IPC M4 Safety
IPC M4 Safety
Infection
Prevention
and Control.
Module 4. Patient and Health Care Worker Safety
Authors
Melanie S. Curless, MPH, RN, CIC
Patricia Lawson, MS, MPH, RN, CIC
Clare Rock, MD, MS
The authors have made every effort to check the accuracy of all information, the dosages of any drugs, and
instructions for use of any devices or equipment. Because the science of infection prevention and control is rapidly
advancing and the knowledge base continues to expand, readers are advised to check current product information
provided by the manufacturer of:
• Each drug, to verify the recommended dose, method of administration, and precautions for use
• Each device, instrument, or piece of equipment to verify recommendations for use and/or operating
instructions
In addition, all forms, instructions, checklists, guidelines, and examples are intended as resources to be used and
adapted to meet national and local health care settings’ needs and requirements. Finally, neither the authors,
editors, nor the Jhpiego Corporation assume liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising
from this publication.
Jhpiego is a nonprofit global leader in the creation and delivery of transformative health care solutions that save lives.
In partnership with national governments, health experts, and local communities, we build health providers’ skills,
and we develop systems that save lives now and guarantee healthier futures for women and their families. Our
aim is revolutionizing health care for the planet’s most disadvantaged people.
Jhpiego Corporation
Brown’s Wharf
1615 Thames Street
Baltimore, MD 21231-3492, USA
www.jhpiego.org
Key Terms
Administrative controls, also known as “work practice controls,” are changes in work procedures
such as written policies, rules, protocols, supervision, schedules, and training, with the goal of
reducing the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to hazardous situations and substances
(e.g., blood, body fluids, chemicals).
Bloodborne pathogens are infectious microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, and other microorganisms)
contained in blood and other potentially infectious body fluids (including urine, respiratory
secretions, cerebrospinal, peritoneal, pleural, pericardial, and synovial amniotic fluids, semen,
vaginal secretions, breast milk, and saliva). The pathogens of primary concern are hepatitis B virus
(HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV.
Health care worker (HCW), in this manual, is someone who works in a health care facility and
provides health care and services to people, either directly or indirectly as a clinician, nurse,
midwife, aide, helper, laboratory or x-ray technician, cleaner, or waste handler.
Multi-dose vial is a vial of liquid medication intended for parenteral administration (injection or
infusion) that the manufacturer has prepared to contain more than one dose of a medication. Multi-
dose vials are labeled as such by the manufacturer and typically contain an antimicrobial
preservative to help prevent the growth of bacteria. The preservative has no effect on viruses and
does not protect against contamination when HCWs fail to follow safe injection practices.
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a preventive medical treatment for which a person may qualify
following potential exposure to a disease-causing pathogen, such as a HIV or HBV, to prevent
becoming infected.
Safe injection is one that does not harm the recipient, does not expose the HCW to any avoidable
risks, and does not result in waste that is dangerous for the community.
Sharps are instruments, needles, and any other objects that can easily penetrate through the skin.
Sharps injuries are injuries from a “sharp” penetrating the skin. “Sharps” include syringe needles,
scalpels, broken glass, and other objects that may be contaminated with blood or body fluids. These
injuries potentially expose HCWs to infections from bloodborne pathogens.
Sharps injury prevention strategies are measures taken to prevent injuries while handling sharps.
These measures include elimination of hazards and the use of engineering controls, administrative
controls, work space practices, and personal protective equipment.
Single-use or single-dose vial is a vial of liquid medication intended for parenteral administration
(injection or infusion) that is meant for use in a single patient for a single case/procedure/injection.
Single-use or single-dose vials are labeled as such by the manufacturer and do not contain
antimicrobial preservative.
Standard Precautions are a set of infection control practices used for every patient encounter to
reduce the risk of transmission of bloodborne and other pathogens from both recognized and
unrecognized sources. They are the basic level of infection control practices to be used, at a
minimum, in preventing the spread of infectious agents to all individuals in the health care facility.
Background
The goal of safe health care services is to protect HCWs, patients, and the community from harm,
including exposure to infection. Unsafe injection practices put patients at increased risk of infection and
other hazards. Additionally, inappropriate handling of syringes and needles puts HCWs, patients,
visitors, and the community at increased risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens. Safe injection
practices, which are a component of Standard Precautions, include using a new, single-use disposable
syringe and needle for each patient, using single-use vials for only one patient, and managing multi-dose
vials correctly.
Risk to Patients
Unsafe injections can result in transmission of a wide variety of pathogens, including viruses, bacteria,
fungi, and parasites. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that in low- and middle-income
countries, 16 billion health care injections are administered each year, translating to approximately
three injections per person per year, many of which are unnecessary. Reuse of syringes or needles,
which is common in many settings, exposes patients to pathogens either directly (via contaminated
equipment) or indirectly (via contaminated medication vials). The risks of unsafe injection practices have
been well-documented for the three primary bloodborne pathogens: HIV, HBV, and HCV. Worldwide,
each year, the overuse of injections and unsafe injection practices combine to cause an estimated:
8–16 million HBV infections
2.3–4.7 million HCV infections
80,000–160,000 HIV infections
(Hutin et al. 2003; Wilburn and Eijkemans 2007; WHO 2015)
Both patients and HCWs are at risk of bloodborne disease from unsafe injection practices. Eliminating
unnecessary injections and using safe injection practices are the best ways to protect patients and staff
from the risks.
Multi-Dose Vials
Multi-dose vials are vials of liquid medication intended for parenteral administration (injection or
infusion) that contain more than one dose of a medication. Multi-dose vials are labeled as such by the
manufacturer and typically contain an antimicrobial preservative to help prevent the growth of bacteria.
The preservative has no effect on viruses and does not protect against contamination when HCWs do
not follow safe injection practices. Thimerosal, a mercury-containing compound, has been used as a
preservative in multi-dose vials including vaccines since 1930. It has antiseptic and antifungal properties.
Thimerosal does not have antiviral activity.
There are many documented incidences of contamination of injection vials due to improper practices in
settings with all levels of resources. In a study at a Brazilian teaching hospital, the overall microbial
contamination rate was 5.36%; the highest rate—14.28%—was found in vials used in the interventional
bronchoscopy unit. (Baniasadi et al. 2013)
In a study on isolation of HIV-1 from experimentally contaminated multi-dose local anesthetic vials, it
was observed that needles and syringes retained small volumes of fluid after use (mean, 25 microL; in
syringe alone, mean 16 microL), which could be transferred to multi-dose vials of local anesthetic. A 10-
mL vial of anesthetic solution contaminated with 8 microL of HIV-infected solution (equivalent to 1%
infected lymphocytes in vivo) contained active virus 1 hour later and, in some settings, HIV could be
isolated 4 hours after exposure. The authors demonstrated that multi-dose vials could be a potential
source of transmissible virus and cause inadvertent contamination with HIV. (Druce et al. 1995)
Single-Use Vials
Single-use vials are vials of liquid medication intended for parenteral administration (injection or
infusion) that are meant for use in a single patient for a single procedure or injection. They are labeled
as “single-use” or “single-dose” or “preservative-free” by the manufacturer and lack an antimicrobial
preservative. Using vials designed for single patient doses for more than one patient increases the risk of
infection. The risk for contamination of the vial is the same as described above for multi-dose vials, with
the added risk of the lack antimicrobial preservatives, which increases the vial’s chances of
contamination and becoming a source of infection. (See Table 1-1.)
they are difficult to clean and sterilize adequately (tiny lumens of the needles cannot be adequately
cleaned and syringes are prone to melt at high temperatures). Pathogens may remain after
reprocessing. It is no longer acceptable to reprocess needles and syringes for injection.
Needles, syringes, and single-use and multi-dose vials can become transmission routes for infection if
infection prevention and control (IPC) practices are not followed.
Even if a new needle is attached, when this syringe is used on subsequent patients, patients can become
infected with bloodborne pathogens from contamination within the syringe. Even if a new needle and
new syringe are used for subsequent patients, they can become infected with bloodborne pathogens
from the contaminated liquid in the vial. Figure 1-1 shows the pathway of transmission of bloodborne
pathogens, in this case HCV, via unsafe injection practices.
Adequate Supply of Safe Injection Devices (Single-Use Disposable Needles and Syringes)
Re-processing of needles and/or syringes is no longer acceptable. This practice should be halted
immediately. Providing sufficient single-use disposable injection devices should be a priority and facility
resources should be prioritized accordingly.
Double-check the expiration date and if the vial has previously been opened, the current date is
within 24 hours of opening (unless a shorter or longer time frame is otherwise specified by the
manufacturer).
Follow the principle of one syringe, one needle, one time.
Discard the single-use vial after use.
