0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 5K views47 pagesAHCA Report 1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
PRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER
HLza960001
whe.
‘COuPLETED
osr2012024
SACRED HEARTHOSPITALON THEEMERALD cont
7900 US HWY 96 W
BEACH, FL 32850
Pate {cack Boney Most Se Pee Be Fu
Te FSI Ton On LS SETI POMPTON)
ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
a ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
000 INITIAL COMMENTS,
On September 10, 2028 through September 20,
2024, an unannounced compiaint survey for
allegations contained within complaint number
2024012179, was conducted at Ascension
‘Sacred Heart Emerald Coast, Miramar Beach,
Florda. AL the time of the survey, deficient
practice was icentifie.
1181) 59A.3.270(4) FAC HEALTH INFORMATION
MGMT -Operative Procedures
(4) For pationts undergoing operative or other
invasive procedures the medical record policies,
must aiso requite:
(a) The recording of prooperative diagnoses prior
ro surgery
(0) That operative reports be recorded in the
health record immediately fliowing surgery or
that an operative progress note is entered in the
patient recor to provide pertinent information;
and,
(6) Postoperative information must inlude vital
signs, level of consciousness, medications, blood
components, complications and management of
‘those events, identification of direct providers of
care, discharge information from the
postanesthesia care area
‘This Statute oF Rule is not met as evidenced by:
‘Based on operating room (OR) sta interviews,
Intorviow with tho county Medical Examiner,
interview with the Pathologist and clinical record
review, the hospital ated to ensure operative
report were compiote anc accurataly vrtten for 1
of 6 patients sampled, Patient #1. During review
of Patient #7°s operative report from August 2028,
there were several discrepancies noted when
compared with the pathology report, interviews
Hoo
Haat
ATER Faas RUST
{ABORATORY ORECTORS OR PROVDERIGUPPLIER REPRESENTATIVES SIGARTORE
me
ome
SNE FORTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
191, Continued From page 191
conducted withthe Mesica! Examiner, the
Pathologist, the Chief Medical Officer and 7 of 7
‘operating room staf interviewed (Registered
Nurse (RN) D, RN , RN Y, Scrub Technicians F
and G, Carliied Registered Nurse Anesthetist ©
‘and General Surgeon K).
In August 2024, during @ scheduled splenectomy
(a surgical procedure to remove the spleen},
Surgeon A mistakenly removed Pationt #1's lor
instead of the spleen. The operative report
‘documents that tre spleen was removed. The
‘perativa report failed to mantion the pationt’s
{ebdominal distention, failed to mention the
presence of a megacclon (a condition where the
colon, orlarge intestine, abnormally dates -
become wider and larger). and aid to mention
the removal ofthe Iver. Adcltonally, the
operative report contradicts portions of stat
imerviows regarding clamp usage, the sequence
of events, the iting ofthe hemorthage (severe
blaeding), and the cause of death. The operative
report eosumens “ne cemplcations”
“The findings include:
‘Areview ofthe operative report dated 8/21/24 for
Patient #1 found the report was electronically
signed and veriied by Surgeon A on 8/23/24 at
S:14 PM Centrat Daylight Time. Surgeon Awas
listed as the only surgeon. The “indication for
Surgery’ and "Preoperative Diagnosis" were
documented as "Splonic laceration with
Hemoperitoneum; Severe splenomegaly; Splenic
10 mifimetersrteriat aneurysm and tet upper
{quadrant abdominal pair.” The postoperative
agnosis was "inre-abdominal hemarshege
‘associated with splenic srlery aneurysm rupture
and cardiac arrest.” The section for
“Complications” indicated "none apparent." The
ATER Fae EATPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1191, Continued From page 2 191
operative report lacked identification of the
members ofthe surgical team (the assistant and
scfub technicians}. The pathology tissue request
documented the specimen as “spleen issue."
Surgeon A indicated the "spleen measured
roughly 30 x 22 em (centimeters). Surgeon A
described the introduction ofthe laparoscopic
camera into the abdomen, then indicated
“Significant homoperitonaurn (biood in tio
abdomen} was noted, Ewtensive adhesions wore
roted around majority ofthe spieen, the spleen
oted to be gute enlarged.” Surgeon A indicated
using wound rotrsctors placed into the fascial
efect, appropriate positioning was achieved. "At
‘hia point using hand assist technique adhesions
‘nthe anterior surface of the spleen were
carefully taken down utiizing laparoscopic hand
‘aselet technique. The entire splean was exposed
noted to be severely deformed. Memopertonaum
‘was noted but no active hemorrhage (no active
bleeding) was aopreciated. Splenic laceration
‘v2s appreciated al the inferir pole. No active
blaeding was noted at this tme. Large size ofthe
spleen we elected fo convert to open provedure.”
‘The surgeon then made an "epigasvic midine
Incision,“ entering the addomen and documented,
“spleen noted to he quite friable and certainly the
lacge size made the dissection challenging,
Spleen was mobilized medially 10 expose the
Fetrogertoneal attachments. The spienorenal
and splencphrenic ligaments were carefully taken
‘down and ligated wit energy daviee.”
"Spleen was circuraforentialy dissected fr trom
surrounding structures and was very mabile. At
‘his lime attention was turned to the splenic
hhium. Splonic artery and voin wore carefully
casected out rom the surrounding tssve.
Splenic artery aneuryam was appreciated at the
Ihlum. “The plan was to perform ligation of the
splenic artery fest and subsequenlly splenic vein
ATER Fae GTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1191, Continued From page 3 191
second, Plan fo perform ligation of the splenic
artery close tothe spleen athe hilum proximal to
the aneurysm. Just prior to achieving control of
the splenic axtery with Endo GIA {orand nme)
stapling device vascular load (insirument which
simultaneously lays down a staple ine and
transects the tissue, veins, andlor arteries }
Unfortunately the aneurysm was noted to supe,
Econsive intra-abdorina’ blood loss was
sustained severely precluding visualization of key
tenatomical structures atthe hilum.” .. “Sponges
gradually removed from loft upper quadrant and
vith great dificutty during ongoing bleeding | was
ble fo control the ruptured sneurysm with
surgical clamp and then gain defintive contrat
vith Endo GIA stapling device vascular load 60
rim, Next. splenic vein was tigated also with
Endo GIA stapling device vascular load 60 mm
fire.” "Spleen was removed and passed off
te field for pathology."
“The word "iver" appeared nowhere on the
operative report. The report aleo did not mention
‘the abdominal cistension or severe megacoton
described by operating room staf.
Pathologist:
Aoviw of the surgical pathology report, dated
6/23/2024 at 217 PM found the comment, "no
splenic issue identified, case discussed with
(Surgeon AY The report indicated tha the tissue
Gosignated as spleen was “Liver with mld chronic
porta inflammation’
(0 00/1012024 at approximately 4:46 PA an
interview was conducted withthe Pathologist. He
stated the whole organ was received in a
spacimen buckot fabelad as “splaen, however,
he cid not see the specimen enly ohotos. He
ATER SOTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
191, Continued From page 4 191
received about 8-10 slides to review, He states
he was able to "elagnose it within @ millisecond,
pretty obvious It was the liver” From the pictures
‘nid histotogy, there was litle quesiion about
Porta inflammation but otherwise the ver, was &
litle heavy -2 upper limits are 1800 grams, and
this one was about 2100 grams,
Mecical Examiner:
(On 09/11/2024 at approximately 1:00 PM a
telephone interview was conducted withthe tocat
Medical Examiner (ME), The ME stated they
‘were intially notified of Patient #'s death on
August 21st, niatly the ME's office was informed
‘that this was an inpatient death from
complications of splenectomy. We were informed
‘the death was not due to trauma but a cyst, and
‘we declined jurisdiction. We were then renotifed
‘on August 25th or 25th by the Risk Managar who
said we need fo tell you this death is not how it
‘vas reported, the liver was removed. The
autopsy confirmed there was no iver. The liver
‘was portecily dissected of the dlaahragm. As a
‘orensic pathologist, that is one of the hardest
‘things to team to do. “Essentially the iver was
autopsied out of that man’. There was.n0
evidence of cross clamping, no sutures, no
texidence of eautery. The inferior Vena Cava (the
‘major vein that brings oxygen-poor blood fram the
lower body back to the heart} was clearly
lssected by the surgeon, Everything
surrounding ths vor was completely untouched.
“The spleen showed no evidence of aneurysm, no
rupture, and no evidence this epleen was:
{ouchad. The sploen stayed where tt was bom 10
be. The spleen was 420 grams ictal. There was
‘no evidence it was touched, not even looked al
‘The Medical Examinar said that a man's ver ie
between 1800 and 2800 grams. The size ofa
ATER OTSTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1191, Continued From page $ 191
‘man's spleen fs typically between 200 and 350
prams, but a diseased spleen can be bigger. The
IME stated the biggest helshe has seen was 800,
grams,
Interviews with Operating Room Stat:
Staff Member ¥, an Operating Room RN
(Rogistored Nursoy
(0 0974012024 at approximately 2:45 PM an
Interview was conductod with RN Y who indicated
sho was working anather case across the hall
lend ddr enter the OR (opereting room) of
Patient #1 untl after the time of death. When she
entered the room, the Scrub Tech (Technician)
tend RN Circulator were present and asked her to
‘et the CMO (Chief Medical Officer). RNY
Slated thatthe CMO eame into the OR and that is
‘uhen the specimen was discussed. The
specimen was pulled out ofthe bucket, and we alt
‘ere tke "in shock” Immediately the CMO
contacted the pathologist ang had the specimen
‘walked tothe fab. People m the room sai “this
looks ke fiver to me." RNY "we all were like this
Is definitely not the normal anatomy ofa spleen.
