ICAEW Ethics Scenarios Guide
ICAEW Ethics Scenarios Guide
ETHICS IN PRACTICE
SCENARIOS
EMPLOYER GUIDE
icaew.com
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 2
INTRODUCTION
The Ethics in Practice scenarios in this document are There is a bank of 18 Ethics in Practice scenarios for use
provided for you to discuss with your students at their during the meetings.
six-monthly meetings in your capacity as their QPRT,
Counsellor or ATP. Scenarios 1 to 6 relate directly to the modules of the
Ethics Learning Programme. Each scenario relates to
They replace the Ethics in Practice webinars which one of the modules. Students are expected to read
accompanied the previous version of the Ethics and discuss some or all of these with you during the
Learning Programme. meetings held while they are studying the Ethics
Learning Programme, during the first year
The six-monthly meetings must include a discussion of of their training agreement.
the student’s learning and progress in relation to ethics.
This is a mandatory part of the qualification. You will Scenarios 7 to 18 are for discussion at meetings
need to discuss with the student: after the first year of the training agreement. These
build in complexity and students will find them
• their progress in the Ethics Learning Programme more challenging. They may cover a range of ethical
including progress through the modules, the dilemmas and some are set in specialist environments,
progress tests and the full assessment; and for example charities or financial services. The scenarios
• an ethical scenario from the Ethics in Practice will reflect the increase in responsibility that the student
scenarios included in this document; and will have at work as they progress through their training
• a real-life ethical situation. agreement.
PLEASE NOTE
Students have access to the bank of scenarios either via You should advise your students to read the scenario
their training file or via a link within the Ethics Learning and consider:
Programme dashboard.
• what are the ethical principles at stake?
The student version of this document advises them • what are the ethical issues to consider?
to prepare for the six-monthly review meetings by • what action would you take to solve the problem?
reading and considering the relevant scenario(s). There
should be enough time to discuss one or possibly The employer version of this document contains
two scenarios at each meeting. Once students have each of the scenarios annotated with call-out boxes
completed the Ethics Learning Programme in the later containing prompts and questions for your discussion
stages of their training agreement there will probably with the student. There are also supporting notes
only be time for one scenario per meeting, as they are covering the ethical principles, issues and actions that
more complex and challenging. the students should consider.
PLEASE NOTE
CONTENTS
YEAR 1
YEAR 2
YEAR 3
CULTURE
Once the audit starts at the client’s premises, you Is this a necessary part of an efficient
feel isolated and bombarded by work programmes, working environment to ensure a competent
timelines and progress schedules. You feel that if you assignment is carried out?
fall behind you would never catch up again.
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
PROFESSIONAL SCEPTICISM
You have only been training for a year and are feeling Does this matter to ensuring competence on
hesitant about auditing. You can never see the bigger the audit?
picture of what you are doing.
You have been allocated to the cash balances part of Might it also make you concerned due to
the audit programme. The programme emphasises that the scale of the client ie, might you lack
you must travel to see original verification documents confidence in your own ability?
that local offices will have obtained from banks in
their regions. However, you are informed that due to
pandemic related travel restrictions you are to carry out
this work remotely. You try to speak to your manager
about how you are to deal with this, however she is Is the manager being unethical here?
quick in her answers, saying things like ‘Do what it takes’
and ‘So long as we deliver a complete service on time
and on budget.’
Your work progresses and you find yourself on Google Should you be on your guard with
Maps looking up where the varied locations of the heightened professional scepticism if you
banks holding these balances are. don’t know the countries?
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
CHARITY
APPLICATION OF FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
ACTIONS TO TAKE
• As an accountant, you would not be expected to have a • In this scenario, although further substantiation/verification
level of understanding of laws and regulations wider than would clearly be needed, it sounds as though the situation
those required for your role. could be close to this.
• You would have acted correctly in this scenario in raising the • While you may have done everything you should in the
matters with your superior, in this case the FD, to address circumstance, the FD is in a senior position. They have a
the matter. greater ability to influence policies, decision-making and
actions taken. The FD should therefore be doing more.
• The issues in this scenario are ones that HR (human
resources) should be made aware of, since this is likely to be • In any situation such as this, you should document the issue
their area of responsibility. and actions taken including the results of any discussion,
and the response.
• NOCLAR (Non-Compliance with Laws and Regulations)
permits a professional accountant (whether in practice or • If some of the issues escalate the board may end up
business) to make disclosure to the appropriate authority needing to take legal advice.
(in this case the Health and Safety Executive (HSE)) without
first reporting the matter to management, but only under
exceptional circumstances. Typically, there must be reason
to believe that there will be an imminent breach of law or
regulation that would cause substantial harm to stakeholders.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 13
Integrity – To be honest and not be associated with misleading Professional competence – Tax treatment needs to be correct.
information. Only a certain amount can be learned from theoretical studies.
Consulting seniors/specialists is always to be advised.
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias or conflict of interest. In Integrity – Could be seen to not be honest.
undertaking the assurance engagement, the firm must not
only be, but also appear to be, independent. Objectivity – Independence could be impaired. The threats to
objectivity would be:
Professional competence – To ensure that the client receives
competent professional service. Self-interest and self-review threats – If the same team
provided both services.
