International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies (IJELLS)

Volume 2, Issue 1, January – December 2023, pp. 57-72, Article ID: IJELLS_02_01_008
Available online at https://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJELLS?Volume=2&Issue=1
ISSN Online: 2390-5680, Journal ID: 8605-7914
Impact Factor (2023): 3.11 (Based on Google Scholar Citation)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/USHRB

© IAEME Publication

THE ROLE OF SYMBOLISM IN WILLIAM

SHAKESPEARE’S PLAYS
Shalu Dadwal
Language Instructor, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia

ABSTRACT
Symbolism plays a pivotal role in William Shakespeare’s timeless plays, acting as a
multi-dimensional tool that enhances the depth and complexity of his characters and
narratives. This abstract explores the significance of symbolism in Shakespearean
works, delving into its thematic, emotional, and dramatic contributions. In
Shakespeare’s plays, symbols serve as conduits for conveying deeper meanings and
emotions. For instance, the recurring motif of the crown symbolizes power and
authority in “Macbeth,” where the ambition for the crown drives the tragic protagonist
to his downfall. Likewise, the rose symbolizes love and beauty in “Romeo and Juliet,”
encapsulating the passionate love between the titular characters.
Symbolism extends beyond objects to include settings, weather, and even colors. In
“Hamlet,” the hauntingly symbolic imagery of Elsinore Castle’s decaying state mirrors
the moral corruption of its inhabitants. Weather changes, such as storms, often parallel
the emotional turmoil of the characters. The color white represents purity and
innocence in “Othello,” but also serves as a tool for deception.
Furthermore, Shakespeare employs symbolism to address universal themes, from
the fleeting nature of life (the “All the world’s a stage” metaphor in “As You Like It”)
to the complexities of human nature (the skull in “Hamlet” as a reminder of mortality).
These symbols resonate with audiences across time and cultures, making Shakespeare’s
works enduring and profound. In conclusion, symbolism in Shakespeare’s plays
enriches the narratives, deepens character development, and explores profound themes.
It is a testament to Shakespeare’s genius that his use of symbolism continues to captivate
and resonate with audiences worldwide.
Keywords: Symbolism, Shakespeare’s Plays, Narratives, Exploration.

Cite this Article: Shalu Dadwal, The Role of Symbolism in William Shakespeare’s
Plays, International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies (IJELLS), 2(1),
2023, pp. 57-72.
https://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJELLS?Volume=2&Issue=1

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 57 [email protected]
 The Role of Symbolism in William Shakespeare’s Plays

1. INTRODUCTION
William Shakespeare, often regarded as the best English-language playwright, has left an
indelible mark on the worlds of literature and theatre. The author's works have received high
praise not just for their fascinating plots and well realised characters, but also for the deep
symbolism they include. Shakespeare made excellent use of symbols in his plays, which he
employed to convey serious meaning, arouse strong emotions, and deepen the play's subject
aspects. Shakespeare's use of symbolism is complicated, and this research paper explores the
ways in which Shakespeare used symbols to stress themes, create characters, move the plot
forward, and promote a range of interpretations.
Shakespeare's plays are rich with symbolism, but only if you have a firm grasp of the
historical and cultural context out of which they emerged. Shakespeare's themes and symbolic
representations reflect the cultural, political, and theological shifts of the Elizabethan and
Jacobean eras, which had a profound effect on the author's work. This section provides an in-
depth analysis of the historical context of Shakespeare's life and works.
This study will investigate the historical and cultural context of the Elizabethan and
Jacobean periods, focusing on how Shakespeare's thematic components and symbolic
representations reflect and respond to these tumultuous times.
Shakespeare's symbolism is most easily understood when the historical and cultural context
is known. Shakespeare's literary legacy is inextricably linked to the social and political climate
of his day. Shakespeare's plays are rich with symbolism, but to fully grasp their significance,
one must immerse oneself in the complex fabric of the Elizabethan and Jacobean eras, during
which Shakespeare lived and created his extraordinary works.
The years 1558-1603 are known as the Elizabethan Era. England under Queen Elizabeth I
saw unprecedented growth and development throughout the Elizabethan era. The political and
social climate of the time, as well as the intellectual and artistic movements of the time, were
shaped by a confluence of factors.
From the heated theological debates of the Reformation to a time of relative religious calm,
the Elizabethan era in England was a watershed moment. The Church of England was founded
by Queen Elizabeth I as a separate entity from the Roman Catholic Church. Shakespeare's plays
frequently reflected the spiritual conflicts and ideological struggles of his day, especially the
conflict between Catholicism and Protestantism, via the use of symbolism.
Corresponded with the Age of Exploration, when English explorers like Sir Walter Raleigh
and Sir Francis Drake set out on journeys that pushed the known world farther outward.
Shakespeare drew inspiration from the stories told by the explorers about the people and places
they saw for the first time. Therefore, he used these newly discovered worlds into his theatrical
works, often using them as symbolic depictions of cultural tensions.
There was an explosion of literary, dramatic, and poetic activity throughout the Elizabethan
period, which is sometimes described as a cultural renaissance. Shakespeare became a major
figure during the cultural renaissance because his plays reflected the intellectual fervour of the
time. The author's use of symbols allowed him to probe such basic issues as the human
condition, morality, and the complexities of being human.
From 1603 through 1625, during the Jacobean Period, When James I of England succeeded
to the throne after the death of Queen Elizabeth I in 1603, a new era in English history began
known as the Jacobean period. Significant changes started during the Elizabethan era persisted
throughout the aforementioned period, yet this era also had its own distinct characteristics.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 58 [email protected]
 Shalu Dadwal

Jacobean politics were notoriously complicated, culminating in the Gunpowder Plot of

1605. Shakespeare's plays often provided a stage for depictions of political tensions and
conspiracies, with the playwright using symbolic elements to illustrate the dynamics of power
disputes and the tenuous nature of political authority.
The social and economic landscape of England changed dramatically over this century.
Shakespeare's works reflect the increasing influence of trade, the development of a monetary
system, and capitalism via the use of symbols representing wealth, social status, and economic
inequality.
During the Jacobean era, English drama and literature flourished and grew steadily in
popularity. Shakespeare's symbolic use of concepts like as morality, ambition, and the
complexities of the human mind ensured that he would continue to be an important figure in
the world of theatre long after his most creative time had ended.
The examination of symbols in William Shakespeare's works requires a thorough familiarity
with the complex historical and cultural environment of the Elizabethan and Jacobean eras. As
a result, modern audiences may better understand Shakespeare's plays and appreciate them for
what they are: reflecting devices that record the complexities and evolutions of their times via
symbolism and allegory. Therefore, this further adds to Shakespeare's literature's deep
relevance and enduring influence.
The major purpose of this research is to analyse and assess Shakespeare's symbolic language
in a selection of his plays. The goal of this method is to shed light on the hidden layers of
meaning in these literary works, demonstrating Shakespeare's calculated use of symbols to
impart his ideas, make social criticism, and capture readers' minds and hearts. Additionally, the
overarching goal of this study is to contribute to the ongoing discussion and scholarly research
around Shakespeare's symbolic language.
The study's significance stems from its potential to deepen our appreciation of
Shakespeare's genius as a writer and the enduring relevance of his works. One of the most well-
known playwrights in history, Shakespeare, may be better understood via an examination of his
use of symbolism. Shakespeare's plays may be interpreted in new ways, and the study of the
relationship between symbols and narrative may be expanded as a result of this study.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Throughout the ages, scholars and readers alike have been riveted by works that make use of
symbolism. By going beyond the everyday and infusing stories with deeper layers of
importance, symbols as literary tools invite readers to explore themes, emotions, and ideas that
go beyond the text's surface level. William Shakespeare, a legendary person renowned for his
mastery of language and storytelling, is also an expert symbolist. Shakespeare was an expert at
using symbols from his vast literary canon to convey complex ideas, deep feelings, and astute
social criticisms, so strengthening the complicated fabric of his stories.

SYMBOLISM IN LITERATURE
Shakespeare's symbolism can only be properly understood by delving into the greater realm of
symbolism in literature. This article provides an in-depth analysis of symbolism as a literary
device, delving into its antecedents, evolution, and many deployments by writers across genres
and eras. Shakespeare's unique and significant contributions to this vast tradition may be
appreciated to a greater extent when we have a thorough understanding of the larger framework
of symbolism in literature.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 59 [email protected]
 The Role of Symbolism in William Shakespeare’s Plays

An important academic resource, Steven Olderr's "Symbolism: A Comprehensive

Dictionary," was originally published in 1986 and provides a thorough investigation of
symbolism throughout a wide range of disciplines, including but not limited to literature, art,
religion, and society. The breadth and depth of this resource's examination of symbols and their
meanings set it apart as a valuable tool for researchers in a variety of fields. Olderr's dictionary
gives not only meanings, but also historical and cultural contexts, allowing the reader to better
understand the significance and evolution of symbols. Researchers, students, and anybody else
with an interest may not only understand symbols using a comprehensive method, but also get
a profound appreciation for their tremendous effect on human expression. The dictionary is a
vital tool for anybody trying to make sense of the rich symbolism present in works of art,
religious texts, and even everyday life. It does so by using symbols from many different cultures
and time periods, demonstrating the flexibility and universality of symbolic communication. In
addition, the book's recognition of the historical context of symbols adds depth to its studies,
helping to cultivate a holistic perspective on the impact of symbols on cultures, communities,
and human communication over time. In conclusion, "Symbolism: A Comprehensive
Dictionary" is an essential tool for readers to navigate the intricate world of symbols and the
enduring impact it has on human communication and comprehension.
Written by C. G. Jung and first published in 1982, "The Comparative and Psychological
Approach to Symbolism in Literature" is a groundbreaking work that bridges the fields of
psychology and literature. An exploration of the relationship between literary symbols and the
unconscious lies at the heart of this groundbreaking book. Jung, a giant in the field of
psychology, brings his wealth of analytical psychology expertise to bear on the art of literary
analysis. The author deftly delves into the significance of symbols in literature, shedding light
on their cryptic and diverse nature as potent conduits connecting the conscious and unconscious
aspects of the human brain, all within the confines of one single work. The author goes further
into the transformative power of symbols in his psychological inquiry than mere interpretation
would allow. This research shows how archetypal symbols, which are stored in the collective
unconscious, may be used to reveal previously unknown parts of an individual's personality.
Jung's comparative research clearly reveals the lasting and transcultural character of symbolism
by using a wide variety of literary representations spanning several cultures and historical eras.
The author introduces the concept of archetypal symbols, which are timeless icons recognised
throughout cultures and which emerge repeatedly in myths, dreams, and works of literature.
According to Jung, these symbols have deep meaning and may serve as a bridge between
individuals and a universal human experience. It also serves as an excellent example of Jung's
interdisciplinary approach, since ideas from psychology, literature, and cultural studies are all
skillfully woven together. By analysing literary symbolism, the author of "Symbolism in
Literature" gives readers a window into the inner workings of the human mind. This
demonstrates how symbols are useful not just as aesthetic devices but also as potent methods
of delving into the depths of the human mind. Therefore, this book has become an important
and influential resource for academics, psychologists, and literary buffs alike. Jung's work is
still important because it sheds light on the hidden parts of human nature and demonstrates the
power of symbolism in literature to bring about significant transformation.
In the discipline of literary studies, "A Handbook to Literature," a compilation written by
William Harmon and C. Hugh Holman, is considered a lasting and necessary research tool. This
classic piece of writing has become an indispensable resource for scholars, students, and
literature lovers since it contains a wealth of data and offers insightful insights into the vast
field of literary studies. This book's unique selling point and lasting popularity stem from its
eclectic perspective. The book delves deeply into critical theories, literary movements, genres,
and other critical points of view, and it also provides a comprehensive and meticulously curated
repository of literary vocabulary.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 60 [email protected]
 Shalu Dadwal

