Tsotsi LitChart
Tsotsi LitChart
com
Tsotsi
the destruction of Sophiatown, a predominantly Black suburb
INTR
INTRODUCTION
ODUCTION of Johannesburg. Police forced the population of Sophiatown
to move in 1955 and subsequently destroyed the suburb,
BRIEF BIOGRAPHY OF ATHOL FUGARD because they thought it was too close to a white neighborhood.
Athol Fugard was born in 1932 in Middelburg, in the Eastern The character Miriam’s husband disappears while taking part in
Cape of South Africa. His father was an Englishman, while his a bus boycott, which may be a reference to the famous 1957
mother was an Afrikaner, a member of South Africa’s white Alexandra bus boycott, in which Black workers in Alexandra—a
minority population whose mostly Dutch ancestors colonized segregated Black neighborhood of Johannesburg—were
the country in the 18th century. After attending but not protesting increased bus fares that would disproportionately
graduating from the University of Cape Town, he worked affect poor Black workers. Finally, a newspaper salesman in the
outside South Africa in 1953 and 1954, during which time he novel mentions that “they” have “shot a hole in the moon,”
began writing. After returning to South Africa, Fugard worked which may be a reference to the first time a man-made object
as a clerk in a Native Commissioners’ Court—a court where landed on the moon—the USSR’s Luna 2, which hit the moon in
white judges passed judgments on Black South Africans—and September 1959.
came to realize how racist South Africa’s laws and society were.
Fugard married the actress Sheila Meiring in 1956 and in 1957, RELATED LITERARY WORKS
they settled in Johannesburg. In the late 1950s, Fugard wrote
several plays that took South African racism as a theme and Athol Fugard is more famous as a playwright than as a
worked with Black South African actors to produce them. From novelist—he has written dozens of plays but only one novel,
1960 to 1962, while also writing his famous early play The Tsotsi. Like Tsotsi, many of Fugard’s plays criticize South African
Blood Knot (1961), Fugard drafted the novel that would become apartheid, a social system operating from the late 1940s to
Tsotsi. He did not try to publish it, however, and after ceasing early 1990s that legally enforced racial segregation and
work on it, he refocused on his playwriting. In 1973, the discrimination against non-white South Africans. For example,
National English Literary Museum (NELM)—a museum for his early play The Blood Knot (1961), which he wrote while he
South African literature in Grahamstown, South Africa—began was also drafting Tsotsi, shows how racism and colorism under
collecting Fugard’s manuscripts and papers. NELM’s Fugard apartheid harm two South African half-brothers, one who has
collection ultimately included the unpublished drafts of Tsotsi. dark skin and one who can pass for white. Another famous
In the late 1970s, a South African English professor named white South African author whose works criticize anti-Black
Stephen Gray found Tsotsi in NELM and persuaded Fugard to racism under apartheid is Nadine Gordimer, who won the
let him revise it for publication. Tsotsi was finally published in Nobel Prize for Literature in 1991. Like Tsotsi, her novel
1980. Although Tsotsi is Fugard’s only novel, Fugard has Burger’s Daughter (1979) represents how apartheid harms and
continued writing plays continuously from the late 1950s destroys South African families. Meanwhile, a novel with similar
through the present day. themes to Tsotsi in a different cultural context is the African
American novelist Richard Wright’s NativNativee Son (1940). Just as
Tsotsi shows how South African apartheid forces some Black
HISTORICAL CONTEXT South Africans into crime, so Nativ
Nativee Son represents how anti-
Athol Fugard wrote Tsotsi while South Africa was still under Black racism in the 1930s United States compels its
apartheid, a set of racist laws active between the late 1940s protagonist Bigger Thomas to commit acts of violence.
and early 1990s that divided the population into four racial
groups (white; Indian; Coloured, meaning mixed race; and KEY FACTS
African/Black), enforced racial segregation, and limited the
rights of non-white South Africans. Tsotsi makes repeated • Full Title: Tsotsi
reference to horrifying events that occurred under apartheid. • When Written: 1960–1962
For example, Black South Africans had to carry passes when • Where Written: England, South Africa
they entered “white” areas. Otherwise, they could be arrested
• When Published: 1980
and incarcerated. Although the novel never states exactly
where or when the action occurs, several historical references • Literary Period: Postmodernism
suggest it takes place in the late 1950s in Johannesburg. The • Genre: Novel, Realism
protagonist Tsotsi hides the baby he adopts in the ruins of a • Setting: South Africa
demolished Black neighborhood, which may be a reference to • Climax: Tsotsi dies trying to save the baby he has adopted.
Related Characters: Tsotsi (David), Boston, Die Aap, Page Number: 20-21
Butcher
Explanation and Analysis
Related Themes: After murdering Gumboot Dhlamini on the train, Tsotsi,
Boston, Die Aap, and Butcher have gone to Soekie’s
Page Number: 7 shebeen (illegal drinking establishment). Boston, humiliated
because the murder made him vomit, is drinking heavily and
Explanation and Analysis
begins to ask Tsotsi about himself, despite knowing that
Tsotsi is leading the other members of his gang—Boston, Tsotsi hates being asked about himself. Immediately before
Die Aap, and Butcher—through the township (a segregated this quotation occurs, the novel reveals that Tsotsi hates
non-white neighborhood or suburb) at nightfall. They are these questions because he doesn’t know the answers: he
going to the train station to “take one on the trains,” that is, has no memories of his early life.
to rob and kill a commuter going home.
Without memories, Tsotsi cannot “make a man with
Tsotsi knows that people in the township “fear” and “hate” meaning” out of his own face in the mirror. In other words,
him because they see him as a tsotsi, a South African term he doesn’t see himself as an individual with a coherent
meaning a gang member or “thug.” Interestingly, he neither identity. In fact, he barely sees himself as human: the parts
dislikes nor feels “enjoyment” at their reaction. Instead, he
feels “the way other men feel when they see the sun in the
of his face might as well be inanimate objects, “a handful of Tsotsi belongs. Yet Tsotsi has constructed his identity
stones picked up at random.” Tsotsi’s nonexistent sense of around a stereotype, “tsotsi” (gang member or “thug”),
self implies that a working memory is essential to individual which he and the people around him view as inhuman or
identity. It also helps explain why he clings to the subhuman. By insisting that Tsotsi is a human being, Boston
stereotyped identity “tsotsi” (i.e. gang member)—the is threatening Tsotsi’s stereotyped sense of himself—which
stereotype, at least, provides an identity for him. helps explain why Tsotsi finally attacks Boston at this
Yet the claim that Tsotsi’s name is “the name, in a way, of all moment.
men” hints that even while lacking a memory, Tsotsi does Second, Boston’s claim implies a religious worldview—likely
have another identity he could assume: the identity of a Christian worldview, since South Africa is a predominantly
human being. In acting out the “tsotsi” stereotype and being Christian country. In Christianity, people have immortal
violent toward others, then, Tsotsi is not taking the only souls created and judged by God. Since the Christian God
path available but actively choosing one path over disapproves of robbery and murder—the activities in which
another—he could, instead, embrace the identity of “all Boston and Tsotsi have just been engaged—Boston’s
men,” of humankind, and act in solidarity with others. At this affirmation of the existence of souls (and, by implication,
point in the novel, he is choosing violence over solidarity God) suggests that he is passing judgment on his own and
and hatred over sympathy, even if he is not aware of making Tsotsi’s way of life. Tsotsi may also feel threatened by
a choice. Boston’s religious judgment, another reason Tsotsi finally
attacks Boston here.
They stayed that way until the street cried, then laughter,
and Soekie started her song again at the beginning, staying Chapter 3 Quotes
like that, Boston still, Tsotsi seemingly the same as always, the The knife was not only his weapon, but also a fetish, a
one in disbelief, the other at the explosive moment of action, talisman that conjured away bad spirits and established him
and this moment precipitated when Boston whispered: ‘You securely in his life.
must have a soul Tsotsi. Everybody’s got a soul. Every living
human being has got a soul!’
Related Characters: Tsotsi (David), Boston
believed to possess religious or magical properties. The sympathy for him, isn’t something he can completely
quotation says that the knife, a fetish/talisman, “conjure[s] control.
away bad spirits”: the term conjuration can describe the
summoning or dismissal of spirits in a variety of religious
practices globally, including some traditional African
This was man. This small, almost ancient, very useless and
religions. abandoned thing was the beginning of a man.
That the knife is clearly a negative symbol, associated with
violence, has disturbing implications. Whereas the novel
Related Characters: Tsotsi (David), The Baby, Cassim,
associates Christianity (brought to South Africa by white
Boston
colonizers) with sympathy and universal human solidarity, it
is associating traditional African religions here with
Related Themes:
weapons, violence, and gang membership. Thus, although
the novel critiques apartheid’s white supremacy and has Page Number: 49
anti-racist intentions, at least in this instance, it reinforces a
negative stereotype about African culture. Explanation and Analysis
Tsotsi has returned to his room, where he has hidden the
baby, after buying some condensed milk for the baby to
Chapter 4 Quotes drink at Cassim’s store. Although the baby smells, Tsotsi is
He didn’t see the man, he saw the type. too shocked to notice: he looks at the baby and sees “man.”
The quotation doesn’t mean that Tsotsi recognizes the baby
is male—he won’t realize that until he unwraps and cleans
Related Characters: Cassim, Tsotsi (David), The Baby the baby later in the chapter. Rather, it means that Tsotsi
recognizes the baby as the “type” of man—an example of a
Related Themes:
group identity, humankind. This may explain why Tsotsi
Page Number: 43 describes the baby as “ancient,” although by definition a
baby has to be young: the baby represents an “ancient”
Explanation and Analysis species.
The morning after a terrified woman gives Tsotsi a shoebox Up to this point in the novel, Tsotsi has reacted to others
with a baby in it, Tsotsi enters the store of a shopkeeper with hatred and violence. Now he is breaking that pattern
named Cassim to buy milk for the baby. When Cassim looks by experiencing nebulous positive feelings toward the baby.
at Tsotsi, he sees not a “man,” an individual worthy of That Tsotsi’s care for the baby coincides with his
respect, but a “type”—that is, a tsotsi (“gangster” or “thug”) recognition of the baby’s humanity suggests two things.
stereotype. First—contrary to his violent reaction to Boston’s
Cassim is Indian. Like other non-white racial groups under invocation of common humanity—Tsotsi may, deep down,
apartheid, Indians had fewer rights than white people. This believe that merely being human entitles someone to
quotation shows how apartheid’s culture not only put white sympathy and care. Second, Tsotsi cannot remember his
people at the top of a racial hierarchy but also sowed anti- family—but now, caring for a baby and thus confronted with
Black prejudice among non-white people. Although Cassim a parental role, he begins to act more ethically, which
and Tsotsi are both members of discriminated classes, suggests that family relationships (biological or otherwise)
Cassim does not feel solidarity with Tsotsi and recognize may be particularly important to maintaining solidarity with
their common humanity. Instead, he looks at Tsotsi, a young humanity at large.
Black man, and sees the violent, no-good “type.” It is
especially ironic that he has that reaction to Tsotsi now,
when Tsotsi is not trying to do anything criminal but trying
to care for an abandoned baby.
With Cassim’s reaction to Tsotsi, this quotation suggests
that while Tsotsi embraces the tsotsi stereotype to gain a
sense of self, other people also impose this stereotype on
him—other people’s fear and hatred of him, their lack of
source in an infinite God’s sympathy for all of humankind. hints at the pain and bitterness he may feel at not having
The passage’s coded religious imagery also foreshadows memories of his mother—pain and bitterness of which he
Tsotsi’s religious experiences later in the novel. does not seem consciously aware.
I must give him something, he thought. I must give this Chapter 8 Quotes
strange and terrible night something back for all it has So she carried on, outwardly adjusting the pattern of her
given me. With the instinct of his kind, he turned to beauty and life as best she could, like taking in washing, doing odd cleaning
gave back the most beautiful thing he knew. jobs in the nearby white suburb. Inwardly she had fallen into
‘Mothers love their children. I know. I remember. They sing us something like a possessive sleep where the same dream is
songs when we are small. I’m telling you, tsotsi. Mothers love dreamt over and over again. She seldom smiled now, kept to
their children.’ herself and her baby, asked no favours and gave none, hoarding
as it were the moments and things in her life.
After this there was silence for the words to register and make
their meaning, for Tsotsi to stand up and say in reply: ‘They
don’t. I’m telling you, I know they don’t,’ and then he walked Related Characters: Miriam Ngidi, Tsotsi (David), David’s
away. Mother (Tondi), The Baby
Related Themes:
Related Characters: Morris Tshabalala , Tsotsi (David),
David’s Mother (Tondi) Page Number: 135
Chapter 9 Quotes Petah turned to David. ‘Willie no good. You not Willie.
What is your name? Talk! Trust me, man. I help you.’
On she came, until a foot or so away the chain stopped her,
and although she pulled at this with her teeth until her David’s eyes grew round and vacant, stared at the darkness. A
breathing was tense and rattled she could go no further, so she tiny sound, a thin squeaking voice, struggled out: ‘David…’ it
lay down there, twisting her body so that the hindquarters fell said, ‘David! But no more! He dead! He dead too, like Willie, like
apart and, like that, fighting all the time, her ribs heaving, she Joji.’
gave birth to the stillborn litter, and then died beside them.
Related Characters: Petah, Tsotsi (David) (speaker),
Related Characters: Tsotsi (David), The Baby, David’s David’s Mother (Tondi)
Mother (Tondi)
Related Themes:
Related Themes:
Page Number: 166-167
Related Symbols: Explanation and Analysis
Having run away from home after his mother’s arrest, David
Page Number: 161
(that is, Tsotsi as a child) has met a group of homeless,
Explanation and Analysis orphaned children and gone with them to sleep in pipes
near the river. Because David will not tell the other children
Tsotsi has a flashback to a yellow dog—female, moving
his name, they decide to call him Willie, after a former
strangely—when he first encounters the abandoned baby.
member of their group who recently died of malnutrition.
He keeps having flashbacks to the dog until he regains his
memories, which reveal that the dog was his childhood pet. Petah, the friendliest of the orphan gang, treats David with
The day before his father—whom he had never met—was real sympathy: he sees that David is his own individual, not
supposed to return after years of absence, police arrested simply a replacement for the dead Willie, and offers to help
his mother in a raid enforcing apartheid pass laws and took David. Petah’s kindness toward David shows that sympathy
her away. When his father returned, Tsotsi hid from him in is a common component in human interactions and can
the backyard. The dog attacked his father—and his father spring up even in miserable circumstances.
gave the dog a fatal kick and left. David’s response to Petah shows how his mother’s arrest
This passage resolves the mystery of Tsotsi’s flashbacks. He due to racist apartheid laws has stripped him of his former
first remembers the dog upon receiving the abandoned identity. Having lost his mother and his home, David
baby because the baby was losing his mother. Tsotsi declares his former self “dead”—a declaration suggesting
associates the dog with the traumatic loss of his own that children’s identities fundamentally depend on their
mother (and the destruction of his childhood) because he relationship to their parents. When a child loses his parents,
witnessed the dog’s death the day after the police took his he is not only in danger of neglect and physical
mother away. death—Willie and Joji, other children in the gang who lost
their parents, have both literally died—but also of a
The dog also symbolizes apartheid’s destruction of Black
figurative death, a loss of personal identity. This loss makes
families. Pet dogs are popularly associated with ideal
David vulnerable to later accepting the stereotyped identity
families. Yet Tsotsi’s childhood dog dies due to apartheid:
tsotsi.
because his mother, having been arrested for violating a
racist and unjust apartheid law, is not present to welcome
his father home, the dog reacts to his father as an intruding
stranger. The dog’s defensive reaction leads to the violent So he went out with them the next day and scavenged. The
altercation in which his father kills the dog. Seeing the dog same day an Indian chased him away from his shop door,
die, Tsotsi literally witnesses the death of a family, since the shouting and calling him a tsotsi. When they went back to the
kick that kills her also kills her puppies. Using the dog as a river that night, they started again, trying names on him: Sam,
symbol, then, the novel underscores how hostile apartheid Willie, and now Simon, until he stopped them.
