Bullack PsychophysiologicalResponsesHappy 2018
Bullack PsychophysiologicalResponsesHappy 2018
Author(s): Antje Bullack, Niklas Büdenbender, Ingo Roden and Gunter Kreutz
Source: Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal , APRIL 2018, Vol. 35, No. 4 (APRIL
2018), pp. 502-517
Published by: University of California Press
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/26417422?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal
E
MOTIONAL RESPONSES TO MUSIC LISTENING To unravel the mysteries of varying levels of psycho-
have been studied extensively over the past dec- physiological association between music materials and
ades (Juslin & Sloboda, 2010; Swaminathan & listeners’ responses, Juslin, Harmat, and Eerola (2013)
Schellenberg, 2015). Some theorists have argued that have addressed hypothetical mechanisms that mediate
music may communicate (Argstatter, 2016; Juslin, 1997; emotional responses in different ways (see also Juslin
Mohn, Argstatter, & Wilker, 2011) or even induce basic et al., 2015). For example, these authors found that
emotions including ‘‘happiness’’ and ‘‘sadness’’ (Kreutz, musically induced ‘‘happiness’’ was associated with
Ott, Teichmann, Osawa, & Vaitl, 2007). Others have a memory mechanism, whereas ‘‘sadness’’ was associ-
sought evidence to differentiate these emotions at both ated with a contagion mechanism. These mechanisms
psychological and physiological levels (Juslin, Barradas, refer to more general theories of emotion induction,
& Eerola, 2015; Kreutz, Bongard, & Jussis, 2002; Krum- which hold that elicitation of emotions may occur at
hansl, 1997; Lundqvist, Carlsson, Hilmersson, & Juslin, different levels of processing. Note that the evidence
Music Perception, VOLUM E 35, ISSU E 4, PP. 502–517, IS S N 0730-7829, EL ECTR ONI C ISSN 1533-8312. © 2018 B Y THE R E GE N TS OF THE UN IV E RS I T Y O F CA LI FOR NIA A LL
R IG HTS RES ERV ED . PLEASE DIR ECT ALL REQ UEST S F OR PER MISSION T O PHOT O COPY OR R EPRO DUC E A RTI CLE CONT ENT T HRO UGH T HE UNI VE R S IT Y OF CALI FO RNIA P R E SS ’ S
R EPR IN TS AN D P ERMISSI ONS WEB PAG E , HT T P :// W W W. UCPR ESS . E DU / JOU RNA LS . PHP ? P ¼REPR IN TS . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ M P.2018.35.4.502
Preparation phase Experimental phase Debriefing phase Facial electromyography measures can be seen as reli-
Welcome (1 practice trial Detachment of sensors able indicators for discriminating between different emo-
Demographic and followed by main Mood rating tions (Ekman, Levenson, & Friesen, 1983). Musically
music questionnaires experiment = 8 trials*)
Debriefing induced facial EMG responses to different emotion cate-
(Gold-MSI)
gories were found to be in line with the predicted patterns
Application of sensors
across studies (e.g., Witvliet, 1998; Witvliet & Vrana,
Mood and emotion
ratings 2007). Lundqvist and colleagues (2009), for example,
found that ‘‘happy’’ music was associated with greater
ca. 15 minutes ca. 40 minutes ca. 5 minutes zygomatic facial muscle activity than ‘‘sad’’ music.
Skin conductance levels, respiratory rate, as well as
time finger temperature are commonly seen as indicators
* Presentation in randomized order (4 ‘happy’ and 4 ‘sad’ music excerpts) reflecting different aspects of autonomic activation. For
example, Khalfa, Isabelle, Jean-Pierre, and Manon.
FIGURE 1. Flowchart of the experimental design and procedure (single (2002) observed that higher skin conductance levels
trials; for further details see text). were associated with high-arousing music, whereas low
skin conductance has been associated with low-arousing
produced to verify emotional mechanism entail specific music (Khalfa et al., 2004). Similarly, both elevated skin
music selections as well as the recording of psychophys- conductance and breathing were associated with higher
iological responses including skin conductance and physiological activation in a study comparing the effects
facial electromyography. Specifically, the memory of music versus noise stimulation (Gomez & Danuser,
mechanism was associated with enhanced skin conduc- 2004). Such arousing effects as reflected in increased
tance and zygomaticus levels on the one hand, and skin conductance, respiration, and heart rate levels
reduced corrugator activity on the other. By contrast, extend to the enhancing effects of films by accompany-
the contagion mechanism was associated with the ing music (Baumgartner, Esslen, & Jäncke, 2006).
enhanced corrugator and reduced zygomaticus activity, Studies on the potential entrainment effects to musi-
whereas skin conductance stayed level (Juslin et al., cal tempo and rhythm (Etzel, Johnsen, Dickerson, Tra-
2015, Figure 1, p. 298). The possibility of confounds nel, & Adolphs, 2006) have sparked a controversy as to
with other mechanisms notwithstanding, there emerges whether responses that differentiate ‘‘happy’’ and ‘‘sad’’
a strong pattern of psychophysiological associations music might be attributable to musical surface features
that underscore the predictability and consistency of rather than to the emotional responses the music elicits
emotional reactions to music listening at least in healthy (Khalfa, Roy, Rainville, Dalla Bella, & Peretz, 2008).
adult listeners and with respect to distinct emotion Although this controversy cannot be regarded as
categories. unequivocally solved, at least it has made clear that
Recent studies that particularly emphasize cardiore- there could be several pathways by which musically
spiratory variables seem to converge in suggesting at induced ANS modulation might occur. In addition,
least partial adaptation between variables related to the individual differences including personality traits have
acoustic surface of music sounds on the one hand, and been discussed as factors that systematically influence
psychobiological responses in the process of listening on autonomous responses to music, which suggests the
the other (Bernardi et al., 2009; Bernardi, Porta, & importance of person-related influences (Liljeström,
Sleight, 2006), but also emphasize the importance of Juslin, & Västfjäll, 2012).
context. Koelsch and Jäncke (2015) concluded from In sum, research on ANS responses to music stimu-
their review, that exciting music induces significantly lation is characterized by rather complex sets of obser-
higher heart rate values than tranquil music. However, vations, pointing to the equally complex nature of the
this prediction, if extended to listening to ‘‘happy’’ ver- underlying physiological processes (Grewe, Nagel,
sus ‘‘sad’’ music, was not supported by Lundqvist et al. Kopiez, & Altenmüller, 2007). Therefore, replication
(2009), who failed to observe significant effects of music of specific experimental designs and procedures seems
listening on heart rate. One recurrent observation is an important, to ascertain greater levels of consistency in
increase of physiological relaxation in prolonged listen- research findings. In the current study, we tested
ing sessions across blocks of trials (Kreutz et al., 2002; whether ANS responses to ‘‘happy’’ and ‘‘sad’’ music
Krumhansl, 1997). In fact, the strongest effect on relax- excerpts would lead to convergent or divergent patterns
ation seems to come from the silence following music as compared to previous work by using instrumental
stimulation (Bernardi et al., 2006). music in our study instead of vocal music.
