UMZIMKHULU LOCAL MUNICICIPALITY

KwaZulu-Natal

uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10

Formalisation
Basic Assessment Report (FINAL)
DC43/0011/2021 KZN/EIA/0001581/2021

Prepared for
MASEKO HLONGWA & ASSOCIATES CC
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CONSULTANTS ,77 HOWICK ROAD, PIETERMARITZBURG
TEL: 033 394 5723 FAX: 033 394 5715

Prepared by

KZN: 15 Eugene Marais Road, Napierville, Pietermaritzburg 3200P O Box 1978 Pietermaritzburg 3200
GAUTENG: Unit 77, Block 4, Riversands Business Hub, Ext4 Fourways, Midrand
Tel +27 724641197 ♦ Fax 27- 86 776 33 25 ♦ Email [email protected]

AUG 2021
FINAL BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT

UMZIMKHULU EXT 9&10 FORMALISATION

UMZIMKHULU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY

HARRY GWALA MUNICIPALITY

KWAZULU-NATAL

EDTEA REF: (DC43/0011/2021 KZN/EIA/0001581/2021)

REPORT CONTTROL
Project Tittle uMzimkhulu Ext 10 Formalisation

Date AUG Report FINAL BAR for Comments

2021 Version

Quality Name Capacity /Designation Signature

Control
Aspects
Authors Mr MacCarthy Environmental Assessment
Honu-Siabi Practitioner

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

2
 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The proposed development will be a formalisation of the existing informal settlement of uMzimkhulu Ext 9
& 10 into a well-established settlement as per the layout in figure 3. This is being packaged in line with the
Integrated Residential Development Programme.

• 300 semi-detached low-income houses

• Internal roads will be upgraded into tarred surface. Expected width of the roads is to 4.5.
• Stormwater Pipes to be used will range between 160mm - 250mm internal diameter PVC
pipes for water and stormwater drainage.
• The layout also made provision for some socio-economic infrastructure. The layout in
Figure 3 portrays the conceptual plan of the proposed development.
• The residential units are bordered on the eastern side by watercourse, mainly, the river
and associated wetland.

Hydrological features summary

The site is bordered by the uMzimkhulu River and associated wetland basin. The possibility of
impacting on the wetland during the development is potentially high unless proper precaution is
put in place. The Wetland impact assessment specialist studies undertaken, has delineated the
extent of the wetland.
The proposed development will be formalisation of the existing houses bordering the wetland,
but none of the green areas will be developed according to the current plan.

All the no-go areas are to be conserved. The proposed development however will occur outside
the wetland areas. All the houses to be formalised appear to be outside the wetland -no-go areas.
The wetland areas are to be included in the passive open spaces zones.

Terrestrial Biodiversity
Site is currently densely occupied hence vegetation is degraded or largely removed. No
vegetation of conservation significance exists within the development footprint. Riparian
vegetation bordering the site could be potentially disturbed. The development should be
restricted to within the development footprint. Further recommendations made in the impact
assessment section can help to avoid any potential impacts.

Heritage and Archaeological Impact

The site is fully settled hence no significant issues are envisaged. However, the process will
involve AMAFA. The report shall be taken through the SARIS application for review and comment
or approval from AMAFA.

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

3
SUMMARY AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Alternative A (preferred alternative) _ The Proposal

Biophysical environment

It is noted that this is an in-situ upgrade within the existing community. Most of the vegetation
on the site is already largely degraded. Only patches of grasslands remain on the open spaces.
These however, act as flood attenuation mechanisms and protection against erosion. The
proposed development will result in minimal clearing of vegetation on the proposed sites for
the construction of houses and service infrastructure such as roads, and water reticulation. The
clearing of the site is likely to result in further exposing the land and possible surface runoff
pollution. This can be mitigated by implementing appropriate stormwater management
strategies, including proper channelling of the stormwater during construction and operational
phases.

Biophysical environment

It is noted that the development is mainly an in-situ upgrade within the existing community.
Most of the vegetation on the site is already largely degraded. Only patches of grasslands
remain on the open spaces. These however, act as flood attenuation mechanisms and
protection against erosion. The proposed development will result in minimal clearing of
vegetation on the proposed sites for the construction of houses and service infrastructure such
as roads and stormwater infrastructure. The clearing of the site is likely to result in further
exposing the land and possible surface runoff pollution. This can be mitigated by implementing
appropriate stormwater management strategies, including proper channelling of the
stormwater during construction and operational phases.

• Wetland habitat impact

The site is bordered by significant wetland and riparian areas. No direct development is
envisaged on the wetland areas according to the scope of the formalisation. These can be
impacted on or encroached on during construction if care is not taken.

• Other Construction Stage impacts that were identified, for the construction phase are
noted to be mitigatable. Noise and dust, and oil spillage can be mitigated by avoiding and
managing the occurrences. Impacts during the construction stage may be short term and may
end when construction is completed.

• Operational stage impacts on the natural environment can also be mitigated if proper
strategies are put in place. The possibility of mitigating these impacts reduces their significant
levels considerably, to low significance once the proper infrastructure is put in place especially
in terms of roads and stormwater systems. The neglect of mitigation measures, such as waste
management could result in severe health hazards. This therefore infers the need to take the

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

4
recommendations made herein and in all applicable regulations and guidelines seriously.

• A synoptic view of the environment in terms of biodiversity, on the physical site and
relevant biodiversity literature and databases and as assessed herein, indicated the aquatic
biodiversity features are located within the outskirts of the site.

• The potential impacts on these are rated to be low (refer to wetland report) within the
development boundaries or within the immediate environments. This is due to the fact that the
sites are located on the high parts of the hills, while the watercourses are located down in the
valley system. It is therefore concluded that the development as proposed, may not impact
significantly on these aquatic biodiversity resources, given the type of development proposed
being in-situ-upgrade of the already disturbed areas of houses and internal roads.

Socio economic impacts during the construction stage will include employment opportunities,
for both skilled and unskilled labour and suppliers of construction materials. The spiral effect of
these will contribute to the improvement of economic activities during this period.

• During operational stage, few people are likely to be employed on permanent basis, like
in waste collection and maintenance services of the municipality. This may reduce the
unemployment in the area further, and bring improvement in livelihoods of the local
community. Above all, it is the level of social satisfaction from better service delivery may also
be a tangible social and economic impact from the proposed development

From this assessment, it is observed that most of the negative impacts can be readily mitigated.
Also, the positive impacts from the proposed development outweigh the identified negatives (if
properly mitigated). A no go alternative may therefore be unwarranted, given the absence of
fatal flaws with the proposed upgrade of uMzimkhulu community and infrastructure.

CONCLUDING STATEMENT
Even though the site borders the wetland, only the existing houses outside the wetland are to
be formalised. None of the green areas will be developed. For this reason, if all the
precautions stipulated here are taken into adherence, impact on the wetland areas will be
negligible. For this reason, we are of the opinion that the formalisation of the settlements
selected can be allowed to proceed.

• Work should be restricted to within the mapped areas within the residential areas
selected as per the layout,
• All wetland areas are no-development zones and should be strictly avoided.
• The EMPr attached provides guidelines on construction stage impact mitigation and
measures.
• The onus however lies with the developer to ensure duty of care to the environment and
ensure that all relevant mitigation measures are implemented.

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

5
No-go alternative (compulsory)

The No-development option will mean that the anticipated effects of impacts of the
development will not occur. All the envisaged construction stage impacts, such as dust, noise
and so forth will not occur because of the proposed development.

In addition, even though the removal of land cover may not occur as a result of development, if
a no-go alternation is the case, some form of degradation may still occur, as the community
expands in an uncontrolled manner, without proper infrastructure to management potential
impacts.

Road networks may still be improperly designed, and some parts of the community may not
have proper access. Emergency services may not have access to vital areas of the community.

From a socio-economic perspective, the no-development option may rather avert the potential
economic benefits that were envisaged. From this perspective, it can be asserted that the
potential positive impacts outweigh the envisaged negative impacts, hence a no-go alternative
may not be necessary.

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

6
 DECLARATION BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER

I, , declare that I –
HONU-SIABI, MACCARTHY (MR)
(a) act as the independent environmental practitioner in this application;
(b) do not have and will not have any financial interest in the undertaking of the activity, other than
remuneration for work performed in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations,
2014;
(c) do not have and will not have a vested interest in the proposed activity proceeding.
(d) have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity;
(e) undertake to disclose, to the competent authority, any material information that has or may have the
potential to influence the decision of the competent authority or the objectivity of any report, plan or
document required in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2006;
(f) will ensure that information containing all relevant facts in respect of the application is distributed or
made available to interested and affected parties and the public and that participation by interested
and affected parties is facilitated in such a manner that all interested and affected parties will be
provided with a reasonable opportunity to participate and to provide comments on documents that
are produced to support the application;
(g) will ensure that the comments of all interested and affected parties are considered and recorded in
reports that are submitted to the Department in respect of the application, provided that comments
that are made by interested and affected parties in respect of a final report that will be submitted to
the Department may be attached to the report without further amendment to the report;
(h) will keep a register of all interested and affected parties that participated in a public participation
process; and
(i) will provide the Department with access to all information at my disposal regarding the application,
whether such information is favourable to the applicant or not.

Signature of the Environmental Assessment Practitioner:

Name of company: Bizycon Pty Ltd

Date 30th Aug 2021

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

7
DETAILS OF THE EAP

Name of representative Education qualifications Professional Experience at

of the EAP affiliations environmental
assessments (yrs)

MacCarthy K Honu- MSSC Development Studies IAIASA, 12 years in the field of

Siabi (UKZN) Environmental
SAMEA management and
Certs Environmental Impact Impact assessment
Assessments (NWU) EAPSA
(registration
Cert: Post Decision Environmental pending)
Control (Auditing)( NWU)

Fhumulani Mudau BSc Environmental Science (UV) 4yrs in Environmental

management

McCarthy Honu-Siabi
MSSc Development Studies: University of KwaZulu-Natal
Cert: Environmental Impact Assessment & Management: North West University:
Certs: Environmental Control and Monitoring: North West University
Certs; Project Management: University of KwaZulu-Natal
Bachelor of Management Studies: University of Cape Coast

McCarthy Honu-Siabi has been involved in projects relating to environmental impact assessment,
social impact assessment and socio-economic planning, community developments, delivery of
sanitation facilities, housing, planning; strategic and general service delivery. For the past five
years he has been a project manager in teams of development professionals in the delivery and
administration of several Housing Projects in both rural and urban areas of South Africa. He has
worked on more than 65 Development projects, relating to environmental impact assessments,
and strategic impact assessments. He therefore possesses vast experience which has assisted in
the compilation of this report. MacCarthy currently work with Bizycon Pty Ltd, as a Senior EIA
Consultant, working with many Government Agencies, and Municipalities and private sector
developers and planners, on EIA related assessments, Strategic Development Planning and
Environmental Management Frameworks and Strategic Development Frameworks among others.

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

8
NAMES AND EXPERTISE OF SPECIALISTS

Names and details of the expertise of each specialist that has contributed to this report:

Name of Education Field of expertise Title of specialist report/ s as

specialist qualifications attached in Appendix D

Sundras Patha Pr Sci.Nat. Eng. Geotechnical

Engineering

Mr Mfaniseni Pr Techni Eng. Civil Engineer

Mpungose

Brian Mafela BSc (Hon) Forest Ecological and

Resource and Aquatic Habitat
Wildlife Assessment
Management

SACNASP
Cand.Sci.Nat.
(Ecological Science:
100214/15)

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

9
Summary of where requirements of Section 22 of the 2014 NEMA EIA Regulations
(GN R 983, as amended) are provided in this Basic Assessment Report

Section Requirements YES/NO SECTION IN BAR

Objective of the basic assessment process
1) The objective of the basic assessment process is to scope the
issues in the environment through a consultative process-
(a) Determine the policy and legislative context within which
the proposed activity is located and how the activity
complies with and responds to the policy and legislative
context;
(b) Identify the alternatives considered, including the activity, YES
location, and technology alternatives;
(c) Describe the need and desirability of the proposed
alternatives,
(d) Through the undertaking of an impact and risk assessment
process inclusive of cumulative impacts which focused on
determining the geographical, physical, biological, social,
economic , heritage and cultural sensitivity of the sites and
locations within sites and the risk impact of the proposed
activity and technology alternatives on the these aspects to
determine-
(i) The nature, significance, consequence,
extent, duration, and probability of the
impacts occurring to; and
(ii) The degree to which these impacts-
(aa) Can be reversed
(bb) May cause irreplaceable loss of
resources; and
(cc) Can be avoided, managed or
mitigated;
(e) Through a ranking of the site sensitivities and possible
impacts the activity and technology alternatives will impose
on the sites and location identified through the life of the
activity to-
i. Identify and motivate a preferred site, activity and
technology alternatives;
ii. Identify suitable measures to avoid, manage or
mitigate identified impacts; and

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

10
 iii. Identify residual risks that need to be managed and
monitored.

Scope of assessment and content of basic assessment reports

2) (1) A basic assessment report must contain the information
that is necessary for the competent authority to consider YES
and come to a decision on the application , and must include
:
(a) Details of:
i. The EAP who prepared the report
ii. The expertise of the EAP, including a curriculum
vitae:

(b) The location of the activity , including:

i. The 21 digit surveyor general code of ach cadastral YES
land parcel;
ii. Where available, the physical address and farm
name;
iii. Where the required information items i and ii is not
available , the coordinates of the boundary of the
property or properties;
(c) A plan which locates the proposed activity or activities
applied for as well as associated structures and YES
infrastructure at an appropriate scale; or if it is-
i. A linear activity, a description and coordinates of the
corridor in which the proposed activity or activities is
to be undertaken; or on land where the property has
not been defined , the coordinates within which the
activity is to be undertaken;

(d) A description of the scope of the proposed activity, including

all listed and specified activities triggered and being applied YES
for; and a description of the activities to be undertaken
associated structures and infrastructure;

(e) A description of the policy and legislative context within

which the development is proposed including-
I. An identification of all legislation, policies, plans, YES
guidelines, spatial tools, municipal development
planning frameworks, and instruments that are
applicable to this activity and have been considered
in the preparation of the report ; and

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

11
 II. How the proposed activity complies with and
responds to the legislation and policy context, plans,
guidelines, tools frameworks, and instruments;

(f) A motivation for the need and desirability for the proposed
development including the need and desirability of the YES
activity in the context of the preferred location;

(g) A motivation for the preferred site, activity and technology YES
alternative;

(h) A full description of the process followed to reach the

proposed preferred alternative within the site, including: YES
i. Details of all the alternatives considered;

ii. Details of the public participation process YES

undertaken in terms of regulation 41 of the
regulations, including copies of the supporting
documents and inputs
iii. A summary of the issues raised by interested and YES
affected parties, and an indication of the manner in
which the issues were incorporated, or the reasons
for not including them;
iv. The environmental attributes associated with the YES
alternatives focusing on the geographical, physical,
biological, social, economic, heritage and cultural
aspects;
v. The impacts and risks identified for each alternative,
including the nature, significance, consequence, YES
extent, duration and probability of the impacts,
including the degree to which these impacts (aa) and
(bb) may cause irreplaceable loss of resources; and
(cc) can be avoided, managed or mitigated
vi. The methodology used in determining and ranking YES
the nature, significance, consequences, extent,
duration, and probability of potential environmental
impacts and risks associated with the alternatives;
vii. Positive and negative impacts that the proposed YES
activity and alternatives will have on the
environment and on the community that may be
affected focusing on the geographical, physical,
biological, social, economic, heritage and cultural
aspects;

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

12
 viii. The possible mitigation measures that could be YES
applied and level of residual risk
ix. The outcomes of the site selection matrix; YES
x. If no alternatives, including alternative locations for YES
the activity were investigated, the motivation for not
considering such; and
xi. A concluding statement indicating the preferred YES
alternatives, including preferred location of the
activity.
(i) A full description of the process undertaken to identify,
assess and rank the impacts the activity will impose on
the preferred location through the life of the activity,
including- YES
i. A description of all environmental issues and
risks that were identified during the
environmental impacts assessment process;
and
ii. An assessment of the significance of each
issue and risk and an indication of the extent
to which the issue and risk could be avoided
or addressed by the adoption of mitigation
measures;

(J) An assessment of each identified potentially significant

impact and risk, including- YES
(i) Cumulative impacts;
(ii) The nature, significance and consequences of the
impact and risk;
(iii) The extent and duration of the impact and risk;
(iv) The probability of the impact and risk occurring;
(v) The degree to which the impact and risk can be
reversed;
(vi) The degree to which impact and risk may cause
irreplaceable loss of resources; and
(vii) The degree to which the impact and risk can be
avoided, managed or mitigated;

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

13
(k) Where applicable, a summary of the findings and impacts
managements measures identified in any specialist report
complying with Appendix 6 to these Regulations and an
indication as to how these findings and recommendations YES
have been included in the final report;

(I) An environmental impact statement which contains-

(i) A summary of the key findings of the environmental YES
impact assessment;
(ii) A map at an appropriate scale which superimpose
the proposed activity and its associated
structures and infrastructure on the
environmental sensitivities of the preferred site
indicating any areas that should be avoided,
including buffers; and
(iii) A summary of the positive and negative impacts and
risks of the proposed activity and identified
alternatives;

(m) based on the assessment, and where applicable, impact

management measures from specialist reports, the
recording of the proposed impact management
objectives, and the impact management outcomes for YES
the development for inclusion in the EMPr;

(n) any aspects which were conditional to the findings of the

assessment either by the EAP or specialist which are to be YES
included as conditions of authorisation;

(o) a description of any assumptions, uncertainties, and gaps in YES

knowledge which relate to the assessment and mitigation
measures proposed;

(p) a reasoned opinion as to whether the proposed activity YES

should or should not be authorised, and if the opinion is that
it should be authorised, any conditions that should be made
in respect of that authorisation;

(q) where the proposed activity does not include operational ×

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

14
 aspects, the period for which the environmental
authorisation is required, the date on which the activity will
be concluded, and the post construction monitoring
requirements finalised;

(r) an undertaking under oath or affirmation by the EAP in

relation to: YES
(i) the correctness of the information provided in the
reports;
(ii)the inclusion of comments and inputs from
stakeholders and I&APs;
(iii) the inclusion of inputs and recommendations from
the specialist reports where relevant; and
(iv) any information provided by the EAP to interested
and affected parties any responses by the EAP to
comments or inputs made by interested and
affected parties; and
(s) where applicable, details of any financial provisions for the
rehabilitation, closure, and ongoing post decommissioning ×
management of negative environmental impacts

(t) any specific information that may be required by the ×

competent authority; and

(u) any other matters required in terms of section 24(4)(a) and ×

(b) of the act.

