FIGHTING WITH FEMININITY:

GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO

CECELlA F. KLEIN

Aeeording to a historical manuseript written around 1580 by the Domi-

niean friar Diego Durán, a fifteenth eentury ruler of Tlatelolco had
ernployed a memorable strategy after being vigorously attaeked by Te-
noehtitlan, the Aztee capital now buried beneath Mexieo City (Durán
1967, 2: 263).1 The TIate10lcan king responded to his desperate cireums-
tanees by ordering sorne women and srnall boys to strip naked and
attaek the invaders. While the Httle boys threw burning sticks, the wornen
approaehed with their prívate parts "shamefully" exposed, sorne slap-
ping their bellies and genitals, others squeezing their breasts and seatter-
ing milk on their enernies. Another version of the sarne event adds that
the naked women had their heads gaudily feathered and their lips paintrd
red, the color of harlots (Tezozómoc 1975: 392).2 According to this
author, the aggressive women carned shidds and obsidian bladed clubs
while loudly accusing the Aztecs of being cowards. As the obscene cont-
ingent advanced other women ­still dressed­ turned around, flung up
their skirts, and showed their buttocks to the enemy, whi1e others flung
frorn the top oí a pyramid brooms, cane staves, weavíngs, warping frames,
spindles and battens.

1 N. B. This paper owes much to many people. Elizabeth Boone, TOn!

Cummins, Joan Weinstein, Zena Pearlstone, and Constance Cortez read over or
listened to earlier drafts and made many helpful commcnts. KarI Taube, Cecile
Whiting, David: Kunzle, Susan Kane, Andrea Stone, Stacy Schaefer, Maria Rodri-
guez­Shadow, Christopher Couch and Geoffrey and SharÍl;se McCafferty all shared
valuable information with me. 1 aro particularly indebted, howev~, to Richard
Trexler for encouraging me to pursue the questions addressed here in a global
fraroework, and for giving me the opportunity to meet and share my findings
with other historians and art historians interested in gender issues.
2 These two versions ~by Diego Durán and D. Hernando Alvarado Tezo-
z6moc­ are cognates, generally thought to derive from a now 103t prototype dubbed
Cronica X. Recently Christopher Couch (1989) has argued that Durin's manuscript
was the original and that Teznzómoc's was taken from Durán's.
* Fotografías de Gui'l'liem Arroyo.
 GENDER }
220 CECELIA F. KLEIN

In the aeeompanying illustration of this incident, these belligerant of an Aztee midwife bathi
wcmen appear at the right and top­eenter, as supporting aetors in the broom among the proper
final, hand­to­hand struggle between the rulers of the two rival dties appropriate instruments for
(Figure 1). The illustration is believed to have been painted by a des-
eendant of native survivors of the 1521 Spanish eonquest of Mexieo, T he Role 01 Ji'amen in A.l
a male member of the by then largely enfeebled and eoopted Aztee How are we, then, to u
aristoeraey, whosc sons were reeeiving schooling in European subjeets tary mythohistory, an epiM:
such as Latin, and -as is evident in this painting- European artistic form of a weapon? How e
techniques and conventions. These native artists were often commis- function in Aztec verbal al
sioned by mendicants such as Durán to illustrate written accounts of -and how did militarism
native history and customs as related by native informants. Since both A cIue to the answer :
the artists and the original informants of Durán's manuscript were newborn, for here thesali
descended from the aristocracy of Tenochtitlan and its clasest allies, of darts and a shield (Fig.
thc manuscript presents the story from Tenochtitlan's point of view. war was a male domain
For purposes of ease and c1arity, 1 will hereaftcr refer to the residents explicitly that the arrny wa
of Tenochtitlan as "the Aztecs", a1though the name is normal1y applied and eyewitness aecounts (
to all of the Valley of Mexico polities -including TIatelo1co- that women were ordered to t
eventually carne under Aztec domination. a obscuring the fact that th
The illustration of tbis famous batde, then, clearly reinforces the 1967, 2:568; Berlin and]
author's contention that the Tlatelo1can women largely fought with Virtually all Aztec men, o
the signs of their gender -not just the biological symbols of their sex, were expected to lcave thl
their reproductive body parts and excretions, and their male offspring- for the state whenever ca
but also the domestic utensils that defined their womanly role. For vir- have been frequent given
tually all of these women's missiles must be understood as supremely on imperial expansion anc:
feminine symbols, sweeping, spinning, and wcaving having been exclu- almost on-going warfare.
sively female tasks in prehispanic Central Mexico. (Sahagún 1953-82, wrought on the average 1
6: 96). Important ones, too, since a recorded speech to ,a newly married sored system of rewards I
Aztcc couple, which states that the bride's duty is to' clean the patio, military service, a S}'Stem
provide food, and spin and weave, advi<¡es her that it wiIl be satisfac- upward in an otherwise .
tory fulfillment of these tasks "for [which] you will be loved, you wiIl consisted of the right to
be honored" (Karttunen and Lockhart 1987: 111, 172). In marked decoration.
contrast, Aztec boys were prevented from even touching a spindle or While physical aggra
batten, lest in doing so they compromise their future manhood (Sahagún men, then, Aztec womCII
1953-82, 3: 51, 61; 9: 14). A midsixteenth century manuscript painting at home. In contrast to th
on the battlefield, the bal
3 The battle between Tenocht.itlan and Tlatelkllco took place in 1473. It
resulted in bringing Tlatelolco under the direct control of Tenochtitlan, ending signify, in the words of (
a period of relative prosperity and autonomy for the former. For this reason, and hére" (Sahagún 1953-8:
because it had been founded by members of the sarue migrant group who founded
Tenochtitlan, TIatelolco is normally included with Tenochtitlan and its closest 4 Durán (1967, 2:265)
neighbors and aJ¡lies under the broader rubric of "Aztec." The inhabitants of the "were to IItay in their houset'
Aztec capital are then referred to as the Mexica, or as the Tenochca. hments for refusing to pay tJ¡
 GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 221

of an Aztec midwife bathing a newbom thus ineludes a spindle and

broom among the proper insignia of a girlchild, but not among the
appropriate instruments for a boy (FIgure 2).

The Role of Women in Aztee Warfare

How are we, then, to understand this curious episode in Aztec mili-
tary mythohistory, an episode in which femininity takes the rhetorical
form of a weapon? How did gender, in particular here female gender,
function in Aztec verbal and visual discourse on warfare and conquest
-and how did militarism function in the discourse on gender?
A clue to the answer appears in the same codex depiction of the
newbom, for here the salient device for a boychild is a combination
oí darts and a shield (Figure 2). This fits with our understanding that
war was a mate domaín in ancient Central Mexico. Sources state
explicitly that the army was drawn exclusive1y from the male population
and eyewitness accounts of the 1521 Spanish conquest indicate that
women were ordered to take up arms only at the end, as a means of
obscuring the fact that the native forces were being defeated (Durán
1967,2:568; Berlin and Barlow 1948:70; Sahagún 1953-82,12:116).
Virtually all Aztec men, except the aged and infirm, and a few offidals,
were expected to leave their fields, jobs, and families to risk their lives
for the state whenever called on. Such calls to military service must
have been frequent given the polítical economy's increasing dependence
on imperial expansion and forced tribute, which after 1428 resulted in
almost on-going warfare. The considerable hardships these demands
wrought on the average household were offset in part by a state-spon-
sored system of rewards of goods and status for faithful .and effective
military service, a system that allowed men an opportunity to move
upward in an otherwise closed class hierarchy. One of these rewards
consisted of the right to certain insignia, includinga particular shield
decoration.
While physical aggression and expropriation were appropriate for
men, then, Aztec women idealIy remained comparatively passive and
at home. In contrast to the baby boy's umbilical cord, which was buried
on the battlefield, the baby girl's cord was buried next to the hearth to
signify, in the words of one Spanish chronicler, that she "wilt go now-
here" (Sahagún 1953-82,6:172-73; 5:186).4 Here she cooked and
4 Durán (1967, 2:265) says that "like women" the defeated Tlatelolcans
"were to stay ín their houses" at the order of the Aztecs of Tenochtítlan as punís-
hments for refusing to pay them tribute.
222 CECELIA F. KLEIl'\ GENDER ANI

cleaned, spun and wove, alld bore and rai),cd tht' (mate) warriors who thohistory at least- often pI1
would form the state's armies of the future. lndced, although sorne batde between Tenochtitlan
prostitutes apparently fol1owcd Aztec warriors into battk, therl' is no the warrior women, but rela,
record of wives having accompanied their husbands to serve and carry ru1er tried to rally his demor:
for them, as did Inka women in andent Peru (Torquemada 1975, and "sodomites" (Torquenu
2: 299; Hemming 1970: 204)." In the final pages of Codex A::catitlan example of such martial use
(XXVI), which illustrate the Spanish conquest of Tenochtitlan, they the ruler of vet another neigh
are instead shown being ferried to a stone building well away from the invited sev~l Aztec dignita
site of the struggle whcrc, watching from the rooC, they presumably men were ordered to put on t
would be saCer. they were told, "these are lb.
becn trying to provoke and
offidals were then sent hODlI
Femininity and Cowardice ruler, who not only respon<
to pardon his enemies. Thc
The Tlatelolco warrior wumen are thcrefore anollloluus fmm an Aztec law, which made tnu
Aztec perspcctive, significant, surely, beca use they invert buth the ideal a capital offense punishable
and the norm. This inversion is al! the more poignant given frn(ucnt
Aztec rhetorieal use of femininity as a metaphor for military cm,vardicc.
For as the Codex Azcatitlan image implies, ordinary women wen.' not Enemy Woman
just, in theory at least, passive and uninvolved in miIitaristic actiYities,
they wnc further represented as weak and timid, inclined to rctreat The significance of the I

from physical conflicto Thus does an Aztec de~cripton of the undesira- painting must therefore be. r
bIe maIe paint him as one who by avoiding batlk "acts like a wOI1lan" fact tha! Aztec women die
and who, "afraid, fearful, cowardIy", retreats from it (Sahagún 195:\- ~mon Aztec representaü
82,10:24). Il That women were perceiv

Both cowardlv as wdl as unsuccessful warriors werc acordingl~ tbe Tlatelolcan ruler's advison ti
labdlcd "effeminate", evcn "homosexual", insults that ·-in Aztcc my- old and 50 no more to be fe
time sitting" (Durán 1967,2:25
los me,ricanos... 1891: 247 fo¡
;¡ According to Adolph Bandelier (I HBO: 131, plus 144n). Azlec womt'n prepart"d lIehavior, and Garibay 1964, W
the food to be taken to the battlefidd, but it was carried there by lamemes (malt, battle loo' to innuendos of hOl
carrien;), and by ¡he warnors themselves. That wornen certainly helpt'd theír mcn (1947,6:444) sutes several tim
lo prepare Cor war is supported by Sahagún (J 953-!L',íl: 69), who mentí'Jlh ¡ha! tantamount to asking for an iD
wornen as wel! as men served as directors o'f ¡he market place, heing rhu" charg('d ..,,: 154).
witn responsibility Cor assigning war provisions. H .. says nothing' howevcr, to indica!!' T The prohibition !leems lo
that lht'se women ever Idt the city to accornpany the arrny, 'fhe only wonWll ('\T1' cation varying from place to pi
rnentioned to have accompanied warriors ¡nto hattle may well havt' beco assigned ~. or buming. See Las '
lhe task by the state. They were apparently auianime, a type of Aztee pmstitllll' lt71 :357; Hiseo,re ti" Met:laÍfI
reportedly Creely availahle to warriors during ct'rtain !Sta te rituals in ¡he ('apilal HO 262, 311-12. The Azteca.
(e.g., SahagúlI 19j:l-H~.2U) Torqllemada (1975·~:2J ca lis them maqui, a word jlllábic. One text deacribea lb
lhat he daims meant "the meddlers." E1izabeth Salas (1990: 7) ,..ems to assume thal IUIIomite as "a defilement, .. al
he meanl rr¡ocíuaquetrque or "valiant worncn." Accordillg to Torquemada, Ihes!' (aahagún Fe 10:37). The he
women often died in !.a!tlc, llaving lhrnwll thcmsekes into lhe fray. Some (lf . . . . " who has a penís {and
them \Vere sacriCiced during QuechoHi in honor of thc goddess uf sexual plca,urc, ClM4t:56). Male homseltuai~
Xoc;hiquetzal. for it, was considered lo be 11\
 GENDER AND WAR iN AZTEG MEXiCO

10
thohistory at lcast- often provoked valor.'; One written ven~iol of the
le
batde between TenochtitIan and Tlatelolco Ieaves out the. story oC
10
the warrior women, but relates instead how the beleagured Tlateloko
Y ruler tried to rally his demoralizcd men by calling them "effeminatcs"
),
and "sodomites" (Torquemada 1975, 1: 179). The most picturesquc
n
y
example of such martial use of femininity to provoke warfare involves
the ruler of yet another ncighbor of Aztec Tenochtitlan, Coyoacan, who
invited several Aztec dignitaries to a local feast. Once arrived, thc..'\t:
y men were ordered to put on the blouse and skirt of a woman "because",
they were told, "these are the proper garments for men whom we have
been trying to provoke and incite to war" (Durán 1967, 2:92). The
officials were then sent home in this "shameful" costume to their own
ruler, who not only responded militarily, but, upon winning, refused
to pardon his enemics. Thc seriousness of the insult i'$. made dear by
tI
Aztec law, which made transvestism, like homosexuality in any form,
I a capital offense punishable by death. 1

