0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes) 418 views35 pagesGR568 - Cadre Restructuring in Ia and Ad For Aao
Cadre Restructuring in IA & AD
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
*
Registered post No24eo-RTU2185-2020
one & frases wd setae a orale
9, OF wana Sarena arf, fem-1o124
" OFFICE OF THE
oie
PTROLLER BAUBTIOR SENERAL OF
Doon Sajal Upadhyaya Nag, New Sese140%2¢
fii / DATE_25.11.2020
To,
Shri LS Sujith Kumar,
Surabhi, L 56 8, LIC Lane, Patiom,
Thiruvananthapuram-695004,
Kerala,
Sub: Your application received under RTI
Sir,
| am to refer to your application under RT dated 27.09.2020 received in this
office on dt 30.09.2020. The information sought by you is as under:
Point [ Information
No, |
7 Cadre Rest ‘ee has submitted its report to the CAG.
[2_ | Copy of the report of Cadre Restructuring Committee is enclosed,
35 Comptroller and Auditor General of India has approved the
recommendation of the commitiee. Action to implement the
__| fecommendation is under process.
ee ss 2 eh
2. The Appellate Authority is Ms. Gurveen Sidhu, Director General
(Headquarters) & FAA, Phone no 011-23235775, The appeal in terms of Section 19
(1) of RT! Act, can be flied within 30 days of receipt of the reply.
Yours faithfully,
~ ahle
nels As above (V. S. Venkatanathan)
Director (Legal) & CPIO
eA / Phone 29609600 at / Fax: SH zazBONA
eeeGroup B & C Cadres (Main Cadres).
Indian Audit & Accounts Department
“March 2019
ets ae SB TP ie&
}
eS
Content
Preface
Chapter 1: introduction.
1.1. Composition of Cadre Review Committee
1.2. Terms of Reference
1.3. Methodology Adopted
Chapter 2: Functional requirements for Cadre Re-Structuring
2.1 Indian Audit and Accounts Department
2.2. Mandate of [AAD
22.1 Accounts Mandote
2.22 Audit Mondate
2.3.Changes in the auditing environment
23,1 Manifold increase in financial outlays
232 Changes in audit strategy
Chapter 3: Career Progression requirements for Cadre Re-Structuring, ..-...22.22.-10
3.1 Existing structure of Group B and C cadre
3.2. Sanctioned strength and Person in Position in various main cadres
3,3,Stagualion profile/resideney for promotion in various posts in Group B and C cadres
3.3.1, Induction of Senior Audit/Accounts Officers into LAS.
3.4, Stagnation at the level of (i) Senior Auditor / Senior Accountant (ii) Assistant
Audit/Accounts Officer and (iii) Senior Audit/ Accounts Officer
3.4.1. Stegnation at the level of Senior Anditor/ Accountant (Level 6 in Pay Matrix):
3.4.2. Stagnation at the level of Assistant Audit/Accounts Officer (AAO) (Level 8 in Pay
Matrix)
3.4.3. Stegnation in the cadre of Senior Audit/Accounts Officer (Level 10 in Pay Matrix)
(Chapter 4: Functional Requirements & Career Progression Issues in Group C and non-
gazetted Group B Cadres, ...-..
4.1 Career progressions in non-gavetted cadre
44.1. Operationalization of level 7
4.1.2 Job profile of posts in the cadre
4.2 Increase in posts of Supervisors (level 8)
4.3 Proposed non-gazetted main cadre structure“Chapter 5: Functional Requirements & Career Progression issues in GazettedCadres.... 18
5] Stagnation at the fevel of Assistant Audit/Accouats Oificer
5.2 Merger of posts of Audit/Accounts Officer (levet 9) and Senior AudivAccounts Officer
(evel 10)
5.3 Group Officers in the Indian Audit & Accounts Department
53.1 Career progressions in the gazetted Group B cadre
3.2 Responsibilities of Group Officers
5.3.3 Span of control of Group Officers
5.3.4. Requixement for additional Group Officers
53.5 Addressing the edditional Group Officer requirements
Chapter 6: Financial inglation of sapiens of Cadre Review Committee
recommendations. .....
Chapter 7: Gist of recommendations of the Cadre Review Committee. .Sterei
PREFACK
A committee for the Cadee Review/Restructuring of Group 8 and C officials (main cadre) of
Indien Audit & Accounts Department (JAAD) was coustituted with a specific mandate to
review the stmeture of the [AAD so as to harmonize the functional nceds with the legitimate
career expectations of its members and to suggest measures to enhance the effectiveness of the
cadre.
The coamnittee has approached the issue in a holistic mariner and arrived at its
recommendations keeping the larger public intetest in mind, We hope that the suggested
measures would enhance the effectiveness of the department and facilitate better cadre
management of the Group B and C officials in LAAD.
Mut, Gatlee
sot (WV Srinivasa Venkatanathan) (Satish Scthi)
(RS)—Member Asst. C&AG (N)~ Member Seeretary 4G (A&E) Rajasthan — Member
hor ee 2
(Prayeer Kumar) (Shurabh Narain) (Ritika Bhatia)
Pr. Direetor (P)-Member AG (E&RSA) Lucknow-Member Pr, Director (Commercial)-Member
(Prem Kumar Kataria)
Director General (SMU)~ Member
(Vithayathil Karian)
ADAI (Western Region) ~ ChairpersonChapter 1: introduction Fe
An eight member Cadre Review Committee (CRC) was constituted January 2018) by the Deputy
Compuoller & Auditor Generel under the Ohsipetsonship of Shri V Kurian, Additional Depaty
Comptroller & Auditor General (Western Region), for Cadre Review/Restructuring of Group B and
C officials to hanmonize the functional needs with the legitimate career expectations of its members.
1.1 Composition of Cadre Review Committee
Shri V Kurian, ADAI (WR) ~ Chairperson
Director General (SMU) Member
Director General (Staff) - Member
Principal Director (Commercial) and IFA ~ Member
Accountant General (E&RSA), UP, Lucknow “Member
Principal Director (Personnel) ~ Member
Accountant General (A&E) Rajasthan, Jaipur ~Member
Asst CRAG (N) — Member Secretary
Sr. DAG (RS), Oo AG (Audit) Delhi ~ Member
1.2 Terms of Reference
© To.assess the magnitude of stagnation in Group B and € posts ie. Clerk, Anditor/ Accountant,
Senior Auditor/Accountant, Supervisor, Assistant Audi/Account Officers (AAO),
Andit/Account (AQ) and Senior Audit/Account Officers (St. AOs) and suggest remedial
measures to reduce promotion block.
2 To review the Group Officers’ span of control over Sr. AO/AO so as to harmonise the
functional needs with the legitimate career expectations of Sr. AOs.
© Feasibility of All India Subordinate Audit and Accounts Service in Indian Audit & Accounts
Department (IAD) and its impact in view of the funetional requirement of AAD.
2 Total number of Group A non-IAAS (Indian Audit and Accounts Service) posts equivalent
to Deputy Accountant General (DAG) and Senior Deputy Accountant General (St. DAG/Sr.
DAG (Non Functional Selection Grade),
2 Job profile of non JAAS Group A Officers and [AAS Group Officers and reporting structure.
13 Methodology Adopted
People are key for growth and suecess of an organisation. Their knowledge, skill, experience and
competency are pivotal for its productive flmetioning. Thus, their effective engagement in the aflaurs
of an organisation is fimdamental.
