Miniaturized Capsule for In Situ Biomarker Detection
Miniaturized Capsule for In Situ Biomarker Detection
Check for updates Transient molecules in the gastrointestinal tract such as nitric oxide and hydrogen
sulfide are key signals and mediators of inflammation. Owing to their highly reactive
nature and extremely short lifetime in the body, these molecules are difficult to detect.
Here we develop a miniaturized device that integrates genetically engineered probiotic
biosensors with a custom-designed photodetector and readout chip to track these
molecules in the gastrointestinal tract. Leveraging the molecular specificity of living
sensors1, we genetically encoded bacteria to respond to inflammation-associated
molecules by producing luminescence. Low-power electronic readout circuits2
integrated into the device convert the light emitted by the encapsulated bacteria to a
wireless signal. We demonstrate in vivo biosensor monitoring in the gastrointestinal
tract of small and large animal models and the integration of all components into a
sub-1.4 cm3 form factor that is compatible with ingestion and capable of supporting
wireless communication. With this device, diseases such as inflammatory bowel
disease could be diagnosed earlier than is currently possible, and disease progression
could be more accurately tracked. The wireless detection of short-lived, disease-
associated molecules with our device could also support timely communication
between patients and caregivers, as well as remote personalized care.
Our ability to diagnose and monitor inflammatory gastrointestinal dis- environment underlying the metabolic pathways of both the human
orders would be transformed if we could profile labile, oxidation-related host and its resident microorganisms. Developing non-invasive
biomarkers and their responses to dietary change and therapies in situ. technologies that can continuously monitor the gastrointestinal
Many microbiome-related conditions, notably inflammatory bowel dis- environment in situ would both expand our understanding of what
ease (IBD), are associated with chronic intestinal inflammation result- causes inflammation and indicate directions for improving therapies.
ing from dysregulated immune homeostasis—specifically, increased Furthermore, diagnosing multi-faceted diseases such as IBD, in which
oxidation3,4. Malnutrition5, antibiotic resistance6, antibiotic dysbiosis7,8, biomarker levels vary substantially among patients, would benefit from
neurodegenerative diseases9 and mitochondrial genetic disorders10 the simultaneous detection of a panel of oxidation-related biomarkers
are associated with redox imbalance in the gastrointestinal tract, and (for example, nitric oxide17 (NO), ROS18, thiosulfate19 and tetrathionate19).
oxidative stress may also underlie poor responses to chemotherapy11, Current methods of diagnosing gastrointestinal inflammation
and vaccines12, as well as aging13. include endoscopy20, which is invasive and should only be performed
Bacterial infections14 and antibiotics7 may substantially increase with limited frequency, and stool analysis, which may not accurately
concentrations of oxidants, such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reflect intestinal conditions owing to differential growth of certain
reactive nitrogen species (RNS). These molecules are labile, which can species21, ambient oxidation13 and loss of labile disease-mediating
make it difficult to detect their presence or accurately measure their molecules. Culture enrichment22 (for example, for analysing low-
concentration in the body. Devices reported to sense labile molecules abundance microorganisms in stool samples with omics techniques)
in the gastrointestinal tract (such as oxidizing gases or volatile organic may also distort the initial bacterial ratio. Because the faecal microbiota
compounds) are limited to off-the-shelf sensors that use non-specific only partially represents the autochthonous microbiota in direct con-
metal-oxide-sensing elements15,16. Thus, the current standard of clinical tact with the intestinal mucosa23, a biopsy may be required for complete
care is limited with respect to our capacity to evaluate the chemical analysis24.
1
Synthetic Biology Group, MIT Synthetic Biology Center, Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 2Research Laboratory of Electronics,
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 4The Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 5Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and
Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 6Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. 7Division of Comparative Medicine, MIT,
Cambridge, MA, USA. 8Department of Microbiology, Biological Sciences Division and Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 9Analog Devices,
Boston, MA, USA. 10Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA. 11Senti Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, USA. 12These authors contributed
equally: M. E. Inda-Webb, M. Jimenez. ✉e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Recombinase
GFP
Recombinase-based switch
Model of chemical landscape of
c health and disease
Development
1. Molecular
detection
8.5 mm
Microbiome state
Fig. 1 | General platform for developing a miniaturized capsule for real-time signal from the intestinal biomarkers detection has been tested in terminal
detection of labile mediators of disease in the gut. a, Probiotic bacteria are experiments in pigs). c, Top, the device could enable remote detection for
engineered to respond to an array of IBD biomarkers (BM). A recombinase- immediate follow-up after therapy, as well as monitoring the gut chemical
based genetic memory system is used to validate the bacterial biosensors (BS) environment for longer-term treatment with personalized therapies or
in animal models. Biosensing bacteria are then re-engineered to respond by dietary and lifestyle changes. Microbiome dynamics could be characterized
luminescing and packaged in a capsule that protects the cells during exposure as depicted in the simplified model in the bottom right. Starting from infancy,
to low pH (such as during passage through the stomach) and interfaces the microbiome gradually reaches one of several adult states characterized by
them with miniaturized electronics (the illustration shows the design and health or disease. Monitoring the gut chemical environment is essential for
dimensions of our fabricated device). b, While in transit through the intestines, timely treatments: perturbations that would lead to an unhealthy state can
the biosensing bacteria sense the metabolites as they are being produced inside be resisted (red blocked arrow) or an effective treatment plan can be used to
the body and the miniaturized capsule transmits the bacterial luminescence return to a healthy state 58 (green arrows). The biosensor image is reproduced
signal wirelessly to an external device, such as a mobile phone (the wireless from ref. 59.