Each new edition of this authoritative reference work demonstrates the publisher's
commitment to keeping pace with the ever-evolving literary scene. The handbook undergoes
careful revision and updating to ensure it remains a useful resource in the dynamic area of
literary studies. The commitment to updating ensures the resource remains relevant, solidifying
its status as a trustworthy partner for anybody navigating the complex terrain of literary analysis
and criticism. In order to make complex literary concepts accessible to a large audience, the
book presents clear and concise explanations of these concepts. Any reader interested in
learning more about literature, whether it be a specific literary movement, a specific genre, or
the critical ideas that underlie them, will find "A Handbook to Literature" to be an invaluable
resource. This reference book has remained popular despite literary tastes shifting over time
because of its comprehensive scope and flexible format. People who love literature, students,
and scholars all find "A Handbook to Literature" to be an indispensable resource. As such, it
serves as a gateway into the field of literary criticism and analysis. The written word will always
be relevant and invaluable because it provides access to an infinite library of stories, poems,
and novels.
In his seminal 1899 work, "The Symbolist Movement in Literature," Arthur Symons
provides a thorough analysis of the Symbolist movement as it relates to the field of literature.
Throughout the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Symons was a prominent character in literary
criticism and poetry. Here, he gives readers a thorough understanding of the avant-garde literary
movement that developed in reaction to the prevailing literary traditions of the time. Symons
examines the foundational ideas and defining characteristics of Symbolism in depth and makes
insightful insights on these topics. In its place, he promotes a more abstract and subjective
literary style, emphasising its departure from realism and naturalism. The author establishes the
significance of symbols, metaphors, and evocative imagery in understanding the impact of the
Symbolist movement on poetry and prose by emphasising their importance in conveying
complicated emotions and ideas. In addition, the book examines the works of major Symbolist
figures including Mallarmé, Verlaine, and Rimbaud, discussing their contributions to the
literary movement as a whole. A definitive record of the seismic shift in literary taste that
marked the turn of the twentieth century, "The Symbolist Movement in Literature" has stood
the test of time. This book provides readers with a wealth of insight into the development of
literary expression and its continuing influence on the literary canon and beyond.
Forging a bridge between the fields of literature and psychoanalysis, Jean-Michel Rabaté's
"The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and Psychoanalysis," published in 2014, is a
fundamental and illuminating book. Respected scholar of both literature and psychoanalysis
Rabaté provides a clear and insightful look at the complex relationship between the two fields.
The complex psychological characteristics of literary characters, plots, and themes are made
clearer as Rabaté examines how psychoanalytic theory improves our understanding of literature
in this thorough introductory text. The author deftly investigates essential concepts like the
subconscious, repression, and desire, explaining their appearance in literary works and their
impact on the creative process. In his writings, Rabaté demonstrates how psychoanalysis may
be used as a different lens through which to analyse the themes, symbols, and narrative
structures of well-known works of literature. Also, the book provides a thorough examination
of the historical and philosophical ties between literature and psychoanalytic philosophy.
Academics, students, and anybody else interested in learning more about the inextricable
relationship between literature and psychoanalysis will find "The Cambridge Introduction to
Literature and Psychoanalysis" to be an indispensable resource. Its insights into the
complexities of human nature and the art of storytelling are priceless. As a result of his extensive
research and writing, Rabaté's works have become an indispensable guide for students trying
to understand the interplay between literature and psychoanalysis.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 61 [email protected]
 The Role of Symbolism in William Shakespeare’s Plays

SHAKESPEAREAN SYMBOLISM: AN OVERVIEW

Shakespeare's skillful use of symbolism continues to fascinate academics and encourage
scholarly research, which is one reason his works have endured for so long. This section serves
as an introduction to Shakespearean symbolism by describing the recurring images and themes
that appear throughout his plays. In addition, Shakespeare's symbolic use of characters, events,
and speeches, as well as his artistic choices and techniques, are investigated in detail. By delving
deeply into the building blocks of symbolism in Shakespearean literature, we provide a
foundation for delving into the meaning of symbolism in specific plays.
Scholarly paper from the year 2000 titled "Shakespeare's Metaphors" by Sylvia Adamson
and Lynette Hunter. This crucial piece of writing provides a thorough analysis of Shakespeare's
metaphor use across his works. Sylvia Adamson and Lynette Hunter have created a book that
delves deep into Shakespeare's use of metaphor. It sheds light on how crucial this language tool
was in conveying nuanced feelings, concepts, and themes across his works of drama and poetry.
The authors give readers with a solid understanding of Shakespeare's use of metaphors to enrich
his narratives and characters via careful analysis and interpretation. Shakespeare's metaphors
are not only catalogued and explained in this book, but their cultural, historical, and literary
settings are also explored. Therefore, it is a valuable tool for academics, students, and
enthusiasts. Shakespeare's use of metaphor is illuminating since it reveals the importance of
this symbolic tool even now. This helps us better appreciate Shakespeare's extraordinary grasp
of language and storytelling.
François Laroque wrote an academic study on Shakespeare's use of festive imagery in his
works titled "Shakespeare's Festive Imagery" in 1976. François Laroque explores the dynamic
and metaphorical world of festive imagery in Shakespeare's plays in this major piece of study.
This book, first published in 1976, examines how Shakespeare often employs metaphors and
colourful pictures related to rituals and communal celebrations. Laroque's study sheds light on
how these festive elements contribute to the Bard's narrative, enriching the depth of his works'
themes and symbols. Laroque provides readers with valuable insights into the cultural and
contextual significance of Shakespeare's use of joyous imagery via a meticulous investigation
of the dynamic interplay between celebration and symbolic representation. This academic
investigation ultimately aids in a better understanding of the complex and multifaceted
meanings weaved throughout his dramatic works. Scholars and readers interested in
Shakespeare's use of symbolism, particularly as it relates to the recurring celebration, ritual, and
communal self-identification themes, continue to find this book an indispensable resource.
Charles Martindale published "Shakespeare and the Utilisation of Antiquity: A Preliminary
Exposition" in 1994. Shakespeare's use of classical and archaic symbols is examined in
fascinating detail by Charles Martindale in the first piece. This 1994 essay delves into the wide
variety of ancient allusions, myths, and symbols that pepper Shakespeare's works. Martindale
explains how Shakespeare infused his plays with many meanings, complexity, and relevance
by drawing on ancient stories, characters, and cultural references. Shakespeare's works have
many connections to the classical world, which are illuminated by Martindale's thorough
analysis and contextualization. This academic undertaking helps readers get a deeper
appreciation for how Shakespeare's use of archaic symbols contributed to the playwright's work.
This research is a great place to begin for historians and fans who are curious in the possible
links between ancient antiquity and Shakespeare's use of symbolism. It elucidates Shakespeare's
mastery of cultural and literary fusion in his works.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 62 [email protected]
 Shalu Dadwal