South Africa was to Black family life. ‘My name,’ he said, ‘is Tsotsi.’
implies she wants to adopt him because she believes God Explanation and Analysis
disapproved of her initial unwillingness to help the baby.
Tsotsi is refusing Miriam’s requests to adopt the abandoned
There is no way to determine the truth of Miriam’s claim baby for whom he has been caring, and he has decided to
that a voice spoke in response to her prayer, because the keep the baby himself. Interestingly, when Miriam asks him
novel never represents that scene directly. The reader only to explain his decision, he has difficulty explaining it to
receives Miriam’s account of it. Moreover, Miriam never himself. As the narrator puts it, “the riddle of the yellow
states explicitly that she thinks God was speaking to her. bitch was solved”—in other words, Tsotsi initially kept the
She only says that “a voice” spoke to her, which could refer baby because the baby triggered a flashback to a (female)
to an inner voice—Miriam’s own thoughts accusing her of yellow dog and he was hoping, by keeping the baby around,
ungenerosity—as well as the voice of God. That Miriam to trigger more; now that he has regained his memories and
heard this voice in the context of prayer, however, suggests solved the “riddle,” that motive no longer applies.
that the voice’s words have a religious meaning.
Yet as Tsotsi also notes, since regaining his memories the
That a religious experience increases Miriam’s sympathy baby’s emotional “hold on his life” has only “grown
toward and willingness to help the baby underlines tighter”—he wants to keep the baby more, now, than he did
something the novel has already implied—namely, that while when the yellow dog was still a mystery. Tsotsi claims that
religion may not be powerful enough to change a racist he wants to keep the baby because he “must find out.” He
society like apartheid South Africa, it can encourage does not explain what it is he must find out, but his thoughts
individuals to recognize others’ humanity and human value. offer two clues.
That the voice Miriam hears specifically chides Miriam for First, he thinks: “No more revenge. No more hate.” Before
having “no milk for babies”—not just milk for her own Tsotsi encountered the baby, his knee-jerk reaction to
baby—implies that in particular, adults should be anyone’s attempt to connect with him was hatred. He even
sympathetic toward children and recognize their humanity, violently beat his fellow gang member Boston for asking
even going so far as to treat all children like their own. This questions about his life and suggesting that he had a soul.
attitude contrasts starkly with how apartheid South Africa Since adopting the baby, Tsotsi has rediscovered sympathy
actually treated Black children: as readers know, Tsotsi was and care for others. Yet, at this point, he does not
left homeless when white police arrested his mother for understand the process—how, exactly, the baby has
violating an unjust, racist law. transformed him from a hateful to a sympathetic person.
The nature of the change he has undergone may be one
thing he “must find out.”
‘What are you going to do with him?’ Second, Tsotsi thinks that “the riddle of the yellow bitch was
‘Keep him.’ solved.” What Tsotsi has learned from fully remembering
‘Why?’ the yellow dog is that unjust apartheid laws led to his
mother’s arrest, destroying his family and his childhood. He
He threw back his head, and she saw the shine of desperation
has already identified his childhood self with the baby and
on his forehead as he struggled with that mighty word. Why,
expressed fears that the baby will suffer as he has. By acting
why was he? No more revenge. No more hate. The riddle of the
as a parent to the baby, he may be hoping to change the
yellow bitch was solved—all of this in a few days and in as short
baby’s fate. The other thing he “must find out” may be what
a time the hold on his life by the blind, black, minute hands had
would have happened to him if he had had a parent
grown tighter. Why?
throughout his entire childhood.
‘Because I must find out,’ he said.
Related Characters: Tsotsi (David), Boston (speaker), The Related Characters: Isaiah, Miss Marriot, Morris
Baby, Miriam Ngidi, Morris Tshabalala , Rev. Henry Tshabalala , David’s Mother (Tondi), Tsotsi (David)
Ransome
Related Themes:
Related Themes:
Page Number: 211
Page Number: 205
Explanation and Analysis
Explanation and Analysis A churchyard gardener, an elderly Black man named Isaiah,
Tsotsi seeks out Boston, his most educated acquaintance, to has been planting flowers when his condescending and
ask him what has caused the changes in behavior and racist white supervisor, Miss Marriot, criticizes his work and
identity (taking care of the baby, sparing Morris Tshabalala) insists on demonstrating how to plant correctly. Despite her
he has undergone throughout the book. By insisting that rude questions, Isaiah gives her polite yes/no answers.
Tsotsi, in asking about these changes, is really asking about Up to this point, white characters have mainly appeared in
God, Boston is implying two things. the novel as nameless agents of apartheid’s structural
First, Boston is implying that God is real and active in racism: for example, the white crowds whom Morris
human lives—an argument for religion’s relevance to all Tshabalala blames for the loss of his legs or the white police
humankind, including Tsotsi. This implication that God is who arrest David’s mother. By focusing on Black characters,
relevant to Tsotsi’s life will lead Tsotsi to seek out religious their histories, and their interactions, the novel has
experiences later in the novel. demonstrated how apartheid and white supremacy shape
Second, Boston is implying that human sympathy, which these characters’ lives even in the absence of much direct
partially motivated Tsotsi to care for the baby and spare interaction with racist white people.
Morris’s life, ultimately comes from God. The novel has The interactions between Isaiah and Miss Marriot
implied this more subtly in Tsotsi’s earlier vision of constitute one of the first times that the novel represents
sympathy as a light that might lead to an ultimate, an extended interaction between a Black and a white
religiously coded revelation. Now, however, Boston is person. Here, the novel adds an important caveat to its
making the connection between God and sympathy more representation of racism as a primarily structural,
explicit. impersonal phenomenon: interpersonal racism as well as
It is difficult to evaluate how seriously the novel wants the structural racism affects those Black characters, like Isaiah,
reader to take Boston’s claims here. On the one hand, the who must interact with white people. During those
Rev. Henry Ransome has experienced several moments of interactions, in this white supremacist society, all the power
religious despair in the novel, implicitly because God is not resides with the white people, and the Black people must
adequately addressing racism, segregation, and poverty in cater to white people’s prejudices and preferences in order
apartheid South Africa. On the other hand, Miriam’s to maintain “a peaceful existence.”
religious experience during prayer has directly changed her
attitudes and behavior, making her more sympathetic
toward an abandoned baby—which does suggest that God ‘Come man and join in the singing.’
and religion are practically relevant to her. So, though the ‘Me!’
novel is somewhat ambivalent about the relevance of
religion and Christianity in particular to human lives, this ‘I’m telling you anybody can come. It’s the House of God. I ring
quote prompts the reader to expect that it holds His bell. Will you come?’
unexpected meaning for Tsotsi himself. ‘Yes.’
‘Listen tonight, you hear. Listen for me. I will call you to believe
in God.’
Chapter 12 Quotes
To an incredible extent a peaceful existence was Related Characters: Isaiah, Tsotsi (David) (speaker),
dependent upon knowing just when to say no or yes to the Boston, The Baby, Morris Tshabalala
white man.
Related Themes:
Page Number: 219 Related Characters: Tsotsi (David) (speaker), The Baby,
Miriam Ngidi
Explanation and Analysis
Related Themes:
Tsotsi has stopped outside the Church of Christ the
Redeemer, where Isaiah gardens. When Isaiah offers Tsotsi
Page Number: 224-225
tea, Tsotsi begins asking questions about the church,
Christianity, and God. Eventually, Isaiah invites Tsotsi to Explanation and Analysis
come to the church’s evening service. This passage implicitly The night before this passage occurs, Tsotsi has gone to
suggests two reasons why Tsotsi, who seems to have no church for the first time. He has also hidden the baby in the
religious background, might find himself interested in demolished township ruins again, because he fears Miriam
Christianity after his brief, earlier conversation with Boston may take the baby from him. The next morning when he
about God. wakes up, however, “what he had thought out last night” is
First, during the novel, Tsotsi has changed from someone on his mind.
who rejects human connection—for example, violently The novel does not explicitly represent what Tsotsi has
beating Boston when Boston tries to understand him—to thought out, but this passage hints at his thoughts’ content.
sympathizing with others, caring for a baby and sparing He remembers “the woman”—that is, Miriam—asking him to
Morris Tshabalala’s life. Tsotsi’s sympathy for others leads come back and thinks that “only one thing” was important
him to believe in common humanity, a group identity that all now. Drawing attention to Miriam’s womanhood and her
people share. When Isaiah asks Tsotsi to “join in the singing,” request that Tsotsi return to her, the novel is implying a
it represents an invitation for Tsotsi to join a larger human possible romantic relationship between them. Since both
community. When Isaiah says “anybody can come” to the Miriam and Tsotsi have babies—hers biological, his
church, he is telling Tsotsi that the church is a potentially adopted—their romantic pairing would lead to the
universal community. Because Tsotsi has been discovering formation of a new family, a replacement for the families
universal humanity over the course of the novel, such an Miriam and Tsotsi have lost due to apartheid. This new
inclusive community may particularly appeal to him. family is likely the “only one thing [that] was important to
Second, Tsotsi may be interested in the Christian focus on him now.”
redemption. When Isaiah first invites Tsotsi to church, The prospect of a new family leads to a final, decisive
Tsotsi exclaims, “Me!” His shock at the invitation suggests change in Tsotsi: he rejects once and for all the tsotsi (“gang
he does not believe himself—a person whom others
member” or “thug”) stereotype and reclaims his full name,
regularly identify as a tsotsi, a “gang member” or
David Madondo. After this point, the novel’s narration itself
“thug”—worthy to enter a church. Yet Isaiah suggests that refers to the character as “David Madondo” or “David”
everyone who hears “His bell” is potentially worthy to enter rather than “Tsotsi”—a sign that the novel endorses David’s
the community of believers. Their conversation thus belief that he has undergone a real identity transformation.
contains an implicit belief in redemption: anyone, including That David and the milkman wish each other peace—a
Tsotsi, can be redeemed by God and change their life. Since traditional religious greeting—highlights that religion has
Tsotsi has undergone significant personal changes for the played a role in David’s transformation. Additionally, that
better during the novel, he may be attracted to Christianity the milkman does not react to David with fear, as characters
for affirming the possibility of this sort of change. have previously done upon seeing him, suggests that his
transformation from Tsotsi to David is somehow physically
apparent to others.
It was a new day and what he had thought out last night
was still there, inside him. Only one thing was important to
him now. ‘Come back,’ the woman had said. ‘Come back, Tsotsi.’ The slum clearance had entered a second and decisive
I must correct her, he thought. ‘My name is David Madondo.’ stage. The white township had grown impatient. The ruins,
He said it aloud in the almost empty street, and laughed. The they said, were being built up again and as many were still
man delivering milk heard him, and looking up said, ‘Peace my coming in as they carried off in lorries to the new locations or in
brother.’ vans to the jails. So they had sent in the bulldozers to raze the
buildings completely to the ground.
‘Peace be with you’, David Madondo replied and carried on his
way.
Related Characters: Tsotsi (David), The Baby, Miriam Page Number: 226
Ngidi, David’s Mother (Tondi)
Explanation and Analysis
Related Themes: David dies trying to save the baby from the bulldozers re-
razing the demolished Black township to enforce apartheid
Page Number: 225
segregation laws. Although the novel does not explicitly
Explanation and Analysis state what happens to the baby, it seems likely that the
David has hidden the baby in the demolished ruins of the same wall that fell on David also killed the baby. By ending
Black township. Now, the white township—in this passage, with David’s and the baby’s deaths due to apartheid—after
the word simply means “neighborhood” or “suburb”—is all the positive individual change that David has
demanding that the ruins be demolished again, which will undergone—the novel is clearly illustrating that South
surely kill the baby if David cannot rescue him in time. African apartheid is a great evil, hostile to Black life and
Black families.
This passage represents in figurative language the ongoing
threat that apartheid and white supremacy pose to Black The novel is also illustrating that individual transformation,
South African families. New Black settlers have “built up” no matter how heroic, cannot lead to a permanent triumph
the “ruins” of a Black neighborhood, destroyed to enforce over an evil society. Just when the reader believes that
apartheid’s segregation laws. This fact symbolizes how, David has rejected the tsotsi (“gang member” or “thug”)
after apartheid destroyed David’s family by arresting stereotype and gained a new family to replace the family
David’s mother, he has finally begun to build up a new family apartheid took from him, apartheid destroys his second
with Miriam and their babies from the ruins of his old life. family too. Importantly, the people who unearth David’s
body still see him as a “tsotsi,” reducing his identity to a
Yet despite David’s individual triumphs—regaining his stereotype. The white supremacist society of apartheid
memories, learning to sympathize with others, finding a new cannot recognize David’s individual humanity or his growth.
family—he is still a Black person in a violently racist, white
supremacist society. This plot twist, that David’s baby is Though largely pessimistic, the novel’s ending does contain
under physical threat due to apartheid’s segregation laws, an ambiguous element, David’s “beautiful” smile in death.
illustrates how, no matter the positive transformations Previous scenes in the novel, such as David/Tsotsi’s
individual Black characters undergo, the racist society in conversation with Isaiah about Jesus Christ, have in
which they find themselves can at any moment destroy their retrospect foreshadowed that, like Christ, David would
lives. sacrifice his life for another. The earlier scene in which
David/Tsotsi imagined human sympathy as connected to a
larger, implicitly religious “revelation,” meanwhile, hints at a
possible reason for David’s smile—by sacrificing his life in a
They unearthed him minutes later. All agreed that his smile Christlike way trying to save the baby’s, he has actually
was beautiful, and strange for a tsotsi, and that when he experienced a religious revelation in the moment of death.
lay there on his back in the sun, before someone had fetched a The novel may even be suggesting an afterlife that
blanket, they agreed that it was hard to believe what the back compensates for David’s life of suffering.
of his head looked like when you saw the smile.
Yet, clearly, religion has not saved David or the baby on
earth—so the novel may intend the “beautiful” smile
Related Characters: Tsotsi (David), The Baby ironically, to show that religion has beneficial elements but
is not powerful enough to change evil systems like
Related Themes: apartheid.
CHAPTER 1
Four people are sitting in silence as they drink, listen to an old By implying that these four people do the same thing “at about the
woman speak in the backyard, and examine the shadows same time” every day, the novel suggests they are stuck in habits or
outside in the street to check their growth. Then, “as always patterns of behavior. Meanwhile, “tsotsi” is a South African slang
happened at about the same time,” the youngest of the four, term meaning “gangster” or “thug.” That Tsotsi uses this slang term
Tsotsi, sits forward and clasps his hands “in the manner of as his name suggests he has embraced a stereotype—the stereotype
prayer.” of a violent criminal—as his identity. Finally, it may be ironic that the
novel describes Tsotsi, who identifies with violent criminality,
clasping his hands “in the manner of prayer”—yet, at the same time,
this detail may be foreshadowing the importance of religion in the
novel.
Before the silence, another of the four, Boston, was telling a This passage confirms that the four men always gather in Tsotsi’s
story. Boston habitually tells stories to the other four when room in the same way and wait for him to tell them what to do,
they gather in Tsotsi’s room, drink, and wait for nightfall and for which suggests that they act out of habit, not exercising their full
Tsotsi to inform them of the night’s plan. The other two—Die capacity for choice. None of the characters seems to go by his given
Aap, nicknamed for his “long arms,” and Butcher—listen to name. As already mentioned, “tsotsi” is a slang term meaning
Boston. Whereas Die Aap listens hard, Butcher finds Boston’s “gangster.” “Die Aap” means “monkey” in Afrikaans, a white minority
stories too long and only listens to pass the time. language in South Africa—a racist nickname for a Black man in a
white supremacist society. Although the novel does not explicitly
state here that “Boston” and “Butcher” are nicknames, they do not
sound like real, given names. The use of such nicknames suggests
that as Black men in apartheid South Africa, they aren’t able to
express their full, non-stereotyped individual identities.
Die Aap interrupts Boston’s story to ask “why.” Boston laughs, This passage suggests that the characters spend time together out
says it was because of a woman, and finishes the story. Silence of habit, not because they are genuine friends—although Die Aap is
falls. Tsotsi clasps his hands, and Boston, Die Aap, and Butcher loyal to Tsotsi, Butcher and Boston may not be. The passage thus
look at him—Boston smiling, Die Aap emotionless, and Butcher foreshadows conflict within the group.
full of “impatience and hate.” Tsotsi notes their reactions. He
thinks that while he can trust Die Aap, he cannot trust Butcher.