Enemy Woman

The significance of the Tlatelolcan women in Aztec literature and

painting must therefore be read in the context of not only the historical
faet that Aztee women did not participate in warfare, but abo the
common Aztec representation of women as ineapable and undesiring
ti That women were perceived as unthreatening is indieated hy the daim that

the Tlatelolcan ruler's advisors told him that his enemy's powerful chief advisor was
old and so no more to be fea red "than a Hule old woman who spends her
time sitting" (Durán 1967,:!:255), See Sahagún 1953·8:!,IO::!4 and Historia de
los mexicanos", 1891: :!47 for additional references to cowardice as womanly
behaviof, and Garibay 1964, 111-55-60 fOf an instance in which failure to win a
batde led tu innuendus uf homosexuaHty (see also Quezada 1975:67), Herrera
( 1947,6: 444) sta tes several times that to call a man a consenlÍng Sodolllile was
tantamount to asking for an immediate fight (see algo Stenzel 1976: 18:1; Guerra
1971: 154),
1 The prohibition seems to have been pan-Mesoamerican, the method uf ,'xc-
cution varying from place to place and source to source as strangling or hanging,
stoning, or burning, See Las Casas 1909: 56; Mendieta 1971: 137·:18; Mntolinía
1971:357; Histoyre du Mechique 1905:18; Historia de los mexicanos •.. 1891::!58,
260, 26:!, 311-1:!. The Aztecs, to judge by ('olonial sources, were decidedly homo-
phobic, Dne text describes the lesbian as having a "crushed vulva'" and the
sodomite as "a defilement, a corruption, " a taster uf fUth, revolting, perverse,,:'
(Sahagún FC 10:37), The hermaphrodíte was assumed to he "a detestable wo-
man". who has a penís fand] takes female c:ompanions", ", that is, a leshian
(lbid: 56), Male homosexuality, to judge hy the etym(,logy (lf tw.. (lf tllf' t.. rI~
for jI, was considcrcd to be íuJlUman (l.ópc~ Auslill 19t1:!: 11)7,;,
 GENDElt A
224 CECELIA F. KLEIN

of doing so. What, then, did their aggressivity connote? The question A;&tecs, we are told, were 1M
is complicated by Robert Barlow's (1987, 1: 116) note that a l1ate- took prisoners""
lolean account of tm same batde portrays the women as true soldicrs It is often the belligeranl
who wore war dress and took prisoners, while downplaying the fact or indirectly, provoke the I
t~a l1atelolco lost the war (see also Berlin and Barlow 1948-5-6, 70)! IIOmething to which he feeJ
Smce the l1atclolcan rendition simply altered rather than eliminated story of one Coyolxauhqui,
tm incident, it follows that the War Woman motif had sorne valuc for duonicler led her 400 brotl
both sides of the conflicto The broader question to be tackled then Goatlicue or "Snake Skirt'
. h ' , tucking a ball of feathers ~
~: ow do we explain this ambivalence of the theme of female aggres-
Slon, and what was its function in Aztec discourse on war and gender? 1953-82, 3: 1-5). The son
1 will argue here that the rhetorical potency of the l1ate1olcan utional patron and war8
warrioresscs derived from their simultaneous reference to two funda- lcamed of the uprising and
to defend her. As the attOl
mentally opposed concepts of the aggressive woman which, through a
partíal overlap of signs, helped the Aztecs to mediate the contradictions tzilopocht1i cut off his evi
in ~en's attitudes toward women. The first of these concepts, which RíOuntain, where it bt"Oke
1 wIlI call "Enemy 'Voman", was embcdded in a mythohistorical tra- üpatched or cxiled, and 1
dítion of combative hostile women who, like the l1atclolcan warrioresscs, moved on to establish thei
in the end did not win their batde. The same manuscript that depiCts . That the sister's anime
the l1atelolco debacle, for example, illustrates two womcn, .armed with the mother, is indicated b~
shields and obsidian bladed clubs, helping thcir lOen to confront Aztec iD which, under another n
advances (Figure 3). Thc accompanying text implies that they repre- with black magic in hope
scnted the enemy Tepanec forces whose critical defeat in 1428 marked As a sorceress, she turned
the beginning of Aztec hegemony (Durán 1967, 2:85, PI. 11 ).8 One unleashed noxious snakes, l
of the only two Aztec tales known to me of fighting women who were math devouring her victin
not enemies of the Aztecs concerns ToItec womcn who fought valiantly ÚlPC 1975a:225). Her a
beside their husbands, even taking prisoners, before -along with their Huitzil0p0chtti, who here
men and children and Jike the Tepanecs- being killed (Ixtlilxochitl IOning her (Durán 1967
1975, 1: 281 ). The only story that does not present warring women as pd produced an evil son
members of a losing party features, significantIy, Aztec women them- .-hority. F or tbis insolen
selves. The incident took place prior to the foundation of the capital l'Purán 1967, 2:37-45).
when the beleaguered Aztecs were foreed to defend their camp at Izta- ... It would be a mistakc
calco against a Tepanec attack (Berlin and Barlow 1948:43). The tbe underlying hostility ,
. lo,cht1i and his sister" Sinc'
8 1 say implies because the text make:¡ no specific mention of women wamors.
j,\".were maJe, it follows
It merely presents the story of the Ih!feat of the Tepanecs as told by the ruler of
Coyoacan and his councilor to their people as a warning of what might happen :.._ ......", but to the poweJ
to them shauld they faH to form allianees against the Aztees. So vicious was the Ihc)tb4er account of the }.
Aztec assault on the Tepanecs that "no one {including the women we must assume] his sister, but bis ro
was spare. d " Other schollars (e.g., Couch 1989:369-70) have erroneously
' tended
to assume that the iIlustration depicts an Aztec war with Coyoacan, which would .tkll1Slllip to the god was :
,.~ o,-
imply that the fighting women were Coyo3canos. 'rhe ilIustrator of tlle TOlla,.
,:~ .• Me abo códit;. R. .
'\lallll.script, who I:npied this illustration, made the same mistake and so labelled
.. ·. . . . .0 . of the incident do 11
the Aztees' adversaries as Coyoacanos in his picture (LaFaye 1972: PI. x).
 GENDER ANO WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 225

Aztees, we are told, were scized with great courage and "each woman
took prisoners".
It is often the bellígerant women themsdves, moreover, who, directly
or indirectly, provoke the hostilities by attempting to deprive man of
80mcthing to which he feels entitlcd. Thc best known example is the
story oC one Coyolxauhqui, or "Bells-on-Check", who according to one
chronicler led her 400 brothers in a brazen attempt to kill their mother,
Coatlicue or "Snake Skirt", becau.'IC she had becomc pregnant upon
tucking a ball oC feathers into her waistband whilc sweeping (Sahagún
1953-82, 3: 1-5). The son in Coatlicue's womb, who was the Aztee
national patron and war god, HJtitzilopochtli or "Hummingbird-Left",
leamed oC the uprising and (shades oC Athena) sprang forth fully armcd
to dcfend her. As the accompanying manuscript illustration shows. Hui-
tzilopochtli cut off his evil sister's head and roUed her body down a
mountain, where it broke into pieces. The 400 brothers were either
dispatehed or exiled, and Huitzilopochtli's people, under his leadership,
moved on to establish their capital and empire in the region.
That the sister'g animosity was directed here toward the son, not
the mother, is indicated by a different version oC the same basic event,
in which, under another name, she is said to have terrorized her people
with blaek magic in hopcs oC attaining divine status like her brother.
As a sorceress, she turned at time into an animal, while at others she
unleashcd noxious snakes, scorpions, centipcdes, and spiders, in the after-
math devouring her victims' hcarts (Codcx RamÍrez 1975: 23; Tczozó-
moe 1975a: 225 ). Her ambition put her in direct competition with
Huitzilopochtli, who here adr~"Se his sister's jealousy by simply aban-
doning her (Durán 1967, 2: 31 ).~ She eventually marricd ,a soreerer
and produced an evil son who grew up to himsdf challenge his uncle's
authority. For this insolenee, Huitzilopocht1i killed and deeapitated him
(Durán 1967, 2: 37-45).
It would be a mistake, however, to conclude from these stories that
the underlying hostility was specifiealIy and simply between Huitzilo-
pochtli and his sister. Sinee all subsequent Aztee rulers, likc Huitzilopoeh-
di, were malc, it follows that the real thrcat was not just to Huitzilo-
poehtli, but to the power and legitimae)" of the state itself. Moreovcr
another account of thc Aztee migrations has Huitzilopoehtli beheading,
nct his sister, but his mothcr. That the defeatcd woman's exact rda-
tionship to the god was not the iS'iue is eonfirmed by the faet that his
1+ See also Códice Ramírez 1975:23. Tezozomuó (1975a:225; 19751>:29)
accounts of the incident do not mention her desire to be a goddess.
 ot~ND:R Al
226 CECELlA ~-. KLEIN

mcther's name in this aecount is Covolxauhcihuatl

, , "Bell-Faee-Woman" .une carved ­hcad of eo,..­o
-an obvious variant of "Bells-Her-Checks", or Coyolxauhqui (Tezozó- ­platform aboye, thc stylizel
mee 1975b: 34­35). The threat to Huitzilopochtli which was poscd by dear sign of her decapitatio
ildlv stood in the vicinih' as

.c
his femalc rclative therefore symbolized all pretensions ­past and futu-
re­ to Aztee supremacy.'" The {'onfliet was cxpre..';sed as gcnder oppo- tbe' recent excavatiol1s ';f tb
sition. J1 ­(Matos 1987: 200). Coyohc
Thc importance to Aztee ideology of the arehetypal prctender's women elsewhere, as ti
deserved defeat is clearly evidenced by a relicf on thc upper surfact' of :viQlent death. a symbol of
a giant (11' in diameter) stone disk aecidentalh­ discovered in 1978 .¡he foundation, the basis of
(Figure 4). The disk wa<; found al the foot of th'at half of the Aztec's >,. , As the archetypal conql
main twintemple pyramid which had been dedicatcd to Huitzilopoeh- 'ted all conque red enemies
di; it" context dates jt to thc years between 1469 and 1481. In it, the .the later Tlatelolco warrio
upstart Coyolxauhqui appears, identifiable by thc gold bells on hcr ­JlCXualitv served as a metap
cheeks, as bound, dccapitated, broken, dismembered, and blceding, Ited Azt~c power, and of ti:
her former evil powers expressed by the skull at thc small of her baek, itélolcans. moreover, she "
and by the monstrous profile masks on her knees, elbows and heels. Hn woman who had stepped
tongue protrudes as a further sign that she is dead. Thc disk, as is ¡enter and to challenge the
aften pointed out, was placed at exactly that spot where would ha\'e ~her femininity. This is expl
landed the lifeless bodies of ritually saerificed war prisoncrs represent- :a.a.lIenge to male leadersll
ing Coyolxauhqui and her brothcrs after being roUed down the stairs 'Described as having dres!e
of the war god's temple pyramid from the platform aboye. There it :hcr offended kinsmen tbat
served to warn potential enemies of thdr certain Cate should thev tn- .b, and of little spirit lii.
to obstruet the state's military ambitions. 12 To reinforee the poi~t, ~ :strong and "manly" (To
·.the giant stonc relief of Q
'" SlIsan Gillespie (1989·50­52) has noted that lIIuthers, wives, daughters,
and sisters are often merged and interchangeable in Azte¡' mythohistory, strongly Jjftg ber as nearly naked, ,
suggesting that their exael relationship lo Ihe male principal i, nOI the i'sue. :~ ..pe'nt loincloth. Rer star
RlIdolf v­an Zantwijk (1963: 192) had aiready warned thal we cannot lake the
term "si,ter" Iiterally in slones 5ueh as that uf Cuyulxallhqui, since kinship terros
~tia: of stripping maJe war
fllnctioned as titles uf Aztee dignitaries. He as~ume that the principals represenl defeat and demeaned soci
IWo of the groups whu travelled together on the migration from Aztlan. Yólotl ,~á.s identified with mart~
González­Torres (1975) argues against the popular helief first put forward by "'¡¡¡"'" -

Eduard Seler (196(J·61, 3: :l28 \ that the analugy is astronomical, wilh Huítzilo-
,~vior was both inappr
pochtli representing the slIn and Coyolxauhqui the moon. .b!. But nakedness coul~,
" 1 would argue, therefore, that Michel Graulich (1984) missed the real Sexualitv, as several mM!
1'1,. ' ,"
point of the allegory of Coyolxauhqui in her aspeet of the sorceress who hoped to ¡

,hare or llsurp her brother's divinity. Graulieh (pp. 150·51) argues that woman 'ttrt' ,
here represents feminine passivity whieh tnreatened to impedc the movemt'nl, ~Coylxauhqi and her
vilality, and militaristic aggressiveness of man as represented hy HlIitzilopochtli. ""Abe names <iE Chanticon:1II
As such, she must he overeome. 1 see her instead as competition in the form of '!'lJ¡;> ,111 Another was the 8Od4
femal!' aggressí\'eness ­­that is, as a marked departure from the female norm. and ". los me",icanus ••• 1891 :23
thus as an aberration. At no time do the texts say that these threatening women m;aII lupapalotl, "Obsidian Bu
want to settle down­ nor is their hehavior: passi\­e. bMrII 1975: 3) .
12 Accordíng to Torquemada (1975, 1: 245­46), capti\­es rt'presellting tht' gods • •:>:: H Quilaztli was in the,
Chantk"n and Cnhuaxolotl were sacrífieed during Ihe mouth festival of TeclIillmitl, ,~poueljS were so offendt­d
"the last lllluuth] of the year:' Thcse "g••ds" may ha\­e actually becn the godo ,-6eJ ,ried to ket"p the mattej
 G~:NUER AND WAR IN A¡¡;TEC MEXICO 227

