0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views16 pages

Polity Elections, Citizenship and Miscellaneous: Postal Ballot System

Uploaded by

aryan9041851100
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views16 pages

Polity Elections, Citizenship and Miscellaneous: Postal Ballot System

Uploaded by

aryan9041851100
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

‭Polity‬


‭Postal Ballot System‬
‭● ‭Postal voting, also referred to as absentee voting, is a way for people to vote by mail
‭instead of going to a polling station in person.
‭● ‭It's helpful for those who can't vote in person for reasons like being away from their home
‭area, having a disability, or being busy with important work on election day.
‭● ‭Following voters are allowed to cast their votes through postal ballot:
‭I. ‭Service Voters (armed forces, the armed police force of a state, and government
‭servants posted abroad)
‭II. ‭Voters on election duty
‭III. ‭Voters above 80 years of age or Persons with Disabilities (PwD)
‭IV. ‭Voters under preventive detention (not punitive detention)

‭Representation of Peoples’ Act‬


‭It was passed by the Parliament in accordance with‬‭Article 327 of the Constitution of India.‬‭It‬
‭deals with the conduct of the elections in the country.‬
‭Significance of the Act:‬
‭I. ‭Decriminalisation:‬‭The provisions regarding disqualification from membership of Parliament
‭and State Legislatures ensures decriminalisation of politics.
‭II. ‭Transparency:‬‭The provision regarding declaration of assets and liabilities, right to
‭information of electors, etc, ensures transparency regarding the candidates in the elections.
‭III. ‭Free and Fair Elections:‬‭The provisions regarding corrupt practices and electoral officers
‭provide promotion of free and fair elections.
‭Challenges:‬
‭I. ‭Ruling Party Advantage:‬‭The Act does not contain clear provisions and guidelines on
‭reducing the advantage to the ruling party in terms of misuse of official machinery and
‭electoral funding.
‭Example:‬‭Receiving around 95% of funds through the Electoral bond scheme by BJP.

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭II.‬ ‭Stopping Criminal Elements:‬‭Even after provisions in RPAs around 43% of MPs in present‬
‭Lok Sabha have criminal cases pending against them.‬
‭III.‬ ‭Social Media:‬‭Social media has blurred the silence period of election campaigning and also‬
‭enables micro-level targeting of voters.‬
‭IV.‬ ‭Power to de-register Parties:‬‭Election Commission of India (ECI) does not have the‬
‭power to de-register political parties that do not contest elections and are merely for‬
‭receiving funds.‬
‭V.‬ ‭Bureaucratisation of Politics:‬‭ECI does not have its own official machinery and has to‬
‭depend on the government which is not conducive for free and fair elections.‬

‭Official Machinery under the Act For Conduct of Election:‬


‭I.‬ ‭District Election Officer:‬‭Designated or nominated by ECI for each district or area‬
‭within the district in consultation with the State government to coordinate and supervise‬
‭preparation and revision of electoral rolls and conduct of elections.‬
‭II.‬ ‭Electoral Registration Officer:‬‭Designated or nominated by ECI in consultation with the‬
‭State government to prepare and revise the electoral rolls.‬
‭III.‬ ‭Assistant Electoral Registration Officer:‬‭Appointed by ECI to assist electoral‬
‭registration officers and subjected to the control of the electoral registration officer.‬
‭IV.‬ ‭Returning officer:‬‭Designated or nominated by ECI for every constituency in consultation‬
‭with the State government to effectively conduct election in the manner provided by the‬
‭Act and rules or orders.‬
‭V.‬ ‭Assistant Returning Officer:‬‭Appointed by ECI to assist returning officer and can‬
‭perform all or any of function of returning officer, except scrutiny of nominations‬
‭VI.‬ ‭Observers:‬‭Nominated by ECl to watch the conduct of elections in constituency or‬
‭constituencies.‬
‭VII.‬ ‭Presiding Officers:‬‭Appointed by district election officers for each polling station to keep‬
‭the order at the polling station and ensure that the polls are taken fairly.‬
‭VIII.‬ ‭Polling Officer:‬‭Appointed by district election officer for each polling station to assist the‬
‭presiding officer.‬
‭IX.‬ ‭Officers on deputation to Election Commission:‬‭The returning officer, assistant‬
‭returning officer, presiding officer, polling officer and any other officer and any police‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭officer are deemed to be on deputation to Election Commission from the date of‬
‭notification for election to the date of declaration of results.‬

