Nama : Handri

Nim : 045031728

Mata Kuliah : Bahasa dan Terminologi Hukum

Program Studi : Ilmu Hukum

Fakultas : FHISIP

Sebelum anda membaca cerita tersebut, tentukan teknik membaca yang akan anda gunakan untuk
menjawab pertanyaan berikut ini:

1. Sebutkan 10 kata kunci dari cerita dibawah ini!

2. Teknik membaca apa yang anda gunakan? apa alasan anda menggunakan teknik tersebut?

Untuk melatih konsentrasi anda, cobalah untuk membaca cerita di bawah ini hanya satu kali untuk
menjawab pertanyaan tersebut.

A Complicated Inheritance Case

Mr. Yanto, a successful entrepreneur in his city, passed away at the age of 65. His sudden departure
shocked his family, especially his children—Tina, Rudi, and Andi. Mr. Yanto has many assets, including
companies, properties, and other investments. However, he left this world without having the chance to
make a will, so all of his inheritance must be divided according to the applicable laws. The problem arose
when Rudi, the second child who had been working with his father in the family business, felt that he
deserved the largest share of the inheritance. "I have dedicated my life to this company," he said during
the family meeting. "Without me, the company wouldn't be this big."

Tina, the eldest child who works as a doctor in another city, disagrees with Rudi's view. "Inheritance is
our right, Rudi. We should share it fairly," she said. Andi, the youngest child who is still in college, feels
trapped between his two older siblings. He doesn't understand much about business or law, but he
knows that this family rift could destroy their relationships. The family ultimately decided to take this
matter to court. They filed a lawsuit requesting the judge to determine the division of the inheritance
according to the law. The court appointed an experienced judge in inheritance cases to handle this
matter.

In the trial process, the judge explained that according to inheritance law in Indonesia, legitimate
children have equal rights to their parents' inheritance. Although Rudi has worked hard at the company,
that does not automatically grant him a larger share of the inheritance, unless there is a will stating
otherwise, which in this case does not exist. However, Rudi did not give up. He presented evidence that
he had invested his personal money into the company, significantly increasing its value. The lawyer
believes that this contribution should be considered as part of the inheritance distribution. Tina doesn't
sit idly by. They submitted documents showing that their father has provided equal financial support to
all three of them throughout their lives, without any difference in treatment.

The trial is lengthy, with arguments from both sides becoming increasingly intense. Tina and Rudi each
feel that they are the ones most entitled. Meanwhile, Andi feels increasingly pressured by the situation
he is facing, confused about which side to take. In the midst of this tension, the family lawyer, Mrs. Siti,
suggested that they try mediation. "The court can decide according to the law, but your relationship as a
family could be destroyed," she said. "It might be better if you sit down together and find a solution that
is acceptable to all parties."

Finally, the family agreed to try mediation. They sat together with a neutral mediator, trying to resolve
the issue without having to continue the conflict in court. In the mediation process, they found that the
core of the issue was not about money or possessions, but rather about mutual respect and recognition
of each other's contributions. Rudi finally realized that his contribution to the company's development
was indeed important, but family relationships were far more valuable. Tina also began to understand
that although they were entitled to the same inheritance, Rudi had sacrificed more time and energy for
the family business.

After several mediation sessions, they finally reached an agreement. Rudi will receive a larger share of
the company due to his active role, while Tina and Andi will receive equal compensation in the form of
property and other investments. This agreement is not only approved by all parties, but it also preserves
their family relationships. In the end, the judge ratified this agreement as a court ruling. Although this
case began with tension and conflict, Mr. Yanto's family managed to resolve it in a way that kept their
brotherhood intact. They learned that in matters of inheritance, justice is not just about dividing wealth,
but also about respecting each other's contributions and feelings. This family continues their lives, with
sweet memories of Mr. Yanto and the awareness that no matter what happens, family must always
come first.

Jawaban :

1. Berikut adalah 10 kata kunci dari cerita di atas beserta penjelasannya :

 Inheritance : Menjadi inti konflik dalam cerita, mengacu pada harta peninggalan
almarhum Mr. Yanto yang harus dibagi di antara ahli warisnya.
 Will : Dokumen yang seharusnya mengatur pembagian harta sebelum seseorang
meninggal. Karena Mr. Yanto tidak meninggalkan wasiat, pembagian dilakukan
berdasarkan hukum.
 Family Business : Perusahaan yang dikelola oleh Rudi dan ayahnya. Usaha ini merupakan
bagian penting dari aset warisan yang diperebutkan.
 Equal rights : Prinsip dalam hukum waris Indonesia yang memberikan hak setara kepada
semua anak sah, menjadi argumen utama Tina.
  Contribution : Peran dan upaya Rudi dalam membesarkan usaha keluarga. Ini menjadi
poin penting dalam menentukan pembagian yang dianggap adil.
 Court : Institusi hukum tempat keluarga mengajukan perkara untuk mendapatkan
keputusan resmi terkait pembagian warisan.
 Mediation : Proses penyelesaian konflik melalui diskusi dengan bantuan mediator.
Pilihan ini digunakan untuk menghindari perpecahan lebih lanjut dalam keluarga.
 Family Relationship : Ikatan antara Tina, Rudi, dan Andi. Isu ini menjadi pertimbangan
utama dalam menyelesaikan konflik dengan cara yang tetap menjaga keharmonisan.
 Justice : Konsep yang dicari dalam pembagian warisan, mencakup pembagian aset yang
sesuai dengan kontribusi dan kebutuhan masing-masing pihak.
 Compensation : Bentuk penggantian dalam pembagian warisan, seperti properti atau
investasi, yang diberikan kepada Tina dan Andi sebagai imbalan atas bagian usaha yang
lebih besar untuk Rudi.
Kata-kata kunci ini memberikan gambaran menyeluruh tentang isu utama dalam cerita dan
pendekatan yang diambil untuk menyelesaikan konflik secara adil.

2. Teknik membaca yang paling tepat untuk memahami paragraf di atas adalah teknik membaca
scanning dikarenakan:

 Pendalaman Isi
Paragraf ini mengandung permasalahan yang kompleks, melibatkan konflik keluarga,
aspek hukum waris, dan proses mediasi. Dengan teknik membaca analitis, pembaca
dapat memahami setiap elemen penting secara menyeluruh, seperti peran masing-
masing karakter, dinamika hukum, dan solusi yang disepakati.
 Memahami Hubungan Antar Komponen
Teknik ini membantu pembaca mengidentifikasi keterkaitan antara konflik keluarga,
intervensi hukum, dan mediasi. Pembaca dapat melihat bagaimana setiap bagian cerita
saling terhubung dan memengaruhi proses penyelesaian.
 Analisis Penerapan Hukum
Mengingat kasus ini berkaitan dengan hukum waris di Indonesia, membaca secara
analitis membantu pembaca memahami bagaimana aturan hukum diterapkan dalam
situasi nyata. Teknik ini memungkinkan pembaca menganalisis peran hukum dalam
pembagian warisan dan pentingnya mediasi sebagai solusi alternatif.
 Menangkap Poin-Poin Kunci
Teknik ini mempermudah pembaca untuk mengidentifikasi aspek-aspek penting seperti
prinsip hak waris yang setara, kontribusi individu dalam keluarga, dan nilai penting
menjaga hubungan kekeluargaan di tengah konflik.

Teknik membaca Scanning efektif untuk memahami dan menganalisis paragraf ini secara
mendalam. Teknik ini cocok untuk menangkap detail konflik, argumen, dan solusi dalam
konteks hukum dan keluarga, memberikan pemahaman yang lebih lengkap terhadap
permasalahan yang dihadapi.