He also thinks that Boston is afraid of him.
Tsotsi leads the other men down an unkempt street. It’s dusk. This passage gestures toward the racial and political context in
As the four men walk through the township, they end a which Tsotsi finds himself. First, he lives in a township, that is, a
moment of “reckoning” in which various people in the township segregated non-white neighborhood or suburb in apartheid South
note new demolitions, inadequate money, and other hardships. Africa. Most of the township population is poor and worried that
When the men pass, the township population fears them and the government may demolish their homes and relocate them as
hides inside. Tsotsi is aware of this phenomenon and accepts it part of a larger apartheid policy of enforcing strict racial
as natural. segregation. By giving this racial and political context, the novel
hints that while Tsotsi habitually accepts his stereotyped criminal
identity and others’ fear or hatred of him as natural, these
phenomena may in fact derive from his political context: apartheid,
which is not natural but man-made.
At the train station, the four men select a man named Gumboot Under apartheid, non-white people’s travel was restricted. They
Dhlamini as their target. Gumboot is a hopeful man with a were forbidden from entering “white” areas unless they had a pass
sense of humor. He left his pregnant wife and walked a showing they were employed in those areas. Gumboot has to leave
thousand miles to the “Golden City” to find work. When he his wife and unborn child behind while he works in the “Golden
arrived, he lived in a township and worked in a mine for a year. City”—that is, Johannesburg—due to these white supremacist
In a week, he plans to return home to his wife with the money apartheid laws, which illustrates how apartheid broke up non-white
he has made. families.
After work, Gumboot is at the train station planning to take the As a criminal in a Black township, Tsotsi illustrates how the
train back to the township, but he makes “three mistakes.” First, economic oppression and deprivation of Black people under
he smiles because he’s anticipating the weekend, having apartheid’s white supremacist legal system has forced some young
written to his wife that he is coming home—and Tsotsi notices Black men into crime—at which point they harm other young Black
his bright smile. Second, he is wearing a red and silver tie, which men like Gumboot Dhlamini, whose very joy at the thought of his
he bought to impress his wife. The tie helps Tsotsi track him in family makes him a target. Thus this passage shows how apartheid
the crowd. Third, Gumboot opens his pay packet to buy his destroys Black families and Black people’s joy.
ticket—showing people he has money—and rushes to the
platform.
CHAPTER 2
Boston demands to know what it proves that he was sick when The sparse furnishings and “rotten” floor in Soekie’s drinking
they killed and robbed Gumboot. Butcher laughs and tells him establishment show the poverty of Black township life under
he was “sick like a dog.” Boston again demands to know what apartheid. Boston demanding to know what it proves that he was
that proves. They are drinking at Soekie’s, a shebeen (that is, sick—it seems he vomited at some point after he helped murder
illegal drinking establishment) in the township. The police often Gumboot—implies that he unwillingly sympathized with Gumboot
close down shebeens in the township, prompting new ones to but doesn’t want to admit it to other members of the gang.
open. Soekie’s has one table, a few chairs, empty walls, and a Butcher’s laughter and claim that Boston was “sick like a dog,”
“rotten” floor. Soekie lives there in a back room. meanwhile, both indicate that Butcher doesn’t share Boston’s
sympathy toward Gumboot and hint that dog imagery may be
important later in the novel.
Tsotsi, Die Aap, and Butcher sit at the table while Boston That Boston hits the incoherent woman in the face shows that he is
stands. An incoherent woman sits in the corner. Boston again emotionally volatile and violent, despite his sympathy for Gumboot.
demands to know what his sickness proves. The woman shouts, By hitting her, he may be trying to prove to the other members of his
“Come here Johnny,” but the men ignore her. The woman asks gang that despite getting sick after the murder, he is still capable of
for Johnny to kiss her, prompting Boston to hit her twice in the violence. The squalid surroundings—only four customers, a terribly
face. Butcher laughs and tells Boston not to go too far. Boston drunk woman, casual violence, bad service—again emphasize the
wanders the room. Butcher, his drink finished, calls for another economic oppression of Black townships under apartheid.
and eyeballs the woman in the corner. Soekie responds from
the other room but doesn’t appear. Butcher yells her name, and
she yells back.
Tsotsi notes that Boston, wandering the room, is searching for Here the novel makes explicit that Boston vomited and cried after
an explanation for his vomiting and tears after they killed helping murder Gumboot. Tsotsi’s decision to behave exactly as
Gumboot. Tsotsi, on the way to Soekie’s, resolved to keep usual, and his hatred of Boston for introducing changing feelings
exactly to his usual behavior, in part because something feels into his life, reveal how psychologically dependent Tsotsi is on his
different to him. Tsotsi blames Boston for this feeling. His habits. Tsotsi’s hatred for Boston, together with his earlier desire
hatred of Boston motivated his decision to kill someone on the that Gumboot hate him, hint that hatred is Tsotsi’s main way of
train. Tsotsi believes Boston has changed the feeling of things relating to other people.
since he joined the gang six months ago, because Boston asks
questions.
Soekie, a “coloured woman in her fifties,” brings more alcohol to In apartheid South Africa, “coloured” was a legally enforced racial
the men’s table. Though born in a European area of the city, she classification referring to people of mixed race. Since Soekie was
lives in the township because her mother didn’t want her. She born in a European—that is, white—neighborhood, her mother was
writes to her mother asking to know her birthday but receives probably white. The novel implies that Soekie’s white mother had a
no reply. On her way back from the table, Soekie tells the romantic relationship with a Black man, became pregnant, and then
woman in the corner, Rosie, that she needs to leave. The rejected their child, either due to her own racism or to protect
woman starts crying, and Soekie returns to the back room. herself from legal repercussions (it was illegal under apartheid for a
white person to have a sexual relationship with a non-white person).
With Soekie’s background, then, the novel is giving the reader
another example of racism and apartheid destroying families and
separating children from their parents.
Boston braces his hands on the table and says “decency.” Boston knows what the word “decency” means, while Butcher and
Butcher asks Boston what he’s talking about, and Boston claims Tsotsi do not (or claim they don’t). On one level, this detail hints that
that decency made him sick. Butcher asks what decency is, and Boston may have had some education, which Butcher and Tsotsi
Boston replies that it’s what Butcher isn’t. He then sits beside were denied due to their poverty. Tsotsi’s inward contempt for
Tsotsi and asks whether he knows what decency means. Tsotsi “books and words” while fighting with Boston also suggests that
thinks Boston wants to wound him and inwardly expresses Tsotsi thinks Boston is more educated than he is. On another level,
contempt for “books and words.” He denies knowing about that Boston knows what “decency” means, while Butcher and Tsotsi
“decency” and asks Boston what it is. Boston says it’s why he don’t, suggests that knowing what “decency” means symbolizes
was sick, and Tsotsi asks whether it’s a sickness. Boston laughs feeling sympathy for other people—Boston feels sympathy for
and says yes—it made him sick and it killed their victim. Tsotsi Gumboot, while Butcher and Tsotsi do not.
tells Boston to go to the doctor.
Butcher keeps calling for Soekie. Boston leans closer to Tsotsi, This passage hints that Tsotsi may have accepted the stereotyped
says he wants to have a conversation, and asks Tsotsi’s age. identity of “tsotsi”—gangster—because he has lost his memories and
Tsotsi loathes Boston’s questions because he can’t answer thus his true identity. At the same time, by claiming that Tsotsi’s
them. He has few memories—fragments of children name is “the name, in a way, of all men,” the passage suggests that
“scavenging,” the police, and loneliness. Tsotsi doesn’t think anyone in Tsotsi’s situation might commit similar crimes.
about himself, the past, or the future. He lives in the present
and “his name was the name, in a way, of all men.”
Soekie refills the men’s drinks, gives Butcher a “dagga” In the South African context, “dagga” means cannabis. That Soekie
cigarette, and again tells Rosie to leave. Butcher demands tells Butcher “no rough stuff” suggests she thinks he might hurt
Soekie stop trying to move Rosie. Soekie notes Rosie used to be Rosie. By leaving the situation instead of trying to protect Rosie
her friend and tells Butcher “no rough stuff.” She returns to the from Butcher, Soekie reveals that she is so used to brutality that she
back room. does not believe she has the power or the choice to protect anyone,
even a former friend.
Butcher and Die Aap smoke the cigarette while Butcher walks This passage suggests, without stating explicitly, that Butcher and
to Rosie and reaches under her dress’s skirt. She begs him, “not Die Aap take Rosie outside to rape her. Later, her screams are
in here,” so he begins pushing her outside. Die Aap calls to further evidence that she’s being violently assaulted. Once again,
Butcher, and Butcher invites him to join, so all three of them go Boston expresses sympathy for a victim of the gang—in this case,
outside. Tsotsi, alone with Boston, wants to flee but acts Rosie—without, however, doing anything to help the victim, which
“outwardly the same, as always.” He and Boston hear a yell from suggests that he lacks the courage or believes he lacks the power to
outside, and Boston asks where the others went. Tsotsi glances intervene. Tsotsi, meanwhile, clings to his habits, acting “outwardly
at Rosie’s empty chair. As they hear another scream, Boston the same, as always,” because he is psychologically dependent on
swears. Tsotsi asks whether he’s feeling sick again, and Boston his routines and afraid that Boston’s sympathies and questions will
replies, “One’s enough.” Tsotsi denies the comparison between somehow disrupt his life.
Rosie and Gumboot. When Boston asks why, Tsotsi points out
Rosie won’t be murdered.
Boston asks Tsotsi whether he feels nothing for Gumboot or In this passage, Boston is not only expressing sympathy for the
Rosie. Tsotsi asks what he means. Boston takes out a knife, gang’s victims, Gumboot and Rosie, but trying to sympathize with
slices his arm, and says that when they killed Gumboot, he felt Tsotsi—to understand his psychology. Tsotsi, having embraced a
like that inside. He asks whether anything makes Tsotsi feel like stereotyped “gangster” identity, does not want to be understood as a
that. Tsotsi thinks he hates Boston more than ever, and unique, psychologically complex individual. So, he falls back on his
knowing he’s going to “do something about it” is what allows habitual emotional reaction—hatred—in response to Boston’s
him to meet Boston’s eyes. He reflects that Boston is trying to attempts to connect with him.
illuminate Tsotsi’s inner world, where nobody—including Tsotsi
himself—ever goes.
CHAPTER 3
Leaving Soekie’s, Tsotsi passes Rosie but ignores her. Boston’s Tsotsi ignoring Rosie—when he knows Butcher and Die Aap have
words keep playing in his mind. Tsotsi watches a house party just raped her—emphasizes once again his lack of sympathy for his
across the street and sees two girls run from the house chased gang’s victims. Yet Boston’s argument for sympathy and his religious
by a drunk man. He almost manages to focus on the moment language have clearly affected Tsotsi: when he sees a church, he
when the drunk man falls in a way that reminds him of Boston runs away “like a man possessed,” a figure of speech that refers to
on the floor. Walking along, Tsotsi passes a church and begins demonic possession and suggests that Tsotsi is in some sense
to run “like a man possessed” out of the township toward the opposed to or afraid of God.
white suburb.
Tsotsi runs until his mind goes blank and then stops under a By mentioning that police prowl the white suburb—presumably to
lamppost. Seeing headlights, he realizes it may be police—they keep out non-white people—the novel reminds the reader that in
prowl the white suburb—so he slips into the darkness. Walking apartheid South Africa, the law served primarily not to uphold
aimlessly, he sees a stand of bluegum trees and decides to rest justice or protect all citizens, but to enforce segregation and oppress
there. As soon as he sits under a tree, he remembers Boston young Black men like Tsotsi. Tsotsi’s conclusion that the gang is
again. Just as he recruited Die Aap for his strength and Butcher failing because Boston asked too many questions about Tsotsi’s
for his violence, Tsotsi recruited Boston for his intelligence, forgotten past, meanwhile, reveals how frightened Tsotsi is of his
which helps the gang elude capture. Tsotsi wonders why the own true identity.
arrangement stopped working. He concludes that it’s because
Boston asked questions Tsotsi didn’t know the answers to.
Tsotsi imagines his inner life as “darkness.” When he sleeps, he Tsotsi’s knife, a violent weapon, represents his stereotyped identity
doesn’t dream, and both his outer and inner worlds are dark. To as a “gangster.” He uses his daily ritual surrounding the knife to
keep this from bothering him, he rigidly follows a few rules. reinforce his “gangster” identity and to distract himself from his own
First, every morning when he wakes up remembering nothing, inner life. By comparing the knife to a “fetish”—a magical object
he immediately checks his knife. He tests its sharpness and associated by European colonizers with indigenous African
sharpens it if it’s dull. Otherwise, he plays with it. It makes him religions—that protects Tsotsi from “bad spirits,” the novel seems to
feel better: “The knife was not only his weapon, but also a be associating indigenous African religious beliefs with violence, in
fetish, a talisman that conjured away bad spirits and contrast with Christianity, which it has so far associated with
established him securely in his life.” sympathy. Despite the novel’s critique of apartheid and white
supremacy, then, it may be implicitly reinforcing racist assumptions
about indigenous African religions here.
Third, Tsotsi won’t allow people to ask questions about him, This passage includes the novel’s first account of Tsotsi’s religious
because questions make him aware of “the vast depths of his beliefs. In contrast with Boston’s implied Christianity, Tsotsi believes
darkness.” These empty depths threaten him with a in a “nothingness” that is more real than “men’s prayers”—in other
“nothingness,” which he fears. Tsotsi believes that hiding words, Tsotsi does not seem to believe in God or in any ultimate
beneath external reality, including “men’s prayers,” is meaning to life.
nothingness. Violence allows Tsotsi to assert himself against
this terrifying nothingness.
Tsotsi, tired of thinking, stands to leave when he hears Just as Butcher and Die Aap raped Rosie seemingly as a matter of
footsteps. Hiding behind a bluegum tree, he sees a young Black habit, without thinking much about their actions, so Tsotsi reacts in
woman carrying something and glancing behind her. As she a stereotyped “gangster” fashion to the appearance of a woman
approaches, Tsotsi sees she’s carrying a shoebox. Heartbeat alone—he moves to assault her.
quickening, Tsotsi moves through the trees to intercept her. As
she enters the trees, he grabs her, puts a hand over her mouth
to muffle her scream, and shoves her against a tree.
Tsotsi puts his knee between her legs and, while she struggles That the woman looks at the shoebox containing her baby “with a
and holds tighter to the shoebox, examines her. She pulls her horror deeper than her fear of” Tsotsi—and that she subsequently
mouth free and screams again. Something about the shoebox abandons her baby to Tsotsi, a strange man who seemed about to
catches his attention, and he moves away. She looks at the sexually assault her—suggests that something has gone terribly
shoebox “with a horror deeper than her fear of him.” She wrong in the relationship between mother and child here. This
pushes the shoebox at him and, when he takes it, runs away. wrongness foreshadows the importance of failed and destroyed
The shoebox lid falls off, and Tsotsi sees a baby inside. He parent-child relationships in the rest of the novel.
recognizes that what made him move away from the woman
was the sound of a baby crying.
CHAPTER 4
Cassim is trying to sell a woman fabric in his shop when a young As soon as Tsotsi walks into Cassim’s shop, Cassim is looking around
man (Tsotsi) walks in. Cassim checks who else is in the shop, to make sure there are “enough” people to protect him from Tsotsi.
counts eight people, and judges it “enough.” He looks at Tsotsi Cassim and his wife look at Tsotsi and see a “type,” not an individual.
and sees a bad “type.” He sells fabric to the woman, looks again, This detail suggests that while Tsotsi has chosen to embrace his
and sees Tsotsi is gone. When he asks his wife whether she saw stereotyped “gangster” identity, other people also impose that
him, his wife replies, “God forgive us.” Tsotsi comes back half an stereotype on him. It also suggests that apartheid’s white
hour later. Cassim, scared, gives an older male customer extra supremacist ideology affects not only how white people see non-
tobacco and tells the customer frenetically about his mother white people, but also how non-white people see each other.
back in India and about Indian history. Again, Tsotsi leaves. Although Cassim is Indian, another legally oppressed racial class
Cassim wonders aloud to his wife what Tsotsi wanted. under South African apartheid, he seems to have absorbed racist
stereotypes about young Black men.
