DP Global Politics Guide (First Teaching 2026)
DP Global Politics Guide (First Teaching 2026)
The International Baccalaureate Organization (known as the IB) offers four high-quality
and challenging educational programmes for a worldwide community of schools, aiming
to create a better, more peaceful world. This publication is one of a range of materials
produced to support these programmes.
The IB may use a variety of sources in its work and check information to verify accuracy
and authenticity, particularly when using community-based knowledge sources such as
Wikipedia. The IB respects the principles of intellectual property and makes strenuous
efforts to identify and obtain permission before publication from rights holders of all
copyright material used. The IB is grateful for permissions received for material used
in this publication and will be pleased to correct any errors or omissions at the earliest
opportunity.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the IB’s prior written
permission, or as expressly permitted by the Rules for use of IB Intellectual Property.
To this end the organization works with schools, governments and international organizations to develop
challenging programmes of international education and rigorous assessment.
These programmes encourage students across the world to become active, compassionate and lifelong
learners who understand that other people, with their differences, can also be right.
IB learner profile
profile IB learner
arner profile IB le
ile IB learner prof
IB learner profile H E IB L E AR
N
ER
er profile IB learn
PROFILE
IB learner profile
The aim of all IB programmes is to develop internationally minded people who, recognizing their common
humanity and shared guardianship of the planet, help to create a better and more peaceful world.
As IB learners we strive to be:
We nurture our curiosity, developing skills for inquiry and We critically appreciate our own cultures and personal histories,
research. We know how to learn independently and with others. as well as the values and traditions of others. We seek and evaluate
We learn with enthusiasm and sustain our love of learning a range of points of view, and we are willing to grow from the
throughout life. experience.
We develop and use conceptual understanding, exploring We show empathy, compassion and respect. We have a
knowledge across a range of disciplines. We engage with issues commitment to service, and we act to make a positive difference
and ideas that have local and global significance. in the lives of others and in the world around us.
We use critical and creative thinking skills to analyse and take We approach uncertainty with forethought and determination;
responsible action on complex problems. We exercise initiative in we work independently and cooperatively to explore new ideas
making reasoned, ethical decisions. and innovative strategies. We are resourceful and resilient in the
face of challenges and change.
We express ourselves confidently and creatively in more than one
language and in many ways. We collaborate effectively, listening We understand the importance of balancing different aspects of
carefully to the perspectives of other individuals and groups. our lives—intellectual, physical, and emotional—to achieve
well-being for ourselves and others. We recognize our interde-
pendence with other people and with the world in which we live.
We act with integrity and honesty, with a strong sense of
fairness and justice, and with respect for the dignity and rights We thoughtfully consider the world and our own ideas and expe-
of people everywhere. We take responsibility for our actions rience. We work to understand our strengths and weaknesses in
and their consequences. order to support our learning and personal development.
The IB learner profile represents 10 attributes valued by IB World Schools. We believe these attributes, and others
like them, can help individuals and groups become responsible members of local, national and global communities.
Introduction 1
About this publication 1
About the IB 2
About the Diploma Programme 3
Syllabus 28
Syllabus outline 28
Syllabus structure 29
Syllabus content 35
Assessment 57
Assessment in the Diploma Programme and Career-related Programme 57
Assessment outline—SL 60
Assessment outline—HL 61
External assessment 62
Internal assessment 69
Appendices 76
Glossary of command terms 76
Bibliography 77
This resource guides the planning, learning, teaching and assessment of the International Baccalaureate (IB)
global politics course. Teachers and students are the primary audiences. This publication, along with
additional support materials, subject reports and grade descriptors, can be found on the subject page of
the Programme Resource Centre at resources.ibo.org. It can also be purchased from the IB store at
store.ibo.org.
Prior learning
The global politics course requires no specific prior learning. No particular background in terms of specific
subjects studied for national or international qualifications is expected or required. The skills needed for the
course are developed within the course itself.
Additional resources
Additional publications, such as specimen papers and markschemes, teacher support materials (TSM),
subject reports and grade descriptors, can also be found on the Programme Resource Centre. Past
examination papers as well as markschemes can be purchased from the IB store. Teachers are encouraged
to engage with official IB online communities to find and share resources used and created by other
teachers.
Acknowledgement
The IB wishes to thank the educators, experts and schools who generously contributed time and resources
to the production of this guide.
About the IB
The DP is a rigorous pre-university course of study designed for students in the 16 to 19 age range. It is a
broad-based two-year course that aims to encourage students to be not only knowledgeable and inquiring
but also caring and compassionate. There is a strong emphasis on encouraging students to develop
intercultural understanding, open-mindedness and the attitudes necessary for them to respect and
evaluate a range of points of view.
Figure 1
Diploma Programme model
Academic integrity
Academic integrity in the DP is a set of values and behaviours informed by the attributes of the learner
profile. In teaching, learning and assessment, academic integrity serves to promote personal integrity,
engender respect for the integrity of others and their work, and ensure that all students have an equal
opportunity to demonstrate the knowledge and skills they acquire during their studies.
All coursework—including work submitted for assessment—is to be authentic, based on the student’s
individual and original ideas, with the ideas and work of others fully acknowledged. Assessment tasks that
require teachers to provide guidance to students or that require students to work collaboratively must be
completed in full compliance with the detailed guidelines provided by the IB for the relevant subjects.
For further information on academic integrity in the IB and the DP, please consult the IB publications
Academic integrity policy, Effective citing and referencing, Diploma Programme: From principles into practice
and the “General regulations” section in the Diploma Programme Assessment procedures. Specific
information regarding academic integrity as it pertains to external assessment and internal assessment (IA)
components of this DP subject can be found in this guide.
method, such as indentation) followed by an appropriate citation that denotes an entry in the bibliography.
If an electronic source is cited, the date of access must be indicated. Students are not expected to show
faultless expertise in referencing, but they are expected to demonstrate that all sources have been
acknowledged. Students must be advised that audiovisual material, text, graphs, images and/or data
published in print or in electronic sources that is not their own must also attribute the source. Again, an
appropriate style of referencing/citation must be used.
Global politics
Global politics is a course for students who want to understand more about how the world they live in
works, what makes it change, or what prevents it from changing. The course draws on a variety of
disciplinary traditions in the study of politics and international relations, and more broadly in the social
sciences and humanities. Students build their knowledge and understanding by critically engaging with
contemporary political issues and challenges that interest them.
The scope of global politics extends over a wide range of topics and areas of study, many of which will find
links with other subjects in the individuals and societies group. Students develop their understanding of
political concepts and their knowledge of specific content by exploring and researching real-world case
studies and examples.
Developing an understanding of power is critical for analysing how political systems work and how they
change. Global politics students encounter the complexity and nuances of power from the beginning of the
course. They build their understanding of how power works across multiple and interconnected
dimensions, affecting the everyday lives of people around the world.
Figure 2
Inquiry in global politics
• Concepts such as power, sovereignty, legitimacy and interdependence are explored and examined
critically throughout the course.
• Content informs inquiries through a variety of global politics topics encompassing, among other
areas, political systems, actors and stakeholders, power interactions, specific treaties and conventions,
relevant terminology and analysis models.
• Contexts diversify, shape and channel inquiries through contemporary real-world examples and
cases.
The teacher support material (TSM) includes an extended explanation about inquiry in the global politics
course.
while facilitating comparison between the levels. Throughout the course, teachers can choose relevant
examples and case studies to ensure that the course appropriately meets their students’ needs and
interests, regardless of their location or cultural context.
The course also enables students to reach an awareness and appreciation of both their own civic
responsibility at a local level, and their shared responsibility as citizens of an increasingly interconnected
world. The inclusion of an engagement project in the course reflects the importance given not only to
appreciating and understanding the complex issues facing the world today but also to engaging with them
in an active and personal way.
TOK concepts The 12 TOK concepts strongly resonate with the nature and study of global
politics.
Power, perspective, responsibility, truth, values, culture—these are central
concepts to discussions in the global politics course.
Evidence, certainty, interpretation, justification, explanation, objectivity—
these are essential elements for skills and assessment in global politics.
The core theme “Knowledge and the knower”: As political actors themselves, students are
encouraged to examine critically the underlying assumptions of their own
knowledge, beliefs and opinions, as well as those of others.
Optional themes Links to the theme of “knowledge and politics” can be extensively explored
throughout the course and serve as a critical perspective when analysing
political issues in the course.