stune carvcd head of Coyulxauhqui al une point was placed on the

platfurm aboye, the stylizcd blood streams carved on its underl'lide a
clear sign of her dccapitation. Statues of her eonquered brothers report-
edly stood in lhe vicinity as wel!; eight stone figures which surfaced in
the recent excavations of the main temple pyramid may represent them
(Matos 1987:200). Coyolxauhqui thus appears here, as do othcr myt-
hic women elsewhere, ID; the first Aztec enemy to die in war. I :\ Her
violent death, a symbol of the Aztees' triumph over treachery, bccamc
the foundation, the basis of thl~ir future succt'sses.
As the archetypal conquercd woman, then, Coyolxauhqui rcprescn-
ted al! conqucred encmies of the state, and servcd as a prototype for
the later Tlatelolco warrioresses. In anticipation of them, her female
scxuaJity scrved as a lllctaphor of the inferiority of all those who contes-
ted Aztee power, and of their inevitable political dcfeat. Like the Tla-
teJoleans, moreover, she was represented in Aztee mythohistory as a
woman who had stepped outside the bounds of ideal femininity to
enter and to challcnge the world of meno In doing _so, she compromiscd
her femininity. This i8 cxplicit in another written \'ersion of the original
ehallenge to male leadcrship, this time by a woman namcd Quilaztli.
Described as having dressed herself for batde, Quilaztli proudly warned
her offended kinsmen that, although they might think her vile, worth-
Jess, and of Jiule spirit like "any other woman", shc was in faet quite
strong and "manly" (Torquemada 1975, 1:80-8t ).'1 The ('arver of
the giant stonc relid of Coyolxauhqui madc the same point by present-
ing her as nearly naked, wearing only her royal jewelry and a knotted
serpent loinc1oth. Her seanty costunw relates directly to the Aztee prar-
tice of stripping male war prisoners to thcir loillcloth as a sign of their
defeatand demeaned social status. Like QuiJaztli, then, Coyolxauhqui
wal'i identified with martiaJ maseuJinity as a sign that her challl'l1ging
bchavior was both inappropriate and ineffeetive.
But nakedness could also be a sign of excessive and illicit femalr
~exuality, as several manuseript paintings of th(' goddess oC lust alld

desses Coyolxauhqui aud her Xochimilcan couuterparl, Chantico; 110 male dejti~
by the names uf Chanticon and Cohuaxolotl are knowu to me.
J3 Another was the goddess Xochiquelzal ("Predous Flower" \; see Hi.\toria
de lus mexicanus... 1891: 1:\5 ). In sorne Central Mexican histories, the womall
was Itzpapalotl, "Obsidian Blltterfly", about whom more above (Anales de Cuauhti-
tlan 1975:3).
11 Quilazüi was in Ihe eud simply ignored ratlter Ihan assanlted hut her
oppoueHts wcre so offend,·d by the masculille beha,-ior of th"ir kiuswoman Ihal
they Iried lo ke¡'p the matter quieto
 GENDEIl }
228 CECELIA F. KLEIN

adultery plainly show; proper Aztec women kept their sexual organs has recentIy argued that w
fully covered when in public view. Femalc sexual promiscuityand pros- which thev then "bequcatb
titution, likc adultery, were rigorously proscribed, and adultery even this sense 'they "ennobled"
at the highest levels was punishable by death. 15 The reasons wcre the system where political ~"
usual; the adultress, like aIl wanton womcn, was seen as "a bcarer of from a certain woman, lt
bastards, an aborter" (Sahagún 1953-82, 10: 56) ,16 Among the ruling circurnscribed.
elite legitímacy of birth was a major issuc, since Iineagc to a great extent Female sexual aggressi
determined who held power and privilege and who did noto The illicit sexual relations, was
importance of womcn in thís process was augmented by thc Cact that, Immoderation, inc1uding I
although lineagc could be traced through cither the male or Ccmalc line, bringing on stunted mcnt
or both, the ideal líneagc founder was a woman. 17 Moreover, although oId age, and even death (l
polítical offices were almost invariably held by men, men's right to 1988, 1:293-96; Sahagm
them depended on the rank and status of their wife and mother; the with the dangers posed by
Aztec supreme ruler's mother was particularly influential (Carrasco when excessive intercours
1984: 43-44; Motolinía 1971: 337-38) .1a Susan Gillespie (1989: 19-20) months, intercourse was S1
142 156).20 Moreover, "
, .._1:
13 Nezahualpilli, ruler of Texcoco, had his principal wHe, a daughter oC the by a ruler to his son, WUI
ruler of Tenochtlitlan, put to death for adultery, although it may be rele\'ant that a11 of thent, young and (
she was abo barren (Carrasco 1984:5, 52). In Tlaxcala, as in Texcoco, the offending
male, as well as the female, was executed (Zorita 1963: 130-31, 134). Sahagún is to await that which
(1953-82,4:82; 4:42, 45; 6:103; 8:42; 9:39) indicates that this was true in (Sahag\1n 1953-82, 6: 11
Tenochtitlan as well. Married men who committed adultery with an unmarried Immorality and all tl
woman were not considered adulteren, but a noble youth could be imprisoned just
Cor looking at another man's wHe (L6pez Austin 1988, 1:292; Sahagún 1953-82, a major connotation of ti
6: 122). Since virtually all of our information comes from the upper c1asses, it is telolcan "harlots", and al
undear whether marital fideHty was so vigorousliy enforced among commoners; exposed breasts and gel
María Rodriguez-Valdés (1988.45) rightly warns that Aztee women did not cons-
titute -and so should not be treated as- a homogeneous group. However, the faet never explicitly describe
that aH adulterers were, Iike prostitutes, regarded as inhuman and "dead" sug· her sorcery, for black m
gests that adultery was at least in theory punishable by death even at the lowest
social levels (L6pez Austin 1982: 167). The most popular methods of executing a
non and illícit sexuality
pair ol adulterers were stoning, clJubbing, and strangling. report that four gaudn~
ljl The woman who intentionally aborted a '{presumably legitimate] fetus was, Tenochtitlan to taunt tb
along with her accomplices, killed unless the mother's lile was in danger (Bialos- in the company of harl
tosky de Chazán 1975:7; Ortiz de Montellano 1989:206 see also Mendieta 1971:
355). Aztee princesses were specifically wamed that any adulterous behavior would
disgrace the nohilityand their family Une (Sahagún 1953-82, 6: 102). time to time al! regent of f~
17 Sahagún (1953-82, 10:5) says, for example, that the great-.grandmother is cesson to a high-ranking po
particularly worthy of praise and gratitude because she "is the foulldler, the beginner 111 Indeed, the harlot CI
[of her Hneage]." Simílarly, <lthe good great-great grandmother .[is] the originator of woman, a "filthy old dog" ,
good progeny" (l bid). This is not said of the great-grandfather, as June Nash old carrying the flowen AII
(1978:352) has pointed out. Similarly, a rnaiden is one "from whom noble lineage rna~uKipt painud ~ IwM
issu.es ..." (Sahagún 1953-8:!, 10: 46), however, as throughout M
18 Carrasco (1984:43·44) notes that only occasionally did a woman hold all three, properly married, Qt
office or title, although sorne sources claim that a daughter of Moctezuma 1 ruled refusing the advances of ti
Tenochtitlan fot a time. The Historia de los mexicanos por sus pinturas (1891: to entrap them (Recinos 19~
20 Breech births were e
632) suggests that I1Iancueitl, the wife of the first Aztec ruler actuaIly ruled the
city in his na me until her death. Outside the capital, women certainly ruled: from intercoune late in pregnanc
 OENDER ANO WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 229

has reeentIy argued that women nominally held the rights to rulership
whieh they then "bequeathed" to their legitimate sons or husbands; in
this sense they "ennobled" thc male members of the governmcnt. In a
system where polítical power depended on a man's legitimate deseent
from a eertain woman, it was imperative that women's sexuality be
cireumscribed.
Female sexual aggressiveness, beeause it was expeeted to result in
illicit sexual relations, was therefore eonnotative1y dangerous and bad.
Immoderation, including re1ations with harIots, eould 'dry up' aman,
bringing on stunted mental and physical growth, sickness, premature
old age, and even death (Ortiz de Montellano 1989:206; López Austin
1988, 1 :293-96; Sahagún 1952-83, 6: 113-19, 125).19 The eoneern
with the dangers posed by women's sexuality earried over to prcgnaney,
when excessive intercourse was believed to harm a fetus; after three
montbs, intercourse was supposed to cease altogether (Sahagún FC VI:
142, 156).20 Moreover, women, according to an Aztec aIlegory passed
by a ruler to his son, unlike men never outgrow their sexual urges. In
all of them, young and old, is "a cave, a gorge, whose only function
is to await that which is given, whose only function is to receive"
(Sahagún 1953-82, 6: 118-19).
Immorality and all that it implies for powerful men is thus surely
a major connotation of the naked bodies of the sexually aggressive 'TIa-
telolcan "harlots", and of Coyolxauhqui's shamefully and conspicuously
exposed breasts and genitals. While Coyolxauhqui's aggressiveness is
never explicitly described in the texts as sexual, this is implied by
her sorcery, for blaek magic is typically associated with female seduc-
tion and illicit sexuality in Aztec literature. A c1assic example is the
report that four gaudily dressed 11atelolcan sorceresses, who entered
Tenochtitlan to taunt the Aztecs prior to the infamous 1473 batde, left
in the company of harlots (Torquemada 1975, 1:178). In a similar

time to time as regent or full·fledged queens in the absence uf suitable male suc-
cessors to a high-ranking position (Schroeder 1991: 159).
19 Indeed, the harlot could be characterized as a lascivious and dissolute old
woman, a "filthy old dog" who "consumes her own substance"; she is depicted as
old, carrying the flowers and f10wing water symbolic of her trade, in a colonial
manuscript painted by Indian artists (Sahagún 1953-82, 10:55). At other times,
however, as throughout Mesoamerica, she was young and attractive. Thus did
three, properly married, Quiche Maya dúefs only narrowly escape destruction by
refusing the advances of three beautiful young women set uut by their enemies
to entrap them (Recinos 1953: 174-75).
20 Breech births were often attrihuted to the parents' having enga!l'ed in sexual
intercourse late in pregnancy (Ortiz de Montellano 1989:206).
 230 CECELJA F. KLEIN GENDER

vein, the contentious and "manly" Quilaztli, who changed herself into 1974: Fig. 1; d. CoáeJ
a beautiful eagle on a cactus to attract and provoke her kinsmen, is noxious insects associated
described in the chronicles as a sorceress (Torquemada 1975, 1: 80) .21 and a spider- crawling .i
Female sexual aggressiveness functioned in all such instances as a sign "Woman Snake", anothc
that threats to the male-constructed social order were evil and abnormal. a serpent or beautiful yo
These interlocked themes of female wantoness, occult behavior, and mistake on their part ~
refusal to serve men weave throughout the fabric of Aztec mythohis- 91 ) .~2
tory, where their potential harmfulness to the social order is always :\s I pointed out SOl
emphasized. In one story of the initial peopling of the world, for exam- figures, like CoyoIxauh(
pie, two two-headed deer turned into women who, having attracted two viewed from the back
male culture heras named Xiuhnel and Mimich with offers of food animaL That it is tlJe "
and drink, then fled from them. Mimich chased them and eventually tipped braided back aprc
killed them (Leyenda de los soles 1975: 123). In a second version of ther or singly, on her m
the same incident, a single bicephalous deer who turned itself into a as Coyolxauhqui. More
woman attacked rather than attracted a culture hero, here named Mix- and eÍbows, are uncomfl
coatl, who retaliated by killing her with arrows (Anales de Cuauhti- fleshless head with outs
tlan 1975: 3 ). According to the first version, the second elusive woman's upper back, a clear sigl
body, which was burned at her death, burst into pieces of colored stone. pitated.
One of these fragments, called Itzpapalotl, "Obsidian Butterfty", was Cihuacoatl's influenc
thereafter carried on Mixcoatl's back whenever he went into combat was seen to have the PO'
(Leyenda de los soles 1975: 124) . death. For this reason l!
Itzpapalotl, the Obsidian Butterfly, was important enough to be behalf of their husband
commemorated in sculpture, where like Quilaztli she appears with mercy in the case of W(
numerous features of the soroeress Coyolxauhqui. Like Quilaztli she the conquest she was reF
tends as well to show up in relief on the undersides of stone objects, in his cradle (Sahagún
where visual -and thus sexual- access to her would have been denied.
revenge, since her own
The evil powers of both women are symbolized by the same monstrous
to sacrifice war prisone:
joints -and here extremities as well- that were seen in the reHef of
( 1989-78) thinks tbat
Coyolxauhqui. While Itzpapalotl can be distinguished on the basis of her
suggesting that Cihuacc
undulating hatched wings punctuated by stylized obsidian blades, bla-
des that also decorated her skirt and her plumed headdress (Heyden 22 The mardal connota:
Maya belief in' a "warrior w
21 In another story, a naked woman named Chimalman, "Resting Shield", a demon who detroys men 1
attracted a male culture hero's iIl-fated arrows and, when he finally pursued her, 1975-124-25' Sahagún 1953
simply disappeared (Leyenda de los soles 1975-124). He finalIy caught and impreg- 10 ruin (Blaffer 1972: 14-).
nated her, another clear case of the close link between sex and war, but after giving 23 The appearance oí
birth, she (predictably) died. Gillespie (1989: 77-78) notes that virtually all women Cihuacoatl had been there
who figure prominently in the early stories of the migration die premature deatlts. night in the marketplacej wl
This, she arglles, eliminated them as "ennoblers" of potentialIy competitive royal (Sahagún 1953·82, 1: 11...
lineages. This fits with the story of a primordial woman named Chimalmat who in 1n sorne Aztec tex.tII. (J
the Quiche Maya creation story Popol Vuh is destroyed along with her sons and nurse of the mate god Qu
hllsband, Seven Macaw, who was a 'false slln', a "puffed up" pretender with crelll5- 1975-124-125; Sahagún 19:
ions oí grandeur (Tedlock 1985: 86, 89-94). the bones of a previoul wo
 GENDER AND W AR IN AZTEe MEXICO 231
¡nto
1974: Fig. 1; d. Codex Borbonicus 15), Quilaztli appears with the
1, is
noxious insects associated with lhe sorceress -a scorpion, a centipede,
').21
and a spider- crawling in her tangled hair (Figure 5). As Cihuacoatl,
¡ign
"Woman Snake", another of her aliases, she could change herself into
nal.
a serpent or beautiful young woman to entice men ¡nto intercourse, a
md
mistake on their part which allegedly killed them (Mendieta 1971:
tús- 91) /2
ays
As 1 pointed out sorne years ago (Klein 1976: 70, 1988), these
lm-
figures, like Coyolxauhqui, are represented in a posture of defeat,
wo viewed from the back and from aboye, like the flayed skin oí an
)()d
animal. That it is the woman's back we see is indicated by the shell-
Llly
tipped braided back apron and large skull buckle elsewhere seen, toge-
of
ther or singly, on her back or on the back of other evil women, such
'a as Coyolxauhqui. Moreover, her arms and legs, hent at the knees
lX-
and elbows, are uncomfortably spread to either side, and her partial1y
~tj­
fleshless head with outstretched tongue hangs upside down over her
n's
le. upper back, a clear sign that, like Coyolxauhqui, she has been deca-
pitated.
Cihuacoatl's influence in the femaIe domain was enormous, 'as she
was seen to have the power to either mandate or grant a reprieve from
be death. For this reason she received regular offerings from women on
th behalf of their husbands and children, just as she was petitioned for
!te merey in the case oC women having difficulty in ehiIdbirth. Even aCter
ts, the eonquest she was reported to have 'eaten' at least one infant boy still
in his cradIe (Sahagún 1953-82, 8:8). Her motive may have been
~.
lIS revenge, sinee her own ehild was a stone knife, oC the kind used
~f to saerifice war prisoners (Sahagún 1953-82, 1: 1 1 ). Louise Burkhart
(1989-78) thinks that the knife represented a lost (Le., dead) child,
suggesting that Cihuaeoatl's behavior was motivated by childIessness. 23

