Teaching Generation Z: is pen and

paper essential?
Do pupils learn better through digital technology or working with
traditional pen and paper? The answer is a mixture of both.

Promethean
Posted 4 years ago

The main objective of pedagogy is to inspire, nurture and encourage

young minds to question and absorb information, and to develop
skills and intellect that provide the best stepping stones into their
futures. There is lively debate, however, over which medium
facilitates Generation Z student learning best — traditional pen and
paper or modern digital technology.
On one hand, traditionalists believe that digital teaching methods are a
distraction from the core information being taught, and that pupils are less
focused or challenged when presented with exciting, modern technology.
Digital evangelists, however, believe technology is essential to interactive,
collaborative learning in the modern classroom. So, who is right? There is
not, in fact, a simple answer.

Digital natives

Children and young adults born anywhere between 1995 and 2010 —
known as Generation Z but also known as Centennials, iGeneration, Post-
Millennials and Plurals — make up the bulk of school pupils today. This
cohort are considered to be the first true digital natives, growing up with
mobile devices, tablets and laptops in both hands. Arguably, digital
technology is neither distracting nor exciting for Gen Z, it is normal life.
According to Econsultancy, 96% of this generation owns a smartphone,
and 63% owns a tablet.

Gen Z pupils are described as individualistic, they value easy access to

information and expect immediate feedback, indicating the value of cloud-
based tools like ClassFlow which provide pupils with 24/7 access to their
materials. They learn most effectively when they are left to solve problems
and find solutions. Most importantly, they adapt to new technologies faster
than any other generation, according to a paper by Ivanova and Smrikarov.
Gen Z clearly has different learning preferences, goals and values to
previous generations. As such, some pedagogy experts identify that
teaching methods should be adapted to the preferences of this group.

But, despite growing up with the advantage of being surrounded by and

relying on technology, shouldn’t Gen Z still learn and absorb information
through the same traditional methods that older generations always did? Or
are there genuine reasons why modern teaching methods should be
adapted to for the younger generation? Science says yes.

Advanced brain development

It has been reported that the physical brain makeup of Gen Z students is
different to that of a student from 20 years ago. Crucially, the part of the
brain that dictates visual ability is significantly more developed than that of
older generations, even their millennial peers.

As a result, these pupils respond best to visual learning. Unlike previous

generations, Gen Z will learn most effectively through interactive mediums,
collaborative projects and challenges rather than long auditory, explanatory
lessons.

Acquired Attention Deficit Disorder (AADD)

Despite a more developed visual ability, Generation Z is so accustomed to

switching between short bursts of information as displayed on social media,
they have acquired an inability to focus on or analyse lengthy pieces of
information. In the classroom today, the attention span of a pupil is only
seven to ten minutes, according to Darla Rothman. Harvard Medical School
explains these brain changes as a condition called Acquired Attention
Deficit Disorder (AADD).

The result is a set of pupils with genuinely different needs in the classroom,
not simply different preferences.
“They are kinesthetic, experiential, hands on
learners who prefer to learn by doing rather than
being told what to do or by reading text. Learning is
not a spectator sport.” Darla Rothman, Ph.D,
Curriculum Developer & Program Coordinator at
Maryland Police and Correctional Training
Commissions.
There is more to a holistic education than how a pupil responds to
pedagogical methods, however. Learning to mentally store and access key
information is an essential skill for examination environments.

Knowledge retention

Dr Jane Vincent, a researcher at London School of Economics and Political

Science conducted a survey to assess the merits of digital note taking over
pen and paper. Students across ten European and Asian countries
confirmed that digital technology was fundamentally important to them for
studying and for researching data, and presenting their finished work.

The same students, however, consistently reported that their ability to

retain knowledge was far higher when using pen and paper. Creating
handwritten notes provided more internal ability to access information at a
later stage.

“We surveyed a mix of undergraduate and graduate

students in Italy, the UK, Slovakia, Bulgaria,
Hungary, Russia, China, Portugal, Finland and
Germany. Overall, while computers are seen as fast
and effective communication tools, pen and paper
does have some advantages.”

“One of the reasons some students favour

handwriting is the role it plays in learning and
retaining knowledge. Many of the students in our
study found making handwritten notes leads to
greater retention of data than if it is typed.”
Dr Jane Vincent, an academic researcher at the
London School of Economics and Political Science
(LSE)
The reduced speed at which a pupil can transcribe by hand is key to how
their information is absorbed. The listener must be more selective of which
information they write, adding their own remarks or notes for future
reference. Digital notes, by contrast, tend to be repeated transcripts of the
information, with little input or consideration of the content.

This theory is corroborated by psychologists Pam A. Muller of Princeton

University and Daniel M. Oppenheimer of UCLA, who published a study in
Psychological Science journal, The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard:
Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. They analysed the
output from 327 participants listening to the same lecture, some taking
handwritten notes, others making digital notes. When it came to analysing
the factual detail, conceptual comprehension, and the capabilities of
retrieving the information over time, those making handwritten notes did
better.

What’s more, medical science has validated this psychological theory.

Scans to indicate cognitive behaviour show that the physical function of
writing information by hand, rather than typing, more actively engages the
brain and triggers the learning centre.

The 20 year old ‘desirable difficulty’ concept by Robert A. Bjork points to

exactly that. His theory identifies that something that challenges and
frustrates us helps us to learn more effectively. Digital technology can
make learning and note writing faster and easier, but at the same time it
removes the creative and intellectual challenge.

Technology is a tool, not the tool

Our youngest generation is immersed in technology, and it has been

proven they learn most effectively from interactive tools and digital practices.
However, as we’ve seen, there is certainly a strong argument to retaining
traditional pen and paper in the classroom. We aren’t likely to see
paperless teaching just yet. The answer, then, is a hybrid of both.

Certain subjects and lessons require contrasting practices to engage

pupils. In a maths class, for example, digital applications can be extremely
helpful when dragging and dropping verticals, visualising relationships
between data and discovering tangible mathematical concepts.
However, when students need to practice algebra lines or write complex
assignments, the flexibility of paper and pens is still invaluable to student
learning and discovery.

Importantly, Generation Z are less impressed by the technology itself, the

subject knowledge and practices behind these digital tools is the key to
inspiration. If technology in the classroom isn’t underpinned by sound
educational techniques, it will fall short.

Generation Z’s learning needs reflect an evolving world, particularly in view

of new technology and digital communication. Much like other industries
and modern business environments digital tools are an enhancement to
traditional working methods, not a replacement.

As a first year student at the University of Hawai’i commented,

“All I wish for in a classroom setting is an effective

teacher who plans their classes ahead of time and
who wants students to succeed. I like teachers who
actually know the information they are teaching, and
who can teach it to students in a way that makes
learning easy and enjoyable… Technology and
resources don’t mean anything unless the teacher is
effective and fully capable of their job and engaging
students.”
Ultimately, some pupils will continue to work better with traditional pen and
paper, and some will engage more with interactive digital platforms
like ClassFlow, depending on their subject preferences or personal skills.
As unique individuals, children have different needs and preferences, there
is no one-size-fits-all answer.

The bottom line is that forward-thinking digital technology and interactive

tools in the classroom cannot detract attention from the importance of
traditional pedagogy and a strong teacher-pupil bond. The energy and
enthusiasm put into the subject matter and the teaching methods to engage
young Generation Z students is key to inspiring their minds, regardless of
the medium.

Promethean
Posted 4 years ago
Found this interesting? Why not share it:
Read more articles about: