Assurance - Chapter 10 (Certificate Level)
Assurance - Chapter 10 (Certificate Level)
Documentation
Contents
Introduction
Examination context
Topic List
1 Purpose of documentation
2 Form and content of documentation
3 Safe custody and retention of
documentation
4 Ownership of and right of access to
documentation
Summary and Self-test
Technical reference
Answers to Self-test
Answer to Interactive question
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009 169
Assurance
Introduction
Practical significance
Assurance providers need to keep working papers about the work they have done for clients, so assurance
firms will have stores of files relating to their clients. They are required to keep them for a set period of
time and may keep them for longer if they feel it benefits the relationship. These records must be kept
secure. Firms may keep files in paper or electronic form, which will bring different security problems.
Working context
If you work in practice, you will prepare working papers from very early on in your career, so it is
important to know the key contents of these and the purpose of them so that you record the correct
details within them. Some contents are required by BSAs, but each firm will have a particular way of
detailing their work and keeping their files, which you will learn very quickly. Most firms have pre-printed or
pre-programmed working papers which already contain some of the reference details that the working
papers are required to have.
Syllabus links
One reason for keeping working papers is to protect the assurance provider in the event of a negligence
claim. This will be looked at in more detail in Audit and Assurance.
170 © The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009
DOCUMENTATION 10
Examination context
Exam requirements
This topic is likely to be examined on a regular basis and questions should be reasonably straightforward if
you are well prepared.
There is one question in the sample paper on documentation, looking at the reasons behind preparing
particular pieces of documentation and whether these reasons were valid.
In the assessment, candidates may be required to:
Define audit documentation
State the reasons for preparing and keeping documentation relating to an assurance engagement
State the form and content of working papers
Identify the advantages of automated working papers
State the content of a permanent audit file and a current audit file
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009 171
Assurance
1 Purpose of documentation
Section overview
Assurance providers should document the work they have done.
This should be a record of the procedures performed, the evidence obtained and the conclusions
reached.
This provides evidence that the engagement was performed in accordance with any relevant
standards, law or regulatory requirements.
A record of work done also assists the team to plan and direct work, facilitates review by senior staff,
provides accountability for work, provides a record of matters that are relevant to future
engagements and enables experienced auditors to carry out any additional reviews necessary.
All assurance work must be documented: the working papers are the tangible evidence of the work done in
support of the conclusion.
Audit documentation or working papers should provide:
(a) A sufficient and appropriate record of the basis for the assurance provider's report; and
(b) Evidence that the engagement was performed in accordance with standards and applicable legal and
regulatory requirements.
They should be prepared on a timely basis.
Definition
Audit documentation (working papers) is the record of procedures performed, relevant evidence
obtained and conclusions reached.
In addition, particularly in relation to audit, assurance providers record their work to:
Assist the audit team to plan and perform the audit
Assist relevant members of the team to direct and supervise work
Enable the audit team to be accountable for its work (and to prove adherence to BSAs in a litigious
situation)
Retain a record of matters of continuing significance to future audits
Enable an experienced auditor to carry out quality control reviews
Enable an experienced auditor to conduct external inspections in accordance with applicable legal,
regulatory or other requirements
Audit working papers should include a summary of all significant matters identified which may require the
exercise of judgement, together with the auditor’s conclusions thereon. If difficult questions of principle or
of judgement arise, the auditor should record the relevant information received and summarise both the
management’s and his own conclusions. It is in such areas as these that the auditor’s judgement may
subsequently be questioned, particularly by a third party who has the benefit of hindsight. It is important to
be able to tell what facts were known at the time the auditor reached his conclusion and to be able to
demonstrate that, based on those facts, the conclusion was reasonable.
172 © The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009
DOCUMENTATION 10
Section overview
Working papers should be headed in a certain way and contain certain information.
They may be automated.
Working papers should be sufficiently complete and detailed to provide an overall understanding of the
engagement.
However, assurance providers cannot record everything they consider. Therefore judgement must be used
as to the extent of working papers, based on the following general rule (given in an audit context):
'What would be necessary to provide an experienced auditor, with no previous connection with the audit,
with an understanding of the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures, the results of audit procedures,
and the audit evidence obtained, and significant matters arising during the audit and conclusions reached
thereon.'