Areas of knowledge Human sciences: Critical examination of how knowledge is constructed and
acquired in human sciences in general and in global politics in particular.
Examples of questions related to theory of knowledge (TOK) that global politics students might consider
include the following.
• How does knowledge in the social sciences differ from knowledge in other areas?
• How does knowledge in global politics differ from knowledge in some other social science disciplines,
such as history, economics and geography?
• How does the often deeply held nature of political beliefs and biases affect the acquisition of
knowledge in global politics?
• What are the benefits and difficulties of examining political issues against the backdrop of a certain
theoretical foundation or ideology?
• Why might the value of case studies as a method of acquiring knowledge be considered questionable?
• Can we have political beliefs or knowledge that are independent of our cultures?
• Why might some individuals or groups believe that they know what is right for others?
• How do we decide between the opinions of experts when they disagree? Who are the experts in
global politics?
• What is the role of communication and media in shaping people’s perception of issues in global
politics?
• Is it ever justifiable to make political decisions based on knowledge that is not fully supported?
An extended development of these links can be found in the TSM, including suggested activities for
integrating TOK into the global politics course.
An extended discussion of the links between global politics and CAS around community engagement is
available in the TSM.
An extended discussion of the possible ways for students to explore independent inquiries in global
politics, including their EE, is available in the TSM.
Aims
Assessment alignment
Assessment objectives are aligned with assessment components as indicated in the table below.
The approaches to learning and approaches to teaching in the global politics course offer innumerable
opportunities to help develop students’ learner profile attributes. The table below outlines some examples
of these as they relate to each attribute.
Inquirers We nurture our Exploration of and inquiry into the complex, continuously
curiosity, developing changing world that we inhabit and share with others is at the
skills for inquiry and very core of global politics.
research. We know how • Throughout the course, students research and debate a
to learn independently variety of perspectives on significant global political issues
and with others. We and on issues they personally care about.
learn with enthusiasm
• The engagement project gives students the opportunity
and sustain our love of
to explore actively a political issue of their own choice in a
learning throughout life.
non-classroom context.
• The flexible syllabus and engagement project allow
students to choose and research cases of particular
interest to them. Students will be better equipped to
become active citizens by going through such processes
of inquiry.
Knowledgeable We develop and use The global politics course focuses on key concepts and themes,
conceptual like power, legitimacy, interdependence, sovereignty. These
understanding, underpin the subject and help students to build a holistic,
exploring knowledge nuanced understanding of global politics.
across a range of • The course gives students the opportunity to explore
disciplines. We engage ideas and issues that are of both local and global
with issues and ideas significance. For example, at HL there is an opportunity to
that have local and study two major global political challenges.
global significance.
• The course is grounded in contemporary, real-life
examples and case studies.
• The course also draws on a variety of disciplines in the
humanities and social sciences, reflecting the complex
nature of many political issues.
Thinkers We use critical and The DP emphasizes the development of higher-order thinking
creative thinking skills skills. In the global politics course, the combination of key
to analyse and take concepts and related themes helps develop students’
responsible action on understanding of wider phenomena in human societies, and
complex problems. We how these relate to political issues. They are encouraged to
exercise initiative in recognize the complexity of real-world political problems and
making reasoned, to consider a variety of perspectives on, and solutions to, these
ethical decisions. issues.
The global politics course helps to develop thinking skills that
enable students to be flexible and adaptive in their thought
project and case studies in the HL extension, allow each global politics course and experience to be
different, reflecting the contextual nature of politics.
Examples of contextualized teaching approaches and activities in global politics include:
• a weekly news briefing in class, where current local and/or global news is discussed and connected
with the key concepts and theories being studied
• extensive, research-based analyses of contemporary political issues debated at various levels of global
politics
• drawing on students’ backgrounds, experiences and interests
• individual students becoming “experts” on a territory, issue or theme over time; teachers can then
draw on this expertise in specific situations for the benefit of the whole class
• participating in a virtual student community where the same political issues are explored by students
from different parts of the world
• real-life learning experiences, especially the engagement project.
for them to develop, pursue and achieve realistic and motivational learning goals. In the context of an IB
education, special consideration often needs to be given to students’ language backgrounds and skills.
Affirming students’ identity and valuing their prior knowledge are important aspects of treating students as
unique individuals and helping them develop holistically as young adults.
In the global politics course, multiple perspectives can often be found most naturally in the classroom.
Different students are interested in different political issues. Their beliefs and positions on the same political
issue differ, and they are differently placed to help their classmates understand a certain key concept,
theory, idea or example. Teachers should identify and draw on this richness in their planning and teaching.
The activities in the engagement project and the case study research in the HL extended inquiries allow for
differentiated learning and more individualized guidance.
A challenge of differentiation may be how best to help all students acquire a conceptual understanding of
global politics—arguably the most challenging aspect of the course, especially for second-language
learners and learners more oriented towards concrete examples rather than abstract thinking. Here, a
variety of approaches to the key concepts throughout the course is likely to be most helpful. It will also be
important to be alert from the beginning to students who are struggling with the conceptual layers, and
look for ways to help them on a more individualized or small-group basis.
Examples of teaching approaches and activities differentiated to meet the needs of all learners in global
politics include:
• a variety of teaching approaches, learning activities and examples intended to reach each student
meaningfully several times over the course
• student choice in approaches and activities, such as the freedom to explain terms or key concepts in
ways that resonate with students, the freedom to select sources in research, and the freedom to use
preferred media and methods by which students can communicate their learning
• drawing on students’ backgrounds, experiences and interests
• individual students becoming “experts” on a territory, issue or theme over time, with teaching drawing
on these experts in specific situations, for the benefit of the whole class
• individualized support in research-based work.
Research skills
Research skills are a central element of the inquiry-based pedagogy of IB programmes. While good research
skills have always been at the centre of academic endeavour, the availability of digital resources and the
explosion in the amount of information easily accessible to students mean that developing these skills is
particularly pertinent to today’s education. Also, learning to work in a way that demonstrates academic
integrity and respects others’ intellectual contributions is an important aspect of learning in all IB
programmes.
Fundamental research skills include formulating focused and precise research questions, appraising
sources, recording, analysing, evaluating and synthesizing information, and presenting and evaluating
results. These skills are as critical in the age of digital research as they have been in the past. Indeed,
research today requires even greater validation, comparison and contrasting of available information:
narrowing down increasing volumes of data into manageable quantities that are relevant to the research
question.
Modern students are confident in browsing and communicating online but often lack the information
literacy skills needed for the kind of effective and self-directed research they are expected to do as part of
their inquiries. In the global politics course, they have ample opportunities to develop their research skills.
As a course intrinsically about current affairs, the key concepts, theories and ideas are grounded in local and
global examples. As such, students need to engage in varied research, depending on the type and
geography of the political issue they examine for any given task. They are exposed to various types of
media and encounter sources with varying degrees of reliability.
There is no stationary body of global politics knowledge that could be studied from a single textbook.
Instead, the course’s summative assessment tasks, and the types of activities that lend themselves to
learning about continuously evolving political issues, require engagement with the world through wide,
continuous and up-to-date research. The self-selected case studies of the HL extension are one of the best
opportunities in the DP to do in-depth research, as are EEs in global politics.
Example approaches and activities that develop students’ research skills in the global politics course
include:
• modelling by the teacher of effective research skills and solid academic practices that also
demonstrate academic integrity
• individual research-based essays, papers, reports and presentations, with adequate guidance from
teachers on aspects such as finding, using and referencing appropriate sources
• group research tasks, where each student studies one aspect of a full phenomenon and the group
compiles this as a resource booklet for other students at the end of the exercise
• preparatory and ongoing research for simulations, games, debates, role-plays and the IA engagement
project.
Communication skills
Communication skills are important in IB programmes for success in school disciplines and they are an
essential part of a wider positive dynamic in the learning community: they help to form and maintain good
relationships between students, and between students and adults. Furthermore, good communication
contributes to the development of students’ self-confidence and enhances their future prospects because
communication skills are a critical ingredient of success in working life. They help students reach outside
themselves and connect to others.
Communication skills consist of a cluster of different skills and forms of communication, including the
ability to:
• listen to and understand a range of spoken messages
• read and understand diverse written texts and other forms of media
• respond clearly and convincingly in spoken, written and digital form.
Some of these forms of communication are independent of era and culture. In this century, interacting with
and within the digital space is a significant part of communication and social interaction for most students.
