EE Lab Manual
EE Lab Manual
LABORATORY MANUAL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING........................................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 2
EXPERIMENTS .................................................................................................................... 3
2018-CIV-67 Page |1
INTRODUCTION
This report is for the Laboratory Manual of the subject Environmental Engineering
and is submitted to the Madam Sarah Aurangzaib.
2018-CIV-67 Page |2
EXPERIMENTS
2018-CIV-67 Page |3
EXPERIMENT 1:
DETERMINATION OF THE PH OF GIVEN WATER SAMPLES
USING THE DIGITAL PH METER
1. A
1.1. OBJECTIVE
To determine the pH value of different water samples.
1.2. APPARATUS
i. pH meter
Figure 1 pH Meter
ii. Beakers
1.3. CHEMICALS
i. Water from different sources
2018-CIV-67 Page |4
1.4.2. POH VALUE
The pOH value of a solution has been defined to be the negative log
of the hydroxyl ions (OH-) concentration.
1.4.3. PH METER
It is a device which is used to measure pH of a solution. In pH meter,
there is an electrode which is placed in a solution. Calibration of pH meter is
done by buffer solutions (4, 7, and 10).
ii. If the pH of water is too high or too low, the aquatic organisms living
within it will die. pH can also affect the solubility and toxicity of chemicals
and heavy metals in the water.
1.6. PROCEDURE
i. Perform calibration of the pH meter using standard pH solutions. The
calibration procedure would depend on the pH range of interest.
ii. In a clean dry 100 mL beaker take the water sample and place it in a
magnetic stirrer, insert the Teflon coated stirring bar and stir well.
2018-CIV-67 Page |5
iii. Now place the electrode in the beaker containing the water sample and
check for the reading in the pH meter. Wait until you get a stable reading.
iv. Take the electrode from the water sample, wash it with distilled water
and then wipe gently with soft tissue.
1.8. RESULTS
The observations show that one sample was acidic, one was basic while water
was neutral.
Distilled water had exactly 7 pH, while tap water had pH a bit greater than 7
indicating the presence of impurities in it.
1.9. COMMENTS
We determined the pH of water through a pH meter. The
pH was determined automatically through the pH meter.
There was a little difference in the pH of distilled and tap
water. Distilled water had a pH of exactly 7, while tap water
had a little bit higher pH. This may be due to the fact that tap
water contains some impurities and salts.
i. pH
ii. pH of Water
2018-CIV-67 Page |6
EXPERIMENT 2:
DETERMINATION OF THE TURBIDITY OF WATER SAMPLES
2. A
2.1. OBJECTIVES
To determine the turbidity value of different water samples.
2.2. APPARATUS
i. Nephelometer
ii. Beakers
Figure 5 Nephelometer
2.3. CHEMICALS
i. Water from different sources
The higher the intensity of scattered light, the higher the turbidity.
Material that causes water to be turbid include clay, silt, very tiny inorganic
and organic matter, algae, dissolved colored organic compounds, and
plankton and other microscopic organisms.
2018-CIV-67 Page |7
2.4.3. STANDARD VALUE
According to Punjab Environmental Health Standards (PEAS), the
turbidity of drinking water should be less than or equal to 5 NTU.
2.4.4. NEPHELOMETER
A nephelometer is an instrument dedicated to the measurement of
the turbidity or cloudiness of a sample. Turbidity is usually caused by the
presence of insoluble particles suspended in a liquid or gas.
2.4.5. CALIBRATION
Always follow the manufacturer’s instructions for calibration of your
particular meter. If the instrument does not have a prepared calibration
curve, make one by using various values of turbidity standards. Plot turbidity
reading versus the standard concentration to obtain curve.
ii. High turbidity can significantly reduce the aesthetic quality of lakes and
streams, having a harmful impact on recreation and tourism.
2018-CIV-67 Page |8
iii. It can increase the cost of water treatment for drinking and food
processing.
iv. It can harm fish and other aquatic life by reducing food supplies,
degrading spawning beds, and affecting gill function.
2.6. PROCEDURE
i. Select the scale.
ii. Add the standard solution in turbidimeter cell and place it in turbidimeter.
iv. Thoroughly shake the sample. Wait until air bubbles disappear before
pouring sample in turbidity tube. When necessary, immerse the turbidity
tube in an ultrasonic bath for 1 to 2 seconds to dislodge the bubbles.
