Potwar Plateau Drainage Analysis
Potwar Plateau Drainage Analysis
net/publication/215467808
Drainage network and lineament analysis: An approach for Potwar Plateau (Northern
Pakistan)
Article in Journal of Mountain Science · February 2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-009-0206-4
CITATIONS READS
59 2,348
3 authors:
            Richard Gloaguen
                                                           Helmholtz Institute Freiberg of Resource Technology
                                                           404 PUBLICATIONS 8,638 CITATIONS
                SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Richard Gloaguen on 28 May 2014.
 Remote Sensing Group, Institute of Geology, Freiberg University of Mining and Technology, Freiberg, 09599,
        Germany.                                        lineaments from DEM is strongly positive in
                                                       the area within 1 km of radius.
       *Corresponding Author:
       [email protected]
                                                       Keywords: Drainage network; lineaments;
                                                       stream profile analysis; uplift rate; local
                                                       correlation
14
                                                                          J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
 Figure 1 Generalized tectonic map of India-Eurasia collision zone (Pivnik and Wells
1996). The study area is represented by red rectangle and shown in Figure2. PP: the
Potwar Plateau; KP: Kohat Plateau; MMT: Main Mantle Thrust; HKS: Hazara Kashmir
Syntaxis. Green dashed line represents geographical boundary of Pakistan with China
and
area information as a function of spatial        correlation between drainage network and
locations. We analyzed these individually        lineaments for this propose. This local
extracted stream profiles and thus the           correlation showed the influence of
whole drainage network by using stream           lineaments on nearby streams and is
power law of scaling relation. The stream        strongly positive in the area within 1 km
profile analysis helped us to calculate          radius, i.e., the lineaments within 1 km
geomorphic indices and uplift rates of           radius of any stream strongly influence
each stream under certain assumptions.           their presence.
The streams in NPDZ indicated high
Afghanistan.
                                                                                                  15
J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
1    Tectonic Settings of the Area             (Jadoon et al. 1997, Moghal et al. 2003,
                                               Monalisa et al. 2002).
     The collisional zones are important for
the formation of fold and thrust belts. The
Himalayan fold and thrust belt was
produced due to the thrusting of the
Indian plate beneath the Eurasian plate
during Himalayan orogeny. This orogeny
consists of Main Karakoram Thrust (MKT),
i.e., Shyok Suture zone, Main Mantle
Thrust (MMT),
i.e., Indus Suture zone, Main Central
Thrust (MCT),
Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) and Salt
Range Thrust (SRT) as major tectonic
boundaries. Due to this continuous
orogenic process the stress started
shifting towards the Main Central Thrust
(MCT) and Main Boundary Thrust (MBT),
respectively. The northwestern part of this
mountain belt refers as northwestern
Himalayan fold and thrust belt (NWHFTB),
and is shown in Figure 2. The NWHFTB
consists of the terrain from MMT to SRT,
while Hazara Kashmir Syntaxes and
Nanga Parbat Haramosh Massif mark its
eastern boundary. The western limit of this
fold and thrust belt is marked by some
thrust faults in the eastern Afghanistan.
This area consists of thin skinned tectonic
features of Eocene time (Baker et al. 1988,
Jadoon and Frisch 1997, Jadoon et al.
1997, Jan et al. 2005, Kazmi and Jan.
1997, Khan et al. 1986, Monalisa et al.
2002, Monalisa et al. 2007).
     The Potwar Plateau is structurally
complex and seismically less active part of
NWHFTB. It extends from the Main
Boundary Thrust (MBT) in the north to the
Salt Range Thrust in the south, while the
Jehlum Fault and Kalabagh Fault mark
their eastern and western boundaries,
respectively. This plateau contains surface
representation of most of the subsurface
structures which help us to study them
with remote sensing technology. But in
most of the cases, the surface features do
not reflect the subsurface structure due to
structural complexity. The structural
complexity of the area is well distributed
in eastern, middle and western section
16
                                                                            J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
      Figure 2 Tectonic map of the study area. The major tectonic subdivisions are clearly
                                                                                 marked,
      i.e., the Northern Potwar Deformed Zone (NPDZ) and Southern Potwar Platform Zone
                                                                                (SPPZ).
                                                                                                    17
J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
      Figure 3 Transient-state profile between initial low-uplift and final high-uplift zones. The
     knick zone which is represented by knickpoints migrates upstream as the channel responds
     to the uplift-rate change. This migration is dependent upon the lithology of both units
     and/or fault activity. The inset
        shows the slope vs. drainage area data for the longitudinal profiles in which the channel
     concavity θ is the same for both the initial and final profiles, while the steepness, ks, is
     considerably higher for the final profile. This figure is modified from that of Snyder et al.
     (2000).