Online activities present ample and stimulating opportunities to develop students’ communication skills:
they are often collaborative in nature and have much creative potential via new previously inconceivable
tasks.
In the global politics course, all these communication skills are practised and developed. Examining
complex political issues invites dialogue, discussion and debate but also requires reflective engagement
with arguments and views expressed in academic literature, popular opinion and news media. When
students write and present on political issues, ideas and concepts, their own arguments and beliefs are
clarified. Essays, reports, shorter writing tasks and oral presentations are often the assessable end outcome
of a learning sequence, and make up students’ summative assessment in global politics.
Examples of approaches and activities that develop students’ communication skills in global politics
include:
• practising various oral communication techniques, such as: Socratic discussions, seminars, student-led
discussions, formal debates, classroom practice where students are required to respond to a point just
made, group and individual presentations, using a variety of presentation formats
• purposeful use of digital tools in enriching understanding of global politics and improving
communication and feedback in the class community, such as virtual learning environments, polls,
data tools expert talks, student-created videos
• workshop-style writing classes for various writing styles, with an emphasis on conceptual essays
• enabling students to practise taking on roles through, for example, role-plays and games, followed by
reflection on the reality, benefits and drawbacks of roles in global politics and in social life in general.
Social skills
Closely related to communication skills are social skills, whose importance in IB programmes relates to the
development of the learner as an individual within a complex and changing society, and the value of
community in learning to develop the social skills necessary for this. As a fundamental community in young
people’s lives, school can play a significant role in the development of their social and emotional skills. The
inherent social nature of school helps students appreciate their contributions to humankind and connect
these with others’ contributions. This is one of the most valuable life skills an educational community can
help to develop.
The ability to understand the perspectives of others, to form good relationships and to regulate one’s own
emotions and behaviour are essential to the IB learner profile and the IB’s aspiration to develop
internationally minded students. From the perspective of learning, the ability to collaborate is a particularly
important social skill. The role of and potential for collaboration in global politics is addressed in the section
“Promoting effective teamwork and collaboration”.
A starting point for developing students’ social skills is to acknowledge that people differ greatly in their
degree of introversion and extroversion, and that these differences should be respected. Similarly, different
cultures have different expectations of appropriate behaviours in social situations.
Self-management skills
In addition to developing life skills in their interactions with others, IB learners also need to learn to
persevere and be emotionally stable as individuals. Often these two processes go hand in hand, as
membership and support of a community is critical for individual well-being. For students, learning to
manage themselves is essential in a demanding educational programme like the DP. This will also serve
them in their later adult lives, with all the additional complexities and responsibilities this brings.
Self-management skills consist of organization skills, such as setting goals and managing time and tasks
effectively, and affective skills, such as managing one’s state of mind, motivation and resilience. Like other
learning skills, these can be modelled and practised.
For DP students, time management is a particularly pertinent organization skill. Strategies for improving
time management include breaking down assignments into achievable steps and timelining each step,
planning revision and study sessions for tests and examinations, and building study timetables. A positive
aspect of such strategies is not only what they factually achieve with students’ use of time, but that they
also give students greater control over their time.
Affective self-management skills enable students to gain some control over their mood, their motivation
and their ability to deal with setbacks and difficulties. A school environment where students feel they have
a degree of autonomy and self-direction, and where they do not need to get everything right the first time,
will support the development of students’ affective skills. Setting challenging but not overly difficult
objectives, and promoting psychological techniques such as mindfulness training, can also be helpful in
this regard. Note, too, that the course can teach students much about affective skills when they study
inspirational individuals at all levels of global politics.
In DP global politics, students have a more open-ended course than in many other DP subjects and they
need to come to terms with this open-endedness. On the one hand, they have the opportunity to focus on
issues of particular interest to them, which can be highly motivating. On the other hand, they must conduct
their inquiries in the context of the course framework, always returning to the key concepts but also being
sure to move on and cover all course requirements. Teachers, of course, will guide them in this process.
Examples of approaches and activities that develop students’ self-management skills in global politics
include:
• establishing clear deadlines, managing expectations and specifying consequences if these are not met
• consistent attention to study techniques, such as time management, note-taking, mind mapping,
digital behaviour
• student choice on when to seek teacher or peer support
• self-reflection on progress, such as start–stop–continue, use of tracking tools for longer term
assignments, written reflections.
Syllabus outline
SL HL
The recommended teaching time is 150 hours to complete standard level (SL) courses and 240 hours to
complete higher level (HL) courses, as stated in the publication Diploma Programme Assessment procedures.
Syllabus structure
The SL and HL syllabus comprises four interconnected components, each with specific prescribed content:
the global politics core topics and three thematic studies.
Figure 3
Global politics integrated syllabus
The core topics encompass wide overarching elements that are central to the study of the subject.
Meanwhile each of the thematic studies presents a particular focus and provides additional conceptual and
analytical tools. As figure 3 shows, rather than thinking of each component as an independent unit,
educators and students are invited to take an integrated approach in engaging with the syllabus.
Establishing connections across the syllabus will contribute to a deeper understanding of global politics.
The content of the guide is necessarily organized and ordered into discrete sections, aligning with the four
components. Nevertheless, there is no prescribed order in which the syllabus sections must be studied, nor
is there any expectation for the topics to be covered in specific units in a linear manner. The flexible syllabus
structure allows—and aims to encourage—educators to build the course around their students’ contexts
and interests, and contemporary events and developments in global politics. Teachers and students can
select specific political issues and cases, within which they explore and develop their understanding of
topics and prescribed content.
• Building the course around targeted global issues, selected case studies or particular contexts that are
of interest to their students, and integrating the prescribed content from both the core topics and
thematic studies that is most relevant in each case.
The teacher support material (TSM) includes further guidance on the possibilities for structuring the course.
The purpose of the core topics is to articulate some of the overarching elements of the subject in an
integrated way. When exploring each thematic study, it is important to consider the specific ways the core
topics and the key concepts can be linked with the prescribed content. For instance:
• sovereignty will have different implications for rights and justice than for development and
sustainability
• legitimacy in peace and conflict might be considered differently than when it is studied in the context
of development and sustainability.
Likewise, each of the types of actors and stakeholders listed in the core topics may take different roles
depending on the theme being studied.
Figure 4
Example syllabus extract
In the syllabus extract shown in figure 4, the first column details the prescribed topics. The second details
prescribed content, indicating specific subtopics, items or aspects expected to be covered. For example,
when covering the United Nations (UN), it is particularly important to examine the General Assembly and
the Security Council.
Note that:
• all content included as prescribed topics or prescribed content may be addressed directly in
examination questions
• any other topics or elements not mentioned explicitly in the prescribed content can be covered and
addressed throughout the course, e.g. alternative classifications of power, or different types of
stakeholders. These allow global politics students to explore areas of personal interest or areas that
may be more relevant to their context.
The prescribed topics and prescribed content are accompanied by a third column of supporting details. In
addition to possible examples, this will include further guidance and clarifications that may help teachers
gain a better understanding of what is expected to be covered in some topics or some important
conceptual or content considerations. For example, “institutions” and “institutional factors” might be
understood as having a wider meaning than “formal organizations”.
The list of examples included in the guide is complemented with a more extensive list in the TSM, as well as
planners that list the examples and case studies used by educators in their structure of the course.
So, for students, defining an interesting contemporary political issue in the wider, real-world situation they
are studying is often an early and key step in making progress with their understanding of global politics.
This is particularly important to facilitate the connections between the core topics and thematic studies, to
determine an appropriate reflective focus for the internal assessment (IA) engagement project, and for HL
students to conduct their extended inquiries into the global political challenges.
Concepts
Integrating political content and topics revolves around a set of key concepts that are central to the study
of global politics: power, sovereignty, legitimacy and interdependence. These weave a conceptual
thread through the course and facilitate connections between topics and also with other subjects. Even
when not explicitly addressed, these key concepts are related to most of the prescribed content of the
course and are central to the analysis of political issues.
The table briefly explains the key concepts and their importance to the course. The “Initial guidance”
column should be taken as a starting point only. The definitions of each key concept and their relationship
to the study of global politics are subject to debate and should be treated as contestable. A significant part
of the learning in the course will come from discussions on how these concepts are understood, interpreted
and prioritized in different contexts or by a diverse range of stakeholders.
