PDF Protection of Electricity Distribution Networks 3rd Edition Juan M. Gers Download
PDF Protection of Electricity Distribution Networks 3rd Edition Juan M. Gers Download
com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/protection-of-electricity-
distribution-networks-3rd-edition-juan-m-gers/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
https://ebookfinal.com/download/protection-of-electricity-
distribution-networks-2nd-edition-iee-power-and-energy-series-ted-
holmes-juan-gers/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/protection-of-electrical-networks-
christophe-preve/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/distribution-system-requirements-for-
fire-protection-4th-edition-edition-american-water-works-association/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/advanced-course-of-mathematical-
analysis-3-juan-m-delgado-sanchez/
ebookfinal.com
Teach Yourself Electricity and Electronics 3rd Edition
Stan Gibilisco
https://ebookfinal.com/download/teach-yourself-electricity-and-
electronics-3rd-edition-stan-gibilisco/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-complete-lab-manual-for-
electricity-3rd-edition-stephen-herman/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/transmission-and-distribution-1st-
edition-u-a-bakshi-m-v-bakshi/
ebookfinal.com
Protection of Electricity
Protection of
3rd Edition
Distribution Networks
Protection of Electricity
Distribution Networks
3rd Edition
Electricity
High quality electrical service is everyday more stringent in utilities and
industrial facilities around the world. One of the main players to achieve
Juan M. Gers obtained his BSc in Electrical
Engineering at University of Valle, Colombia, in
Distribution
Networks
this is the protection system, which has to be reliable, fast and with a good 1977. In 1981 he finished an MSc at the University
cost/benefit ratio. This book refers to most aspects of electrical protections, of Salford in England and his PhD in 1998 at the
University of Strathclyde in Scotland. He has been
with emphasis on Distribution Systems. Protection of generation and
working as consulting engineer and university
transmission systems are also treated in the text. References to modern lecturer for over 30 years. Dr. Gers is a Chartered
topics such as the Distributed Generation, Smart Grid and Standard IEC Engineer of the IET and Member of the IEEE.
61850 have been introduced. Written by two well experienced engineers
3rd Edition
Ted Holmes graduated from Queen Mary,
who combine a comprehensive theoretical background with examples and University of London in 1950 and joined the
exercises, this book will allow the reader to easily follow the ideas explored. CEGB, where he worked for over 35 years. A
The book will be valuable to pre and postgraduate students, design, Fellow of the IEE and a Chartered Engineer, he
maintenance and consulting engineers as well as instructors looking for is co-author of the book Electricity Distribution
proper references. Network Design. He passed away in July of 2006
after fighting a long illness.
Juan M. Gers
and Edward J. Holmes
Gers and Holmes
Protection of
Electricity
Distribution
Networks
Volume 1 Power circuit breaker theory and design C.H. Flurscheim (Editor)
Volume 4 Industrial microwave heating A.C. Metaxas and R.J. Meredith
Volume 7 Insulators for high voltages J.S.T. Looms
Volume 8 Variable frequency AC motor drive systems D. Finney
Volume 10 SF6 switchgear H.M. Ryan and G.R. Jones
Volume 11 Conduction and induction heating E.J. Davies
Volume 13 Statistical techniques for high voltage engineering W. Hauschild and W. Mosch
Volume 14 Uninterruptible power supplies J. Platts and J.D. St Aubyn (Editors)
Volume 15 Digital protection for power systems A.T. Johns and S.K. Salman
Volume 16 Electricity economics and planning T.W. Berrie
Volume 18 Vacuum switchgear A. Greenwood
Volume 19 Electrical safety: a guide to causes and prevention of hazards
J. Maxwell Adams
Volume 21 Electricity distribution network design, 2nd edition E. Lakervi and E.J. Holmes
Volume 22 Artificial intelligence techniques in power systems K. Warwick, A.O. Ekwue
and R. Aggarwal (Editors)
Volume 24 Power system commissioning and maintenance practice K. Harker
Volume 25 Engineers’ handbook of industrial microwave heating R.J. Meredith
Volume 26 Small electric motors H. Moczala et al.
Volume 27 AC-DC power system analysis J. Arrillaga and B.C. Smith
Volume 29 High voltage direct current transmission, 2nd edition J. Arrillaga
Volume 30 Flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) Y-H. Song (Editor)
Volume 31 Embedded generation N. Jenkins et al.
Volume 32 High voltage engineering and testing, 2nd edition H.M. Ryan (Editor)
Volume 33 Overvoltage protection of low-voltage systems, revised edition P. Hasse
Volume 34 The lightning flash V. Cooray
Volume 36 Voltage quality in electrical power systems J. Schlabbach et al.
Volume 37 Electrical steels for rotating machines P. Beckley
Volume 38 The electric car: development and future of battery, hybrid and fuel-cell
cars M. Westbrook
Volume 39 Power systems electromagnetic transients simulation J. Arrillaga
and N. Watson
Volume 40 Advances in high voltage engineering M. Haddad and D. Warne
Volume 41 Electrical operation of electrostatic precipitators K. Parker
Volume 43 Thermal power plant simulation and control D. Flynn
Volume 44 Economic evaluation of projects in the electricity supply industry H. Khatib