0.45 (0.59)
0.00 (0.00)
0.20 (0.40)
0.10 (0.30)
2.20 (0.81)
2.25 (0.77)
2.25 (0.99)
2.65 (0.57)
‘‘sadness’’
müller, 2008). Music as a soundtrack in film is even
considered as one key factor influencing viewers’ emo-
tional responses (Cohen, 2001).
The music excerpts were tested in a pilot experiment
‘‘happiness’’
(0.68)
(0.57)
(0.77)
(0.62)
(0.36)
(0.48)
(0.22)
(0.30)
with 20 participants (10 women, age M ¼ 25.8 years, age
SD ¼ 3.19; 10 men, age M ¼ 29.7 years, age SD ¼ 3.56). In
2.20
2.65
2.00
2.10
0.15
0.35
0.05
0.10
single or group sessions, the participants rated the degree
to which each of the eight ‘‘happy’’ and eight ‘‘sad’’ excerpts
Duration
evoked emotional responses. The items included valence,
(in min)
02:22a,b
02:21a
02:27a,b
02:36b
02:21b
02:30b
02:24a
02:23a,b
arousal, pleasantness, and familiarity as well as six emo-
Note: The superscript ‘‘a’’ means that excerpts were looped to achieve a comparable duration with the other excerpts; the superscript ‘‘b’’ indicates that excerpts were faded out.
tions of the Differential Emotions Scale (Izard, 1977),
namely ‘‘happiness,’’ ‘‘surprise,’’ ‘‘sadness,’’ ‘‘anger,’’ ‘‘dis-
00:00-01:15
00:00-02:36
00:00-02:30
00:00-01:47
00:00-01:28
00:00-01:57
00:00-02:21
00:00-02:23
gust,’’ and ‘‘fear.’’ The ratings were recorded on 4-point
(in min)
Section
Likert scales (0 ¼ not at all, 1 ¼ slightly, 2 ¼ somewhat, 3 ¼
very strongly). In addition, listeners rated whether or not
TABLE 1. Description and Pre-test Ratings for “Happiness” and “Sadness” of Music Excerpts Used in the Main Experiment
they were familiar with each of the excerpts.
The music excerpts of highest salience with respect to
Track
04
03
10
02
04
10
21
01
the target emotion categories were selected for the main
experiment. Four of these excerpts represented ‘‘happy’’
Portrait of A Lady
Fantastic Mr. Fox
Soundtrack
that the stimuli were unfamiliar to most participants
Pan’s Labyrinth
The Fountain
The Fountain
(see Table 1 for details).
The Artist
PARTICIPANTS
Thirty-two healthy adults (16 female, age M ¼ 26.25,
age SD ¼ 2.17; 16 male; age M ¼ 26.31, age SD ¼ 3.57)
George Valentin
MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS
Twilight Cellos
Javier Navarrete
Ludovic Bource
Clint Mansell
Clint Mansell
S1
S2
S3
S4
Additionally, participants rated valence (pleasant – of the left musculus corrugator and the left musculus
unpleasant) and arousal (activating – calming) on bipo- zygomaticus. Ag/AgCl electrodes were placed according
lar 5-point scales. Liking (‘‘I like this piece of music’’) to standard guidelines (e.g., Fridlund & Cacioppo, 1986;
and familiarity (‘‘I know this piece of music’’) were eval- Tassinary, Cacioppo, & Green, 1989; Ekman, Hager &
uated on 5-point Likert scales ranging from 0 (not at all) Friesen, 1981). Finally, respiratory rate was measured
to 4 (very strongly). using an elastic belt in the abdominal area, which reg-
To assess mood level changes in response to the istered changes in volume. A computer, which was
experimental procedures, participants rated wakeful- placed exterior to the experimental cabin, recorded the
ness on bipolar 5-point scales (awake ¼ 1 – tired ¼ digitized signals via USB-port. Physiological measures
5), attention (attentive ¼ 1 – distracted ¼ 5), and ten- were recorded at a rate of 32 samples per second. The
sion (tensed ¼ 1 – relaxed ¼ 5). signals were monitored during the entire session.
Music sophistication. The German version of the Gold-
PROCEDURE
smiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI) was
Participants were tested individually after informed
used to identify musicians and nonmusicians (Müllensie-
consent was obtained. Then, participants filled a ques-
fen, Gingras, Musil, & Stewart, 2014; German version:
tionnaire with general demographic information and
Schaal et al., 2014). The concept of music sophistication
questions about their health status and rated their cur-
is based on the idea that music expertise not only consists
rent mood (wakefulness, attention, and tension). Next,
of practical music training but also includes active
they were seated in a comfortable chair in the experi-
engagement with music in many different forms and at
mental cabin and familiarized with the materials of the
various levels across the lifespan.
study. Music was presented by a computer via speakers
The self-report questionnaire measured music engage-
that were placed at a distance of approximately one
ment by five subscales that capture several aspects (active
meter from the participants’ ears. It was ensured prior
engagement, perceptual abilities, music training, singing
to the experiment that the loudness of the music
abilities, and emotions). From these, a general music
excerpts was set at a comfortable level. Finger sensors
sophistication factor is calculated. Participants could
and facial electrodes were applied as described and fol-
achieve a score between 23 and 121. Participants were
lowing recommendations in the NeXus-10 MKII1 sys-
grouped as high or low in music sophistication based on
tem manual. Recordings of physiological data were
a median split of the total music sophistication score.
started about 10 minutes before the test procedure
High music sophistication is characterized by a frequent
began to ensure that participants adjusted well to the
exercise of music abilities or behaviors, greater ease and
testing situation. They were told that the facial electro-
precision of music abilities or behaviors, and greater and
des captured the activity of the sweat glands. Likewise,
highly varied repertoire of music behavior. For example,
the aim of the DES was disguised. Participants were told
individuals with high music sophistication are thought to
that the questionnaire captured aspects such as fatigue
respond to a wider range of music situations. They also
and their current mood because these variables could
show a greater diversity in their music-related behavior
influence psychophysiological measures (Fridlund &
and more effective approaches to achieve their music
Cacioppo, 1986). Then, the participants filled the first
goals (Müllensiefen et al., 2014).