‭Provisions regarding disqualifications in RPA 1951:‬


‭I.‬ ‭Disqualification on conviction for certain offences:‬‭Section 8 provides that a person who‬
‭is MP or MLA in any legislature is disqualified for a period of six years, if he is convicted‬
‭of:‬
‭A.‬ ‭Promotion of enmity between different groups‬
‭B.‬ ‭Offence of rape‬
‭C.‬ ‭Promotion of untouchability‬
‭D.‬ ‭Import and export of prohibited goods‬
‭E.‬ ‭Member of unlawful association‬
‭F.‬ ‭Booth capturing‬
‭G.‬ ‭Insult of National Flag or Constitution of India and Prevention of singing of‬
‭National Anthem.‬
‭II.‬ ‭Disqualifications for voting:‬‭A person is disqualified from voting at any election for a‬
‭period of six years if he is convicted of:‬
‭A.‬ ‭IPC, 1860:‬‭Offence of bribery and undue influence or personation at an election‬
‭B.‬ ‭RoPA, 1951:‬‭Offence of promoting enmity between classes in connection with the‬
‭election; removal of ballot paper from polling stations; fraudulently defacing or‬
‭fraudulently destroying any nomination paper.‬
‭III.‬ ‭Other Grounds:‬
‭A.‬ ‭If a person convicted of any offence and sentenced to imprisonment for two or‬
‭more years is disqualified.‬
‭B.‬ ‭If a person is guilty of corrupt practices‬
‭C.‬ ‭If a person is dismissed from government service for corruption or disloyalty.‬
‭D.‬ ‭If a person has any contract in the course of trade or business or supply of goods‬
‭to the government.‬
‭E.‬ ‭If a person is a managing agent, manager or secretary of any company or‬
‭corporation (other than a cooperative society), in which the Government has at‬
‭least twenty-five percent share.‬
‭F.‬ ‭If a person has failed to lodge an account of his election expenses within the time.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭Case - Lily Thomas v. Union Of India, 2013:‬
‭The Supreme Court in Lily Thomas v. Union of India case, 2013 held the provision that‬
‭disqualification of a member of Parliament and State Legislature shall not take place until three‬
‭months from the date of conviction, as unconstitutional and provided for immediate‬
‭disqualification on conviction.‬

‭Remedies available for Disqualified Person:‬


‭●‬ ‭The disqualified person can approach the Election Commission for removal of disqualification‬
‭under Section 11 of the Act (except disqualification on the ground of corrupt practices).‬
‭●‬ ‭If the disqualification has resulted due to an election petition filed in the High Court, then‬
‭the person can approach the Supreme Court for appeal under section 116A.‬
‭Way Forward:‬
‭●‬ ‭The recommendations of the‬‭244th report of Law Commission‬‭should be implemented, i.e.‬
‭disqualification at the stage of framing of charges along with other legal safeguards to curb‬
‭criminalization of politics.‬

‭Right to Know‬
‭●‬ ‭At the time of Covid, the Election Commission of India had revised norms for star‬
‭campaigners for polls during the Covid-19 pandemic.‬
‭●‬ ‭As per revised norms, a recognised political party could have only 30 star-campaigners and‬
‭an unrecognised (but registered) political party could have 15.‬
‭●‬ ‭Moreover, the Law Ministry has also increased the expenditure limit for a candidate in‬
‭bigger states to Rs. 77 lakhs for Lok Sabha polls and Rs. 30.8 lakh for assembly polls. In‬
‭smaller states the limit is Rs- 59.4 lakh and Rs. 22 lakhs respectively.‬
‭●‬ ‭Declaration of Assets and Liabilities:‬‭Section 75A provides that every elected candidate‬
‭for a House of Parliament has to furnish following information to the Chairman/Speaker‬
‭within ninety days from subscribing oath:‬
‭○‬ ‭The movable and immovable property of which he, his spouse and his dependent‬
‭children are jointly or severally owners or beneficiaries;‬
‭○‬ ‭His liabilities to any public financial institution, Central or State government.‬
‭●‬ ‭The Chairman/Speaker can make rules in this regard and wilful contravention of the rules‬
‭can be considered as a breach of privilege.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭Supreme Court Ruling on Right to Information of Electors:‬