Professional behaviour and due care – To comply with
relevant laws and regulations and avoid any conduct that Intimidation threat – There could also be a threat to
might discredit the profession. independence due to a demanding client. Intimidation
involves exerting undue pressure or influence. The client
THREATS TO THE PRINCIPLES acting in this manner could influence the actions of your firm
in the tax work. This could be seen as ’bullying’. Clearly the tax
This scenario has many threats, below are some of the major advisor should not be influenced by this behaviour.
ones:
Advocacy – Need to consider whether adopting a position
Self-interest – The threat that the financial or other interest will too closely aligned to that of management ie, including
inappropriately influence the firm’s judgement or behaviour. representing the entity in any negotiations or proceedings
involving the tax authority. If this was the case, this would
Self-review – The threat that during the audit the firm will not affect/compromise the independence of the advisor.
appropriately evaluate the results of previous judgements
made by the firm ie, in connection with the tax work. Professional behaviour – Some of the aspects of the scenario,
such as the association with the offshore tax haven and the
Intimidation threat – Exerting undue pressure or influence. sundry expenses should prompt professional scepticism in
your work.
ACTIONS TO TAKE
GREEN WASHING
You hadn’t been working there for long when you Is ‘green wash’ a term you are familiar with?
started to realise that many of these green credentials Have you come across examples of it in
are in fact ‘green wash’ (ie, giving the impression that real-life?
the company is behaving in an environmentally-friendly
manner to increase sales, when it is not doing so) and
most of the company’s practices are unsustainable or
take no account of environmental or societal impacts.
Do you think they should be doing so?
The company’s policy is to advise client companies to What do you think about the balance between
use the cheapest energy provider. You are expected to commercial priorities and ethical ones?
convey this advice. Your concern is that no-one spends Is it clear cut?
any time looking into what the environmental practices
of these energy providers are. When you suggest doing
so, you are strongly reminded that that wouldn’t be time
that you could be charging to any client. Is it fair if you won’t be allowed to log any
chargeable time to this research?
The rubbish collection points with huge colourful bins
laid out in a modernist design pattern to encourage
you to go there and recycle your waste at the large
headquarters office where you work are a talking point
among your co-workers. However, you have noticed the
office waste collection vehicles. They are provided by
a waste management facility company. On looking the
company up, you find a host of news reports and media To what extent does a company have a
comment about the waste company burning waste with responsibility to look into the further chain
seeming disregard for its environmental impact. as to what happens to something like waste
disposal?
Your employer has a policy of asking you to pitch for Once your company has passed the waste to
new business focussing on how green the company the contractor company does their
is and asks you to post on your personal social media responsibility end?
endorsing this. The management advisory company is
entering an award as ‘Green advisors of the year’; the
winners will be decided as those with the most posts on
social media.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 16
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
SOCIAL MEDIA
In a private conversation Jack said to you recently ‘I feel What advice, if any, would you give Jack on
strongly about the matters I am raising in my posts, but I the actions he should take?
will be able to say much more after I leave FLT. However,
What ethical difference would it make if Jack
I would like your advice on what I should do now.’
had made the same social media posts, but
after he had left FLT?
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 18
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE Social media disclosures by Jack about the firm that employs
him are also a breach of confidential information and
Confidentiality – There is a professional duty to respect perhaps also his employment contract. However, they are not
the confidentiality of information acquired as a result of necessarily a breach of client confidentiality.
professional and business relationships. Not to disclose such
information outside the organisation, unless there is duty or The duty of confidentiality does not end when Jack leaves the
right to disclose, or disclosure is in the public interest and firm.
permitted by law.
Duty to report or disclose - As you are aware of Jack’s
Professional behaviour, competence and due care – behaviour on social media and the possible consequences,
To comply with relevant laws and regulations and avoid you should consider your obligation to report the matter to
any conduct that might discredit the profession. Ensuring somebody senior in the firm, perhaps the staff partner or
a competent professional service, which is compliant with ethics partner.
technical and professional standards and legislation.
(2) Possibility of inappropriate financial reporting by client
Integrity – To be honest and not be associated with misleading and lack of challenge by audit firm.
information.
Professional behaviour, competence and due care – With
Intimidation – Exerting undue pressure or influence. only two years’ experience, Jack may not be in a position to
make a reliable judgement on the required financial reporting
treatment of long-term contract losses.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
However, he has the right to voice his opinion within the audit
(1) Public disclosure of confidential information in social team and make his case.
media.
Intimidation threat – An intimidation threat, or a perception
Confidentiality - There is a risk that, despite not naming the of an intimidation threat may mitigate Jack raising the issue
client in the social media postings, somebody who knows internally and may constrain subsequent open and honest
Jack could identify the audit firm and the client. This would discussion of the issues within the audit team.
be a serious breach of confidentiality given the nature of the
disclosures. As Rinter is a listed company, this could be a The instruction by the engagement manager for Jack to
particularly serious matter as its shares could be traded at a remove his concerns from the audit documentation does not
profit, based on the information in the postings. suggest his view has been heard and considered.
ACTIONS TO TAKE
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias, conflict of interest or undue
influence of others.
Integrity – Not being associated with misleading information.
Professional competence and due care – Ensuring
competent professional service based on technical and
professional standards and legislation.
Confidentiality – To respect the confidentiality of
information acquired as a result of professional and business
relationships.
Professional behaviour – To comply with relevant laws and
regulations and avoid any conduct that the professional
accountant knows or should know might discredit the
profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
Objectivity – In this situation, careful safeguards will need to
be implemented in order to act for both the parties. It will be
difficult to know who to listen to and who to take instruction
from.
Conflicts of interest – There is guidance on conflicts of
interest over and above what is stated in the Code of Ethics
itself. ACTIONS TO TAKE
Integrity – You will need to make a note of the points about
the potential inappropriate treatment and keeping of records • On the potential inappropriate motor expenses, you
re: the motoring expenses. You will then need to follow will need to write this up and bring it to the attention
this up, to ensure that both yourself and your firm are not of the partner. It will be necessary to scrutinise the
associated with misleading information. records carefully in order to resolve the concerns.
