(HL ECON) - Inequality and Poverty
(HL ECON) - Inequality and Poverty
• Equality describes situations where economic outcomes are similar for different
people or different social groups
o Income equality would mean everyone, irrespective of their job, is paid the
same
o Inequality in the distribution of income is one cause of absolute and relative
poverty
• Absolute poverty is a situation where individuals cannot afford to acquire the basic
necessities for a healthy and safe existence
o These necessities include shelter, water, nutrition, clothing and healthcare
o In 2022, the World Bank defined absolute poverty as anyone who was living
on less than $1.90 a day (the so called international poverty line)
• The two main measures of income inequality are the Lorenz Curve and the Gini
coefficient
• Data is commonly presented in quintiles (population divided into 5 groups i.e 20%)
or deciles (population divided into 10 groups i.e 10%)
o E.g. in 2020, 49% of the income flow in Bolivia went to the top 20% of
households while only 4% went to the bottom 20%
• Perfect income distribution is not the goal (20 % of the population gets 20% of the
income; 40% gets 40% percent of the income etc.)
o That would equate to socialism and completely remove incentives for
work as everyone would be paid equally
• More equal income distribution is desired as it reduces poverty and social unrest
o What constitutes acceptable income equality is a normative economic issue
An illustration of Income Inequality for Bolivia (blue line) and Sweden (red line) and the
UK (yellow line) using a Lorenz Curve Model. The income distribution in Bolivia is more
unequal than that of Sweden
Diagram Analysis
Diagram Analysis
• GINI=A/A+B
• A represents the area between the line of equality and Bolivia's Lorenz curve
• B represents the area under the Lorenz curve
• A value of 0 represents absolute equality (socialism) and 1 represents perfect
inequality
• In 2017, Estonia's coefficient was 0.3 as compared with a value of 0.62 in South Africa
o The distribution of income in Estonia was more equitable than in South Africa
• Governments use progressive taxation and transfer payments to shift the Gini
coefficient closer to zero
Worked example
Using a Lorenz curve diagram, explain what happened to income inequality in Bolivia
between 2008 and 2016 [4]
The closer to zero, the closer the country is moving to perfect equality.
The situation in Bolivia has improved so the Lorenz curve is moving closer to the line of
perfect equality
Step 2: Draw and label the Lorenz Curve for each year
(2 marks for a correctly labelled diagram with a shift inwards of the Lorenz curve)
Step 3: With reference to your diagram, explain what has happened to the income
inequality between the two time periods
The closer the Gini coefficient is to zero, the more equal the distribution of income in a
country. [1 mark] Bolivia's Gini coefficient has moved closer to zero indicating that there is
less income inequality in 2016 than there was in 2008 and this is illustrated by an inward shift
of the Lorenz curve towards the line of perfect equality [1 mark]
• The Lorenz Curve plots the percentage of a nation’s total income against the
percentage of the nation’s population, and thereby shows how much each quintile
(or one fifth) of the population earns of the total income
% of Population Poorest 20% 2nd 20% 3rd 20% 4th 20% 5th 20% Gini Index
Bangladesh 8.6% 12.4% 16.2% 21.4% 41.4% 32.4
Canada 7.4% 12.6% 17% 23% 40% 32.5
South Africa 2.3% 4.8% 8.2% 16.5% 68.2% 63.00
Vietnam 6.6% 11.5% 15.9% 22.1% 43.9% 36.8
Source: World Bank
• The country with a Gini Index closest to zero has the most income equality
o Bangladesh has the best income equality and South Africa has the worst
• The Lorenz curve for Bangladesh will be closest to the line of perfect equality and
furthest away for South Africa
Worked example
Using information from the table above, construct a Lorenz Curve diagram which shows the
distribution of income for the country with the highest inequality and the country with the
lowest inequality [4]
Step 1: Identify the countries with the best and worst income inequality
South Africa has the worst and Bangladesh has the best [1 mark]
Step 2: Change the income data so that it is cumulative from quintile to quintile
[1mark]
% of Population Poorest 20% 2nd 20% 3rd 20% 4th 20% 5th 20% Gini Index
Bangladesh 8.6% 21% 37.2% 58.6% 100% 32.4
South Africa 2.3% 7.1% 15.3% 31.8% 100% 63.00
Measuring Poverty
• There are many single indicators of economic development. These can be used to
compare the relative standing of countries at any point in time. They also serve to
provide targets for improving the lives of citizens. Examples include
• A composite indicator can provide more meaningful data for comparisons between
countries
o One useful composite indicator is the Multi-dimensional Poverty Index (MPI)
1. Launched in 2010 by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative at the
University of Oxford
2. The MPI uses a survey to measure the complexities of poor people’s lives,
individually and collectively, each year
3. The MPI tracks deprivation across three dimensions and 10 indicators
o Health (child mortality, nutrition)
o Education (years of schooling, enrolment)
o Living standards (water, sanitation, electricity, cooking fuel, housing, assets)
• There are many causes of poverty. However, poor countries have several common
characteristics which can be summarised in a poverty cycle diagram
• Low wages represent the intersection of economic growth and human development
and are the major cause of poverty
o Low wages are usually the result of unemployment, informal employment, a
lack of skills, or a primary sector based economy
• Education and healthcare cost money and with lower wage levels these are not
accessible, resulting in poor human capital
o People find it harder to stay well or to recover from illness resulting in lower
productivity and shorter life expectancy
Cause Explanation
Differences in human capital • The higher the skill level the higher the level of income
• A country with a poor education system will see greater inequality
than one with a good education system
Inequality of opportunity • Access to education and health can vary significantly within
communities and between different regions