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

15
TABLE OF CONTENTS

DECLARATION BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PRACTITIONER ......................................................... 7

DETAILS OF THE EAP ...................................................................................................................................... 8
NAMES AND EXPERTISE OF SPECIALISTS ........................................................................................................ 9
Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................... 16
List of Figures................................................................................................................................................ 19
List if Tables .................................................................................................................................................. 19
1. BACKGROUND...................................................................................................................................... 20
1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 20
1.2 Project SITE Location ................................................................................................................... 20
2. Project & Activity Description .............................................................................................................. 24
2.1 Listed Activities in terms of NEMA Regulations Dec 2014 as amended ....................................... 26
Activities applied for ...................................................................................................................................... 26
3. The Basic Assessment Process ............................................................................................................. 28
3.1 The detail site analsysis (BASIC ASSESSMENT) ................................................................................... 29
3.2 Field visits and data collection..................................................................................................... 29
3.3 Public participation requirements ............................................................................................... 29
4. CONSIDERATION OF LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ......................................................... 29
4.1 National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) Act 107 of 1998 ........................................... 29
4.2 Occupational Health and safety Act (ACT 85 of 1993) ................................................................. 30
4.3 Development Facilitation Act (Act 67 of 1995) ............................................................................ 30
4.4 Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act (Act 43 of 1983) ...................................................... 30
4.5 National Water Act (Act 36 of 1998) ........................................................................................... 30
4.6 National Forest Act (ACT 84 OF 1998) ......................................................................................... 31
4.7 National Heritage resources Act (Act 25 of 1999) ....................................................................... 31
5. Need and desirability ........................................................................................................................... 32
6. Motivation for the proposed site, activity and technological alternatives ........................................... 32
Site Alternative ......................................................................................................................................... 32
Activity alternative ................................................................................................................................... 33
Technological Alternative ......................................................................................................................... 33

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

16
 No-go Alternative ..................................................................................................................................... 33
7. DESCRIPTION OF THE RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................... 34
7.1 Physical characteristics ................................................................................................................ 34
7.1.1Topography .................................................................................................................................. 34
7.2 Hydrology .................................................................................................................................... 35
Hydrological Characteristics. .................................................................................................................... 35
7.3 VEGETATION AND GENERAL BIODIVERSITY ................................................................................. 37
Vegetation ................................................................................................................................................ 37
7.4 Current and Potential Land Use ......................................................................................................... 38
7.5 Major Hazardous installations (MHI) .................................................................................................. 38
7.6 Cultural/ Heritage ............................................................................................................................... 38
7.7 Availability of support infrastructure /Bulk services .......................................................................... 39
8. IMPACT IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 40
Impact Assessment and Rating Criteria /Framework ............................................................................... 40
8.1 Description of impacts identified ............................................................................................... 43
8.2 Constructional Stage ................................................................................................................... 45
8.2.1 Summary Rating of potential impacts and their ratings Alternative A (Preferred alternative)45
8.2.2 Detail Significance rating of identified impacts ....................................................................... 46
8.3 Operational Stage ........................................................................................................................ 63
8.3.1 Summary of potential impacts and their ratings ..................................................................... 63
8.3.2 Details Of Impact Assessments At Operational Phase Proposal (Preffered Alternative) ......... 64
8.4 No Go Alternative ........................................................................................................................ 71
9 CONCLUSIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT .............................................................. 73
10 RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................................... 76
11 Appendixes .......................................................................................................................................... 79
Appendix 1 Project lo ................................................................................................................................... 80
Appendix 2 Public Participation report Public Participation report ............................................................. 82
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 85
2. PUBLIC ADVERTISEMENT ...................................................................................................................... 85
3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT (BID) ................................................................................ 85
4. PUBLIC MEETINGS ................................................................................................................................ 85
5. COMMENTS FROM STAKEHOLDERS ..................................................................................................... 85

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

17
 Site Notice ............................................................................................................................................ 87
Newspaper advertisement ................................................................................................................... 90
Background information Document (BID) and Distribution List ........................................................... 92
BID Distribution List.................................................................................................................................. 99
STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS AND REPONSES .......................................................................................... 105
Appendix 3 Wetland habbitat assessment and ecological report............................................................... 117
I. Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations (See Annexure A) ................................................................. 176
II. Key to Acronyms ............................................................................................................................ 176
1.1. Background................................................................................................................................ 177
1.2 Aims and objectives of the EMPr ...................................................................................................... 177
1.2.1 Aim ............................................................................................................................................ 177
1.2.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 177
SECTION 2: REGULATORY / LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ..................................................................................... 178
DEALING WITH NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE EMPr (Penalties/ Incentives) .......................................... 178
2.1 Key Legislation and Regulatory Requirements .................................................................................. 178
2.1.1 National Environmental Management Act No. 107 of 1998 ...................................................... 178
2.1.1.1 Penalties for non-compliance ..................................................................................................... 178
2.1.2 National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999........................................................................... 179
2.1.2.1 Penalties for noncompliance....................................................................................................... 179
2.1.3 Occupational Health and Safety Act No. 85 of 1993....................................................................... 179
2.1.3.1 Penalties for noncompliance .................................................................................................. 179
2.1.4 Other necessary legislations but not limited to: ............................................................................. 179
2.2 KEY ROLE PLAYERS AND THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES ...................................................................... 179
SECTION 3: SENSITIVE AREAS OF THE PROJECT AREA ................................................................................. 180
3.1 The Development site ....................................................................................................................... 180
3.2 Protecting the Integrity of the Ecosystem of the project site ............................................................ 180
3.4 Ensuring Health and safety ............................................................................................................... 182
5. EMP CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENTATIONS ...................................................................................... 201
Detailed CV of EAP ................................................................................................................................. 206

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

18
LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 Topographical Character of the site ................................................................................................ 34

Figure 2 Vegetation Types ............................................................................................................................ 37
Figure 3 Site layout with sensitive areas that may be impacted (work across watercourses). .................. 180

LIST IF TABLES

Table 1 Listed Activities) ............................................................................................................................... 26

Table 2 EMPr Impacts and Management Actions (Template adapted from CSIR, 2016). ......................... 183

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

19
1. BACKGROUND

1.1 INTRODUCTION
The provision of improved settlement infrastructure is a channel that is used by government to improve
peoples lives. As part of this initiative, uMzimkhulu Local Municipality in collaboration the Department of
Human Settlement (funder), intend to undertake the formalisation of the Settlements in Section 9 & 10.
This will include construction of about 300 Low Income Houses to be put in duplex forms for beneficiaries.

As part of the feasibility assessment and planning of the proposed development, Bizycon Ltd has been
engaged through Maseko Hlongwa and Associates (the development planners) to conduct an
environmental assessment for the proposed development. Formalisation is to include the upgrade of
internal roads from gravel surfaces to tarred surfaces, equipped with appropriate stormwater
infrastructure.

As per the provisions of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Regulations, December 2014, as
amended, under the National Environmental Management Act- NEMA (Act 107 of 1998) an environmental
impact assessment is required for the proposed developments prior to commencing any physical activities
that fall within any of the listings within the notices. The site is bordered by watercourses which may be
impacted on during the formalisation process.

As determined in the preliminary study undertaken 2018 by the EAP to determine applicability of the EIA
regulations and need for EIA in terms of Chapter 4 of 2014 EIA Regulation (GNR 982) as amended 2017,
Basic Assessment (BA) process is required to be followed towards environmental authorisation for the
proposed development. This EIA is to identify the potential impacts of proposed activities on the
biophysical and social environment (and vice versa) and to facilitate any necessary authorisation for such
activity which may be triggered in terms of the regulations. This having provided adequate measures to
address such impacts.

1.2 PROJECT SITE LOCATION

The site under

consideration is the is
occupied by informal
settlement that extends
along the outskirts of the
existing semi-formal and
formalised residential
areas, located on the
eastern half of the
uMzimkhulu community
along R56 and west of the
uMzimkhulu River. The
GPS Coordinates of the site
are 30°16'27.79"S and
29°56'27.48"E. Location of

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

20
the proposed site is also depicted in Figure 1.

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Ext 9 and 10 of uMzimkhulu, Sisulu Settlement,

SG 21-DIGIT NO NOES04200000227000000

ZONING Residential

GPS POINTS

30°16' 27.79"S 29° 56' 27.48"E

Housing • 300 residential units to be constructed in semi-detached format.

/Ervens This will be two 42m2 houses put together, back-to-back.

Roads ad • There are existing gravel surfaced internal roads within the
Stormwater settlement which will be upgraded into tarred surfaced roads of
Mgt about 8m wide, with no road reserves. This will be equipped
with the necessary storm water drainages systems and discharge
points
• Stormwater Pipes to be used will range between 160mm -
250mm internal diameter PVC pipes for water and stormwater
drainage.
Internal • Internal roads will be of tarred surfaces of various lengths but
Roads mostly 6-10m wide.
network • Minimum curb radius of 8-10m Road surfaces are to be block
paving for curbs, internal roads, cape seal, asphalt on main
roads.
Water • There are bulk water pipes available in the vicinity.
reticulation • The pipe diameters of the network in the vicinity range from
75mm to 250mm and this will be applied to the proposed
development.
• The Water Treatment Plant next to the site has been upgraded
hence the development is expected to be accommodated by the
existing water provision.
Sewer • There are formal bulk sewer services available in the vicinity of
the study area.
Electricity • The houses are already connected to electricity hence no special
provision is required.

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

21
2

Preserving nature and ensuring sustainable development in the developing world

22
Figure 2 uMzimkhulu Locality
2. PROJECT & ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION
A key part of government’s theory of change on human settlement programme is to use housing as a
vehicle to drive social and integrated settlement developments which allow for the provision of major
services and access to urban amenities to communities in which such developments are implemented.
In line with this purpose, the uMzimkhulu development will entail a holistic upgrade of the existing
community.

The proposed development will be a formalisation of the existing informal settlement of uMzimkhulu
Ext 9 & 10 into a well-established settlement as per the layout in figure 3.

The proposed development is being packaged in line with the Integrated Residential Development
Programme.

• 300 semi-detached low-income houses

• Internal roads will be upgraded into tarred surface. Expected width of the roads is to
4.5 and road reserve of 8m.
• Stormwater Pipes to be used will range between 160mm - 250mm internal diameter
PVC pipes for water and stormwater drainage.
• The layout also made provision for some socio-economic infrastructure. The layout in
Figure 3 portrays the conceptual plan of the proposed development.
• The residential units are bordered on the eastern side by watercourse, mainly, the river
and associated wetland.

The consolidated layout / Master layout of the site is shown in Figure 3.

 2.1 LISTED ACTIVITIES IN TERMS OF NEMA REGULATIONS DEC 2014 A S AMENDED
The National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 is the legislative instrument that governs
environmental implications in relation to development vis-à-vis sustainability and environmental
management. Regulations have been developed to guide the implementation of the National
Environmental Management Act, under which, are lists of activities that may require authorization
from the relevant Environmental Department prior to implementation.

The implications of various aspects of the proposed development in terms of the regulations are
discussed in the ensuing sections of this report. Particularly, it is noted that activities such as the
formalization of the roads and the additional installation of pipes needs careful scrutiny in relation to
the environmental regulation. Determination of possible adverse impacts and mitigation would be an
advantage to both the receiving environment and the beneficiaries. This report is also prepared in
accordance with the environmental assessment requirements for housing projects as prescribed by the
KZN Department of Human Settlement.

As per Chapter 3 and 4 of the Environmental impact Assessment Regulations 2014, as promulgated
under the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA), Act 107 of 1998, a developer, upon
crossing specified thresholds, must conduct environmental impacts assessment processes to obtain
authorisation from a competent authority prior to the commencement of such activities. It is the duty
of the EAP to determine if proposed activities fall within such schedule. Depending on the magnitude
of the proposed activities, a Basic Assessment Process (under regulations 983) or a full scoping and EIA
(under regulations 984) may be undertaken in terms of Section 24D .

From the screening of the activities proposed by the developer as detailed in the attached Preliminary
Engineering report and layout, and as confirmed by the specialist studies undertaken, the following
listed activities are noted, for which a Basic Assessment Process for authorisation is being undertaken.
(Table 2).

ACTIVITIES APPLIED FOR

Table 1 Listed Activities)

a. For an application for authorization that involves more than one listed or specified activity that, together,
make up one development proposal, all the listed activities pertaining to this application must be indicated.

Indicate the Provide the relevant Activity Describe each listed activity as per the project description
Activity (ies) as set out in Listing (and not as per wording of the relevant Government
Number: Notice 1, 2 & 3 (GN R327, Notice)1:
GNR325 & GNR324)

Act Regulation Activity Activity Description Applicability to this

1
Please note that this description should not be a repetition of the listed activity as contained in the relevant Government Notice, but should
be a brief description of activities to be undertaken as per the project description, i.e. describe the components of the desired development.
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

No project

NEMA 1998 GNR 327 9 The development ofThe proposed

– EIA REGs Listing infrastructure exceeding development will largely
April 2017 as Notice 1 1000m in length for the bulk entail using smaller
amended transportation of water or pipes of between
stormwater, i) with an internal160mm to 250mm
diameter of 0.36m or ii) with adiameter, however the
peak throughput of 120l per main pipes from the
second or more, reservoir from which the
adjacent pipes will be
connected may be more
But excluding where such than 360mm in
activities are within road diameter. It is envisaged
reserves or within urban areas this will be about 450 Or
more.

12 The development of- Bulk pipes will be

connected from the
main water source to
vi) bulk storm water outlet the reticulation pipes
structures exceeding 100 that connect the houses
square metres in size;

19 The infilling or depositing of The site is close to a

any material of more than 10 wetland and river
cubic metres into, or the system. Roadwork and
dredging, pipe laying may result in
excavations close to
excavation, removal or moving
these drainage lines and
of soil, sand, shells, shell grit, in few cases, this may
pebbles or rock of more than result in removing
10 vegetation within the
cubic metres from- wetland or their buffers
and these are expected
(i) a watercourse; to be more than 10m3.

Please note that any authorization that may result from this application will only cover activities specifically applied
for.

27
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

3. THE BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS

The environmental impact assessment process as a whole is intended to provide information

on the affected project area, to determine whether there are any fatal flaws that may militate
against proposed development, to access any positive factors that the development may take
advantage of, identify alternatives at an early stage, facilitate consultation with all Interested
and Affected Parties (I&APs) and key stakeholders, including specialists and to address the
concerns of I&APs that may arise regarding the proposed development, thereby ensuring full
public participation. This is to ensure a holistic planning approach that promotes full
community engagement. A schematic representation of the basic Assessment (EIA) process is
depicted in Figure 4.
PROPOSED PROJECT

Screening

EIA Required NO EIA Required

BASIC ASSESSMENT

Draft Environmental Management Stakeholder

Plan involvement /
Public
Distributed to Stakeholders for Participation
comment

Consolidate Stakeholder and Public

Participation inputs

Review by Competent Authority

Decision

Implementation and
If not approved Approved (Authorised) Follow Up

28

Figure 4 An illustration of the EIA Process flow (Source: Adapted from Aucamp J.P., 2010).
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

3.1 THE DETAIL SITE ANALSYSIS (BASIC ASSESSMENT)

The project is currently at the details environmental analysis and issue identification and
assessment phase of the process. Public participation is fundamental at this stage phase
because it assists the Environmental Assessment Practitioner (EAP) to identify, categorize, and
recommend issues that are significant and what impacts they may have on the proposed
development and Vise-versa in accordance with the guidelines contained in Regulation 982
and 984 of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998.
3.2 FIELD VISITS AND DATA COLLECTION
Field visits were conducted for two broad purposes namely collection of data for public
participation and environmental assessment. Issues were identified using professional
judgment, experience of similar projects, and previous knowledge of the study area, a review
of available literature, public consultation, specialist input and consultation with relevant
decision-making authorities. Additionally, specialist duties were conducted to identify and
confirm the significance of some of the issues identified. Wetland and heritage studies were
undertaken. Reports on these are attached in appendix to this report.
3.3 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS

The public participation process involved consultations with stakeholders, and the general
public, neighbouring businesses, and stakeholders such as, South African National Biodiversity
Institute (SANBI), The South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA), and AMAFA Kwazulu-
Natal, Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) and all regional and local stakeholders. This
draft report will be circulated for further comments, and these will be attached and integrated
when received. Public participation report attached summarises the public participation
process undertaken as part of this process.

4. CONSIDERATION OF LEGAL AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

The following are some of the key legislations relevant to this development:
4.1 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACT (NEMA) ACT 107 OF 1998

The National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 has in terms of section 24 and 24D
of the Act established regulations regarding the conduct of EIA processes made under section
24 (5) of the Act and published in Government Gazette 38282 of December 2014, as amended.
These regulations published lists of activities (982, 983, 984 and 985) that require various
levels of applications of EIA process. The section of the regulation that bears relevance to this
project is R327, R325 and R324.
Under this regulation an environmental impact assessment, in this case, a basic assessment
process is required, the elements of which are stipulated in relevant sections of the National
Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998.

29
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

4.2 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT (ACT 85 OF 1993)

The specific requirements under this Act that are relevant to the proposed project are the
regulations on Major Hazardous Installations (MHI) and their potential health and safety
impacts. Section 9 of the MHI regulation, which came into force in 1999, requires that where
practicable the developer shall prevent the establishment of developments adjacent to sites or
areas that the MHI would potentially pose a hazard.
This Act also bears relevance to the National Environmental Management Act, which requires
proponents of development to ensure a ‘risk averse’ approach where there is adequate
information that a given development is associated with potential for health and safety risks to
beneficiary and neighbouring communities. Where a given development affects settlements,
the requirement of this Act needs to be carefully and adequately integrated in the planning
process.
4.3 DEVELOPMENT FACILITATION ACT (ACT 67 OF 1995)

The Development Facilitation Act was established to facilitate the speedy delivery of services
and facilities to previously disadvantaged groups. However, enshrined in this Act is the
provision that developers are to ensure that adequate provision is made for the assessment of
the potential impacts that the development project is likely to have on the receiving
environment, and provision made for the management of these impacts. The EIA process is
therefore being undertaken in fulfillment of the requirements of this Act.
4.4 CONSERVATION OF AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES ACT (ACT 43 OF 1983)

The objective of this Act is to provide for the conservation of natural resources by maintaining
the production potential of land, combating and preventing erosion, preventing the weakening
or destruction of water resources, protecting natural vegetation, and preventing and/or
combating invader plants and weeds. The planning and implementation processes of the
proposed project therefore will take cognizance of relevant provisions of this Act.

4.5 NATIONAL WATER ACT (ACT 36 OF 1998)

Current regulations regarding discharge of surface water requires that surface water is
handled with care both in terms of quality and quantity before being discharged into any
natural water course, so that the quality and flow rate of natural systems are not significantly
disrupted.
The development under investigation is expected to generate large quantities of stormwater,
consequently an accelerated run off at the discharge points. This Act requires that stormwater
control measures are satisfactorily addressed, and a maintenance programme developed to
ensure that stormwater discharge points and downstream impacts are effectively mitigated.
In addition, Section 21 the act National Water Act (Act 36 of 1998) also requires that a water-
use license be obtained from the competent authority prior to undertaking certain activities
for developments that are within 500m of a watercourse. In this case the project site
accommodates a wetland and hence a Water Use License Application may need to be made
with the Department of Water and Sanitation.

30
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

4.6 NATIONAL FOREST ACT (ACT 84 OF 1998)

The National Forest Act dictates the procedures and processes required for the protection of
natural forests and forest trees. The relevance of this Act to the development under
investigation is that the impact of the development on trees in the riparian vegetation on the
site should be minimized as much as possible. Any removal of indigenous trees has to be
authorized by the Department of Forestry.
4.7 NATIONAL HERITAGE RESOURCES ACT (ACT 25 OF 1999)

The National Heritage Resources Act (NHRA), Act No. 25 of 1999) defines a heritage resource
as any place or object of cultural significance i.e. of aesthetic, architectural, historical,
scientific, social, spiritual, linguistic or technological value or significance.
Reports in fulfilment of Section 38(3) of the NHRA must include the following information:
• the identification and mapping of all heritage resources in the area affected;
• an assessment of the significance of such resources in terms of the heritage
assessment criteria set out in regulations;
• an assessment of the impact of the development on such heritage resources;
• an evaluation of the impact of the development on heritage resources relative
to the sustainable social and economic benefits to be derived from the
development;
• the results of consultation with communities affected by the proposed
development and other interested parties regarding the impact of the
development on heritage resources;
• if heritage resources will be adversely affected by the proposed development,
the consideration of alternatives; and
• plans for mitigation of any adverse effects during and after completion of the
proposed development.
The Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) is limited to the actions described above, i.e.
identification of heritage resources and recommendations for their management, and does
not include mitigation costs. The final report will be submitted to the relevant authorities
responsible for heritage for assessment and approval.

