SUBA ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL
School ID: 119615
Suba, Samboan, Cebu

ENHANCED
SCHOOL
IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
School Year 2022-2025

MESSAGE

School Improvement Plan 1

 DepEd Cebu Province envisioned the schools under its stewardship as
seats of exemplary of not only academic performance but also culture, arts and
sports made possible by the school head, teachers, parents to meet the other
stakeholders who are sensitive, focused and empowered to produce a God-loving,
humane and nationalistic individuals.

It is our constant desire to meet the needs of our clientele, to provide the
best education and in order to do this the school is constantly equipping itself the
necessary knowledge and skills to be effective and efficient in the methodologies
of teaching and acquiring the values and attitudes towards promoting the holistic
development of the learner. By religiously following this, the school is doing its
best to be an effective and efficient courier in the delivery of quality basic
education.

With this in mind and heart, to promote the vision and mission of the
department, the school has undertaken measures and implementations to
address the various needs of the school. These comprise the implementation of
various projects which addressed the priority needs of the school through the
assistance of the PTA, the LGU and other stakeholders; careful and strategic
analysis; the identification of contingency plans and capacity building for the
teaching staff. Moreover, careful study and preparation of the SIP, AIP, SRC and
SOB played a significant role.

Finally, committees of equally skillful and capable human resources were

created from the PTA officials, teachers and other stakeholders with the
unwavering assistance from the LGUs and other individuals. This congregation of
unselfish and committed people made sure of the successful delivery of
educational services and the implementation of diverse projects and programs
with one goal in mind, that is to meet the standards and targets by the Division.
The principles of pro-active participation, consultative decision making and the
effective utilization of data based research and evaluation ensure for its
successful implementation.

To God be the glory!

JEANETTE F. BANTAYA DevEdD
Head Teacher III

TABLE OF CONTENTS

School Improvement Plan 2

List of Acronyms 4

List of Tables and Illustrations 5

CHAPTER 1. Department of Education’s Vision,

Mission, and Core Values Statement 6-9

A. Clarify and Completeness of Discussion on 6

DepEd VMV 7-8
B. List of Roles and Responsibilities of all SPT 9
Members
C. SPT Timetable
CHAPTER 2. School’s Current Situation 10

A. School’s Current Situation 11

B. Priority Improvement Areas 11
C. General Objectives 12
D. Targets 12
E. Root Cause Analysis 13-18

CHAPTER 3. Plan 19 - 23

A. List Solutions 19
B. Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix 20-22
C. Annual Implementation Plan 23

CHAPTER 4. ACT 24
A. Project Monitoring Report Plan 25

Attestation 26

Appendix

LIST OF ACRONYMS

AIP ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

AURA AUTHORITY,RESPONSIBILTY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY

School Improvement Plan 3

 BARANGAY DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND
BDRRMC
MANAGEMENT COUNCIL
BC BARANGAY COUNCIL
DRRMC DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND MANAGEMENT
COUNCIL
CFSS CHILD-FRIENDLY SCHOOL SURVEY
CI CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
DEPED DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
EBEIS ENHANCED BASIC EDUCATION INFORMATION
SYSTEM
FGD FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION
GO GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION
LGU LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT
LAPG LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT FOR PRIMARY GRADES
MPS MEAN PERCENTAGE SCORE
MOOE MAINTENANCE AND OTHER OPEARATING EXPENSES
NGO NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION
OSC OUT-OF-SCHOOL-YOUTH
PAP PROGRAMS,ACTIVITIES,PROJECT
PHIL-IRI PHILIPPNE INFORMAL READING INVENTORY
PI PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
PIA PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT ARAES
PTA PARENTS TEACHERS ASSOCIATION
RPMS RESULTS-BASED PERFORMANCE SYSTEM
SBM SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT
SCPC SCHOOL CHILD PROTECTION POLICY
SES SUBA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SIP SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
SRAP STUDENT-LED RISKS ASSESSMENT PLAN
SRC SCHOOL REPORT CARD
SPT SCHOOL PLNNING TEAM
SPG SUPREME PUPIL GOVERNMENT.
SY SCHOOL YEAR

