New Intro To Stem Cells
New Intro To Stem Cells
For centuries, scientists have known that certain animals can regenerate missing parts of their
bodies. Humans actually share this ability with animals like the starfish and the newt. Although we
can't replace a missing leg or a finger, our bodies are constantly regenerating blood, skin, and other
tissues. The identity of the powerful cells that allow us to regenerate some tissues was first revealed
when experiments with bone marrow in the 1950s established the existence of stem cells in our
bodies and led to the development of bone marrow transplantation, a therapy now widely used in
medicine. This discovery raised hope in the medical potential of regeneration. For the first time in
history, it became possible for physicians to regenerate a damaged tissue with a new supply of
healthy cells by drawing on the unique ability of stem cells to create many of the body's specialized
cell types.
Once they had recognized the medical potential of regeneration through the success of bone marrow
transplants, scientists sought to identify similar cells within the embryo. Early studies of human
development had demonstrated that the cells of the embryo were capable of producing every cell
type in the human body. Scientists were able to extract embryonic stem cells from mice in the
1980s, but it wasn't until 1998 that a team of scientists from the University of Wisconsin-Madison
became the first group to isolate human embryonic stem cells and keep them alive in the laboratory.
The team knew that they had in fact isolated stem cells because the cells could remain unspecialized
for long periods of time, yet maintained the ability to transform into a variety of specialized cell
types, including nerve, gut, muscle, bone, and cartilage cells.
Stem cell research is being pursued in the hope of achieving major medical breakthroughs.
Scientists are striving to create therapies that rebuild or replace damaged cells with tissues grown
from stem cells and offer hope to people suffering from cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease,
spinal-cord injuries, and many other disorders. Both adult and embryonic stem cells may also
provide a route for scientists to develop valuable new methods of drug discovery and testing. They
are also powerful tools for doing the research that leads to a better understanding of the basic
biology of the human body. By drawing on expert scientists, doctors, bioethicists, and others, the
National Academies have examined the potential of stem cell technologies for medicine and
provided a forum for discussing the ethical implications and moral dilemmas of stem cell research.
Over the past two decades, scientists have been gradually deciphering the processes by which
unspecialized stem cells become the many specialized cell types in the body. Stem cells can
regenerate themselves or produce specialized cell types. This property makes stem cells appealing
for scientists seeking to create medical treatments that replace lost or damaged cells.
-1-
-2-
Types of Stem Cells
Stem cells are found in all of us, from the early stages of human development to the end of life. All
stem cells may prove useful for medical research, but each of the different types has both promise
and limitations. Embryonic stem cells, which can be derived from a very early stage in human
development, have the potential to produce all of the body's cell types. Adult stem cells, which are
found in certain tissues in fully developed humans, from babies to adults, may be limited to
producing only certain types of specialized cells. Recently, scientists have also identified stem cells
in umbilical cord blood and the placenta that can give rise to the various types of blood cells.
In comon usage, "embryo" can refer to all stages of development from fertilization until a somewhat
ill-defined stage when it is called a fetus. Scientists use terms such as "morula" and "blastocyst" to
refer to precise, specific stages of pre-implantation development. In order to be as precise as
possible, this booklet uses the scientific terms when describing scientific concepts but uses the term
"embryo" where more precision seemed likely to confuse rather than clarify.
In normal development, the blastocyst would implant in the wall of the uterus to become the
embryo and continue developing into a mature organism. Its outer cells would begin to form the
placenta and the inner cell mass would begin to differentiate into the progressively more specialized
cell types of the body.
When the blastocyst is used for stem cell research, scientists remove the inner cell mass and place
these cells in a culture dish with a nutrient-rich liquid where they give rise to embryonic stem cells.
Embryonic stem cells seem to be more flexible than stem cells found in adults, because they have
the potential to produce every cell type in the human body. They are also generally easier to collect,
purify and maintain in the laboratory than adult stem cells.
Scientists can induce embryonic stem cells to replicate themselves in an undifferentiated state for
very long periods of time before stimulating them to create specialized cells. This means that just a
few embryonic stem cells can build a large bank of stem cells to be used in experiments. However,
such undifferentiated stem cells could not be used directly for tissue transplants because they can
cause a type of tumor called a teratoma. To be used for therapies, embryonic stem cells would first
need to be differentiated into specialized cell types.
