MARY BERNSTEIN

1
ELIZABETH TIGANO
2 3416 Deerwood Terrace, #113
Fremont, CA 94536
3 Email: [email protected]
(510) 938-6280
4
Plaintiffs Pro Se aka “Self-Represented Litigants”
5

7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9

10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11 MARY BERNSTEIN, ELIZABETH Case No. 3:24-cv-00131-JSC

TIGANO,
12
Motion for Disqualification of the
13 Plaintiffs, Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley,
Pursuant to 28 US.C. §§ 144 and 455;
14 vs. Affidavit of Prejudice by Elizabeth Tigano,
Certificate of Good Faith by Counsel of
15
ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, record
16 a California Court with Jurisdiction over
Alameda County, EUMI K. LEE, JENNA M.
17 WHITMAN; KEITH KERN FONG;
ELIZABETH RILES; SUSAN LEW; MARK
18
P. FICKES, JOHN DOE 1-50; MARY ROE 1-
19 50; XYZ CORP 1-50; ABC LLC 1-50; The
names of the "John Doe 1-50" "Mary Roe 1-
20 50", "XYZ Corp, 1-50", and "ABC LLC, 1-
50", defendants being fictitious, and unknown
21
to the Plaintiff,
22
Defendants.
23

24

25

26

27

28

-1–

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1
NOTICE OF MOTION
2
TO DEFENDANTS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
3
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT October 17, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 8—19th Floor
4
Videoconference only1 Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley at the United States District Court for
5
the Northern District of California, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, CA 94102,
6 Plaintiffs will, and hereby do, move for the Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott
7 Corley, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 144 and 455, on the grounds that there is evidence of bias
8 in favor of the Defendants and prejudice against the Plaintiffs. This motion will be based upon
9 the attached points and authorities, the affidavit of Elizabeth Tigano Declarations and the

10
exhibits attached thereto, the Certificate of Counsel, and all pleadings and records on file in this
action.
11
Plaintiffs medical doctors leave medical issues follow up multiple letters. Plaintiffs have despite
12
difficulties have prepared this motion disqualification in timely fashion. Plaintiffds have
13
significant medical appointments and procedures for medical issues that this judge refused to
14
allow to file under seal demonstration incapable of moving forwards right now Plaintiff Mary
15
Bernstein filed extensive amended first amended complaint attached alameda which demanded
16 substantial amount of time due to medical issues Tigano has substantial medical issues
17 demanding pause as well evidenced by medical report, letters that this Judge refused to review
18 communication disabilities
19 This judge speaks out of both sides of mouth claims failures to state claims in previous matter

20
but refusal to appoint counsel in previous matter. Fedpro attorneys approved yet this judge
dismissed magistrate.
21
This Judge demeans pro se litigants desperately need a lawyer suffering significant adverse
22
material consequences. This Judge calls housing matter frivolous. This case is about denial
23

24
11 Psalm 10 14 But you, God, see the trouble of the afflicted; you consider their grief and take it in hand.
The victims commit themselves to you; you are the helper of the fatherless. 15 Break the arm of the wicked man;
25 call the evildoer to account for his wickedness that would not otherwise be found out. 16 The Lord is King for
ever and ever; the nations will perish from his land.17 You, Lord, hear the desire of the afflicted; you
26 encourage them, and you listen to their cry,18 defending the fatherless and the oppressed, so that mere earthly
mortals will never again str terror.
27 10 Woe to unjust judges and to those who issue unfair laws, says the Lord, 2 so that there is no justice for
the poor, the widows, and orphans. Yes, it is true that they even rob the widows and fatherless
28 children.

-2–

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 reasonable accommodations in serious case Alameda county. Many many other Alameda
1
County residents disabled, pro se litigants are likely suffering these same injustices. A majority
2
of tenants in housing court are unrepresented. A similar pattern exists in child custody
3
proceedings. All litigants deserve a respectful, dignified, and transparent experience with the
4
courts. All litigants deserve compassion integrity from court. Handicapped individuals deserve
5
to be treated with care and compassion by the Courts federal included.
6

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-3–

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 INTRODUCTION
1
Plaintiffs Elizabeth Tigano and Mary Bernstein hereby move to disqualify the Honorable
2
Jacqueline Scott Corley as the sitting judge in the present case on the grounds of 28 USC
3
Sections 14412 and 455. 3 As set forth in more detail below, this motion is based on evidence
4
contained in the supporting Affidavit of Elizabeth Tigano, Affidvit Mary Bernstein Declarations.
5
This includes Judge Corley’s growing repugnance of self-represented litigatnts as
6 evidenced above in the below unrelated cases of other pro se litigants 3:23-cv-03776-JSC
7 Tauscher v. Hanshew Case filed: 07/28/2023 and 3:21-cv-09347-JSC Austin v. Riley Case
8 filed: 12/02/2021. This is not an informa pauperis case; Plaintiff Elizabeth Tigano paid the filing
9 fee though a hardship financially. This federal case is about Plaintiffs, child sexual abuse

10
survivors victimized in Alameda County Superior Court Defendants. This is imperative that a
fair, unbiased Judge is assigned. A Court is ostensibly a venue wherein litigants, victims seek
11
adjudication, resolution and protection; Plaintiffs have endured and are enduring quite the
12
opposite. Defendants, males with criminal records, military backgrounds in the Alameda case
13
have been allowed to weaponize the Court against Plaintiffs and facilitated, sponsored
14
harassment. Restraining orders placed on the victims a grandmother with a walker, severely
15
impaired sister as retaliation. This case is about reasonable accommodations denied tio disabled,
16 handicapped litigants and abuses perpetuated by Alameda Courby directed at traumatized
17 women. This abuse reached Apex during COVID 10 and is continuing to this date during
18 litigation in Alameda County. The bully pulpit Judges abuses in Alameda County towards
19 impaired litigants. Kaiser doctors, treating physicians and witnesses will be testifying in the

20
Alameda Court trial and in this trial concerning Plaintiffs. Expert witnesses will also be
testifying. Alameda County has a long history of abuses of impaired, vulnerable individuals in
21
recent years. Alameda County Superior Court also has long history 2005 discrimination against
22
2 In relevant part, section 144 states: “Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and
23 sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in
favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be assigned to hear such
24 proceeding. The affidavit shall state the facts and the reasons for the belief that bias or prejudice exists, and shall be filed not
less than ten days before the beginning of the term at which the proceeding is to be heard, or good cause shall be shown for
25 failure to file it within such time.”
3 In relevant part, section 455 states: “(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United

26 States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be
questioned.
27 (b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:
(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of
disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.”
28

-4–

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 jewish last name and blacks in its Court. Alameda County did not give any #Me Too sympathy
1
to abused, disabled women plaintiffs. This judge Corley would not allow medical records
2
concerning extension of time status report submitted under seal but elected to further impose
3
trauma on plaintiffs pushing to hurry up and finalize a first amended complaint and denial further
4
extensions. The case was only filed in January of this year.
5
On April 19, 2024 an Order was filed advising Plaintiffs FINAL MOTION extending time Case
6 3:24-cv-00131-JSC Document 17 Filed 04/19/24 Page 1 of 2 advising Plaintiffs strategizing not
7 timely and to file and serve existing complaint bhy July 19, 2024 or must file NEW
8 COMPLAINT by this time. Plaintiffs are on fixed income and cannot afford to file another
9 complaint to the tune of $435.00 in similary case Judge Jacqueoine Corley had no compassion

10
for a budget of a pro se plaintiff filing matter.4 “Budgets,” “health issues” this is dismissive and
an ivory tower looking down on people disabled and with moderate incomes.
11
Thr juidge Corley speaks with such contempt and disdain for self represented plaintiffs. Dinal
12
extension. Ther are instances wherein 15-20 amended complaints have been filed by attorneys.
13
Plaintiffs are disabled and cannot file amended complaint motion for disqualification while under
14
doctor care excusing from court for health reasons this demonstrates this Judge seeking
15
4 Tauscher v. Hanshew Case filed: 07/28/2023
16 Case closed: 09/25/2023 Cause: 42:1981 Civil Rights
NOS: 440 Civil Rights: Other
17 Office: San Francisco
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Presider: Jacqueline Scott Corley
18 Jury demand: Plaintiff
Case flags: ADRMOP,APPEAL,CLOSED,E-ProSe,ProSe
19 A court must dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint before service of process if it is
frivolous, fails to state a claim, or contains a complete defense to the action on its face. Plaintiff is proceeding without
20 representation by a lawyer. Even considering the claims on their merits, the undersigned finds they should be dismissed.

21 3:21-cv-09347-JSC
Austin v. Riley Case filed: 12/02/2021
22 Case closed: 03/16/2022 Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
NOS: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Office: San Francisco
23 Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Presider: Jacqueline Scott Corley
24 Jury demand: Plaintiff
Case flags: ADRMOP,CLOSED,E-ProSe,ProSe
25 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter without representation by a lawyer. After Plaintiff
filed his complaint on December 2, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either pay the required
26 filing fee or complete an application to proceed in forma pauperis. In his motion, Plaintiff represents that his “budget for this
particular expense has been strained (combined with service issues), and thus [he] has need of additional time.” (Dkt. No.
27 12
at 2.) He notes that he is busy with various responsibilities, and requests an extension “until after
April 12th, perhaps early May.” Nor does the motion persuade the Court to exercise its discretion, absent good cause, to extend
28 the time for service. See Efaw v. Williams, 473 F.3d 1038, 1040–41 (9th Cir. 2007).

-5–

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 predetermined outcome. On one hand judge criticizes plaintiffs for deficiencies in writings; on
1
the other hand pushes to finish when incapacitated. Plaintiffs have Kaiser doctors and do not
2
want to post private medical information on public domain. Plaintiffs are still under doctors care
3
for medical issues incapacitated. Plaintiffs sought to provide these documents reports letters
4
under seal; however Judge Corley refused and made public through Orders denying Under Seal
5
on docket as opposed to mailing.
6

9
This entire case against Alameda Court is concerning denial of reasonable accommodations. In
10
addition, late Mother a witness in the Alameda Court matter was denied reasonable
11
accommodations refusal to allow to testify. Mother passed away shortly thereafter. Leave was
12
denied terminally ill Mother Alameda Court and her subsequent death. Now, plaintiffs are
13
subjected to insensitivity concerning filings and extensions due to medical and communication
14
issues by this judge corley. In this instance, Plaintiffs are undergoing an indifference from this
15 jurist in this court regarding private medical information dissemination and lack of discretion.
16 STATEMENT OF FACTS
17 A complaint [1] This matter was filed on January 8 2024. The assigned Judge on January
18 8, 2024 was Trina L. Thompson, a former Alameda County Su[peior Court judge. On

19
January 9 2024, an Order of Recusal filed [6] ORDER OF RECUSA. Signed by Judge
Trina L. Thompson. On January 10 2024 [7] ORDER REASSIGNING CASE to Judge
20
Rita F. Lin, former San Francisco Superior Court judge and [8] on January 11 2024
21
ORDER OF RECUSAL. On January 19, 2024 [9] ORDER REASSIGNING CASE Judge
22
Jacqueline Scott Corley. Both Alameda and San Francisco county former judgdes three
23
reassignments of this Court’s own volition, Jacqueline Scott Corley was assigned on January 19,
24
2024. Plaintiffs suffered extreme health issues in late February 2024. On March 5, 2024
25 Plaintiffs filed administrative motion [12] to file under seal medical records concerning need for
26 extension, status report Kaiser medical issues and alerting Judge to the filing of disqualification.
27 On March 6, 2024 one day later [13] to plainitffs’ surprise an Order concerning under seal was
28 not mailed to plaintiffs but efiled denied renewal. On March 31, 2024 under seal motion 14 and

-6–

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 finally 16 April 10 2024 vacate extension of time to file complaint and motion to disqualify.
1
Again to plaintffs surprise April 9 23024 15 Order efiled Plaintiffs seek leave to file under seal a
2
status report “medical extension conderning [sic] due dates.” This dismissive attitude and refusal
3
to accept medical information for court to justify extensions not meant for pubic consumption
4
under seal. The scoffing, disbelief concerning medical issues of which this Court denied filing
5
under seal, discretion sensitive medical reports.
6 An order accusing Plaintiffs of “strategizing”[17] Filed 04/19/24.. Given Plaintiffs’
7 unrepresented status and their health issues, the Court will grant Plaintiffs a final extension of
8 time to serve Defendants. who are representing themselves. This type of draconian approach to
9 impaired litigants with medical issues penalizing with final extension. Plaintiffs are to have a

10
trial based on merits and to have the opportunity to present their claims to the best of their ability
when able to do so.
11
On February 2, 2024, the Court granted their first request for an extension of time to serve based
12
on their intent to file an amended complaint, giving them until April 18, 2024 to file an amended
13
complaint and serve Defendants.
14
In late February 2024, Plaintiffs’ suffered health crises of which they requested to file under seal
15
private confidential medical information which was not intended for public consumption.5 This
16 case is based on denial of medical reasonable accommodations by the lower court Alameda
17 County Superior Court which Plaintiffs have requested a jury trial before peers.
18 Plaintiff filed administrative under seal to file private medical concerning health crisis suffered
19 late February 2024 and were denied under seal

20
03/06/2024 [13] Order denying under seal should not have been filed and placed on the
docket. This was response to under seal and should have been mailed.
21
[12] and [14] were filed under seal. 04/09/2024 [15]again addressing under seal contents and
22
not mailing response order.
23
Is it possible that not one pro se litigant can ever have a plausible or legitimate complaint or
24
claim? Is this a statistical probability? Exhibit A Because people cannot afford attorneys, fees
25
they are not to be believed or lunatic fringe? This is not equal access to the courts for a large
26 segment of the population. Disabled persons also not to be believed? A former Circuit Judge
27
5 Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; And lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him,
28 And he shall direct thy paths.

-7–

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Richard Posner addressed how pro se litigants are treated by Judges Corley in writing Posner:
1
Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time'. Posner elaborated on
2
his concerns about the treatment of such litigants. Judge Corley demonstrates the exact type of
3
conduct, behavior that this Judge is referencing.
4
https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/posner_most_judges_regard_pro_se_litigants_as_kind
5
_of_trash_nor_worth_the_t
6 A second request for extension denied and reference by judge accusatory medically challenged
7 ill plaintiffs for“strategic purposes.” This is despite doctors reports to the contrary. This is
8 highly offensive and had the judge allowed under seal medical records it would have been clear
9 why extensions are justified.

10
The Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley was assigned to this matter on [9] January 19, 2024.
An administrative motion [2]
11
. On the next day she issued an Order [15] prohibiting Plaintiffs’ request is denied to renewal
12
filing under seal. The judge included in the Order information confidentially filed in
13
administrative motion why wanted to file under seal medical information. The Judge stated
14
“Plaintiffs seek leave to file under seal a status report “medical extension conderning [sic]
15
due dates.” (Dkt. No. 14.) The public did not need to have access language about reasoning for
16 filing under seal status report. Case 3:24-cv-00131-JSC Document 15 Filed 04/09/24 Order
17 essentially setting forth contents of motion filed under seal. Plaintiffs filed this under seal as did
18 not want medical information referenced. However, this Court elected to spell out contents of
19 [14] Administrative motion to file under seal. Plaintiffs non attorneys did not want to file

20
medical records under seal declaration because this judge and then this judge to make
public which is what plaintiffs believed she would do once denying under seal.
21

22
Plaintiffs will be adding Alameda Court Judge Keith Fong to this lawsuit in First Amended
23
Complaint as underwent abuses recently. Defnedant Keith Fong worked as a law clerk in this
24
court for many years under Saundra Brown Armstrong. Defendant Keith Fong denied
25
reasonable accommodations to plaintiffs.
26 JUDGE CORLEY’S RELATIONSHIP WITH PREVIOUS LAW FIRM OF
27 DEDFENDANT KEITH FONG
28

-8–

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Judge Corey has a longstanding relationship with her previoius law firm. Judge Corley for
1
many years has updated and worked with Kerr & Wagsaffe the Wagstaffe Group receiving
2
compensation 2011, 2016-2022 judidiail financial disclosures. Keith Fong, a defendant in this
3
matter also works with the Wagstaffe Group, James Wagstaffe adjunct professor professor
4
since 2004 UC Hastings. Defendant Eumi Lee UC Hastings professor for many years prior to
5
the bench 2018. Eumi Lee 2005 – 2018 UC Hastings. It’s a small world after all. Conflict of
6 interest.
7

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19 In March 2024, Plaintiffs’ obtained a copy of Judge Corley’s Senate Judiciary

20 Committee questionnaire. In that questionnaire, Judge Corley indicated that her husband works

21
for Kaiser medical . Plaintiffs had not been aware iof this fact previously as Judge Corley
elevated to Article III judge and this information contained in Senate questiioneaire. In addition,
22
Plaintiffs learnt of her disdain towards other self represented litigants and their filing
23
disqualification against her. Judge Corely had been a magristrate in pervious case that Plaintifss
24
consented to magistrate. Plaintiffs could not believe the experience had ithat matter by Judge
25
Crely.6
26
6 What the Bible says about Judges with Evil Thoughts
27
(From Forerunner Commentary)
28 Deuteronomy 27:25

-9–

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1

The reference is to taking bribes that lead to the death of the innocent, most often in a judicial context. Such bribes are by nature
2
“under the counter,” since the cornerstone of any properly functioning jurisprudence is impartiality (Leviticus 19:15;
Deuteronomy 10:17-18, I Timothy 5:21; James 2:1, 9). Judges are to be unimpeachably honest, disinterested. This is, of
3 course, in reference to the ninth commandment, forbidding bearing false witness (see Exodus 20:16 and more specifically,
Exodus 23:7-8).
4
Charles Whitaker
5 Unity and Division: The Blessing and the Curse (Part Four)

6
Related Topics: Bearing False Witness | Blessings and Curses | Blessings and Cursings | Corrupt Judges | Effects of Partiality |
False Witness | Judges with Evil Thoughts | Ninth Commandment | Partiality | Refusing Bribes | Sin of Partiality | The Ninth
7
Commandment
8
James 2:1
9
In his epistle, the apostle James is combating the practice of showing favoritism toward the wealthy at the expense of poorer
10 brethren. He asks in James 2:4, in doing so, "have you not shown partiality among yourselves, and become judges with evil
thoughts?" As converted children of God, we are supposed to be able to make righteous judgments through the gift of God's
11 Spirit. However, when we show partiality or respect of persons, we have allowed evil thoughts to compromise our judgment.

