Open Access Review

Article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28405

Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A

Systematic Review of Existing Treatment
Review began 08/10/2022
Modalities to Newer Proprioceptive-Based
Review ended 08/23/2022
Published 08/25/2022 Strategies
© Copyright 2022 Harman Singh 1 , Aaronvir Thind 1 , Nequesha S. Mohamed 2
Singh et al. This is an open access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., 1. Internal Medicine, Medical University of the Americas, Nevis, KNA 2. Orthopaedics, Wake Forest School of Medicine,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, Winston-Salem, USA
and reproduction in any medium, provided
the original author and source are credited.
Corresponding author: Nequesha S. Mohamed, [email protected]

Abstract
Musculoskeletal pain is a common reason for primary care visits, with many visits for shoulder pain due to
subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS). Current treatments lack evidence for effective management,
showing only temporary outcomes. This systematic review evaluates existing modalities in comparison to
the use of more permanent proprioceptive-based strategies. Specifically, this meta-analysis compared the
use of kinesiology tape, myofascial trigger point release (MPTR), scapular stabilization exercises (SSE), and
resistance training. PubMed, BioMedCentral, and ScienceDirect databases were queried for studies
evaluating proprioceptive-based exercises in the last nine years. In total, 48 studies met the inclusion and
exclusion criteria. After removing duplicates, a total of 14 level 1 studies were left. Kinesiology tape use
demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in pain-free range of motion. MPTR improved in all pain
scores and the disability scores index. SSE also reduced pain; however, mixed results were seen for range of
motion. Finally, resistance training not only reduced pain but improved proprioception and joint position
sense. Even though all techniques showed some promise in treating SIS, further large-scale studies exploring
related outcomes are needed.

Categories: Orthopedics
Keywords: joint position sense therapy, proprioception-based exercises, kin tape, subacromial impingement
syndrome, shoulder kinematics, proprioceptive treatment

Introduction And Background

Musculoskeletal pain is the second most common reason for visits to a primary care physician. The American
Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) estimates that a quarter of Americans have a musculoskeletal
condition, which costs the United States over $850 billion dollars per year [1]. The prevalence of these
conditions has led to a doubling of skeletal muscle relaxant prescriptions from 2005 to 2016 [2]. Of all
musculoskeletal pain disorders, shoulder pain is the third most common reason for chronic pain visits [3].
The anatomy of the thoracic spine plays a crucial role in these pathologies as it is linked to different
orientations of the scapula. In patients with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS), particularly
secondary SIS caused by muscular imbalance, the scapula can be found to be more protracted and the
thoracic spine more flexed [4]. These alignment impairments may interfere with shoulder kinematics,
leading to poor posture with chronic loss of range of motion and increased muscle relaxant prescriptions as
patients attempt to deal with the pain [5].

It is estimated that 44-65% of all visits for shoulder pain are due to SIS [6]. Primary impingement syndrome
is caused by structural changes that cause the narrowing of the subacromial space. Secondary impingement
syndrome refers to an incorrect centering of the humeral head often due to muscular imbalance causing
soft-tissue impingement when the shoulder joint is moved [3]. SIS does not describe one specific disorder
but rather a spectrum of possible pathological processes, including partial thickness tears, rotator cuff tears,
rotator cuff tendinosis, calcific tendinitis, and subacromial bursitis. Its prevalence is high in a wide range of
repetitive overhead sports, such as swimming, volleyball, and handball, as well as in manual jobs requiring
prolonged overhead positioning of the arm such as builders, electricians, and hairdressers.

The main consequences of SIS are functional loss, pain, and disability. Treatment strategies include a
combination of exercise therapies, steroid injections, and, for refractory or severe patients, surgery [7].
There is growing evidence to support the use of resistance training, improved joint position sense, and
proprioceptive shoulder exercises over movement-based exercise therapies alone. Current research,
however, not only lacks evidence for the outcome of these management modalities but, specifically, there is
a limitation as to which exercise therapies are most clinically effective [8].

There remains a need for high-quality clinical research on the treatment of SIS. This systematic review will
focus on evaluating several existing functional rehabilitation strategies in comparison to the use of specific

How to cite this article

Singh H, Thind A, Mohamed N S (August 25, 2022) Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Existing Treatment Modalities to
Newer Proprioceptive-Based Strategies. Cureus 14(8): e28405. DOI 10.7759/cureus.28405
 proprioceptive-based strategies. It also reviews scapular kinematic deficits that should also be addressed
with specific exercises in the rehabilitation of SIS.

Review
Methodology
Databases Queried

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a
systematic review of the literature for proprioceptive-based exercise therapies was conducted by searching
PubMed, BioMedCentral, and ScienceDirect. Articles published in the past nine years (January 1, 2011, to
December 31, 2020) were identified using various keyword combinations. The following string was utilized
for the search: ((“Subacromial impingement syndrome” OR “SIS” OR “Chronic Shoulder pain”) AND
(“Kinesiology tape” OR “KT” OR “Scapular stabilization exercises” OR “SSE” OR “Resistance training” OR
“Myofascial Trigger point release” OR “MTPR”)).

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Publications were eligible for inclusion if they: (1) included patients with existing chronic shoulder pain
and/or SIS; (2) included a comparison of both pre and posttreatment results; (3) the level of evidence was
level 2 or higher based on the American Society of Plastic Surgeons; and (4) the study was performed in the
United States, Canada, United Kingdom, or Australia. Studies were excluded if they: (1) were published
beyond 2011; (2) included surgical intervention as a treatment modality; (3) were written or published in a
language other than English; (4) the full text was not available; and (5) were systematic reviews, meta-
analyses, case reports, case studies, feasibility or pilot studies, letters to the editor, or surveys.