Letting the sample stand for period of time to allow air bubbles to
dissipate will also allow the solids to settle thus changes the
characteristics of the sample being evaluated.
v. Wipe outside of tube to remove fingerprints, dust dirt and water droplets.
Place tube in turbidity meter.
vi. Read turbidity from instrument by direct reading scale or from calibration
table.
2018-CIV-67 Page |9
2.8. RESULTS
The turbidity values of different samples of water obtained from different
locations are given in the above table. Only the value of turbidity obtained from tap
water was less than 5 NTU.
2.9. COMMENTS
Turbidity is the measure of how clear the water is. High turbidity may not be
intrinsically harmful, but its effects can certainly be.
The sources from where the samples were taken are mostly earthen channels,
which carry a high quantity of silts and thus are highly turbid. Their water is
brownish in colour. Only tap water is clear, that is why its turbidity was less than the
amount fixed by PEAS.
2.10. REFERENCES
i. Turbidity
ii. Turbidity:
Description,
Impact on Water
Quality, Sources,
Measures
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 10
EXPERIMENT 3:
DETERMINATION OF THE TOTAL HARDNESS, CALCIUM HARDNESS
AND MAGNESIUM HARDNESS OF DIFFERENT WATER SAMPLES
BY EDTA METHOD
3. A
3.1. OBJECTIVES
To determine:
• Total hardness
• Calcium Hardness
• Magnesium Hardness
Figure 8 Beaker
3.2. APPARATUS
i. Beakers
3.3. CHEMICALS
i. EBT
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 11
3.4.2. TYPES OF HARDNESS
There are two types of hardness:
i. Temporary hardness
Concentration of CaCO3
Sr. No. Description
Mg/L
1. 0 – 75 Soft
2. 75 – 150 Moderately hard
3. 150 – 300 Hard
4. 300 and up Very hard
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 12
3.5. ENVIRONMENTAL SIGNIFICANCE
The environmental significance of hardness of water is:
i. The most important impact of hardness on fish and other aquatic life
appears to be the affect the presence of these ions has on the other more
toxic metals such as lead, cadmium, chromium, and zinc. Generally, the
harder the water, the lower the toxicity of other metals to aquatic life.
ii. In hard water some of the metal ions form insoluble precipitates and drop
out of solution and are not available to be taken in by the organism. Large
amounts of hardness are undesirable mostly for economic or aesthetic
reasons.
3.6. PROCEDURE
3.6.1. TOTAL HARDNESS
i. Take 50ml of sample in a titration flask.
vi. Test three samples and determine mean volume of titrant used.
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 13
3.6.2. CALCIUM HARDNESS
i. Take 50ml of sample in a titration flask.
v. Titrate against 0.01M EDTA from burette until color changes to blue.
vii. Test three samples and determine mean volume of titrant used.
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 14
Vol of EDTA for calcium hardness Calcium hardness
Sample
1 2 3 Avg. Mg/l
1 20.5 20.5 23.5 21.5 860
2 44 55 52 50.3 1160
3 (tap water) 6.2 6.8 6.5 6.5 52
3.8. RESULTS
Total hardness Calcium hardness Magnesium hardness
Sample
Mg/l Mg/l Mg/l
1 960.8 860 100.8
2 1713.33 1160 553.33
3 (tap water) 244 52 192
3.9. COMMENTS
We determined total hardness, calcium hardness and magnesium hardness of
the given water samples.
Only the tap water was fulfilling the criteria of drinking water as it had
hardness less than 120 mg/L, while both the samples
had hardness value more than the limit. Samples 1 & 2
can both be classified as very hard, because their
calcium hardness exceeded 300 mg/L.
3.10. REFERENCES
i. Hardness and water quality
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 15
EXPERIMENT 4:
DETERMINATION OF THE CONCENTRATION OF CHLORIDES
IN WATER SAMPLES
4. A
4.1. OBJECTIVE
To determine the concentration of chlorides in water
sample and distilled water.
