Polity Elections, Citizenship and Miscellaneous: Postal Ballot System
Polity Elections, Citizenship and Miscellaneous: Postal Ballot System
Postal Ballot System
● Postal voting, also referred to as absentee voting, is a way for people to vote by mail
instead of going to a polling station in person.
● It's helpful for those who can't vote in person for reasons like being away from their home
area, having a disability, or being busy with important work on election day.
● Following voters are allowed to cast their votes through postal ballot:
I. Service Voters (armed forces, the armed police force of a state, and government
servants posted abroad)
II. Voters on election duty
III. Voters above 80 years of age or Persons with Disabilities (PwD)
IV. Voters under preventive detention (not punitive detention)
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
II. Stopping Criminal Elements:Even after provisions in RPAs around 43% of MPs in present
Lok Sabha have criminal cases pending against them.
III. Social Media:Social media has blurred the silence period of election campaigning and also
enables micro-level targeting of voters.
IV. Power to de-register Parties:Election Commission of India (ECI) does not have the
power to de-register political parties that do not contest elections and are merely for
receiving funds.
V. Bureaucratisation of Politics:ECI does not have its own official machinery and has to
depend on the government which is not conducive for free and fair elections.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
officer are deemed to be on deputation to Election Commission from the date of
notification for election to the date of declaration of results.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
Case - Lily Thomas v. Union Of India, 2013:
The Supreme Court in Lily Thomas v. Union of India case, 2013 held the provision that
disqualification of a member of Parliament and State Legislature shall not take place until three
months from the date of conviction, as unconstitutional and provided for immediate
disqualification on conviction.
Right to Know
● At the time of Covid, the Election Commission of India had revised norms for star
campaigners for polls during the Covid-19 pandemic.
● As per revised norms, a recognised political party could have only 30 star-campaigners and
an unrecognised (but registered) political party could have 15.
● Moreover, the Law Ministry has also increased the expenditure limit for a candidate in
bigger states to Rs. 77 lakhs for Lok Sabha polls and Rs. 30.8 lakh for assembly polls. In
smaller states the limit is Rs- 59.4 lakh and Rs. 22 lakhs respectively.
● Declaration of Assets and Liabilities:Section 75A provides that every elected candidate
for a House of Parliament has to furnish following information to the Chairman/Speaker
within ninety days from subscribing oath:
○ The movable and immovable property of which he, his spouse and his dependent
children are jointly or severally owners or beneficiaries;
○ His liabilities to any public financial institution, Central or State government.
● The Chairman/Speaker can make rules in this regard and wilful contravention of the rules
can be considered as a breach of privilege.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
Supreme Court Ruling on Right to Information of Electors:
Association for Democratic Candidate has to furnish information regarding any criminal
Reforms v. Union of India, antecedent, educational qualification and assets.
2002
People's Union for Civil Voters have a fundamental right to know relevant qualifications
Liberties v. Union of India, of candidates for office, including information about their
2003 income and assets.
Accordingly, section 33B of the RPA, 1951, which
stated that candidates could not be compelled to disclose any
information about themselves other than their criminal records.
Resurgence India Case, Made it compulsory for Returning Officers to reject those
2013 nomination papers which are accompanied by incomplete/blank
affidavits.
Krishnamurthy V. Sivakumar The Supreme Court held that the disclosure of criminal
& others, 2015 antecedents (especially heinous crimes) of a candidate at the
time of filing of nomination paper as mandated by law was
categorically imperative.
Lok Prahari v. Election The SC asked the Centre to amend the rules as well as the
Commission, 2018 disclosure form filed by candidates along with their nomination
papers, to include source of their income, and those of their
spouses and dependents.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
● To show income tax return of self, spouse and dependents of last 5 years (earlier only
one year).
● To provide details of offshore assets as well as same details of their spouse, members of
the Hindu Undivided Family and dependents (earlier not sought).
What if a candidate lies in an affidavit?
● On the allegation of suppression of information or false information, an election petition
can be filed.
● Presently, the penalty for lying in an affidavit is imprisonment up to six months or fine
or both.
Election Petition
June 2021:West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has filed an election petition in the
Calcutta High Court challenging the Assembly election result of Nandigram constituency.