‭Case‬ ‭Supreme Court Ruling‬

‭Association for Democratic‬ ‭Candidate has to furnish information regarding any criminal‬
‭Reforms v. Union of India,‬ ‭antecedent, educational qualification and assets.‬
‭2002‬

‭People's Union for Civil‬ ‭Voters have a fundamental right to know relevant qualifications‬
‭Liberties v. Union of India,‬ ‭of candidates for office, including information about their‬
‭2003‬ ‭income and assets.‬
‭Accordingly, section 33B of the RPA, 1951, which‬
‭stated that candidates could not be compelled to disclose any‬
‭information about themselves other than their criminal records.‬

‭Resurgence India Case,‬ ‭Made it compulsory for Returning Officers to reject those‬
‭2013‬ ‭nomination papers which are accompanied by incomplete/blank‬
‭affidavits.‬

‭Krishnamurthy V. Sivakumar‬ ‭The Supreme Court held that the disclosure of criminal‬
‭& others, 2015‬ ‭antecedents (especially heinous crimes) of a candidate at the‬
‭time of filing of nomination paper as mandated by law was‬
‭categorically imperative.‬

‭Lok Prahari v. Election‬ ‭The SC asked the Centre to amend the rules as well as the‬
‭Commission, 2018‬ ‭disclosure form filed by candidates along with their nomination‬
‭papers, to include source of their income, and those of their‬
‭spouses and dependents.‬

‭About Form 26:‬


‭A candidate is required to file an affidavit called Form 26 along with the nomination papers,‬
‭that furnishes information on his assets, liabilities, educational qualifications, criminal‬
‭antecedents (convictions and all pending cases) and public dues.‬
‭What are the new changes?‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭●‬ ‭To show income tax return of self, spouse and dependents of last 5 years (earlier only‬
‭one year).‬
‭●‬ ‭To provide details of offshore assets as well as same details of their spouse, members of‬
‭the Hindu Undivided Family and dependents (earlier not sought).‬
‭What if a candidate lies in an affidavit?‬
‭●‬ ‭On the allegation of suppression of information or false information, an election petition‬
‭can be filed.‬
‭●‬ ‭Presently, the penalty for lying in an affidavit is imprisonment up to six months or fine‬
‭or both.‬