Discard a single-use vial:
> If sterility or content is compromised
> If the expiry date or time has passed
> If found to be undated, improperly stored, inadvertently contaminated, perceived to be
contaminated, or already punctured, regardless of expiration date
When using multi-dose vials:
If a multi-dose vial is assigned to a single patient (e.g., insulin pen), check that you have the right
vial for the patient.
Double-check the expiration date and if previously opened, check that the vial is labeled by the
manufacturer as a multi-dose vial and the current date is within 28 days of opening, unless a
shorter or longer time frame is otherwise specified by the manufacturer.
Follow the principle of one syringe, one needle, one time.
When withdrawing medication from a multi-dose vial, avoid double dipping, which may
contaminate the contents of the vial and transmit infection to subsequent patients. See the
Needles and Syringes section in this chapter.
If newly opened, label the multi-dose vial. See the Labeling section in this chapter.
DO NOT store multi-dose vials in patient care areas, where they could be inadvertently
contaminated.
Discard a multi-dose vial:
If sterility or content is compromised
If the expiry date or time has passed (even if the vial contains antimicrobial preservatives)
If it is not properly stored after opening, or within 28 days of opening, unless a shorter or longer
time frame is otherwise specified by the manufacturer, or follow the manufacturer’s
instructions for the time the vial can be used once opened
If found to be undated, improperly stored, inadvertently contaminated, perceived to be
contaminated, or has a visible hole in the rubber septum, regardless of expiration date, if
thought to be a single-use rather than multi-dose vial
Reconstitution
Always use a sterile syringe and a sterile needle to withdraw the reconstitution solution from an
ampoule or a vial, insert the needle into the rubber septum in the single- or multi-dose vial, and
inject the necessary amount of reconstitution fluid.
Remove the needle and syringe and discard them immediately as a single unit into a sharps
container.
Mix the contents of the vial thoroughly until all visible particles have dissolved.
Delay in administration
If a dose has been withdrawn into a syringe and cannot be administered immediately for any
reason, cover the needle with the cap using a one-handed scoop technique. Do not keep the
medication longer than 24 hours unless a shorter or longer time frame is otherwise specified by the
manufacturer. Inject the medication as soon as possible after withdrawing from the vial. See the
section on labeling in this chapter.
(WHO 2010)
Labeling
After reconstitution of a vaccine or medication in a multi-dose vial (e.g., BCG vaccine), label the vial and
the final medication container with:
Date and time of preparation
For multi-dose medications that DO NOT require reconstitution (e.g., lignocaine), label the container
with:
Date and time of first piercing of the vial
Expiry date and time after reconstitution
Name and signature of the person first piercing the vial
Wipe the top of the vial with 70% alcohol (isopropyl alcohol or ethanol) using a swab or cotton-
wool ball. Allow it to dry.
Open the package in front of the patient to reassure the person that the syringe and needle
have not been used previously.
Use a sterile syringe and needle to withdraw the medication from the ampoule or vial.
Important points
DO NOT allow the needle to touch any contaminated surface.
DO NOT reuse a syringe, even if the needle has been changed.
DO NOT touch the rubber septum after disinfection with the 70% alcohol (isopropyl alcohol or
ethanol).
DO NOT re-enter a multi-dose vial with the same needle used for mixing or reconstituting
medications.
DO NOT re-enter a vial with a needle or syringe used on a patient if that vial will be used to
withdraw medication again (whether it is for the same patient or for another patient).
DO NOT use bags or bottles of intravenous solution as a common source of supply for injections
(e.g., normal saline flushes) for multiple patients. These are not manufactured as multi-dose and do
not have any preservative (see Table 1-1).
1. Place the cap on a flat surface, then remove your hand from the
cap. With one hand, hold the syringe and use the needle to
scoop up the cap.
2. When the cap covers the needle completely, use your other
hand to secure the cap on the needle hub. Handle the cap at the
bottom, near the hub.
Discard used sharps and glass ampoules into a leak- and puncture-resistant sharps container
immediately after use in the location where they were used.
Place the sharps container within arm’s reach to allow for easy disposal of sharps.
Seal and replace the sharps container when it is three-quarters full. Be sure that no sharp items are
sticking out of the container.
Summary
Injections present risks to patients, HCWs, and the community and should be limited where alternative
administration routes are available. Safe injection practices are one of the components of Standard
Precautions. A safe injection is one that does not harm the recipient, does not expose the HCW to any
avoidable risks, and does not result in waste that is dangerous for the community (Rapiti et al.
2005). Safe injection practices include the proper use of single-use and multi-dose vials. It is the
responsibility of each HCW to ensure safe injection practices for every patient.
References
Baniasadi S, et al. 2013. Microbial contamination of single-and multiple-dose vials after opening in a
pulmonary teaching hospital. Braz J of Infect Dis. 17(1):69–73.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2008. Acute hepatitis C virus infections attributed to
unsafe injection practices at an endoscopy clinic—Nevada, 2007. MMWR. 57:513–517.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5719a2.htm.
CDC. 2010. Stop Sticks Campaign. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/stopsticks/sharpsdisposal.html.
CDC. 2015. Injection Safety: The One & Only Campaign.
http://www.cdc.gov/injectionsafety/1anOnly.html.
CDC. n.d. Injection Safety: What Every Healthcare Provider Needs to Know.
https://www.cdc.gov/winnablebattles/HealthcareAssociatedInfections/pdf/One_and_Only_Campaign_P
roviderBrochure.pdf.
DeGirolamo KM, Courtemanche DJ, Hill WD, Kennedy A, Skarsgard ED. 2013. Use of safety scalpels and
other safety practices to reduce sharps injury in the operating room: what is the evidence? Can J Surg.
56(4):263–269.
Doyle GR, McCutcheon JA. 2015. Clinical Procedures for Safer Patient Care. Vancouver, Canada: British
Columbia Institute of Technology. https://opentextbc.ca/clinicalskills/chapter/safe-injection-
administration-and-preparing-medication-from-ampules-and-vials/.
Druce JD, et al. 1995. Isolation of HIV-1 from experimentally contaminated multi-dose local anesthetic
vials. Med J Aust. 162(10):513–515.
Hanafi MI, et al. 2011. Needle stick injuries among healthcare workers of University of Alexandria
hospitals. East Mediterr Health J. 17(1).
Health Protection Agency. 2005. Eye of the Needle: Surveillance of Significant Occupational Exposure to
Blood-borne Viruses in Healthcare Personnel. London, England: Health Protection Agency.
Hutin YJ, Hauri AM, Armstrong GL. 2003. Use of injections in healthcare settings worldwide, 2000:
literature review and regional estimates. BMJ. 327(7423):1075.
http://www.bmj.com/content/327/7423/1075.long.
http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/81/7/en/Hutin0703.pdf.
Motamedifar M, et al. 2009. The prevalence of multi-dose vial contamination by aerobic bacteria in
major teaching hospital, Shiraz, Iran 2006. Am J Infect Control. 37(9):773–777.
Perry J, Jagger J. 2003. EPINet data report: injuries from phlebotomy needles. Adv Expos Prev. 6(4):43–
45.
Prüss-Üstün A, Rapiti E, Hutin Y. 2005. Estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to
contaminated sharps injuries among health-care workers. Am J Ind Med. 48(6):482–490.
http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/global/7sharps.pdf.
Rapiti E, Prüss-Üstün A, Hutin Y. 2005. Sharps Injuries: Assessing the Burden of Disease from Sharps
Injuries to Health-Care Workers at National and Local Levels. WHO Environmental Burden of Disease
Series, No. 11. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/ebd11.pdf?ua=1.
Tietjen L, Bossemeyer D, McIntosh N. 2003. Infection Prevention: Guidelines for Healthcare Facilities
with Limited Resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego.
Wilburn S, Eijkemans G. 2007. Protecting health workers from occupational exposure to HIV, hepatitis,
and other bloodborne pathogens: from research to practice. Asian-Pac Newsl Occup Health Safety.
13:8–12.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2005. Sharps Injuries: Assessing the Burden of Disease from Sharps
Injuries to Health-Care Workers at National and Local Levels. Environmental Burden of Disease Series,
No. 11. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/ebd11.pdf?ua=1.
WHO. 2006. Protecting Healthcare Workers: Preventing Needlestick Injuries Toolkit. Geneva,
Switzerland: WHO. http://www.who.int/occupational_health/activities/pnitoolkit/en/.
WHO. 2010. WHO Best Practices for Injections and Related Procedures Toolkit. Geneva, Switzerland:
WHO. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44298/1/9789241599252_eng.pdf.
WHO. 2014. Guidelines on Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV and the Use of Co-Trimoxazole Prophylaxis
for HIV-Related Infections among Adults, Adolescents and Children Recommendations for a Public Health
Approach. December 2014 Supplement to the 2013 Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of Antiretroviral
Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/145719/1/9789241508193_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1.