With this objective, the terms of references of Cadre Review Committee was forwarded to th
jevel Associations/Federations to obtain their feedback. The apex level Associations/FederatSeer
made their presentations to the Committee on 07.03.2018. The list of apex level
Associetions/Federations that met the committee is annexed (Annexure !).
‘The committee also invited suggestions/views from Sr, AOs‘AOs (Administration) (Annexure 2) of
field offices of IASD from different streams (Accounts, Civil Audit, Commercial Audit, Defence
Audit, P&T Audit and Railway Andit). The committee offered them opportunity for presenting their
views as well.
All the Cadre Controlling Offices of TAAD were reqnested fo forward information regarding
stagnation profile in each cadre of Group B and (and estimated time likely to be taken for promotion
during the next 3 years based on the retirement profile, so as to ative at minimum and maximum
average time taken for promotion.
Existing span of control of Group Officers with reference to Sr. AOs/AOs and number of audit teams
‘was deliberated upon by the committee.
-consiiited Group Officers (Sr. DAGINFSG Level) from each Stream, ie Aecounis,
‘Cuil Audit, Central Audit, Commercial Audit, Defence Audit, P&T Audit and Railway Audit and
the functional wings at Headquarters. The committee also consulted the senior management of the
department.
conemereernee reneSecret
&)
Chapter 2: Functional requirements for Cadre Re-Structuring
‘The Comptroller & Auditor General of India (CAG) and the Indian Audit and Accounts Department
(IAD) functioning under him provide for a unified andit mechanism in a federal set up under the
Constitution of India. In che constitutional scheme of checks and balances in a Parliamentary
democracy, this institution is mandated to facilitate ensuring accountability of the executive to the
legislature. The concept and establishment of audit is inherent in public financial administration as
management of public funds represents a trust. Audit is an indispensable part of a regulatory system
vwihose aim is to reveal deviations from the accepted standards of prudential management of public
finances.
The Parliament/ State Legislatures apprave the annual budget and suppiementary appropriations and
authorize Governments to collect taxes. There are financial rules to ensure standards of propriety,
regularity and probity in managing public funds. The Government Departments and other public
bodies are expected to follow these rules and adhere to the framework preseribed therein, when they
receive and spend public money. The Departments are accountable to the Parliament and State
Legislatures for both the quantity and quality of their expenditure.
‘The Constitution prescribes a unique rote for the CAG of India in assisting Parliament/State
Legislatures to enforce the legislative accountability of the Governments. The CAG audits the Central
and State Govemments, local bodies, autonomous bodies and also compiles the accounts of the State
Governments. The tole of the Comptroller and Auditor General assumes greater significance in view
of the federal democratic structure where both Union and State Governments are responsible for
implementation of a large number of schemes involving substantial public resources,
2.1 Indian Audit and Accounts Department
Articles 148, 149, 150 and 151 of the Constitution of India define the basic structure of the institution
of the CAG of India. The CAG of India is an independent constitutional authority who is neither part
of the legislature nor executive, and though appoiiited by the President on the advice of the Prime
Minister, can be removed only through a motion of impeachment.
In terms of the provisions of the Constitution, CAG’s (DPC) Act, 1971 was enacted, detailing the
duties, powers and conditions of service of the CAG of India,
Over the years, the Department’s functions and activities have increased manifold due to significant
increase in the volume and complexity of government functioning. Some of the other major
developments include the growth of revenve audit and performance audit of major
schemes'programmes across the country. The greater use of information technology by the
Governments, both al the Centre and the States has also had a significant influence on the audit
strategy. ‘There is a continuous aced for a skilled and motivated workforce in the JAAD. Various
functional audit streams. Civil, Defence, Post &Telecommunication, Commercial, Science &
Technology and Railway Audits which are managed by officers of the IAAS, continue to adapt to
the changing requirements.2.2 Mandate of [AAD
2.2.1 Accounts Mandate
The CAG's DPC (Duties, Powers ard Conditions of Service) Act, 1971 promulgated in exercise of
Powers conferred by the Constitution provides for compilation of aceounts of the State governments
by the CAG. Besides compiling accounts, the CAG is zesponsible for preparing and submitting the
accounts {0 the Governors of States and Administrators of Union Territories having Legislative
Assemblies. He also provides information and tenders assistance in preparation of accounts, [AAD
compiles accounts of State Governments from the subsidiary accounts submitted by treasuries and
other officers of the State Govemments, IAD actively monitors expenditure pattems and brings
excesses, surrenders and lapses of fiands to the knowledge of the State Legislatures. The Anmual
Finanee & Appropriation Accounts of 28 States were prepared. In addition, AAD is responsible for
finalisation of pension of State goveumment employees in 19 States, maintenance of their GPF
accounts in 20 States and Gazetted Entitlement in 9 States. During 2016-17, 417,609 pension cases
‘were Ginalised and 28,24,829 GPF accounts maintained of the State government employees.
2.2.2 Audit Mandate
The audit mandate of the CAG is defined in the CAG’s DPC Act 1971 end other laws enacted by the
Parliament. ‘The CAG has the mandate to audit and report upon:
® AI receipts and expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of the Union and State
Governments;
* All Gnancial transactions ia emergencies, outside the oral budget (called the Contingency
Fund);
* Inflows and cuiflows of private monies of the public held by the Goverment as a trustes or
banker (called Public Accounts) at Central as welll as State levels;
I trading, manvfacturing, profit and loss accounts, balance sheets and other subsidiary
accounts kept in any Govemment Department;
* All stores and stock accounts of all Government offices and Departinents;
* Accounts of ail Goverament Companies where government's equity investment is not less
than 51 per cent;
* Accounts ofall Regulatory Bodies, other statutory authosities/eorporations, where governing
Jaws provide for their audit by the CAG:
® Accounts of all autonomous bodies and authorities substantially financed from public
exchequer;
* Accounts of a body or authority whose audit is specifically entrusted to the CAG, in public
interest, by the President/ Governor /Lt. Governor under enabling provisions of the CAG’s
DPC Act 1971,
‘The following special responsibilities have also been entrusted to the CA\
© Providing technical guidance and support to the Local Fund Audit wings of the-State
‘Governments, who are the primary auditors of the urban and rural local bodies,
8Seeret
© Conducting a review of the performance of the Union Governme:
under the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, 2003, as amended in 2012.
e
ing the net proceeds of Central taxes/duties, which are shareable
2.3. Changes in the auditing environment
23.1 Manifold increase in financial outlays
‘There has been a manifold inerease in the financial outlays of the Union & State Governments.
During the period 2005-2006 and 2016-2017, the receipts of Union & State Governments have
increased by 324 per cent and the expenditure by 311 per cent as tabulated below:
Table 2.1: Receipts & expenditure of the Union & State Governments
ae (Rs. in crore)
Increase
Receipt 73,042 5 28,29,129
Expenditure | 9,85, [ 54 30,68,894
‘The role of Comptroller and Auditor General assumes greater significance in view of the increased
financial outlays and the finds being utilized both by the Union and States for implementation of
large number of schemes. There has been a paradigm shift in public financial management in the last
decade, which interalia includes public private partnerships for delivery of public services and
increasing expenditure being incumred through Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), Trusts, Societies,
and NGOs. The increase in the receipt and expenditure of the States has in turn increased the volume.
of accounting fimctions in the States.
2.3.2 Changes in audit strategy
‘There has been a change in the overall audit strategy, given the focus on outcomes as distinct from
expenditure. The rigorous methodology preseribed for audits has placed new demands on audit
resources. Audits of entities like Public-Private Partnerships and regulatory agencies require
ceployment of audit resourees with high quality. Emerging areas of audit, like the environmental
audits need a combination of the generic domain-specific knowledge of audit with specific skills.