You can ell between a liver and spleen. Basic
knowledge of anatomy." She went on tc say that
before the code had eccurred, she was being
psy and fooked through the OR window and “ai!
sould see was a huge megacolon” fa conchiion|
‘where the colon, oF large intestine, abnormally
lates - become widor and larger). RNY
recounted, after the patient's death, how Surgeon
‘Acame back ino the OR, not once but three
times to state te them that the patlent suffered a
‘splenic aneurysm’ and there wes nothing that
could be done fo save him. He also came into
ak for the measurements of the spleen,
ATER Fae STSTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1191, Continued From page 6 191
‘Sta Member F, @n OR Scrub Technician and
First Assistant (Serub Tech F)
(On 08/10/2024 at approximately 3:14 PM an
Interview was conducted with Slaf Member F, an
(OR Scub Technician and First Assistant, Serub
“Tech F stated she was informed by the RN
Circulator ofthe patient's abdomen being
elstonded, and because of what case wo wore
ong we ware guessing it was blood pooting.
Scrub Tech F thought that procedurally, we would
have problorns with visuaization. Scrub Tech F
‘wont on to describe the surgical procedure. She
slated they put the trocars (which creates an
‘8c0988 point nto the abdomen) in and saw there
‘was blood on both sides of the abdomen, but not
fn insane amount, Right away we noticed Mow
lated the colon was. We could see this cn the
screen. Visualization was tight because of the
colon. ‘She said the surgeen put in 3 tocars (5
big and 2 sina, Again, not able to 3ee 8 ft,
“The hand post went tn, which allowed the surgeon
access witn his hand. He did not have wiggle
room, very limited due to the stze ofthe colon. It
‘was at thal point we bailed on the hand assist and
‘wont to open. As soon as the surgeon made the
‘abcorinat incision, tie "bowels spiling aut
She said tothe surgeon that looked Tike @
megacolon,” in which Surgeon A replied it was @
"volvulus ofthe colon.” (vols is when the
colon fwisis around the tissue that holds it in
place). She indicated the surgeon is aissectng:
sh is reacting with one hand and suctioning
vith the other and sill holding back bowel io allow
\isualzation. Anothor staff (RN E) came fn to
assist wih retracting and hen a third sora
technician, Serub Tech G assisted, Scrub Tech F
stated the surgeon is dissecting, gat bleesing,
‘and recalls the gurgean stating there was a tear
In the spleen. Bleeding increased a bit and we
ATER Fane RESTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1191, Continued From page 7 191
asked for a second coll saver (a device that
collects and returns a patients blood during
surgery. which is then transfused back into the:
patient) as one was not keeping up. Surgoon A
asked for a stapler, vascular oad (staping device
used in cntical vassal transection) ater the first
slaple that's when we gol into the horrible bieed.
Once into the bleed, there was ro going back and
‘we nevor had visualization again, There was no
specimen at that time, just dissection.
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was.
sated, ane the surgeon continued to work during
compressions. She racated, stopping aside and
seeing, with both hands, Surgeon A take the
spacimen out and lay iton the drape. All the
tochs, wo immediately noticed; 1. That doesn't
look ike a spleen and 2. Itwas massive
‘compares to what you thought in your brain was,
going to look like."
‘Scrub Tech F stated al one paint Surgeon K
came in, be asked what happened, ghe thinks
she told him, but couldn't answer his questions,
‘Sho wae tying fo Keep ik together and not ery.
Scrub Tech F stated Surgeon K went around to
‘the back table and stated fo Surgeon A" aos
Fike the liver to me," in whick Surgoon A replied
“no that's the spleen.”
Scab Tech F stated she and RN E wore talking
‘amongst themselves thatthe specimen looked
tke tho iver, She stated on tne underside ofthe
liver Ricokes tke a space where the galblader
iad been. She eoked the CRNA (Certed
Registored Nurse Anesthetist) i the patint had
tad a previous cholecystectomy (gal badder
femovel), she was tld "yes". When the CMO
(Chief Mecical Otoer) was asked to come into
the OR, we asked his was a safe place 1 tal
He replied "yes" We tld him, "cone of us think
ATER CATTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1191, Continued From page & 191
‘what he took out isthe spleen, it looks tke the
Iver". That is when the CMO looked at the
specimen and called pathology. Sorub Tech F
died thal Surgeon A, came back into the OR
multiple times and kept teing us the spiaen had
‘an aneurysm, and it suptuted and was rexterating
that to us, and after a rd time, asked Scrub Tech
G. to measure the specimen
Scrub Tach F, sald she looked at Surgeon A's
operative note, and it never mentioned the
colon.” Scrub Tech F stated the colon was @
‘major factor in this case and sho vas taken back
thatthe report never mentioned the colon. Scxub
Tech F stated the Operative Note indicated "he
‘was able to conto! bloeding witha clamp, but not
ine time cid he ever ask for a lamp. Which is
‘the one instrument you need to stop bleeding
Bleeding ofthat magnitude youre not going to
cauterize. He never asked for lamp" Because
there was no clamping or trying fo cut off bleeding
toad the source, we wore ltraly drowning.
‘She said she never had eyes on the spleen, andl
‘ever had eyes on the liver uni twas removed.
Staff Member G, OR Scab Technician
(07 09/11/2024 at approximately 8:24 AM, an
intorviow sas conducted with Staff Member G an
OR Scrub Technician. She statos she came into
Patient #1's operating room around 6:10 PME
because she received a text messaga from RN.H
Inleating they needed an extra set of hands,
She said when she scruboed in, Sugeon A was
ligaturing a bunch. She had no visualization
bbocauee she was near the patent's foot. Thoy
‘were using "ture drapes, which have pouches
al sround and avery part was megacoton. When
eama in t was pretty bloody but assumed from
the megacolon, these pouches were all colon
ATER Fane HOTTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1191, Continued From page 8 191
‘She remembers Surgeon A asking for 3 GIA
stapler with vascular load of 60 and then asked
‘or another call saver suction, and asked! for 3
‘more stapler loa, sthich is fl. Al this point he
stared bleeding a fot, She recal's while doing 2
staple load, she ceachod out wth a Kelly iamp
multiple times. She Indicated, when tying to
sschieve hemostasis, you clamp and then do
cutting, “He (Surgoon A) nover took it tho
clamp. Scrub Tech G stated at that point wo
start coding the patient. Compressions sierte.
‘She recalls when she began compressions:
(curing her 2 minutes) the specimen came cut =
‘that was when she saw the Iver on the table end
‘thought why is he doing that? | saw 3 lobes and
the concave space ftom where [Pationt #1's]
cgallbiadder had been, She stated that everyone
knew it was the iver. They asked the CMO to
look atthe specimen, That was wher the CMO
looked at te specimen, tumed back around, his
‘eyes wide’ said to “gett tothe pathotogist now.”
Staff Member D, RN Circulator (RN D)
(0m 08/11/2024 at approximately 9:00 AM a
telephone interview was conctucted with Stat
‘member D, RN Circuletor, RN D stated Surgeon
A started the case laparoscopieally, noticed some
blood in the abdomen and he had megacolon
‘which made it dificult to view. At tat time,
Surgeon A was going to open (mine incision}
‘The patient's abdomen was distended, We
‘opened and at that me, we're moving the colon
faround to get out of the wound and suctioning
some blood which was minimal. Surgeon A asks
{or the GIA stapler. She stated normaly when
‘working on the spleen, you dently end clemp the
splenio artery ana vein. She said she didn't have
‘2 good view. The surgean was the one looking
down int the abdomen. She says he fred the
ATER OSTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1191, Continued From page 10 191
{st staple endl ask for 3 mare loads, Then the
palient hemorthaged. We weat fom minimal
suction to suctioning alot of blood, asked for a
2nd cel-saver (a device that collects and returns
2 patient's blood during surgery, whichis then
transfused back lato the patient) My fst thought
‘was he didn't have control ofthe splenic artery
fad vein or the hertormhage. The aode was
called and we wore busy dealing with the
herrorrhage, helsing anesthesia and hanging
blood. Buring tis time, | saw the specimen on
the fable. "Llooked tke the Iver and fot sick to
ry stomach, [I know fhe took part of iver wo
‘werest oana be able to stop the bleeding’. She
‘shed the surgeon to identify the specimen, She
slated that she is instructed to write down what
the surgeon says, and he said "spleen, the
spleen," | thought “excuse me?" Surgeon A
insisted that was what itwas, and that's what |
labeled tas. “tknew in my hear itwas the liver.”
Surgeon A stated to them, "You guys realize the
paliont died because he had a splenic aneurysm.”
‘We just looked athim and ain't respond. So
‘when he walked out of the room, we looked at
leach other and agreed that looks tke the liver
Sho deserbod the sploen was smaller with
pimple ike rough area. The liver is puriish and
smooth, Surgeon Acame in agaln and again,
reiterating the cause of death - splenic aneurysm.