Power Power is a central concept in the study of global politics and a key focus of the
course. Power can be seen as an ability to effect change. Rather than being viewed as
a unitary or independent force, it can also be seen as an aspect of relations among
people functioning within a social organization. Contested relationships between
people and groups of people dominate politics, particularly in this era of increased
globalization. Understanding the dynamics of power therefore plays a central role in
understanding global politics.
Sovereignty Sovereignty characterizes a state’s independence, its control over territory and its
ability to govern itself. How states use their sovereign power is at the centre of many
important issues in global politics. Some theorists argue that sovereign power is
increasingly being eroded by aspects of globalization such as borderless
communication and trade, which states cannot fully control. Others argue that
sovereign states exercise a great deal of power when acting in their national interest,
and that this is unlikely to change.
Legitimacy Legitimacy refers to an actor or an action that is commonly considered acceptable to
a population. It provides the fundamental rationale for all forms of governance and
other ways of exercising power.
The most accepted contemporary form of state legitimacy is some form of
democracy or constitutionalism, whereby the governed have a defined and periodic
opportunity to choose who governs and exercises power. In states where this is not
the norm, other sources of legitimacy might be expressed, such as hereditary or
traditional leadership.
Within any proposed framework of legitimacy, individual actions by a state can be
considered legitimate to a greater or lesser extent. Other actors in global politics, and
their behaviour, can also be evaluated from the perspective of legitimacy. Evaluation
can be based on the acceptance or recognition these actors are given by others in
exercising certain roles or taking specific decisions.
Interdependence In global politics, the concept of interdependence most often refers to the mutual
reliance between and among groups, organizations, geographic areas and/or states
on access to resources that sustain living arrangements. Often, this mutual reliance is
economic (e.g. trade), but it can also have a security dimension (e.g. defence
Many other political concepts merit consideration and are examined as part of the course. Some of these
are presented in the “Contested meanings” within each table the “Thematic studies” area of the syllabus.
An extended exploration of conceptual understanding in the global politics course can be found in the
TSM.
An extended list of possible examples to illustrate the prescribed content can be found in the TSM.
Supporting details
In the “Supporting details” column of the syllabus, an initial list of possible examples is presented for each
part of the core topics and thematic studies, along with further guidance. Note the following in particular.
• These examples are intended purely as a starting point: as support and inspiration for teachers
and students. For many topics, local and/or current examples will be more appropriate than
those suggested in this guide.
• For most topics, more possible examples are listed than are expected to be covered during the
course.
Many of the possible examples are formulated as subtopics through which the prescribed content might be
approached, and some examples additionally refer to specific models, actors and events. The listed
examples illustrate a breadth of possibilities and are intended to point towards some possible directions in
which to guide inquiries. It is emphasized that any examples that bring to life the prescribed content and
key concepts can be explored.
An extended exploration of how to engage with diverse contexts can be found in the TSM.
Syllabus content
Framing global Stakeholders and actors The inclusion of “stakeholders” alongside “actors”
politics • States suggests that, in many cases, political issues affect
Systems and individuals and groups that may not possess the
• Subnational and local
interactions in agency or means to act—i.e. exercise power—in a
governments
global politics particular situation. As such, they might not be
• Intergovernmental analysed as “actors” per se. Nevertheless, all affected
organizations (IGOs) stakeholders should be considered when studying
• Organized civil society political issues.
(including non- When addressing political issues, the structure and
governmental dynamics of political systems should be considered,
organizations (NGOs)) and how these regulate the interactions and possible
• Private actors/ courses of action of political actors. Similar types of
companies actors in diverse contexts or systems may have
• Social movements drastically different power and legitimacy. For
example, private companies in North America and Asia
• Resistance movements
might be perceived differently, as might organized
• Political parties
civil society in Latin America and in Europe.
• Interest and pressure
Particular rules, norms and institutions that regulate
groups
interactions between political actors are also
• Political leaders considered because they ultimately shape or limit
• Formal and informal possible approaches to political issues; or may in some
political forums cases be the source of these.
• The media Institutions encompass formalized organizations or
• Other individual and agencies and also any social structures of rules and
collective actors norms that shape—and constrain—individual and
collective behaviour.
Systems—structures and
dynamics
Legal frameworks, norms and
institutions
Power in global Definitions and ways of Students should engage critically with a variety of
politics understanding power definitions and approaches to the concept of power. It
is important that any definitions considered are
discussed and evaluated throughout the course.
• Some authors and thinkers whose views on
power might be useful to consider could include:
• Hannah Arendt, Michel Foucault, Antonio
Gramsci, Bell Hooks, Eric Liu, Steven Lukes, John
• Hard, soft and smart Rather than merely listing these classifications or
power defining them abstractly, students should familiarize
themselves with the classifications and try to use them
• Structural and relational
when they are relevant in analysing real-world
power
examples and cases. They might evaluate their
• Economic, political, advantages and limitations as analysis tools or
social and cultural examine their similarities or links.
power
• Hard power (coercion)—e.g. military
• Power to, power over, interventions, economic sanctions
power with
• Soft power (persuasion)—e.g. cultural influence,
ideology, economic aid
• Smart power (an eclectic combination of hard
and soft power, depending on aims)—e.g.
approaches to climate change, negotiations
• Structural power—e.g. UN Security Council
membership, heads of state
• Relational power—e.g. alliances, collective civil
movements
Sovereignty in Nature of state sovereignty The nature of state sovereignty should be examined in
global politics • Traditional and modern the light of the three thematic studies. Areas to
notions of state consider could include:
sovereignty • the Westphalian conception of state sovereignty
• Sources of sovereignty • possession and use of force
• Internal and external • international law and norms
dimensions of • recognition by other states due to considerations
sovereignty of economics and balance of power
• consent (or lack thereof) of the governed through
political participation.
Challenges to state Assessing what constitutes a challenge to state
sovereignty sovereignty may depend on which notions of
sovereignty are examined. Areas to consider could
include:
• increased global interdependence, influence or
interference from other states, supranationality,
humanitarian intervention
• indigenous national claims and alternative
notions of sovereignty, transnational cultural
groups, nationalist movements, violent non-state
actors, influence of transnational companies
(TNCs).
Legitimacy in Sources of state legitimacy, The complex distinction between state legitimacy and
global politics including government the legitimacy of a particular government should be
legitimacy considered when analysing political issues.
The links and distinctions between sovereignty and
legitimacy are of particular importance as well.
Sources of state and government legitimacy to
consider could include:
• history
• ideology
• national identity
• leadership recognition
• government performance
• free and fair elections
• representation
• consent of governed people
• transparency
• citizen welfare
• order and stability
• economic, political, and social development
• sustained development
• international recognition
• quality of governance.
Challenges to state and When addressing challenges to state legitimacy,
government legitimacy students should consider both challenges from within
the state and from external stakeholders. Areas to
consider could include:
• political, economic, and social instability
• inability to govern effectively
• inability to ensure well-being of citizens
• excessive use of force, threat
• violence, oppression, human rights violations.
Sources of legitimacy of non- Strong emphasis should be placed on the legitimacy
state actors of non-state actors, not only from and towards
governments but also in connection to other actors.
Areas to consider could include:
• representation—how representative they are of
the interests of groups in society
• interaction—how they relate to other state and
non-state actors
• ability—what means they may have of exerting
influence
• efficacy—to what extent they can achieve goals
or intended outcomes.
Legitimation processes and Legitimacy is not a fixed condition for political actors.
loss of legitimacy of political It can be gained, strengthened, reduced or lost,
actors depending on actions, interactions and outcomes
among and between different political actors and
stakeholders. Areas to consider could include:
• formal recognition processes established by an
actor in an authority role (“top down”)
• self-legitimation strategies by political actors
• organic recognition gained from stakeholders or
audiences
• (de)legitimation strategies by opposing or
alternative political actors.
Interdependence Global governance and The distinction between “government” and
in global politics international law “governance” should be examined, as well as the
difference between the scope, nature and dynamic of
national and international law.
Examples—UN Security Council resolutions, climate
change agenda, Basel accords on financial regulation,
World Trade Organization (WTO) trade agreements,
regional decision-making mechanisms.
Sources of international law—treaties, international
custom, general widely recognized principles of law,
decisions of international, national and regional
courts, scholarly writings.
The UN Particular examples of other UN committees, agencies
Achievements and limitations and programmes, as well as their roles, achievements
of the UN and limitations, should be examined in the light of
each of the thematic studies. Examples include:
General structure, roles and
functions of the UN, including • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
the UN Charter, General • United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC)
Assembly and Security • International Court of Justice (ICJ).