Eligible Studies

The primary search of the PubMed database generated 23,374 results, of which 25 met the inclusion and
exclusion criteria. The original search of the BioMed database resulted in 222 entries. Of these, seven met
the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The initial search of the ScienceDirect database returned 7,601 results,
of which 16 met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. After removing duplicates and further assessing for
relevance, we were left with a total of 14 studies, all reporting level 1 evidence (Figure 1).

2022 Singh et al. Cureus 14(8): e28405. DOI 10.7759/cureus.28405 2 of 10

 FIGURE 1: PRISMA flowchart.
PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Study Data/Extracted Data

The 14 studies included in this systematic review were assessed, and the data extracted included the type of
study, diagnosis, type of treatments utilized, exercise therapy strategies, rehabilitation intervention, control
and intervention group characteristics, time to follow-up, and outcome measures.

Treatment Modalities

The first treatment considered was kinesiology tape (KT). KT works by extending from a muscle’s origin to
insertion using different degrees of stretch at either side of the tape to achieve a desired effect depending on
the specific muscle ailment that it is being used for.

The second treatment, myofascial trigger point release (MTPR), involves the use of the therapist’s hands to
palpate and identify points of resistance in the muscle tissue. Once found, the therapist applies specific
pressure to the point until there is a release of tension or decline in pain.

Scapular stabilization exercises (SSE) refer to several exercises designed to strengthen the muscles that
anchor the scapula to the thoracic cage. The serratus anterior, serratus posterior, trapezius, rhomboids, teres
major, levator scapulae, and the latissimus dorsi are all crucial to allow for scapular stability which directly
impacts the ability of the shoulder joint to correctly function.

Resistance training consists of specific movements and exercises that target progressive
stretching/strengthening designed to reverse specific shoulder complications. This treatment modality
utilizes resistance/weight training and focuses on the strengthening of muscles surrounding the shoulder
joint with the intention of facilitating greater joint stabilization.

Results
Treatment One: Elastic Kinesiology Tape

When a muscle is acutely overstressed, the goal of therapy is to inhibit the muscle to decrease the load, and

2022 Singh et al. Cureus 14(8): e28405. DOI 10.7759/cureus.28405 3 of 10

 thereby the pain that patients feel. Elastic KT can achieve this effect by tensing the KT to 15-25% stretch
starting from the painful area at the muscle insertion and ending at the origin of the muscle. In a weakened
muscle, the aim is to stimulate the muscle by applying 15-25% tension to the KT and attaching it to the
origin of the muscle, with the other end of the KT attached to the insertion. With these two methods, KT
decreases pain and increases range of motion (ROM) [9]. Elastic KT is a useful technique that is designed to
prevent and treat many musculoskeletal injuries, as well as increase sports performance [9]. Three level 1
studies evaluating the use of KT are included in this review.

Shakeri et al. [10] evaluated 30 patients with SIS. The experimental group received KT taping on/around
their shoulder girdle on day one and were assessed using outcome measures, such as the Visual Analog Scale
(VAS) and pain-free ROM for abduction, flexion, and scapular plane elevation. Patients kept the KT on for
three days and underwent the first evaluation on day four after the KT was removed. The application of the
tape was repeated, kept on for three days, and following KT removal, patients were again evaluated. A
control group received taping at the same intervals but placebo taping techniques were used in place of KT.
When compared with pretreatment scores, the experimental group saw a significant decrease of 2-3 points
in VAS for pain intensity during movement (p = 0.000). There was a significant decrease of 3-4 points in VAS
for nocturnal pain (p = 0.000). Significant differences in pain-free ROM compared to pretreatment were
reported for all three shoulder ROMs (10-19 degrees) (p = 0.000). After placebo taping, the control group
showed no significant differences in VAS for pain intensity during movement nor in shoulder flexion ROM
when compared to pretreatment scores. A significant difference in VAS for nocturnal pain was found
immediately after taping (1-point difference) and a week after taping (2-point difference). A significant
difference was found in pain-free shoulder abduction ROM (9 degrees) and scapular elevation ROM (8
degrees) after one week of placebo when compared to pretreatment values (control group).

The study by Kul and Ugur [11] divided 40 patients with SIS into two groups based on the treatment modality
they were to receive. The first group, KT group (KTG), received KT as well as a home exercise program (HEP).
The second group, physiotherapy (PT) modalities group (PTG), received 15 sessions of physical therapy with
HEP. Patients were followed up with two calls at five-day intervals for a total of six calls. Patients who had
received corticosteroid injections in the last three months were not included in this study. Outcome
measurements in this study included the VAS for rest, nocturnal and activity pain, as well as ROM values for
active flexion, abduction, and internal rotation. Patients were assessed pretreatment (time 1; T1), after
treatment (T2), and one month after treatment ended (T3). All values at T2 in the KTG showed significant
changes when compared to baseline (all p < 0.001). At T3, significant improvements were seen in VAS rest
pain (p < 0.01), VAS nocturnal pain (p < 0.01), and VAS activity pain (p < 0.05). The PTG showed significant
improvements for all variables at T2 (p < 0.01). At T3, significant improvements were seen in shoulder
abduction ROM (p < 0.05) and VAS nocturnal pain (p < 0.05). PT was more effective than KT in VAS activity
pain (p < 0.05) and VAS nocturnal pain (p < 0.01) at T2 compared to T1. PTG improvements continued to be
statistically significantly different from KTG until T3 for rest pain (p < 0.05).