LIST OF TABLES AND ILLUSTRATIONS

Table 1. List of SPT Members and their Roles & Function 7

Table 2. SPT Time Table of Activities 8

Table 3. Grade Six NAT MPS 10

School Improvement Plan 4

Table 4. Priority Improvement Areas 10

Table 5. General Objectives 11

Table 6. Targets 11
C
Illustration 1. Analysis on the Low Academic Performance 12 H
Illustration 2. Analysis on the Low Literacy Level A
P
Illustration 3. Analysis on Low Numeracy Level
T
Table 3.A List of Solutions 20 E
Table 3.B1 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix R
Table 3.B.2 Project Work Plan and Budget
22 1
Table 3.B.3 Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix -
23
Table 7. Monitoring and Evaluation

CHAPTER 1
Department of Education Mission, Vision, and Core
Values Statement

Suba Elementary School aimed to mold and to produce learners

who love their country and imbued with knowledge and skills that will help
them become productive individuals in their community. The Department
of Education’s Vision, Mission, and Core Values (VMV) statements serve as
guiding principles in its unwavering thrust to provide quality education
that cultivates passion for the country that is anchored on a set of core
values.

School Improvement Plan 5

 It is the mission of Suba Elementary School to fulfill the DepEd’s
mission by implementing the agency’s rules and policies, programs and
projects, establish school rules and guidelines that cater their needs. It is
also our mission to help our younger generation achieve their dreams and
aspirations by making them realize the importance of education, thus, it is
our duty to promote a quality basic education for all Filipino children. The
school, as an institution of learning, has seen its significant role in the
young generation’s lives especially in their holistic development into
responsible and productive citizens.
To be able to devote quality education, the school, with the
cooperation and support of families, community, and other stakeholders
should nurture the young minds of our children with values of being Maka-
Diyos, Maka-tao, Makakalisan at Makabansa. These will guide them to
become better and successful countrymen.
Within this context, Suba Elementary School, with the help of the
SPT and the Project Teams, dutifully prepares a three-year School
Improvement Plan (SIP) to continuously assess its governance, access, and
quality and to work collaboratively to further achieve performance
sustainability for every individual learner.
Each member of the SPT Team set to work collaboratively. As
Parent Representative
Mrs. Genevieve Roda expressed her commitment by saying, “ Isip PTA
President ug myembro sa SPT sa Suba Elementary School, ako ug ang
akong kaubanang opisyales, mosupurta ug mutabang sa bisan unsang
paagi sa tanang ginbuhaton para sa kaayuhan sa atong eskwelahan ug
mga kabataan sa Suba ES”.
The Barangay Representative Councilor Gracelyn D. Sy said,”Kami
mga barangay opisyales padayon sa pagsuporta sa mga proyekto sa
eskwelahan ug mualagad alang sa mga kabataan arun ang mga tinun-an
mahimong propisyonal ugma damlag”.
As learner representative, Charles S. Lamb said,” I will do my
responsibility to lead my co-learners to support our school policies to
adhere the DepEd’s VMC”.
With all the minds and ideas gathered and consolidated, we commit
ourselves to the effectiveness of the plan mentioned in the School
Improvement Plan.
Furthermore, Suba ES believes that the SIP is a vital tool in the
process of conducting monitoring and evaluation geared towards the
desired goal and accomplishments of targets integral in DepEd’s VMC.
With the accomplished SIP, the school can properly and clearly
uphold the implementation of school programs and projects deemed
suited to the needs and demands of this 21st century learners, which
provides and ensures the holistic development of school children
promulgating all their rights and privileges, encouraging active support,
and involvement of school personnel, family, community institutions and
other individuals
Table 1. List of SPT Members and their Roles and Functions
Name Role Functions

The School-Community Planning Team is composed of the internal and

external stakeholders organized for the purpose of identifying school
concerns and issues and strategically coming up with appropriate
interventions through collaborative process. The SPT is a collegial body
mandated to formulate the School Improvement Plan which will serve
as the roadmap that lays down the specific interventions that the

School Improvement Plan 6

school undertakes within the period of three (3) consecutive years.
Collectively an singularly the members of the SPT are expected to
contribute meaningfully to the successful formulation of the School
Improvement Plan (SIP) and the eventual necessary adjustment and
reformulation every after the three (3) year life cycle. Individually, the
members of the SPT are expected to perform the following specific
functions to wit:

 Meet with the School Planning Team every

beginning of the SIP cycle and all other
activities of the SPT
 Establishes a project schedule and
determine each phase
 Assigns tasks to project team members
 Responsible for the completion of the
project
Jeanette
Team  Provides regular updates of the project to
F.
Leader the SPT
Bantaya
 Facilitates workshop e.g. project Work Plan
and Budget Matrix, AIP and others.
 And perform such other roles and functions
deemed necessary, incidental to the
effective functioning of his/her mandate RA
No.9155 and as delegated to him/her by
the SPT.