‭Election Petition‬
‭June 2021:‬‭West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has filed an election petition in the‬
‭Calcutta High Court challenging the Assembly election result of Nandigram constituency.‬
‭Provisions Regarding Election Petition in RPA, 1951:‬
‭●‬ ‭High Court to try election petitions: An election can be called in question only by an‬
‭election petition and the High Court has jurisdiction to try an election petition. The trial of‬
‭election petition is continued on a day-to- day basis within six months.‬
‭●‬ ‭Appeal: The appeal lies to the Supreme Court within thirty days.‬
‭Power of the High Court‬
‭The High Court can:‬
‭●‬ ‭dismiss the election petition; or‬
‭●‬ ‭declare the election of all or any of the elected candidates to be void; Or‬
‭●‬ ‭declare the election of all or any of the elected candidates to be void and the petitioner or‬
‭any other candidate to have been duly elected.‬
‭Corrupt Practices:‬
‭Provisions regarding corrupt practices in RPA, 1951 -‬‭Section 123 of the Act defines corrupt‬
‭practices:‬
‭●‬ ‭Bribery:‬‭any gift, offer or promise by a candidate or his agent to any person to stand or‬
‭not to stand or to withdraw or not to withdraw from being a candidate or to vote or‬
‭refrain from voting.‬
‭●‬ ‭Undue influence:‬‭direct or indirect interference with the free exercise of any electoral right.‬
‭It includes threatening any election candidate or elector.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭●‬ ‭Religious appeal:‬‭The appeal on the ground of his religion, race, caste, community or‬
‭language or appeal to religious symbols, national symbols, such as the national flag or the‬
‭national emblem.‬
‭The Supreme Court in‬‭Abhiram Singh case, 2017‬‭held that election is a secular exercise‬
‭and an appeal for votes during elections on the basis of religion, caste, race, community or‬
‭language amount to a 'corrupt practice'‬
‭●‬ ‭Promotion of enmity or hatred:‬‭The promotion of feelings of enmity or hatred between‬
‭different classes of the citizens of India on grounds of religion, race, caste, community, or‬
‭language.‬
‭The propagation of the practice or the commission of sati or its glorification.‬
‭●‬ ‭False publication:‬‭The publication of any false statement of fact in relation to the‬
‭personal character or conduct of any candidate.‬
‭●‬ ‭Providing free conveyance:‬‭Use of any vehicle or vessel for the free conveyance of any‬
‭elector (other than the candidate himself, the members of his family or his agent) to or‬
‭from any polling station.‬
‭●‬ ‭Breach of Section 77:‬‭The incurring or authorising of expenditure in contravention of‬
‭'Account of election expenses and maximum limit prescribed under Section 77 of RPA, 1951.‬
‭●‬ ‭Seeking assistance from the government servants:‬‭Obtaining any assistance (other than‬
‭the giving of vote) from gazetted officers, stipendiary judges and magistrates, members of‬
‭armed forces, excise officers, revenue officers etc.‬
‭●‬ ‭Booth capturing: It refers to a type of electoral fraud in which members of a party or hired‬
‭criminals cast false votes either by threatening voters or by preventing genuine voters from‬
‭reaching the polling booth.‬

‭Proxy Voting‬
‭●‬ ‭Under proxy voting, a registered elector can delegate his voting power to a representative.‬
‭●‬ ‭The Law Ministry accepted the recommendation of the Election Commission on proxy‬
‭voting.‬
‭●‬ ‭The Union Cabinet passed the proposal on proxy voting rights for NRIs in 2017. Existing‬
‭process for NRIs is as follows:‬
‭○‬ ‭Voting rights for NRIs were introduced only in 2011, through an amendment to the‬
‭Representation of the People Act 1950.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭○‬ ‭An NRI can vote in the constituency located in his/her place of residence, as‬
‭mentioned in the passport.‬
‭○‬ ‭He/she can only vote in person and will have to produce her passport in original at‬
‭the polling station for establishing identity.‬
‭Challenges Associated with NRIs Voting:‬
‭●‬ ‭Identification of voters:‬‭Questions regarding the identity of voters can be raised as‬
‭representatives of political parties may not be present at the venue of voting.‬
‭●‬ ‭Policing and security:‬‭The EC will have to come up with the ways to ensure how these‬
‭venues can be policed and secured.‬
‭●‬ ‭Model Code of Conduct:‬‭Foreign governments are not bothered to maintain a silence period‬
‭before polling.‬
‭Way Forward:‬
‭●‬ ‭According to the Ministry of External Affairs, "huge logistical challenges" need to be‬
‭addressed and "a realistic assessment of requirements" need to be made before the‬
‭proposal is implemented.‬
‭●‬ ‭The embassies and consulates should be enough to accommodate all the voters and to‬
‭provide actual facilitation of voting, identification of voters, and venues for voting.‬