Council
Participation of IGOs and The role of multiple diverse actors and stakeholders in
non-state actors in global global governance should be examined.
governance • Regional organizations, e.g. African Union (AU),
Cooperation and competition Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN),
between political actors European Union (EU), Mercosur
Treaties, collective security, • Organizations with specific scope and functions,
strategic alliances, economic e.g. Commonwealth of Learning (COL), Digital
cooperation Nations (DN), International Energy Agency (IEA),
Global interactions and Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting
networks Countries (OPEC)
• Treaties, e.g. Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT),
Montreal Protocol
• Collective security, e.g. North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO), Organization of American
States (OAS)
• Responses to
violations of rights
and perceived
injustices
Debates on … • Politicization of rights • Globalization and • Justifications of
and justice development violence in conflict
• Claims on individual • Sustainable • Legitimacy of non-
and collective rights development violent and violent
• Universal and relative • Alternative views on protests
rights development and • Effectiveness of
sustainability peacebuilding efforts
• Peacebuilding, including
reconciliation processes
and justice institutions
Debates on peace • Justifications of violence • Demonstrations, civil disobedience, violent
and conflict in conflict, including protests, guerrilla warfare, terrorism, genocide,
cultural, legal and arms proliferation, nuclear deterrence
religious justifications
• Legitimacy of non-
violent and violent
protests
• Effectiveness of
peacebuilding efforts
Figure 5
Possible engagement project workflow
learn about this meaningfully through activities, such as becoming involved with a human rights NGO
working with immigrant women from that part of the world.
During their engagement project, students should consider a wide collection of perspectives, from their
research sources to the stakeholders and actors they plan to engage with in their activities. The table below
outlines further examples of the kinds of engagements, and the political issues embedded in them, that are
likely to lend themselves to meaningful and successful engagement activities in global politics. Teachers
and students are free to choose their own topics: the topics listed here only serve as examples.
How does the nature of democracy • Attendance at the full meeting of a city council, followed by
impact the representation of women in interviews with two of its female councillors
politics? • Campaigning with a city councillor in support of a female
candidate running for the national parliament
• Attendance at a conference to hear a speech by a female
member of parliament opposed to quotas for women in
politics
• Participation in a group discussion with a female
government minister
How legitimate and effective are the • Preparation and performance of street theatre on the theme
strategies employed by NGOs in of women’s rights in country A for NGO B
improving women’s rights in country A, • Interviews with women from country A involved in NGO B’s
compared with the legitimacy and work
effectiveness of an outside military
intervention?
What are the impacts of “voluntarism” • Three-week stay and work at a “voluntarism” school in
on the local and national development country C
of country C? • Interviews with the school’s representatives and other local
stakeholders
• Discussions with students and parents
What are the strengths and weaknesses • Participation in a question-and-answer session at
of international law when applied to international criminal courts D and E
the concept of personal responsibility • Observation of a trial against a war criminal at court D
for war crimes and crimes against
• Preparation and participation in a mock war crimes trial, in
humanity?
the role of a prosecutor
How do processes of global politics • Investigation into the value chain of three products selected
influence where the products we need from a local store: a locally sourced vegetable, a nationally
in daily life come from and how they sourced drink, and an internationally sourced toy
are made? • Interviews with the store purchasing manager, the local
farmer selling the vegetable, the drinks company, and an
NGO working on consumer-awareness issues
In the normal course of their global politics studies, students may be involved with several activities that
could qualify as engagements. They could potentially choose the most interesting and suitable of these to
develop further as the foundation for their engagement project. However, teachers should actively guide
students and advise them on their time commitments so that other elements of their DP do not suffer.
It is not a requirement that students link their engagement project to any specific section of the course
syllabus, but their analysis of the selected political issue should show evidence of knowledge and
understanding of relevant course content, with an emphasis on the key concepts. When selecting an
appropriate project, some students might find it useful to select one of the thematic studies or one of the
HL extension topic areas as a starting point. Others might first identify a specific situation they are
interested in, and then establish links with course content.
Written report
The written report is an opportunity for students to bring together the lessons they have learned about
their chosen political issue through their engagement activities and complementary research. As for other
large writing projects, it is likely to be helpful for students to formulate an initial question, tightly linked to
the political issue, that they attempt to answer through their experiences and research. They can refine this
question and how they plan to address it throughout the engagement project process.
In their reports, students must identify a political issue they decided to explore through the engagement
activities and explain the reasons why they wanted to get involved with this specific engagement and issue.
If the engagement is large and multifaceted—perhaps consisting of several tasks, or with the student
having several roles in the course of the engagement—students need to focus their report on aspects of
the engagement that are most relevant for their treatment of the political issue. Instead of describing at
length what they did, the key sense in which students outline their engagement in the written report
is to analyse what it contributed to their understanding of the selected political issue. The lessons
from experiential learning, combined with insights from research, inform students’ analysis of the political
issue. They are expected to synthesize their insights and evaluate the political issue from multiple
perspectives.
There is no specific format required of the written report, but it is expected that the report is a structured
piece of well-presented writing.
Word count
The written report must not exceed 2,000 words for SL and 2,400 words for HL. Work that falls significantly
below these word counts is unlikely to meet fully the stated requirements of the task, and is likely to receive
lower marks.
A word count must be included as part of the report. If the word limit is exceeded, the teacher’s assessment
must be based on the first 2,000 words (SL) or 2,400 words (HL) only.
The following are not included in the word count.
• Acknowledgements
• Contents page
• Tables of statistical data
• Diagrams or figures
• Equations, formulas and calculations
• Citations (which, if used, must be in the body of the written report*)
• References (which, if used, must be in the footnotes/endnotes**)
• Bibliography
• Appendices
*A citation is a shorthand method of making a reference in the body of the report, which is then linked to
the full reference in the bibliography.
**Footnotes/endnotes may be used for references only. Definitions of terms and quotations, if used, must
be in the body of the work and are included in the word count.
Teacher guidance
• With the teacher’s support, students must choose appropriate engagement activities for their project.
• Before any formalized contact with external stakeholders takes place, the teacher should approve the
student’s proposed political issue and its corresponding engagement activities. This will ensure that
the issue and activities are suitable, affording the student full access to all levels of the assessment
criteria. (It is also highly advisable that every student is supplied with a copy of the assessment criteria.)
• It is particularly important for teachers to take an active role in guiding students’ choice of
engagement project, to ensure that:
◦ a political issue is identified that can be actively explored through what students suggest they
can do
◦ the political issue is of genuine interest to the student.
• The teacher should also guide students regarding the relevance and sufficiency of their research, both
in preparation for the engagement activities and in complementing their experiential learning.
• Throughout the engagement project process, student and teacher should engage in dialogue that is
supportive of the students’ work, i.e. formative feedback. For example, as part of the learning process,
the teacher may comment on students’ plans, including the scope of their research and the first draft
of the written report.
Where an activity is extensive and multifaceted, it may be that there is one element that could constitute an
appropriate engagement for global politics, and other elements that could be appropriate as activities for
CAS. Nonetheless, the same elements may not be counted for both global politics and CAS. For example:
• A student participating in a Model United Nations (MUN) simulation could identify one specific
element—such as discussing various political discourse techniques—as one of their global politics
engagement activities
• The student could then identify other elements of their MUN participation—such as leading their
school delegation—for CAS.
Similarly, a student involved in a youth initiative in the local community could:
• as part of their global politics engagement project, examine the role of the community council in
empowering youth, and canvassing youth support for this specific project
• for CAS, document their participation in actual activities with youth.
Figure 6
Integration of the HL extension with the common SL/HL syllabus
Figure 7
Interconnected nature of the global political challenges and HL topic areas
In a similar way to the thematic studies, the HL topic areas can be seen as areas of study in global politics
that provide additional tools for analysis, models, frameworks and terminology, to delve deeper into
political issues. Additionally, exploring the links between multiple topic areas will most likely evidence the
complexities of global political challenges but also the tools available to address them. For example, some
students might look into the links between poverty and health, and research their impacts in vulnerable
populations. Other students might explore how technology is used to address security concerns or reduce
environmental risks.
Two main approaches to conducting the HL extended inquiries are suggested.
