0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views5 pages

Certificate: Product Tested Certificate Holder

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
97 views5 pages

Certificate: Product Tested Certificate Holder

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Certificate

No.: 968/V 1194.00/20

Product tested Butterfly Valves Certificate Chongqing ChuanYi


holder Control Valve Co., Ltd.
No.879 Caihe road,
Caijiagang town, Beibei
district
Chongqing
P.R. China

Type designation - VBJG, VBJG-300002, VBJG-300012, VBJG-300001, VBJG-300011, VB500,


VB400, VBJG-400, VBJGB, VBJG-300102, VBJG-300101
- VBD, VBJG-600, VBS, VBJG-20000, VBJ, VBJG-20001
- VBSF, VBM
- VB100, VB100-412, VB100-422, VB100-210, VB100-211, VB100-220,
VB100-221

Codes and standards IEC 61508 Parts 1-2 and 4-7:2010

Intended application Safety functions:


- Close on demand and external tightness
- Close on demand with leakage rate as per GB/T 4213 and external tightness
- Open on demand and external tightness

The valves are suitable for use in a safety instrumented system up to SIL 2 (low
10/222 12. 12 E A4 ® TÜV, TUEV and TUV are registered trademarks. Utilisation and application requires prior approval.

demand mode). Under consideration of the minimum required hardware fault

Tel.: +49 221 806-1790, Fax: +49 221 806-1539, E-Mail: [email protected]
tolerance HFT = 1 the valves may be used in a redundant architecture up to SIL 3.

TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH, Am Grauen Stein, 51105 Köln / Germany
Specific requirements The instructions of the associated Installation, Operating and Safety Manual shall
be considered.

Summary of test results see page 2 to 5 of this certificate.

Valid until 2025-11-25

The issue of this certificate is based upon an evaluation in accordance with the Certification Program
CERT FSP1 V1.0:2017 in its actual version, whose results are documented in Report No. 968/V 1194.00/20 dated
2020-11-24. This certificate is valid only for products, which are identical with the product tested.

Köln, 2020-11-25 Certification Body Safety & Security for Automation & Grid Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Wolf Rückwart

www.fs-products.com

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)


968/V 1194.00/20 - page 2

Holder: Chongqing ChuanYi Control Valve Co., Ltd.


No.879 Caihe road, Caijiagang town, Beibei district,
Chongqing,
P.R. China

Product tested: Butterfly Valves; Group I: Triple eccentric and


quadruple eccentric butterfly valves
VBJG, VBJG-300002, VBJG-300012, VBJG-300001,
VBJG-300011, VB500, VB400, VBJG-400, VBJGB,
VBJG-300102, VBJG-300101

Results of Assessment
Route of Assessment 2H / 1S
Type of Sub-system Type A
Mode of Operation Low Demand Mode
Hardware Fault Tolerance HFT 0
Systematic Capability SC 3

Close on demand and external tightness


Dangerous Failure Rate λD 3.66 E-07 / h 366 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 1.63 E-03
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 1.66 E-04

Close on demand with leakage rate as per GB/T 4213 and external tightness
Dangerous Failure Rate λD 4.40 E-07 / h 440 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 1.96 E-03
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 2.00 E-04

Open on demand and external tightness


Dangerous Failure Rate λD 3.64 E-07 / h 364 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 1.62 E-03
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 1.65 E-04
Assumptions for the calculations above: DC = 0 %, T 1 = 1 year, MRT = 72 h, β1oo2 = 10 %

Origin of failure rates


The stated failure rates for low demand are the result of an FMEDA with tailored failure rates for the design
and manufacturing process.
Furthermore the results have been verified by field-feedback data.
Failure rates include failures that occur at a random point in time and are due to degradation mechanisms
such as ageing.
The stated failure rates do not release the end-user from collecting and evaluating application-specific
reliability data.

Periodic Tests and Maintenance


The given values require periodic tests and maintenance as described in the Safety Manual.
The operator is responsible for the consideration of specific external conditions (e.g. ensuring of required
quality of media, max. temperature, time of impact), and adequate test cycles.

TP-4800; Rev. 5.0 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH, Am Grauen Stein, 51105 Köln /
Germany
968/V 1194.00/20 - page 3

Holder: Chongqing ChuanYi Control Valve Co., Ltd.