31
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

5. NEED AND DESIRABILITY

The provision of services to local communities is part of government’s initiative to improve service
delivery and improve the livelihoods of such communities. This is being done through many means,
from improving residential infrastructure, improving of roads infrastructure and extension of other vital
services such as water, electricity, sanitation, and accessibility by emergency services. The project is
noted to be part of a larger development approach to formalize the entire community, in phases
according to the availability of funding. This development is one of these phases where only the
informal settlement of Ext 9&10 will be formalized.

The community has the basic services such as electricity and water in some parts. What is lacking is a
harmonious formalization of the community which will include vital services such as roads. Once roads
are improved and properly formalized, there will be access to various parts of the community. Other
positive spillover developmental effects are expected to occur with the provision of these foundational
infrastructure. In this case upgrade of roads infrastructure and provision of better housing
infrastructure.

6. MOTIVATION FOR THE PROPOSED SITE, ACTIVITY AND TECHNOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVES

The EIA Regulations in the specification of the EIA process requires suitable and feasible alternatives to
be provided, if possible, to the proposed activity as part of holistic planning. Chapter 1 of NGR 982 of
2014 defines alternatives to the proposed activity to mean a different means of meeting the general
purpose of the requirements of the activity. These include alternatives in terms of:

a) Property or location at which the proposed development is to occur,

b) Type of activity to be undertaken.
c) Design or layout of the activity
d) Technology to be used in the activity or
e) Operational aspects of the activity

The alternatives are also to include the option of not carrying out the proposed activity, which is
popularly referred to as the “no-go alternative”. The impact assessment then is to include not only the
desired alternative but also impacts of the identified alternatives. A summary is then provided of these
alternatives to have an idea which will yield the most benefits with less undesirable impacts. It is also
acknowledged that in some cases, where not suitable alternatives are feasible, then the proposed
activity becomes the only alternative to the no-go alternative.

SITE ALTERNATIVE
Currently, the site proposed for the development is the area covered by the existing settlement. This
means that the houses will be constructed on the yards of the homesteads, as per the formalization
plan. The roads will also be upgraded on the existing internal roads or as per the proposed layout. Due
to the complicated nature of coming out with the layout of such communities, unless any significant
issues are incurred, the most conducive sites are chosen in order to have the minimum negative
impacts in terms of bulk infrastructure such as roads and reticulation pipes. According to the town
planner’s layout, the proposed layout is the only alternative so far. So far this current layout is the only
alternative considered and deemed suitable and takes into consideration the sensitive areas within the
project site as identified by the wetland assessment studies undertaken.

32
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

ACTIVITY ALTERNATIVE
The purpose of the development is to formalize the community by providing internal roads and other
services. Currently due to budget and time constraints and the developmental needs of the
community, it is indicated that the proposed activity is the most suitable means of improving the
community’s current outlook. In view of this no other activity alternative is considered as this is already
an integrated service delivery project.

TECHNOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVE
Technological alternatives include the current ways of constructing houses by manually laying of bricks
and using human labour in digging trenches laying pipes and covering them up. Roads construction will
also be according to the current technological standards as per the transport sector regulations and
budget parameters. No special technologies have been considered other than the current accepted
technological ways of doing things as per the accepted standards. It is noted however that details of
each technology employed will be approved by the project engineer prior to use.

NO-GO ALTERNATIVE

The no-go alternative to this development implies that the settlement upgrade does not take
place. The areas where access and internal roads are in poor condition will remain as such, if
not deteriorate. No water installations or additions will be made to the households. The status
quo will simply remain, coupled with current community unsatisfaction with the state of
services, leading to potential social unrests and protests. That is the current nature of the no-
go alternative. This also implies that potential disturbance to wetlands and drainage lines may
not occur due to this project (even though they may still be degraded by other developments,
natural erosion phenomena or informal encroachment).

33
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

7. DESCRIPTION OF THE RECEIVING ENVIRONMENT

7.1 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS

7.1.1TOPOGRAPHY

The proposed site is situated at the lower ends of a gentle sloping landscape. The north-eastern
segment of the site consist of gentle slopes to flattish slopes within the valley bedrocks. The southern
and south-western portions slope relatively steeper into the valley system. Slope is not likely to be an
issue for any infrastructural development, given the flat nature of the land. Figure 3 is a photograph of
portion of the farm and depicting the topographical character of the site.

Figure 1 Topographical Character of the site

Figure 5 Contours of the slope patterns in the areas.

Implications for the proposed development

The general topography appears to be conducive for infrastructure development as most of these
areas are not likely to fall within the development thresholds of more than 1:3 slope. Generally, slopes
that are steeper than 1:3 are not suitable for residential developments. Stormwater management

34
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

strategy may need to be put in place, to mitigate localised flooding or ponding on the flatter areas that
are suitable for development.

7.2 HYDROLOGY
HYDROLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS.

A stream extending from the Umzimkhulu River flows through the valley that borders the southern
boundary of the site. Functional wetlands characterise the western to southern halve of the site due to
the broad river basins and flood plains of the stream. This can be attributed to the relatively gentler
slopping to flattish nature of the terrain. The characteristics of the site in relation to hydrological is
depicted on the map presented in figure 6.

The site in general falls within the western catchment of the uMzimkhulu River located east of the site
boundary. The wetland area has been assessed and delineated by the Wetland studies conducted by
Afzelia Wetland Specialists. The Mapping of the various hydrological character of the site is shown in
the Map in Figure 6. Further details and analysis is included in the Wetland Habitat Report in appendix
4.

Figure 6 Hydrological characteristics

35
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Implications for the proposed development

There are watercourses in the form of streams and wetlands within the development boundary and its
peripheries which be impacted on if the development is implemented. These are most likely to stem
from the excavation of areas and vegetation removal as well as stormwater management. Other than
the areas that are already settled, most of the vacant areas within the development boundary may not
be available for residential development due to wetness. This implies a reduction in the actual area
available for development. These developable areas will be restricted to mainly the higher terrains of
the site. Additionally, wetlands are important ecological habitats for many aquatic organisms. The
wetlands in particular are also important in reducing the velocity of stormwater flow which otherwise
would result in exacerbation of erosion and flooding in the area. It is important to conserve the
wetland areas so that erosion and in some cases flooding can be controlled in the area. Thus,
development planning for the area needs to ensure that wetlands areas on the site are excluded from
all developments.

The Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife’s guidelines (2017), on freshwater spatial planning implications laid down
the following useful principles to be followed:

• There should be no clearance of indigenous riparian vegetation. These should be maintained as

erosion and sedimentation control mechanisms which will also provide river movement
corridor for wild species.
• A minimum of 20m buffer of undisturbed vegetation soil should be maintained between hard
surfaces and the riverine system or at the bank of the watercourse.
• Stormwater management should not be discharged directly into the river system without
setting and polishing of the runoff water occurring either through soft or engineering
structures.
• Alien invasive vegetation should be removed or cleared from the riparian zones, preferably by
chemical means, or if chemical are used, such chemicals must have been determined to be
non- toxic to aquatic species.

36
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

7.3 VEGETATION AND GENERAL BIODIVERSITY

VEGETATION

In terms of the South African Biodiversity Institute’s (SANBI) classification, the site is covered by
vegetation type classified as the Dry Coast Hinterland Grassland (Ngogoni Veld), as indicated on Map 3.
This falls within the savanna vegetation biome (Mucina, L. & Rutherford, M. C., 2006; SANBI, 2016).

Figure 2 Vegetation Types

The character of this vegetation on the site is mainly grasslands in most parts, and patches of riparian
forest located mostly within the wetland and riparian zones of the river. The grassland is noted to be in
relatively pristine and in indigenous form with minimal disturbance, mainly from settlement activities.

In terms of the vegetation conservation status, the threatened ecosystem status is classified into
critically endangered, endangered, and vulnerable and least threaten ecosystems. Endangered
vegetation is vegetation type that has undergone immense transformation that its very existence in an
indigenous form is significantly threatened. Vegetation classified as endangered is thus of high

37
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

conservation significance. Vulnerable vegetation falls within the category that if its transformation is
not checked, could move into an endangered category.

According to the conservation database, the Grassland is classified as endangered in terms of

conservation status. This requires that care be taken in order to not cause any unnecessary
disturbance to the vegetation in indigenous forms. .

Implication for the proposed development

According to the current layout of the proposed formalisation, only the informal settled areas will be
developed. These areas already have vegetation removed. Except for the section on the mid-western
side, where some little patch of scrappy vegetation remains, the entire area is fully settled.

This implies that potential impact on vegetation will be very minimal. Vegetation removal, thus is not
likely to be the main issue for this development.

7.4 CURRENT AND POTENTIAL LAND USE

The landuse on the site consist of settlement and vacant portions occupied by a stream and associated
wetlands. The already settled areas are in line with the proposed in-situ upgrade. Developing the
vacant areas may mean transforming the open spaces into residential use. This however may be
unlikely due to the fact that most of the open spaces fall within wetland and floodplains of the river.
The proposal to include these areas into open space system is a recommended landuse for the wetland
areas identified (as indicated on the Map). Fortunately the actual development will only be an upgrade
of the existing residential aeras.

7.5 MAJOR HAZARDOUS INSTALLATIONS (MHI)

This preliminary investigation did not reveal the presence of any MHI within the proposed area or within
the immediate surroundings of the site.

Implications for the proposed development

No issues are expected in terms of such installations.

7.6 CULTURAL/ HERITAGE

An initial scan of the site did not reveal any sites or structures of historical importance. Even though
the proposed site does not appear to have any significant heritage, or cultural issues, Amafa KwaZulu-

38
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Natali should be made a stakeholder any further EIA process. As per the EIA Regulations, a Heritage
Impact Assessment (HIA) should be conducted for the transformation of undeveloped sites that are
more than 500m2 in extent. For this development, a clearance from Amafa KwaZulu-Natali may be
required should the development proceed.

Given the formalisation is occurring within the already developed areas, and excluding the vacant
lands, no significant issues are expected in terms of heritage and archaeological resources.

7.7 AVAILABILITY OF SUPPORT INFRASTRUCTURE /BULK SERVICES

The site is currently informal settlement within the uMzimkhulu town where basic services such as
water, electricity and sanitation facilities exist. However, the state of bulk services may still need to be
confirmed to determine capacity to service the proposed development. Issues such as waste water and
refuse disposal, water demand and availability of connection points needs to be specifically confirmed.
Given that the development is an in-situ upgrade of existing residential units, it is envisaged that these
bulk infrastructure requirements will be integrated into the existing services being provided by the
Municipality.

39
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

8. IMPACT IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT

IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND RATING CRITERIA /FRAMEWORK

The impacts identified have been assessed and rated based on the rating criteria outlined by the
Department of Environmental Affairs, as per the guideline documents to the EIA regulations (1998) as
amended. This took into consideration the extent, duration, magnitude and probability of the impact
occurring, in arriving at the overall significance of the identified impact. Below is a description the
methodology utilized in ranking the identified impacts .

ASPECT SCORE/DESCRIPTION IMPLICATION

(a) Status Negative impact i.e. at cost to the environment)

Positive impact i.e. at benefit to the environment

Neutral effect

(b) Extent 1 Site Within the boundaries of the site

2 Local area Within 10km of the site

3 Municipal Area Within the Waterberg District Municipality and areas

less than 100km

4 Regional Within the Province of Limpopo (or neighbouring

Mpumalanga)

5 National South Africa

6 international Southern Africa

(c) Duration 1 Immediate / - < 1 year

temporal

2 Short Term 1 – 5 years

3 Medium term 6 -15 years

4 Long term The impact will cease when the operation stops

40
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

5 Permanent No mitigation measure will reduce the impact after

construction

(d) Magnitude 0 None Where the aspect will have no impact on the
environment

2 Minor Where the effects of the environment is in such a way

that natural, cultural and social functions or processes
are not affected

4 Low Where the effects of the environment in such a way

that natural, cultural and social functions or processes
are slightly affected

6 Moderate Where the effects of the environment in such a way

that natural, cultural and social functions or processes
continue but in a modified way

8 High natural, cultural and social functions or processes are

altered in such a way that they will temporarily cease
or operate in a different ways from usual for the
duration of the activity

10 Very high natural, cultural and social functions or processes will

cease or be altered permanently

(e) Possibility of 0 Very Low Will not result in any irreversible or irreplaceable loss
resulting in in resources
Irreplaceable
loss of
resources

1 Low Likely to result is preventable and localized loss to

resources

2 Moderate Most likely to cause loss if the project is implemented

but can be moderately mitigated or avoided.

3 High Highly likely to cause long term loss as long as the

project remains but can be reverted after
decommissioning

4 Very High Will result in Permanent loss to resources

6 Extremely High Southern Africa and beyond (international)

41
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 Formalisation Project Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

(f) Probability of 0 None Impact will not occur

occurrence
0.1 Improbable Possibility of the impact materializing is very low as a
result of design, historic experience or by virtue of
implementation of adequate mitigation measures.

0.25 Possible but The is moderate chance that the impact will occur
unlikely

0.5 Probable Impact may occur

0.75 Highly probable Occurrence is most likely

1 Definite / unknown The impact will occur regardless of the

implementation of preventive or corrective actions, or
where the probability that the impact will occur is
unknown due to lack of information

(g) Significance weighting of the impact (S)

From the above descriptions, the potential impacts are assigned a significance weighting (S). This
weighting is arrived at by adding the assigned scores of the extent (E), duration (D), possibility to
cause Irreplaceable Loss of Resources (I) and magnitude (M) and multiplying the sum by the
probability score (P).

Thus: S = (E+D+M+I) x P

The overall significance weightings scores are categorized below:

SCORE Description Interpretation Colour Code

≤2 Very Low

2-5 Low

5-10 Medium

11 - ≤16 High

Positive

Negative

Positively High

42
8.1 DESCRIPTION OF IMPACTS IDE NTIFIED

IMPACTS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE PLANNING AND DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,
OPERATIONAL, DECOMMISSIONING AND CLOSURE PHASES AS WELL AS PROPOSED
MANAGEMENT OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES
In terms of the criteria for identifying potential project impacts, it is important to list the potential
direct, indirect and cumulative property/activity/design/technology/operational alternative related
impacts (as appropriate) that are likely to occur as a result of the planning and design phase,
construction phase, operational phase, decommissioning and closure phase, including impacts relating
to the choice of site/activity/technology alternatives as well as the mitigation measures that may
eliminate or reduce the potential impacts listed.

For this proposed residential development at Umzimkhulu, the anticipated impacts associated with the
proposed development have been identified and analysed using the mixed method approach. This
includes site visits, consultation or interaction with key stakeholders, consultation of secondary
information or literature, and independent assessment by the project environmental personnel and
project officials. Direct impacts that may result from the proposed development include impacts on the
biophysical environment, from construction activities such as site clearing, digging, building and
installations of reticulation infrastructure.

Social impacts include, employment and business opportunities that may open up to the local and
neighbouring communities as well as satisfaction that may be derived from the upgrade in the
community’s outlook. Other impacts may result from the operational stages of the development. The
list below includes the potential identified impacts of the proposed development.

Some of these impacts may occur at the various stages but with different intensities and extent, and
significance. These are assessed in relation to the various stages of the development, specifically
construction and operational stages. It is noted that no decommissioning is envisaged in the proposed
activities of this development. From this context, no decommissioning impacts are identified.

Construction stage Impacts

Direct impacts

1) Potential loss of biodiversity during construction stage, due to vegetation removal

2) The loss of indigenous vegetation due to the removal of land cover
3) Impacts on Hydrological and watercourses
4) Noise impacts
5) Dust generation and Air pollution
6) Possible water pollution / Surface runoff /Stormwater pollution
7) Soil disturbance and possible erosion activities
8) Heritage/Cultural /historical surface sites
9) Visual /aesthetic view disruption
10) Hydrocarbon (oil) Spills
11) Traffic generation and disruption in normal community life
12) Health and Safety issues
13) Job Creation
Indirect / cumulative Impacts
14) Improvement in the livelihood of local community members
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

15) Potential impacts on local services

16) Assistance in the stimulation of local economy
17) Potential contamination from improper waste management
Operational Stage Impacts
1) Noise
2) Water pollution watercourses /
3) Soil disturbance and erosion activities
4) Dust and air pollution issues
5) Stormwater Management
6) Job creation
7) Visual and aesthetic impacts
8) Traffic issues
9) Health & Safety Issues
10) Impacts on local services
11) Benefits to the community

44
8.2 CONSTRUCTIONAL STAGE

8.2.1 SUMMARY RATING OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND THEIR RATINGS ALTERNATIVE A (PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE)

Nature Irreplaceable
Mitigation Significance
Impact of Extent Duration Magnitude Loss of Probability
Required Score
Impact resources
CONSTRUCTION STAGE
1 Potential Loss of Biodiversity Yes 1 5 4 4 0,25 3,5
2 Loss of indigenous vegetation (Flora Impacts) Yes 1 2 2 2 0,25 2,5
3 Impact on fauna Yes 2 5 4 0 0,25 2,75
4 Impact on Hydrological Resources Yes 2 4 4 0 0,5 8
5 Noise Impacts Yes 2 1 6 0 0,75 6,75
6 Dust / Air Pollution Yes 3 2 4 0 0,75 6,75
Water Pollution/Surface runoff/Stormwater
7 Yes 1 2 8 4 1 15
pollution
None
8 Soil disturbances and possible degradation 3 2 6 0 1 11
Required
9 Cultural or historical surface sites Yes 1 4 5 0 0,25 2,5
10 Visual / Aesthetic impact Yes 1 2 2 2 0,5 3,5
11 Hydrocarbon Spills Yes 2 1 8 2 0,5 6,5
12 Traffic Yes 2 2 4 0 0,5 4
13 Health & Safety issues Yes 2 2 6 0 0,5 5
None
14 Job Creation 3 2 6 0 0,75 8,25
required
15 Improvement in livelihood of local community None 3 2 6 0 0,75 8,25
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

required
16 Impact on Local services Yes 3 2 4 0 0,5 4,5
None
17 Benefits to local economy stimulation 2 2 6 0 0,5 5
required
Potential contamination from improper waste None
17 2 2 6 1 0,5 5,5
management required
93,5
Mean Significance Rating 5,84375 0

8.2.2 DETAIL SIGNIFICANCE RATING OF IDENTIFIED IMPACTS

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

Loss of critical biodiversity/habitat 3.5 =Low Though site does not constitute a high Low Unnecessary encroachment on the
The community to be upgraded is an existing biodiversity zone, most of the vacant riparian zones may lead to
settlement. The existence of areas of high portions especially along the riparian degradation of wetlands, and
biodiversity integrity to accommodate critical areas have relatively good land cover disturbance of aquatic life in those
habitats is very limited. Possibilities of aquatic and sensitive corridors. Fortunately, areas.
micro-organisms is largely limited to the along the settled areas are no directly within
the wetland areas. These can be avoided by restricting
the drainage lines and wetland areas. These development activity to the
areas may be home to several, (including development footprint only.
microscopic aquatic) organisms.
These the wetland areas need to be
46
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

No significant impact is expected on critical incorporated in the open space plan of

biodiversity from this formalisation as per the the community and considered no-
current layout for this development. development zones.

the areas where vegetation exist, are not During construction period, it is
being included in the development hence no important to demarcate these areas
impact is expected. However, given the off, to reduce any incidents of
proximity of the wetland vegetation to the encroachment.
development, care need to be taken not to
disturb the neighbouring vegetation areas. No dumping of materials or turning of
vehicles should be allowed.