‭Simultaneous Elections: One Nation One Election‬


‭●‬ ‭Many experts including the Prime minister, NITI Aayog have pitched to initiate discussion‬
‭on simultaneous elections.‬
‭●‬ ‭It implies synchronised elections for Lok Sabha and State Assemblies and voters in a‬
‭particular constituency vote for both State Assembly and Lok Sabha the same day.‬
‭●‬ ‭It was prevalent in India till 1967.‬
‭Need:‬
‭●‬ ‭NITI AAYOG:‬‭India is continuous in election mode. Between two general elections 5 to 7‬
‭assembly elections take place every year. In addition, by-election and local body elections‬
‭also take place.‬
‭●‬ ‭Expenditure:‬‭No cap on party expenditure results in high spendings in elections. E.g.‬
‭60,000 cr spent in 2019 general elections.‬
‭●‬ ‭Policy paralysis:‬‭Frequent application of Model Code of Conduct disrupts government‬
‭functions and civic life.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭●‬ ‭Saving resources:‬‭It makes perfect sense as the same voter, booth, and security staff in‬
‭both elections.‬
‭●‬ ‭Social harmony:‬‭During election time, the rivalry regarding communalism and casteism‬
‭becomes common.‬
‭●‬ ‭Sustainable development:‬‭Frequent elections forces politicians to focus on short-term‬
‭reforms.‬
‭●‬ ‭Global experiences:‬‭Countries like South Africa, Sweden are following the process of one‬
‭nation one election.‬
‭Arguments Against Simultaneous Elections:‬
‭●‬ ‭Practical difficulties:‬‭It requires reduction or expansion of terms of various assemblies‬
‭which will not be supported either by many political parties.‬
‭●‬ ‭Constitutional hurdles:‬‭Article 83 and Article 172 does not provide fixed tenure for LS and‬
‭assemblies, hence, the policy of one election is needed for synchronisation.‬
‭●‬ ‭Anti-federalism:‬‭Ill informed voters' choices may lead to National issues impacting the‬
‭electorate's behaviour for voting in State Assembly elections and vice versa.‬
‭●‬ ‭Reduces accountability:‬‭Frequent elections keep politicians in touch with voters and ensure‬
‭necessary course correction by the government.‬
‭●‬ ‭Grassroot economy:‬‭Many jobs get created during the election which gives a boost to the‬
‭grassroots level economy‬
‭●‬ ‭False arguments related to MCC:‬‭It stops only new schemes. Even new schemes with‬
‭urgent public importance can be launched with EC approval.‬
‭●‬ ‭Alternative reforms:‬‭Reforms like a cap on party expenditure state funding of elections,‬
‭33-35 days poll durations, and raising of mor battalion for security are more feasible and‬
‭effective‬
‭Way Forward:‬
‭Law commission has recommended the following ways to address hurdles:‬
‭●‬ ‭Amendment to constitution and RPA,1951:‬‭New Lok Sabha and assembly, constituted‬
‭after midterm elections, shall be only for the remainder of the term. The no-confidence‬
‭motion may be replaced with a constructive vote of no-confidence suggesting alternatives.‬
‭●‬ ‭Anti-defection law:‬‭The Commission recommended that appropriate amendments be made‬
‭to anti-defection laws to ensure that all disqualification issues (arising from defection) are‬
‭decided by the presiding officer within six months.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭A Single Voters’ List‬
‭Recent Context:‬‭PMO, ECI, and the law commission are checking the possibility of having a‬
‭common electoral roll for PRI, ULBs, state assembly, and the Lok Sabha elections.‬

‭Types of voter’s list‬ ‭Reasons for the demand for a single‬ ‭Challenges‬
‭voter’s list‬

‭●‬ ‭Some state laws‬ ‭●‬ ‭Saving resources:‬‭Combined with‬ ‭●‬ ‭Against the spirit of‬
‭allow SECs to‬ ‭simultaneous elections, it prevents‬ ‭Federalism.‬
‭borrow ECI’s‬ ‭duplication of efforts.‬ ‭●‬ ‭Persuading state‬
‭electoral roll.‬ ‭●‬ ‭Voter's convenience:‬‭It saves the‬ ‭government's to‬
‭●‬ ‭Some SECs repair‬ ‭efforts of voters to register twice.‬ ‭change state laws to‬
‭and revise their roll‬ ‭Also, avoid confusion created due‬ ‭use ECl electoral‬
‭with ECIs electoral‬ ‭to missing names from one of‬ ‭rolls.‬
‭roll as a base.‬ ‭the lists.‬ ‭●‬ ‭The difference in‬
‭●‬ ‭Some states have‬ ‭●‬ ‭It is supported by the Law‬ ‭boundaries of EC's‬
‭their electoral rolls‬ ‭commission in 2015 and ECI in‬ ‭polling station and‬
‭and do not adopt‬ ‭1999.‬ ‭Ward.‬
‭EC's roll for local‬ ‭●‬ ‭Constitutional feasibility:‬
‭body polls.‬ ‭Amendment to Article 243K and‬
‭243ZA to make it mandatory for‬
‭all SECs to use ECl electoral roll.‬