With computerisation of Government functioning, the requirements for system audits has increased,
Unification and rationalisation of taxation, like the GST regime, has made the distinction between
Audits of Union and States irrelevant, thereby requiring a more synergistic audit approach. There is,
thetefore, a requirenient for allgmenting audit resourees both in terms of quantity and quality.
saeadeansansaee
9
ZL
in sneeting its obligations
7Chapter 3: Career Progression
3.1 Existing structure of Group B and C main cadre:
In view of the constitutional responsibility for audit of both the Union & State governments, the
organisation structure of the department is unique & distinct from any other Central department. The
departunent is organised into State-wise cadres that speciali
in accounting & auditing the
functioning of the respective States. There are central cadres for auditing the functioning of various
aspects of Union goverment. The cadre of Indian Audit and Accounts Service
(JAAS) officers is
organised at the all India tevel that manages both the State & Central cadres. This gives the Indian
Audit 4 Accounts Department (ASD) a distinctive character not shared by any other Ceniral
department, and there with, its unique requirements in terms of organisational structure. The structure
in which the cadres are organised in the IAAT is chown is as. under:
Table 3.1: Cadre structure in 1AAD
Level | a a ai [ Level
= TS) Grr epee eal cial
| : Siow & wv
le | toate astra air tarnt |g
E ieee nese
ime Penance seein ce 2
| ar
Accountant General/Principal Lirectar
SD Kea Ga DiS
ea Group A B
SS tea cena a ieee cee
wi | eater a econ ee Son ayaa SES
ia Sea | esac oar ter
| oe ae
2] eS TE ie Geis een ea!
7 Fossa ls
Seem | RealwAta capes ¥ =
ees coeun
a ne convioitetriamemetdatasees —
ics oe continence 5
eee
pase hc :
ou
=
Mult Teskingsts# | ‘ ;
oe
10Secret
3.2 Sanctioned strength and person in position in main cadres
‘The sanctioned strength and person in-position in the department as in February 2019 is shown in the
table below:
Table 3.2: Human Resource of AAD
36136 | 36| 26.85 |
¢ 2010. Against this vacancy, IAD is
recruiting DEOs.
4 An additional 6 per cent posts in the cadre of AAOs are being utilized for promoting eligible
officials in the cadre of Supervisor in those offices which have shortfall of 15 per cent or more in
AAOs cadre
3.3 Stagnation profile/residency for promotion in various posts in Group B and C eadres:
‘The service period required asperrecsuitment rules and the actual time taken for promotion in various
Group B & C cadres in LAAD is as tabulated below: -
Stagnation profile in nen-gareted cadres.
~~ 1 Clerk level2) to Auton] Andior/Aesountantio Senior] Sealor Auditor’ Accoumiant to
| “Accountant (level 5) ‘Auditor/ Accountant (level 8) | Supervisor (level 8)
Branch
ee eet sa
Required time [Actual time | Required time | Actual time | Required ime | Actwat tne
for promotion | taken for | for promotion as | taken for for promotion | taken for
asperRRs | promotion promotion asper RRs | promot
: = act
3.2ycas| Syears| 23 years
3.2 years | .
3 years
_3 years
3 years | 3.3 years
“Civil Accounts:
Table 3.4: Stagnation profite in gazetted cadres
ny ‘AAO (evel) fo AO (exel9) | “ROWSE ADL) |
Branch | Roguived tine for | Actual time taken for | Required time for | Actual time takea for
"| promotion asper RRs | promotion promotion as per RRs | promotion
| Chil Accounts “2yeas| 25 yeas
25 years3.3.1 Induction of Senior Audit/Accounts Officers into IAAS
‘The sanctioned sirenath in the cadre of Senior Audit/Accounts Officer (Sr. AO) and Audit/Accounts
Officers (AO) is 5900. However, only 272 posts in LAS are earmarked for induction of Sr, AO/AO.
The average number of officers geiting inducted during last five years is 22. Therefore, the pereentaze
of inducted officers against the feeder cadre for induction is 0.4 per cent. Year-wise number of
officials inducted is tabulated below:
Table 3.5: Induction into IAAS
[Vacancy Year | Number of §
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
3.4.Stagnation at the level of Sonior Auditor/ Accountant, Assistant Audit/Accounts Officer
and Senior Audit/Accounts Officer
The committee analysed the stagnation profile in the various cadres as noted in tables
3.5 above,
34 and
341 Stagnation at the level of Senior Auditor/Accountent (Level 6 in Pay Matrix)
‘ligibility for promotion of a Group B or C official to the post of Assistant Audit/Accounts Officer
(AAO) is qualifying the Subordinate Audit/Accounts Service (SAS) examination. The only
promotional channel available to those Senior Auditors/Accountants (LeVel 6) who have not passed
the Subordinate Audit/Accounts Service (SAS) examination is promotion to the post of Supervisors
(Level 8). Against the sanctioned strength of 22,005 in the cadre of Senior Auditor/Accountant, the
sanctioned strength in the promotional post of Supervisor is 4 per cent of the total strength of
Assistant Audit/Accounts Officer (AAO) cadre, which is only 488.
As per Recruitment Rules to the post of Supervisor, Senior Auditor/Accountant is eligible for
promotion after 3 's of regular service in the grade. However, actual time taken for: ‘promotion is
21 years in Commercial Audit, 23 years in Civil Audit, 22 years in P&T Audit, 26 years in Railway
Audit, 25 years in Defence Audit and 28 years in Civil Accounts offices, The average time taken for
promotion from the post of Senior Auditor/Accountant (Level 6) to the post of Supervisors (Level 8)
is about 25 years. The committee noted that there is stagnation at this level
34.2 Stagnation at she level of Assistant Audit/Accounts Officer (Level 8 in Pay Matrix)
As per Recruitment Rules of the post of Audit/Accounts Officer, Assistant Audit/ Accounts Officers
(AAOs) after 5 years of service are eligible for promotion. However, actual time taken for promotion
is 9 years in Commercial Audit, 11 years in Civil Andit, 13 years in P&T Audit, 14 years in Railway
Audit and 16 years in Defence Audit and Civil Accounts offices. ‘The average time taken for
promotion from the post of Assistant Audit/Accounts Officer (Level 8) to the post of Audit/Aecounts
Officer (Level 8) is about 13 years, The committee noted that there is stagnation at this level.
3.43 Stagnation in the cadre of Senior Audit/4ccounts Officer (Level 10 in Pay Matrix)
‘The promotional channel available for Senior Audit/Acconnts Officers is induction into the IAAS
(level 10). As per Recruitment Rules, the prescribed eligibility critetia are 5 years of combined
12years. As per file, average actual time taken for promotion to the post of
‘Audit/Accounis Officer is 13 years. For promotion from Audit/Accounts Officer to Senior
Audiv/Accounts Officer, average time taken is 2.5 years. Therefore, an Assistant Audit/Accounts
Officer becomes a Senior Audit/Accounts Officer at around the age of 44 years. For the remai
period of 16 years, there is no promotional avenue for most of the officials. There is lack of.
career progression.Chapter 4: Functional Requirements & Career Progression Issues in
Group C and non-gazetied Group B main Cadres
‘The Group C and non-gazetted Group B cadres consist of the posts of Auditor/Accountant, Senior
Auditor/Accountant and Supervisor (excluding the supporting cadres of Multi-Tasking Staff and
Clerks), Direct recruitment is at the level of the Auditor/ Accountant.