                                                                      19
J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
where U and E represent uplift and             using the concavity index of upper
erosion rates, respectively. K represents      segment of each stream. Normalized
erosion efficiency factor which is directly    steepness index is calculated using this
related to sediments and rock strength, A      mean concavity or a regionally estimated
is upstream drainage area and S is             concavity index. The uplift rate as shown
channel slope. The constants m and n are       in equation 4 is a function of normalized
dependent on basin hydrology, hydraulic        steepness index ksn, constants n and K. We
geometry and erosion process. dz/dt            can calculate the uplift rates in the area
represents the changing rate of elevation      by assuming constant values of n and K
with respect to time and if landscape is in    which can be obtained from already
steady-state condition, then it is equal to    available studies (Anderson et al. 1994,
0. Thus for a steady state landscape,          Seidl and Dietrich 1992, Tucker and
equation 1 can be written as:                  Slingerland 1996, Wobus et al. 2006).
                         1/ n
                                               Knickpoints      are     important    tool   to
                                               understand the landscape response to a
                     ⎛U ⎞     m/ n
                                               base level fall and the corresponding
                S        =⎜          ⎟    A    sediment      fluxes      from     rejuvenated
                     (2) ⎝ K ⎠                 catchments. We identified those points on
                                               individual stream profiles and hence their
where m/n shows the concavity of the           spatial distribution is available in map
profile and coefficient         (    )
                             U /K 1/ n is      view to see the tectonic behavior (Bishop
steepness of the profile. Power function       et al. 2005).
for stream gradients is represented by             We prepared the lineament database
                                               of the area using Hough transformation to
                                               study this relationship (Gloaguen et al.
         S =ksA−θ                        (3)
                                               2007). We calculated
                                               the attitude of these extracted lineaments
where θ and ks are concavity and
                                               and streams of the drainage network. We
steepness indices, respectively. They can
                                               prepared the rose diagrams of the
be measured directly by regression
                                               lineaments and drainage network to
analysis of data as shown in equation 3,
                                               observe their inter-relationship. In order
i.e., area and slope (Howard 1994,
                                               to perform the detailed analysis we
Montgomery et al. 1996, Schoenbohm et
                                               calculated the correlation between the
al. 2004, Snyder et al. 2000, Whipple
                                               drainage network and lineaments because
2004, Wobus et al. 2006). By combining
                                               we still did not know the quantitative
equations 2 and 3 we can get a useful
                                               relationship between flow directions of
relationship for calculating uplift rates.
                                               rivers    and      fault    alignment.     This
                                               correlation could help us understand the
         U =ksnnK                        (4)   influence of lineaments on the drainage or
                                               vice versa. For this reason we compared
where ksn is normalized steepness index.       the local correlation between DEM
This equation gives us uplift rate for the     extracted     lineaments       and    drainage
area with steady state landscape by            network of the area respectively. To
choosing appropriate values of m, n and K.     calculate these parameter two different
Stream profile analysis is implemented on      line systems A1 and A2 are to be
the selected trends of each stream for         considered:
calculating     channel        parameters.
Geomorphic parameters, i.e., concavity                    A1 = Drainage system
and steepness values are calculated after                 A2 = Lineaments system
logarithmic regression analysis of area
and slope values of a selected trend. The
mean concavity index is calculated by
20
                                                                        J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
     The line densities (intensities) λ 1 and   These stream profiles show the difference
λ2 of these two systems are measured            between initial low-uplift and final high-
first:                                          uplift zone as shown in Figure 3. By using
                                                stream power law the data obtained for
                       ⎡length(A1)⎤             steepness and concavity indices mostly
                  =⎢            ⎥               give similar information, because a
             λ1         ⎣   Area ⎦              downstream      transition   between     two
(5)                                             different steepness values is normally
                                                bridged by a zone of very high or low
where length (A1) is the total line length of
                                                concavity. However the channel concavity
the drainage system and line density is
                                                θ remains the same for both the initial and
measured in inverse of distance, i.e., [Km] -
1
                                                final profiles, while the steepness, ks,
  . The reduced covariance C12 gives the
                                                becomes considerably higher for the final
expected total line length of A2 measured
                                                profile (Snyder et al. 2000). In other
in a circle with radius r. The circle is
                                                words, the general low concavities of
placed at any point belonging to A1. The
                                                streams indicate downstream increases in
C12 is well approximated by moving the
                                                either incision rate or change in rock
circle at regular intervals along A2,
                                                strength. The sharpness of the knickpoints
measuring total fault lengths inside, and
                                                gives relative information that how the
calculating the expected value over all
                                                more recent tectonics or river capture
measuring     points.     C12     completely
                                                events had occurred. In general, the
describes the correlation between faults
                                                sharper the knickpoints, the more recently
and streams (Clark and Wilson 1994,
                                                it developed (Wobus et al. 2006).