4.2. APPARATUS
Figure 11 Beaker
i. Beakers
4.3. CHEMICALS
i. HNO3 (0.1 n)
iii. Indicator
Figure 12 Titration Apparatus
iv. Water samples
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 16
4.4.2. CHLORIDES IN WATER
All natural waters contain chloride and sulfate ions. Their
concentrations vary considerably according to the mineral content of the
earth in any given area. In small amounts, they are not significant. In large
concentrations, they present problems. As chlorides concentration
increases, pH changes from basic to acidic. It results in corrosion and affects
the pH of concrete.
ii. High levels of chloride can corrode and weaken metallic piping and
fixtures, give a "salty" taste to the drinking water, damage household
appliances, boilers, and, if the water is being used for irrigation, it may
inhibit the growth of vegetation.
4.6. PROCEDURE
i. Take 50ml of sample in titration flask
ii. Add 0.5ml of mixed indicator in it. Add indicator until color becomes
purple.
iii. Add 1ml of HNO3 and color of the solution turns yellow
iv. Titrate this sample with 0.0141N Hg (NO3)2 titrant till a definite purple end
point color is achieved
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 17
Chloride ions concentration can be determined form following formula:
(A−B)x N x 35.45 x 1000
Cl- in mg/L =
Volume of Sample (50ml)
Where:
A
Initial reading Final reading Difference
(ml)
Sample 1
0 4.5 4.5
4.5 5.9 1.4 2.967
5.9 8.9 3
Sample 2
0 4.5 4.5
4.5 9 4.5 4.33
9 13 4
Sample 3 (tap water)
0 0.4 0.4
0.4 0.7 0.3 0.367
0.7 1.1 0.4
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 18
4.8. RESULTS
A Cl-
Sample No.
(ml) (mg/l)
1 2.967 593.72
2 4.33 866.46
3 (tap water) 0.367 73.44
4.9. COMMENTS
We determined the concentration of chloride ions in the given water samples.
According to Public drinking water standards, the limit of chloride ions in water is
250 mg/L.
Only the tap water was conforming this limit, the rest of the two samples had
a much higher concentration. As chloride ions are toxic in higher concentrations,
hence their concentrations must be reduced to make the samples 1 & 2 drinkable.
The most common water treatment devices for reducing the chloride content
of drinking water are reverse osmosis, anion exchange or distillation treatment
systems.
4.10. REFERENCES
i. The Effects of Chloride from
Wastewater on the Environment
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 19
EXPERIMENT 5:
DETERMINATION OF THE SOLIDS CONTENT
IN WATER SAMPLE
5. A
5.1. OBJECTIVES
To determine the total dissolved solids,
settleable solids, total suspended solids and total
solids in the water sample.
i. China Dish
iv. Oven
v. Imhoff Cone
Figure 16 Oven
5.3. CHEMICALS
i. Water samples
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 20
5.4.2. TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS)
It is the solid material in water or wastewater sample, which is
retained by a filter of 2µm nominal size under specified conditions.
ii. Suspended solids can clog fish gills, either killing them or reducing their
growth rate. They also reduce light penetration. This reduces the ability
of algae to produce food and oxygen.
iv. Settleable solids can suffocate benthic organisms and fish eggs. In
addition, the sediment may smother insect larvae and other fish food
sources.
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 21
5.6. PROCEDURE
5.6.1. TOTAL SOLIDS (TS)
i. Take 100ml of sample.
iv. Place it in water bath, as a result solid residues will be left in China dish.
iv. Dry it in water bath and then take the weight the China dish.
(A−B) x 1000 x 1000
TDS in mg/L =
Volume of sample
iv. Take the filter paper and dry it in oven and then note the weight
(A−B) x 1000 x 1000
TDS in mg/L =
Volume of sample
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 22
5.6.4. SETTLEABLE SOLIDS (SS)
i. Take 1 liter of sample in Imhoff Cone
iii. After 45 minutes, gently stir this sample from edges 1-2 times
W1= 53.2353 g
W2=53.1851 g
= 502mg/l
• For TDS:
= 385mg/l
• For TSS
= ((0.0972-0.0961) *10002)/100
= 11mg/l
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 23
5.8. RESULTS
5.9. COMMENTS
We determined the solids content of the given water sample. The amount and
type of solids in water are very important as they directly affect the quality of water.
Higher concentrations of solids usually lead to an undrinkable water.
According to Public Health Engineering, the limit for TS in water is 500 ppm,
which for water is about 500 mg/L. The given water sample almost conformed to
this limit, so it can be used for domestic purposes.