‭Electronic Voting Machine (EVM)‬


‭●‬ ‭EVM consists of a‬‭control unit with a polling officer and the balloting unit in the voting‬
‭compartment‬‭where the voter casts vote in secret.‬
‭●‬ ‭EVMs in India are manufactured by‬‭Electronics Corporation of India Ltd and Bharat‬
‭Electronics Limited.‬
‭●‬ ‭Legal provision:‬‭RPA,1951 amended in 1988 allows the use of EvM for conducting elections.‬
‭Advantages of using EVM over Paper Ballot:‬
‭●‬ ‭The integrity of election:‬‭Various safety features of EVMs combined with various safety‬
‭procedures ensures a free and fair election which is the bedrock of democracy‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭●‬ ‭Time-saving:‬‭Electronic voting and electronic counting ensure that people can get official‬
‭election results within hours instead of weeks.‬
‭●‬ ‭Transparency:‬‭EVMs can be audited by all parties, citizens, and election commissions at‬
‭every stage.‬
‭Concerns regarding EVMs:‬
‭●‬ ‭Mistrust:‬‭Even the possibility of hacking creates mistrust about EVM and undermines the‬
‭credibility of ECI.‬
‭●‬ ‭Malfunctioning:‬‭Many incidents have been witnessed where EVMs stopped responding due‬
‭to various reasons including negligence of officers.‬
‭●‬ ‭Undermines democratic values:‬
‭○‬ ‭Transparency:‬‭Display and vote stored may not be the same‬
‭○‬ ‭Verifiability:‬‭VVPAT auditing is done in only one EVMs per constituency.‬
‭○‬ ‭Secrecy:‬‭Vote counting is done booth-wise without using a totalizer machine.‬
‭○‬ ‭International experience:‬‭Technologically advanced countries like Germany has‬
‭banned EVM on the concern about transparency‬
‭Way Forward:‬
‭●‬ ‭Totalizer Machines:‬‭It increases the secrecy of voting by counting votes polled at 14‬
‭polling booths together unlike present booth-wise results.‬
‭●‬ ‭Safety demonstration:‬‭ECI shall arrange a hackathon as done in 2017 where it challenged‬
‭people to demonstrate hacking of EVMs.‬
‭●‬ ‭Human resources:‬‭ECI shall train all its workforce to handle any issue arising in EVM at‬
‭the polling station.‬

‭None Of The Above (NOTA)‬


‭●‬ ‭NOTA, or None Of The Above, is an option on the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) that‬
‭allows voters to‬‭register their discontent with available options of candidates.‬
‭●‬ ‭SC in People's Union for Civil Liberties vs. Union of India, 2013 conferred the right to‬
‭negative vote which leads to the inclusion of NOTA in the ballot list.‬
‭Limitations of NOTA‬
‭●‬ ‭NOTA in India doesn't provide the right to reject.‬
‭●‬ ‭ECI has no power to call a fresh election even if NOTA secures the highest votes.‬
‭Significance of NOTA‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭●‬ ‭Fundamental right:‬‭NOTA ensures that people exercise their freedom of expression and‬
‭right to liberty in the political sphere through their consent or discontent to candidates‬
‭●‬ ‭The credibility of election:‬‭Maximum voter turnout increases the credibility of the‬
‭election. People opting for NOTA instead of abstaining from voting ensures maximum voter‬
‭turnout.‬
‭●‬ ‭Moral pressure:‬‭In the absence of inner-party democracy, the voter has no role in choosing‬
‭election candidates. Hence by rejecting candidates people make their voices heard.‬
‭●‬ ‭Supreme court:‬‭Negative voting could bring about "a systemic change in polls and political‬
‭parties will be forced to project clean candidates".‬
‭●‬ ‭Increasing voting share:‬‭Factors like criminalization of political parties, opaqueness in the‬
‭functioning of political parties and increased awareness among voters has increased vote‬
‭share of NOTA.‬
‭Example:‬‭1.04% in the 2019 LS election.‬