• With regard to the splitting of the business, you will
Professional competence and due care – If you do not feel need to pass this situation on to the partner and to
competent to carry out this job in the first place, you will most probably the engagement manager in your firm
need to make this clear to the partner. You will also need to to sort out the arrangements re: the splitting of the
follow up whether the correct client acceptance documents, business.
Know Your Client documents and engagement letters are • In this circumstance there are effectively three clients,
comprehensive and up to date. When Mia asks you about each of the husband and wife directors, plus also
splitting the business and matters that are outside your level the business. The key thing is consent and to ensure
of expertise, you should make sure you let her know this fact that this is obtained in the appropriate way from the
and that someone will get back to her. However, it would be appropriate party.
ok to say very general points about possibilities for going • It will be possible to keep acting for the two
forward in a text-book like fashion. individually. The most important thing will be
safeguards and that there are information barriers.
Confidentiality – Talking in the coffee shop was not to be
• As far as the company is concerned, it will have to
advised, especially as one of the parties wasn’t present, and
be made clear that your firm can no longer take
you could be disclosing his information. The potential loss of
instruction from one of the parties. There will need to
the laptop has now clearly compounded the confidentiality
be unanimous consent from the board.
breach and may also have compromised GDPR (General Data
• The missing laptop will need to be reported straight
Protection Regulations).
away. It may be possible for information to be locked
Professional behaviour – Again, talking in the coffee shop down remotely. If the laptop turns out to be lost, the
about the client’s affairs could well be construed as not risk to client information may need to be reported to
professional behaviour. You also need to make sure that you the client.
take reasonable precautions not to lose client information ie,
in the form of taking care of the laptop.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 21
One problem has been over social metrics which it is found Do you think it is possible to have
have been harder to measure with precision. You can also see comparability in these type of criteria just as
that some companies that adopt specific social policies can
you can in financial criteria?
end up appearing stronger than other companies that by the
nature of their strategy can deliver social impact. How important is this to encourage
responsible investing?
Another problem has been ensuring there is a staff
knowledge base in all the areas. There has been a big
recruitment drive for staff with a STEM (science, technology,
engineering and mathematics) background. One of the recent
recruits to the department is Jane. Jane has a degree in
Have you tried looking at CO2 emissions
Natural Sciences and has been a real asset with regard to the reporting?
emissions reporting. Do you think a scientific background is required
to understand the data?
You are currently the senior on an engagement for a cement
manufacturing client. Jane reports to you on this assignment.
The company has introduced a new manufacturing
technology. Your assignment is to provide assurance on its What ethical issues will be important when
claims that this technology can cut emissions by more than providing assurance on future claims?
two-thirds. The technology does not use natural resources
and importantly does not involve use of the high temperature
kilns.
You are called to meet with the engagement partner on It seems Jane has chatted about the company
the assignment. The partner informs you that the CEO of
within earshot of the CEO. What should be
the company has made a complaint that he himself heard
Jane chatting informally by one of the coffee stations with a
done about this?
member of the company’s accounting staff, saying that she
didn’t really believe the CO2 emissions reduction that the
company was claiming.
Should Jane be removed from the
He is demanding that Jane be removed from the assignment assignment?
and threatening that the company might start looking for an
alternative assurance firm. What stance should the partner take in terms
of the CEO saying this?
You speak to Jane after the meeting. Jane tells you that she
has seen board minutes in which the operations director
admitted that she has doubts about the effectiveness of the
new technology.
How does this fact impact the situation?
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 22
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Integrity – Not being associated with misleading information.
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias, conflict of interest or undue
influence of others.
Professional competence and due care – Ensuring
competent professional service based on technical and
professional standards and legislation; and to act diligently in
accordance with these standards.
Professional behaviour – Complying with relevant laws and
regulations and avoiding conduct that might cause discredit
to the profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
Integrity – You will need to consider the possibility of being
associated with misleading information in terms of the claims
that the company is making about the new technology. Jane
has been using her professional scepticism, though it would
seem not dealing with her concerns in an appropriate way.
Objectivity – The CEO is putting the firm under pressure after
he heard Jane’s comments. It will be necessary to safeguard
against being influenced by this and in particular by his threat
to take his business elsewhere.
Professional competence and due care – In having ACTIONS TO TAKE
appropriate staff in the ESG department, the firm is taking
care to ensure professional competence and due care. • It is entirely appropriate to talk to Jane about this
Professional behaviour – In signing up to the new framework incident.
for ESG reporting, your firm will need to ensure that it upholds
the standards of that framework. • It will be necessary to caution Jane with regard to
‘casual’ chatting, no matter how true the content of
If your firm is associated with ESG assurance that is found what she is saying.
to have been carried out incompetently, this could clearly
discredit the profession. • With regard to the doubts about the efficacy of the
new technology in reducing CO2 emissions, you
and Jane should assemble evidence to support
whatever level of assurance it is felt can, or cannot, be
given. Jane will be able to make use of her scientific
knowledge to interrogate the data presented.
BANKING
You are an audit senior on the final audit visit of a large
UK bank with a premium listing on the London Stock What additional pressure does this create?
Exchange. It has a 31 December year end. It’s the first
year for which your firm is auditor, having won a tender Might there be a self-interest threat?
initiated by the maximum auditor tenure requirements How could this be mitigated?
for public interest entities (PIEs). The bank’s policy is
to announce its preliminary results before the end of
February and all audit work needs to be completed by
that date.
You were pleased to have been selected as this is a Does this create a conflict of interest?
prestigious new audit client for your firm, a household
name and you even have your own bank account with
them. At the initial planning meeting the engagement
partner mentioned that this was an excellent career
opportunity for everyone in the audit team and that it was
important for the first year of the audit to go really well. Is there undue pressure being put on you
here?