22 The martíal connotations of her llOose behavior surface today in a highland

Maya belief in a "warrior woman" called Siguanaba who is haH snake, haH woman,
a demon who detroys men by impersonating their lovers (Asturias, cited by Blaffer
1975-124-25: Sahagún 1953-82, 2: 236). When Quetzalcoatl bled his member over
10 ruin (Blaffer 1972: 14).
23 The appearance of this knife in the marketplace at dawn índicated that
Cihuacoatl had been thcre during the night. At times she was heard weeping at
night in the marketplace; when she was, her cries were construed as an omen of war
(Sahagún 1953-82, 1:11,46-47).
In sorne Aztec texts, Cihuacoatl-Quilaztli is referred' to as the mother or wet-
nurse of the male god Quetza1coatl or his father, Mixc(\atl (Leyenda de los soles
1975-124-125; Sahagún 1953-82, 2:236). When Quetza1coatl b!ed his member over
the bone5 of a previous world population to create a ncw one, it was Cihuacoatl-
232 CECELIA F. KLEIN OENDER

The goddess's role, in any event, clearIy extended into the male-run name was literally Tzitzimi
imperium as welI, an offidal cult having heen established in the capital me and pursued the couJ
in the earIy 14305 following the Aztec conquest of several dties of rejoined and buried Maya
which she had been patrono Her statue, which was e(fectiveIy "captu- guey plant, source of the b
red" from those conquered polities, was removed to Tenochtitlan and pulque.
literally imprisoned in a special building near the main temple. There, L6pez Austin (lbid) al
as an symbol of the state's growing military power, her "hunger" was is Mayahue1 herself, here I
henceforth ritually appeased with sacrificed war captives. manuscripts, however, Ma
It is this extension of the goddess of female reproduction into the zed maguey plant and De"
operation of a male-run imperialist government that explains the maca- Codex Borbonicus 8). Mo
bre necklace of human hearts, hands, and liver worn in a colonial ma- underneath the large CoJ
nuscript painting of a frightful skeletal woman with monstrous joints, paper banners, long hair,
a protruding tongue, and the shell-tipped skirt often worn by Cihua- the figure represents not )
coatl (Figure 6). Cihuacoatl here represents not an enemy of the state tzimitl, who unsuccessfuD,
so much as she does the enemy. The commentary that accompanies the ported by her skirt of skI
image reads uThís is a figure that they call Tzitzimitl ..." (Boone of stars and the pJanet '
1983: 214). The name Tzitzimitl refers to a group of hostile nocturnal flattened, monster-jointe<l
demons collective1y known as Tzitzimime who were believed to descend braided back apron and
headfirst to earth during eclipses when, like sorcerers, they could devour small mate figure. Many
the living (Codex Telleriano-RemenJÍs 18v; Codex Ríos 27v).24 Itzpa- head with gaping mouth
palotl was a Tzitzimitl, and another of Quilaztli's names was, in fact, see, SUggests decapitation
Tzitzimicihuatl, or "Tzitzimitl Woman" (Leyenda de los soles 1975: While Mayahue1's ev
124; Torquemada 1975, 1 :81). As Yaocihuatl, Quilaztli was lite rally been killed in punishmenl
"Enemy Woman". would imply this. All Tzi
Cihuacoatl-Quilaztli's dangerous powers af(~ further connoted in point is made by a (1.'1
this manuscript painting by the paper banners in her touseled hair. named Zitlanmiyauh ~
Such banners reportedly were worn by the four Tlate1olco harlot-sor- having left her maguey f
ceresses mentioned earlier, who were called Cihuatetehuitl, or "Banner ís seized by a male warri
Women" (Torquemada 1975, 1: 178). Similar banners appear in the story behind this scene, 1
hair of a female figure carved on a greenstone slab found in an earlier being thirsty, had asked :
layer of construction directIy underneath the famous relief of Coyol- Zitlanmiyauh proceeded '
xauhqui (Figure 7). Alfredo L6pez Austin (1979) has re1ated this warrior, we are told, cut
image to the story of a virgin named Mayahue1, "Powerful Flow" Coatlicue, often idell
(Sullivan 1982: 24) , who was carried off by a maJe deity named Ehecatl Tzitzimitl, or enemy. EH
who had come in search of a drink that would makc men happy (His- famous eight foot high ~
toyre du Mechique 1905: 106-07). Her guardian grandmother, whose red, monster-jointed W(
that describes her name:
Quilaztli who lirst ground them up in an earthen tub (Leyenda de los soles 1975: 8tatues representing .Tzi
121 ).
24 The Tzitzimime are referred to as "the black ones, the dirty ones, and as
main temple (Durán 1
tltúlacatecolo, a term for sorcerers (Burkhart 1989: 103, 214). 486) (Figure 8). The 11
 OENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 233
ale-run name was lite rally Tzitzimitl (<;i~mtl), summoned the other Tzitzimi-
capital me and pursued the couple, devouring Mayahuel. Ehecatl, however,
ties of rejoined and buried Mayahuel's bones, from which grew the first ma-
captu- guey plant, source of the highly nourishing Mexican beverage known as
n and pulque.
There, López Austin (lbid) argues that the woman in the greenstone relief
~, was
is Mayahuel herself, here giving birth to the god of pulque. In painted
manuscripts, however, Mayahuel takes the form of an anthropomorphi-
10 the zed maguey plant and never bears attributes of the Tzitzimime (e.g.,
maca- Codex Borbonicus 8). Moreover, the greenstone relief's location directly
~l ma- underneath the large CoyoIxauhqui relief, together with the woman's
joints, paper banners, long hair, and exposed, gritted teeth, all suggest that
~ihua­
the figure represents not Mayahuel, but her demonic grandmother Tzi-
~ state
tzim itl , who unsuccessfulIy tried to deprive man of pulque. This is sup-
les the ported by her skirt of skulls and crossbones, here edged with symbols
800ne of stars and the planet Venus, which appear on other figures of a
tu mal flattened, monster­jointed woman who alternately either wears the
~end braided back apron and skull buckle seen earlier or gives birth to a
levour small male figure. Many of these sport a huge, grotesque upturned
ltzpa- head with gaping mouth and ferocious teeth, which, as we will shortly
~ fact, see, suggests decapitation (Nicholson 1967: Fig. 3).
1975: While Mayahuel's evil grandmother is not expressly said to have
~ra1ly been killed in punishment of her insolence, the force of Aztec tradition
I wouId impIy this. AH Tzitzimime had been primordialIy defeated. The
~d in point is made by a (Texcocan) manuscript depiction of a woman
: hair. named Zitlanmiyauh ­obviousIy a variant spelling of Tzitzimitl­ who,
~.sor­ having left her maguey ficld with a bowl of maguey juice on her back,
fmner is seized by a maIe warrior (Codex X olotl: PI. VIII). According to the
~ the story behind this scene, the warrior, who was fleeing from his enemies,
~lier being thirsty, had asked for and been refused a drink. When the selfish

~
y~:; Zitlanmiyauh proceeded to alert his enemies to his presence, the furious
warrior, we are told, cut off her head (Ixtlilxochitl 1975, 1: 346) .
ow" Coatlicue, often identified as Huitzilopochtli's mother, was aIso a
ti Tzitzimitl, or enemy. Elizabeth Boone (n.d.) has pointed out that the
His- famous eight foot high Aztee stone statue of a decapitated, dismembe-
fhose red, monster­jointed woman wearing the skirt of interIaced serpents
that describes her name, "Snake Skirt", was probably one oC several
f1975: statues representing Tzitzimime reported to have once stood at the
fas main temple (Durán 1987, 1:345; Tezozómoc 1975a:358, 360­61,
486) (Figure 8). The statue has a shelltipped braided back apron and
 234 CECELlA F. KLEIN GENDER .

sku\l back buckle, monstermaskcd shoulders and elbows, and exposed, appears so dressed as the
flacid breasts seen on images oí Coyolxauhqui and Cihuacoatl; her cript, accompanied by a ~
necklacc of human hearts and hands, like thc snake that hangs bet- (Figure 9).
wecn her legs, compares with that of the írightful woman labelled «zi 1 have argued e1sewhel
zí mitl" in Figure 6. 25 Justino Fernándcz (1972: 134) long ago convin- to advertise and celebrate
cingly argued that thc two converging serpcnts which create the crea- victory over the southem I
ture's monstrous head represent streams of blood gushing from the that since Tlacae1el had bf
severed arteries oí her neck. The interpretation explains the monstrous earlier, had been forced t
head oí the relief figures discussed earlier. The giant snakes that like- dress, his ritual cross-dre
wisc form Coatlicue's arms must therefore signify that, like Coyolxauh- avenge that insulto Accor
qui, she has also becn dismembered. woman's clothing on one
F ernández (I bíd : 126, 128) observed, moreover, that the Coatlicue militarv cowardice; the h~
appears to consist of a flayed human skin worn over sorne other body. kctpla~e and, ultimate1y, e
On the basis of numerous reports that male priests ritualIy donncd the Male cross-dressing signifil
flayed skins oC sacriíiced female goddess-impersonators, he hypothesized werful of the 10rds of TI:
that that body was male (lbid: 119, 128, 131-32).26 The political sig- Spaniards was described a
nificance oí such male appropriations oí íemale coverings and identity woman (Berlin and Barlm
is revealed by a look at the second most powerful person in the Aztec successful Aztec advances
government, a c10sc male relative of the ruler who held as title the underskirts on all of us!"
name of Cihuacoatl. The first cihuacoatl, whosc name was Tlacaelel, Much, then, as Maya
had received the title 'as reward for having led the Aztec army that had men's dresses at certain !
conquered the southern dties -including Coyoacan- where the god- officials, Tlacae1el may hi
dess had been patron (Klein 1988). With the ti tic went stewardship enemies when he appearec
of the goddess's cult, which, like hcr captured statue, had been trans- ker 1973: 181-83). This
ferred to the Aztec capital. But Tlacaelel received as well the right to went to meet MotecuhzOl
henceforth appear in Cihuacoatl's costume on state occasions, leading at least one major batde (
one Franciscan to write that, "they worshipped a devil in the guise it clear that to assume t
of a woman, namcd CihuacoatI", who "when he appeared before regarded as a grave insult
men, appeared as a woman" (Sahagún 1953-82, 1 :69). The cihuacoatl kin, demonstration of tlle l
would have been the ultin
25 Another extant, albeit badly damaged figure of t\1is set wears a skirt of total degradation (Bande1
human hearts, suggesting that her name was Yolotlicue, "Heart Skirt". Although
there are no references to a goddess with that name, Sahagún (1953-82,2:138-40) the act of appropriating 1
says that aman and woman were sacrificed' during the month festival of Quecholli goddess associated that p
in honor of the god of the hunt, Mixcoatl. The male victim represented Mixcoatl, akin to the masculinizatio
I.he female victim one Yeuatlicue, who is identified here as his consort. Since Yeua-
t1icue would mean "That Woman", a somewhat meaningless name, it may be a qui and Quilaztli.21
misspelling of Yolotlicue. Also kil!ed at this time were women each named Coatlicue,
who were wives of two male gods, Tlamatzincatl and Izquitecatl. The wom{',n were 210ne of the signs of I
slain Iike deer, recalling the deer-woman Itzpapalotl, consort of Mixcoatl. Spanish conquest was tbe pu
26 Women who were sacrificed and then flayed variously represented the godo the ragged dress of a woman
desses I1amatecuhtli, Tlazolteotl!Toci, Coatlicue, Huixtocihuatl, and Xilonen. See The mythohistorical p'n!d
Sahagún 1953-82, 1:15-16; 2:5-6, 134-40. occurred near CoIhuacan, a
 GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 235
:lSed,
appears so dressed as the goddess several times in a painted manus-
her
cript, accompanied by a gloss reading papa mayor, "supreme priest"
bet-
(Figure 9).
I "zi 1 have argued elsewhere that Tlacaelel's public transvestism served
~vin­
to advertise and celebrate both his personal and the state's military
~rea­
victory over the southern citie'l (Klein 1988). 1 wish to suggest here
the
that since 11acaele1 had been among those Aztec dignitaries who, years
,.OU8
earlier, had been forced to return home from Coyoacan in women's
~ke­
dress, his ritual cross-dressing may have been further intended to
~uh-
avenge that insulto According to one source, Moctecuhzoma 1 put
woman's clothing on one of his war captains as a sign of the latter's
kue military cowardice; the hap]ess warrior was then paraded in the mar-
iXly. ketplace and, ultimately, castrated (Suárez de Peralta 1878: 104-05).
¡the Male cross-dressing signified defeat, as weIl, as the formerIy most po-
ized werful of the lords of Tlatelolco to survive the fall of Mexico to the
'Slg- Spaniards was described as wandering about in the ragged dress of a
!tity woman (Berlin and Barlow 1980:74). Similarly, Tarascans upset about
~ec successful Aztec advances complained that "They have put women's
¡the underskirts on all of us!" (Krippner-Martínez 1991: 191).
~le), Much, then, as Maya men in recent times have worn tattered wo-
~ad men's dresses at certain saints' festivals to mock certain male public
~d­ officials, Tlacaelel may have been mocking both his past and present
Júp enemies when he appeared in the captured Cihuacoatl's costume (Bric-
fllS- ker 1973: 181-83). This would explain why he so dressed when he
I to went to meet Motecuhzoma 1 on the latter's triumphant return from
~ng at least one major batde (Durán 1976,11:431). Since the sources make
it cIear that to assume the dress or insignia of another's office was
regarded as a grave insult to both the "rightful" office holder and his
kin, demonstration of the ability to do so without need to fear retaliation
would have been the ultimate sign of personal triumph and the enemy's
total degradation (Bandelier 1880: 627). In Tlacaelel's case,. moreover,
the act of appropriating the dress and name of another polity's patron
goddess associated that polity's subordination with a los5 of femininity
akin to the masculinization of other enemy women such as Coyolxauh-
qui and QUilaztli. 21

