Mock May 19 Solutions
Mock May 19 Solutions
=
(1 0.05)(1 0.15) - 1= 0.04522 i.e. 4.52%
(d) (i) Despite the VaR measure being better known than the expected shortfall, the latter has
more advantages:
• Expected shortfall is sensitive to the entire tail of the distribution, whereas VaR will no t
change even if there are large increases in some of the losses beyond the cut-off
percentile at which the VaR is being measured.
• Expected Shortfall is a more stable measure than VaR in showing less sensitivity to
data errors and less day to day movement due to irrelevant changes in the input data.
• With VaR, negative diversification effects can arise whereas expected shortfall never
displays negative diversification effects.
(ii) The main advantage of the use of Monte Carlo simulation is that we can generate correlated
scenarios based on a statistical distribution. Due to which it models multiple risk factors.
= 51,90,760 –50,00,000
= 1,90,760
(e) (i) CDS contracts have obvious similarities with insurance, because the buyer pays a premium
and, in return, receives a sum of money if an adverse event occurs.
However, there are also many differences, the most important being that an insurance
contract provides an indemnity against the losses actually suffered by the policy holder on
an asset in which it holds an insurable interest. By contrast a CDS provides an equal payout
to all holders, calculated using an agreed, market-wide method. The holder does not need
to own the underlying security and does not even have to suffer a loss from the default
event. The CDS can therefore be used to speculate on debt objects. The other differences
include:
• The seller might in principle not be a regulated entity (though in practice most are banks);
• The seller is not required to maintain reserves to cover the protection sold (this was a
principal cause of AIG's financial distress in 2008; it had insufficient reserves to meet the
"run" of expected payouts caused by the collapse of the housing bubble);
• Insurance requires the buyer to disclose all known risks, while CDSs do not (the CDS seller
can in many cases still determine potential risk, as the debt instrument being "insured" is a
market commodity available for inspection, but in the case of certain instruments like CDOs
made up of "slices" of debt packages, it can be difficult to tell exactly what is being
insured);