‘ Senior ‘5
Auditor/Accountant QuiehorAeauntant Supervisor
Level 5 lavate Level 8
Group C
Group B Non Gazetted Group O Non Careees
The committee noted the job profile at different levels as prescribed in Comptroller & Auditor
General’s Manual of Standing Orders and other manuals and acknowledged that these posts discharge
important responsibilities, both at the field and headquarters level. The responsibility includes
carrying out central audits and field audits which inter alia includes establishment audits and setvice
book verifications on the audit side and compilation of vouchers, maintenance of various accounting
books and entitlement functions on the accounts side. These are basic and essential functions and
require a thorough knowledge of the rules. This cadre also performs administration related works at
Headquarters.
‘The committee recognised the need to have a motivated Group C and non-gazetted Group B main
cadres to discharge these essential functions and to free the gazetted cadres for other higher level
responsibilities. As per the extant RRs, these cadres also get into the gazetted post of Assistant
Audit/Accounts Officer by clearing the Subordinate Audi¥/Accounts Examination, This provides a
‘good mix of experience and direct recruitment in the gazetted cadres,
4.1.Career progression in non-gazetted cadre
The scheme of Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) introduced by the DoP'f in 2009
provides for three financial up-gradations to Group B and C officials in their career. Further, DoPT
vide OM dated 10 February 2011 has stated that the scheme of MACP is a fall back option, in the
event of promotions not taking place. Cadre structure need to be reviewed periodically to hamnonise
the functional needs of the organisation and caresr progression of employees, Therefore, there is a
need to have at least three regular promotions in the cadre
The non-gazetted cadre currently has only three posts, namely, the Auditor/Accountant (level 5),
Senior Auditor/Accountant (level 6) and Supervisor (level 8). Level 7 is not operationalized in this
cadre. This structure enables a maximum of two promotions.
4: *@a)
411 Operationalization of level 7
The non-gazetted cadre discharges duties that are basic and essential, necessitating its effective
discharge. This requires the officials in the cadce to grow over a petiod and understand the nuanees
of the different responsibilities. A cade with adequate levels of posts is more suited to such an
requirement, allowing the officials to ‘growin the cadre to take up higher responsibilities.
To achieve the functional requirements of allowing the officials to grow through adequate levels in
the cadre and to provide for three promotions to direct recruit Auditors/Accountants (Level 5), the
committee recommends 10 operationalise post at Level 7 in Pay Matrix, without creating any extea
posts (Recommendation 1). The Committce recommends to designate the post as Assistant
Supervisor.
4.1.2 Job profile of posts in the cadre
‘The Assistant Supervisor should be assigned with responsibilities that requize more professional
experience (Recommendation 2). This is expected to improve the quality of audit. Some examples
(not exhaustive) are as under:
@) Field Audit: Andit of stores and stock, examination of cash book, andit of vouchers exceeding
i checking of reconciliation with treasuty/bank, pay fixation of staff in the
on of contracts upto a threshold level, verification of account
financial attest audits etc,
ion and updating of data on the audit universe and
Pennual audit plan in headquarters, checking of selected
n accounts and cross checking of arithmetical accuracy,
“Accountant General (A&E) to audit office for detailed
‘with statutes/tules like preparation of replies under Right
ee calculation of income tax of staff, legal work,
matters including operation of Public Finance Management System (PFMS),
nd Expenditure Monitoring System (BEMS), procurement through Government E.
‘Application exc.
(iv) Accounts & Entitlement: Entrusted with duties involving higher risk accounting tasks like
evaluation of badgets of State government, management of data capture in Voucher Level
Computerisation System (VLC), Entitlement Applications like GPF IT Application, Pension
Processing IT Application, Gazetted Entitlement Management (GEM) System, Grievance
redressal etc.
4.2.Ancrease in posts of Supervisor (Level 8)
Against the senstioned strength of 22,005 in the cadre of Senior Auditor/Accountant, the sanctioned
strength in the promotional post of Supervisor is fixed at 4 per cent of the total strength of Assistant
Andit/Accounts Officer (AAO) cadre, which is only 488. The commitiee noted that the percentage
of Supervisor post to that of the feeder cadre is only 2.2 per cent. The committee suggests that the
Supervisor posis need to be operated as a percentage (on the basis of DoPY norm of the feeder post
15Seci
being 3 to 5 times the promotional post) of the non-gazeited main cadre posts, as it is a promotional
post of this non-gazetted cadre (Recommendation 3).
4.3.Proposed noa-gazetied main cadre structure
Consequent upon the restructuring of the Indian Audit & Accounts Depariment in 1984, it was
decided by the Govemment of India to place 80 per cent of the posts of Auditors in the higher scale
and designate it as Senior Auditor wef. 01 March 1984. Finther, on the recommendations of the 4!
Central Pay Commission that there should be broad parity in the pay structure of Accounts and Audit
Staff, the re-structuring scheme was extended to the Accounts Staff w.e.f. OL April 1987. Therefore,
the posts of Auditor/Accountant and Senior Anditor/Accountant are in the ratio of 20: 80
respectively.
As per para 3.11.2 of DoPT OM dated 31 December 2010, normally the feeder grade should range
from 3 10 5 times the number of sanctioned posts in the higher grado. However, in this eadre the
feeder post (Auditor/Accountant) is only 0.25 times (20 per cent). At the next promotional level ie
Sr Auditor/Accountant the posts are 80 per cent. At the next promotional level ie Supervisor, the
number of posts of Supervisor is only 488, Therefore, there is significant stagnation from Senior
Auditor/Accountant to Supervisor. The pyramidal structure is not maintdined in the entire non-
gazetted cadre. .
There is a need to review the number of posts in different levels of the cadre to ease stagnation
Without increasing the total existing strength in the non-gazetted cadre,
Considering the facis stated above, the committee recommends to redistribute the posts in the cadre
among the different levels (Recommendation 4)-as tabulated below: as
Table 4.1: Redistribution of posts in non-gazetted cadre in Audit offices
Pay] Existing ~~] Sanctioned | Persoa in | Proposed Proposed | Ratio of feeder | Proposed _
Level | Cadre Strength Position | Cadre Percentage | pos. to | Number of
ofPosts | promotional | Posts
(02820 x
Columa
o
“@
5 Iisa
| 6
i i i | Asian
Supervisor
Supervisor* | 398" | 614** | Supervisor i
+——
‘Total 12820 |
16Ratio
promotional | Number of
| post to feeder | Posts(14262
| yost x Column
EON
oO ®
* Number of posts of supervisor is 4 per cent of the Assistant Audi Accounts Officer and not Linked
to the Accountant cadre. ‘Therefore, this figure has not been included in the total posts in the non-
garetted cadre.
*2An additional 6 per cent posts in the cadre of AAOs ate being utilized for promoting eligible
officals the eatke of Spervisor in those offices which have shontfall of 15 er cenl or more i
AOS cadre.