Engineered living bacteria, due to their innate sensing ability and as a smartphone. We have tested this multi-diagnostic pill in live pigs,
robust functionality in the gut, have been proposed as a solution to demonstrating that a human-scale diagnostic device can be built to
detect analytes associated with intestinal inflammation in complex detect transient mediators of gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases
physiological environments1—such as in clinical samples25 (for example, (Fig. 1).
serum or urine) and inside the gut, detecting either biomolecules sup-
plemented in diet26–28 or by-products of inflammation19,29,30. However,
current applications of biosensors still depend on the complex analysis Design of biosensing genetic circuits
of bacterial gene expression, RNA or DNA in stool, rather than real-time Intestinal bacteria have natural sensors that continuously detect spe-
reporting from localized regions within the body. cific molecules in the gut. We chose probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle
Electronic devices that continuously collect, process and wirelessly 1917 as a chassis owing to its resilience and excellent safety profile
transmit information can also be used to analyse the gastrointestinal in the gastrointestinal tract36, and engineered it to detect the labile
tract. However, capsule endoscopy cameras currently approved by IBD-mediating molecules NO, H2O2, thiosulfate and tetrathionate
the US Food and Drug Administration31 do not directly measure the (Extended Data Fig. 1).
molecular mediators of disease such as ROS or RNS. Other ingestible, We first optimized the NO sensor by combining the bacterial NO
ultralow-power electronic devices currently under development biosensor NorR17,37,38 with a DNA recombinase core circuit39 to create
can be used to visually evaluate the gastrointestinal tract and meas- memory circuits that could record NO exposure of bacterial biosen-
ure gas concentrations, temperature and pH levels15,32 but require sors as they travelled through the gastrointestinal tract (Fig. 2a) in
functionalization with fragile transducers to convert biochemi- the dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) model of intestinal inflammation
cal information into electronic signals, which limits specificity and in mice. Because the recorded information is stored in the DNA and
robustness15,33. passed from generation to generation, it can be retrieved by meas-
To overcome these challenges and to leverage the promise of tran- uring GFP expression from the bacteria recovered from faeces.
sient biomarker panels, we combined natural protein-based sensing Using flow cytometry, the percentage of cells that were GFP ‘ON’18
elements for NO, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), tetrathionate and thiosul- (the percentage of GFP-positive cells) was calculated at each concen-
fate with genetically encoded memory circuits, incorporated them into tration of diethylenetriamine–nitric oxide adduct (DETA–NO). After
probiotic bacteria, and validated their function in vivo in mouse and multiple rounds of optimization to improve the signal-to-noise ratio
pig models of inflammation. We then integrated these bacterial sensors (SNR) of the genetic circuits and characterization (Extended Data
with a custom-designed integrated photodiode array and readout chip. Fig. 2a–c), our NO recombinase-based memory system responded
This integrated system builds on our early prototype34, which was only to a concentration threshold of 30 μM NO with high specificity and
validated for the detection of blood in vivo but was considerably larger was not influenced by other RNS (NOx) present in the gut environ-
(more than 9 cm3) than any known safe ingestibles. The new pill has a ment (Fig. 2a). The NO sensor was tested under anaerobic condi-
volume of less than 1.4 cm3 and a pill form factor that conforms to the tions (Extended Data Fig. 2d) and over time (Extended Data Fig. 2e,f).
size of safe ingestible non-deformable dosage forms on the market35. Similarly, we built recombinase-based memory circuits to optimize
Our miniaturized wireless bio-electronic pill can safely process data the detection of H2O2, thiosulfate and tetrathionate (Extended Data
with low power consumption and transmit it to a portable device such Fig. 3a–d).
Control
norR bxb1
DSS
40 PnorV
20
20
gfp
0 15
0.1 1 10 100 1,000 10,000 Control DSS
Stool collection
Nitric oxide concentration (μM)
c d Negative Healthy Ischemia-
Negative control 0.6 mM DETA-NO control reperfusion
0 mM DETA-NO 6 mM DETA-NO
NO sensor 1 NO sensor 2
100 100
** Mesentery artery ***
80 ** *** 80
GFP+ cells (%)
Intestinal arteries
40 Small intestine 40
20 20
0 0
NO NO NO H D K H D K
sensor 1 sensor 2 sensor 3
Fig. 2 | Validation in vitro and in vivo of probiotic bacteria engineered to ***P = 0.002. Two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test. c, The NO sensor was
detect NO. a, Inset, in response to NO, the transcription factor NorR binds to validated in pigs. Right, experimental design: intestines were clamped to
the PnorV promoter (inset), activating the transcription of bxb1 recombinase, separate control and treated compartments. Bacterial NO sensors 1, 2 and
leading to inversion of the gfp expression cassette (located between attB and 3—with activation thresholds of 0.6 mM, 0.6 to 6 mM and 6 mM DETA–NO,
attP sites, triangles) and expression of GFP. Flow cytometry was used to respectively—were placed in the different compartments. n = 3 per group.