Tsotsi comes back when there are no other customers. Cassim simply cannot believe that Tsotsi is trying to find milk for a
Cassim’s wife and children hide in a back room. Tsotsi demands baby. His disbelief reveals that due to his stereotypes about poor
milk, but Cassim thinks he must have misheard. Tsotsi again young Black men like Tsotsi, he cannot imagine Tsotsi in the role of
demands milk. Cassim, so afraid he cannot see Tsotsi’s face, parent or caretaker. By revealing that Tsotsi cannot read,
asks what kind. Tsotsi says, “Baby milk.” Cassim runs to the door meanwhile, the novel hints at the poverty and lack of education
behind which his family is hiding and says, “Baby milk!” His from which Tsotsi has suffered in his mysterious past.
family starts crying because they think Tsotsi has stabbed
Cassim. Their tears remind Cassim of something. He runs to
Tsotsi, tells him he wants condensed milk, and grabs a tin. Tsotsi
examines the tin. Cassim, realizing Tsotsi can’t read the label,
tells Tsotsi it’s excellent baby milk. Tsotsi pays Cassim and
leaves.
Tsotsi, leaving Cassim’s store, makes himself stop while holding Tsotsi, like Cassim, has embraced negative stereotypes about
the tin to show himself he doesn’t care whether anyone is himself and does not feel “right” taking on the positive role of parent
watching him, even though it doesn’t seem “right” to him to buy or caretaker—yet, curiously, he takes on the role anyway.
baby milk.
It’s Saturday. On Saturdays, people are happy because the work By describing what people habitually do on Saturdays, the novel
week is over, they’ve been paid, and the next day is Sunday, also reminds us that most people, not just Tsotsi, follow habits or
not a workday. Tsotsi ignores this Saturday behavior because patterns of behavior. Tsotsi’s secretiveness when he gets back to his
he recognizes it. He rushes home, reinforces the door with a room reminds the reader that he, by contrast, is doing something
chair, blocks a hole in the wall with some wood, and removes unusual and strange for him: assuming a caretaking, parental role.
the shoebox from under his bed. Although the baby smells, Tsotsi’s association of the baby with “man”—that is, with all
Tsotsi is too shocked by its being to notice: “This was man. This mankind—suggests that in addition to having stereotyped identities
small, almost ancient, very useless and abandoned thing was and real, individual identities, people can also have true group
the beginning of a man.” identities like “human.” By attributing the group identity of “man” to
the baby—an identity that Tsotsi, of course, also shares—Tsotsi may
be starting to identify with and thus sympathize with the baby.
Tsotsi fetches a shirt from the cardboard box he uses as a That the baby has been wrapped in “a torn petticoat and an old pair
dresser. Unwrapping the baby, he notices its rags used to be “a of blue bloomers”—that is, women’s underclothes—hints that his
torn petticoat and an old pair of blue bloomers.” The baby cries, mother did want to care for him (she took the trouble to wrap him)
which disconcerts Tsotsi. When he has unwrapped the baby, he but lacked the necessary resources (she couldn’t afford baby
realizes with surprise that the baby is male. Lifting him out of clothes). Given the poverty in which apartheid keeps the novel’s
the rags, Tsotsi sees that the baby has been lying in feces. He Black characters, this detail may be implying that a lack of
cleans the baby with some of the rags, rewraps him in his shirt, economic opportunity in a white supremacist society prevented the
and returns him to the shoebox. woman from being able to provide for her child and thus made her
desperate enough to abandon him.
Tsotsi looks at the tin, whose label he recognizes but can’t read. Tsotsi wishes for his one educated acquaintance, Boston, to help
He remembers trying to feed the baby bread and water that him with the baby, despite having violently attacked Boston the last
morning. He knows condensed milk and baby’s milk aren’t the time they talked—which suggests both how seriously Tsotsi takes
same, but Cassim told him the tin’s label said baby’s milk. The caring for the baby and how out of his depth he feels in assuming a
baby keeps crying. Tsotsi wishes Boston was here, but he cuts parental role.
off that thought because it’s “too late.” He tells the baby that it’ll
drink the condensed milk the same way he does.
Tsotsi pokes holes in the tin with his knife, tries the milk, and Previously, Tsotsi’s knife reinforced his stereotyped “gangster”
pours some onto a spoon. He gives some to the baby, who identity. Now, he is using it, rather awkwardly and inappropriately,
stops crying. After feeding the baby 10 spoonsful, Tsotsi stops to open a milk tin for a baby—a use that represents Tsotsi’s shift
and looks out the window. He worries that Butcher and Die away from his “gangster” identity and toward a parental role. Yet
Aap may visit soon and discover him taking care of the baby. Tsotsi still identifies somewhat with the mindless gangster
Tsotsi decides he needs to take the baby elsewhere. He stereotype: he doesn’t want the other gang members to know about
considers taking him to Soekie but imagines her asking where the baby, and he refuses to explore his own inner world by thinking
and why he obtained a baby. Then, he asks himself why he took about his motives for accepting the baby.
the baby but quickly dismisses that question in favor of the
more practical question: where.
Out the window, Tsotsi sees “one of the demolition squads,” Under apartheid law, people had to live in racially segregated
men whose job it is to destroy the township piece by piece. He neighborhoods. To enforce segregation, the government would order
decides to stash the baby in one of the deserted, demolished demolished any non-white neighborhoods they thought were too
areas, near the white suburb. Tsotsi packs up the milk and close to white neighborhoods and force the non-white residents to
spoon, puts the lid over the baby in the shoebox, and leaves his move elsewhere. The “demolition squads” that Tsotsi sees have the
room. job of destroying the non-white neighborhoods near the white
suburb.
Tsotsi opens the shoebox to check on the baby, puts it in the Before encountering the baby, Tsotsi clung tightly to his stereotyped
shadowed corner, and thinks. He has realized that taking and “gangster” activity and violent habits. When he compares taking
caring for the baby doesn’t “fit into the pattern of his life.” Tsotsi care of the baby to playing dice, he is acknowledging that in taking
asks himself why he’s cared for the baby, when usually he kills. on a parental role, he is gambling with—and may lose—his whole
He wonders whether he plans to kill the baby in some special previous identity and “the pattern of his life.”
way. Although Tsotsi wishes that were the case, he realizes that
he is “chancing his hand at a game he [has] never dared play and
the baby [is] the dice.”
Tsotsi recalls the details of the night before: the baby’s cry, the Tsotsi experiences his flashback to the yellow dog immediately after
woman giving him the shoebox, the lid coming off and revealing the desperate woman abandons her baby with him—thus, the novel
the baby. All of a sudden, Tsotsi had a memory of a “yellow clearly connects the yellow dog to the idea of failed or destroyed
bitch”—that is, a yellow dog, which is female—“crawling” at him families. Yet the dog remains mysterious. For example, the reader
and “whimper[ing].” Tsotsi came back from the memory does not know why it was “crawling” or “whimper[ing]” or in what
kneeling and saw the baby on the ground. The baby had context Tsotsi saw it. This mystery hints at revelations yet to come.
summoned a memory of Tsotsi’s, which made him curious—and Meanwhile, Tsotsi’s realization that he wants to remember his past
terrified him, because he’d never wanted to know about his is a major turning point for the character: he is moving further from
past before. He now realizes that he kept the baby because the his stereotyped “gangster” identity and beginning to seek his true,
baby inspired a memory, and he wanted it to happen again. individual identity.
Tsotsi leaves the baby in the demolished ruins but resolves to
come back to feed him the following day.
CHAPTER 5
The same Saturday Tsotsi takes the baby to the ruins and thinks The authorities’ half-hearted and unsuccessful attempts to decorate
though his behavior, Gumboot Dhlamini’s funeral occurs, and the Black township’s cemetery shows how the South African
Boston regains consciousness. The funeral occurs at a plot of government under apartheid neglected and oppressed its Black
ground where people were already burying their loved ones citizens. That the Rev. Henry Ransome doesn’t know Gumboot
and where the authorities, after the fact, put up a fence and Dhlamini’s name, meanwhile, suggests that while the Reverend may
planted some trees. Termites ate the fence, and the trees have good intentions, religious ministry is not enough to overcome
mostly died. The “Reverend Henry Ransome of the Church of racism and segregation under apartheid: although the novel has not
Christ the Redeemer in the township” performs the funeral. explicitly stated this, it is implied that Gumboot was Black while the
The gravedigger, Big Jacob, asks the Reverend who Gumboot Reverend is white, and it seems the white Reverend does not know
is, but the Reverend doesn’t know. He walks back to his church his Black potential congregants very well.
in distress.
Butcher and Die Aap are waiting on the street outside Tsotsi’s This passage reveals how Butcher and Die Aap are trapped in habits
room, arguing about whether Tsotsi will show up. Neither and appear to lack control over their own lives. When an
knows whether Tsotsi beating Boston means the gang has unexpected event like Tsotsi beating Boston interrupts the gang’s
broken up. Butcher and Die Aap really began worrying about habits, they do not know what to do. Rather than making choices
the gang the day after the beating, when they didn’t have Tsotsi for themselves, they feel they need someone else, Tsotsi, to make
to tell them what to do. They wandered around all day until choices for them.
they arrived outside Tsotsi’s. They’ve just resolved to leave
when they spot Tsotsi walking up the street.
Tsotsi walks past Butcher and Die Aap without speaking Once again, members of the gang—in this case, Butcher—seem to
because he hasn’t decided what to do about them. When a have a habitual reaction upon encountering a woman who is alone:
woman with a baby walks past, Butcher yells at her to feed the automatically, without thinking about it, they assault or harass the
baby next to him. The woman spits and hurries away. Tsotsi woman. Although the novel does not tell us what Tsotsi thinks when
comes to his door to watch what’s going on. Butcher yells an he sees the woman with the baby, it seems to be something different
obscene suggestion after the woman. Tsotsi, seeing the woman from what Butcher is thinking—which illustrates that Tsotsi, unlike
with the baby, has a thought. Butcher, is breaking with the gang’s habits.
Butcher asks Tsotsi whether they should “find one and play.” Since Butcher has just been sexually harassing a woman on the
Tsotsi shakes his head but invites Butcher and Die Aap inside. street, his ominous phrase “find one and play” seems to indicate that
Inside, Butcher asks about the smell. Tsotsi, without replying, he wants the gang to find another woman and sexually assault her.
throws the baby’s old rags into the backyard. Butcher tries to By refusing, Tsotsi breaks further with the gang’s old habits. Now
tell stories like Boston used to, but all his stories are very short. that Tsotsi is breaking with the gang’s habits and with his old
Tsotsi asks Butcher and Die Aap where Boston is. Butcher says “gangster” identity, the members of the gang don’t know how to
he doesn’t know. Trying to maintain conversation, he adds that relate to one another—they can’t even keep up a regular
Boston could be at Soekie’s, and that he and Die Aap left conversation.
Boston in the back alley behind it.
CHAPTER 6
By “city,” Tsotsi means Terminal Place, a street junction near the People have to take buses between the city and the townships
gasworks where people shop from stores and carts. At because of racist apartheid laws: non-white people are allowed to
Terminal Place, the buses make journeys between the city and work for white people in the city if they have the required pass, but
the townships. Terminal Place becomes active in the morning, they are not allowed to live in “white” areas due to apartheid’s
when workers start taking buses. By dawn, commercial activity segregation laws. So, people have to pay to commute from the non-
starts. Activity dies down by nightfall, because “night is never white townships. The reminder that “night is never safe,” meanwhile,
safe.” Tsotsi arrives at Terminal Place in the evening on a bus. suggests that poverty and oppression under apartheid have
He leaves without Butcher or Die Aap 15 minutes after he increased crime and made the areas near the townships dangerous.
arrives, having found a prospective target.
The target is Morris Tshabalala, who still considers himself a Morris Tshabalala curses Tsotsi by calling him the “whelp of a yellow
man despite losing his legs in an accident and lacking hope. bitch”—literally, Morris is saying that Tsotsi is the puppy of a female
When a foot steps on Morris’s hand, he cries out, “Whelp of a yellow dog. Thus Morris’s curse mysteriously associates the yellow
yellow bitch!”—in other words, puppy of a female yellow dog. dog Tsotsi has begun to remember with Tsotsi’s mother, whom he
He cries out not because of the pain but because he dislikes can’t remember.
being seen. Whereas usually people apologize when they step
on Morris, this man (Tsotsi) doesn’t reply. Morris, disturbed by
Tsotsi’s eyes, grunts and moves away.
Morris doesn’t move away from Tsotsi because he is afraid. South Africa contains a number of gold mines. Before and during
Morris doesn’t consider anything fear that fails to measure up apartheid, Black men did the dangerous work of mining the gold for
to the “terror” of the mining collapse he experienced. The mine little pay while white men reaped the major profits. This economic
was a dark world where time was measured differently and structure led to Morris losing his legs—which shows how racist
men sang about their estrangement from the sun, the moon, structures like apartheid seriously harm people, even when no one
and their wives. When the shaft collapsed, the workers individual is intending the harm. When Morris calls Tsotsi a “tsotsi,”
panicked. Morris Tshabalala’s legs were crushed under a beam. meanwhile, it reminds the reader that Tsotsi has not only embraced
Wondering whether he is getting old, Morris calls Tsotsi a this stereotyped identity in the past—other people also impose it on
“Tsotsi shit” and a “yellow bitch shit.” him.
Morris stops to check his hands and looks behind him. He sees When Morris wonders what he has to live for, it shows how the
a man sitting by a store and, beyond him, the dwindling crowds. profoundly apartheid economic structures that led to his mining
Morris, starting to move again, wonders why he continues accident have harmed him. That he hates money, meanwhile,
living and what he has to live for. He stops to rest. It’s getting suggests he knows that white greed for money led to his
dark. Morris sees the same man sitting by a different store, accident—which in turn shows that Morris, unlike Tsotsi, is
closer by. He notices it’s the man who stepped on his hand consciously aware of how white supremacy and apartheid have
earlier—that is, Tsotsi. Morris, heading back toward the crowds, shaped his life.
thinks that he was correct in hating money because Tsotsi may
kill him for it.
Morris wonders how he could survive without money. He Although the novel does not explicitly state the race of the old
recalls begging an old woman who called him “John my poor woman who refused to employ Morris, she called him “boy”
boy” and “Johnny poor boy” to employ him as her gardener. although he was a grown man, which implies that she was white
Instead, she gave him a penny and shut the door on him. Morris and engaged in condescending interpersonal racism. That people
threw out the penny and kept seeking employment. People kept giving Morris charity when he wanted work suggests a
dropped change to him in the street, and he threw it out, until mismatch between how he identified himself and how other people
one day he was too exhausted. Although he hated the money, identified him: he identified as a worker, but because he was
which he hadn’t earned, he couldn’t throw out the amount he disabled, other people stereotyped him as a beggar and failed to
had been given without drawing notice. treat him with dignity.
After that day, Morris began begging. He learned begging spots This passage illustrates how people internalize and come to identify
and tricks until he could obtain enough money for food, but his with the stereotypes, like “beggar” or “tsotsi,” that other people
pride never recovered. After six years of begging, he’s become impose on them.
bitter. He yells at people to “go to hell,” but they don’t hear him.
Morris catches sight of Tsotsi watching him and curses. He Under apartheid law, Black people were required to carry passes
resolves that despite being crippled, he is man enough to face and could be arrested if they didn’t have one. Given Morris’s
down Tsotsi. Morris starts moving. The salesman calls after him awareness of apartheid’s evils, it is ironic that he’s hoping a white
about a penny he’s left behind, but Morris ignores him. Then policeman enforcing apartheid laws will stop Tsotsi and thereby
the salesman throws the penny at Morris, but Morris doesn’t save Morris from him.
pick it up. Instead, Morris is thinking that the crowds and lights
will protect him from Tsotsi. He hopes a policeman will stop
Tsotsi to demand his pass.