DES questionnaire and the Gold-MSI inventory.
Physiological measures. Physiological responses were After the questionnaires were completed, participants
recorded using the NeXus-10 MKII1 system via stan- were asked to avoid deliberate movement of bodily mus-
dard sensors. They were applied according to the writ- cles during the testing period as far as possible. Then, the
ten manual and recommendations provided by the computer-assisted test sequence programmed with E-
supplier. In particular, heart rate was measured using Prime1 2.0 was initiated. The experimental phase started
a blood volume pulse (BVP) sensor. This photoplethys- with one practice trial followed by the main experiment
mograph was attached to the forefinger of the left hand. consisting of eight trials. Every trial started with a different
Skin conductance was measured by placing two Ag/ two-minute video, showing nature scenes with sounds
AgCl electrodes on the distal phalanges of the middle (burbling of water, singing birds, etc.) to support partici-
and ring finger of the left hand. The electrodes were pants resuming a neutral emotional state. Next, partici-
fixed with a Velcro tape. Finger temperature was mea- pants listened to one happy or one sad excerpt. They
sured with a thermistor, attached with adhesive tape on rated each on the emotion categories provided by the
the distal phalanx of the auricular finger of the left hand. DES as well as on additional 5-point Likert-type scales
Bipolar facial EMG signals were recorded in the regions for valence, arousal, pleasantness, and familiarity.
Presentation of excerpts occurred in random order. After ANS data were first analyzed using a 2 x 2 x 2 ANOVA
the experiment, participants filled out a second question- with condition (change score for ‘‘happy’’ music, change
naire about their current mood and were debriefed after- score for ‘‘sad’’ music) as within-subjects factor and gen-
wards. Further information on psychophysiological der (female, male) and music sophistication (nonmusi-
measurements as well as the purpose of the DES was cian, musician) as between-subject factors.
provided upon request. Figure 1 presents a flow chart To consider temporal changes, ANS data were also
of the experimental sessions. Participants were tested analyzed using a 2 x 28 ANOVA, in which the change
individually. Each session lasted approximately 60 min. scores of the ‘‘happy’’ and ‘‘sad’’ music conditions rela-
tive to baseline were entered as the within-subject factor
DATA PREPARATION AND ANALYSES and time block was entered as the repeated measures
The psychophysiological data were exported using the factor. Again, sex (female, male) and music sophistica-
software BioTraceþ1. Heart rate was measured as beat tion (nonmusician, musician) served as between-subject
per minute (bpm) and derived from the interbeat inter- factors in subsequent analyses to assess any influence of
val as provided by the blood volume pulse recordings. these independent variables.
Skin conductance units were measured in micro- For each measure, we assessed whether preconditions
Siemens (mS). EMG signals were subjected to low- and for conducting ANOVAs (normality Box’s M test of
high-pass filtering to eliminate artifacts. Filters were set equality of covariance matrices and Mauchly’s test of
at 10 Hz and 1 kHz. In addition, a notch filter with sphericity) were met. Accordingly, degrees of freedom
a center frequency at 50 Hz was applied. EMG signals were estimated in the F-statistics using Greenhouse-
were measured in microvolts (mV). Inspection of raw Geisser corrections where appropriate.
data revealed that certain streams of physiological data In all statistical tests, the p values were set to .05,
had to be excluded from analysis: corrugator supercilii except when an adjustment to multiple comparisons
data (female, nonmusician), two data sets of musculus was mandatory. In addition, partial eta-squared was
zygomaticus activity (males, nonmusicians), one data calculated as a measure of the effect size.
set of electrodermal activity (female, musician), and one
further data set of heart rate (male, musician). Repeated Results
measures ANOVAs with order as a within-subject factor
were conducted across all dependent variables, but only SUBJECTIVE RESPONSES
significant order effects are reported. Table 2 shows the results from the emotion ratings on
Values of the three items representing an emotion on the DES from pre- to post-measurements. Both induced
the Differential emotion scale (DES) were summed up ‘‘happiness’’ and ‘‘sadness’’ decreased significantly in
scoring between 0 and 300 points. The ratings of the both music conditions. However, ratings on the former
first questionnaire filled out before the experiment scale decreased more strongly after listening to ‘‘sad’’
served as initial measures of emotional tone, hence music than after listening to ‘‘happy’’ music, t(31) ¼
called ‘‘pre-measurement.’’ The questionnaires after 11.65, p < .001, d ¼ 2.06. In addition, there was a signif-
listening to happy and sad music excerpts served as icant difference in ‘‘happiness’’ ratings with respect to
subsequent measures of emotional tone, hence called music condition, t(31) ¼ 8.76, p < .001, d ¼ 1.55. ‘‘sad’’
‘‘post-measurements.’’ DES ratings were first analyzed music induced higher ratings of ‘‘sadness’’ than did
by two-way 3 x 2 x 2 repeated measures ANOVAs with ‘‘happy’’ music, t(31) ¼ 4.20, p < .001, d ¼ 0.74.
condition (pre-measurement, ‘‘happy’’ music, ‘‘sad’’ Conversely, ‘‘sadness’’ ratings decreased when listening
music) as the within-subject and sex (female, male) and to ‘‘happy’’ music, t(31) ¼ 2.63, p < .05, d ¼ 0.46.
music sophistication (nonmusician, musician) as Table 2 reveals that significant differences were also
between-subjects factors. observed for emotion categories other than ‘‘happiness’’
Recordings of the eight two-minute videos between and ‘‘sadness.’’ In particular, listening to ‘‘sad’’ music
music presentations were averaged, thereby providing was associated with decreases of ‘‘interest’’ and ‘‘sur-
baseline values for the calculation of change scores. To prise,’’ whereas ‘‘disgust’’ and ‘‘fear’’ increased. ‘‘Happy’’
this end, baseline values were subtracted from averages music, by contrast, led to a decrease of ‘‘interest’’ and
of physiological measurements during ‘‘happy’’ as well ‘‘fear.’’ No significant effects for ‘‘anger’’ were found.
