﻤﻊ ﻤﻌﻠﻭﻤﺎﺕ ﻤﻘﻨﻨﺔ ﻋﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﺸﻜﻠﺔ ﻭﺘﺼﻨﻴﻔﻬﺎ ﻭﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﻭﺇﺨﻀﺎﻋﻬﺎ ﻝﻠﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﻗﻴﻘﺔ" )ﺸﺭﻭﺥ ﺼﻼﺡ ﺍﻝﺩﻴﻥ‪.(147 :2003 ،‬‬

‫‪ .II‬ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ‪:‬‬
‫‪ /1‬ﺤﺠﻡ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ‪ :‬ﺘﻜﻭﻨﺕ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﻥ ‪ 30‬ﻤﻔﺘﺸﺎ ﻭﻤﻔﺘﺸﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺼل ‪ 39‬ﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﺍﻝﺘﺎﺒﻌﻴﻥ ﻝﻤﺩﻴﺭﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻝﻭﻻﻴﺔ‬
‫ﻤﺴﺘﻐﺎﻨﻡ؛ ﻭﺍﻝﺫﻴﻥ ﻴﻤﺜﻠﻭﻥ ﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ؛ ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﺴﺘﺒﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻝﺫﻴﻥ ﻜﺎﻨﺕ ﺍﺴﺘﻤﺎﺭﺍﺘﻬﻡ ﻨﺎﻗﺼﺔ ﺴـﻭﺍﺀ ﻤـﻥ ﺤﻴـﺙ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺒﻴﺎﻨﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻹﺠﺎﺒﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻔﻘﺭﺍﺕ‪.‬‬

‫‪ /2‬ﻤﻤﻴﺯﺍﺕ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺤﺴﺏ ﺍﻝﺠﻨﺱ‪:‬‬


‫ﺠﺩﻭل ﺭﻗﻡ)‪ :(01‬ﻴﻭﻀﺢ ﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺤﺴﺏ ﺍﻝﺠﻨﺱ‬

‫ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻤﻭﻉ‬ ‫ﺫﻜﻭﺭ‬ ‫ﺇﻨﺎﺙ‬ ‫ﺍﻝﺠﻨﺱ‬


‫‪30‬‬ ‫‪23‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬ ‫ﺍﻝﻌﺩﺩ‬
‫‪%100‬‬ ‫‪%76.7‬‬ ‫‪%23.3‬‬ ‫ﺍﻝﻨﺴﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺌﻭﻴﺔ ‪٪‬‬

‫ﻴﺘﻀﺢ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻋﺩﺩ ﺫﻜﻭﺭ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ )‪ 23‬ﺫﻜﺭﺍ ﺒﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪ (%76.7‬ﺃﻜﺒﺭ ﻤﻥ ﻋﺩﺩ ﺍﻹﻨﺎﺙ ﻓﻴﻬـﺎ )‪7‬‬
‫ﺇﻨﺎﺙ ﺒﻨﺴﺒﺔ ‪ (%23.3‬ﺒﻔﺎﺭﻕ ﻗﺩﺭﻩ ‪ 16‬ﻓﺭﺩ ﺃﻱ ﻤﺎ ﻨﺴﺒﺘﻪ ‪ %53.33‬ﻤﻥ ﻤﺠﻤﻭﻉ ﺃﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻜﻜل‪.‬‬

‫‪ /3‬ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ‪ :‬ﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﺒﺈﻋﺩﺍﺩ ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺃﻋﺩﻩ ﺍﻝﺩﻜﺘﻭﺭ ﻤﻘﺩﻡ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﻝﺤﻔﻴﻅ ﻓﻲ‬
‫ﻜﺘﺎﺒﻪ ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ )ﻤﻘﺩﻡ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﻝﺤﻔﻴﻅ‪(294،295 :2011 ،‬؛ ﻭﺘﻀﻤﻥ ‪ 20‬ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﻗـﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤـﺙ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻲ ﺒﺼﻴﺎﻏﺘﻬﺎ ﺤﺴﺏ ﺃﻫﺩﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻝﺘﻘﻴﺱ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻠﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ؛ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺒﺘﻘﺴﻴﻤﻬﺎ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺒﻌﺩﻴﻥ ﻭﻫﻤﺎ‪:‬‬

‫‪11‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺘﻨﻅﻴﻡ ﺍﻝﻌﻤل‪ :‬ﻭﻴﻀﻡ ﺍﻝﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ‪. 3،5،7،9،11،13،15،17،19،1‬‬


‫ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ‪ :‬ﻭﻴﻀﻡ ﺍﻝﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ‪. 2،4،6،8،10،12،14،16،18،20‬‬
‫ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺴﻠﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﻘﺩﻴﺭ ﻝﻴﻜﺭﺕ ﻭﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺤﺩﺩﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺨﻤﺱ ﺩﺭﺠﺎﺕ ﻭﻫﻲ )ﺩﻭﻤﺎ‪ ،‬ﻋﺎﺩﺓ‪ ،‬ﺃﺤﻴﺎﻨﺎ‪ ،‬ﻨﺎﺩﺭﺍ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺃﺒﺩﺍ(‪.‬‬
‫ﻤﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺍﻝﺘﺼﺤﻴﺢ‪ :‬ﺩﻭﻤﺎ=‪5‬ﺩﺭﺠﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻋﺎﺩﺓ=‪ 4‬ﺩﺭﺠﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺃﺤﻴﺎﻨﺎ= ‪ 3‬ﺩﺭﺠﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻨﺎﺩﺭﺍ= ‪ 2‬ﺩﺭﺠﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﻻ ﺃﺒﺩﺍ= ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﻭﺍﺤﺩﺓ‬

‫‪ .III‬ﺍﻝﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﺴﻴﻜﻭﻤﺘﺭﻴﺔ ﻻﺴﺘﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ‪:‬‬


‫‪ /1‬ﺍﻝﺼﺩﻕ ‪ :‬ﻝﻠﺘﺄﻜﺩ ﻤﻥ ﻓﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺭﺍﺕ ﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻤﻥ ﺘﻭﻓﺭ ﺼﺩﻕ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﺎﺴﻕ ﺍﻝﺩﺍﺨﻠﻲ ﻝﻔﻘﺭﺍﺘـﻪ ﻋـﻥ‬
‫ﻁﺭﻴﻕ ﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﻻﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﻜل ﻓﻘﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻓﻘﺭﺍﺕ ﻜل ﺒﻌﺩ ﻭﺍﻝﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺘﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﺇﻝﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻜﻤﺎ ﺘـﻡ‬
‫ﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﻻﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﻜل ﻓﻘﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻝﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻝﻸﺩﺍﺓ؛ ﻭﻜﺫﺍ ﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﻻﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺩﺭﺠﺎﺕ ﻜل ﺒﻌﺩ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺠﻤﻭﻉ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻲ ﻝﺩﺭﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﻤﺎ ﺘﻭﻀﺤﻪ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﺍﻭل ﺭﻗﻡ )‪ (3)،(2‬ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﻭﺍﻝﻲ‪:‬‬

‫ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺭﻗﻡ) ‪ : ( 2‬ﻴﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﺒﻴﺭﺴﻭﻥ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻜل ﻓﻘﺭﺓ ﻭﺍﻝﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺘﻨﺘﻤﻲ ﺇﻝﻴﻪ‬
‫ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل‬

‫‪20‬‬ ‫‪18‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬ ‫‪14‬‬ ‫‪12‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪6‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪19‬‬ ‫‪17‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬ ‫‪9‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬ ‫ﺍﻝﻔﻘﺭﺓ‬
‫**‪,60‬‬

‫**‪,53‬‬

‫**‪,72‬‬

‫**‪,55‬‬

‫**‪,69‬‬

‫**‪,53‬‬

‫**‪,70‬‬

‫**‪,65‬‬

‫**‪,87‬‬

‫**‪,50‬‬

‫**‪,69‬‬

‫**‪,52‬‬

‫**‪,68‬‬
‫**‪,63‬‬
‫**‪,67‬‬
‫ﻡ‪.‬ﺍﻹﺭ‬
‫*‪,36‬‬

‫*‪,39‬‬

‫*‪,37‬‬

‫*‪,38‬‬

‫*‪,46‬‬

‫ﺘﺒﺎﻁ‬
‫* ﺩﺍل ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ )‪(0.05 =α‬‬ ‫** ﺩﺍل ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ )‪(0.01 =α‬‬

‫ﻨﻼﺤﻅ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻜل ﻓﻘﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻓﻘﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻬﺎ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﻤﻭﺠﺏ ﺒﺎﻝﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻝـﺫﻱ ﺘﻨﺘﻤـﻲ‬
‫ﺇﻝﻴﻪ؛ ﺤﻴﺙ ﺒﻠﻎ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﻓﻲ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل )‪ (0.87‬ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ )‪ (0.01 =α‬ﻭﺃﻗل ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ‬
‫)‪ (0.46‬ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ )‪ ، (0.05 =α‬ﻭﻴﺩل ﺫﻝﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺘﻤﺘﻊ ﺍﻝﻔﻘﺭﺍﺕ ﺒﻔﺎﻋﻠﻴﺔ ﻋﺎﻝﻴﺔ؛ ﺃﻤﺎ ﻓﻲ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗـﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺩ ﺒﻠﻐﺕ ﺃﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ )‪ (0.72‬ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ )‪ ،(0.01 =α‬ﻭﺃﺩﻨﻰ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ )‪ (0.36‬ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺩﻻﻝـﺔ‬
‫)‪.(0.05 =α‬‬
‫ﻭﺒﻨﺎﺀﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺎ ﺴﺒﻕ ﺫﻜﺭﻩ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﻭل ﺒﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻗﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻔﻘﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﻤﻴﻴﺯ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺇﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻓﻲ ﻜل ﺒﻌﺩ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺃﺒﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ‪.‬‬
‫ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺭﻗﻡ) ‪ : ( 3‬ﻴﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﺒﻴﺭﺴﻭﻥ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻜل ﻓﻘﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﺒﻌﺩ ﻭﺍﻝﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻝﻸﺩﺍﺓ‬
‫ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل‬

‫‪20‬‬ ‫‪18‬‬ ‫‪16‬‬ ‫‪14‬‬ ‫‪12‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬ ‫‪8‬‬ ‫‪6‬‬ ‫‪4‬‬ ‫‪2‬‬ ‫‪19‬‬ ‫‪17‬‬ ‫‪15‬‬ ‫‪13‬‬ ‫‪11‬‬ ‫‪9‬‬ ‫‪7‬‬ ‫‪5‬‬ ‫‪3‬‬ ‫‪1‬‬
‫ﻓﻘﺭ‬
‫ﺍﻝ‬

