EY's IPO Readiness Guide
EY's IPO Readiness Guide
going public
Are you ready? We are.
Foreword
For fast-growing private companies seeking to raise capital, an IPO can be a superior route
to funding growth. While challenging markets will come and go, it’s the companies that are
fully prepared that will best be able to leverage the windows of IPO opportunity whenever
they open.
For over two decades, EY has worked with top companies considering their options for funding
for growth, including a public listing. We also frequently undertake extensive research to
identify critical IPO success factors. Year after year, we have found that companies with
successful IPOs:
• Approach the IPO as a transformational process rather than just a financing event or as
the endgame
• Begin to act and operate as public companies at least one year in advance of the IPO
• Outperform the competition on key performance measures before, during and after the IPO
We surveyed over 300 institutional investors around the world to determine how uncertain
markets in 2009 might have affected their IPO portfolio decision-making. This report
incorporates these investor insights, while examining in-depth the 10 steps toward IPO
readiness, alternative capital raising options, and current public listing challenges.
We hope this report will help you to begin what we call the IPO value journey, well prepared
to transform your private company into a successful public company that continually delivers
value to its shareholders.
Maria Pinelli
Global IPO Leader, EY
Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
• Investors base an average of 60% of their IPO • Fine-tune your internal business operations —
investment decisions on financial factors especially: especially working capital management, regulatory
debt to equity ratios, EPS growth, sales growth, risk and rationalizing the business structure
ROE, profitability and EBITDA growth • Deal with current accounting challenges —
• Investors base an average of 40% of their IPO especially asset valuation impairment, consolidated
investment decisions on non-financial factors subsidiary financial statement issues and revenue
especially: quality of management, corporate recognition
strategy and execution, brand strength and
operational effectiveness, and corporate governance
Focus on being a public company
• Be able to articulate a compelling equity story (not just on going public)
backed up by a strong track record of growth which
sets you apart from your peers while maximizing
value for owners
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Preparing for the 4. Building the right 7. Managing investor 9. Attracting the
IPO value journey management and relations and right investors
2. Keeping your options open advisory teams communications and analysts
5. Building your 8. Conducting an 10. Delivering on
3. Timing the market
business and financial effective road show your promises
processes and
infrastructure
6. Establishing corporate
structure and
governance
Part one
Pros Cons
• Greater access to funds since company can return to public • Highly distracting and time consuming due to need for periodic
markets for additional capital and access alternative financing on reporting and investor relations
favorable terms from private investors as well
• High costs due to initial and ongoing expenses, including payments
• Provides a more liquid and diversified share capital base and a liquid to external advisors for regulatory compliance and maintaining a
currency for acquisitions listing
• Enhances prestige, brand image, public profile and credibility • Limits on management’s freedom to act including need for
approval of board or shareholders on many major matters
• Facilitates future acquisitions of other businesses, which may be
paid for at least partially in a public company’s shares • Potential loss of control and privacy since there is a need to reveal
highly sensitive information in public reports
• Achieves higher valuations than private enterprises since greater
disclosure of information reduces uncertainty around performance • Shareholders’ expectations can create pressure on management
and increases value to perform
• Provides a potential exit strategy and liquidity for investors, owners • Difficulty in recruiting good non-executive directors for board
and (or) shareholders
• Limited window of opportunity of access to IPO markets so
• Attracts, retains and rewards valued employees through share compromise on price may be necessary
option plans
• Corporate governance requirements include business process
• Enhances benchmarking operations against other public companies improvements and non-executive directors’ oversight
from same industry
• Retains future upside potential in business
• Opportunity for reducing debt or refinancing
Accounts and
Financial information Internal Management Corporate Investor
Equity story results systems controls team governance relations
A compelling equity Strong operating Timely and reliable Accounting and In place for at least A strong An expert to
story aligned across performance, financial information financial control one year, with a independent board drive effective
organization, balance sheet available, team ensures proven track record formed early communications
sound business and positive cash appropriate IT and accurate financial and the experience on, with a clear strategy, manage
track record, flow over several budgetary system in results, puts controls and expertise to and transparent public spotlight
predictable growth quarters, and place with concise in place and provides undertake an IPO shareholder and and send effective
trajectory and clear several years of management certification event and operate a corporate structure messages to
understanding of strong, steady information readily public company investors and
how IPO proceeds growth and rising available on monthly analysts
will be used to fund profits and quarterly basis
growth
ROE 55%
ROI 26%
ROA 12%
Our survey results show that investors are wary of highly leveraged Return on Equity (ROE) shows potential investors what they might
companies with high debt-to-equity ratios. During the period of hope to receive as a return. It usually indicates the company’s
market uncertainty in which they were surveyed, investors ranked efficiency or how much profit it generates in comparison to its
debt-to-equity ratio as the most important financial factor. (In book value (the amount invested by business owners or total
striking contrast, the debt-to-equity ratio was only the ninth- stockholders’ equity). The higher the perceived risk by an investor,
most important financial factor in our 2008 institutional investor the higher the return they will require to invest and hence the lower
survey.) All of this is particularly relevant for private equity-backed the equity valuation.