as ‘‘sad’’ music listening. In addition, we analyzed the ‘‘Happy’’ music excerpts (M ¼ 1.76, SD ¼ 0.52) were
data in accordance with Lundqvist et al. (2009); that is, rated as more pleasant than ‘‘sad’’ excerpts (M ¼ 2.30,
28 epochs of 5-s segments for each physiological vari- SD ¼ 0.88), t(50.14) ¼ 2.98, p < .01, d ¼ 0.56. Also
able for further statistical analysis. ‘‘happy’’ excerpts (M ¼ 1.91, SD ¼ 0.58) were evaluated
TABLE 2. Means and Standard Deviations of Emotional Experience Ratings (0-300) Before and After Listening to “Happy” and “Sad” Music
TABLE 3. Means and Standard Deviations of Levels of Physiological Activity at Baseline and During Listening to “Happy” and “Sad” Music
as more arousing and ‘‘sad’’ excerpts (M ¼ 3.90, SD ¼ AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM (ANS) ACTIVITY
0.61) as more calming, t(62) ¼ 14.04, p < .001, d ¼ Table 3 summarizes the averaged physiological
2.34. The mean rating for liking was 2.63 (SD ¼ 0.64) responses with respect to the recordings of parameters
for ‘‘happy’’ excerpts and 2.20 (SD ¼ 0.84) for ‘‘sad’’ included in this study in relation to baseline values. It
music stimuli, t(62) ¼ 2.32, p < .05, d ¼ 0.44. Excerpts shows that significant physiological responses to
were highly unfamiliar to the participants (Mhappy ¼ ‘‘happy’’ music were found in two variables (skin con-
0.86, SD ¼ 0.83, Msad ¼ 0.35, SD ¼ 0.50), t(50.84) ¼ ductance, respiratory rate), whereas three parameters
2.97, p < .01, d ¼ 0.68. (skin conductance, corrugator, zygomaticus) were asso-
Neither sex nor music sophistication significantly ciated with significant changes in response to ‘‘sad’’
influenced emotion ratings, all Fs 3.67, p .06. Also, music.
general mood before and after the experiment was sta- There were variations of physiological responses in
ble and in a positive range (awake – tired: Mbefore, ¼ the time course of listening during the two music con-
1.88, SD ¼ 0.79; Mafter ¼ 2.22, SD ¼ 0.94; attentive – ditions as calculated relative to baseline. Therefore, the
distracted: Mbefore, ¼ 1.78, SD ¼ 0.71; Mafter ¼ 2.06, following analyses will address the change scores with
SD ¼ 0.76; tensed – relaxed: Mbefore, ¼ 4.00, SD ¼ respect to the ‘‘happy’’ and ‘‘sad’’ music conditions for
0.95; Mafter ¼ 4.06, SD ¼ 0.62), all ts 1.94, p .06). each physiological parameter separately.
Happy
Sad
0,3
0,1
-0,1
-0,3
μS
-0,5
-0,7
-0,9
1 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Time (s)
FIGURE 2. Means and standard errors of the means (SEM) of changes of skin conductance levels across emotion categories averaged over all happy
respectively sad music excerpts.
Happy
Sad
2,2
1,8
1,4
breaths/min
0,6
0,2
-0,2
-0,6
1 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Time (s)
FIGURE 3. Means and standard errors of the means (SEM) of changes of respiratory activity levels across emotion categories averaged over all happy
respectively sad music excerpts.
Skin conductance. Significant influences of order could Respiratory rate. Respiratory rate significantly increased
be observed for skin conductance, F(3.7, 111.71) ¼ when listening to ‘‘happy’’ music in comparison to ‘‘sad’’
4.74, p < .01, p2 ¼ 0.14. There was a significant dif- music, F(1, 28) ¼ 60.32, p < .001, p2 ¼ 0.68. Again, there
ference between the first and the second music excerpt, was a main effect for time block, F(14.56, 815.36) ¼
t(30) ¼ 2.85, p < .001, d ¼ 0.51. Further, there was 1.76, p < .05, p2 ¼ 0.30, indicating an overall higher
a significant main effect for condition, F(1, 27) ¼ breathing rate during music listening as compared to
15.72, p < .001, p2 ¼ 0.37. Skin conductance during baseline (see Figure 3).
listening to ‘‘happy’’ music was significantly higher
than during listening to ‘‘sad’’ music. There was also Heart rate. No significant effects of music condition were
a main effect for time block, F(4.67, 252.19) ¼ 31.46, observed for heart rate, F(1, 27) ¼ 2.14, p ¼ .15, ns, but
p < .001, p2 ¼ 0.37, indicating an overall decrease of there was a main effect for time block F(15.92, 859.58) ¼
skin conductance levels in the time course of listening 2.18, p < .005, ¼ 0.39, again indicating higher cardiac
(see Figure 2). activity during music listening as compared to baseline.
Happy
Sad
1,3
0,9
0,5
μV
0,1
-0,3
-0,7
1 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Time (s)
FIGURE 4A. Means and standard errors of the means (SEM) of changes of corrugator activity levels across emotion categories averaged over all
happy respectively sad music excerpts.
Happy
Sad
1,1
0,7
0,3
μV
-0,1
-0,5
-0,9
-1,3
1 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Time (s)
FIGURE 4B. Means and standard errors of the means (SEM) of changes of zygomaticus activity levels across emotion categories averaged over all
happy respectively sad music excerpts.
Finger temperature. Significant influences of order were Facial electromyography. Zygomatic activity was higher
observed for temperature, F(2.07, 64.14) ¼ 3.42, p < .05, while listening to ‘‘happy’’ music, F(1, 26) ¼ 13.52, p <
p2 ¼ 0.99. Specifically, temperature increased from the .01, p2 ¼ 0.34, than when listening to ‘‘sad’’ music. An
first to the second piece of music, t(32) ¼ 3.21, p < .01, increase of corrugator activity was found for the ‘‘sad’’
d ¼ 0.57. No significant main effects of ‘‘happy’’ or music condition, F(1, 27) ¼ 6.53, p < .05, p2 ¼ 0.20.