‭Model Code of Conduct (MCC)‬


‭●‬ ‭These are a set of guidelines laid down by ECI to govern the conduct of political parties‬
‭and candidates in the run-up to an election.‬
‭Legal Backing‬
‭●‬ ‭Article 324:‬‭Power of ECI to supervise elections to the Parliament and state legislatures.‬
‭●‬ ‭Supreme court:‬‭SC laid down MCC in Union of India vs. Harbans Sigh Jalal and Others‬
‭Case‬
‭Evolution of MCC:‬
‭●‬ ‭1960:‬‭State administration prepared a Code of Conduct for political actors.‬
‭●‬ ‭1962:‬‭ECI made code for all recognized political parties and state government Suboptimal‬
‭implementation of MCC till 1991.‬
‭●‬ ‭Post-1991:‬‭ECI used its power to rebuke politicians, postponing elections for violation of‬
‭MCC. Due to stringent actions, political parties started to take it seriously.‬
‭Challenges:‬
‭●‬ ‭Social Media:‬‭It has Increased access to non-regulated social media leads to making‬
‭campaign-related stuff viral, bringing in celebrities to influence people, etc.‬
‭○‬ ‭This is used to spread unverified and deliberate fake news using tools like a deep‬
‭fake.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭○‬ ‭It is difficult to identify the perpetrators.‬
‭○‬ ‭The Election Commission lacks resources as well as surveillance capacity to‬
‭implement and punish the violation of MCC.‬
‭●‬ ‭Election Expenditure:‬‭Latest tools like block chain technology, digital payments and tools‬
‭like electoral bonds have made tracing money trails and poll expenditure difficult.‬
‭●‬ ‭Reduced Transparency:‬‭Increased use of social media for political advertisements, reduced‬
‭transparency in functioning and donation of political parties.‬
‭Way Forward:‬
‭●‬ ‭Fake news:‬‭Create a clear set of goals and impose a hefty fine per view of an ad that‬
‭breaks the rules.‬
‭●‬ ‭Regulate social media:‬‭Ensure that social media strictly follows a voluntary code of ethics‬
‭that insists on transparency in political ads.‬
‭●‬ ‭Electioneering in the digital world:‬‭More steps like all candidates are to provide details of‬
‭their social media accounts to the commission and take prior approval for all political‬
‭advertisements on social media.‬
‭●‬ ‭Independence of ECI:‬‭To ensure the independence of ECI a separate secretariat to ECI‬
‭should be provided, as well as collegium should be formed for the appointment of all‬
‭election commissioners.‬
‭Shall MCC be legally enforceable?‬
‭●‬ ‭MCC is not enforceable by law. Certain provisions of the MCC are enforceable through‬
‭provisions of other acts such as the IPC, 1860, CrPC, 1973, and RPA, 1951.‬
‭●‬ ‭The Standing Committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice‬
‭recommended making the MCC legally binding and recommended that the MCC be made a‬
‭part of the RPA 1951.‬
‭●‬ ‭ECI has opposed this with the reason that elections must be completed in a short time‬
‭and judicial proceedings take longer time, therefore it is not feasible to make it enforceable‬
‭by law.‬