 Represents and articulates the voice and

concerns of the teachers in the planning of
the SIP.
 Give the needed information and guidance
relative to teaching and learning activities
and processes undertaken by the teachers
everyday.
Sarah B. Teacher  Actively participate during the
Dela Representati development of the SIP in establishing
Cerna ve priorities, setting goals and formulating
implementation strategies for the plan.
 Effectively advocates for the successful
implementation of the different
interventions identified and prioritized in
the SIP.
 Perform such other duties which is
necessary, incidental and delegated to
him/her by the SPT.
Genevie PTA
ve Representati  Represents the voice and articulates the

School Improvement Plan 7

 concerns of the parents in the preparation
of the SIP.
 Share insights about what their children
need to learn and the difficulties they face
in the school, their aspirations for the
school and their children and present other
areas of concern.
 Actively supports all the interventions laid
Roda ve
down in the SIP and persistently advocate
to his/her sector to achieve maximum
participation in the achievements of school
goals and priorities.
 Perform such other duties which is
necessary, incidental and delegated to
him/her by the SPT.

 Represents and articulates the voice and

concerns of the community and the local
government unit relative to education.
 Share valuable information and guidance
on relevant issues and concerns of the
community that might have significance in
LGU
Grace D. the formulation of SIP
Representa
Sy  Participate actively in the formulation of
tive
school interventions, strategies and
priorities to address the pressing needs
and issues of the school.
 Perform such other duties which is
necessary, incidental and delegated to
him/her by the SPT.

Charles  Represent and articulates the voice and

S. concerns of the community and the local
Lamb SPG government unit relative to education

Representa  Participate actively in the formulation of

tive school interventions, strategies and

priorities to address the pressing needs
and issues of the school.

School Improvement Plan 8

Table 2. SPT Timetable of Activities

Activities SCHEDULE C
H
Preparatory Activities
Data gathering. Organization, and A
June 27 – July 5, 2022
Validation
July 08, 2022 P
Form SPT
Convene and Orient the SPT/DepEd July 08- 29, 2022 T
VMV-Sharing/Form Project Team E
Phase I: ASSES
Analysis of Gaps August 2022 R
Identifying and Prioritizing August 2022
Improvement Areas 2
Root Causes Analysis August 2022
Phase II: PLAN
Planning and Project Designing
August 1 – 1st week of
SIP Writing
September 2022
SIP Assessment and QA Tool
Making and Submission of 1st – 2nd week of
AIP,WFP,SOB, and APP September, 2022
Phase III: ACT
Solution Try-Out October – December,
2022
Solution Roll – out October – December,
2022
Progress Monitoring January, 2023 –
December, 2025
M and E Assessment and Adjustment October, 2022-
October,2023

CHAPTER 2
Assess

2.A. School’s Current Situation

Suba Elementary School is a barangay school located along the

coastline of Samboan and established in the year 1925. It is 2.4 kilometers
away from the heart of the town and the first school that can be located
upon entering the town of Samboan if you travel via Barili way.The school
site as per document is owned by the Department of Education with a
total land area of 6.465 square meters through a written Contract of
USUFRACT.

