Types of tendering
Types of tendering
Name ID No.
1 Bethlehem Ashenafi etr/8113/10
i
Acknowledgment
In writing this assignment, we had to take the help and guidance of some respected people, who
deserve our greatest gratitude. We would like to extend our gratitude to Mr. Teklebirhan for
giving us a good guideline for the assignment through numerous carefully planned consultations.
We would also like to expand our deepest gratitude to all those who have directly and indirectly
guided us in writing this assignment.
The contribution of each and every team member was significant as the many valuable
comments and suggestions that were made have served as an inspiration to further improve and
develop the content of the assignment.
ii
Abstract
iii
Table of Contents
1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................6
2. Background of Tendering............................................................................................................6
iv
3.1 Tender or bid regulations in Ethiopia..................................................................................12
4. Conclusion.................................................................................................................................20
Reference.......................................................................................................................................21
v
1. Introduction
The term tender formally means an invitation to trade under the terms of offer, while the term
contract is used when two parties have reached agreement.
The tendering process is highly regulated for government projects, but it can be less formal for
private projects. However, it follows more or less the same procedure.
2. Background of Tendering
2
2.2 Types of tendering
Advantage
Disadvantage
The wrong contractor may be chosen because the background can be unknown
Client must bear expensive cost of tendering
It consumes additional time
The contractor who submits the lowest tender is generally awarded the contract; however, they
are chosen for their expertise and experiences
Advantages
Disadvantages
3
Favoritism may occur throughout the shortlisting process
Under this method only one contractor is approached; following the completion of the design,
the contractor will price the bill of quantities and then enter into a negotiation with the quantity
surveyor.
Advantage
Disadvantage
The cost of work is likely to be higher than the cost of a competitive tender
It reduces the amount of work available to other contractors
Serial tendering may use where the client has a regular program of works that they would like to
be undertaken by a single contractor, often minor works, repetitive works (such as housing) or
maintenance work.
Advantage
4
Disadvantage
Tender Form
Special and general terms and condition
Specification and tender drawings
Bill of quantities (BOQ)
Labor laws and clauses
EHS clause
BIM Protocol ( in case of large & complex project)
If the tender of the contractor is rejected, the money is returned to the contractor immediately,
otherwise, it is adjusted at the time of final payment to the contractor.
5
This deposit is kept as a check so that the conditions of the contract that are agreed upon are
fulfilled and the work is completed to the satisfaction of the authorities within time. This money
can be forbidden by the employer if progress and the quality of the work are not up to the mark.
These drawings are different from GFC ( good for construction) drawings and are only given for
reference purposes.
Federal Government in Ethiopia is the major purchaser of construction. And the tendering
process for award of construction projects in Ethiopia is usually based on the lowest-bidding
method. In this method, the firm which is responsive and submits the lowest bid, gets the right
for the construction project. It is generally accepted that competitive lowest bidding method
saves public money and protects public interest. (Mebratu)
There are definite benefits and drawbacks to the low-bid award system. Promoting competition
amongst contractors, compelling contractors to lower their costs, usually through innovation are
clear benefits to the process. In addition, the process is beneficial specifically to the public sector
because of the transparency, an important criterion of public policy. However, allowing projects
to be awarded based on the least price has inherent flaws. Delays in meeting the contract
duration, increment of the final project cost due to high variations, tendency to compromise
6
quality, and adversarial relationship among contracting parties are the major drawbacks
associated with low-bid award procedure. (Mebratu)
1. Require any information, documents, records and reports in respect of any aspect of the
public procurement process where a breach, wrongdoing, mismanagement or collusions has
been alleged, reported or proven against any public body;
2. Summon witnesses, call for the production of books of accounts, plans, documents and
examine witnesses and parties concerned on oath;
3. Give warning to or suspend for a definite or indefinite period of time from participating in
public procurement፡ candidates, suppliers or persons involved in the disposal of public
property where it proves that they have offered a price higher than the market or committed
an act contravening the provisions of the Proclamation and the directives issued by the
Minister;
4. Conduct audit on its own program or cause audit to be conducted where it receives
allegations of misconduct warranting such audit on a process of public procurement and
property administration;
5. Up on the request of public bodies, exceptionally and when justified on sound grounds, may
permit the use of a procedure which is not consistent with the procedures laid down by the
Proclamation or the procurement directives.
7
works equal percentage points are resulted for bidders offering similar price and quality,
preference shall be given to local goods, services or companies.
Other than the above preference, a public body must not discriminate potential candidates on the
basis of nationality, race or any other criterion not having to do with their qualifications.
The language used in a national bid (which doesn’t involve international bidders) is Amharic.
However, if it is found to facilitate the procurement process, the public body concerned may
authorize the use of English language in the preparation of bid documents and bid proposals in a
national bid in which only local bidders participate, provided that such an act is not prejudicial to
fair competition. English language is also used for international bids.
a. that they possess the necessary professional and technical qualifications and competence,
financial resources, equipment and other physical facilities, managerial capability,
experience in the procurement object, reputation, and the personnel, to perform the contract;
b. that they have the legal capacity to enter into the contract;
c. that they are not insolvent, in receivership, bankrupt or being wound up, their business
activities have not been suspended, and they are not the subject of legal proceedings for any
of the foregoing;
d. subject to the directives that are issued by the Ministry, that they are registered in the
suppliers list;
8
e. that the period for which they were suspended from participating in public procurement is
over;
f. that they have renewed trade license and fulfilled their obligations to pay taxes according to
Ethiopian tax laws;
g. that they have a bank account
The above stated requirements along those established by the public body should be set forth in
the bid documents or other documents for solicitation of proposals, and should apply equally to
all candidates.