William Shakespeare examines the Book of Common Prayer and its place in Elizabethan
culture in his 2013 book of the same name. In this article, Daniel Swift examines how the Book
of Common Prayer relates to Elizabethan society. Daniel Swift's academic contribution is a
riveting examination of the influence of the Book of Common Prayer on William Shakespeare
and the broader cultural milieu of the Elizabethan age. This book, released in 2013, investigates
the use by Shakespeare of religious imagery, terminology, and concepts from the Book of
Common Prayer. Swift's in-depth analysis reveals how the Book of Common Prayer influenced
the spiritual and symbolic atmosphere of the Elizabethan era, and hence how it manifested itself
in Shakespeare's poetry. This academic work provides a plethora of fresh insights on the
spiritual and theological symbolism in Shakespeare's works by analysing the interplay between
religion, language, and literature. It highlights the critical role of such symbolism in interpreting
the historical and cultural contexts in which William Shakespeare wrote his plays. Swift's
analysis is crucial for scholars, students, and fans who want to learn more about the intertwined
nature of religious symbolism and Shakespeare's enduring literary influence.
Sylvia Beach makes a substantial addition to Shakespearean studies with her 1966 book
Shakespeare's Symbols, in which she analyses the many symbols that appear in the works of
William Shakespeare. This book is a must-have for anybody interested in understanding the
rich symbolism used by the great dramatist. This book, first published in 1966, provides an in-
depth analysis of the motifs and symbols that appear repeatedly throughout Shakespeare's
canon. Beach's study provides insight into how these symbols connect to Shakespeare's themes
and other symbolic elements. The author gives insightful new insights on the cultural, historical,
and literary contexts in which these symbols operate as a result of extensive scholarly study and
meticulous analysis. The book not only explains and recognises Shakespeare's symbols, but
also highlights the many ways in which they might be interpreted and used. Scholars, students,
and anybody else interested in deciphering the complex symbolism present in Shakespeare's
canon continue to find the aforementioned book an invaluable resource. Shakespeare's profound
impact on the literary world and his gift for captivating an audience via his stories may be better
understood by digging into this resource.

PREVIOUS RESEARCH ON SYMBOLISM IN SHAKESPEARE'S PLAYS

Shakespeare's literary canon has been the subject of exhaustive study and research by
academics, scholars, literary critics, and fans alike, with an emphasis on the deciphering of the
symbolic themes hidden throughout his theatrical output. This section offers a thorough
evaluation and synthesis of previous academic studies on the subject of symbolism in
Shakespeare's works, with a focus on key findings, research methodologies, and critical
perspectives. To place our own research within the larger academic debate and identify gaps in
our understanding, we might draw on the work of our predecessors.
The numerous levels of symbolism in William Shakespeare's plays have been the subject
of much academic investigation. Symbolism in Shakespeare's works has been studied
extensively, shedding light on the numerous ways in which it enriches our understanding of the
works' thematic and metaphorical features.
In this regard, Jan Kott's work stands out; he did considerable academic analysis of the
symbolic portrayal of the "Fool" figure in Shakespearean drama. Kott's idea, as outlined in his
1964 article "Shakespeare Our Contemporary," offers a fresh perspective on the Fool's symbolic
significance as an embodiment of societal critiques and realities in Shakespeare's plays.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 63 [email protected]
 The Role of Symbolism in William Shakespeare’s Plays

In addition, the research undertaken by Kenneth Muir and published in his book "The
Sources of Shakespeare's Plays" in 1977 elucidates the relevance of nature as a symbolic
element in Shakespeare's works. According to Muir's theory (Muir, 1977), Shakespeare often
used symbolic representations of animals and landscapes to convey serious themes and moral
teachings.
Shakespeare's Caliban: A Cultural History, written by Alden T. Vaughan in 1991, delves
into the symbolic importance of characters like Caliban from "The Tempest" via an examination
of Shakespeare's treatment of the issue of colonialism in his plays. The racial and colonial
undertones of these portrayals are examined by Vaughan's study (Vaughan, 1991).
In addition, Carol Thomas Neely's scholarly work "Distracted Subjects: Madness and
Gender in Shakespeare and Early Modern Culture" (2004) delves into an analysis of the
gendered symbolism of madness as it appears in Shakespeare's works. The complex relationship
between mental illness, gender norms, and social expectations is shed light on by Neely's
approach (Neely, 2004).
The aforementioned studies give a solid foundation for understanding the complex
symbolism in Shakespeare's theatrical works. In light of these observations, the fundamental
aim of this research is to provide a significant addition to our understanding of the use of
symbols in Shakespeare's plays. The study aims to shed light on the meaning of these symbols
in light of character growth, plot progression, and the examination of thematic components.

LITERATURE GAP
Even though there has been a lot of work done by scholars to decipher the symbolic elements
in Shakespeare's plays, there is still a noticeable gap in the literature when it comes to the
psychological aspects of symbolism in Shakespearean theatre. Symbolism's cultural, historical,
and thematic components have all been thoroughly explored by academics. However, there is
a lack of research into the psychological effects of symbols on the growth of characters and the
impact of symbolism on the audience's emotional investment. Shakespeare's works include
many layers of meaning and emotional effect, some of which may be revealed via an
understanding of the symbolic language used. By delving into the role of symbolism in affecting
characters' mental states, motives, and changes, this research hopes to fill a need in the current
literature. We hope that this approach will help us better grasp the intricate symbolic web at
work in Shakespearean theatre and the tremendous effect it has on the characters and the
audience.