Some find embryonic stem cell research to be morally objectionable, because when scientists
remove the inner cell mass, the blastocyst no longer has the potential to become a fully developed
human being.
-3-
-4-
Sources of Embryonic Stem Cells
In Vitro Fertilization
The largest potential source of blastocysts for stem cell research is from in vitro fertilization (IVF)
clinics. The process of IVF requires the retrieval of a woman's eggs via a surgical procedure after
undergoing an intensive regimen of "fertility drugs," which stimulate her ovaries to produce
multiple mature eggs.
When IVF is used for reproductive purposes, doctors typically fertilize all of the donated eggs in
order to maximize their chance of producing a viable blastocyst that can be implanted in the womb.
Because not all the fertilized eggs are implanted, this has resulted in a large bank of "excess"
blastocysts that are currently stored in freezers around the country. The blastocysts stored in IVF
clinics could prove to be a major source of embryonic stem cells for use in medical research.
However, because most of these blastocysts were created before the advent of stem cell research,
most donors were not asked for their permission to use these left-over blastocysts for research.
The IVF technique could potentially also be used to produce blastocysts specifically for research
purposes. This would facilitate the isolation of stem cells with specific genetic traits necessary for
the study of particular diseases. For example, it may be possible to study the origins of an inherited
disease like cystic fibrosis using stem cells made from egg and sperm donors who have this disease.
The creation of stem cells specifically for research using IVF is, however, ethically problematic for
some people because it involves intentionally creating a blastocyst that will never develop into a
human being.
Nuclear Transfer:
The process called nuclear transfer offers another potential way to produce embryonic stem cells.
In animals, nuclear transfer has been accomplished by inserting the nucleus of an already
differentiated adult cell-for example, a skin cell-into a donated egg that has had its nucleus
removed. This egg, which now contains the genetic material of the skin cell, is then stimulated to
form a blastocyst from which embryonic stem cells can be derived. The stem cells that are created
in this way are therefore copies or "clones" of the original adult cell because their nuclear DNA
matches that of the adult cell.
As of the summer of 2006, nuclear transfer has not been successful in the production of human
embryonic stem cells, but progress in animal research suggests that scientists may be able to use this
technique to develop human stem cells in the future.
Scientists believe that if they are able to use nuclear transfer to derive human stem cells, it could
allow them to study the development and progression of specific diseases by creating stem cells
containing the genes responsible for certain disorders. In the future, scientists may also be able to
create "personalized" stem cells that contain only the DNA of a specific patient. The embryonic
stem cells created by nuclear transfer would be genetically matched to a person needing a
transplant, making it far less likely that the patient's body would reject the new cells than it would
be with traditional tissue transplant procedures.
Although using nuclear transfer to produce stem cells is not the same as reproductive cloning, some
are concerned about the potential misapplication of the technique for reproductive cloning purposes.
-5-
Other ethical considerations include egg donation, which requires informed consent, and the
possible destruction of blastocysts.
Producing Embryonic Stem Cells Using Nuclear Transfer Is Not the Same as Reproductive
Cloning
The use of nuclear transfer to develop disease-specific stem cells can be called research cloning,
and the use of this technique for personalized tissue transplants is sometimes called therapeutic
cloning. These terms must be carefully distinguished from reproductive cloning, in which the intent
is to implant a cloned embryo in a female's womb and allow it to develop fully into an individual.
This was the technique by which Dolly the sheep was made and is now widely used for
reproductive cloning in animals. In humans, however, reproductive cloning has been actively
discouraged by most in the scientific community. The National Academies concluded," Human
reproductive cloning should not now be practiced. It is dangerous and likely to fail" in the 2002
report Scientific and Medical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning.
-6-
Adult Stem Cells
-7-
-8-
Identifying Stem Cells
As early as 1961, scientists knew that adult bone marrow contained cells that could make all of the
blood cell types. But it wasn't until 1988 that those stem cells were isolated as pure populations.
