05 - Cost Estimate Report
05 - Cost Estimate Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 3
1.1 FOREWORD 3
1.2 SCOPE 4
1.3 DEFINITIONS 5
1.4 ABBREVIATIONS 5
2. COST ESTIMATIONS 6
2.1.1 CAPEX 6
2.1.2 OPEX - Operating & Maintenance Costs 6
2.1.3 ACCURACY 6
3. BASIC DATA 7
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 FOREWORD
In the context of negative emissions and decarbonizing industry, carbon capture and storage (CCS) is being
discussed as an option for Switzerland. The search for domestic storage sites is ongoing, in the meantime, there
could be a possibility of collecting Swiss CO2 and sending it to storage sites under the North Sea, that are planned
to open by end of 2024 (Northern Lights project by Equinor, Shell, Total).
In Switzerland, KVA Linth is currently performing a feasibility study for a capture plant with a potential provider,
other emitters are also exploring cost and feasibility.
Saipem has been awarded for the feasibility and cost estimate of building a “collection network” (similar to a
distribution grid for gas) to connect to Switzerland’s largest CO2 emitters on the one hand and to transmission
pipelines on the other hand by 2030.
Switzerland has currently 32 large emitters, defined as point sources that emit over 100,000 tons/y of CO2 (see
Figure 1.1.1). Together, these 32 large emitters emit about 7 million tons of CO2 per year.
Figure 1.1.1: Large emitters and current natural gas pipeline network in Switzerland
Currently, none of these plants has a capture facility – it is expected that the current study should provide an
indication of optimal conditioning parameters (water content and purity) for the CO2.
The CO2 collecting network subject of the present study will transport the captured CO2 stream up to a delivery
point, from where a long transmission pipeline will deliver the CO2 to a selected location, for final sequestration.
W.O. VBSA to Saipem Sept 2020
CUSTOMER: VBSA
JOB: 023115
It is requested that the new pipeline network to follow the existing natural gas pipelines corridors as much as
possible. A specific effort shall be made to clarify possible configurations for the Kanton of Zurich, where different
scenarios are possible to connect additional smaller point sources.
1.2 SCOPE
The purpose of the present document is to describe the methodology used for the Estimate for all solution studied
in the Pipeline System Hydraulic & Optimization Study Report Doc. No. 000-ZA-E-09001 Rev.A, which are:
Gaseous phase transport is with a maximum operating pressure of 35 barg. This is the maximum pressure level
ensuring no liquid formation associated to phase change in the pipeline thus allowing single phase stable transport
(i.e. purely gas). This solution has the advantage to keep quite low pressures in the system, however large
diameters could be required in case of high flowrates. Due to safety reasons, some flowlines crossing urban areas
are considered with a MOP = 10 barg (i.e. low pressure flowlines).
This configuration is as per base case above, with the difference that the maximum operating pressure for the low
pressure flowlines is 5 barg instead of 10 barg.
This configuration is as per base case above, but considers the possibility to install high pressure flowlines (i.e.
MOP = 35 barg) also in urban areas.
1.3 DEFINITIONS
The abbreviations when used in this document will have the meanings described here in the following list:
COMPANY/OWNER VBSA
CONTRACTOR Saipem S.p.A.
PROJECT CO2 COLLECTION NETWORK CONCEPTUAL STUDY
1.4 ABBREVIATIONS
2. COST ESTIMATIONS
The estimates are based on budgetary costs available at present in Saipem databases from similar project in Oil
and Gas field of application executed in Europe zone as well as from available publications.
No formal inquires to vendors and subcontractors have been required for material supply cost, transport and
construction.
2.1.1 CAPEX
The Facilities Costs represent the EPC Contractor’s Budget Price required to execute the Engineering, Procurement
and Supply, Construction, Pre-commissioning and Commissioning operations for the Project.
Land Fee and Transit costs have been added in a separate section as intended to be manage by COMPANY as
owner cost.
Operating and maintenance costs have been estimated according to the following assumptions:
2.1.3 ACCURACY
The Cost Estimation has the accuracy of the Estimate is a Class 5, in accordance with table here below, and the
level of maturity of technical and design information.
W.O. VBSA to Saipem Sept 2020
CUSTOMER: VBSA
JOB: 023115
3. BASIC DATA
Home Office Services cost including Project Management, basic and detail Engineering, Procurement activities,
subcontracts engineering studies can be considered.
• Line Pipes (material only): 1.8€/kg (ISO3183 L450MB - API5L X65 steel grade is considered, no
significant savings are expected if using lower steel grades, typically used in low pressure gas lines)
• Internal Lining: N/A
• External Coating: 23 €/m2 (3mm PE)
• Cathodic Protection: 2.4 €/m
• Valves, Scraper Traps, etc.: 6% of line pipe material
• SCADA/Telecommunication: 21 €/m
Material of Compression Station has been estimated starting from internal database for similar project for Oil &
Gas.