12 The Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Commentary emphasizes that "the sin in question [respect of persons] is peculiarly
inconsistent with His 'faith.'" Christ died for all, rich and poor alike, and His doctrine consistently stresses the spiritual
equality of believers and unity in a brotherhood of believers. Thus, preferring one person over another because of wealth or
13 status introduces an element of wickedness into Christian relations: division.

14 Matthew Henry agrees:

15 The apostle is here reproving a very corrupt practice. He shows how much mischief there is in the sin of prosôpolepsía—respect
of persons, which seemed to be a very growing evil in the churches of Christ even in those early ages, and which, in these
16 after-times, has sadly corrupted and divided Christian nations and societies.

17 . . . You who profess to believe the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ, which the poorest Christian shall partake of equally with the
rich, and to which all worldly glory is but vanity, you should not make men's outward and worldly advantages the measure of
your respect. In professing the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, we should not show respect to men, so as to cloud or lessen the
18 glory of our glorious Lord: how ever any may think of it, this is certainly a very heinous sin.

19 What about God's supposed favoritism for His chosen people? For many centuries, it seemed as if God was partial toward Israel
in that only Israelites had an opportunity for salvation. From our perspective today, we know that He was working solely
20 through Israel only for the time being, preparing a people for the coming of His Son in the flesh.

21 After Jesus' resurrection, God soon opened salvation to the Gentiles too, as related in the story of Cornelius in Acts 10. In verses
34-35 of this chapter, Peter draws a conclusion from his experiences with the vision of the animals let down in a sheet from
22 heaven and with the conversion of the household of Cornelius: "In truth I perceive that God shows no partiality, but in every
nation whoever fears Him and works righteousness is accepted by Him."
23 In Romans 2:11, speaking of the righteous judgment of God, Paul repeats this point: "For there is no partiality with God," a truth
Paul understood from the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 10:17). To the Galatians, the apostle makes the spiritual equality of
24 Christians even more specific: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor
female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28; see I Corinthians 12:13; Colossians 3:11).
25
It is clear that God is not a respecter of persons, giving everyone an equal opportunity for salvation and judging all by the same
26 standards. And certainly, we should want to be like God, respecting every member of the church as an equal brother or sister
in Christ.
27
English playwright George Bernard Shaw wrote, "We educate one another, and we cannot do this if half of us consider the other
half not good enough to talk to." The church of God is an educational institution, and every member has a part to play in
28 helping to build up others as they prepare for God's Kingdom. Eliminating biases and prejudices will go a long way toward

- 10 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 ARGUMENT
1
I. THE AFFIDAVIT OF ELIZABETH TIGANO is TIMELY FILED UNDER 28 U.S.C. §
2
144
3
Since the United States District Court for the Northern District of California does not sit in
4
specific sessions or terms, but is deemed to be in continuous session, there is no specific “timely”
5
period for filing an Affidavit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144. By extension from the fact that there is
6 no “term,” there is no ten-day period. Accordingly, even where there can be no good cause
7 shown
8 for delay, an affidavit will be considered timely filed, and timeliness will be dealt with as a
9 matter of weight rather than admissibility. Tenants & Owners in Opposition to Redevelopment

10
(TOOR) v. HUD, 338 F.Supp.29, 32 (N.D. Cal. 1972). “[A] litigant’s duty to investigate the
facts of his case does not include a mandate for investigations into a judge’s impartiality.”
11
American Textile Mfrs. Institute, Inc. v. The Limited, Inc., 190 F.3d 729, 742 (6th Cir. 1999). In
12
this case, Plaintiffs did undertake a preliminary investigation of Judge Corley’s impartiality as
13
soon as she was assigned to this matter. Plaintiffs learnt that this former magistrate elevated to
14
Article III judge. Plaintiffs reviewed Senate Questionnaires concerning discqualifications
15
complaints filed by other pro se litigants, examined database ECF other cases Corley dismissed
16 because poor people self reprented litigatnts. Plaintiffs also review financial disclosures and
17 learnt of relationship with Defendant Keith Fong same employer same time and conflct.
18 Plaintiffs made known early in the intent to file disqualifcxation. Plaintiffs let this Court know
19 serious medical issues delaying matter. Recent discoveries justify disquallifcation motion filed.

20
In light of these more recent discoveries and the judge Corley demeanor towards us and our
medical conditions did a motion to disqualify appear fully justified and appropriate. “Plaintiffs
21
are acting as their own counsel. Therefore, Counsel for a party who believes a judge’s
22
impartiality is reasonably subject to question has not only a professional duty to the client to
23
raise the matter, but an independent responsibility as an officer of the court . . . A lawyer who
24
reasonably believes that the judge before whom he is appearing should not sit must raise the
25
issue so it may be confronted and put to rest. Any other course would risk undermining public
26 confidence in our judicial system.” Bernard v. Coyne (In re Bernard), 31 F.3d 842, 847 (9th Cir.
27
bringing unity and growth to God's church.
28 https://www.bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Topical.show/RTD/cgg/ID/19152/Judges-with-Evil-Thoughts.htm

- 11 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1994). In view of the fact that plaintiffs are disabled and gave notice that they would be filing
1
disqualification, this case is brand new foregoing, this affidavit and motion are timely.
2

3
Plaintiffs do not have Harvard degrees and are not publishers of mtultiple publications, papers,
4
board memberships. Plaintiffs are two handicapped litigants trying to get a fair trial in Alameda
5
before a jury with reasonable accommodations and now it seems that in federal court for this
6 case met with prejudices, difficulties impatience by this jurist. Plaintiffs do not need to feel like
7 they are bad boys held by the scruff of the neck by judge Corley in this matter for attempting to
8 file discreet under seal medical status report with documenastion that the world does not need to
9 know every medical matter, nuance about plaintiffs.

10
II. ELIZABETH TIGANO AND MARY BERNSTEIN SET FORTH FACTS IN THEIR
AFFADAVIT REQUIRING RECUSAL
11
A legally sufficient declaration under 28 U.S.C. § 144 must meet the following
12
requirements: (1) the facts are material and stated with particularity; (2) the facts are such that, if
13
true they would convince a reasonable person that a bias exists; and (3) the facts show that the
14
bias is personal, as opposed to judicial, in nature. Reiffen v. Microsoft Corp., 158 F.Supp.2d
15
1016, 1022 (N.D. Cal. 2001).
16 Section 144 requires a district judge to accept the moving party’s affidavit as true. In re
17 Martinez-Catala, 129 F.3d 213, 218 (1st Cir. 1997). While a trial judge may not pass upon the
18 truth of the matters asserted in the moving party’s affidavit, a trial judge is not required to recuse
19 himself immediately, because the “judge must pass upon the legal sufficiency of the affidavit.”

20
United States v. Kelley, 712 F.2d 884, 889 (1st Cir. 1983). Furthermore, “[s]ince sections 144
and 455 of 28 U.S.C. use similar language, and are intended to govern the same area of conduct,
21
they have been construed in pari materia, and the test of the legal sufficiency of a motion for
22
disqualification is the same under both statutes.” Id.
23
If an affidavit of bias or prejudice complies with the statutory standards set forth in this
24
section concerning timeliness and legal sufficiency, then the judge against whom it is directed is
25
obligated to recuse himself. A judge is required to recuse himself even if the judge believes (or
26 knows with certainty) that the allegations of bias and prejudice made against him are false.
27 United States v. Partin, 312 F.Supp. 1355, 1359 (D. La. 1970).
28

- 12 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 The facts stated in Mary Bernstein Elizabeth Tigano affidavits are material and are stated with
1
particularity. As to their sufficiency to show bias for or against a party, the dismissals and
2
recusal and behavior towards self represented litigants in previous cases concerning budget, and
3
bastardizing in Orders for self representation
4
III. DISQUALIFICATION IS ALSO REQUIRED UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) IN ORDER
5
TO AVOID AN APPEARANCE OF BIAS OR PARTIALITY.
6 In 1974, Congress rewrote 28 U.S.C. § 455 to correct perceived problems in the
7 disqualification statutes. Prior to 1974, both the technical and legal sufficiency requirements of
8 section 144 had been construed strictly in favor of judges. Courts also operated under the so-
9 called “duty to sit” doctrine which required a judge to hear a case unless a clear demonstration of

10
extra judicial bias or prejudice was made. Consequently, disqualification of a judge was
difficult under section 144. In passing the amended 28 U.S.C. § 455, Congress broadened the
11
grounds and loosened the procedure for disqualification in the federal courts.
12
Section 455 “is directed to the judge, rather than the parties, and is self-enforcing on the
13
part of the judge.” U.S. v. Sibla, 624 F.2d 864, 867-68 (9th Cir. 1980). It “modifies section 144
14
in requiring the judge to go beyond the section 144 affidavit and consider the merits of the
15
motion pursuant to section 455(a) & (b)(1).” Id. at 868.
16 In Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. 486 U.S. 847, 860-61 (1988), the Supreme
17 Court, quoting the lower court’s decision, stated:
18 The goal of section 455(a) is to avoid even the appearance of partiality. If it would
19 appear to a reasonable person that a judge has knowledge of facts that would give him

20
an interest in the litigation then an appearance of partiality is created even though no
actual partiality exists because the judge does not recall the facts, because the judge
21
actually has no interest in the case or because the judge is pure in heart and
22
incorruptible. Under section 455(a), therefore, recusal is required even when a judge
23
lacks actual knowledge of the facts indicating his interest or bias in the case if a
24
reasonable person, knowing all the circumstances, would expect that the judge would
25
have actual knowledge.
26 In sum, under section 455, “it is the appearance of bias or partiality that matters here, not actual
27 bias.” United States v. Tucker, 78 F.3d 1313, 1324 (8th Cir. 1996). In Tucker, prosecutors,
28 relying “primarily on news articles,” sought the recusal of District Court Judge Woods from the

- 13 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 trial of Governor Tucker, because of Woods’s close association with Hillary Clinton, wife of
1
then President Bill Clinton. Governor Tucker was indicted for financial crimes related to an
2
investigation of President and Mrs. Clinton. Id. at 1315, 1316. The news articles indicated that
3
not only did the Clintons have a close relationship with Judge Woods, but also they had
4
expressed their support of Governor Tucker, including after he was indicted.
5
The Tucker court held:
6 The Independent Counsel argues that, because of the “unmistakable appearance”
7 of bias or partiality here, “reassignment is necessary to preserve the appearance
8 and reality of justice.” [] We agree. Based on the information before us in this
9 case, we conclude that the risk of a perception of judicial bias or partiality is

10
sufficiently great so that our proper course is to order reassignment on remand.
As we have discussed, Judge Woods’s link with the Clintons and the Clintons’
11
connection to Tucker have been widely reported in the press. Moreover, as the
12
Independent Counsel has noted, “this case will, as a matter of law, involve
13
matters related to the investigation of the President and Hillary Rodham
14
Clinton.” [] Given the high profile of the Independent Counsel’s work and of
15
this case in particular, and the reported connections among Judge Woods, the
16 Clintons, and Tucker, assignment to a different judge on remand is required to
17 insure the perception of impartiality.
18 Id. at 1324-1325 (citations omitted).
19 In the instant case, 1) Judge Corley has a relationship with the Defendant co worker 2) Keith

20
Fong and 3) employer Kerr & Wagstaffe, 4) Husband works for Kaiser, and 5) appears to be
impatient disdain towards handicapped and those with limited incomes in this case and in other
21
cases history of dismissiveness. In addition, frustration impatience for disabled women to hurry
22
up and file amended complaint or serve deficient complaint by July 19 2024.
23
A reasonable person would easily question whether Judge Corley is able to
24
impartially assess the evidence that Defendants
25
In addition, Judge Corley’s impartiality can reasonably be questioned on the basis of bail
26 hearings.7 In criminal matters, Judge Corley championed for rights of non US Citizens bail
27
7 One of her rulings, in 2018, required bail hearings every six months for hundreds of undocumented immigrants in Western
28 states who were held in jail while awaiting rulings on applications for political asylum. Although the Supreme Court had

- 14 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 hearings. There is a double standard for disabled, US citizens, born in the United States
1
Plaintiffs in this matter. However, in this matter elects to deny due process rights in case.
2
Courts have also noted, in the context of recusal motions, that “the whole is sometimes
3
greater than the sum of the parts. The cumulative effect of a judge’s individual actions,
4
comments and past associations could raise some question about impartiality, even though
5
none (taken alone) would require recusal. In re Martinez-Catala, supra, 129 F.3d at 221.
6 “[A] judge may not sit in cases in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”
7 U.S. v. Holland, 519 F.3d 909, 911 (9th Cir. 2008) (original emphasis) (internal quotation marks
8 omitted). “If it is a close case, the balance tips in favor of recusal.” Id. For that reason, the court
9 in Melendres decided that recusal was appropriate: “No Court should tolerate even the slightest

10
chance that its continued participation in a high profile lawsuit could taint the public’s perception
of the fairness of the outcome. Certainly, this Court is unwilling to take such a risk.” Melendres,
11
2009 WL 2132693, at *15, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65069, at *52-53.
12
Plaintiff Mary Bernstein filed a notice of disqualification of counsel McNamara when learnt that
13
opposing counsel represented Kaiser Permanente physicians which would be testifying at
14
trial. Alameda Court judge allowed McNamara counsel to remain despite this confict of
15
interest. This is inappropriate for this judge Corley to remain conflct of interest Kaiser.
16 Plaintiff learnt of this late in the game int eh civil matter in Alaemda. This has caused much
17 anxiety for Plaintiffs Elizabeth Tigano and Maryn Bernstein.
18

19 Ms. Bernstein and Ms. Tigano had no idea in previous case that Jacquline Corley husband

20
worked for Kaiser and that other “self-represented” litigants filed motions for recusal,
disqualificadtion due to bias. This information was not made public until judicial questionnaire
21
filed in relation to Article III nomination. Plaintiffs did not have this case or Defendant Judge
22
Keith Fong at that time of which there wuldm be a conflict of intrrest with affinity with Kerr &
23
Wagstaffe, The Wagstaffe Group Affiliation. Wagstaff Group affiliation with UC Hastings
24
Eumi Lee colleage Jame Wagstaffe and Jacqueline Corley Keith Fong colleage.
25

26
recently ruled against mandatory bond hearings for immigrants in U.S. custody, Corley said the constitutional guarantees of
27 liberty and due process of law entitle them to consideration of release after prolonged detention.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Senate-confirms-Biden-s-first-appointee-to-San-17009876.php
Judge Corley concerned abut the rights f undocumenteed immigrants but not for fair housing and disability rights of disabled
28 citizens.

- 15 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 It is a little odd the statistical probability that we would be “randomly assigned” this same judge
1
in previous matter 3:20-cv-02983-WHO despite 25 judges in the United States District Court
2
Northern District of California; coincidentally despite 70 judges in Alameda County Superior
3
Court, Defendant Keith Fong “randomly assigned” in a subsequent case 24CV063817 Bernstein,
4
et al, v. Bay Area Property Services to that of HG18897381 Bernstein v. Associa, et al.
5

6 Plaintffs Bernstein and Tigano are concerned about Judge Corley’s association with firm
7 association Keith Fong. A motion to disqualify is appropriate and Plaintiffs have filed as soon as
8 they were aware of conflicts, bias towards self-represetned plaintiffs. A financial relationship, a
9 relationship exists in financial disclosure Judge Corley’s Questionnaire. Judge Corley and Judge

10
Fong worked at the same firms Kerr & Wagstaff same time and worked for, are still working
Judge Corley for The Wagstaff Group. The owner of The Wagstaffe Group, Kerr & Wagstaffe
11
Jame Wagstaff has worked for UC Hastings where Dedendant Eumi Lee worked aame time
12
2005. It is not a stretch that this is a cozy group and affiliates. Again, learning of these conflicts
13
and Judge Corley’s relationships with Defendant Keith Fong,8 the prejudice disdain towards self-
14
reprsented litigants, refual to allow extension to write amended complaint, a motion to disqualify
15
is justified.
16

17

18

19
8 Fong was born in Oakland and lived in both Alameda and Contra Costa counties growing up. He has been with his partner,
20 Chris, a sign language interpreter, for nearly 20 years. They married in August 2019 and live in the Redwood neighborhood of
Oakland, not far from the Mormon Temple.
21 After earning his Juris Doctor degree from the UC Davis School of Law, Fong was hired as a law clerk by Armstrong in 1992.
He also worked as an associate at the law firm Gordon & Rees in the early 1990s.
In 1993 Fong returned to clerk for Armstrong until 1998, when he became general counsel and chief administrative officer for
22 Discovery Foods. He left in 2002 to become senior counsel and an associate at Kerr & Wagstaffe LLC until 2009, when he
returned again to clerk for Armstrong.
23 In that position Fong has reviewed the papers submitted in the cases heard by Armstrong, analyzed the facts and the law, made
recommendations on what he thought her ruling should be, and drafted the ultimate opinion determined by the judge.
24 "I have been working for the judiciary now off and on 17 years. In that capacity I really have come to appreciate the critical role
that judges have in making sure that justice is done," said Fong. "I saw the awesome power and fulfillment of being a public
25 servant and making sure the process works the way it should."
He had first applied for a judicial appointment near the end of former governor Jerry Brown's last term and reapplied this past
26 January with Newsom's judicial appointments secretary, who at the time was Martin Jenkins, now the state's first out gay
Supreme Court justice. Fong learned he had been selected a few days prior to the official announcement earlier this month.
27 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/federal-judge-orders-alameda-county-to-review-death-penalty-cases/ar-AA1nviWW

28

- 16 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 IV. JUDGE CORLEY’S RELATIONSHIP WITH PREVIOUS LAW FIRM OF
1
DEDFENDANT KEITH FONG
2
Judge Corey has a longstanding relationship with her previoius law firm. Judge Corley for
3
many years has updated and worked with Kerr & Wagsaffe the Wagstaffe Group receiving
4
compensation 2011, 2016-2022 judidiail financial disclosures. Keith Fong, a defendant in this
5
matter also works with the Wagstaffe Group, James Wagstaffe adjunct professor professor
6 since 2004 UC Hastings. Defendant Eumi Lee UC Hastings professor for many years prior to
7 the bench 2018. Eumi Lee 2005 – 2018 UC Hastings. It’s a small world after all. Conflict of
8 interest.
9

10
Judge Corley was a partner at Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, a San Francisco law firm that specializes
in civil litigation. Defendant Keith Fong is a Judge in Alameda County Superior Court that
11
worked at the same time with Judge Corley at law firm Kerr & Wagstaffe; both worked and have
12
ties with the Wagstaffe Group.
13

14
• Judge Jacqueline Corley has served as a Magistrate Judge on the United States District
15
Court for the Northern District of California since 2011. From 2009 to 2011, Judge Corley was a
16 partner at Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP, a San Francisco law firm that specializes in civil litigation.
17 President Biden Names Ninth Round of Judicial Nominees
18 www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/11/03/president-biden-names-
19 ninth-round-of-judicial-nominees/

20
The criticism and accusation at disabled Plaintiffs that only learnt of these conflicts is apparent in
21
Order ORDER RE: SECOND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Document 17 “[A]
22
motion to disqualify or recuse a judge under 28 USC § 144 or § 455 must be made in a timely
23
fashion,” but there is no specific timeframe for bringing such a motion. Molina v. Rison, 886
24
F.2d 1124, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989); see also E.&J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co., 967 F.2d
25
1280, 1295 (9th Cir. 1992) (“While there is no per se rule that recusal motions must be made at a
26 fixed point in order to be timely, such motions should be filed with reasonable promptness after
27 the ground for such a motion is ascertained” and not for “strategic purposes.”) (cleaned up). So,
28 there is no need for an extension of time to file a motion to disqualify.