School Improvement Plan 9

 The school is accessible for the school children of the barangay
because it can be reached by bus, jeepney, motorcycle, or even a bicycle
from the Municipality of Samboan and by the neighboring town of
Ginatilan, Cebu. Most of the school children will just walk from their
houses to school.
The nearest public schools are the Manuel L. Quezon Elementary
School, Samboan Central School and the Samboan National High School
going southward.The nearest private schools are the Holy Trinity College
of Ginatilan, Cebu and St. Pius X. School INC located at the town proper.
Going to the District Office, Suba Elementary School is just 2
kilometers away and can be reached by tricycle,motorcycle,bicycle and all
types of vehicles. The Division Office can be reached by bus which takes 4
to 5 hours’ travel going to the South Bus Terminal with 303.00 pesos fare
and 45 minutes to the Division Offices with 140 taxi fare.
In three years’ time, minor health threat like a case of dengue fever
have been recorded. At present Suba Elementary School is catering 161
school children whose family is reliant on the blessings of the sea while
others are working in the city and nearby towns. Most of the pupils were
residents of the barangay, some from neighboring barangays like Palanas,
Ginatilan and Cambigong, Samboan.
Of these 157 pupils, 82 of them are males and 75 are females.
There are 14 wasted and severely wasted pupils in the Nutritional Status
for this School Year and these learners are beneficiary of the School-Based
Feeding Program funded by DepED.
With regards to the instructional materials, all the grade levels have
already their books which are aligned to the new curriculum except grade
6 level in which only Math and ESP books were available and the teachers
did their best to have their references. With the collaborative efforts of all
the grade 6 teachers of Samboan District they were able to secure which
really helped them to teach the competencies of the New Curriculum. As
of this time, the Grade 6 teachers still hoping that books from DepED will
be delivered to our school the soonest time possible.
There are 11 female teachers who dedicatedly and passionately
perform their duties and responsibilities as stewards in attaining the
DepEds VMV. Two of them are Teacher 3, four are Teacher 2, five are
Teacher 1 and one Head Teacher 3 the pillar in our school.
With regards to our school facilities, we are equipped with pupils’
tables and chairs for grade 1, desks for grades 2 to 3, wooden armchairs
for grade 4 and white plastic monobloc armed chairs for grades 5 and 6
pupils. We have 4 buildings, 3 of these were used as classrooms for kinder
to grade 6, 1 for E- Room, Library and Home Economics room. Each room
has lavatory and shared toilet for male and female learners. Our School’s
Operating Budget is from our monthly MOOE in the amount of Php
23,670.00. We participated any activities in our districts and sad to say
that we we’re not so lucky enough to receive awards, we only got the last
place, it is only last year that we reach to the area level in English but was
not able to reach to the highest level. But the school will always be
struggling to reach up to the highest level of competitions and pupils will
gain learnings effectively.
We don’t have drop out last year and the school will see to it that
there will be no more drop outs as the school year goes on.
Our promotion rate is 100% because of the differentiated
instructions used by the teachers in teaching. But, still even if our
promotion rate is 100%, there are still problems to ponder on, the Low
Reading Comprehension which lead to low literacy and numeracy skills of

School Improvement Plan 10

our learners. There are areas that really challenge the school in terms of
the reading comprehensions of the learners.
In the recent Endline result of EGRA and PHIL IRI and the overall
result of the quarterly assessment of learners, the school did not meet the
Division standard level which is 100%. Analysis conducted that the Low
Performance level in Reading Comprehension was due to the lack of
program that gives opportunities for teachers to master the competencies
in different teaching – learning strategies of the lesson which they can use
in their everyday lesson.
Aside from that, the literacy level of the Grades 1 to 3 learners
which is 45 out of 63 pupils belong to frustration level in English ORV, and
there are 39 out of 63 Grades 1 to 3 learners belong to non-numerates.
The school is targeting to increase the MPS within three years’ time,
to zero-out non-readers in Grades 1 to 3 and to reduce non-numerates in
Grades 1 to 3. All of these are achievable within three years.
Due to the problem, Low Academic Performance of 50%, the 25%
literacy rate and 54% numeracy rate of the school which is below the 75%
of DEPED planning standard. The school aims to address the problem to
achieve higher level academic performance.

