Beeswax Boosts Solar Still Efficiency
Beeswax Boosts Solar Still Efficiency
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62154/ajesre.2024.016.010397
Abstract
An experimental study on the effects of beeswax incorporated in the construction of the
absorber for a solar still was conducted. As part of the study, two solar stills of the same geometry
were constructed with the same water depth and volume. The one without a phase change
material (PCM) was used as the control still, while the other with beeswax as a phase change
material laid at the bottom of its basin to serve as an absorber was used as the experimental still.
The experiments were conducted in the thermodynamic laboratory of JS Tarka University,
Makurdi, Nigeria, between 10.00 am and 5.00 pm for two weeks. 16 litres of water were used for
each still, corresponding to 100 mm depth. The stills were kept side by side and exposed to
sunshine from 10.00 am to 5.00 pm for three days. Temperatures of the water at inlet and in the
still were measured. HT-9815 digital thermocouple was used to determine the temperature of
water in the basin and that of the inner glass cover. SM206 solar power meter was used to
measure the amount of solar energy incident on the still’s collector. The results showed that the
still with beeswax as phase change material (experimental still) has an improved thermal
efficiency enhancement of 109.30% as compared to the still without a phase change material
with a thermal efficiency enhancement of 86.1%. This implies that beeswax is a good phase
change material for solar stills, and the use of beeswax should be encouraged as it is non-toxic
and organic.
Keywords: Beeswax, Phase Change Material, PCM, Clean Water, Sustainability, Solar Still.
Introduction
The consistent increase in paucity of clean drinking water especially in remote communities
has been a major cause of concern globally (Shahsavari and Akbari, 2018). Although water
is said to be naturally abundant in rivers, lakes and underground reservoirs, constituting
about 70 % of the earth, research has shown that only 2.5 - 3 % of this is fresh, out of which
only 0.4 % is drinkable while about 1.6 % is polar ice caps and glacier (Benson, 2018). In
recent times, water purification processes have become of important, and despite
technological advancements, about 14.7 % of the earth’s population still lack access to clean
water, a crisis which has led to ground water overdraft, diminished agricultural yields,
regional conflicts over scarce water resources, inadequate access to water for sanitation
and waste disposal amongst others (Olsson, 2015; World Health Organization, 2016).
172 Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy
Afropolitan Journals
In developing nations such as Nigeria, lack of adequate potable water has taken the lead
among causes of death of children (Peter and Umar, 2018: Odipe et al., 2019; Manta et al.,
2021). This results from the presence of micro-organisms and dissolved substances in the
water, causing dysentery which eventually leads to diarrhea and fatal dehydration
(Surendhiran et al., 2017). It has been estimated that due to persistent demand for clean
water, its availability will be short by 56 % by 2025 - 2030, likely causing about 1.8 billion
people to experience water scarcity in several regions of the world (World Water
Organization, 2010; Udmale et al., 2016).
Solar distillation is one of the most reliable, cost-effective methods of purifying water
employing only the free power of the sun as its energy source in a still (Fang et al., 2019). It
is a functional system that harnesses solar thermal energy to produce drinkable water
through distillation, which involves evaporation and condensation, where the water
evaporates to leave contaminants behind (Obayemi et al., 2014; Gao et al., 2019; Zhang et
al., 2019). This process is however yet to achieve commercial status due to limitations on
the volume of water it can produce. As a result, researchers are constantly seeking ways to
enhance its productivity. One method being explored is to increase its thermal efficiency by
utilizing absorbers incorporating materials with large energy storage capabilities. These
store energy during peak hours of sunshine to release them during low radiation periods,
thereby sustaining production.