WHO. 2015. Aide-Memoire for a National Strategy for the Safe and Appropriate Use of Injections.
Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. http://www.who.int/infection-prevention/tools/injections/AideMemoire-
injection-safety.pdf.
WHO. 2016. Injection Safety; Questions and Answers. http://www.who.int/infection-
prevention/publications/is_questions-answers.pdf?ua=1.
WHO. 2017. Injection Safety Tools and Resources. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. http://who.int/infection-
prevention/tools/injections/communications/en/.
Key Terms
Health care worker (HCW), in this manual, is someone who works in a health care facility and
provides health care and services to people, either directly or indirectly as a clinician, nurse,
midwife, aide, helper, laboratory or x-ray technician, cleaner, or waste handler.
Occupational exposure is an exposure of an HCW to an infection while providing care and treatment
services to patients in a health care facility.
Occupational health is the discipline that deals with all aspects of work-related health and safety
and has a strong focus on prevention; it is known also as employee health.
Occupational health activities include all aspects of work-related health and safety activities,
including prevention. In this chapter, the term refers in particular to activities that address infectious
hazards at health care facilities.
Occupational health surveillance is the collection, analysis, and dissemination of data on hazards
that have endangered or may endanger HCWs.
Occupational infection is an infection contracted as a result of an exposure to risk factors arising
from work activity.
Sharps injuries are injuries from a “sharp” penetrating the skin. “Sharps” include syringe needles,
scalpels, broken glass, and other objects that may be contaminated with blood or body fluids. These
injuries potentially expose HCWs to infections from bloodborne pathogens.
Vaccine-preventable diseases are infectious diseases for which effective vaccines are available.
They include but are not limited to hepatitis A and B, influenza, measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus,
diphtheria, pertussis, and varicella (chicken pox).
Background
Health care facilities around the world employ over 59 million workers who are routinely exposed to a
variety of health and safety risks (WHO 2016a). These risks include exposure to infectious agents such as
bloodborne pathogens, tuberculosis (TB), viral respiratory infections, vaccine-preventable diseases,
bacterial infections, and gastrointestinal infections, among others. If an infection is contracted as a
result of an exposure to risk factors arising from work activity, it is known as an occupational infection.
In general, HCWs who have contact with patients, body fluids, or specimens have a higher risk of
acquiring or transmitting infections than those who have casual contact with patients and the health
care environment.
Occupational exposures to sharps injuries are an example of the substantial impact of occupational
infections among HCWs. It is estimated that 39% of hepatitis C virus (HCV), 37% of hepatitis B virus
(HBV), and 4.4% of HIV infections among HCWs worldwide are attributable to occupational exposure
due to sharps injuries. This amounts to an estimate of 16,000 HCV, 66,000 HBV, and 1,000 HIV
occupational infections annually (Prüss-Üstün et al. 2005). It is thought that more than 90% of these are
in limited-resource countries. (IFIC 2003)
It is notable that infection with HBV is 95% preventable with immunization, and the HBV vaccine has
contributed to a significant reduction of HBV in HCWs. However, less than 20% of HCWs in some regions
of the world have received all three doses of vaccine needed for immunity from HBV infection. (APIC
2014a; IFIC 2003)
In general, occupational health deals with all aspects of work-related health and safety and has a strong
focus on prevention, especially for infectious (such as disease exposures) and non-infectious risks (such
as injury). The goals of infection prevention and control (IPC) intersect with those of occupational health
in preventing and addressing infectious hazards at health care facilities. Therefore, a large portion of
occupational health activities at a health care facility are also IPC activities. (APIC 2014a)
Although the actual risk of infectious exposure for HCWs depends somewhat upon the job description
and the setting, attention to IPC helps protect staff and patients in all settings. Emerging infectious
disease outbreaks, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003, Middle Eastern
respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012, and Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in 2014, have
highlighted the importance of IPC in protecting HCWs, as transmission of these viruses to HCWs
occurred when they cared for infected patients. These outbreaks have demonstrated that strategies to
protect HCWs from exposure to infectious risks in the workplace are critically important and that
facilities must have the infrastructure in place to be able to adapt to changes in emerging infectious
threats. Health care facilities need staff knowledgeable in IPC to conduct and support sound
occupational health activities to minimize the risk of occupational infection in HCWs and provide a safe
environment for patients and staff. (APIC 2014a; WHO 2016a; WHO 2016c)
Protection from acquiring infections through occupational exposure is critical to maintaining and
retaining an adequate workforce of trained and healthy HCWs. Protecting HCWs also helps to contain
costs associated with absenteeism, illness, and attrition as a result of incapacity, death, and fear. In
addition, occupational health activities protect patients through prevention, early identification, and
control of infections among staff. Therefore, protecting HCWs is integral to maintaining a safe
environment for both patients and staff.
Aspects of occupational health should be included in any IPC program; the World Health Organization’s
(WHO’s) (2016c) Core Components of IPC emphasize the importance of collaboration between
occupational health/employee safety activities and the IPC program (CDC 1998; WHO 2016a; WHO
2016c).
It is ideal to have an occupational health department and program in a larger health care facility,
depending on the size of the facility and available staffing. In smaller health care facilities, the IPC team
or other appropriate staff may carry out occupational health activities. All occupational health programs
should be coordinated and overseen by a trained health care professional or team who hold the
responsibility for ensuring that all of the program activities, including IPC aspects are conducted.
A responsible person from various departments, which could include human resources, IPC, outpatient
clinics, administration, and the laboratory, should work in a coordinated manner to implement
occupational health activities such as efficient and prompt screening, immunization, and follow-up of
exposures and outbreaks among HCWs.
Activities that should be implemented by staff responsible for occupational health can be divided into
the following categories:
For newly employed HCWs (see Table 2-1)
For all HCWs on an ongoing basis (see Table 2-2)
Facility-wide activities (see Table 2-3)
Post-exposure • Follow up immediately those HCWs with job-related exposures and make decisions
follow-up
about work restrictions and post-exposure care (see Appendix 2-A for disease-
specific work restrictions). See the Occupational Health Activities for Management
of Job-Related Illnesses and Occupational Exposures section in this chapter.
Vaccination • Organize vaccination sessions for those staff who need to complete vaccinations
according to national/facility recommendations.
Adapted from: World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations for Routine Immunization-Summary Tables.
Table 4, Summary of WHO Position Papers-Immunization of Health Care Workers. Updated 2015. © World Health
Organization.
Table 2-5. Occupational Health Activities for Management of Job-Related Illnesses and Exposures
Activity Key Occupational Health Activities: Job-Related Illnesses and Exposures
Infectious • Identify infections in HCWs (whether community-acquired or job-related).
disease in HCWs
• Make decisions about the length and type of work restrictions (related to patient care or
food handling) and assignment to other duties (see Appendix 2-A).
• Report to public health authorities if it is a notifiable disease of public health interest.
Sentinel • Suspect a job-related infection in an HCW with an infectious disease known to spread in
infections in health care facilities. Certain occupational infections may be the result of caring for
HCWs patients with an unidentified infection (such as meningococcal meningitis or novel
influenza) or may indicate IPC lapses at the facility. (See Appendix 2-A for disease-
specific risk of transmission to and from HCWs.)
• Ensure infections are managed following clinical guidelines and make decisions about
the length and type of work restrictions (as above).
• Take necessary measures to prevent further spread of the infection through
investigation of possible routes of transmission in the facility and correct any lapses in
IPC.
• Identify and facilitate clinical management and work restrictions of those exposed.
• Monitor closely for additional cases (indicating a hospital or community outbreak).
Post-exposure • Determine what is considered an exposure (exposure definition).
follow-up
• Obtain a list of those who have been exposed.
• Counsel those exposed.
• Offer PEP promptly when appropriate and available.
• Determine any work restrictions.
• Conduct medical surveillance for development of disease.
• Determine when the HCW can return to work.
• Maintain adequate and confidential documentation on the event.
• Coordinate all of the above and any other activities such as ongoing monitoring or
follow-up lab testing.
(See Chapter 3, Sharps Injuries and Management of Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens,
in this module for more information on post-exposure management for HBV, HCV, and
HIV and Appendix 2-A for disease-specific guidance for management of exposed HCWs.)
Counseling on protection from and management of accidental exposure to bloodborne and other
infectious pathogens
Maintenance of personnel health records
(APIC 2014a; CDC 1998; WHO 2002)
Prevention Strategies for Infections Relevant to Occupational Health in Health Care Facilities
Prevent occupational exposure of HCWs by the application of Standard Precautions for all patients,
at all times, as well as disease- or syndrome-specific Transmission-Based Precautions, to prevent
exposures to infectious agents. (See Module 1, Chapter 2, Standard and Transmission-Based
Precautions.)