No.879 Caihe road, Caijiagang town, Beibei district,
Chongqing,
P.R. China

Product tested: Butterfly Valves; Group II: Face sealing and double
eccentric butterfly valve
VBD, VBJG-600, VBS, VBJG-20000, VBJ, VBJG-
20001

Results of Assessment
Route of Assessment 2H / 1S
Type of Sub-system Type A
Mode of Operation Low Demand Mode
Hardware Fault Tolerance HFT 0
Systematic Capability SC 3

Close on demand and external tightness


Dangerous Failure Rate λD 2.15 E-07 / h 215 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 9.57 E-04
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 9.67 E-05

Close on demand with leakage rate as per GB/T 4213 and external tightness
Dangerous Failure Rate λD 2.88 E-07 / h 288 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 1.28 E-03
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 1.30 E-04

Open on demand and external tightness


Dangerous Failure Rate λD 2.09 E-07 / h 209 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 9.30 E-04
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 9.40 E-05
Assumptions for the calculations above: DC = 0 %, T 1 = 1 year, MRT = 72 h, β1oo2 = 10 %

Origin of failure rates


The stated failure rates for low demand are the result of an FMEDA with tailored failure rates for the design
and manufacturing process.
Furthermore the results have been verified by field-feedback data.
Failure rates include failures that occur at a random point in time and are due to degradation mechanisms
such as ageing.
The stated failure rates do not release the end-user from collecting and evaluating application-specific
reliability data.

Periodic Tests and Maintenance


The given values require periodic tests and maintenance as described in the Safety Manual.
The operator is responsible for the consideration of specific external conditions (e.g. ensuring of required
quality of media, max. temperature, time of impact), and adequate test cycles.

TP-4800; Rev. 5.0 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH, Am Grauen Stein, 51105 Köln /
Germany
968/V 1194.00/20 - page 4

Holder: Chongqing ChuanYi Control Valve Co., Ltd.


No.879 Caihe road, Caijiagang town, Beibei district,
Chongqing,
P.R. China

Product tested: Butterfly Valves; Group III: rubber-coated and fluorine-


coated butterfly valve
VBSF, VBM

Results of Assessment
Route of Assessment 2H / 1S
Type of Sub-system Type A
Mode of Operation Low Demand Mode
Hardware Fault Tolerance HFT 0
Systematic Capability SC 3

Close on demand and external tightness


Dangerous Failure Rate λD 5.04 E-07 / h 504 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 2.24 E-03
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 2.30 E-04

Close on demand with leakage rate as per GB/T 4213 and external tightness
Dangerous Failure Rate λD 6.26 E-07 / h 626 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 2.79 E-03
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 2.87 E-04

Open on demand and external tightness


Dangerous Failure Rate λD 4.99 E-07 / h 499 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 2.22 E-03
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 2.28 E-04
Assumptions for the calculations above: DC = 0 %, T 1 = 1 year, MRT = 72 h, β1oo2 = 10 %

Origin of failure rates


The stated failure rates for low demand are the result of an FMEDA with tailored failure rates for the design
and manufacturing process.
Furthermore the results have been verified by field-feedback data.
Failure rates include failures that occur at a random point in time and are due to degradation mechanisms
such as ageing.
The stated failure rates do not release the end-user from collecting and evaluating application-specific
reliability data.

Periodic Tests and Maintenance


The given values require periodic tests and maintenance as described in the Safety Manual.
The operator is responsible for the consideration of specific external conditions (e.g. ensuring of required
quality of media, max. temperature, time of impact), and adequate test cycles.

TP-4800; Rev. 5.0 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH, Am Grauen Stein, 51105 Köln /
Germany
968/V 1194.00/20 - page 5

Holder: Chongqing ChuanYi Control Valve Co., Ltd.


No.879 Caihe road, Caijiagang town, Beibei district,
Chongqing,
P.R. China

Product tested: Butterfly Valves; Group IV: Ultra-low temperature


butterfly valve
VB100, VB100-412, VB100-422, VB100-210, VB100-
211, VB100-220, VB100-221

Results of Assessment
Route of Assessment 2H / 1S
Type of Sub-system Type A
Mode of Operation Low Demand Mode
Hardware Fault Tolerance HFT 0
Systematic Capability SC 3

Close on demand and external tightness


Dangerous Failure Rate λD 4.08 E-07 / h 408 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 1.82 E-03
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 1.85 E-04

Close on demand with leakage rate as per GB/T 4213 and external tightness
Dangerous Failure Rate λD 5.89 E-07 / h 589 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 2.62 E-03
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 2.70 E-04

Open on demand and external tightness


Dangerous Failure Rate λD 3.45 E-07 / h 345 FIT
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo1 PFDavg(T1) 1.54 E-03
Average Probability of Failure on Demand 1oo2 PFDavg(T1) 1.56 E-04
Assumptions for the calculations above: DC = 0 %, T 1 = 1 year, MRT = 72 h, β1oo2 = 10 %

Origin of failure rates


The stated failure rates for low demand are the result of an FMEDA with tailored failure rates for the design
and manufacturing process.
Furthermore the results have been verified by field-feedback data.
Failure rates include failures that occur at a random point in time and are due to degradation mechanisms
such as ageing.
The stated failure rates do not release the end-user from collecting and evaluating application-specific
reliability data.

Periodic Tests and Maintenance


The given values require periodic tests and maintenance as described in the Safety Manual.
The operator is responsible for the consideration of specific external conditions (e.g. ensuring of required
quality of media, max. temperature, time of impact), and adequate test cycles.

TP-4800; Rev. 5.0 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH, Am Grauen Stein, 51105 Köln /
Germany

You might also like