Why did it take so long? The techniques for identifying stem cells have only recently been
developed. Partly, this is because adult stem cells are, by their very nature, inconspicuous in shape,
size, and function. They also tend to hide deep in tissues and are present only in very low numbers,
making their identification and isolation like finding a needle in a haystack.
How do scientists know when they have found a stem cell? Every cell displays an array of proteins
on its surface; different cell types have different proteins. Scientists can use these surface proteins
as "markers" that characterize individual cell types-a type of "molecular ID." For example, using
molecules that recognize and attach to specific surface proteins and that can fluoresce under certain
wavelengths of light, scientists can visually tell the difference between a blood stem cell and a
mature white blood cell. Unfortunately, not all stem cells can now be identified in this manner
because scientists have not yet identified markers for all stem cell types. Scientists also identify
stem cells by observing their behavior in the laboratory: stem cells must be able to remain
unspecialized and self-renew for long periods of time. Scientists believe that there might be more
types of adult stem cells than the handful that have already been identified, but finding them is a
difficult process.
The culturing of stem cells is the first step in establishing a stem cell line—a propagating collection
of genetically identical cells. Cell lines are important because they provide a long-term supply of
multiplying cells that can be shared among scientists for research and therapy development. The
National Academies report Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine (2001) described
some of the challenges of maintaining cell lines: "Over time, all cell lines change, typically
accumulating harmful genetic mutations. There is no reason to expect stem cell lines to behave
differently. While there is much that can be learned using existing stem cell lines, such concerns
necessitate continued monitoring of these cells as well as the development of new stem cell lines in
the future."
Once they have established a stable stem cell line, scientists start the process of causing the stem
cells to differentiate into specialized cell types. The cellular environment in which stem cells
naturally reside provides scientists with clues about how to make them differentiate in a culture
dish. For example, in the bone marrow, where blood stem cells reside, bone cells send physical and
chemical signals that tell the blood stem cells when to differentiate. Scientists are just beginning to
understand these signals and have developed ways to mimic the natural processes in cell cultures.
Usually, the technology involves adding certain proteins to the cell culture and, in some cases,
introducing specific genes into the stem cells.
-9-
It will be essential that scientists are sure that stem cells have fully differentiated before they can
use them for medical applications. If completely undifferentiated stem cells (such as embryonic
stem cells) are implanted directly into an organism, they can cause a type of tumor called a
teratoma, which scientists have observed in experiments using mice. Semi-specialized adult stem
cells and differentiated cells derived from embryonic stem cells are unlikely to cause teratomas.
For medical research, as well as for research that explores the basic processes in the development of
organisms and diseases, scientists often rely on animals. Implanting human cells into animals such
as mice has long been common practice in order to test the safety and effectiveness of new drugs,
procedures, and medical devices before clinical testing in human volunteers.
For stem cell research, scientists use animals to make sure the stem cells are able to incorporate into
the tissue, do not cause any harmful consequences, and function in concert with the rest of the body.
For example, before using stem cells to replace the pancreatic cells that are destroyed by type I
diabetes in humans, scientists will transplant human stem cells into a mouse to see whether the stem
cells yield healthy, insulin-producing cells. If their methods prove successful in mice, scientists may
eventually apply the technology to developing treatments for diabetes in humans.
Animal studies can also reveal how human cells differentiate during normal development. For
example, scientists may implant human stem cells into a developing mouse to observe the processes
involved in building and organizing the different tissue types that make up the human body.
Scientists can also trace the development and progression of certain diseases within an animal. By
implanting human stem cells that lead to a particular disease into a mouse blastocyst, scientists can
observe when and how the afflicted cells begin to show signs of disease and can test drugs that
might prevent that process.
Organisms that contain cells or tissues from another individual of the same or a different species are
called chimeras. A common example of a chimera is a mouse that has been injected with some
human cells so that it can be used for studying a human disease or testing a new drug. A person who
has had a blood transfusion or a person who has received a heart valve transplant from a pig is
technically a chimera, as well. The making of chimeras for research has unique ethical implications
that have been the topic of discussions among scientists, ethicists and the public, especially when
the chimeras contain both human and animal cells.