Watching Tsotsi, Morris wonders whether his hands are “soft,” Morris shows his ability to sympathize with Tsotsi, despite the
whether he has a mother, and what his relationship with her threat Tsotsi poses to him, when he wonders about Tsotsi’s hands
was like. But he’s “really asking how do men come to be what and realizes that other people may see him the way he sees Tsotsi.
they become.” He considers that other people might think When Morris wonders about Tsotsi’s mother, and the novel
about him the way he’s thinking about Tsotsi. connects this to the question of “how do men come to be what they
become,” the novel implicitly suggests that a person’s parents are
centrally important to their individual identities—which may explain
why Tsotsi, who cannot remember his parents, has until recently
embraced a stereotyped identity and rejected his individual identity.
Morris reaches a dark side street that leads to a restaurant. In South Africa, the word “kaffir” is an anti-Black racial slur. That
He’s tired and worried Tsotsi will kill him if he goes down the even white people who seem to be sympathizing with Morris
dark street. Morris considers leaving his money somewhere casually call him this slur suggests how deeply ingrained anti-Black
visible. Then a car stalls nearby. Two men get out to push it, racism was in apartheid South African society. Morris’s clever use of
while women stay inside the car and laugh at them. The two the stalled car to elude Tsotsi, meanwhile, shows how much he
men sit on the bumper and smoke a cigarette. One of them wants to live despite the harms that apartheid has inflicted on him.
points out Morris, calling him a “poor kaffir.” Then the two men
start pushing the car again. Morris follows them down the side
street onto another, larger street that’s not as well-lit as the
main street but still busy.
Morris eats, orders more food, and checks the street for Tsotsi. Morris’s self-reflection about his desire to live contrasts with Tsotsi’s
Although he sees people who look like Tsotsi, he doesn’t see the relative lack of self-reflection—another detail betraying how
man himself. He orders some coffee and, drinking it, admits important memory is to understanding oneself and one’s identity.
internally that he was frightened. He realizes he wants to live.
A voice tells Morris that he didn’t hear him. It’s the newspaper By comparing Tsotsi to a dog, the salesman reminds the reader of
salesman, giving Morris back the penny Morris left behind. The the mysterious connection between the yellow dog and Tsotsi’s
salesman lectures Morris briefly on the value of a penny, telling mother. Meanwhile, by saying that men like Tsotsi “bite their own
him people will commit murder over a penny. Morris takes the people,” the salesman is suggesting that apartheid not only harms
penny and tells the salesman about Tsotsi following him. The Black South Africans by depriving them of economic opportunity,
salesman calls people like Tsotsi “mad dogs” who “bite their but also encourages them to harm each other by making violent
own people,” and Morris says that if he were a real man, he crime one of their only opportunities to earn money. Finally, by
would have killed Tsotsi. The salesman says that then the urging Morris to go home and thank God, the salesman seems to
authorities would have executed Morris. Morris asks what a suggest that religion is not a powerful force in people’s lives but
man is supposed to do. The salesman replies that he should go rather a consolation they indulge in when they are powerless to act.
home, thank God, and deny responsibility. He leaves.
Morris drinks his coffee and checks the street but doesn’t see In this chapter, the novel has been giving the reader Morris’s
Tsotsi. The restaurant owner tells Morris he’s closing. Though perspective on his interactions with Tsotsi while withholding Tsotsi’s
afraid, Morris decides to go home—that is, to the abandoned perspective. When Tsotsi kicks Morris’s money, it’s another break
hut where he squats. On the way, he realizes Tsotsi is following with Tsotsi’s habits—the last time Tsotsi’s gang murdered a man,
him. Morris’s hands are bleeding, and he is holding back tears. Gumboot Dhlamini, they also took his money. Thus the novel is
He raises his money high so Tsotsi can see it and leaves it under foreshadowing a potential change in Tsotsi’s character while
a streetlamp. Pausing at the next streetlamp, Morris sees Tsotsi withholding from the reader exactly what it is.
kick the money.
CHAPTER 7
Later, Tsotsi will realize that he should have killed Morris Chapter 7 goes back in time to retell the events of Chapter 6 while
before Morris reached the main street. By not killing him then, giving the reader access to Tsotsi’s perspective. By connecting
Tsotsi will experience unexpected consequences, as he did Tsotsi’s interactions with Morris to his experience under the
under the bluegum trees. When Tsotsi steps on Morris’s bluegum trees—where Tsotsi accepted the abandoned baby—the
hand—not on purpose—he’s been thinking about his memory of novel hints that in his interactions with Morris, Tsotsi will somehow
the yellow dog. Morris calling him “whelp of a yellow bitch” at break with his old habits and his stereotyped “gangster” identity, just
that moment startles and terrifies Tsotsi. Tsotsi, filled with as he did when he began caring for the baby. Yet initially, Tsotsi’s
“burning hate” for Morris, decides to kill him, as is “natural in reaction to Morris is in keeping with his stereotyped
the pattern of his life.” identity—feeling threatened by Morris’s mention of the mysterious
yellow dog, he reacts with kneejerk “hate,” and decides to kill Morris
because it fits “the pattern of his life,” or in other words, his
“gangster” habits.
In economic terms, Morris is not a good target for Tsotsi, Just as Tsotsi became invested in the baby when the baby helped
because beggars don’t make much money. Nevertheless, Tsotsi him regain a memory, so he becomes strangely invested in Morris
follows Morris, engrossed by his disability. Eventually he when Morris’s disability helps him understand that memory
realizes Morris carries himself like the yellow dog of Tsotsi’s better—something had harmed the yellow dog’s legs. Tsotsi’s feeling
memory, which leads Tsotsi to realize that the yellow dog’s back that Morris’s disability and oppression represent “the final reality to
legs were “useless.” Tsotsi becomes fascinated by Morris and so life,” meanwhile, may hint that Tsotsi is becoming more aware of
misses opportunities to kill him. Without knowing where his how apartheid (the ultimate cause of Morris’s accident) has shaped
certainty comes from, Tsotsi is certain that Morris’s disability not only Morris’s existence but his own and those of everyone
and ostracism from society represent “the final reality to life.” around him.
Tsotsi only identifies that he’s made a mistake in letting Morris Up to this point, Tsotsi’s habitual, knee-jerk feeling toward other
reach the main street when he observes Morris stop at the people has been hatred. That he is beginning to feel something other
newspaper stand. Morris looks back, seems relieved when he than hatred toward Morris shows that he is breaking with his old
can’t find Tsotsi, and gets scared when he eventually sees Tsotsi habits.
again. Tsotsi begins to have a feeling for Morris that is neither
hatred nor disgust. Tsotsi recognizes the feeling but cannot
identify it. Although aware he is undergoing some strange
experience, Tsotsi isn’t sure what it is.
When Morris stops before the dimly lit side street, Tsotsi This passage includes a major turning point for Tsotsi’s character.
thinks he has the looks and mannerisms of a dog. Tsotsi keeps Earlier in the novel, when Boston asked whether Tsotsi ever
insisting to himself that he doesn’t know or care about Morris sympathized with the gang’s victims, Tsotsi seemed to deny it—but
in order to hold off the feeling he can’t identify, which makes Boston predicted that one day, Tsotsi would have such feelings and
him wish Morris wouldn’t move into the side street. When wouldn’t know what to do with them. Now Boston’s prediction
Morris escapes behind the stalled car the two men are pushing, about Tsotsi is coming true.
Tsotsi feels “relief.” He realizes that for the first time, he is
sympathizing with a person he intends to kill.
Tsotsi spies on Morris as he goes into the Bantu Eating House. Tsotsi thinks of sympathy not only as a feeling, but also as a kind of
He buys food from an Indian shop across the street and waits, knowledge that allows him to understand what other people feel
considering his sympathy for Morris. He concludes that the and to see them more clearly. His sense of “revelation” and “infinity”
issue is really Morris’s feeling, not his own—Tsotsi is “realizing in his sympathy nebulously connects sympathy to God, since the
something of what the other man felt.” He links his sympathy word “revelation” has religious connotations—it can refer to
with Morris to Boston being sick after they killed Gumboot. knowledge that God bestows directly on human beings—and since
Though Tsotsi doesn’t fully understand sympathy, he compares “infinity,” or limitlessness, is associated with God in the major
it to a sudden illumination that allows him to see Morris. The monotheistic religions.
light of sympathy also allows Tsotsi to see the baby, Boston,
and Gumboot. Beyond them, Tsotsi senses “an infinity” and “a
brighter, intense revelation.”
Tsotsi sees the Bantu Eating House’s lights go out and runs Clearly, Tsotsi is confused and conflicted: although he is becoming
around looking for Morris. He laughs when he catches sight of more aware of his own capacity for choice, he still feels that he has
Morris and thinks he has no choice but to continue stalking no choice but to act out his “gangster” habits or patterns of behavior
Morris, despite his “new-found sympathy.” Tsotsi, finding it and murder Morris. Yet, at the same time, his sympathy for Morris
painful that Morris doesn’t know Tsotsi is still stalking him, prompts him to try to alert his victim with unnecessary noise.
starts coughing, whistling, and coming nearer.
After Morris sees Tsotsi, events move faster. When Morris puts To “belittle” something is to trivialize it or downplay its value.
the money down, Tsotsi feels that it is a “belittlement” of what Ironically, although Tsotsi still plans to murder Morris, his sympathy
has occurred between them—hardly a price that could “buy with Morris makes him feel that Morris’s life is worth much more
life”—and so he kicks it. Then Morris starts throwing stones at than money—so much more that Morris’s attempt to “buy” his
Tsotsi. Tsotsi longs to call out, “I understand.” Instead, while safety with money actually trivializes or downplays his life’s value.
Morris throws stones, yells curses, and cries, Tsotsi moves Once again, Tsotsi associates sympathy with understanding: he
ahead of him and waits for him in the darkness. believes he has come to understand Morris as a result of
sympathizing with him.
When Morris meets Tsotsi in the dark, they wait with a feeling Tsotsi breaks dramatically with his previous habits and his
of intense “intimacy.” When Tsotsi asks Morris what he’s feeling, stereotyped “gangster” identity by displaying curiosity about his
Morris says he feels nothing. Tsotsi asks what he used to feel, victim Morris’s life rather than simply killing Morris. Meanwhile,
and Morris admits that death scared him. Tsotsi asks whether Morris’s statement—“You have heard a big man cry. It is
he’s scared anymore. Morris says he has learned from his hands enough”—implies that his crying violates gender stereotypes
not to be, explaining that before his accident, his hands used to because it is not something a “big man” should do. Just as Tsotsi is
feel life in sexual encounters with women. After his accident, he reevaluating his stereotyped “gangster” identity, so Morris suggests
used his hands like feet, and they stopped feeling. Then, after that his emotional behavior doesn’t fit a stereotyped masculine
feeling so much fear while Tsotsi was stalking him, his heart identity.
stopped feeling. He concludes: “You have heard a big man cry. It
is enough.”
Morris asks what he ever did to Tsotsi and why Tsotsi is Morris rejects Tsotsi’s too-quick claim to understand him by
pursuing him after he surrendered his money. Tsotsi says he insisting on his life’s unique aspects, including his disabled body. In
didn’t want the money and states a third time that he this passage, then, Morris’s “hard hands,” “ugly face,” and “no legs”
sympathized with Morris. Morris asks why Tsotsi is targeting represent what is particular to him as an individual—what Tsotsi
him, and Tsotsi tells Morris that he’s ugly and asks whether needs to know if he is really going to understand and sympathize
that’s “all.” Morris thinks for a while and says he wants to live. with Morris. Thus, this passage suggests that to genuinely
When Tsotsi claims he knows that, Morris tells him that he sympathize with someone, you can’t just have vague good feelings
doesn’t know—that Morris, after many years of despair, is toward them—you have to engage imaginatively with the
speaking about his desire to live to his own “hard hands,” “ugly particulars of their experience and their unique individual identity.
face,” and “no legs.” Tsotsi, moved by Morris’s emotion, asks him
to explain. Morris says he wants to sense warmth from the
pavement, rain, wind, trees, colors, and birdsong. He asks
whether Tsotsi understands, and Tsotsi says yes.
Morris asks why Tsotsi needs to kill him. After a pause, Tsotsi By deciding not to kill Morris, Tsotsi once again breaks with his old
says he doesn’t need to. He repeats it and declares he’ll let habits and stereotyped “gangster” identity. In so doing, he
Morris live. Morris asks Tsotsi’s age. Tsotsi says he doesn’t recognizes his own capacity for choice. After this decision, he tells
know but plans to figure it out. Morris, looking at Tsotsi, can Morris he plans to find out his own age—which shows how, in
only see “the shape of a man” and can’t remember what Tsotsi rejecting his stereotyped identity, he is becoming more interested in
looked like under the streetlights due to his own fear. Wanting his true, individual identity. When Morris looks at Tsotsi and sees
to give Tsotsi a gift, Morris decides to tell him something “the shape of a man,” it recalls the earlier scene where Tsotsi looked
special: he says that mothers love their children and sing them at his own reflection in a window and could see only a generic
songs. Tsotsi denies that mothers do this and walks away. human shape—suggesting that Tsotsi, in sparing Morris’s life, is
Glancing back, he sees Morris gathering the money Tsotsi embracing the group identity of “human”—or, in other words,
kicked. recovering his humanity. The strange exchange between Tsotsi and
Morris about mothers, in which Tsotsi denies that mothers love
their children, may foreshadow some later revelation about Tsotsi’s
own mother, whom he cannot remember.
Tsotsi concludes the day is not an anomaly but a new This passage marks another major turning point for Tsotsi. Here, he
beginning—though of what, he isn’t sure. He will continue to explicitly asserts his power to reject his old, violent habits. He is also
care for the baby and try to uncover his memories, starting deciding to pursue an identity distinct from his former stereotyped
with the yellow dog. Perhaps most importantly, he has realized “gangster” identity—an identity as a parental stand-in for the baby
that he has the choice to break with the old patterns of his life. and as someone with a unique past, here represented by his
Specifically, he has the choice whether or not to kill. He memory of the yellow dog.
wonders, forcefully, when he first made the choice to kill. Then,
he crumples to the ground and sleeps.
CHAPTER 8
On Sunday, the Church of Christ the Redeemer rings its bell. In this passage, religion brings people together, in that everyone in
People throughout the township hear it—including Boston, the township hears the church bells at the same time. Yet the white
lying somewhere unknown staring at his own arm without Reverend—whom the reader would expect to feel positively about
recognizing it. Meanwhile, the Reverend Ransome glances out religion—casts doubt on the ability of religion to unite people across
his window at congregants filing into the church. He becomes racial groups when he remembers that he even didn’t know the poor
suddenly, helplessly enraged, thinking, “Go home. It’s no good. I Black worker Gumboot Dhlamini’s name, despite presiding over his
didn’t know his name.” Yet he hurriedly leaves for church and funeral. Thus, the passage implies both that religion can unify
prays to God for aid. people and that it still isn’t powerful enough to overcome South
African segregation and racism.
Tsotsi walks into the ruins and sees an “uncertain line” on the Tsotsi doesn’t really know how to care for a baby, despite his
wall, the shoebox, and the corner. It reminds him of a day when decision to take on a parental role: he got the wrong food for the
he was playing with Boston’s pencil in his room, drawing on the baby, which attracted ants, which in turn harmed the baby. That
table, until he glanced at Boston, got angry at his expression, Tsotsi continues to care for the baby despite his first impulse to flee
and broke the pencil. He says aloud, “Jesus. Ants”—the from his mistakes shows that he is continuing to exercise his free
condensed milk has attracted ants to the room. When Tsotsi choice to take on a new role and identity, even when it is difficult.
opens the shoebox, he finds ants around the baby’s mouth.
Though his first impulse is to get rid of the baby, Tsotsi cleans
the baby’s face and puts the shoebox in a shaded corner
without ants. He kills the ants on the wall and in the corner.
Tsotsi’s room is down the street from a “communal tap” called That people in the township must wait in long lines for a necessity
Waterworks Square. Day and night, people come there to like water shows the poverty in which non-white people lived under
collect water. Because the line is long, people talk while waiting, apartheid. In mentioning that the water baptizes infants who will
and the tap is “rooted in their lives.” The church even uses its soon enough be waiting in the line, the novel suggests both religion’s
water to baptize infants who will soon have to wait in line for social importance in the township and its inability to improve the
water themselves. On Sunday, an 18-year-old mother named material conditions of the township. Miriam and her son Simon,
Miriam Ngidi is waiting in the line while carrying her baby. She meanwhile, are noteworthy in that they are the first positive
looks at her baby Simon, he waves to her, and she feels mother-child relationship represented in the novel—in contrast with
intensely proud of him. Tsotsi, who cannot remember his mother, and with the woman who
abandoned her baby to Tsotsi’s care.