• Using HL topic areas as entry points: If a student is interested in one of the HL topic areas, they may
begin an in-depth study of this, then select an appropriate case through which to investigate it further.
• Using cases as entry points: If a particular case or topic is of special interest to the student, they may
explore the case and make links to multiple topic areas that they consider relevant.
Regardless of the approach taken, as part of their extended inquiries HL students must sure that they
conduct research on at least two different case studies and on at least two different topic areas.
This section includes initial orientation for each of the HL topic areas, as well as some possible examples of
appropriate case studies. However, as figure 7 illustrates, emphasis should be placed on the interconnected
nature of these topic areas, rather than on what sets them apart.
HL topic area Initial guidance and possible links with Suggested examples
course content
Environment Many environmental problems transcend • Melting ice caps in the Arctic—
national boundaries, and the activities of opportunities of and threats to regional
one country can have a direct impact on political cooperation between Russia and
multiple countries. northern European states
Mitigation of and responses to climate • The 2016–2018 drought in Cape Town,
change and other such global South Africa—government control in an
environmental challenges involve and environmental crises
HL topic area Initial guidance and possible links with Suggested examples
course content
HL topic area Initial guidance and possible links with Suggested examples
course content
For example, since the 9/11 terrorist present day—are attitudes changing? If
attacks in the USA (2001), increasing so, how and why?
attention has been given to the • Class identity in South Africa—how is the
significance of cultural and religious role of the working class changing in
identity in global politics. labour-related politics?
The identities of women and ethnic • Race and incarceration in the USA—what
minorities can be similarly political, with are the reasons for and the effects of
debates in many societies about the racial profiling in US policing?
appropriate line between the private and
• National identity in Hungary—the
public spheres of life.
Fidesz-led government’s use of national
Media coverage of how cases of genocide identity as a method to rally public
and ethnic violence are treated in support for its policies
international justice institutions point to
the role identity can play in some of the
most horrific conflicts of recent times.
There are particularly strong links
between this topic and the thematic area
“Rights and justice”, i.e. human rights.
Borders “Borders” may be physical borders • The 2014 Scottish referendum on
between countries but also less obvious independence—the role of different
but equally influential borders of, for borders between England and Scotland
example, social class, ethnicity, gender. in strengthening the “Yes” campaign
Sometimes it is not the existence of • The USA–Mexico border fence/wall—the
borders that may be regarded as a effect of new migration legislation in the
political challenge but rather a lack USA on the principles and practice of
thereof: an example might be the cross- operations on this border
border movement of capital or treatment • Forced relocation and conflict over
of labour. ancestral land between the national
Migration is closely linked to the concept government and Bushmen in Botswana
of globalization as physical borders —do claims emphasizing the right to a
between nations are increasingly reduced. different way of life have authority in
Immigration is a controversial and topical modern land conflicts?
issue in many countries, and political • Migration in Europe—the role of national
backlashes to immigration are widespread vs regional (European Union (EU))
in the face of changing and unstable policies in facilitating youth migration
economic conditions. from the south to the north
Many conflicts have a dimension related • Gender borders—the role of Islam in
to borders of various kinds; often, human shaping women’s rights in Egypt
rights are violated in crossing borders, e.g.
human trafficking.
Security Many of the topics, political issues and key • The 2012 case of Joseph Kony in Uganda
concepts encountered in the core topics —to what extent can social media be a
and the thematic studies are central to catalyst for social change?
discussions of security. • Disputed claims over the South China
For example, discussions of sovereignty, sea—implications for regional maritime
military power, wars between and within security
states, arms proliferation, and the
HL topic area Initial guidance and possible links with Suggested examples
course content
HL topic area Initial guidance and possible links with Suggested examples
course content
3. Reflection
• How can I use the key concepts, theories, ideas and examples I have learned in the course to analyse
this case and political issue?
• Which wider issues or developments in global politics are relevant in understanding this case?
• What is the particular significance of this case?
• What other interpretations of or points of view on the case are possible?
Students’ research can be based on primary and secondary material, although the emphasis is likely to be
on secondary sources. Newspaper, magazine and journal articles, books, carefully selected websites, images
and audiovisual materials are all valid secondary sources. Good research practice requires that the sources
represent a balance of views.
General
Assessment is an integral part of learning and teaching. The most important aims of assessment are that it
should support curricular goals and encourage appropriate student learning. Both external and internal
assessments are used in the Diploma Programme (DP) and Career-related Programme (CP). IB examiners
mark work produced for external assessment, while work produced for internal assessment (IA) is marked
by teachers and externally moderated by the IB.
There are two main types of assessment identified by the IB.
• Formative assessment informs both learning and teaching. It is concerned with providing accurate and
helpful feedback to candidates and teachers on the kind of learning taking place and the nature of
candidates’ strengths and weaknesses in order to help develop candidates’ understanding and
capabilities. Formative assessment can also help to improve teaching quality as it can provide
information to monitor progress towards meeting the course aims and objectives.
• Summative assessment gives an overview of previous learning and is concerned with measuring
candidate achievement at, or towards, the end of the course of study.
A comprehensive assessment plan is viewed as being integral to learning, teaching and course
organization. For further information, see the IB Programme standards and practices publication.
The approach to assessment used by the IB is criterion-related, not norm-referenced. This approach to
assessment judges candidates’ work by their performance in relation to identified levels of attainment, and
not in relation to the work of other candidates. For further information on assessment within the DP, please
refer to the publication Assessment: principles and practice—Quality assessments in a digital age.
To support teachers in the planning, delivery and assessment of the DP or CP courses, a variety of resources
can be found on the Programme Resource Centre or purchased from the IB store (store.ibo.org). Additional
publications such as specimen papers and markschemes, teacher support materials (TSMs), subject reports
and grade descriptors can also be found on the Programme Resource Centre. Past examination papers as
well as markschemes can be purchased from the IB store.
Assessment-related resources
For more information about assessment in the IB, please refer to the following resources.
Assessment
• Diploma Programme Assessment procedures (updated annually)
• Assessment principles and practice—Quality assessments in a digital age
• Conduct of examinations booklet (updated annually)
• Programme standards and practices
Assessment integrity
• Academic integrity policy
• Effective citing and referencing
• Diploma Programme: From principles into practice (For use from August 2015)
• “B1 General regulations: Diploma Programme” in Diploma Programme Assessment procedures (updated
annually)
• “C5 Academic honesty” in Diploma Programme Assessment procedures (updated annually)
Methods of assessment
The IB uses several methods to assess work produced by candidates.
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria are used when the assessment task is open-ended. Each criterion concentrates on a
particular skill that candidates are expected to demonstrate. An assessment objective (AO) describes what
candidates should be able to do, and assessment criteria describe how well they should be able to do it.
Using assessment criteria allows discrimination between different answers and encourages a variety of
responses. Each criterion comprises a set of hierarchically ordered level descriptors. Each level descriptor is
worth one or more marks. Each criterion is applied independently using a best-fit model. The maximum
marks for each criterion may differ according to the criterion’s importance. The marks awarded for each
criterion are added together to give the total mark for the piece of work.
Markbands
Markbands are a comprehensive statement of expected performance against which responses are judged.
They represent a single holistic criterion divided into level descriptors. Each level descriptor corresponds to
a range of marks to differentiate candidate performance. A best-fit approach is used to ascertain which
particular mark to use from the possible range for each level descriptor.
Analytical markschemes
Analytical markschemes are prepared for those examination questions that expect a particular kind of
response and/or a given final answer from candidates. They give detailed instructions to examiners on how
to break down the total mark for each question for different parts of the response.
Marking notes
For some assessment components marked using assessment criteria, marking notes are provided. Marking
notes give guidance on how to apply assessment criteria to the particular requirements of a question.
Assessment outline—SL
Assessment outline—HL
External assessment
Command terms
Command terms are used in examination questions to indicate the required depth of treatment for
candidate responses. There is a progression in demand from AO 1 to 3. Examination questions may use any
command term from the AO level specified in the paper descriptions found in this guide.
The command terms used in examinations are indicated below and defined in the glossary.
Candidates and teachers must be familiar with command terms used in the course.
Identify
Outline
AO2: Application and Analyse Command terms that require candidates to apply their
analysis Distinguish knowledge and understanding to demonstrate analysis.
Explain
Suggest
AO3: Evaluation and Compare Command terms that require candidates to demonstrate
synthesis Compare and evaluation and synthesis.
contrast
Contrast
Discuss
Evaluate
Examine
Justify
Recommend
To what extent
When real-world examples and cases are used, candidates should not just state an example (as this is too
limited) but also offer a proper explanation or contextualization, depending on the question asked.