Provisions Regarding Election Petition in RPA, 1951:
● High Court to try election petitions: An election can be called in question only by an
election petition and the High Court has jurisdiction to try an election petition. The trial of
election petition is continued on a day-to- day basis within six months.
● Appeal: The appeal lies to the Supreme Court within thirty days.
Power of the High Court
The High Court can:
● dismiss the election petition; or
● declare the election of all or any of the elected candidates to be void; Or
● declare the election of all or any of the elected candidates to be void and the petitioner or
any other candidate to have been duly elected.
Corrupt Practices:
Provisions regarding corrupt practices in RPA, 1951 -Section 123 of the Act defines corrupt
practices:
● Bribery:any gift, offer or promise by a candidate or his agent to any person to stand or
not to stand or to withdraw or not to withdraw from being a candidate or to vote or
refrain from voting.
● Undue influence:direct or indirect interference with the free exercise of any electoral right.
It includes threatening any election candidate or elector.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
● Religious appeal:The appeal on the ground of his religion, race, caste, community or
language or appeal to religious symbols, national symbols, such as the national flag or the
national emblem.
The Supreme Court inAbhiram Singh case, 2017held that election is a secular exercise
and an appeal for votes during elections on the basis of religion, caste, race, community or
language amount to a 'corrupt practice'
● Promotion of enmity or hatred:The promotion of feelings of enmity or hatred between
different classes of the citizens of India on grounds of religion, race, caste, community, or
language.
The propagation of the practice or the commission of sati or its glorification.
● False publication:The publication of any false statement of fact in relation to the
personal character or conduct of any candidate.
● Providing free conveyance:Use of any vehicle or vessel for the free conveyance of any
elector (other than the candidate himself, the members of his family or his agent) to or
from any polling station.
● Breach of Section 77:The incurring or authorising of expenditure in contravention of
'Account of election expenses and maximum limit prescribed under Section 77 of RPA, 1951.
● Seeking assistance from the government servants:Obtaining any assistance (other than
the giving of vote) from gazetted officers, stipendiary judges and magistrates, members of
armed forces, excise officers, revenue officers etc.
● Booth capturing: It refers to a type of electoral fraud in which members of a party or hired
criminals cast false votes either by threatening voters or by preventing genuine voters from
reaching the polling booth.
Proxy Voting
● Under proxy voting, a registered elector can delegate his voting power to a representative.
● The Law Ministry accepted the recommendation of the Election Commission on proxy
voting.
● The Union Cabinet passed the proposal on proxy voting rights for NRIs in 2017. Existing
process for NRIs is as follows:
○ Voting rights for NRIs were introduced only in 2011, through an amendment to the
Representation of the People Act 1950.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
○ An NRI can vote in the constituency located in his/her place of residence, as
mentioned in the passport.
○ He/she can only vote in person and will have to produce her passport in original at
the polling station for establishing identity.
Challenges Associated with NRIs Voting:
● Identification of voters:Questions regarding the identity of voters can be raised as
representatives of political parties may not be present at the venue of voting.
● Policing and security:The EC will have to come up with the ways to ensure how these
venues can be policed and secured.
● Model Code of Conduct:Foreign governments are not bothered to maintain a silence period
before polling.
Way Forward:
● According to the Ministry of External Affairs, "huge logistical challenges" need to be
addressed and "a realistic assessment of requirements" need to be made before the
proposal is implemented.
● The embassies and consulates should be enough to accommodate all the voters and to
provide actual facilitation of voting, identification of voters, and venues for voting.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
● Saving resources:It makes perfect sense as the same voter, booth, and security staff in
both elections.
● Social harmony:During election time, the rivalry regarding communalism and casteism
becomes common.
● Sustainable development:Frequent elections forces politicians to focus on short-term
reforms.
● Global experiences:Countries like South Africa, Sweden are following the process of one
nation one election.
Arguments Against Simultaneous Elections:
● Practical difficulties:It requires reduction or expansion of terms of various assemblies
which will not be supported either by many political parties.
● Constitutional hurdles:Article 83 and Article 172 does not provide fixed tenure for LS and
assemblies, hence, the policy of one election is needed for synchronisation.
● Anti-federalism:Ill informed voters' choices may lead to National issues impacting the
electorate's behaviour for voting in State Assembly elections and vice versa.