Protect against vaccine-preventable diseases: Having a mandatory program that requires all HCWs
to receive vaccines to protect themselves against vaccine-preventable diseases has been found to
be more effective than a voluntary program in ensuring that all susceptible staff are vaccinated. In
settings with limited resources, priority should be given to staff who are at high risk of exposure and
those without any existing immunity. Select the vaccines that may provide the most protective
effects, such as hepatitis B or influenza.
Manage occupational exposures following the national guidelines (e.g., national guidelines for
management of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids) (Refer to Chapter 3, Sharps Injuries
and Management of Exposure to Bloodborne Pathogens, in this module for post-exposure
management of HBV, HCV, and HIV and Appendix 2-A for disease-specific guidance for management
of exposed HCWs.)
Keep up to date by seeking additional information on specific diseases and local epidemiology:
Details on specific, key infections relevant to limited-resource settings can be found in Appendix 2-A.
Table 2-6. Infectious Agents of Concern for Pregnant HCWs According to the Risk of Transmission Associated
with Providing Health Care Services and Available Preventive Measures
However, as in the case of non-pregnant HCWs, non-immune pregnant HCWs should not care for
patients with measles, rubella, and varicella (APIC 2014b). Table 2-7 provides information on
occupational exposure to infection among pregnant HCWs, risks to their babies, and prevention
strategies. The information provided in the table will guide the occupational health team members in
making appropriate decisions. Table 2-7 describes additional pertinent facts to assist with management
of relevant occupational exposures in pregnant HCWs.
In settings where adequate infection control precautions (including PPE) are available and
immunizations for vaccine-preventable diseases are maintained, there are few instances in which
pregnant HCWs cannot provide the same care as their non-pregnant colleagues; they should not
routinely be restricted from duties on the basis of pregnancy status. However, pregnant HCWs should
not care for patients with parvovirus B16 and certain vaccine-preventable diseases if they are non-
immune. At times of PPE and vaccine shortage, assign pregnant HCWs to other tasks with no risk for
exposure to infectious agents. (APIC 2014b; CDC 2013)
Table 2-7. Management of Occupational Exposure to Common Infections for Pregnant Staff Members
HIV Blood, body fluids No congenital syndrome; if Depends on HIV viral Routine maternal Antiretroviral chemoprophylxis available
fetus infected, AIDS in 2–4 titer and use of ART screening advised for exposures, postnatal/breastfeeding
years If titer < 1,000 virus; If exposed, testing at 3, chemoprophylaxis for HIV+ mothers and
rate 2% 6, and 12 months their infants.
If titer ≥ 10,000; rate Standard Precautions
up to 25%
Influenza Sneezing and coughing, No congenital syndrome: Rare None Non-live vaccine (such as trivalent
respiratory tract influenza in mother could inactivated) for all pregnant HCW during
secretions cause hypoxia in fetus influenza season.
Droplet Precautions
Measles Respiratory secretion, Prematurity, spontaneous Rare Antibody test Vaccine contraindicated during pregnancy.
(rubeola) coughing abortion, no congenital Vaccination recommended prior to
syndrome conception.
Airborne Precautions
Neisseria Respiratory secretion Sepsis Unknown None Chemoprophylaxis with ceftriaxone or
meningitidis of untreated patients No congenital syndrome azithromycin
or those patients who Vaccine if indicated for outbreak control
have received Droplet Precautions, based on syndrome
antimicrobials for and for confirmed cases.
< 24 hours Standard Precautions, especially mask, face
protection for all intubations
Rubella Respiratory secretions Congenital syndrome 90% in first trimester Routine rubella IgG Vaccine contraindicated during pregnancy.
40–50% overall testing in pregnancy Vaccine prior to conception
Preconception screening No congenital rubella syndrome described
recommended for vaccine
Droplet Precautions; Contact Precautions
for contact with congenital rubella
patients.
Syphilis Blood, lesion, fluid, Congenital syndrome Variable 10–90%, VDRL RPR Post-exposure prophylaxis with penicillin
amniotic fluid depends on stage of FTA-ABS Standard Precautions, gloves until 24 hours
maternal disease and of effective therapy completed for infants
trimester of the with congenital syphilis and all patients
infection with skin and mucous membrane lesions
Tuberculosis Sputum, skin lesions Neonatal TB; liver most Rare TB skin test Post-exposure prevention
(TB) frequently infected Interferon recommendations vary with tuberculin skin
gamma-release assay test reaction size and chest radiograph
(IGRA) blood test; if result.
available. Chest Airborne Precautions
radiograph
Varicella-zoster Droplet or airborne Malformations (skin, limb, Total 25%: congenital Antibody Vaccine contraindicated during pregnancy.
spread of vesicle fluid central nervous system, eye); syndrome Vaccine prior to conception
or secretions of the chicken pox (0–4%) Varicella-zoster immune globulin within 96
respiratory tract (scabs hours’ exposure if susceptible
are not infective) Airborne and Contact Precautions
*Congenital syndrome: varying combinations of jaundice, hepatosplenomegaly, microcephaly, thrombocytopenia, anemia, retinopathy, and skin and bone lesions.
FTA-ABS = fluorescent treponemal absorption test; HbsAg = hepatitis B surface antigen; HbeAg = hepatitis B e-antigen; HBIG = hepatitis B immune globulin; IgG =
immunoglobulin G; RPR = rapid plasma reagin test; VDRL = Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test
Laboratory Staff
HCWs in laboratories may be at increased risk of occupational exposure to the pathogens with which
they work. Laboratory staff should receive specific training on the risks and how to avoid them (such as
working under a biocontainment hood, using a closed centrifuge, avoiding mouth pipetting) and have
access to PPE, as required, according to the procedures they perform and the pathogens with which
they have contact. (Module 8, Chapter 1, Clinical Laboratory Biosafety, provides details on preventing
infection among laboratory staff.) In addition to the vaccines routinely recommended for all HCWs,
further vaccinations may be appropriate for HCWs working in a clinical or research laboratory (CDC
1998). National recommendations should be consulted and followed if available.
The following vaccines may be relevant for staff working with specific pathogens:
BCG (Mycobacterium tuberculosis)
Hepatitis A
Meningococcal (N. meningitidis)
Polio
Rabies
Typhoid
(CDC 1998)
HCWs with these conditions should be closely followed up by a team of clinicians for periodical clinical
monitoring, to assess treatment response and viral suppression, when appropriate, and to revise
recommendations about duty restrictions accordingly. They should avoid performing procedures that
may result in increased risk of contact with large amounts of blood and body fluids. There are no
restrictions for those staff with viral loads less than designated levels. (Henderson et al. 2010)
The Society of Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) has classified patient care and clinical
procedures into three different categories based on the risk of transmission of bloodborne pathogens:
Category I: Procedures with minimum risk of bloodborne virus transmission. Clinical procedures
and patient care activities that either do not involve touching patients (e.g., history taking,
counseling) or are limited to touching patients’ intact skin (e.g., performing physical examinations)
and mucous membranes (e.g., performing vaginal examinations, performing some dental
procedures, phlebotomy). It also includes minor surgical procedures with very minimal exposure to
patients’ blood and body fluids (e.g., surface stitches, gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures).
Category II: Procedures for which bloodborne virus transmission is theoretically possible but
unlikely. Several surgical procedures are examples of such procedures, including ophthalmic
surgery, dental surgery that requires local anesthesia, minor oral surgical procedures, endoscopic
and arthroscopic procedures, provision of contraceptive methods, minor gynecological procedures,
starting of central lines, and medical male circumcisions.
Category III: Procedures for which there is definite risk of bloodborne transmission of viruses or
that have previously been classified as “exposure-prone.” All major surgical procedures that involve
a high volume of blood and body fluids are Category III procedures with definite risk of exposure.
Examples of Category III procedures are: general surgery; oral surgery with difficult access for
suturing; emergency surgical procedures involving bleeding and exposure to a high volume of blood;
obstetric procedures, including cesarean section; and orthopedic surgeries. Any major surgical
procedure that goes beyond 3 hours and requires changing gloves should not include staff members
infected with bloodborne pathogens.
6. Agree in writing to comply with recommendations and guidance of the expert clinicians as well as
the facility IPC/occupational health and management team.
Adapted from: Henderson et al. 2010.
Surveillance activities can be conducted by the staff organizing occupational health activities at the
facility and/or with the assistance of IPC staff. Table 2-8 outlines three examples of how to calculate
rates of reported sharps injuries that can be used to measure performance improvement.
Table 2-8. Calculation of Rates to Measure and Compare Reported Sharps Injuries
Metric How to Calculate
Rate of sharps injuries reported (Number of sharps injuries reported in 1 year/average daily occupied beds
per year during that year) x 100
Application:
Calculate Rates:
1. 2015
(20 sharps injuries reported in 2015/average daily occupied beds during 2015 was 80 per day) x 100
= (20/80) x 100 = Rate of 25 sharps injuries per 100 occupied beds in 2015
2. 2016
(10 sharps injuries reported in 2016/average daily occupied beds during 2016 was 100 occupied beds) x 100
= (10/100) x 100 = Rate of 10 sharps injuries per 100 occupied beds in 2016
Such calculations allow comparisons of yearly rates. The rates for 2016 were much lower than the rates in
2015.