Miriam moves forward in line, feels her baby falling asleep on In apartheid South Africa, bus boycotts were one way that Black
her back, and wonders where her husband, also named Simon, workers protested their legal and economic oppression. As Miriam’s
has gone. She wonders how a man in love, who’s gotten a husband vanished during a bus boycott, the novel may be implying
woman pregnant, can just vanish on his way to work. When he that he was imprisoned or killed for his political activities.
vanished, Miriam was eight months pregnant. She walked
Simon’s six-mile route to his factory job looking for him. The
workers were all walking to their jobs at this time due to a bus
boycott.
A voice tells Miriam that if she falls asleep, the others will cut The elderly man’s claim that many people vanished on their way to
her in line. Miriam moves forward with the line, looks back work strengthens the implication that Black workers walking to
toward the voice, and sees an elderly man. He asks Miriam their jobs during the bus boycott suffered racist violence in
about herself. After hesitating about whether to ask him the retaliation. Miriam’s hopelessness upon seeing the look in the man’s
questions she asks all strangers, she tells him that her husband eyes, meanwhile, shows her fear that apartheid’s white supremacist
vanished on his way to work. The elderly man says that culture has permanently taken her husband away from her and
happened to many people. Miriam asks whether the man has their son.
seen Simon and tells him Simon’s name, address, and
description, but she stops talking when she sees the look in the
man’s eyes.
Miriam fills the elderly man’s tin, fills her own, and walks back to That many of the boycotting workers spent time in jail reveals that it
her room. There, she reflects that the elderly man told the was primarily the white police who retaliated against them. This
truth—a lot of people did vanish on their way to work during fact suggests that the police may have harmed Miriam’s husband as
the boycott. Yet most of them returned after time in jail, well and tightens the connection between the apartheid
whereas Simon didn’t. Miriam asks aloud the question she only government and the destruction of Miriam’s family.
asks in this room she used to share with Simon: “Are you dead?”
Someone knocks on Miriam’s door. She hopes it’s Simon, Earlier in the novel, characters such as Cassim and Morris have
though he wouldn’t knock on his own door. When she opens it, looked at Tsotsi and immediately identified him as a stereotype, a
she sees “just another young man” and asks him what he wants. “gangster.” By contrast, Miriam looks at him and sees “just another
The man (Tsotsi) checks behind him that no one else is around. young man.” This contrast illustrates Miriam’s disconnection from
Before Miriam can close the door, he covers her mouth, barrels the social world, yet it may also foreshadow Miriam seeing Tsotsi
into the room, and tells her he’ll kill the baby if she tries to more clearly as an individual than other characters have been able
escape or makes noise. He lets her go, examines the baby, and to do. Nevertheless, this passage does show Tsotsi falling back on his
tells her to come with him. When she won’t move, he again old, violent habits. Rather than asking for Miriam’s help, he coerces
threatens to kill her baby and tells her what he wants “won’t her, threatening her child and accidentally making her believe he
take long.” She flinches. He says, “It’s not that.” When she asks plans to rape her.
whether she can get someone to take care of the baby, he
insists it won’t take long.
Tsotsi walks to his room with Miriam following. He makes her Although Miriam is mother to a young child herself, she at first feels
enter ahead of him. He pulls her to the bed, where she sees a no sympathy for the neglected baby that Tsotsi wants her to help.
baby. He demands she feed the baby. When she doesn’t react, Miriam’s lack of generosity here suggests that under conditions of
he rips open her shirt and repeats his demand. Miriam hides threat and stress, people are less likely to react sympathetically to
her breasts and retreats, disgusted by the strange baby with others. Similarly, Tsotsi regresses because he is worried about the
the bad smell. The situation has elicited her ungenerous, baby: he falls back on his old, violent habits and brandishes the knife
antisocial instincts. She tells Tsotsi the baby is too filthy to feed, that represents his stereotyped “gangster” identity.
so Tsotsi demands she clean and then feed the baby. He takes
out his knife and, again, threatens to kill Miriam’s baby if she
doesn’t do what he says.
Miriam cleans the baby and dresses him in Tsotsi’s rags. Once This strange and arguably sexist passage seems to imply that
cleaned, the baby no longer disgusts her. She shuts her eyes women so instinctively identify as mothers that they find
and feeds him, which triggers “a sudden wave of erotic feeling breastfeeding “erotic,” which in turn makes women in caretaking
in her.” She would not have resisted much if Tsotsi had raped roles vulnerable to men’s sexual advances.
her then. When the baby finishes feeding, Miriam is exhausted.
She puts him on the bed, feels the wounds around his mouth,
and glances at Tsotsi. Tsotsi twice tells her that ants did it, but
she doesn’t seem to grasp his meaning.
Miriam fixes her clothes, walks to the door, and asks where the Just as Morris frightened Tsotsi by calling him “whelp of a yellow
baby’s mother is. Tsotsi shrugs. Miriam says: “a bitch in a bitch”—in other words, puppy of a yellow female dog—so Miriam
backyard would look after its puppies better.” Tsotsi, for some frightens Tsotsi by talking about female dogs and puppies. Tsotsi’s
reason scared, tells her no. Miriam, mishearing it as “go,” leaves. strange fear underlines the importance of the yellow dog to his
psychology and heightens the mystery surrounding it.
CHAPTER 9
In a flashback, a child (David) listens to his mother hum with This family scene, with its “security” and comfort, contrasts with the
“warm security.” An elderly woman says his mother seems impoverished, dangerous situations that Black characters living
happy. His mother agrees and sings more loudly. David is on the under apartheid have suffered throughout the novel. Because this
floor in a little room listening to his mother and watching a fly chapter comes directly after Tsotsi has gained a new memory, the
hit the window. He recognizes everything in his world and feels reader may suspect that this chapter contains Tsotsi’s childhood
“comforted.” memories. The singing mother reminds the reader of Morris’s claim
that mothers sing to their children. Since Tsotsi denied that mothers
sing to their children, this connection may foreshadow that
something will happen to stop David from hearing his mother’s
singing.
The elderly woman asks, “What time tomorrow, my child?” The The novel has not yet made clear who “he” is. Yet given the
mother says, “He says to be here all day.” The elderly woman frequency with which family separations occur in the novel—a
suggests that this is typical male behavior. The mother asks mother abandoning her child to Tsotsi, Tsotsi forgetting his parents,
whether, after years, one more day of waiting matters. Miriam losing her husband while pregnant with his child—the
reader may suspect that “he” is a lost family member who is finally
returning.
The mother asks David to bring the salt. While he’s fetching it, It seems that the mother and the elderly woman have ceased
he hears the elderly woman ask whether he knows. His mother talking about the unidentified “he” and have started talking about
says yes, and the elderly woman asks what he says about it. His the child David, since the mother mentions that “he” is too young to
mother says that he’s too young to remember. David runs to his remember. Although the passage leaves unstated what David
mother with the salt, and she hugs him. Looking at the old doesn’t remember, the reader may guess that David can’t remember
woman, he thinks about his fear and respect for her: fear, since the lost “he” who has been absent for years. David’s thoughts about
she pinched him hard when he misbehaved, and respect, the elderly woman suggest that she has taken on a quasi-parental
because adults respect her and because she really sees him and role with respect to him: she punishes him when he misbehaves, but
doesn’t laugh at him. she also sees him, understands him, and takes him seriously—in
other words, sympathizes with him.
David goes into the yard and stops a “safe distance” from the The yellow dog’s appearance may strengthen the reader’s suspicion
yellow dog. David and the dog once played together, but now that this chapter represents Tsotsi’s childhood memories. The
she snarls if he comes near to where she’s tied up. David edges mother’s comment that David will have “other playmates soon
close to her and prepares to edge closer before running away. enough” implies that the yellow dog is pregnant with puppies—a fact
His mother comes out and tells him to stop it. When he that partially explains why Tsotsi associates the yellow dog with
complains that the dog won’t play with him anymore, his babies and mothers but does not reveal why the memory has so
mother says he’ll have “other playmates soon enough.” much traumatic weight for him.
The mother sends David to fetch a mat. He gets it out. She This passage reveals that the elderly woman is not related to David
gives him food to bring to the elderly lady, who pretends not to and his mother and makes explicit that the man David’s mother is
notice she’s taking it, because she lacks a family and would expecting is David’s father. In tandem, these two facts suggests that
starve without David’s mother. David, his mother, and the the elderly woman has taken on a quasi-parental role toward David,
elderly woman eat dinner. At the meal’s end, David’s mother not because of any biological obligation, but because his father—for
tells him his father will arrive the next day. For a long time, reasons not yet explained—has been absent.
David’s mother has been saying his father would come back,
and now the time has come.
Because David’s mother told David his father is warm, Although David’s home seems secure and comforting in contrast
laughing, and soft, David imagines his father “glowing,” laughing with most other settings in the novel, this passage reveals the
constantly, and covered in feathers. He imagines his father sadness of David’s family situation: he was deprived of his father for
flying home. After dinner, David and his mother go to bed. In unknown reasons when he was too young to know his father or fully
bed, David’s mother talks more about David’s father and the understand what was happening. The storm attacking David’s
past. David falls into a dream about himself and his mother reunited family in his dream foreshadows trouble for them.
riding on his flying, feathered father’s back. Out of nowhere, a
storm comes and begins driving them out of the air.
David wakes. He hears stones on lamp-posts—a signal that the That the people in David’s neighborhood have a signal to alert their
police are about to raid the neighborhood. Policemen break neighbors of a police raid implies raids are both common and
down the door to David’s house and come with flashlights into threatening—hinting at how the apartheid government uses the
the room where he and his mother are sleeping. He begins to police to regulate and oppress Black people and how Black people
cry out, but his mother grabs him and tells him not to, so he resist this oppression.
stops.
Once the police have crammed the vans with people, they The people the police have arrested are calling out instructions to
leave. The people in the vans call out instructions about money, those left behind, which suggests that such arrests are common and
courts, police, and what to bring them, but it’s difficult to hear that people believe they know what to do in response. Yet the novel
full sentences. The vans leave, and eventually the makes clear that those left behind can’t hear the arrested people
neighborhood sinks into quiet. The people in the neighborhood well, implying that their instructions may be fruitless. The sense of
feel the destructiveness of the police raid less in the physical powerlessness that haunts the neighborhood after the police leave
damage than in the emotional injury it leaves behind. After they underscores the lack of legal rights Black people had under
have cleaned up a bit, they go to bed because they have no apartheid: those left behind do not believe the law will treat their
other options. loved ones fairly.
David stays in bed without moving. His mother has promised This passage reveals that David’s mother has explained to him what
him many times that if someone takes her away, he should wait to do if she is arrested, which shows that their Black neighborhood
in their room, and she will come back. He listens for noise is constantly under threat from white police enforcing racist
indicating she’s coming. He hears the yellow dog outside but apartheid laws. Since David hears the yellow dog after his mother’s
not his mother. He begins to call out for her. arrest, the reader may begin to understand why Tsotsi associates
the dog with children separated from their mothers.
The elderly woman calls back to ask what’s the matter, comes The elderly woman guesses right away that the police have taken
into the room, and examines it. She asks where David’s mother David’s mother, which underlines once again how regularly the
is. When he doesn’t reply, she asks whether it was the police. police raid David’s neighborhood. Here, she steps into a quasi-
He wails for his mother and makes for the door. The elderly parental role, caring for David in his mother’s absence.
woman catches him, waits for him to finish struggling and
yelling, and puts him back in bed. He cries until he falls asleep.
The elderly woman dresses and tells David she’s going to The elderly woman is trying to help David’s family by finding his
search for his mother. David says his mother promised to mother, but she’s also leaving a young child alone. That she has to
return. The elderly woman says she’ll take David’s mother her choose between finding David’s mother and supervising David
dress and help her come back. David asks to accompany the shows the impossible situations in which apartheid puts Black
elderly woman, but she tells him to wait for his father to arrive. adults trying to fulfill parental roles.
When the elderly woman leaves, David is terrified of meeting From context, the reader can assume that “Tondi” is David’s
his father without his mother. He waits in bed and falls asleep mother’s name and that the person searching for her is David’s
around noon. Someone wakes him up by knocking on the door father, now returned. Yet without a supervising adult, David has no
and calling, “Tondi.” David flees into the back yard and hides in a one to introduce him to his father, whom he’s never met. He’s
chicken coop. He hears footsteps and a voice continuing to call naturally afraid of an unknown intruder in his house.
for “Tondi.” Another voice calls out that Tondi is gone—the
police took her.
The voice keeps crying Tondi’s name. David hears “wild The “wild breaking noise” from the house implies that David’s father
breaking noise” from the house. Footsteps travel into the yard. is so upset by his wife’s arrest—the day before their family was
The yellow dog snarls, and then David hears her yell in pain. supposed to reunite—that he destroys something. The yellow dog
The footsteps move away, the voice cries, “Tondi! I’m come snarling and then yelling in pain, meanwhile, implies that she warns
back,” and then David can only hear the dog’s pained noises. off or attempts to attack David’s father, who responds by hurting
her.
David looks at the yellow dog. Someone has kicked her and In his anger at Tondi’s arrest, David’s father has fatally harmed the
broken her back legs. She crawls toward the coop with her yellow dog. That the yellow dog and her puppies die the day after
front legs until she hits the end of her chain. She lies down, David’s mother is arrested (and as an indirect result of her arrest)
births dead puppies, and dies. All day David watches flies suggests that the yellow dog represents how apartheid destroys
collect around the bodies. Then he runs away from the coop. families and separates parents from children. It is now clear why a
baby abandoned by his mother triggered the memory of the yellow
dog in Tsotsi—it reminded him of his own childhood separation from
his mother.
The group’s youngest boy, Simon, won’t eat. The others Simon’s swollen belly is a symptom of malnutrition. This fact,
examine his swollen belly and say he’s “going like Willie.” When together with the children’s discussion of Willie—who seems to have
David asks who Willie is, someone replies that they “put him died and been “put away,” that is, buried or dumped, by the other
away.” The group decides to give David—whose name they children—reveals that these parentless children never have enough
haven’t learned—Willie’s name. They decide the day was a to eat and sometimes starve. This fact highlights how dysfunctional
failure because they got so little food and agree to “try and oppressive apartheid South Africa is.
somewhere else” the next day. David asks what they mean, but
they don’t seem to understand the question.
A boy called Petah says he’ll show David where to sleep, tells The reader will remember that Tsotsi encounters Petah after he has
him they’ll get him a better name than the “dead” Willie, says lost his memory and that Petah calls him “David.” Petah’s
they’ll be friends, and demands David say something. Then he appearance here is more evidence that David is Tsotsi as a child. At
leads David into a pipe, where Petah falls asleep. David realizes this point, David can only confusedly remember his mother’s singing
the pipes are warm and tries to remember where else was and that he was supposed to wait for her, which reveals that the
warm. He remembers singing and a voice telling him not to trauma of her disappearance has already caused him to start losing
move. Realizing there’s somewhere he ought to be, he climbs his memory.
out of the pipe.
Petah wakes up and asks where David’s going. David is trying Already, David has lost coherent memories of his past: his reason for
to climb the steep riverbank when Petah catches him and tells leaving the other children comes to him but is soon “gone.” When
him to stop. The other children emerge from their pipes and the other children get David on the ground and hold him there
hold David on the ground. Someone asks David what he was because he’s trying to leave, the novel may be hinting that David
doing, and he shakes his head because his reason is “gone.” has entered a new, more violent way of life.
When Petah suggests the problem was “home,” the other
children disperse.