● Reduces accountability:Frequent elections keep politicians in touch with voters and ensure
necessary course correction by the government.
● Grassroot economy:Many jobs get created during the election which gives a boost to the
grassroots level economy
● False arguments related to MCC:It stops only new schemes. Even new schemes with
urgent public importance can be launched with EC approval.
● Alternative reforms:Reforms like a cap on party expenditure state funding of elections,
33-35 days poll durations, and raising of mor battalion for security are more feasible and
effective
Way Forward:
Law commission has recommended the following ways to address hurdles:
● Amendment to constitution and RPA,1951:New Lok Sabha and assembly, constituted
after midterm elections, shall be only for the remainder of the term. The no-confidence
motion may be replaced with a constructive vote of no-confidence suggesting alternatives.
● Anti-defection law:The Commission recommended that appropriate amendments be made
to anti-defection laws to ensure that all disqualification issues (arising from defection) are
decided by the presiding officer within six months.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
A Single Voters’ List
Recent Context:PMO, ECI, and the law commission are checking the possibility of having a
common electoral roll for PRI, ULBs, state assembly, and the Lok Sabha elections.
Types of voter’s list Reasons for the demand for a single Challenges
voter’s list
● Some state laws ● Saving resources:Combined with ● Against the spirit of
allow SECs to simultaneous elections, it prevents Federalism.
borrow ECI’s duplication of efforts. ● Persuading state
electoral roll. ● Voter's convenience:It saves the government's to
● Some SECs repair efforts of voters to register twice. change state laws to
and revise their roll Also, avoid confusion created due use ECl electoral
with ECIs electoral to missing names from one of rolls.
roll as a base. the lists. ● The difference in
● Some states have ● It is supported by the Law boundaries of EC's
their electoral rolls commission in 2015 and ECI in polling station and
and do not adopt 1999. Ward.
EC's roll for local ● Constitutional feasibility:
body polls. Amendment to Article 243K and
243ZA to make it mandatory for
all SECs to use ECl electoral roll.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
● Time-saving:Electronic voting and electronic counting ensure that people can get official
election results within hours instead of weeks.
● Transparency:EVMs can be audited by all parties, citizens, and election commissions at
every stage.
Concerns regarding EVMs:
● Mistrust:Even the possibility of hacking creates mistrust about EVM and undermines the
credibility of ECI.
● Malfunctioning:Many incidents have been witnessed where EVMs stopped responding due
to various reasons including negligence of officers.
● Undermines democratic values:
○ Transparency:Display and vote stored may not be the same
○ Verifiability:VVPAT auditing is done in only one EVMs per constituency.
○ Secrecy:Vote counting is done booth-wise without using a totalizer machine.
○ International experience:Technologically advanced countries like Germany has
banned EVM on the concern about transparency
Way Forward:
● Totalizer Machines:It increases the secrecy of voting by counting votes polled at 14
polling booths together unlike present booth-wise results.
● Safety demonstration:ECI shall arrange a hackathon as done in 2017 where it challenged
people to demonstrate hacking of EVMs.
● Human resources:ECI shall train all its workforce to handle any issue arising in EVM at
the polling station.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
● Fundamental right:NOTA ensures that people exercise their freedom of expression and
right to liberty in the political sphere through their consent or discontent to candidates
● The credibility of election:Maximum voter turnout increases the credibility of the
election. People opting for NOTA instead of abstaining from voting ensures maximum voter
turnout.
● Moral pressure:In the absence of inner-party democracy, the voter has no role in choosing
election candidates. Hence by rejecting candidates people make their voices heard.
● Supreme court:Negative voting could bring about "a systemic change in polls and political
parties will be forced to project clean candidates".
● Increasing voting share:Factors like criminalization of political parties, opaqueness in the
functioning of political parties and increased awareness among voters has increased vote
share of NOTA.
Example:1.04% in the 2019 LS election.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
○ It is difficult to identify the perpetrators.
○ The Election Commission lacks resources as well as surveillance capacity to
implement and punish the violation of MCC.
● Election Expenditure:Latest tools like block chain technology, digital payments and tools
like electoral bonds have made tracing money trails and poll expenditure difficult.
● Reduced Transparency:Increased use of social media for political advertisements, reduced
transparency in functioning and donation of political parties.