Volume 45 Propulsion systems for hybrid vehicles J. Miller
Volume 46 Distribution switchgear S. Stewart
Volume 47 Protection of electricity distribution networks, 2nd edition J. Gers
and E. Holmes
Volume 48 Wood pole overhead lines B. Wareing
Volume 49 Electric fuses, 3rd edition A. Wright and G. Newbery
Volume 50 Wind power integration: connection and system operational aspects
B. Fox et al.
Volume 51 Short circuit currents J. Schlabbach
Volume 52 Nuclear power J. Wood
Volume 53 Condition assessment of high voltage insulation in power system
equipment R.E. James and Q. Su
Volume 55 Local energy: distributed generation of heat and power J. Wood
Volume 56 Condition monitoring of rotating electrical machines P. Tavner, L. Ran,
J. Penman and H. Sedding
Volume 57 The control techniques drives and controls handbook, 2nd edition B. Drury
Volume 58 Lightning protection V. Cooray (Editor)
Juan M. Gers
and Edward J. Holmes
The Institution of Engineering and Technology
This publication is copyright under the Berne Convention and the Universal Copyright
Convention. All rights reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research
or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and
Patents Act 1988, this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted, in any
form or by any means, only with the prior permission in writing of the publishers, or in
the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of licences issued
by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside those
terms should be sent to the publisher at the undermentioned address:
The Institution of Engineering and Technology
Michael Faraday House
Six Hills Way, Stevenage
Herts, SG1 2AY, United Kingdom
www.theiet.org
While the author and publisher believe that the information and guidance given in
this work are correct, all parties must rely upon their own skill and judgement when
making use of them. Neither the author nor publisher assumes any liability to
anyone for any loss or damage caused by any error or omission in the work, whether
such an error or omission is the result of negligence or any other cause. Any and all
such liability is disclaimed.
The moral rights of the author to be identified as author of this work have been
asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
1 Introduction 1
1.1 General 1
1.2 Basic principles of electrical systems 2
1.3 Protection requirements 2
1.4 Protection zones 5
1.5 Primary and back-up protection 5
1.5.1 Primary protection 6
1.5.2 Back-up protection 6
1.6 Directional protection 7
5 Overcurrent protection 61
5.1 General 61
5.2 Types of overcurrent relay 61
5.2.1 Definite-current relays 61
5.2.2 Definite-time/current or definite-time relays 64
5.2.3 Inverse-time relays 64
5.3 Setting overcurrent relays 64
5.3.1 Setting instantaneous units 65
5.3.2 Coverage of instantaneous units protecting lines between
substations 66
5.3.3 Setting the parameters of time-delay overcurrent relays 67
5.3.3.1 The pick-up setting 68
5.3.3.2 Time dial setting 69
5.3.3.3 Time discrimination margin 70
5.3.3.4 Use of mathematical expressions for the relay
characteristics 70
In the six years since this book was first published, there have been considerable
advances in relay protection design. The development of powerful numerical
algorithms and further improvements in digital technology have greatly extended
the scope of protection systems. Most of the latest types of relays are now multi-
functional devices with control, metering, reporting and alarm functions in addition
to their protection capabilities that normally include several types within the same
device. They also have very good communication facilities that allow them to work
in virtually any automated scheme. Modern relays therefore now offer better pro-
tection coverage and can be programmed to automatically adjust for changes in
power system topologies and different operating conditions due to the multiple
setting groups feature incorporated in most of them.
Chapters 3 and 5 have been considerably extended to include more detail on
numerical relays. Chapter 12, dealing with protection schemes, has been updated to
take account of the new technology available, while the testing procedures covered
in the last chapter now include ample reference to numerical protection.
We have also taken the opportunity of updating sections of the original text
and have added a new chapter on the processing of alarms since the fast and effi-
cient processing of the many alarms that flow from the power system into control
centres has an important bearing on the speed with which system faults are dealt
with. Our thanks are due to our colleague Professor K. L. Lo of the University of
Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, for his help with this material.
Finally, once again we acknowledge the support of our wives Pilar and Maggie
during the work on this edition.
J.M. Gers E.J. Holmes
Weston, Florida Stourbridge
USA England
[email protected] [email protected]
The fundamentals of protective relays have remained the same for many years, but
software, hardware and communications have experienced outstanding progress.
That has been introduced in the protection systems as a whole, which has impacted
positively the performance of relays and in particular in regards to reliability and
speed of operation.
Distribution systems are receiving great attention in all utilities worldwide
since the responsibility of the quality of service depends greatly on their appro-
priate performance. A very important role in the proper operation of distribution
systems is played by the protective relays that, as always, have to perform reliably,
rapidly and in selective form. Interesting enough is that the price of the relays has
dropped remarkably as it has happened with all computer-based devices. Modern
relays, of course, are structured very much following computer architecture.
One important requirement of relays applied to distribution systems is their
ability to adapt to the prevailing condition of the topology that can vary in multiple
ways due to the ever growing number of devices installed in the system to imple-
ment distribution automation. The use of adaptive criteria is a good solution for
this. It requires an individual study of all the operating scenarios to achieve the
correct setting for each one of the groups that modern relays have. This has made
the setting of relays applied to distribution system more interesting but more
complex and time demanding too.
The third edition does not introduce considerable changes in regards to fun-
damentals but in new technologies implemented. Fewer changes have been intro-
duced in the different chapters to ease the understanding of the material or to
update some topics of the first two editions. The chapter on processing alarms was
removed, and instead a chapter on communication networks for power systems
automation was introduced, which has ample reference to the IEC 61850 Standard.
I regret not having had for the preparation of this new edition our late friend
Ted Holmes who fought for many years a long illness. I still miss the long and
fruitful discussions we had during the preparation of the previous editions. How-
ever, the spirit of the book and its technical level have been rigorously maintained.
Special thanks are given to James Ariza for his cooperation with the chapter on
communication networks, Cesar Gallego for his comments on several topics,
Francisco Pacheco for his care and patience in producing the drawings, Francia
Solis for his help with the overall organization of the material and in general to the
engineers of the GERS group for their invaluable contribution throughout the many
years working in the field of protections.
I also extend my gratitude to the IET for their trust and in particular to Lisa
Reading for her enthusiasm with the new edition and to S. Ramya for her valuable
contribution with the revision of the text.
I am always grateful to my wife Pilar for her continuous understanding and to
Maggie, Ted’s wife, who always gave great support to this effort.
J.M. Gers
Weston, Florida
USA
[email protected]
1.1 General
With the increasing dependence on electricity supplies, in both developing and
developed countries, the need to achieve an acceptable level of reliability, quality
and safety at an economic price becomes even more important to customers.
A further requirement is the safety of the electricity supply. A priority of any
supply system is that it has been well designed and properly maintained in order to
limit the number of faults that might occur.