You have the responsibility for coordinating the audit
of the bank’s proprietary trading and structured
finance operations. This includes valuation of financial
instruments held in the bank’s trading book. These
include over the counter (OTC) derivative positions
which have been valued by the bank using sophisticated Can you be sure that you are not breaching
derivative pricing models. A derivative valuation the ethical principle of professional
specialist has been engaged as an auditor’s expert competence in this tricky area?
to assist in obtaining sufficient appropriate evidence.
You have always found derivatives a challenging area How can you ensure your professional
and are glad that an expert has been employed to scepticism isn’t compromised?
cover this area. As he is an expert, you have accepted
his conclusion that all derivative positions are valued
appropriately.
To make matters worse, you also don’t know how to What issues are raised by the fact that your
proceed with regard to the following matter: a female
member of your team has come to you to complain colleague has turned to social media to
about the manner in which she has been treated when speak out on this matter?
making enquiries regarding the valuation of equity
positions. She states that she has had to suffer ‘a barrage
of micro-aggressions’ including being frequently
addressed in patronising and sexist terms by the bank’s
staff. She tells you that she has frequently described
how difficult she finds the environment at the bank What should you do in this circumstance?
on her social media accounts and many people have
advised her that she shouldn’t put up with a toxic work
environment. You are unsure how to proceed.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 24
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Integrity – Not being associated with misleading information.
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias, conflict of interest or undue
influence of others.
Professional competence and due care – Ensuring
competent professional service based on technical and
professional standards and legislation; and to act diligently in
accordance with these standards.
Confidentiality – To respect the confidentiality of information
acquired as a result of professional and business relationships.
Not disclose information outside the organisation.
Professional behaviour – Complying with relevant laws and
regulations and avoiding conduct that might cause discredit
to the profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
Integrity – You will need to ensure that you are not associated
with misleading information, by ensuring enough safeguards
in relation to not fully understanding the derivatives pricing
model and by fully interrogating the situation of the SPVs.
Objectivity – The fact of the student loan does not create a
conflict of interest if the loan is on normal commercial terms.
ACTIONS TO TAKE
The engagement partner mentions that this is an excellent
career opportunity and that it is important for the first year of
the audit to go well. This creates a self-interest threat due to • With regard to the derivatives valuations, you need
the potential pressure being put on you. to make sure that you satisfy the auditing standards’
guidance as to reliance on experts.
There is a potential intimidation threat in relation to the head
of the structured lending team. You need to make sure that • You should also make sure that how you dealt with
you don’t compromise your judgements as a result of his your professional scepticism concerns is documented.
attitude. There could also be a self-interest threat with you not
wishing to cause problems for the client. • With regard to the setting up of special purpose
vehicles as part of asset securitisations you need to
Professional competence – You need to make sure this
make sure that you gain what information you consider
ethical principle isn’t breached with regard to the challenging
necessary and are not intimidated by the attitude of
area of derivatives. Using an expert is an appropriate way
the head of the structured lending team.
to help with this, however you still need to keep control
and responsibility. You will need to make sure that your
• The discrimination suffered by a member of your team
professional scepticism isn’t compromised.
during the audit is an important matter to follow up.
Confidentiality – Social media content can create a breach of You will need to reassure your colleague that she did
this principle. right to speak up and find the appropriate avenues in
your firm for advice on how you should deal with this.
Professional behaviour – It would bring the Institute into
At the same time as being supportive on this matter,
disrepute if you did not engage with the situation of your
you will need to advise your colleague that she should
colleague suffering from potential discrimination and seek
take care with regard to putting confidential client
the appropriate avenue for it to be investigated and fed
sensitive material on social media, again hopefully
back to the client that your firm will not allow their staff to be
your firm has advice to give out on this. Advice can
subjected to this behaviour.
also be sought from ICAEW.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 25
STAFF SURVEILLANCE
You are a manager at a services support company. The
division you are in charge of provides payroll services for
a healthcare provider, Westerncare.
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Integrity – Not being associated with misleading information.
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias, conflict of interest or undue
influence of others.
Professional competence and due care – Ensuring
competent professional service based on technical and
professional standards and legislation; and to act diligently in
accordance with these standards.
Confidentiality – To respect the confidentiality of information
acquired as a result of professional and business relationships.
Not disclose information outside the organisation.
Professional behaviour – Complying with relevant laws and
regulations and avoiding conduct that might cause discredit
to the profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
Integrity – If you process a payroll knowing that due to the
access method for hours, the staff won’t know whether their
pay is correct or not, do you have some responsibility for
being associated with misleading information? Or is it too far ACTIONS TO TAKE
removed from you? Once you know the information may be
misleading does this change your responsibility? • You should explain to the FD of Westerncare that he
should present his concerns to the other directors at
Objectivity – Would you have a conflict of interest in the meeting. It is understandable that the FD wants to
taking part in the healthcare provider’s decisions regarding consult someone else who he considers might be a
obtaining staff time? Would you want to encourage whatever ‘like mind’ for moral support. You should encourage
provides the cheapest and easiest source of information for the FD to follow the ICAEW Code of Ethics and use the
your own company to process the payroll? ICAEW helpline. The FD should not present misleading
As the operations director is a major shareholder in one of the financial information to his fellow directors. He should
companies being considered to supply the lanyards, do they present both sides of the argument.
have a conflict of interest in terms of the decision between
using the lanyards or the badges as the tracking device? • You should make it clear that some parts of the
meeting are not relevant to you, but if ethical
Professional competence and due care – Can you be said principles are threatened you should speak out.