• Inequality in education and healthcare leads to inequality of
opportunity in the job market
Unequal status and power • Countries with strong trade union membership provide workers with
more power and higher levels of income
• With low trade union membership, the exploitation of workers
through low wages is easier and income inequality is worse
Government tax and benefits policies • Countries that provide a range of benefits (such as unemployment,
pension, disability, child support, housing support etc) raise the
income of the lowest 20% of the population resulting in more equal
distribution
• Progressive tax systems allow all income earners to contribute
to public revenue according to their ability
• Decreasing taxes on the lower end and increasing it on the upper end
would mean that the system is more progressive and there would be
a more equal distribution of income
Globalisation and technological change • Globalisation is the economic integration of different countries
through increasing freedoms in the cross-border movement of people,
goods/services, technology and finance
• This integration of global economies has impacted national cultures,
spread ideas, speeded up industrialisation in developing nations and
led to de-industrialisation in developed nations
• Countries which are more isolated will experience higher levels of
wealth and income inequality
Market based supply-side policies • Supply-side policies such as deregulation, privatisation and trade
liberalisation can provide great opportunities but also increase
inequality
• E.g. Privatisation of state owned assets often allows a few people to
get rich (those who buy the asset) and the service provided by the
newly privatised firm may become more expensive to access
o More equal societies tend to be more stable, tolerant and considerate with
lower levels of crime and better standards of living
o Less equal societies tend to be characterised by political instability, strife,
social unrest - and in extreme cases this can lead to revolutions
3.4.3 Using Taxation to Reduce
Inequality & Poverty
The Role of Taxation
Types of taxes
Regressive • As income
rises, a smaller
percentage of
income is paid
in tax
• In the diagram,
when
personal income
rises from Y1 to
Y2, the tax rate
falls from TR1 to
TR2
• All indirect taxes
are regressive
• In the
USA, Federal
income tax is
progressive but
almost all State
taxes are
regressive (the
bottom 20% of
income earners
pay as much as
6x the % of their
income than the
top 20%)
Proportional • As income
rises, the same
percentage of
income is paid
in tax
• In the diagram,
when
personal income
rises from Y1 to
Y2, the tax rate
remains
constant at 20%
• In 2022, Bolivia
was using this
system with
a proportional
tax rate of 13%
The link Between Taxation & the Reduction of Income Inequality & Poverty
Progressive taxation • A progressive tax system redistributes from Higher redistribution → better
those with higher income to those with lower education/healthcare → better
income and reduces income inequality human capital → better
• Redistribution often starts with the provision productivity → higher income
of free education and healthcare
• Many governments use tax revenues to provide
multiple levels of financial support to poor
households including disability payments,
heating subsidies, travel subsidies etc.
• Sometimes the benefits of a good progressive
tax system are eradicated by the penalties
imposed through multiple regressive (indirect)
taxes
• Indirect tax rate calculations focus on calculating the taxes paid by consumers on
expenditure
o Indirect taxes usually have to be identified from a table, before the
calculations are made
• Direct tax rate calculations usually focus on the calculation of marginal and average
tax rates from a set of data provided
o Marginal tax rates represent the amount of additional tax paid for every
additional dollar earned as income
o Marginal tax rates increase as income increases
o Average tax rates are calculated using the following formula
Worked example
Using information from the table below, calculate the average tax rate paid by an employee
who earns $25,000 a year [4]
5% x 10,000 = $500
Step 3: Calculate the tax paid on income between $18,001 and $25,000 (the employees
income)
Step 4: Add the marginal tax paid together to obtain the total tax bill for the employee
Policy
Explanation Impact on Poverty Cycle
Investing in human capital • Investing in this supply-side Higher education/skill levels → higher
e.g. education policy increases the potential output of human capital → increased productivity
the country (shifts the production → higher output → higher income
possibility frontier outwards)
More generous transfer • Transfer payments are usually given to More benefits → higher wages → better
payments the poorest and most education/healthcare → better human
vulnerable people in society capital → better productivity → higher
• Transfer payments wages
include unemployment and disability
payments, pension payments, heating
discounts, public transport subsidies
etc.
Establishment/increase of • Minimum wages are set above the free Higher wages → better
national minimum wage market rate education/healthcare → better human
• Firms are not allowed to pay anyone capital → better productivity → higher
less than the legal rate wages
Establishing a universal • A universal basic income (UBI) is a Minimum income for all → better
basic income guaranteed minimum income level - education/healthcare → better human
and when necessary, paid by the capital → improved labour offer →
government to each individual in decreasing unemployment
society
Targeted government • This can be aimed at the greatest Higher education/skill levels → higher
spending on goods/services needs in society human capital → increased productivity
• E.g. Providing more schools, teachers or → higher output → higher income
hospitals
Policies to reduce • Discrimination occurs in many different Less discrimination → better productivity
discrimination forms (age, ethnicity, gender, disability → higher wages
etc) and in each case results in social
exclusion leading to inequalities of
opportunity and income
• Reducing discrimination reduces
inequality
Policies which help to improve any factor in the diagram will help to alleviate
poverty