Associated with the distribution networks themselves are a number of ancillary
systems to assist in meeting the requirements for safety, reliability and quality of
supply. The most important of these are the protection systems that are installed to
clear faults and limit any damage to distribution equipment. Among the principal
causes of faults are lightning discharges, the deterioration of insulation, vandalism,
and tree branches and animals contacting the electricity circuits. The majority of
faults are of a transient nature and can often be cleared with no loss of supply, or just
the shortest of interruptions, whereas permanent faults can result in longer outages.
To avoid damage, suitable and reliable protection should be installed on all circuits
and electrical equipment. Protective relays initiate the isolation of faulted sections of
the network in order to maintain supplies elsewhere on the system. This then leads to
an improved electricity service with better continuity and quality of supply.
A properly coordinated protection system is vital to ensure that an electricity
distribution network can operate within preset requirements for safety for indivi-
dual items of equipment, staff and public, and the network overall. Automatic
operation is necessary to isolate faults on the networks as quickly as possible in
order to minimise damage. The economic costs and the benefits of a protection
system must be considered in order to arrive at a suitable balance between the
requirements of the scheme and the available financial resources. In addition,
minimising the costs of non-distributed energy is receiving increasing attention.
When providing protective devices on any supply network, the following basic
principles must apply. On the occurrence of a fault or abnormal condition, the
protection system must be capable of detecting it immediately in order to isolate
the affected section, thus permitting the rest of the power system to remain in
service and limiting the possibility of damage to other equipment. Disconnection of
equipment must be restricted to the minimum amount necessary to isolate the fault
from the system. The protection must be sensitive enough to operate when a fault
occurs under minimum fault conditions, yet be stable enough not to operate when
its associated equipment is carrying the maximum rated current, which may be a
short-time value. It must also be fast enough to operate in order to clear the fault
from the system quickly to minimise damage to system components and be reliable
in operation. Back-up protection to cover the possible failure of the main protection
is provided on most circuits in order to improve the reliability of the protection
system. While electromechanical relays can still be found in some utilities, the
tendency is to replace these by microprocessor and numerical relays, particularly in
the more complex protection arrangements.
The primary aim of any electricity supply system is to meet all customers’
demands for energy. Power generation is carried out wherever it achieves the
most economic selling cost overall. The transmission system is used to transfer
large amounts of energy to major load centres, while distribution systems carry
the energy to the furthest customer, using the most appropriate voltage level.
Where the transport of very large amounts of power over large distances is
involved, an extra high voltage (EHV) system, sometimes termed major or pri-
mary transmission, is required. Such systems operate in the >300-kV range,
typical values being 400, 500 and 765 kV.
High-voltage (HV) networks transport large amounts of power within a particular
region and are operated as either interconnected systems or discrete groups. Below the
transmission system, there can be two or three distribution voltage levels to cater for
the variety of customers and their demands. In general, the medium-voltage (MV)
networks and low-voltage (LV) networks are operated as radial systems.
Figure 1.1 illustrates the interrelation of the various networks. The HV
networks are supplied from EHV/HV substations that themselves are supplied by
inter-regional EHV lines. HV/MV transforming substations situated around each
HV network supply individual MV networks. The HV and MV networks provide
supplies direct to large customers, but the vast majority of customers are connected
at low voltage and supplied via MV/LV distribution substations and their asso-
ciated networks, as shown in Figure 1.2.
EHV
EHV/HV
Major HV
substation
HV/MV
HV network
HV/MV
MV
MV
overhead MV cable
network network
To adjacent
MV
network
Urban distribution
Rural MV/LV
distribution
LV board
LV network
Generation
EHV
Generation
EHV/HV
HV
HV/MV
MV
Consumption
MV/LV
LV
Consumption
M M
~ ~
Busbar protection
Line protection
protection, operate only for faults within their protection zone. Other relays are able
to detect faults both within a particular zone and outside of it, usually in adjacent
zones, and can be used to back up the primary protection as a second line of
defence. It is essential that any fault is isolated, even if the associated main pro-
tection does not operate. Therefore, wherever possible, every element in the power
system should be protected by both primary and back-up relays.
A B C
G2 G3 G4
2 5 9
G1
1 3 4 6 10
F1 F2 F3
7 8 11
F4
Table 1.1 shows the breakers that failed to open and those that were tripped by
the primary protection and by the back-up protection.
For fault F1, the protection correctly tripped breaker 4 to open one end of the
faulted feeder. With breaker 3 failing to open, breakers 1 and 2 were tripped by
back-up protection to stop fault current flowing into the fault from generators
G1 and G2. With fault F2, when breaker 6 failed to operate, the directional pro-
tection on breakers 3 and 8 operated to open the incoming feeders from the adjacent
busbars, and the back-up protection on breaker 5 tripped to stop G3 feeding into
the fault.
Fault F3 was correctly cleared by the tripping of feeder breaker 10. Fault F4
was correctly cleared by the operation of breaker 11, so that the tripping of breaker
G1
1
Termoyumbo 115 kV
G2 2 3 4
F1 5 6 29
10
Bajo Anchicayá 115 kV Chipichape 115 kV San Luis 115 kV
9 28
11 12 13 14 7 8
15
20 27
Pailon 115 kV Chipichape 34.5 kV San Luis 34.5 kV
F3
16 21 22 26
17 18 23 24
19 25
G3
8 was incorrect. Any fault current flowing along inter-busbar feeder 7–8 before
breaker 11 opened would have been from 7 to 8. Relay 8 is directional, and
operation should not have been initiated for flows from 7 to 8. Thus, the first two
cases illustrate maloperation from a dependability point of view, with the last one
illustrating maloperation from a security standpoint.
Exercise 1.1
For the power system arrangement shown in Figure 1.6, complete Table 1.2, taking
into account the operation of the circuit breakers as shown for each fault case.
Please note that, as in Example 1.1, some of the circuit breakers that operated may
have done so unnecessarily.