companies, which tend to be highly leveraged. Given current While it would be preferable for a company to have a strong track
investor scrutiny, the resolution of debt financing and leverage record of profitability growth, our survey shows that it is not
levels must now be addressed at the same time as the equity necessarily a prerequisite. Many institutional investors say they will
funding proposition for IPOs. participate in an IPO provided there is a visible path to profitability
Earnings per share (EPS) growth drives share prices and has with strong growth and positive cash flow.
historically been the key measure for investors, though as noted EBITDA measures earnings before financing and tax costs and
above, the financial crisis in 2009 has caused investors to also non-cash charges. Where there is a divergence between reported
focus on debt-to-equity ratios. EBITDA and cash generated, investors will want to understand the
Sales growth includes the growth that comes from a company’s reasons. For companies that require significant investment (such
existing businesses (organic growth) and from acquiring new as many technology companies), the cash burn rate is an
businesses (takeovers, acquisitions or mergers). Investors are important ratio.
focusing on the potential for significant growth, which translates
into bottom-line performance.
Do you know the critical IPO success factors for company’s valuation and how the IPO is priced (which
institutional investors? is typically at a 10% to 15% discount relative to its peer
group of comparable companies). At the same time,
You need to view your IPO from your institutional investor’s
investors say they give non-financial measures a weighting
perspective. Institutional investors drive stock prices, with
of approximately 40% — even in their evaluations of the
the highly sophisticated institutional investor market typically
largest, mature companies. (See Charts 2 and 3 for the key
receiving 70–80% of IPO stock allocations. It includes mutual
IPO success factors, both financial and non-financial, from
funds, hedge funds, banks, insurance companies, pension
the perspective of institutional investors.)
funds, money management funds, larger corporate issuers
and other corporate finance intermediaries.
Investors give about a 60/40% weighting to financial/
non-financial metrics. When making buy or sell decisions
for their portfolios, investors weight financial metrics
about 60% in determining the attractiveness of the
Keep your options open through a multi-track approach. What do buyers/investors focus on in a prospect?
Increasingly, businesses are taking a “dual — or triple-track” • Sales and revenue trending
approach where they pursue a trade sale or other funding • Underlying cost base
source and prepare for a possible IPO at the same time. The
• Working capital management
multi-track approach allows you to keep your options open
during the preparation process. This can be especially beneficial • Business plan strength
in case the IPO window shuts on you during this often lengthy
Who is likely to buy the business? Understanding the needs
process. Thus, successful companies typically have a Plan B and
of the buyer is crucial for a successful divestment process.
often a Plan C (for example, simultaneously pursuing an IPO, a
While all buyers are concerned about key value drivers such
trade sale and debt refinancing).
as market share, competition, growth potential, the stability
Since there is considerable overlap in the preparation required of cash flows, the cost base and the quality of underlying
for the various routes, a dual — or triple-track can be executed assets — different purchasers have different strategic
without doubling or tripling your costs. By diversifying concerns.
your approach, your company can significantly increase its
strategic options and negotiating leverage while reducing Type of investor Key strategic sale concern
execution risk.
PE • Whether the investment will meet their financial
Investors expect companies to be properly funded, which criteria in terms of internal rate of return and other
measures of asset quality
can mean reducing or refinancing debt:
Trade • The fit between the assets and existing operations,
• Decreasing future funding costs by getting better and how quickly and easily the business will be
borrowing terms integrated
• Arranging extra debt to fund new projects Funding bank • The security of the investment
• Negotiating more advantageous covenants
• Restructuring debt
The appropriate exit strategy will differ significantly based on
the likely buyer, yet should contain contingency plans should a
different type of buyer emerge during the divestment process.
