1.4.3 test
1.4.3 test
Points Possible:40
Date: 10/14
1. Scarcity, also known as the basic problem of economics, is the result of the combination of
two factors. Identify and briefly describe these two factors, and explain how together they
contribute to scarcity. The two factors that contribute to scarcity are limited resources and
unlimited wants. These two factors create scarcity because people have unlimited things they
want, but resources are limited. People will need to make smart choices on what they want and
important factors. Identify and define these two factors, and give an example of each. The two
important factors are cost and benefit. Cost refers to the value you give up when you choose
one economic activity over the next best economic activity. For example, a consumer typically
equates cost with the price of a good (such as a loaf of bread, a pair of shoes, or a car) or a
service (such as a haircut or a night in a hotel). Benefit refers to the gain that is received from
producing or consuming a good or service. It can be in terms of happiness, utility or profit. For
example, buying a new car can give happiness, having a reliable vehicle, getting a good deal, or
3. Describe the impact of scarcity on economic decision making. What happens when products
and resources become less available? How might this affect the incentives or trade-offs
involved in a person's economic decision making? (4 points) Scarcity plays a big role in the
decision making for the economy because it creates incentives, influences trade-offs, and
drives innovation. As prices rise, businesses have a greater incentive to find substitutes and to
conserve resources. Scarcity forces businesses to make trade-offs, choosing to allocate their
4. Briefly explain economist Adam Smith's positions on these three subjects: the freedom of
markets, the true source of wealth, and the division of labor. (4 points) Adam Smith believed
that the freedom of markets was essential for economic growth. He believed that this
economic policy was foolish and actually limited the potential for "real wealth," which he
defined as "the annual produce of the land and labor of the society." The main cause of
prosperity, argued Smith, was increasing division of labor. Smith gave the famous example of
pins. He asserted that ten workers could produce 48,000 pins per day if each of eighteen
specialized tasks was assigned to particular workers. Average productivity: 4,800 pins per
economy. Then, identify three specific areas where the government plays an important role, and
give an example of each. (4 points) The overall involvement of the government is: Providing
public goods, enforcing contracts, and regulating markets. The government provides goods
such as roads, bridges, and national defense. The government enforces contracts between
businesses and individuals. This helps to ensure that businesses can operate in a stable
environment. The government regulates markets to protect consumers and workers. For
6. While each country in the world has a unique economic system, all systems fall into four main
categories:
● Traditional
● Command
● Market
● Mixed
System Production: What, how, Strengths Weaknesses
who
the three other economic systems and imagine that the U.S. government has decided to make
fundamental changes to the economy in order to fully adopt this other system. In your
paragraph, describe what you see as the benefits and drawbacks of the change. Would the
economy thrive, or suffer? How, in your opinion, would the American people react to this
America will switch into a command economy. In a command economy the government will
pretty much control all aspects of the economy. Benefits of them transitioning into the
command economy could be a change in income inequality, because the government would
prioritize people getting an equal distribution of pay and benefits. The government could
probably also tackle issues like global warming and unemployment. Some disadvantages could
be the lack of competition could lead to shortages and there being no innovation. There also
would be no freedom for the economy because the government took control. The Americans
may feel discouraged and have a hard time adapting to the command economy because having
a mixed economy gives freedom for your own business and getting to regulate things on your
own terms. With a command economy, it will restrict any personal choices and the government
will make all choices for the economy/businesses. Americans may even show resistance to
government control because Americans are used to freedom and then they get stripped of it. I
don’t know if the economy would thrive I feel with such a sudden change the citizens will be
outraged and may not abide with the government and could make the economy suffer.