A study by Goksu et al. [12] compared the therapeutic effects of KT versus subacromial corticosteroid
injections (SCI) in patients with SIS. In total, 61 patients were separated into two groups. The KTG received
taping three times in three-day intervals. The corticosteroid injection group (CIG) received a corticosteroid
as well as a local anesthetic (bupivacaine). Both groups were prescribed the same home exercise regimen to
follow for seven sessions with 24 hours between each session. The outcome measurements for this study
evaluated flexion/abduction ROM values, and the VAS was used to quantify shoulder pain at rest/during
movement. Shoulder functional status was detected by the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).
Evaluations were done at baseline (T1), one week after therapy (T2), and four weeks after therapy (T3). Both
groups were found to have significant improvements in ROM, VAS scores, and SPADI scores at the end of T2
and T3. When comparing the two groups at T2, the CIG had statistically significant improvement in VAS
scores at rest (p < 0.025), abduction ROM (p < 0.028), and SPADI scores (p < 0.043). At T3, the CIG again had
statistically significant changes when compared to the KTG for VAS scores at rest (p < 0.01), abduction ROM
(p < 0.043), and SPADI scores (p < 0.031). Both groups had similar score improvements in VAS pain scores in
motion, as well as ROM for flexion and abduction. All parameters improved after both treatment modalities
at a statistically significant level.

Summary: Elastic KT has been shown to be effective in the treatment of shoulder pain, and more specifically
in SIS. The VAS was an outcome measure common to all three studies assessed. KT was found to decrease
VAS scores at rest, during movement, and at night. This effect lasted for at least one month after treatment
ceased. Shakeri et al. found that KT increased the pain-free ROM for abduction, flexion, and scapular plane
elevation. Kul and Uger found significant increases in ROM for all movements; however, this was only found
immediately after treatment and not at one-month post treatment. Goksu et al., however, showed
statistically significant lasting effects (four weeks post treatment) of KT on flexion and abduction ROM as
well as on SPADI scores. Elastic KT appears to be an effective treatment modality for chronic shoulder pain
due to SIS.

Treatment Two: Myofascial Trigger Point Release

Myofascial trigger points (MTPs) are tender points in tight bands of muscle that cause pain, known as
myofascial pain. In MTPR, a therapist applies pressure on a patient’s muscle until they find an area of

2022 Singh et al. Cureus 14(8): e28405. DOI 10.7759/cureus.28405 4 of 10

 increase in tissue resistance, the MTP. On palpation of the MTP, the patient often experiences
pain/discomfort. The pressure is maintained until the patient feels a release of tension/decline in pain or
until the therapist feels a release of tension underneath their palpating finger. With this manual therapy,
the practitioner searches for MTPs and attempts to provide relief at these points. Three studies reporting
level 1 evidence were included to evaluate MTPR.

Bron et al. [13] investigated the effect of MTPR in patients with chronic shoulder pain. In total, 72 patients
were included in the study and placed into one of two groups. The intervention group (IG) consisted of 37
patients who received MTPR treatment once weekly for a maximum of 12 weeks. Patients in the control
group were instructed to continue their current treatment interventions, whether medicine or stretching. At
six and 12 weeks of treatment, both groups reported results. The primary outcome measurement was the
Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire score. Another outcome measure was the VAS
for Pain (VAS-P). This is a general pain score and rates pain at that moment (VAS-P1), pain in the last seven
days (VAS-P2), and the most severe pain in the last seven days (VAS-P3). Lastly, the number of muscles with
MTP between the two groups was assessed and compared at six and 12 weeks. There was a significant
improvement in the IG when compared to the control group at 12 weeks (all p < 0.05). Differences were
detected on the DASH (mean difference = 7.7), the VAS-P1 (mean difference = 13.8), the VAS-P2 (mean
difference = 10.2), and the VAS-P3 (mean difference = 13.8). The IG had a mean difference of 2.7 fewer
muscles with MTPs when compared to the control group. After 12 weeks of study, 55% of IG patients
reported improvement in shoulder pain, whereas this number was only 14% in the control group.

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a musculoskeletal disorder that features many MTPs, as well as
increasing muscle stiffness. A study by Kisilewicz et al. [14] studied the effects of MTPR on trapezius muscle
stiffness and the resultant presence of MPS. The study considered 12 professional Polish basketball players
with unilateral neck or shoulder pain on the dominant side. Once MTPs were localized, they were treated
with MTPR. The main outcome measure of this study was dynamic stiffness. Dynamic stiffness is the
resistance of soft tissue to an external or internal force. The more dynamic stiffness, the more resistance,
resulting in greater pain. Dynamic stiffness was measured immediately before and after MTPR with a device
called the MyotonPRO. The results of the trial produced mixed results. There was a significant decrease in
muscle stiffness of the upper trapezius by 11.8% (p < 0.01). Comparatively, no significant changes were
detected in the middle or lower trapezius. Furthermore, no significant change was seen in the dynamic
stiffness in the whole contralateral trapezius muscle (p > 0.05).