3. METHODOLOGY
3.1. RESEARCH QUESTIONS

To guide our exploration, this paper addresses the following research questions:

I How does Shakespeare employ symbolism in his plays to convey thematic elements?

II What are the recurring symbols and motifs across his works, and how do they evolve
in meaning and significance?

III How do different interpretations and critical perspectives enrich our understanding of
Shakespearean symbolism?

IV In what ways does symbolism impact character development, plot progression, and
conflict resolution within Shakespeare’s plays

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 64 [email protected]
 Shalu Dadwal

3.2. DATA COLLECTION

This study's research technique will include an in-depth exploration of selected Shakespearean
plays, with an eye on locating and analysing symbolic elements. The linguistic content of the
plays themselves will serve as the primary source of information. The purpose of this research
is to investigate a number of Shakespeare's plays, including "Macbeth," "Romeo and Juliet,"
"Hamlet," "The Tempest," and "Othello," with an eye towards spotting and making sense of
symbolic language. The analysis will be bolstered by scholarly articles, critical analyses, and
comments relevant to these plays, which will provide significant viewpoints on the
contemporary readings of the symbols.

3.3. DATA ANALYSIS

Shakespearean plays will be studied and interpreted closely to identify and classify symbols
according to their thematic relevance, character relationships, and narrative purposes. Character
growth, story advancement, and theme investigation may all be attributed to the use of well-
read symbols, which will be examined in their proper context. Data on metaphors, allegories,
and recurrent themes, among other types of symbolism, will be extracted and organised using
qualitative content analysis.

3.4. RESEARCH APPROACH

This study uses a qualitative methodology because it is interested in exploring the complex and
very personal symbolism of Shakespeare's works. Understanding the subtleties of symbols,
their psychological connotations, and how they affect character growth and plot dynamics is
best accomplished via the use of qualitative approaches. This study seeks to give a deep and
nuanced comprehension of symbolism in Shakespeare's works via careful textual analysis and
interpretation. This method will help us better understand the lasting relevance of Shakespeare's
symbolism by evaluating the symbols' impact on the characters and the audience from a
psychological standpoint.

4. FINDINGS
4.1 SYMBOLISM IN SELECTED PLAYS
4.1.1. "MACBETH": THE DAGGER AND BLOOD
The use of symbolic elements such as the knife and blood in Shakespeare's renowned tragedy,
"Macbeth," assumes a crucial function in effectively communicating the underlying themes of
ambition, guilt, and the deleterious influence of power. The dagger, prominently alluded to as
"Is this a dagger which I perceive before me?" inside Macbeth's soliloquy, functions as a visual
manifestation of his internal conflict and ethical deterioration (Booth, 2000). The sign in
question represents the captivating nature of power and ambition, which ultimately drives
Macbeth to engage in the act of regicide and then spiral into a state of insanity. In contrast,
blood emerges as a prevalent motif throughout the play, serving to symbolise the enduring mark
of culpability. One of the most well-known lines said by Lady Macbeth is, "Out, damned spot!"
The phrase "Out, I say!" serves as a manifestation of the pervasive and inextricable quality of
guilt. The knife and blood serve as prominent motifs in the tragedy of "Macbeth," emphasising
the psychological and moral repercussions of unbridled ambition.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 65 [email protected]
 The Role of Symbolism in William Shakespeare’s Plays

4.1.2. "ROMEO AND JULIET": LIGHT AND DARKNESS

The use of light and darkness as symbolic elements in Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet"
effectively conveys the inherent duality present in themes of love and conflict (Duncan-Jones,
2001). Light symbolises concepts like as love, purity, and hope, which are shown in the
renowned balcony scene with Juliet as the metaphorical "sun." On the other hand, darkness is
representative of discord, concealment, and calamity. The juxtaposition of light and darkness
is readily apparent in the illicit rendezvous of Romeo and Juliet during the nocturnal hours, as
well as the sad denouement of their love inside the confines of the tomb. The use of symbolism
in this context serves to emphasise the contrasting nature of the love shared by the protagonists
and the intense animosity that exists between their respective families, namely the Montagues
and the Capulets. The text highlights the sad inevitability of their romantic narrative and the
cultural factors that work together to obstruct their relationship.

4.1.3. "HAMLET": YORICK'S SKULL AND GRAVEYARDS

In William Shakespeare's play "Hamlet," the depiction of Yorick's skull and the recurring
portrayal of graveyards function as powerful symbols that represent the concept of mortality
and the inescapable nature of death (Empson, 1951). In the renowned scene when Hamlet
encounters Yorick's skull, he is prompted to reflect about the ephemeral nature of existence and
the futility inherent in human pursuits. This incites Hamlet to engage in introspection over the
concept of death and the purpose of human life. In contrast, graveyards serve as recurrent
locations throughout the play, symbolising the ultimate resting place for everyone irrespective
of their social standing or position. The symbols in "Hamlet" collectively communicate the
central topic of mortality, highlighting the transient quality of human existence and the
existential inquiries that torment the characters.

4.1.4. "THE TEMPEST": CALIBAN AND ARIEL

In Shakespeare's play "The Tempest," the characters of Caliban and Ariel serve as contrasting
figures, embodying divergent aspects of both the natural world and human nature (Greenblatt,
1980). Caliban, being an indigenous inhabitant of the island, symbolises the fundamental and
instinctual aspects of human nature. The individual personifies the uncontrolled and innate
aspect of human nature, often linked to the depths of human life. On the other hand, Ariel, a
celestial being associated with the atmosphere, serves as a representation of the intangible and
otherworldly aspects of human capabilities. Ariel symbolises the concepts of liberty, elegance,
and the ability to undergo metamorphosis. The dynamic interaction between Caliban and Ariel
in Shakespeare's play may be seen as a symbolic examination of the inherent duality within
human nature, including both primal inclinations and the capacity for higher transformation.