(Number of sharps injuries reported in an occupational category in 1
year/Number of full-time equivalents (FTEs) of the same occupational
Rate of sharps injuries per category employed in that year)
occupational category per year
Note: The category of HCW must be identified when each sharps injury is
reported.
Application:
Occupational breakdown of sharps injuries: In 2015: surgeons 5; nurses 10; rubbish collectors 5
Calculate Rates for Each:
3. Surgeons
(5 sharps injuries reported by surgeons in 2015/7 FTE surgeons employed in 2015) = 5/7
= Rate of 0.7 sharps injury per FTE surgeon in 2015
4. Nurses
(10 sharps injuries reported by nurses in 2015/100 FTE nurses employed in 2015)
= 10/100
= Rate of 0.1 sharps injury per FTE nurse in 2015
5. Rubbish collectors (5 sharps injuries reported by rubbish collectors in 2015/5 FTE rubbish collectors
employed in 2015)
= 5/5
= Rate of 1 sharps injury per FTE rubbish collectors in 2015
In a comparison of sharps injuries by occupational categories, it is evident that the rubbish collectors had
the highest rate of 1 per FTE rubbish collectors in 2015. The health care facility should prioritize
interventions to reduce sharps injuries among the rubbish collectors.
(Number of sharps injuries from a device type in 1 year/number of the
Rate of sharps injury per device devices iof that type used in that year) x 100
type per year Note: The type of device must be identified when each sharps injury is
reported.
Application:
Breakdown of devices causing sharps injuries: In 2015: removable-blade scalpel 3; disposable fixed-blade
scalpel 1
Disposable scalpel
(1 sharps injury from disposable scalpel in 2015/500 disposable scalpels used in 2015) x 100
= (1/500) x 100
= Rate of 0.2 sharps injuries per 100 disposable scalpels in 2015
Compare rates between occupational categories: Comparison of the rates indicates that removable-blade
scalpels are 15 times riskier than disposable scalpels. This will help the health care facility make a strong case for
replacing removable blade scalpels with disposable scalpels.
Summary
In the course of their duties, millions of HCWs around the world are routinely exposed to a variety of
health and safety hazards, including infectious agents. Infections can be transmitted to HCWs, who can
in turn transmit the infections to patients and others. The goals of IPC intersect with those of
occupational health activities in preventing and addressing infectious hazards at health care facilities.
Therefore, IPC staff should be involved in occupational health activities at the facility, and occupational
health staff should be knowledgeable about IPC.
IPC elements of an occupational health program include surveillance, education, immunization, and
exposure prevention and response. Protection of staff by the application of Standard Precautions to
every patient, every time, and use of disease- or syndrome-specific Transmission-Based Precautions to
prevent exposures to infectious agents are essential to prevent occupational exposures.
Recommendations for managing specific occupational exposures and infections in staff members are
based on the epidemiology of infectious disease transmission in health care facilities and they should
target HCWs as potential sources or hosts. Special attention may be needed for specific groups of
employees with potential increased risk of exposure (laboratory, pregnant, and emergency response
personnel, and HCWs infected with HBV, HCV, and HIV). Finally, the effectiveness of interventions to
protect HCWs from occupational infection should be evaluated. Monitoring progress and identifying
causes, with feedback to key persons, can enhance prevention activities.
Appendix 2-A. Risk and Work Restriction for Health Care Workers Exposed to or
Infected with Infectious Diseases of Importance in Health Care Settings
This information is to be used in the absence of local regulations.
Transmission Risk Post-
Disease/ Main Risk in Health Exposure
Mode of Incubation Vaccine
Infection/ Staff to Patient to Care Prevention Prophylaxis
Transmission Period Available
Syndrome Patient Staff Facility (PEP)
Available
Yes;
Hours to 5 days,
Hand hygiene, Contact No
Fecal-oral Shedding up to Stool contact,
Cholera Rare Rare Precautions, clean recommend- No
contaminated water 10 days after unwashed hands
environment ation for
cessation
HCWs
Work restrictions: No duty. Restrict from food handling.
Duration of restrictions: Until 48 hours after last episode of diarrhea except for food handlers: 2 consecutive negative fecal specimens at least 48 hours apart and at least 48
hours after stopping antibiotics are required.*
Contact with eye 5–12 days,
Hand hygiene, Contact
secretions and shedding from Surfaces,
Conjunctivitis due Precautions, clean
contaminated High High incubation equipment, No No
to adenovirus instruments and
surfaces and period until 14 unwashed hands
equipment
equipment days after onset
Work restrictions: No contact with patient or patient environment.
Duration of restrictions: Until discharge from eye ceases.
Contact with urine,
saliva, breast milk, Contact with body
cervical secretions, fluids, especially
Cytomegalovirus Hand hygiene,
and semen from Rare Rare Unknown saliva, blood, and No No
(CMV)⁰ Standard Precautions
infected person who urine, possibly
is actively shedding unwashed hands
virus
Work restrictions: No restriction.
Duration of restrictions: None.
Work restrictions: Active: No contact with patient or the patient environment, or food handling. Carrier: No restriction unless linked with transmission.
Duration of restrictions: Until 24 hours after effective treatment is started.
Airborne
Incomplete Isoniazid
transmission from
implementation of Yes, BCG; (INH) for
sources with active
recommend control There is no treatment of
pulmonary or
measures, including recommenda- latent TB
laryngeal Low to
Tuberculosis (TB)⁰ Low to high Weeks to years patient placement, Airborne Precautions tion for HCWs infection;
tuberculosis; high
facility ventilation, in routine 4-drug
susceptible person
and personal circumstances regimen for
must inhale airborne
respiratory active TB
droplet nuclei to
protection
become infected
Work restrictions: Active pulmonary or laryngeal: Off duty. Active extra-pulmonary: No restriction once pulmonary or laryngeal involvement is excluded. Latent: No
restriction. PPD (tuberculin skin test) conversion (> 10 mm induration): No restriction; consider isoniazid prophylaxis depending on local recommendations.
Duration of restrictions: Active: Until proven non-infectious (by sputum acid-fast bacilli [AFB] culture culture).
Work restrictions: Localized in healthy person: Cover lesions, no contact with high-risk patients.◊ Generalized or localized in immunosuppressed person: No patient contact.
Post-exposure in non-immune people: No patient contact.
Duration of restrictions: Active and generalized: Until all lesions are dry and crusted. Post-exposure: From 10th day after first exposure through 21st day (28th if VZIG is given)
after last exposure or if varicella occurs, until all lesions dry and crusted.
References
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC). 2014a. Occupational health
(Chapter 100). In: APIC Text of Infection Control and Epidemiology, 4th ed. Washington, DC: APIC.
APIC. 2014b. Pregnant healthcare personnel (Chapter 104). In: APIC Text of Infection Control and
Epidemiology, 4th ed. Washington, DC: APIC.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 1998. Guidelines for infection control in the
healthcare worker, 1998. Am J Infect Control. 26:289–354.
CDC. 2005. Guidelines for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in health-care
settings. MMWR. 54(RR-17):1–141. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5417.pdf.
CDC. 2013. CDC guidance for evaluating health-care personnel for hepatitis B virus protection and for
administering postexposure management. MMWR. 62(RR-10):1–19.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6210.pdf.
CDC. 2015. Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Hospitalized Patients Under
Investigation (PUIs) for Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in U.S. Hospitals.
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/hospitals/infection-control.html.
Henderson DK, Dembry L, Fishman NO, et al. for the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.
2010. SHEA guideline for management of healthcare workers who are infected with hepatitis B virus,
hepatitis C virus and/or human immunodeficiency virus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 31(3):203–232.
International Federation of Infection Control (IFIC). 2003. Prevention and management of infectious
diseases in healthcare workers. In: Basic Infection Control Training Programme: Element VI. IFIC.
http://theific.org/basic-ic-training-course-outline/.
Jagger J. 1992. Calculating needle-stick rates. In: BD Safety Compliance Initiative Exposure Prevention
Information Network. Franklin Lakes, NJ: Becton Dickinson.
Prüss-Üstün A, Rapiti E, Hutin Y. 2005. Estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to
contaminated sharps injuries among health-care workers. Am J Ind Med. 48(6):482–490.
Reitsma AM, Closen ML, Cunningham M, et al. 2005. Infected physicians and invasive procedures: safe
practice management. Clin Infect Dis. 40:1665–1672.
Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). 2014. SHEA Response to Institutions’
Implementation of 2010 Guideline for Healthcare Workers Infected with Bloodborne Pathogens.
https://www.shea-online.org/images/guidelines/10_2014_Bloodborne_Pathogens_Public_Letter.pdf.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2002. Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Practical Guide,
2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/drugresist/WHO_CDS_CSR_EPH_2002_12/en/.
WHO. 2009. Hepatitis B vaccines: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 40(84):405–420.
WHO. 2010. Infection Control Precautions in Cholera Outbreaks: Aide-Memoire. Pan American Health
Organization. http://www1.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2010/Aide_Mem_Cholera-
Eng_4Nov%20.pdf?ua=1.
WHO. 2014. Occupational Health: Ebola Virus Disease: Occupational Safety and Health.
http://www.who.int/occupational_health/publications/ebola_osh/en/.
WHO. 2016a. Health Workers: Health Worker Occupational Health. Introduction.
http://www.who.int/occupational_health/topics/hcworkers/en/.
WHO. 2016b. WHO Recommendations for Routine Immunization: Summary Tables. Table 4: Summary of
WHO Position Papers – Immunization of Health Care Workers, and Table 1: Summary of WHO Position
Papers – Recommendations for Routine Immunization.
http://www.who.int/immunization/policy/immunization_tables/en/.
WHO 2016c. Guidelines on Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programmes at the
National and Acute Health Care Facility Level. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://www.who.int/gpsc/core-components.pdf.
Key Terms
Bloodborne pathogens are infectious microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, and other microorganisms)
contained in blood and other potentially infectious body fluids (including urine, respiratory
secretions, cerebrospinal, peritoneal, pleural, pericardial, and synovial amniotic fluids, semen,
vaginal secretions, breast milk, and saliva). The pathogens of primary concern are hepatitis B virus
(HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and HIV.
Hands-free technique is the technique for transferring sharp instruments to reduce the risk of
injuries. It consists of the indirect transfer of instruments between health care workers (HCWs)
performing a procedure so that only one person touches the same sharp item at any time. Items are
usually placed in a designated neutral or safe zone, which can be a section of the surgical field or a
container, from where they can be picked up.
Neutral (safe) zone is a designated area on the sterile field during procedures where sharps can be
placed by an HCW and then picked up by another HCW.
Occupational exposure to blood and body fluid is the exposure of an HCW to blood or other
potentially infectious materials during the performance of an employee's duties. Exposure to
bloodborne pathogens involves skin, eye, mucous membrane, or parenteral contact (e.g., a needle
stick).
Partial or limited hands-free technique is used to hand a sharp instrument directly to the HCW
performing a procedure (e.g., surgeon) and to return the instrument to the assistant HCW via a
neutral zone.
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is a preventive medical treatment that a person may take following
exposure to potentially infectious bloodborne pathogens, such as HIV or HBV, to prevent becoming
infected from the exposure. Post-exposure prophylaxis can also be taken following exposure to non-
bloodborne pathogens such as invasive Group A streptococcal infections, invasive meningococcal
infections, and pertussis.
Sharps are instruments, needles, and any other objects that can easily penetrate through the skin.
Sharps injuries are injuries from a “sharp” penetrating the skin. “Sharps” include syringe needles,
scalpels, broken glass, and other objects that may be contaminated with blood or body fluids. These
injuries potentially expose HCWs to infections from bloodborne pathogens.
Sharps injury prevention strategies are measures taken to prevent injuries while handling sharps.
These measures include elimination of hazards and the use of engineering controls, administrative
controls, work space practices, and personal protective equipment.
Standard Precautions are a set of infection control practices (IPC) used for every patient encounter
to reduce the risk of transmission of bloodborne and other pathogens from both recognized and
unrecognized sources. They are the basic level of infection control practices to be used, at a
minimum, in preventing the spread of infectious agents to all individuals in the health care facility.
Background
Globally, HCWs are at an increased risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens (HBV, HCV, and HIV)
because they handle sharps during the course of their duties. It is estimated that 39% of HCV, 37% of
HBV, and 4.4% of HIV infection among HCWs worldwide are attributable to occupational exposure to
sharps injuries (Prüss-Üstün et al. 2005). According to estimates in the World Health Organization
(WHO) sharps injuries report (2005), the Eastern Mediterranean region had the highest incidence of
sharps injuries, with 4.86 injuries per HCW; the African regions had an estimated incidence of 2.1. The
regions with the lowest incidence of sharps injuries were the United States, Northern Europe, and the
Western Pacific, with 0.18, 0.64, and 0.74 per HCW respectively. (Rapiti et al. 2005)
Understanding the risk of exposure to blood and body fluids is important for all HCWs. Implementing
recommended IPC practices, technological advances, and a greater emphasis on a culture of safety in
health care facilities have reduced sharps injuries in many settings. While safer practices have been
available for some time, effective implementation of these safety standards has been a challenge for
many low- and middle-income countries. Table 3-1 provides examples of safe and unsafe practices in the
use of sharps. (Also see Module 8, Chapter 1, Clinical Laboratory Biosafety.)
Source: Tso et al. 2012. (*See Appendix 3-B*, Neutral and Safe Zone Using Hands-Free Technique.)
Exposure to blood and body fluids may occur without the HCW’s knowledge and is noticed when the
gloves are removed at the end of the procedure, which prolongs the duration of exposure. Intact skin is
an adequate barrier against bloodborne pathogens such as HBV, HCV, and HIV, but fingers are
frequently the site of minor scratches and cuts, increasing the risk of infection.
Instrument
Use Suture Needles Scalpel Blades Disposable Syringes
% % %
Injury Occurrences
Suture needle injuries occur most often when:
Loading or repositioning the needle in the needle holder
Passing the needle hand to hand between team members
Suturing using fingers to hold tissue
Tying knots with the needle still attached or in the operative field
Leaving the suture needle in the operative field before and after use
Accidentally dropping needles and injuring body parts
Placing needles in an overfilled sharps container or a poorly located container
The following are specific measures the can be used to prevent Note: Educating HCWs on the safe
needle sticks and other sharps injuries (see Appendix 3-C for an handling of sharps reduces the risk
Operating Theater Sharps Safety Checklist and Appendix 3-D of injury.
for a Safe Assisting and Operating Checklist).
Double Gloving
The transmission of HBV and HCV from HCWs to patients and vice versa can occur even in the absence
of breaks in proper surgical techniques with intact gloves. Even the best-quality latex rubber surgical and
non-sterile gloves may leak. After testing gloves for defects, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
determined that the acceptable levels of leakage for surgical and non-sterile gloves are 1.5% and 2.5%
respectively. Defects in new gloves would be expected to be higher in gloves from manufacturers with
less stringent quality controls and where poor storage conditions exist. Latex gloves, especially when
exposed to fat in wounds and some alcohol-based handrubs, gradually become weaker and can lose
their integrity. (Davis 2001; FDA 2011; WHO 2009)
Double gloving cannot prevent needle sticks but may lower the risk of blood-hand contact, especially
with procedures that involve large amounts of blood or other body fluids (e.g., vaginal deliveries and
cesarean sections) and orthopedic procedures in which sharp bone fragments, wire sutures, and other
sharps are likely to be encountered. (See Module 3, Chapter 1, Personal Protective Equipment, and
Chapter 2, Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Health Care Settings, in
this module.)
Many sharps injuries can be easily avoided with little expense by using the following devices (see
Appendix 3-A) and procedures (see Appendix 3-C):
Use small Mayo forceps (not fingers) when holding a scalpel blade, when putting a blade on or
taking it off, or for loading a suture needle.
Use disposable scalpels with a permanent blade that cannot be removed.
Use tissue forceps, not fingers, to hold tissue when using a scalpel or suturing or use blunt-tipped
needles for suturing.
Use straight needles to help reduce sharps injuries during surgery. Other examples of instruments or
devices that protect the surgical team without sacrificing patient safety or staff performance are
shown in Table 3-4.
Use a hands-free technique to pass or transfer sharps (e.g., scalpels, needles, and sharp-tipped
scissors) by establishing a safe or neutral zone in the sterile field. The hands-free technique for
sharps handling is inexpensive, is simple to practice, and ensures that more than one HCW never
touches the same instrument at the same time (see Appendix 3-B). (DeGirolamo et al. 2013; Fox
1992; Stringer et al. 2009)
Reviewing the checklist with the surgical team just before starting the procedure and pointing out
where changes may be necessary will make the planned surgery go more smoothly and with less risk
of injury. This review can also help reduce the operation time and therefore protect patients from
injury or increased blood loss. (CDC 1997; Dauleh et al. 1994; Nelson 2008)
In many low- and middle-income countries, the proportion of HCWs offered PEP after a blood or body
fluid exposure has been poorly documented. Health care facilities should have a non-punitive system to
report occupational exposure. The rates of injuries or exposures among staff should be routinely
reviewed and reported back to the staff, and strategies and action plans to prevent future injuries
should be developed and regularly updated (see Chapter 2, Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of
Occupational Health in Health Care Settings, in this module).