- 17 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1
The scoffing by Judge Corley about health issues and refusal to file under seal previously
2
confiddntial medical records that Plaintiffs do not want public consumption private matters
3
“Plaintiffs have now filed a second motion seeking an extension of time to serve Defendants
4 because they are still preparing their amended complaint and are experiencing “extreme health
issues.” (Dkt. No. 16 at 2.) Plaintiffs also seek an extension of time to file a motion for
5
disqualification under 28 USC §§ 144, 455.
6 Given Plaintiffs’ unrepresented status and their health issues, the Court will grant Plaintiffs a

7
final extension of time to serve Defendants.”
Plaintiff Bernstein having worked in the legal field previously is aware of upwards of 19, 20
8
amended complaints filed by Plaintiff attorneys. Therefore, it is a double standard at play for pro
9
se litigants pushing to serve complaint.
10

11
• Conflicxt of interest keith fongf Jacqueline corely both at same firm 2009
12
• Husband kaiser
13
• Her hatred of self represented litigants and lack oif compassion for their budgets and
14 health issues
15 Plaintiffs want this matter transferred to Oakand or San Jse san jose to be transfererred to closer
16 health took turn for worse the case our health
17

18
San Francisco too far and frightened to travel so far now

19
This judge fong named ADA denials
20

21
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:20-cv-02983-WHO
22
Case 3:20-cv-02983-WHO Document 99 Filed 08/16/21
23
Plaintiffs Mary Helen Bernstein and Elizabeth Grace Tigano, who are proceeding without
24 an attorney,
25 Plaintiffs Mary Bernstein and Elizabeth Tigano are sisters. They identify themselves as
26 suffering from numerous disabilities and as survivors of sexual abuse. (Dkt. No. 98 at ¶¶ 1-2.)
27 Judge Coreley in previous matter Third Amended Complaint screening order had facts wrong.

28
TAC describes a lengthy history of issues with the tenants and management of the apartment

- 18 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 complex in which Ms. Bernstein lives, (erroneous it is a common interest development which
1
Plainitiff Bernstein is a homeowner) and .. Ms. Tigano her HUD-affiliated housing project – Ms.
2
Tigano did not ive in a HUD housing project but a singled family home which their monther
3
owned. Docket 99 page 2, lines 13-21.m This Judge clearly has spirit of error as thjese facts are
4
misreprented. It appears that Judge Corley makes assumptions or does not pay attention to the
5
facts.
6 The Alameda Court is under investigation as we speak for discrimination against jews and
7 bladcks Jews were excluded from Alameda County’s death penalty juries for decades, new
8 evidence reveals https://jweekly.com/2024/05/13/jews-were-excluded-from-alameda-countys-
9 death-penalty-juries-for-decades-new-evidence-reveals/ https://www.msn.com/en-

10
us/news/crime/federal-judge-finds-strong-evidence-alameda-prosecutors-deliberately-kept-black-
and-jewish-people-off-jurors/ar-AA1ntvEo
11

12
Federal judge finds ‘strong evidence’ Alameda prosecutors deliberately kept Black and
13
Jewish people off juries
14
On July 30, 2020, GBDH, along with Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund,
15 Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, and Disability Rights California (DRC), filed a
16 lawsuit against Alameda County for unnecessarily and illegally segregating people with
17 mental health disabilities in psychiatric institutions instead of providing them with services
18 they need to live in the community.

19
Disability Rights California (DRC), along with Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund,
20 the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho, and the Law
Office of Aaron J. Fischer have filed a federal lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act
21 against Alameda County and Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services. The lawsuit
challenges the unnecessary and illegal segregation of people with mental health disabilities-
22
especially Black people with disabilities in psychiatric institutions and the failure to ensure
23 people with disabilities are provided the services they need.

24 DRC is demanding that the County expand and enhance intensive community-based mental
health services, including supported housing, so that people are not forced into institutions like
25
John George Psychiatric Hospital, or the Santa Rita Jail, when they can be served in a more
26 integrated setting.

27 Case Name:
Disability Rights California v. County of Alameda
28

- 19 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Court and Case Number:
1
5:20-cv-05256 (N.D. Cal.)
2
Co-Counsel:
3 Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law
Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund
4
Law Office of Aaron J. Fischer
5 Goldstein, Borgen, Dardarian & Ho

6 https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-finds-alameda-county-california-

7 violates-americans-disabilities-act-and-us

8
Justice Department Finds that Alameda County, California, Violates the Americans with
9
Disabilities Act and the U.S. Constitution
10

11
Uppity undertones exhibited by Judge Corley
12
I have paid for this case filing
13 This judge in earlier matter discredited me as handicapped person claiming case frivolus
14 No trial date has even been set bias prejudice conflict of interest
15 Magistrate judge recommended my case could not go forward
16 I do not want this judge again prejudicial

17
Mothers house has wall around it
Judge was assigned as a Magistrate previously and has a predetermined mindset to hurry up and
18
close this matter; insensitive covert hostility towards unrepresented litigants in particular
19
handicapped litigants
20
U.S. District Court
21
California Northern District (San Francisco)
22
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:20-cv-02983-WHO
23

24 Case No. 20-cv-02983-JSC

25

26 01-13-2021 screening order recommending dismissal as Plaintiffs were disabled, sisters and filed

27
informa pauperis

28

- 20 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 MARY HELEN BERNSTEIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
1
HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., Defendants.
2

3
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge
4
Case No. 20-cv-02983-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2021)
5
A complaint drafted by a pro se plaintiff is held to a less stringent standard than a formal
6 pleading drafted by a lawyer. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007).
7

8 SCREENING ORDER
9 Plaintiffs Mary Helen Bernstein and Elizabeth Grace Tigano, who are proceeding without an

10
attorney, filed this discrimination action against the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, and several
11
individual defendants. The Court previously granted Plaintiffs leave to proceed in forma pauperis
12
and reserved review of Plaintiffs' complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Dkt. No. 12.) Plaintiffs
13
thereafter requested leave to file an amended complaint prior to the Court's 1915 review, which
14
the Court granted. (Dkt. No. 14.) Plaintiffs subsequently filed the now operative First Amended
15
Complaint. (Dkt. No. 37.) Having reviewed the complaint pursuant to Section 1915, the Court
16 concludes that it is deficient for the reasons stated below.
17 This is curious because Fedpro attorneys reviewed and found that it was in fact sufficient and
18 should survive screening order. Fedpro is the very resource that this Court encouraged plaintffs
19 to utilize and plaintiffs did just that.

20
“At the root of Plaintiffs' claims are their allegations of ongoing harassment and abuse by the
21
other residents of their multi-resident housing complexes. With respect to Ms. Bernstein's
22
housing complex, Plaintiffs allege that the other residents engage in a constant campaign of
23
harassment and that Ms. Bernstein's upstairs neighbor "terrorizes" both sisters by "constant
24
dropping of weights, furniture night and day" while they are on video calls. (Id. at ¶¶ 38-41.)”
25
The Respondent Defendant in the civil harassment matter Joaquin Rivera admitted to doing so
26 and a restraining order was assigned to him after the hearing by Commissioner Hockenhull. The
27 attitude of the magistrate judge of sneering, scoffing in belief with italicized word “terrorizes” is
28 dismissive of what sisters were enduring. Witnesses testified, recordings, videos provided at the

- 21 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 July 10 2020 were convincing enough for Commissioner Tamiza Hockenhull to find that the
1
behavior rose to the level to justify restraining order.
2

3
The judge is extremely dismissive towards disabled Plaintiff Elizabeth Tigano, a non attorney for
4
attempting to obtain assistance during pandemic for harassment by project across the street
5
tenants in the screen order
6

7 “At page 56 of the FAC, Plaintiffs include allegations regarding harassment of Ms. Tigano at the
8 Mission Vista Apartments in Tucson. (Id. at ¶ 68.) The harassment is described as
9

10
Constantly watching, surveying me, threatening me, defaming me, stalking following me to the
store, harassing me, criticisms about my weight, my clothing, accusing me of being prostitute,
11
pretentious, aloof. Tresspassing [sic] on property, prowling, tipping over chairs, threatening with
12
assault. They say that they hate me so much that they want me to kill myself.
13
(Id. at ¶ 69.) Although Ms. Tigano filed a complaint with HUD regarding the harassment, it was
14
immediately dismissed. (Id. at ¶ 71.)”
15

16 This judge treating me as a non person as a handicapped person going through this stress during
17 pandemic. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/12/24/collective-trauma-public-
18 outbursts/ In Arizona where I was living at the time, the entire neighborhood depreciated with
19 many drug addicts in the project across the street. There are many articles that have discussed

20
that during the pandemic harassment reached its apex. This judge attitude towards me as a
handicaped person “Ms. Tigano” that it was dismissed. This article states “Across the United
21
States, an alarming number of people are lashing out in aggressive and often cruel ways in
22
response to policies or behavior they dislike.” My sister was trying to get me help in Arizona as
23
she had a case in California federal same region for HUD. I did the best I could filing HUD
24
complaint as a handicapped person. It was not even investigated by HUD at all.
25

26 Judge Corley scoffing, disbelief about abuses suffered by disabled persons.

27 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32804531/ Interpersonal violence against people with
28 disabilities: Additional concerns and considerations in the COVID-19 pandemic.

- 22 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1

2
Interpersonal violence against people with disabilities: Additional concerns and
3
considerations in the COVID-19 pandemic
4
Emily M Lund 1
5

6 • PMID: 32804531
• DOI: 10.1037/rep0000347
7

8 Abstract
9
Objective/Purpose: The objective of this article is to provide information about the ways in
10 which the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may affect the ongoing public health
issue of violence against people with disabilities and how rehabilitation psychologists and other
11 providers can address these concerns in their practice.
12
Method: This article reviews the literature on violence against people with disabilities as well as
13 emerging literature on the COVID-19 pandemic and its social and medical consequences.
14 Results: The COVID-19 pandemic magnifies existing issues and barriers facing people with
15
disabilities who are experiencing interpersonal violence. These issues include reliance on the
perpetrator for care and assistance, barriers to reporting abuse and seeking help, fear of
16 retaliation and other negative consequences if abuse is reported, emotional abuse related to
disability, and exacerbation of secondary physical and mental health sequalae of abuse.
17

18 Conclusions/implications: The COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences enhance the already
increased risk for abuse among people with disabilities. Providers who work with individuals
19 with disabilities should address these issues at both the individual client and systems levels.
(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
20

21 PubMed Disclaimer

22
Similar articles
23
• Examining the impact of COVID-19 on stress and coping strategies in individuals with
24
disabilities and chronic conditions.
25
Umucu E, Lee B.Rehabil Psychol. 2020 Aug;65(3):193-198. doi: 10.1037/rep0000328.
26 Epub 2020 May 14.PMID: 32406739
27
• Mental health implications of the COVID-19 pandemic in India.
28

- 23 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Kene P.Psychol Trauma. 2020 Sep;12(6):585-587. doi: 10.1037/tra0000750. Epub 2020
1
Aug 6.PMID: 32757578 Review.
2
• Impact of COVID-19 and other pandemics and epidemics on people with pre-existing
3 mental disorders: a systematic review protocol and suggestions for clinical care.
4
Sergeant A, van Reekum EA, Sanger N, Dufort A, Rosic T, Sanger S, Lubert S,
5 Mbuagbaw L, Thabane L, Samaan Z.BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 1;10(9):e040229. doi:
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040229.PMID: 32873685 Free PMC article.
6

7
• The COVID-19 pandemic, stress, and trauma in the disability community: A call to
action.
8
Lund EM, Forber-Pratt AJ, Wilson C, Mona LR.Rehabil Psychol. 2020 Nov;65(4):313-
9
322. doi: 10.1037/rep0000368. Epub 2020 Oct 29.PMID: 33119381 Review.
10
• The situation in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic.
11 Li AC, Cheung PCG, Lee KCG.Psychol Trauma. 2020 Sep;12(6):576-578. doi:
10.1037/tra0000727.PMID: 32816517 Review.
12
See all similar articles
13

14 Cited by
15
• How Did Governments Address the Needs of People With Disabilities During the
16 COVID-19 Pandemic? An Analysis of 14 Countries' Policies Based on the UN
Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities.
17

18 Shikako K, Lencucha R, Hunt M, Jodoin S, Elsabbagh M, Hudon A, Cogburn D,

Chandra A, Gignac-Eddy A, Ananthamoorthy N, Martens R.Int J Health Policy Manag.
19 2023;12:7111. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7111. Epub 2023 May
17.PMID: 37579394 Free PMC article.
20

21 • Understanding the Mental Health Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Individuals
With Chronic Illness.
22
Bhatt KJ, Schulder T, Rudenstine S, McNeal K, Ettman CK, Galea S.Psychol Rep. 2023
23
Mar 18:332941231164338. doi: 10.1177/00332941231164338. Online ahead of
24 print.PMID: 36932930 Free PMC article.

25 • The Association between Physical and Psychological Domestic Violence Experienced

26
during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Mental Health Symptoms.

27 Lund EM, Thomas KB.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;20(4):3312. doi:
10.3390/ijerph20043312.PMID: 36834007 Free PMC article.
28

- 24 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 • An Integrative Literature Review of Interventions to Protect People with Disabilities
1
from Domestic and Family Violence.
2
Saleme P, Seydel T, Pang B, Deshpande S, Parkinson J.Int J Environ Res Public Health.
3 2023 Jan 25;20(3):2145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032145.PMID: 36767512 Free PMC
article. Review.
4

5 • Specialty Grand Challenge: Disability, Rehabilitation, and Inclusion.

Escorpizo R, Kroll T.Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Mar 4;1:622575. doi:
6 10.3389/fresc.2020.622575. eCollection 2020.PMID: 36570607 Free PMC article. No
7
abstract available.

8
Sepehry-Fard v. Lee
9
5:20-cv-03585-EJD (N.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2021)
10 6 more...
11 the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's first, fourth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth, and eleventh
12 causes of action. See Bernstein v. U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., 2021 WL 121125, at *2

13 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2021) (“The Court has a continuing duty to dismiss any case in which a party

14
is proceeding in forma pauperis upon a determination that the case is . . . fails to state a claim on
which relief may be granted . . . .”)
15
Magistrate Jacqueline Corley this caase as well screening ordre?
16

17
• Disenfranchised disabled persons

18
• Undermining disabled

19
• Discrediting

20
This judge would not allow me to file under seal confidential motion to disqualify health issues
21
which I am uncomfortable with placing here
22

23 Will be working on First Amended Complaint ill right now

24 Douglas A. Corley, MD, PhD husband Kaiser Exhibit D
25

26 ADA denials Keith Fong this case moot, refusal to provide reasonable accommodations during

27
sickness to Plaintiffs. Plaintiff Elizabeth Tigano is a witness in Alameda County Superior Court
Case No. HG18897381. Elizabeth Tigano is a plaintiff in Alameda County Superior Court case
28

- 25 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 No. 24CV063817 TIGANO BERNSTEIN, et al. vs BAY AREA PROPERTY SERVICES, et al.
1
I have concerns about how I will be treated by this Judge Keith Fong as a disabled Plaintiff after
2
observing how this Judge and Alameda Court has treated my sister as a Plaintiff. I have not been
3
treated well as a witness by Alameda Court. I have not been treated well by this Federal Court
4
judge Corley. Your magistrate judge Corley was not kind to me.
5
Matthew 5:16
6 “Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father
7 which is in heaven.”
8

9 No ttrial date or CMC has been set demonatrating bad faith – the CMC was to be set at the filing

10
of this action. These are some issues we are uncomfortable with Judge Corley
1. Kerr & Wagstafee, Jacqueline scott Corley keith kern fong
11
2. Conflicts of interest
12
3. Kaiser husband plaintiff doxtors
13
4. Denial of sealing ADA medical – this is a case about ADA violations and denials and this
14
Judge denial ADA inn federal court - conflict plantiffs uncomfortable with this judge
15
Jacquieline Scott Corely
16 5. Disdain disgust two sisters representing themselves disabled comes through her feelings
17 LOUD AND CLEAR URGENCY OUR LAST CHANCE FINAL EXTENSION
18 DESPITE WE HAVE TIME FOR NO ONE SERVED TO PREPARE OUR FIRST
19 AMENDED COMPLAINT

20
6. ATTORNEYS UPWARDS AS MANY AS 10, 20 AMENDED COMPLAINTS
7. UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THIS JUDGE
21
8. Mentalism Sanism this judge discrimination disbelieves conditions and mistreatment
22
9. TIMELY FILED
23
10. We are afraid of this judge
24
This is a criticsl casre concerning housing for plaintiffs and a fair trial mistreatment by state
25
judges before a jury reasonable accommodations and discrininaion anti semitic anti crhisrtian
26 jewish black discrimination
27

28

- 26 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1

10

11

12
Amended Pleading deadline imposed
13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
If you cannot tolerate disabled non attorneys asnd hold then to the same standards as attorneys,
26
explasin it in such a way or be compassionate, you exclude people and deny equal access to the
27 courts
28

- 27 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1 • Disenfranchised disabled persons
2 • Undermining disabled
3 • Discrediting
4

5 Sanism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanism
6 Alameda County engages in Sanism. 9
7 Sanism, saneism, mentalism, or psychophobia refers to the systemic discrimination against
or oppression of individuals perceived to have a mental disorder or cognitive impairment. This
8 discrimination and oppression are based on numerous factors such
as stereotypes about neurodiversity. Mentalism impacts individuals with autism, learning
9 disorders, ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder), FASD (fetal alcohol spectrum
disorder), bipolar, schizophrenia, personality disorders, stuttering, tics, intellectual disabilities, and
10 other cognitive impairments.