determine the percentage of GFP-positive cells at various NO concentrations. d, Ischaemia-reperfusion model of inflammation in pigs. Data are shown from
RNS other than NO (NOx) did not activate the system. n = 3 per group. b, Left, four independent experiments (four pigs: H, D, M and K) on different days,
experimental timeline for validation in mice. C57BL/6 male mice were treated with multiple compartments per animal. ***P = 0.0005. Two-way ANOVA for
for 7 days with 3% DSS in drinking water. DSS-treated mice and control were multiple comparisons. In c,d, bacteria were collected from the intestine after
gavaged every other day with engineered bacteria carrying the NO memory two hours of exposure to the analyte or the ischaemia-reperfusion. In b–d, the
system. Stool was collected 6 h after gavage. Right, the NO sensor was percentage of GFP-positive cells was measured by flow cytometry (n = 10,000
significantly activated on day six of DSS treatment. DSS: n = 10; control: events) from separately grown culture after retrieval. Data are mean ± s.e.m.
n = 10. Sensor 1: **P = 0.0015; sensor 2: **P = 0.0067, ***P = 0.0007; sensor 3:
We also created a disease-stage detector based on the concentra- GFP activation increased significantly at day nine after the start of
tion of NO detected, which would indicate whether inflammation DSS treatment (Extended Data Fig. 4a), correlating with the peak of
was mild, moderate or severe (Extended Data Fig. 3e). The incor- inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activation40. Tracking NO with
porated recombinase-based switch was also used to discretize the the disease-stage detector revealed an exacerbated inflammatory
biomarker input levels and create digital memories in the cells18. response following antibiotic treatment in a chronic inflammation
Tuning the sensitivity of the NO biosensor resulted in different model (Extended Data Fig. 4d,e). We also tested our bacterial sensors
activation thresholds, so that physiologically relevant concentra- for detection of ROS (H2O2), tetrathionate and thiosulfate; activation
tions of the biomarker (low, medium or high) could be measured was detected as inflammation progressed, with thiosulfate detection
in animal models. All of the sensors developed for in vivo valida- at day six after the start of DSS treatment and tetrathionate (a product
tion in mice measured GFP expression as a readout of the memory of thiosulfate oxidation) detection at day ten, overlapping with ROS
system activation; the sensors were activated within minutes detection (Extended Data Fig. 3b,c).
(Extended Data Fig. 2e), making them suitable for detection in the To validate the bacterial sensors in a disease model that is similar
intestine36. in physiology and scale to human anatomy41, we tested the bacte-
rial biosensors in living pigs using an ischaemia-reperfusion injury
model of intestinal inflammation42. We injected the bacterial bio-
Biosensors detect disease in animal models of IBD sensors directly into the intestinal lumen of a sedated pig, in either
To examine the in vivo functionality of our bacterial sensors, we evalu- inflamed segments or healthy segments with or without added bio
ated whether they could detect chemically induced gastrointestinal markers. The NO-sensing bacteria detected different concentrations of
inflammation while passing through the gastrointestinal tract in NO in the control group (Fig. 2c) and emitted a positive signal in
a mouse model of colitis (Fig. 2b). After inflammation was induced some of the animals in the disease group (ischaemia-reperfusion;
with DSS, control and treated mice were orally gavaged with the NO Fig. 2d). Although previous direct NO measurements in inflamed
biosensors. Six hours later34, the percentage of GFP+ cells recovered intestines are limited and uncertain, based on the lowest detectable
from faecal samples was analysed by flow cytometry. NO biosensors signal from the NO biosensor bacteria 1 (around 8 μM; Extended
detected significantly more GFP+ cell activation in faecal pellets from Data Fig. 3e) our results agree with an estimated range of expected
treated mice than in those from healthy controls (Fig. 2b). Inflammation NO (1–10 μM) in humans and suggest that the biosensors are functio
in the colitis model was measured over time (Extended Data Fig. 4a) nal in the complex, dynamic environment of an inflamed intestine43.
and independently validated (Extended Data Fig. 4b,c). Our biosen- Additionally, the ROS, thiosulfate and tetrathionate sensors also
sor thus detected the presence of NO as a marker of gastrointestinal detected significant quantities of analytes in control-treated pigs
inflammation in vivo. (Extended Data Fig. 4f).