‫ﺓ‬
‫**‬

‫**‪,58‬‬

‫**‪,63‬‬

‫**‪,74‬‬
‫**‬

‫**‬

‫**‪,71‬‬

‫**‬

‫**‪,53‬‬
‫**‪,49‬‬

‫**‪,74‬‬

‫**‪,71‬‬

‫**‪,61‬‬

‫**‪,71‬‬

‫**‬

‫ﻡ‪ .‬ﺍﻹﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ‬
‫*‪,68‬‬

‫*‪,55‬‬

‫*‪,57‬‬

‫*‪,68‬‬

‫*‬
‫‪,63‬‬
‫‪,64‬‬

‫‪,61‬‬

‫‪,66‬‬

‫‪,69‬‬

‫‪,58‬‬

‫**‪,78‬‬ ‫**‪,79‬‬

‫* ﺩﺍل ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ )‪(0.05 =α‬‬ ‫** ﺩﺍل ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ )‪(0.01 =α‬‬

‫ﻴﻭﻀﺢ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﻤﻭﺠﺒﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻜل ﻓﻘﺭﺓ ﻤﻥ ﻓﻘﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﺒﻌﺩﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻴـﺔ ﻝـﻸﺩﺍﺓ‬
‫ﻭﺠﻤﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﻝﺔ ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺩﻻﻝﺔ )‪ (0.05 =α‬ﻭﻜﺫﺍ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ )‪ ،(0.01 =α‬ﻜﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﺭﺘﺒـﺎﻁ‬
‫ﻤﻭﺠﺒﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻜل ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﻝﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﻝﻸﺩﺍﺓ‪ ،‬ﻭﺒﻨﺎﺀﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻤﺎ ﺜﺒﺕ ﻤﻥ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﻭل ﺒﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﺍﻝﺘﻨﺎﺴﻕ ﺍﻝﺩﺍﺨﻠﻲ ﺒﻴﻥ‬
‫ﻓﻘﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺓ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻋﺎﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻜﺫﺍ ﺘﺤﻘﻕ ﻗﺩﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻔﻘﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺘﻤﻴﻴﺯ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺇﺠﺎﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻓﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﻴﻨﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻝﻔﻘـﺭﺍﺕ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗـﺔ‬

‫‪12‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ﺒﺎﻷﺴﻠﻭﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻴﻴﻥ )ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل‪ ،‬ﻭﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ(؛ ﻭﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﻭﺼل ﺇﻝﻴﻬﺎ ﺘﺠﻌﻠﻨﺎ ﻨﻁﻤﺌﻥ ﺒﺸﻜل ﻜﺎﻑ‬
‫ﻝﺼﺤﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﻴﻨﺔ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﻝﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺃﻏﺭﺍﻀﻬﺎ‪.‬‬
‫‪ /2‬ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ‪ :‬ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺩ ﻓﻲ ﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺠﺯﺌﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺼﻔﻴﺔ ﻭﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺃﻝﻔﺎ ﻜﺭﻭﻨﺒﺎﺥ‬
‫ﺃ ـ ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺠﺯﺌﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺼﻔﻴﺔ ‪ :‬ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺩ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻓﻲ ﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻴـﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻁﺭﻴﻘـﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺠﺯﺌـﺔ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻨﺼﻔﻴﺔ؛ ﺤﻴﺙ ﻗﺴﻡ ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻤﺎﺭﺓ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻨﺼﻔﻴﻥ‪ :‬ﺍﻝﻨﺼﻑ ﺍﻷﻭل ﺨﺎﺹ ﺒﺎﻷﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺩﻴﺔ )ﻤﻥ ‪ 1‬ﺍﻝﻰ ‪ ،( 19‬ﻭﺍﻝﻨﺼـﻑ ﺍﻝﺜـﺎﻨﻲ‬
‫ﻴﻀﻡ ﺍﻷﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻝﺯﻭﺠﻴﺔ )ﻤﻥ ‪ 2‬ﺇﻝﻰ ‪( 20‬؛ ﺜﻡ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺫﻝﻙ ﺒﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻻﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﺒﻴﺭﺴﻭﻥ ﻝﻨﺼـﻔﻲ ﺍﻻﺴـﺘﻤﺎﺭﺓ ﻓﻜﺎﻨـﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺭ= ‪ 0.576‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺩﺍﻝﺔ ﺇﺤﺼﺎﺌﻴﺎ ﻋﻨﺩ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ )‪ .(0.01‬ﻭﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻝﺘﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺒﻤﻌﺎﺩﻝﺔ ﺴﺒﻴﺭﻤﺎﻥ ﺒﺭﺍﻭﻥ ﺃﺼـﺒﺤﺕ ﻗﻴﻤـﺔ‬
‫ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻻﺭﺘﺒﺎﻁ ﻝﻼﺴﺘﻤﺎﺭﺓ ﻜﻜل ﺘﺴﺎﻭﻱ ‪ . 0.73‬ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻝﻘﻭل ﺒﺄﻥ ﺍﺴﺘﻤﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﻷﻨﻤﺎﻁ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻴـﺔ ﺘﺘﻤﺘـﻊ ﺒﻘـﺩﺭ ﻤـﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻻﺴﺘﻘﺭﺍﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺠﻬﺎ‪ ،‬ﻭﺒﺎﻝﺘﺎﻝﻲ ﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻝﺘﺤﻘﻴﻕ ﺃﻏﺭﺍﺽ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ﺏ ـ ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺒﻁﺭﻴﻘﺔ ﺃﻝﻔﺎ ﻜﺭﻭﻨﺒﺎﺥ‪ :‬ﺍﺴﺘﺨﺩﻡ ﺍﻝﺒﺎﺤﺙ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻝﻔﺎ ﻜﺭﻭﻨﺒﺎﺥ؛ ﻭﻗﺩ ﺒﻠﻎ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻜﻤﺎ ﻴﻠﻲ ‪:‬‬

‫ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺭﻗﻡ ) ‪ : (04‬ﻴﺒﻴﻥ ﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺒﻌﺩﻱ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺓ‪:‬‬