RN D added f was tke he fot fhe reguraliated
lenough we woutd repeat it. Noone responded,
Staff Member E, RN Scrub (RN E)
(0 00/11/2024 at approximatoly 01:45 PM, a
telephone interview was conducted with Stat
ember E, an RN Scrub was part ofthe surgical
‘eam for Patent #3, RN E algo provided a writen
statement with her account of the events. RN E
ATER ESTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1191, Continued From page 11 191
‘52, the patient hed & large stdomen and
Surgeon A could’ reach or see the spleen
‘adequately; that was when the case went from
laparoscopic o open. The colon was huge,
megacolon everywhere, and Surgeon Ahad 10
push bowel out of the way. RN E says she was
holding retractors and did see ether the spleen
or the liver unif the fiver was on the lable. RN E
says thore was bowel all around the sides ond the
bottom. The surgeon had a good working space,
| could see vessels but | couldn’ identify or tok
‘the diference between the spleen and hepatic
artery, he could saa the vessel, RI E added, in
my opinion you see 2 large vessel you clamp it
and cut t. Surgeon A did not use a clamp st any
time and started to cul, Patient #1 had olher
Issues and a large abdomen, megacolon, and
reaching in there, Surgeon A should have known
that ifthe spleen was moved over, he should
have known al of tat
RN E revealed, Surgeon A points cuta vessel he
Intends to locate, and cuts with Ligasure
(stument used to dissect and ses! blood
vessels) and i starts bleeding profusely, He
continued to Ligasure ané the heavy bleeding
stops, Surgeon A wraps finger around the area he
Intends fo cut next and ssid "ch that's scary" then
said he could fee! the heartizorts beating under
his fnger. Sutgean A then asks fora (brand
name} powered stapler wih a vascular toad and
kept saying he was having trouble getting the
stapler around the structure, gots lt around and
fired the stapler. The heavy bleeding starts again,
other suction (cell saver) is obtained. There is
‘more blood coming out than te two suetions can
handle. Surgeon A asks for another sieper load
‘and fies the stapler bind straight down into the
bloody area. RN E repors thal Anesthasia (Staff
Member C, CRNA. Certified Registared Nurse
oyPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
H 191 Continued From page 12 191
‘Anethetist) sfates, Patient #7 ie hypotensive and
about to code. Staff C then stales the palit is
coding begin CPR. RNE reporied, "immediately
started chest compressions while the nurse cals
code biue” Wrile the cade is going on, RN E
reported that Surgeon A took out tho lver and
placed on patents! legs and "I put ton the table”
‘The CMO was inthe room. We lookse a the
spacimon and told ism it was the For and No
1peeded to look at, She said the CMO looked at
the specimen ard said he was calling pathologist
RN E repert the CMO's expressicn looked
shookod looking, but she did not hear him say
enything at that ime. RN E stated, "I then looked:
in the abdomen for the liver and could not find it
acked (Stall F, Scrub Technician) to also kook in
the bomen forthe liver and neither of us could
se6/L” Afar the time of death, Surgeon Alef the
oom. He came back in twice fing us that the
patient had a splenic artery rupture and that is,
‘wtiy he died,
Staff Member K, 2 Genera Surgeon
(0 99/12/2024 at approximately 07:00 PM an
Intoriow was conducted with Staf K, a generat
surgeon. Surgeon K said, received @ STAT
request fo come in to assist. Las in the medical
office bulding across the streot and came over.
Compressions were in place, the CMO was
running the code, then he called the code about
10 seconds lator. Surgeon K stated that he
observed the organ on the back table. "did not
say anything, (Surgeon ) made a comment and
Idantited tas the spleen, ! gave him the eye and
‘walked away". Surgeon K stated that with his
knowledge and expertise he would identty the
spacimen 26 the fver.
ATER STPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
H 191. Continued From page 13, 191
Physician M, The former CMO:
(On 08/16/2024 at approximately 04:00 PA an
Interview about OR documentation was
Conducted wth Physician M, the former GMO of
hospital. Regarding medical documentation,
Physician M said that in goneral, what is charted
Is considered accurate, wo rly on the physicians
to document. We have too many physicians to
review [documentation for accuracy], Physician M
‘was asked about the Operate Report omiting
the megacolon. Physiclan M indicated that he
‘would expect clinically significant findings to be
documented. I she nurseisorub technician
indicatod this was signficant, "I would say tho OR
staff are a better judge than me, then t tend to
believe them at east”
Curent GMO:
(0 09/16/2024 at approximately 08:00 PM a
telephone/zoom interview was conducted with the
current CMO who stated that he was contacted
by RNY that @ code blue was called, and then
recelved a text from the anesthesoiogist that they
‘wore coding Pationt #1. | went into the operating
room and staf were in active resuscitation. The
procedure was a splenectomy, and saw the
frgan was on the tabi, The CMO stated that it
‘was apparent that itwas not the organ {Surgeon
‘A)had intended to remove. The CMO stated
‘that he was notified afterwards by ths pathologist
‘that itwas the liver,
Staff Member C, Cerified Registered Nurse
‘Anesthetist (CRNA C}
(On 0972012024 at approximately 4:43 PM, an
Interviow was conducted with Staff Member C.
ATER Fane OTTAgency for Heath Gare Administration
PRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER
HLza960001
whe.
‘COuPLETED
osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
‘SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THE EMERALD COAE
MIRAMAR BEACH, FL. 32550
ao
Tae
{ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL
REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION]
a
(PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
1191. Continued From page 14
Corttiod Registered nurse Anesthetist (CRNA),
‘ho slated he has worked with Surgeon A quite
fften, but had not bean through a splenectomy
wilh him. CRNAC stated that the surgical pian
was for laparoscopic hand assisied procedure,
nd that he was able to see the screen but dic
"ot see the spleen, there was mostly bowet on
the screen notable to 69e much else. After about
16 minutos Surgaon A converted to an apen
case, CRNA stated that Patient #1 remained
stable, the vital signs were normal, Surgeon A
‘was expioring the abdomen, and Surgeon A
made a remark about wondering what was going
ton here, and kept exploring going from eft to
fight side, Surgeon A commented on the bowel
cistension, and it appeared ho was struggling.
CRNA C did not recall Surgean A asking for @
clamp. At 6:23 PMs, Surgeon Awas briefed on
paliont’s status and EBL (ectinated blood loss)
‘which was less than alter and transfusion of
blood products 3s continuing at that tine. At 6:30
PM, Surgeon A was made aware of changes in
hemogynamics and the code cart and ail
available blood products were brought into the
room, CRNA slated that a code was called 5
‘minutos later (6:85 PM) and we all startod
‘working on resuscitation, except for Surgeon A,
‘who remained in the patient's abdomen, while
staff were rotating and performing chest
compressions. CRNA C stated that during chest
‘compressions, he saw them passing an organ of
‘and Surgeon A remained in the abdomen, CRNA
C recalled socing Surgeon K walk to the foot of
the bed looked at the specimen, CRNA stated
‘that he recalied a woman's voice stating, "Thats
the fucking tver”
Surgeon A:
On 09/20/2024 at approximately $0.00 AM an
191
ATES ASTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
H 191. Continued From page 15 191
interview was conducted with Surgeon A who
escribed the surgical procedure for Patient #1
Surgeon A stated he was positioned on Patient
41's right to be opposite from target organ se that
he could look att straight. During the
Laparoscopic hand assist procedure, Surgeon A
slated he saw a massively distended colon as
Patient #1 had a belly full of blood and bod is
lnitant te bowel. Surgeon A commentod, that the
bowel was so massive, twas obiterating any
visualization. The blood was bright red and fresh
‘th alot of blood clois ane a large hematoma on
lef side, Surgaon Astated he was able to
vsuslze the spleen after moving the colon,
Surgeon A describe the spleen as iregulac
shaped wth a large amount of blood around it,
Ceformed and large. Surgeon A identified the
spleen visually on the monitor with the scope and
used his left hand to bring it into the il.
Surgeon A stated he also visualized other organs
{0 include the smal and tage intestines, fver arc
claphregm. Surgeon A slated he made the
Cision to convert to an open case when
realized hematoma, amount of bioed, colon and
Patient #1's deteriorating clinical stuation.
‘Surgeon A indicated that once opened, the colon
‘gs 30 lage they had to ight ad battle with it to
cently visualize Key structres, spleen and
surrounding siuclures. Surgeon A stated that he
‘was aware ofthe large colon prior to surgery from
CT scan (computed tomography imaging tes!)
fend abdominal dstonton, Surgeon A stated he
Idantfed the liver out of It comer of his eye.
‘Surgeon A stated thatthe fiver iooks dierent than
‘the spleen, He described a liver as having 2
lobes, sightly differant in color, ane mora reddish
in appearence. Surgeon A desorbed Patient #1°s
spleen as large, deformed, had a cyst and was
significantly eniarged witha tear an bluish la
calor.
ooPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
191, Continued From page 18 191
Surgeon A confiemed visualization of liver ard
spleen and used a surgical knife (Ligasure) to
clssect around the spleen, as Patient #1 had
extensive adhsions, and it helped to prepare to
loasen the spieen and help to remove i. Spleen
had old blood tke @ hematoma and ftesh biood.
Due to colon distension, large abdomen and
dotenorating condition, di trauma styfe incision
{0 cloaly dantfy anatomy, assisted by stat to
have clear view offs
Surgeon A staied multiple times spleen was
visualized and tnat twas deformed and enlarued.
Surgeon A stated he was not able to completely
Gissect the spleen free, and he visualized what he
‘hough! was an aneurysm and prepared to take
contol off, Surgeon A stated that k was diffeutt
10 see due toe large hematoma around spleen
‘and active blood coming from somewhere.
Assistants were working hard to suction blood,
pushing colon out of the way. retract and look.