Several phase change materials such as salt hydrates, paraffin waxes, fatty acids, and sugar
alcohols can be used for latent heat storage applications (Liu et al., 2017). Paraffin waxes
represent the most suitable option for solar still applications, due to their consistent melting
temperatures, abundance and low price (Kabeel and Abdelgaied, 2016; Jahanpanah et al.,
2021). However, they usually suffer from relatively lower thermal conductivity and high
volumetric expansion ratios (Putra et al., 2016; Ahmed, et al., 2022). Previous studies on the
effects of paraffin wax used as PCMs for thermal storage in solar stills include Mohammad
and Farshad (2011), who studied the behavior of cascade still incorporating materials for
storing latent heat. Behaviors of the solar still incorporating PCM and without it have been
modelled mathematically with the results indicating a better distillate productivity for the
PCM incorporated still (31% higher) than the solar still without PCM. Arunkumar et al.
(2018) studied the effect of thermal storage material on the yield of a concentrating
hemispherical basin still. The results showed a 26 % improvement on the yield of the still
with PCM.
One other material that has been shown to have good PCM properties is Beeswax. Beeswax
can be classified as an organic PCM originating from organic materials. It comprises of
esters of fatty acids and long-chain alcohols. The empirical formula for beeswax is
C15H31COOC30H61, which consists of palmitate, palmit oleate, hydroxyl palmitate, and
oleate esters of long-chain aliphatic alcohols (Putra, et al., 2016).
Beeswax shares the advantages of organic PCMs which have been noted as being largely
available, with acceptable melting temperatures of 30 oC - 60 oC, having high latent heat of
173 Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy
www.afropolitanjournals.com
AJESRE
fusion, good chemical stability, non-corrosiveness and no/very low super cooling (Sharma
et al., 2021; Putra et al., 2016). The major disadvantage of organic PCMs (Low thermal
conductivity) can be overcome through the use of additives such as nano-particles of highly
conductive materials (Putra et al., 2016; Ouikhalfan et al., 2016; Ahmed, et al., 2022).
Furthermore, beeswax is a waste derived from bee farms mostly located in rural areas who
coincidentally, mostly lack good water supply. Its utilization will therefore add more value
to bee farming and enhance good water supply.
In spite of all the promising results obtained on beeswax as a PCM, no studies on its use in
solar stills have been reported. This study therefore sought to determine the usability of
beeswax as a PCM in solar stills.
Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy 174
www.afropolitanjournals.com
Afropolitan Journals
Table 1: Materials Specification for Components of the Solar Still and Equipment
S/N Component Material
1 Frame Mild Still (25 ×25 ×5) mm angle bar
2 Basin Stainless still (1 mm thick)
3 Body Laminated MDF board
4 Top cover Transparent glass (4 mm thick)
5 PCM Beeswax (15 mm thick)
6 Distillate Collection Tank Plastic
7 Distillate Collection Hose Plastic
Equipment Model
1 Solar Power Meter SM206
2 Digital Thermocouple HT-9815
175 Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy
www.afropolitanjournals.com
AJESRE
Experimental Setup
The experiments were conducted in the thermodynamic laboratory of JS Tarka University,
Makurdi, Nigeria, between 10.00 am and 5.00 pm for two weeks. 16 litres of water was used
for each still, corresponding to 100 mm depth. The choice of this depth was guided by the
findings of Bhargva and Yadav (2021). Measurements were taken at 30 minutes intervals
throughout the daily period of experiment. This was repeated twice at weekly intervals to
accommodate weather fluctuations, and the average values of parameters measured were
found and used appropriately. Both stills were subjected to same conditions with
precautions taken to avoid shading of the still throughout the period of experiment.
The SM206 solar power meter was used to measure the intensity of solar radiation on the
still’s surface in W/m2. HT-9815 digital thermocouple was employed to determine the
temperatures of the inner glass and water surfaces and at inlet and outlet of tills (oC) at the
Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy 176
www.afropolitanjournals.com
Afropolitan Journals
same time using its four probes. A digital temperature sensor was used to monitor the
ambient temperature throughout the period of the experiments.