to be performing a task with adequate due care, if you know
that the data you have been supplied with from a third party is • You should suggest a working group be set up on the
potentially unreliable? use of surveillance software at your own company. This
Confidentiality – What issues are there with confidentiality should include all stakeholders including the Human
when staff increasingly carry out work away from a formal Resources department and staff representatives.
workplace? What difference does the sort of accountancy
work it is make? Is it appropriate for payroll work? • The meeting must discuss the wider ramifications of
the proposed changes. The physical and psychological
Professional behaviour – If you know there is a safety risk welfare of staff must be considered and constantly
with the lanyards, would it be acceptable for you to sit at a reviewed. The issue of trust of staff is an important one,
meeting where they are decided upon and excuse yourself both in terms of staff welfare and also in terms of staff
from a contribution because it is outside your remit? motivation. With the introduction of new technology
Is it acceptable to talk to the FD about his company’s affairs small scale samples or trial periods can then seek
outside the formal work meeting? feedback for what unintended consequences there
could be.
Is the Westerncare FD, as another ICAEW member, being
inappropriate in not explaining to the other directors why • The impact on confidentiality of staff working at home
he doesn’t want to present the beneficial cost aspect re: the is important. The type of work is relevant. Payroll work
lanyards due to his concerns on health and safety grounds? demands high levels of confidentiality and it may be
decided it is not suitable for it to take place remotely.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 27
MODERN SLAVERY
You are working as an associate on the audit of a large
food and consumer goods company with complex
supply chains.
1
Section 54 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (the Act) requires certain organisations
to produce a slavery and human trafficking statement each year.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 28
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Integrity – Not being associated with misleading information.
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias, conflict of interest or undue
influence of others.
Professional competence and due care – Ensuring
competent professional service based on technical and
professional standards and legislation; and to act diligently in
accordance with these standards.
Confidentiality – To respect the confidentiality of information
acquired as a result of professional and business relationships.
Not disclose information outside the organisation.
Professional behaviour – Complying with relevant laws and
regulations and avoiding conduct that might cause discredit
to the profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
Integrity – Auditors are required to ‘read’ all of the ‘other’
information that appears in the annual report as well as the
financial statements, and to deal with any actual or apparent
inconsistencies between the financial statements and the
other information, and any ‘misleading’ information. Section
54 statements are not part of the annual report but must be
published on the company’s website so are in the public
domain – therefore if the section 54 statement is misleading /
ACTIONS TO TAKE
untrue etc this could impact the financial statements.
Objectivity – Is the manager putting an undue pressure on • Although the line manager is technically correct to say
you by saying you should do nothing further? the Section 54 statement is not part of the audit, any
information regarding possible misconduct should be
Confidentiality – If you let the company’s management know
followed up.
that this has been drawn to your attention will this be breaking
the confidence of the staff member?
• This is the case even though you have no way of
Professional behaviour – Ignoring this matter could bring knowing if the staff member’s report is accurate.
discredit to the profession if allegations of modern slavery are Some NGOs do not name and shame companies, and
not taken seriously. others do so only after a full investigation, so the lack
of information on the NGO’s website may just be a
question of timing, not proof that there was no such
report.
MACHINE LEARNING
You are an ICAEW Chartered Accountant working as a
consultant in a machine learning advisory company which What do you think about this dilemma?
specialises in agriculture. Your client list comprises agricultural
laboratories and large-scale farms. Your boyfriend, who works
for a micro-finance charity, often makes comments about the
high prices companies like yours charge and the ‘millions of
small-scale farmers across the globe who can’t afford your
products’. You don’t like to admit it but you do have a slight
dilemma about this yourself. Smart farming involves the use of
algorithms to drive efficiency. Your own specialism is presenting
the financial savings related to this.
How can you be certain to use your professional
Yield prediction is in increasing demand. You have often heard scepticism appropriately and be confident in
your computer analyst colleagues explaining the technology, your professional competence when technology
and you trust their word that these are well defined models, is becoming sophisticated at such a fast pace?
but they seem almost magic to you. You like the reassurance of
working on a spreadsheet or a calculator and directly seeing
how inputs affect outputs. Economic conditions are even
factored in.
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Integrity – Not being associated with misleading information.
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias, conflict of interest or undue
influence of others.
Professional competence and due care – Ensuring
competent professional service based on technical and
professional standards and legislation; and to act diligently in
accordance with these standards.
Professional behaviour – Complying with relevant laws and
regulations and avoiding conduct that might cause discredit
to the profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
Integrity – Are you being misleading if you know that there
could be a short-term cost for the farms, but you want to
encourage them on environmental grounds, and you believe
there will be a longer-term cost gain?
Objectivity – Does the fact that your company earns a fee
when clients purchase software and hardware from third
parties you have recommended impact your objectivity?
Professional competence – Are you ensuring a competent
professional service if you don’t fully understand the ACTIONS TO TAKE
mathematics and coding behind the models you are
presenting to clients? • You should clearly be transparent with the clients
about the source of the models you are presenting.
Professional behaviour – Is it behaviour likely to cause
You should also be honest about what you understand
discredit if you are not fully transparent with the client; about
and don’t understand in terms of the uncertainties in
the uncertainties in the data and about the full picture of the
the predictions.
cost versus the environmental sustainability gain?
Could your consultancy also be criticised for not taking into • You should make every effort to meet with the
account the welfare of the smaller farms around the globe scientists, mathematicians and coders within your
who cannot afford access to this technology? company to improve your understanding. However, in
such advanced technical areas as the use of machine
learning you cannot be expected to understand
everything. What is important is to not be afraid to
ask questions and to ask for help. Your professional
scepticism will need to be heightened in areas where
you are not an expert.
In 20X1 S plc is approved as a supplier by a health authority Did you realise the contract is not binding?