5.10. REFERENCES
i. Total Suspended Solids and water
quality
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 24
EXPERIMENT 6:
DETERMINATION OF THE AMOUNT OF
DISSOLVED OXYGEN (DO) IN WATER
6. A
6.1. OBJECTIVES
To determine the amount of dissolved oxygen (DO) in
water sample.
6.2. APPARATUS
Figure 19 Beaker
i. Beakers
6.3. CHEMICALS
i. MnSO4
iii. H2SO4
Figure 20 Titration Apparatus
iv. Na2S2O3 (0.025 n)
v. Starch solution
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 25
6.4.2. IMPORTANCE OF DO
• Fish and aquatic animals cannot split oxygen from water (H2O) or other
oxygen-containing compounds.
• Only green plants and some bacteria can do that through photosynthesis
and similar processes.
6.6. PROCEDURE
i. Take BOD bottle (300 ml volume).
iii. Add 1 ml MnSO4 solution to it and mix uniformly with the help of pipette.
iv. Add 1ml alkali-azide iodide solution. On addition, if white ppts. are
formed, then there is no DO in water. Formation of Reddish brown ppts.
Indicates the presence of DO.
v. If Reddish brown ppts are formed, stopper the bottle, and shake it upside
down for 20 times and allow the ppts. To settle down for about 2 inches.
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 26
vi. Add 1 ml Concentrated H2SO4 and again shake for about 8 times.
vii. Take 200 ml of this water sample in a titration flask and titrate it with
0.025 N Na2S2O3 till the appearance of light-yellow color.
viii. Then add 1ml starch solution. The color of solution becomes blue on this
addition.
ix. Again, titrate it with 0.025N Na2S2O3 till the disappearance of blue color.
The above formula is applicable if we use 200ml of water sample solution and
0.025N Na2S2O3. General formula is given by:
𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎 𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗 𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐 𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕𝒕 𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖∗𝑵𝑵∗𝟖𝟖𝟖𝟖𝟖𝟖𝟖𝟖
DO (mg/l) =
𝑭𝑭∗ 𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗 𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐 𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 𝒊𝒊𝒊𝒊 𝒎𝒎𝒎𝒎
Where:
𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽 𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐 𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩 𝒃𝒃𝒃𝒃𝒃𝒃𝒃𝒃𝒃𝒃𝒃𝒃−𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗𝒗 𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐 𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓𝒓 𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖
F =
𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽𝑽 𝒐𝒐𝒐𝒐 𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩 𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩
For 1st 100 ml (a1) For 2nd 100ml (a2) For 3rd 100ml (a3)
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 27
6.8. RESULTS
A
DO
Sample (A1+A2+A3)
(ml) (mg/l)
Tap water 7.4 4.983
Aerated 12.7 8.552
Lab Sample 0 0
6.9. COMMENTS
We determined Dissolved Oxygen (DO) in the given samples. Healthy water
should have dissolved oxygen concentrations between 6.5 – 8 mg/L.
The tap water has DO less than the given range limits while aerated water has
DO slightly more than the upper limit of range. Lesser amount of DO would
negatively affect aquatic life while a slightly more DO is more or less fine. So, we
should increase DO in tap water more before supplying it to water bodies.
6.10. REFERENCES
i. Learn More: Dissolved Oxygen
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 28
EXPERIMENT 7:
DETERMINATION OF BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (BOD)
IN WATER
7. A
7.1. OBJECTIVES
To determine the amount of Biochemical Oxygen
Demand (BOD) in different water samples.
7.2. APPARATUS
Figure 22 Titration apparatus
i. 11 BOD Bottles
ii. Beakers
iii. Burette
v. Pipette
vii. Incubator
Figure 23 Buffer solutions Figure 24 Beaker
7.3. CHEMICALS
i. 1 L Dilution media
vi. Wastewater
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 29
vii. Na2S2O3 (o.2 n)
viii. MnSO4
x. Conc. H2SO4
xi. Starch
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 30
ii. Higher BOD indicates more oxygen is required, which is less for oxygen-
demanding species to feed on and signifies lower water quality. Inversely,
low BOD means less oxygen is being removed from water, so water is
generally purer.by aerobic biological organisms to oxidize organic
compounds. Sewage with high BOD can cause a decrease in oxygen of
receiving waters, which in turn can cause the death of some organism.
iii. BOD gives the respiration rate of sewage, sludge, soil, and garbage. It
determines the rate of respiration in living beings. Measuring BOD gives
the COD or Chemical Oxygen Demand of inorganic substances.