Surgeon A stated he reached in with his left hand
‘and brought sploen forward and flt the artery,
but before he sould contol she ancuryem there
‘was a large pool of blood to ihe point was
‘exsanguinating. Surgeon A stated that It was 80
‘much blood we could not say up witht. We had
to get another suction device and activated Mass
“Transfusion protocol du to Ke threatening
catastrophic hemorrhage, trying to gett under
contol. Surgeon A stated he did not use stapler
Lntiatar the hemorrhage started. Surgeon A
slated tho sploon was sill atlachod and had
‘adhesions, and he used an energy device to teke
‘fown adhesions. Patient #1 was bieding faster
‘than we could continue to supoost and replace
im with blood products. His main conceen wes to
‘ot control of biescing. Surgeon A stated that
despite best etfs, they coud not see the sources
ofthe bleeding and the patient was getting
ATER Fae ROASTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
191, Continued From page 17, 191
progressively worse and went into cardiag ares,
Surgeon A raveaied he used clamp over the
splenic artery before using the siaoier device, and
before any bleeding or culling occurred. Surgeon
{stated he has to remove the clamp in erder to
ullize the stapler device because the clamp was
in the way. The patient was not bleeding
profusely when the clamp was removed, i
happened when he prepared to introduce the
‘evice, Surgeon A siated he but put stapler
device down because helore you can staple you
have 10 bo able to see what you are staping. ifs
8 sucgica! instrument.
Surgaon A stated the stapler device was
Introduced after about 15 minutes of cardiac
arrest 3s 9 last resort hoping that fhe could get
crantel of the aneurysm that would give Patient
#1 a fighting chance. Surgeon A stated that he
reached in with left hand and again this is bind,
belly fall ef blood and colon in the way. he
Identified what he fet were the spleen anc the
aneurysm and tried io siapie below that, This was
happening during ches! compressions. He stated
ho used 2 fires withthe stapling device ooross the:
btu of te spleen, and removed the organ, after
5:7 minules laler we called the code and had no
progeess,
Surgeon A stated he gave the organ to his
aselstants who asked him what twas, and he
told them twas the spleen, Surgeon A stated that
ro ane informed hie that it was the iver.
Surgeon A confirmed that he did go down to the
laboratory after the procadtre to inspect the
specimen but it dit nat click with me, Iwas,
Cistraught, Surgeon A added that he found out it
‘vias the Fver 2 days fer when the pathologist
(Stal), called him and told him the specimen
ATER Fane OTTPRINTED: tavtor2024
"FORM APPROVED
‘Agency for Heatth Care Adminstration,
SIRTEMENTOFEROENEES | et) FROWETEURPLERTUR TWAT PAE CONSTROETION [paionre aime
IMDRUNOF CORREETIN (Binrecarion wowace aoone ‘SoMPLETED
Pe ym osv20/2024
7000 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEARTHOSPITAL ON THEENERALD con [OPONS IMATE
Pate {cack Boney Most Se Pee Be Fu onan. EACH CORRECTNE ATEN SHOULD BE cole
1S FSI Ton On LS SETI POMPTON) He ‘ORO HEPEMENEZO 70 THE SPORODTE ore
1181) Continued From page 18 Hae
‘was the Ber
Surgeon A stated that he calied the CMO and told
io itwas the liver. Later that day the CMO then
Informed bim there would be an investigation
Surgeon A verified that the operative report was
‘rue and accarale to best of his knowledge at tho
‘ime and ho has not made any addondums to the
‘operative report leaming it was the ver
lass it
#1280) 59A.3.275(2), FAG ORGANIZED MEDICAL 230
S556 STAFF - Commitions
(2) Each hospitars organized medical staff shall
termine its appropriate committee structure
‘and shall provide thatthe following required
committee functions are caried out with sufficient
periodicity to assure their objectives being
Bohioved by separate committee, combined
committees, or commitiee ofthe whole:
(2) Coordination ofthe actuties and general
policies of me various departments,
(0) Interim deciston making for the organized
medical staf between staff meetings, under such
limitations as shail be set by the organized
medical staf
{}Foliowrup and appropriate disposition of at
Teports deating withthe various stat functions.
(4) Review of ail applications for appointment and
reappointment to all categories of staff, and
recommendations on each to the governing
board, including delineation of pivieges to be
granted in each case, and right of hearing and
ppesrance, Except in emergency cases,
ATER EST
‘STATE FORA “ wor Vesna 0047PRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230 Continued From page 19, 290
recommendations to the goveming board for
vwithcraoral of any privieges of a member ofthe
organized mecical stator cismissl from the
organized mecical staff willbe made only after a
thorough investigation by the organized medical
staff ora committe thereof, wih the subject
member being alven the ght of hearing belore
the organized medical sta ora cormittee
‘thereof if requested within a reasonable immo as
specified inthe hospta's bylaws.
(6) Mecical records curently maintained
esenbing the condition, treatment, and progress
of patient in sufiiont completeness to assure
transferable comprehension of he case at any
time,
(1) Clinical evaluation ofthe quality of mesical
care provided to ei categories of patents on the
basis of documented evidence,
{} Review of hospital admissions with respect fo
‘eed for admission, length of stay, discharge
practices and evaluation ofthe services ortered
and provided
{) Surveitance of hospital infection potentials
{and cases and the promotion ofa preventive and
corrective program designed fo minimize these
hazards.
() Surveiiance of pharmacy and therapeutic
policies and practices within the insitston
() Hospital tests may be ordered oniy bythe
attending physician, or by another censed health
professional that licensed health professional is
‘acting within his scope of practice as defined by
‘applicable faws and rules ofthe agency, Nothing
herein shal be construed to expand ar restrict
Suh laws and rules pertaining to the practice of
the vatlous health professions.
“This Statute or Rule is not met as evidenced by:
Based on staff interviews, ciizal record review,
review of medical staf bylaws and facity
ATER CATTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230 Continued From page 20, 290
ocumentation review, te hospital falled to
ensure that each member ofthe medical sta
‘emonsizated competencies to perform each task
vithin the scope of practice for which privileges
have been granted for 1 of 5 surgeons sampled,
Surgeon A. From May 2028 fo August 2024, the
hospital denttied a total of 3 surgical errors. A'S
errors involved Surgeon A. In May 2023,
‘Surgeon & removed part of Patient #5's pancreas
Instead of the intended adrenal gland. Surgeon A
pad not performed any other adrenalectomies
(omovat of adrenal gland) at the fact.
Corroctve actions included to immadiately stop
scheduling adrenalectomies, counseling
Surgeons on the use of surgical markers and
proctoring al least § cases. Proctoring was not
‘completed as the hospital no longer performs
adrenalectomies. In August 2023, Patient #6 was
identified to have a bowel perforation folowing a
partal colectomy (suryical procedure to removes
part of the colon) performed by Surgeon A,
Patient #8 died ftom infection compicalions.
Corrective actions included rferral to the
rodentiaing committee for potential actions.
However, per Credentialing Manager interview,
‘this is not one ofthe Credentialing commitie
‘unctions. in August 2024, Surgeon A performed a
splenectomy (removal of the spleen) on Patient
#1, Surgeon A removed the patient's liver instead
resulting in hemorrage (severe and pertuse
bleeding) and death, Surgeon A had not
performed a spienectomy at this hospital in over 3
years, sinco July 2021, The hosoital susponciod
Surgeon A's privileges end initiated an
Investigation.
Interviews with 8 sampled operating room stait
‘ound 6 stat with concems regarding surgical
practices by Surgeon A (Registered Nurse (RN)
D,RNE, Scrub Technician F and G, RN H and
ATER Fae TOTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230, Continued From page 24 290
RNY), These concems wore reported tothe
Operating Room Manager andlor Operating
Room Director, but no further action was intiated,
Staf inierviows identified 2 additonal patients
vnth possible surgical erors by Surgeon A thal
had not been investigated. Surgeon Awas
‘observed to sever the common bile duct on
Patient #2 during a Cholecystectomy (removal of
‘2 gallladdan in Age 2024, and sever a urator on
Ptient #4 during a partial colactomy in July 2024
resulting in @ Urologist being called to the
‘9perating room for ropairs dunng the surgery for
Pationt #4
‘The finding inckide
(07 05/12/2025, Surgeon & was the Primary
‘Surgeon involved in a wrong surgical procedure
Involving Paliant #5. Identified was the removal
of a portion of the patient's pancreas instead of
fn adrenalectomy. Prior to this adrenalectomy
allempt, no other adrenalectomies had been
performed at the hospital. The hospital
investigated and implemented corrective actions
{olowing this event
‘The hospitat recommended fo immediately coase
the scheduling of adrenalectomies by either
provider until practoring is completed. The
Physicians involved wore counsoled on
‘opportunites to uiize markers when performing
procedures, and surgical proclonng for procedure
bya provider who has experiance with
‘adrenalectories, minimum of 5 cases would take
place. The hospital indicated they were no ionger
performing adzenalactomies, vierefere ao
proctoring was completed. This was confirmed
by review ofthe operative toa,
(n 08/04/2023. Surgeon A wes one of several
ATER OATPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230 Continued From page 22, 290
physicisns involved in an error eueiating in the
‘eath of patiant #6. Surgeon A performed a colon
resection; identified past-surgically was a air and
‘uid coletion in the abdomen and pelvis;
concerns were identified for bowel perforation or
12 small oak atthe anastomosis (a surgical
connection between two body channels}
Identiied was the hospital's staff feture to follow
sopsis protocol folowing a feak of a colon
‘anastomosis. Corrective actions included the
case being peer reviewed to determine education
requited for physicians involved, case fo be
reviewed by the Credentialing cormmities for
potential action plan and fe re-educte personal
‘n inpatient sepsis alert process,
Per review of an email to the Medical Executive
Committee (MEC), dates 1010812023, from the
Chief Medical Officer, indicated thatthe Medical
Staff Performance Improvement Committee
(MSPIC) met: identifying the following concems
“nih Surgeon A’s:"pallern of questionable
erision-making: less 20 related to surgical
‘ochnique and more related ‘0 post-operative
management and complications; mast of issues
‘00m to revolve around bowel sugary
recognition of dificut cases and has a higher
‘volume than his regional colleagues; few cases
have bean done with another locat surgeon as the
“assistan.", questions cogarding the number of
‘acilities that Surgeon A covers fet questions
‘nether ample time is being allocated to each
pationtin tie post-op setting; documentation
seems hurried and often delayed and does not
‘accurately reftect what the surgeon is abte to
cloquently sta regarding his trought procosses
{end actions upon review: and the surgeon is
‘penuine, wel intentioned, respected by the
‘medical stall and has not had prior major issues,
apart from the cases discussed over the past few
ATER Fane ROTOPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230 Continued From page 23, 290
months,
In the same email (19/09/2023), MSPIC
recommends: a lller of guidance, counset,
“warning or reprimand be issued by the MEC;
conditions for cninued appointment to inciude
‘moritoring, proctorng and consultation witivby &
peer (TBD'- to be determined) - must have
bowol-surgary casos reviewed on a monthiy basis
‘or next quarter and reviews should include the
\ecision-making processes both before and after
‘the surgical provedure; and Surgeon A must
tundortake spocie CME (continued medicat
education) on Selected Readings in General
Surgery (SRGS) focused on Large Bower
Disorder and SESAP (Surgical Education andt
Self-Assessment Program) 18 - Alimentary Tract
‘and SESAP 18 - Advanced Alimentary Tract
Surgeon A took a voluntary leave of absence from
(09/20:2028 through 1012012023.