A study by Gordon et al. [15] examined the effects of MTPR on 23 patients with shoulder pain. All patients
received four 10-minute sessions of therapy exclusively on the painful shoulder over a span of two weeks.
Outcomes were assessed before treatment (T1), after two weeks (T2), and after six weeks (T3). The
MyotonPRO was utilized in this study to assess changes in muscle stiffness. Muscle stiffness scores showed
significant improvements for the treatment when comparing pre and posttreatment values (p = 0.012). The
non-treated side did not show these same significant improvements in muscle stiffness (p = 0.241). Pain
scores were assessed using the Brief Pain Index (BPI). The BPI scores showed that MTPR brought forth
statistically significant changes in BPI scores (p < 0.0001). Pain scores also remained stable at the four-week
follow-up appointment and continued to be stable at the 13-month follow-up appointment. The Wilcoxon
test was utilized to determine three different parameters indicating the effect of MTPR on quality of
life. Levels of stress (p = 0.024), average suffering (p < 0.0001), and reduction of quality of life scores (p <
0.0001) significantly improved, indicating that MTPR was effective in decreasing patient stress, decreasing
patient suffering, and improving the quality of life.

Summary: MTPR was found to be an effective therapy for reducing pain, decreasing muscle stiffness, as well
as improving patient quality of life and disability. Bron et al. reported that the IG that received treatment
improved significantly in all pain scores when compared to the control group. Furthermore, disability scores
were also seen to improve. Kisilwecz et al. identified that MTPR was not as effective in the treatment of the
middle or lower trapezius regarding changes in muscle stiffness. However, the upper trapezius was
responsive to MTPR, and dynamic muscle stiffness was found to decrease in post versus pretreatment
scores. Gordon et al. found that all outcomes assessed showed statistically significant improvement in
comparison to pretreatment scores. As exemplified above, MTPR appears to be an effective treatment for
chronic shoulder pain from SIS or by other causes.

Treatment Three: Scapular Stabilization Exercises

Forward head posture and round shoulder posture are two of the most common postural disorders, often
seen together. It increases the gravitational force exerted on the head, which can lead to degenerative
changes in the cervical spine. This is known to be from a dysfunction of the flexion-relaxation phenomenon
(FRP). The FRP is a normal and physiologic pattern that refers to the reduction or silence of myoelectric
activity of the lumbar erector spinae (ES) muscle during full-trunk flexion [16]. In patients with shoulder
injuries, postural correction can be seen to improve pain. Several investigations have shown that pain can be
reduced through SSE. These SSEs include chin-tuck, overhead press, horizontal pull apart, chest press,
serratus anterior punches, retraction plus external rotation, and scapular protraction. Some studies reported
increased ROM using these exercises, which occurs from improved joint position sense and
proprioception [16]. Four level 1 studies evaluating the use of SSE were included in this systematic review.

2022 Singh et al. Cureus 14(8): e28405. DOI 10.7759/cureus.28405 5 of 10

 Shiravi et al. [17] assessed 132 consecutive patients who presented with secondary SIS due to forward head
and round shoulder postures. All participants were submitted to the evaluation of the joint position sense
(JPS) at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 degrees of shoulder forward flexion during the sitting position. Study group
1 consisted of 45 patients who used SSE and the control group included 45 patients who underwent no
intervention. The SSEs were performed 30 minutes each day for six weeks (three sessions per week). The
study found that group one had significant decreases in pain (−3.8 ± 0.48, p = 0.021) and proprioception
(−2.5 ± 0.2, p = 0.033) after six weeks. The addition of SSE for the cervical spine led to greater improvements
in pain, posture, FRP, and strength (start of the concentric contraction, p = 0.009, and end of the concentric
contraction, p = 0.044). No significant changes were seen in pain and proprioception in the control group.

Hotta et al. [18] assessed 50 patients with SIS, of whom 25 were in the control group and 25 were in the
treatment group. The treatment group underwent eight weeks of SSE with periscapular strengthening.
Scapular kinematics, shoulder pain, and shoulder disability index were the outcome measures used. The
orientation and position of the thorax, scapula, and humerus of the patients were assessed using the three-
dimensional motion capture system 3 SPACE Liberty. Electromagnetic sensors were used, which were
attached to the body segments to be analyzed and to digitize the anatomical points. There was a significant
improvement in shoulder pain and disability index (p < 0.01), shoulder kinematics for upward rotation (p <
0.01), anterior tilt (p < 0.01), and internal rotation (p < 0.01) of the scapula. Muscular strength increased in
the treated group after carrying out the protocol. In the treatment group, a significant reduction in pain was
seen with a mean difference of 32.4 points (p < 0.01), indicating improved shoulder function in the
treatment group.

Moezy et al. [19] conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SSE with
conventional PT in 68 patients with SIS. The flexibility exercises included the sleeper stretch, crossed arm
stretch, and corner stretch. The outcomes measured included improved ROM and joint position sense.
Scapular clock exercises using a ball were used to help with joint kinesthesia. The PT protocol included
pendulum and ROM exercises. The improvement of shoulder abduction (p = 0.024), external rotation ranges
(p = 0.001), postural parameters such as forward shoulder translation (p < 0.0001), forward head posture (p =
0.001), mid-thoracic curve (p = 0.001), and pectoralis minor length in the SSE group were significantly
greater than that the PT group. After six weeks, the SSE group also demonstrated significant improvement in
shoulder flexibility (p < 0.0001) and protraction of the shoulder (p = 0.001). In the PT group, there were also
significant differences in scapular rotation and pectoralis minor length; however, no improvement in
scapular symmetry and no reduction in pain were seen (p = 0.576).

Struyf et al. [20] conducted an RCT among 22 patients with SIS. The scapular-focused treatment group
included stretching and scapular motor control training which included upward and downward rotation,
external and internal rotation, and posterior and anterior tilting of the scapula. The control therapy group
included stretching and rotator cuff training with an elastic band. The forward posture head was measured
vertically with a sliding caliper. One gravity-referenced inclinometer was used to measure humeral
elevation, and a second inclinometer was used to reliably measure the upward rotation of the scapula.
Clinically significant improvement was seen in scapular motor control training using self-reported disability
(Cohen’s p = 0.93, p = 0.025), and improvement in pain during the Neer test, Hawkins test, and empty can
test (p = 0.076, 0.014, and 0.092, respectively). The experimental group demonstrated a moderate
improvement in self-experienced pain at rest, whereas the control group showed no improvement. However,
no significant difference was seen in the scapular upward rotation and the shoulder disability questionnaire.