11
Mentalism may cause harm through a combination of social inequalities, insults, indignities, and
overt discrimination. Some examples of these include refusal of service and the denial of human
12 rights.
Mentalism does not only describe how individuals are treated by the general public. The concept
13
also encapsulates how individuals are treated by mental health professionals, the legal
14
system and other institutions.
15
The terms mentalism, from "mental", and sanism, from "sane", have become established in some
16
contexts, although concepts such as social stigma, and in some cases ableism, may be used in
17
similar but not identical ways. While mentalism and sanism are used interchangeably, sanism is
18 becoming predominant in certain circles, such as academics. Those who identify as mad, mad
19 advocates, and in a socio-political context where sanism is gaining ground as a movement.[1] The
movement of sanism is an act of resistance among those who identify as mad, consumer survivors,
20
and mental health advocates.[1][2][3] In academia evidence of this movement can be found in the
21
number of recent publications about sanism and social work practice
22 Plaintiff paid for this lawsuit filing fee and has a right to jury trial and adjudication citizen of the
23 united statses
24 2011-2019 post Kerr & Wagstaffe receiving income from this firm connection. Judicial financial

25 disclosure not posted 2020 – 2024.

26
Defenndants already have a lot of friends in Court former Alameda California state judges
comprise large number of US District Court Northern District of California.
27

28 9

- 28 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Reasons:
1
Handicapped pro se non attorney under seal rules leniency
2
Confidential
3
Pro se parties are granted greater leeway than litigants represented by counsel. See Haines v.
4
Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520–21 (1972) (holding that pro se complaints are held to “less stringent
5
standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers”). Plaintiffs is severely disabled and is
6 unable to proceed until medical issues subsided. Fedpro assisting with matters, no one has been
7 seved in matter at this time. Plaintiff will be filing a First Amended Complaint Rule 15 of the
8 federal rules of civil procedure allows the plaintiff to amend their complaint one time within 21
9 days of serving the original complaint or at any point before the defendant answers the

10
complaint.
Plaintiffs do not want to list medical issues for public consumption and attempted to file under
11
seal. Plaintiff is suffering from medical complications and is not going to put such private
12
medical conditions listed for public consumption. No defendants have been served at this time.
13
Plaintiff requested to file under seal details medical concerning motion for disqualification
14
recently due to privacy issues confidential and was denied.
15
Kaiser husband kaiser doctors uncomfortable with this as doctors to be in case
16 “Finally, my spouse is a partner in the Permanente Medical Group so I have placed that entity on
17
my conflict list. I have also included other Kaiser health insurance entities because the San
Francisco Bay Area public generally does not understand that Kaiser physicians are separate
18 from Kaiser hospitals and the Kaiser health insurance plan and thus my
impartiality might reasonably be questioned in any proceeding involving any
19 Kaiser entity.
20
In Warne v. the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF), No. 16-CV 6773-DMR, the
unrepresented plaintiff moved for my recusal after two years of
21 litigation.” Exhibit ___”
Unlike that matter this matter is early on litigation, plaintiffs are ill but have done to the best of
22
ability
23
Plaintiffs did not know at the time of filing this complaint about this conflicts
24
Plaintiff learnt in judicial questionnaire these facts about other self represented liigant
25
unconforable with this judge
26 Defendants and judge connections Kerr & Wagstaffe, LLP Keith Fong alumni abnd saqme time
27 colleagues Exhibits C, K, L, N, P to Declarations Bernstein, Tigano.
28 2009

- 29 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Jacqueline Scott Corley
1
Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP
2
100 Spear Street, Suite 1800
3
San Francisco, California 94105
4
Partner
5
2009
6 Keith Wong
7 Kerr & Wagstaffe LLP
8 100 Spear Street, Suite 1800
9 San Francisco, California 94105

10
Senior Counsel
Plaintiffs did not know at the time of filing this complaint about this conflicts
11
Plaintiff learnt in judicial questionnaire these facts
12

13
ADA denials
14
https://www.acslaw.org/expertforum/the-disability-docket-whats-at-stake-at-the-u-s-supreme-
15
court-for-people-with-disabilities/
16 On July 26, we will celebrate the 33rd anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act
17 (ADA), a law that was enacted to prohibit discrimination against individuals with disabilities in
18 all areas of public life, including jobs, schools, transportation, government programs and
19 services, and all places open to the public. In many ways, the COVID-19 pandemic, in

20
exacerbating existing inequities, has made society at large more aware of the barriers faced by
people with disabilities, particularly people of color with disabilities, and the life-or-death
21
consequences such discrimination can entail during a time of crisis. During the pandemic,
22
disabled activists also raised awareness of the reality that so many accommodations long sought
23
by and often denied to disabled people, such as remote work and other virtual participation
24
options, were, in fact, eminently achievable and preferred by many with and without disabilities
25
alike.
26 Pro se parties are granted greater leeway than litigants represented by counsel. See Haines v.
27 Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520–21 (1972) (holding that pro se complaints are held to “less stringent
28

- 30 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers”).10 Plaintiffs is severely disabled and is
1
unable to proceed until medical issues subsided. Fedpro assisting with matters, no one has been
2

3 10 When Government Rewards Evil and Punishes Good

Sermons Selected Scriptures 81-117 Jun 13, 2021
4 A + A - RESET
I have obviously tried to address, through the last year and a half almost, the issues that confront us in the country that we live in,
5 in the world that we live in, in the times that we live in. But I thought there is one final message that I would like to lay upon
you, and that’s what’s come together this morning. It has many components and many parts, and it may test your attention
6 span a little bit.

When we first decided to meet as a church—it’s been a year now—and to do that without regard to what the government was
7
telling us to do, there was a lot of criticism. That criticism came from evangelical leaders, pastors, bloggers, writers, friends,
foes—just about everywhere. But we were not dissuaded in any sense from doing what we did. And the Lord has
8 demonstrated to us that we were lied to. And I think whatever the issues are in the world, the church is the only hope of the
world.
9
Now I want to see if I can’t, from the Word of God, pull together some things that will help you to understand why this is our
10 position. And I want this because I think in the future, for those who are younger than I am—maybe I’ll live to see some of
it—this resolve to be the church when the government wants to shut you down is going to be tested again, and it’s going to be
11 tested at a much more aggressive level. There were many churches that failed this test, and there will be many who will fail
the next one. But the true church follows Christ, not the government. Our President’s said in the last month that the greatest
12 threat to America—he said on one occasion—is systemic racism, which doesn’t exist; he said white supremacy, which
doesn’t exist with any power; and then he said global warming, which doesn’t exist either, and if it does, God’s in charge of
it.
13
In reality the greatest threat to this nation is the government, the government. And I want to show you how we are to understand
14 that. Turn to Romans 13, Romans 13. Listen carefully to what the apostle Paul said: “Every person is to be in subjection to
the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God. Therefore
15 whoever resists authority has opposed the ordinance of God; and they who have opposed will receive condemnation upon
themselves. For rulers are not a cause of fear for good behavior, but for evil. Do you want to have no fear of authority? Do
16 what is good and you will have praise from the same; for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be
afraid; for it doesn’t bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who
17 practices evil.” The role of the government is to restrain evil; and when it functions to restrain evil, it is fulfilling its God-
ordained purpose.
18 Please notice in verses 1 and 2 that government is from God, by God, of God. It is designed as a necessary restraint in a world of
sinners. Verses 3 and 4 tell us it is not a threat to those whose behavior is good, but evil. It is those who do evil who should
19 be afraid, not those who do good. In fact it offers praise to those who do good, and brings wrath on those who do evil. And
rulers actually, according to verse 6, are servants of God, devoted to that service.
20
This is God’s design for government. The problem is, when government ceases to function by God’s design, it yields up its
21 authority. The same would be true in a family. God’s design is that the father lead the family. When the father leads in a
destructive and evil way, he yields up the right to exercise that God-given authority.
22
And by the way just as a footnote, the man who wrote that, the apostle Paul, was in violation of the government more often than
any other person in the entire New Testament. And when he went to preach the gospel, he was very often thrown in jail; and
23 ultimately he was executed by the government that he refused to obey when it no longer functioned to protect good behavior
and punish evil behavior.
24
A second passage, 1 Peter chapter 2, and verses 13 and 14 will suffice, I think: “Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every
25 human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, or to governors as sent by him”—by the Lord—“for the
punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right.” There again we are to submit for the Lord’s sake. “What do
26 you mean ‘the Lord’s sake’?” When the government is doing what the Lord designed it to do.

27 When government turns the divine design on its head and protects those who do evil and makes those who do good afraid, it
forfeits its divine purpose. In our world today rulers are designing a culture that protects the immoral. It even has reached the
point where it desires to protect criminals, and makes those who do good afraid. When the criminals are unrestrained because
28 they don’t fear the consequences, but the police are restrained because they fear the consequences of stopping criminals, you

- 31 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1

know everything is turned on its head. Our government is the source of lies and the protector of liars, and the enemy of those
2
who speak the truth. It praises the evil and persecutes the good.
3 So God’s design for government has been entirely corrupted. As these divinely designed spheres of control in human society
descend into chaos, the government will cease to function the way God designed it, and in fact it will become the enemy of
4 the divine design. It will turn everything upside down. It will become the punisher of those who do good, like putting James
Coates in prison for preaching but letting rioters go free.
5
Now I want you to understand that there’s some supernatural reasons why this is happening. They’re not political. They’re not
6 even social in the fullest measure. If you go back to 1 John and reconnect with the passage from last week, 1 John 2:15–17,
we read, “Do not love the world nor the things that are in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in
him.” Then verse 16, “For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh and the lust of the eyes and the boastful pride of life, is
7
not from the Father, but is from the world. The world is passing away, and also its lusts; but the one who does the will of God
lives forever.”
8
The world is the enemy of God, the enemy of the triune God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The world is the enemy of Scripture.
9 The world is the enemy of the gospel. The world is the enemy of the church. What do we mean by the world? Well remember
last week I talked about the world as the complex of evil. The word is kosmos; it means a system. The complex of evil works
10 against what is good.

11 So you have government, which is a part of the world, turned to restrain the world of which it is a part. Very hard for it to hold
together because it’s all part of the same system. The complex of evil works everywhere, and the government is no exception
12 because the very evil people given the responsibility to restrain evil are themselves incapable of being without evil. And that
makes enough problems. We have a human system made up of evil, sinful people trying to control a culture of evil, sinful
people. The potential for breakdown is inevitable, and it has been demonstrated historically. That’s why the Bible says the
13 world gets worse and worse; evil men get worse and worse as time goes on.

14 But there’s something more than just that. There’s something more than just the human complex of sinners trying to restrain sin,
which in the end is a losing effort. There’s something more that we have to face, and that’s in 1 John 5:19, and I want you to
15 look at it. First John 5:19, “We know that we are of God.” We, believers, are of God. And then this very, very important
statement, “And that the whole world lies in”—literally—“in the evil one.” The whole world is in the control of the evil one.
16 It isn’t just that everybody’s sinful; it is that there is an evil supernatural power: the evil one.

17 Who is this archenemy of God, this evil one? Listen to John 12:31, where Jesus speaks of the devil and says he is “the ruler of
this world.” And then again in John 14 and verse 30, He calls the devil the ruler of this world. And then again in chapter 16
and verse 11, for the third time, “the ruler of this world.” And in Ephesians 2:2, he is “the prince of the power of the air, the
18 spirit working in the sons of disobedience.”

19 So you have Satan, who is the world ruler, who operates in the system and—listen carefully—in the people. The whole world is
in his kingdom—John 8:44, “You’re of your father the devil.” And Satan is in them in the sense that he can attach his
20 devious, evil deception to the lust of the eyes, the lust of the flesh, and the pride of life—and that way exercise influence over
them. He is “the god of this world,” 2 Corinthians 4:4, who blinds minds. And Paul says in Ephesians 6:12, “We wrestle not
21 against flesh and blood”—humanity—“but against principalities and powers, the rulers of the darkness of this world, spiritual
wickedness in the heavenlies.”
22
It’s not just a human complex of evil, it is behind that that the entire force of hell operates. The enemy is not just sinful people, it
is the system of evil behind that visible evil, that invisible system basically under the control of the prince of demons, Satan
23 himself, and all his demon cohorts. Evil operates in the heart of every human being, so there is a kosmos of evil that operates
in the human heart. But there’s another powerful kosmos of evil in the invisible spiritual world run by Satan.
24
What is Satan’s objective? Listen to Peter’s words, 1 Peter 5:8, “Your adversary, the devil, prowls around like a roaring lion,
25 seeking someone to devour, seeking someone to devour.” He’s a killer. John 8 tells us “he’s a liar, the father of lies,” and he’s
“a murderer.” He tempts, he lies, he seduces, he slanders; and Scripture gives us all of these illustrations. He distracts, he
26 divides, he destroys, he sifts, he silences, he strategizes, he steals, he oppresses, he possesses, he blinds, and he kills.

27 And how does he gain the power to do this? How is he so adept at drawing people into his methods? The answer comes in
Revelation 12:9, which says this: “Satan deceives the whole world.” “Satan deceives the whole world.” Paul told the
Corinthians he is disguised as an angel of light, and therein lies the deception.
28

- 32 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1

So what we’re dealing with in the world is not just a complex of human evil, as vast and complete and comprehensive as it is,
2
we’re dealing with another level altogether—not just that visible human world, but that invisible demonic world. And Satan’s
ultimate goal is to prevent people from coming to Christ. His ultimate goal is to take over everything, to rule in the place of
3 God. He is the usurper. And he has a goal, he has an objective: He’s heading human history toward his kingdom. He has a
goal, he has an objective: Satan is systematically working to get to his kingdom.
4
That kingdom is described for us in the book of Revelation. Turn to chapter 13 of Revelation, one of the most amazing images in
5 this incredible revelation. As he moves through human history, Satan wants to strip all elements of divine law and all
elements of divine truth from society. He’s moving the world into his final design. Chapter 13, verse 1, John has a vision of a
6 dragon “on the sand of the seashore,” and he sees a monster, “a beast coming up out of the sea, having ten horns and seven
heads, and on his horns were ten diadems, and on his heads were blasphemous names.” This is a monster—this is a monster
who consolidates power and consolidates national leadership; the ten and the seven speak of that consolidation. All the
7
crowns are on his head, and all of them have the name of blasphemy because this is the kingdom that Satan is pulling
together as the final attempt to dethrone God. It describes this kingdom as having powers like a leopard, a bear, and a lion;
8 and what we find here is this monster is none other than the final Antichrist.

9 “Even now,” John says, there are “many antichrists.” This is the final one. He rises up out of the sea, out of the nations. He
consolidates all world power—this is globalism symbolized by ten horns, a number of completion, as is seven heads. He has
10 the consolidated power and the consolidated authority. He is a blasphemer, but a powerful one. And the dragon is Satan, and
the dragon gave the Antichrist in John’s vision his power, his throne, and his great authority. At some point in the future the
11 world will be, verse 3 says, amazed at this monster. And as a result of his influence they will worship the devil, the dragon,
because he gave his authority to the beast. They worship the beast, the monster, the Antichrist, “saying, ‘Who is like the
12 beast, and who is able to wage war with him?’”

Understand—all of human history is progressing toward a global kingdom under the power of Satan, in which Satan has one
13 global monster ruling the whole world. He is a blasphemer—we’ve already seen it, but notice “blasphemies,” in verse 5,
“blasphemies” in verse 6, “blaspheme” in verse 6 again. And verse 7, what does he do? He “makes war with the saints to
14 overcome them, and authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation was given to him.” This final, global ruler
will make war against the saints.
15
Verse 8, “All who dwell on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name was not written from the foundation of the world
16 in the book of life of the Lamb who had been slain.” The whole world is going to go after him. We’re headed toward a one-
world, global government with one massive, monstrous leader.
17
He has a cohort in verses 11 and following. This is another monster who has two horns like a lamb. This is a more benign
individual. This is the false prophet. This is the religious leader who, going along with the political leader, assists him. He
18 exercises all the authority of the first monster. He “makes the earth and those who dwell in it worship the first monster,
whose fatal wound was healed.” Apparently there’s some kind of false resurrection, which is how he gains power. And then
19 “he performs great signs,” verse 13, “making fire come down out of heaven in the presence of men.”

20 Verse 14, “He deceives those who dwell on the earth”—again, this is Satan—“which is given to him to perform in the presence
of the beast, telling those who dwell on the earth to make an image to the beast who had the wound of the sword and has
21 come to life.” So once he has this false resurrection, he then establishes himself as the world ruler; and the false prophet
points the world to him.
22
Go down to verse 16. We don’t have time to cover all the details. “He causes all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor,
free men and slaves, to be given a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, and he provides that no one will be able to
23 buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the monster or the number of his name,” which “is 666.”

24 So we’re headed toward a time when there’s a global satanic kingdom. It consolidates all kingdoms of the world. It is under the
final monster Antichrist, designed by the devil himself, and the entire world follows him, the entire world. Along with this
25 political leader there is a spiritual leader; this is the false prophet. He is the one who lures, seduces the world religiously to
worship the Antichrist. So he becomes god; he is Satan’s puppet.
26
One world religion—that final world religion is the target of judgment in John’s vision of Revelation 17; go to Revelation 17.
27 Here this one-world religion, consolidated with the Antichrist and the false prophet, is called “the great harlot” because it’s
the prostitution of true religion. “Sits on many waters”—which means it just literally covers the globe—“with whom the
kings of the earth committed acts of immorality”—this is to say that the kings, the rulers, the nations of the world consolidate
28 all their power; metaphorically speaking, it’s like committing adultery with a prostitute. “And those who dwell on the earth

- 33 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1
are drunk with the wine of her immorality.” So what’s going to happen in the end is this massive, global unification of the
entire world under the Antichrist, and there will be a religious component to it, led by the false prophet.
2
And again, verse 3, you see this “scarlet monster, full of blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten horns”—that again is a
3 reference to Antichrist. Then you see the harlot, the false religion, “clothed in purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and
precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a gold cup full of abominations of the unclean things of her immorality, and on
4 her forehead a name was written, a mystery, ‘BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE
ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.’” And this false religion is depicted as the prostitute of the final, global, one-world
5 kingdom—the prostitute religion, the apostate religion. She is “drunk,” verse 6 says, “with the blood of the saints,” because
they persecute the saints. Antichrist’s kingdom will persecute the saints, kill the saints, shed the blood of the witnesses of
6 Jesus. How does it all end? If you come down to verse 14, “These will wage war against the Lamb, and the Lamb will
overcome them.”
7
So this is where Satan’s going. He is pulling the world together, unifying the world in a way that never could have been done in
the past because he didn’t have the technology to do it. But they “wage war against the Lamb,” and that is a losing
8 proposition because “the Lamb will overcome them,” verse 14 says, “because He is Lord of lords and King of kings, and
those who are with Him are called and chosen and faithful.” This is where history is going. Don’t be surprised at globalistic
9 efforts. Don’t be surprised at government’s turning on divine truth. This is Satan’s plan.