The current that flows through an element of a power system is a parameter that
can be used to detect faults, given the large increase in current flow when a
short-circuit occurs. For this reason, a review of the concepts and procedures for
calculating fault currents will be made in this chapter, together with some calcu-
lations illustrating the methods used. Although the use of these short-circuit
calculations in relation to protection settings will be considered in detail, it is
important to bear in mind that these calculations are also required for other appli-
cations, for example, calculating the substation earthing grid, the selection of
conductor sizes and for the specifications of equipment such as power circuit
breakers.
For the circuit shown in Figure 2.1, the mathematical expression that defines
the behaviour of the current is
di
eðtÞ ¼ L þ RiðtÞ ð2:1Þ
dt
wL
V max h i
sinðwt þ a fÞ sinða fÞ eðR=LÞ
t
iðtÞ ¼ ð2:2Þ
Z
where
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
Z¼ R2 þ w2 L2
where a is the closing angle that defines the point on the source sinusoidal voltage
when the fault occurs, and
wL
f ¼ tan1
R
It can be seen that, in (2.2), the first term varies sinusoidally and the second
term decreases exponentially with a time constant of L/R.The first term corresponds
to the AC component, whereas the second term can be recognised as the DC
component of the current having an initial maximum value when a– f ¼ p/2, and
zero value when a ¼ f (see Figure 2.2). It is impossible to predict at what point on
the sinusoidal cycle the fault will be applied and therefore what magnitude the DC
component will reach. If the tripping of the circuit, due to a fault, takes place when
the sinusoidal component is at its negative peak, the DC component reaches its
theoretical maximum value half a cycle later.
(a)
(b)
An approximate formula for calculating the effective value of the total asym-
metrical current, including the AC and DC components, with acceptable accuracy
can be used by assuming that these components are in quadrature with the fol-
lowing expression:
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
I rms:asym: ¼ I 2rms þ I 2DC ð2:3Þ
induction current, can be seen in Figure 2.3. This effect is known as armature
reaction.
ia
ib
ic
The physical situation that is presented to a generator, and which makes the
calculations quite difficult, can be interpreted as a reactance that varies with time.
Notwithstanding this, in the majority of practical applications it is possible to take
account of the variation of reactance in only three stages without producing
significant errors. In Figure 2.4, it is to be noted that the variation of current with
time, I(t), comes close to the three discrete levels of current, I00 , I0 and I – the
subtransient, transient and steady-state currents, respectively. The corresponding
values of direct axis reactance are denoted by X d00, Xd0 and Xd, and the typical
variation with time for each of these is illustrated in Figure 2.5.
I″
I(t)
I′
t
t1 t2
X(t)
Xd
Xd′
Xd″
t1 t2 t
duty types defined as first cycle or momentary, peak, interrupting or breaking, and
time-delayed or steady-state currents.
First cycle currents, also called momentary currents, are the currents present
one half of a cycle after fault initiation. In European Standards, these values are
00
indicated by I k . These are the currents that are sensed by circuit breaker protection
equipment when a fault occurs and are therefore also called close and latch cur-
rents. They are calculated with DC offset but no AC decrement in the sources, and
using the machine subtransient reactances. Peak currents correspond to the max-
imum currents during the first cycle after the fault occurs and differ from the first
cycle currents that are totally asymmetrical rms currents.
Interrupting currents, also known as contact parting currents, are the values
that have to be cleared by interrupting equipment. In European Standards, these
values are called breaking currents and typically are calculated in the range from
three to five cycles. These currents contain DC offset and some decrement of
the AC current. Time-delayed or steady-state short-circuit currents correspond to
the values obtained between 6 and 30 cycles. These currents should not contain DC
offset, and synchronous and induction contributions should be neglected
and transient reactances or higher values should be used in calculating the currents.
Reactance values to be used for the different duties are reproduced in
Figure 2.6, based on IEEE Standard 399-1990. For each case, asymmetrical or
symmetrical rms values can be defined depending on whether the DC component pffiffiisffi
included or not. The peak values are obtained by multiplying the rms values by 2.
The asymmetrical values are calculated as the square root of the sum of the
squares of the DC component and the rms value of the AC current, i.e.
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
I rms ¼ I 2DC þ I 2AC ð2:4Þ
Figure 2.6 Reactance values for first cycle and interrupting duty calculations [from
IEEE Standard 399-1990; reproduced by permission of the IEEE]
I peak ¼ I DC þ I AC
pffiffiffi ! pffiffiffi !
0:9 2V 0:9 2V
¼ 00 þ 00 ð2:6Þ
Xd Xd
¼ 2:55I rms:sym:
When considering the specification for the switchgear opening current, the
so-called rms value of interrupting current is used in which, again, the AC and DC
components are taken into account, and therefore,
qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
I rms:asym:int: ¼ I 2DC þ I 2AC:rms:sym:int:
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
4
3
2
1
Ratio X/R
80
70
60
es
50
ycl
40 e, c
im
gt
30
in
rt
20 t- pa
n ta c
Co
10
0
1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7
Multiplying factors
Figure 2.7 Multiplying factors for three-phase and line-to-earth faults (total
current rating basis) [from IEEE Standard C37.5-1979; reproduced
by permission of the IEEE]
V a ¼ V a0 þ V a1 þ V a2
V b ¼ V b0 þ V b1 þ V b2
V c ¼ V c0 þ V c1 þ V c2
V b ¼ V a0 þ a2 V a1 þ aV a2
V c ¼ V a0 þ aVa1 þ a2 V a2
where a is a so-called operator that gives a phase shift of 120 clockwise and a
multiplication of unit magnitude, i.e. a ¼ 1ff120 , and a2 similarly gives a phase
shift of 240 , i.e. a2 ¼ 1ff240 .