‫ﺍﻝﺼﺩﻕ*‬ ‫ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻝﻔﺎ ﻜﺭﻭﻨﺒﺎﺥ‬ ‫ﻋﺩﺩ ﺍﻝﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ‬ ‫ﺍﻝﺒﻌﺩ‬
‫‪0.914‬‬ ‫‪0.837‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬ ‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل‬
‫‪0.836‬‬ ‫‪0.699‬‬ ‫‪10‬‬ ‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ‬
‫‪0.911‬‬ ‫‪0.831‬‬ ‫‪20‬‬ ‫ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻴﺔ‬
‫*ﺘﻡ ﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻝﺼﺩﻕ ﻋﻥ ﻁﺭﻴﻕ ﺠﺫﺭ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ‬

‫ﻴﺘﻀﺢ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺭﻗﻡ ) ‪ ( 04‬ﺃﻥ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺃﻝﻔﺎ ﻜﺭﻭﻨﺒﺎﺥ ﻝﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل )‪ ،(0.837‬ﺃﻤﺎ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤـﺎﻡ‬
‫ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ )‪ ،(0.699‬ﻭﺒﻠﻎ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻲ ﻝﻸﺩﺍﺓ )‪(0.831‬؛ ﻭﺠﻤﻴﻌﻬﺎ ﺘﻌﺒ‪‬ﺭ ﻋﻥ ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺘﺘﻤﺘـﻊ ﺒﺩﺭﺠـﺔ‬
‫ﻋﺎﻝﻴﺔ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﺘﻔﻲ ﺒﺄﻏﺭﺍﺽ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺃﻤﺎ ﺤﺴﺎﺏ ﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻝﺼﺩﻕ ﻋﻥ ﻁﺭﻴﻕ ﺍﻝﺠﺫﺭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻝﻤﻌﺎﻤل ﺍﻝﺜﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﻘﺩ ﻜـﺎﻥ‬
‫ﻝﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﻴﺴﺎﻭﻱ )‪ ،(0.914‬ﻭﻝﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ )‪ (0.836‬ﻭﻝـﻸﺩﺍﺓ ﻜﻜـل )‪ (0.911‬ﻭﻫـﻲ‬
‫ﻤﻌﺎﻤﻼﺕ ﺘﻌﺒﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻴﻘﻴﺱ ﻤﺎ ﺃﻋ ‪‬ﺩ ﻝﻘﻴﺎﺴﻪ‪.‬‬

‫ﺇﺤﺩﻯ ﻋﺸﺭ‪ :‬ﻋﺭﺽ ﻭﻤﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ‬


‫‪ .I‬ﻋﺭﺽ ﻭﻤﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﻔﺭﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻝﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺭﻗﻡ )‪ :(5‬ﻴﻤﺜل ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺤﺴﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻻﻨﺤﺭﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺌﺩ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻤﻥ‬
‫ﻭﺠﻬﺔ ﻨﻅﺭﻫﻡ‪ ،‬ﻭﻝﻜل ﺒﻌﺩ ﻤﻥ ﺒﻌﺩﻱ ﺃﺩﺍﺓ ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ‬

‫ﺍﻻﻨﺤﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ‬ ‫ﺍﻝﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﺍﻝﺤﺴﺎﺒﻲ‬ ‫ﺍﻝﺒﻌﺩ‬ ‫ﺍﻝﺭﻗﻡ‬


‫‪3.35‬‬ ‫‪46.80‬‬ ‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل‬ ‫‪01‬‬
‫‪3.41‬‬ ‫‪44.67‬‬ ‫ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ‬ ‫‪02‬‬
‫‪5.28‬‬ ‫‪91.47‬‬ ‫ﺍﻝﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﻜﻠﻴﺔ‬

‫ﻴﻼﺤﻅ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺭﻗﻡ )‪ (5‬ﺃﻥ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﺠﺎﺀ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻷﻭﻝﻰ ﺒﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﺤﺴﺎﺒﻲ )‪ (46.80‬ﻭﺍﻨﺤﺭﺍﻑ‬
‫ﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ )‪(3.35‬؛ ﺃﻤﺎ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﻓﻘﺩ ﺠﺎﺀ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺒﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﺤﺴﺎﺒﻲ )‪ (44.67‬ﻭﺍﻨﺤـﺭﺍﻑ‬
‫ﻤﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ )‪ ،(3.41‬ﻭﺘﺩل ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻴﺴﺘﺨﺩﻤﻭﻥ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻴﺩﻤﺞ ﻜﻼ ﺍﻝﺒﻌﺩﻴﻥ )ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل‬

‫‪13‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ﻭﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ( ﻓﻲ ﺤﻴﻥ ﻴﻐﻠﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﺘﻬﻡ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﺒﺩﺭﺠﺔ ﻗﻠﻴﻠﺔ؛ ﻭﺘﺘﻔﻕ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻨﺘـﺎﺌﺞ ﻤـﻊ‬
‫ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻜل ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺤﺩﺍﺭﻭﻱ )‪ (1988‬ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺴﺎﺩ )‪ (1989‬ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻤﺒﺎﺭﻜﻲ )‪(1993‬؛ ﻭﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭ ﻤﺎ ﺘﻭﺼﻠﺕ ﺇﻝﻴـﻪ‬
‫ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﻀﻴﺔ ﺒﺄﻥ ﺒﻌﺩ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل ﻴﻁﻐﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻝﻠﻤﻔﺘﺸﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﻘـﺎﺭﻫﻡ ﺇﻝـﻰ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻜﻔﺎﺀﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻭﺍﻗﻑ ﺍﻝﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻭﺍﺠﻬﻬﻡ ﺃﺜﻨﺎﺀ ﺘﻔﺎﻋﻠﻬﻡ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ؛ ﺇﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﻗﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻜـﻭﻴﻥ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻔﻌﺎل ﻭﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺯﻭ‪‬ﺩﻫﻡ ﺒﺎﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻷﺩﺍﺌﻴﺔ ‪...‬‬