Adhesive film
8.5 mm
3D printed top
(chamber bodies)
14.25 mm
Microelectronics PCB
3D printed bottom 5 mm
BS3
Ref
BS1
c d
BS2
ROS BS, exp 1 ROS BS, exp 3
BM ROS BS, exp 2 ROS BS, exp 4
BSP Luc 1 4
On Off On
2 3
150 400
TT
Relative photocurrent (fA)
200
50
100
0
0
–50
–100
0 30 60 90 120 0 6 12 18 24
Time (min) Time (h)
Fig. 3 | Design and in vitro characterization of a device for miniaturized used to detect bacterial sensor output; (2) battery; (3) microcontroller and
wireless sensing with cell-based biosensors. a, Components and dimensions radio chip; (4) antenna. Lines represent the mean and the shaded area indicates
of the device. b, Design of a miniaturized pill casing with a bacterial-electronic the the s.e.m. for three independent replicates, conducted with one induced
chamber interface. Top, side view of the device. Bottom, fully assembled pill device (tetrathionate) and one uninduced device (buffer). BM, biomolecule
with the permeable membrane attached. The bacterial chamber–casing that induces the circuit; BSP, biosensing protein; Luc, luciferase reporter
unibody design uses a thin clear backing film to place the bacteria close to operon; ref, reference chamber. d, In vitro characterization of the device for
the photosensitive electronic chip. A double-sided adhesive film enables a long-term use, measuring reversibility over time for 24 h. Probiotic bacteria
low-profile seal to the permeable outer filter membrane. c, Top left, the genetic engineered to detect ROS (ROS BS) were encapsulated in the device and
circuit and wireless signal over time from the tetrathionate sensor encapsulated immersed in bacterial growth media intermittently supplemented with 20 mM
in the device and immersed in bacterial growth media supplemented with H2O2 to test reversibility. Wireless signals were recorded over time. The dynamic
100 mM tetrathionate. Low-power CMOS-integrated photodiodes convert circuit for ROS performed with stringent control during the off phase and
bioluminescence emitted from the bacterial sensor to a photocurrent, which showed a perfect reactivation over the second on phase. Lines represent four
is converted to quantifiable digital data and transmitted wirelessly to the independent replicates (exp 1–4) conducted with two different chips on different
external device. Top right, Multiple biosensors (BS) can be used together days over multiple cycles induced with 20 mM H2O2, followed by a wash and
with this array to study a metabolic pathway (for example, H2O2, thiosulfate incubation in growth medium and induced again by supplementing the growth
and tetrathionate sensors; Extended Data Fig. 3c). (1) A threshold-based medium with 20 mM H2O2.
bioluminescence detector with a CMOS-integrated photodiode2 array was
(Extended Data Fig. 5b) were sealed with porous membranes (nominal
Validation of a bacterial-electronic sensor pill pore size, 0.4 µm), which did not interfere with the detection of the tar-
To advance our bacterial sensors towards clinical application, we get molecules when the chambers were placed in faeces (Extended Data
integrated them into a bacterial-electronic pill. Specifically, we Fig. 6a). Additionally, to protect the on-board bacteria during ingestion
designed a system with a size and form factor conforming to a proven and transit through the stomach, we developed free-standing enteric
non-deformable dosage form (Extended Data Fig. 5a) by developing polymer films that prevent low pH ingress through simulated ingestion
an optimized luminescent readout via a custom microelectronic bio- (Extended Data Figs. 6b–e and 7). To generate versions of the bacterial
luminescence detector2 and bacterial chambers built directly into sensors that can optimally couple to the photosensitive electronics,
the pill casing. we replaced the GFP readout with a self-contained bioluminescence
Our multi-diagnostic device requires nutrients and analytes to be readout, the luxCDABE operon from Photorhabdus luminescens34,
exchanged efficiently while retaining the engineered microorganisms and the memory system with a reversible analogue output. We con-
and simultaneously allowing the generated light signal to reach the structed this genetic circuit in E. coli Nissle 1917 and exposed the result-
electronic detectors. Thus, we developed a pill casing that incorporates ant strain to DETA–NO as a source of NO (Extended Data Fig. 8a–c).
a bacterial-electronic chamber interface in a unibody design (Fig. 3a,b) The NO-biosensing bacteria responded rapidly to DETA–NO exposure
in which the bacteria are precisely aligned in a tablet-shaped two-by-two (time to reach maximum signal (tmax) = 60 min) with a high luminescence
array with the microelectronic photodiodes and a hermetic seal is main- output and a SNR of 170 (Extended Data Fig. 8a). Production of the lumi-
tained around the electronic components. This design enabled sensing nescence machinery was also induced by DETA–NO in cultures grown
from an array of engineered microbial strains expressing luciferase under anaerobic conditions (Extended Data Fig. 8d) and the machinery
in response to several biomarkers (NO, ROS, tetrathionate and nega- was stable through simulated ingestion (Extended Data Fig. 7). ROS, thi-
tive reference). To retain the bacterial cells, the integrated chambers osulfate and tetrathionate sensors were also built in combination with
Buffer
Small intestine
Uninduced Induced
d e
100 1.0
TT
Buffer
Relative photocurrent (fA)
0.8
50
Sensitivity
0.6
0
0.4
–50
0.2
TT sensor
Null sensor
–100 0
0 30 60 90 120 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Time (min) 1 – specificity
Fig. 4 | Validation of the integrated device for miniaturized wireless at 37 °C. Wireless signals transmitted from inside the abdomen were detected
biosensing in live pigs. a, Schematic of the experiment. The bacterial by a commercial receiver, which can be connected to a laptop computer or
biosensors encapsulated in the device were tested in situ in a terminal procedure a mobile phone. d, Kinetics of the tetrathionate sensor embedded in the
in anaesthetized Yorkshire pigs weighing around 90 kg. After opening the abdominal cavity of a pig. The response of the device placed in the compartment
abdominal cavity, we placed the device through a small incision directly into with tetrathionate was clearly distinguishable from that of the device in the
the lumen of the small intestine, compartmentalized with clamps. b, Schematic compartment with the buffer control. Dark lines represent the mean of
of compartmentalization of a section of the intestine that was clamped for independent experiments in different pigs with up to two devices in separate
experimentation. Tetrathionate (100 mM) was injected with a syringe into the compartments (tetrathionate (TT) and buffer) and the shaded area represents
clamped intestinal compartment. Buffer was added as a control in a different the s.e.m. Tetrathionate: n = 5; buffer: n = 3. e, The receiver operating
compartment. c, Compartmentalized intestines were kept inside the abdomen characteristic of the device with sensing after 60 min.
the luxCDABE operon for real-time detection and characterized in vitro successfully interface with the pill to give an electronic readout in the
(Fig. 3c and Extended Data Fig. 8a–c); the tetrathionate sensor reached presence of the target molecules (Extended Data Fig. 9b,c) and even
the highest luminescence values in simulated intestinal fluid (Extended show reversibility (Fig. 3d; ROS sensor).