Parameters used in measuring the stills’ performance include inner glass and water surfaces
temperature difference, overall yield and thermal efficiency. The following relations were
used to determine the parameters:
∆T = Tw − Tg (1)
Tw and Tg are the water and the glass temperature respectively.
Where Tw = Twp (for experimental still); Twc (for control still), Tg = Tgp (for experimental
still); Tgc (for control still), ∆T = ∆Tp (for experimental still); ∆𝑇𝑐 (for control still).
Therefore, the enhancement in temperature difference as a result of using PCM was found
using the relation
∑ ∆T = ∑ ∆Tp − ∑ ∆Tc (2)
Where ∑ ∆Tp = Whole day temperature difference for experimental still, ∑ ∆Tc = Whole
day temperature difference for control still.
The overall yield of still was constantly measured with a graduated cylinder at 30 minutes
intervals. These values are the instantaneous yield ( Yc for control still, and Yp for
experimental still)
∴ Overall yield enhancement was determined thus:
∑ Y = ∑ Yp − ∑ Yc (3)
Where ∑ Yc = Sum of all instantaneous yield for control still throughout the day,
∑ Yp = Sum of all instantaneous yield for experimental still throughout the day.
Furthermore, thermal analysis was conducted to ascertain the effect of the PCM on the
thermal efficiency of the still. The useful thermal energy gained by the stills (Q) was
determined as the function of the quantity of water evaporated, and the following relation
was used (Prakash, et al., 2022).
Q mCp (T2 −T1 )
η= = (4)
AI(t) AI(t)
Where A = Area of still
I = Solar radiation received by still
m = mass of distillate
Cp = Specific heat capacity of water at constant pressure
t = Daily period of experiment
T2 = Temperature of water at outlet of still
T1 = Temperature of water at inlet of still
177 Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy
www.afropolitanjournals.com
AJESRE
1400
1200
Solar Intensity (W/m2)
1000
800 SI (w/m2)
600
400
200
0
11:30 AM
10:00 AM
10:30 AM
11:00 AM
12:30 PM
4:00 PM
1:00 PM
1:30 PM
2:00 PM
2:30 PM
3:00 PM
3:30 PM
4:30 PM
5:00 PM
12:00 Noon
Temperature Variation
Figure 4 represents the variation of ambient temperature (AT), inner temperature of glass
for control still (Tgc), inner temperature of glass for experimental still (Tgp), surface
temperature of water in basin for control still (Twc) and the temperature of water surface in
basin for experimental still (Twp) with time of day and solar radiation intensity. It further
shows that the ambient temperature only slightly rose from 30.6 oC through its peak (37.1
o
C) at 2:00 am and declined gradually to 36.8 oC at 5:00 am. It expectedly remained below
the still’s inner temperatures throughout the duration of the experiment, indicating that the
still actually collected and stored solar thermal energy to enhance its function. The inner
temperatures of glass Tgc and Tgp followed a similar trend of starting low at 10:00 am,
gradually rising to 53.00 oC and 53.60 oC, and then declined gradually to 35.00 oC and 49.3
o
C respectively. Note that between 10:00 am and 1:00 pm, Tgp remained lower than Tgc. This
is attributable to the presence of the PCM in the basin which absorbed and stored part of
the thermal energy through phase change. However, between 1.00 pm and 5:00 pm, Tgp
rose and remained higher than Tgc indicating that the PCM was able to maintain higher
temperatures in the still by releasing the stored energy as the need arose. Similarly, Twc and
Twp followed a similar trend with Twc rising faster while Twp rose slowly but steadily until 12:30
pm when they became equal and Twp overtook Twc after 1:30 pm and remained higher with
Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy 178
www.afropolitanjournals.com
Afropolitan Journals
a smoother curve till 5:00 pm, indicative of the influence of the PCM, which released energy
gradually and continuously to the water making it easier to evaporate.