(SHA) for a multi-agency Hospital Information System
procurement process. The contract is potentially an extremely Does this have any impact?
profitable one for S plc. You are uncertain whether you will be
able to include it in the interim results; you know it would be
highly material. Complex negotiations in respect of the services
to be provided are taking place. Knowing that T Group was going to be making
merger decisions about valuation based on your
Eventually a draft contract with SHA is produced. You meet figures should have made you even more aware
with the FD, who you report to. He tells you the formality of that everything needed to be transparent and
ministerial approval is imminent. He also shares with you that not misleading.
he is suffering from depression and has now sought medical
advice. He is highly stressed by discussions that are also taking
place with regard to a merger with T Group.
Your boss instructs you to recognise the £20m licence fee Are ethical principles now being breached?
revenue from the contract and has advised you not to disclose Which ones?
to the auditors the fact that the contract has not yet been
Can you argue that it will be a simple timing
signed by SHA.
difference?
Negotiations are also underway for the sale of cash flows What should you have done at this point?
receivable from the contract to an Asset Finance company
(AF). A letter from AF agreeing to the arrangement is received.
Although no funding has actually been received, you authorise
the £15m to be posted in S plc’s books as cash received. The You know that the auditors are relying on it.
auditors ask you for evidence supporting the AF cash. You So you know it is misleading.
supply the letter AF had sent. The half-year results are approved
and published.
At the full year end the auditors ask further about the SHA
contract. You know that the situation is still pending. You agree
with the FD to relabel an amount of cash received from a This is deliberate improper conduct.
genuine customer and show it as from the SHA contract in
order to satisfy the auditors.
By the 20X2 year end the FD has gone off on sick leave. The
T Group merger is now looking likely and their auditors are
carrying out due diligence on S plc. You are asked to sign off
Your involvement is now worse, as you need to
their report which includes historical financial results.
make the cash balances agree again.
You would have known those are inaccurate.
Eventually during the year to 20X3 the SHA contract is finally
signed. When the actual funding for the SHA contract is
received, you explain this to the auditors as funding being
unwound and replaced with a new funding arrangement. Later
that year the stress is getting too much for you and you contact
the auditors to say you would like to explain the whole situation. Does speaking up about this improper
behaviour excuse your part in it?
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 32
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Integrity – Not being associated with misleading information.
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias, conflict of interest or undue
influence of others.
Professional competence and due care – Ensuring
competent professional service based on technical and
professional standards and legislation; and to act diligently in
accordance with these standards.
Professional behaviour – Complying with relevant laws and
regulations and avoiding conduct that might cause discredit
to the profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
Integrity – Clearly this was breached when you were
responsible for the booking of the contract when it was
not legally binding. The situation then gets compounded
when you also account falsely for the AF funding. You also
intentionally made statements to your own auditors and to
those carrying out the due diligence which you knew to be
untrue. The fact that you do eventually admit your role in the
affair would only be taken account of in terms of what degree
of sanction should be imposed.
ACTIONS TO TAKE
Objectivity – You have allowed yourself to be influenced by
others. When the FD said to not let the auditors know the
precise picture, you should not have been influenced by him • The scenario shows a picture of you getting more
to act improperly. and more embroiled in an extremely serious matter.
At every step of the way, you should have thought to
Professional competence – This has not been ensured. You bring this to a close. There would be a number of
did not carry out your work with skill, care and diligence. It ways to do this. It could have been by speaking to a
would not be acceptable to try to say these were just timing non-executive director or consulting ICAEW.
difference matters. They were matters of considerable
substance. Revenue has been recorded incorrectly. Cash
entries have been manipulated. Inaccurate published
accounts have been produced.
Professional behaviour – Clearly there are issues throughout
the scenario where the behaviour brings discredit to the
profession. The scenario shows repeated incidents over a
period of time. Financial statements are critically important to
the market, investors and to financial institutions.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 33
The other thought that starts to run through your head is that,
while on one of your assignments, when you chatted about
what you might do once qualified, the client said to get back
in touch if you ever ‘go it alone’. They had a quite separate Can you see any ethical problems from
small business that they could do with some freelance help on following this up?
from someone with accountancy skills…maybe this could be
interesting…
.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 34
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Integrity – To be straightforward and honest in all
professional and business relationships. Not being associated
with misleading information.
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias, conflict of interest or undue
influence of others.
Professional competence and due care – Ensuring
competent professional service based on technical and
professional standards and legislation; and to act diligently in
accordance with these standards.
Confidentiality – To respect the confidentiality of information
acquired as a result of professional and business relationships.
Not disclose information outside the organisation.
Professional behaviour – Complying with relevant laws and
regulations and avoiding conduct that might cause discredit
to the profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER ACTIONS TO TAKE
Integrity – Indicating skills or experience you don’t really
possess on your CV/resumé suggests a lack of integrity. • In receiving any gifts from an audit client, you should
check your firm rules with regard to hospitality and
Objectivity – Need to consider whether accepting the flowers
what is acceptable.
from the financial accountant is likely to influence behaviour
and impartiality on the audit. • Confidential matters should not be disclosed to
others nor talked about in a public place. The fact that
Professional competence – Need to consider whether,
the gym is not near to the client does not make any
were you to get the job at the film company, you would be
difference.
compromised by not having the experience to perform a
competent job. • If you have passed all your ACA exams but not yet
completed 450 days of practical work experience,
Confidentiality – Talking about client and employer
you are not yet an ICAEW Chartered Accountant. You
personnel in a public place could breach this principle.
shouldn’t be using the letters ACA after your name
The comments don’t have to be disparaging to result in an
or on any of your networking profiles until you have
inadvertent leak of confidential information. (And could still
received confirmation of your membership from
result in disciplinary action.) That said, some proportionality
ICAEW.
needs to be considered. Simply telling a friend about how
nice people have been during your day without specific • It is not fair on your employer to use their time
identifying details such as names, should be acceptable. or resources on tasks that do not relate to your
employment, unless they have expressly given their
Professional behaviour – Relating to the job hunt, care
permission to do otherwise.
needs to be taken not to take advantage of your employer
resources in terms of use of your chargeable time and the • You should make sure that any claims you make in
use of employer equipment. You also need to be careful not your CV/resumé or in any covering letters are true.
to breach any of your firm’s rules with regard to considering You should not be influenced by keen recruitment
following up a connected opportunity with one of your firm’s consultants to do otherwise.
clients.