Summary: The use of SSE in patients with SIS has demonstrated improvements in various outcomes of
measures. With the studies evaluated for this treatment, some contradicting results were found. A key
finding that was common to all the RCTs studied here was an improvement in scapular rotation and ROM.
This increase in ROM can be attributed to reduced pain which was also seen in all studies. The study by
Struyf et al. was unique in that no significant difference was found in scapular upward rotation; however,
motor control training including external/internal rotation and posterior/anterior tilting of the scapula
demonstrated improvement. In addition, all the above studies showed a reduction in pain using scapular
exercises alone except the study by Moezy et al., which showed an equal reduction in pain using both SSE
and PT.

Treatment Four: Resistance Training Exercises

Several studies measure the effect of active exercises and strength training for shoulder injuries and pain
that cause the weakening of the surrounding muscles. Shoulder movement is a modifiable factor that can
contribute to shoulder pain and disability. Because people with SIS, rotator cuff injuries, or even diabetes
demonstrate decreased shoulder motion and strength, specific movement and exercise strategies targeting
progressive stretching and strengthening will help to reverse these shoulder complications. Two main
aspects should be taken into account during strength training: specific muscle-force level and the force
balance among muscles that act on the same joint [7]. Proprioception, the ability to recognize and locate the
body in relation to its position and orientation in space, is essential for motor control and joint stability
during daily activities and sports practice [7]. Several studies have described its effects on muscle
strengthening which directly affects the functional capacity. Therefore, it is important to understand the
effects of resistance training on proprioception so that we can improve the strength-training protocols to

2022 Singh et al. Cureus 14(8): e28405. DOI 10.7759/cureus.28405 6 of 10

 increase joint stability. The strength-training program exercises reviewed in these studies included a sling
suspension system, bench press, lat pull-down, shoulder press, seated row, inferior glide, isometric low row,
dynamic knee push-up, wall press, and wall slide with weights. Four level 1 studies were included in this
exercise.

Jung et al. [21] assessed 36 patients who received active shoulder exercise with a sling suspension system
and 18 patients in the control group who received bilateral arm training for 40 minutes five days a week for
four weeks. The outcome measures before and after the intervention included measurement of shoulder
subluxation distance, shoulder proprioception, the Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) scale, and the manual
function test (MFT). A sling suspension-based exercise method can compensate for gravity by hanging part
of the body on a string. It can induce selective active muscle contraction by adjusting the gravity, designed
to strengthen muscles around the shoulder joint. The control group underwent shoulder flexion-extension
exercise, elbow joint flexion-extension exercise, and a forward-reaching exercise. The shoulder subluxation
distance was evaluated using an L-shaped thermoplastic rod (or jig). The assessment of shoulder
proprioception was performed using a repositioning test of shoulder flexion position sense using five
specified angles. The FMA tool was used for quantitative assessment of the functional recovery. The change
in distance measured in shoulder subluxation (p = 0.008), the degree of shoulder proprioception (p = 0.006),
and the upper extremity manual function (p = 0.002) demonstrated significantly greater results in the study
group than in the control group.

Shiravi et al. [17] assessed 132 consecutive patients who presented with secondary SIS due to forward head
and round shoulder postures. Study group one consisted of 45 patients who used abdominal control feedback
(ACF) exercises and the control group included 45 patients who underwent no intervention. All participants
were submitted to the evaluation of the JPS at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 degrees of shoulder forward flexion
during the sitting position. Shoulder proprioception was measured by a goniometer. Electromyography data
were normalized for maximum voluntary contraction. The maximal isometric strength of scapular upward
rotators was measured using a handheld dynamometer. The addition of ACF to a conservative program for a
shoulder injury led to greater improvements in neck pain, posture, FRP, and strength. The study found that
group one had significant decreases in pain (p = 0.036) and proprioception error (p = 0.034) after six weeks.
No significant changes were seen in pain and proprioception in the control group.

Salles et al. [22] assessed a total of 90 male undergraduates. They were randomly distributed into three
groups: group one with 24 subjects performed four exercises at the same high intensity, group two with 27
subjects performed exercises at different intensities, and the control group with 30 subjects performed no
upper body exercise. The ACF exercises including bench press, lat pulldown, shoulder press, and seated row
were performed 30 minutes each day for six weeks (three sessions per week). They determined the ROM for
shoulder rotation by measuring the amplitude between the maximum internal and external rotation. The JPS
absolute error (AE) was assessed by applying the joint-position reproduction test, with a target position at
50% of ROM. At pretraining, there was no difference in JPS AE among groups, yet at post-training, group one
demonstrated less AE than both group two and the control group with the best performance. JPS improved in
group one compared to group two and the AE in group two was also less compared with the control group.
Meanwhile, the control group maintained the same AE and did not improve proprioceptive acuity. The
results demonstrate that AE depends on training intensity; strength training improved healthy participants’
ability to reproduce joint position and thus improved proprioception.