70 AT (oC)
60
Tgc
50 (oC)
40 Tgp
(oC)
30
Twc
20 (oC)
10 Twp
(oC)
0
20
∆Tp (oC)
15
10 Yc (ml)
5
0 Yp (ml)
10:00 AM
10:30 AM
11:00 AM
11:30 AM
12:30 PM
1:30 PM
1:00 PM
2:00 PM
2:30 PM
3:00 PM
3:30 PM
4:00 PM
4:30 PM
5:00 PM
12:00 Noon
-5
-10
-15
Figure 5: Variation of Temperature Difference between Inner Glass Surface and Water
Surface and Yield of Stills with Time of Day
179 Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy
www.afropolitanjournals.com
AJESRE
223.3
∑∆Tc (oC)
120
∑∆Tp (oC)
∑Yc (ml)
40.7
23.5
∑Yp (ml)
Figure 6: Cumulative Temperature Difference between Inner Glass Surface and Water
Surface and Yield of Stills
Thermal Efficiency
Figure 7 shows that the experimental still had a higher efficiency (18 %) than the control still
(8.6 %), further confirming the effect of the beeswax PCM. This gave an efficiency
enhancement of 109.30%. This result agrees with the result of Prakash et al. (2022) in the
efficiency range for single slope solar still. These results corroborate the findings of Putra et
al. (2016), Putra et al. (2020), and Ramnanan-Singh (2012), who reported that beeswax is a
good PCM with good energy storage capabilities due to its superior thermal properties such
as high latent heat of fusion, specific heat and melting point compared to other materials.
This shows that beeswax has the potential to revolutionize still construction through cost
reduction by replacing expensive absorber materials and enhanced performance.
18
8.6
ηc ηp
Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy 180
www.afropolitanjournals.com
Afropolitan Journals
Improved thermal efficiency was also observed in the still incorporating beeswax as PCM.
Thus, the PCM minimized heat loss at night and offered a steady heat source on overcast
days.
The results obtained are experimental and there is need for this technology to be tested at
a large scale to further ascertain its viability. Also, the experiment needs to be tested in
other climatic zones to ascertain it applicability there too. Further research is also needful
on was from different species of bees to check specie related variability.
References
Ahmed, S. F., Rafa, N., Mehnaz, T., Ahmed, B., Islam, N., Mofijur, M., and Shafiullah, G. M. (2022). Integration of
phase change materials in improving the performance of heating, cooling, and clean energy storage
systems: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 132639.
Arunkumar, T., Senthil Kumar, M., & Iniyan, S. (2018). Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Thermal
Storage Material on the Performance of a Concentrator-Coupled Hemispherical Basin Still. Energy
Conversion and Management, 173: 248-256.
Benson, K. (2018). The Solar Still: A Forgotten Water Source. Journal of Green Engineering, 7(4): 387-398.
Bhargva, M. and Yadav, A. (2021). Factors Affecting the Performance of a Solar Still and Productivity
Enhancement Methods: A Review, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 54383 – 54402.
Fang, S., Tu, W., Mu, L., Sun, Z., Hu, Q. and Yang, Y. (2019). Saline Alkali Water Desalination Project In Southern
Xinjiang Of China: A Review of Desalination Planning, Desalination Schemes and Economic Analysis.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 113, 109268.
Gao, M., Zhu, L., Peh, C. K., and Ho, G. W. (2019). Solar Absorber Material and System Designs for Photothermal
Water Vaporization towards Clean Water and Energy Production. Energy and Environmental Science,
12(3), 841-864.
Jahanpanah, M., Sadatinejad, S. J., Kasaeian, A., Jahangir, M. H., and Sarrafha, H. (2021). Experimental
Investigation of the Effects of Low-Temperature Phase Change Material on Single-Slope Solar Still.
Desalination, 499, 114799.
Kabeel, A. E. and Abdelgaied, M. (2016). Improving the Performance of Solar Still By Using PCM as A Thermal
Storage Medium under Egyptian Conditions. Desalination, 383, 22-28.