‫ﻭﻓﻲ ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻅﺭﻭﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻴﻤﺎﺭﺱ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺸﻭﻥ ﻤﻬﺎﻤﻬﻡ ﺘﺠﻌﻠﻬﻡ ﻴﻠﺠﺌﻭﻥ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﺠﺘﻬﺎﺩﻫﻡ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤـﻊ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﺃﻭ ﻴﺴﺘﻌﻤﻠﻭﻥ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺘﺴﻴﻴﺭ ﺯﻴﺎﺭﺘﻬﻡ ﺃﻭ ﻨﺩﻭﺍﺘﻬﻡ ﻤﻥ ﺃﺠل ﺘﻐﻁﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺍﻍ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﺘﺘﺭﻜﻪ ﻗﻠﺔ ﻜﻔـﺎﺀﺍﺘﻬﻡ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ‪ ...‬ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﺍﻹﺠﺭﺍﺀ ﻗﺩ ﻴﺘﺨﺫﻭﻨﻪ ﺃﻴﻀﺎ ﺒﺄﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺁﺨﺭ ﻭﻫﻭ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﺤﺘﹼـﻰ ﻴﻜﺴـﺒﻭﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠـﻡ‬
‫ﻭﻴﺘﻔﺎﺩﻭﻥ ﺍﻻﻨﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﻀﻁﺭﺍﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻗﺩ ﺘﻌﻴﻕ ﺩﻭﺭﻫﻡ ﻭﺘﺨﻠﻕ ﻝﺩﻴﻬﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺎﻜل ﻭﺍﻝﺼﺭﺍﻋﺎﺕ ﺒﻴﻨﻬﻡ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻁﺎﻗﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒـﻭﻱ؛‬
‫ﻭﺒﺎﻝﺘﺎﻝﻲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺍﻷﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺭﻭﻨﻪ ﻤﻨﺎﺴﺒﺎ ﻫﻭ ﺍﻝﺫﻱ ﻴﺩﻤﺞ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﺎ ﻫﻭ ﺇﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻤﺎ ﻫﻭ ﺇﻨﺴـﺎﻨﻲ؛ ﻭﺍﻝـﺫﻱ ﻴﺭﺍﻋـﻲ ﺠﻤﻴـﻊ‬
‫ﺍﻷﻁﺭﺍﻑ ﻭﻻ ﻴﻌﻴﻕ ﺴﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ‪.‬‬

‫‪ .II‬ﻋﺭﺽ ﻭﻤﻨﺎﻗﺸﺔ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺼﺔ ﺒﺎﻝﻔﺭﻀﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺜﺎﻨﻴﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺭﻗﻡ )‪ :(6‬ﻴﻤﺜل ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ "ﺕ" ﻝﺩﻻﻝﺔ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﻭﻕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴـﺘﻬﻡ ﻝﻠﺴـﻠﻭﻙ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ‬

‫ﺍﻻﺤﺘﻤﺎل‬ ‫ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﺍﻝﻌﻴﻨﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺤﺭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﻗﻴﻤﺔ "ﺕ" ﺍﻝﻤﺤﺴﻭﺒﺔ‬