Pros Cons
• Maintain control without the constraints of taking company public • Restricted access to public market resources
• Quicker and easier method for capital-raising than an IPO, with no • Lack of market visibility
registration statements and simpler documentation and disclosure
• Possibly conflicting business cultures of shareholders and investors
required
• Potential investor participation in the day-to-day management
• Lower cost than raising money through an IPO
• Issuer determines conditions of the placement
• A marker for the future value of the company at time of an IPO
• Cash flow reserved for investment in the business
• Builds investor base
• More flexibility in amount and type of financing with choices among
equity and debt capital
Consider your M&A valuation versus likely IPO stock price. Have you considered a private placement?
You will need to evaluate what your company would be worth A private placement is money invested, usually by institutional
if you were to sell it to a strategic or financial buyer and what investors (in the form of stocks and sometimes bonds). It is
your stock price would be worth in an IPO. You will also need called a private placement because the stock is offered to a
to research comparable transactions and public company few private investors instead of the public at large. Typically, a
valuations in the sector in which your company operates. private placement is appropriate for a small company looking
In uncertain times, market leaders seek acquisitions. M&A to fund growth and expansion. It often involves commitment
activity is gradually returning to healthier levels, and multi- to an IPO or liquidity event within a specific time frame. It
nationals are expected to make a greater number of strategic can be an excellent prelude or alternative to going public. It
acquisitions. Investors who have cash but have not yet is an especially effective tool for raising second — and third-
deployed it are picking through their choices of possible round capital.
targets. Top companies are considering smaller acquisitions A private placement can be a quick and low-cost source of
and looking to integrate past acquisitions while divesting capital. In most cases, the purpose of a private placement
any non-core businesses. Although the ranks of potential is to raise a limited amount of capital in a relatively short
acquirers were thinned by economic instability, M&A is time at a relatively low cost. Often an IPO may not be a
expected to increasingly be used as a vehicle for accessing good option for a young company without the financial
innovation, in addition to growth. track record or reputation to attract the general investing
Preparing for an IPO can help the strategic sale process. public to its stock. Furthermore, as a privately negotiated
Gearing up for an IPO and preparing for a successful exit transaction, private placements can be designed to meet
to a trade or financial buyer involve many of the same the specific needs of your company. (Please refer to the
preparation activities. There is very high correlation in table above of private placement pros and cons.)
relation to the value drivers for both. A company that is
properly prepared for IPO should be better placed in relation
to other transaction alternatives. Your business will have been
taken through a similar process with all the rigors of a public
offering such as the right management structures and strong
corporate governance.
Pros Cons
• Relatively low cost with less capital committed than in a full • Potentially incompatible corporate cultures between partners
acquisition
• Risk of unrealistic expectations or ill-defined objectives
• Maintains some control
• Consistent oversight of other partner needed
• Shared risks and rewards
• Potential risk — legal, financial and reputational — due to joint and
• A bridge to a sale or IPO several liability with partner
• Integrates products and customers • More sophistication demanded from partners
• Builds credibility and knowledge to expand into key markets, • Slower decision-making
develop new products and improve productivity
• Special considerations for licensing, distribution and supply,
• Can help expand business, access new technology or cut costs manufacturing, employee and other relationship agreements
• Entry to strategic markets and geographies in a risk-managed way
while establishing strong local partnerships and new sales channels
• Greater transparency of operations
• May offer transition toward divestiture or facilitate streamlining of
corporate portfolios
Have you considered a joint venture (and other Have you chosen the right stock exchange and
strategic alliances)? listing option?
Market leaders often look to forge new partnerships during The best stock exchange will be the one that most effectively
an uncertain economy, to drive innovation and knowledge enhances the attractiveness of the company’s stock to
acquisition. Partnerships and joint ventures are expected to investors. After a company goes public, the exchange should
increase, providing companies with operational efficiencies, also continue to meet a business’ needs.
access to knowledge and minimal costs. In our recent survey,
Factors to consider when choosing an exchange:
29% of businesses stated that they were likely to enter into a
JV or strategic partnership in the next 12 months. • Access to institutional investors
• Stock market liquidity
JVs and partnerships are expected to increase in number.
In the JV, businesses create a partnership (to share profits, • Brand building in local market
markets, assets, intellectual property, etc.) and form a • Valuation
separate legal entity. In contrast to a merger, there is • Listing requirements
no ownership transfer in the JV. On the other hand, in a • Future financing options
strategic partnership or alliance, typically a smaller company • Cost
collaborates with a larger, financially stronger company.