Petah says David shouldn’t go home at night. One child in the Petah’s story about Joji, murdered trying to find his family, shows
group, Sam, reunited with his mother during the day—but how dangerous the parentless children’s lives are. In losing his
another, Joji, went back to his old home at night and was killed mother and his memories, David is also losing his identity: he
by the new inhabitants. Petah suggests that David, whom he declares his old self “dead.” This declaration shows how important
calls Willie, try for home the next day—and then says the name family and memories are to keeping a sense of oneself under difficult
Willie won’t work and asks for David’s real name. David tells conditions like poverty and oppression.
Petah his name was David, but David is “dead.” Petah agrees
that David should pick a new name when he’s “ready.” They
return to the pipe. Petah goes to sleep, and David watches the
sky all night.
When the other children come back to the pipes that evening, In this passage, the novel finally makes explicit that David is Tsotsi
Petah tells him that if David scavenges with them the next day, as a child. Although the adult Tsotsi embraced the “tsotsi”
he’ll get bread. David agrees. When he asks where Simon is, no stereotype—his “gangster” identity—the reader now learns that he
one answers. While scavenging that day, a shopkeeper runs him did not originally choose this stereotype for himself: a shopkeeper
off and yells “tsotsi” at him. Later, when the group is trying to imposed it on him when he was a starving, homeless child. Thus, the
pick a name for David, he tells them he’s “Tsotsi.” novel suggests that Tsotsi became how he is due to apartheid law’s
destruction of his family and the subsequent cruelty that his racist
society showed him.
Eventually the police disperse the children by the river. Tsotsi The police break up the group of homeless children apparently
joins other gangs, but he always remembers how he learned to without trying to find their families or otherwise aid them, which
survive. He gives up “sympathy and compassion” and spurns shows that the police’s job in apartheid South African society is to
memory, which in any case he doesn’t have. control Black people, not help them. Here the reader learns that
Tsotsi rejected “sympathy,” which he has only recently rediscovered
in the novel’s present timeline, due to his separation from his
mother, his ensuing homelessness, and the gang life that
homelessness introduced him to. The novel seems to be suggesting,
then, that oppression and cruelty can destroy sympathy and breed
hatred.
CHAPTER 10
Tsotsi wakes to knocking on his door and “instinctively” reaches Earlier in the novel, the reader learned that Tsotsi always grabs his
for his knife. Without grabbing it, he has another idea and knife and tests its sharpness as soon as he wakes up, as a way of
checks for the baby at the foot of the bed. He hears knocking clearing his mind and maintaining his stereotyped “gangster”
again and thinks perhaps Miriam has come back—but wonders identity. Here, Tsotsi breaks that habit: rather than picking up the
why she would. He grabs his knife, and instead of comforting knife, he checks on the baby first, which suggests that his parental
him, it triggers memories of the children by the river, Petah, and role is becoming more important to him that his stereotyped
his mother. “gangster” identity. When he does eventually grab the knife,
meanwhile, it no longer clears his mind. Instead, it makes him
remember the events that led to him becoming “Tsotsi.” By
reclaiming his memories, Tsotsi is moving further from the “tsotsi”
stereotype and becoming more aware of himself as a unique
individual with a particular past.
Through the window, Die Aap asks why. Tsotsi thinks about his Tsotsi considers his mother “the beginning of himself,” which
memories, especially his mother, whom he considers “the illustrates both how important parents are to their children’s
beginning of himself.” He says “my mother” out loud. Die Aap, identities and how traumatic losing his mother was for Tsotsi
surprised at the idea of Tsotsi’s mother, mentions his own specifically—it led to him embracing the “tsotsi” identity that he’s
mother is dead. Tsotsi is struck that every person, including now struggling to discard. Much like Tsotsi’s earlier recognition that
Boston, Die Aap, and Butcher, has a mother. He asks where his reflection could be that of any man, his revelation here that
Butcher is, and Die Aap replies that Butcher isn’t coming. Tsotsi every person has a mother shows he’s coming to appreciate the
ponders what this means. If the gang is over, will Tsotsi join common humanity of all individuals. Yet he and Die Aap are both
another one, as he has since childhood? surprised at the idea that the other had a mother—hinting that up
to this point, neither one has fully perceived the other’s humanity.
Finally, when Tsotsi wonders whether he’ll join another gang, it
suggests that while he is breaking with his old “gangster” habits, he
does not yet feel fully free of them.
Die Aap explains Butcher is angry that Tsotsi had “done a job Butcher is angry that Tsotsi “done a job alone”—in other words, he
alone” and, though he and Die Aap came back to Tsotsi’s room believes that Tsotsi killed Morris Tshabalala when the gang went to
twice after that, once Tsotsi wasn’t there and once he was with the city and resents that he didn’t get to participate in the murder.
a woman. Tsotsi asks, “So what?” Die Aap says Butcher has This detail reveals Butcher’s sadism. By contrast, Die Aap’s return to
joined another gang led by a man named Buster, and Tsotsi asks Tsotsi reveals Die Aap’s loyalty but also his tendency to get stuck in
why Die Aap didn’t join too. Die Aap points out that he’s been in habits.
a gang with Tsotsi for two years. Tsotsi is baffled that Die Aap
has been following him for that long.
Die Aap begins to suggest that he and Tsotsi reform the gang At this moment, Tsotsi both recalls the beginning of his career in
with new members when the baby under the bed begins to cry. gangs—which has been his lifestyle “since the river”—and decides
When Die Aap notices Tsotsi isn’t reacting to the noise, Die Aap that career is “finished.” Since Tsotsi remembering how he became a
pretends not to hear it. Meanwhile, Tsotsi is thinking: “start gang member and deciding to stop being a gang member coincide,
again, since the river…but what about the river?” The baby the novel suggests that to change one’s habits or pattern of life, a
stops crying. Tsotsi tells Die Aap they aren’t going to reform the person has to remember and understand how they got to where
gang, which is “finished.” Die Aap asks Tsotsi what he should do. they are.
Tsotsi tells him to leave. They stare at each other, and then Die
Aap exits.
Tsotsi looks through his window for Miriam, who has gotten in Instead of coercing Miriam to help him, Tsotsi appeals to her with
line for the water tap. He sees her glance toward his room and his eyes. He also observes her more closely than he did previously.
speculates that it will be easier to persuade her to come with This close observation may suggest sexual attraction, but together
him this time, since she doesn’t seem scared. She gets water with his more respectful treatment of Miriam, it also suggests that
and begins walking away. Tsotsi notes her looks and posture in he is getting better at recognizing her as an individual with
a way he didn’t before. He leaves his room and waits outside so value—sympathizing with her, in other words.
she’ll spot him. Tsotsi tries to communicate through eye contact
that he wants her help feeding the baby. She follows him back
toward his room.
Once inside, Tsotsi demands Miriam feed the baby. She balks in Miriam’s decision to care for the baby above and beyond what
the doorway but then enters. When Miriam produces ointment Tsotsi has demanded of her hints that she regrets her earlier disgust
for the baby’s mouth, new clothes, and baby powder, Tsotsi with the baby and sympathizes with the baby’s situation. Although
realizes she was planning to come back. She begins to Tsotsi has been acting in a parental role toward the baby, he is not
breastfeed the baby, which at first drinks milk but then refuses. ready to claim the identity of “father.” His statement that David
Miriam tries to coax the baby to drink, asks his name, and “never saw his father” betrays how closely he is currently identifying
suggests calling him Peter. Tsotsi says the baby is called “David.” the baby with his memories of himself as a child.
Miriam asks whether Tsotsi is the father, but Tsotsi tells her
David “never saw his father.”
The baby begins to breastfeed properly. Miriam asks Tsotsi to That Tsotsi wants to kill Miriam when she offers to adopt the baby
give her the baby so she can care for him. She offers to let shows both how emotionally invested he is in the baby and how,
Tsotsi visit and says the baby can play with her son. Tsotsi’s first when feeling threatened, he is still in danger of reverting to his old,
impulse is to murder Miriam. He points out to himself that he violent patterns of behavior. When he reviews what he has done for
bought the baby milk and killed the ants. Then he thinks about the baby (buying the milk, killing the ants), he seems to be
the river and how he used to play with other children in a reassuring himself that he's an adequate parental stand-in. His
derelict car. intrusive memories of childhood imply that his identification of the
baby with his childhood self, David, is motivating his behavior: he
wants to care for the baby to compensate for the neglect and
homelessness he experienced after his mother’s arrest.
Miriam demands the whole story, so Tsotsi tells her. She asks The novel doesn’t clarify what Tsotsi means when he says he “must
how long ago it happened. He tells her three days and explains find out,” but this passage does provide a clue. Immediately before
some of what has happened since. She asks what Tsotsi plans to he says it, he's thinking about the yellow dog—which represents the
do with the baby, and Tsotsi says he’s going to keep him. She destruction of families by apartheid, in particular his own family’s
asks why. Tsotsi considers the question, thinking of the yellow destruction and his ensuing homelessness and gang involvement.
dog and the connection he feels to the baby, and says he “must He’s also thinking about the baby, whom he identifies with David,
find out.” Miriam, unable to think clearly about this response, his childhood self. By caring for the baby, Tsotsi may be trying to find
puts a milk bottle on the table, tells Tsotsi to feed the baby the out what would have happened in his own childhood if he hadn’t
next day, and announces she’ll come by. Then she leaves. been abandoned.
Tsotsi, periodically looking around to make sure Miriam isn’t Despite Tsotsi’s sympathy for the baby, his identification with the
tailing him, goes to hide the baby in the demolished ruins. Then baby and desire to keep the baby for himself make him act selfishly:
he walks to the pipes down by the river. He finds the derelict after all, even if Tsotsi is now afraid Miriam will take the baby from
car and takes it as proof that his memories are correct. him, the baby would be safer under Miriam’s supervision than alone
Afterward, he runs back home and enters a shebeen to ask among ruins. Tsotsi’s behavior here implies that identification is not
after Boston. always a positive force—it can also lead to questionable behavior.
CHAPTER 11
Boston has been lying unconscious or drinking in a shebeen run Marty’s claim that she wouldn’t treat even “a mad dog,” let alone a
by a woman, Marty, since Tsotsi beat him up. When Tsotsi human, the way Tsotsi treated Boston implies that people should
locates Boston there, Marty is trying to rouse Boston and kick treat each other with some minimum standard of care just because
him out because he’s urinated on the floor. Tsotsi tells Marty to of their shared group identity—their common humanity. Yet she lets
leave Boston alone. Marty asks what Tsotsi wants, and Tsotsi Tsotsi take Boston away relatively quickly, which indicates that she
says he wants Boston. Marty, putting herself between the men, doesn’t necessarily want to display that care toward Boston herself.
says she wouldn’t treat “a mad dog” the way Tsotsi treated
Boston and asks Tsotsi what he has to say for himself. Tsotsi
says he wants to talk to Boston. Marty lights a cigarette,
shrugs, and agrees to let Tsotsi take him.
In the room, Tsotsi puts Boston to bed, removes his soiled Once again, Tsotsi is caring for Boston as he has previously cared for
clothes, and throws them away. Seeing Boston naked, Tsotsi the baby: throwing out his soiled clothes, putting him to bed, and so
realizes Boston is extremely thin, his eye swollen, his nose forth. That he cares for Boston—and that he wants to vomit when
broken, and his mouth sliced up. Tsotsi feels like vomiting. He he sees the physical damage he’s inflicted on Boston—shows how
checks how much money he has and goes out to buy food. much his character has changed since the novel’s beginning, when
When he returns with bread and sourmilk, Boston is still he felt only hatred for Boston.
immobile on the bed. Tsotsi eats and watches him.
Boston was born Walter Nguza in Umtata to a “humble, tired Umtata (now called Mthatha) is a small city almost 375 miles
old woman.” He went to St. John’s College, to St. Peter’s High south of Johannesburg. That Boston was able to travel so far for
School in Johannesburg, and finally to a teacher’s college. His high school, and did so well in college, suggests that despite his
first two years in college, he came first in his class. Though he “humble, tired” family and oppressed social position within
was a small, bespectacled man who couldn’t get women, his apartheid South Africa, he was somewhat upwardly mobile before
mother was “very proud” of him. Then, the year he would have his expulsion for attempted rape. The repeated mentions of his
graduated, the school expelled him “for trying to rape a fellow mother, meanwhile, foreshadow that she may be important to the
student.” rest of his story.
In a flashback, it’s revealed that Boston wrote the preceding Earlier in the novel, Tsotsi used the word “finished” to end his
account of his life some time after his expulsion. He likes it criminal career when Die Aap suggested they form a new gang.
because, without excess emotion or drama, it tells how his life Boston uses the same word, “finished,” to describe how his old life
progressed until it “broke.” One time, when he reads it aloud to “broke.” The repetition suggests that the novel uses the word
members of his gang, they ask him what happened afterward. “finished” to mark major changes in identity. Just as Tsotsi
He tells them nothing did: after the rape accusation, everything definitively “finished” being a gang member and has to become
was “finished.” They ask him about the girl, but he can’t tell something new, so Boston moved in the other direction—he
them. “finished” being a student and became a gang member after he
attempted to rape someone.
Boston wonders who, if anyone, is to blame—himself, the girl, By “Adam,” Boston means the first man God created in the Bible.
those who discovered them, or even Boston’s mother—but Rather than take individual responsibility for his attempted rape of
decides it’s all the same, because regardless, it ends with his the other student, Boston decides that mistakes like his are inherent
expulsion. This event makes Boston think about mistakes. to human identity and that humanity is therefore “one big mistake.”
When he is 24 and drunk, he declares everything a mistake:
“The whole bloody thing, from beginning to end, from Adam to
Walter Boston Nguza is one big mistake.”
After his expulsion, Boston goes to the railway station for a late By lying to and avoiding his mother, Boston continues the novel’s
train. Waiting at the station, he pictures his “proud” mother pattern of children separated from their parents. Unlike the
greeting him and realizes he can’t bear to go home. Instead he separation of Tsotsi from his mother or of Miriam’s husband from
writes his mother a letter saying he finished teacher’s college his baby, however, this separation occurs due to Boston’s desire to
early, is going to look for a job, and will send her a new address protect his mother’s pride, not due to the social context of
soon. apartheid.
After spending a week homeless in the city, Boston meets As previously mentioned, Black South Africans under apartheid
Johnboy Lethetwa at the Pass Office. Boston goes to the Pass were required to carry passes (or “pass books”) that determined
Office because he has a relative there he plans to ask for help. where they were allowed to go. If Black people didn’t have all the
When he arrives, he waits outside and thinks. He’s worried the right entries in their pass book—including the signature of a white
relative will tell his mother and unsure what he should ask for. employer—they could be arrested and put in jail. Johnboy’s story
Johnboy sits beside him and asks Boston to read a piece of highlights the illogic and cruelty of apartheid pass laws: to get an
paper for him. Boston tells him the paper says, “you can’t work employer—and stay out of jail—Black people needed to have had an
at Natty Outfitters because your last employer did not sign employer already.
your book.” Johnboy says, “They’ll pick me up.” Boston asks why
the employer didn’t sign the book, and Johnboy explains he was
in jail because he didn’t have a previous employer.
Boston asks to see Johnboy’s pass, fills it out and signs it, and In this passage, the reader sees a new side to Boston’s character.
tells Johnboy he now has a previous employer. Johnboy takes Whereas previously he has been drunk, cowardly, and violent, here
the pass and leaves. Boston is about to go inside to speak with he uses his education generously to help a man in danger of being
his relative when Johnboy returns, hands Boston four more jailed due to an unjust, racist law. Ironically, this generous act begins
passbooks, and asks for previous employers. When Boston a criminal career in forgery—which shows how unjust apartheid
balks, Johnboy gives Boston two 10-shilling notes. Boston laws drive many of the novel’s characters to criminal behavior.
signs the passbooks. Johnboy brings back more.
Boston and Johnboy begin forging various permits as well as The expansion of Boston’s forgeries from passbooks to other
employers’ signatures. Boston keeps sending his mother required permits suggests how many different ways bureaucracy
money. Boston realizes he and Johnboy are not similar people, under apartheid oppressed Black South Africans. Boston’s drinking
but that doesn’t bother him. Boston goes to shebeens to think problem, meanwhile, illustrates how bad behavior can develop into
and drink until, without realizing it, he’s developed a drinking a habit, difficult to break.
problem.