• You must ensure you check any restraint of trade
clauses in your current employment contract before
following up any possibilities from your employer
clients.
• If you do go on to carry out freelance work as an
ICAEW Chartered Accountant, you will need to check
and comply with all practice regulations with regard
to this, including having a practising certificate and
the appropriate professional indemnity insurance. It
would be advisable to contact ICAEW if in doubt on
any matters.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 35
DIVERSITY
You are an audit manager in a large firm of chartered
accountants. One of the trainees in your team has asked
if they could have a meeting with you. At the meeting the
trainee tells you that they are wondering why they never get
assigned to audit certain high-profile Government Agencies or What would you do if something similar was
Royal Charities. The trainee says they are seeking your advice happening in your workplace?
because they have raised this with their People Manager, who What is the most appropriate action to take?
is responsible for audit scheduling. The People Manager said
that due to the profile of these clients the audit team members
require the highest level of security clearance to be assigned
to the client, and that the trainee probably didn’t have the right
immigration status to be allowed access to those clients. The
trainee is clearly unsettled by this. It is not at all true. The trainee
simply has a heritage that is non-white. The trainee pointed out Does this add weight to your actions?
to the People Manager that they were born in the UK and raised
in the UK. This conversation with the People Manager took
place six months ago and the trainee can see that there has
been no effort made to redress this scheduling of audit work.
You tell the trainee you will look into this and get back to them. Should you use your work time to investigate
this?
Your firm frequently makes statements that it makes every effort Should you have handed it over elsewhere
to promote diversity. You take it upon yourself to investigate and stepped back?
further. This ends up taking a lot more time than you had
expected, which brings your own dilemmas as you have a
number of audit work responsibilities that are at a crucial stage.
Initially you try emailing the head of diversity, however you get
a rather generic response that the individual themselves would Should you have spent more time trying to
need to come forward on this and it wouldn’t be appropriate persuade the trainee to make more of a stand?
for them to enter into an email correspondence that seems to Whose responsibility is it to challenge the
be critical of a member of staff. situation - the person who suffered the potential
discrimination or others?
You decide to take the matter into your own hands, which
involves you persuading various staff members to let you see
records of the audit personnel assigned to jobs. You are not
certain whether they are breaking any confidentiality rules in Do you think confidentiality rules are being
showing you, but you feel someone has to make a stand on this. broken?
Is it ok to undermine one ethical principle for the
You try speaking to Human Resources (HR), explaining to them
sake of another?
what you are researching, and asking if they could give you any
sort of listing of staff with some sort of indication as to ethnicity.
Again, you cannot obtain the information. You are told this
information cannot possibly be disclosed. You ask if HR would
like to carry out the research, but you just get told the names How do you deal with this when you don’t feel
of various initiatives that they are already involved with that are HR has acted appropriately?
related to promoting diversity in the firm.
SCENARIO 16 – DIVERSITY
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Integrity – Not being associated with misleading information.
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias, conflict of interest or undue
influence of others.
Confidentiality – To respect the confidentiality of
information acquired as a result of professional and business
relationships.
Professional behaviour – Complying with relevant laws and
regulations and avoiding conduct that might cause discredit
to the profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
Integrity – You are concerned that you are associated with
misleading information if you know of a circumstance of
discrimination taking place within your firm and yet the firm
also promotes its strong diversity credentials.
Objectivity – If the firm really isn’t putting forward people
of certain ethnicity for high profile audits, it is potentially not
taking a fair and balanced approach.
Confidentiality – Can it be justified to ask for staff details
ACTIONS TO TAKE
in order to further some other ethical purpose? This is a
very difficult balance. Are there some circumstances where
• Actions for this scenario will very much need to follow
maintaining confidentiality would almost be in breach of the
individual firm procedures.
public interest?
• You have clearly done right in supporting the trainee in
It is important that in investigating the matter you don’t
this matter of potential discrimination.
put undue pressure on other staff members to contravene
their own confidentiality rules for their departments. Senior • Collecting evidence is a sensible way of going about
authority should always be sought. researching this, however permission should always be
gained for accessing records.
Professional behaviour – Discriminatory behaviour is the sort
of behaviour that brings discredit to the profession. It could • It may well be necessary to escalate this matter up
also be that unfair procedures on the basis of race contravene the various channels of seniority in the different
legislation (In the UK the Equality Act 2010). departments in order to ensure this.
• It is appropriate that others look into this for the
trainee. It would be compounding the unfairness if not
only did they suffer the potential discrimination but
also, they had to put their work time in jeopardy by
trying to investigate the scale of the matter further.
• That said, it would be important that you didn’t let
any of your own audit work timeframes become
compromised because you are working on this matter.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 37
Despite the pressure you are put under, you refuse to approve
the statutory accounts.
You are concerned about what you will say to future potential
employers about your reasons for leaving your current job, and
What should you say to future employers?
what references you will be given for this role.