2. B. Priority Improvement Areas

Table 4. Priority Improvement Areas

Improvement
Strategic
Area UrgencyMagnitudeFeasibilityAverage Interpretation
Importance
Very
Low Academic 5 5 5 5 5 High Priority
Performance

Low Literacy Very

Level 5 5 5 5 5 High Priority
Low
Numeracy 5 5 5 5 5 Very
Level High Priority

2. C. GENERAL OBJECTIVES

Table 5. General Objectives

Priority Improvement Area General Objectives

To increase the school’s MPS from
Low Academic Performance 50% to 75% in 3 years

To increase the literacy rate from 25%

Low Literacy Rate
to 75% within 3 years
To increase the numeracy rate from
Low Numeracy Rate 54% to 75% within 3 years

School Improvement Plan 11

Table 5. Targets

Priority General Root Cause/s Time Frame

Improvement Objectives Y1 Y2 Y3
Areas

Low Academic To the school’s *Poor study

Performance MPS from 50% habits
to 75% in 3 *Lack of parental
years support
*Overlapping 58% 66% 75%
Activities
* Lack of interest
in studying

Low Literacy To increase the *Failure to use

Rate literacy rate appropriate
from 25% to strategy and
75% within 3 approaches to
years teach sounds &
phonetics 42% 59% 75%
*Lack interest in
reading
*Reading
materials are
obsolete
Low Numeracy To increase the *Lack of
Rate numeracy rate opportunities to
from 54% to identify learner’s
75% within 3 needs
years * Lack mastery
61% 68% 75%
of the lessons
*Teacher use
outmoded
methods

2. D. Root Cause Analysis

The school as steward institution, takes the lead in shaping a

learning environment that enables every child to grow healthy, well-

rounded, happy, physically safe and emotionally secure. It provides

opportunities that allow its learners to be equipped with knowledge and

skills that they can treasure throughout their life and enables them to

become responsible and productive members of their community and

society.

School Improvement Plan 12

 The school aims to increase the MPS from 50% to 75% in 3 years.

That all learners can apply and perform what they have learned from the

lesson.

The school aims to give quality education to the learners so the

issues and concerns pertaining to the Low Academic Performance needs

to be resolved by providing a support program to teachers for the

enhancement of their competencies in teaching and learning process.

Illustration 1. Root Cause Analysis of Low Academic Performance

using Fishbone method

LEARNERS TEACHERS SCHOOL HEAD

*Lack of Training.
*Limited time Problem
*Lack of Interest * Overlapping of Activities Statement
*Poor study habits *Overlapping activities
*Low comprehension *Poor strategies Academic
Performanc
e is 50%
which is
below the
planning
*Lack of IMs *Computer games standard of
75%
*Lack of School Facilities * Lack of funds *Lack of determination

*Limited Library Materials

SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT
INSTRUCTIONAL
FACILITIES
MATERIALS

Illustration 2: Root Cause Analysis of the Low Literacy Rate using Fish Bone

RESOURCES PERSONNEL

*Unavailability of instructional *Lack of trainings for teachers

materials
* Lack of strategies in teaching
Problem
reading
Statement

Literacy rate
of
frustration
level is 25%
below the
*Unavailability of instructional *Strategies of teachers not Division
materials suited for the learners Target of
750%

School Improvement Plan 13

 C
H
A
MATERIALS P
METHOD
T
E
R
Illustration 3: Root Cause Analysis of the Low Numeracy Rate using Fish Bone

3
RESOURCES PERSONNEL

* Pupils lack mastery on four

*Unavailability of resources
fundamental operation
Problem
* Lack of training for teachers. Statement

Numeracy
rate is 54%
below the
Division
Target of
*Strategies of teachers not
*Unavailability of instructional 75%
materials suited for the learners

MATERIALS
METHOD

CHAPTER 3
Plan

3. A. Solutions

PIA ROOT CAUSES Project Name Major Activities

Low The school needs to  Item analysis
Academic provide intensified  Brainstorming on least
Performance program that gives mastered competencies
opportunities and Paningkamot ko,  Conduct action research
support to teachers Paglambo ko  Extend review sessions
that will improve  Close supervision among
academic teachers
performance of  Monitoring and Evaluation
learners.
Low Literacy The school has no Today A Reader, Call teachers’ attention to this
Rate program that gives Tomorrow A matter.
opportunities to Speaker Produce intervention materials in
teachers that will reading
help them to Conduct remediation in reading.
develop and Call PTA meeting and introduce
practice the inputs on reading techniques
concepts/skills in Update Instructional materials in