‘An emai fromm Surgeon to the Director of
Quality, dated 0171212024, includes proof of
completion of the required SRGS readings and
(OME modivies, ane a receipt forthe courses,
purchased on 04/08/2024, Solf.assesement
scores were included which revealed 4 parts to
the Alimentary Tract module and 2 parts to the
‘Advanced Aimentary Tract module. Sutgeon A
scored the folowing
Advanood Alimentary Tract
+ Advanced Almentary Tract - Part | shows @
Complete Ini score of 36%, Latest score 92%
= Advanced Alimentary Tract - Part shows a
Complete inal score of 40%, Latest score 88%
‘A aview of the “American Collage of Surgeons,”
‘website, which offers the SESAP 18 an SESAP.
ATER Fae OTSTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230, Continued From page 24 230)
18 Advanced course indicates "To obtain CME
red, 80 percent ofthe questions must be
answered correctly within three attempts.
‘Actioral review is offered untl a score of 80
percent is achieved.” Advanced CME | ACS
(facs.or9)
Presented for review, was a lller to Surgeon A,
ated 01/23/2024, from the Chairman, Modical
Staff Performance Improvernent Commitee
indicating that six eases related fo Surgeon A's
Focused Professional Practice Evaluation (FPPE}
‘wore conducted, The cases were reviewed and
ciscusseds there were no concerns identified
‘The fetter aiso indicated that Surgeon A had
successfully completed the CME on Bowe!
surgery and that his FPPE was being closed.
“There were six (6) cases that were peer
reviewed, speciic lo colon-rectal or abdominal
surgeries that were performed between
17110472028 to 01/08/2024, However, there was no
‘mention of Surgeon A's, "Complete initial failing
score on Advanced Alimentary Tract, and there
had been ro mention in which order Surgeon A
needed to complete the MSPIC
recommendations (as Surgeon A completed the
‘educational component afer the performance of
surgical case peer reviews), No proctoring was
completed.
Surgeon A was re-appointed to the Medical Staff
n 05125/2024,
(02 09/11/2024 at approximately 10:10 AM, an
Interview was conducted with tie Director of
Medical Staff Services and the Credentialing
Menager (CM). The CM indicated that
credentialing has nothing to do with peer review.
‘These are completely separate. The CM stated
they verify the appears for intial appointment,
ATER Fane RESTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230 Continued From page 25 290
education, feensure, employment peer
{0 tum in case logs for 24 months. We do
‘documentation is then reviewed by the
yoars
oer eases, this ie noted ‘verbally’ thatthe
question oF concern about a practioner.
recommendations, and he submited
documentation that he had completed the
‘weight’ on the posttest and that without
references, boar cetification, training, hospital
affiation and malpractice. Surgeons are required
background check on the intial appointment. All
credentialing committed and severifed every 2
(0 08/1312024 at approximately 1:50 PM, an
interview was conducted with the Director of
(Quality regarding ongoing physician performanes
evaluations (OPP), She stated that peor roview
and OPP were 2 separate things. When a
physician comes.up for evaluation - if ho's had
physician has been through the peer review
committee, Peer review is done based off ofa
(0 09/13/2024 at approximatay 4:00 PM, a
telephone interview was conducted withthe
‘former Chief Medical Officer leaving the position
in January 2024. He stated that the cases from
Surgeon A were sent fo the MSPIC committee
‘and reviewed, and twas determined based on a
certain level of concerns expressed, Surgeon A.
‘nas given a set of guidefines in order to stay
credentialed. We investigated the cases and
charts were handed of to individuals (other
physicians) who blindly completed a review and
‘ould provide an unbiased evaluation of the
chats in questions, Surgeon A met those.
coursgs requested for him to take. When asked
bout the failing scores on the inital test, he
sated its not unusual to have a pretest to test
‘gap knowledge. He stated | would put most
ATER Fae ROTOPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
230 Continued From page 28 230)
information ftom the testnriters he could rot
‘comment further. As far as concerns with
Surgeon A's competencies, he stated there were
2 few cases brought up via the Event Reporting
System (ERS) and a few general nonspecific
‘comments made, but that's conjecture and ne
requested real events and encouraged ERS
reparts and would investigate those and hand off
10 MSPIC,
(On 0911612024 at approximately 6:00 PM, an
Interview was conductod withthe cutront Chvet
Mocical Officer (CMO) beginning this role on May
5, 2024, The CMO staled he had no concerns
vith Surgeon A’s competencies, and no formal
concems, regarding Surgeon A, had beer
brought to him,
‘There have been no addlional pact reviews
completed for Surgeon A,
Identiied to eceyr on 08/2112024, Surgeon A was
the Primary Surgeon involved in a wrong surgical
procedure invoiving Patient #1. Surgeon A
intended fo perform a splenectorny; however, the
patient's iver was removed resulting ia tho death
of Patient #1 (cross reference H0191),
‘Aoview of Surgeon A's case log reveaiod he had
performed ony two splonectomies at the hospital
Since Apit 2021. His last splenectomy was over 3
yeas prion July 2021
“The hospte! deta report, showed a total of four
splensctomies performed within the hospital,
querying back to October 2078 to July 2024. The
last splenectomy performed was by Surgeon Kin
September 2023,
Per clinical racord review, Patient #t presented to
ATER Fane EOEPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
230, Continued From page 27 230)
‘the hospital wath worsening abdominal pain
lef-side and tefl chast on 08/18/2024. The
Patient was seen by Surgeon A, a General
Surgeon, and admited with pain consistent with
fan enlarged spleen and splenic mass, identiied
por maging studies. Monitoring of the patients
hemoglobin and hematoorit (H&H} were ordered,
slong with addtional maging studies, monitoring
of vita signs and a recommendation for a
splenectomy (removal of spioon). The patient
into refused suegery. requesting to be
lscharged, but agreed to surgery after blood
reports on his hemoglobin continued to decrease
end the patient's abdorrinal pain failed 10
Improve. The pationt was italy offered transfer
to a higher level of care, but due to the patient's
continued dectine of his hemagiabin, Surgeon A
‘elt he opportunity to transfer the patient was no
longer en option. The patient agreed to the
surgical procedure on 03/2/2024, which was
scheduled for st 4:00 PM,
(On 09/10/2024 at 216 PM, an interview was
conducted Staff Member ¥, a Registered Nurse
(RN) Circulator, regarding Surgeon & and the
surgical case of Pationt #1. RNY stated that
Surgeon A was “pleasant io work wi,” and
slated that "cases that were routine he was very
compeient in, such as laparoscopic
chotecystectomias, appendectomies, but wo all
hd this eere feeing’, “how are we doing a
spleen (splenectomy) at 4 (o'clock) in te
afternoon?” RNY, stated that Susgeon A is very
‘typical for being laie, stating he was tae [date of
event] and they dict got back to room unt 5-6
O'dock. RN Y statad that ‘splenociomies are not
routine procedures and she can only think of 2
‘thet were done inthe past 2 % years.” RNY
Slated there were complaints about Surgeon A
znd tha in the beginning of her career. when she
ATER Faas REETAgency for Heath Gare Administration
PRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
‘worked at & hospital in another state, she kept
hearing his name (Surgeon A}, and il was never 2
‘00d thing. RNY stated that many technicians
‘nd nurses faked about him and bad outcomes,
twas never good surgical. This was nota
ormal ease and this was nota rautine normal
caselsplenectomy] for Surgeon. RNY stated
she had never paricpated in a splenectomy al
‘his tospital, ang it was nota routine procedure.