Liu, Y., Zheng, R., and Li, J. (2022). High Latent Heat Phase Change Materials (PCMS) With Low Melting
Temperature for Thermal Management and Storage of Electronic Devices and Power Batteries: Critical
Review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 168, 112783.
Manta, O., Okeke, O. C., Odo, C. E., Okereke, E. C., Nnabuo, E. U., and Otuu, F. C. (2021). Water Scarcity and Its
Impact on Child Mortality in Nigeria. Public Health in Practice, 2: 100144.
Mohammad, D. and Farshad, F. T. (2011). THERMAL Analysis Of A Weir-Type Casczde Solar Still Integrated
With Pcm Storage. Desalination, (279), 415-422.
Obayemi, S., Daramola, M. O., and Akinyemi, M. L. (2014). Design and Construction of a Solar-Powered Water
Distillation System for Rural Areas. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 3(10):
1224-1229.
Odipe, O. E., Raimi, M. O., Deinkuro, N. S., Funmilayo, A. A., innocent Edewor, O. P., Lateefat, H. M., and Fadeyibi,
M. (2019). Assessment of Environmental Sanitation, Food Safety Knowledge, Handling Practice Among
Food Handlers of Bukateria Complexes in Iju Town, Akure North of Ondo-State, Nigeria. Acta Scientific
Nutritional Health, 3(6).
Olsson, G. (2015). Water and Energy: Threats and Opportunities. IWA Publishing.
Ouikhalfan, M. et al. (2016). Improvement of Heat Storage with a Phase-change Material by Incorporating
Highly Conductive Nano-particles. AMT2016/AMT_139-Energy Storage, April, 2016
Peter, A. K., and Umar, U. (2018). Combating Diarrhoea in Nigeria: The Way Forward. J Microbiol Exp, 6(4), 191-
197.
181 Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy
www.afropolitanjournals.com
AJESRE
Prakash, O. et al. (2022). Performance Analysis and Economic Feasibility Evaluation of Single-Slope Sigle-Basin
Domestic Solar Still Under Different Water Depths. Energies, (22)15, 8517.
Putra, N. Prawiro, E. & Amin, M. (2016). Thermal Properties of Beeswax/CuO Nano Phase-change Material Used
for Thermal Energy Storage. International Journal of Technology, 2: 244 – 235.
Putra, N., Sandi, A. F., Ariantara, B., Abdullah, N. & Mahila, T. M. (2020). Performance of Heating, Cooling and
Clean Energy Storage Systems: An Overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364:132639.
Ramnanan-Singh, R. (2012). Formulation and Thermophysical Analysis of a Beeswax Microemulsion and the
Experimental Calculation of Its Heat Transfer Coefficient. City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Shahsavari, A. and Akbari, M. (2018). Potential of Solar Energy in Developing Countries for Reducing Energy-
Related Emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 275-291.
Sharma, A. et al. (2021). A Review of Phase-change Materials (PCMs) for Thermal Storage Simultaneously Solar
and Electric Energy, Energy Build. 38 (3) 258–265.
Surendhiran, D., Sirajunnisa, A. and Tamilselvam, K. (2017). Silver–magnetic nanocomposites for water
purification. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 15, 367-386.
Udmale, P., Ishidaira, H., Thapa, B. R. and Shakya, N. M. (2016). The Status of Domestic Water Demand: Supply
Deficit in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Water, 8(5), 196.
World Health Organization. (2016). World Health Statistics: Monitoring Health for the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs).
World Water Organization, (2010). Water Facts and Water Stories from Across the Globe, Retrieved from:
http://www.theworldwater.org/waterfacts.php
Zhang, C., Liang, H. Q., Xu, Z. K. and Wang, Z. (2019). Harnessing solar‐driven photothermal effect toward the
water–energy Nexus. Advanced Science, 6(18), 1900883.
Vol. 16, No. 1 2024 African Journal of Environmental Sciences & Renewable Energy 182
www.afropolitanjournals.com