Mueller et al. [23], conducted an RCT for three months on 52 participants with shoulder pain or limited
motion and were randomized to a group receiving progressive shoulder movement intervention (ShoMo
group) and a control group receiving wellness activities. The ShoMo intervention group included exercises to
improve shoulder ROM. Participants started with passive stretching of end-range shoulder flexion and
rotation (internal, external) that progressed to active, followed by resisted shoulder motions tailored to their
ability level. Participants were then instructed to perform three assigned stretching motions for a minimum
of two sets of 10 repetitions every day. Participants were also instructed in active shoulder movement that
could be incorporated into daily activities with a dose based on the participant’s measured activity count at
baseline using accelerometers. The intent of the wellness program was to control interactions with physical
therapists (participants seen four times over three months) and to provide useful information for disease
management, but not provide intervention that directly targeted shoulder joint motion. The outcome
measures involved ROM and SPADI. The ShoMo group had a 7.2-degree increase in active shoulder flexion
compared to the wellness group after three months of intervention (p < 0.05). However, the difference did
not persist for more than three months. The ShoMo group showed a 12.7-point improvement in the total
SPADI score compared to the wellness group following three months of intervention. The significant
difference between groups persisted over 12 months.

Summary: The use of resistance for strengthening and active weight-bearing exercises has been shown to
significantly reduce pain and improve proprioception in those who have shoulder injuries. In each of the
studies reviewed, strengthening exercises improved joint position sense and shoulder kinesthesia. The
simultaneous reduction in pain parallels the improved ROM also seen in the literature. In the study by
Mueller et al., the results did not persist over the long term because there was no follow-up after the
therapeutic intervention was completed. It becomes important to continue to note any confounding factors
that may have caused the results. Therefore, the results of the present study should be verified by additional

2022 Singh et al. Cureus 14(8): e28405. DOI 10.7759/cureus.28405 7 of 10

 studies with larger sample sizes. Furthermore, although all the studies demonstrated improved ROM, only
the study by Jung et al. actually measured the improved manual function test.

Discussion
Chronic shoulder pain is an extremely prevalent problem that plagues Americans. It is the third most
common reason for physician visits, of which secondary muscular SIS pathologies make up approximately
half. To assess the usefulness of specific proprioceptive-based treatment modalities compared to more
traditional and existing rehabilitation exercises, this review looked at the use of KT, MTPR, SSE, as well as
resistance training. KT was seen to effectively reduce pain and improve functional limitation, especially in
combination with exercise therapy [11]. However, it was also seen that proper posture and scapular stabilizer
exercises appear to be more effective than general exercise therapy. Furthermore, when conventional
treatment modalities fail, surgical methods are considered. Yet, several RCTs have reported no difference in
pain outcomes between conservative compared to surgically treated patients [24]. Aside from these options,
however, this review reviewed more unconventional therapies. KT appears to be an effective treatment
modality for chronic shoulder pain and improvement in functional ROM for up to four weeks posttreatment.
MTPR was universally found to be an effective therapy for reducing pain, decreasing muscle stiffness, as well
as improving patient quality of life. SSE-based treatment has some contradicting results where pain and
ROM were improved in all studies except one. Finally, resistance training improved joint position sense and
shoulder kinesthesia in each of the studies reviewed; however, the pain was less studied. All techniques
reviewed showed promise in effectively treating SIS, but further studies are needed to make definitive
conclusions.

There are some limitations to this review. One limitation of this review includes inconsistent patient follow-
up. Most literature studies measured outcomes up to three months to a maximum of one year. To determine
promising long-term results, it is vital to maintain continuity. However, the fact that not many papers have
focused on this aspect of the research is the reason why this review is important. Despite the positive results
seen in this paper, physicians limit SIS treatment to the more commonly used methods such as non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and corticosteroids because there is a need for continuity. Another
limitation is the limited number of studies available for each technique. There is limited research conducted
on proprioceptive-based modalities specifically, which is the basis of this paper. Improving joint position
sense is what allows for an increase in ROM. Limited ROM is the root cause of pain and functional disability.
More studies are needed to help assess whether treatment modalities such as KT and resistance training
increase the degree of joint position sense. The ideal goal is that once more research is conducted and shows
promising results, management of SIS can shift primarily to these treatments instead of NSAIDs or just
physiotherapy. Finally, the scoring systems for each outcome measured can be hard to quantify because a
wide range of scoring techniques have been used. For example, studies used a varying range of exercise sets
and repetitions for the resistance training group. It is important to assess the numerical threshold after
which improvement was seen. This can help us determine whether continuing treatment in those that did
not see improvement might have proved beneficial. Regardless of this, the reports reviewed showed
promising results and allow us to potentially standardize scoring systems in the future.

Previous literature studies have shown a range of improvements with KT treatment. Yam et
al. [25] compared RCTs measuring lower limb muscle strength and performance in patients with muscle
fatigue, chronic musculoskeletal disease, those without disabilities, and those with postoperative orthopedic
conditions. This was done by conducting distance in a single leg hop and vertical jump height. From each
study, the greatest improvement seen favoring KT was in those with chronic musculoskeletal diseases [25].
Similarly, Wilson et al. [26] saw improvements in stability for lateral ankle sprains with a reduction in
recurrence seen using KT. They measured proprioception using the dynamic balance test and endurance
using the heel raise test. It was seen that KT may increase afferent input and improve proprioception on
ankle stability. It was also seen that KT increased plantar flexor endurance and vertical jump height. Finally,
improvements in postural control were also found [26]. These results are similar to those reviewed in this
study.