RN Y slated that Surgeon A didnot ask for
helprassistance from another surgeon inthis
cease, and that he could have. Holp was avaliable.
‘Wo want the family to know the tuth and never
thought | would see something tke this, this is 9
huge learning moment for everybody and prevent
this from happening again from incompeteny.”
RN Y had never completed an event report
regatéing Surgeon A.
(On 09/10/2024 at 3:15 PM, an interview was
conducted with Sta Member F, a Serub
“Technician (Scrub Tech) and Firs Assistant,
Scrub Tech F was asked ifshe hag any concerns
vith the competency of Surgeon A. Scrub Tech F
slated that there was once case where he was
oing a robotic inguinal hernia, and she noticed
be was dissecting on the wrong side. She said
‘when she pointed this out to Surgeon A, he stated
he was doing a"bilatora" despite the operative
consent incicating a right Inguinal homia repat.
Scrub Tech F stated she did not report this
because the paint did have bilateral hernias and
the the consent included “and all nocessary othor
procedures", so she "oid think he was doing
Something wrong.” Scrub Tech Fis fama wth
‘the factiy’sincidem reporting system, known as,
ERS (Event Reporting System). Sorub Tech F
had never completed an event report regarding
‘Surgeon A, or the wrong side surgery.
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
230, Continued From page 28 230)
ATER TTAgency for Heath Gare Administration
PRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
HLza960001
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER neuLoNe
whe.
‘COuPLETED
osr2012024
‘SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THE EMERALD COAE
7900 US HWY 96 W
MIRAMAR BEACH, FL. 32550
Pate {cack Boney Most Se Pee Be Fu ene
Te FecOLATORT om Ss EENTIFYNG NFORWTION we
(PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
1230 Continued From page 29,
‘think it makes him dangerous,
report and understands what needs to be
2 event report regarding Surgeon A.
conducted with Staff Member 6, @ Scrub
(0m 09/1002024 at 3:57 PM, an interview was
conducted with Staff Member H, an RN Operating
Room (OR) Nurse. RN H stated she has never
participated ina splenectomy. RN H wa asked if
she had any concerns with the competency oF
skls of Surgeon A, and replied for the most part,
“no”, but his was her frst year working on the
surgery side. RIN H incicatod thal his patients
“have been a ile questionable fo mo" whan
comes to thelr co-mortidites, and she stated his
cases are often added ai the end of the day when
ho ison call. RN H stated she has never hag any
Issues with Surgaon A, and has ne probloms
voicing concerns and feels leaders would act on
‘those actions. She described Surgeon A, "in
‘general, he can be very eavalier, So much 60,1
‘Stat Member H
‘was famtiar withthe fecity’s incident reporting
system, indicating she has compteted an incident
reported. Staff Member H had newer completed
0m 09/11/2024 at 8:24 AM, an interview was
“Technician (Scrub Tech), who stated that she has
‘worked with Surgeon A muitiple times. Scrub
‘Tech G staied that Surgeon Ais a ikeable guy,
fun, loud during "ime-cut”, She stated she had
hor concerns when she worked with bim, as she
had previously worked at trauma hospital in
Colorado. The frst few times working with him,
she would raise an eysbraw, She explained this
statement by stating, "He cut the common bile
‘luct during a laparoscope cholocystectomy
(gallbiadder romoval and broke sorub and went
into hattway to take a phone call". She stated she
‘asoumed the call was to Gl (gastrointestinal)
‘surgeon or another general surgeon, Scrub Tech
G stated that Suigeon A ded not puta stent in, he
230)
ATER Faas HOTTAgency for Heath Gare Administration
PRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER
HLza960001
ewe
‘COuPLETED
osr2012024
‘SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THE EMERALD COAE
7900 US HWY 96 W
MIRAMAR BEACH, FL. 32550
ao
Tae
{ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL
REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION]
ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
a ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
230
Continued From page 30
Just closed i, In her experience, you do puta
slentin, She slated that this incident was
reported to the Operating Room Manager and
Operating Room Director, but she was unaware
ofthe outcome. The incident involved Patient #2,
‘Sho also added that most of Surgeon A's
laparoscopic cholecysteciomies, she sald it
seoms like 90% of thor, would end up “open”
(mid abdominal incision), She stated converting
{0 an open procedure was so cormman "every
‘ime! would bring in a major ray and most ofthe
time we would ond up using them.” Scrub Tech
G referred back to Pationt #2 stating that she
"Gide feet ne took it serious at al and he doesn't
othe right thing”, She stated "I don't ust him
‘8a docl [refering to Surgeon A), hated
‘working with him". When asked if any conceme
‘were voiced preoperatively regarding the
splenectomy scheduled for 08/21/24, she stated
‘that all of us were wondering why we were doing
8 splenectomy here anc why we were doing t 50
late in the day. Scrub Tech G added that even
‘the Anesthesto‘ogist questioned it. The coneams.
‘were brought to the charge nurse and to the Chief
Mecical Officer. Serub Tech G stated, “anyone
‘that has done a splenectomy knows you are
ong to bised.” Scrub Tech G added that stat
cal the hospital to see who is on call for surgery i
‘their family need io come hore, and Hits
Surgeon A, thoy will wait. When asked if se felt
comfortable in speaking up f she sees something
‘that it ight, she reptiod that she feats
comfortable, but also al the same time, "Im a
Scrub Tech and the surgeon wan't ister fo 3
Scrub Tach unfortunately." Soruo Tech G didn't
{think incident reporting was part of her orientation
process, bul she had good resources available to
her in the operating room. Staff Member G
slated she was awace how to complete an event
report in ERS, and knows why to report and says,
230)
ATER REETPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230, Continued From page 31 290
“basically everyhing should be reported. Scrub
‘Tech G tas never completed an avent report
regarding her cancers with Surgeon A ot when a
laparoecopie procedure tums to an open
procedure.
(On 09/11/2024 at approximately 8:59 AM, a
telephone interview was conducted with Stat
Member 0, an RIN Operating Reom Nurse, RN
slated she voiced concomns about the
splenectomy scheduled, on 08/21/2024 at
4:00PM, tothe Charge Nurse (CN), She stated
sho told the CN “she was not comfortable with the
case and was concemed about the outcome.”
RN D wanted to make sure they had enough
blood; stating that "splaens get a ot of biood.
She stated she was told by the CN thet the doctor
‘was approved and credentialed, IRN D sad, she
“alin hava @ good feeling. [lacked confidence
in the surgeon to do the case and she raised
‘those same concems". RN D slated that
Surgeon A was about an hour late. The surgery
‘was scheduled for 4:00 PM and the pationt went
into the OR 95:20 PM, She recalled standing at
pationt#'s bedside white Surgeon Awas
yeaking with the pation". She stated Surgeon A
“made it sound ike [the surgery] run ofthe mi,
but | knew diferent" RN D, stated she had,
never bean involved in something Fke this.”
During the ntorviw, RN D sisted "Evoryone
knows he's ot a good surgeon,” and added that
statf would not bring their fami I he was on cal,
RN D sai there was a similar incident last year
‘that has been under review. RN stated, "I dont.
know how he was alowed to come back” and she
had heard thore were 6 cases against hin. RN D-
reiterated that she did tell the charge nurse and
talked to anesthesia and voiced the same
coneeens. Staff Member D had naver completed
ln event report regarding Surgeon A
AERPs CSOTAgency for Heath Gare Administration
PRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
(0 09/12/2024 at approximately 12:08 PM, a
telephone interview was conducted with the
Director of Risk Management. He stated that it
‘a8 broughl to our attention by sorne of the OR
staf that Surgeon A had severed a common bite
uct and had never been reported. He stated
‘they are warking on that now and weil be
‘educating the staf. He stated he oxpactod
rursing staff andor provider should have
reported those issues immediately
(0 0971212024 beginning at approximately 8:25
AM, a simuitaneous interview wes conducted with
‘the Operating Room (OR) Director and Operating
Room Manager. The staf stated that fa
procedure changed from sthat was originally
planned, then staff do an ERS. The staff used
‘the example - fa scheduled laparotomy
converted fo open, that would constitute and
ERS. The OR Director stated that some of the
concerns they are hearing about Surgeon Aare
Just now being brought to thelr attention, euch as
Surgeon A’ reputation in (city in Alabama). She
ld acknowledge that she 'has heard’ sta!
Indicate that they check to see what surgeon is
(on caf frst before they bring family to hossital
sand fits Surgeon A they don’t come in, But
slated, staff each have tele favorites, and this
‘was not something that caused hor concem. She
said Surgeon A does a big volume, dss 2 lot of
ca868, anc has more inpatients. The OR Director
slated that whon surgeons are baing
recredentisied we give the commitee the OR
cca9e logs, but we don’ know how this is done at
ther hospiials. The OR Manager etated she had
heard concerns voiced by staff 0 include
concems from anesthesia, regarding the late stat
ofthe splenectomy scheduled at 4.0080
(08/21/2024). The anesthesiologist was informed
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230 Continued From page 32 290
ATER Fane OTSTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230 Continued From page 33 290
‘thet they ad suffeiont staf and al the necessary
ssupplies/products needed to perform the surgery.
The OR Manager indicated she had "fufed the
slat, for this ease. They hed enough staf, at
necessary products and equipment. ‘The staft
‘work 12:Rour shifis ans scheduling tis
procedure was within cur scheduling window.