Grassberger and Procaccia 1983, Stoyan
                                                     We have studied the Swan River which
and Stoyan 1983).
                                                bisects the Potwar Plateau into two parts.
                                                The extracted streams and lineaments are
                                                located on both sides of the river as shown
    G12(r) =⎡⎢   drd
                       C12(r)⎤−1          (6)   in Figure 8. We have studied all the
                                                streams and main channel by stream
                                   ⎥
                                                power law. The analysis of three
                       ⎣ 2πrλ2 ⎦                prominent streams, i.e., Main Swan River,
                                                Stream A in NPDZ and Stream B in SPPZ
    G12 is a local correlation coefficient
                                                is discussed here in details. Figure 4
and is a function of radius r. We plotted
                                                shows the stream profile analysis of the
these computed values of G12 vs. r and
                                                Swan River.      This is a three segment
connected the points. This graph shows us
                                                channel and represents relict landscape.
the influence of drainage system over the
                                                The presence of active tectonic features is
lineaments and vice versa.
                                                observed with the help of two knickpoints.
                                                The
3     Results and Discussions                   first knickpoint shows the presence of
                                                Main Boundary thrust while the second
                                                point is right after the end of the Rawal
    The        principle       goal       of    Lake which is another import geomorphic
tectonogeomorphology      is    to  extract     feature in the vicinity of Islamabad along
tectonic information from the longitudinal      Murree Road. This profile observes three
profiles. These profiles contain tectonic       trends based on the morphological
information in the form of knickpoints and      observation, i.e., an upper segment,
their Strahler order as well. In any profile    middle segment and lower segment. The
the knickpoints migrates upstream or            upper     segment    travels   over    relict
downstream as the channel responds to           landscape with low steepness index 70.1
the tectonic changes or the change of the       and uniform concavity index 0.31, which
lithology along the path of the stream.         mean that they have been less eroded
                                                                                                21
J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
during the recent erosion processes. The      respectively to understand the lineament
middle segment shows intermediate             behavior, shown in Figure 5 and 6. The
concavity 1.75 and steepness 56.63, which     morphology of both streams consists of
shows that the area has undergone             two segments with identified knickpoints.
intermediate erosion process or uplift. The   The first segment of Stream A shows relict
lower segment suggests higher concavity       landscape with no or very little erosion,
and lower steepness indices, i.e., 2.71 and   but after crossing the Khairi Murat Fault it
36.2. Along the downstream of the river,      shows high concavity and steepness
the sudden change in the geomorphic           indices. Stream B is flowing in SPPZ and
indices shows gradual change in lithology     has higher concavity values from 0.99 to
and tectonic activity. The eastern section    1.08. But both segments have almost
of the river has high steepness values and    equal values of steepness index of 9.8 and
because steepness is directly proportional    9.5 which are generally very low. As the
to uplift rate it means that we have more     values of steepness are directly related to
deformation processes working on eastern      uplift, thus comparing these values to
section as compared to central or western     those of Stream A we can conclude that
section. Previous studies also suggest that   NPDZ is more deformed and is uplifting,
the eastern section is more deformed and      while SPPZ is more stable. The detailed
this   deformation    decreases     towards   concavity and steepness values are shown
central and western section of the plateau    in Table.    This table shows increasing
(Moghal et al. 2003). We studied streams      normalized steepness and concavity from
A and B from NPDZ and SPPZ,                   the upper, middle to lower
segments, and high variability of concavity indices steepness index is calculated with a
fixed mean in the middle segments and normalized steepness concavity value of 0.45.
indices in the upper segment. The normalized
     Figure 4 Stream profile analysis of the Swan River. It clearly shows that the two main
     knickpoints and three clear segments are identified. This helps us separate the Eastern,
     Western and Central Potwar.
22
                                                                            J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
 Figure 5 Stream profile analysis of Stream A from NPDZ. It clearly shows that the
location of Khairi Murat Fault is identified by the two main knickpoints.
 Figure 6 Stream profile analysis of Stream B from SPPZ. It is a two segment profile
showing very less variation in steepness.
                                                                                                    23
J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
24
                                                                                J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
     Figure 7 Uplift rate map of the area showing uplift values (cm/yr). Distribution of the uplift
rates   and knickpoints helps us not only quantify the amount of deformation, but also separate
eastern,       central and western sections.
Figure 8 Lineaments and drainage network map. These are extracted from DEM.
                                                                                                        25
J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24
the slope-area data are assessed in the                      source of this influence is thin skinned
context with other geological information                    tectonics of the area.
at hand. In the case of the Potwar Plateau,
the eastern section of strong deformation
could be identified.                                         Acknowledgements
26
 J. Mt. Sci. (2009) 6: 14–24