Therefore, the following matrix relationship can be established:
2 3 2 3 2 3
Va 1 1 1 V a0
4 V b 5 ¼ 4 1 a2 a 5 4 V a1 5
Vc 1 a a2 V a2
1
V a0 ¼ ðV a þ V b þ V c Þ
3
1
V a1 ¼ ðV a þ aVb þ a2 V c Þ
3
1
V a2 ¼ ðV a þ a2 V b þ aV c Þ
3
The foregoing procedure can also be applied directly to currents and gives
I a ¼ I a0 þ I a1 þ I a2
I b ¼ I a0 þ a2 I a1 þ aI a2
I c ¼ I a0 þ aI a1 þ a2 I a2
Therefore
1
I a0 ¼ ðI a þ I b þ I c Þ
3
1
I a1 ¼ ðI a þ aI b þ a2 I c Þ ð11:1Þ
3
1
I a2 ¼ ðI a þ a2 I b þ aI c Þ
3
In three-phase systems, the neutral current is equal to In ¼ Ia + Ib + Ic and,
therefore, In ¼ 3Ia0.
By way of illustration, a three-phase unbalanced system is shown in Figure 2.8
together with the associated symmetrical components.
Vc
Va
Vb
Vc1
Va1
Vb2
Vc2
Vb1
Vc0
Vc2
Vc Vc1
Va1
Va Va2
Va0
Vb
Vb1
Vb0
Vb2
00 0
Type of machine Xd Xd Xd X2 X0
Turbine (2-pole) 0.09 0.15 1.20 0.09 0.03
Generator (4-pole) 0.14 0.22 1.70 0.14 0.07
Salientpole (withdampers) 0.20 0.30 1.25 0.20 0.18
Generator (withoutdampers) 0.28 0.30 1.20 0.35 0.12
Ia1
a Reference bus
Z1 –
Ea
+
Ea +
Va1
Ec – –
– Eb
Z1 +
+ Z1 Z1
Ib1
c b
a
Ic1
Ia1
(a) (b)
Ia2
a
Reference bus
Z2
Va2
Z2
Z2 Z2
Ib2
c b
Ic2 a
Ia2
(c) (d )
Ia0
a
Ia0 Reference bus
Ib0 = Ia0
Ic0 = Ia0 Ze0
3Zn
Zn Va0
Z0
Ze0 Ze0
Ib0 Ze0
c b
a
Ic0
Ia0
(e) (f)
Figure 2.9 Equivalent sequence networks and current flows for a synchronous
generator: (a) positive-sequence current; (b) positive-sequence
network; (c) negative-sequence current; (d) negative-sequence
network; (e) zero-sequence current; (f) zero-sequence network
The above equations can be applied to any generator that carries unbalanced
currents and are the starting point for calculations for any type of fault. The same
approach can be used with equivalent power systems or loaded generators, Ea then
being the voltage behind the reactance before the fault occurs.
2.2.2.3 Line-to-line-to-earthfault
The conditions for a fault between lines b and c and earth are represented by the
equations Ia ¼ 0 and Vb ¼ Vc ¼ 0. From these equations, it can be proved that
Ea
I a1 ¼
Z 1 þ ½Z 0 Z 2 =ðZ 0 þ Z 2 Þ
Ea
Va1
Z1
Z2 Va2
Va0
Z0
Ia1
(a)
Ea
Va1 Va2
Z1 Z2
Ia1 Ia2
(b)
Ea
(c)
Figure 2.10 Connection of sequence networks for asymmetrical faults: (a) phase-
to-earth fault; (b) phase-to-phase fault; (c) double-phase-to-earth
fault
V2
Z¼
P
where
Z ¼ equivalent positive- and negative-sequence impedances
V ¼ nominal phase-to-phase voltage
P ¼ three-phase short-circuit power
The equivalent zero sequence of a system can be derived from the expressions
of sequence components referred to for a single-phase fault, i.e. Ia1 ¼ Ia2 ¼ Ia0 ¼
VLN/(Z1 + Z2 + Z0), where VLN is the line-to-neutral voltage.
For lines and cables, the positive- and negative-sequence impedances are equal.
Thus, on the basis that the generator impedances are not significant in most distribution
network fault studies, it may be assumed that overall Z2 ¼ Z1, which simplifies the
calculations. Thus, the above formula reduces to Ia ¼ 3 Ia0 ¼ 3VLN/(2Z1 + Z0), where
VLN is the line-to-neutral voltage and Z0 ¼ (3VLN/Ia)– 2Z1.
Ch002
a1 a2 c2 a0, b0, c0 a a1 a2 c2
a, b, e a, b, e c
c1 b1 b2 c=0 b c1 b1 b2 a0, b0, c0 a=b=0
a1 c2 a=0 a1 c2 a0, b0, c0 a
b2 b2
b, c, c b, c, c
c1 b1 a0, b0, c0 c b c1 b1
a2 a2 b=c=0
a1 a a1
Protection of electricity distribution networks
b2 a2 b2 a2
c, a, e c, a, e b
c1 b1 a0, b0, c0 c b=0 c1 b1 a0, b0, c0 a=c=0
c2 c2
Figure 2.11 Currents and voltages for various types of faults: (a) sequence currents for different
types of faults and (b) sequence voltages for different types of faults
Calculation of short-circuit currents 29
A protection relay is a device that senses any change in the signal it is receiving,
usually from a current and/or voltage source. If the magnitude of the incoming
signal is outside a pre-set value, the relay will carry out a specific operation, gen-
erally to close or open electrical contacts to initiate some further operation, for
example the tripping of a circuit breaker.
3.1 Classification
3.1.1 Construction
● electromechanical
● solid state
● microprocessor
● numerical
● non-electrical (thermal, pressure, etc.)
3.1.3 Function
● overcurrent
● directional overcurrent
● distance
● overvoltage
● differential
● reverse power
● other
transformer. Non-electrical relays are outside the scope of this book and therefore
are not referred to.
Fixed contact
Moving contact
Restraining
spring
Armature
Coil
Pivot
Fig. 10
29. Window Openings.—Referring to Fig. 9, which shows the
face view of a bay of the wall illustrated in section in Fig. 7, the
details of the several window openings in the walls may be studied.
The basement windows are independent frames with double-hung
sash, a rowlock brick arch supporting the brickwork over the window
head. In the practice and design of window heads for mill buildings,
it is usual to make the radius of the window head equal to the width
of the reveal. In this instance, the distance across the opening is 4
feet 3 inches, and the radius of the arched head is the same
dimension.