Any activity that will degrade the

wetland area should be avoided.

Loss of indigenous vegetation 2,5 Low It is important that all the areas If all recommendations are adhered
Most of the areas of indigenous vegetation in identified as riparian zones be to, and monitoring of construction is
excluded from active development to Low strictly done, these issues should be
the community have been severely degraded.
The most significant indigenous vegetation maintain the integrity of such areas. avoided, bringing the potential
remains along the riparian corridors an on impact to moderate to low.
All areas that may be left bare during Vegetation in natural form is quite
few of the open spaces at the outskirts of the construction should be rehabilitated
47
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

community, especially on the north-eastern immediately with suitable vegetation low in extend due to degradation,
area. (and approved by ECO and site but the few areas of good grassland
Engineer) to avoid any alien species for domestic grazing could be lost or
Disturbance of these surface cover may pave encroachment. This must be reduced.
the ways for alien vegetation encroachment monitored during construction and
and hardened surfaces as result of loos of post construction.
landcover. Given the that the development is
to occur only within the existing or settled These the wetland areas need to be
areas, no significant impact is expected on the incorporated in the open space plan of
indigenous vegetation. the community and considered no-
development zones.
The only possibility of disturbance will be
encroaching unto the neighbouring During construction period, it is
vegetation area due during construction. important to demarcate these areas
off, to reduce any incidents of
encroachment.

No dumping of materials or turning of

vehicles should be allowed.

Any activity that will degrade the

wetland area should be avoided.

48
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

Impact on fauna 2.75 = Low Machinery with low noise levels to be Low This impact is expected to be limited,
used. given that the community is an
The area is settled community, hence the existing one, and with the current
presence of any significant fauna, other than Site activities should be conducted density, so significant fauna is
domestic animals and few birds are present in during daytime hours to avoid night expected other than riparian
the area. time noise disturbances when people organisms.
come home and want to rest.
In view of this, impact on fauna is expected to If the riparian areas are not
be very minimal. Limited impacts may occur . preserved, disturbances may occur.
in the form of noise from machinery but this Excessively laud noises from
is not expected to significantly disturb any machines, may be nuisance to the
fauna in the area. environment.

Noise 6,75 = Machinery should be kept in good Low Should the mitigation not be
Medium working order to reduce noise implemented, for instance where
Construction stage noise will consist of noise emission. Noise reduction work is carried out into the night,
and vibrations by vehicles moving materials mechanisms should be equipped if then the nearby households may get
and also construction workers. This is likely to necessary. irritated. This may be a source of
cause some irritation to nearby households. nuisance to the community itself.
This is likely to last during the construction The construction activities should be
stage and day time if all activities are restricted to normal working hours

49
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

restricted to day working hours and during the day, between 8 to

5pm.

Dust / Air pollution 6.75 = Clearance of the site should be kept to Low Polluted air, from dust and fumes or
medium a minimum, and uncovered soil should other sources is likely to be a
Air pollution during the construction stage is be kept moist to avoid dust nuisance to the community
likely to stem from dust and perhaps fumes generation. members. This may also pose a
and noise from vehicles. health risk if not mitigated.
Construction vehicles and machinery
The air pollution will affect the employees utilised on site should be maintained
and surrounding community. However this and always be kept in good working
can be controlled or mitigated order.

Protective construction gears should

be worn by workers on dusty days,
and watering should be applied where
necessary keep the ground moist.

50
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

Possible disturbance to hydrological 8 Wetlands and watercourses are major Low to Should the recommendations not be
resources: hydrological systems that perform moderate adhered to, possibility of encroaching
functions of flood attenuation and on the wetland areas next to the site
The side is largely devoid of rivers and major also server as habitat for some aquatic may result in wetland degradation.
wetlands. However it is bordered by wetland microorganisms. Appropriate Cumulative impacts on these may be
and riparian areas and seepage areas. These protection is necessary for all valley localized flooding, as these systems
have been identified. These have become the systems and water-logged areas in the have become good channels for
main channels for drainage and aquatic catchment. It is therefore surface water management.
corridor into the river systems outside the site recommended that a buffer of 30m be
boundary. It is equally important to protect established along the open valley
these areas from degradation. system identified along the southern
boundary of the proposed site.

• It is further recommended
that in order to augment the
catchment efficiency of the
area, at detailed planning
level, buffers of between 20 m
and 15 m be established along
the other drainage lines to
protect important or sensitive
natural communities that are
specific to certain localities.

51
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

No development should be
allowed within the valley not
go areas.
• All recommendations in the
wetland ecological report
should be adhered to also.

Underground water 15 = High Equipment or tools with oil or grease Low Inappropriate handling of waste and
is not allowed to be placed on bare hazardous substance on the site can
There is also the Possibility of contamination ground. reduce the quality of underground
of underground water as a results of soil water
pollution due to the usage of hazardous These must always be placed on a
substance on the site. lined surface. Cement mixing will take
place on a lined surface. No Cement
Mixing of cement and striped soils may pave should be mixed on a bare surface.
the ways for siltation into underground water,
especially on rainy days during the
construction phase.
Stockpiles of rubble and topsoil should Low Should there be no mitigation
Surface runoff pollution
not be left piled for more than a measures, possibility of storm water
Impact on surface water may be as a result of reasonable time, as may be stipulated pollution during constructionism
in the EMP, but generally not more likely to result. This however, is likely

52
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

uncontrolled waste handling, including than 14 days on site. These should be to be localized.
stockpiles. recycled where possible.

Storm water management

A storm water management system, in Very Low Should no mitigation be
Given the proposed development regards the terms of the National Building implemented, this may constitute
removal of land cover in some cases, the regulations needs to be implemented poor stormwater management which
potential to create more hardened surfaces is by the contracture in the building of may result in Issues such as localized
eminent. Storm water acceleration and the structures. Onsite, drainage ponding, sedimentation, erosion and
localised ponding/flooding is likely to occur. systems to be provided. In addition, a pollution among other things.
stormwater management plan be
In addition, spillage and waste could be other designed and approved by the
sources of pollution of storm water. This may engineer prior to the commencement
lead to contamination of water bodies and of construction works on the site.
underground water.

Soil disturbance/erosion 11=High Cleared areas will be mostly occupied medium Should the mitigation measures not
by residential units. be implemented, and then there is
The proposed activity will result in further possibility of the impacts discussed
surface clearance, soil removal, which In the case of areas cleared for pipes occurring. There will also be
decreases soil stability and lead to loss of soil and other reticulation work, these additional impacts including air
resources by erosion, contamination and need to be revegetated with pollution by dust as results of
indigenous vegetation following diggings and top soil removal, and
Soil degradation will also cause an indirect construction activities, and all soil erosion will be high given the fact
53
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

impact on the loss of micro habitats. excavations will be backfilled with sub that soil will be left bare exposed to
soil and top soil in the reverse order to wind and rain.
Soils that are left bare and rehabilitated, may which the soil profiles were removed.
become susceptible to erosion activities. It is
noted that some areas within the drainage All visible weeds should be removed
already shows signs of severe erosion from top soil and placement area
occurring. Further removal of land cover before replacing top soil.
without any
Contaminated soil by spills should be
removed and disposed of as
hazardous waste at a licensed
hazardous landfill facility.

Cultural and Historical surface sites 2=Low If any cultural or historical features Very low
discovered during the construction,
From this assessment, no significant heritage the construction must stop
resources were identified. The site is already immediately, and the remaining must
fully developed and the formalisation will be be reported to the AMAFA KwaZulu-
restricted to these areas only. Natali

54
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

Visual / Aesthetic Impacts 3.5=Medium Material storage during operations low Visual Impacts is most likely to occur
should be done at designated areas, in if mitigations are not considered
Visual impacts are likely to emanate from order not to constitute any aesthetic which will disturb the eyes and mind
construction activities such as storage of nuisance. of the community. This may cause
materials, and neglected excavations. nuisance also to road users etc.
Construction of roads may also result in Soil stockpiling and excavations should
considerable altering of the current looks of be worked on and the areas restored
the areas along such footprints. within reasonable time frames, to
reduce the length of visual impacts.

Roadworks should be undertaken

according to construction standards,
and no unnecessary blockings and
erecting of structures should occur.
Where such are necessary, they
should be removed as soon as work is
complete in that area. Visual friendly
materials should be used in all cases.

55
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

Hydrocarbon spill/fuel 6.5 = Mitigation measures for this kind of low If all the mitigation measures are
Oil and fuel leaks and spills from construction medium risk includes prevention and implemented, the impact should
vehicles is highly possible during construction management. Ideally, the spillage of remain low. However should this not
phase. This is likely to contaminate storm such oils and fuels should be be the case the risk of potential
water and also source possible contamination prevented at all cost. contamination is high. This may lead
or pollution of the soil, if not properly to contamination of underground
But where any of such incidents occur, water, soil pollution and disturbance
managed or prevented. prompt remedial actions should be of the bio-equilibrium among other
taken. Examples of which include negative effects
cutting the site and disposing
appropriately, say in a registered
landfill.

Where necessary all vehicles

suspected with leakages should be
undersealed with drip pans.

Fuels and petroleum product storage

should be undertaken and sealed hard
surfaces, which are possibly lined, to
prevent any dripping into the soil and
grass.

All foremen of operators of such

56
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

vehicles should be educated on this,

and the vehicles should be well
maintained and checked regularly for
any such leakages. The health and
safety rules as stipulated by the
department of health should be well
enforced during the construction and
operational faces.

Traffic 4=Low Traffic control officers should be Very low If the mitigation measures are not
appointed to control the flow of traffic implemented, there will be a high
Traffic during construction stage is likely to on the road to avoid such chance of unnecessary traffic
stem from the construction vehicles moving inconvenience. disruption.
materials to and from the site, via the existing
road networks and also the blocking of some This kind of inconvenience can also be
roads, of lanes for construction work on such avoided by using alternative routes
roads. and proper planning of road
diversions is necessary.
This may cause some inconvenience to local
residents. However, this is likely to be Road closures and diversions and
minimal given that the site can be accessed traffic disruption should be avoided as
via different routes. much as possible, and where such are
necessary, should be within minimal

57
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

durations to allow normal flow of

traffic.

Proper signage should company any

planned roadworks, and disruption of
traffic

Health & Safety 5 =Low The risks of accidents and injury can Very low Should these mitigation measures
be minimized by the implementation not put in place, these may
The movement of machinery, storage of of safety procedures. Proper health constitute violation of the health and
materials, and excavations are possible and safety measures should be put in safety regulations. This may also
sources of safety issues during construction place during the implementation of leave workers exposed to all kinds of
stage. the proposed development. risks. Should any incident occur, this
may leady to prolonged waiting for
Neglect to any health and safety measures Health and safety plan should be help, which may lead to loss of
may result in injury to both workers and any prepared and approved by the property for, instance in the case of
other persons who may find themselves on engineer prior to construction. The fire.
this site. This requires a strict enforcement of Occupational health and safety
the national health and safety regulations procedures as outlined by the
pertaining to construction sites. department of Health should be put in
place prior to the commencement of
work. Safety equipment such as fire
extinguishers,

58
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

First Aid boxes, and other safety

appliances should be readily available
and administered by a trained safety
officer.

Proper safety measures also need to

be implemented with areas of dug
trenches barricaded off.

Job creation 8.5 =medium No mitigation is required High N/A

The construction phase of the proposed

development is likely to create temporary
additional jobs for the local area. Jobs will be
created during construction as labours,
masons and other workers may be required.

This is likely to impact positively on the local

economy as more people getting employment
may spiral some level of livelihood
improvement

Improvement in livelihood of local 8,5=Medium None required Medium N/A

59
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

community

The temporal income generated may

contribute to household life improvement in
the short term.

In the long term however, local people will

gain skills that will help them on their future
and they will stand a better chance of being
hired when the development of this kind
happens again.

Impact on Local services 4.5 = Low Given the proposed technology that Low Disruption in services without
involve mostly manual or human adequate notification may be a
Given that the development includes an labour and auto-powered machines source of irritation for affected
upgrade of the existing community, most of and construction vehicles, the impact community. However, with proper
the local services such as water and electricity is expected to be low. mitigation measures, these should be
resources are expected to aid the mitigated.
development process. Any disruption in services, should be
preceded with ample and adequate

60
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

Also some services such as road usage and notifications of the affected areas.
water connections may be disrupted
temporarily during construction. Services should be restored within the
shortest possible time.

Benefits to local Economy 5=Medium None required Medium N/A

The spill over of the construction stage

employment and sourcing of materials from
local suppliers will go a long way in providing
socio-economic benefit to the community as a
whole.

More income in the pocket of community

members means, more purchasing power,
leading to the stirring of economic acidity in
the local economy.

In addition, access and improvement of bus

routes will also empower easy movements
within the community making people go
about their daily business with much ease,

61
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS SIGNIFICANC PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICAN RISK OF THE IMPACT AND
E RATING OF CE RATING MITIGATION NOT BEING
IMPACTS OF IMPACTS IMPLEMENTED
(POSITIVE AFTER
OR MITIGATIO
NEGATIVE ) N:

thereby improving efficiency of any existing

economic activities.

62
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

8.3 OPERATIONAL STAGE

8. 3. 1 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND THEIR RATINGS

OPERATIONAL STAGE
Nature Irreplaceable
Mitigation of Loss of Significance
Impact Required Impact Extent Duration Magnitude resources Probability Score
1 Noise Yes 1 1 2 0 0,25 1
2 Water pollution (water courses) Yes 3 4 4 1 0,25 3
3 Soil disturbance /Erosion Yes 1 1 4 1 0,5 3,5
4 Air Pollution Yes 2 3 2 1 0,5 4
5 Stormwater management Yes 3 2 6 1 0,25 3
6 None
Job Creation Required 3 4 6 0 0,5 6,5
7 Visual / Aesthetic impact Yes 1 4 0 0 0,5 2,5
8 Traffic Yes 2 1 4 0 0,5 3,5
9 Safety Yes 1 2 4 0 0,5 3,5
10 Impact on Local services Yes 3 4 4 0 0,5 5,5
11 None
Benefits to local economy Required 4 4 6 0 0,5 7
43
Mean impact rating 3,909090909

63
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

8.3.2 DETAILS OF IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AT OPERATIONAL PHASE PROPOSAL (PREFFERED ALTERNATIVE)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS: SIGNIFICANCE PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICA RISK OF THE IMPACT AND MITIGATION
RATING OF NCE NOT BEING IMPLEMENTED
IMPACTS RATING
(POSITIVE OR OF
NEGATIVE): IMPACTS
AFTER
MITIGATI
ON:

1. Noise Score 1 = No mitigation required for Low None mitigation hence required.
Noise levels are likely to be back to normal during Low noise during operational stage
the operational stage. as life would have returned to
normal as construction
Given that no additional people from outside the machines would have been
existing community will be moved into the withdrawn.
community, and also that not noisy installations are
expected as part of this development, noise levels
are expected to be at normal levels for the
community.

2. Water pollution (water courses) Score 3 • Waste management Low Should there be no mitigation measures;
• During operational stage, the handling of waste and should be included in the possibility of stormwater pollution during
other chemicals such as disinfectants could be Low responsibilities of the the operation is likely to result. This is
possible sources of surface water pollutions. local authority and carried likely to be localized. Local water systems
out regularly to avoid any and drainage systems may be
• Improper stormwater management may result in contamination of the contaminated if not properly managed.
contamination of surface water and siltation and
64
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS: SIGNIFICANCE PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICA RISK OF THE IMPACT AND MITIGATION
RATING OF NCE NOT BEING IMPLEMENTED
IMPACTS RATING
(POSITIVE OR OF
NEGATIVE): IMPACTS
AFTER
MITIGATI
ON:

subsequent blocking of drains and disturbances of environment. .

watercourses.
• Given the improvement in
road network, it is
expected that waste
management services will
also improve.

3. Soil disturbance /Erosion Moderate 3.5 Striped surfaces should be Low Should the mitigation measures not be
At operational stages, potential disturbances to the utilized immediately. implemented, and then there is possibility
soil are likely to stem from the areas left bare from Stormwater management of the impacts discussed occurring. What
construction stage, not rehabilitated. These if not mechanisms need to be put in could happen will be ponding and also or
properly monitored and attended to may be prone place to reduce or attenuate stagnation if the bare land is left for a
to erosion activities. Soil erosion activities may the possible effects of surface longer time without any mitigation
cause degradation in the land if not checked in time. runoff. Land cover within the measures. Erosion may also occur as a
open spaces an riparian zones result of improper discharge of
should be maintained to serve stormwater.
as a reduction mechanism for
surface runoff.

65
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS: SIGNIFICANCE PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICA RISK OF THE IMPACT AND MITIGATION
RATING OF NCE NOT BEING IMPLEMENTED
IMPACTS RATING
(POSITIVE OR OF
NEGATIVE): IMPACTS
AFTER
MITIGATI
ON:

4. Air Pollution Low 4 Speed regulating mechanisms Low 5 The identified impacts may occur, should
Possible pollution sources during the operational should be applied on any no long-term mitigation measures not be
phase may stem from waste left uncollected and on unpaved roads, in such a way put in place. People may have unrests and
any unpaved roads within the area, generating dust. that reduces any potential discomfort from such impacts.
dust generation.

Waste collection as
emphasised in the previous
sections, should be regularly
carried out by the local
authority.

5. Storm water management Score 3 • A stormwater Low 6 • Should no mitigation be

• Given the proposed development regards the management system, in implemented, this may constitute
removal the land cover, the potential to create Medium terms of the National poor stormwater management which
more hardened surfaces is eminent. Stormwater Building regulations needs may result in Issus such as localized
acceleration and localised ponding is likely to occur. to be implemented. ponding, sedimentation, erosion and
In addition, spillage and waste could be other Onsite, drainage systems pollution among other things.
sources of pollution of storm water. This may lead will be provided.
to contamination of water surface bodies and
• In addition, a stormwater

66
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS: SIGNIFICANCE PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICA RISK OF THE IMPACT AND MITIGATION
RATING OF NCE NOT BEING IMPLEMENTED
IMPACTS RATING
(POSITIVE OR OF
NEGATIVE): IMPACTS
AFTER
MITIGATI
ON:

underground water. management plan should

be designed and approved
by the engineer prior to
the commencement of
construction works on the
site.

• Proper stormwater
discharge points should
be identified and
implemented as part of
the stormwater
channelling mechanism.

6. Job Creation 6.5Medium N/A Should the development no be

Both the construction and operational phases of the implemented, then the iterated or
proposed development are likely to create envisaged positive impacts are not likely
additional jobs for the local community. Jobs will be to occur.
created during construction as labours, masons and
other workers may be required.

67
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS: SIGNIFICANCE PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICA RISK OF THE IMPACT AND MITIGATION
RATING OF NCE NOT BEING IMPLEMENTED
IMPACTS RATING
(POSITIVE OR OF
NEGATIVE): IMPACTS
AFTER
MITIGATI
ON:

Operational phase of the development may

however see fewer jobs. Potential jobs may include
maintenance staff and skilled labour work such as
engineers overseeing and monitoring operation of
services.

Waste collection is also likely to generate some

form of job avenues for some local community
members.