Note, that the submission of false, inaccurate or incomplete information would disqualify such
candidate.
The bid should also contain technical specifications and descriptions laying down the
characteristics of the goods or services to be procured. In particular, the bid should clearly
describe public body’s requirement with respect the quality, performance, safety and where
necessary dimensions, symbols, terminology, packaging, marking and labeling, or the processes
and methods of production and requirements relating to conformity assessment procedures.
a. there is proof of error in the procurement proceeding which could affect the outcome of the
bid;
b. it is ascertained that the procurement has no use in enabling the public body to obtain a better
technical or economic advantage as a result of a change of work plan or another alternative
representing a better option to meet the requirement of the public body;
c. bidders fail to meet the minimum criteria set forth in the bid document;
d. the minimum price offered in the bid does not match with the market price circulated by the
Agency and the public body expected that it can get a better price advantage by re-
advertising the bid;
9
e. the price offered by the successful bidder exceeds the budgetary allocation made for the
procurement and the public body cannot make up for the deficiency from any other source;
f. It is proved that the bidding is not sufficiently competitive as a result of connivance among
candidates.
Public bodies have to give notice to candidates forth with disclosing the reasons for rejecting
bids, proposals or quotations wholly or partially. However, they are not required to justify the
reasons. If the decision to reject all bids results before the opening date and time, the bids
received shall be returned unopened to the candidates submitting them.
Apart from the standard bidding document, an invitation to bid should include the following
particulars:
10
Bidding Document
A bid may also be deemed as unfit if it has failed to demonstrate the qualification requirements
(discussed earlier or see article 28 of the Proclamation)
a. The bid that is found to be responsive to the technical requirements and with the lowest
evaluated price;
11
b. If the bidding document sets a preference for potential candidates who offer a better
economic advantage then such bidder will become successful.
c. Where it is ascertained in post evaluation of bids that the legal, financial and technical
standing of the candidate selected as the successful bidder conforms to the requirements
stated in the bidding document.
1. When it is not feasible for the public body to formulate detailed specifications for the
goods or works and in the case of services, to identify their characteristics and, in order to
obtain the most satisfactory solution to its procurement needs;
2. When the public body seeks to enter into a contract for the purpose of research,
experiment, study or development, except where the contract includes the production of
goods in quantities sufficient to establish their commercial viability or to recover research
and development costs;
3. Where bid proceedings are initiated but no bids are submitted as a result of the nature of
the object of procurement not being clearly described or where all bids are rejected due to
failure on the part of the public body concerned to draw up a clear and complete
specification; or
4. Because of the technical character of the required goods or works or because of the
nature of the consultancy or other services it is necessary for the public body to negotiate
with the suppliers.
12
Two-stage bidding as its name denotes involves two stages.
In the first stage the public body prepares a solicitation documents that call upon suppliers to
submit their proposals without a tender price. The solicitation documents may also solicit
proposal relating to the technical, quality or other characteristics of the goods, works or services
as well as to contractual terms and conditions of supply, and where relevant the professional and
technical competence and qualifications of the suppliers.
The public body, then, identify responsive bids by evaluating the proposals submitted by the
bidders at the first stage of the bid proceeding against its requirements. The public body may
without prejudice to their intellectual property rights at the first stage hold discussion with the
candidates on the content of their proposals.
Next, the public body draws up a specification which is more appropriate to its requirements on
the basis of the evaluation against the requirements of the proposals submitted to it at the first
stage of the bid proceeding. It then proceed to communicate the revised specification to the
candidates who submitted responsible bids at the first stage and invite such candidates to submit
proposals on the basis of the revised specification.
Therefore, the second stage commences upon the invitation to bid based on the revised
specifications. A supplier not wishing to participate in the second stage of tendering in
accordance with the reformulated specification may withdraw from the proceeding. Note that
article 43 of the proclamation, dealing with examination and evaluation on open tender, is also
applicable to two-stage bidding.
1. It is a ascertained that the required object of procurement is available only with limited
suppliers;
2. The cost of procurement does not exceed a certain threshold to be specified in a directive to
be issued by the Minister; or
13
3. Where a repeated advertisement of the invitation to bid fails to attract bidders.
Restricted tendering procedures are the same as those applied in open tendering, except that:
Where the object of procurement is available only with limited suppliers the invitation to bid
is sent to all such suppliers. Therefore such bid is not subjected to advertisement.
If restricted tendering is used for the reason stated above in bulletin 2 and 3, the invitation to
bid shall as far as possible be sent to limited suppliers chosen from among those registered in
the suppliers list on the basis of the following consideration:
Any selection shall allow opportunities for suppliers on the list,
The number of suppliers to whom the invitation to bid is sent shall be such that it is sufficient
to ensure effective competition and shall not as far as possible be less than five competitors.
4. Conclusion
14
Reference
Mebratu, S. (n.d.). Tender aluation System for Public Building Projects in Ethiopia.
Melese, D. (17 March 2009). How to Participate in Government Tender or bid in Ethiopia:
Regulations and Procedures. General Info.
15