‫ﺍﻹﻨﺎﺙ‬ ‫ﺍﻝﺫﻜﻭﺭ‬
‫‪0.983‬‬ ‫‪28‬‬ ‫‪0.021‬‬
‫‪91.42‬‬ ‫‪91.47‬‬

‫ﻨﻼﺤﻅ ﻤﻥ ﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﺨﺘﺒﺎﺭ "ﺕ" ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻭل ﺃﻋﻼﻩ ﺃﻥ ﻗﻴﻤﺔ ﺍﻻﺤﺘﻤﺎل )‪ Sig. (bilatérale‬ﺘﺴﺎﻭﻱ ‪ 0.983‬ﻭﻫﻲ ﺃﻜﺒﺭ‬
‫ﻤﻥ ﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ ‪ %5‬ﻭﺒﺎﻝﺘﺎﻝﻲ ﻓﺈﻨﻨﺎ ﻨﻘﺒل ﺍﻝﻔﺭﺽ ﺍﻝﻌﺩﻤﻲ ﺒﺄﻥ ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻴﺴﺎﻭﻱ ﻤﺘﻭﺴﻁ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺘﻬﻡ ﻝﻠﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ؛ ﺒﻤﻌﻨﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﻭﻕ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺠﻨﺴﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺴﻠﻭﻙ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻏﻴﺭ ﻤﻌﻨﻭﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﻭﻴﻤﻜﻥ ﺘﻔﺴﻴﺭ‬
‫ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺒﺄﻥ ﻜﻼ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺎﺕ ﻴﻌﻤﻠﻭﻥ ﻓﻲ ﻨﻔﺱ ﺍﻝﻨﻁﺎﻕ ﺍﻝﺠﻐﺭﺍﻓﻲ ﻭﺘﻠﻘـﻭﻥ ﻨﻔـﺱ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺘﻜﻭﻴﻥ؛ ﺇﻀﺎﻓﺔ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﻜﺎﻨﺔ ﺍﻻﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﺭﺃﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺠﻌﻠﺘﻬﺎ ﺘﻤﺎﺭﺱ ﻤﻬﺎﻤﻬﺎ ﺒﻨﻔﺱ ﺍﻝﻨﺴﻕ ﻭﺍﻝﻭﺘﻴﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﻴﺘﺒﻌﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺭﺠل ‪ ...‬ﻭﺒﺎﻝﺘﺎﻝﻲ ﻓﺎﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺃﺼﺒﺤﺕ ﻤﻬﻤﺔ ﻴﺸﺘﺭﻙ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻜﻼ ﺍﻝﺠﻨﺴﻴﻥ ﻭﻻ ﺘﻘﺘﺼﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﺫﻜﺭ ﻓﻘﻁ‪ ،‬ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻐﻴـﺭﺍﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺩﻴﻨﺎﻤﻴﻜﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﺘﻭﻯ ﺍﻝﺜﻘﺎﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﻻﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭﺨﺭﻭﺝ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺃﺓ ﻝﻠﻌﻤل ﻭﻤﻨﺤﻬﺎ ﻓﺭﺼﺎ ﺃﻜﺒﺭ ﻓﻲ ﺇﺒـﺩﺍﺀ ﺭﺃﻴﻬـﺎ ﻭﻤﺴـﺎﻫﻤﺘﻬﺎ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻔﻌﺎﻝﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺘﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻝﻘﺭﺍﺭﺍﺕ؛ ﻭﺘﻤﺨﺽ ﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺫﻝﻙ ﺘﻘﻤﺹ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺃﺓ ﻝﻤﻨﺎﺼﺏ ﻤﺨﺘﻠﻔﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻭﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﻜﻤﻌﻠﻤﺔ ﻭﻜﻤـﺩﻴﺭﺓ‬
‫ﻭﻤﺸﺭﻓﺔ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ‪ ...‬ﺍﻝﺦ؛ ﻜل ﻫﺫﻩ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺠﻌﻠﺕ ﺍﻝﻔﺭﻭﻕ ﺘﺯﻭل ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴـﺎﺕ ﻓـﻲ‬
‫ﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺘﻬﻡ ﻝﻸﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﺎﻤل ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ‪.‬‬
‫ﻭ ﻨﻅﺭ‪‬ﺍ ﻝﻘﻠﺔ ﺘﻜﻭﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﺎل ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺭﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﻭﻓﻲ ﺃﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻘﻭﻴﻡ ﺘﺠﻌﻠﻬﻡ‬
‫ﻴﻌﺘﻤﺩﻭﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺠﺘﻬﺎﺩﻫﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﺨﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻝﻤﻨﺎﺴﺒﺔ ﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﻫﺫﺍ ﻴﺘﻔﻕ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻨﺘﺎﺌﺞ ﺍﻝﺘﻲ ﺘﻭﺼـل ﺇﻝﻴﻬـﺎ ﺍﻝﻤﺴـﺎﺩ‬
‫)‪ (1989‬ﻭﻤﺒﺎﺭﻜﻲ )‪ (1993‬ﻗﺭﺴﺎﺱ )‪(2008‬؛ ﻭﺒﺎﻝﺘﺎﻝﻲ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺃﺼﺒﺤﺕ ﻻ ﺘﺘﻡ ﺒﺸـﻜﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤـﻲ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻝﻤﻘﻨﻥ ﺒل ﺃﻀﺤﺕ ﺘﺨﻀﻊ ﻝﻠﺨﺼﺎﺌﺹ ﺍﻝﺸﺨﺼﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﻓﻲ ﺘﺴﻴﻴﺭﻩ ﻝﻬﺎ‪.‬‬

‫‪14‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫ﺍﺜﻨﺎ ﻋﺸﺭ‪ :‬ﺍﻝﺘﻭﺼﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻻﻗﺘﺭﺍﺤﺎﺕ‬


‫ــ ﺃﺨﺫ ﺍﻝﻤﺸﺭﻓﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﻴﻥ ﺃﺴﻠﻭﺏ ﺍﻝﻌﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺤﺴﺒﺎﻥ؛ ﺤﺘﻰ ﻴﺘﺭﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺇﻴﺠﺎﺒﻴﺔ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻨﺤـﻭ‬
‫ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ؛ ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻨﺴﻴﺎﻥ ﺠﺎﻨﺏ ﺍﻻﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺒﺎﻝﻌﻤل؛ ﺤﺘﻰ ﻴﻜﻭﻥ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻴﻬﺘﻡ ﺒﺎﻹﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺒﺼـﺒﻐﺔ‬
‫ﺇﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ‪.‬‬
‫ــ ﺯﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻋﺩﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺸﻴﻥ ﻜﻤ‪‬ﺎ ﻭﻨﻭﻋ‪‬ﺎ ﺤﺘﻰ ﻴﺘﻤﻜﻨﻭﻥ ﻤﻥ ﺍﻝﺘﻭﺍﺼل ﺒﺼﻔﺔ ﻤﺴﺘﻤﺭﺓ ﻤﻊ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ؛ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠـﻡ ﻓـﻲ ﺍﻝﻭﻗـﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻝﻲ ﻝﻪ ﻓﺭﺼﺔ ﻭﺍﺤﺩﺓ ﻝﻠﻘﺎﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ ﺃﻭ ﺭﺒﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻴﺯﻭﺭﻩ ﺘﻤﺎﻤﺎ ﺨﻼل ﺍﻝﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﺫﻝﻙ ﻨﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺎل ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺍﻜﻤﻴﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻝﻤﻔﺘﺵ‪.‬‬

‫ﻗﺎﺌﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺭﺍﺠﻊ‪:‬‬
‫‪ - 1‬ﺃﺒﻭ ﺍﻝﻭﻓﺎ ﺠﻤﺎل )‪ - (2006‬ﺩﻭﺭ ﻗﻴﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﺔ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻴﺔ ﻓﻲ ﺘﻨﻤﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺒﺩﺍﻉ ﺍﻝﺠﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻝﺩﻯ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻤﻠﻴﻥ ﺒﻬﺎ ﻝﻤﻭﺍﺠﻬﺔ ﺘﺤـﺩﻴﺎﺕ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻌﻭﻝﻤﺔ ـ ﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﻤﺴﺘﻘﺒل ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﺭﺒﻴﺔ ‪ -‬ﺍﻝﻤﺠﻠﺩ )‪ - (12‬ﺍﻝﻌﺩﺩ )‪ (42‬ـ ﺍﻝﻘﺎﻫﺭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 2‬ﺍﻝﺤﺭﻴﺭﻱ‪ ،‬ﺭﺍﻓﺩﺓ ﻋﻤﺭ )‪ - (2010‬ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﻭﺇﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺠﻭﺩﺓ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﺍﻝﻌﺎﻝﻲ ‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﻝﻠﻨﺸﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ‪ -‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪ -3‬ﺍﻝﺸﺎﻴﺏ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ ﺍﻝﺴﺎﺴﻲ )‪ - (2007‬ﻋﻼﻗﺔ ﺃﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺒﻜﻔﺎﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤﻴﻥ ﻭﺍﺘﺠﺎﻫﺎﺘﻬﻡ ﻨﺤﻭ ﻤﻬﻨـﺔ ﺍﻝﺘـﺩﺭﻴﺱ ‪-‬‬
‫ﺭﺴﺎﻝﺔ ﺩﻜﺘﻭﺭﺍﻩ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻠﻡ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺱ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ‪ -‬ﻗﺴﻡ ﻋﻠﻡ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺱ ﻭﻋﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ‪ -‬ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻻﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ـ ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﻭﻫﺭﺍﻥ)ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ(‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 4‬ﺍﻝﻌﺒﻴﺩﻱ ﺠﺎﺴﻡ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ )‪ -(2010‬ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﺜﻘﺎﻓﺔ ﻝﻠﻨﺸﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ‪ -‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 5‬ﺍﻝﻌﺠﻤﻲ ﺤﺴﻨﻴﻥ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ )‪ - (2008‬ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪ ،‬ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺍﻝﻔﻌﺎل ﻭﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻓﺯﻴﺔ ـ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﺍﻝﺠﺩﻴـﺩﺓ ـ‬
‫ﺍﻝﻘﺎﻫﺭﺓ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 6‬ﺍﻝﻌﻴﺎﺼﺭﺓ ﻤﻌﻥ ﻤﺤﻤﻭﺩ ﺃﺤﻤﺩ )‪ - (2008‬ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻭﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ﻭﻋﻼﻗﺘﻬﻤﺎ ﺒﺎﻻﺤﺘﺭﺍﻕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻲ ــ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﺤﺎﻤـﺩ‬
‫‪ -‬ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 7‬ﺒﻥ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﷲ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ )‪ - (2005‬ﺍﻝﻤﻨﻅﻭﻤﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻤﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻁﻠﻊ ﺇﻝﻰ ﺍﻹﺼﻼﺡ ‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻐﺭﺏ ﻝﻠﻨﺸﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ـ ﻭﻫﺭﺍﻥ ‪ /‬ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 8‬ﺒﻭﺴﻌﺩﺓ ﻗﺎﺴﻡ )‪ - (2010‬ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ )ﺍﻝﺘﻔﺘﻴﺵ ﻨﻤﻭﺫﺠﺎ( ‪ -‬ﻤﺠﻠﺔ ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴـﺔ ‪ -‬ﺍﻝﻌـﺩﺩ ‪- 4‬‬
‫ﻭﺭﻗﻠﺔ‪/‬ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 9‬ﺘﺭﻜﻲ ﺭﺍﺒﺢ )‪ (1990‬ـ ﺃﺼﻭل ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ـ ﺩﻴﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻁﺒﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺠﺎﻤﻌﻴﺔ ـ ﻁ ‪ 2‬ـ ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 10‬ﺭﻴﺎﻥ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ ﻫﺎﺸﻡ ﻭﺁﺨﺭﻭﻥ )‪ - (2010‬ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺠﺎل ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺴﻼﻤﻴﺔ ‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﻴﺭﺓ ﻝﻠﻨﺸـﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴـﻊ ‪-‬‬
‫ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 11‬ﺯﺍﻴﺩ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﻁﺎﻑ )‪ - (2008‬ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻹﺭﺸﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ ‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﺭﻓﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ ﻝﻠﻨﺸﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ‪ -‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 12‬ﺯﺒﺩﻱ ﻨﺎﺼﺭ ﺍﻝﺩﻴﻥ ) ‪ -(2007‬ﺴﻴﻜﻭﻝﻭﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺱ )ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺔ ﻭﺼﻔﻴﺔ ﺘﺤﻠﻴﻠﻴﺔ( ‪ -‬ﻁ ‪ - 3‬ﺩﻴﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻁﺒﻭﻋـﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺠﺎﻤﻌﻴـﺔ ‪-‬‬
‫ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪ 13‬ــ ﺸﺭﻭﺥ ﺼﻼﺡ ﺍﻝﺩﻴﻥ )‪ (2003‬ــ ﻤﻨﻬﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺒﺤﺙ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﻝﻠﺠﺎﻤﻌﻴﻴﻥ ـ ﺒﺩﻭﻥ ﻁﺒﻌﺔ ـ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﻝﻠﻨﺸـﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴـﻊ ـ‬
‫ﻋﻨﺎﺒﺔ ‪ /‬ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 14‬ﻋﺎﻴﺵ ﺠﻤﻴل ﺃﺤﻤﺩ )‪ - (2010‬ﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﺴﻴﺭﺓ ﻝﻠﻨﺸﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ‪ -‬ﻁ ‪ - 2‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 15‬ﻋﺒﻭﻱ ﻤﻨﻴﺭ ﺯﻴﺩ )‪- (2007‬ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻲ ﺍﻝﻨﺎﺠﺢ )ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﺓ ﺍﻝﻤﺩﺭﺴﻴﺔ ﺒﻴﻥ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻁﺒﻴﻕ( ‪ -‬ﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﻤﺠﺘﻤـﻊ ﺍﻝﻌﺭﺒـﻲ‬
‫ﻝﻠﻨﺸﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ‪ -‬ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 16‬ﻋﻁﺎﺭﻱ ﺘﻭﻓﻴﻕ ﻋﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺁﺨﺭﻴﻥ )‪ - (2005‬ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻨﻤﺎﺫﺠﻪ ﺍﻝﻨﻅﺭﻴﺔ ﻭﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﺎﺘﻪ ﺍﻝﻌﻤﻠﻴﺔ ‪ -‬ﻤﻜﺘﺒﺔ ﺍﻝﻔـﻼﺡ ﻝﻠﻨﺸـﺭ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ‪ -‬ﺍﻝﻜﻭﻴﺕ‪.‬‬