7. Visual impact 2.5 = Low Any materials left during Very low Aesthetic or visual impacts are expected
At operational stage, visual impacts are expected to construction should be to normalize drastically during operation
normalise. The new structures should have cleared, as part of site closure, if all care is taken during stockpiling of
interested into the new view of the area and before contractors leave site. materials and waste.
become the new reality.
Waste should be organised in
• Aesthetic view or the new view of the community is such a way to reduce any
rather expected to improve, as new residential aesthetic nuisance. Waste
structures are put in, and roads are well structured storage sites should be
and well formalised. properly designated during
operation to ensure minimal

68
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS: SIGNIFICANCE PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICA RISK OF THE IMPACT AND MITIGATION
RATING OF NCE NOT BEING IMPLEMENTED
IMPACTS RATING
(POSITIVE OR OF
NEGATIVE): IMPACTS
AFTER
MITIGATI
ON:

aesthetic discomfort to
community members.

8. Traffic = •
3.5 Proper signage should be • • Improper signage and traffic control
• Traffic during operation may be from vehicles Moderate applied, to ensure most measures such as speed limits may
moving goods to and fro the farm. Traffic should efficient traffic situation result in traffic situations,
return to normal and rather improved, with during operational stage inconvenience and in some cases
additional and improved road network systems. of eh development. possible accidents.

9. Safety 3.5 Low Traffic calming measures 4 Very

Safety during operation should improve should be implemented on Low
significantly, now that services are improved, and road networks, accompanied
houses are well demarcated, people can fence their by proper signage.
houses and put in other safety measures.
Improvement in the road network should improve
safety in terms of traffic issues and accidents, if
proper and traffic calming measures are
implemented.

10. Impact on Local services 5.5 = Medium Potential impacts on local

Local services, should improve significantly during services during operation are
69
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS: SIGNIFICANCE PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICA RISK OF THE IMPACT AND MITIGATION
RATING OF NCE NOT BEING IMPLEMENTED
IMPACTS RATING
(POSITIVE OR OF
NEGATIVE): IMPACTS
AFTER
MITIGATI
ON:

operational stages. Residential unites would’ve expected to be rather

been upgraded, and water and sanitation services positive, if services such as
provided. Road networks would have improved also. waste and stormwater
management are handled
Also as more parts of the community are accessible, efficiently.
other additional services such as emergency and
security services such as police, services can now
access the various parts of the community to deliver
valuable services.

11. Improvement in livelihood of local Economy 6 = Medium None required NA NA

• At operational stage, the improvement in the local
economy would stem from the improvement in
services to the community. for instance, water
connection will be readily available for domestic and
commercial activities.

• Improvement in road networks, mean people can go

about their daily duties with much easy. Cumulative
effect of all these improvements is expected to
stimulate the local economy, though indirectly.

70
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS: SIGNIFICANCE PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICA RISK OF THE IMPACT AND MITIGATION
RATING OF NCE NOT BEING IMPLEMENTED
IMPACTS RATING
(POSITIVE OR OF
NEGATIVE): IMPACTS
AFTER
MITIGATI
ON:

8.4 NO GO ALTERNATIVE

Potential impacts: Significance Proposed mitigation: Significan Risk of the impact and mitigation not
rating of ce rating being implemented
impacts of
(positive or impacts
negative): after
mitigatio
n:

The impacts of no go alternative are most likely to be Moderately Mitigation for this impact, is Low Should the mitigation not be
felt from a socio economic development perspective. High to find ways of implementing implemented, then the issues described
this development as planned, in the impacts section will continue as

71
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9 &1 Formalisation Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

POTENTIAL IMPACTS: SIGNIFICANCE PROPOSED MITIGATION: SIGNIFICA RISK OF THE IMPACT AND MITIGATION
RATING OF NCE NOT BEING IMPLEMENTED
IMPACTS RATING
(POSITIVE OR OF
NEGATIVE): IMPACTS
AFTER
MITIGATI
ON:

No go alternative, may imply that the community in an environmentally friendly they currently are. More service delivery
remain with the current issues of poor services. and responsible manner, protests may rather occur. Also there may
adhering to all legislations and be dissatisfaction and conflict within the
The envisaged job creations and economic stimulation guidelines as well as community as some residential unit
may also not occur. recommendations of this hopefuls would have been denied houses,
assessment. leading to social conflicts.

All possible employment opportunities that are likely to

arise from the proposed development construction and
operational stages will be lost, or at least stunted.

Socio economic benefits of the proposed development

to the community are also likely to be lost.

A no go alternative however; will keep the environment

the way it currently is. Possible construction stage
impacts as well may be avoided. Production levels will
remain same, or increase gradually. 1

72
 9 CONCLUSIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

The purpose of this is to detail the assessment undertaken, taking the assessment of potential
impacts into account, to give an environmental impact statement that summarises the impact
that the proposed activities and alternatives may have on the environment prior to and after
the management and mitigation of impacts have been taken into account, with specific
reference to types of impact, duration of impacts, likelihood of potential impacts actually
occurring and the significance of impacts.
The impact assessment and significance rating show that the construction stage impacts, and
operational stage impacts are largely of medium significance, given the fact that the site is
largely an already settled community. Construction stage impacts at an overall mean of 6.64,
which is Medium, while operational stage impacts have a mean of 3.9, which are considered
low. If all the proposed mitigations are implemented, these impacts should be reduced
further. This is also attributed to the fact that other than the heritage sensitive areas
identified, most of the hydrological and terrestrial impacts are located outside the
development footprint.

Alternative A (preferred alternative) _ The Proposal

Biophysical environment

It is noted that the development is mainly an in-situ upgrade within the existing community.
Most of the vegetation on the site is already largely degraded. Only patches of grasslands
remain on the open spaces. These however, act as flood attenuation mechanisms and
protection against erosion. The proposed development will result in minimal clearing of
vegetation on the proposed sites for the construction of houses and service infrastructure such
as roads and stormwater infrastructure. The clearing of the site is likely to result in further
exposing the land and possible surface runoff pollution. This can be mitigated by implementing
appropriate stormwater management strategies, including proper channelling of the
stormwater during construction and operational phases.

• Wetland habitat impact

The site is bordered by significant wetland and riparian areas. No direct development is
envisaged on the wetland areas according to the scope of the formalisation. These can
be impacted on or encroached on during construction if care is not taken.

• Other Construction Stage impacts that were identified, for the construction phase are
noted to be mitigatable. Noise and dust, and oil spillage can be mitigated by avoiding
and managing the occurrences. Impacts during the construction stage may be short term
and may end when construction is completed.

• Operational stage impacts on the natural environment can also be mitigated if proper
strategies are put in place. The possibility of mitigating these impacts reduces their
significant levels considerably, to low significance once the proper infrastructure is put in
place especially in terms of roads and stormwater systems. The neglect of mitigation
measures, such as waste management could result in severe health hazards. This
therefore infers the need to take the recommendations made herein and in all
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

applicable regulations and guidelines seriously.

• A synoptic view of the environment in terms of biodiversity, on the physical site and
relevant biodiversity literature and databases and as assessed herein, indicated the
aquatic biodiversity features are located within the outskirts of the site.

• The potential impacts on these are rated to be low (refer to wetland report) within the
development boundaries or within the immediate environments. This is due to the fact
that the sites are located on the high parts of the hills, while the watercourses are
located down in the valley system. It is therefore concluded that the development as
proposed, may not impact significantly on these aquatic biodiversity resources, given the
type of development proposed being in-situ-upgrade of the already disturbed areas of
houses and internal roads.

Socio economic impacts during the construction stage will include employment opportunities,
for both skilled and unskilled labour and suppliers of construction materials. The spiral effect of
these will contribute to the improvement of economic activities during this period.

• During operational stage, few people are likely to be employed on permanent basis, like
in waste collection and maintenance services of the municipality. This may reduce the
unemployment in the area further, and bring improvement in livelihoods of the local
community. Above all, it is the level of social satisfaction from better service delivery
may also be a tangible social and economic impact from the proposed development

From this assessment, it is observed that most of the negative impacts can be readily mitigated.
Also, the positive impacts from the proposed development outweigh the identified negatives (if
properly mitigated). A no go alternative may therefore be unwarranted, given the absence of
fatal flaws with the proposed upgrade of uMzimkhulu community and infrastructure.

No-go alternative (compulsory)

The No-development option will mean that the anticipated effects of impacts of the
development will not occur. All the envisaged construction stage impacts, such as dust, noise
and so forth will not occur because of the proposed development.

In addition, even though much removal of land cover may not occur as a result of development,
a no-go alternation in this case, may still pave the way for some form of degradation as the
community expands in an uncontrolled manner, without proper infrastructure to manage
potential impacts.

• Road networks may still be an issue and some parts of the community may not have
proper access. Emergency services may not have access to vital areas of the community.

• From a socio-economic perspective, the no-development option may rather hinder the
74
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

potential biophysical and socio-economic benefits that were envisaged. From this
perspective, it can be asserted that the potential positive impacts outweigh the
envisaged negative impacts, hence a no-go alternative may not be necessary.

75
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

10 RECOMMENDATIONS

From this assessment of the biophysical and socio-economic environment, given that there are
no fatal flaws that will hinder the proposed development it is concluded that the proposed
development is feasible. The specialist studies undertaken to assess the potential impacts on
wetlands and sensitive ecological areas also concludes that the potential impacts are low
(refer to wetland). The proposed development is thus possible provided all impacts are duly
mitigated as proposed.

In addition, the following recommendations are provided:

• It is recommended that the mitigation measures suggested in this report herein be
taken seriously and considered during the implementation of the proposed
development to minimize any unwarranted effects of the identified impacts.
• The development must be restricted to the current development footprint as per the
layout included in this assessment.
• The wetland area bordering the site, should be fenced off during construction stage as
no development zones, and no activity whatsoever must be undertaken within the
wetland space.
• It is important that an independent environmental control officer be appointed to
monitor the construction activities, in terms of the EIA regulations requirements, and
to ensure that the EMPr is fully implemented.
• Project implementation monitoring and audit report must be regularly submitted to
the competent authority to ensure all conditions and mitigation measures and proper
due diligence is being applied.
• From the information gathered and based on this Basic Assessment Process, given that
no fatal flaws were identified, and given the development is likely to rather improve
the settlement, it is our opinion and recommendation that the development may be
allowed to proceed given the socio-economic benefits it may yield to the community
and the environment. This may also add to the service delivery progress of the Local
Municipality.

76
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

REFERENCES
Aucamp, P J. (2010). Environmental Impact Assessment: a practical guide for the discerning
practitioner. Van Shaik Publishers.
Mucina, L., & Rutherford, M. C. (2006). The Vegetation of South Africa, Lsotho and Swaziland. Strelizia,
South African National Biodiversity Institute, 19.
SANBI. (2016). KwaZulu-Natal Systmatic Conservation Plan (KZNSCP) : KZNSCP Vegetation types.
Retrieved April 30, 2016, from http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/39
Shaw, C. S., & Escott, B. (2011). KwaZulu–Natal Vegetation Type Description Document for Vegetation
Map 2011: kznveg05v2_1_11_wll. shp. Retrieved from
http://cpu.uwc.ac.za/KZN/KZN_vegetationtypes_descriptionsVer2_1.pdf

77
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

REFERENCES

Aucamp, P J. (2010). Environmental Impact Assessment: a practical guide for the discerning

practitioner. Van Shaik Publishers.

Mucina, L., & Rutherford, M. C. (2006). The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland.

Strelizia, South African National Biodiversity Institute, 19.

SANBI. (2016). KwaZulu-Natal Systematic Conservation Plan (KZNSCP) : KZNSCP Vegetation types.

Retrieved April 30, 2016, from http://bgis.sanbi.org/Projects/Detail/39

Shaw, C. S., & Escott, B. (2011). KwaZulu–Natal Vegetation Type Description Document for Vegetation

Map 2011: kznveg05v2_1_11_wll. shp. Retrieved from

http://cpu.uwc.ac.za/KZN/KZN_vegetationtypes_descriptionsVer2_1.pdf

78
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

11 APPENDIXES

Appendix 1. Locality Mapping

Appendix 2 Proposed Development Layouts

Appendix 3 Public Participation report

Appendix 4 Wetland Habitat assessment report

Appendix 5 EMPr

79
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

APPENDIX 1 PROJECT LO

80
APPENDIX 2 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REPORT
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REPORT

83

KZN: 15 Eugene Marais Road, Napierville, Pietermaritzburg 3200P O Box 1978 Pietermaritzburg 3200
GAUTENG: Unit 77, Block 4, Riversands Business Hub, Ext4 Fourways, Midrand
Tel +27 (0)776 ♦ Cell +27 (0) 719212618 ♦ Fax+27- 86 776 33 25 ♦
Email [email protected] www.developmentimpact.co.za
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CONTENTS

Appendix 2 Public Participation report Public Participation report ......................................................................... 82

1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 85
2. PUBLIC ADVERTISEMENT ................................................................................................................................. 85
3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT (BID) ............................................................................................ 85
4. PUBLIC MEETINGS ............................................................................................................................................ 85
5. COMMENTS FROM STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................................................................. 85
Site Notice ....................................................................................................................................................... 87
Newspaper advertisement .............................................................................................................................. 90
Background information Document (BID) and Distribution List ...................................................................... 92
BID Distribution List ............................................................................................................................................. 99
STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS AND REPONSES ...................................................................................................... 105

84
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

1. INTRODUCTION

This report is a summary of the public participation process and activities undertaken so far for the assessment
process curried out for the uMzimkhulu Ext 9 & 10 formalisation Project. Public participation is done with the
assistance of the Ward Councillors and also Project Development committee members within the community to
ensure the community is provided sufficient opportunity to participate. This report details the activities carried
out and outcomes to date. Generally, the community is happy and anxiously waiting for the project to be
executed and completed., as was indicated from interactions with them.

2. PUBLIC ADVERTISEMENT

2.1 Site notices

Site notices where laced within the community in places that are mostly assessable by the community members,
under the guidance of the Development Committee members. Photographs of some of the Site Notices are
attached in Appendix 2(i).

2.2 Newspaper advertisement

A newspaper advertisement is being placed in the Natal Witness for the public digest. This is to further give
notice to the public and invite comments on the Basic assessment report. Copy of the advert is included in this
public participation report Appendix 2(ii).

3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT (BID)

Background Information was prepared and distributed within the community of uMzimkhulu suburb of Sisulu
where the formalisation is to take place. This was done with the assistance of the local councillor/ ward
committee members. All those who received such information were encouraged to register as interested and
affected parties if they so wish. A copy of the BID and list of people to whom it was distributed are attached in
Appendix 2 .

4. PUBLIC MEETINGS

From the interactions with the public so far, it didn’t appear that there were any critical issues for which public
meetings would be called for. Should this become necessary, it will be planned with the municipality and
community leaders. Also because of COVID-19 Restrictions, unnecessary public meetings are discouraged given
no critical issues were raised.

5. COMMENTS FROM STAKEHOLDERS

The draft basic assessment report (BAR) has been distributed to key stakeholders between the 1st of July to 15th of
August (relevant government departments and municipalities) for comments. These include, AMAFA, KZN
Wildlife, EDTEA and DWS. Comments received are inculcated into this final report to be competent authority.

85
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Indications from KZN Wildlife is that since the development is formalisation of the existing settlements and does
not include any of the wetland areas or areas of biodiversity concern then no issues are envisaged. The report
submitted was not commented on within the comment period. Report has also been loaded unto SAHRIS for
AMAFA, but no comments were provided. A screen shot of the status is included in this report. Given the
development is in-situ upgrade of the already degraded areas no critical issues are expected in terms of heritage
resources. Biodiversity Comments from DWS and EDTEA are responded to and integrated into the finalisation of
this report.

86
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

SITE NOTICE

87
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

PUBLIC NOTICE
UMZIMKHULU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
FORMALISATION OF UMZIMKHULU EXT 9 &10, UMZIMKHULU LOCAL
MUNICIPALITY
BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS (EIA)
EIA NO: DC24/00011/2021 NEAS: KZN/EIA/0001581/2021

Notice is hereby given in terms of the regulations published in Government Notice No. GNR 38282 of
December 2014 under the National Environmental Management Act (Act No. 107 of 1998) as amended, of
the intent to carry out the following activity:

uMzimkhulu Local Municipality in collaboration with the KZN Department of Human Settlements intends
to formalise the informal settlements on
Extension 9 and 10 of the uMzimkhulu. This
would include the construction of about 300
houses in semi-detached format and the
upgrade of internal roads from gravel to
tarred surfaces.

The proposed development site borders

sensitive hydrological features along the
stream that flows along the outskirts of the
boundary. The wetland studies undertaken
noted the extend of these wetlands and
recommended buffer zones. This also
triggers activities within Listing Notice 1 of
GNR 327 of 2017 under the National
Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of
1998). An environmental Application has
been submitted towards obtaining
authorisation for the proposed development.

Basic Assessment (EIA) process is being undertaken by Bizycon (PTY) LTD and an application for
authorisation for this project will be submitted to the KZN Department of Economic Development, Tourism
& Environmental Affairs (EDTEA).

All Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) may submit their names, contact details and written interest or
comments relating to the above development to the contact persons given below within 30 days of the
date of publication of this advertisement or 11 July 2021.

Isaziso Somphakathi
Inqubo ye-Basic Assessment (EIA) yenziwa yi-Bizycon (PTY) LTD futhi isicelo sokugunyazwa kwale phrojekthi
sizothunyelwa eMnyangweni Wezokuthuthukiswa Komnotho, Ezokuvakasha nezeMvelo e-KZN (i-EDTEA).

Zonke izinhlaka ezithintekayo nezithintekayo (I & APs) zingathumela amagama azo, imininingwane
yokuxhumana kanye nesithakazelo esibhaliwe noma ukuphawula okuphathelene nalokhu kuthuthukiswa
okungenhla kubantu okuxhunyanwa nabo abanikezwe ngezansi zingakapheli izinsuku ezingama-30
kusukela ngosuku lokushicilelwa kwalesi sikhangiso: 11 Julayi, 2021.

Mr MacCarthy Honu-Siabi: Tel: 0724641197 Fax 086 7763325 Email: 88

[email protected]
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

89
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

NEWSPAPER ADVERTISEMENT

90
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

91
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT (BID) AND DISTRIBUTION LIST

92
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

FORMALISATION OF UMZIMKHULU EXT 9 &10, UMZIMKHULU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY

BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS
BACKGROUND INFORMATION DOCUMENT (BID)

BACKGROUND
uMzimkhulu Local Municipality in collaboration with the KZN Department of Human Settlements intends to
formalise the informal settlements on Extension 9 and 10 of the uMzimkhulu. This would include the construction
of about 300 houses in semi-detached format and the upgrade of internal roads from gravel to tarred surfaces.

The proposed development site borders sensitive hydrological features along the stream that flows along the
outskirts of the boundary. The wetland studies undertaken noted the extend of these wetlands and
recommended buffer zones. This also triggers activities within Listing Notice 1 of GNR 327 of 2017 under the
National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998). An environmental Application has been submitted
towards obtaining authorisation for the proposed development.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT SITE

The project site is the located on the outskirts of
the community. The portions of the community
where the development will take place as per
the layout below.
Environmental Process &
Considerations
This triggers activities within Listing Notice 1 of
GNR 983, of the National Environmental
Management Act (Act 107 of 1998) for which
environmental authorisation is required.

A Basic Assessment (EIA) process is being

undertaken by Bizycon (PTY) LTD and an
application for authorisation for this has been
submitted to the KZN Department of Economic Development, Tourism & Environmental Affairs (EDTEA).