JVs can be a low-cost way to penetrate new markets. More than 90% list on their domestic stock exchanges,
JVs and strategic alliances can provide an ideal vehicle for although they may sell shares abroad simultaneously. Smaller,
establishing strong local business partnerships and entering younger companies tend to list on their home countries’
strategic markets and geographies. A JV or alliance can junior stock exchanges, while the larger, more established
help companies to expand business, access technology companies will prefer a main market listing. An issuer may
or cut costs. At the same time, less capital is usually sell its shares just to domestic investors (usually the route for
committed than in a full acquisition. A successful JV also smaller offerings) or else choose an international offering.
may be a transitional step toward divestiture or facilitate A larger company may seek foreign listing for a higher
the streamlining of corporate portfolios. Be sure your JV is valuation, to maximize IPO proceeds or to broaden its investor
supported by quantifiable milestones and compatible goals base. This is especially true for larger companies with small
between the partners in order to foster realistic expectations. domestic markets which seek more than US$1 billion in
In our experience, alliances that fail usually lack these vital funding. However, a major deterrent to a foreign listing is that
ingredients. (Please refer to the table above of joint venture/ a company must comply with the policies of the foreign stock
strategic alliance pros and cons.) exchange, which may be more stringent than those at home.
• Greater liquidity of some foreign • Higher cost and complexity • Shares are offered to private • Gains access to large pools of
markets of preparing an IPO for and (or) institutional investors capital abroad
multiple markets and are usually underwritten
• Access to a broader shareholder • Allows exposure to new group
base (which may increase • Possibly more stringent • Shares can be listed on main of investors which potentially
demand and maximize value of regulations and increased exchanges or junior markets increases demand for its
IPO) disclosure requirements shares and raises share price
• Greater liquidity
• Improve proceeds of the IPO • Flowback or return of • Increases issuer’s visibility by
• Listing process is usually
shares to domestic market increased analyst and press
• Potentially higher valuation, more onerous and expensive
since institutional investors coverage
since international investors than GDRs
may not hold offshore
may value shares higher than • Cheaper than a full listing
shares for the long term • Can be used as acquisition
domestic investors
currency or in staff incentive • Excluded from major indices
• Shares are useful in M&A activity schemes
• Less rigorous corporate
(high-profile companies can
• Companies need to apply governance requirements
use the shares as currency for
the exchange’s corporate than a public listing
acquisitions)
governance standards
• Inability to participate in
• Specialization in particular
• Accounts need to be in IFRS rights issues
sectors (e.g. NASDAQ for
or US GAAP equivalent
technology or London for mining
and energy)
Source: EY Top 10 IPO readiness challenges — a measures that matter global study, 2008
Have you evaluated which pre-IPO transactions The possible benefits of pre-IPO transactions:
could enhance an offering’s value? • Facilitate growth, such as expanding into new markets
Your company’s overall transaction strategy should be • Strengthen the business
made up of much more than the IPO itself. Most companies • Increase company revenues
undertake pre-IPO strategic transactions which are powerful • Offer scale to the listing
tools for accelerating the development of your business. In
• Provide a platform for operations, management and
challenging market conditions, it is more difficult to obtain
financial reporting
pre-IPO transactions and to close the deal. Nonetheless, most
successful companies typically do undertake transactions • Increase credibility with market analysts and investors
in advance of the IPO. In a recent executive survey, 90% of
During uncertain times, market leaders re-evaluate their
global executives stated that their pre-IPO (and post-IPO)
business models and try to optimize their market reach. They
transactions contributed to their shareholder values. (Please
prioritize seizing transaction opportunities — particularly
see page 15 for pre-IPO transactions which could enhance
targeting weakened competitors. They seek transactions that
offering value.)
will expand their geographic reach and help to secure new
customers and service lines. At the same time, winning
companies do not pursue growth for its own sake, but
maintain a focus on strategic value.
M&A 58%
JVs 41%
Other activities 5%
Pre-IPO companies need to reduce debt levels and refinance Equity financing can help build critical mass before the IPO event.
expensive debt financing prior to the IPO event. Debt financing According to our survey results, 66% of institutional investors
or refinancing was chosen by 70% of institutional investors as the would have pursued an equity financing without a liquidity event
type of pre-IPO corporate activity that creates the most value (selling shares). With the limits in debt financing options post-
for pre-listed companies going forward. This is because investors downturn, many market leaders have stated they would have
are mostly avoiding companies with high leverage. Prior to the raised additional equity to finance the business and to provide
economic downturn, raising debt finance was relatively easy and some liquidity for shareholders in advance of the IPO. This means
inexpensive. Nowadays, debt financing has become costly and hard getting money into the shareholders’ pockets early on, before the
to obtain. Most debt is only available with much higher margins company goes public, so that IPO proceeds will be used mainly to
and fees, tighter covenants and more onerous due diligence grow the company. It can also allow some shareholders to exit the
requirements. business in advance of the IPO.