&
‘This will ensure a pyramidal structure for the non-gazetied main cadre within the overall sanctioned
strength of the non-gazetied main cadres. In the revised structure, sanctioned strength of
Anéitor/Accountant and Sr. Auéitor/Accountant would be 11,063 and 7,300 respectively. The
proposed cadre structure will include the post of Assistant Supervisor (5210) and increased number
of post of Supervisor (1309).
seeaqeanes
WT‘sech
Chapter 5: Functional Requirements & Career Progression issues in
Gazetted Cadres
‘The main auditing/accounting gazetted Group B cadre of IAAD consist of the posts of Assistant
AudivAccounts Officer, Audi/Accounts Officer and Senior Aucit/Accounts Officer. Direct
recruitment is at the level of the Assistant AudivAccounts Officer,
Assistant ‘ : Senior Audit/Accounts
Audit/Accounts Officer | J Hae eerestsOhtieee
Officer
Level 9 Peveiin
This gazetted cadre is the cutting edge of the depariment, for which the entry level is the Assistant
Audit/Accounts Officer (AAO) post. As per Recrutiment Rules of the post of Assistant
Audit/Accounts Officer, the mode of mweruitment is promotion of Subvidinate Audit/Accounts
Service (SAS) examination passed officials, failing which by deputation/absorption and failing both
by direct recruitment. Direct recruit AAOs have to qualify the SAS examination within the probation
period for regular appvintinent and confirmation, °
SAS examination is a computer based test and the question papers are based on multiple-choice
objective questions (except for drafting end writing abilities which is a subjective paper) with
negative marking for wrong answers. SAS Examination is being conducted in 7 streams (Civil
Accounts, Civil audit, Commercial Audit, Defence Audit, Local Audit Department, P&T Audit and
Railway Audit), Details are placed at Annexure 3.
The committee observed that eniry into the gazetied cadre is only by cleating the Subordinate
Audit/Accounts Service (SAS) examination. A direct recruit has to clear this examination for
confirmation in the post. Officials from various cadres need to clear this examination for promotion
to the post of Assistant Andit/Accounts Officer. This has ensured the desired level of expertise and
aptitude in the officials of this cadre,
Despite the challenge of a rapidly changing environment and a manifold increase in government
functions (in terms of magnitude and complexity), this cadre has delivered high quality work. ‘The
committee felt the need to look into the functional and career progression needs of this cadre to ensure
that the LAAD continues te discharge its constitutional responsibilities effectively.
5.1 Stagnation at the level of Assistant Audit/Accounts Officer (Level 8 in Pay Matrix):
As per Recruitment Rules to the post of Audit/Accounts Officer, Assistant Audit/ Accounts Officers
(AAOs) after 5 years of service are eligible for promotion. iJowever, the average time taken for
promotion from the post of Assistant Audit/Accounts Offieer (Level 8) 0 the post of Audit! Accounts
Officer (Level 9) is about 13 years.
18Secret
“7 Central Pay Commission (CPC) bad recommended grant of non-fimetional up-gradation 10
Assistant Audit/Accounts Officers (AAO) aiter 4 years of service to level 9. Ministry of Finance vide
OM dated 18.06.2018 and 27.06.2018 hes implemented the recommendation of 7" CPC to grant non-
functional up-gradation 1) to AAOs w.e-f. 01 January 2016, This has been implemented in the
TAAD and therefore all eligible AAOs after 4 years are being financially upgraded to level 9,
‘The committee noted that the AAOs (NEU) have spent a minimum of four years in auditing and
accounting functions. Considering the fact that they have gained adequate experience afier clearing
the SAS examination of ther respective streams and considering that they are at level 9, which is the
same as that of the As, the committee opines that the AAOs (NFU) can be assigned responsibilities
by the Head of Departments keeping in view their auditing and accounting experience, including that
‘cf heading field audit parties (Recommendation 5).
5.2 Merger of posts of Audit/Accounts Officer (level 9) and Senior Audit/Accounts Officer
(evel 10)
nee noted that the next promotional post of AO is the Audit/Accounts Officer (AQ),
which is currently at level 9 of the pay matrix. AAO with five years of regular service hecon
dligible to be promoted as an AO. The post of AO involves significant higher responsibilities. In
audit, the AOs supervise an audit team, consisting of AAOs and Auditors/Senior Auditors. In
secounts, the AOs head a branch, which has several sections headed by AAOs. The AAOS report to
the AOs,
‘The committee also noted that till 1992, the auditing/accounting hierarchy consisted only up to the
post of an Andit/Acconnis Officer. The Government of India decided to provide a promotional grade
for AudiAccounts Officer vide OM dated 22.09.1992. Accordingly, the post of Senior
AvdiVAccounts Officer (Sr. AO) was created. An AO with two years of regular service becomes
eligible to be promoted as 2 Sr. AO. The number of posts in the promotional scale (Sr. AO) was fixed
af 80 per cent of the sanctioned strength. Accordingly, the cadre of AO is 20 per cent and Se. AO is
80 per cent. The job description of AO and Sr. AO is the same and AOs do not report to the Sr. AOs.
Both the AOs and the Sr. AOs report to the Group Officers (Deputy Accountant General/ Deputy
Director Senior Deputy Accountant General/ Director).
‘The committee considered the following facts:
* AAOs report to the AOs and the Sr. AOs
© On non-functional up-gradation, the AAO reaches fevel 9, which is the level of the AO
@ The post of Sr. AO was created as a promotional avenue for the AOS
© 80 percent of the posts are operated at the Sr. AO level and only 20 per cent at AO level
© AOs do not report to Sr.A0. Both AQs and Sr. AOs report to the Group Officers
° The
years
ice required for promotion from AAG to AO is 5 years and from AO to Sr. AO is 2
Accordingly, the committee recommends to merge the post of AO into St. AO (Levell0)
(Recommendation 6),
19Seci
AAO (NFU) with three years of regular service at level 9 may be made eligible for promotion to the
merged post of Sr. AO, The existing residency period of seven years from AAO to Sr. AO (Live years
for AAU to AO and two years for AO to Sr. AO) has heen retained. The now hierarchy would b
Table 5.1: Recommended hierarchy in the gazetted cadre after merger of AO and Sr. AO
Post it Remarks
=e promation/
8 Assistant Audit/Accounts Officer Pe ao cthe eats
iis ete absorption direct recruitment
I : : et years of Tea
9 | Assistant Audit/Accounts Officer (NEU) mpletion of 4 years of sepuler
service in level 8
On completion of 3 years of regular
service in level 9
Senior Audi/Accounts Officer
5.3 Group Officers in the Indian Audit & Accounts Department
5.3.1. Career progressions in the gazetted Group B cadre
This cadro has only two regular promotions, Assistant AudiVAccounts (Officer to Audit/Accounts
Officer and Audit/ Accounts Officer to Senior Audit/Accounts Officer, Even after implementation of
‘the above recommendations of this committee, this eadre would still have only two regular
promotions, non-functional up-gradation of Assistant Audit/Accounis Officer and promotion from
Assistant Audi/Accounts Officer to Senior Audiv/Accounts Officer. A caite should be structured so
as to offer adequate carcer progressions through regular promotions.
Against a total sanctioned strength of 5,900 AO/Sr. AO, there are a mere 272 posts for induction into
the Indian Audit & Accounts Service (IAAS) yearly. As aresult, only around 22 officials get inducted
into the IAAS every year. Year-wise number of officials eligible for promotion and number of
officials promoted are shown in table 3.5.
The average ape of direct recruit AAOs is 28 years. AS per stagnation profile, average actual time
taken for promotion to the post of AO is 13 years. For promotion ftom AO to Sr. AO, average time
is 2.5 years. Therefore, an AAO becomes a Sr. AO on an average al the age of 44 years. For the
remaining period of 16 years, there is no promotional avemue for most of these officials.