1.4.5. "OTHELLO": HANDKERCHIEF AND MOORISH IMAGERY

The analysis of the play "Othello" focuses on the significance of the handkerchief and the use
of Moorish imagery. The play "Othello" by William Shakespeare employs the handkerchief and
Moorish imagery as potent symbols that have considerable metaphorical significance. The
handkerchief, initially serving as a representation of the affection shared between Othello and
Desdemona, undergoes a significant transformation into a potent symbol of envy and treachery
when it gets possessed by a someone with malicious intent (Kott, 1967). The evolution of this
object, once representing fondness, became a subject of doubt and scepticism, serves as a
representation of the detrimental consequences stemming from feelings of envy and doubt.
Furthermore, the use of Moorish imagery in relation to Othello functions as a representation of
racial discrimination and social prejudices. The character of Othello, being of Moorish descent,
is positioned as an individual who lives on the outside of Venetian society.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 66 [email protected]
 Shalu Dadwal

This portrayal serves as a symbolic representation that underscores the primary themes of
racial prejudice and the sense of being an outsider, which ultimately propel the narrative of the
tragedy. Collectively, these symbols serve to underscore the deleterious influence of envy and
prejudice in Shakespeare's play "Othello," finally culminating in a tragic and despairing
outcome.

4.2. THEMES, INTERPRETATIONS, AND IMPACT

4.2.1. LOVE AND DEATH IN SHAKESPEAREAN SYMBOLISM
Within the realm of Shakespearean symbolism, the interweaving of love and death themes
serves as a reflection of the intricate and deep essence of human life. Love is often represented
by a range of themes, including flowers, Cupid's arrow, and romantic images (Nevo, 1985). The
repeated use of roses in the literary works of Shakespeare serves to symbolise the aesthetic
appeal and delicate nature of love. This is seen in "A Midsummer Night's Dream" when Oberon
employs a mystical flower as a representation of the profound influence of love. Conversely,
death is represented by many symbolic elements such as skulls, graveyards, and apparitions.
The skull of Yorick in Shakespeare's play "Hamlet" serves as a metaphor that conveys the
impermanence and fleeting nature of human existence. Additionally, the presence of
supernatural apparitions, such as the ghost of King Hamlet in the same literary work, signifies
the lingering unsolved conflicts and haunting remnants of bygone eras. The Shakespearean
symbolism of love and death serves as a representation of the perpetual human endeavour to
harmonise the fervent, life-affirming power of love with the inescapable nature of mortality.

4.2.2. POWER AND AMBITION IN SHAKESPEARE'S SYMBOLS

In Shakespeare's works, symbols are used to explore the themes of power and ambition. The
symbols used by Shakespeare often function as potent vehicles for the examination of topics
related to power and ambition. The crown, throne, and sceptre are recurrent symbols that
symbolise the exercise of power and the relentless pursuit of ambition (Punter, 2000). In the
play "Macbeth," the crown serves as a dual representation, functioning as both a symbolic
manifestation of authority and a compelling catalyst for Macbeth's unrelenting ambition. The
dagger, serving as an additional emblem, represents the pernicious impact of ambition, enticing
Macbeth towards the act of regicide. In contrast, symbols such as the storm and natural elements
serve as representations of the formidable and unmanageable powers of power. The
tempestuous storm shown in Shakespeare's tragedy "King Lear" serves as a symbolic
representation of the tumultuous consequences that arise from unbridled authority and
ambition. Shakespeare uses symbolic elements in order to emphasise the captivating attraction
of power, the repercussions of its relentless pursuit, and the intrinsic conflicts for supremacy
that are prevalent throughout his theatrical works.

4.2.3. NATURE AND THE SUPERNATURAL: SYMBOLIC ELEMENTS

Shakespeare often employs the use of nature symbolism and supernatural elements as a means
of examining the interplay between the tangible realm of the natural world and the ethereal or
mystical dimensions. The forest is a recurring motif in the author's writings, often embodying
the uncontrolled and capricious elements of the natural world. The woodland of Arden in
William Shakespeare's play "As You Like It" serves as a symbolic setting that represents a
realm of profound personal growth and introspection (Schoenbaum, 1987). Moreover,
Shakespearean play often incorporates supernatural aspects such as witches, fairies, and ghosts,
which serve as prominent symbols. The witches portrayed in Shakespeare's play "Macbeth"
serve as symbolic representations of sinister supernatural entities that exert control over the
destinies of individuals.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 67 [email protected]
 The Role of Symbolism in William Shakespeare’s Plays

In Shakespeare's play "A Midsummer Night's Dream," the character Puck embodies the
capricious and enigmatic qualities associated with the realm of the supernatural. These symbols
serve to obscure the boundaries between the natural and supernatural realms, prompting viewers
to reflect about the enigmatic and awe-inspiring phenomena that lie beyond the limits of human
understanding (Orgel, 2008).

4.3. INTERPRETATIONS AND CRITICS' PERSPECTIVES

4.3.1. DIVERSE VIEWS ON SHAKESPEAREAN SYMBOLS
The symbols found in Shakespearean works have been a topic of extensive analysis and
interpretation among historians and critics throughout the course of history, leading to a wide
range of perspectives and often contradictory viewpoints. The aforementioned perspectives
demonstrate the depth and intricacy inherent in Shakespeare's literary oeuvre. Various
theoretical frameworks have arisen with respect to the interpretation and import of certain
symbols. The dagger seen in Shakespeare's play "Macbeth" has been subject to several
interpretations, with scholars positing it as a symbol of Macbeth's guilt and alternatively as an
embodiment of his ambition (Tillyard, 1943). Likewise, the handkerchief seen in Shakespeare's
play "Othello" has been interpreted by some scholars as a representation of love and
faithfulness, but other perspectives perceive it as a sign of vulnerability and treachery. The
many perspectives presented underscore the versatility of Shakespearean symbols, enabling
them to evoke a response from both audiences and scholars in distinct cultural and historical
settings.