Data Fig. 8b) and was selected for initial optimization of an integrated To model the complex milieu of the gastrointestinal tract, the inte-
device. Finally, we designed a millimetre-scale capsule printed circuit grated device was also tested in vivo in pig small intestines. Upon induc-
board (PCB) housing a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor tion, luminescence was detected by the custom-designed electronic
(CMOS) bioluminescence detector chip with an integrated photodiode readout circuits in the capsule; the information was wirelessly trans-
array achieving high sensitivity (Fig. 3c). The custom chip integrates mitted in real time from inside the body of the living pig to an external
a threshold-based bioluminescence detector, time-to-digital con- recording device (Fig. 4a–c). This design enabled remote monitoring
verter, voltage references, voltage regulators and four 1 mm × 1 mm of biomolecules in the gut for 4 h, with 70 fA relative photocurrent
CMOS-compatible photodiodes2 (Extended Data Fig. 9a). Besides the detected in the induced compartment, and a baseline of −50 fA from
custom chip, the miniaturized capsule includes a commercial micro- the uninduced control (Fig. 4c and Extended Data Fig. 10a–c). The
controller and wireless transmitter. Bioluminescence from activated receiver operating characteristic of the tetrathionate sensing showed
cells was detected by CMOS-integrated photodiodes located below a detection latency of 1 h and reached a sensitivity and specificity of
each chamber. Custom-designed electronics processed the lumi 100% at 120 min; thus, the miniaturized device can effectively detect
nescence data by periodically sampling the photon-generated charge the target analyte in the harsh intestinal environment (Fig. 4d and
(with a programmable integration time of approximately 26 s). The Extended Data Fig. 10d).
detected luminescence was converted to a digital code by the low-power
luminescence readout chip and transmitted wirelessly for calibration,
display and recording. Discussion
In vitro, with 1 µl of sensor bacteria culture per chamber, the inte- We have built a microbial biosensor that is compatible with ingestion
grated device detected the presence of tetrathionate. We recorded and can sense an array of biomarkers in situ as they are being produced.
125 fA of relative photocurrent produced by the induced tetrathionate This technology can potentially support remote disease management
bacteria sensor, with a baseline of around 0 fA from the uninduced by providing quantitative, real-time and multiplexed information link-
control (Fig. 3c). We next evaluated the performance of the other bacte- ing perturbations in the gastrointestinal tract microbiome to disease.
rial sensors in this optimized, integrated electronic pill. Although the To validate the cell-based biosensors in preclinical disease models,
thiosulfate sensor did not have a luminescence readout compatible we coupled engineered sensing bacteria with a recombinase-based
with the electronics (as expected from the plate reader-based char- memory system. Our memory system records information as soon as
acterization in Extended Data Fig. 8c), the NO and ROS sensors could metabolites are produced in the gut, activating switches within minutes
Extended Data Fig. 1 | Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is mediated by (TS) in the GI tract are mucin-derived cysteine and sulfate, which are metabolized
labile molecules that are not detectable with current technologies. to hydrogen sulfide (H2S)19. During ulceration, epithelial cells and red blood
Following an inflammatory insult, disproportionate mucosal immune responses cells enter the colon; these cells produce enzymes that convert H2S to TS. In the
via cytokine signaling lead to the release of redox-active molecules such as presence of ROS, TS is oxidized to tetrathionate (TT). Consumption of TT and
reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO). The resulting oxidative sulfate allows certain pathogens to establish a foot-hold for infection19,29, evoking
stress inhibits microbial growth in the gut lumen. However, chronic intestinal further immune responses. These mediators of disease are labile and cannot be
inflammation damages the epithelium and destroys the epithelial barrier, measured with existing technology. With only the limited information current
allowing intestinal microbes to invade the mucosa. The sources of thiosulfate approaches provide, breaking this positive feedback loop is challenging.
Extended Data Fig. 2 | See next page for caption.
Article
Extended Data Fig. 2 | Genetic circuit optimization and characterization did not affect growth of bacteria when ON vs. OFF states were compared. d, NO
of incorporated recombinase-based switch. a, Dose-response curves of detection in anaerobiosis. e, Time course of switch activation. The recombinase
NO-sensing genetic circuits in E. coli Nissle 1917. The translational initiation system triggered GFP expression within minutes (5 min for sensor NO Sensor 1
strength of the recombinase Bxb1 was varied by using different computationally and NO Sensor 2, 10 min for NO Sensor 3, and less than 1 min for the ROS sensor)
designed ribosome binding sites (RBS). Predicted RBS strengths are listed in of exposure to the target molecule. f, Correlation of number of cells, time and
the inset. Lower RBS strength led to a higher SNR. b, The memory circuit in the concentration to show the performance of the system, (n = 3 per group). Lines
three NO sensors was stable over multiple rounds of re-growth. Engineered represent the mean. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three independent
bacteria collected in stool were cultured in a selective media to measure NO biological replicates derived from flow cytometry experiments (a–b, d–e), each
detection, and the memory system was validated to ascertain that it accurately of which involved n = 10,000 events.
reflected, over multiple rounds of culturing, the initial input. c, GFP expression
Extended Data Fig. 3 | See next page for caption.