Candidates are expected to use and apply global politics terminology consistent with relevant and accurate
knowledge.
Paper 2
Duration: 1 hour 45 minutes
Maximum mark: 30
Weighting: 40%
Paper 2 is the same for SL and HL and is an extended response paper.
The paper has two sections, and candidates answer one question from each. Section A includes questions
from each of the thematic studies. Section B includes integrating questions, which allows and requires
candidates to make connections across the three thematic studies as well as the core topics.
The ability to synthesize elements from the course prescribed content, key concepts and diverse contexts in
an integrated way is particularly important in this paper. Even where the key concepts are not explicitly
mentioned in a question, candidates should demonstrate a conceptual understanding of global politics. In
their responses, candidates are invited to draw on the complexities of any relevant political concepts,
depending on the arguments they put forward.
Marks are awarded for demonstrating relevant knowledge and understanding of political concepts and
prescribed content, sustaining arguments and referring to specific relevant examples and cases. Candidates
are expected to examine diverse perspectives through: consideration of different views on the question;
consideration of claims and counterclaims; or evaluation of the arguments they propose and the examples
they use to support them.
Paper 1, question 4
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–3 The response shows a limited understanding of the demands of the question.
• Little relevant knowledge is demonstrated.
• References to the sources are made, but they are mostly descriptive or no clear
evidence is integrated in the response.
• Different perspectives are not identified.
4–6 The response shows some understanding of the demands of the question.
• Some knowledge is demonstrated, but this is not always relevant or accurate.
• Evidence from the sources is partially integrated into the response.
• Different perspectives are identified, but not explored.
7–9 The response shows adequate understanding of the demands of the question.
• Relevant and accurate knowledge is demonstrated.
• There is synthesis of own knowledge and source material.
• Different perspectives are explored.
10–12 The response shows an in-depth understanding of the demands of the question.
• Relevant and accurate knowledge is used effectively throughout.
• There is effective synthesis of own knowledge and source material, with appropriate
examples integrated in the response.
• Different perspectives are explored and evaluated.
Paper 2
In addition to paper-specific analytical markschemes used for all questions, the marks for paper 2 are also
allocated using markbands. Within these bands, level descriptors are written as individual bullet points, and
markbands are applied holistically using a best-fit approach.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–3 The response shows limited understanding of the demands of the question.
• The arguments are poorly structured and unclear.
• There is little relevant knowledge present.
• The response is descriptive or is based in unsupported generalizations.
4–6 The response shows some understanding of the demands of the question.
• The response is structured to an extent, but the organization lacks clarity or
coherence.
• There is limited justification of the claims presented.
• The response demonstrates limited understanding of global politics concepts.
• Some relevant knowledge is present.
• Some examples are mentioned, but they are not developed, or their relevance is
unclear.
• Diverse perspectives are not identified.
7–9 The response indicates an understanding of the demands of the question, but these
demands are only partially addressed.
• The response presents an adequate structure and organization. Arguments are clear
and coherent.
• Most of the main claims are justified.
• Relevant and accurate knowledge is present.
• Supporting examples are partly developed.
• Diverse perspectives are identified, but not explored.
10–12 The response indicates that the demands of the question are understood and addressed.
• The response is well structured and organized. Arguments are clear, coherent and well
supported.
• All of the main claims are justified.
• Relevant and accurate knowledge is demonstrated throughout the response.
• Supporting examples are adequately developed.
• Diverse perspectives are explored.
13–15 The response indicates that the demands of the question are understood and addressed,
and that possible implications are considered.
• The response is well structured, balanced and effectively organized. Arguments are
clear, coherent and compelling.
• All of the main claims are justified and evaluated.
• Relevant and accurate knowledge is used effectively throughout the response.
• Supporting examples are effectively developed.
• Diverse perspectives are explored and evaluated.
Paper 2
Duration: 1 hour 45 minutes
Maximum mark: 30
Weighting: 30%
Paper 2 is the same for SL and HL and is an extended response paper.
Please refer to the section “External assessment details—SL” for further details.
Question 3 AO3 Question 3 requires synthesis and evaluation of researched case studies
(15 marks) and global political challenges
The question will be based on the guiding lines of inquiry for the HL
extension.
Paper 2
Paper 2 markbands are the same for SL and HL.
Please refer to the section “External assessment markbands—SL” for further details.
Paper 3
Question 1 will be marked according to an analytical markscheme developed for the specific question
presented in the paper in each session.
In addition to paper-specific analytical markschemes used for all questions, the marks for question 2 and
question 3 are also allocated using markbands. Within these bands, level descriptors are written as
individual bullet points, and markbands are applied holistically using a best-fit approach.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2 The demands of the question are partially addressed.
• The response is mostly descriptive.
• Some knowledge of the political issue is demonstrated, but it is not all relevant or
accurate.
3–4 The demands of the question are addressed.
• The response provides a clear analysis of a political issue.
• Relevant and accurate knowledge of the context is demonstrated.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2 A recommendation is presented, but it is vague or unclear.
• The recommendation does not clearly address the identified political issue.
3–4 An adequate recommendation is presented.
• The recommendation addresses the identified political issue.
• Possible challenges or implications are not considered.
5–6 A clear and well-supported recommendation is presented.
• The recommendation addresses the identified political issue effectively.
• Possible challenges, implications or unintended consequences are considered.
Paper 3, question 3
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–3 The response shows limited understanding of the demands of the question.
• The arguments are poorly structured and unclear.
• There is little relevant knowledge present.
• The response is descriptive or is based in unsupported generalizations.
4–6 The response shows some understanding of the demands of the question.
• The response is structured to an extent, but the arguments lack clarity or coherence.
• There is limited justification of the claims presented.
• Some relevant knowledge is present.
• Some examples are mentioned, but they are not developed, or their relevance is
unclear.
• Diverse perspectives are not identified.
7–9 The response indicates an understanding of the demands of the question, but these
demands are only partially addressed.
• The response presents an adequate structure and organization. Arguments are clear
and coherent.
• Most of the main claims are justified.
• Relevant and accurate knowledge is present.
• Supporting examples are partly developed.
• Diverse perspectives are identified, but not explored.
10–12 The response indicates that the demands of the question are understood and addressed.
• The response is well structured and organized. Arguments are clear, coherent and well
supported.
• All of the main claims are justified.
• Relevant and accurate knowledge is demonstrated throughout the response.
• Supporting examples are adequately developed.
• Diverse perspectives are explored.
13–15 The response indicates that demands of the question are understood and addressed, and
that possible implications are considered.
• The response is well structured, balanced and effectively organized. Arguments are
clear, coherent and compelling.
• All of the main claims are justified and evaluated.
• Relevant and accurate knowledge is used effectively throughout the response.
• Supporting examples are effectively developed.
• Diverse perspectives are explored and evaluated.
Internal assessment
Additional guidance on collaboration while conducting the engagement project can be found in the TSM.
Time allocation
IA is an integral part of the global politics course, contributing 30% to the final SL assessment and 20% to
the final HL assessment. This weighting should be reflected in the time allocated to develop the knowledge,
skills and understanding required, as well as the time allocated to carry out the work.
It is recommended that a total of approximately 25 hours (SL) and 35 hours (HL) of teaching time should be
allocated to the engagement project. This should include time for:
• the teacher to explain to candidates the requirements of the project and the ethical guidelines for any
engagement activities
• consultation between the teacher and each candidate, e.g. to discuss initial ideas about the focus of
the project, review planned engagement activities
• candidates to conduct preparatory research, plan and undertake their engagement activities, conduct
complementary research, and write their report
• the teacher to review and monitor progress throughout the process (especially when candidates carry
out their engagement activities), and check authenticity.
• Since the engagement project requires interactions with external stakeholders, it is advised that
appropriate time is reserved throughout the course for candidates to become familiar with the
requirements, plan carefully and carry out their engagement activities successfully.
• Acknowledgments
• Contents page
• Tables of statistical data
• Diagrams or figures
• Equations, formulas and calculations
• Citations (which, if used, must be in the body of the written report*)
• References (which, if used, must be in the footnotes/endnotes**)
• Bibliography
• Appendices
* Note that citation is a shorthand method of making a reference in the body of the report, which is then
linked to the full reference in the bibliography.