Be sure the corporate structure is focused on your core business. A successful business alliance or M&A can help you achieve
Our survey shows that 68% of institutional investors believe critical mass and also supports your growth story. If a company
corporate re-organization to segregate a business line would can demonstrate that a successful joint venture partnership or
create value before an IPO. A major motivation in pursuing a acquisition has already been completed and integrated, it adds
corporate re-organization seems to be to engineer a business credibility to a company’s growth plans. Investors may be more
that the market and investors can readily understand. Indeed, sceptical of IPO candidates that have not demonstrated successful
a streamlined, more simplistic company structure can allow pre-IPO transactions where an acquisition strategy forms part of
executives to present investors with a clearer, more focused the post-IPO growth story.
business model. Ever since the economic downturn, many
companies are facing some level of financial or operational stress.
Pre-IPO companies may need to financially or operationally
restructure their businesses to secure market position through a
disciplined divestiture process.
Note: % represents the percentage of executive respondents that chose this particular time frame
12 months before IPO 6–12 months before IPO 6–24 weeks before IPO 1–6 weeks before IPO
• Develop a robust business plan • Finalize preparation of historical • Finalize timetable • Begin formal marketing
including the objectives of going financial information
• Begin financial and legal due • Price and allocate the offering
public, as well as a Plan B
• Commence initial due diligence diligence
• Register prospectus/admission
• Establish internal team that will
• Make necessary changes to • Consider adequacy of working document
manage the IPO process, and
the executive board and begin capital and use of proceeds
enhance if necessary • Have underwriter perform
recruiting additional board
• Produce draft prospectus and marketing of securities (“book
• Appoint external advisors members
other documents building”)
including financial, accounting
• Start building financial model and
and legal advisory team, and • Do initial review of pricing issues • Admission to stock exchange is
business plan
work with them to draw up granted and trading commences
• Review public relations
schedule and timetables • Meet with stock exchange
presentations
representatives
• Adopt leading-practice corporate • Begin initial marketing
governance and reporting • Consider investor relations
processes strategy and equity story • Commission expert reports if
required
• Make all efforts to help ensure • Implement financial reporting
compliance with laws and procedures • Appoint non-executive directors
regulations • Discuss transaction with the • Eliminate deal breakers and
• Complete strategic initiatives and relevant stock exchange resolve any potential litigation or
pre-IPO transactions due diligence issues
• Agree draft timetable
(e.g. acquisitions) • Comply with all reporting
• Begin preparation of historical requirements
financial information • Prepare road show presentations
• Establish financial reporting to targeted potential investors
procedures
• Review management information
systems and operational and
compliance controls
• Consider ownership and tax
issues
• Consider nationality of holding
company
*Source: EY’s Top 10 IPO readiness challenges — a measures that matter global study, 2008
Part two
IPO execution phase
1 to 12 months before IPO
IPO readiness involves the acceptance and
implementation of change — not just by
executive management, but throughout every
aspect of the business and corporate culture.
Is your management team experienced, with an Have you chosen the right external advisory
IPO track record ? team with IPO and public company experience?
Building a powerful team starts at the top. You need to On the journey of transformation into a public company,
have the right executive team with experience in IPOs and success depends a great deal on a coordinated team effort by
appropriate incentives functioning well before the IPO. For the internal management and the advisory team. Following
the vast majority (90%) of institutional investors in our survey, economic uncertainty, it is more important than ever to build
quality of management was the single most important non- a quality advisory team. Begin to assemble your advisory
financial factor when evaluating a new offering. (Please see team well in advance of your public launch. (See page 20 for
Chart on page 9.) roles and responsibilities of external advisory team.)
Provide good incentives for senior management. Market Professional, experienced advisors will be able to carefully
leaders look at innovative ways to recruit and reward their prime your business, introduce you to the right investors, help
key senior talent with compensation. Management incentives you sell your story and most significantly, put a value on your
include performance-based compensation structures, share business that reflects its position and potential. Get this right
options, greater transparency and employee involvement. and the IPO will still be hard work — but a cohesive team will
Such high-level incentives and shared ownership by yield optimal results.
management creates the motivation that often leads to
strong performance.