Article
Extended Data Fig. 3 | Multiple specific disease biomarkers detected in of 0.1 mM, 1 mM and 10mM respectively and 1mM for the positive control with
vitro and in vivo. a–c, The bacterial sensors were validated for the ROS H2O2, DETA-NO). In (a and d) lines represent the mean, the errors (SEM) are derived
TS, and TT in vitro (a,d) and in vivo (b–c), following the protocol shown in Fig. 2. from flow cytometry experiments of three representative biological replicates,
In the presence of H2O2, the transcription factor OxyR is oxidized and activated each of which involved n = 10,000 events. In (b-c) individual points represent
in E. coli. To construct a ROS biosensor that detected H2O2, the recombinase independent biological replicates, n = 5 animals per group, and the bars (b),
gene bxb1 was placed under the control of the OxyR-regulated oxyS promoter, **p = 0.0091 (ROS, day 14), *p = 0.0243 (TT, day 10), ***p = 0.0006 (TS, day 6),
oxySp, on the same genetic circuit18 (panel a). To construct the TT and TS and lines (c) show the mean with SEM, **p = 0.0011 (TS, day 6), **p = 0.0029
sensors, we sought to overcome the oxygen repression that can affect Fumarate (ROS, day 10), *p = 0.0126 (ROS, day 14), **p = 0.0053 (TT, day 10), two-way
and Nitrate Reductase Regulator (FNR)-dependent sensors such as the ANOVA for multiple comparisons. e, The NO biosensor was evaluated for its use
previously reported two-component system TtrSR 29. Oxygen levels fluctuate as an NO disease stage detector. NorR, constitutively expressed from a library
in the gut, depending on the level of disruption of the mucosal epithelium. of ribosome-binding sites (RBS), exhibited different NO activation thresholds.
To avoid this cross-repression, we used two newly identified sensors to express Selected NO sensors (Sensor 1, 2, and 3) detected three concentrations (15, 30,
the recombinase system for detecting TS and TT: a TT sensor from Shewanella and 80uM), which could correspond respectively to mild, moderate, and severe
baltica, which does not depend on the FNR system, and the ThsRS sensor from states of inflammation61. Based on the recombinase system described in
Shewanella halifaxensis, the only genetically encoded TS sensor characterized Fig. 2a, flow cytometry was used to measure the percentage of GFP-positive
so far19. Both sensors distinguished their target molecules from other terminal cells at different concentrations of NO. For each point, the mean of three
electron acceptors in vitro19. d, The cross-reactivity of the NorR-engineered biological replicates, each with n = 10,000 flow cytometry events, is plotted.
bacteria was tested against ROS (H2O2), TT and TS in a series of dose-response Error bars are the standard error of the mean (SEM).
curves (series of two-fold dilutions of the inducer with an initial concentration
Extended Data Fig. 4 | See next page for caption.
Article
Extended Data Fig. 4 | In vivo validation of inflammatory biosensors. especially high for mouse #3. ‘DSS” samples, n = 5 and “Control” samples, n = 5.
a, Detection of NO by the NO biosensor as a marker of GI inflammation in vivo *p = 0.0408, **p = 0.0038, two-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons. e, Control
over time, n = 10 animals per group. Data are represented as mean ± SEM, for basal % of GFP+ over 4 days. After six rounds of re-growth of Sensor 1 and
**p = 0.0012 (day 13), ***p = 0.0005 (day 6), ***p = 0.0002 (day 11), ****p < 0.0001 Sensor 2, the background signal of non-induced cells does not continue
(day 9), two-way ANOVA for multiple comparisons. b, Independent validation expanding over time, which validates them for use in animal models. Engineered
of the presence of inflammation in the DSS colitis model by quantifying iNOS bacteria were cultured in a selective media to measure NO detection, and the
expression during DSS treatment, weight loss, and the lipocalin-2 (LCN-2) memory system was validated to ascertain that it accurately reflected, over
biomarker, n = 10 animals per group. Data are represented as mean ± SEM, multiple rounds of culturing (6 rounds, during 4 days) the initial input, n = 3 per
****p < 0.0001, two-tailed unpaired Student’s t test. c, Histological scores of group. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. f, Sensor validation in pigs.