In the below table 1, the cost of 1 compression unit is reported for the 4 possible compression configurations and
for different classes, each one corresponding to a different maximum flowrate.
The installed power of each compression unit is reported in Table 2.
Table 1: Compressor Unit Cost
Max Compression from 0 Compression from 0 Compression from 10 to Compression from 0 to
rate to 20 bar (gas phase) to 40 bar (gas phase) 140 bar (dense phase) 140 bar (dense phase)
ktons/y MM€ MM€ MM€ MM€
Class 1 200 2.1 3.1 2.6 4.1
Class 2 300 2.4 3.6 3.0 4.8
Class 3 400 2.7 4.0 3.4 5.4
Class 4 500 3.0 4.5 3.8 6.1
W.O. VBSA to Saipem Sept 2020
CUSTOMER: VBSA
JOB: 023115
Here below the remaining compression station supply costs are listed:
• Appurtenances (piping, utilities, instrumentation, etc.) 150% of compressor unit (gas phase)
200% of compressor unit (dense
phase)
In the below Table 3, the cost of 1 compression unit is reported for the export stations at Basel and Collombey,
with compression from gas or dense phase. In all cases a spare philosophy of 3+1 is considered. No dehydration
unit is foreseen at the export stations, since the CO2 coming from the gathering network is already dehydrated.
The following investment costs are considered in case of compression from gas phase (10 to 145 bar):
The following investment costs are considered in case of compression from dense phase (100 to 145 bar):
Pipeline Laying and Assembling cost: 55 €/inch/m in hilly terrain (most of the system)
90 €/inch/m in mountain/challenging areas (Lonza and Giubiasco
flowlines)
The above Costs should be intended as inclusive of Installation of Cathodic Protection, Block Valve Station , Scraper
Traps, SCADA, and telecommunication system.
Pipeline Construction Cost should be intended as inclusive of SITE MANAGEMENT and SUPERVISION (QA, HSE ect.)
In accordance with the level of accuracy of estimation and in line with our experience and our cost database,
construction cost of Compressor Station has been estimated as:
• 35% of Construction plus Material Supply for compressor stations of the gathering network;
• 100% of Construction plus Material Supply for the compressor stations at delivery points.
Construction Cost should be intended as inclusive of SITE MANAGEMENT and SUPERVISION (QA, HSE ect.)
3.4 COMMISSIONING
Commissioning works have been estimated in accordance with the following percentage:
• Pipeline Commissioning: 0.5 % of total Pipeline material + construction cost
• Station Commissioning: 1.5 % of Station material + construction cost
W.O. VBSA to Saipem Sept 2020
CUSTOMER: VBSA
JOB: 023115
Parameters used for a budgetary cost estimate of the Geneva Lake offshore section are reported here below.
Metering stations can be installed at compression facilities, including filters and metering lines, in a suitable
arrangement to measure the flow as per actual state of-the-art.
Please note that these system components are not included in the present CAPEX/OPEX Estimation
The Estimate is inclusive of the technical allowance to cover all technical uncertainties related to material supply
and construction.
• ALLOWANCEs: 15 % of total investment cost
4.3 ESCALATION
The present Capex has been developed on today’s cost, based on current cost data and the escalation not
included.
4.4 EXCLUSION
The present cost estimate does not include, due to unavailable information at this stage of the project, the
following costs:
• Financing Costs;
• Custom Duties, Taxes and VAT;
• Any other OWNER Cost except Land Fee and Transit costs;
• Currency Risks;
• Escalation/market conditions;
• Any costs associated to specific Company’s terms and conditions;
• All Weather stand-by cost for Offshore Pipeline Section.
W.O. VBSA to Saipem Sept 2020
CUSTOMER: VBSA
JOB: 023115
The calculations for CAPEX and OPEX costs are reported here below for the four different scenarios listed in
Appendix 1.2 Scope of these present documentation.
Gaseous - LP flowlines
Pipeline (MM€) Compressor Stations (MM€)
MOP=5bar
Compressor Compressor
Export CS at Delivery Points Export CS at Delivery Points
Stations Stations
from Gas Phase from Dense Phase
(MM€) (MM€)
Engineering 33.2 Engineering 6.2
Basel CS 18.2 Basel CS 3.1
Collombey CS 15.0 Collombey CS 3.1
Material Supply 248.8 Material Supply 48.7
Basel CS 134.8 Basel CS 24.4
Collombey CS 114.0 Collombey CS 24.4
Construction Construction
87.8 13.8
Comm & Supervision Comm & Supervision
Basel CS 46.8 Basel CS 6.5
Collombey CS 36.0 Collombey CS 6.5