P10 S16
P10 S16
PART – A
SECTION–I
1. (a)
(i) (B)
(ii) (B)
(iii) (A)
(iv) (B)
(v) (D)
(vi) (B)
1. (b)
(i) (C)
(ii) (H)
(iii) (E)
(iv) (F)
1. (c)
(i) False
(ii) True
(iii) True
(iv) False
SECTION–II
2. (a)
Estimated Sales = ₹ 24,00,000
2. (b)
Overall Contribution per unit = ₹ 15.8974
3.(a)
Particulars 50% 90%
Sales (In Units) 10000 18000
Sales (In ₹) ₹ 20,00,000 ₹ 36,00,000
Total Variable Costs ₹ 4,00,000 ₹ 7,20,000
Contribution (Sales – Variable Costs) ₹ 16,00,000 ₹ 28,80,000
Total Fixed Costs ₹ 9,60,000 ₹ 9,60,000
Profit (Contribution – Fixed Costs) ₹ 6,40,000 ₹ 19,20,000
3. (b)
Efficiency Ratio = 0.9375 or 93.75%
Activity Ratio = 0.90 or 90%
Capacity Ratio = 0.96 or 96%
Calendar Ratio = 0.96 or 96%
Idle Capacity Ratio = 0.04 or 4%
Standard Capacity Usage Ratio = 0.8333 or 83.33%
Actual Usage of Maximum Capacity Ratio = 0.80 or 80%
1
4. (a)
Skilled Workers = 14
Semi-skilled Workers = 7
Unskilled Workers = 4
4. (b)
Variable Overheads Efficiency Variance = ₹ 2,948.40 (A)
Fixed Overheads Efficiency Variance = ₹ 8,283.60 (A)
Fixed Overhead Calendar Variance = ₹ 3,540 (F)
5. (a)
Break-even Analysis is a method for examining the relationship between sales revenue, variable costs and
fixed costs to determine the minimum value of production necessary to break even. Break Even means the
volume of production or sales where there is no profit or loss. In other words, Break Even Point is the
volume of production or sales where total costs are equal to revenue. It helps in finding out the relationship
between costs and revenues to output. In understanding the breakeven point, cost, volume and profit are
always used. The break-even analysis is used to answer many questions of the management in day-to-day
business.
Variance Analysis is nothing but the differences between Standard Cost and Actual Cost. In ordinary
language we call it difference; in statistics, we call it deviations and in costing terminology we call it
variances. When Standard Costing is adopted, the standards are set for all the costs, revenue and profit, and
if the difference in case of cost is more than the standard we call it adverse variance, symbolized (A) and if
the difference is less than the standard, we call it favourable variance, symbolized (F). However, in the case
of sales and profit, if the standard is more than the actual it is an adverse variance and if the standard is less
than the actual it is a favourable variance. From this, we understand that variances can be calculated in all
the elements of costs, sales and profit too.
Budget Manual is a document which contains standing instructions regarding the procedures to be followed
at the time of budget preparation.
5. (d)
Basic Differences:
(i) Standard Cost and Estimated Cost:
The primary difference between Standard Cost and Estimated Cost is their purpose and usage.
Standard Cost represents the predetermined cost that management expects to incur for the production
of goods or services under normal operating conditions and efficiency levels. It serves as a
benchmark against which actual costs are compared for performance evaluation and cost control. On
the other hand, Estimated Cost is an approximate calculation of future costs based on available
information, but it is not necessarily used as a performance benchmark like Standard Cost.
(ii) Standard Costing and Historical Costing:
Standard Costing and Historical Costing are different costing methods used for performance
evaluation. Standard Costing involves the application of predetermined standard costs to measure and
evaluate performance. It compares actual costs with the predetermined standard costs to identify
variances and assess efficiency. Historical Costing, on the other hand, relies on actual historical costs
incurred for measuring performance. It does not involve the use of predetermined standards but rather
focuses on actual costs as the basis of evaluation.
(iii) Standard Costing and Budgetary Control:
3
Standard Costing and Budgetary Control are two distinct management control techniques used for
different purposes. Standard Costing focuses on measuring and evaluating the efficiency of the
production process by comparing actual costs with predetermined standard costs. It helps in cost
control and performance evaluation. Budgetary Control, on the other hand, involves the formulation
of budgets for various business functions and comparing actual results with budgeted amounts to
assess overall financial performance and achieve financial goals.
(iv) Standard Hour and Budgeted Hour:
Standard Hour refers to the predetermined time expected to be taken by a worker or a machine to
complete a specific task or produce output. These hours are based on the company's predetermined
standards or expectations for efficiency and productivity whereas Budgeted Hours, on the other hand,
are the anticipated or planned hours of work for a particular period, such as a month or a year. These
hours are part of the budgeting process and are used to estimate labour costs and resource
requirements for the planned level of production or operations.