‘The committee, therefore, felt it essential that the carser progression aspirations of the cadre need to
be adequately addressed, considering the fact that the cadre discharges the core responsibilities of the
department,
5.3.2. Responsibitites of Group Officers
In field offices of [AAD, there are 367 Group Officers posted. Out of 367 Group Officers, 81 Group
Officers are posted in Accounts offices and 286 are posted in Audit offices. The Group officers are
the cutting edge in the IAAS and are resource for the delivery of quality Audit and
Accounting/Enfitlement fumetions. Statistics regarding number of inspection/audit reports issued,
amounts recovered at instance of audit and total expenditure of JAAD are tabulated in Annexure 4,Seeret,
“Group Officers (Deputy Accountant General/ Deputy Director/ Senior Deputy Accountant General/
Director] have a wide mandate and are assigned the responsibility of achieving the objectives of their
respective wings. A Group Olficer ts audit is assigned a few Departments of the government and is
smandated to ensure that audit assurances relating those Departments are made at the end of the year.
In the accounts offices, a Group Oflicer is assigned one of the major fumetions relating to accounting
or entitlements. The Group Officer is sesponsible for ensuring preparation of the accounts of the State
or ensure that entitlement fimctions assigned to him/her aro fally discharged for the State.
A Group Officer in audit inter-:
ia perfomns the following functions for the Departments
+ Planning audits - prepares a database of all audited entities under his/her charge, carries of
risk analysis of the units, caries out pilot studies, prepares an audit plan and andit
programmes and examines the unit audit plan before audit of a unit by an audit team.
© Conduct of audit ~ monitors deployment of adequate resources for each audit, monitors
progress made by audit teams under his/her charge in their audits, supervises the works of
individual audit tears through field visits and conducts mid-term reviews of vatious audits
conducted by bis/her wing.
© Audit reporting,
carries out vetting of Inspection Reports of audit icams and authorizes them
before their issue, prepares draft audit paras for inclusion in audit reports, draft audit reports,
aids in the conduct of Public Accounts Committee (PAC) and Committee on Public Sector
Undertakings (COPU) meetings through preparation of Memoranda of Important Points,
follows-up on the recommendations of the PAC/COPU and follows-up on audit paras not
included in audit reports through departmental Audit Committees
* Interaction with the audited entities — collects information required for various purposes,
including, those for planning audits, conducts entry and exit conferences with the audited
Departments for various audits and follows-up with the audited entities on production of
records and information required for conduct of audit
‘© Capacity building — plans and conducts in-house training programmes for capacity building
of officials under his/her charge, nominates officials fo various training programmes by RTIs
and other training institutes and carries out systemic studies in his/her wing to improve
processes and bring in efficiencies
‘The Group Officer discharges his/her responsibilities through his/her team of Senior Audit/Accounts
Officers and Audit/Accounts Officers. With the continuous emergence of new areas of audit there is
a greater requirement on the Group Officers in providing guidance to his/her ‘eam and their closer
monitoring.
5.34, Spar of control of Group Officers
The Group Officer functions through his/her audit teams under the charge of Senior Audit/Accounts
Officers and Audit/Accounts Officers (Sr. AOYAOs). The Sr. AOYAOs head a branch. In
headquarters, one or more Assistant Audit/ Accounts Officers (AAOs) and Supervisors report to the
Sr. AOYAOs. The AAOsiSupervisors head a section comprising, of Auditors/Accountants/Senior
Auditors/ Accountants and Clerks/DEOs, in the field, the St. AOs/AOs are in-charge of the audit
21
ane() Secri
t
cams. As per norms the composition of the audit team consists of around 2 AAOs/Supervisors and
one AnditorSenior Auditor, The span of control, which is the number of Se. AOs/AOs per Group
Officer, iS @ good indicator ofthe workload of a Group Officer. A large spam of control would lead
‘o compromises on the quality of work of the Group Officer. It is essential to have an optimal span
of control to cusure efficient discharge of responsibilities by the Group Officer.
Table 5,2: Existing span of control in IAD:
[ Number of Croup Officers | SS of Sr. AGW AOs 7
DERG. Bogen Rice ere Sipp
As nay be seen from the table above, the committee observed that the span of control of the Group
Officers in the department is 16. In audit offices, for every St. AOJAO, there are 2 AAOs and 2.5
Auditors/Senior Auditors, In accounts offices, for every St. AO/AO, there are 3 AAOs and 15
Accountant/Senior Accouniants. This entails a total of around 88 officials pet Group Officerin Audit
and around 304 officials in Accounts.
‘The committee carted out an analysis of the time required fora Group Otticer to discharge his/aer
Tere esbonsillities. The committee observed that of the 286 Group Officers posted in ault
offices across the country, 93 have been assigned the responsibility of office administration. The
eriaining 195 are involved in audit. On an average, $0,092 compliance audits, 181 performance
audits and 4,441 Gnancial audit were camied out per year during the last ffve years as per the
performance report of the department. This works out to an average of 260 compliance audits, one
Performance audit and 23 financial audits per year for each of the Group Otficer posted in audit
offices. The details of various andit outputs are shown in the table below:
Table 5.3: Year-wise details of auiit ouipiit
"| Group | Compliance audits | ]
~—
officers | (CA) Annual
Yer | in ] per | Financial | PAs per
__| Andis | Union | Union | state | toml| Go| audits 5
2012-13] 193 | 19512 | 30083 | 150] 198 i
2013-14 | 193 | teas, 0 | 4 te
[193] 16232] 1806 | 480: 166
193 | 16304 51560 |
03 34839 | S106! |
193 |
‘The Group Oificer discharges several responsibilities like planning, supervision, reporting, follow-
up and capacity building to ensure that audit outputs are delivered on time and are of the desired
quality. The committee assessed the time spent by the Group Offer on each of these responsibilities,
The commitiee observed that the time available with the Group Officer is 1856 hoursiyear as shown
in Annexure 5. The time required for effectively discharging hishher responsibilities +» deliver an
AuGuGe Of 260 compliance audits, one performance audit and 23 financial audit per year works ous
to 3268 hontsiyeat. This is 76 per cent more than the time actually available with the Group Officer,
“The committee secognise that there is a pressing need for substantially reducing the Span of Control
22Secret 7
| 8)
J ~of Group Officers. The details of the time calculation for discharging various responsibilities oe
/ Group Officer are tabulated in Annexure 5.
‘The Committee observed that if the span of control is reduced to &, the time requirement for various.
responsibilities would be proportionately reduced, as there would be more Group Officers for the
j given number of audit deliverables. Accordingly, 2 proportionately reduced time required for various
responsibilities was calculated. It was analysed that with a reduced span of control of 8, a Group
Officer will requixe 2014 hours/year for achieving the audit outputs. This is closer to the available
time of 1856 hours/year.
To arrive at the optimal span of control for Group Officers, the commitiee also adopted a consultative
approach. It obtained inputs from two Senior Deputy Accountants General/ Directors at level L3fom
cach stream on the ideal span of control. Inputs of the functional wings in CAG office Headquarters
were also obtained on the span of control for the respective streams.
On the basis of the consultations and the analysis, the committe: recommends a span of eontiol of
eight AOs/Sr. AOs reporting to a Group Officer (Recommendation 7}.
5.3.4, Requirement of additional Group Officer
Based on span of control of 8, requirement of additional Group Officers in JA&.AD would be as
under:
‘Table 5.4: Additional requirement of Group Officer in AAD
Number of | S$ of Sr. | Span of| Recommended | Required Additional
Group AOs/ AOs | Control Span of| Number of | requirement
| Officers | | | Controt Group officers | of Group
Officers
367| —_5900/ 16.08 g BI 370
As this additional requirement is for the fan .¢ Group Officer, the committee opined that
‘the job profile of these additional 370 Group Oificers would be the same as that of the JAAS Group
Officers. The reporting structure would also be the same.