‫‪15‬‬
‫ﻋـﺩﺩ ‪ 15‬ﺩﻴﺴﻤﺒﺭ ‪2015‬‬ ‫ﻤﺨﺒﺭ ﺘﻁﻭﻴﺭ ﺍﻝﻤﻤﺎﺭﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺴﺎﺕ ﻨﻔﺴﻴﺔ ﻭ ﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴﺔ‪،‬‬

‫‪ - 17‬ﻋﻭﺩﺓ ﺃﺤﻤﺩ ﺒﻼل )‪ -(2009‬ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺨﺎﺼﺔ ‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﺸﺭﻭﻕ ﻝﻠﻨﺸﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ‪ -‬ﻋﻤﺎﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 18‬ﻗﺎﺴﻤﻲ ﺇﺒﺭﺍﻫﻴﻡ )‪ - (2004‬ﺩﻝﻴل ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻡ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻝﻜﻔﺎﻴﺎﺕ ‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﻫﻭﻤﻪ ﻝﻠﻁﺒﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻨﺸﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ‪ -‬ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 19‬ﻗﺭﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﻝﺤﺴﻴﻥ )‪ - (2008‬ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻹﺸﺭﺍﻑ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻓﻲ ﻤﺭﺤﻠﺔ ﺍﻝﺘﻌﻠﻴﻡ ﺍﻻﺒﺘﺩﺍﺌﻲ ﺤﺴﺏ ﺁﺭﺍﺀ ﺍﻝﻤﻌﻠﻤـﻴﻥ ‪ -‬ﺭﺴـﺎﻝﺔ‬
‫ﻤﺎﺠﺴﺘﻴﺭ ﻓﻲ ﻋﻠﻡ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺱ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﺘﺨﺼﺹ ﺘﻘﻴﻴﻡ ﺃﻨﻤﺎﻁ ﺍﻝﺘﻜﻭﻴﻥ ـ ﻜﻠﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻻﺠﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﻌﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻹﻨﺴﺎﻨﻴﺔ ‪ -‬ﺠﺎﻤﻌﺔ ﻤﻨﺘﻭﺭﻱ‪-‬‬
‫ﻗﺴﻨﻁﻴﻨﺔ‪ /‬ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 20‬ﻤﻘﺎﺒﻠﺔ ﻗﺎﺴﻡ ﻤﺤﻤﺩ )‪ -(2011‬ﺍﻝﺘﺩﺭﻴﺏ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻭﺍﻷﺴﺎﻝﻴﺏ ﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺩﻴﺔ ﺍﻝﺤﺩﻴﺜﺔ ﻭﺘﻁﺒﻴﻘﺎﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻴـﺔ ‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﺸـﺭﻭﻕ ﻝﻠﻨﺸـﺭ‬
‫ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ـ ﺍﻷﺭﺩﻥ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 21‬ﻤﻘﺩﻡ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﻝﺤﻔﻴﻅ )‪ -(2011‬ﺍﻹﺤﺼﺎﺀ ﻭﺍﻝﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﻝﻨﻔﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ‪ -‬ﺩﻴﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻝﻤﻁﺒﻭﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻝﺠﺎﻤﻌﻴﺔ ‪ -‬ﻁ ‪ - 3‬ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ‪.‬‬
‫‪ - 22‬ﻴﻌﻘﻭﺒﻲ ﻋﺒﺩ ﺍﻝﻤﺅﻤﻥ )‪ - (2004‬ﺍﻝﺘﺩﺒﻴﺭ ﺍﻹﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻭﻱ ﻭﻤﺸﺭﻭﻉ ﺍﻝﻤﺅﺴﺴﺔ ‪ -‬ﺴﻠﺴﻠﺔ ﻋﻠﻭﻡ ﺍﻝﺘﺭﺒﻴﺔ ﻭﺍﻝﺩﻴـﺩﺍﻜﺘﻴﻙ ‪ -‬ﺍﻝﻌـﺩﺩ‬
‫ﺍﻝﺭﺍﺒﻊ ‪ -‬ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻝﻐﺭﺏ ﻝﻠﻨﺸﺭ ﻭﺍﻝﺘﻭﺯﻴﻊ ‪ -‬ﺍﻝﺠﺯﺍﺌﺭ‪.‬‬

‫‪16‬‬

You might also like