21 Qne oí the signs of the crefeat and degradation of Mexico íollowing the
Spanish conquest was the public appearance oí the "great lord" of Tlatelolco in
the ragged dress of a woman (Berlín and Barlow 1946:74).
The mythohistorical precedent for al! these f1ayings oí women appears to have
occurred near Colhuacan, a city not far from the ~ite where, years later, the
 236 CECELlA F. KLEIN GENDER Al

right man, and remained m

The Good Woman aborted or subversive childn
this warrioress was, moreoV1
The stories and depictions oí Coyolxauhqui and the Tzitzimime Aztec mother.
indicate, then, that tite Tlatelolco warrioresses íormed part oC a mytho- This concept of the ide:
historical tradition in which brazen and depriving women represented of Enemy Woman to empü1
the doomed or defeated challenger oí male and state authority. The It could do so because Azt4
dangers posed by such behavior were communicated sexually in terms res of production and inf1
oC wanton and occult practices, and its unacceptability was expressed from them, in the same ,
culturally as a lack or loss oC íemininity. This concept oí the Enemy the enemy. Virtually all 01
Woman certainly would seem to explain the Tlate10lcan women's na- were, like inappropriate f
kedness and gaudy make-up,. as well as their abusive language and military conflicto At, the D'
obscene slapping oí their private parts. But wha:t explains the claim "war" household dirt, for e
that, accompanied by young boys presumably their own children, sorne in mock combat with mal
oC them expressed their breast milk on their encmies, while others raised goddess oí lust and adulte
their skirts to expose their naked buttocks? Why were the arms takcn represented, and who waa
up by still others not the darts, war clubs, and shiclds customary íor cripts holding a shield al
male warriors, but rather the weaving impJement.'l and brooms emble- 2: 120-21 V" Brooms coul
matic oí a proper Cemale vocation? of domestic filth, but the
To answer these questions we must look at the second major Aztec well. F or this reason tbe J
concept oC the warrior woman, one that saCely channelled the poten- tioned earlier bumed bloc
tially dangerous aggressions embodied by the concept oC Enemy Woman would saon die (Torquerl
into separate, spedal domains oí value to the male-run state. In this Cihuacoatl-Quilaztli, (]
paradigm, which I will call the Good Woman, female aggrcssion scrved carries a weaving batten
to protect and reproduce men rather than contest their power, and belief that weaving too1&,
manliness indicated heroic bravery rather than brazenness, excessive were also weapons capa
sexuality, and decit.2~ Neither wanton nor e1usive, never a practitio- :IIJ The evidence that loo
ner oí black magic, this woman was always sexually attainable for the tedly seant, but it has to be .i
eight years was intended too IÍ'
Aztecs would Cound their capital:. The A:decs, who had recently arrived in the area, torment to it... we ate {It],
had been permitted by the Colhua to settle there. Apparently wishing to provoke to it, we adde<! lime. Al we t
hostilities with their benefactors, the Aztecs asked the Colhua king Cor a bride 2: 178). Cooking could abo b
Cor their god Huitzilopochtli. The unsuspecting king sent his own daughter, whom Tul&, was said to have \leen ~
the Aztecs then killed and flayed. Trouhle broke out when the king, who had' been Toltecs to her hearth with ti
invited to the Aztecs settlement for the wedding, was presente<! with a maJe priest a11 (Sahagún 1953·82, 3:31),
wearing his daughter's flayed skin (Durán 1967, 2:41-43; Brown 1984). GiIlespie 80 The blood on the brl

(1989:61) has opined that the male wearer oC the skin of flayed women signified in seIf-sacrifice, a penitentW
not the expropriation oC the woman's gender identity hy a man so much as the objeet, usually a. maguey thtl
union oC both sexes, a sexuall composite. Obviously, 1 disagree. encourase the blood to f1ow.
208 Magali Carrera (1979) has observed that visual images oC Aztec women ''Una''. The Tlate101can IOn;-
tend to fall into two categories, one of destructive, hostile women, and one ol titenta normaDy bume<! their
henevolent, nounshing women. She emphasizes that sorne Aztec goddesses can fall have been made oí SttaW8 UII
into either ol the~ categories-that is, that Aztec remale deities had both destructive .8l For elaboration of th
and bene\'olent aspects. Mesoamerica, see Peter Fun
 GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 237

right man, and remained monogamous thereafter. Far from producing

aborted or subversive children, or from avoiding motherhood altogether,
this warrioress was, moreover, as by now might be expected, the ideal
nime Aztec mother.
(tho- This concept of the ideal Aztec woman worked together with that
nted of Enemy Woman to empower the story of the TIateloJcan warrioresses.
The It could do so because Aztec ideology defined the proper female sphe-
erms res of production and influence, as well as the status that accrued
:ssed from them, in the same male miJitaristic terms used to characterize
lemy the enemy. Virtual1y aH of the tasks deemed appropriate for women
na- were, Jike inappropriate female behavior, conceived of in terms of
and military conflicto As the major implement in Aztec woman's on-going
laim "war" household dirt, for example, brooms were ritually used by women
ome in mock combat with male warriors. These ritual batdes honored the
lised goddess of lust and adultery, TIazolteotl or Toci, whom these women
lken represented, and who was herself usuaUy depicted in colonial manus-
for cripts holding a shield and broom (Sahagún 1953-82, 1: Fig. 12;
¡ble- 2: 120-21 ) .29 Brooms could therefore symbolize, not just the removal
of domestic filth, but the removal of polítical and moral impurities, as
ztec wel1. For this reason the lacivious TIatelo1can "Banner Women" men-
ten- tioned earlier burned bloody brooms as a sign that the Aztec warriors
nan would soon die (Torquemada 1975, 1: 178).00
'this Cihuacoatl-Quilaztli, on the other hand, in Aztec manuscripts usualIy
ved carries a weaving batten along with a shield, a likely reference to the
~nd beJief that weaving tools, which have creative powers akin to sexuality,
~ve were also weapons capable of destruction (Figure 10) .:11 During a
••
,tlo-
2\) The evidence that food preparation was perceived as a "batde" is admit-
~the tedly scant, but it has to be significant that the Atamalqualiztli festival held every
eight years was intendOO to give the maize (corn) a rest beca use "we brought much
~a, torment to it... we ate .[it], we put chili on it, we salted it, we added salitpeter
oke 10 it, we added lime. As we tired it to death, so we revivOO it" (Sahagún 1953-82,
2: 178). Cooking could also be used as a weapon. The andent Toltec capital city,
TuJa, was said to have been destroyed by an old sorcereress who, having Jured the
Toltecs to her hearth with the odor dI her toastOO maize, proceeded to slay them
all (Sahagún 1953-82,3:31).
30 The blood on the brooms used as weapons in Aztec rituals had been let
in self-6aCrifice, a penitential act involving the pricking oE one's skin with a sharp
object, usually t. maguey thorn, and then passing straws through the openings to
encourage the blood to flow. The bloodi so released in effect removed the penitent's
"sins". The Tlatelolcan 50rceresses' bloody brooms, which were burned just as pen-
titents normally bumed their straws at the completion of autosacrifice, are said to
have been made oE straws used in autosacrifice (Torquemada 1975, 1: 178).
31 For e1aboration of the idea that weaving had sexual connotations in ancient
Mesoamerica, see Peter Furst 1975:236, Thelma Sullivan 1982: 14-15, and Stacy
238 CECELJA F. KLEIN

month festival celebrating the rain gods, the breasts of anthropomorphic

dough images of local mountains were slashed with a weaving batten
( Sahagún FC 2: 29, 141). The chronicler Bemardino de Sahagún
(1953~82, 2: 29) compared this batten to a machete, the rural male
weapon and production tool par excellence, whose name is applied to
weaving sticks today (n.d.a: 10). Geoffrey and Sharisse McCafferty
(n.d.a: 3; n.d.b: 18) have also argued that spindle whorls were meta-
phorical shields, since a number of cIay whorls found at Cholula are
painted with motifs seen on depictions of Aztec war shields. Although
the chronides do not actually describe the aet of weaving as a battle,
it is telling that the present-day Huichol of West Mexico, who speak a
language related to that of the Aztecs, pereeive it as a form of hunting,
for hunting for the Aztecs was an analogue of war. 32 Huichol women
help their men to trap deer through their weaving, as the 100m is
believed to ensnare the deer by eapturing its soul (Fikes 1985: 217 -22 ;
see also Schaefer 1990: 30~2). As late as the seventeenth eentury, the
Aztecs' descendents were invoking "Cihuacoatl, the female warrior" for
success in deer hunting, the goddess's name here referring to the rope
used to snare the prey (Andrews and Hassig 1984: 98) .
The household instruments flung at the Aztecs by the Tlatelolcan
warrioresses thus must be understood as magieal weapons, womanly
counterparts to the darts and spears hurIed by men. The same can be
said 'for their exposed bodies, moreover, for the Aztees likened the
reproductive organs to weapons, and sexual intercourse and human
reproduction to war. The poteney of the image of the Tlatelolcan women
who slapped their naked privates and exposed their buttoeks ean only
be fully understood in light of the widespread Mesoamerican belief
that exposed female gen italia can subdue aggression. The belief is well
documented for many rural Mexicans living today, nowhere better
than among the Maya speakers of higbland Chiapas, many of whom
were under Aztec control at the time of the Spanish eonquest. 33 In
the mock bullfights performed in Zinaeantan, for example, men dressed

Schaeler n.d.a.,n.d.b, 1990:39. In these scenarios, the weaving batten is a male

(phallic?) symbol.
32 This is best seen in the legends 01 deliant women like Quilaztli who turn
into animals at will only to attract the arrows 01 their maJe kinsmen (Torquemada
1975, 1: 178). These men are expressly said to be hunters. The accounts oC these
incidents frequently conflate hunting and warfare (see also Leyendo. de los soles
1975: 123).
33 See especially Victoria Bricker (1973:16-17, 117), but also Benjamin Colby
1967:423, 4n).
 1(\ ~n-d\.

.. ... ...
'í .~
~

,~1 . . . ., . M
,
"':r
t
J. ~
~ - .... p

7t"\

t.
....... ~ : .

FlO. 2. Midwífe bathing a newbom. From Codex Mendoza, 57.v

(Frorn Echeagary 1979, lám. LVID 57v)
 FIO. 2. Midwife bathing a newbom. From Codex Mendoza, 57.v
(From Echeagary 1979, lám. Lvm 57v)

FIG. 3. The battle with the Tepanecs, Durán's Historia de las Indias de Nueva España.
(Courtcsy of the Hispanic Foundation, Library oí Congress)
FIG. 4. The Coyolxauhqui relief. Stone. Templo Mayor.
(From Solís 1991, fig. 87)

FIG. 5. Relie
(From Cal
FIG. 5. Relief oC Cihuacoatl-Quilaztli. Stone.
(From Carrasco and Matos 1992, p. 43)
FIG. 6. Tzitzimitl. Codcx Magliabechiano , 76r.
(After Tuttall 1978, pI. 76 )
FIO. 7. Tzitzim
(Frol
FIO. 7. Tzitzimitl. Greenstone plaque. T emplo Mayor.
(From López Austin 1979, fig. 4)
 FIG. 8. Coatlicue. Stone.
( From Carrasco and Matos, 1992, p. 42)
FIG. ~. The cihi
(From r
 ,

...

FIG. ~. The cihuacoatl. Codex Borbonicus, 23.

(From Nowotny 1974, pI. 23)
FIG. 10. Cihuacoatl-Quilaztli. Codex Magliabechiano, 45r. FIG. 11 . Cihuatel
(From Nuttall 19713, p. 45)
Flc. 11. Cihuateteo. Stone. (From Matos 19S5b, p. SI )
 GENDER Ar-

as "Grandmothers" lift their

genitals in order to keep the 1
Victoria Bricker (1973: 16-1 1
neighbors, the Chamula5, be
malc objects such as bulis ali
their women actually fbught
of 1867-1870, and that they (
by exposing their buttocks to
not fire.
According to one rendítl
functioned as human shicld:
the enemy's bullets in their al
Aztecs rootcd the word for s
red", "to be defended", "to
association of the protective
armor, the shield, may date 1
sincc the chid ddt)' at the
to have been a militaristic
shield (Taube 1983; KIein l
of the national patron and v
cribed as a woman named (
Codex Aubin 1980:13), wf
the founder of the Aztec n
Shield" (Leyenda de los sO
were associated wíth shields
tzilopochtli having emerged j
ribay 1940: 7).
Aztec literature acordin~
and conquest, implying mal(
malma (n), or "Resting Shi(
future father only after deí:
she stood, naked, on her shielo
telling, a Chalcan song metal
ing of a plumed shield on t i
Quezada 1975:62-70). The

34 The story invokes Cilbert :

in New Guinea metaphorically r
"shield".
~,; 1n Codex Azc.atitlan V se'
during rhe ca rly stage of Ihe mi!,
 GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEe MEXICO 239

as "Grandmothers" lift their skirts to expose their (theoretically) fernale

genitals in order to keep the bull from killing their ceremonial husbands.
Victoria Bricker (1973: 16-17) explains that the Zinacantecos, like their
neighbors, the Chamulas, believe that women can tame or cool "hot"
male objects such as bulls and guns. Chamulans contend, in fact, that
their women actually fought alongside their men during the Caste War
of 1867-1870, and that they did so, like sorne of the TlateIolcan women, .
by exposing their buttocks to the enemy so that the Ladino guns would
not fire.
According to one rendition of this event, these posturing women
functioned as human shields, saving their men by lite rally receiving
the enemy's bullets in their anuscs (Bricker 1973: 117) .34 As with us, the
Aztecs rooted the word for shield in their words meaning "to be cove-
red", "to be defended", "to be protected" (Siméon 1977: 103). This
association of the protective war woman with the chief item of mate
armor, the shield, may date back to Pre-Aztec times in Central Mexico,
since the chief deity at the Classic period site of Teotihuacan appears
to have been a militaristic woman whose face or body was literalIy a
shield (Taube 1983; Ktein n.d.). In Aztec mythohistory the caretaker
of the national patron and war deity Huitzilopochtli is sometimes des-
cribed as a woman named Chimalma, "ShieId" (Codex Azcatitlan 3;
Codex Aubin 1980: 13), while the mother of the god Quetzalcoatl,
the founder of the Aztec nobility, was called Chimalman, "Rcsting
Shield" (Leyenda de los soles 1975:124).35 That the female organs
were associated with shields may also account for a reference to Hui-
tzilopochtli having emerged from his mother's womb on a shicld (Ga-
ribay 1940:7).
Aztec literature accordingly equatcs sexual intercourse with warfare
and conquest, implying mate penetration of the worman's shield. Chi-
malma(n), or "Rcsting Shield", succumbed sexualIy to QuetzalcoatI's
future father only after deflecting the arrows he f¡red at her while
she stood, naked, on her shield (Leyenda de los soles 1975: 124). EqualIy
telling, a Chalean song metaphorizcs male sexual arousal as the grasp-
ing of a plumed shield on the battlefield (Garibay 1968: 57; see also
Quezada 1975:62-70). The song, which was composed to taunt an

34 The story invokes Gilbert Herdt's (1981: 173, 22n) report that Sambia men
in New Guinea metaphorically refer to the female genital area as a whole as a
"shield".
35 In Codex Azcatitlan V several women appear as caretakers of Aztec deities
during the early stage of the migration.
 240 CECELIA F. KLEIN
GENDER

Aztec ruIer who had tried unsuceessfully to defeat Chalco, portrays

This equation of the I
him as incapable of seducing women, and thus as one whose "spindIe
honorific Cor the former,
cannot dance", whose "weaving stiek cannot weave" (Quezada 1975:
take the risks of reproduct
62-70). The Aztecs thus falI into that common, if not universal eate- as great as men's. lt fom
gory of peopIes who have defined warfare in tcrms of maIe/female
describe the ideal Aztec
sexual relations -who have, in other words, construed the opposition comparatively passive and
of war to peace, aggression to resislance, and víctory to defcat, 111 for example, assured bis d
terms of gender (Freeman 1989: 304-05 ) .36 honored as though she WI
Like the andent Greeks, finally, the Aztees Iikened childbirth to exploits in war merited 1
batde, and the parturient to a mighty warrior. The woman who was Jike the gocd soldiees" (8
having a difficult labor was urged "to scize well thc little shicld", and on the day One Flint W
"to imÍtate the brave woman Ciuacoatl, Quilaztli" (Sahagún 1953-82, hardy, and "reekoned as
6: 160). A Spanish writer reports that a ncwly delivered Aztee noble- auspicious day, were "con:
woman was told: (lbid, 4:9, 79). Whereru
seen as merely brazen and
[Thou hast] aceompanied thy mother, CiucoatI, the noblewoman indeed ideal femininity ¡tSt
Quilaztli ... Thou hast made war, thou hast skinnished, thou hast
Women who died in
exerted thyself, thou hast taken weIl, seized well thy shield, thy club.
Now our lord hath moved, hath placed apart, to one side, the tribute were described as having
of death (Ibid:194). to steal their hair or mid
battIe (Sahagún 1953-82,
The midwife praised her bceause she had becn brave like an cagle along with their fiest chill
or oeelot warrior, a direct referenee to the two highest male militaf)' approximated that of warr
orders, and beca use like them she "had taken a eaptive, had captured sacrificial stone. Dead war
a baby" (Ibid: 167, 179; d. 180, 185) .a1 the eastern horizon, whe]
noontime zenith; after lo
36 Freeman (1989:304-05) credits He\ene CiXCllS'S (1986) argument that the birds and butterflies to suc
couple pro\'Ídes the hasic organizationa\ pattern oC Western thought, the. res~1t
being that every oppositioll is not only sexed, but has a gender; she explallls Its dead women, like women
fadle relation to warCare in terms of Elaine Scarry's (1985) point that "war is a this responsibility each da
contest". d ucted the sun from zenitI
31 The comparisoll wa~ played out in the mal e arena as wel! when A~tc
warriors declined to join their kin in ritually eating the remains of the war captlves The breast milk exprel
they had presented fm 5a('fifice. According to one chrunicler, the warrior cOlt~nde small fighting boys who ac
that he had to abstain from the rite beca use he regarded his prisoner as if he
were a "be\oved son" (Sahagún 1953-82, 2: 54). The ideo\ogical nature of this 01 motherhood to warfar
trope is made c1ear in the additional comment that at the time of capture, tile weaken the Aztee warrior.
captive in turn referred to his captor as his "be\oved father" (1 bid: 54 ). 'DIe male
identification oC warCare with childbirth may he an example oC maJe discursive 3~ Less noble youths tried
appropriatíon of the terms oC femate sexuality. a reversal of the prm;ess 1 have tants of houses they wished ti
been emphasizing. It is oCten noted, Cor example, that Aztec rulers, Iike their '1'0 prevent aH oC this, the de
patron deity Huitzilopochtli, were addressed as "Cather and mother of aU" (Durán prior to her buria\ (lbid, 6: 16
1967, 2: l:l4). While this ineorporalion oC the Cemale productive sphere into the 30 Sütterlin ( 1989: 73) re
realm oC men may imply a I'ccognitíoll of the unique powers oC women, it serve, and New Guinea c1aim that ti
the same (maJe) polítical ends as the militarization of the d'iscourse on women. to show that they are mothen
 GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 241

This equation of the parturient with the male warrior was clearIy
honorifie for the former, sureIy funetioning to eneourage women to
take the risks of reproduetion by assuring them of a status theoretieally
as great as men's. It formcd, moreover, part of a broader tcndeney to
describe the ideal Aztee woman, who as we havc se en was aetually
eomparatively passive and domestic, as a manIy warriorcss. Onc ruler,
for exampIe, assured his daughter that by behaving well she wouId be
honored as though she were "in the' halls of those who through thcir
expIoits in war merited honor"; she would thus "assume thc shield
like thc gocd soldiers" (Sahagún 1953-82, 6: 97, 11n). Women born
on the day One Flint were expeeted to beeome eouragcous, strong,
hardy, and "reekoned as aman"; thosc born on One Dccr, another
auspicious day, werc "eonsidered as aman, esteemed as if aman ..."
([bid, 4: 9, 79). Whereas Enemy Woman's ,aggrcssiveness, then, wa,>
seen as merely brazen and unfeminine, that of the good Aztee woman,
indeed ideal femininity itself, was eharaeterized as brave, and as manIy.
Women who died in ehildbirth, despitc their failure, aeeordingly
were deseribed as having "suffercd manfully" and young warriors tried
to steal thcir hair or middle finger to inerease their own bravcry in
battle (Sahagún 1953-82, 6: 164, 162).38 Thosc ehildbearers who died
along with their first ehiId, moreover, were aeeorded an afterlife that
approximated that of warriors who had died in battlc or on the enemy's
sacrificial stone. Dcad warriors were said to go to a speeial paradisc at
the eastern horizon, where they daily escorted the rising sun to its
noontime zenith; after four ycars they joyously returned to carth as
birds and butterflies to suek neetar from the flowers (Ibid, 3 :49). The
dead women, like women who had been killed in warfare, took over
this responsibility cach day at noon, when, dressed for war, they eOIl-
dueted the SUB from zenith to its disappearance at the westcrn horizon.
The breast milk expressed by the Tlatelolcan women, then, Iike the
small fighting boys whoaecompanied them, sureIy refers to this analogy
of motherhood to warfare; it suggests that the women intended to
weaken the Aztee warriors by reducing them to the status of infants. ~

as Less noble youths tried to get a forearm so they could paralyze the inhabi-
tants of houses they wished to rob (Sahagún 1953-82,4:101,103,162; 10:39).
'1'0 prevent all of this, the deceased's male kin guarded her body for four nights
prior to her hurial (I bid, 6: 161 ) .
3\1 Sütterlin (1989: 73) reports, in contrast, that some women in Australia
and New Guinea c1aim that they hoId or present their breasts in times of dauger
to show that they are mothers and therefore shouId be spared.
 GENDER A
242 CECELIA F. KLEIN

always expressed in terms I

At the very least it manifested llateloleo's contempt for the Aztecs,
whether bv unfeminine WOIl
much as the army of youths sent by the Aztccs against Cuitlahuac was
as we ha~e seen, was nearl
apparently formed to show contempt" for that city (Durán 1967,
their feminine weapons, w~
11: 20). The same analogy Ís implicit in an Aztec hymn dedicated to
the end regarded as a sigIl
Cihuacoatl-Quilaztli, in which she is repeatedly addressed as "Our
Mother", "War Woman" (ibid, 2: 236). The Tlateloleo warrioresses, addressed to an enemy spc
however, clearly represent an abuse, a misdirection of female sexuality your shields of woman", ~
a~d woman's reproductive weapons, which opposes them to the good (Garibay 1940:40). This
wlfe and mother. It is this misplacement of their aggressions that iden- lolean ruler intended for h
tifies them instead, with the state's metaphoric nemesis, Enemy Woman. rarv diversion, and by the
It must be recognized, however, that the ideological parallel bet- 2: 263 ). Barlow understoo
ween the domestic, reproductive woman and the militarilv successful sion of their story aS a n:
man was intrinsically assymmetical and fictive. This is evident in the that in the Tlatelolean ve
fate of the dead parturients, who, in contrast to the dead warriors,
went to live and work in the western sky, the place of darkness and
the sun's descent, where the Aztecs located the entrance to the land Conclusion
of the dead. These unhappy women also returned to earth at night
and on unlucky days to look for their lost female clothing and equip- The power of the disc
the inherent contradicti01
ment -that is, for their lost femininity (Ibid, 6: 162-63, MacLachlin
women is perhaps most
1976: 50). Like the Tzitzimime, and especially Cihuacoatl-Quilaztli,
they might wreak havoc at these times -specifically sickness and defor- story. For here, and only)
. do we finally see wornen ~
mities such as hare lips and crossed eyes on othcr women's children.
They were therefore regarded by the living as "inhuman ones, mockers and who, like the Good .
mento The case with whil
of the people", and .as hateful, furious, and immodest (Ibid, 4: 41, 107).
Children were kept indoors and offerings made to statues of them, such an oppositc is furthel
statues which mav well be those we see todav of macabre skeletal women abridged version of the
with attributes oC the Tzitzimime (Figure í 1 ) .!O been studying. For sorne
In Aztec ritual, moreover, women never impersonated mal e deities; known as Codex Ramír
they never wore men's outer coverings to signify the destruction and TIatelolean warriorCliSes ~
expropriation of their masculinity. Nor were male deities ever represen- batde (Codex Ramírez
ted as effeminate in Aztec literature.41 Opposition to the state was however, because he hOJ
Jesuits to double their ef
40 My emphasis here on the negative implications of the fate of women who merous new illustrations,
had diedi in childbirth is at odds with that of other Aztec scholars, who argue that nal for inspiration (Co~c
the fact that Aztec women were offered an afterlife similar to that of dead warriors
essentially put them on an equal ideologicial footing (see, e.g., Sullivan 1966, 1982; In doing so, the artÍst el
McCafferty n.d.b., 1988). depiction oí the l1atelol
41 Burkhart (1989) says one source states that the god Tezcatlipoca imperso-
nated a woman in order to seduce his rival Quetzalcoatl and so disgrace him but she with the forces of evil and: i
does not cite her so urce and I am unaware of it. In ¿ne incident, howeve;, Tezca-
a "sodomite" (e.g., Sahagún
tlipoca did turn into an old women who destroyed the Toltecs with the odor of
undesireabll".
her toasted maize. In this story, however, as elsewhere, Tezcatlipoca is alliend
 GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 243

S, always expressed in terms of opposition to "malc", or "manly" men,

lS whether by unfcminine women or efíeminate meno Women's militarism,
7, as we have seen, was nearly always metaphorical, and it is cIear that
:0 their feminine weapons, when misemployed in actual warfare, were in
Ir the end regarded as a sign of despcration and a joke. An Aztec song
s, addressed to an enemy speak" derisively oí "rour arms oí woman ...
your shields of woman", and adds that one can onl)' laugh at them
(Garibay 1940: 40). This is consistent with the report that the Tlate-
Jolean ruler intended for his women warriors to serve only as a tempo-
rary diversion, and by the fact that the strategy failed (Duráll 1967,
2: 263 ). Barlow understood this when he characterized the Aztec ver-
sion oí their litory as a mockery oí the defeated enemy, pointing out
that in the Tlatelolean version, the women fight likc real meno
1,
d
d Conclusion