Remuneration is an area of increasing complexity and an
on-going regulatory challenge. Executive remuneration
attracts high-profile attention from executives, shareholders
and the media, creating significant business risk.
Remuneration cannot be considered once the deal is done.
At the same time, an IPO presents significant opportunities
to deliver remuneration in ways that are not generally
available to private companies. Equity can form a key
component of remuneration for executives and can be used
to promote the company’s brand among employees.
* This describes the typical responsibilities of a reporting accountant and independent auditor in the UK.
Auditing requirements differ from market to market with the minimum requirement usually being
three years unqualified audit reports in accordance with recognized GAAP.
5 Tax accounting and reporting issues 5 Tax accounting and reporting issues
Note: Rankings are listed from (1) most important to (7) least important by Institutional investor respondents
According to our survey, asset valuation impairment is the biggest Revenue recognition can be highly subjective. When terms of
issue institutional investors are grappling with, particularly in payment become more complex, the decision of when revenue
certain industries. Valuing businesses and their underlying assets should be recognized becomes more complicated and subject to
has become much more difficult. Economic uncertainty has directly interpretation. When companies try to protect their results, they may
affected valuation assumptions such as growth and discount rates, be recognizing revenue earlier, taking advantage of the subjectivity
making accurate forecasting of cash flows challenging. In addition, of revenue recognition. The US in particular has a substantial body
the decline in transactions and the lack of comparable transactions of literature on revenue recognition that can, on occasion, prove
information has increased the complexity of performing valuations useful when there is no IFRS guidance available. Historically this was
and determining fair value. The past two years have seen an particularly relevant for IFRS-reporting companies registered with
increased level of impairments reported. Many companies have the US SEC, who wished to avoid as far as possible having IFRS/
seen their goodwill and assets fall in value and may need to take a US GAAP differences. This is now less significant as reconciliation
charge against earnings. to US GAAP is no longer required. However, such differences are
Users of financial statements will be more inquisitive, demanding sometimes unavoidable, and it is not always the case that a revenue
greater transparency in and explanation of the assumptions recognition policy under US GAAP is acceptable under IFRS, and
management makes about a company’s future. They will refer to vice versa.
multiple sources of information to validate the assumptions and Related-parties transactions, which are business deals between
sensitivity analysis behind asset valuations. Companies should be two related parties, become quite significant when a private
prepared for increased scrutiny and rigorously present realistic and company goes public. Regulations exist which must be followed,
consistent information. With prolonged uncertainty, impairments including that all companies report such related-party transactions.
will remain a focus for all participants in global capital markets. Most related-party transactions are perfectly legal. However,
Making sense of consolidated subsidiary financial statement due to the potential conflict of interest that may exist between
issues is also a challenge for investors. Business combinations two related parties (leading potentially to the parties benefitting
are growing in importance in capital markets, but investors to the detriment of shareholders), these transactions will bring
have experienced difficulty in accurately assessing business scrutiny and will require transparency. IFRS requires disclosure
combinations. Comparing financial statements is especially of all related party transactions and the terms under which they
difficult when acquirers are accounting for acquisitions in different have been conducted. Those entities that have considerable related
ways. The IASB and FASB have undertaken a joint project whose party transactions should re-evaluate the basis for the transactions
objective is to develop a single accounting standard. Thanks largely and the terms under which they are conducted. To the extent they
to changes made to US GAAP, such a unified approach would are not on arms’ length terms, the impact on the financial results
ensure that the accounting for business combinations is the same should be considered and the terms renegotiated ahead of any IPO
whether an entity is applying IFRS or US GAAP. taking place. Therefore, ensure that your related party transactions
are conducted on arm’s length terms since IFRS disclosures may
become more extensive.
Establishing corporate
structure and governance
With greater scrutiny and liability for public company directors, How directors can improve board performance:
substantial time and effort is required to identify, appoint and • Have loyalty to shareholders, not management
groom a qualified board of independent directors. You will need
• Challenge management to simplify and explain the business
to adopt leading practice corporate governance principles and
reporting policies that protect your shareholders’ interests. • Serve as ambassadors and promoters of the business
• Carefully evaluate executive remuneration plans
Have you created the corporate governance • Improve audit committee oversight of risk management
policies that inspire shareholder confidence?