To address ethical concerns about the destruction of blastocysts, scientists are trying to find new
ways of obtaining stem cells that behave like embryonic stem cells but that don't require harming a
blastocyst. As the science progresses, ethical issues surrounding these alternatives may also arise.
Some possible alternatives include:
- 10 -
• Cells collected from the morula (MOR-yoo-la), the developmental stage prior to the
blastocyst. The morula, a solid ball of about 16-30 cells, seems able to sustain the loss of a
few cells without developmental damage so that the remaining cells can continue to develop.
Cell extraction from the morula is already being used in some clinics to screen for genetic
disorders in embryos produced by in vitro fertilization.
Researchers have recently shown that cells isolated from a mouse morula can give rise to
embryonic stem cells while the remaining morula cells develop into a healthy mouse.
However, this process may still be morally objectionable to some because of the chance of
harm to the morula, and because the long-term effects of removing cells from a morula are
not yet known.
• The creation of embryonic stem cells through a process called altered nuclear transfer
(ANT). In this variation of the nuclear transfer technique, scientists create a blastocyst
whose genetic material has been changed so that further development and implantation into
the uterus is not possible. It aims to create embryo-like entities that are not truly embryos but
that can be a source of pluripotent stem cells.
ANT, so far only tested with mouse blastocysts, could allow the creation of embryonic stem
cells without destroying a viable human blastocyst. Some who object to embryonic stem cell
research support ANT because the resulting blastocyst could never develop into a full
human being and therefore would not have the moral status of a human embryo. However,
this procedure is objectionable to some because they believe that it involves the creation of
an imperfect blastocyst that is designed to be destroyed.
• Causing an adult cell to act like an embryonic stem cell. During development, as cells
become more and more specialized, they gradually lose the ability to turn on the genes that
allow embryonic stem cells to be so versatile. The silencing of these genes seems to be
responsible for keeping specialized cells specialized and limiting the differentiation
capacities of adult stem cells. By "reprogramming" adult stem cells so that they can turn on
the genes that allow versatility, scientists hope to cause them to revert to a more flexible
state. It is even possible that scientists could one day "reprogram" any cell, not only stem
cells. However, research in this area is in the early stages and scientists may be many years
away from making an adult cell as versatile as an embryonic stem cell.
- 11 -
- 12 -
Stem Cell Basics-Why SC Research Is Being Pursued
Right now, only a few diseases are treatable with stem cell therapies because scientists can only
regenerate a few types of tissues. However, the success of the most established stem cell-based
therapies—blood and skin transplants—gives hope that someday stem cells will allow scientists to
develop therapies for a variety of diseases previously thought to be incurable.
After scraping a knee or donating blood, the body replenishes the blood cells that are lost by
drawing on a small number of semi-specialized hematopoietic (heem-AT-oh-poh-EH-tik) stem cells
contained in the blood and bone marrow. For decades, scientists have been using this type of adult
stem cell to treat patients with diseases such as leukemia, sickle cell anemia, bone marrow damage,
and some metabolic disorders and immunodeficiencies where the body has lost its ability to
replenish its own set of healthy blood cells.
Hematopoietic stem cells give rise to all the blood cell types, from infection-fighting white blood
cells to blood-clotting platelets. Preliminary results have suggested that they may also be able to
produce other cell types not found in blood, but this is not yet proven. In the past, the only way to
use hematopoietic stem cells for therapies was through bone marrow transplants. Extracting bone
marrow is an uncomfortable and invasive procedure, and in order for a transplant to work, the donor
and recipient must be genetically similar. If they are too genetically different, the blood cells
produced from the transplanted marrow may recognize the patient's body as foreign and fight
against the patient's own cells and organs. Additionally, the patient's immune system may reject the
transplant, causing a dangerous "war" within the patient's body.
More recently, scientists have developed ways to derive hematopoietic stem cells from the blood
contained in the umbilical cord and placenta at birth. The stem cells isolated from a person's own
umbilical cord blood and placenta, if used for therapies later in life, would be less likely to cause an
"internal war" within the recipient's body. They are also more accessible than the stem cells in bone
marrow because the extraction of this blood poses no risk to the mother or infant.