** Note that footnotes/endnotes may be used for references only. Definitions of terms and quotations, if
used, must be in the body of the work and are included in the word count.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2 The report includes a limited explanation and justification of the engagement project.
• A political issue is identified, but not clearly explained.
• There is a limited explanation of the importance and suitability of the project.
• The engagement activities are described, but their relevance is not justified.
3–4 The report includes an appropriate explanation and justification of the engagement
project.
• A political issue is identified and clearly explained.
• There is a clear explanation of the importance and suitability of the project.
• The engagement activities are explained, and their relevance is justified.
Criterion B: Process
• Does the report evidence a well-developed process of research and engagement?
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 The report evidences a limited research and engagement process.
2 The report evidences an adequate research and engagement process.
3 The report evidences a well-planned and integrated research and engagement process.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2 The report is mostly descriptive.
• There is a vague reference to relevant course concepts and content.
• The political issue is identified, but not analysed.
• There is no synthesis of perspectives.
3–4 The report presents limited analysis and synthesis of the political issue.
• The analysis demonstrates a limited understanding of relevant course concepts and
content.
• Analysis of the political issue is limited.
• There is limited synthesis of the perspectives of stakeholders and sources.
5–6 The report presents an adequate analysis and synthesis of the political issue.
• The analysis demonstrates an adequate understanding of relevant course concepts
and content.
• The political issue is partially analysed.
• Perspectives of stakeholders and sources are partially synthesized, but not always
clear.
7–8 The report presents an effective analysis and synthesis of the political issue.
• The analysis demonstrates a good understanding and application of relevant course
concepts and content.
• The political issue is clearly analysed.
• There is an effective synthesis of the perspectives of involved stakeholders and
sources.
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2 The report demonstrates limited evaluation and reflection.
Criterion E: Communication
• Are the information and points presented in the report communicated clearly?
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1 Communication is limited.
• The organization and clarity of the report are limited and do not support
understanding.
2 Communication is adequate.
• The report is adequately organized and supports understanding.
3 Communication is effective.
• The report is well organized and coherently supports understanding.
Criterion F: Recommendation
• Does the report include a well-supported recommendation?
• Is the recommendation presented appropriate for the analysed context?
0 The work does not reach a standard described by the descriptors below.
1–2 A limited recommendation is presented.
• The recommendation is partially supported, with limited reference to specific
evidence.
• The recommendation partly addresses the political issue with some considerations of
the context studied.
• Possible implications or challenges are not identified.
3–4 An adequate recommendation is presented.
• The recommendation is supported by relevant evidence.
• The recommendation adequately addresses the political issue within the context
studied.
• Possible implications or challenges are identified.
5–6 An effective recommendation is presented.
• The recommendation is well supported by relevant and specific evidence.
• The recommendation effectively addresses the political issue within the context
studied.
• Possible implications or challenges are explained.
Analyse AO2 Break down in order to bring out the essential elements or
structure.
Compare AO3 Give an account of the similarities between two (or more) items or
situations, referring to both (all) of them throughout.
Compare and AO3 Give an account of similarities and differences between two (or
contrast more) items or situations, referring to both (all) of them
throughout.
Contrast AO3 Give an account of the differences between two (or more) items or
situations, referring to both (all) of them throughout.
Describe AO1 Give a detailed account.
Discuss AO3 Offer a considered and balanced review that includes a range of
arguments, factors or hypotheses. Opinions or conclusions should
be presented clearly and supported by appropriate evidence.
Distinguish AO2 Make clear the differences between two or more concepts or items.
Evaluate AO3 Make an appraisal by weighing up the strengths and limitations.
Examine AO3 Consider an argument or concept in a way that uncovers the
assumptions and interrelationships of the issue.
Explain AO2 Give a detailed account including reasons or causes.
Identify AO1 Provide an answer from a number of possibilities.
Justify AO3 Give valid reasons or evidence to support an answer or conclusion.
List AO1 Give a sequence of brief answers with no explanation.
Outline AO1 Give a brief account or summary.
Recommend AO3 Present an advisable course of action with appropriate supporting
evidence/reason in relation to a given situation, problem or issue.
Suggest AO2 Propose a solution, hypothesis or other possible answer.
To what extent AO3 Consider the merits or otherwise of an argument or concept.
Opinions and conclusions should be presented clearly and
supported with appropriate evidence and sound argument.
Bibliography
The principal works used to inform the curriculum review are listed below. It is not an exhaustive list and
does not include all the literature available: judicious selection was made in order to better advise and
guide teachers. This bibliography is not a list of recommended textbooks.
Acharya, A. (2014). Global international relations (IR) and regional worlds: A new agenda for international
studies. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 647–659.
Acharya, A. (2017). Towards a global IR. In S. McGlinchey, R. Walters, & C. Scheinpflug (Eds.), International
relations theory (pp. 76–82). E-International Relations Publishing.
Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019). The making of global international relations: Origins and evolution of IR at its
centenary. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, C. (2018). International relations and international political theory. In C. Brown, & R. Eckersley (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of international political theory (pp. 48–59). Oxford University Press.
Caraccioli, M. J., Wigen, E., Costa Lopez, J., Cheney, A., & Subotic, J. (2021). Forum: Interlingual relations:
Approaches, conflicts, and lessons in the translation of global politics. International Studies Review, 23(3),
1015–1045.
Crilley R., Manor, I., & Bjola, C. (2020). Visual narratives of global politics in the digital age: An introduction.
Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(5), 628–637.
De Oliveira Andreotti, V. (2011). The political economy of global citizenship education. Globalisation,
Societies and Education, 9(3–4), 307–310.
Diehl, P. F. (2016). Exploring peace: Looking beyond war and negative peace. International Studies Quarterly,
60(1), 1–10.
Galtung, J. (2017). Bringing in the future: An essay on time. World Futures Review, 9(1), 17–18.
Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? The American Political Science Review, 98(2),
341–354.
Haggart, B. (2017). Rise of the “knowledge structure”: Implications for the exercise of power in the global
political economy. Journal of Information Policy, 7, 164–175.
Held, D., & Maffetone, P. (2016). Global political theory. Wiley.
Herrmann, R. K. (2017). How attachments to the nation shape beliefs about the world: A theory of motivated
reasoning. International Organization, 71(S1), S61–S84.
Hierro, M. J., & Gallego, A. (2018). Identities in between: Political conflict and ethnonational identities in
multicultural states. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(6), 1314–1339.
Icaza Garza, R. (2021). Decolonial feminism and global politics: Border thinking and vulnerability as a
knowing otherwise. In Vulnerability and the politics of care: Transdisciplinary dialogues. Oxford University
Press.
Icaza Garza, R., & Valiana, A. (2021). Un feminismo otro. On the (im)possibilities of encountering each other
across the colonial divide. Journal fur Entwicklungspolitik, 38(1/2), 210–238.
Katzenstein, P. J., & Seybert, L. A. (2018). Protean power and uncertainty: Exploring the unexpected in world
politics. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 80–93.
Lösch, B. (2011). The political dimension of global education: Global governance and democracy. Journal of
Social Science Education, 10(4), 50–58.
McGlinchey, S., Walters, R., & Scheinpflug, C. (Eds.). (2017). International relations theory. E-International
Relations Publishing.
McInerney, P., Smyth, J., & Down, B. (2011). “Coming to a place near you?” The politics and possibilities of a
critical pedagogy of place-based education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 3–16.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of
thinking and practising within the discipline. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning theory and practice,
10 years on (pp. 1–16). Oxford Centre for Staff & Learning Development.
Mirra, N., & Garcia, A. (2017). Civic participation reimagined: Youth interrogation and innovation in the
multimodal public sphere. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 136–158.
Ní, M. A. (2016). Critical imaginations in international relations. Routledge.
Osler, A., & Leung, Y. W. (2011). Human rights education, politics and power. Education, Citizenship and Social
Justice, 6(3), 199–203.
Osler, A., & Zhu, J. (2011). Narratives in teaching and research for justice and human rights. Education,
Citizenship and Social Justice, 6(3), 223–235.
Parmenter, L. (2011). Power and place in the discourse of global citizenship education. Globalisation,
Societies and Education, 9(3–4), 367–380.
Reus-Smit, C. (2017). Review: Cultural diversity and international order. International Organization, 71(4),
851–885.
Qin, Y. (2018). A relational theory of world politics. Cambridge University Press.