The media and general public placed partial blame for the Have you adopted leading practice corporate
2009 financial crisis on poor corporate governance. Many governance oversight, policies and procedures?
believe that boards failed to understand and manage risk Top companies adopt the appropriate corporate governance
and incentives appropriately. With the charges of fraud and practices that will protect shareholder interests. This will
market manipulation that arose out of the financial downturn, involve working with your legal counsel on all corporate
investors are placing a premium on corporate governance and governance matters, including efficient pre — and post-IPO legal
high stock exchange standards. structures and compliance with exchange-listing and other
Corporate governance reform is now at the top of agendas regulatory requirements.
for investors, regulators and boards. Boards are reflecting on
how to be more involved with governance and create greater Are you and your board focusing on risk
audit committee oversight of the risk management processes. management?
Now more than ever, a strong corporate governance function, Your newly-public company will need a full suite of board-
including attractive qualified independent board members and approved risk management and control policies.
the transparency of related-party transactions, is critical.
Investors are increasing their scrutiny of risk and will pay a
Have you recruited and assembled your entire premium for strong risk management, while companies are
focusing more on risk assessment and response. This is a result
board of directors?
of increased regulatory and investor scrutiny and increased
Investors expect that your board will have a balance of business activity in the emerging markets. In the downturn,
executive and non-executive directors (NEDs) with sufficient businesses of all sizes were hit by risks that were completely
knowledge of the business. Take time to build a public off their radars. Now, shareholders expect transparency, open
company board with a good mix of skills, including industry communication and effective global risk management.
contacts, technical knowledge, business development,
marketing, strategic planning, acquisition integration and Risk management oversight in many companies is inadequate
financial expertise. for identifying new risks. Companies need a comprehensive
process and structure to identify and manage risks. In its
Start recruiting your board early, especially NEDs. The oversight capacity, the board bears ultimate responsibility for
leading companies will usually have the right boards in place developing the risk management framework, which allows a
before the IPO. The typical board candidate search process company to manage risk prudently, yet allows for growth.
is quite similar to recruiting a CEO or other C-level executive.
However, for many companies, there are often last-minute, Key success factors in managing risk include:
frantic searches for independent board members. In some • Assignment of risk ownership
countries, there is a veritable war for boardroom talent since • Internal risk communications
the pool of good potential directors is often so limited.
• Understanding of enterprise-wide risk
Therefore, NEDs should be sought as much in advance as
possible — six months ahead of the IPO event is realistic Although enterprise risk management is still in its early
timing. A NED with experience of an IPO, who understands the stages for most pre-listed companies today, the larger public
process and who is able to challenge board debate (and not companies are looking beyond internal controls around
just rubber stamp management actions), can be a great asset financial reporting to address the broader enterprise and
in the lead-up to an IPO. external risks.
Recruiting qualified independent board members is a huge Under public scrutiny, companies must create a sensible
challenge these days. In the past, corporate scandals have arisen management compensation structure. The compensation
when a board of directors became too friendly with the executive structure should maximize the company’s profitability while
team. Often, the bigger and more complex a company becomes, rewarding high-quality managers for reaching goals. To be fair to
the more difficult it becomes for a non-executive director (NED) shareholders, this may mean a compensation and bonus structure
to have a complete grasp of the business. It is often challenging to that is far less than the remuneration received when the company
find a NED who is independent, with the right skills and knowledge was private. At the same time, you want a remuneration structure
or background. that provides adequate incentive for management to drive the
business forward. Once the IPO is effective and the company has
Enhancing internal controls can help you meet changing
publically traded stock, an employee stock option plan can be a
accounting, tax, legal and procedural requirements. Historically,
highly attractive part of the company’s executive compensation
the top two reported internal-control deficiencies contributing to
package.
a material weakness were related to: competency and training of
accounting resources and inadequate accounting documentation, Implementing board meeting and reporting processes is a
policy or procedures. Dealing with such significant accounting necessary formality. Your company needs to set board meeting
issues (e.g. valuations and revenue recognition) early is a critical guidelines and establish a protocol. For instance, certain issues and
success factor to an IPO. decisions should be reserved as the domain only of the board and
not of any other part of the business. This needs to be circulated
Forming a qualified audit committee is challenging, since the
and agreed upon by both management and board members.
directors need to have financial literacy, with at least one of the
NEDs qualifying as a financial expert. As the audit committee
provides the financial oversight of the business, typically audit
committees examine the annual and quarterly financial reports
and review the financial reporting and budgeting process. They will
therefore be expected to understand complex accounting issues.
*Source: EY’s Top 10 IPO readiness challenges — a measures that matter global study, 2008
Part three
IPO realization
phase
1 to 24 months post-IPO
The last stage of the IPO value journey begins
after shares are priced and allocated to
institutional investors. Now, aftermarket
trading and the “real work” of being a public
company begins.