10 In chapter 18, you have a look at the final world culture. The religion is what is revealed in chapter 17; in chapter 18 you see,
rather, just the culture of the world. “The kings of the earth,” verse 9, “who have committed acts of immorality and lived
11 sensuously . . . will weep and lament over her when they see the smoke of her burning.” What does that mean? Well back in
verse 8, “In one day her plagues will come, pestilence and mourning and famine, and she will be burned up with fire; for the
12 Lord God who judges her is strong.” In the end God is going to bring down that global religion, and that global kingdom as
well.
13 “‘Woe’”—verse 10—“‘woe, the great city of Babylon, the strong city! In one hour your judgment has come.’ And the merchants
of the earth weep and mourn over her, because no one buys their cargoes anymore—cargoes of gold and silver and precious
14 stones, pearls, fine linen,” et cetera. “Merchants”—in verse 15—“are standing at a distance because of the fear of” what
they’re seeing in “torment, weeping and mourning.”
15
Verse 16, “‘Woe, woe, the great city, she who was clothed in fine linen and purple and scarlet, and adorned with gold and
16 precious stones and pearls; for in one hour such great wealth has been laid waste!’ And every shipmaster, every passenger
and sailor, as many as make their living by the sea, stood at a distance, crying as they saw the smoke of the burning, saying,
17 ‘What city is like the great city?’ They threw dust on their heads and were crying out, weeping and mourning.” Realize John
is seeing this in a vision. This is a vision that depicts what is coming.
18 “Woe”—verse 19—“the great city, in which all who had ships at sea became rich by her wealth, for in one hour she had been laid
waste!” Verse 20, “Rejoice over her, O heaven, and you saints and apostles and prophets, because God has pronounced
19 judgment for you against her.” This is where Satan is taking the world. Again, Satan has many strategies; but he has one goal,
and that is to collect the world around one final Antichrist, empower him to defeat God. In the process, he persecutes the
20 saints; he seeks to kill them.

21 Now let me remind you of something. We talk about persecution and we sometimes experience it in the sense that somebody
doesn’t like us because of our Christian testimony. You might have trouble with a professor in a university class because of
22 your testimony; you might get a bad grade. You might lose your job because of your convictions and your testimony. And
that’s a measure of persecution. But mark this: Real persecution, which means imprisonment or execution, can only be done
by government, right? Only government does that. There can’t be a group of atheists who go out and imprison Christians;
23 only government can do that. God has given government the sword, the power; and when they prostitute that power and they
begin to punish those who do good and protect those who do evil, they wield that power against the people of God.
24
Satan knows that in order to kill the saints he has to have the one legitimate earthly power, and that’s the power of the
25 government. So government is, and always has been, and always will be the ultimate persecutor of the church. It is
government—authority, power constituted in rulers and leaders—that has essentially done all the damage to the church
26 through its history. And so I say what I said at the beginning: The greatest threat to truth and virtue in this country is the
government because they have totally prostituted their God-ordained design. All through history, government is the ultimate
27 persecutor of people. Satan has to get ahold of government; and that’s where he operates—always work through government.

Go back to Isaiah 14. Isaiah 14, the prophecy of Isaiah spoken to the king of Babylon, the king of Babylon. It’s a judgment
28 against the king of Babylon—chapter 14, verse 4, a “taunt against the king of Babylon,” judgment against the king of

- 34 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1
Babylon. But notice how interesting it is. This judgment, down in verse 12—something more than just the king of Babylon
appears to happen here: “How are you fallen from heaven, O star of the morning, son of the dawn!”
2
Has the king of Babylon fallen from heaven? No, but who is fallen from heaven? Lucifer. So who is behind the king of Babylon?
3 Lucifer. He goes from talking about judgment on the king of Babylon to going behind the king of Babylon to the “star of the
morning, the son of the dawn”: “You’ve been cut down to the earth, you have weakened the nations! But you said in your
4 heart”—this is what Satan said when he was in heaven—“‘I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of
God’”—the angels of God—“‘I will sit on the mount of assembly in the recesses of the north. I will ascend above the heights
5 of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’” “‘I will, I will, I will, I will.’” This is Satan’s rebellion. And so Isaiah
shows us that it is Satan himself, the fallen one, who is energizing the king of Babylon, controlling the king of Babylon.
6
There is a similar section of Scripture, Ezekiel 28; I want you to turn to it. Ezekiel 28, verse 11, “And the word of the Lord came
to me saying, ‘Son of man’”—that was God’s name for Ezekiel—“‘take up a lamentation over the king of Tyre.’” Now we’re
7
talking about the king of Tyre; Tyre was another pagan kingdom, persecuted the people of God. But notice how this seems to
be something more than just the king of Tyre: “Thus says the Lord God, ‘You had the seal of perfection, full of wisdom and
8 perfect in beauty. You were in Eden, the garden of God’”—wait a minute, the king of Tyre? He wasn’t in Eden. Who was in
Eden? Who was prowling in Eden? Satan.
9
“You were in Eden, the garden of God; every precious stone was your covering: the ruby, the topaz, the diamond; the beryl, the
10 onyx, the jasper; lapis lazuli”—which is a beautiful blue stone—“the turquoise, the emerald; and the gold, the workmanship
of your settings and sockets, was in you. On the day you were created they were prepared. You were the anointed”—what?—
11 “cherub who covers.” Now you can see, Satan in Isaiah is working behind the king of Babylon; here in Ezekiel he’s working
behind the king of Tyre. This is because Satan does his great work against the people of God using political leaders—kings
12 and rulers.

“You were the anointed cherub who covers, and I placed you there. You were on the holy mountain of God and walked in the
13 midst of the stones of fire. You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created until unrighteousness was found
in you. By the abundance of your trade you were internally filled with violence, and you sinned; therefore I have cast you as
14 profane from the mountain of God, and destroyed you, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. Your heart
was lifted up because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom by reason of your splendor. I cast you to the ground; I put
15 you before kings, that they may see you, the multitude of your iniquities.” He goes back to talking about the king of Tyre
with almost not missing a beat. The judgment on the king of Tyre is also a declaration of the judgment on the one who is
16 behind the king of Tyre.

17 Satan always works through evil rulers to persecute the people of God. In the book of Exodus it was Pharaoh. When the children
of God left Egypt, it was the Canaanites, it was the powers of the Philistines. It was the rulers of Assyria then, and then it was
the rulers of Babylon. And you come into the New Testament, and the persecutors of the people of God were the official
18 leaders of Israel, the Sanhedrin. And then it was the Roman Empire. Destroying the people of God is always a government
enterprise.
19
I want to show you another illustration of this in Daniel, in Daniel chapter 2. Daniel, though he is a Jew in exile in Babylon along
20 with all the Jews that were taken there, God has elevated him because he interpreted Nebuchadnezzar’s dream. At the end of
chapter 2, verse 46, “King Nebuchadnezzar fell on his face, did homage to Daniel, gave orders to present to him an offering
21 and fragrant incense. The king answered Daniel and said, ‘Surely your God is a God of gods and a Lord of [lords] and a
revealer of mysteries, since you have been able to reveal this mystery.’ Then the king promoted Daniel and gave him many
22 great gifts, and made him ruler over the whole province of Babylon and chief prefect over all the wise men of Babylon. And
Daniel made request of the king, and appointed Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego over the administration of the province of
Babylon, while Daniel was at the king’s court.” You know for a while Nebuchadnezzar liked Daniel a lot because all his own
23 fools, disguised as wise men, couldn’t answer any of his dilemmas. But he sounds like—almost like a believer here. Verse
47, “Your God is a God of gods and a Lord of [lords].”
24
Some time passed, probably some years. Chapter 3 gives us a different picture. Nebuchadnezzar had forgotten, apparently, about
25 the declaration that the God of Daniel was the God of gods, and he “made an image of gold, the height of which was sixty
cubits”—that would be ninety feet—the “width six cubits”—that would be nine feet—“and he set it on the plain of Dura in
26 the province of Babylon. Then Nebuchadnezzar the king sent word to assemble the satraps, the prefects, the governors, the
counselors, the treasurers, the judges, the magistrates, all the rulers of the provinces to come to the dedication of the image
27 Nebuchadnezzar the king had set up.” And by the way it was an image of him.

Then they all came. In verse 4, “The herald loudly proclaimed: ‘To you the command is given, O people, nation and men of
28 every language, that at the moment you hear the sound of the horn, the flute, the lyre, the trigon’”—another musical

- 35 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1
instrument, stringed instrument—“‘psaltery, bagpipe and all kinds of music, . . . fall down and worship the golden image that
Nebuchadnezzar the king has set up. Whoever doesn’t fall down and worship shall immediately be cast into the midst of a
2
furnace of blazing fire.’” So now Nebuchadnezzar has set himself up as god, and anybody who defies that is going to die.
3 So some of the “Chaldeans,” in verse 8, “came . . . and brought charges against the Jews.” They came, in verse 9, and they said to
Nebuchadnezzar, “‘O king, live forever! You, O king, made a decree that every man’” should bow when they hear the music,
4 “‘fall down and worship the golden image. And whoever doesn’t fall down and worship shall be cast into the midst of a
furnace of blazing fire. There are certain Jews whom you have appointed over the administration of the province of Babylon,
5 namely Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego. These men, O king, have disregarded you; they do not serve your gods or
worship the golden image which you have set up.’
6
“Then Nebuchadnezzar in rage and anger gave orders to bring Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego; then these men were brought
before the king. . . . ‘Is it true,’” he says, “‘that you do not serve my gods or worship the golden image that I set up?’” Verse
7
16, they replied, “O Nebuchadnezzar, we do not need to give you an answer concerning this matter. If it be so, our God
whom we serve is able to deliver us from the furnace of blazing fire; and He will deliver us out of your hand, O king. But
8 even if He does not, let it be known to you, O king, we are not going to serve your gods or worship the golden image that you
have set up.” This is civil disobedience: “We’re not worshiping your god; we’re not worshiping you. If it is to be the fire, let
9 it be the fire.” Nebuchadnezzar was so infuriated by this that “his facial expression was altered,” and he gave “orders to heat
the furnace seven times more.”
10
Well you know the rest of the story, right? Threw them in the furnace. In verse 25, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking in
11 the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!” And again in verse 28,
Nebuchadnezzar says, “‘Blessed be the God of Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego, who has sent His angel and delivered His
12 servants who put their trust in Him, violating the king’s command, and yielding up their bodies so as not to serve or worship
any god except their own God. Therefore I make a decree that any people, nation or tongue that speaks anything offensive
against the God of Shadrach, Meshach and Abed-nego shall be torn limb from limb and their houses reduced to a rubbish
13 heap, inasmuch as there is no other god who is able to deliver in this way.’ Then the king caused Shadrach, Meshach and
Abed-nego to prosper in the province of Babylon.” This is getting to be a little bit repetitious—but he bounces back again.
14 When it serves them well, government may tolerate the people of God; but when they are angry, they have the power of death
in their hands.
15
Chapter 4 is incredible. It’s one of the great conversion stories in the Bible. It’s the conversion of Nebuchadnezzar, and it’s a
16 first-person story. “Nebuchadnezzar the king to all the peoples, nations, and men of every language that live in all the earth:
‘May your peace abound! It has seemed good to me to declare the signs and wonders which the Most High God has done for
17 me. How great are His signs and how mighty are His wonders! His kingdom is an everlasting kingdom and His dominion is
from generation to generation.” He was hard to convince, but there’s a change in his attitude.
18 Then he gives his testimony; I won’t go through all of it. It’s an amazing testimony. He has a dream, he can’t figure out the
meaning of the dream, Daniel tells him the meaning of the dream in verses 19 through 27. The dream is about him being cut
19 down. It’s a dream of a tree; it’s him—he’s going to be cut down, chopped down, nothing left but a small stump. Why? Well
because he needs to learn, verse 25, “that the Most High is ruler over the realm of mankind and bestows it on whomever He
20 wishes.”

21 So Daniel interprets the dream, and then in verse 27 says, “Let me give you some advice, O king”: “Break away now from your
sins by doing righteousness and from your iniquities by showing mercy to the poor, in case there may be a prolonging of your
22 prosperity.” Here’s another opportunity for this guy to say what he says and actually believe it. All this happened to the king.
This is the interpretation of the dream.
23 Verse 29, “twelve months later,” he’s forgotten it again. And he thinks he’s God, and he’s reflecting on it: “Is not this
Babylon”—verse 30—“the great, which I myself have built as a royal residence by the might of my power and for the glory
24 of my majesty?” It’s a soliloquy on his majesty. “While the word was in the king’s mouth, a voice came from heaven, saying,
‘King Nebuchadnezzar, to you it is declared: sovereignty has been removed from you. You’ll be driven away from mankind,
25 your dwelling place will be with the beasts of the field. You’ll be given grass to eat like cattle, and seven [years, literally] will
pass over until you recognize the Most High is ruler over the realm of mankind and bestows it on whomever He wishes.’
26 Immediately the word concerning Nebuchadnezzar was fulfilled; he was driven away from mankind, began eating grass like
cattle, his body was drenched with the dew of heaven until his hair had grown like eagles’ feathers and nails like birds’
27 claws.” For seven years. That is humbling.

“At the end of the period, I, Nebuchadnezzar, raised my eyes toward heaven and my reason returned to me, and I blessed the
28 Most High and praised and honored Him who lives forever; for His dominion is an everlasting dominion, His kingdom

- 36 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1

endures from generation to generation. All the inhabitants of the earth are accounted as nothing; He does according to His
2
will in the host of heaven and among the inhabitants of earth; and no one can ward off His hand or say to Him, “What have
You done?” At that time my reason returned to me. And my majesty and splendor were restored to me for the glory of my
3 kingdom, and my counselors and my nobles began seeking me out; so I was reestablished in my sovereignty, and surpassing
greatness was added to me. Now I, Nebuchadnezzar, praise, exalt and honor the King of heaven, for all His works are true
4 and His ways just, and He’s able to humble those who walk in pride’”—yeah, he learned that. I think you’re going to see him
in heaven. It’s a real conversion story.
5
The point that I want to make out of this is it’s always in the power of monarchs to do damage to the people of God, always. That
6 is why Proverbs 16:12 says, “It is an abomination for kings to commit wickedness,” because it turns everything upside-down.
Only in righteousness is a throne established.
7
Look, in Acts chapter 4, the Jewish leaders said to the apostles, “Stop preaching!” In Daniel 3, Nebuchadnezzar said, “Stop
worshiping!” Again, in Daniel 6—we didn’t read it—the rulers said, “Stop praying, or we’re going to throw you into”—
8 what?—“the lions’ den.” The governor of California says, “Stop singing! Stop hugging!” But God’s people don’t stop
because no—listen to me—no human authority is absolute. No human authority is absolute. I’ll say it again: No human
9 authority is absolute. All human authorities are only authorities as long as they function in the way God designed them; and
when they don’t function that way anymore, but they turn it on its head and do it in the reverse form, they yield up that God-
10 given authority. Obviously the fallout is horrendous.

11 I love this little paragraph by Doug Wilson talking about Peter. He said, “The man who [told us to submit to the government] was
soon to be executed by the magistrate as someone who was a grave threat to the civil order. This [is] the same man who was
12 broken out of jail by an angel, . . . who disappeared from the book of Acts as a wanted man. The guards who lost him were
executed because of his disappearance. This was the man who was in jail in the first place because he was a leader of
Christians, and who earlier had told the Sanhedrin that he [would not] quit preaching, no matter what they said. And he was
13 the man who was writing this letter to prepare law-abiding Christians for the time of persecution that was coming, in which
time they would be accused of being [rebellious]. So whatever his words in chapter 2 mean, they [had] to be consistent with
14 the life of the [man] who wrote them.” You submit when the government functions in the way God designed it.

15 So we are beginning to see persecution from government. This is the most formidable persecution: COVID, LGBTQ,
transgender, social justice—all these new ideologies are now going to become the only acceptable moral standards. And if
16 you don’t accept them, you’re going to be the enemy of the government. Truth, the Bible, Scripture is going to be canceled.
The government’s taking control; they want to take control of absolutely everything. The church has become the main enemy
17 of the government—nothing new.

Some helpful insights from Tim Cantrell over in South Africa, one of our missionaries: “In July 1933, during Hitler’s first
18 summer in power, a young German pastor named Joachim Hossenfelder preached a sermon in . . . Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial
Church, Berlin’s most important church. He used the words of Romans 13 to remind worshippers of the importance of
19 obedience to those in authority.” This is 1933. “The church was [all decked out] with Nazi banners . . . its pews packed with
the Nazi . . . faithful [and soldiers in uniform].” Earlier that same year, Friedrich Dibelius, “a German bishop and one of the
20 highest Protestant officials in the country” also preached on Romans 13 “to justify all the Nazi seizure[s] of power and
[brutal] policies,” and misquoted Martin Luther himself about the powers of the state. “Three days” after this sermon by
21 Dibelius, “the German parliament dissolved,” and Hitler took over. Within a few years, six million Jews had been
slaughtered, and the world devastated by World War II.
22
Throughout history, even in the Western world, people lived under what was called the divine right of kings. Kings were believed
to have had a divine right. This was absolute monarchy. What broke that was basically the Reformers. The Reformers—a
23 little phrase was “the law is king,” not the man. Because of the myth of the divine right of kings, it became the justification
for the slaughter and the massacre of countless children of God.
24
One New Testament writer says that Romans 13 has “caused more unhappiness and misery . . . than any other . . . verses in the
25 New Testament by the license they have given to tyrants . . . used to justify a host of horrendous abuses of individual human
rights.” Hitler’s Holocaust, racism in the apartheid of South Africa, Cantrell says, “Both the Jews in Germany and blacks in
26 South Africa were viewed as a threat to public health and national security. . . . “‘Trust us,’ said government . . . ‘we truly
have your best interests at heart. All we want to do is help . . . keep you safe.’”
27
Government has already become the purveyor of wickedness. Government is a murderer, slaughtering millions of infants in
abortion; elevating the LGBTQ agenda, the bizarre transgender deception. The culture has become anti-truth, we all know
28 that. The truth is the biggest threat to lies. William Pitt, well-known name in English history, said this: “Necessity (i.e., public

- 37 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1
health, common good) is the plea [of] every infringement of human freedom: it is the argument of tyrants. “Get people afraid,
and they’ll do whatever you want. A fearful society will always comply; panicking people will believe anything” [(Cantrell)].
2
“During the gruesome and bloody days of the French Revolution, when 40,000 innocent [people] lost their heads,” you would be
3 interested to know who was operating the guillotine: the Committee for Public Safety [(Cantrell)]. One writer says,
“Governments now get voted into power by promising to oversee housing, education, medicine, the economy, [the] currency,
4 a minimum income, food, water, land, and the list goes on. The government become a parent, and the citizens are dependents.
The government in this role becomes a monstrous juggernaut of bureaucracy, devouring taxes and trying to regulate every
5 detail of life.” And they definitely want to regulate the church and silence its proclamation.

