Research Peer Evaluation Form
Name of Evaluator: __________________________________________________________________________________
Grade and Section: __________________________________________________________________________________
Write the name of each of your group members in a separate column. For each person,
indicate the extent to which you agree with the statement on the left, using a scale of 1-4
(See Criteria Guide Below). Total the numbers in each column.
Evaluation Criteria Group member: Group member:
Collaboration
Participation
Preparation
Quality of Input
Knowledge of subject
Communication
TOTALS
Issues related to group members encountered during the conduct of your research?
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Criteria Guide
When our group was collaborating together, this person:
4- Listens to other’s ideas. Gives broad ideas and expands on them or encourages others to do so. Builds on
contributions of others.
3- Listens well. Contributes ideas but the ideas do not deepen the discussion rather maintain it at current level.
2- Listens fairly well but interrupts at times. Rarely deepens the discussion.
1- Overbearing. Interrupts. Doesn’t allow discussion of ideas other than own and/or does not listen or contribute.
The way in which this person participated was:
4- Contributes ideas. Actively speaks up. Brainstorms.
3- Contributes some ideas but is mainly passive.
2- Sits passively.
1- Does nothing.
This person was prepared in the following way:
4- Does more than required.
3- Does what committed to do.
2- Does some of what committed to do.
1- Does nothing.
The typical quality of input this person provided was:
4- Provides extensive accurate information to group members.
3- Information is usually accurate and is an adequate amount.
2- Mostly misinforms group or provides little information.
1- Provides group with no useful accurate information.
This person displayed a knowledge of the subject such as:
4- Demonstrates understanding of topics related to the research.
3- Misses occasional info., but is generally informed about the topics related to the research.
2- Misses info. often, but knows some topics related to the research.
1- Expects others to inform him/her about the research.
They way in which this person communicated was:
4- Reliably communicates progress to group. Reachable and regularly checks messages/email. Talks with others in
group.
3- Stays in fairly good touch with the group, but is occasionally difficult to contact.
2- Is unreachable but initiates communication with others occasionally.
1- Is unreachable and does not communicate with group members about the project