2. Strategic Planning and resource allocation, Don’t lose sight of your strategy. Be careful and well considered as you approach new
communications, investor relations, major initiatives to accelerate your growth, such as acquisitions or rapid expansion into new
initiatives, competitive market dynamics, geographical markets. A robust approach to corporate development is essential.
M&A, divestitures, macro-market dynamics
3. Compliance Governance, regulatory, legal, code of Investors are becoming increasingly focused on corporate governance. As a newly
conduct public company, you have to comply with a host of new regulations, legislation and
filing deadlines. Thus, you need to get the right controls in place and communicate
clear policies and procedures.
4. Operational IT, physical assets, sales and marketing, You need to reconsider your current infrastructure, systems and controls, as you
people, R&D, supply chain, hazards now need to provide timely and appropriate information to your stakeholders. Keep
your team focused and fully aware of their new or expanded responsibilities.
An effective working capital management strategy can help As a result of financial or operational stress, some companies
companies release much-needed cash in uncertain times, when may need to financially or operationally rationalize their
“cash is still king.” The economic downturn led to declining business structure to maintain their market positions in the
revenue, major currency and commodity price fluctuations and a current environment. Boards are more actively seeking to establish
severe restriction of access to new funds. As a result, the ability a tighter grip on their core businesses. Many are closely monitoring
to manage working capital — the lifeblood of a company — and the performance of subsidiaries so that underperforming assets
promoting a “cash culture” have become crucial. Your company can be identified for divestment. Restructuring also allows some
will require a disciplined working capital management program companies seeking to dispose of non-performing assets to better
to access liquidity, manage cash more tightly, improve cash flow focus on their core businesses. Such restructuring initiatives are
forecasting, release cash and control costs. targeted to improve performance and increase cash flow and
liquidity.
Regulatory and compliance risk is a current strategic challenge
driven by escalating regulatory burdens in many markets and Timely financial reporting procedures allow public companies to
industries. As companies extend their value chains abroad, achieve accurate forecasts each quarter and consistently meet
numerous compliance risk challenges have also arisen. Your targets. While a private company may endure negative publicity
company needs to revitalize the way you manage risk, identify without major repercussions, a public company’s stock price will
the full risk complexity of the market and develop a strong control suffer unless it can file its periodic financial statements, accurately
framework for your business. and on-time, quarterly and annually, without fail.
Other, 1%
Proprietary trading desk, 2%
Sovereign wealth fund, 0.3% Insurance, 5%
Other, 2% Private equity, 1%
Pension fund, 6%
Broker affiliate, 6%
Latin America, 18% Asia, 21%
Mutual fund, 33%
$150b or more, 6%
Less than $50m, 6%
$75b – $149.99b, 3%
$50 – $99m, 8%
$30b – $74.99b, 6%
$5b – $9.99b, 7%
$300 – $499m, 7%
About EY
EY is a global leader in assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services.
The insights and quality services we deliver help build trust and confidence IPO Leaders
in the capital markets and in economies the world over. We develop
outstanding leaders who team to deliver on our promises to all of our Global
stakeholders. In so doing, we play a critical role in building a better
Maria Pinelli
working world for our people, for our clients and for our communities.
+44 20 7980 0960
EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of
[email protected]
the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a
separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited
Americas
by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. For more information
about our organization, please visit ey.com. Jacqueline Kelley
+1 949 437 0237
About EY’s IPO services
EY is a leader in helping to take companies public worldwide. With decades [email protected]
of experience, our global network is dedicated to serving market leaders
and helping businesses evaluate the pros and cons of an IPO. We demystify Asia-Pacific
the process by offering IPO readiness assessments, IPO preparation, project Ringo Choi
management and execution services, all of which help prepare you for life +86 755 2502 8298
in the public spotlight. Our Global IPO Center of Excellence is a virtual hub
which provides access to our IPO knowledge, tools, thought leadership and [email protected]
contacts from around the world in one easy-to-use source.
ey.com/ipocenter EMEIA
Dr. Martin Steinbach
© 2016 EYGM Limited. +49 6196 9961 1574
All Rights Reserved.
[email protected]
EYG no. CY0633
BMC Agency
Japan
GA 0000_05421 Shinichiro Suzuki
ED None +81 3 3503 2510
[email protected]
In line with EY’s commitment to minimize its impact on the environment,
this document has been printed on paper with a high recycled content.
This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not
intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax or other professional advice. Please
refer to your advisors for specific advice.
ey.com