6 In his book The Glorious Body of Christ, Kuiper wrote, “Our age is one of ecclesiastical passivism. . . . When a church ceases to
be militant it also ceases to be a church of Jesus Christ. . . . A truly militant church stands opposed to the world both without
its walls and within. . . . Time and again in its history the church has found it necessary to assert its sovereignty over against
7
usurpations by the state.” And Kuiper gave some biblical examples, like when King Saul or King Uzziah usurped the
priesthood, stating, “In both cases a representative of the state was severely punished for encroaching [on] the sovereignty of
8 the church.”

9 “Lord Macaulay of England summed up the Puritan reputation this way” [(Cantrell)]. He said of the Puritans, “He bowed himself
in the dust before his Maker; [as] he set his foot on the neck of his king.” Kuiper says, “Ours is an age of state totalitarianism.
10 All over the world statism is [rising] . . . . In consequence, in many lands the church finds itself utterly at the mercy of the
state whose mercy often proves cruelty, while in others the notion is rapidly gaining ground that the church exists and
11 operates by the state’s permission.” We do not operate by the state’s permission; we operate by the Lord’s command.

12 Francis Schaeffer, who died in 1984, says, “If [there’s] no final place for civil disobedience, then the government has been made
autonomous, and as such, it has been put in the place of the living God.” And that point is exactly when the early Christians
performed their acts of civil disobedience, even when it cost them their lives. “Acts of State which contradict God’s [Laws]
13 are illegitimate and acts of tyranny. Tyranny is ruling without the sanction of God. To resist tyranny is to honour God. . . .
The bottom line is that at a certain point there is not only the right, but the duty to disobey the State.”
14
[Cantrell:] “G. K. Chesterton once made this . . . observation: ‘It is only by believing in God that we can ever criticize the
15 government. Once abolish God, and the government becomes . . . God . . . . Wherever the people do not believe in something
beyond the [government], they will worship [it]. . . . They will worship the strongest thing in the world.’”
16
John Calvin said, “[We’re] subject to the men who rule over us, but subject only in the Lord. If they command anything against
17 Him let us not pay the least regard to it, nor be moved by all the dignity which they possess as magistrates.”

Now Scottish Covenanters, amazing people. Andrew Melville was jailed in the Tower of London for the gospel. He was actually
18 jailed because he confronted King James of the King James Bible. This is what Melville said: “There are two kings and two
kingdoms in Scotland: There is King James, the head of the Commonwealth, and there is King Jesus, the Head of the
19 [Church], whose subject King James is, and of whose kingdom he is not the head, nor a lord, but only a member.” For that he
was jailed.
20
[Cantrell:] “In 1660 the Covenanters signed their National Covenant” with their blood. “Historian S.M. Houghton tells . . . they
21 were determined”—quoting—“to: resist to the death the claims of the king . . . to override the Crown Rights of the Redeemer
in His [Church] (King Jesus). Their National Covenant [gave] high honour to the eternal God and His most holy Word;
22 demands the faithful preaching of that Word, the due and right ministration of the sacraments . . . . The subscribers further
say that they fear neither ‘the foul aspersions of rebellion, combination, or what else our adversaries from their craft and
malice would put upon us, seeing what we do is so well warranted, and [arises] from an unfeigned desire to maintain the true
23 worship of God, the majesty of our King, and the peace of [His] kingdom, for the common happiness of ourselves and our
posterity.’ They [pledged] themselves as in the sight of God to ‘be good examples to others of all godliness, soberness, and
24 righteousness, and . . . every duty we owe to God and man.’”

25 Does government win? Does Satan win? No, because in chapter 19 of the book of Revelation, Jesus comes back, right? And
destroys all kings set against Him. Battle of Armageddon, He wipes them out. Listen to Psalm 2: “Why are the nations in an
26 uproar and the peoples devising a vain thing? The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers take counsel together
against the Lord and against His Anointed”—this is what the rulers of the world do. And they say, “‘Let us tear their fetters
27 apart and cast away their cords from us!’ He who sits in the heavens laughs, the Lord scoffs at them. Then He will speak to
them in His anger and terrify them in His fury, saying, ‘But as for Me, I have installed My King upon Zion, My holy
mountain.’” The King is coming, isn’t He?
28

- 38 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 seved in matter at this time. Plaintiffs will be filing a First Amended Complaint Rule 15 of the
1
federal rules of civil procedure allows the plaintiff to amend their complaint one time within 21
2
days of serving the original complaint or at any point before the defendant answers the
3
complaint. It is unlawful for this judge to insist exactly when we are to file and serve amended
4
complaint. Plaintiff attorneys in federal court in cases have filed 19, 20 amended complaints.
5
Plaintiffs have been ill and are experiencing stress and bias for a judge to insist that an amended
6 complaint is filed within a certain parameter of time when Plaintiffs have legitimate reason why
7 they have not been able to do so. This is not a informa pauperis case; yet this judge is treating
8 very much the same way. In fact, there has not been any case management conference set initial
9 or trial date set.

10
This is demonstrative of bias and prejudice. Rule 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of California CIVIL LOCAL RULES
11

12

13

14 “I will . . . tell you the decree of the Lord: He said to Me, ‘You’re My Son, today I have begotten You. Ask of Me, and I’ll surely
give the nations as Your inheritance, and the very ends of the earth as Your possession. You will break’” those nations “‘with
15 a rod of iron, You will shatter them like’” clay pots. “‘Therefore, O kings, show discernment; take warning, O judges of the
earth. Worship the Lord with reverence and rejoice with trembling. Do homage to the Son, that He not become angry, and
you perish in the way, for His wrath may soon be kindled. How blessed are all who take refuge in Him!” A warning to the
16 leaders of this nation and every nation: The King is coming. He will crush all opposition.

17 Satan persecutes the church through governments. But the Son of God has come to destroy the devil, to render him powerless, to
overthrow Satan’s final kingdom of darkness. In conclusion, Romans 8:31, “If God be for us, who is against us?” Let’s pray.
18
Father, we are so grateful for the confidence that we have, borne to our souls from Your precious truth: Your Word. Thank You
19 for these dear people. Thank You for their faithfulness, for their love for You, for the love wrought in their hearts, by You
and thus for You. Thank You for the joy of fellowship. Give us such joy, as we understand that what’s coming is all going to
20 be for Your glory.

Everything in history is unfolding in the plan that You have designed. Your purposes cannot be thwarted. You will triumph.
21 Christ will come. He will destroy His enemies. He will destroy all kings and all rulers, and reign alone in His glorious
kingdom, of which we who love Him will be a part. We long for that day. Until then may we celebrate with joy and
22 thanksgiving that we even now are citizens of that kingdom; and we who know Him and love Him will reign with Him. We
thank You for that promise.
23
May we never become discouraged by what’s happening in the world. May we understand that it’s exactly what Scripture says
24 we would expect. Help us not to get caught up in the politics of these things, but rather to see them through the lens of Holy
Scripture.
25
We know that the devil has a plan, but so do You; and You will triumph. You are triumphing even now at Grace Church, and we
are basking in a preview of Your final triumph. We thank You for that sweet gift of grace. Bring to Yourself any with us
26 today who don’t know Christ. Draw that soul into Your kingdom. For Your glory we pray. Amen.

27 https://www.gty.org/library/sermons-library/81-117/when-government-rewards-

28 evil-and-punishes-good

- 39 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
No dates have been scheduled in this matter; no one has been served and there is no
26
inconvenience or prejudice to anyone with extension of time to adequately prepare as non
27 attorneys, disabled and confer with Fedpro before filing first amended complaint. Fedpro
28 reviewed and approved previous First Amended Complaint in 3:20-cv-02983-WHO. Several
- 40 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 reviews were completed and consultations with Fedpro for Second Amended Complaint;
1
curiously shortly thereafter filing Second Amended Complaint narrowed down consultation with
2
Fedpro attorneys; a request was made by Jacqueline Scott Corley for a Third Amended
3
Complaint. Plaintiffs’ were besides themselves did not know what else they could do but filed a
4
Third Amended Complaint Fedpro approved and was still recommended by Magistrate
5
Jacqueline Scott Corley to be dismissed.11 Plaintiffs are extremely uncomfortable with this
6 Judge that it appears has mind made up despite paid for filing fee to dismiss matter. The
7 disapproving nature, attitude towards disabled, unrepresented plaintiffs as well as other
8 dismissed matters involving unrepresented litigants, confirms fears that before this Judge the
9 “sisters” as this judge refers to us will be unlikely to even receive a trial date or a CMC, let alone

10
have trial conducted matter adjudicated if this Judge has her way.

11
Plaintiffs do not want to list medical issues for public consumption and attempted to file under
12
seal. Plaintiff is suffering from medical complications and is not going to put such private
13
medical conditions listed for public consumption. No defendants have been served at this time.
14
Plaintiff requested to file under seal details medical concerning motion for disqualification
15
recently due to privacy issues confidential and was denied.
16

17 Biased prejudicial public sense of impropriety

18 Denial under seal private confiditial trauma and medical. Plaintiffs are non attorneys and are
19 preparing first amended complaint. Attorneys will be reviewing first amended complaint and

20 11 (A Psalm of David.) The earth is the LORD'S, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein.

21 2For he hath founded it upon the seas, and established it upon the floods.

22 3Who shall ascend into the hill of the LORD? or who shall stand in his holy place?

4He that hath clean hands, and a pure heart; who hath not lifted up his soul unto vanity, nor sworn deceitfully.
23
5He shall receive the blessing from the LORD, and righteousness from the God of his salvation.
24
6This is the generation of them that seek him, that seek thy face, O Jacob. Selah.
25
7Lift up your heads, O ye gates; and be ye lift up, ye everlasting doors; and the King of glory shall come in.
26
8Who is this King of glory? The LORD strong and mighty, the LORD mighty in battle.
27
9Lift up your heads, O ye gates; even lift them up, ye everlasting doors; and the King of glory shall come in.
28 10Who is this King of glory? The LORD of hosts, he is the King of glory. Selah.

- 41 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 assisting Plaintiffs. Pro se parties are granted greater leeway than litigants represented by
1
counsel. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520–21 (1972) (holding that pro se complaints are
2
held to “less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers”).
3
§144. Bias or prejudice of judge
4
Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient
5
affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either
6 against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but
7 another judge shall be assigned to hear such proceeding.
8 Biased Disdain towards Pro Se Litigants Pattern Recommends Dismissals
9 3:23-cv-03776-JSC

10
Tauscher v. Hanshew Case filed: 07/28/2023
Case closed: 09/25/2023 Cause: 42:1981 Civil Rights
11
NOS: 440 Civil Rights: Other
12
Office: San Francisco
13
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
14
Presider: Jacqueline Scott Corley
15
Jury demand: Plaintiff
16 Case flags: ADRMOP,APPEAL,CLOSED,E-ProSe,ProSe
17 A court must dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint before service of process if it is
18 frivolous, fails to state a claim, or contains a complete defense to the action on its face. Plaintiff
19 is proceeding without representation by a lawyer. Even considering the claims on their

20
merits, the undersigned finds they should be dismissed.
3:21-cv-09347-JSC
21
Austin v. Riley Case filed: 12/02/2021
22
Case closed: 03/16/2022 Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment
23
Discrimination
24
NOS: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
25
Office: San Francisco
26 Jurisdiction: Federal Question
27 Presider: Jacqueline Scott Corley
28 Jury demand: Plaintiff

- 42 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Case flags: ADRMOP,CLOSED,E-ProSe,ProSe
1
Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter without representation by a lawyer. After Plaintiff
2
filed his complaint on December 2, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to either pay the required
3
filing fee or complete an application to proceed in forma pauperis. In his motion, Plaintiff
4
represents that his “budget12 for this particular expense has been
5
12 The Sin of Partiality
6
by Dan Elmore
Forerunner, "Ready Answer," July 2007
7
Related
Is There Hope For Equality?
8 Grace, Faith, and Love
Respect or Respect of Persons?
9 What Sin Is
God's Way of Give at the Feast of Tabernacles
10 The Weightier Matters (Part 2): Judgment
James and Unleavened Bread (Part Two)
11 "My brethren, do not hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with partiality." —James 2:1

12 Back in the 1970s, in Norwalk, California, when I was seeking to be baptized, I was trying to quit smoking. I found that it
required that I keep quitting, because I kept finding a cigarette in my hand. It was such an ingrained habit that I did it without
thinking. Each time I did, I would leave the rest of the pack some place where I could not recover it.
13
One night during this time, my family went to the home of some friends for a barbeque. Out of habit, I lit a cigarette and took a
14 drag. As I blew the smoke out, I overheard my mother bragging to our host that I had quit smoking. My mom had been
blinded by her partiality toward me and my abilities, and I felt horrible that I had caused her shame and disappointment.
15 Realizing this helped me to quit the disgusting habit for good.

16 James 2:1 broaches the topic of partiality: "My brethren, do not hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with
partiality." The King James Version translates this virtually the same way except that instead of "partiality," it reads "respect
17 of persons." In many ways, "respect of persons" is a plainer translation of the Greek, since that is exactly what the apostle is
fighting: church members respecting some people over others.
18 Since we, too, are members of God's church, it is beneficial to take a closer look at this idea of partiality or respect of persons
from time to time. This problem frequently rears its ugly head, causing trouble among brethren, so it is good to know what it
19 is and how it manifests itself in a congregation.

20 Definitions

21 First, we need to make sure that we understand the full implications of partiality by reviewing some definitions of the term.
Webster's Dictionary defines partial as "biased to one party; inclined to favor one party in a cause, or one side of a question,
22 more than the other; not indifferent." A second meaning emphasizes favoring something "without reason," and a third,
"affecting a part only; not general or universal; not total," implies dividing or separating things apart from the whole.
23 Another tool we can use to get a better grasp of a term is to see how other translations of a particular Bible verse use it. Here are
several alternate translations of James 2:1:
24
International Standard Version: My brothers, do not practice your faith in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ by showing partiality.
25
New International Version: My brothers, as believers in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ, don't show favoritism.
26
Good News Translation: My friends, as believers in our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, you must never treat people in
27 different ways according to their outward appearance.

James Moffatt Translation: My brothers, as you believe in our Lord Jesus Christ, who is the Glory, pay no servile regard to
28 people.

- 43 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1

William Barclay Translation: My brothers, you cannot at one and the same time believe in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ and be
2
a snob.
3 The New Testament in Modern English: Don't ever attempt, my brothers, to combine snobbery with faith in our glorious Lord
Jesus Christ!
4
Amplified Bible: My brethren, pay no servile regard to people [show no prejudice, no partiality]. Do not [attempt to] hold [and]
5 practice the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [the Lord] of Glory, [together with snobbery]!

6 This term, rendered variously as "partiality," "favoritism," "respect of persons," "servile regard," and "snobbery" in James 2:1, is
prosôpolepsía in Greek, and it is very close in meaning to the English word partiality. Vine's Expository Dictionary of New
Testament Words expands on its meaning: "[It is] the fault of one who, when responsible to give judgment, has respect to the
7
position, rank, popularity, or circumstances of men, instead of their intrinsic conditions, preferring the rich and powerful to
those who are not so. . . ."
8
Armed with this understanding, we can explore some of the occasions when partiality occurs. For instance, parents almost always
9 display partiality for their own children over other people's children, which is only natural, but sometimes they favor one of
their own children over his or her sibling(s). This is bound to have disastrous results at some point.
10
People also make economic distinctions, showing a bias for one brand of car, clothing, appliance, or laundry soap. Some are
11 partial to stocks and bonds, while others prefer to invest in land, gold, or commodities. Such preferences are usually just
personal opinions due to habit, experience, advertising, or personal recommendation.
12
Of course, there are racial, social, religious, and political prejudices. We read or hear of such biases frequently. Many of these
kinds of partialities can get one in trouble with the group in question, the law, the community, or the church, depending on
13 how radically a person displays them. Even in supposedly free and equal societies, prejudices abound, as they are part of
human nature.
14
Further, intellectual snobbery and elitism abound. Those who have advanced degrees too often look down their noses at those
15 whose educational achievements were stymied by a lack of opportunity or funds or plain bad grades in school. Though it is
more rare, a reverse intellectual snobbery has been known to exist among poorly educated Americans from time to time.
16
In the church, we often witness the "holier than thou" individual who wears his spirituality on his sleeve for all to see. He is quick
17 to criticize others for their shortcomings, drawing away from fellowship with them for their "lack of conversion." Such a
person is showing a bias toward his idea of righteousness, which, as we know, is called "self-righteousness."
18 There are many other kinds of partiality, and if one keeps an eye out for them, they are easy to spot. Respect of persons is part of
the underside of the human condition, so it is not surprising that the Bible presents so many illustrations of it.
19
Biblical Examples
20
God provides us with dozens of examples of men and women who were partial to various people or things, and along with the
21 examples come important lessons we can learn to avoid their mistakes. Sometimes, a right and godly favoritism is shown—
particularly by God Himself—and an unrighteous, human reaction causes a great deal of trouble. Yet, more often, human
22 partiality toward or against others opens the proverbial can of worms. A number of examples come immediately to mind.

»When God accepted Abel's offering but rejected Cain's—favor based on obedience and proper attitude—hatred, jealousy,
23 resentment, and murderous rage resulted (see Genesis 4). This first example is one of godly favor taken badly.

24 »Through favoritism, Isaac (toward Esau) and Rebecca (toward Jacob) instilled a spirit of competition, strife, and resentment
between the two brothers, which led to an even-now ongoing feud, more than 3,500 years later (see Genesis 25 and 27)!
25
»Jacob's partiality to Rachel was the source of a great deal of hostility and scheming among Jacobs's wives and concubines (see
26 Genesis 30). This also created rivalries between their sons.