School Improvement Plan 14

 Reading
Conduct PHIL-IRI/ORV Quarterly
teaching beginning
Implement Reading Policy During
reading to the
Lunch Time
learners.
Provide Reading Activities to
Pupils
Low The school has no  Conduct Numeracy
Numeracy program that gives Verification Test every after
Rate opportunities to Quarterly Exams
teachers that will help  Provide Mathematical drill
them to develop and every vacant period of the
practice the
concepts/skills in Pupils
Mathematics to the  Post some mathematical
Ituro Mo, Bilangin at
learners Galingan Ko posters/ equation of the four
mathematical operations
 Used of differentiated
activities
 Produce intervention
materials

3.B. Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Project Title: Paningkamot ko, Paglambo ko
Project Statement: Academic Performance is 50% which is below the DEPED planning standard of
75%.

Project Objective Statement: To increase the school’s MPS from 50% to 75% in 3 years

Root Cause : The school needs to provide intensified program that gives opportunities and support
to teachers that will improve academic performance of learners.

Date of Budget
Activity Output Person Responsible Budget
Implementation Source

Gather data on Complete data

 Teachers
the list learned on the list August, 2022 500 School MOOE
 Pupils
skills learned skills
Teachers  Teaches
Conduct August 2022 – SCHOOL
remedial  Pupils 4,000
remediation July 2023 MOOE
Instruction Plan
Implementing
Arouse the  Teachers
interventions in August 2022 – SCHOOL
pupils interest to  Pupils 15,00
five academic July 2023 MOOE
study and learn  Parents
areas
Conduct Class August 2022 –  Teachers 6,000 SCHOOL
Classroom Observation July 2023  School Head MOOE
observations notes,/Teachers
competencies
will be attained

School Improvement Plan 15

 successfully
Use Low learners will
August 2022 –  Teachers SCHOOL
Differentiated not be left 30,000
July 2023  Learners MOOE
Instructions behind
Learners will be
Provide more interested to
 Teachers
Interesting listen and August 2022 – SCHOOL
 Learners 20,000
Instructional engage in July 2023 MOOE
 Parents
Materials teaching –
learning process
SCHOOL
MOOE
Post  Teachers
Meet the 100%
Implementatio July 2023  Pupils 500
Division Target
n

Project Title: Today A Reader, Tomorrow A Speaker

Problem Statement: LITERACY RATE IS 25% BELOW THE PLANNING STANDARD OF 75%

Project Objective Statement: Increase the literacy rate from 25% to 75% in 3 years

Root Cause: The school has no program that gives opportunities to teachers that will help them
to develop and practice the concepts/skills in teaching beginning reading to the learners
Pupils cannot identify sounds.
Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Date of Budget
Activity Output Person Responsible Budget
Implementation Source

Conduct Pre- Decrease August 22 – 24,  Teachers School

500
test Frustration level 2022  Pupils MOOE
Augment the
Conduct Learner’s  Teaches
August 2022 – SCHOOL
Reading Reading and  Pupils 3,000
July 2023 MOOE
Remediation Comprehension
Level
Implementing Arouse the pupils  Teachers
August 2022 – SCHOOL
interventions in interest to read  Pupils 15,000
July 2023 MOOE
reading and comprehend  Parents
Learners will be
Include aware of the
Spelling before spelling and August 2022 –  Teachers SCHOOL
6,000
every lesson in sound of each July 2023  School Head MOOE
English starts letter in the word

Provide more Learners will be August 2022 –  Teachers 15,000 SCHOOL

School Improvement Plan 16

 interested to
Interesting
listen and engage  Learners
Instructional July 2023 MOOE
in teaching –  Parents
Materials
learning process
Learners
Implement
attention will be  Teachers
reading policy August 2022 – SCHOOL
on reading not  Pupils 6,000
during lunch July 2023 MOOE
playing after  Parents
time
lunchtime

Post  Teachers
SCHOOL
Implementatio 0 Frustration level July 2023  Pupils 500
MOOE
n

Project Title: Ituro Mo, Bilangin at Galingan Ko

Problem Statement: Numeracy rate is 54% below the DEPED planning standard of 100%

Project Objective Statement: Increase the numeracy rate from 54% to 75% in 3 years

