0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views

088book

researech article

Uploaded by

Marius Ghergu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views

088book

researech article

Uploaded by

Marius Ghergu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
Se MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLICATIONS, PART A. ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICS SUPPLEMENTARY STUDIES, VOL. 7A A Note on Isolated Singularities for Linear Elliptic Equations HAM Brézis AND Prerre-Louis Lions Département de Mathématiques Université de Paris VI Paris, France DapicaTep To LAURENT ScHWARTZ Set By = (xe RY, < R} with N > 2. Our main result is the following: TueoreM 1. Let ue L1,(B,\{0}) be such that ‘Awe Li,(Bg\(0}) in the sense of distributions on B,\{0}, (1) u20 ae. in Br, Q) Au(x) < au(x) + f(x) ae. in Bg, @ where a is a positive constant and f ¢ Li(B,). Then ue L},(B,) and there exists @ € Lj,.(Bg) and a > 0 such that —bu=9 +a, in9(By, ® where 5, is the Dirac mass at the origin. In particular, it follows that ue M{,,(By)' where p = N/(N — 2) when N > 2 and p < co is arbitrary when N=2, Remarks. (1) Theorem 1 turns out to be useful in the study of isolated singularities in semilinear elliptic equations. For example, it implies the following fact—which extends a result of [1]. Assume f is a continuous function from R, into R such that liminf,_, . f()/t > —0o; assume ue ioc(Bg\{0}), flu) € Li, (Bg\(0}), u>0 ac. and —Au = f(v) in 9(B,\{0}). Then f(u) € L},.(B,), and — Au = f(u) + a5, in 9(B,) for some a > 0. ’ @) Suppose N > 3; if instead of (2), we assume that u>g acinB, with ge M¥N-2(B,), @ * M? denotes the weak L? (or Marcinkiewica) space for 1

0. The proof is an easy modification of the proof of Theorem 1, and we shall omit it. The proof of Theorem 1 is divided into three steps. Step 1. Let u(r) be the average of u over the sphere 1 Me) = See fuga HODES where sy denotes the measure of the unit sphere in R”. It follows from (1), (2), and (3) that a (7-H), € 110.2) 720, and TO), 0 ase-+0, uniformly on compact subsets of By\{0}, (10) C0) =0 for |x| —au — fe LL.(B,)—we deduce as ¢—> 0 that 9 L},.(B,) and in addition {ors [aan « Step 3. Consider now the distribution T= —Au- ge 9'B,). The support of T is contained in {0}; thus by a classical result about dis- tributions (see [2, Theorem XXXV]) we know that T= ¥ cD%q. (14) wim We claim that c, = 0 when |p| > 1. Indeed let ¢ ¢ 9(B,) be any fixed function such that (=D(D°E)0) = for every |p| 0. REFERENCES 1. P. L. Lions, Isolated singularities in semilinear problems, J. Differential Equations (1981), to appear. 2. L. Scuwarrz, “Theorie des distributions,” Hermann, Paris, 1966.

You might also like