The power oí the discursive motif of the fighting woman to resol ve

the inherent contradictions in these varÍous. representations of Aztec
women is perhaps most apparent in this Tlatelolean version oí the
story. For here, and only here, in the oral history oC the Aztccs' enemies,
do we finally sec women who takc up real arms to dcfend their people,
and who, like the Good Woman, support thc efforts of their govern-
ment. Thc case with which Enemy Woman couId be transformed into
such an opposite is íurther manifcst in a later, Spanish copy of a second,
abridged version of the samc manuscript whose illustration we have
been studying. For sorne unknown reason, the abridgl'd vcrsíon, now
known as Codex Ramírez, eliminated' all refcrencc to the lccherous
Tlate10lcan warioc~se and, unlike the original, did not illustrate the
batde (Codex Ramírez 1975:69-70). The copiest, Juan de Tovar,
howevcr, beca use he hoped his manuscript would persuade his fellow
Jesuits to doublc their efforts to convert the natives, commissioncd nu-
merous new illustrations, for which his artist often turncd to the origi-
nal for inspiration (Cquch 1989: 151, 191, 194; LaFaye 1972: 60-61 ) .
In doing so, thc artist elccted to use a modiíied "ersion of thc original
dcpiction oí the Tlatcloleo batde to illustrate the story oí the earHer

wíth the 'forces of evil and; is described as a sorcerer; elsewhere he is portrayed as

a "sodornite" (e.g., Sahagún 1953.82, 3: 12). His behavior is thus socially decidedly
undesireable.
244 CECELIA F. KLEIN GENDER A

batde with the ill-fated Tepanecs (Couch 1989:369) (Figure 12).42 those who fought with theil
The strutting naked mothers to the right of the original have been strategy that bolstered, not
eliminated in the copy, and thc naked women on the nearby rooftop, concomitantly the power a
who hurled their brooms and weaving tools at their advancing enemy,
have been converted into an unarmed, well dressed, sequestered group.
The docmed women are defended by a lone, likewise fully dressed woman
armed exclusively with a male war shield and club (Ibid: 42, PI. m).
The secret of the effectiveness and flexibility of the motif of the
Altee War Woman in these various texts and pictures is their mutual "Anales de Cuauhtitlan." In
1975 y Leyenda de los SI
dependence on male values to characterize both ideal and undesirable
Instituto de lnvest
female behavior, and by means of these, appropriate polítical behavior Autónoma de M6
for women. Because aggression itself, like bravery, was essential to a
state which depended on warfare, the wrol)gdoings of Enemy Woman ANDREws, J. Richard, and :
were, like the virtues of her opposite, the Good Woman, identified with 1984 then Superstition.s
male strength and aggrel'Sivity, and the visual and verbal signs of the to This New Spai
versity of Oklaholl
one overlapped -Índeed were partially identical to-- those of the other.
It was this shared signage that made it possible for the Aztecs to so BANDELIER, AdoIf F., "On
effectively combine, if not conflate, the contradictory messagcs of these 1880 Andent Mexicans.
concepts in single motifs such as that of the Tlatelolcan warrioresses, Archaeology and
and for their enemies and successors to so readily adapt them to another 161. Cambridge.
purpose. In the end, of course, this same reliance on male rhetoric helpcd BARLOW, Robert H., Tlatel
to ensure that all womcn, both "good" and "bad", like thc statc's poli- 1987 rás­Ruiz, Elena L.
tical cm.·mies, were doomed to lose the contest!3 In Aztec ideology, of Obras de Robel
e Historia, MéxiCl
42 The ilIustl'ation in the original of the Coyoacan remembrance oC the war
1949 "Codíce Azcatitlal
with Azcapotzalco was later used as a model for the illustration of the later Aztee
war with Coyoacan. n.s. 2, 38: 101.3::
4:i Marina Warner (1981­215­17) makes the same point with regard to the in 29 plates. Par~
andent Greek Amazons, who by virtue of being aclmired for their speed, eourage,
aim, and endurance, simply reaffirm male superiority. 1 have considered the possihi- BF.RLlN, Heinrich, and Rol
lity that the story of the Tlatelolcan women was a post­conquest invention inspired 1980 Tlatelolco. Edicio
by the eonquerors' keen interest in the legends of the Amazons, but see no evidenee
of a relationship (see Leonard 1949: 36­52). Likewise, 1 know of no híblical ur BIALOSTOSKY DE CHAzÁN,
other medieval/renaissance European prototype. George Devereux (1981: 29­30, 1975 azteca." En CO'll.(l
57, 60), citing Heroclotus, Plutarch, and Artemidorus, does discuss aneient Egyptian, Bialostosky de el
Etruscan, and Greek incidents in which exposed female genitalia, actual or gra\'en,
were used to insult an enemy by imputing cowardiee. Similarly, the Arabs who Nacional AutónOl
in the tenth century were trying unsuecessfully to defend Moslem Crete from the
Greeks. reportedly plaeed on their city walls Ha strange woman, a sort of sorceress, BLAFFER, Sarah C., The j
who gesturing and swinging her bocly indeeently, challenged the Byzantines" (Vassi- 1972 Legettd. U niversil
los Christides 1984: 180). That such body language is probably a universal is
inclicated by Cervantes de Salazar's (1985: 721) daim that the Spanish conquistador BoONE, Elizabeth Hill, TJ
Cristóbal de Olid presented his b'llttoeks to the Aztecs a show of his eontempt 1983 type o{ the Mall
for them. For no other culture than the Aztec, however, ha\'e 1 found a story of
Lite o{ the An,it
naked, obseene women, who fight with their own hody parts and excretions, having
been sent into batde. versity of Califol
 GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 245

f) •..ol2
those who fought with their femininity were simply part of a discursive
leen strategy that bolstered, not just the sovereignty of the state itseU, but
¡OP, concomitantly the power and authority of men.
my,
IUP·
lan
II) • BlBLIOGRAPHY
the
ual "Anales de Cuauhtitlan." In Códice Chimalpopoca: Anales de Cuauhtitlan
,ble 1975 y Leyenda de los soles, transo Primo Feliciano Ve\ázquez, p. 3-68.
'¡or Instituto de Investigaciones de Históricas, Universidad Nacional
) a Autónoma de México, México.
lan ANoREws, J. Richard, and Ross Hassig, transo & eds. Treatise on the Hea-
ith 1984 then Superstitians That Toda)! Live Among the /ndians Native
the ta This New Spain, 1629, by Hernando Ruiz de Alarcón. Unii.
ler. versity of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
so BANI>ELIER, Adolf F., "On the Art of War and Mode of Warfare of the
ese 1880 Aneient Mexicans." Reports of the Peabody Museum of American
leS, Archaeology and Ethnalogy, Harvard University, vol. 2, p. 95-
ler 161. Cambridge.
ied
BARLOW, Robert H., Tlatelolco, Rival de Tenochtitla1l, ed. Jesús Monja-
rli- 1987 rás­Ruiz, Elena Limón, and María de la Cruz PailIés H. Vol. 1
gy, of Obras de Robert H. Barlow. Instituto Nacional de Antropología
e Historia, México/Universidad de las Américas, Puebla.
1949 "Codice Azeatitlan." Journal dex Sociéte Américanistes de París,
n.s. 2, 38: 101.35, with separate rl'production of the manuscript
in 29 pIates. París.
BERLIN, Heinrich, and Robert BARLOW, Anales de Tiatdolco y C6dice de
1980 Tlatelolco. Ediciones Rafael Porrúa, México.
BIAl.OSTOSKY DE CHAZÁN, Sara" "Condición social y jurídica de la mujer
1975 azteca." En Condición jurídica de la mujer ~n México, ed. Sara
Bialostosky de Chazán, et al. Facultad de Derecho, Universidad
Nacional Autónoma de México, México.
BLAFFER, Sarah C., The Black-Man of Zinacantan: A Central American
1972 Legend. University of Texas Press, Austín.
BOONE, Elízabeth HiIl, The Codex Magliabechiano and The Lost Proto-
1983 type af the Magliabechiano Group. Book 2 of The Book of the
Life of the Andent Mexicans:. The Codex Magliabechiano. Uni-
versity of California Press, Berkeley.
246 CECELIA F. KLEIN GENDER J

n.d. "A Reevaluation of the 'Coatlicue'." Paper presentcd at the 37th COLBY, Benjamin, "Psychok
Annual Meeting of the Mid-America Collcge Art Association, 1967 American Indians.
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1973. versity of Texas Pr

BRICKER, Victoria Reifler, Ritual Humor in Highland Chiapas. University CORDRY, Dorothy, and Don
1973 of Texas Press, Austin. 1968 versity of Texas Pi

BROWN, Betty Ann, "Ochpaniztli in Historical Perspective." In Ritual COUCH, N. C. Christopher,

1984 Human Sacri/ice in Mesoamerica, ed. Elizabeth H. Boone, p. 1989 An lnterpretive Si
195-210. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D. C. nuscripts. Universi'
BURKHART, Louise, The Slíppery Earth: Nahua-Christian Moral DÚllo- DEVEREUX, George, Baubo;
1989 gue in S ixteenth­C entury M exico. U niversity of Arizona Press, 1981 hauer. Syndikat, I
Tucson.
DÍAZ DEL CASTILLO, »ero.
CARRASCO, Pedro, "Royal Marriages in Andent Mexico." In Explorations 1956 15I7~2, transo J
1984 in Ethnohistory, ed. H. R. Harvey and Hanns J. Prem, p. 41-81. York.
University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.
DIBBLE, Charles, ed., Cod~
CARRERA, Magali Marie, The Representation o/ Women in Aztee­Mexiea
1980 noma de México,
1979 Seulpture. University Microfilms (#79244860), Ann Arbor.
CERVANTES DE SALAZAR, Francisco, CróniCflJ de la Nueva España. Editorial DURÁN, Diego, Historia ti
1985 Porrúa, México. 1967 Tierra Firme, ed,
rrua, México.
CHRISTIDES, Vassilios, The Conquest o/ Crete by the Arabs (ca. 824): A
1984 Turning Point in the Struggle between Byzantium and Islam. FERNÁNDEZ, Justino, Coatl
AHHNAI. 1972 tuto de Investigal
ma de México, ~
Crxous, Helene, "Sorties." In The Newly Born Woman, transo Rets)' Wing,
1986 p. 63-132. Minnesota University Press, Minneapolis. FIKES, Jay Courtney, HUI
1985 crofilms, Ann Arl
CODEX AUBIN, Histoire de la Nation M exieaine Depuis le dé part d' Aztlan
1893 jusqu'á l'arrivee des Conquérants espagnols (et au delá 1607), FREEMAN, Barbara, "Epitll
transo Feu J-M.-A. Aubin. Libraire Orientale et Américaine, 1989 A rms and the lt
Maisonncuve Freres, éditeurs, París. tion, ed. Helen
Codex Borbonicus, see Novotny 1974 Susan Merrill &
Press, Chapel Hi
Codex Magliabeehiano, see NuttaU 1978
Códice Ramírez, "Códice Ramírez." En Crónica mexicana/Códice Rami- FmI.ST, Peter, "The Thm
1975 rez, ed. Di Manuel Orozco y Ber.ra, 2d ed. Editorial POITÚa, 1975 Aztec, Huichol, a
México. , Perspectiva de
México, p. 235­<
Codex Xólotl, see Dibble 1980 pa. Sociedad y,
COE, Michael D., and Gordon WHITTAKER, transo & eds. Aztec Sorcerers
1982 in Seventeenth Century lvlexico: The Treatise on Superstitions GARIBAY KINTANA, Angel
by Hernando Ruiz de Alarcón. Institute for Mesoamerican Stu- 1968 vestigaciones Hu
xico, México.
dies, Publication No. 7, SUNY, Albany.
 GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 247

7th COLBY, Benjamin, "Psychological Orientations." In Handbook 01 Middle

:m, 1967 American Indians, ed. Robert Wauchope, vol. 6, p. 416-31. Uní-
versity oí Texas Press, Austin.
iity CORDRY, Úorothy, and Donald CORDRY, Mexican Indian Costumes. Uní-
1968 versity oí Texas Press, Austin.
~al COUCH, N. C. Christopher, Style and I deology in the Durán Illustrations:
p. 1989 An Interpretive Stud'Y 01 Three Early ColoniJal Mexican Ma-
nuscripts. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
10- DEVEREUX, George, Baubo: Die Mythische Vulva. Trans. Eva Molden-
~s,
1981 hauer. Syndikat, Frankfurt am Main.

ms DÍAZ DEL CASTILLO, Bernal, The Discovery and Conquest 01 Mexico,

~l.
1956 1517­1521, transo A. P. Maudslay. Farrar, Straus & Cudahy, New
York.
DIBBLE, Charles, ed., Codex Xólotl, 2 vols. Universidad Nacional Autó-
1980 noma de México, México.

íal DURÁN, Diego, Historia de las Indias de Nueva España e Islas de la

1967 Tierra Firme, ed. Ángel M. Garibay K, 2 vols., Editorial Po-
rrúa, México.
A
m. FERNÁNDEZ, Justino, Coatlicue: estética del arte indígena antiguo. Insti-
1972 tuto de Investigaciones Estéticas, Universidad Nacional Autóno-
19, ma. de México, México.
FIKES, Jay Courtney, Huichol Identity and Adaptation. University Mi-
1985 crofilms, Ann Arbor.
FREEMAN, Barbara, "Epitaphs and Epigraphs: 'The End(s) oí Man.'." In
1989 Arms and the Woman: War, G.ender, and Literary Representa-
tion, ed. Helen M. Cooper, Adrienne Auslander Munich, and
Susan Merrill Squier, p. 303­22. University of North Carolina
Press, Chapel Hill.

FURST, Pe ter, "The Thread of Life: Some Parallels in the Symbolism oí

1975 Aztec, Huichol, and Pueblo Earth Mother Goddesses." In Balance
y Perspectiva de la Antropología de Mesoamérica'Y del Norte de
México, p. 235­45. XIII Mesa Redonda, Sep. 9­15, 1973, Jala-
pa. Sociedad Mexicana de Antropología, México.

