LAB TEST STA680

NAME: NUR SYAMZIE ADRIANNA BINTI ROSYAM

STUDENT ID: 2023368469
GROUP: CDCS2415A

QUESTION 1
a)
Box's Test of
Equality of
Covariance
Matricesa
Box's M 20.372
F .828
df1 12
df2 392.538
Sig. .621
Tests the null
hypothesis that the
observed
covariance matrices
of the dependent
variables are equal
across groups.
a. Design: Intercept
+ VARIETY

1. H 0∶ Σ 1 = Σ 2 = Σ 3
H 1∶ at least one of Σ i = Σ j

2. α = 0.05

3. p-value = 20.372

4. Decision: Since p-value = 20.372 > α = 0.05, therefore fail to reject H 0.

5. Conclusion: The covariance matrices between three periods are equal.

 b)

Multivariate Testsa
Hypothesis
Effect Value F df Error df Sig.
b
Intercept Pillai's Trace .999 4580.767 3.000 7.000 <.001
b
Wilks' Lambda .001 4580.767 3.000 7.000 <.001
b
Hotelling's Trace 1963.186 4580.767 3.000 7.000 <.001
b
Roy's Largest 1963.186 4580.767 3.000 7.000 <.001
Root
VARIET Pillai's Trace 1.172 3.772 6.000 16.000 .016
Y Wilks' Lambda .153 3.630 b
6.000 14.000 .022
Hotelling's Trace 3.411 3.411 6.000 12.000 .033
c
Roy's Largest 2.592 6.912 3.000 8.000 .013
Root
a. Design: Intercept + VARIETY
b. Exact statistic
c. The statistic is an upper bound on F that yields a lower bound on the significance
level.

1. H 0 : μ1 = μ2=μ3
H 1 : at least one of μi=μ j
2. α = 0.05
3. Wilks Lamda = 0.153
4. P-value = 0.022
5. Decision: Since p-value = 0.022 < α = 0.05, therefore reject H 0 .
a) Conclusion: There is a significant different in the mean of skulls among the
three time periods.
 a)
Multiple Comparisons
Mean 95% Confidence Interval
Dependent (I) (J) Difference (I- Std. Lower Upper
Variable VARIETY VARIETY J) Error Sig. Bound Bound
X1 LSD 5 6 -9.875* 4.1500 .041 -19.263 -.487
8 -5.575 4.1500 .212 -14.963 3.813
6 5 9.875* 4.1500 .041 .487 19.263
8 4.300 4.1500 .327 -5.088 13.688
8 5 5.575 4.1500 .212 -3.813 14.963
6 -4.300 4.1500 .327 -13.688 5.088
Bonferro 5 6 -9.875 4.1500 .124 -22.048 2.298
ni 8 -5.575 4.1500 .636 -17.748 6.598
6 5 9.875 4.1500 .124 -2.298 22.048
8 4.300 4.1500 .982 -7.873 16.473
8 5 5.575 4.1500 .636 -6.598 17.748
6 -4.300 4.1500 .982 -16.473 7.873
X2 LSD 5 6 -17.325 8.4816 .071 -36.512 1.862
8 -22.200* 8.4816 .028 -41.387 -3.013
6 5 17.325 8.4816 .071 -1.862 36.512
8 -4.875 8.4816 .580 -24.062 14.312
8 5 22.200* 8.4816 .028 3.013 41.387
6 4.875 8.4816 .580 -14.312 24.062
Bonferro 5 6 -17.325 8.4816 .214 -42.204 7.554
ni 8 -22.200 8.4816 .084 -47.079 2.679
6 5 17.325 8.4816 .214 -7.554 42.204
8 -4.875 8.4816 1.000 -29.754 20.004
8 5 22.200 8.4816 .084 -2.679 47.079
6 4.875 8.4816 1.000 -20.004 29.754
X3 LSD 5 6 -1.275 3.7514 .742 -9.761 7.211
8 -10.900* 3.7514 .017 -19.386 -2.414
6 5 1.275 3.7514 .742 -7.211 9.761
8 -9.625* 3.7514 .030 -18.111 -1.139
8 5 10.900* 3.7514 .017 2.414 19.386
6 9.625* 3.7514 .030 1.139 18.111
Bonferro 5 6 -1.275 3.7514 1.000 -12.279 9.729
ni 8 -10.900 3.7514 .052 -21.904 .104
6 5 1.275 3.7514 1.000 -9.729 12.279
8 -9.625 3.7514 .091 -20.629 1.379
8 5 10.900 3.7514 .052 -.104 21.904
6 9.625 3.7514 .091 -1.379 20.629
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 28.145.
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
i. Variable 5 is a significant different with variable 6 for variable X1.
ii.
 QUESTION 2

a)
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling .659
Adequacy.
Bartlett's Test of Approx. Chi-Square 263.263
Sphericity df 36
Sig. <.001

1. KMO: Since KMO = 0.659 which is greater than 0.6, then the factor analysis is
appropriate for this data set.
2. Bartlett’s Test: Since p-value= 0.000 < α = 0.05, therefore the correlation
matrix is not an identity matrix.
b)

Total Variance Explained

Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings Rotatio
Componen % of Cumulative % of Cumulative
t Total Variance % Total Variance % Tota
1 2.880 32.005 32.005 2.880 32.005 32.005 2.3
2 1.439 15.985 47.990 1.439 15.985 47.990 1.5
3 1.164 12.933 60.922 1.164 12.933 60.922 1.4
4 1.024 11.383 72.305 1.024 11.383 72.305 1.1
5 .705 7.836 80.141
6 .648 7.196 87.337
7 .562 6.249 93.586
8 .345 3.836 97.422
9 .232 2.578 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Scree Plot
3.5

2.5
Eigenvalue

1.5

0.5

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Component Number
 Rotated Component Matrixa
Component
1 2 3 4
Expect .077 -.751 -.290 .243
Entertain .671 .482 .048 -.057
Comm .896 -.129 .073 .018
Expert .100 .005 .087 .951
Motivate .301 .076 .660 .184
Caring -.001 -.021 .828 -.058
Charisma .869 -.001 .122 .144
Passion .510 .144 .390 .262
Friendly .093 .835 -.180 .272
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
a. Rotation converged in 5 iterations.