The windows throughout the balance of the building are twin
windows, double hung, and the construction of the window frame
and sash is shown in the drawing. This frame is what is known as a
reveal frame, and is built in as the brickwork progresses.
Sometimes the frame is slipped in from the back, as shown in Fig.
10, and when this is the case the work can be carried along without
waiting for the window frames.
Fig. 11
As distinguishable from the reveal frame, there is the plank-
frame construction, which is not built into the brickwork, but is
built up as shown in Fig. 11. When it is desirable to have the central
mullion a, Fig. 9, as narrow as possible, the box construction
indicated on the drawing is done away with and the window is hung
by means of overhead pulleys, the weights operating in the boxes at
the sides.
STANDARD SLOW-BURNING
CONSTRUCTION
30. A type of factory construction more usual than that
previously described is illustrated in Fig. 12. In this illustration, it will
be noticed that the main girders bear on wall pilasters, and the
spandrel filling between the pilasters is kept as thin as possible. The
usual reveal window frame is used, as shown at a, and the soffit of
the arch over the window openings is checked at the head of the
opening to provide a wind and water stop as at b. In this
construction, which is probably the best, though it does not possess
the advantage of giving the maximum amount of window space,
and, consequently, light in the building, a rowlock or bonded brick
arch is used over the window frames. By means of this construction,
either the window frame may be built in place, or the windows may
be slipped in from the back against a rabbet formed in the
brickwork. The arch over the window head is indicated at c.
Fig. 12
31. Floor Construction.—The floor construction consists of
heavy timber girders, no dimension of which may be less than 6
inches, as otherwise it would not comply with the requirements of
slow-burning construction. The floor planking consists of 3- or 4-inch
tongued-and-grooved spruce, or yellow-pine planking, planed on the
under side, and thoroughly spiked to the girder. Planking of the
former thickness may be used for clear spans as great as 8 feet,
while the latter thickness may be used for up to 10-foot or even 12-
foot spans, if the loads are light. The girders are indicated at d, and
the floor planking at e. Usually the girders,
in order to obtain the requisite strength, are
made of long-leaf yellow pine. On the top
of the spruce planking is placed a finished
maple floor. This floor is made from either
1-inch maple, which finishes as ⅞ inch, or
1¼-inch maple, which finishes as 1⅛
inches, in thickness. Neponsett sheathing
paper, or deadening felt, is placed between
the spruce planking and the finished maple
flooring for the purpose of preventing dust
from percolating through. This sheathing
Fig. 13 paper or felt is sometimes made waterproof
to prevent leakage due to water used for
fire-extinguishing purposes.
Frequently, the brickwork is corbeled out, as indicated at f, in
order to form a fire-stop between floors, or at least to prevent an
open joint at this place. Where the walls are offsetted, as shown in
Fig. 13, there is no need of corbeling out, for the offset in the
brickwork can be made to form the fire or dust stop.
32. Where heavy yellow-pine girders bear on brick walls, it is
usual to obtain the requisite bearing area by the use of cast-iron
bearing plates, as indicated in Fig. 14 (a), (b), and (c). In (a) is
shown an ordinary flat plate that has an area figured so that the
load on the brickwork will not exceed its ultimate stress, which for
brickwork laid in lime-and-cement mortar is about 150 pounds per
square inch, while for brickwork laid in cement mortar, it is in the
neighborhood of 200 pounds per square inch. This plate is usually
cast with a lug on the back, as at a, to be built in the brickwork, and
dowel-pins, or a lip, as at b, over which the girder is fitted, or
notched. By this means, a tie to the wall is obtained. There is
difficulty, however, in using such a connection, for the carpenters on
the job frequently miscut their beams, so that the notchings or
borings at b do not come where they should, and to remedy the
defect, the notchings, or borings, are cut or gouged out, so that
frequently the pin or lip at b is not brought to bear against the
timber.
(a)
(b )
( c)
Fig. 14
A more practicable bearing plate is illustrated in Fig. 14 (b). Here,
instead of providing dowels, or a lip, to set into the girder, the top of
the plate is cast with teeth, as indicated at c. While these teeth tend
to destroy fibers at the bottom of the beam, they nevertheless sink
into the timber, creating great friction, and thus accomplish a tie to
the wall fully as efficient as a dowel-pin, or lip, let into the timber
would be.
Probably the most common form of bearing plate is that
illustrated in Fig. 14 (c), which is known as the Goetz-Mitchell
bearing box. This is usually built flared, as indicated in the
illustration, so that when built into the brickwork it will have a hold
in it, and the timber acts as a tie by being notched over the lip, as at
d in this figure. These Goetz-Mitchell boxes are generally provided
with a plate that sets on top of them, on which the brickwork may
be built, and not infrequently the sides of the boxes are grooved so
that the ends of the girders are ventilated.
Fig. 15
33. Window Heads.—In Fig. 12 was shown a form of window
head that is the best for strength, but possesses the disadvantage of
lowering the top of the window, thus cutting off light to the room,
which is a serious objection where the room is wide, or where it
depends on the windows in one side for lighting the entire floor
area. In order to keep the window head up near the under side of
the floor construction, an I beam, lintel, or some similar form of
support for the brickwork over the head that takes up little room,
must be employed. A construction using shallow I beams is
illustrated in Fig. 15. Here the window head is directly beneath the
rough flooring; and while the outside face of the window is formed
with an arch, the brickwork above the window head is supported on
shallow I beams. This figure illustrates a section through the wall
extending parallel with the main girders, a bearing being obtained
for the floor planking by bolting to the I beams a bearing strap a.
This construction would not be permitted in some of the larger
cities, as the building laws require that all steel beams supporting
brickwork must be fireproofed. Consequently, a steel lintel of this
construction would have to be surrounded with concrete, and the
window head dropped somewhat to allow a bearing for the floor
planking, or some other form of construction adopted.