The form and content of working papers are affected by matters such as:
The nature of the audit procedures to be performed
The identified risks of material misstatements
The extent of judgement required in performing the work and evaluating the results
The significance of the audit evidence obtained
The nature and extent of problems or exceptions from expected test results identified
The need to document a conclusion or the basis for a conclusion not readily determinable
from the documentation of the work performed or audit evidence obtained
The audit methodology and tools used
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009 173
Assurance
Copies of letters or notes concerning audit matters communicated to or discussed with management,
including the terms of the engagement and material weaknesses in internal control
Letters of representation received from the entity (these are covered in Chapter 12)
Conclusions reached by the auditor concerning significant aspects of the audit, including how
exceptions and unusual matters, if any, disclosed by the auditor's procedures were resolved or treated
Copies of the financial statements and auditor's reports
Notes of discussions about significant matters with management and others
In exceptional circumstances, the reasons for departing from a basic principle or essential procedure
of a BSA and how the alternative procedure performed achieved the audit objective
174 © The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009
DOCUMENTATION 10
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009 175
Assurance
KEY
1 The name of the client 8 The date of the review
2 The balance sheet date 9 The objective of the work done
3 The file reference of the working paper 10 The sources of information
4 The name of the person preparing the 11 The work done
working paper 12 A key to any audit ticks or symbols
5 The date the working paper was prepared 13 The results obtained
6 The subject of the working paper 14 Analysis of errors or other significant
7 The name of the person reviewing the observations
working paper 15 The conclusions drawn
The auditor should record the identifying characteristics of specific items or matters being tested.
176 © The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009
DOCUMENTATION 10
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009 177
Assurance
Sampling plans
Analytical procedures
Details of tests of detail and tests of control
Section overview
Assurance providers should retain documents for a certain period of time.
Documents must be kept secure during this period due to confidentiality requirements.
Judgement may have to be used in deciding the duration of holding working papers, and further
consideration should be given to the matter before their destruction. All firms should have a document
retention policy and auditing standards require auditors to keep all audit working papers for a reasonable
period of time from the end of the accounting period to which they relate.
According to the Companies Act 1994, section 181(5), “The books of accounts of every company relating
to a period of not less than twelve years immediately preceding the current year together with vouchers
relevant to any entry in such books of account shall be preserved in good order”.
Given that assurance work must be kept confidential (as we shall see in Chapter 16), it is important that
firms have good security procedures over their retained working papers. Paper documents must be kept
securely, in locked premises. Electronic documents should be protected by electronic controls.
Section overview
Working papers belong to the assurance providers.
The report, once issued, belongs to the client.
Assurance providers must keep working papers confidential.
They may show working papers to the client at their discretion.
They should obtain client permission before showing working papers to third parties.
Working papers are the property of the assurance providers. They are not a substitute for, nor part of, the
entity's accounting records. However, the report becomes the property of the client once it has been
issued.
Assurance providers must follow ethical guidance on the confidentiality of working papers. As working
papers belong to the firm, the assurance providers are not required to show them to the client. However,
the firm may show working papers to the client at their discretion, so long as the assurance process is not
prejudiced.
Information should not be made available to third parties without the permission of the client. An example
of when working papers might be shared with a third party is when a new firm is taking over an audit from
the existing auditors.
178 © The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009
DOCUMENTATION 10
The table shows how the ownership of documents depends on the nature of the work being carried out.
Auditing
Preparation of audit report whether Any documents prepared by member solely for Member
carried out under statutory purpose of carrying out his duties as auditor
provisions or not
Audit Report Client
Accountancy
Preparation of accounting records Accounting Records Client
Preparation of financial statements Financial statements Client
from client's records
Draft/office copy of financial statements Member
Correspondence with third parties Member
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009 179
Assurance
Summary
This provides evidence that the A record of work done also assists the
engagement was performed in team to plan and direct work, facilitates
accordance with any relevant review by senior staff, provides
standards, law or regulatory accountability for work, keeps a record
requirements of matters that are relevant to future
engagements and enables experienced
staff to carry out any additional reviews
necessary
180 © The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009
DOCUMENTATION 10
Self-test
Answer the following questions.
1 State whether the following are advantages or disadvantages of standardised audit working papers:
Engagement letters
New client questionnaire
Financial statements relating to year under review
Management letter
Accounts checklists
Audit planning memo
Board minutes of continuing relevance
Accounting systems notes
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009 181
Assurance
Technical reference
182 © The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009
DOCUMENTATION 10
Answers to Self-test
1 (a) Advantage
(b) Disadvantage
(c) Advantage
2
3 A, C, D
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009 183
Assurance
184 © The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, March 2009