All Interested and Affected Parties (I&APs) may submit their names, contact details and written interests or
comments relating to the above development to the contact persons given below within 30 days of the date of
publication of this advertisement

Your involvement
Environmental Assessment plays a vital role to ensure that it provides the necessary and adequate information on
which to base the decision of whether to grant environmental authorisation on the anticipated project. This
environmental approval will also give information on whether and if yes under which conditions the authorisation

93
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

will be granted. There are numerous stakeholders that are involved from entirely different sectors, and each
contributes towards a desirable conclusion. Your remarks, if any, will enhance all appropriate concerns or
appraisals that are assessed in the EIA. You are therefore encouraged to fill in the enclosed registration/comment
form or write a letter, call, and email or send a fax to the EAP on the following contacts in case you want to
comment on the proposed development. If you have no comments, then you do not need to do anything. After
30 days, if no comments are received, we shall take it you do not have any.

ISIZULU Isaziso
Somphakathi
ISENDLALELO
UMasipala Wendawo uMzimkhulu ngokubambisana noMnyango Wezokuhlaliswa
Kwabantu eKZN uhlose ukwenza imijondolo ibe semthethweni e-Extension 9 no-10
eMzimkhulu. Lokhu kuzobandakanya ukwakhiwa kwezindlu ezilinganiselwa ku-300
ezakhiwe ngendlela ehlukaniswe kancane nokuvuselelwa kwemigwaqo
yangaphakathi kusuka kubhuqu kuya ezindaweni ezinetiyela.

Indawo ehlongozwayo yentuthuko inemingcele yezici ezibucayi ze-hydrological

eceleni komfudlana ogeleza emaphethelweni omngcele. Ucwaningo lwamaxhaphozi
olwenziwe lwaqaphela ukwandiswa kwalezi zindawo ezingamaxhaphozi nezindawo
ezinconywayo ezinconyiwe. Lokhu kubuye kudale imisebenzi ngaphakathi koHlu
Lokufakwa Kuhlu 1 luka-GNR 327 lonyaka we-2017 ngaphansi koMthetho
Kazwelonke Wokuphathwa Kwezemvelo (Umthetho 107 ka-1998). Isicelo Sezemvelo
sithunyelwe mayelana nokuthola ukugunyazwa kwentuthuko ehlongozwayo.

INCAZELO YESIKHUNGO SOMSEBENZI

OPHA

94
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

95
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

KANYISIWEYO
Isiza sephrojekthi sitholakala emaphethelweni omphakathi. Izingxenye zomphakathi
lapho intuthuko izokwenzeka khona njengokwesakhiwo esingezansi.
Inqubo Yezemvelo Nokucatshangelwa
Lokhu kudala imisebenzi ngaphakathi koHlu Lokufakwa Kuhlu 1 luka-GNR 983,
loMthetho Kazwelonke Wokuphathwa Kwezemvelo (uMthetho 107 ka-1998)
okudingeka kuwo ukugunyazwa kwemvelo.
Inqubo ye-Basic Assessment (EIA) yenziwa yi-Bizycon (PTY) LTD futhi isicelo
sokugunyazwa kwalokhu sesithunyelwe eMnyangweni Wezokuthuthukiswa
Komnotho, Ezokuvakasha Nezemvelo e-KZN (EDTEA).
Bonke Abathintekayo Nabathintekayo (I & APs) bangaletha amagama abo,
imininingwane yokuxhumana kanye nezintshisekelo ezibhalwe phansi noma
ukuphawula okuphathelene nalokhu kuthuthukiswa okungenhla kubantu
okuxhunyanwa nabo abanikezwe ngezansi zingakapheli izinsuku ezingama-30
kusukela ngosuku lokushicilelwa kwalesi sikhangiso.

Ukubandakanyeka kwakho
UkuHlolisiswa Kwezemvelo kudlala indima ebalulekile ukuqinisekisa ukuthi
kunikeza ulwazi oludingekayo nolwanele okungasekelwa kulo isinqumo sokuthi
ngabe kuyakhishwa yini ukugunyazwa kwezemvelo kulowo msebenzi olindelekile.
Lokhu kuvunyelwa kwemvelo kuzophinde kunikeze imininingwane yokuthi ngabe
imvume izonikezwa ngaphansi kwaziphi izimo. Baningi ababambiqhaza
ababandakanyekayo abavela emikhakheni ehluke ngokuphelele, futhi ngamunye
ubamba iqhaza ekufinyeleleni esiphethweni esihle. Ukuphawula kwakho, uma
kukhona, kuzothuthukisa konke ukukhathazeka okufanele noma ukuhlolwa
kwamanani okuhlolwa ku-EIA. Ngakho-ke uyakhuthazwa ukuthi ugcwalise ifomu
lokubhalisa / lokuphawula elifakiwe noma ubhale incwadi, ushayele, uthumele i-
imeyili noma uthumele ifeksi ku-EAP kulaba oxhumana nabo abalandelayo uma
kwenzeka ufuna ukuphawula ngentuthuko ehlongozwayo. Uma ungenakho
ukuphawula, awudingi ukwenza lutho. Ngemuva kwezinsuku ezingama-30, uma
kungekho okutholakele okutholakele, sizokuthatha awunakho.

REGISTRATION AND COMMENT FORM

96
Accompanying Background Information Document
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Should you have any comments regarding the proposed project, please complete and send the attached
comments sheet to either of the following contact person:

Mr Maccarthy Honu-Siabi

Tel: Cell: 0724641197, Fax: 086 776 33 25

Email: [email protected] [email protected]

TITLE FIRST NAME

INITIALS SURNAME
Email: [email protected]
ORGANISATION/TOWN E MAIL
POSTAL ADDRESS
Tel: 0789855494, Fax: 086 776 33 25

TEL NO. Email: [email protected] POSTAL CODE

CELL FAX NO.

REGISTRATION AS AN INTERESTED OR AFFECTED PARTY (I&AP) (Please circle applicable

box)
Please formally register me as an interested and affected party so that I may receive YES NO
further information and notifications during the EIA process
I would like my notification by Letter (mail)
E Mail
Fax
Telephone

In terms of the GNR 327 (EIA process regulations) I disclose below any direct business, financial,
personal or other interest that I may have in the approval or refusal of the application.

97
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

COMMENTS (you may use a separate sheet if you so wish)

I have no objections to the proposed development. My reasons are

.......................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................................
..................................

I support the proposed development. My reasons are:

.................................................................…………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………

I object to the proposed development. My reasons are:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……
Other I&APs to be contacted are:
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………

98
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

BID DISTRIBUTION LIST

99
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

101
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

102
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

103
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

104
STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS AND REPONSES
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

106
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

107
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

108
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

109
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

110
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

111
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

112
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

113
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

114
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

115
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

AMAFA Proof of submission

116
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

APPENDIX 3 WETLAND HABBITAT ASSESSMENT AND ECOLOGICAL REPORT

117
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

118
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

119
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

120
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

121
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

122
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

123
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

124
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

125
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

126
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

127
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

128
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

129
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

130
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

131
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

132
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

133
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

134
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

135
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

136
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

137
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

138
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

139
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

140
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

141
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

142
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

143
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

144
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

145
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

146
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

147
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

148
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

149
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

150
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

151
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

152
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

153
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

154
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

155
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

156
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

157
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

158
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

159
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

160
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

161
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

162
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

163
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

164
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

165
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

166
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

167
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

168
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

169
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

170
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

171
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

172
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

173
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

uMzimkhulu Local Municipality

uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Formalisation Project
Construction & Operational Stage
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAMME
(EMPr)

MASEKO HLONGWA & ASSOCIATES CC

DEVELOPMENT PLANNING CONSULTANTS
77 HOWICK ROAD, PIETERMARITZBURG
TEL: 033 394 5723 FAX: 033 394 5715

PREPARED BY:

KZN: 15 Eugene Murrais Road, P O Box 1978 Pietermaritzburg 3200

GP: Unit 77, Block 4, Riversands Incubation Hub. 8 Incubation Drive, Riverside View Ext 15, Fourways,
Midrand 2021
Tel: 0724641197 Fax 086 776 3325, Email: [email protected] Contact: McCarthy Honu-Siabi

174
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Table of Contents
I. Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations (See Annexure A) .............................................................................. 176
II. Key to Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... 176
EMP: SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 177
1.1. Background ............................................................................................................................................. 177
1.2 Aims and objectives of the EMPr .................................................................................................................. 177
1.2.1 Aim ........................................................................................................................................................ 177
1.2.2 Objectives ............................................................................................................................................. 177
SECTION 2: REGULATORY / LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT ................................................................................................. 178
DEALING WITH NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE EMPr (Penalties/ Incentives) ...................................................... 178
2.1 Key Legislation and Regulatory Requirements .............................................................................................. 178
2.1.1 National Environmental Management Act No. 107 of 1998 .................................................................. 178
2.1.1.1 Penalties for non-compliance ................................................................................................................ 178
2.1.2 National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999 ...................................................................................... 179
2.1.2.1 Penalties for noncompliance .................................................................................................................. 179
2.1.3 Occupational Health and Safety Act No. 85 of 1993 .................................................................................. 179
2.1.3.1 Penalties for noncompliance .............................................................................................................. 179
2.1.4 Other necessary legislations but not limited to: ........................................................................................ 179
2.2 KEY ROLE PLAYERS AND THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................... 179
SECTION 3: SENSITIVE AREAS OF THE PROJECT AREA ............................................................................................. 180
3.1 The Development site................................................................................................................................... 180
3.2 Protecting the Integrity of the Ecosystem of the project site ........................................................................ 180
3.4 Ensuring Health and safety ........................................................................................................................... 182
5. EMP CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENTATIONS .................................................................................................. 201
Annex A: Glossary ................................................................................................................................................... 202

175
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

I. Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations (See Annexure A)

II. Key to Acronyms
• EDTEA Economic Development Tourism and Environmental Affairs
• DME Department of Mineral and Energy
• ECO Environmental Control Officer
• EMPr Environmental Management Programme
• EA Environmental Authorisation

• ARC Agriculture Research Council

• BA Basic Assessment

• BAR Basic Assessment Report

• BID Background Information Document

• DEA Department of Environmental Affairs

• DWS Department of Water & Sanitation

• EIA Environmental Impact Assessment

• EIR Environmental Impact Report

• EAP Environmental Assessment Practitioner

• I&APs Interested and/or Affected Parties

• LRAD Land Reform for Agricultural Development

• NEMA National Environmental Management Act, 1998(Act 107 of 1998)

• NHRA National Heritage Resources Act

• SAHRA South African Heritage Resource Agency

• SANBI South African National Biodiversity Institute

176
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

EMP: SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION

1.1.Background
The National Environmental legislation requires that an assessment of potential environmental issues is undertaken as
an important component of development projects. The Environmental Impact Assessment process identifies potential
impacts that may arise at various stages of the development process and how these impacts can be mitigated. An
Environmental Management Plan serves as a guideline.

Bizycon Pty Ltd (PTY) LTD conducted a Basic Assessment environmental investigation regarding the uMzimkhulu Ext
9&10 settlement formalisation which include housing and service installations such as roads upgrades. This process
identified potential environmental impacts that may arise and made recommendations in the report on how these
impacts can be managed, especially during construction stages of the development. It also identified issues that should
be considered during the operational phase of the development.

This EMP is a key environmental document, the content of which the line contractor must comply with during the
construction process with the assistance of an environmental control officer and the site engineer and all relevant role
players. This is to include any post construction rehabilitation work, which may be needed, and which would be carried
out by the contractor or specialist subcontractor who he may appoint to do such rehabilitation when needed.

This EMPr is also developed in accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Management Act
(NEMA, Act 107 of 1998).

1.2 Aims and objectives of the EMPr

1.2.1 Aim

This EMP outlines measures to be implemented in order to minimize the potential environmental impacts associated
with construction works along the drainage lines, rivers and associated wetlands. It serves as a guide for the contractor
and the construction workforce on their roles and responsibilities concerning environmental management on site, and
it provides a framework for environmental monitoring throughout the construction period.

1.2.2 Objectives

The EMP becomes a legally binding document upon granting of an environmental authorisation. The objectives of this
EMP include:

• Encourage good management practices through implementation of the proposed development and ensure
commitment to environmental issues;
• Define how the management of the environment is reported and performance evaluated;

177
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

• To point out necessary mitigation measures to be carried out

• Develop waste management practices based on prevention, minimization, recycling, treatment or disposal of
wastes;
• Follow all monitoring procedures required to identify impacts on the environment; and;
• Provide guidance to the employees and contractors regarding their environmental and legislative obligations.

SECTION 2: REGULATORY / LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT

The EPMr is prepared taking into cognizance relevant legislative instruments that relate to the proposed development.
The on us lies on the applicant to ensure adherence to all necessary regulations. Contractors must be alerted of the
existence of the EMPr and its legislative implications and the need to comply and a copy of the EMPr
must always be kept on site.
DEALING WITH NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE EMPr (Penalties/ Incentives)

The contractor shall put in place procedures to motivate his staff to comply with the EMPr and to ensure that the work
force is sufficiently aware and understand all necessary legal requirements related to the construction process. It is also
important for the contractor to ensure that the workforce understands the implications of acts of non-compliance, or
deliberate and malicious damage to the environment by any staff member.

2.1 Key Legislation and Regulatory Requirements

The following legislations are instrument for the construction process of the poultry houses. Noncompliance will lead
to the penalties as set by the relevant sections of the related legislations:

2.1.1 National Environmental Management Act No. 107 of 1998

The National Environmental Management Act of 1998, Chapter 7 Part 1 Section 28 States that:

• Every person who causes, has caused, or may cause significant pollution or degradation of the environment
must take reasonable measures to prevent such pollution or degradation from occurring, continuing or
recurring, and is responsible for the costs and repair of the environment.

2.1.1.1 Penalties for non-compliance

Chapter 7 of the National Environmental Management Act of 1998 indicates explicitly under subsections 8, 9, and
10 the steps that may be taken to recover environmental protection costs from any manager, agent or employee
who omits or goes against this Act.

178
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

2.1.2 National Heritage Resources Act No. 25 of 1999

Chapter II Part 1 Section 27 (18) on Protection and Management of Heritage Resources provides guidelines that state
that;

• No person will be allowed to destroy, damage, deface, excavate, alter, remove from its original position,
subdivide or change the planning status of any heritage sites without a permit issued by the heritage resources
authority responsible for the protection of such site.

2.1.2.1 Penalties for noncompliance

Section 51 of National Heritage Resources Act of 1999, set penalties to non-compliance as follows:

• A fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding five years or to both such fine and imprisonment.
• A fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding three years or to both such fine and imprisonment.
• A fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years or to both such fine and imprisonment.

2.1.3 Occupational Health and Safety Act No. 85 of 1993

Section 14 (a) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1993 makes the contractor responsible for the health and
safety of persons who may be affected by any acts of omissions and the safety of the working environment under his
jurisdiction.

2.1.3.1 Penalties for noncompliance

Section 38 (1)(2) (3) and (4) of this Act explicitly explain the offence and penalties to any employer who does or
omits an act thereby causing any person to be injured at workplace.

2.1.4 Other necessary legislations but not limited to:

Environmental safety requirements in other legislative instruments such as the National Veld and Forest Fire Act,
(No.101 of 1998), National water Act, (No.36of 1998) and Hazardous Substances Act, 1973, the National Air Quality Act,
39 of 2004, need to be taken into consideration and conditions observed during the implementation of his
development.

2.2 KEY ROLE PLAYERS AND THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES

The successful implementation if the EMPr hinges heavily on the proper identification, definition, and allocation of
roles to responsible persons or role players.

179
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

SECTION 3: SENSITIVE AREAS OF THE PROJECT AREA

Although the broad environment within and around the proposed development area is important in
general consideration of construction impacts, the contractor shall ensure that his workforce are aware
of the key sensitive sites within the project area and that they understand how their activities could
impact directly or indirectly on environmental resources of these areas. The following descriptions need
to be particularly understood and adhered to in the implementation of this EMP.

3.1 The Development site

The most likely activities that may impact on sensitive areas is the roadworks and construction of
houses near to the wetland areas on the boundary of the site as shown in Figure 2 below. These areas
require extra care during the construction period. These should be fenced off as no-development zones.

Figure 3 Site layout with sensitive areas that may be impacted (work across watercourses).

3.2 Protecting the Integrity of the Ecosystem of the project site

• As part of conserving biological diversity and protecting the integrity of the ecosystem within development
areas, sites that are typically rich in species diversity, contain the presence of rare or endangered species,
function as a unique or intriguing habitat, or are heritage sites, are often mapped as “sensitive sites”. The
180
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

sensitivity refers broadly to sites being sensitive to the activities of man, and therefore, qualifying for
additional protection over and above that of the surrounding areas.

• In the case of the site for the proposed community upgrade such sensitive areas such as wetlands and
associated buffer areas are noted and mapped out. As shown in Figure 7 and work around these areas should
be planned to avoid or at least reduce any negative impacts.

3.3 Potential development activities

• Potential development activities that may impact on receiving environment include:

a. Clearing of the site unto surrounding areas and into the river systems or working within watercourses,
such as road upgrades and pipe laying across rivers,

b. Storage of equipment and material unto surrounding areas

c. Driving and turning of construction vehicles outside the designated area of construction

d. Indiscriminate location of construction camp

e. Excavations for foundations for buildings

f. Mixing of mortar and concrete

g. Structure assembly and erecting

h. Transport of materials /supplies

i. Waste generation and management

j.

As a general principle to observe in conducting activities:

• In order to make it easier to avoid, minimize or contain, the occurrence of the above impacts, all construction
activities should be restricted to within the boundary of the development footprint.

• Though the vegetation on the site is severely transformed, the site is surrounded by river systems and which
could be the receiver of any environmental malpractices on the site. Thus the buffer zones between the site
development footprint and the river should be strictly maintained as no-development zones as mapped on the
layout.

181
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

3.4 Ensuring Health and safety

• Although development in whatever form it takes is expected to benefit mankind, it in the process, could also
cause disruptions to the established livelihood system and the general day-to-day operations of affected
beneficiary communities or as in this case the surrounding houses, road users, and also workers/construction
staff.

• The purpose of this EMPr in this regard is to provide guidelines that would ensure that the health and safety
needs of residents are taken into consideration during the construction and operation period and that, every
necessary and possible step is taken to ensure that the normal social life of the community is not disrupted
significantly during the period of construction and operation but rather improved in a positive manner.

SECTION 4: IMPACTS, MITIGATION MEASURES, AND MONITORING

• This section covers the core of the EMPr detailing potential environmental impacts, impacts sources and
objectives are described, and environmental management mitigation measures to be implemented during
construction are specified. The contractor shall always adhere to these measures. A checklist that may be
used for internal monitoring of environmental performance is contained in Appendix 1.
The table below details the potential impacts, management objectives and proposed management actions required
for mitigation.

182
 Table 2 EMPr Impacts and Management Actions (Template adapted from CSIR, 2016).

Impact Management Management /Mitigation Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

Site Clearing and Vegetation Removal

Clearing of To ensure safety • Vegetation removal within the drainage • Site visit Visual Continuous Constructor, Site
lines and buffer zones should be strictly monitoring of
vegetation of the Observations Engineer and ECO
avoided, as this will serve as storm water construction
through dining surrounding control mechanism for the river systems. period and
of trenches or environment before
• All areas where vegetation is tripped off,
working within and the River handover to
for any reason, should be re-vegetation
watercourses systems are not immediately after construction in that ensure
disturbed section or spot is complete. environment
is properly
taken care of.