(0 09/11/2024 at approximatoly 1:46 Ma
‘elephone interview was conducted with Stat
Member E, an Operating Room Registered
Nurse. RN E stated she brought forth concerns
prooparativaly, stating hat the majordy of staf
fend anesthesia and the CRNA (Certified
Registered Nurse Anesthetist) al voiced thelr
‘opinion and dign' think we should be doing this
procedure jsplenectorm}. RN € stated thet she
ide think "Surgeon Awas a great eurgeon and
cet think it woud and wel," and incicated this
hospital is "not a trauma facility.” RN E stated
‘this was an elective eurgery and thst
'splonectomies can go bad vary fast, and starting
the surgery at §:30 PM (surgeon was late) wasnt
‘omar with limited sta; and not ema forthe
patient. She stated, the patient should have been
Somewhere whore they do splenecfomies on a
regular basis and staff that are qualified. RN E
‘added that Surgeon A has had a prior wrong she
surgery and people in the OR voiced concerns:
about his skis (0 the Charge Nurse and tothe
OR Director, RNE stated she was familiar vith
‘the faciy’s incident reporting system in ERS.
RN E statod sho has not completed an ERS this
time; "never done it hefore, wish had."
During an interview conducted with Surgeon A, on
(09/20/2024 beginning at appcoximately 10.00 AN,
Surgeon A stated thet he has performed probably
"20-30 splenectomies” in Ws career, tee at this
hospital including the one on 0821/2024.
AUER Faae RESTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230, Continued From page 34 230)
Surgeon A describes the events that aocurred for
patient #4, Staling he was ‘on calf and received
2 vall from the Emergency Department for patient
Uv had acute onset of abdarinat pain and
tiscomfor. Based on his imaging studies,
physical examination findings anc laboratory
{ndings @ splenectomy was recommended. The
pationt was not wanting surgery. He advised tho
patlont that this hosptat dows not nave
“intarventionat radiology’ (a modical specalty that
ses minimaly-invasive procedures to diagnose
‘and treat disease in the body - often used fo treat
splenic injuries in stable patants through a
procedure called splenic artery embolization).
Patient #1 wanted to be discharged. Surgeon A
Indicated that would bo against medical advico,
fs the patient wanted to drive home 6 hours.
Surgeon A offered to transfer the patient to 8
Nigher lavel of care, but the patient refused. He
had placed the patient on the OR (operating
oom) sohedule, to ensure space avaisbiity for
08/20. Surgeon A continued to monitor Patient
1's clinical canction, and the bloods counts kept
iminishing and the scan were showing there is
a problem. Again, he had a conversation with the
pationt recommending transfor toa higher level of
care. The patient didnt want to do that and didnt
‘ant to consider having the procedure done. By
Day #3, the patent was really sick and now
Indieates he wants somathing done. At this point,
‘Surgeon A stated, that Patient ft's condition has
\eteriorated and we've fost window to transfer {0
Higher lovel of care apd pationt #$ became very
stended. Surgeon A felt thet patient #1 was no
longer stable enough to transfer, indicating that
transfers can take up to 24-48 hours to occur
Surgeon A stated thet no sta members
‘approaches nim with concerns about this,
procedure. He aid speak with the
anesthesiologist to ensure af blood products
ooPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230 Continued From page 35 290
‘were aveiiabie, The surgeon stated that
"splenectomy" is nola simple procedure and
normally he would have ancther physician assist
in, but based on the availabilty of help the
(OR, a Surgea) Scrub Technician Fist Assistant
(Sorub Tech F),he fet confidant he could take
care of patient #. Surgeon A added that if she
had not been avatable, he would have called
‘another Surgeon. Surgeon A stated that ho
cooedinated with the anesthesia team and with
the CMO and they had worked on making sure
blood products ware avaliable.
Brought tothe attention ofthe Director of Quelily
and Rsk Management on 08/05/2024 by the
CMO, was Patient #4, Patient #4 had presented
‘0 hospital io have a stent remove following 4
laparoscopic hand-assisted left colectomy
ccompiated by Surgeon A on 0770212024. Duving
the pationts surgery, Surgeon A.cut the Fight
ureter requiring additional surgioa intervention by
a urologist. This flied lo be reported al the time
ofthe incident
(01 09/432024 at approximately 4:50 PM, an
Interview was conducted with the Director of
(Quality regarding the Medical Staff Performance
Excellence Committee (MSPEC) and peor
reviow. The Director of Quality staied physicians
have ongoing physician performance evaluations
completed, and when a physician comes up for
jevaivation. fhe has had any peer review cases
‘that information is provided here and signed off
by the depariment chair. The peer review
process and the ongoing physician performance
fevalvations ato two separate things. Pear roview
‘occurs when there isa ease af concern, either by
1 peer, another physician or the SERT Teor
(Safety Event Response Team}. They wil make
2 request for peer review. Peer review is
AERPs RESTAgency for Heath Gare Administration
PRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER
HLza960001
whe.
‘COuPLETED
osr2012024
‘SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THE EMERALD COAE
7900 US HWY 96 W
MIRAMAR BEACH, FL. 32550
ao
Tae
{ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL
REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION]
a
(PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
1230 Continued From page 36
reviewed by the MSPEC committee which
Includes 3 separate corporate affliated hospitals
that are poojed together, which creates the
Midwest MSPEC,
(on 09/20/2024 a approsimatay 00 AM, an
interview was conducted withthe Chaiman,
Metical Stat Performance improvement
Commitoo, Midwost Markt, Ho stated tho
process works when the Diector of Quaity and
her team identify 2 case to come to peer review
oF 19 8 SERT process, This gos presented at
the MSPEC committee, isan overall process
were we have doctor in that field review and
talk about the cage. We discuss wo thek the
cate is accoplabio or unaccoplabla, Somatimos
‘we need to send the ease out for more review
‘We cant make a determination unt we receive
axvica from otter doctors. Theres a slandard
MSPEC form and quay post guide forthe form
‘nbich addresses ciferent elements of te case
‘We perform this review fairly and objectively and
equally apy
Areview ofthe factity's Medical Staff Bylaws,
10212021, identifies in Aticle 8, beginning on page
26 the duties of "The Exocutive Committe is
Slegated the primary oversight authority over
professional activities and functions of the
Medical Staf and performance improvement
activites regarding the professional services
provided by Medical Staff member with cinical
privieges. This authority may be removed or
mmodifed by amending these Bylaws and related
policies. The Executive Commies is responsible
Tor the flowing
(2) Acting on behalf ofthe Medica Sta in the
Intorvais between Medical Staff meetings (the
officers and the CMO ara empowered to act as a
group in urgent situations between Executive
230)
ATER Faae OTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPTALON THEEMERALDCOAE [HUME MAT ORM
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230, Continued From page 37 230)
Commitee meetings:
(c). Recommending dieetty to the Board on at
least the folowing
en
2. the mechanism used to review exedemtiats and
{0 delinsata inalvicual clinica privleges:
3. applicants for Medical Staff appointment and
reappointment;
4. Gelineaton of cnical privtegos;
5. participation ofthe Modicat Statin
performance improvement activities and the
{ually of professional services boing provided by
the Medical Stat,
6, the mechanism by which Medicat Steft
ppointment may be terminated:
7. bearing procedures; and
8. other appropriate reports end
recommendations that the Executive Commitioe
has received from Madical Staff committoes:
epartments, clinica services, and other groups.
Aatige 8, €, - "Performance improverrent
Functions" indicate that "The Medical Staff's
‘2ctivaly involved in the measurement,
‘assessment and improvement of a ieest the
‘olowing:
4. Patient safety, including processes to respond
{0 patient safety alerts, meet pallent safety goals,
and reduce patient safety risks
3. Medical assessments and treatment of patients
6. Operative and other procedures, inctuding
tissue review and review of discrepancies
between pre-operative and post-operative
lagnoses
7. Appropriateness of clinical practice patterns
11, Sentinel events incuding root cause analyses
‘and responses Io unamticipated adverse events
17. Accurate, timely, and legible completion of
rmesical records
19, Review of findings fram the ongoing and
focused professional practice evaluation activities
ATER Fae CESTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
zsseooet wg osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1230 Continued From page 38 230)
‘thet ore relevant to an individuals performance;
and
20. Communication of findings, conclusions,
recommendations, and action to improve
performance to appropriate Medical Sta
‘members and the board,
Class tt
#407 396,0187(1 044, F.S. Approp Measure - Ongoing aor
Eval of ProolSysiems
(6) The development of appropriate measures to
minimize the tsk of adverse incidents to pation,
Including, but not inited to:
4, Development, implementation, and ongoing
evaluation of procedures, protocols, and ystems
{0 accurately identity patienis, planned
procedures, and the correct site ofthe planned
procedure £0 as to minimize the performance of
2 surgical procedure on the wrang patient. a
‘wrong surgical procedure, a wrongesite surgical
procedura, ora surgical procedure otherwise
‘nreiated to the palients diagnosis or medical
condition.
This Statute oF Rule is pot met as evidenced by:
‘Based on staff interviews, patient madical record
review, hospital docurnonts roviaw and reviow of
the hospita’s policy and procedure, the fecity
failed to ensure that staf reported any quality
pationt safely concer to the Risk Maniagor for
Investigation, This staffs faire in reporting
‘oneemns with competency led to the hospitats
‘altar in identifying opportunites te improve
patient heaith outcomes.