At Marty’s shebeen, Boston meets another gang. One day, after Boston’s transition from Johnboy’s non-violent forgery business to
Johnboy is arrested for the passbook business, Boston Tsotsi’s violent gang hints that once you are in the habit of criminal
overhears the gang talking about a problem. Boston suggests activity, you are more likely to graduate to more serious crimes.
an obvious answer. The gang offers him part of their haul, and Boston’s deceitful correspondence with his mother shows both how
eventually he becomes a member. Meanwhile, he is receiving much he cares about her pride and how ashamed he is of his
letters from his mother begging him to visit. One day, he situation.
dresses up himself and Butcher, has their photograph taken,
and sends it home with a letter claiming he is working as a
teacher and Boston is his coworker.
In the shebeen subculture, Boston gains a reputation as an Boston’s reliance on alcohol to deal with “a rough job”—the violence
intelligent but timid person who abuses alcohol “after a rough that occasionally comes with gang activity—shows how bad habits
job.” Yet his good manners endear him to Marty. They strike up (in this case, alcohol abuse and violence) can be mutually
a friendship and then a romance, but their romance ends the reinforcing. His cruel treatment of Marty due to his own guilt hints
first time Boston does a job where someone is murdered. that people who hate themselves—who do not have a positive
Afterwards, he takes his misery out on Marty and “drag[s] her individual identity—are more likely to be hateful toward others.
down as low as his words.” Marty doesn’t retaliate, but their
relationship—the sole romance of Boston’s life—ends. Boston
regrets his cruelty to her. Because the police are searching for
Boston’s gang, they disperse, and Boston avoids Marty’s. He
approaches her later, but she treats him like a stranger. Then,
two years later, he comes to her the night Tsotsi beats him up.
Back in the present, Boston wakes up in the dark and asks Like Morris Tshabalala, who seemed to think that crying made him
where he is. Tsotsi lights a candle, and they stare at each other. less of a man, Boston seems to think that being physically beaten
At first, Boston is scared, but then he remembers how totally destroys his masculine identity, his “manhood.” In Boston’s case, his
Tsotsi destroyed him and his “manhood” and he stops being failure to live up to masculine stereotypes makes him passive and
scared. He closes his eyes and asks why Tsotsi brought him to uninterested in what’s going on around him. Tsotsi, by contrast, is
his room. Tsotsi says he wants to talk. Boston doesn’t care, trying to reach out to Boston and express sympathy with him by
though this event would once have delighted him. Boston saying, “I felt you.”
draws Tsotsi’s attention to the physical damage he’s done, and
Tsotsi replies, “I felt you.” Boston is curious what Tsotsi means,
but the curiosity passes.
Tsotsi doesn’t understand what Boston means, reflects on his Again, the novel associates the yellow dog with Tsotsi’s mother,
own ignorance, and starts sweating. He tells Boston about emphasizing that the yellow dog represents Tsotsi’s separation from
stalking Morris and sparing his life. Boston listens but loses his his mother—and, by implication, apartheid’s destruction of Black
train of thought thinking about mercy and the fields of his families more generally. As Die Aap was surprised in an earlier
youth. He tries to catch the thread of Tsotsi’s story, hears chapter that Tsotsi has a mother, so Boston is surprised here, a
something about a yellow dog and Tsotsi’s mother, and is repetition that underlines how the other gang members don’t see
surprised by Tsotsi having a mother. He recalls his own mother Tsotsi as fully human (after all, as Tsotsi has realized, every human
and wonders whether she’s still waiting for him to come home. being has a mother).
Tsotsi explains that he only started remembering his childhood Boston’s claim that everyone is sick from life indicates his pessimism
the day before. Sitting by the bed, he points out that Boston has and hopelessness. Yet his sympathy for Tsotsi’s pain motivates him
read books and asks him what the story means. Boston says to recognize that while he, Boston, may not be able to break free
everyone is sick from life. Tsotsi’s head falls, and Boston feels from his destructive habits or his criminal identity, Tsotsi can. His
intense sympathy for his pain. He touches Tsotsi and tells him explicit association of Tsotsi’s transformation with God, here,
that he, Boston, is totally ignorant, but that Tsotsi is “different” suggests that human sympathy has a religious source.
because he’s changing. He urges Tsotsi not to be scared. Tsotsi
asks what changed him, and Boston replies that Tsotsi is now
talking about God.
Tsotsi sits quietly through the night. Boston sings part of a The hymn “Gentle Jesus, meek and mild” includes lyrics referring to
hymn, “Gentle Jesus, meek and mild.” Dawn comes. Boston the singer’s childhood and Jesus’s own childhood, as well as a prayer
speaks again about the fields of his youth and begins to leave. that the singer be more like Jesus. The allusion to the hymn here
Tsotsi holds him back, but Boston tells him he needs to leave thus reinforces the importance of childhood to both Boston and
and insists that the fields of his youth were green. Tsotsi gives Tsotsi’s lives and foreshadows that someone in the novel may
Boston clothing and offers him food, which Boston refuses. He imitate Christ in some way. By offering clothing and food to Boston,
watches Boston flee down the street. whom he recently beat, , Tsotsi demonstrates his rejection of his old
“gangster” identity and his violent habits.
CHAPTER 12
Isaiah is trying to plant a row of seedlings straight but fears he Up to this point the novel has mostly represented racism as a
has planted them crooked, despite Miss Marriot’s structural force, impacting the Black characters’ lives not through
demonstrations. From the office window, Miss Marriot asks their encounters with individual racists, but through their
whether everything is fine. Pretending he can’t hear her due to oppression by racist laws. Here, however, the novel foregrounds
old age, Isaiah measures the rows with his hand to demonstrate interpersonal racism in South African society. Although Isaiah (who
he’s planting correctly. Yet he hears her coming. Miss Marriot is Black) is elderly, his white employer Miss Marriot calls him a
asks him what he's done. He sneaks a look at her “white, “naughty boy” and condescends to him as if he were stupid or a
powdery face and thin lips” and sees her smiling. She calls him a child.
“naughty boy” and reminds him to plant one hand apart.
Isaiah replies, “Yes, Miss Marry.” Miss Marriot corrects his Here, the novel jokingly reverses an anti-Black racist stereotype
pronunciation of her name and says he has to replant the about Black people smelling bad by having a Black character find
seedlings. He agrees dutifully. They pause in silence, and he the “white” smell of his employer “repellent”—that is, disgusting.
notices he finds her “white, powdery” odor “repellent.” She tells
him to start working.
Isaiah starts replanting. He wishes Miss Marriot would leave Again, the novel is reversing a racist stereotype. Under apartheid,
him alone. When he works by himself, his memory helps the the South African government outlawed marriage and sexual
time pass quickly. When she watches him work, the time passes relationships between non-white and white people. One law had
painfully slowly. But Miss Marriot stays to watch and criticize, harsher penalties for non-white women who “seduced” white
insisting on showing him how to treat roots gently. He hates men—the racist assumption apparently being that non-white people
her being near him demonstrating things, because once he saw would particularly want to have sex with white people, who are
her “flat, white breasts” down the front of her collar and once somehow more desirable. In the novel, on the other hand, the only
she farted. She insists on him watching and asks whether he extended contact between a Black person (Isaiah) and a white
was doing it the way she is. He says no and reflects, “To an person (Miss Marriot) involves him being physically disgusted by
incredible extent a peaceful existence was dependent upon her. Isaiah’s comment that “peaceful existence” requires him to
knowing just when to say no or yes to the white man.” come up with the right responses for “the white man” shows how, in
Black-white interactions in apartheid South Africa, all the power
resided with the white person.
Miss Marriot accuses Isaiah of wanting the plants to die. She This passage makes clear that—despite Boston’s argument that God
calls him a “naughty boy” again, claims to have completed all his and religion increase sympathy between people—religiosity can
work, and reminds him that he’s “planting on holy ground, coexist with racism, as demonstrated by church lady Miss Marriot.
because it [is] church ground.” After that, she leaves.
Isaiah plants seedlings and thinks about white Although Isaiah recognizes that the same white-supremacist power
people—specifically, the great difference between the two dynamics are at play in all his interactions with white people, he
white people for whom he works, Miss Marriot and Rev. does not assume that all white individuals are the same—he sees
Ransome. He reflects that while Miss Marriot tries to teach differences between his two white employers.
him to plant, Rev. Ransome has taught him how to ring the
church bell.
When Isaiah sits under a bluegum in the churchyard to drink Like Cassim and Morris, Isaiah at a glance recognizes Tsotsi as a
his tea, he sees a man (Tsotsi) sitting on the sidewalk looking “tsotsi-type,” a gang member. Unlike Cassim and Morris, however,
exhausted. His exhaustion reminds Isaiah of when he worked as Isaiah immediately sympathizes with Tsotsi’s exhaustion because
a farm laborer. It strikes Isaiah as strange that a “tsotsi-type,” he can remember being that exhausted. Isaiah’s memory and his
who doesn’t work hard, would be so exhausted. Though Isaiah tendency to act based on “what he had been through himself” allow
knows other people would tell him to avoid Tsotsi, he derives him to extend kindness to Tsotsi in a way other characters haven’t.
meaning from life based on “what he [can] recognize or
remember, what he knew or what he had been through himself.”
He goes and offers Tsotsi some tea.
Tsotsi takes the tea and looks at the church thoughtfully. Isaiah Isaiah gets the name of the church wrong (it’s Church of Christ the
says, “The Church of Christ the Dreamer.” Tsotsi states, Redeemer), which implies that he may not have had a very good
haltingly, that God is inside the church. Isaiah affirms it and tells religious education—casting a negative light on the white people
Tsotsi he rings the church bell. Tsotsi asks why. Isaiah says it’s who run the church. When Tsotsi responds strongly to Isaiah’s claim
to call believers, including the lazy ones who “don’t want to that some people “don’t want to hear” God’s call, it hints that Tsotsi
hear.” Tsotsi seems struck by this answer. himself is ambivalent about his possibly religious experiences.
Miss Marriot calls to Isaiah, asks him whether he’s finished Miss Marriot’s obvious desire to drive Tsotsi, a young Black man she
planting marigolds, and tells him they don’t allow “strangers” in doesn’t know, away from the church suggests she’s suspicious of him
the church yard. Then she asks Tsotsi’s name. He leaves due to racism. Her attempt to cloak her suspicion and hostility by
without answering. She asks Isaiah who Tsotsi is, but Isaiah says claiming she wants Tsotsi to pray suggests that her religious feelings
he doesn’t know. Miss Marriot tells Isaiah to tell Tsotsi that the are only skin-deep, whereas her racism is entrenched.
church yard isn’t a park, but that they do want him to pray. Then
she tells Isaiah to come when he’s done planting and returns to
her office.
Tsotsi comes back to the church fence while Isaiah is planting When Isaiah misnames Jesus Christ as “Jesus Cries,” the novel once
and asks whether Isaiah has been inside the church. Isaiah says again suggests that apartheid has prevented many Black people
yes. Tsotsi asks what’s inside, so Isaiah lists things, including from getting an education in general and religious education
“Jesus Cries on a cross.” Tsotsi asks what Jesus does, and Isaiah specifically. Isaiah’s discussion of the crucifixion may foreshadow an
explains that people killed him on a cross after his father, God, act of self-sacrifice later in the novel.
sent him. Tsotsi asks about God. In response, Isaiah asks Tsotsi
why he has so many questions and why he’s so tired.
Isaiah realizes that—distracted by talking with Tsotsi—he has Isaiah makes several accurate theological claims here: according to
started planting crookedly again. He returns to the place in the Christian belief, God is everywhere and does want people to be
row where he began making mistakes. Tsotsi, tailing him, asks good. Notably, if Tsotsi becomes a Christian, he must stop “stealing,
where God is and what he wants. Isaiah says God is and killing and robbing”—permanently break with gang life and give
everywhere and that he wants people to be good and to stop up his old, violent habits. Here, the novel may be suggesting that
“stealing, and killing and robbing,” because these things are sins. God has somehow, mysteriously, called Tsotsi to change his life. Yet
Tsotsi asks what happens if you sin, and Isaiah replies that when Isaiah entertains Tsotsi’s suggestion that maybe Jesus
Jesus will punish you with hell. Tsotsi asks whether punishment punishes sinners by killing them (which is not an orthodox Christian
means killing. Isaiah replies, “Maybe.” belief), it leaves open a more cynical interpretation: that God is just
another, bigger gang boss who answers violence with more
violence.
Tsotsi leaves for a time but returns to ask Isaiah when they sing. This passage highlights the importance of forgiveness and
Isaiah says that evening and invites Tsotsi to join. Tsotsi is redemption in Christianity: even Tsotsi, who has murdered people, is
shocked. Isaiah tells him that everyone is welcome: “It’s the welcome in “the House of God” if he is willing to listen to God’s
House of God. I ring His bell. Will you come?” Tsotsi agrees. “bell”—that is, God’s demand that sinners change their evil habits.
Tsotsi, feeling weightless, walks down the street holding the That Tsotsi feels weightless and that Miriam asks him what’s wrong,
baby in his coat. Miriam, who’s in the yard doing washing, spots implying that he looks disturbed, may indicate that he’s having an
him. When he walks up to her, she leads him into her room, intense reaction to his religious conversation with Isaiah, that he’s
takes the baby, and puts it on the bed. Tsotsi claims the baby very worried about the sick baby, or perhaps both.
wasn’t hungry, but Miriam asks whether Tsotsi gave it the milk
she left. Tsotsi says the baby vomited it up. Miriam asks
whether he has money, and he says no. Miriam leaves to buy
medicine, returns, and feeds some to the baby. Then she gives
him milk. She looks at Tsotsi, asks what’s wrong, and offers him
food.
Miriam concludes that she, her baby, baby David, and Tsotsi all Miriam’s claim—“Tomorrow comes and you got to live”—is a hopeful
have to live: “That’s all it is. Tomorrow comes and you got to one. It suggests that as long as people are alive, they have the
live.” Tsotsi thinks of his own history and silently agrees. Miriam capacity to break with their old, destructive habits and make new
offers to let him rest at her house, and she goes outside to choices. Tsotsi agrees and, to an extent, acts according to his
finish the washing. Tsotsi watches the baby. When Miriam agreement: by having the church bell ring as Tsotsi is leaving, the
comes back inside, he says he knows she wants the baby and novel implies that Tsotsi has accepted Isaiah’s invitation to go to
asks her please not to take him. Miriam asks Tsotsi when he’ll church, a repudiation of his old “gangster” identity. Yet Tsotsi is still
be back and asks whether he’s going. The church bell rings. too possessive of the baby, with whom he identifies, to trust the
Later, Tsotsi returns, takes the baby, and hides it again in the baby with Miriam, which suggests that his transformation is not yet
ruins because he doesn’t trust Miriam enough. complete.
Tsotsi wakes up. He remembers that Miriam told him, “Come In this passage, the reader learns Tsotsi’s real, full name—“David
back, Tsotsi.” He thinks he needs to tell her his real name. In the Madondo”—for the first time. That he decides to tell Miriam his
street he says out loud, “My name is David Madondo,” and whole name shows that he is fully rejecting his old identity as a gang
laughs. The milkman overhears him and wishes him peace. member and embracing his true individual identity. Notably, the
milkman wishes Tsotsi peace rather than immediately reacting to
him with fear, as previous characters such as Cassim and Morris
Tshabalala have done. The milkman’s reaction suggests that Tsotsi’s
transformation is visible to others; mysteriously, he no longer looks
like a gang member. That the two characters wish each other
peace—a religious greeting—suggests that Tsotsi’s transformation is
somehow religious in nature.
To cite any of the quotes from Tsotsi covered in the Quotes section
HOW T
TO
O CITE of this LitChart:
To cite this LitChart: MLA
MLA Fugard, Athol. Tsotsi. Grove Press. 2006.
Prendergast, Finola. "Tsotsi." LitCharts. LitCharts LLC, 20 May CHICA
CHICAGO
GO MANU
MANUAL
AL
2022. Web. 20 May 2022.
Fugard, Athol. Tsotsi. New York: Grove Press. 2006.
CHICA
CHICAGO
GO MANU
MANUAL
AL
Prendergast, Finola. "Tsotsi." LitCharts LLC, May 20, 2022.
Retrieved May 20, 2022. https://www.litcharts.com/lit/tsotsi.