‘‘sad’’ music on finger temperature occurred, F(1, 28) ¼ A significant main effect for time block was found for
1.72, p ¼ .20, ns. However, a significant effect of time both zygomatic, F(6.35, 330.05) ¼ 3.91, p < .001, p2 ¼
block, F(1.22, 68.26) ¼ 3.86, p < .05, p2 ¼ 0.64, was 0.07, and corrugator activity, F(5.26, 284.07) ¼ 7.05, p <
found, indicating a small decrease of finger temperature .001, p2 ¼ 0.12. Whereas zygomatic activity showed
during music listening. A nonsignificant increase of fin- a slight decrease, corrugator activity increased over time
ger temperature relative to baseline was also associated in both music conditions (cf. Figures 4a and 4b).
with exposure to ‘‘sad’’ rather than ‘‘happy’’ music (cf. Table 4 summarizes and compares the effect sizes of
Table 3). dependent measures in Lundqvist et al. (2009) and the
TABLE 4. Comparison of Effect Sizes (p2 ) of Dependent Measures there remained a significant difference in happiness
(“Happy” versus “Sad” Music) Between Lundqvist et al. (2009) and indicating higher values after listening to ‘‘happy’’ music
Present Study
as compared to ‘‘sad’’ music. Moreover, perceived sad-
Lundqvist et al. (2009) Present study ness increased after listening to ‘‘sad’’ music, which is in
line with expectations (Lundqvist et al., 2009). Given
Skin Conductance .18" .37" that participants started the experiment in a positive
Respiration rate n/a* .68"
Heart rate n/a** .07 mood, it is not too surprising that listening to generally
Temperature .12# .06 unfamiliar music did not lead to increases in positive
Corrugator n/a** .20# affect (Hunter, Schellenberg, & Griffith, 2011). With
Zygomatic .13" .34" respect to induced sadness, ‘‘sad’’ music, again as
Note: " indicates values were significantly higher in response to ‘‘happy’’ music as expected, was highly effective in intensifying this emo-
compared to ‘‘sad’’ music, whereas # indicates the opposite effect. *This parameter tion, whereas ‘‘happy’’ music was not effective in this
was not being recorded. **Data were reported as not significant; information to sense. It is important to note that listening to music may
calculate effect sizes not available.
enhance instantaneous feelings of negative emotions
without affecting overall mood negatively (Garrido &
Schubert, 2011). Furthermore, current research suggests
present study based on change scores. Results suggest that listening to ‘‘sad’’ music can evoke a range of feel-
significant and empirically relevant associations between ings of reward that could explain the somewhat para-
music listening and psychophysiological response pat- doxical finding that the ‘‘sad’’ music excerpts were
terns with respect to the two emotion categories. However, associated with relatively high happiness ratings (Taruffi
there are both similarities and differences in these patterns & Koelsch, 2014).
of changes. For example, the results of the present study Previous studies suggest a trend of deactivation in
indicated no significant differences in finger temperature, experiments concerning physiological responses to
whereas respiratory rate was significantly affected. music listening (e.g., Kreutz et al., 2002). A similar, but
nonsignificant trend was also observed here in ratings of
Sex and music sophistication. Musicality ranged from
overall mood, especially wakefulness and attention,
nonmusicians to well-trained musicians (range ¼ 32–
which could be interpreted as a general increase of
111, M ¼ 75.8, SD ¼ 20.7; nonmusicians: M ¼ 57.75,
relaxation over time in participants while being seated.
SD ¼ 11.73; musicians: M ¼ 93.81, SD ¼ 9.20).
Contrary to our expectations, emotions other than hap-
Neither sex nor music sophistication yielded any
piness and sadness were also affected, specifically dis-
main effects on the dependent measures in this study;
gust and fear in the presence of ‘‘sad’’ music. However,
all Fs 2.85, p .10. Moreover, these variables also did
the changes indicated a somewhat subtle shift of emo-
not interact with other independent measures (time
tional states. Furthermore, the co-occurrence of emo-
sex music condition; time music sophistication
tional changes with respect to negative emotions
music condition; all Fs 1.84, p .14).
including sadness, fear, and disgust is common accord-
ing to the Differential Emotion Theory (Izard, 1977).
Discussion Considering ANS responses, the present study
revealed both similarities and differences with respect
We designed the present study to investigate the psy- to the precursor study by Lundqvist et al. (2009). In that
chophysiological effects of listening to music excerpts study, no differences between baseline and music con-
representing ‘‘happiness’’ and ‘‘sadness’’ in healthy adult ditions were reported. By contrast, our findings show
listeners. Following Lunqvist et al. (2009), we assumed that, in comparison to baseline, skin conductance levels
similar patterns of responses would occur in behavioral decreased across both music conditions, albeit more
as well as physiological measures. In particular, we strongly in response to ‘‘sad’’ music, perhaps indicating
expected that musically induced ‘‘happy’’ and ‘‘sad’’ an overall trend of physiological relaxation. However,
emotions would evoke differential changes from pre- respiratory rate (a measure not included in Lundqvist
to post-measurements in terms of emotion ratings as et al., 2009) increased in response to ‘‘happy’’ music
well as differential time course of physiological only, but not in the presence of ‘‘sad’’ music. Although
responses. Furthermore, we expected that levels of the literature on music listening and respiration is rel-
music sophistication modulated those. atively scarce, elevated rates of breathing in response to
First, participants felt significantly less ‘‘happy’’ after music listening are common (Ellis & Brighouse, 1952).
listening to music of either emotion category. However, With respect to our final physiological measure, finger
in response to music, whereas Kreutz et al. (2007) no professional musicians represented in the study sam-
observed influences of stylistic preferences on emotional ple. In addition, listeners were recruited from a healthy
responses to music excerpts. Moreover, Liljeström et al. student population. It would be of interest to extend the
(2012) found that self-chosen music arouses more present work to other populations including children
intense emotions as randomly selected music as indicated and older adults as well as individuals suffering from
by psychological and physiological markers. By contrast, physical and/or mental health problems. Moreover, the
however, work by Iwanaga and Moroki (1999) as well as present study adds further evidence suggesting that
Bernardi et al. (2006) suggested little influence of music music listening to ‘‘sad’’ music evokes stronger and
preference on physiological measures. more complex responses than does ‘‘happy’’ music. It
would be of interest to examine more systematically
Conclusions to what extent this asymmetry arises from music-,
listener-, or from task-related factors. In other words,
The present results corroborate the view that listening the social and cultural dimensions of psychophysiolog-
to music evokes differential emotional responses at both ical responses need to be accounted for in order to build
behavioral and physiological levels, thus supporting coherent frameworks to understand the behavioral
the philosophical emotivist position. Therefore, the implications of music listening in everyday life.