GARIBAY KINTANA, Ángel María, Poesía náhuatl, Vol. 3. Instituto de In-

1968 vestigaciones Históricas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mé-
xico, México.
248 CECELIA F. KLEIN GENDEJl It

1940 Poesía indígena de la Altiplanicie, divulgación literaria. U niver- KARTTUNEN, Franees, and
sidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México. 1987 Speech: The BancT'
Los Ángeles.
GILLESPIE, Su san D., The Aztec Kings: The Construction 01 Rulership
1989 in Mexica History. Universíty of Arizona Press, Tucson. KLEIN, Cecelia F., "Post­C!
1975 Cyclic Completion.'
GONZÁLEZ TORRES, Yólotl, El culto de los astros entre los meX,lcas. Secre- bian America, ed.
1975 tarÍa de Educación Pública, México. Oaks. Washington,

GRAULJCH, Michel, "Les femmes azteques dévoreuses de coeurs." In Magie, n.d.a. "Fighting with Fel
1984 SOTcellerie, Parapsychologie, p. 147­55. Universite de BruxeIles. Paper presented at
Anthropological As
GUERRA, Francisco, The Pre-Columbian Mind. Seminar Press, New York.
1971 1988 "Rethinking Cihua,
red W oman." In
HEMMING, John, The Conquest 01 the Incas. Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich, Memo')' 01 Theln
1970 New York. Karen Dakin, Par
HERDT, Gilbert, Guardians 01 the Flutes: Idioms 01 Masculinit),. McGraw B.A.R., Oxford.
1981 Hill, New York. KRlPPNER MARTÍNEZ, Jame
HERRERA, Antonio de, Historia general de los hechos de los Castellanos en 1991 tion of the 'Relaci~
1947 las Islas y Tierra Firme del Mar Océano, vol. 6. La Real Acade- 98.
mia de la Historia, Madrid. LAFAVE, J acques, ed., M anl
HEYDEN, Doris, "La diosca madre: ItzpapalotI." Boletín del I.N.A.H., 1972 du Mechiqae. Aka
1974 Época II octubre­diciembre: 3· H. Instituto Nacional de Antro- LAS CASAS, Bartolomé de,
pología e Historia, México. 1909 blioteea de Auton
HISTORIA DE LOS MEXICANOS, "Historia de los mexicanos por sus pintu- vol. 1. Madrid.
1891 ras." En Nueva colección de documentos para la historia de Mé- LEONARD, Irving, Books 01
xiCQ, ed. Joaquín García Icazbalceta, vol. 3, p. 228­63. Fran- 1949 bridge.
cisco Díaz de León, Méxioo.
LEYENDA DE LOS SOLES, •
HISTOYRE DU MECHIQUE, "Histoyre du Mechique: manuscrit frangais 1975 poca: Anales de (
1905 inedit du XVle siecle', ed. M. Edward de Jonghe. Joumal de la Feliciano Velázqu
Sociéte des A mericanistes n.s. 2: 1­41. Paris. tóricas, U niversidi
IRIZARRY, EstelIe, "Echoes of the Amazon Myth in Medieval Spanish Lite- LÓPEZ AUSTIN, Alfredo, "1
1983 rature." In Women in Hispanic Literature: Icons and Fallen Idols, 1979 plo Mayor." Anal
ed. Beth MilIer, p. 53­66. University of California Press, Ber-
kcley. 1982 "La sexualidad el
dad en Nueva EsJ
IXTLILXÓCHITL, Fernando de Alva, Obras hist6ricas, oo. Alfredo Chavero. ción Pública/SO,
1975/85 2 vols. Editorial Nacional, México.
1988 l'he Human Botl,
KAPLAN, E. Ann, "Introduction." In "Vomen and Film: Both Sides 01 the transo Thelma Oi
1983 Camera, p. )­20. Methuen, New York. telIano. 2 vols. t
 GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 249

KARTTlJNEN, Frances, and James Lockhart, eds. The Art 01 Nahuatl

1987 Speech: The Banerolt Dialogues. UCLA Latin American Ccnter,
Los Ángeles.
p
KLEIN, Cecelia F., "Post-Classic Mexican Death Imagery as a Sign of
1975 Cyclic Completion." In Death and the Alterlile in Pre­Colwn-
bian America, ed. Elizabeth P. Benson, p. 69-85. Dumbartoll
Oaks. Washington, D. C.
n.d.a. "Fighting with Femininity: Aztec Imagen of Women Warriors."
s. Paper presented at the 1990 Annual Meeting of the Southwestern
Anthropological Association, Long BeaCh' California, April, 1990.
t.
1988 "Rethinking Cihuacoatl: Aztee Polítical Imagery of the Conque-
redWoman." In Smoke and Mist: Mesoamerican Studies in
Memory 01 Thelma D. Sullivan, ed. J. Kathryn Josserand &
Karen Dakin, Part i, p. 237­77. BAR International Series 402.
B.A.R., Oxford.
KRIPPNER MARTÍNEZ, James, "The Politics of Conquest: An Interpreta-
1991 don of the 'Relación de Michoacan'." The Amerieas 47(2): 177-
98.
WFAYE, .Tacques, ed., Manuscrit TOl)ar: Origine et Croyances des Indiens
1972 du Mechique. Akademische Druck­ü Verlagsanstalt, Graz Austria.
LAS CASAS, Bartolomé de, Apologética historia de las Indias. Nueva Bi-
1909 blioteca de Autores Españoles, vol. 13: Historiadores de Indias,
vol. 1. Madrid.
LEONARD, Irving, Books 01 the Bra.ve. Harvard University Press, Cam-
1949 bridge.
LEYENDA DE LOS SOLf:S, "Leyenda de los soles." En Códice Chimalpo-
1975 poca: Anales de Cuauhtitlan y Leyenda de los soles, transo Primo
Feliciano Velázquez, p. 119­42. Instituto de Investigaciones His-
tóricas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.

LÓPEZ AlJSTIN, Alfredo, "Iconografía mexica: el monolito verde del Tem-

1979 plo Mayor." Anales de Antropología 16: 133­53.
1982 "La sexualidad entre los antiguos nahuas." En Familia y sexuali-
dad en Nueva España, p. 141­76. Colección Secretaría de Educa-
ción Pública/BO, No. 41. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.
1988 The Human Bod)' and Ideology: Concepts 01 the Ancient Nahuas,
transo Thelma Ortiz de Montellano and Bernard Ortiz de Mon-
tellano. 2 vols. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
 GENDER AN
250 CECELIA F. KLEIN

MAcLACHLAN, Colín, "The Eagle and the Serpent: Male over Female ORTIZ DF. MONTELLANO, Bern
1976 in Tenochtitlan. Proceedings of the Pacific Coast Council 01 1989 Physiology." In T~e
logy in M esoamnc~
Latin American Studies 5: 45-56.
209. BAR Internati(J
MATOS MOCTEZUMA, Eduardo, Obras maestras del Templo Mayor. Fo-
1988a mento Cultural Banamex, México. QUEZADA Noemi, Amor y m.
1975 ~n el México colonu
1987 "Symbolism of the Templo Mayor." In The Aztec Templo Ma- tigaciones AntropoU
yor. ed. Elizabeth HilI Boone, p. 185­209. Dumbarton Oaks. México.
Washington, D. C.
1988b The Mask of Death. Garda Valadés, Méxi'co, RECINOS, Adrian, and Delia
1953 versity of Oklahom~
McCAFFERTY, Sharisse D., and Geoffrey G. McCafferty "Powerful Wo-
1988 men and the Myth of Male Dominance in Aztec Society." Archaeo- RODRÍGUEZ VALDÉS, María J.
logical Review from Cambridge 7 (1): 45­59. 1988 Estado de México,

n.d.a. "Weapons of Resistance: Material Metaphors of Gender Identity SAHAGl;N, Bemardino de, Fl,
in Postclassic Mexico." Paper presented al the Annual Meeting 1953-82 of New Spain, tI
of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, D. C., ble. 13 vols. Mono
1989. No. 14. The School
1991 "Mexican Spinning and Weaving as Female Gender Identity." Utah, Santa Fe.
In Mesoamer,ican and Andean Cloth and Clothing, ed. M. B.
SALAS, Elizabeth, SoldaderaJ
Schevill, J. C. Berlo, and E. Dwyer.
1990 University of Texa:
MENDlETA, Gerónimo, Historia eclesiástica indiana: obra escrita a. fines
1971 del siglo XVI. 2d ed. Editorial Porma, México. SCARRY, Elaine, The Bodv
1985 World. Oxford UI
MOToLINÍA, Toribio de Benavente, o Memoriales o libro de las cosas de
1971 la Nueva España y de los naturales de ella, ed. Edmundo O'Gor- SCHAEFER, Stacy B., "The 1
mano Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Universidad Nacio- nal of Latin Ame
nal Autónoma de México, México. 1990 Becoming a Welll
NAsH, June, "The Aztees and the Ideology of Male Dominance." Signs U niversity Microfi
1978 4(2): 349·62.
n.d. "The Loom as a
NICHOLSON, Henry B., "A Fragment of an Aztec Relief Carving of the Art in Small­Scll
1967 Earth Monster." Journal de la Société des Américanistes de chard Anderson 81
París n.s. 56: 81­94. París.
SCHROEDER, Susan, "Ind~
NOVOTNY, Karl A., ed., Codex Borbonicus: Bibliotheque de l'Assemblee 1991 pahin." In Land
1974 Nationale, París (Y 120). Akademische Druck­ü. Verlagsanstalt, Thousand Year 1
Graz, Austria. versity of New M
NUTTALL, Zelia, Introduction and Facsimile. Vol. 1 of The Book of the
SELER, Eduard, Gesamme
1978 Life of the Ancient Mexicans Containing an Account of their
1960-61 und Alterhum
Rites and Superstitiolls. University oC California, Berkeley. [Uni.
sanstalt, Graz, A1
versity Microfilms facsimile of the Codex Magliabechiano].
 GENDER AND WAR IN AZTEC MEXICO 251

ORTIZ DE MONTELLANO, Bernard, "The Body, Ethics and Cosmos: Aztec

1989 Physiology." In The Imagint1ltion of Matter: Religion and Eco-
logy in Mesoamerican Traditions, ed. Davíd Carrasco, p. 191-
209. BAR International Series 515. B.A.R., Oxford.

QUEZADA, Noemi, Amor y magia amorosa entre los aztecas: supervivencia

19.75 en el México colonial. Serie Antropológica 17. Instituto de Inves-
tigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional de Autónoma,
México.

REcrNos, Adrian, and Delia Goetz, The Annals of the Cakchiquels. Uni-
1953 versity of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

RODRÍGUEZ VALDÉS, María J., La mujer azteca. Universidad Autónoma del

1988 Estado de México, Toluca, México.

SAHAGÚN, Bernardino de, Florentine Codex: General lJistory of the Things

1953­82 of New Spain J transo Arthur J. O. Anderson & Charles E. Dib-
ble. 13 vols. Monographs oC the School of American Research,
No. 14. The School of American Research and the University of
Utah, Santa Fe.

SALAS, Elizabeth, Soldaderas in the Mexican Military: Myth and lJistory.

1990 University of Texas Press, Austin.

SCARRY, Elaine, The Bodv in Paint: The Making and Unmaking of lhe
1985 World. Oxford University Press, New York.

SCHAEFER, Stacy B., "The Loom and Time in the Huichol World." Jour-
nal of Latín American Lore.
1990 Becoming a Weaver: The Woman's Path in Huichol Culture.
University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.

n.d. "The Loom as a Sacred Power Object in Huichol Culture." In

Art in Small­Scale Societies: Contemporary Readings, ed. Ri-
chard Anderson & Karen L, Field, Prentice Hall. In Press.

SCHROEDER, Susan, "Indigenous Sociopolitical Organization in Chimal-

1991 pahin." In Land and Politics in the Va/ley of Mexico: A Two
Thousand Year Perspective ed. H. R. Harvey, p. 141·62. Uni-
J

versity of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.

SELER, Eduard, Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur Amerikanischen Sprach-

1960­61 und Alterhumskunde. 5 vols. Akademische Druck­ü. Verlag-
sanstalt, Graz, Austria.
252 CECELIA F. KLEIN GENDER ANI

SIMÉON, Rfmí, Díaionario de la lengua náhuatl o mexicano, transo Jose- ZANTWl}K, Rudolf van, "P'fl?C
1977 fina Oliva de Col!. Siglo Veintiuno, México. 1963 troducción al estudlO
Estudios de Cultura
SOLÍs, Felipe, Gloria y fama meúra. Smurfit Garton )' Papel de México,
1991 México. ZORITA Alonso de, Life and La
1963' mary Relation o{ the
Sn:NZEl., \Vemer, "The Military and Religious Orders of Aneient Mexi- Rutgers University P
1976 co." Actas del XLI Congr.eso Internacional di' Amerícanistas,
México,2 al 7 de septiembre de 1974, vol. 2, p, 179­87. México.

SUI"LlVAN, Thelma, Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Deification oi the

1966 Women Who Died in Childbirth," Estudios de Cultura Náhuatl
6: p. 63­75. México.
1982 "Tlazolteotl­Ixcuína: The Great Spinner andWeaver." In Art
and Iconograph)' of Late Post-Classic Cmtral Me'xíco, ed. EH-
zabeth Rill Boone, p. 7­35. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D. C.

SÜITERLIN, Christa, "Universals in Apotropaic Symbolism: A Behavioral and

1989 Comparative Approach to Sorne Medieval Sculptures." Leonardo
22 ( 1): 65­74.

T AUBE, Karl A., "The Iconography of Mirrors at Teotihuacan." In Art,

1992 Ideology and the Cít)' 01 Teotihuacan.

TEDLOCK, Dennís, trans., The Popal Vuh: Tite Definitive Edition of the
1985 Mayan Book of the Dawn of Life and the Glories af Gods and
Kings. Simon & Schuster, New York.

TEZOZÓMOC, D. Remando Alvarado, "Crónica mexicana." En Cróni«a me~

1975a xicanajCódice Ramírez, ed. D. Manuel Orozco y Berra, p. 23~
701. 2d ('d. Editorial Porrúa, México.

1975b Crónica mexicáyotl, transo Adrián León. 2d ed. Instituto de In-

vestigaciones Históricas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mf-
XICO, México.

TORQUEMADA, Juan de, Monarquía indiana. 3 vols. 5th ed. Editorial Po-
1975 rrúa, México.

TOZZER, Álfred M., "Landa's Relación de las Cosas de Yucatán." Papen

of the Peabody Museum vf Archaelvgr and Ethnology, Jlarvard
Uníversity, vol. 18. Cambridge.

WARNER. Marina, loan of Are: The lmage of Female Heroism. Weiden-

1981 feld & Nicolson, London.
 GENDER AND W AR IN AZTEC MEXICO 253

ZANTWIJK, Rudolf van, "Principios organizadores de los mcxicas, una in-

1963 troducción al estudio dd sistema interno del régimen azteca."
Estudios de Cultura Náhuatl 4: 187-222. México.
ZORITA, Alonso de, Lile and Labor in Ancient Mexico: The Briel and Su m-
1963 mary Relation of the Lords 01 New Spain, transo Benjamin Keen.
Rutgers University Press, Ncw Brunswick.