Literature supports MTPR treatment of head and neck muscles in tension-type headaches and migraine-type
headaches. Dry needling is a type of treatment using a thin filiform needle to penetrate the skin that
stimulates MTPR. In a review by Navarro-Santana et al. [27], it was seen to improve pain-related disability
compared to no treatment. Similarly, Falsiroli Maistrello et al. [28] have shown the effectiveness of manual
MTPR regarding frequency, intensity, and duration of attacks in both tension-type and migraine headaches.
Those with either of these have a greater number of trigger points compared to healthy subjects, and a
higher number correlates with the severity and the duration of attacks. The treatment used ischemic
compression, myofascial release, muscle energy, soft-tissue treatment, and positional release. The results
showed a greater reduction in pain, intensity, and duration scales of headaches [28].

Studies have shown that targeted SSE can lead to improvement in posture and pain. An RCT by Kang et
al. [29] used 14 exercises, including press-ups in a chain, push-up plus, supine deep breathing, supine
shoulder at 90 degrees of flexion with scapular protraction/retraction, arm raise in the quadruped position,
lateral arm raises with 2 kg dumbbells, posture education, prone I, prone Y, prone T, prone W, and lateral
pulldown. Significant improvements were seen using the pain scale and neck function using the neck

2022 Singh et al. Cureus 14(8): e28405. DOI 10.7759/cureus.28405 8 of 10

 disability index. An RCT was also conducted by Beurskens et al. [30] to measure the effectiveness of
physiotherapy following breast cancer and axillary node dissection. Treatments included postural
correction, upper extremity coordination exercise, strengthening and conditioning exercise, and exercise for
lymphedema. The program took place in nine sessions over three months. The main outcome was the VAS,
which showed that shoulder/arm pain was significantly improved [30].

Previous studies have shown that intensity resistance training exercises improve pain and functional
mobility. The scientific evidence behind this is due to muscle hypertrophy which contributes to muscle
growth that stems from an increase in neural adaptations from exercising [31]. An RCT by Jones et
al. [32] was conducted to compare resistance training versus general exercises versus no treatment in
women with fibromyalgia. The regime consisted of resistance training using hand weights up to 3 lb and
elastic tubing. The outcomes showed improvements of 26% in multidimensional function, 15.9% in self-
reported physical function, 44.6% in pain, 12.6% in tenderness, and 25% in muscle strength in the
resistance groups. Similarly, a meta-analysis of 667 articles by Papa et al. [33] showed that resistance
training can decrease age-related regression in functional mobility. The training focused on the large muscle
groups in the lower extremities, the effects of full-body resistance training, as well as resistance training for
the muscles in the core of the body, including abdominals and spine stabilizers. Improvements in the
functional mobility, gait, speed, and balance of older adults were seen. The most common outcomes
included the Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and the Functional Reach test (FR). There is a 15% decrease in
muscle strength every 10 years after the age of 50. However, this paper shows that resistance training can
slow the loss of muscle mass and muscle strength if performed two to three days per week. These findings
are in line with the ones discussed here and may provide promising results in the future.

Conclusions
Musculoskeletal disorders, and specifically SIS, are common reasons for primary care visits, and more
permanent therapeutic modalities in this area need a focus of care. Most current treatment options are
temporary or only have short-term outcomes. The need for improvements in care has shed light on newer
therapies for treating SIS. This meta-analysis compared the use of KT, MTPR, SSE, and resistance training.
All techniques reviewed showed some promise in effectively treating SIS, but further information is needed
to make definitive conclusions. Future studies should explore the use of resistance, improved joint position
sense, and proprioceptive shoulder exercises, and focus on providing further information and insights on the
fascial mobilization used in these techniques that contribute to the outcome measures.

Additional Information
Disclosures
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the
following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from
any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have
no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might
have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no
other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

References
1. Mayo Clinic. Overview . (2021). Accessed: June 13, 2022: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-
conditions/osteoarthritis/symptoms-causes/syc-20351925.
2. Soprano SE, Hennessy S, Bilker WB, Leonard CE: Assessment of physician prescribing of muscle relaxants in
the United States, 2005-2016. JAMA Netw Open. 2020, 3:e207664. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7664
3. Garving C, Jakob S, Bauer I, Nadjar R, Brunner UH: Impingement syndrome of the shoulder . Dtsch Arztebl
Int. 2017, 114:765-76. 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0765
4. Consigliere P, Haddo O, Levy O, Sforza G: Subacromial impingement syndrome: management challenges .
Orthop Res Rev. 2018, 10:83-91. 10.2147/ORR.S157864
5. Oliveira VM, Pitangui AC, Gomes MR, Silva HA, Passos MH, Araújo RC: Shoulder pain in adolescent athletes:
prevalence, associated factors and its influence on upper limb function. Braz J Phys Ther. 2017, 21:107-13.
10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.03.005
6. Umer M, Qadir I, Azam M: Subacromial impingement syndrome. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2012, 4:e18.
10.4081/or.2012.e18
7. Gumina S, Camerota F, Celletti C, Venditto T, Candela V: The effects of rotator cuff tear on shoulder
proprioception. Int Orthop. 2019, 43:229-35. 10.1007/s00264-018-4150-1
8. Larsson R, Bernhardsson S, Nordeman L: Effects of eccentric exercise in patients with subacromial
impingement syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019, 20:446.
10.1186/s12891-019-2796-5
9. Pyšný L, Pyšná J, Petrů D: Kinesio taping use in prevention of sports injuries during teaching of physical
education and sport. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015, 186:618-23. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.039
10. Shakeri H, Keshavarz R, Arab AM, Ebrahimi I: Clinical effectiveness of kinesiological taping on pain and
pain-free shoulder range of motion in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized, double
blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013, 8:800-10.
11. Kul A, Ugur M: Comparison of the efficacy of conventional physical therapy modalities and kinesio taping
treatments in shoulder impingement syndrome. Eurasian J Med. 2019, 51:139-44.