findings add further support to the notion that ‘‘happy’’ Correspondence concerning this article should be
and ‘‘sad’’ music can be used to effectively modulate addressed to Antje Bullack, Department of Music, Uni-
emotional states as reflected, for example, in facial elec- versity of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstr. 114–118,
tromyography, skin conductance, and respiration. 26111 Oldenburg, Germany. E-mail: antje.bullack@uni-
Importantly, there seems to be little influence of poten- oldenburg.de; or Gunter Kreutz, Department of Music,
tially moderating variables such as music sophistication Ammerländer Heerstr. 114–118, 26111 Oldenburg, Ger-
or sex. However, more research is needed, as there were many. E-mail: [email protected]
References
A LI , S. O., & P EYNIRCIOGLU, Z. F. (2006). Songs and emotions: B ERNARDI , L., P ORTA , C., C ASUCCI , G., B ALSAMO, R., B ERNARDI ,
Are lyrics and melodies equal partners? Psychology of Music, N. F., F OGARI , R., & S LEIGHT, P. (2009). Dynamic interactions
34, 511–534. DOI: 10.1177/0305735606067168 between musical, cardiovascular, and cerebral rhythms in
A LTENMÜLLER , E. O., S CHÜRMANN , K., L IM , V. K., & PARLITZ , D. humans. Circulation, 119, 3171–3180. DOI: 10.1161/
(2002). Hits to the left, flops to the right: Different emotions CIRCULATIONAHA.108.806174
during listening to music are reflected in cortical lateralisation B ERNARDI , L., P ORTA , C., & S LEIGHT, P. (2006). Cardiovascular,
patterns. Neuropsychologia, 40, 2242–2256. DOI: 10.1016/ cerebrovascular, and respiratory changes induced by different
S0028-3932(02)00107-0 types of music in musicians and non-musicians: The impor-
A NDERSON , C. A., C ARNAGEY, N. L., E UBANKS , J. (2003). tance of silence. Heart, 92, 445–452. DOI: 10.1136/
Exposure to violent media: The effects of songs with violent hrt.2005.064600
lyrics on aggressive thoughts and feelings. Journal of B IGAND, E., & P OULIN -C HARRONNAT, B. (2006). Are we ‘‘expe-
Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 960–971. DOI: 10.1037/ rienced listeners’’? A review of the musical capacities that do
0022-3514.84.5.960 not depend on formal musical training. Cognition, 100, 100–
A RGSTATTER , H. (2016). Perception of basic emotions in music: 130. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.007
Culture-specific or multicultural? Psychology of Music, 44, B IGAND, E., V IEILLARD, S., M ADURELL , F., M AROZEAU, J., &
674–690. DOI: 10.1177/0305735615589214 D ACQUET, A. (2005). Multidimensional scaling of emotional
B ARTLETT, D. L. (1996). Psychophysiological responses to music responses to music: The effect of musical expertise and of the
and sound stimuli. In D. A. Hodges (Ed.), Handbook of Music duration of the excerpts. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1113–
Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 343–385). San Antonio, TX: Institute 1139. DOI: 10.1080/02699930500204250
for Music Research Press. B LOOD, A. J., & Z ATORRE , R. J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable
B AUMGARTNER , T., E SSLEN , M., & JÄNCKE , L. (2006). From responses to music correlate with activity in brain
emotion perception to emotion experience: Emotions evoked regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proceedings
by pictures and classical music. International Journal of of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
Psychophysiology, 60, 34–43. DOI: 10.1016/ of America, 98, 11818–11823. DOI: 10.1073/
j.ijpsycho.2005.04.007 pnas.191355898
B RADLEY, M. M., & L ANG , P. J. (2000). Affective reactions to E VANS , P., & S CHUBERT, E. (2008). Relationships between
acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology, 37, 204–215. DOI: 10.1111/ expressed and felt emotions in music. Musicae Scientiae, 12,
1469-8986.3720204 75–99. DOI: 10.1177/102986490801200105
C OHEN , A. (2001). Music as a source of emotion in film. In J. F RIDLUND, A. J., & C ACIOPPO, J. T. (1986). Guidelines for human
A. Sloboda & P. N. Juslin (Eds.), Music and emotion: Theory electromyographic research. Psychophysiology, 23, 567–589.
and research (pp. 249–272). New York: Oxford University DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00676.x
Press. G ARRIDO, S., & S CHUBERT, E. (2011). Individual differences in
C RAIG , D. G. (2005). An exploratory study of physiological the enjoyment of negative emotion in music: A literature
changes during ‘‘chills’’ induced by music. Musicae Scientiae, 9, review and experiment. Music Perception, 28, 279–296. DOI:
273–287. DOI: 10.1177/102986490500900207 10.1525/mp.2011.28.3.279
DAWSON , M. E., S CHELL , A. M., & F ILION , D. L. (2016). The G OMEZ , P., & DANUSER , B. (2004). Affective and physiological
electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. responses to environmental noises and music. International
G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (4th ed., pp. Journal of Psychophysiology, 53, 91–103. DOI: 10.1037/1528-
217–243). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 3542.7.4.774
10.1017/9781107415782.010 G OMEZ , P., & DANUSER , B. (2007). Relationships between
D IMBERG , U. (1990a). Facial reactions to auditory stimuli: Sex musical structure and psychophysiological measures of
differences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31, 228–233. emotion. Emotion, 7, 377–387. DOI: 10.1037/1528-
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1990.tb00835.x 3542.7.2.377
D IMBERG , U. (1990b). Facial electrymyography and emotional G REWE , O., N AGEL , F., KOPIEZ , R., & A LTENMÜLLER , E. (2007).
reactions. Psychophysiology, 27, 481–494. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469- Emotions over time: Synchronicity and development of
8986.1990.tb01962.x subjective, physiological, and facial affective reactions to
D IMBERG , U., LUNDQVIST, L.-O. (1990). Gender differences in music. Emotion, 7, 774–788. DOI: 10.1037/1528-
facial reactions to facial expressions. Biological Psychology, 30, 3542.7.4.774
151–159. DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(90)90024-Q H UNTER , P. G., S CHELLENBERG , E. G., & G RIFFITH , A. T.
E EROLA , T. (2011). Are the emotions expressed in music (2011). Misery loves company: Mood-congruent emotional
genre-specific? An audio-based evaluation of datasets responding to music. Emotion, 11, 1068–1072. DOI:
spanning classical, film, pop and mixed genres. Journal of 10.1037/a0023749
New Music Research, 40, 349–366. DOI: 10.1080/ H UNTER , P. G., S CHELLENBERG , E. G., & S CHIMMACK , U. (2008).