For many years, scientists have been harnessing the regenerative capabilities of human skin to treat
victims of severe burns using skin transplants. Skin transplants are possible because of the existence
of stem cells located just under the top layer of skin. Every day, thousands of new skin cells are
produced to replace those that have been shed. When someone suffers severe burns that destroy the
- 13 -
source of these stem cells, their skin can no longer regenerate on its own.
Traditionally, doctors treated severe burns by transplanting sections of skin from undamaged areas
of the body onto the burned areas, but if doctors could not find enough unharmed skin to cover the
burned areas, the patient could die. Now, scientists can grow vast sheets of new skin by culturing
the stem cells from small pieces of healthy skin. This practice, which is a type of tissue engineering,
has become routine for treating burn victims over the past 20 years.
Recently, scientists have identified other types of stem cells in hair follicles and deeper layers of the
skin. The inclusion of these new stem cells into engineered skin should help create more natural-
looking skin transplants in the future.
When most people reach for a pen, their body acts in one smooth and controlled movement. This is
because the instant a person thinks of grabbing the pen, a series of nerve cells fire in an orchestrated
symphony from the brain to the muscles responsible for that action. For the movement to be precise
and smooth, all the nerve cells in the "grabbing-the-pen network" must function properly, including
cells that tell unneeded muscles to stay still.
In Parkinson's disease, the brain cells responsible for keeping unneeded muscles from moving
degenerate and die. This results in progressively more dramatic and uncontrolled movements,
tremors, and spasms. To date, there is no cure for Parkinson's disease because no one has figured
out a way to bring back the specialized nerve cells that have died.
Because Parkinson's disease results from the loss of one specific type of nerve cell, stem cells offer
a very tangible possibility for treatment. Researchers have recently learned how to differentiate
embryonic stem cells into the specific type of brain cell that is lost in Parkinson's disease. They
have also successfully transplanted adult nerve stem cells into rat brains. When this technique is
proven to be effective and safe, transplantation of stem cells into the brains of patients may one day
allow doctors to reverse the burden of Parkinson's disease and restore control of movement.
Another strategy currently under study is the addition of chemicals or growth factors that aim to
induce the patient's own stem cells to repair the damaged nerves without needing to grow and
transplant stem cells.
In people who suffer from type I diabetes, the beta cells of the pancreas that normally produce
insulin are destroyed by the patient's overactive immune system. Without insulin, the cells of the
body cannot take up glucose and they starve.
Patients with type I diabetes require insulin injections several times a day for their entire lives. The
- 14 -
only current cure is a pancreatic transplant from a recently deceased donor, but the demand for
transplants far outweighs the supply.
While adult stem cells have not yet been found in the pancreas, scientists have made progress
transforming embryonic stem cells into insulin-producing cells. Combining beta-cell transplants
with methods to "fix" the patient's immune system-including chemotherapy to destroy
malfunctioning immunesystem cells and blood transplants to replenish healthy white blood cells-
could offer great hope for the many Americans suffering with type I diabetes.
Why are some cancers so hard to eliminate, even after many rounds of chemotherapy? The answer
may lie in a few abnormal stem cells.
Cancerous stem cells were first identified in 1997 when a research group from the University of
Toronto transferred a few blood stem cells from human leukemia patients into mice and watched
leukemia develop in the mice. Stem cell-like cells have also recently been found in breast and brain
tumors. Like normal stem cells, tumor stem cells exist in very low numbers, but they can replicate
and give rise to a multitude of cells. Unlike normal stem cells, however, cancerous stem cells lack
the controls that tell them when to stop dividing. Traditional chemotherapy kills off the majority of
the tumor cells, but if any of the cancerous stem cells survive the treatment, the cancer may return.
Research into the differences in gene expression between normal and tumor stem cells may lead to
treatments where the root of the problem—the cancer stem cell—is targeted.
The list of medical achievements stem cells could offer seems to be expanding at an incredible pace.
The role of stem cells in medicine is already very real, but there is a danger of exaggerating the
promise of new medical developments.