Hepatitis B
Chronic hepatitis B is a global public health problem; 240 million individuals worldwide live with the
disease. Approximately 780,000 individuals (0.3% of infected individuals) die each year from HBV
infection. Guidelines are available for the treatment of HBV infections. A high percentage of patients
who survive become chronic carriers or are disabled and cannot work because of permanent liver
damage (i.e., cirrhosis). HBV is estimated to be 50–100 times more infectious than HIV (WHO 2015). It is
estimated that 37% of HBV infection among HCWs worldwide is attributable to occupational exposure to
sharps injuries. (Prüss-Üstün et al. 2005)
While an effective vaccine for HBV has been available for more than 30 years, many HCWs have not
been immunized against HBV. Health care facilities should prioritize hepatitis B vaccination for all HCWs.
Being vaccinated against HBV protects not only the individual, but also other HCWs, patients, and family
members. PEP is available for HBV exposure in the form of vaccination and immunoglobulin. (See
Chapter 2, Infection Prevention and Control Aspects of Occupational Health in Health Care Settings, in
this module for details on hepatitis B vaccination for HCWs.)
Hepatitis C
Hepatitis C has infected an estimated 130 to 150 million individuals worldwide, resulting in 350,000 to
500,000 deaths annually. Guidelines are available for the treatment of HCV infections. It is estimated
that 39% of HCV infection among HCWs worldwide are attributable to occupational exposure to sharps
injuries. (Prüss-Üstün et al. 2005)
Currently there is no vaccine or PEP available for HCV, and prevention of occupational exposure to blood
and body fluids remains the best option.
HIV
In 2016, 36.7 million people globally were living with HIV; 1.8 million people became newly infected with
HIV; and 1 million people died from AIDS-related illnesses. It is estimated that 4.4% of HIV infection
among HCWs worldwide are attributable to occupational exposure to sharps injuries. (Prüss-Üstün et al.
2005)
Currently there is no vaccine available for HIV. PEP is available for HIV exposure in the form of
antiretroviral (ARV) drugs.
STEP 2: Time frame—immediately after reporting. Person responsible: Physician, In-Charge of PEP
management.
Determine the risk associated with exposure (see Table 3-5) by:
Type of fluid (e.g., blood, visibly bloody fluid, other potentially infectious fluid or tissue)
Type of exposure (e.g., sharps injury, mucous membrane or non-intact skin exposure, bites
resulting in direct contact with infected blood) (CDC 2001)
Infectious status of source (presence of HBSAg, HCV antibody, or HIV antibody)
Susceptibility of exposed person (hepatitis B vaccine and vaccine response status, HBV, HCV
immune status)
STEP 3: Time frame—as soon as possible, preferably within 24 hours. Person responsible: Physician, In-
Charge of PEP management, HCW.
Evaluate the exposed HCW:
Check history of hepatitis B vaccination (currently there is no vaccine for hepatitis C or HIV).
Determine immune and infection status of the exposed HCW.
For HBV, if not conducted previously, measure total hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBc)1 and
hepatitis B surface antibodies (anti-HBs).2
For HCV, test for HCV antibodies (anti-HCV—a positive test means current or past infection) and ALT
(alanine aminotransferase).
If test is positive, test for viremia to confirm current infections.
For HIV, check status and history of previous HIV testing:
Provide HIV pretest counseling.
Offer HIV testing if the exposed HCW provides informed consent.
Offer HIV post-test counseling per the national counseling and testing guidelines.
Refer to HIV care and treatment for those who test positive.
STEP 4: Time frame—as soon as possible, preferably within 24 hours, simultaneously with Step 3 above.
Person responsible: In-Charge of PEP management, patient’s treating physician.
Evaluate the exposure source:
Obtain detailed information on clinical status of the source person.
Determine vaccination and immune status of the source person:
> Test known source person for HBsAg.3
> Test known source person for anti-HCV antibodies.
> Check known source person for HIV status and history of previous HIV testing.
> Conduct clinical assessment of known source person for HIV/AIDS.
Provide HIV pretest counseling.
Conduct HIV testing if the source person provides informed consent.
Offer HIV post-test counseling per the national counseling and testing guidelines.
Refer to HIV care and treatment for those who test positive.
1 Total hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)—indicates previous or ongoing infection with HBV (CDC. Hepatitis).
2 Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs)—generally indicates recovery and immunity from HBV infection. Anti-HBs also develop
in a person who has been successfully vaccinated against HBV (CDC. Hepatitis).
3 Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)—indicates that the person is infectious (CDC. Hepatitis).
Table 3-6. Determinant for Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for Occupational Exposure to HBV
Vaccination and Treatment
Antibody
Response Status
of Exposed Source Unknown or Not
Source HBsAga Positive Source HBsAg Negative
Health Care Available for Testing
Worker
Previously No treatment No treatment No treatment
vaccinated
Unvaccinated HBIGb single dose and full Full HB vaccination Full HB vaccination
HB vaccination
Known responderc No treatment No treatment No treatment
Known non- HBIG single dose and No treatment If known high-risk source,
responderd revaccination or second manage as if source were
dose of HBIG HBsAg positive
Antibody response Test exposed person for No treatment Test exposed person for
unknown anti-HBse: anti-HBs:
If adequate level, no If adequate, no treatment
treatment is necessary; is necessary;
if inadequate level, HBIG if inadequate, vaccine
single dose and HB vaccine booster and check titer in
booster 1–2 months
a
HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen
b
HBIG: hepatitis B immunoglobulin
c
Known responder: a person who has an adequate level of serum antibody (anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL
d
Known non-responder: a person with inadequate response to vaccination (anti-HBs < 10 mIU/mL)
e
Anti-HBs: hepatitis B surface antibody
Source: CDC 2001.
STEP 5: Time frame—as soon as test results return (if any), must be within 72 hours from exposure.
Person responsible: Physician, In-Charge of PEP management, HCW.
Establish eligibility for PEP:
Refer to Table 3-6 to determine the PEP required for HBV exposure.
Parenteral or mucous membrane exposure (e.g., sexual exposure, splashes to the eye, nose, or
oral cavity)
Exposure to blood, blood-stained saliva, breast milk, genital secretions, or cerebrospinal,
amniotic, peritoneal, synovial, pericardial, or pleural fluids
PEP is not indicated if:
The exposed HCW is known to be HIV-positive.
The source person is HIV-negative.
Exposure is limited to intact skin.
Testing the source person and the exposed HCW is helpful but it is not mandatory to have either
test results to initiate HIV PEP. The decision is sometimes based on an individual’s level of concern
as well as background HIV prevalence.
STEP 6: Prescribe PEP: Time frame—initiate PEP as early as possible but within 72 hours.
Continue ARVs for HIV for 28 days.
Continue HBV vaccine schedule over 6 months.
Provide adherence counseling and address any drug interactions.
Follow national guidelines or WHO recommendations for PEP.
STEP 7: Time frame—72 hours―6 months after exposure. Person responsible: Physician, In Charge of
PEP Management, HCW.
Follow-up:
Provide follow-up for adherence and any side effects of ARVs and address questions that the
individual may have.
Arrange for an HIV test at 3 months after the exposure.
Arrange for HBV vaccine at 1 and 6 months, if indicated.
Link HIV care and treatment, including prevention measure for protecting others, in case the HIV
test results are positive.
Provide additional counseling and other preventive interventions, as needed, and if test results
are negative.
Document all PEP provided, following facility and national guidelines.
Monitor PEP provision in the facility.
Summary
Globally, HCWs are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens because they handle sharps and come
into contact with blood and body fluids during the course of their duties. Certain practices and particular
equipment and instruments used in health care increase the risk of exposure to blood and body fluids.
Strategies to prevent injuries include, in general, eliminating hazards, using engineering controls,
developing administrative controls, incorporating work practice controls, placing visual reminders, and
utilizing barriers, whenever possible.
It is better to prevent accidental exposure to blood and body fluids than to manage exposed HCWs.
However, when exposure occurs, it is important that HCWs are aware of the necessary steps, including
prompt management and evaluation for PEP. HCWs often do not report exposures or take advantage of
PEP after occupational exposures. For those who do, adherence can be an issue: the adherence to HIV
PEP was found to be 56% in a systemic review of studies on PEP (WHO 2014a). Understanding the risk is
important for all HCWs. Implementing recommended IPC practices, technological advances, and a
greater emphasis on a culture of safety in health care facilities can reduced occupational exposure in
many settings. Health care facilities should have a non-punitive system for HCWs to report occupational
exposure and obtain access to PEP.