inflammation and necrosis, indicating the validity of the DSS model. Other Experimental design: intestines were clamped to separate the different
indicators were observed but not quantified: bloody and loose stools, poor compartments (control vs. treated), and bacterial sensors were placed in
vigor, anal prolapse, and shortening of the colon upon dissection and gross the different compartments (left panel). All sensors registered significant
morphological examination. Lines represent the mean. Error bars represent activation in the presence of their respective inducers (300 uM H2O2, 30 mM
the SEM of independent biological replicates. d, Antibiotic-triggered redox TS, 3 mM TT, right panel). The bacteria were collected from the intestine after
imbalance measured by the NO sensor. NO Sensor 2 allowed us to detect an two hours of exposure to the analyte, and the percentage of GFP-positive cells
exacerbated inflammatory response after antibiotic treatment (carbenicillin was measured by flow cytometry. Lines represent the mean. The errors (SEM)
and chloramphenicol) in a chronic DSS inflammation model, which implies are derived from flow cytometry experiments of three representative
multiple rounds of DSS treatment. Our biosensor for NO shows an increase of biological replicates, each of which involved n = 10,000 events. Here, we show
NO expression after 4 and 20–30 days of antibiotic treatment in both healthy data of three independent experiments (three animals [M, U, T, K] on different
and DSS-treated mice, with a significant switch activation on day 9 in the days, multiple compartments per animal). ****p < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA for
DSS-treated mice and on day 29 in the chronic DSS inflammation model, multiple comparisons.
Extended Data Fig. 5 | Design and manufacture of a bacteria-electronic pill b, Pill casing manufacturing process. Casing blanks are 3D printed via
casing compatible with ingestion. a, Size comparison of ingestible electronics selective laser sintering (Formlabs) with supports only on the top and bottom
and solid dosage forms with established safety rates. The safety of ingestible face to preserve the thin wall features. The top and bottom faces are then
devices depends, in part, on ensuring that these devices will not damage, sanded to size. The filter membrane is cut to size with a punch and the double-
obstruct, or be retained in the GI tract. The current design was built to conform sided adhesive film is laser cut with through holes aligned to the chambers.
with the dimensions and form factors of solid dosage forms with known safety After pressing these outer layers together, the chambers are filled with
profiles and obstruction/retention rates (Procardia XL)55. Our system integration bacterial suspensions from the inside and sealed off with a thin clear adhesive
at the bacterial, electronics, and pill casing level allowed a significant reduction film to yield the fully sealed bacterial chamber/casing unibody. Scale bar = 5 mm.
in size compared to a previously reported prototype (>9 mL to <1.4 mL)34.
Article
Extended Data Fig. 6 | Validation of semipermeable membranes and of a pill casing protected from low pH ingress, compatible with ingestion. b,
coatings for sealing and protection of on-board bacterial sensors. a, Effect The assembled pill casing/chamber unibody can protect the sensor bacteria
of membrane on analyte diffusion. The porous membranes, when placed in against low pH during stomach transit by inclusion of a film made of an enteric
feces, did not interfere with detection of the target molecules. Fouling of the polymer (L100-55) attached via an adhesive layer (black). c, The enteric film
membrane by faecal matter may pose a problem, so we also screened several hardens after exposure to simulated gastric fluid (SGF), but dissolves away
membrane materials, e.g., polyethersulfone (PES), polycarbonate (PC), and after a brief exposure (< 1 hr) to neutral pH (PBS) allowing the bacteria to be
polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), to find which material allowed the highest exposed to the chemical environment of the small intestine. d, close-up view
diffusion of the analyte molecules across the membrane. Several porous (red, dashed square in panel b) of enteric protected pill casings showing no
membranes were tested in Franz Cells (inset on the right) in the presence membrane fouling after exposure to neutral pH (PBS). e, analysis of internal pH
of feces. All the membranes tested showed similar results, with a similar of fluid inside casing chambers by spotting contents onto pH paper. First two
percentage of detection from the NO bacterial sensors after the analyte rows are control spots of the indicated fluids. Last two rows are spots from
had passed through the membrane. The errors (SEM) are derived from flow three chambers each from a protected or un-protected pill casing exposed to
cytometry experiments of three representative biological replicates, each simulated gastric fluid (SGF) for 18 h. Bottom legend indicates corresponding
of which involved n = 10,000 events. b–e, Manufacturing and performance pH of the resulting color change.
Extended Data Fig. 7 | Enteric-protected pill casings preserve viability and of individual replicate chambers. N = 8 (4 chambers x 2 pill casings), Multiple
luminescence of on-board bacterial sensors through simulated ingestion. unpaired t-tests (two-tailed), *p = 0.0253 (unprotected), *p = 0.0195 (free cells),
a, Un-protected or enteric-protected pill casings were loaded with constitutively (ns) not significant. c, At end of exposure, the luminescence of the same chambers
luminescent bacterial cells and exposed to simulated intestinal fluid (SIF only, was also recorded (BioRad, ChemiDoc) from the inner side of the casings through
blue) or simulated ingestion with a 1-hour exposure to pH 1.2 simulated gastric the optically clear backing film. Total chamber luminescence was quantified
fluid (SGF+SIF) at 37 C. b, At end of exposure the internal chamber contents (FIJI, Image J) and divided by the total chamber colony forming units (CFU)
were extracted and viability was measured through serial dilution and colony from panel b. The limit of detection (LOD) was set at 2.5x the standard deviation
counting. As a control, an equivalent number of cells was directly resuspended of the background signal divided by the largest viability value observed. Values
in the exposure fluids (free cells) and pelleted between treatments. The viability below the LOD were set equal to the LOD and all values were normalized to set
of the common cell stock used to load the pill casings and for the free cell control the LOD = 1. Geometric mean and geometric 95% confidence intervals are
was kept refrigerated during the exposures and its viability was also measured. plotted on top of individual replicate chambers. N = 8 (4 chambers x 2 pill
Geometric mean and geometric 95% confidence intervals are plotted on top casings). d, Images used for luminescence quantification in panel c.