‭Election Funding‬
‭RPA Provisions:‬
‭●‬ ‭Section 29B:‬‭Parties to accept voluntary contributions from any person/company, except a‬
‭Government Company.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭●‬ ‭Section 29C:‬‭Political parties declare donations that exceed 20,000 rupees by submitting a‬
‭report to ECI. Failure to do so makes them ineligible for tax relief under the Income Tax‬
‭Act, 1961.‬
‭Methods used to raise political funds:‬
‭I.‬ ‭Individual:‬‭From individual under section 29B‬
‭II.‬ ‭State funding:‬
‭A.‬ ‭Direct Funding: Not allowed‬
‭B.‬ ‭Indirect Funding: Free access to state media, public places for rallies etc.‬
‭III.‬ ‭Corporate funding:‬‭It is governed by Companies Act, 2013 which provides that the‬
‭company should be at least three years old to donate only after the approval of the Board‬
‭of Directors.‬
‭IV.‬ ‭Electoral Trust:‬‭Non profit company for orderly receipt of contribution from any source. It‬
‭shall donate 95% of their income to the registered political parties.‬
‭Expected consequences of Election funding:‬
‭I.‬ ‭Criminalisation of politics‬
‭II.‬ ‭Political inequality: Money power determines legal rule instead of concerns for all.‬
‭III.‬ ‭Quid Pro Quo:‬‭Donors can ask back favours.‬
‭IV.‬ ‭No free and free elections, political outcomes will solely determined by the money power.‬
‭Challenges with election funding:‬
‭●‬ ‭Lack of transparency:‬‭The Majority of funding to political parties is received through‬
‭opaque sources like electoral bonds, anonymous donations through cash, etc.‬
‭●‬ ‭Legal loopholes:‬‭There are various gaps in Indian rules, the benefit of which political parties‬
‭take to avoid any kind of reporting. E.g. Exemption to political parties from income tax.‬
‭●‬ ‭Bribes:‬‭No power with ECI to take action if parties bribe voters of a constituency.‬
‭●‬ ‭Hamper economy:‬‭Hidden sources of funding result in more spending of funds in election‬
‭campaigns, thus impacting the economy of the country.‬

‭Electoral Bond‬
‭●‬ ‭The electoral bonds were introduced with the Finance Bill (2017). On January 29, 2018 the‬
‭Narendra Modi-led NDA government notified the‬‭Electoral Bond Scheme 2018.‬
‭●‬ ‭An electoral bond is like a promissory note that can be bought by any Indian citizen or‬
‭company incorporated in India from select branches of State Bank of India.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭●‬ ‭The citizen or corporate can then donate the same to any eligible political party of his/her‬
‭choice.‬
‭●‬ ‭The bonds are similar to bank notes that are payable to the bearer on demand and are‬
‭free of interest.‬
‭●‬ ‭An individual or party will be allowed to purchase these bonds digitally or through cheque.‬
‭●‬ ‭However, this scheme was held unconstitutional by the Supreme court in the case of‬
‭Association for Democratic Reform v. Union of India, and held that the Electoral Bond‬
‭Scheme was unconstitutional for violating the right to information of voters.‬

‭Right to Recall‬
‭●‬ ‭It is a tool of direct democracy whereby the electorate has the power to remove the‬
‭elected officials before the expiry of their terms.‬
‭●‬ ‭Procedure:‬‭Particular percentage of voters (Usually 50%) have to give in writing that they‬
‭have to initiate proceedings.‬
‭●‬ ‭This is followed by a secret ballot.‬
‭●‬ ‭If it receives a specified limit (Usually 2/3 rd votes) then the person stands removed from‬
‭his position.‬
‭Advantages:‬
‭●‬ ‭Strengthen democracy:‬‭Free and fair elections are the right of the citizen. If a‬
‭representative loses the support of people for any reason then he should be removed‬
‭●‬ ‭Increases accountability:‬‭This too will ensure greater accountability of representatives‬
‭which is a true edifice of democracy.‬
‭●‬ ‭Check on the criminalization of politics:‬‭The right to recall will act as a significant check‬
‭on corruption and discourage criminal candidates from contesting an election.‬
‭●‬ ‭Reduces election expenditure:‬‭Morally skewed candidates will limit campaign spending‬
‭with a fear of being recalled.‬
‭●‬ ‭Better delivery of services:‬‭Non-performance being the primary criteria to use the right to‬
‭recall, Election promises would be fulfilled by the representative.‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬
‭Comparison of Indian and USA Election Commission:‬

‭PW Web/App:‬‭https://smart.link/7wwosivoicgd4‬

You might also like