Clearing of the To ensure safety • Vegetation removal within the buffer • Site visit Visual Continuous Constructor, Site
zones should be strictly avoided, as this monitoring of
vegetation of the Observations Engineer and ECO
will serve as storm water control construction
during site surrounding mechanism for the river systems. period and
establishment environment before
• All areas where vegetation is tripped off,
fencing and and the River handover to
such as camp site etc, should re-
construction. systems are not vegetation immediately after ensure
disturbed construction is complete. environment
is properly
taken care of.
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management /Mitigation Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

Noise Impacts

Noise is likely Ensure that • Construction activities should be limited to Construction Records of Continuous Contractor and
daytime hours (i.e. 07:00- 17:00, as
to be noise does not times to be complaints ECO /EHS Officer
defined in South African National
generated from become Standards (SANS) 10103). The noise monitored and register and
the use of nuisance to generated during construction and managed (as well visual
equipment and surrounding operational phases must adhere to the as included in the observations
from environment and relevant SANS standards. tender contract).
construction neighbours
workers on
site.

Traffic Impacts

Traffic, Prevent • Road barricading should be Monitor, Record Records of Continuous Contractor EHS
undertaken where required and road
congestion and unnecessary and report non- complaints Manager
safety signs should be adequately
potential for impacts on the installed at strategic points within the compliance. register and
collisions surroundings construction and operational vehicles visual
during the road network by site must be adhered to observations
construction supplying • During the construction phase,
phase. parking for suitable parking area should be
construction created and designated for
vehicles on site. construction trucks and vehicles.
• A construction supervisor should be
184
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management /Mitigation Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

Managing the appointed to coordinate construction

flow of traffic at traffic during the construction phase
critical areas (by drawing up a traffic plan prior to
construction).
where necessary.

Safety, Health and Environment

Potential Prevention of • Ensure that skilled, licensed and Monitors activities Records of Continuous Health and Safety
competent Contractors, riggers and
impact on the injuries to and and record and complaints Officer /contractor
crane operators are appointed during
safety of fatalities of the construction phase, along with the report non- register and /ECO
construction construction use of certified. Equipment and compliance by visual
workers due to personnel during scaffolding. undertaking observations
construction the construction • Ensure that roads are not closed inspections.
activities (such phase. during construction, which may
as welding restrict access for emergency services.
cutting, use of • Ensure that construction and
hot metals, operational staff members adhere to
working at the relevant health and safety
heights, lifting standards of the Occupational Health
and Safety Act 181 of 1993
of heavy items
etc.).

Pollution Prevention • No mixing of cement directly on the Monitor activities Incident registers Continuous Project Developer,
ground.
caused by unnecessary and record and ECO and

185
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management /Mitigation Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

spillage or pollution impacts • All spills to be reported to the ECO. report non- contractor
discharge of on the • Ensure that adequate containment compliance by
construction surrounding structures are provided for the undertaking
wastewater environment storage of construction materials on inspections.
into the site.
surrounding • Ensure the adequate removal and
environment disposal of construction waste and
material.
• Oil containers must be stored on lined
platform covered by disposable sand.

Heritage Resources (Archaeology and Palaeontology)

Impact on Prevent damage • Carry out general monitoring of Monitor Visual Daily during Contractor and
excavations for potential fossil excavations and
Archaeology and destruction observation excavation ECO.
heritage, artefacts and material of construction
and to fossil, heritage importance as per the Chance work. As
activities for
Palaeontology artefacts and Find Protocol ( Refer to Heritage required/
archaeological and
material of Report in BAR) paleontological necessary
heritage • All work must cease immediately, if material. during
significance any human remains and /or other construction.
Archaeology, Paleontology and
historical material are uncovered. Contact
Such material, if exposed, must be AMAFA/SAHRA
reported to the nearest museum, and identified
archaeologist/ palaeontologist and to paleontological/
Archaeology if any

186
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management /Mitigation Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

AMAFA (or the South African Police heritage features

Service), so that a systematic and are uncovered.
professional investigation can be
undertaken. Enough time should be
allowed to remove/collect such
material before construction
recommences.

Groundwater Management

Contamination To control • Concrete mixing must be carried out Monitor the Register of Daily Project Developer,
on an impermeable surface (such as
of soil and concrete and handling and incident Contractor and
on boards or plastic sheeting and/or
ground water cement batching within a banded (lined) area with an storage of sand, EHS Manager.
through actives to impermeable surface). stone and cement
spillage of prevent spillages • Concrete mixing areas must be fitted as instructed
concrete and and with a containment facility for the
cement contamination of collection of cement-laden water. This
soil, facility must be impervious to prevent
groundwater soil groundwater contamination.
and the marine • A washout facility must be provided
environment. for washing of concrete associated
equipment.
• Empty cement bags must be secured
with adequate binding material if
these will be temporarily stored on
site. Sand and aggregates containing

187
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management /Mitigation Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

cement must be kept damp to prevent

the generation of dust.
• Any excess sand, stone and cement
must be removed from site at the
completion of the construction period
and disposed at a registered disposal
facility.

Wastewater Management

Pollution Reduce • Implement proper construction site Monitor via site Register of Monthly EHS Manager
management actions such as the
caused by construction audits ad records incidents
installation of containment structures,
spillage or wastewater good on-site housekeeping (regular non-compliance
discharge of discharge into sweeping of roadway and work areas, and incidents.
construction the environment reporting system and environmental Visual
wastewater and the resulting awareness training), and spillage
observation
into the impact management
surrounding
environment

Storm water Management

Pollution of the Reduce the • The appointed Contractor should Compile Method Register of Once off (and Contractor ECO/
compile a Method Statement for Statement
surrounding contamination of incidents thereafter EHS Manager
Storm Water Management during the
environment updated as

188
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management /Mitigation Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

because of storm water construction phase. Monitor the required).

contamination • Provide secure storage for oil, banding and Weekly
of storm water. containment Contractor
chemicals and other waste materials
Contamination to prevent contamination of storm structures. Weekly
Visual
could result water runoff.
observation
from • Regular inspections of storm water Monitors via site
chemicals, oil, infrastructure should be undertaken audits and record
fuels, sewage, to ensure that it is kept clear of all non-compliance
debris and weeds. and incidents (i.e.
solid waste,
litter etc. • Erosion prevention structures should by implementing
be placed to reduce water velocity walk through
within the drainage system. inspections.)
• Only essential (what cannot be
avoinded) vegetation should be
removed and no disturbance to
surrounding vegetation should be
permitted.
• Accumulation of water on the surface
must be avoided always.

Waste Management

Pollution of the Reduce soil and • General waste and hazardous waste Inspection of the Register of Daily ECO & EHS
should be sorted temporarily on site in temporary waste incidents
surrounding groundwater and Manager
suitable (and correctly labelled) waste storage area.
environment river collection bins and skips (or similar).

189
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management /Mitigation Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

because of the contaminations Waste collection bins and skips should

handling, because of be covered with suitable material,
Monitor waste
temporary incorrect where appropriate. Visual
generation and
storage and storage, handling • Should on-site storage of general collection observation
disposal of and disposal of waste and hazardous waste exceed throughout the
solid waste general and 100m3 and 80m3 respectively, then construction
the National Norms and Standards for phase
(general and hazardous
the Storage of Waste (published on 29
hazardous). waste. November 2013 under Government
Notice 926) must be adhered to.
• Ensure that the construction site is
kept cleans always and that
construction personnel are made
aware of correct waste disposal
methods.
• No solid waste may be burned or
buried on site.

Air Quality Management

Increased dust Reduce dust • Ensure that cleared (excavated) areas Monitor dust Register of During EHS Manager, ECO
and unpaved surfaces are sprayed suppression
level and Air emissions during incidents complaints/in and Contractor
with water (obtained from an mechanisms and
Quality Impact: construction approved source) to minimise dust cidents
record non-
Emissions from activities. generation. compliances.
construction
• Ensure that construction vehicles Visual
vehicles and travelling on unpaved roads do not
190
 Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management /Mitigation Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

generations of exceed a speed limit of 40km/hour. observation

dust because • Limit construction activities to
of earthworks, daytime hours.
as well as the
delivery and
mixing of
construction
material.

Socio-Economic Impacts Management

Employment Maximise local • Enhance the use of local labour and Maximize local Records of staff During the Contractor and
local skills as far as reasonably
creation and employment and employment for members construction ECO.
possible. The project will employ
skills local business approximately 20 people from the unskilled labour phase
development opportunities to and Number of Local
area.
opportunist promote and provincial/national people
• Where the required skills do not occur employed
during the improve the locally, and where appropriate and skilled labour.
construction local economy. applicable ensure that relevant local
individuals are recruited. Visual observation

• Ensure that goods and services are Procurement

sources from the local and regional source documents
economy as far as reasonably possible.

191
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR OPERATIONAL PHASE

Impact Management Management Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

Alien Vegetation Management

Potential re- Ensure the • Ensure that any alien invasive Monitor the removal of During the EHS Manager /
plants that become re-
establishment of removal of the alien invasive removal
established on site are Municipal
alien plants on site alien invasive removed promptly. The vegetation process
vegetation Environmental
removal of these species must
from the Officer in Charge
have carried out in line with
proposed relevant municipal and
Visual observation
projects area provincial procedures,
and prevent guidelines and
recommendations.
the
establishment • The removed species should
be immediately disposed of
and spread of
correctly and should not be
alien invasive kept on site for prolonged
plants. periods of time, as this will
enhance the spread of these
species.

192
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

Land rehabilitation Ensure land • Infilling of all excavation work. Infill of excavation Visual When /If Project
(neighbours) • Remove all rubble from ensuring sub soil is filled observation complaints Developer
impacted construction site and disposal first. are received.
of it at a registered landfill
during
site.
construction
phase is
Removal rubble to a
sufficiently registered
rehabilitated.

Safety, Health and Environment

Soil and Water Prevent • Storm water should not be Carry out though Incident reports Daily Project Applicant
allowed to encounter inspection of piping,
pollution unnecessary
effluent. loading hoses, and (municipal
pollution
• Monitoring water qualify of banding for leaks, using a Environmental
impacts on the
onsite borehole should be checklist. Visual Officers)
surrounding conducted. observation
environment
• Ensure that excrement,
Proof of attendance to
carcasses, feed and other
training sessions to be
operational waste and
kept on file at the
hazardous materials are
terminal.
appropriately and effective
contained and disposed of
without detriment to the
environment

193
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

Air Pollution Prevent • Ensure that operational waste Assurance of functionally Complaints As needed Project Applicant
are appropriately and of fire extinguishers via
Environmental unnecessary report
effectively contained and inspections and
contamination of air pollution disposed without detriment certification by an
the surrounding impacts to the environment. accredited fire service
environment from because of the • Adhere to the best practice company.
organic waste and improper / guidelines for managing farm
inadequate / operations. Maintenance
Operation of negligent Regularly check and register /Signed
• Ensure that the development
Crematorium operational record Air quality , and
is designated and lined with by operating
functionality of furnace
procedures. impermeable substances engineer and
strappers
(concrete) in accordance with Municipality
advice from international best environmental
practice norms. Regular records of Officer
• Establish appropriate crematorium, as per /Inspector
emergency producers for facility specifications
accidental contamination of
the surroundings. Waste
recycling should be
incorporated into the facility’s
operations as far as possible.
• The relevant standards for air
quality must be adhered to.

Potential impact on To ensure that • Operational personnel must Medical investigations or Visual As necessary EHS Manager
wear basic (i.e. gloves) are surveillance to be observation
the health of there are no and Project
necessary during the undertaken for the
operating adverse

194
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

personnel, effects on the operational phase. operating personnel. Developer.

especially in the health of • Fire extinguishers should be
crematorium operating easily accessible on site.
Keep a register of the
resulting in personnel medical records for the
potential health operating personnel.
injuries.

Increase in Highly • Detect and control pest Visual As necessary EHS Manager
infestations before they
vertebrate and localized pest observation and Project
become a problem though
invertebrate pests. invertebrate frequent and careful cleaning, Developer
control that monitoring and control.
does not
• Poultry legislation guidelines
affect non- should be adhered to.
target
• Applicant to adhere to Best
populations or Practise Guild lines and
taxa Animal Disease Act (Act 35 of
1984)

Storm water Management

Increased storm Reduce the • Regular monitoring of Implement surface water Incident reports As agreed Project ECO
stormwater quality and river
water discharge impacts of quality monitoring during the
health
into the increased programme, based on operational
surrounding storm water consultation with the phase. Project Applicant
environment which discharge to
(Municipal
195
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

may end up in the the landowner Environmental

rivers environment Officer)

• Regular inspections of storm Undertake regular Weekly Site Manager

water infrastructure should be
inspections of the storm and EHS
undertaken to ensure that it is
kept clear of all debris and water infrastructure (i.e. Manager
weeds. by implementation walk
• Accumulation of water on the through inspections).
surface must be avoided.
• Waste traps in storm water
system should be cleaned at
regular intervals.
• Run off to roads must
avoided.

Socio-Economic Management

Additional Maximise local • Enhance the use of local Maximise local During the Project
labour and local skills as far as
employment employment employment for unskilled operational Developer
reasonably possible.
opportunities and local labour and provincial/ phase
• Where the required skills do
business national skilled labour
not occur locally, and where
opportunities appropriate and applicable,
to promote ensure that relevant local
and improve individual are trained.
• Ensure that goods and
196
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

local economy services are sourced from the

local and regional economy as
far as reasonably possible.

Boost in the Maximise • Ensure that the proposed Seek out local markets Monthly supplier Monthly Project
project has secured local
economy of Region positive and secure formal trade reports developer
buyers
2 impacts agreement
through
ensuring
produce is sold
to local
markets

Environmental Awareness`

Increased energy Reduce energy • Encourage the use of energy Monitor energy usage via Monthly EHS Manager /
saving equipment (such low site investigations.
consumption consumption Municipality
voltage light and low-pressure
during the where taps) and promote recycling.
operational phase possible Operational personnel must Conduct training for all
be made aware of energy operational personnel
conservation practices as part
of the environmental
awareness training
programme.

197
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

• Firefighting equipment must

be made available at various
appropriate locations

Safety, Health and Environment

Pollution of the Prevent • General waste (i.e. building Monitor activities and Compliance Throughout Project
rubble, demolition waste,
surrounding unnecessary record and report non- reports the applicant, ECO
discarded concrete, bricks,
environment as a pollution tiles, woods, glass, plastic, compliance by decommissio and Contractor
result of the impacts on the metal, excavated material, undertaking inspections. ning phase
handling, surrounding packaging material, paper and Visual
temporary storage environment domestic waste etc.) and
observations
and disposal of hazardous waste (i.e. empty
solid waste tins, paint and paint cleaning
liquids, oils, fuel spillage and
chemicals etc.) generated
during the decommissioning
phase should be stored
temporarily on site in suitable
(and correctly labelled waste
collection bins and skips (or
similar).
• Ensure that enough general
waste disposal bins are
provided for all personnel
throughout the site. These
bins must be emptied on a

198
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

regular basis.

Spill contingency, Management and Handling of Chemicals/Dangerous Goods

Potential spillage Reduce the • Ensure that normal sewage EHS Manager to monitor Incident reports Monthly EHS Manager
management practices are
of effluent to the spillage of via site audits and record and
implemented during usage
surrounding domestic non-compliance and Environmentalist
environment from effluent and incidents Visual
chemicals used in the impact
observations
crematorium and thereof on the
ablution facilities environment. • Ensure that the Monitor via site audits Incident reports Daily EHS Manager
of the cemetery toilet/sanitation facilities are
and record non- and Contractor
maintained in a clean, orderly
a sanitary condition. compliance and incidents Visual
observations

Waste Management

Pollution of the Reduce soil • Include regular waste Carry out monitoring Compliance Continuously Project
collection from the facility
surrounding and ground throughout the reports thought-out Developer and
into the municipal waste
environment as a water stream. operational phase life of project EHS Manager
result of the contamination Visual
handling, as a result of observations
temporary storage incorrect
and disposal of storage.
Handling and

199
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Impact Management Management Actions Monitoring

Objectives
Indicator Methodology Frequency Responsibility

solid waste disposal of

general and
hazardous
waste

• •

200
5. EMP CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENTATIONS

The significance of most of the issues identified may be effectively reduced after mitigation should this environmental
management plan be carefully followed. The proposed development will be undertaken as part of the in-situ upgrade
which requires that care be taken to not unnecessarily inconvenient the community during construction. The
concluding recommendations are:

• Contractors need to follow the environmental management plan;

• A copy of the EMP should always be placed on site, and the contractor and team should be
workshopped on the requirements of the EMP.

• The development needs to benefit the community in a tangible manner, and therefore, attempts
need to be made to integrate community needs and aspirations into the implementation
processes of the development.

• Where appropriate, the contractor must use local labour as much as possible;

• The contractor needs to show concerns for health in general and the health safety of the
employees in particular;

• In terms of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1989 everybody is required to
take reasonable measures to ensure that they do not pollute the environment. Reasonable
measures include informing and educating employees about the environmental risks of their
work and training them to operate in an environmentally acceptable manner;

• Furthermore, in terms of the Nation Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 the cost of
repair for any environmental damage shall be borne by the person responsible for the damage.

• Operational stage recommendations should be also implemented and the onus is on the
applicant to ensure adherence to the mitigation measures proposed. Regular maintenance and
monitoring is required from the municipality and to ensure smooth operations.

• The competent authority may also pay random visits to the facility to monitor compliance during
construction and operation stages.
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Annex A: Glossary
• 1.3.1 General

• The contractor shall actively engage himself and workers (if necessary) on this project to knowing and
understanding of relevant terms, descriptions, and abbreviations in this EMP as indicated below:

• Contractor (CT)

• For the purpose of this EMP: “CT” refers to the main contractor(s) appointed for the construction activities of
the project or portion of the project. The main contractor(s) are required to adhere to the EMP and are
responsible for ensuring that all subcontractors, suppliers and staff appointed by them, also adhere to the
EMP.

• All Staff

• This is the entire workforce. Workers employed by the contractor or persons involved with activities related to
the project, or persons present or visiting the construction area, including permanent, contract, or casual
labour and informal traders.

• Environmental Control Officer (ECO)

• An individual or representative of an organization appointed to act on matters concerning the day-to-day

implementation of the EMP, and for liaison with the DAEA&RD, and the public affected by construction.

• EDTEA

• Department of Economic Development, Tourism, and Environmental Affairs – who is the competent authority
in the case of this application.

• Local Community

• People residing in the region and near the construction activities, including the owners and/or managers of land
affected by construction, small holdings, workers on the land, and the people in nearby towns and villages.

• Public

• Any individual or group of individuals concerned with or affected by the project and its consequences, -
including the local community, local, regional, and national authorities, investors, workforce, customers,
consumers, environmental interest groups, and the general public.

• Relevant Authority

• This refers to the environmental authority on national, provincial or local level with the responsibility for
granting approval to a proposal or allocating resources.

pg. 202
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

• 1.3.2 About the Construction Activities

• Alternatives

• A possible course of action, in place of another, that would meet the same purpose and need (of proposal).
Alternative can refer to any of the following but are not limited to hereto: alternative sites for development,
alternative site layouts, alternative design, alternative process and materials.

• Construction Areas/Site:

• This is land area on which the project is to be located. It includes the sites of individual stands, construction
campsites, access roads and tracks, as well as any other area affected or disturbed by construction activities.
The EMP (particularly) the specifications for rehabilitation) is relevant for all areas disturbed during
construction.

• Development

• This is the act of altering or modifying resources in order to obtain potential benefits.

• Access Roads and Tracks

• Access Roads and Tracks refers exiting and newly established roads and tracks, and areas cleared or driven over
to provide access to/from the construction areas, and for the transportation of the construction workforce,
equipment and materials.

• 1.3.3 About the Environment

• Receiving / Affected environment

• Those parts of the socio-economic and biophysical environment impacted on by the development.

• Assessment

• The process of collecting, organizing, analysing, interpreting, and communicating data that is relevant to some
decision.