What will you do about references?
You also have a nagging feeling that you ought to have
done something about the auditors who you didn’t feel were
performing a competent task, as they did not pick up the
charge, and were fellow accounting professionals. Should you do/or have done anything about the
auditors?
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 38
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Integrity – Not being associated with misleading information.
Objectivity – Not compromising judgement because of
undue influence.
Professional competence and due care – Ensuring
competent professional service based on technical and
professional standards and legislation.
Confidentiality – Respecting the confidentiality of
information.
Professional behaviour – complying with relevant laws and
regulations and avoiding conduct that might cause discredit
to the profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
Integrity – The incorrect inclusion of the MD’s roof
expenditure.
Objectivity – The pressure put on you by the MD could have ACTIONS TO TAKE
led to you compromising your professional judgement. It was
important to stand firm. • Having taken a new position, you should have raised
the fact that you felt uneasy about the competency
Professional competence and due care – The accounting
of the staff in the accounting team with other senior
team you are in charge of who don’t seem competent.
members of the company. To do otherwise would
Confidentiality – Who to talk to about this matter? The other compromise your own professional competence
family shareholders? The external auditors? and due care. Your area of responsibility will only
be as good as the staff working within it. You should
Professional behaviour – Ensuring appropriate accounts in
have devised a plan and a budget for improving the
the role of Finance Director so as not to bring discredit to the
situation, either through additional training or possibly
profession.
further qualified staff.
• You correctly refused to sign the accounts when you
knew there was a non-allowable expense included.
• What should you have done with regard to the
external auditors? Should you have spoken to them
about the posting at the time that the MD was still
refusing to accept the treatment? As it turns out you
were able to resolve the matter internally.
• It would have been appropriate to ring the ICAEW
helpline if the matter wasn’t resolved.
• It might not have been necessary to resign your
position. Standing up for what is right and challenging
decisions is often respected, even if resisted initially.
However, it is understandable that you had lost your
confidence in the MD and wanted to look elsewhere.
• What about your future references? Might you have
trouble asking the MD for a reference now, since
he developed a hostile attitude after you forced the
correct treatment in the accounts?
• If necessary, you will need to be transparent with future
employers that there was a difficulty in a previous
role. However, you must ensure confidentiality is not
breached, therefore you should not disclose any of the
details.
ICAEW ETHICS IN PRACTICE SCENARIOS 39
GOING CONCERN
You are the head of management accounting at a large travel
and rental company. The company’s key activity is renting Should you be wary of these high volumes
out everything from private jets to small electric cars for use of subsidiary companies and the separation
in urban areas. It also has an extensive group of subsidiary between ownership and the renting parties?
companies. Some of these companies are the owners of the Or are they just normal arrangements in
assets that the parent company rents out. today’s commercial world?
PRINCIPLES AT STAKE
Integrity – Not being associated with misleading information.
Objectivity – Not to compromise professional or business
judgements because of bias, conflict of interest or undue
influence of others.
Professional competence and due care – Ensuring
competent professional service based on technical and
professional standards and legislation; and to act diligently in
accordance with these standards.
Professional behaviour – Complying with relevant laws and
regulations and avoiding conduct that might cause discredit
to the profession.
ISSUES TO CONSIDER
Integrity – Once your professional scepticism has lead
you to have concerns about accounting arrangements at
your company, as a senior member of accounting staff, you
will need to consider whether you should try to speak out
further about this, for example at a senior management team
meeting in order to satisfy yourself that you are not at risk
of being associated with misleading information? Published
accounts necessarily have a wide range of professional
ACTIONS TO TAKE
judgement decisions behind them, it is important that the
resulting picture that they give to stakeholders is honest and
that there is transparent disclosure of relevant matters. • It is highly relevant to potential actions that you are
a senior member of staff, as well as being a qualified
Objectivity – You will need to ensure that the potential finance professional. While some matters might
conflict of interest threat of you having shares in the company well be outside your remit and control, such as the
doesn’t influence your views about the right accounting published accounts being so long, other matters are
treatment and a fair consideration as to whether a dividend more immediately ones where you should speak out.
should be paid out.
• You should not need to remind your colleague that
Professional competence and due care – As the head of published accounts are relied upon by a wide group
the Management Accounting department, you need to take of stakeholders, however, it sounds as though you do
responsibility for the competence of the department overall. need to be honest with him that you take transparent
This would include ensuring staff have enough training disclosures about going concern status very seriously.
and supervision, as well as that enough qualified staff are
recruited. • If you have doubts about your colleague’s integrity in
the matter, you should raise this with another senior
Professional behaviour – Ensuring that the public interest colleague or with the board.
is taken account of is a responsibility of all ICAEW Chartered
Accountants. If your colleague is being judicious with • You cannot turn ‘a blind eye’ to potential doubts you
evidence to present a more confident picture of going might have as to whether dividends should be being
concern status to the auditors than judgement would suggest, paid. At any top level company meetings you are at,
his behaviour may well cause discredit to the profession. you should make your views known; a responsibility
is owed to those suppliers, staff, pension funds who
might not be able to be paid if the company runs in
to difficulties and cash has already been paid out in
dividends.
• You should ensure that your department is producing
competent information and should engage fully
with the auditors to hear their suggestions to aid
improvements to be made.
ICAEW ETHICS
Chartered IN PRACTICE
accountants SCENARIOS
are talented, ethical and 41
committed professionals. ICAEW represents
more than 202,450 members and students
around the world. All of the top 100 global brands
employ ICAEW Chartered Accountants.*
charteredaccountantsworldwide.com
globalaccountingalliance.com
ICAEW
Chartered Accountants’ Hall
Moorgate Place
London
EC2R 6EA UK