5.3.5. Addressing the additional Group Officer requirements
‘The committee considered the modes of adéressing the additional Group Officer requirements in the
Gepartment, including creation of an all-india subordinate audit and accounts service. Under the
extant service rules for the LAAS, 33.33 per centof the posts are reserved for induction into the JAAS.
Currently, this works out to 272 posts for induction into [AAS.
‘The committee noted that if the additional requirement of 370 Group Officer posts are met through
am increase in the LAAS, it would lead to an increase of 123 posts under induction quoia and the
remaining 247 posts under direct recruitment quota, ‘The committee observed that the requirements
of additional posts are at the Group Officer level. Increasing the number of posts in the [AAS to™meet
‘his requirement would Jead to an intake of a large number of direct reeruit IAS. Therefore, such a
23significant stagnation,
‘The commnitiee also noted that the additional requirement of Group Officer level Posts (370) in the
TAAS would result in an increase in the ‘Percentage of posts reserved for induction into [AAS to more
than 51 percent. The Committee observed thet the additional requirements of Group. Officers through
this methodology would not be appzopriate,
Considering these factors the committee recommends that the additional 370 posts of Group Officers
be created as regular promotional posts of Senior Audit/Accounts Officers. This would also enable
enhanced regular promotional avennes for the main auditiag/aecounting gazetted Group B eadre of
the department. The committee opined that the Senior Audit/ Accounts Officers who become Group
Officers through regular promotion should continueto be eligible forinducti
Deputy Accountant Geneial! Depuiy Dizector at level 11. Senior Deputy Accountant General/
Director at level 12 and non-functional selection grade of Senior Deputy Accountant General/
Diteetor at level 13 are the Group Officer positions in the department. The 370 additional Group
Officer posis required may be operated at these three levels 2¢ regular promotional posts for the
Senior Audit/Accounts Officers (Recommendation 8),
‘The committee felt the need to have an ali-India combined eligibility list of AOs/AQs and all-
India transfer liability for the regular promotional posts of Sr. AO to Group Officers {levels 11, 12
and 13) to ensure efficiency, given the structure and fmetional requirements of the department.
As per para 3.11.2 of DoPT OM dated 31.12 2010, the feeder grade stould normally range from 3 to
5 times the number of sanctioned posts in the higher grade. Accordingly, the above 370 posts may
be allocate from Level 11 to Level 13 as tabulated below:
Table 5.5: Recommended allocation of additionat Group Oifieer posts
[Pay re of Post al seers Percentage
24Name of the post
| Assistant Accounts] |
"SAS passed
aa officials failing which by
“deputation or absorption failing both by
-Girect recruitment. During the period of
tion direct recruits shall have 10
"qualify the SAS exam fer confirmation
‘and regular appointment tp the post of
AAO
~ Ratioin |
=
Secret @
feeder cadre
(GP Rs. 5400 PB 3)
‘By promotion (AAO in evel 8&9
with iota 7 yeats approved service in
the prade) failing which by deputti
2.05
DAG Dy Director
Group A Gazetied
S:DAG_ Director
Group A Gazetied
Level IT
(GPRS. 6500)
Level 12
(GP Rs. 7600)
‘By promotion (SrAO in lvl 10 with.
5 years approved service in the grate)
~ Ba
‘By promotion (Dy. DirectorDAG
in level J1 with 5 years approved
seivice inthe grade)
3a
“ SHDAG / Director
i QNFSG)
Group A Gazetted
Level 13
(GP Rs. 8700)
By promotion (Director/St. DAG
in level 12 with 5 years approved
service in the grade)
500
BRRSAEERER EEon .
Chapier 6: Financial implication of implementation of Cadre Review
Committee recommendations
Implementation of recommendations of the Cadre Review Committee would lead to the following
changes in the sanetioned strength of the posts in the main auditing/accounting cadre:
Table 7.1: Changes in the sanctioned strength on implementation of recommendations
Designation Sanctioned Strength
Increase (+)/ Decrease
__ Auditor/Accountant
Senior Auditor/Accountant
Senior Audit/Accomnts Officer
~ Group Officer (Level if)
‘Group Officer (Level 12)
Group Officer (Level 13)
L ‘Total
‘The commitice observed that there would be an overall decrease of 11$ posts in the sanctioned
strength. ‘Ihe financial impact of implementation of the recommendations of the Cadre Review
Committee is placed in Annexure 6. The committee notes that there would be an additional annual
cost of Rs. 80.09 crore.
26Chapter 7: Gist of recommendations of the Cadre Review Committee @)
Recommendation 3:
Recommendation 4:
Recommendation 5:
Recommendation 6:
Recommendation 7:
Recommendation §;
Secret
Non-Gazetted Cadre
= Operstionalise post at Level 7 in Pay Matrix, without creating any extra
Posts. The post may be designated Assistant Supervisor (page 15),
Assistant Supervisors to be assigned higher functional responsibilities that
require more professional experience (page 15).
Supervisor posts need to be operated as a percentage of the non-gazetted
main cadre posts, as it isa promotional post ofthis non-gazetted cadre (page
16)
Re-distribute the posis in the non-gazetted cadre among the different levels,
Auditors/Accouniants, Sz. Audito/Sr. Accountants, Assistant Supervisor
‘and Supervisor (page 16).
Gazetted Cadre
AAO (NFU) be assigned responsibilities keeping in view their accounting
and auditing experience, including that of heading Audit parties (pagel 9),
Marge the post of AO into Sx.40 and place them at level 10 (page 19)
Eight AOs'Sr. AOs reporting to a Group Officer would be an ideal span of
control in Accounts! Audit offices (page 23).
Additional 370 posts of Group Officers be created as regular promotional
posts of Senior Auditi Accounts Officers (page 24)
beepers
27C) ANNEXURE i
List of apex level Associations/¥ cderations who met the Committee
SL Name of the Association/ | Names of the Designation
No. | Federation representatives
1 All India Audit & Shri Vinod Kumar President
Accounts Officers | - -
Association Secretary General
Z All India Federation of St President
Audit Officers and Audit = —
Officers | Shri Debananda Patnaik | Secretary General
All India Audit & Shri M.S. Raja |
Accounls Association
4. | National Audit Federation, | President
Sujith Kumar | Secretary GeneralSecret,
= ®
List of Sx. AOs/AOs (administration) who met the Commitiee
ANNE:
Name Post | Name of the Office
| Sai SM. Soral_ | StAQ (Admn) _Pr. Accountant General (G&SSA), Rajasthan,
on ____ Jaipur- 302.005 i
2) MsS.Manonmani |StAQ(Admn) | Pr. Accountant General, Tamil Nadu
aise’ etry, Chennai -600018
3. MsSabbihaBanu. | SrAQ(Admn) | Accountant General (A&3), Karnataka,
| R Bengaluru- 560 001
4 Shri Naveen Kumar | SrAQ (Admn) | Pr. Accountant. General (Audit), Punjab
Chandigarh. 160 017 s
AO (Admn) Director General of Audit, Defence Services,
New Delhi- 110 001
StAO (Admn) | Pr. Accountant General (A&E), Odisha,
Bhubaneswar-751 001
7., Ms Prativa Das eral (Audit), Assam- 781 029
Jain, SrAQ (Admn) | Director General. of ~~ Audit Post
&Telecommunications New Delhi- 110.054
9] Shri BK. Pandey | SrAQ (Admn) _| Pr. Dizector of Audit (Noth Central Railway)
t i" Allahabad - 211015
SeA0 (Adan) —_|pe-5 bes
‘Constitution of Constitution of
Indi, Stettes nda, Starts
land Service jand Service.
|Reguiation [Regulation
\cii
[PC —8 FinanciallPC— 8
it ‘local Audit [Defence
laccomnss —_|Auait [branch
Group
Audit
PC 8 PC-9
ANNEXURE 3
Syllabus of Subordinate Audit/Accounts Service (SAS) Examination
Ov, __Group 1 a Te
ieivit Git Local Audit [Defence Par Railway
lAccounts Adit branch Aedt LA Andi
PCT Pei rc 1 po=t i IPo~t }
[Language Skills [Language Skills [Language Skills |Language Skills [1 Language Skills |
o=2 po-2 lpC-2 PC—2 BC?