1. Blunt-tipped
needle
2. Blunt retractor
3. Scalpel:
disposable,
retractable
safety scalpel
4. Stapler for
closing surgical
skin incision
5. Safe butterfly
needle that can
be drawn in
before
discarding
Blunt-Tipped Needles
More than half of all suture needle injuries occur during the suturing of muscles and fascia. Using blunt-
tipped needles can substantially reduce needle sticks. When used appropriately, these needles are as
effective as sharp-tipped needles; therefore, it is recommended that, where possible, surgeons use
blunt-tipped needles when closing fascia and muscles. (OSHA 2008)
Sharps Containers
Examples of the different types of sharps containers include:
Ready-made plastic sharps containers are generally bright yellow in color with a biohazard symbol
on the outside.
Thick cardboard sharps boxes designed by WHO and UNICEF are water-resistant and can hold up to
150 needles and syringes in one container.
Improvised sharps containers can be used for disposing of used needles (see below). Needles must
be detached from the syringe before being dropped through the hole in the top of the lid.
Improvised containers should be labeled as hazardous, able to be completely closed, used only for
needles (if syringes since may not fit into the opening of the container), and tightly sealed before
disposal to prevent them from being opened.
Recommendations for Using Sharps Containers
DO put sharps containers as close to the point of use as possible, ideally within an arm’s reach of
the treatment area. Containers should be easy to see, recognize, and use.
DO attach containers to walls or other surfaces, if at all possible, at a level at which the HCW can
easily see the disposal opening.
DO mark them clearly so that people will not use them as garbage containers or for discarding
debris.
DO mark the fill line at the three-quarters-full level.
DO replace the container when it reaches the fill line (three-quarters full).
Instruments passed with the hands-free technique include anything sharp enough to puncture a glove
(e.g., trocars, sharp-tipped mosquito forceps, loaded needle holders). The ideal container for a neutral
or safe zone should be large enough to hold sharps, not easy to tip over, preferably mobile in the
operative field, and easy to move between HCWs (e.g., Mayo stand or magnetic pad). Avoid using a
kidney tray as the designated “pass container” because the surgical team member must reach into the
narrow space, causing an increased risk of a sharps injury.
A “partial” hands-free technique may be used when the surgeon must not break eye contact with the
operative field or when a microscope is used. This involves the surgical assistant or scrub nurse directly
handing the sharp instrument to the surgeon. The surgeon later returns the sharp to the scrub nurse by
placing it in a neutral zone.
4 Various items (e.g., basins, mats or trays, parts of a sterile instrument stand) or a designated area in the operative field can be
Sharps disposal container that is puncture-resistant, leak-proof, prevents over-filling, has a change
indicator, and is readily accessible
Separate contaminated, reusable sharps container with biohazard symbols for transport to the
decontamination area
References
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN). 2014. Recommended practices for sharps
safety. Perioperative Standards and Recommended Practices. Denver, CO: AORN, Inc.
AORN. n.d. Sharps Safety Tool Kit. OR Sharps Safety Checklist. http://www.aorn.org/aorn-
org/guidelines/clinical-resources/tool-kits/sharps-safety-tool-kit.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 1997. Evaluation of blunt suture needles in
preventing percutaneous injuries among health-care workers during gynecological surgical procedures.
MMWR. 46(2):25–29.
CDC. 2001. Updated U.S. Public Health Service guidelines for the management of occupational
exposures to HBV, HCV, and HIV and recommendations for postexposure prophylaxis. MMWR. 50(RR-
11):1–52. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5011a1.htm.
CDC. 2008. Acute hepatitis C virus infections attributed to unsafe injection practices at an endoscopy
clinic—Nevada, 2007. MMWR. 57:513–517.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5719a2.htm.
CDC. n.d. Hepatitis. Interpretation of Hepatitis B Serologic Test Results.
http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/HBV/PDFs/SerologicChartv8.pdf.
CDC. n.d. One Needle, One Syringe, Only One Time. http://www.oneandonlycampaign.org/.
Dagi TF, Berguer R, Moore S, Reines HD. 2007. Preventable errors in the operating room Part 2: retained
foreign objects, sharps injuries, and wrong site surgery. Curr Probl Surg. 44(6):352–381.
Dauleh MI, Irving AD, Townell NH. 1994. Needle prick injury to the surgeon—do we need sharp needles?
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 39(5):310–311.
Davis MS. 2001. Advanced Precautions for Today’s OR: The Operating Room Professional's Handbook for
the Prevention of Sharps Injuries and Bloodborne Exposures, 2nd ed. Atlanta, GA: Sweinbinder
Publications LLC.
DeGirolamo KM, Courtemanche DJ, Hill WD, Kennedy A, Skarsgard ED. 2013. Use of safety scalpels and
other safety practices to reduce sharps injury in the operating room: what is the evidence? Can J Surg.
56(4):263–269.
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), US Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Compliance
Policy Guide Sec. 335.700 Surgeons’ Gloves and Patient Examination Gloves; Defects – Criteria for Direct
Reference Seizure: Guidance for FDA Staff.
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ICECI/ComplianceManuals/CompliancePolicyGuidanceManual/UCM255
705.pdf.
Fox V. 1992. Passing surgical instruments, sharps without injury. AORN J. 55(1):264–266.
Gupta E, Bajpai M, Sharma P, Shah A, Sarin SK. 2013. Unsafe injection practices: a potential weapon for
the outbreak of blood borne viruses in the community. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 3(2):177–181.
International Health Care Worker Safety Center, University of Virginia. n.d. Checklist for Sharps Injury
Prevention. http://www.medicalcenter.virginia.edu/epinet/new/chcklst2.pdf.
Jagger J, Berguer R, Phillips EK, Parker G, Gomaa AE. 2010. Increase of sharps injuries in surgical settings
versus nonsurgical settings after passage of national needlestick legislation. J Am Coll Surg. 210(4):496–
502.
Makary MA, Pronovost PJ, Weiss ES, et al. 2006. Sharpless surgery: a prospective study of the feasibility
of performing operations using non-sharp techniques in an urban, university-based surgical practice.
World J Surg. 30(7):1224–1229.
Manangan LP, Pugliese G, Jackson M, et al. 2001. Infection control dogma: top 10 suspects. Infect
Control Hosp Epidemiol. 22(4):243–247.
Nelson BP. 2008. Making straight suture needles a little safer: a technique to keep fingers from harm’s
way. J Emerg Med. 34(2):195–197.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), US Department of Labor, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2008. Use of
Blunt-Tip Suture Needles to Decrease Percutaneous Injuries to Surgical Personnel.
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2008-101/pdfs/2008-101.pdf.
Pyrek KM. 2012. Occupational health: sharps safety in the OR. Infection Control Today.
http://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/articles/2012/10/occupational-health-sharps-safety-in-the-
or.aspx.
Pyrek KM. 2013. Sharps safety: taking the “unfinished agenda” to completion. Infection Control Today.
http://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/articles/2013/10/sharps-safety-taking-the-unfinished-agenda-
to-completion.aspx.
Rapiti E, Prüss-Üstün A, Hutin Y. 2005. Sharps Injuries: Assessing the Burden of Disease from Sharps
Injuries to Health-Care Workers at National and Local Levels. WHO Environmental Burden of Disease
Series, No. 11. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/ebd11.pdf?ua=1.
Stringer B, Haines T, Goldsmith CH, et al. 2009. Hands-free technique in the operating room: reduction
in body fluid exposure and the value of a training video. Public Health Rep. 124(Suppl 1):169–179.
Tietjen L, Bossemeyer D, McIntosh N. 2003. Infection Prevention: Guidelines for Healthcare Facilities
with Limited Resources. Baltimore, MD: Jhpiego.
Tso D, Langer M, Blair GK, Butterworth S. 2012. Sharps-handling practices among junior surgical
residents: a video analysis. Can J Surg. 55(4):S178–S183.
WHO. 2007. Standard Precautions in Health Care.
http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/standardprecautions/en/.
WHO. 2009. Glove Use Information Leaflet.
http://www.who.int/gpsc/5may/Glove_Use_Information_Leaflet.pdf.
WHO. 2014a. Guidelines on Post-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV and the Use of Co-Trimoxazole Prophylaxis
for HIV-Related Infections among Adults, Adolescents and Children: Recommendations for a Public
Health Approach; December 2014 Supplement to the 2013 Consolidated Guidelines on the Use of
Antiretroviral Drugs for Treating and Preventing HIV Infection. Supplement. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/145719/1/9789241508193_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1.
WHO. 2014b. WHO Issues Its First Hepatitis C Treatment Guidelines.
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/hepatitis-guidelines/en/.
WHO. 2015. Hepatitis B. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs204/en/.
WHO, International Labour Organization (ILO). 2005. Joint ILO/WHO Guidelines on Health Services and
HIV/AIDS. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO and ILO.
http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/prev_care/ilowhoguidelines.pdf?ua=1.