27 »Jacob's favoritism for Joseph made his half-brothers so jealous that they were ready to murder him (see Genesis 37). Instead,
they "only" sold him into slavery, telling their father that he had been torn to pieces by a wild beast. This caused the patriarch
no end of grief.
28

- 44 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1
»Through his partiality as a father, Eli allowed himself to become complacent to the gross sins of his two sons (see I Samuel 2—
4). This led both to calamity for Eli's house and national defeat at the hands of the Philistines.
2
»King David's partiality blinded his eyes to his children's evil actions, particularly Amnon's rape of his half-sister, Tamar; and
3 Absalom's murder of Amnon and his rebellion against David himself (see II Samuel 13—18). Later, he ignored Adonijah's
preparations to take over his throne, in spite of his expressed desire to have Solomon succeed him (see I Kings 1).
4
»In the story of Esther, Haman's prejudice almost cost the lives of all the Jews living in the Persian Empire (see Esther 3—8).
5 Only an act of great courage and self-sacrifice saved the Jews from annihilation.

6 The Bible contains a host of other examples that thoroughly demonstrate the insidiousness of this potential sin. It is clear that the
effects of partiality are the real problem. A person can have the best of intentions and reasons for his bias—as God's favor
certainly is—but the reactions of those not in favor cause events to spin out of control. At other times, and certainly in most
7
cases of human bias, the respect of persons is clearly wrong from the outset, and the carnal reactions of those it affects just
makes matters worse.
8
Emulating God
9
In his epistle, the apostle James is combating the practice of showing favoritism toward the wealthy at the expense of poorer
10 brethren. He asks in James 2:4, in doing so, "have you not shown partiality among yourselves, and become judges with evil
thoughts?" Here, he gets to the crux of the problem. As converted children of God, we are supposed to be able to make
11 righteous judgments through the gift of God's Spirit. However, when we show partiality or respect of persons, we have
allowed evil thoughts to compromise our judgment.
12
The Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown Commentary emphasizes that "the sin in question [respect of persons] is peculiarly
inconsistent with His 'faith.'" Christ died for all, rich and poor alike, and His doctrine consistently stresses the spiritual
13 equality of believers and unity in a brotherhood of believers. Thus, preferring one person over another because of wealth or
status introduces an element of wickedness into Christian relations: division.
14
Matthew Henry agrees:
15
The apostle is here reproving a very corrupt practice. He shows how much mischief there is in the sin of prosôpolepsía—respect
16 of persons, which seemed to be a very growing evil in the churches of Christ even in those early ages, and which, in these
after-times, has sadly corrupted and divided Christian nations and societies.
17
. . . You who profess to believe the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ, which the poorest Christian shall partake of equally with the
rich, and to which all worldly glory is but vanity, you should not make men's outward and worldly advantages the measure of
18 your respect. In professing the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, we should not show respect to men, so as to cloud or lessen the
glory of our glorious Lord: how ever any may think of it, this is certainly a very heinous sin.
19
What about God's supposed favoritism for His chosen people? For many centuries, it seemed as if God was partial toward Israel
20 in that only Israelites had an opportunity for salvation. From our perspective today, we know that He was working solely
through Israel only for the time being, preparing a people for the coming of His Son in the flesh.
21
After Jesus' resurrection, God soon opened salvation to the Gentiles too, as related in the story of Cornelius in Acts 10. In verses
22 34-35 of this chapter, Peter draws a conclusion from his experiences with the vision of the animals let down in a sheet from
heaven and with the conversion of the household of Cornelius: "In truth I perceive that God shows no partiality, but in every
nation whoever fears Him and works righteousness is accepted by Him."
23
In Romans 2:11, speaking of the righteous judgment of God, Paul repeats this point: "For there is no partiality with God," a truth
24 Paul understood from the Old Testament (Deuteronomy 10:17). To the Galatians, the apostle makes the spiritual equality of
Christians even more specific: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor
25 female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 3:28; see I Corinthians 12:13; Colossians 3:11).

26 It is clear that God is not a respecter of persons, giving everyone an equal opportunity for salvation and judging all by the same
standards. And certainly, we should want to be like God, respecting every member of the church as an equal brother or sister
27 in Christ.

English playwright George Bernard Shaw wrote, "We educate one another, and we cannot do this if half of us consider the other
28 half not good enough to talk to." The church of God is an educational institution, and every member has a part to play in

- 45 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 strained (combined with service issues), and thus [he] has need of additional time.” (Dkt.
1
No. 12
2
at 2.) He notes that he is busy with various responsibilities, and requests an extension “until after
3
April 12th, perhaps early May.” Nor does the motion persuade the Court to exercise its
4
discretion, absent good cause, to extend the time for service. See Efaw v. Williams, 473 F.3d
5
1038, 1040–41 (9th Cir. 2007).
6

7 One of her rulings, in 2018, required bail hearings every six months for hundreds of
8 undocumented immigrants in Western states who were held in jail while awaiting rulings on
9 applications for political asylum. Although the Supreme Court had recently ruled against

10
mandatory bond hearings for immigrants in U.S. custody, Corley said the constitutional
guarantees of liberty and due process of law entitle them to consideration of release after
11
prolonged detention. https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Senate-confirms-Biden-s-
12
first-appointee-to-San-17009876.php Exhibit S
13
Judge Corley concerned abut the rights f undocumente4ed immigrants but not for fair housing
14
and disability rights of disabled citizens. This motion and the affidavits made to the best of
15
plaintiff ability.13
16
helping to build up others as they prepare for God's Kingdom. Eliminating biases and prejudices will go a long way toward
17 bringing unity and growth to God's church.https://www.bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Library.sr/CT/RA/k/1253/sin-
partiality.htm
18

19 13 The affidavit shall state the facts and the reasons for the belief that bias or prejudice exists, and shall be filed not less than ten
days before the beginning of the term at which the proceeding is to be heard, or good cause shall be shown for failure to file it
20 within such time. A party may file only one such affidavit in any case. It shall be accompanied by a certificate of counsel of
record stating that it is made in good faith.
21 a)Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality
might reasonably be questioned.
22 (b)He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:
(1)Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning
the proceeding;
23 (2)Where in private practice he served as lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law
served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such lawyer has been a material witness
24 concerning it;
(3)Where he has served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or material witness
25 concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy;
(4)He knows that he, individually or as a fiduciary, or his spouse or minor child residing in his household, has a financial interest
26 in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be substantially affected by the
outcome of the proceeding;
27 (5)He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person:
(i)Is a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party;
(ii)Is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
28 (iii)Is known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;

- 46 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1

2
(iv)Is to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.
(c)A judge should inform himself about his personal and fiduciary financial interests, and make a reasonable effort to inform
3 himself about the personal financial interests of his spouse and minor children residing in his household.
(d)For the purposes of this section the following words or phrases shall have the meaning indicated:
4 (1)“proceeding” includes pretrial, trial, appellate review, or other stages of litigation;
(2)the degree of relationship is calculated according to the civil law system;
5 (3)“fiduciary” includes such relationships as executor, administrator, trustee, and guardian;
(4)“financial interest” means ownership of a legal or equitable interest, however small, or a relationship as director, adviser, or
6 other active participant in the affairs of a party, except that:
(i)Ownership in a mutual or common investment fund that holds securities is not a “financial interest” in such securities unless
the judge participates in the management of the fund;
7
(ii)An office in an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organization is not a “financial interest” in securities held
by the organization;
8 (iii)The proprietary interest of a policyholder in a mutual insurance company, of a depositor in a mutual savings association, or a
similar proprietary interest, is a “financial interest” in the organization only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially
9 affect the value of the interest;
(iv)Ownership of government securities is a “financial interest” in the issuer only if the outcome of the proceeding could
10 substantially affect the value of the securities.
(e)No justice, judge, or magistrate judge shall accept from the parties to the proceeding a waiver of any ground for
11 disqualification enumerated in subsection (b). Where the ground for disqualification arises only under subsection (a), waiver may
be accepted provided it is preceded by a full disclosure on the record of the basis for disqualification.
12 (f)Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this section, if any justice, judge, magistrate judge, or bankruptcy judge to whom
a matter has been assigned would be disqualified, after substantial judicial time has been devoted to the matter, because of the
appearance or discovery, after the matter was assigned to him or her, that he or she individually or as a fiduciary, or his or her
13 spouse or minor child residing in his or her household, has a financial interest in a party (other than an interest that could be
substantially affected by the outcome), disqualification is not required if the justice, judge, magistrate judge, bankruptcy judge,
14 spouse or minor child, as the case may be, divests himself or herself of the interest that provides the grounds for the
disqualification.
15 (June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 908; Pub. L. 93–512, § 1, Dec. 5, 1974, 88 Stat. 1609; Pub. L. 95–598, title II, § 214(a), (b),
Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2661; Pub. L. 100–702, title X, § 1007, Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4667; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 321,
16 Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117.)
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 898 ; May 24, 1949, ch. 139, §65, 63 Stat. 99 .)
17
What is the difference between Section 144 and Section 455?
18 Section 144 deals exclusively with actual bias, whereas section 455 deals with actual bias as well as other specific conflicts of
interest and the appearance of partiality. Section 144 is triggered by a party’s affidavit while section 455 may be invoked by
19 motion and requires judges to recuse sua sponte.
Refusal to allow under seal traumatic and medical
20
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/recusal-analysis-case-law-under-28-usc-ss-455-144
21 Litigants can move for trial judges to recuse themselves on grounds of partiality or the appearance of partiality. Improper denial
of these motions can deprive citizens of their right to a “neutral and detached judge,” and diminish public trust in the judicial
22 system. The statute 28 U.S.C. Section 144 deals with the bias or prejudice of a judge. Section 455 deals with the
disqualification of a justice, judge, or magistrate. While section 455 overlaps and subsumes section 144, there are important
differences between the two sections. Section 144 deals exclusively with actual bias, whereas section 455 deals with actual
23 bias as well as other specific conflicts of interest and the appearance of partiality. Section 144 is triggered by a party’s
affidavit while section 455 may be invoked by motion and requires judges to recuse sua sponte. Section 144 applies only to
24 district judges while section 455 applies to any justice, judge, or magistrate. A third recusal statute, 28 U.S.C. Section 47
applies only to appellate judges or trial judges sitting by designation on appellate panels. This statute prohibits a recently
25 promoted appellate judge from hearing an appeal of a case tried by that same judge. Recusal is usually unnecessary in cases
of the judge’s adverse ruling or expression of opinion; rumor, suspicion, or innuendo; familiarity with parties or events;
26 personal attacks on the judge; and threats or lawsuits against the judge. Recusal is more likely in cases of close personal or
professional relationship to attorneys or others; public comments or outside activities; ex parte contacts; involvement
27 pertaining to guilty plea; and a judge taking personal offense. Miscellaneous issues, such as timeliness of motion, recusal in
bench trials, standing, efforts to investigate, rule of necessity, and substitution of counsel, are discussed. Appellate issues are
analyzed, including standard of review, harmless error, interlocutory review, reviewability of recusal, mootness, guilty plea,
28 and jurisdiction. 339 footnotes, 17 references

- 47 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 FOUR WINDS
1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FewzoFUKBjM
2
Wednesday (Night) Preaching: Mar 13 2024
3

4
The Wind, as a Type of the Holy Spirit, Is Not Unlike the Very Breath of God by Which Man
5
Became a Living Soul. And, God Breathed His Word (Inspired) Both When He Wrote It and
6 When It Is Read. The Winds from the Four Corners of the Earth Are Distinctive: the East, a
7 Cleansing Wind; the North, Purifying; South, Fragrant and Comforting; and the West, Rain.
8 Also, Inspiration from a 16th Century Text and from Joni Eareckson Tada.
9 Scripture: Song of Solomon 4:15-16

10
No one has been served in this matter yet In the process of first amended complaint prior to
service
11

12
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/demystifying-psychiatry/201602/why-do-people-
13
schizophrenia-die-prematurely
14

15
Cousin Jeannie Tigano died prematurely schizophereni; family friend schizophrenia Stevep Jakes
16 died prematurely
17 Persons with schizophrenia have a greatly diminished life span. In general,
18 people with this disorder die more than 25 years earlier than the general
population. In other words, these individuals can only expect to live about 70%
19 of the normal life span. Why do they die early? In a paper recently published
20 in JAMA Psychiatry, Mark Olfson and colleagues set out to answer this
question. They examined reasons for premature mortality in a group of over 1
21
million people with schizophrenia covered by Medicaid, the largest insurance
22 provider for persons suffering from schizophrenia in the U.S. They identified
causes of death for over 65,500 of the 74,000 people who died during the
23
study period and found that individuals with schizophrenia had an increased
24 rate of death across all ages and all demographic groups when compared to
the general population.
25

26 What were the causes of death in these individuals? Olfson and colleagues
27
found that both natural causes and unnatural causes of death were increased
by over three-fold. The most common causes of death were cardiovascular
28

- 48 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1
disease, cancer (particularly lung cancer), diabetes, influenza, accidental
deaths, and suicides. The large majority of deaths (almost 55,750) resulted
2 from natural causes. However, the rates of death from suicide and accidents
3 were also substantially elevated.

5 Therefore the limited time that she has has been raftr with aggravation, trauma in this common
6 development. And Court
7 ECF pattern pro se closure Exhibit A 2023-2024

8 Code of Conduct for United States Judges Exhibit B

9
Jacqueline Corley Senate Questionnaire Exhibit C
Douglas Corley Kaiser Exhibit D
10
Disability Accommodations California Courts Exhibit E
11
Wagstaffe Group Exhibit F Exhibit FA – FM
12

13
Alameda Blacks and Jews 2005 Exhibit G (inside Wagstaffe Group)
14
Revolvling Door Project request recusal family member Exhibit H
15 Eumi Lee Judgeship confirmation March 2024 Exhibit I
16 How Domestic Abusers abuse the Courts The Fuller Project Exhibit J
17 Jacqueline Corley Ballotpedia Wagstaffe Exhibit K

18 Keith Fong appointed judge Exhibit L

19
Case 3:23-cv-03776-JSC Order dismissing pro se without leave to amend Exhibit M
Chevron case partner Jacqueline Corley Kerr & Wagstaffe Exhibit N
20
The Vetting Room Exhibit O
21
Judicial disclosures financial 2011-2021 Exhibits P PA-PE
22

23
Case 5:23-cv-02799-BLF Kai Lu discrimination Exhibit Q
24
Lu Vivente Exhibit R
25 Senate confirms Biden’s first appointee to San Francisco federal court Exhibit S
26 The Disability Docket: What’s at Stake at the U.S. Supreme Court for People with Disabilities?
27 Exhibit T
28

- 49 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Watchdog Demands Recusal of Judge Overseeing Activision Case Because Her Son Works for
1
Microsoft Gizmodo Exhibit U
2
Watchdog group calls on judge to recuse in FTC-Microsoft case Washington Post Exhibit V
3
Posner: Most judges regard pro se litigants as 'kind of trash not worth the time' Exhibit W
4

6 CONCLUSION
7 Plaintiffs hereby move to disqualify the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley as the sitting judge in
8 the present case on the grounds of 28 USC Sections 144114 and 455. 15 As set forth in more detail
9 below, this motion is based on evidence contained in the supporting Affidavit of Elizabeth

10
Tigano. This includes Judge Corley’s growing repugnance of self-represented litigatnts as
evidenced above in the above cases unrelated cases 3:23-cv-03776-JSC
11
Tauscher v. Hanshew Case filed: 07/28/2023 and 3:21-cv-09347-JSC
12
Austin v. Riley Case filed: 12/02/2021.
13

14
And more recently disdainfully referring to disabled sisters repreesnting themselves in order
15
Docket 17 Judge Corley holding her nose, Judge Corley friend partner Defendant in this
16 matter Keith Fong to be added same law firm in First Amended Complaint (Keith Fong was
17 a law clerk here in this US District Court before becoming an Alameda County Superior Court
18 Judge).
19

20
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for
darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter
21

22

23 14 In relevant part, section 144 states: “Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and
sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in
24 favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be assigned to hear such
proceeding. The affidavit shall state the facts and the reasons for the belief that bias or prejudice exists, and shall be filed not
25 less than ten days before the beginning of the term at which the proceeding is to be heard, or good cause shall be shown for
failure to file it within such time.”
15 In relevant part, section 455 states: “(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United
26
States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be
27 questioned.
(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:
(1) Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of
28 disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.”

- 50 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 • Woe to unjust judges and to those who issue unfair laws, says the Lord, so that there is no
1
justice for the poor, the widows, and orphans.
2

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27
Plaintiff Mary Bernstein this 22nd day of May, 2024.
28

- 51 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1

3
__________
MARY BERNSTEIN
4
Plaintiff Elizabeth Tigano this 22nd day of May, 2024.
5
_
6

7
ELIZABETH TIGANO
8

9 1 Samuel 17:47 ESV / 1,177

10 And that all this assembly may know that the Lord saves not with sword and spear.
For the battle is the Lord's, and he will give you into our hand.”
11
2 Chronicles 20:15 ESV / 990
12
And he said, “Listen, all Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem and King Jehoshaphat:
13 Thus says the Lord to you, ‘Do not be afraid and do not be dismayed at this great
horde, for the battle is not yours but God's.
14

15 2 Chronicles 32:7 ESV / 581

“Be strong and courageous. Do not be afraid or dismayed before the king of Assyria
16 and all the horde that is with him, for there are more with us than with him.
17
Ephesians 6:12 ESV / 570
18 For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the
authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the
19
spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.
20
Proverbs 21:31 ESV / 511
21
The horse is made ready for the day of battle, but the victory belongs to the Lord.
22
Exodus 14:13-14 ESV / 463
23 And Moses said to the people, “Fear not, stand firm, and see the salvation of the Lord,
24
which he will work for you today. For the Egyptians whom you see today, you shall
never see again. The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”
25
1 Corinthians 15:57 ESV / 461
26
But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.
27
Zechariah 4:6 ESV / 459
28

- 52 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Then he said to me, “This is the word of the Lord to Zerubbabel: Not by might, nor by
1
power, but by my Spirit, says the Lord of hosts.
2
Romans 8:28 ESV / 435
3
And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those
4 who are called according to his purpose.