FACTORY BUILDINGS OF
REINFORCED CONCRETE
Fig. 16
34. Within the last few years, the cost of the best Portland
cement has been so materially reduced that concrete has become an
available material for the construction of factories. Unless used in
great masses, however, it has not the strength to support the
necessary floor loads without the use of steel reinforcement. As
explained in Design of Beams, the fibers on the bottom of all beams
subjected to transverse stress are in tension, and while concrete has
considerable resistance to compression, it offers comparatively little
to tensile stress. It is therefore necessary to reinforce the lower
portion of all beams and floor slabs as indicated at a, Fig. 16.
35. Advantages of Reinforced Concrete.—In Fig. 16, the
details of a typical reinforced-concrete factory building are
illustrated, and a building of this character may be constructed for a
cost of from 10 to 15 per cent. greater than the ordinary slow-
burning type of building. Besides, this construction possesses the
advantage of being practicable for long spans and heavy loads,
whereas in buildings of the slow-burning type, owing to the fact that
the size of the wooden beams is limited to the available commercial
timber, it is frequently impossible to design floors with girders of
large spans for floor loads of over 250 pounds per square foot. While
this is a heavy load, it is too light for some classes of work, such as
occur in printing houses and lithographing establishments where
heavy stones are used and stored. The floor loads in such buildings
sometimes amount to as much as 300 or 400 pounds per square
foot, while it is not unusual to find the load on floors in warehouses
amounting to as much as 500 pounds per square foot.
36. Strength of Concrete Columns With Steel Cores.—In
the building shown in Fig. 17, it will be noticed that the columns are
reduced in size in the lower floors, increased in the middle portion of
the building, and reduced toward the roof. The reduction in the
columns a and b is due to the fact that these columns are reinforced
with a steel core composed of structural shapes riveted together,
angles usually being employed for this purpose. In proportioning
such columns, it is good practice to figure on the ultimate safe unit
compressive stress of the steel without considering the reduction
made by the usual column formula, but to neglect, in the
consideration of the strength of the column, the resistance of the
concrete surrounding the steel core. To illustrate, if the sectional
area of the steel reinforcements in these columns equals 20 square
inches, and a safe unit fiber stress of 16,000 pounds is assumed, the
safe strength of the column will be 320,000 pounds.
Above the second floor, the
columns are made much larger,
for here there is less steel
reinforcement, and it is
necessary to figure on the safe
bearing strength of the
concrete.
37. Strength of
Reinforced-Concrete
Columns.—In proportioning
reinforced-concrete columns, it
is customary among
conservative engineers to figure
the safe strength of the
concrete-column section at 500
pounds per square inch of
section; that is, if the column is
20 inches square, its area is 400
square inches, and its safe
strength at 500 pounds per
square inch will be 200,000
pounds. In the top floor, it is
seldom advisable to use
concrete columns less than 10
inches square, though at this
dimension they generally
possess several times the
Fig. 17 requisite amount of resistance.
All columns in reinforced
construction generally have embedded in them 3¾-inch to 1-inch
round steel rods, tied together with round iron binders, or bar-iron
straps as indicated in Fig. 16 (b).
38. Floor and Roof Construction.—In considering the floor
and roof construction of buildings built of reinforced concrete, it will
be noted from Fig. 16 that the roof slab is made 3 inches in
thickness. Such a slab made of good concrete, reinforced with ⅜-
inch steel rods, spaced 6 inches from center to center, will carry the
usual roof loads for spans up to 7 feet in the clear.
In forming the gutter for such roofs, as indicated at b, the gusset
is made by filling in with cinder concrete. Usually cast-iron eave
boxes are embedded in the concrete, and these in turn connected
with inside rain conductors.
The beams supporting the roof, when the span is from 12 to 14
feet, are made about 12 inches deep and 8 inches wide, while the
girders, also constructed of reinforced concrete, are usually made
about 3 inches deeper and 11 inches in width.
In order to make the roof impervious to moisture, a covering of
felt and slag is commonly employed. This slag joins the parapet wall
with the usual tin flashing and counter flashing, as at c, though
copper is recommended for best work.
In the floor construction of reinforced-concrete factory buildings,
the slabs forming the floor panels are made not less than 4 inches in
thickness, and seldom over 5 inches, with a 1-inch finish coat of
cement besides, if this character of finish is desired. Such a floor
slab is shown in the construction at d, Fig. 16, while the wooden
floor construction is shown in Fig. 16 (c). Here the structural feature
of the floor is a 4-inch concrete slab upon the top of which is placed
2" × 3" beveled hemlock sleepers, the space between these sleepers
being filled with cinder concrete, and the floor finish obtained by
laying 1-inch tongued-and-grooved maple floorings.
39. Reinforced-Concrete Beams and Girders.—The depth of
the beams and girders in reinforced-concrete construction varies, of
course, with the span and loads to be supported. Their width enters
little into the strength, and they may be made as narrow as possible
in order to cover the reinforcing steel. It is the best practice to make
beams and girders of the same width, for then the process of
forming the molds is greatly simplified and the cost reduced.
In placing the reinforcement in the concrete, it should always be
at least 2 inches from the outside surface, for a distance less than
this is considered inadequate fireproofing. In order that the
reinforcing metal e, Fig. 16, may enter over the top of the
reinforcing metal at f, it is usual to make the secondary girders, or
beams, 3 inches less in depth than the main girders. To stiffen the
building, brackets are customarily introduced between the column
and girders, as illustrated at g. These brackets tend to greatly
increase the rigidity of the connection and shorten the span of the
girder somewhat.
Fig. 18
40. Construction at Window Heads.—Where it is necessary
to have the window head near the top of the ceiling, reinforced-
concrete construction lends itself readily to the requirements of this
condition, for even where girders are supported over the window
head, the construction may be followed out, as indicated at h, Fig.
16. Where it is desired to have the window head raised still higher, a
construction similar to that shown in Fig. 18 may be used. In this
case, however, care must be taken to have the girders bear on the
piers between the windows, and to have no intermediate beams.