09298215.2011.602195 Mixed affective responses to music with conflicting cues.
E KMAN , P., H AGER , J. C., & F RIESEN , W. V. (1981). The sym- Cognition and Emotion, 22, 327–352. doi: 10.1080/
metry of emotional and deliberate facial actions. 02699930701438145
Psychophysiology, 18, 101–106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469- H UNTER , P. G., S CHELLENBERG , E. G., & S CHIMMACK , U. (2010).
8986.1981.tb02919.x Feelings and perceptions of happiness and sadness induced by
E KMAN , P., L EVENSON , R., & F RIESEN , W. (1983). Autonomic music: Similarities, differences, and mixed emotions.
nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4, 47–56.
Science, 221, 1208–1210. DOI: 10.1126/science.6612338 DOI: 10.1037/a0016873
E LLIS , D. S., & B RIGHOUSE , G. (1952). Effects of music on res- I WANAGA , M., I KEDA , M., & I WAKI , T. (1996). The effects of
piration- and heart-rate. The American Journal of Psychology, repetitive exposure to music on subjective and physiological
65, 39–47. DOI: 10.2307/1418826 responses. Journal of Music Therapy, 33, 219–230. DOI:
E LLIS , R. J., & S IMONS , R. F. (2005). The impact of music on 10.1093/jmt/33.3.219
subjective and physiological indices of emotion while viewing I WANAGA , M., & M OROKI , Y. (1999). Subjective and physiological
films. Psychomusicology: A Journal of Research in Music responses to music stimuli controlled over activity and pref-
Cognition, 19, 15–40. DOI: 10.1037/h0094042 erence. Journal of Music Therapy, 36, 26–38. DOI: 10.1093/jmt/
E SCHRICH , S., M ÜNTE , T. F., & A LTENMÜLLER , E. O. (2008). 36.1.26
Unforgettable film music: The role of emotion in episodic I ZARD, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Springer.
long-term memory for music. BMC Neuroscience, 9. DOI: J USLIN , P. N. (1997). Emotional communication in music per-
10.1186/1471-2202-9-48 formance: A functionalist perspective and some data. Music
E TZEL , J. A., J OHNSEN , E. L., D ICKERSON , J., T RANEL , D., & Perception, 14, 383–418. DOI: 10.2307/40285731
A DOLPHS , R. (2006). Cardiovascular and respiratory responses J USLIN , P. N., B ARRADAS , G., & E EROLA , T. (2015). From sound
during musical mood induction. International Journal of to significance: Exploring the mechanisms underlying emo-
Psychophysiology, 61, 57–69. DOI: 10.1016/ tional reactions to music. American Journal of Psychology, 128,
j.ijpsycho.2005.10.025 281–304. DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.3.0281
J USLIN , P. N., H ARMAT, L., & E EROLA , T. (2013). What makes K RUMHANSL , C. L. (1997). An exploratory study of musical
music emotionally significant? Exploring the underlying emotions and psychophysiology. Canadian Journal of
mechanisms. Psychology of Music, 42, 599–623. DOI: 10.1177/ Experimental Psychology, 51, 336–353. DOI: 10.1037/1196-
0305735613484548 1961.51.4.336
J USLIN , P. N., L ILJESTRÖM , S. VÄSTFJÄLL , S. B ARRADAS , G., & L ARSEN , J. T., N ORRIS , C. J., & C ACIOPPO, J. T. (2003). Effects of
S ILVA , A. (2008). An experience sampling study of emotional positive and negative affect on electromyographic activity over
reactions to music: Listener, music, and situation. Emotion, 8, zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii. Psychophysiology,
668–683. DOI: 10.1037/a0013505. 40, 776–785. DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.00078
J USLIN , P. N., & S LOBODA , J. A. (2010). Handbook of music and L EVENSON , R. W. (2003). Autonomic specificity and emotion. In
emotion: Theory, research, applications. New York: Oxford R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.),
University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof: oso/ Handbook of Affective Sciences (pp. 212–224). New York:
9780199230143.001.0001 Oxford University Press.
K ALLINEN , K. (2005). Emotional ratings of music excerpts in the L EVENSON , R. W. (2014). The autonomic nervous system and
western art music repertoire and their self-organization in the emotion. Emotion Review, 6, 100–112. DOI: 10.1016/
Kohonen neural network. Psychology of Music, 33, 373–393. j.biopsycho.2010.03.010
DOI: 10.1177/0305735605056147 L ILJESTRÖM , S., J USLIN , P. N., & VÄSTFJÄLL , D. (2012).
K ALLINEN , K., & R AVAJA , N. (2006). Emotion perceived and Experimental evidence of the roles of music choice, social
emotion felt: Same and different. Musicae Scientiae, 10, 191– context, and listener personality in emotional reactions to
213. DOI: 10.1177/102986490601000203 music. Psychology of Music, 41, 579–599. DOI: 10.1177/
K AMENETSKY, S. B., H ILL , D. S., & T REHUB , S. E. (1997). Effect of 0305735612440615
tempo and dynamics on the perception of emotion in music. L IMA , C. F., & C ASTRO, S. L. (2011). Speaking to the trained ear:
Psychology of Music, 25, 149–160. DOI: 10.1177/ Musical expertise enhances the recognition of emotions in
0305735697252005 speech prosody. Emotion, 11, 1021–1031. DOI: 10.1037/
K ANTOR-M ARTYNUSKA , J., & H ORABIK , J. (2015). Granularity of a0024521
emotional responses to music: The effect of musical expertise. LUNDQVIST, L.-O., C ARLSSON , F., H ILMERSSON , P., & J USLIN , P.
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 235–247. N. (2009). Emotional responses to music: Experience,
DOI: 10.1037/a0039107 expression, and physiology. Psychology of Music, 37, 61–90.
K HALFA , S., I SABELLE , P., J EAN -P IERRE , B., & M ANON , R. (2002). DOI: 10.1177/0305735607086048
Event-related skin conductance responses to musical emotions M C FARLAND, R. A., & K ADISH , R. (1991). Sex differences in
in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 328(2), 145–149. DOI: finger temperature response to music. International Journal of
10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00462-7 Psychophysiology, 11, 295–298. DOI: 10.1016/0167-
K HALFA , S., R OY, M., R AINVILLE , P., DALLA B ELLA , S., & P ERETZ , 8760(91)90024-R
I. (2008). Role of tempo entrainment in psychophysiological M C R AE , K., O CHSNER , K. N., M AUSS , I. B., G ABRIELI , J. J. D., &
differentiation of happy and sad music? International Journal G ROSS , J. J. (2008). Gender differences in emotion regulation:
of Psychophysiology, 68, 17–26. DOI: 10.1016/ An fMRI study of cognitive reappraisal. Group Processes and
j.ijpsycho.2007.12.001 Intergroup Relations, 11, 143–162. DOI: 10.1177/
K OELSCH , S., & JÄNCKE , L. (2015). Music and the heart. European 1368430207088035
Heart Journal, 36, 3043–3048. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv430 M ERTEN , J., & K RAUSE , R. (1993). Differentielle Affekt-Skala DAS.