5 2 Corinthians 10:4 ESV / 433

6
For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy
strongholds.
7
Exodus 15:3 ESV / 426
8
The Lord is a man of war; the Lord is his name.
9
2 Chronicles 20:17 ESV / 423
10 You will not need to fight in this battle. Stand firm, hold your position, and see the
11 salvation of the Lord on your behalf, O Judah and Jerusalem.’ Do not be afraid and do
not be dismayed. Tomorrow go out against them, and the Lord will be with you.”
12
2 Chronicles 20:16 ESV / 418
13
Tomorrow go down against them. Behold, they will come up by the ascent of Ziz. You
14 will find them at the end of the valley, east of the wilderness of Jeruel.
15
Ephesians 6:17 ESV / 411
16 And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,

17 Galatians 5:17 ESV / 408

18
For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are
against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other, to keep you from doing the
19 things you want to do.
20
Isaiah 64:8 ESV / 402
21 But now, O Lord, you are our Father; we are the clay, and you are our potter; we are all
the work of your hand.
22

23 1 Samuel 17:46 ESV / 402

This day the Lord will deliver you into my hand, and I will strike you down and cut off
24 your head. And I will give the dead bodies of the host of the Philistines this day to the
25
birds of the air and to the wild beasts of the earth, that all the earth may know that
there is a God in Israel,
26
2 Corinthians 4:8 ESV / 401
27
We are afflicted in every way, but not crushed; perplexed, but not driven to despair;
28

- 53 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Acts 16:31 ESV / 401
1
And they said, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your
2 household.”
3
2 Chronicles 20:20 ESV / 398
4 And they rose early in the morning and went out into the wilderness of Tekoa. And
when they went out, Jehoshaphat stood and said, “Hear me, Judah and inhabitants of
5 Jerusalem! Believe in the Lord your God, and you will be established; believe his
6
prophets, and you will succeed.”

7 Romans 8:37 ESV / 387

No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us.
8

9 1 Samuel 14:6 ESV / 382

Jonathan said to the young man who carried his armor, “Come, let us go over to the
10 garrison of these uncircumcised. It may be that the Lord will work for us, for nothing
11 can hinder the Lord from saving by many or by few.”

12 Isaiah 31:1 ESV / 380

Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help and rely on horses, who trust in chariots
13
because they are many and in horsemen because they are very strong, but do not look
14 to the Holy One of Israel or consult the Lord!
15
1 Samuel 17:1-58 ESV / 379
16 Now the Philistines gathered their armies for battle. And they were gathered at Socoh,
which belongs to Judah, and encamped between Socoh and Azekah, in Ephes-
17 dammim. And Saul and the men of Israel were gathered, and encamped in the Valley
18
of Elah, and drew up in line of battle against the Philistines. And the Philistines stood
on the mountain on the one side, and Israel stood on the mountain on the other side,
19 with a valley between them. And there came out from the camp of the Philistines a
champion named Goliath of Gath, whose height was six cubits and a span. He had a
20
helmet of bronze on his head, and he was armed with a coat of mail, and the weight of
21 the coat was five thousand shekels of bronze. ...
22
Exodus 14:14 ESV / 376
23 The Lord will fight for you, and you have only to be silent.”

24 James 4:7 ESV / 364

25
Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and he will flee from you.

26 Philippians 4:13 ESV / 356

I can do all things through him who strengthens me.
27

28 2 Kings 20:1-7 ESV / 355

- 54 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 In those days Hezekiah became sick and was at the point of death. And Isaiah the
1
prophet the son of Amoz came to him and said to him, “Thus says the Lord, ‘Set your
2 house in order, for you shall die; you shall not recover.’” Then Hezekiah turned his face
to the wall and prayed to the Lord, saying, “Now, O Lord, please remember how I have
3
walked before you in faithfulness and with a whole heart, and have done what is good
4 in your sight.” And Hezekiah wept bitterly. And before Isaiah had gone out of the
middle court, the word of the Lord came to him: “Turn back, and say to Hezekiah the
5 leader of my people, Thus says the Lord, the God of David your father: I have heard
6
your prayer; I have seen your tears. Behold, I will heal you. On the third day you shall go
up to the house of the Lord, ...
7
2 Kings 19:14-19 ESV / 353
8
Hezekiah received the letter from the hand of the messengers and read it; and
9 Hezekiah went up to the house of the Lord and spread it before the Lord. And
Hezekiah prayed before the Lord and said: “O Lord, the God of Israel, enthroned above
10 the cherubim, you are the God, you alone, of all the kingdoms of the earth; you have
11 made heaven and earth. Incline your ear, O Lord, and hear; open your eyes, O Lord, and
see; and hear the words of Sennacherib, which he has sent to mock the living God.
12 Truly, O Lord, the kings of Assyria have laid waste the nations and their lands and have
cast their gods into the fire, for they were not gods, but the work of men's hands, wood
13
and stone. Therefore they were destroyed. ...
14
Deuteronomy 20:1 ESV / 350
15
“When you go out to war against your enemies, and see horses and chariots and an
16 army larger than your own, you shall not be afraid of them, for the Lord your God is
with you, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt.
17

18
John 10:1-42 ESV / 348
“Truly, truly, I say to you, he who does not enter the sheepfold by the door but climbs in
19 by another way, that man is a thief and a robber. But he who enters by the door is the
shepherd of the sheep. To him the gatekeeper opens. The sheep hear his voice, and
20
he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. When he has brought out all his
21 own, he goes before them, and the sheep follow him, for they know his voice. A
stranger they will not follow, but they will flee from him, for they do not know the voice
22
of strangers.” ...
23
Ecclesiastes 9:11 ESV / 343
24 Again I saw that under the sun the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong,
25
nor bread to the wise, nor riches to the intelligent, nor favor to those with knowledge,
but time and chance happen to them all.
26
1 Samuel 17:37 ESV / 342
27

28

- 55 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 And David said, “The Lord who delivered me from the paw of the lion and from the
1
paw of the bear will deliver me from the hand of this Philistine.” And Saul said to
2 David, “Go, and the Lord be with you!”
3
Exodus 14:13 ESV / 325
4 And Moses said to the people, “Fear not, stand firm, and see the salvation of the Lord,
which he will work for you today. For the Egyptians whom you see today, you shall
5 never see again.
6
Psalm 3:8 ESV / 321
7 Salvation belongs to the Lord; your blessing be on your people! Selah
8
Romans 8:31 ESV / 317
9 What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?

10 1 Corinthians 10:13 ESV / 307

11 No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he
will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also
12 provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it.
13
Ephesians 6:10 ESV / 305
14 Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might.
15
Ephesians 6:1-24 ESV / 301
16 Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. “Honor your father and
mother” (this is the first commandment with a promise), “that it may go well with you
17 and that you may live long in the land.” Fathers, do not provoke your children to anger,
18
but bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord. Bondservants, obey
your earthly masters with fear and trembling, with a sincere heart, as you would Christ,
19 ...
20
Revelation 1:1 ESV / 300
21 The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things
that must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant
22
John,
23
Ephesians 6:13 ESV / 297
24 Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the
25
evil day, and having done all, to stand firm.

26 Deuteronomy 20:4 ESV / 296

For the Lord your God is he who goes with you to fight for you against your enemies,
27
to give you the victory.’
28

- 56 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Joshua 1:9 ESV / 290
1
Have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be frightened, and do
2 not be dismayed, for the Lord your God is with you wherever you go.”
3
Ephesians 6:11 ESV / 289
4 Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of
the devil.
5

6
2 Chronicles 20:12 ESV / 288
O our God, will you not execute judgment on them? For we are powerless against this
7 great horde that is coming against us. We do not know what to do, but our eyes are on
you.”
8

9 Proverbs 3:5 ESV / 287

Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding.
10

11 Psalm 28:7 ESV / 278

The Lord is my strength and my shield; in him my heart trusts, and I am helped; my
12 heart exults, and with my song I give thanks to him.
13
Ephesians 2:8 ESV / 277
14 For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is
the gift of God,
15

16 Isaiah 41:10 ESV / 272

Fear not, for I am with you; be not dismayed, for I am your God; I will strengthen you, I
17 will help you, I will uphold you with my righteous right hand.
18
Romans 13:1 ESV / 267
19 Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority
except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.
20

21 John 1:12 ESV / 267

But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become
22
children of God,
23
Psalm 23:1-6 ESV / 261
24 A Psalm of David. The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want. He makes me lie down in
25
green pastures. He leads me beside still waters. He restores my soul. He leads me in
paths of righteousness for his name's sake. Even though I walk through the valley of
26 the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for you are with me; your rod and your staff,
they comfort me. You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies; you
27
anoint my head with oil; my cup overflows. ...
28

- 57 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 Psalm 44:6-7 ESV / 257
1
For not in my bow do I trust, nor can my sword save me. But you have saved us from
2 our foes and have put to shame those who hate us.
3
Hosea 1:7 ESV / 253
4 But I will have mercy on the house of Judah, and I will save them by the Lord their God.
I will not save them by bow or by sword or by war or by horses or by horsemen.”
5

6
2 Chronicles 20:7 ESV / 247
Did you not, our God, drive out the inhabitants of this land before your people Israel,
7 and give it forever to the descendants of Abraham your friend?
8
2 Chronicles 14:11 ESV / 243
9 And Asa cried to the Lord his God, “O Lord, there is none like you to help, between the
mighty and the weak. Help us, O Lord our God, for we rely on you, and in your name we
10 have come against this multitude. O Lord, you are our God; let not man prevail against
11 you.”

12 Ephesians 6:10-20 ESV / 239

Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might. Put on the whole armor
13
of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. For we do not
14 wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against
the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in
15
the heavenly places. Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able
16 to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand firm. Stand therefore, having
fastened on the belt of truth, and having put on the breastplate of righteousness, ...
17

18
2 Chronicles 20:9 ESV / 230
‘If disaster comes upon us, the sword, judgment, or pestilence, or famine, we will
19 stand before this house and before you—for your name is in this house—and cry out to
you in our affliction, and you will hear and save.’
20

21 Revelation 1:1-20 ESV / 227

The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show to his servants the things
22
that must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant
23 John, who bore witness to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ, even
to all that he saw. Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and
24 blessed are those who hear, and who keep what is written in it, for the time is near.
25
John to the seven churches that are in Asia: Grace to you and peace from him who is
and who was and who is to come, and from the seven spirits who are before his
26 throne, and from Jesus Christ the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the
ruler of kings on earth. To him who loves us and has freed us from our sins by his
27
blood ...
28

- 58 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 2 Corinthians 10:3-5 ESV / 222
1
For though we walk in the flesh, we are not waging war according to the flesh. For the
2 weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy
strongholds. We destroy arguments and every lofty opinion raised against the
3
knowledge of God, and take every thought captive to obey Christ,
4
Psalm 46:10-11 ESV / 220
5 “Be still, and know that I am God. I will be exalted among the nations, I will be exalted
6
in the earth!” The Lord of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our fortress. Selah

7 John 3:16-17 ESV / 216

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him
8
should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the world to
9 condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.

10 2 Chronicles 32:8 ESV / 195

11 With him is an arm of flesh, but with us is the Lord our God, to help us and to fight our
battles.” And the people took confidence from the words of Hezekiah king of Judah.
12
2 Chronicles 20:6 ESV / 192
13
And said, “O Lord, God of our fathers, are you not God in heaven? You rule over all the
14 kingdoms of the nations. In your hand are power and might, so that none is able to
withstand you.
15

16 Psalm 44:5 ESV / 187

Through you we push down our foes; through your name we tread down those who
17 rise up against us.
18
Psalm 20:7 ESV / 186
19 Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the Lord our
God.
20

21 Matthew 16:18 ESV / 184

And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of
22
hell shall not prevail against it.
23
Jeremiah 3:23 ESV / 179
24 Truly the hills are a delusion, the orgies on the mountains. Truly in the Lord our God is
25
the salvation of Israel.

26 1 Samuel 17:48 ESV / 175

When the Philistine arose and came and drew near to meet David, David ran quickly
27
toward the battle line to meet the Philistine.
28

- 59 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 1 Samuel 17:26 ESV / 165
1
And David said to the men who stood by him, “What shall be done for the man who
2 kills this Philistine and takes away the reproach from Israel? For who is this
uncircumcised Philistine, that he should defy the armies of the living God?”
3

4 John 3:16 ESV / 163

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him
5 should not perish but have eternal life.
6
1 John 1:9 ESV / 158
7 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us
from all unrighteousness.
8

9 Psalm 33:17 ESV / 147

The war horse is a false hope for salvation, and by its great might it cannot rescue.
10

11 2 Chronicles 21:1-20 ESV / 147

Jehoshaphat slept with his fathers and was buried with his fathers in the city of David,
12 and Jehoram his son reigned in his place. He had brothers, the sons of Jehoshaphat:
Azariah, Jehiel, Zechariah, Azariah, Michael, and Shephatiah; all these were the sons
13
of Jehoshaphat king of Israel. Their father gave them great gifts of silver, gold, and
14 valuable possessions, together with fortified cities in Judah, but he gave the kingdom
to Jehoram, because he was the firstborn. When Jehoram had ascended the throne of
15
his father and was established, he killed all his brothers with the sword, and also some
16 of the princes of Israel. Jehoram was thirty-two years old when he became king, and
he reigned eight years in Jerusalem. ...
17

18
Romans 12:19 ESV / 145
Beloved, never avenge yourselves, but leave it to the wrath of God, for it is written,
19 “Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord.”
20
2 Chronicles 19:1-11 ESV / 144
21 Jehoshaphat the king of Judah returned in safety to his house in Jerusalem. But Jehu
the son of Hanani the seer went out to meet him and said to King Jehoshaphat,
22
“Should you help the wicked and love those who hate the Lord? Because of this, wrath
23 has gone out against you from the Lord. Nevertheless, some good is found in you, for
you destroyed the Asheroth out of the land, and have set your heart to seek God.”
24 Jehoshaphat lived at Jerusalem. And he went out again among the people, from
25
Beersheba to the hill country of Ephraim, and brought them back to the Lord, the God
of their fathers. He appointed judges in the land in all the fortified cities of Judah, city
26 by city, ...
27
2 Chronicles 20:15-17 ESV / 142
28

- 60 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 And he said, “Listen, all Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem and King Jehoshaphat:
1
Thus says the Lord to you, ‘Do not be afraid and do not be dismayed at this great
2 horde, for the battle is not yours but God's. Tomorrow go down against them. Behold,
they will come up by the ascent of Ziz. You will find them at the end of the valley, east
3
of the wilderness of Jeruel. You will not need to fight in this battle. Stand firm, hold
4 your position, and see the salvation of the Lord on your behalf, O Judah and
Jerusalem.’ Do not be afraid and do not be dismayed. Tomorrow go out against them,
5 and the Lord will be with you.”
6
Psalm 44:6 ESV / 137
7 For not in my bow do I trust, nor can my sword save me.
8
1 Timothy 6:12 ESV / 133
9 Fight the good fight of the faith. Take hold of the eternal life to which you were called
and about which you made the good confession in the presence of many witnesses.
10

11 Psalm 33:16-17 ESV / 132

The king is not saved by his great army; a warrior is not delivered by his great strength.
12 The war horse is a false hope for salvation, and by its great might it cannot rescue.
13
Psalm 91:1-4 ESV / 130
14 He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will abide in the shadow of the Almighty.
I will say to the Lord, “My refuge and my fortress, my God, in whom I trust.” For he will
15
deliver you from the snare of the fowler and from the deadly pestilence. He will cover
16 you with his pinions, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness is a
shield and buckler.
17

18
Romans 12:1 ESV / 126
I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a
19 living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship.
20
Ephesians 6:16 ESV / 118
21 In all circumstances take up the shield of faith, with which you can extinguish all the
flaming darts of the evil one;
22

23 Deuteronomy 31:6 ESV / 117

Be strong and courageous. Do not fear or be in dread of them, for it is the Lord your
24 God who goes with you. He will not leave you or forsake you.”
25
Psalm 24:8 ESV / 112
26 Who is this King of glory? The Lord, strong and mighty, the Lord, mighty in battle!
27
2 Chronicles 20:1-37 ESV / 112
28

- 61 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 After this the Moabites and Ammonites, and with them some of the Meunites, came
1
against Jehoshaphat for battle. Some men came and told Jehoshaphat, “A great
2 multitude is coming against you from Edom, from beyond the sea; and, behold, they
are in Hazazon-tamar” (that is, Engedi). Then Jehoshaphat was afraid and set his face
3
to seek the Lord, and proclaimed a fast throughout all Judah. And Judah assembled
4 to seek help from the Lord; from all the cities of Judah they came to seek the Lord.
And Jehoshaphat stood in the assembly of Judah and Jerusalem, in the house of the
5 Lord, before the new court, ...
6
Proverbs 3:12 ESV / 103
7 For the Lord reproves him whom he loves, as a father the son in whom he delights.
8
2 Corinthians 2:14 ESV / 95
9 But thanks be to God, who in Christ always leads us in triumphal procession, and
through us spreads the fragrance of the knowledge of him everywhere.
10

11 Matthew 16:7 ESV / 95

And they began discussing it among themselves, saying, “We brought no bread.”
12
James 4:6 ESV / 90
13
But he gives more grace. Therefore it says, “God opposes the proud but gives grace to
14 the humble.”
15
Philippians 1:3 ESV / 79
16 I thank my God in all my remembrance of you,

17 Deuteronomy 3:22 ESV / 69

18
You shall not fear them, for it is the Lord your God who fights for you.’

19 Psalm 121:1-8 ESV / 64

A Song of Ascents. I lift up my eyes to the hills. From where does my help come? My
20
help comes from the Lord, who made heaven and earth. He will not let your foot be
21 moved; he who keeps you will not slumber. Behold, he who keeps Israel will neither
slumber nor sleep. The Lord is your keeper; the Lord is your shade on your right hand.
22
...
23
Deuteronomy 1:30 ESV / 60
24 The Lord your God who goes before you will himself fight for you, just as he did for
25
you in Egypt before your eyes,

26 Psalm 46:11 ESV / 54

The Lord of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our fortress. Selah
27

28 1 John 5:4 ESV / 50

- 62 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley

 For everyone who has been born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory
1
that has overcome the world—our faith.
2
John 16:33 ESV / 49
3
I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you will
4 have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world.”

5 Romans 1:13 ESV / 46

6
I do not want you to be unaware, brothers, that I have often intended to come to you
(but thus far have been prevented), in order that I may reap some harvest among you
7 as well as among the rest of the Gentiles.
8
Psalm 46:8 ESV / 46 Helpful Not Helpful
9 Come, behold the works of the Lord, how he has brought desolations on the earth.

10 1 Peter 5:8 ESV / 37

11 Be sober-minded; be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring
lion, seeking someone to devour.
12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 63 –

Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Jacqueline Scott Corley