2022 Singh et al. Cureus 14(8): e28405. DOI 10.7759/cureus.28405 9 of 10

 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.17421
12. Göksu H, Tuncay F, Borman P: The comparative efficacy of kinesio taping and local injection therapy in
patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016, 50:483-8.
10.1016/j.aott.2016.08.015
13. Bron C, Wensing M, Franssen JL, Oostendorp RA: Treatment of myofascial trigger points in common
shoulder disorders by physical therapy: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN75722066]. BMC
Musculoskelet Disord. 2007, 8:107. 10.1186/1471-2474-8-107
14. Kisilewicz A, Janusiak M, Szafraniec R, et al.: Changes in muscle stiffness of the trapezius muscle after
application of ischemic compression into myofascial trigger points in professional basketball players. J Hum
Kinet. 2018, 64:35-45. 10.2478/hukin-2018-0043
15. Gordon CM, Andrasik F, Schleip R, Birbaumer N, Rea M: Myofascial triggerpoint release (MTR) for treating
chronic shoulder pain: a novel approach. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016, 20:614-22. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.01.009
16. Dilek B, Gulbahar S, Gundogdu M, Ergin B, Manisali M, Ozkan M, Akalin E: Efficacy of proprioceptive
exercises in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a single-blinded randomized controlled
study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016, 95:169-82. 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000327
17. Shiravi S, Letafatkar A, Bertozzi L, Pillastrini P, Khaleghi Tazji M: Efficacy of abdominal control feedback
and scapula stabilization exercises in participants with forward head, round shoulder postures and neck
movement impairment. Sports Health. 2019, 11:272-9. 10.1177/1941738119835223
18. Hotta GH, Santos AL, McQuade KJ, de Oliveira AS: Scapular-focused exercise treatment protocol for
shoulder impingement symptoms: three-dimensional scapular kinematics analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol,
Avon). 2018, 51:76-81. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.12.005
19. Moezy A, Sepehrifar S, Solaymani Dodaran M: The effects of scapular stabilization based exercise therapy on
pain, posture, flexibility and shoulder mobility in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a
controlled randomized clinical trial. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014, 28:87.
20. Struyf F, Nijs J, Mollekens S, Jeurissen I, Truijen S, Mottram S, Meeusen R: Scapular-focused treatment in
patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2013, 32:73-85.
10.1007/s10067-012-2093-2
21. Jung KM, Choi JD: The effects of active shoulder exercise with a sling suspension system on shoulder
subluxation, proprioception, and upper extremity function in patients with acute stroke. Med Sci Monit.
2019, 25:4849-55. 10.12659/MSM.915277
22. Salles JI, Velasques B, Cossich V, Nicoliche E, Ribeiro P, Amaral MV, Motta G: Strength training and
shoulder proprioception. J Athl Train. 2015, 50:277-80. 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.84
23. Mueller MJ, Sorensen CJ, McGill JB, et al.: Effect of a shoulder movement intervention on joint mobility,
pain, and disability in people with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2018, 98:745-53.
10.1093/ptj/pzy070
24. Dorrestijn O, Stevens M, Winters JC, van der Meer K, Diercks RL: Conservative or surgical treatment for
subacromial impingement syndrome? A systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009, 18:652-60.
10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.010
25. Yam ML, Yang Z, Zee BC, Chong KC: Effects of Kinesio tape on lower limb muscle strength, hop test, and
vertical jump performances: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019, 20:212. 10.1186/s12891-
019-2564-6
26. Wilson B, Bialocerkowski A: The effects of kinesiotape applied to the lateral aspect of the ankle: relevance
to ankle sprains--a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015, 10:e0124214. 10.1371/journal.pone.0124214
27. Navarro-Santana MJ, Sanchez-Infante J, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Cleland JA, Martín-Casas P, Plaza-
Manzano G: Effectiveness of dry needling for myofascial trigger points associated with neck pain
symptoms: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2020, 9:3300. 10.3390/jcm9103300
28. Falsiroli Maistrello L, Geri T, Gianola S, Zaninetti M, Testa M: Effectiveness of trigger point manual
treatment on the frequency, intensity, and duration of attacks in primary headaches: a systematic review
and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Neurol. 2018, 9:254. 10.3389/fneur.2018.00254
29. Kang JI, Choi HH, Jeong DK, Choi H, Moon YJ, Park JS: Effect of scapular stabilization exercise on neck
alignment and muscle activity in patients with forward head posture. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018, 30:804-8.
10.1589/jpts.30.804
30. Beurskens CH, van Uden CJ, Strobbe LJ, Oostendorp RA, Wobbes T: The efficacy of physiotherapy upon
shoulder function following axillary dissection in breast cancer, a randomized controlled study. BMC
Cancer. 2007, 7:166. 10.1186/1471-2407-7-166
31. Krzysztofik M, Wilk M, Wojdała G, Gołaś A: Maximizing muscle hypertrophy: a systematic review of
advanced resistance training techniques and methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019, 16:4897.
10.3390/ijerph16244897
32. Jones KD, Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennett RM, Potempa KM: A randomized controlled trial of muscle
strengthening versus flexibility training in fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol. 2002, 29:1041-8.
33. Papa EV, Dong X, Hassan M: Resistance training for activity limitations in older adults with skeletal muscle
function deficits: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging. 2017, 12:955-61. 10.2147/CIA.S104674

2022 Singh et al. Cureus 14(8): e28405. DOI 10.7759/cureus.28405 10 of 10