Way Forward:
● Fake news:Create a clear set of goals and impose a hefty fine per view of an ad that
breaks the rules.
● Regulate social media:Ensure that social media strictly follows a voluntary code of ethics
that insists on transparency in political ads.
● Electioneering in the digital world:More steps like all candidates are to provide details of
their social media accounts to the commission and take prior approval for all political
advertisements on social media.
● Independence of ECI:To ensure the independence of ECI a separate secretariat to ECI
should be provided, as well as collegium should be formed for the appointment of all
election commissioners.
Shall MCC be legally enforceable?
● MCC is not enforceable by law. Certain provisions of the MCC are enforceable through
provisions of other acts such as the IPC, 1860, CrPC, 1973, and RPA, 1951.
● The Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice
recommended making the MCC legally binding and recommended that the MCC be made a
part of the RPA 1951.
● ECI has opposed this with the reason that elections must be completed in a short time
and judicial proceedings take longer time, therefore it is not feasible to make it enforceable
by law.
Election Funding
RPA Provisions:
● Section 29B:Parties to accept voluntary contributions from any person/company, except a
Government Company.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
● Section 29C:Political parties declare donations that exceed 20,000 rupees by submitting a
report to ECI. Failure to do so makes them ineligible for tax relief under the Income Tax
Act, 1961.
Methods used to raise political funds:
I. Individual:From individual under section 29B
II. State funding:
A. Direct Funding: Not allowed
B. Indirect Funding: Free access to state media, public places for rallies etc.
III. Corporate funding:It is governed by Companies Act, 2013 which provides that the
company should be at least three years old to donate only after the approval of the Board
of Directors.
IV. Electoral Trust:Non profit company for orderly receipt of contribution from any source. It
shall donate 95% of their income to the registered political parties.
Expected consequences of Election funding:
I. Criminalisation of politics
II. Political inequality: Money power determines legal rule instead of concerns for all.
III. Quid Pro Quo:Donors can ask back favours.
IV. No free and free elections, political outcomes will solely determined by the money power.
Challenges with election funding:
● Lack of transparency:The Majority of funding to political parties is received through
opaque sources like electoral bonds, anonymous donations through cash, etc.
● Legal loopholes:There are various gaps in Indian rules, the benefit of which political parties
take to avoid any kind of reporting. E.g. Exemption to political parties from income tax.
● Bribes:No power with ECI to take action if parties bribe voters of a constituency.
● Hamper economy:Hidden sources of funding result in more spending of funds in election
campaigns, thus impacting the economy of the country.
Electoral Bond
● The electoral bonds were introduced with the Finance Bill (2017). On January 29, 2018 the
Narendra Modi-led NDA government notified theElectoral Bond Scheme 2018.
● An electoral bond is like a promissory note that can be bought by any Indian citizen or
company incorporated in India from select branches of State Bank of India.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
● The citizen or corporate can then donate the same to any eligible political party of his/her
choice.
● The bonds are similar to bank notes that are payable to the bearer on demand and are
free of interest.
● An individual or party will be allowed to purchase these bonds digitally or through cheque.
● However, this scheme was held unconstitutional by the Supreme court in the case of
Association for Democratic Reform v. Union of India, and held that the Electoral Bond
Scheme was unconstitutional for violating the right to information of voters.
Right to Recall
● It is a tool of direct democracy whereby the electorate has the power to remove the
elected officials before the expiry of their terms.
● Procedure:Particular percentage of voters (Usually 50%) have to give in writing that they
have to initiate proceedings.
● This is followed by a secret ballot.
● If it receives a specified limit (Usually 2/3 rd votes) then the person stands removed from
his position.
Advantages:
● Strengthen democracy:Free and fair elections are the right of the citizen. If a
representative loses the support of people for any reason then he should be removed
● Increases accountability:This too will ensure greater accountability of representatives
which is a true edifice of democracy.
● Check on the criminalization of politics:The right to recall will act as a significant check
on corruption and discourage criminal candidates from contesting an election.
● Reduces election expenditure:Morally skewed candidates will limit campaign spending
with a fear of being recalled.
● Better delivery of services:Non-performance being the primary criteria to use the right to
recall, Election promises would be fulfilled by the representative.
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4
Comparison of Indian and USA Election Commission:
PW Web/App:https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4