4.3.2. SYMBOLISM'S CRITICAL ANALYSIS

The examination and interpretation of symbolism in the works of Shakespeare have been a
primary area of interest within the field of literary research (Leggatt, 2005). Scholars have
extensively examined the many layers of significance and the socio-cultural circumstances that
encompass these symbols. The analysis of Yorick's skull in Shakespeare's "Hamlet" has
included a thorough examination of its portrayal of mortality, memento mori, and the prevailing
preoccupation with death throughout the Elizabethan era. Academic scholars have conducted
an analysis of the psychological implications inherent in Lady Macbeth's soliloquy, often
referred to as the "Out, damned spot!" speech, within the context of William Shakespeare's play
"Macbeth." This scholarly examination delves into the symbolic representation of guilt via the
imagined bloodstain on Lady Macbeth's hands (Wilson, 1952). The present critical study serves
the purpose of revealing the profound symbolism embedded within the plays of William
Shakespeare, while also offering valuable perspectives on the playwright's active involvement
with the cultural and philosophical trends prevalent throughout his day.

4.3.3. EVOLVING PERSPECTIVES ON SHAKESPEAREAN SYMBOLISM

Over the course of time, there has been a notable evolution in the interpretations of
Shakespearean symbolism, which may be attributed to the shifting intellectual paradigms and
cultural norms. In the first stages of analysis, scholars often prioritised moral and allegorical
interpretations of symbols, so matching their perspectives with the religious and moral
paradigms that were prominent during Shakespeare's time (Bloom, 1998). Nevertheless, in
contemporary scholarship, academics have increasingly adopted a broader spectrum of
interpretive methodologies, including psychoanalytic, feminist, postcolonial, and
deconstructive perspectives. These methodologies illuminate aspects of symbolism that have
not been thoroughly examined before, including the psychological aspects, gender dynamics,
colonial discourse, and power systems inherent in the symbols.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 68 [email protected]
 Shalu Dadwal

The dynamic evolution of viewpoints has facilitated the exploration of new pathways in
comprehending the intricate characteristics of symbols in Shakespearean works, as well as their
pertinence in present-day discussions.

4.4. SYMBOLISM'S IMPACT ON CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT, PLOT,

AND CONFLICT
4.4.1. SHAPING CHARACTERS AND SYMBOLIC MOTIFS
The use of Shakespearean symbolism has considerable influence on the formation of characters
and the thematic ideas that surround them. In several instances, characters often establish
intricate connections with certain symbols, so enhancing their overall depth and complexity. In
the play "Hamlet," the inclusion of Yorick's skull as a symbolic element not only functions as
a reminder of mortality but also plays a significant role in shaping Hamlet's introspective and
thoughtful nature (Brown, 1957). Hamlet's contemplation on death and the human condition is
significantly shaped by the reoccurring theme of the skull. In the play "Macbeth," the themes
of the dagger and blood are closely linked to the characterization of Macbeth, serving as
symbolic representations of his gradual decline into insanity and ethical deterioration in his
relentless pursuit of power. The symbols in question serve as extensions of the characters, so
enhancing their psychological depth and motives.

4.4.2. PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF SYMBOLISM

Symbolism in Shakespearean plays often conveys significant psychological meanings for both
the characters inside the plays and the audiences that engage with them. Symbols function as
portals that provide insight into the innermost thoughts, desires, and struggles of the characters
(Clemen, 2005). An example may be seen in Shakespeare's play "Macbeth," where Lady
Macbeth's compulsive act of handwashing serves as a symbolic representation of her profound
psychological anguish and remorse stemming from her involvement in the regicide of King
Duncan. The symbolic act shown in this instance serves as a means to depict her gradual decline
into a state of lunacy, so providing valuable perspectives on the delicate and susceptible facets
of the human mind. Furthermore, symbolism has the capacity to elicit comparable effects on
the viewership, eliciting emotional reactions and fostering introspective contemplation
(Kerrigan, 2002). The use of Shakespearean symbolism serves as an invitation for spectators or
readers to actively participate in the exploration of the characters' psychological challenges, so
establishing a profound emotional bond and encouraging reflection upon overarching human
issues.

4.4.3. SYMBOLISM'S ROLE IN PLOT PROGRESSION AND FORESHADOWING

Symbols in Shakespearean plays have a crucial role in propelling the narrative along and
providing hints about significant future occurrences (Garber, 2013). Frequently, symbols are
intentionally positioned in order to foreshadow forthcoming events or engender a feeling of
expectation. In the play "Romeo and Juliet," the repeated theme of stars and light serves as a
foreshadowing device, hinting at the unfortunate destiny that awaits the youthful protagonists.
The renowned prologue, which begins with the lines "Two households, both alike in dignity, /
In fair Verona, where we lay our scene, / From ancient grudge break to new mutiny, / Where
civil blood makes civil hands unclean," utilises symbolism to establish the context for the
forthcoming conflict and tragedy (Hulme, 2004). Symbols such as stars serve to communicate
a perception of predetermined fate and inescapability, effectively directing the anticipations of
the audience and heightening the dramatic suspense.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 69 [email protected]
 The Role of Symbolism in William Shakespeare’s Plays

5. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Several important discoveries have emerged throughout this study of Shakespeare's symbolism,
revealing its complex and varied use. Shakespeare uses considerable symbolism to anchor his
plays and offer significance. Textual symbols convey themes, emotions, and character
motivations.
Personality Changes: Symbols Shape Character. Characters seldom form deep ties with
important symbols in stories. These links deepen characters' motivations, personalities, and
progress. Shakespearean symbolism illuminates the play's topics. Symbols are chosen to
analyse human experiences including love, ambition, power, and death. Shakespeare employs
symbols to investigate these topics, presenting important philosophical questions.
Actors and viewers relate to symbols psychologically. They expose characters' motives,
difficulties, and moral problems and disclose their thinking. Symbols make readers feel, which
helps them identify with heroes and villains.
Symbols shape the plot and predict key events. Shakespeare's symbolism foreshadows and
builds suspense. Stars and other mystical elements are only two symbols that construct a
narrative.
Many interpretations and analyses are possible for Shakespeare's symbols. The plasticity of
symbols throughout time and geography has prompted researchers and critics to disagree on
their meaning and value.
Changes in Symbolism Shakespeare's symbolism has changed with intellectual and social
conventions. Psychoanalysis, feminism, postcolonialism, and deconstruction have illuminated
Shakespeare's symbolism.
Shakespearean symbolism is a complex web of literary skill, introspection, and topicality.
Shakespeare's works and symbolism continue to draw readers and critics from all backgrounds.
The study of symbolism in William Shakespeare's plays has profound implications,
affecting various aspects of literature, theater, and our understanding of the human experience.
Key implications include enhanced literary appreciation, deeper character understanding,
exploration of universal themes, psychological resonance, theatrical impact, educational
significance, cultural and historical insights, interdisciplinary study, inspiration for adaptations
and interpretations, and ongoing scholarly inquiry. Shakespearean symbolism enriches our
understanding of his works, characters, and the broader cultural and intellectual contexts they
represent. By exploring the symbols associated with each character, readers and audiences gain
insights into their motivations, conflicts, and psychological complexities. Shakespearean
symbolism also evokes psychological resonance, making the characters' dilemmas, struggles,
and moral choices relatable to the audience. The study of symbolism in Shakespeare's plays is
essential for critical thinking, literary analysis, and cultural exploration, making it a valuable
tool for understanding literature, drama, and the human experience.
The study of symbolism in Shakespeare's plays has immense potential for further
exploration and discovery. Future research directions include interdisciplinary approaches,
comparative Symbolism, contemporary adaptations, global perspectives, gender and
symbolism, postcolonial readings, digital humanities, cognitive analysis, audience reception,
symbolism in non-dramatic works, pedagogical applications, and synthesis of adaptation
theory. Interdisciplinary approaches can provide new insights into the cognitive and emotional
responses to Shakespearean symbols, while comparative studies can analyze how symbols are
used across different plays. Comparative studies can reveal overarching patterns in
Shakespeare's symbolic language, while global perspectives can illuminate the universality and
adaptability of Shakespearean symbols. Postcolonial readings can shed light on how symbols
in Shakespeare's plays intersect with issues of colonization, race, and identity.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 70 [email protected]
 Shalu Dadwal

REFERENCES
[1] Adamson, S., & Hunter, L. (2000). Shakespeare's Metaphors.

[2] Alden T. Vaughan. (1991). Shakespeare's Caliban: A Cultural History.

[3] Arthur Symons. (1899). The Symbolist Movement in Literature.

[4] Beach, S. (1966). Shakespeare's Symbols.

[5] Bloom, Harold. (1998). "Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human." Riverhead Books.

[6] Booth, Stephen. (2000). "Shakespeare's Sonnets." Yale University Press.

[7] Brown, John Russell. (1957). "Shakespeare and His Comedies." Methuen & Co Ltd.

[8] C. G. Jung. (1982). Symbolism in Literature: The Comparative and Psychological Approach.

[9] Carol Thomas Neely. (2004). Distracted Subjects: Madness and Gender in Shakespeare and
Early Modern Culture.

[10] Clemen, Wolfgang. (2005). "Shakespeare's Soliloquies." Routledge.

[11] Duncan-Jones, Katherine. (2001). "Shakespeare's Sonnets." Arden Shakespeare.

[12] Empson, William. (1951). "Seven Types of Ambiguity." Chatto & Windus.

[13] Garber, Marjorie. (2013). "Shakespeare After All." Anchor Books.

[14] Greenblatt, Stephen. (1980). "Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare."

University of Chicago Press.

[15] Hulme, Peter. (2004). "Shakespeare and Renaissance Literature Before Heterosexuality."
Palgrave Macmillan.

[16] Jan Kott. (1964). Shakespeare Our Contemporary.

[17] Jean-Michel Rabaté. (2014). The Cambridge Introduction to Literature and Psychoanalysis.

[18] Kenneth Muir. (1977). The Sources of Shakespeare's Plays.

[19] Kerrigan, John. (2002). "Shakespeare's Binding Language." Oxford University Press.

[20] Kott, Jan. (1967). "Shakespeare Our Contemporary." W. W. Norton & Company.

[21] Laroque, F. (1976). Shakespeare's Festive Imagery.

[22] Leggatt, Alexander. (2005). "Shakespeare's Political Drama: The History Plays and the Roman
Plays." Routledge.

[23] Martindale, C. (1994). Shakespeare and the Uses of Antiquity: An Introductory Essay.

[24] Nevo, Ruth. (1985). "Comic Transformations in Shakespeare." Routledge.

[25] Orgel, Stephen. (2008). "Imagining Shakespeare: A History of Texts and Visions." Palgrave
Macmillan.

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 71 [email protected]
 The Role of Symbolism in William Shakespeare’s Plays

[26] Punter, David. (2000). "William Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage." Routledge.

[27] Schoenbaum, S. (1987). "William Shakespeare: A Documentary Life." Oxford University Press.

[28] Smith, Emma. (2018). "Shakespeare's First Folio: Four Centuries of an Iconic Book." Oxford
University Press.

[29] Steven Olderr. (1986). Symbolism: A Comprehensive Dictionary.

[30] Swift, D. (2013). Shakespeare's Common Prayers: The Book of Common Prayer and the
Elizabethan Age.

[31] Tillyard, E. M. W. (1943). "Shakespeare's History Plays." Chatto & Windus.

[32] Wells, Stanley, & Stanton, Sarah. (2002). "Shakespeare's Histories." Oxford University Press.

[33] William Harmon & C. Hugh Holman. (Various editions). A Handbook to Literature.

[34] Wilson, J. Dover. (1952). "The Essential Shakespeare: A Biographical Adventure." Cambridge
University Press.

Citation: Article: Shalu Dadwal, The Role of Symbolism in William Shakespeare’s Plays, International Journal of
English Language and Literature Studies (IJELLS), 2(1), 2023, pp. 57-72

Abstract Link: https://iaeme.com/Home/article_id/IJELLS_02_01_008

Article Link:
https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJELLS/VOLUME_2_ISSUE_1/IJELLS_02_01_008.pdf

Copyright: © 2023 Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the
original author and source are credited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

✉ [email protected]

https://iaeme.com/Home/journal/IJELLS 72 [email protected]