(a)
(b )
Fig. 19
41. Column Footings.—With factory buildings of more than five
or six stories in height, great pressure is transmitted to the soil from
the base of the bottom column, and as it is necessary with soils of
even fairly good bearing capacity to have footings beneath the piers
supporting columns of from 6 to 10 feet square, adequate means of
providing these footings must be obtained. In Fig. 19 (a) and (b) are
shown two types of footings for concrete columns. In (a) is indicated
a reinforced-concrete column with a steel core. In such an instance,
all the load is transmitted by the steel core through its angle plates
and webbing at the foot to grillage beams. These grillage beams are,
however, not made sufficiently large to transmit the load to the soil,
but merely to distribute the load on the bed of concrete. The spread
portion of the footing is reinforced with steel rods a, a crossed each
way, and longitudinal shear is taken up in the footing by means of
stirrups b b. This is the usual type of footing construction under
reinforced-concrete factory columns.
Where, however, the column is not reinforced with a steel core,
but is merely a pier, footings may be designed as illustrated in Fig.
19 (b). Here the base of the column is enlarged in order to better
distribute the load on the several steps of the footing, and where the
bottom step has a considerable overhang, it is reinforced with steel
rods and stirrups, as indicated.
42. Detail of Slab and Girder Reinforcement.—In the
previous article, the general construction of the floors and column
supports of a factory building was explained. By referring to Fig. 20,
it will be shown how the girders and beams are reinforced with the
steel bars. In this figure, a plan is indicated at (a) and an elevation
at (b). The rod reinforcement of the slab is shown in the plan at a,
a. It will be noticed that over every other beam these rod
reinforcements lap, or break joints, and that some additional tie or
reinforcement is placed over the girders, as indicated by b, b. These
latter rods tend to tie in the floor slabs still more rigidly than can be
accomplished with their individual reinforcement.
Referring to the elevation (b), it will be noticed that all the
reinforcement of the beams is not usually carried along the lower
portion of the girder for its entire distance, but that some of the
reinforcement is bent up at a point about one-quarter of the span
from the abutment, in the form of a camber rod. By arranging the
reinforcing rods in this manner, an additional stirrup action, or tie, to
the girder supports is provided, and the oblique section made by a
horizontal line passing through these rods tends to provide
additional resistance to the horizontal shear in the beams and also
provide for negative bending moment produced in the beams near
the support. To further provide for this, shear stirrups are placed
closer together, toward the abutments, as indicated at c, c. These
stirrups are ordinarily light pieces of bar iron bent in a U-shape, and
sometimes bent around the rod reinforcement, a detail of this stirrup
being shown in Fig. 20 (c).
Fig. 20
Fig. 22
In placing galvanized ironwork on the sides of steel-mill buildings,
it is best to construct the necessary framework between the main
supporting members of the building of light angles, or tees. These
should be furnished punched with ⅜-inch or ⁵/₁₆-inch holes, to
which the galvanized iron may be riveted, it being best to mark the
galvanized iron in the field and punch it there. This may be done
without much difficulty with the usual light gauge used for this
purpose. It is sometimes necessary with this construction to flash
around the window and door heads with IX tin.
DETAILS OF MILL CONSTRUCTION
AND DESIGN
STRUCTURAL FEATURES
(b )
( c)
Fig. 23
49. Where it is not desirable to use wrought-iron or steel
hangers, a simple and inexpensive form of construction may be
adopted as that shown in Fig. 23 (c). Here the beam a is supported
on a wooden strip b, which extends the full length of the girder, and
is bolted near the bottom with through bolts. Such a construction
provides sufficient strength for the support of the average factory
floor, but its strength is difficult to figure with any degree of
certainty, and some surer form of connection is generally considered
preferable. In all instances, it is good practice to tie together the
opposite floor-beams butting on a girder by means of an iron dog, or
tie-plate, c.
50. In Fig. 24 (a), (b), (c), and (d) are indicated other methods
of supporting the secondary floor-beams on main girders in the
construction of factories. In Fig. 24 (a) is shown an I-beam girder
supporting heavy timbers of a floor of slow-burning construction. It
is always necessary in this construction to bring the top edge of the
timbers above the upper flange of the I beam, and to span the
space a thus created with a piece of timber for a tie and for the
support of the floor planking. By providing this space between the
ironwork and the wooden tie, any shrinkage that may occur in the
secondary timbers will not cause the floor to ride on the top of the
steel beam and thus make a ridge evident in the finished floor at this
place. The timbers forming the secondary girders may either be
supported on angle-iron brackets, or on angle irons extending the
entire length of the girder. The latter method is only pursued when it
is necessary to keep the end of the timber a few inches away from
the steel beam, and the angle, consequently, being subjected to a
greater bending moment, must have more resistance by increasing
the width of the section of the bracket.
Fig. 24
Sometimes, the secondary beams are supported on double
stirrup hangers, as shown in Fig. 24 (b). When it is not desired to
use steel beams, resort is frequently had to flitch-plate girders. They
are, however, held in some disfavor by the building departments of
the several cities, who do not consider that the combined strength of
the timber and metal can be taken, and will only permit the strength
of either the timber or metal to be used.
51. The building departments of several of the large cities
stipulate that buildings of the second class, which includes factory
construction, shall not have steel girders that are not fireproofed
supporting brick walls or floors. When this construction is required,
the secondaries must be supported as in Fig. 24 (c). In this view is
two angle brackets riveted or bolted to the steel beam, and
extending through the concrete for the support of the wooden
beams. While there is some danger of heat being transmitted to the
beams through the projecting ends of these brackets, nevertheless it
is considered better construction than that shown in Fig. 24 (d),
where stirrups are used over the concrete fireproofing. In this latter
construction, there is a liability of the stirrup bending at a, a, and
crushing the concrete beneath. Where the reaction from the end of
the girder is great, this undoubtedly is likely to occur, and such
stirrups should be provided with a bearing plate on top of the
concrete, so that their bearing at the edge will be distributed over a
considerable area.
TRAVELING-CRANE LOADS