K REUTZ , G., B ONGARD, S., & J USSIS , J. VON . (2002). Saarbrücken, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.prof-
Kardiovaskuläre Wirkungen des Musikhörens: Die Bedeutung rkrause.de/data/Differentielle_Affekt-Skala_DAS.pdf.
von Expertise und musikalischem Ausdruck [Cardiovascular M OHN , C., A RGSTATTER , H., & W ILKER , F.-W. (2011).
effects of listening to music: The significance of expertise and Perception of six basic emotions in music. Psychology of Music,
musical expression]. Musicae Scientiae, 6, 257–278. DOI: 39, 503–517. DOI: 10.1177/0305735610378183
10.1177/102986490200600207 M ÜLLENSIEFEN , D., G INGRAS , B., M USIL , J., & S TEWART, L.
K REUTZ , G., O TT, U., T EICHMANN , D., O SAWA , P., & VAITL , D. (2014). The musicality of non-musicians: An index for asses-
(2007). Using music to induce emotions: Influences of musical sing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS
preference and absorption. Psychology of Music, 36, 101–126. ONE, 9(6), e89642. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089642
DOI: 10.1177/0305735607082623 NATER , U. M., A BBRUZZESE , E., K REBS , M., & E HLERT, U. (2006).
K RING , A. M., & G ORDON , A. H. (1998). Sex differences in Sex differences in emotional and psychophysiological
emotion: Expression, experience, and physiology. Journal of responses to musical stimuli. International Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 686–703. DOI: 10.1037/ Psychophysiology, 62, 300–308. DOI: 10.1016/
0022-3514.74.3.686 j.ijpsycho.2006.05.011
N YKLICEK , I., T HAYER , J. F., & VAN D OORNEN , L. J. P. (1997). T HAYER , J. F., & FAITH , M. L. (2006). A dynamic systems model
Cardiorespiratory differentiation of musicall-induced emo- of musically induced emotions. Annals of the New York
tions. Journal of Psychophysiology, 11, 304–321. Academy of Sciences, 930(1), 452–456. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-
O PEN S CIENCE C OLLABORATION . (2015). Estimating the repro- 6632.2001.tb05768.x
ducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716. DOI: T ROCHIDIS , K., S EARS , D., T RÂN , D.-L., & M C A DAMS , S. (2013).
10.1126/science.aac4716 Psychophysiological measures of emotional response to romantic
R ICKARD, N. S. (2004). Intense emotional responses to music: orchestral music and their musical and acoustic correlates. In M.
A test of the physiological arousal hypothesis. Psychology of Aramaki, Barthet M., Kronland-Martinet R., Ystad S. (Eds.),
Music, 32, 371–388. DOI: 10.1177/0305735604046096 Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 44–57). Heidelberg,
R OBAZZA , C., M ACALUSO, C., & D’U RSO, V. (1994). Emotional Germany: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-41248-6_3
reactions to music by gender, age, and expertise. Perceptual and V ERDUYN , P., D ELVAUX , E., VAN C OILLIE , H., T UERLINCKX , F., &
Motor Skills, 79, 939–944. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.2.939 VAN M ECHELEN , I. (2009). Predicting the duration of emo-
S CHAAL , N. K., B AUER , A.-K. R., & M ÜLLENSIEFEN , D. (2014). tional experience: Two experience sampling studies. Emotion,
Der Gold-MSI: Replikation und Validierung eines 9, 83–91. DOI: 10.1037/a0014610.
Fragebogeninstrumentes zur Messung Musikalischer V ERDUYN , P., VAN M ECHELEN , I., & T UERLINCKX , F. (2011). The
Erfahrenheit anhand einer deutschen Stichprobe [The Gold- relation between event processing and the duration of emo-
MSI: Replication and validation of a questionnaire instrument tional experience. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 20–28. DOI:
for the measurement of musical sophistication on the basis of 10.1037/a0021239
a German sample]. Musicae Scientiae, 18, 423–447. DOI: V UOSKOSKI , J. K., & E EROLA , T. (2011). The role of mood and
0.1177/1029864914541851 personality in the perception of emotions represented by
S CHERER , K. R., & Z ENTNER , M.R. (2001). Emotional effects of music. Cortex, 47, 1099–1106. DOI: 10.1016/
music: Production rules. In P. N. Juslin & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), j.cortex.2011.04.011
Music and emotion: Theory and research (pp. 361–392). New W HITE , E. L., & R ICKARD, N. S. (2016). Emotion response and
York: Oxford University Press. regulation to ‘‘happy’’ and ‘‘sad’’ music stimuli: Partial syn-
S CHUBERT, E. (2007). The influence of emotion, locus of emotion chronization of subjective and physiological responses.
and familiarity upon preference in music. Psychology of Music, Musicae Scientiae, 20, 11–25. DOI: 10.1177/
35, 499–515. DOI: 10.1177/0305735607072657 1029864915608911
S WAMINATHAN , S., & S CHELLENBERG , E. G. (2015). Current W ITVLIET, C. V. O. (1998). The impact of music-prompted
emotion research in music psychology. Emotion Review, 7, emotional valence and arousal on self-report, autonomic, facial
189–197. DOI: 10.1177/1754073914558282 EMG, and startle responses across experimental contexts.
TARUFFI , L., & KOELSCH , S. (2014). The paradox of music- Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences
evoked sadness: An online survey. PLoS One, 9(10), e110490. and Engineering, 58(12-B), 6832.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110490 W ITVLIET, C. V. O., & V RANA , S. R. (2007). Play it again Sam:
TASSINARY, L. G., C ACIOPPO, J. T., & G EEN , T. R. (1989). Repeated exposure to emotionally evocative music polarises
A psychometric study of surface electrode placements. liking and smiling responses, and influences other affective
Psychophysiology, 26, 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469- reports, facial EMG, and heart rate. Cognition and Emotion, 21,
8986.1989.tb03125.x 3–25. DOI: 10.1080/02699930601000672