Article
Extended Data Fig. 8 | Kinetic response of the inflammatory biosensors values were measured thirty minutes to two hours post-exposure to the inducer
with the luciferase readout. a–b, E. coli Nissle biosensors were treated and normalized to the optical density of the culture. Lines represent the mean.
with their target analytes in LB (a) or in simulated intestinal fluid (b). The Error bars represent the SEM of three independent biological experiments.
luminescence response was measured in a plate reader every 3 min for 10 h. The d, Nitric oxide (NO) detection and luciferase expression in anaerobiosis,
signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated by dividing the OD600-normalized replicating the gut environment. Luminescence values were measured
luminescence values induced by the OD600-normalized luminescence values aerobically in a plate reader after overnight aerobic or anaerobic growth and
of uninduced samples. c, Response curve of the inflammatory biosensors with exposure to the inducer (DETA-NO 1mM) and normalized to the optical density
the luciferase readout. E. coli Nissle inflammatory sensor strains were treated of the culture. Lines represent the mean. Error bars denote the SEM for three
with various concentrations of their target analytes; maximal luminescence independent biological replicates.
Extended Data Fig. 9 | Electronic design and in vitro validation of the characterization of the device for miniaturized wireless sensing of NO and
integrated bacterial-electronic pill. a, Schematic of the miniaturized capsule ROS with cell-based biosensors. Wireless signal over time from the NO (b) and
PCB. The custom bioluminescence detector IC was fabricated in 65 nm CMOS ROS (c) sensors encapsulated in the device and immersed in bacterial growth
technology2. The top PCB holds the custom-designed multi-channel and media supplemented with 5 mM and 20 mM, respectively. Low-power CMOS-
time-multiplexed bioluminescence detector, a 6.8 mm x 2.1 mm coin-cell integrated photodiodes converted bioluminescence emitted from the
battery, two 220 µF decoupling capacitors, and an 8-position female connector. bacterial sensor into a photocurrent, which was converted into quantifiable
The bottom PCB holds a microcontroller with an integrated transmitter, digital data and transmitted wirelessly to the external device. Lines represent
a crystal oscillator, an 8-position male connector, an antenna and other the mean, and error bars denote the SEM for three independent replicates,
components for wireless data transmission. The components on the top conducted with one induced device (NO or ROS) and one uninduced device
and bottom PCB communicate through the two connectors. b–c, In vitro (Buffer); Rel. photocurrent, Relative Photocurrent.
Article
Extended Data Fig. 10 | In vivo validation of the integrated bacterial- c, Comparison of light detection between different chambers. E. coli Nissle
electronic pill. a,b, Individual replicates of TT sensing in the pig intestinal strains containing a functional biosensor circuit for TT detection (TT sensor),
environment. The devices with the TT sensor were deposited in the intestinal and E coli Nissle without the gene for luciferase (null sensor) were loaded into
compartments and TT (100 mM, blue) or buffer alone (black) were injected the device. Devices were deposited in the intestine compartments and after
after temperature stabilization (~15 min, 37 °C). Readings from the device temperature stabilization (~15 min), TT (100 mM, blue) or buffer alone (black)
were wirelessly collected for 120 min following device deposition. Dark trace were injected. Compartmentalized intestines were kept inside the abdomen, at
represents the mean of 3 replicates measurements (3 animals on different days, 37 °C, and wireless signals transmitted from inside the abdomen were collected
2 devices per pig, in two different compartments) and pale traces indicate for 120 min to analyze the kinetic response of the devices in the abdominal
the individual current values for a given device (two channels measured per cavity of the pig. Photocurrents provided relative to a one-time calibration
device). Photocurrents are provided relative to a one-time calibration value at value at t = 15 min. Non-induced sensor cells (black lines) decrease their
t = 15 min. Non-induced sensor cells (black lines) decrease their luminescence luminescence output throughout the experiment (as shown when tested in
output throughout the experiment (as shown in vitro, tested in simulated simulated intestinal fluid, Extended Data Fig. 8b), while induced cells express
intestinal fluid, Extended Data Fig. 8b), while induced cells express higher higher levels of luciferase compensating signal loss over time. The response of
levels of luciferase, compensating signal loss over time. For all the replicates, the device placed in the compartment with TT was clearly distinguishable from
the response of the device placed in the compartment with TT was clearly that of the device in the compartment with the buffer control. Null cells (light
distinguishable from that of the device in the compartment with the buffer blue and grey traces) maintain constant values throughout. Error bars denote
control. b, For clarity, individual photocurrent values corresponding to SEM for three experiments (3 animals on different days, 2 capsules per animal).
different time points (15, 30, 60 and 120 min) for n = 3 or n = 5 samples for d, Validation of the whole integrated device for miniaturized wireless
different set of conditions, including: TT sensor + TT, null sensor + TT, null biosensing in living pigs over time. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC)
sensor + buffer and TT sensor + buffer. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. of the device sensing TT reached a sensitivity and specificity of 100% at 120 min.