Logical, Logical, Logical, Logical, Logical, ILogieal,
[Analytical and [Analyticat and [Analytical and JAnalytical and |Analyticaland {Analytical and [Analysicaland
[aaatiiative Quantitative [Quantlative — |Quantiative —|uamitaive [Quantitative [Quantitative
[Abilities |Abiities” Abilities” ___|Abititie” [Abilities 2
C3 PC—3 PC 3 PC 3 Pi rc 3
[information finformation [Information [Information _jimfermation information [Information
[Tectnology [Technology |fechnology [Technology [Technology Technology (Technology.
[(iheory) “__|(Theory)__|cTheory)__[crheory) selon {ctheory)
pea Po 4 Ire-4 jpc—4 4 BC-4
Infomation information [Information [Information Information Information
Technology [Technology {Technology [Technology _| Technology ‘Tectnology
\Practical) _[(Practicaly __|(Practieal) __|@Praciical) _| (Practical) Practical
pc—5 PC—6 pc be C5
[Constitution of [Constitution of |Constittionof Cinstiution of |Constinuion of
Jindia, Statutes India, Statutes |india, Satutes India, Statutes India, Statutes
fmadService and Defence landService —andService [and Service
\Regulation [Service Regulation Regulation Regulation,
[Regulation | linctuding relate
| ‘Accounts / Andi
arena EE 1 Procedures |
30
Rules end [Financial Rules [Financial Rules [Financial Rules Financial Rules [Financial Rules |'inancial Rules,
Principles of jand Principles ofjand Principles of and Principles of and Principles of)Principles of Principles of
[Government (Goverment [Govemment Defence Postal Accounts |Goverameat _ | Government
[Accounts [Accounts [Accounts Accounts ‘Accounts! Audit Accounts and
| | jand works = ICPWA.
opti (a le ee eee eae
po as Ipc 14 [Po-14 [Pe-14 roa IPC Po— 15
(Accountancy [Financial nancial Financial (Financial [Financial lAdvance
[Accounting with Accounting with| Accounting with Accounting with Accounting with Accounting
Elementry Elementary fElemeniary —[fementary
ee (Costing (Costing __|Costing “__|osting | i
PC— 16 Publ PC 16 [PC 17 Defenco|PC. 18 Postal [PC - 19 Rallway|PC— 20 Cost
j Works Accounts| Works Accounts Public Works: [Ait ‘audit {Traffic Revenue |Accountan:
| “Accounts | (Geena
i Laws and
ik ees tt (ht (Corporate Tax_|
iPC— 22 IPC_ 25 ContactPC 24 Ipc 25 [Pc-26
(Govemment | Govemment {Audit and Audit |Telecom Audit [Government |Commercial
|Andit |Audit [procedures Audit including | Avditing
(Workshop and |
tors Audit |
a Ree r ae istics ae
[Acts oftegitann,
[statutory Rates,
laudit and
linspecion of
LAccounts of local i
Le aS Heute i eeeSecret
3 4
ii is,
Inspection/audit x recovered at instance of audit and total expenditure
of AAD
Rs Crore
of | Total Amount ‘Amounts | Total
Audit | Recoveries | accepted _by | recovered | expenditure
Reports | pointed out | audited entities | by Govt. | of [A&AD
| issued issued
2012-13, 47595 | 138 2,51,220 36,226 5537 2649
(14.42%)
2013-14 4ogog| 134 132.394 $5,261 3000
(64.4%)
2014-15, 48038 | 162 1,07,151 39,560 4492 3215
(36.92%)
2015-16 | 53873 188 88,089 39,640 4523 3428
(45%) |
2016-17 51061 150 128,458 42,712 6917 4045
(3%) :
Baloa
SE
| Unit |
ANNEXURE 5,
| Hours/unit | Total
Hours
Total
Hours
‘Time estimation for discharge of Group Ofiicer responsibilities in audit charge
| Average Span of Control | 16
Number of working days | 232
Planning
Anaval Plan
Audil Programme
Unit audit plan
| Reporting
250
PACICOPU
Action Taken Note
Audit Committee Meetings
Performance Audits
Planning
study
Drafiing guidelines
| Annual PAs per GO
Execution
| Eniry conference
Mid-term Review
Exit conference
Reporting
‘Audit Report
Audit follo-up
| PAC/COPU
Action Taken NoteUnit audit plan
Execution
Bia ia |e Estimate
Estimate
Fstimate
7 days supervision per week
S
[Handling training sessions 12 | 1
{daysperyear) d
Preparation time pee
Training of self [So
Tomy Veco ae
Total time required a
33fA Peay
9x09 60°08 “SL Fo 1809 UNUM JOE
‘999758008 | BBBLEL99 at [sre ieee Se eee ee eersh [Tsssh ro
PIOOZIOS ZL99LOF TiRELI [bos0st | d06STz-00171 SH ia 0 EL RAPT
‘ereitizet__| 92465001 OLIGL [oog9cr_~ o0ze0c-00882 °H CU le Way eae ¢ TL POT
CaLécescy | O8PESHSE O8CEEL [o0061t | 02802-00229 SU i 99 oe | 0 TETAS
Cescoreeot | o¥zezeget g0cOTT [_O0bR6 | O0SEZ1-00198 SH or | “ect 0068 aS
CeeIsoeesI= | OcepORLTI- OST HOT | oo0es | oossgt-oores ta 6 Leal cmmeere| ov
ze0e6 [-ooocs | oortst-oosp'sa [gO Teoet_| ison | ovv |
FeoReeS | CARILROL ze9s6 | CeOdT | OO9ES GLI ST-009ZF SH. cs soEl | 88h fosuodng |
at aay = 1 asad
CTISOLLISS | OOLEIS6SH gszes | 9Sb6 0088. | _OOFEEI-000Hr SU £ olts 0 assy
T | | UBIMOOSY “IS |
OrBGLLEsrOl- | OTESTTLS t9960 | pope | onzeo | _oobeTT-0oHse “su o_| soszi- | oogs | sooce | soupny as |
ie | i | mauimooay
FCOOSOITTe | esdooscre zecis | cero | Oot | ovez6-o0z6z ‘su. s gg6s_| e901t | LL0s BORpI
(siuour 1 I | |
tEXOD (exp) Gw) | | |
SamTy or 6 Band thek 9 | s Dance ea a |S Une
Tonvoyday | woweaqdur al ] =
eur Tepuewy Le | ma | mse | oar | nc _| posoddoag | Supa,
qenuwy Amwow ree, GocD va) soy [ Xenerdeg wo Tans pauiopouug |_wonwuaiso
(so0dmyr uy unoury)
ASIABYT dap! A sisod Jo asua.iouy pasodoad yo uowpeoyduay pepewnT
9 MIOXANNY
yasoa:
Se :
-\