Root Cause: No mastery on the four fundamental operations

Date of Budget
Activity Output Person Responsible Budget
Implementation Source

Conduct Pre- Decrease Non -  Teachers

November, 2022 500 School MOOE
test numerates  Pupils
Conduct
Teachers can
Numeracy
identify the January –  Teaches
Verification Test SCHOOL
progress of the December  Pupils 1,000
every after MOOE
learners’ 2023
Quarterly
numeracy skills
Exams
Provide Arouse the
Mathematical learners interest January –  Teachers
SCHOOL
drill every to learn solving December  Pupils 6,000
MOOE
vacant period of mathematical 2023  Parents
the Pupils equation
Post some
Learners will be
mathematical
aware to answer
posters/
and this will August 2022 –  Teachers SCHOOL
equation of the 6,000
become a part of July 2023  School Head MOOE
four
their games
mathematical
operations
Learners will be
Teachers must interested to
 Teachers
used listen and November 2022 SCHOOL
 Learners 15,000
differentiated engage in – July 2023 MOOE
 Parents
instructions teaching –
learning process

School Improvement Plan 17

 Leaning
Produce
mathematics for October 2022 –  Teachers SCHOOL
intervention 20,000
the learners will July 2023  Pupls MOOE
materials
be fun.
SCHOOL C
 Teachers
Post 0 Non-
July 2023  Pupils 500
MOOE H
Implementation numerates
A
P
CHAPTER 4 T
Monitoring and Evaluation E
R
All projects being implemented by Suba Elementary School will be monitored by the
SPT, Project Team Leader and School Head. This is to ensure the progress of the activities
4
and projects that will be done effectively and efficiently. All projects will be measured through
certain indicators. These indicators will determine the status of the project, if the solutions were
effective or not. There will be target schedules to be followed to help the SPT in the
implementation process, and in the reporting of progress of the project. Frequency of the
monitoring will depend on the project being implemented. Below is the Monitoring form for all
the Projects of Suba Elementary School.
Table 11: Monitoring Plan

Reporting and Feedback

Project Name Objectives and Targets Schedule
Mechanism to Stakeholders

-Achievement Test Results in

“PANINGKAMOT
KO, PAGLAMBO
January every quarter
KO”
To increase academic 2023- - MPS of Quarterly Exams
performance from 50% December - Form 14 & 15
to 75% in 3 years 2025 - Remedial Activities
(Low Academic
Performance)

“TODAY A To increase the literacy

READER, rate from 25% to 75% in January
TOMORROW A 3 years 2023- -Phil-IRI results
SPEAKER” December - ORV Results
(Low Literacy Rate) 2025

“ITURO MO, January

BILANGIN AT To increase numeracy -EGMA Results
2023-
GALINGAN KO” rate from a range of - Math MPS in quarterly Exams
December
25% to 75% in 3 years
(Low Numeracy Rate)
2025

School Improvement Plan 18

 This project monitoring tool aims to check and evaluate the progress of the
interventions and solutions which targets the increase of the percentage of the academic
performance and numeracy rate of our learners at the same time to decrease frustration level
percentage. It will help the SPT and the PT to decide and to craft for additional solutions if
needed.

Table 12: Project Report Monitoring Form

Reporting Issues/ Recomme Signatur
Objecti and Problems/ ndations/ e of SPT
ves & Sche Feedback Challenge Action and
Project Name Mechanism s Points Project
Target dule
s to Team
Stakeholde Leader
rs
To
increa
”PANINGK se
AMOT KO, acade
KALAMBU mic
AN KO” perfor
manc
e from
(Low School 50%
Academic to
Performanc 75%
e) in 3
years
“TODAY A To
READER, increa
TOMORRO se the
literac
WA
y rate
SPEAKER”
from
26%
to
(Low 100%
Numeracy within
Rate) 3
years
“ITURO
MO, To
BILANGIN increa
AT se the
GALINGAN numer
KO” acy
rate
from
54%
(Low to
Literacy 100%
Rate) within
3
years

School Improvement Plan 19

 Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
DIVISION of Cebu Province
Region _VII_

awards this

Certificate of
Acceptance to

(NAME OF SCHOOL)

for having successfully complied and met the requirements and

standards of the Department of Education as mandated by
DepEd Order 44, s. 2015.

Given on the ______ day of __________________ 20_______.

Schools Division Superintendent

School Improvement Plan 20

School Improvement Plan 21