PART – B
SECTION–III
6. (a)
(i) (D)
(ii) (D)
(iii) (C)
(iv) (A)
(v) (D)
(vi) (C)
6. (b)
(i) (B)
(ii) (D)
(iii) (F)
(iv) (G)
6. (c)
(i) True
(ii) False
(iii) False
(iv) True
SECTION–IV
7. (a)
The Indifference point between Financial Plan I and Financial Plan II is indeterminate.
Financial Break-Even Point for Plan I = ₹ 60,000
Financial Break-Even Point for Plan II = ₹ 70,000
7. (b)
Return on Equity Shareholders Funds = 0.55 or 55%
4
8. (a)
8. (b)
Marginal Cost of Capital = 0.17065 or 17.065%
9. (a)
Net Working Capital Requirements (On Cash Cost basis) = D 31,68,399
9.(b)
Cash Budget from January 2023 to March 2023
Particulars January 2023 February 2023 March 2023
(In ₹) (In ₹) (In ₹)
Opening Balance 50,000 1,74,960 3,55,280
Cash Sales 1,20,000 1,20,000 1,60,000
Received from Debtors 5,44,960 6,00,320 4,94,400
Payment to Creditors 5,40,000 5,40,000 7,20,000
Closing Balance 1,74,960 3,55,280 2,89,680
10. (a)
Meaning and Methods of Venture Capital Financing
Venture Capital Financing
Venture Capital is a form of equity financing especially designed for funding high-risk and high-reward
projects. The term ‘Venture Capital’ represents a financial investment in a highly risky project with the
objective of earning a high rate of return.
There is a common perception that Venture Capital is a means of financing high-technology projects.
However, Venture Capital is an investment of long-term finances made in:
1. Ventures promoted by technically or professionally qualified but unproven entrepreneurs, or
2. Ventures seeking to harness commercially unproven technology, or
3. High-risk ventures
10. (c)
Basic Differences:
(i) The basic difference between Asset Securitisation and Debt Securitisation is the nature of the
underlying assets. In Asset Securitisation, a pool of diversified financial assets (e.g., mortgages,
loans) is converted into tradable securities, while in Debt Securitisation, the focus is on converting
existing debt obligations (e.g., bonds, loans) into marketable securities, backed by the debtors'
repayment commitments.
(ii) Capital Structure and Financial Structure are terms often used interchangeably, but there is a subtle
difference. Capital Structure refers specifically to the mix of long-term debt, equity, and other
financial instruments used to finance a company's assets. On the other hand, Financial Structure
encompasses a broader perspective, including both short-term and long-term sources of funds and
how they are allocated to various assets and operations within the organization.
(iii) Net Operating Income theory and Net Income theory of capital structure differ in their focus. Net
Operating Income (NOI) theory suggests that the cost of capital is solely influenced by the operating
income generated by a firm's assets, irrespective of the financing mix. In contrast, the Net Income
theory asserts that the capital structure decision affects the overall cost of capital, as financial
6
leverage impacts the cost of equity capital, leading to changes in the firm's net income and its
market value.
(iv) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR) are both measures of
investment performance. The key difference lies in how they handle cash flows. IRR assumes that
cash flows are reinvested at the project's IRR, which may not be practical. MIRR addresses this
limitation by assuming that positive cash flows are reinvested at a firm's cost of capital and
computes a single, more realistic rate of return for the investment.
10. (d)
Basic Differences:
(i) The basic difference between the Aggressive Approach and the Conservative Approach of
Financing Current Assets lies in their risk and profitability trade-off. The Aggressive Approach
involves financing a significant portion of current assets with short-term debt, aiming to maximize
profitability through increased leverage. However, this exposes the company to higher liquidity and
refinancing risks. On the other hand, the Conservative Approach relies on more long-term financing
and less short-term debt, prioritizing lower risk even though it might result in slightly lower
profitability.
(ii) The key difference between Non-recourse Factoring and Recourse Factoring is the party assuming
credit risk. In Non-recourse Factoring, the factor assumes the credit risk of the accounts receivables,
meaning if the debtor fails to pay, the factor absorbs the loss. In Recourse Factoring, the seller
retains the credit risk, and if the debtor defaults, the factor has the right to seek payment from the
seller, shifting the risk back to them.
(iii) Factoring and Forfaiting are both methods of financing receivables, but they differ in the type of
transactions involved. Factoring is typically used for short-term domestic receivables and involves
the outright purchase of receivables by the factor. Forfaiting, on the other hand, is used for long-
term export receivables and involves the purchase of trade receivables related to exports without
recourse to the exporter. It is a form of financing with fixed, negotiable terms.
(iv) Baumol's Model and Miller-Orr's Model are cash management models that differ in their approach
to cash balance management. Baumol's Model suggests maintaining a constant cash balance to
minimize transaction costs and opportunity costs associated with holding cash. In contrast, Miller-
Orr's Model uses upper and lower control limits to determine when to invest or disinvest excess
cash. It aims to minimize the costs of both holding cash and making transactions, providing a more
dynamic approach to cash management.
__________________________