ATER TET
‘STATE FORA “ wor Hesston sont 300147PRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
407 Continued From page 39 aor
The findings inctude:
Patient medical record review was conducted for
Patient #1, Patient #1 was the subject of a wrong
sile Fwrong surgery resulting inthe patients
oath, Pationt #1 was scheduled for a
laparoscopic splenectomy by Physician A.
Physician A removed the urong organ, the liver,
instead of tne patents spleen, resutng in the
patient's hemorrhage, cardiac arrest and death
(0 09/1012024 at 2°18 PM, an interviow was
conducted Staff Member Y, a Registered Nurse
(RN) Circulator, regarding Surgeon A and the
surgical case of Patient #1. RNY stated that
Surgeon A was "pleasant io wotk with," and
slated that "cases that were routine he was very
‘competent in, such as laparoscopic,
cholecyslectemias, appendectomias, bul we all
had this ees feeling’, "now are we doing a
spleen (splenectomy) at 4 (o'clock) in the
figragon?” RN Y, stated that Surgeon Ais very
typical fr being aie, stating he was late (date of
event] and! they dit get back to room unti 5-6
oldock. RNY stated that ‘splenectomies are not
routine procedures an she can only think of 2
‘that were done in the past2 % years.” RNY
slated there were complaints abou! Surgeon A
and that in the beginning of her career, when she
‘worked ata hospital in another stato, sha kept
rearing his name (Surgeon A}, and itwas never a
good thing. RIN Y stated that many technicians
‘and nurses talked about him and bad outcomes,
ites never good surgicely. Staff Member ¥ had
ever completed an event report regarding
Physician A,
(01 09/10/2024 at 3:75 PM, an interview was,
conducted with Staff Member F,a Serub
“Technician (Scrub Tech) and First Assistant
ATER Fae CTTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
407 Continued From page 40 aor
Scrub Tech F was asked ifshe had any concems
th the competency of Surgeon A. Scrub Tech F
slated that there was ones ease where he was
ing a robotic inguinal emia, and she noticed
he was dissecting on the wrong site, She said
‘when she pointed this out to Surgeon A, he stated
he was doing a “bilateral” despite the operative
consent incicating a ight inguinal hema repac.
‘Scrub Toch F stated she did not report this
because the patient cid have bilateral hernias and
‘the the consent included “and all nevessary other
procoures", 50 she “didnt think he was doing
somthing wrong” Scrub Tech Fis falar wit
the faciy’s incident reporting system, known os,
ERS (Event Reporting System), Sorub Tech F
had never completed an event ropoxt regarding
Surgeon A, or the wrong side surgery.
(0 09/10,2024 at 3:57 PM, an interview was
conducted with Staff Membar #, an RN Operating
Room (OR) Nutse. RN H siated she has never
participated ina splenectomy, RN H was asked if
she had any concerns with the competency or
skis of Surgeon A, and replied forthe most pert,
no", bu this was her first year working on the
surgery side, RN H incicatod thal his patients
“have been a ble questionable to me" when t
comes to their co-morbidities, and she stated his
cases are often added at the and af the day whon
ho ison call, RN H stated sho has never had any
issues with Surgeon A, and has ne problems
‘voicing concerns and feels leaders would act on
those actions. She described Surgoon A, "in
‘eneral, he can be very cavalier. So much 30,
think makes him dangerous.” Stat Member H
‘as familiar with the faclty's incident reporting
system, indicating she has completed an incident
report and understands what needs to be
reported. Staff Member H fad never completed
an event report regarding Surgeon A
ATER RESOPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
1407, Continued From page 44 aor
(01 00/11/2024 at 8:24 AM, an interview was
conducted with Sta Member G, 2 Scrub
“Technician (Sorub Tech}, who stated that she has
worked with Surgeon A multiple tines. Scrub
“Toch G statad that Surgeon As a tkeabie guy,
fun, loud during "Ume-ou”, She stated she had
her concerns when she worked with him, as she
bad previously worked at a traurna hosplial in
Colorado. The frst few times working with him,
she would reise an eyebrow. She explained this
statement by stating, "He oul the common bile
{uct during a laparoscopic cholecystoctomy
(galiadder removal) and broke scrub and went
into hatway to take a phone call, She stated she
assumed the call was loa Gl (gastroiniestinal)
‘surgeon or anather general surgeon, Serub Tech
G stated that Surgeon A did not put a stent in, he
just closed it In her experience, you do puta
stant in, She stated that this incgent was,
reported to the Operating Room Manager and
Operating Room Director, but she was unaware
fof the outsame. The inciientinvaived Patient #2
Sho also added that most of Surgeon A's
lagaroscopic cholecysteciomies, she sab
feems tke 90% of them, would end up "open"
(mid abdominal incision}. She stated converting
{o.an open procedure was so.common “every
ime i would bring ina major ray and most of the
time we would ond up using them.” Scrub Tach
G referred back to Patient #2 stating thal she
“lr fet te took it serious al all and te doesn't
othe right thing", She stated "I don't ust him
fs a doctor [referring to Surgeon Al, hated
‘working with him’. ‘When asked if any concarne
‘wore voiced preoperativaly regarding the
splenectomy scheduled for 06/21/24, she slated
‘that all of us were wondering why we were doing
= splenectomy hare and why we ware doing i 5
late in the day. Sora Tech G added that even
ATER RESTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
407 Continued From page 42 aor
‘the Anesinestologist questioned il, The cancems.
‘were brought lo the charge nurse and to the Chief
Meslcal Officer. Sesub Teah G stated, "anyone
thet has done a splenectomy knows you are
jpoing to bleed" Scrub Tech G added that stat
‘al the hospital to see wha is on call for surgery i
theic family need to come here, and if itis
Surgeon A, they will weit, When asked if sho felt
comfortable in speaking up if sto soes something
‘that fst ight, she reptiod tat she feats
comfortable, but also al the same time, "Tm a
Scrub Tach and the surgeon won't isten to a
Scrub Tach unfortunately " Scrub Tach G didn't
think incident reporting was part of her axentation
process, but she had good respuroes available to
hor in the operating room. Staff Member G
sated she was aware how to camplete an event
report in ERS, and knows why to report and says,
“basically everything should be eeporied. Scrub
‘Tech G has never completed an event ceport
regarding ter concems with Surgeon A ar when
laparoscopic procedure turns to an open
procedure,
(0 09/11/2024 at approximately 8:59 AM, 2
telephone inteniow was conducted with Stott
Member D, an RN Operating Room Nurse. She
slated she use fo be a Scrub Tech and became
nurse in #998. RN D stated she voiced concerns
about the splenectomy scheduled, on 0821/2024
{at 400M, to the Charge Nurse (CN). She
slated she lold the GN “she was not comfortable
‘with tho case and was concerned about the
outcome." RN D wered to meke sure they had
enough blood; stating that “spleens get a lot of
blood She stated she was told by the CN that
the doctor was approved and credentialed. RN D
8d, she "didn't have a good feeing. | lacked
cantenee in the surgeon te do the case and she
raised those same concerns". RN D stated that
ATER ESTPRINTED: tavtor2024
FORM APPROVED.
Agency for Heath Gare Administration
SINFUENT OF DEFENCES (0) PRowoeveurmucmcum pay mre ConSTaUeTON [parame ame
INDPLAN OF CORRECTION \Dinrrtcaion NUMBER naman ‘COuPLETED
HLza960001 wns. osr2012024
7900 US HWY 96 W
SACRED HEART HOSPITAL ON THEENERALDCOAE [AUREUS
rer: {ech GeneINDY MUST SE PREGEDED SY FUL ene (PACH COREE ACTON SHOULD BE coe
me REGULATORY O# GEM MVING NFOAMATION] He ‘CROSS REFERENCED 70 THEAPPROPRITE one
407 Continued From page 43 aor
Surgeon A was about an hour late, The surgery
‘wes scheduled for 4:00 PM and the patient went
into the OR at 5:20 PM. She recalled standing at
pationt 1's bedside white Surgeon Awas
speaking wit the patient, She stated Surgeon A
made it sound ike the surgery run ofthe mil
but | knew diferent." RN D, stated she had,
never been involved in something Eko thi.”
During the interviow, RN O stated "Evaryone
knox ho's rot a good surgeon,” and added that
staif would not being their ferity he was on cal,
RN D said there was a similar incident last year
‘that has been undar review. RN D stated, "I don't
ow how he was allowed to come back” and she
had heard there were 8 cases against him. RN D
reiterated that she dis tl the charge nurse ard
talked to anesthesia and voiced the seme
concerns. Staff Momnner D had never completed
‘an event report regarding Surgeon A
(0 09/11/2026 at aporoxinately 1:46 PM
telephone interview was conducted with Stat
Member E, an Operating Ream Registered
Nurse. RN E stated she brougit foth concerns
preoperatively, stating thal the majority of staff
‘and anesthosia and tho CRNA (Certified
Registered Nurse Anesthetist) al voicad thelr
opinion and didn't thing we should be doing this
procedure fsplenectoeny}, RN E stated that she
ide think "Surgeon Awas a great surgeon and
cc think it would end wel," and incicated this
hospital ls “nol trauma facity.” RN E stated
this was an elective surgery and that
'splenectomies can go bad very fast, and starting
‘the surgery at 5:20 PM (surgeon wes late) wasnt
smart with Hnited staf and not smart fr the
patient. She stated, the patient should have been
Somewhere where they do sptenectomies on a
regular basis and staff hat are qualifad. RN E
‘added that Surgeon A has had a prior wrong site
ATER ae OTT