• Environment

• The surrounding within which humans exist that are made up of: - the land, water and atmosphere, fauna and
flora, including any part, combination or interrelationships among these; and all the physical, chemical,
aesthetic and cultural properties and conditions of the foregoing that influence human wellbeing.

• Environmental Impact

pg. 203
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

• This is the degree of change in an environment resulting from effect of an activity whether desirable or
undesirable. Impacts may be direct consequences of an organization’s activities or may be indirectly caused by
them.

• Environmental Impact Report

• A report describing the process of examining the environmental effects of a development proposal, the
expected impacts and the proposed mitigation measures.

• Evaluation

• The process of weighing information, the act of making value judgments or ascribing values to data in order to
reach a decision.

• Hazards

• Hazardous substances in this regard are anything that constitutes a source of, or exposure to danger. Some
examples of hazardous sources or materials are:

• Diesel, petroleum, oil, bituminous products;

• Cement;

• Solvent based paints;

• Lubricants;

• Explosives;

• Drilling fluids;

• Pesticides, herbicides.

• Hydrological Features

• Hydrological features include, but not limited to:

• Rivers and Wetlands;

• Open water;

• Vegetated drainage channels;

• Subterranean water;

• Life Support Systems

• Life support systems include, but are not limited to:

pg. 204
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

• An ecological system in which its outputs are vital for sustaining specialized habitats;

• An ecological system in which its outputs are vital for sustaining human life (e.g. water purification).

• Mitigation

• Measures designed to avoid, reduce or remedy adverse impacts.

• Monitoring

• This is the repetitive and continued observation, measurement and evaluation of environmental data to follow
changes over a period to assess the efficiency of control measures.

• Negative Impact

• A change that reduces the quality of the environment (for example, by reducing species diversity and the
reproductive capacity of the ecosystem, by damaging health, property or by causing nuisance.

• Rehabilitation

• Measures implemented to restore a damaged Environment to an acceptable level.

• Significant impact

• This is an impact that, by its magnitude, duration or intensity alters an important aspect of the environment.

pg. 205
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

DETAILED CV OF EAP

pg. 206
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Curriculum Vitae
Of
Honu-Siabi MacCarthy
Cell: +27 (0) 719212618 Fax: +27(0)86 776 33 25 E-mail: [email protected]
/[email protected]

PERSONAL INFORMATION
Surname : Honu-Siabi
First Names : MacCarthy
Gender : Male
Current residence : South Africa (Pietermaritzburg / Johannesburg)

Profile summary:
Having been working in the development sector for a while, I have acquired more than 12 years experience in
critically assessing the environmental, economic and social impacts of development interventions, in Africa. I have
worked with both the public and private sector on diverse developmental initiatives and mostly work across
sectors, and in collaborate with other individuals, teams and institutions in ensuring collective efforts towards
sustainable and people-centered development and growth in South Africa and in on the continent of Africa as a
whole.

EDUCATION
Name of Institution Degree/Qualification obtained Year
Obtained
University of the Witwatersrand PGD in Public and Development Sector Monitoring 2015
and Evaluation
University of KwaZulu-Natal -RSA Master of Social Sciences (MS Sc.) – 2014
Policy and Development Studies
North West University - RSA Environmental Impact Assessment (Cert) 2013

North West University - RSA Post Decision Environmental Monitoring and 2013
Enforcement (Cert)
University of Kwazulu-Natal GSB -RSA Project Management 2012
(Cert)
University of Cape Coast - Ghana Bachelor of Management Studies – (Honours) 2007
International School Of Aviation - Ghana Tourism Management (Diploma) 2001

pg. 207
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Skills and Competencies

• Good Programme implementation and management skills
• Ability to use MS Projects in scheduling, executing and managing complex projects
• Conversant with all Microsoft Office End User Applications ( Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access,
Publisher etc), Corel Draw, SPSS etc
• General Knowledge in computer Hardware and Software.
• Excellent verbal and written communication skills all levels
• Research, workshop, organisation, facilitation and Presentation skills
• Attention to details and strong result oriented thinking and innovation ability
• Ability to work under pressure with less or no supervision
• Design and implementation of monitoring systems
• Data collection (multiple methods/tools), data analysis and reporting skills
• Ability to search, using search protocols, and write up high quality academic/professional output

RESEARCH ACTIVITIES / CONFERENCES /WORKSHOPS

Research
Theses An Analysis of the Implementation of a Monitoring
& Evaluation System at the NGO sector: The Case of the NGO
SaveAct, 2013
(Paper on this is being edited for publication)
Market research Commercialization Goat meat in the KZN Province
Department of Finance & Economic Development (Funder)
2011

Conferences /Presentations
Conference Presenter: Unpacking diagnostics as a key component in
public policy making process: The need for evidence in
diagnosing societal problems

5th SAMEA Biennial Conference

Sandton, Johannesburg, RSA
12-16 October 2015

Capacity-Building Workshop Research synthesis and Systematic Reviews (3IE training)

African Evidence network Colloquium on Research evidence use
University of Johannesburg
November 2014

Workshop and conference Participant - Workshop on Systematic Reviews and Impact

Evaluations

Presenter: The critical role of monitoring and evaluation systems

in impact evaluation: Lessons from a case study

pg. 208
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

3IE, Asian Development Bank Conference: Making Impact

Evaluations Mater; Better evidence for Effective Policies and
Programmes.
Asian Development Bank
Manila, Philippines
1-5 September, 2014

Conference Presenter- An Analysis of the Implementation of a

Monitoring and Evaluation System: The Case of the NGO
SaveAct
SAMEA, DPME Conference on: Policy Research: Do
findings make a difference
16 to 20 September 2013

Capacity-Building Workshop Participant-Developing Monitoring and Evaluation Systems

SAMEA and DPME workshop Series
25-27 September, 2013, Durban
AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS
Conference Scholarship 3IE Sponsorship to attend and present poster at workshop and
conference dubbed Making Impact Evaluations Matter. Manila,
Philippines,
Sept 1-7, 2014

Best Poster Presentation Award 1st Position, Best poster presentation, Making Impact Evaluation
Matter Conference, Manila, Philippines, 2014

Emerging Evaluator Award (Scholarship) South African Monitoring and Evaluation Association
(SAMEA) 4th Biennial Conference, Sandton, Johannesburg, Sept
2013

Runner up (2nd Position) – National Millennium Essay Competition (Organized for all Secondary Schools
Nationwide)
Ghana Millennium Commission,
Nov 2000

EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
Employer Bizycon Pty Ltd / Development Impact Group
Position Snr EAP – EIAs, Research & Evaluations
Duties Managing projects and consulting -
Duration 2011 to date

Employer Quest Research Services (QRS)

pg. 209
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Position Snr Consultant – Monitoring and Evaluation

Duties Project consultancy
Duration 2016 - 2019

Employer University of the Witwatersrand

Position MOOC Community Teaching /Facilitating (short consultancy)
Duties Assisting with student issues, monitoring and moderating
online discussion forums and helping plan and review new
modules and online courses.
Duration September 2016 – November 2016

Employer Anglophone Centre for learning on Evaluation and Results

(CLEAR-AA), Wits School of Governance
Position Researcher
Duties Rendering support to Snr M&E technical expect
Managing projects and offering support on key projects of
CLEAR-AA, assisting institutions develop M&E systems and
capacity, Undertaking research, conducting surveys, collecting
and analyzing data and report writing, in addition to conducting
presentations and meetings, and also organizing workshops and
other interactive events.
Duration November 2015 – April 2016

Employer Nature & Development Group of Africa

Position Project Manager (consulting)
Project Manager – Environmental Consulting and Research
Duration 2009 – 2012, 2012 to 2015

Name of employer Nisis Engineering Designs Co. Ltd

(Project Management/Civil Engineering/Construction)
Position held Assist. Manager (Projects and Administration)
Duties Management of Projects and Procurement
(For Construction of Public Water and Sanitation Facilities),
Managing personnel and preparing of quarterly reports,
General administration
Duration Feb, 2006—November, 2007.

Name of company Thembaletu Community Education Centre

Position Trainer/ Facilitator
Duties Training participants in Basic Business Skills, Reviewing
Training material, preparing and conducting assessments and
Evaluation, and reporting at meetings

pg. 210
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

DEVELOPMENTAL WORK EXPERIENCE /PROJECTS

RECENT MONITORING AND EVALUATION PROJECTS

Jan 2017 –July 2017 Diagnostic Evaluation of the implementation process of Pomfret Relocation and
Rehabilitation intervention. –A project to evaluate the implementation process
and also diagnose socio economic conditions of Pomfret community for
redesigning of new intervention and provide cabinet with sufficient evidence for
decision making.
Client DPME
Project Leader (QRS) Mr C Dube
My role /Position Principal Evaluator

Nov 2016 Design and Facilitation of (2 Workshops): Dialogue among Higher Educational
Institutions across Sub-Sahara Africa on the Professionalization of Monitoring
and Evaluation in Africa, including curriculum structuring and delivery. Held in
Nairobi (for Eastern and Southern Africa) and Accra (for Western Africa).
Implementer /Employer CLEAR AA (Wits School of Governance)
Project Leader (QRS) Ms H Robertson
My role /Position Organiser and Co Facilitator

Oct 2015 –April Strengthening the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework of City Of
2016 Johannesburg: Institutional Support from CLEAR AA: Diagnostic assessment of
the current monitoring & Evaluation system, programme design, curriculum
development and training
Implementer /Employer CLEAR AA (Wits School of Governance)
Project Leader (QRS) Ms H Robertson / Dr Laila Smith
My role /Position Programme Coordinator

Nov 2016 Workshop Design and Facilitation:

Monitoring and Measuring the effect of Human Settlement interventions: A re-
look at the human settlement mandate and evaluation frameworks of various
sectors of government as related to Outcome 8 of the National Development Plan.
The workshops sort to find a dialogue on integration and aligning of the
evaluations frameworks related to various legislative instruments such as the IUF,
SPLUMA, MTSF, and MEIA Etc.
Implementer /Employer DPME /CLEAR-AA
Project Leader (QRS) Dr Laila Smith /Ms M Amisi
My role /Position Programme Design and Co-Facilitation.

pg. 211
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROJECTS:

Some Selected Projects worked on in this regard include:
Environmental Impact Assessment (BAR) for Residential development on Erf 1087 Posmasburg, Northern Cape
Project Implementing Agent : Thuso Enviro and Developments
Project Leader : Mr R Themeli
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : In progress 2020

Environmental Impact Assessment (BAR) for Residential development on 15 Strathcona Drive, Clansthal, Durban
Project Implementing Agent :
Project Leader : Mr H P Rayes
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : In progress 2020

Environmental Impact Assessment (BAR) for Greater Kokstad Cemetery Establishment

Project Implementing Agent : Inzuzo Yesizwe Development Planners
Project Leader : Mr Mxolisi Ndlovu
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed July 2020

Environmental Impact Assessment for Umzimkhulu Housing Project, Umzimkhulu

Project Implementing Agent : Isibuko Development Planners
Project Leader : Ms Sithokoza Cele
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed Aug 2020

Environmental Impact Assessment for Greenco Poultry Farm, Bela Bela, Limpopo
Project Implementing Agent : Development Impact Group (DIG)
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed June 2020

Environmental Analysis for Town Planning Scheme: Nquthu Local Municipality

Project Implementing Agent : NANGA Projects
Project Leader : Mr Suleiman Mwajuzuu
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed 2019

Environmental Analysis for Town Planning Scheme: Umlalazi Local Municipality

Project Implementing Agent : NANGA Projects
Project Leader : Mr Suleiman Mwajuzuu
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed 2018

pg. 212
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Environmental Analysis for Town Planning Scheme: Emfuleni Local Municipality, Mpumalanga
Project Implementing Agent : Isibuko Development Planners
Project Leader : Mr M Maseko
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : 2018

Project identification and Township Establishments Nkangala District – Strategic Development Framework (SDF)
Project Implementing Agent : Isibuko Development Planners
Project Leader : Mr M Maseko
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : 2016

Middlebuilt Housing Project, Delmas – Environmental Impact Assessment (Scoping)

Project Implementing Agent : Isibuko Development Planners
Project Leader : Mr M Maseko
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : 2016

West Rand Poultry Value Chain – Environmental Impact Assessment

Project Implementing Agent : DRDLR, through Nkwele Agribusiness &Investments
Project Leader : Mr Thati Tladi
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed 2016

Environmental Impact Assessment Groutiville Priority 2 Sanitation Project

Project Implementing Agent : Linda Masinga & Associates, Durban
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed 2015

Environmental Impact Assessment Namani Shopping Mall Ekuvukeni – near Ladysmith

Project Implementing Agent : Isineke Developments
Project Leader : Dr Nelson Mwanyama
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed 2015

Environmental Impact Assessment (Basic Assessment) Mkhuze Waste Water Treatment Works
Project manager : RCR Collaborative, Durban
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed 2015

Environmental Impact Assessment (Environmental Scoping &EIA) for Redcliff Housing Project
Project manager : RCR Collaborative, Durban

pg. 213
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Project Leader : Patrick Addo

Project Consultant (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed 2012

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Rehabilitation of Storm-Damaged Roads in Hibiscus Coast Municipality
Project manager : Liquid Platinum
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Project status : Completed 2009

Environmental Impact Assessment for Kenville Housing Project (Durban)

Project manager : Project Preparation Trust of KZN
Project leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully 2009

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Vulamehlo Ward 5 Housing Project

Project manager : TMS Properties
Project leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed 2010

Environmental Scoping for the Emapeleni Housing Project (Emapeleni)

Project manager : eThekwini Municipality
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : In progress

Environmental Scoping for the Kwadinabakubo Housing Project

Project manager : eThekwini Municipality
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Completed 2008

Environmental Scoping for the Cottonlands Housing Project (Cottonlands, Ndwedwe)

Project manager : eThekwini Municipality
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, public participation and report preparation
Project status : In progress

pg. 214
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Wetland Assessment for the Copesville Housing Project (Copesville, Pietermaritzburg)

Project manager : Mr. M. Marareni (Umpheme Development Services)
Project leader : Dr. Nelson Mwanyama/Patric Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My Duties : Wetland Delineation and Report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed 2009

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Umlasi AA and Chicago Housing Project (Umlaasi, Durban)
Project manager : Chris Calitz (Terraplan Associates)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed 2009

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Umlasi - Isimbini Housing Project (Umlasi, Durban)
Project manager : Chris Calitz (Terraplan Associates)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed 2009

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Zanzibari Housing Project (Bluff, Durban)
Project manager : Project Preparation Trust of KZN
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Completed

Environmental Screening/Assessment for the Chartsworth Bulk and Infill Housing Project
Project manager : Nelson Allopi and Associates
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : Dr. Nelson Mwanyama
MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed 2009

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Valley View Special Residential Housing Project (Valley-View Road,
Marrianhill)
Project manager : eThekwini Housing
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed 2010

pg. 215
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Rehabilitation and Upgrade of Roads in Inanda Project (Inanda,
Durban)
Project manager : Sigh Govender and Associates
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Completed 2010

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Sandton Phase 2 Housing Project (Kwandengezi, Pine Town)
Project manager : Sakum Housing Cc
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Environmental Impact Assessment for a Helicopter Landing Facility in Darnell

Project manager : Silvermoon Investment 364 Cc
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Frediville Phase 2 Housing Project (Fredville, Hamasdale)
Project manager : Chris Calitz (Terraplan Associates)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Bhubhubhu Housing Project (Mfolozi Municipality)
Project manager : Chris Calitz (Terraplan Associates)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Iutval Rural Housing Project (Indaka Local Municipality)
Project manager : Mr. Graham (Siyamthanda Development)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Cato Crest Housing Project

Project manager : Bernd Rothaug (RCR Collaborative)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo

pg. 216
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi

My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : In Progress.

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Waterfall Ext. 4 Housing Development

Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : In Progress

Other Housing Development Projects

Projects worked on in this regard include:

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Zidweni Rural Housing Project (Zedweni, Ingwe Municipality)
Project manager : Mr. M. Marareni (Umpheme Developments)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Manzamnyama Rural Housing Project (Centocow, Ingwe Municipality)
Project manager : Mr. Ray Doherty
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Qiniselani-Manyuswa Rural Housing Project (Qiniselani near Hillcrest)
Project manager : Chris Calitz (Terraplan Associates)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Vukuzithathe Rural Housing Project (Ezinqoleni)
Project manager : Mr. M. Marareni (Umpheme Developments)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Environmental Impact Assessment for the Zidweni Rural Housing Project (Zidweni, Creighton)
Project manager : Mr. M. Marareni (Umpheme Developments)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo

pg. 217
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi

My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Environmental Impact Assessment for the KwaMashabane Rural Housing Project (Mbazwana)
Project manager : Mr. M. Marareni (Umpheme Developments)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Environmental Impact Assessment for the KwaMashabane Rural Housing Project (Mbazwana)
Project manager : Mr. M. Marareni (Umpheme Developments)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Strategic Planning and Environmental Assessment (SEA) Developments

Projects worked on in this regard include:

Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment for the Groutville, Adinville, Melville and Dube Village Township
Regeneration Strategy (Groutville)
Project manager : S’bongiseni Maseko (Isibuko se Africa)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment for the Shakaskraal, Woodmead, Shayamoya and Nkobongo
Township Regeneration Strategy (Shakaskraal)
Project manager : S’bongiseni Maseko (Isibuko se Africa)
Project leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Strategic Environmental Assessment for preparation of a Strategic Development Framework for Phelandaba
Township
Project manager : S’bongiseni Maseko (Isibuko se Africa)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi

pg. 218
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation

Project status : Successfully completed

Strategic Environmental Assessment for preparation of a Strategic Development Framework for Ndumo Township
Project manager : S’bongiseni Maseko (Isibuko se Africa)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Strategic Environmental Assessment for the preparation of a Strategic Development Framework for Bhambanana
Township ( Jozini)
Project manager : S’bongiseni Maseko (Isibuko se Africa)
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Field work, data collection and report preparation
Project status : Successfully completed

Other Work on EIAs and Environmental Management

Rehabilitation of Storm-Damaged Roads in Hibiscus Coast Municipality

Project manager : Liquid Platinum
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Duties : ECO (Monitoring and preparation of monthly reports)
Project status Completed

Kwaxolo Low Cost Housing Project, Kwaxolo, Bushy Vales, Marburg

Project manager : Malusi Zwane Dept. Of Human Settlement
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
Duties : Sales Administration
Project status : Completed

Environmental Scoping for Ekwandeni Housing Project

Project manager : eThekwini Housing
Project Leader : Patrick Addo
My duties : Public Participation – Information Distribution
Project status : Completed

Preparation of Business Plan for the Commercialisation of the Goat Industry in Kwazulu-Natal
Prepared for : Department of Economic development
Project manager : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi

pg. 219
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

My duties : Market research - data collection and analysis report preparation

Project status : Completed

Empangweni Housing Development

Project manager : Patrick Addo
Project Manager (Environmental) : MacCarthy Honu-Siabi
My duties : Beneficiary Data Collection and processing

pg. 220
Proposed uMzimkhulu Ext 9&10 Residential Development Draft Basic Assessment Report (BAR)

REFERENCES

1 Name : Dr. Nelson Mwanyama

Position : Director of Projects /CEO
Organisation : Isineke Developments / Bizycon Pty Ltd
Contact Number : [email protected]

2. Name : Mr. P. K. Addo

Position : Managing Director
Organisation : Nature and Development Group of Africa CC
Pietermaritzburg
Contact Number : +27(0)83 555 22 88

pg. 221