0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views4 pages

IB - SEHS:Biology - IA - Checklist 2

Uploaded by

Ricardo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views4 pages

IB - SEHS:Biology - IA - Checklist 2

Uploaded by

Ricardo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

IB SPORTS EXERCISE AND HEALTH SCIENCES/BIOLOGY IA CHECKLIST

body and conclusion


Personal engagement [ /2 (8%)] □ The introduction includes an observation that leads to the research
□ Thinking, initiative or insight for investigating chosen topic is given. A question
statement of purpose. □ The hypothesis is given as a scientifically reasonable answer to the
□ Justification indicates personal interest, significance or curiosity for research question
chosen design & presentation is given □ The hypothesis is clearly justified and supported through a review of
□ Relationship with the real world scientific literature
□ Originality of the design of the method (choice of materials and
methods)
□ The quality of observations made & reflections on the quality of the data. □ All information is clearly supported with references
□ At least 3 appropriate sources with authors have been used
Exploration [ /6 (25%)] □ Both Internet and print sources are included
Research Question □ There is no plagiarism (this will give a zero)
□ A descriptive yet concise title is given
□ A grammatically correct question about a precise relationship is asked Methodology: Manipulation and Control of the Variables
□ A sufficiently detailed question to stand alone and be self-explanatory is □ An introduction establishes the methodology as a fair test of the
asked hypothesis
□ A specific measurable dependent variable is included □ The modification of procedures from other sources are clearly referenced
□ A specific independent variable to be manipulated is included in MLA format
□ Precise locations, measurements and Genus species names are given □ All materials are clearly listed with details (type, amount, size, volume,
concentration…)
Variables □ No kitchen terms (measuring cup, kitchen scale, etc.)
□ Independent and dependent variables are written exactly the same as in □ Diagrams and/or photographs clearly showing the setup of apparatus are
the question included as needed
□ A very brief description of how the independent variable is modified is □ Diagrams and photographs are referenced using MLA or
given (Drawing/Photograph by Author)
□ The range and/or intervals of the independent variable is given □ How the listed controlled variables were kept controlled in the
□ A very brief description of how the dependent variable is measured is experiment is described
given □ Safety is addressed as needed (gloves, eyewear, and appropriate
□ Controlled variables include all significant variables that could affect the chemical clean-up/disposal of waste)
dependent variable □ The use of consent forms in human physiology experiments is explained
□ A very brief description of why each controlled variable must be kept
constant is given Methodology: Collection of the Data
□ Uncontrolled variables identified and how they could impact results are □ Methods written in prose or recipe style
discussed □ The introduction establishes the data collected is valid for answering the
research question
Hypothesis □ The reliability of the methodology is established through sufficient
□ A grammatically correct answer to the research question is given repetition
□ The hypothesis can be supported through scientific research and □ How the dependent variable measurements were taken is precisely
reasoning explained
□ A precise relationship between the independent and dependent □ The number of dependent variable measurements and why this amount
variables is predicted is described
□ The size of the increments between each data point and why this was
Background acceptable is described
□ A well-organized essay with paragraphs is given with an introduction, □ The use of at least 5 repeats to calculate standard deviation for error
analysis is explained
□ Enough data is being collected (a minimum of 30 data points to process)
□ The collection of data from any other students or sources is clearly
explained and referenced
□ Qualitative data is recorded
Analysis [ /6 (25%)] □ The variation in results is reported, showing the strength of the
Data Collection conclusion
□ A short introduction is given to establish what data was collected and □ Scientific reasoning is used to show the validity of the relationship
why it is appropriate □ How far the conclusion can be generalized is discussed
□ Appropriate raw quantitative data is recorded in a clearly designed and
drawn table
□ A descriptive title with the variables is given for the data table
□ Column headings include the quantity, units and uncertainties
□ Data is recorded to an appropriate degree of precision and consistent Evaluation [ /6 (25%)]
with uncertainties Evaluation
□ Qualitative data is recorded in the data table or separately as □ The appropriateness of the apparatus in obtaining relevant data is
appropriate commented on
□ Weaknesses in the methodology are discussed
Data Analysis: Processing Data □ The reliability of the data is commented on
□ A short introduction of how the data was processed is given □ The quantity of the data is commented on
□ The relevance of this data processing to answer the research question is □ The precision and accuracy of the data is commented on
given □ Outlier data or irregularities in the data are addressed
□ Calculations are carried out correctly and allow construction of an □ Standard deviation/error bars are discussed
appropriate graph
□ Sample calculations are demonstrated for the reader Suggested Improvements
□ Averages and standard deviation is determined and properly presented □ Where limitations are determined to be significant, specific
in data table improvements are proposed
□ Rate is also calculated if appropriate from experiment □ Improvements effectively address the limitations (not just to be more
□ Uncertainties are explained as necessary – limitations of instruments careful or if more time was provided)
chosen □ Improvements are given which are possible within the context of a
school laboratory
Data Analysis: Presenting Data
□ The dependent variable is appropriately graphed against the Further Research Questions
independent variable □ At least 2 research questions are stated with clear independent and
□ Graphs include descriptive titles of the variables and axis are labeled dependent variables
including units □ The research questions are an extension from the conclusion and
□ Error bars showing the uncertainties are included on the graph for evaluation
individual data points □ A short explanation for each question is given to establish its importance
□ Maximum and minimum lines of best fit are drawn if appropriate and relevance
□ Each graph has a paragraph discussing the relationship(s) and trends
shown – no conclusion. Communication [ /4 (17%)]
References (formatting)
Conclusion □ Parenthetical in-text references/citations are given in proper and
□ An introduction is given consistent format
□ A conclusion is clearly stated “In conclusion…” □ A Works Cited List with proper formatting is given at the end of the
□ The conclusion given is correct and clearly supported by the report
interpretation of the data
□ Key data from the analysis is given and trends in the data are discussed Overall Presentation
□ The extent to which the hypothesis is supported by the data is explained □ No spelling or grammar errors are present
□ There are clear headings for each section, with consistent formatting
□ Font size 12 font is used
□ No double spacing

*** Report must be 6-12 pages ***

You might also like