What tend to be "over-promised" are not only the potential outcomes of both embryonic and adult
stem cell research, but also the time scales that are involved. The basic research needed to develop
viable therapeutic options is a lengthy process that may extend over many years and decades. Even
after science has moved from basic research to developing medical applications, it still takes many
years to thoroughly test those applications and demonstrate that they are safe to prescribe for
patients. This is true for all medical treatments, including the development of new drugs,
procedures, and medical equipment, and is not specific to the living cell therapies made possible by
stem cell research.
There are also many legal and social questions that must be addressed before stem cell-based
therapies become clinically available. Legal issues that will affect stem cell applications include
how to address intellectual property concerns and how to apply and enforce diverse and sometimes
conflicting state and national laws. Social issues include concerns about the destruction of embryos,
the distribution of the benefits of the research, and the protection of both physical and privacy
interests of egg and sperm donors and clinical research subjects.
- 15 -
The Role of Stem Cells in Basic Research
Stem cells offer opportunities for scientific advances that go far beyond regenerative medicine.
They offer a window for addressing many of biology's most fundamental questions.
Watching embryonic stem cells give rise to specialized cells is like peeking into the earliest
development of the many tissues and organs of the human body. Stem cell research may help clarify
the role genes play in human development and how genetic mutations affect normal processes. They
can be used to study how infectious agents invade and attack human cells, to investigate the genetic
and environmental factors that are involved in cancer and other diseases, and to decipher what
happens during aging.
Stem cells may also revolutionize traditional chemical medicine. Because embryonic stem cells can
continue to divide for long periods of time and produce a variety of cell types, they could provide a
valuable source of human cells for testing drugs or measuring the effects of toxins on normal tissues
without risking the health of a single human volunteer. In the future, thousands of compounds could
be quickly tested on a wide assortment of cell types derived from stem cells, making drug discovery
more efficient and cost effective.
Using nuclear transfer to produce stem cells could be particularly useful for testing drugs for
disorders that are of genetic origin. For example, it is difficult to study the progression of
Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases in the brains of live patients- but by using the cells of an
Alzheimer's patient to create stem cell lines with nuclear transfer, scientists could trace the
development of the disease in a culture dish and test drugs that regenerate lost nerve cells with no
danger to the patient.
Stem cells may also help scientists calculate the effects of toxic substances in drugs, food, and the
environment.
- 16 -
Stem Cell Basics - Ethics, Moral Values, and U.S. Law
Scientists and society as a whole must consider the ethical implications of stem cell research.
Different ethical issues are raised by the wide range of stem cell research activities. In 2005, the
National Academies published guidelines for scientists who do research with human embryonic
stem cells to encourage responsible and ethically sensitive conduct in their work. Although the
guidelines are not expressly legally binding, many researchers have voluntarily adopted them as a
guide to what constitutes appropriate conduct in human embryonic stem cell research. Yet for some
people, such guidelines are inadequate because they aim to govern a practice that they see as
intrinsically unethical.
As the science advances, it is essential that scientists; religious, moral, and political leaders; and
society as a whole continue to evaluate and communicate about the ethical implications of stem cell
research.
The National Academies' Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research
In order to provide all scientists—those working in universities and private companies and with
both public and private funding—with a common set of scientific and ethical guidelines, the
National Academies published the Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in 2005.
The report outlines the need for institutional oversight mechanisms for monitoring all human
embryonic stem cell research and provides specific guidance regarding the derivation of new stem
cell lines.
Under the guidelines, certain activities, such as experimenting on human embryos by inserting stem
cells into them, are not permitted. The guidelines also require that all egg, sperm, and blastocyst
donations follow appropriate informed consent and confidentiality procedures. Because the ethical
and technical questions associated with human embryonic stem cell research are likely to change as
science advances, in 2006, the National Academies established a panel of experts to monitor and
review scientific developments and changing ethical, legal, and policy issues and to prepare
periodic reports to update the guidelines as needed.
Is an Embryo a Person?
The controversy over embryonic stem cell research touches on some of the same fundamental
questions that society has grappled with in the debates over contraception, abortion, and in vitro
fertilization. The questions at the center of the controversy concern the nature of early human life
and the legal and moral status of the human embryo.