7.6. PROCEDURE
i. First of all, it is important to know the number of samples to be used for
test. For this purpose, the source of sample is to be recorded which will
indicate the approximate value of BOD5 for the sample.
ii. Take 9 BOD bottles note their numbers and arrange them in 3 groups.
iii. Fill each bottle half with dilution media ensuring that no air gets mixed
with the media while fill in as in DO test.
iv. Add 2ml sample in each of the three bottles marked as first group: 5 ml in
each bottle pf 2nd group and 10ml in each bottle of the 3rd group.
v. Fill the bottle completely with dilution media and place the stopper such
that no air bubbles are trapped.
vi. Now take one bottle from each set and estimate its DO. This will be DO
initial or DO 0days.
vii. For comparison prepare two more bottles with blank dilutions media
(without sewage sample) and find the DO from one bottle.
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 31
viii. Place the rest of the six bottles with sewage samples and one bottle for
blank in the incubator at 200C.
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 32
Volume of
Bottle DO at day 0 DO at day 5 DO depletion BOD at day 5
sample
(ml) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
A1, B1, C1 1 6.47 4.83 1.64 491
A2, B2, C2 3 6.53 4.67 1.86 186
A3, B3, C3 5 6.4 4.3 2.1 126
Blank 1,2 Blank 6.8 6.78 0.02
7.8. RESULTS
7.9. COMMENTS
We determined Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) in the given samples.
Typical maximum values range from 10 mg/L for direct environmental disposal and
300 mg/L for disposal to sewer systems.
We obtained a BOD value of 268 mg/L for given water sample. This shows that
we can dispose this water to sewer systems, but not directly to water bodies. Also,
according to PEQ, standard for wastewater discharge is 80 mg/L (in receiving body).
7.10. REFERENCES
i. Biochemical Oxygen Demand
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 33
EXPERIMENT 8:
DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT OF
CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND (COD) IN WATER
8. A
8.1. OBJECTIVES
To determine the amount of Chemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) in different
water samples.
8.2. APPARATUS
i. COD Flask
iii. Burette
Figure 27 COD Flask
8.3. CHEMICALS
i. K2Cr2O7
ii. HgCl2
iii. H2SO4
v. FAS (0.025N)
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 34
BOD, even though the COD test measures some additional organic matter
(such as cellulose) which is not normally oxidized by biological action. As with
the BOD test, the COD test is reported as mg/Lit of oxygen used.
8.4.2. SIGNIFICANCE
• Chemical Oxygen Demand is an important water quality parameter
because, similar to BOD, it provides an index to assess the effect
discharged wastewater will have on the receiving environment.
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 35
8.6. PROCEDURE
i. Place 50ml sample in 500ml refluxing flask (for samples with
COD>900mg/L use a smaller sample diluted to 50ml).
iii. Add slowly 5ml H2SO4 reagent while mixing to dissolve HgSO4
vi. Attach the flask to the condenser and turn on cooling water.
vii. Add remaining H2SO4 (70ml) through open end of the condenser
continue mixing while adding H2SO4.
viii. Reflux the mixture for 2 hrs. and cool to room temperature, after diluting
the mixture to about twice its volume with distilled water.
ix. Titrate excess of K2 Cr2O7 with Ferrous ammonium sulfate using 2,3
drops of ferroin indicator. The end point will be from blue green to
reddish brown.
x. Reflux and titrate in the same manner a blank containing the reagents
and the volume of the distilled water will be equal to that of sample.
Sr. No. Vol. Of sample Initial volume Final volume Volume used “a”
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 36
Sr. No. Vol. Of sample Initial volume Final volume Volume used “b”
1 100 0 5.4 5.4
2 100 5.4 10.8 5.4
3 150 10.8 17.6 6.8
Average volume used
B= 17.6
8.8. RESULTS
8.9. COMMENTS
We determined Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) in the given samples. Typical
maximum values range from not more than 120 mg/l depending on receiving water
or type of industry under consideration of PCC but not exceeding 400 mg/l.
We obtained a COD value of 17 mg/L, which is well within limits. A higher value
of COD indicates that water requires more oxygen, hence it has more organic
pollution in it. The given sample had a less amount of COD, hence it shows that it is
relatively free from organic matter.
8.10. REFERENCES
i. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
2018-CIV-67 P a g e | 37