0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views3 pages

2024 - UC4 Inglés Curricular

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views3 pages

2024 - UC4 Inglés Curricular

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Juan Luis Fuentes Reche

UC 4 – Inglés en el curriculum

Assessment and Evaluation Processes for the Didactic Unit on Environmental Awareness and
Sustainability

1. Test to Evaluate Students’ Proficiency Level


Format: The test will consist of 20 questions, including multiple-choice, true/false, and short-
answer formats to assess comprehension of vocabulary, grammar usage (present simple and future
tenses), and general knowledge about environmental issues.
• Examples:
• Multiple-choice: "What is the best definition of 'renewable energy'?"
• True/False: "Recycling helps reduce waste and pollution." (True/False)
• Short-answer: "Name two ways to reduce plastic pollution in your community."
Justification: This mixed-format test ensures a comprehensive evaluation of students’ knowledge
and language skills, while catering to different learning styles. It provides a clear overview of each
student's understanding and retention of key concepts in an objective and straightforward manner.

2. Examples of Continuous Assessment


Example 1: Group Project – Environmental Poster Creation
• Description: Students work in groups to create a poster showcasing three practical actions
to protect the environment.
• Assessment Criteria:
• Relevance and accuracy of information
• Use of environmental vocabulary
• Creativity and visual presentation
• Collaboration and teamwork
• Justification: This continuous assessment activity fosters collaborative learning and
practical application of vocabulary and grammar. It encourages creativity while engaging
with real-life environmental issues.
Example 2: Reading Comprehension Activity
• Description: Students read a short text on recycling and highlight key points, followed by a
group discussion about their interpretations.
• Assessment Criteria:
• Comprehension and summarization skills
• Participation and engagement during the discussion
• Ability to connect text content with real-world implications
• Justification: Continuous engagement through reading helps students develop
comprehension skills and connect theoretical knowledge to practical discussions, thereby
improving language acquisition and critical thinking.

1
Juan Luis Fuentes Reche

3. Self-Assessment Example
Activity: Reflective Journal on Environmental Actions
• Description: At the end of the unit, students complete a self-assessment form reflecting on
their learning and actions they can take to help the environment.
• Criteria for Reflection:
• Identification of new vocabulary and grammar learned
• Description of personal efforts to improve sustainability
• Self-evaluation of participation in discussions and group activities
• Personal goals for continued environmental improvement

• Justification: This activity encourages students to reflect on their learning process,


promoting self-awareness and fostering a sense of accountability for their environmental
impact.

4. Detailed Rubric for Evaluating Communication Skills in Presentations


Level 4
Criterion Level 1 (Low) Level 2 (Basic) Level 3 (Good)
(Excellent)
Some structure Very clear, well-
Presentation is Generally clear
Clarity and and clarity; may structured, and
disorganized, unclear, with a good flow
Structure have moments of logically
and hard to follow. of ideas.
confusion. organized.
Appropriate
Limited use of relevant Basic use of Extensive and
Use of vocabulary usage
vocabulary; frequent vocabulary, with accurate
Vocabulary with minor
errors. some errors. vocabulary use.
errors.
Speech is hard to Speech is
Mostly clear and
Pronunciation understand; many somewhat clear; Clear, fluent, and
fluent speech,
and Fluency pauses and some errors and confident delivery.
few errors.
mispronunciations. hesitations.
Engages the Excellent
Moderate
Engagement Little to no engagement; audience with engagement;
engagement;
with Audience minimal eye contact. good eye contact strong connection
some eye contact.
and questions. with the audience.

Justification: This rubric ensures a structured assessment of communication skills during


presentations, focusing on clarity, use of vocabulary, pronunciation, and audience interaction. It
provides both the teacher and students with clear expectations and feedback on their oral
communication skills.

2
Juan Luis Fuentes Reche

Overall Assessment Criteria


• Participation: Active involvement in discussions, group activities, and presentations.
• Quality of Work: Creativity, accuracy, and adherence to environmental topics in projects
and written work.
• Peer Collaboration: Ability to work effectively in groups.
• Reflective Writing: Thoughtful engagement with self-assessment and reflection activities.

You might also like