Embryonic stem cell research often involves removing the inner cell mass from "excess" blastocysts
that are unneeded by couples who have completed their fertility treatment. This prevents those
blastocysts from continuing to develop. Although such blastocysts would likely be discarded (and
thus destroyed) by the clinics in any case, some believe that this does not make it morally
- 17 -
acceptable to use them for research or therapeutic purposes. They believe that the life of a human
being begins at the moment of conception and that society undermines a commitment to human
equality and to the protection of vulnerable individuals if blastocysts are used for such purposes.
Some cultures and religious traditions oppose the use of human life as a means to some other end,
no matter how noble that end might be. Other traditions support embryonic stem cell research
because they believe that the embryo gains the moral status of a human being only after a few
weeks or months of development. Many traditions emphasize obligations to heal the sick and ease
suffering—goals for which embryonic stem cell research holds great potential—and favor
embryonic stem cell research for this reason. Several religious groups are currently involved in
internal discussions about the status of the human embryo and have not yet established official
opinions on the matter.
Public opinion polls suggest that the majority of both religious and non-religious Americans support
embryonic stem cell research, although public opinion seems divided about the creation or use of
human blastocysts solely for research.
Although cloning and stem cell research are often lumped together in the context of ethical debates,
the goals and results of the two are very different. The common factor between current attempts at
reproductive cloning and stem cell research is a laboratory technique called nuclear transfer.
Using nuclear transfer, scientists can create blastocysts containing stem cells that are "clones" of a
single adult cell by inserting the genetic material from an adult cell (for example, a skin cell) into an
egg whose nucleus has been removed. Scientists hope that they could derive stem cells from the
cells inside such blastocysts and grow replacement tissues that are genetically matched to specific
patients, thus offering patients a safer alternative to traditional tissue transplants.
Reproductive cloning, such as the process that was used to create Dolly the sheep, also uses the
nuclear transfer technique. However, instead of removing the inner cell mass to derive a stem cell
line, the blastocyst is implanted into the uterus and allowed to develop fully. In 2002, the National
Academies issued the report Scientific and Medical Aspects of Human Reproductive Cloning, which
concluded "Human reproductive cloning should not now be practiced. It is dangerous and likely to
fail."
Chimeras are organisms composed of cells or tissues from more than one individual. Chimeras have
been produced for research for many years, but when human and animal cells are mixed in the
laboratory, there is a clear need for heightened ethical consideration.
Cells from different organisms can be combined either in the early developmental stages (for
example, introducing human cells into a mouse blastocyst to observe certain developmental
- 18 -
processes) or after an individual is fully developed (for example, implanting human stem cell-
derived pancreatic cells into a mouse to test their ability to function in a living body). Chimeras are
considered essential for advancing stem cell research to viable therapies, since no therapy can be
tested in humans without research in animals first.
Some people believe that the creation of chimeras involving human cells for medical research is
morally acceptable as long as the chimera has no level of human consciousness. Therefore, research
in which it is possible for human stem cells to produce part of an animal's brain should be
conducted with great care. The National Academies' guidelines prohibit the introduction of human
cells into the blastocyst of a non-human primate, or the introduction of any animal or human cells
into a human blastocyst. The guidelines also prohibit the breeding of human-animal chimeras in the
unlikely event that any human genetic material would be contained in their reproductive cells.
Is it legal?
As of the summer of 2006, all forms of stem cell research in the U.S. are legal at the federal level.
That is, it is not illegal to make or work with new embryonic stem cell lines. However, the use of
federal funds for human embryonic stem cell research is restricted to the cell lines that were
available as of August 9, 2001. Therefore, the derivation of new embryonic stem cell lines can only
occur when scientists are working with non-federal funding. Some states and private foundations
have been supporting this work. Some requirements of federal law, such as human subjects
protections, apply to state- and privately funded stem cell research. For a complete discussion of the
mechanisms for oversight of stem cell research, see the National Academies' report Guidelines for
Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research.
It is legal to conduct research using blastocysts and to derive new cell lines in most states, with
some exceptions. Because stem cell legislation is an area of active debate, please visit the National
Conference of State Legislatures to learn about the laws in a particular state.
- 19 -