CanDo Descriptors Alternate
CanDo Descriptors Alternate
WIDA Alternate
Can Do Descriptors
WIDA is housed within the Wisconsin Center for Education Research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
© 2024 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of WIDA
Español
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON
Contents
Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Comparison Between the Alternate Proficiency Level Descriptors and the Alternate Can Do Descriptors. . . . . . . . . . . 4
Alternate Proficiency Level Descriptors and Alternate Can Do Descriptors Comparison. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Conceptually, as illustrated in Figure 1, WIDA Standard 1 (Language for Social and Instructional Purposes) is designed to integrate with Standards 2–5 (Language
for Language Arts, Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies), emphasizing the use of everyday language as a springboard to co-construct meaning making in
academic discussions and explorations (Shafer Willner, Kray, & Gottlieb, 2021).
Both the Alt PLDs and the Alt Can Dos are resources that align to the WIDA English Language Development Standards Framework, 2020 Edition. Educators can
use these resources to aid in interpreting results from WIDA alternate assessments, enhance their pedagogy to allow for meaningful student participation, and
monitor the language and communication progress of multilingual learners with the most significant cognitive disabilities.
Although the Alt PLDs and the Alt Can Dos are separate resources and have unique purposes, they work together to help describe what English language
development could look like for multilingual learners with the most significant cognitive disabilities. The table below compares the two tools.
Describes… • Growth in interpretive and expressive language across • Examples of how multilingual learners process and use language for
levels of English language proficiency development each communication mode, ELD standard and proficiency level by
• Progression of linguistic complexity and vocabulary grade cluster
development • Examples of what multilingual learners with significant cognitive
disabilities can do at varying levels of English language proficiency
Grade Band Not grade level or band specific Grade band specific
Academic Content-area agnostic Organized by five WIDA Standards: Language for Social and
Content Instructional Purposes, Language for Language Arts, Language for
Mathematics, Language for Science, and Language for Social Studies
Scaffold/ Cumulative progressions, with each proficiency level building A progression of increasingly greater language development required
Progression on the previous one to accomplish the task in English, but the tasks and activities do not
scaffold across the proficiency levels
Potential Uses • Use as guide for understanding typical patterns of • Understand what students at different levels of language proficiency
language development can do with language
• Show how language development grows over time to the • Expand understanding of what the process of language
next level of language complexity development can look like
• Scaffold learning and resources across all levels of • Support collaboration and scaffolding to help students engage in
language proficiency content-area learning and develop language at the same time
• Score Alternate ACCESS Speaking and Writing domains • Differentiate instruction and classroom assessment for language
• Interpret Alternate ACCESS scores
IN
TE
RP
RE
+V
TI
Listening
V
ie
E
wi
ng
Writing MODES OF Reading
COMMUNICATION
+R
ep
Speaking
re
EX
s
en
P
tin
RE
g
SS
IV
E
The Alt PLDs are written along three dimensions of language use: discourse, sentence, and word/phrase.
• The discourse dimension communicates overall meaning across an entire text, including how a language user constructs, communicates, or understands the
overall message conveyed, including its organization, connectedness, and degree of detail.
• For multilingual learners with the most significant cognitive disabilities, this also includes the sentence dimension as an indication of grammatical complexity
of clause structures (i.e., chunks of language, and simple, compound, or complex sentences).
• The discourse dimension is supported by the word/phrase dimension, which adds precision and specificity to communication. Like all language learners,
multilingual learners with the most significant cognitive disabilities may often use high-frequency words, but as language develops, they can use and interpret
cross-disciplinary and content-area specific language to express ideas and interpret concepts. The precision of student communication is also impacted by the
degree to which it is embedded in context.
Educators can use the Alt PLDs to understand characteristics of language development at various levels of language proficiency in interpretive and expressive
communication. This can help educators to scaffold learning and resources across levels of English language and communication proficiency, by recognizing where
students are now and where they need to go next. However, as the Alt PLDs are not grade-level or grade-band specific, they must be interpreted with the lens of
grade- and developmental-level appropriateness.
Expressive Interpretive
…multilingual learners with significant …multilingual learners with significant
cognitive disabilities will produce… cognitive disabilities will interpret and respond to…
End of • Connected ideas with recognizable organization, including • Connected ideas with recognizable organization, including
Level 5 connectors and details connectors and details
Bridging • Simple and compound, connected sentence(s) • A variety of sentences (e.g., simple, compound, and complex
• A growing selection of everyday and content-area words and sentences)
phrases within and across familiar and novel social and academic • A growing selection of everyday and content-area words and
contexts phrases within and across familiar and novel social and academic
contexts
End of • Connected ideas with emerging details • Connected ideas with emerging details
Level 4 • Simple, connected sentence(s) • Simple and compound, connected sentence(s)
Expanding • A selection of everyday and content-area words and phrases • A selection of everyday and content-area words and phrases
applicable in familiar social and academic contexts applicable in familiar and novel social and academic contexts
End of • Familiar ideas with occasional details • Familiar ideas with occasional details
Level 3 • Spoken simple sentences and written chunks of language, • Simple, connected sentence(s)
Developing phrases, or simple clauses (e.g., subject + verb) • High-frequency, familiar words and phrases as part of routine and
• High-frequency, familiar words and phrases as part of routine and familiar social and academic contexts
familiar social and academic contexts
End of • Intentional communication of familiar ideas with attempted • Intentional communication of familiar ideas with attempted
Level 2 details details
Emerging • Spoken chunks of language, phrases, or simple clauses (e.g., • Chunks of language, phrases, or simple clauses (e.g., subject +
subject + verb) and written word(s) verb)
• High-frequency, familiar words and phrases relying on concrete, • High-frequency, familiar words and phrases relying on concrete,
immediate social and academic contexts immediate social and academic contexts
The Alt Can Dos describe what multilingual learners at each of the language development levels can do with communication and language in
English at each of the levels in relation to a learning task. The Alt Can Dos provide examples of a language tasks or activities, and the Alt PLDs
describe the type and amount of language expected to achieve the task or activity in English at a given proficiency level. Thus, the Alt Can Dos
and the Alt PLDs work together to support educators’ understanding of language development at each level.
When developing the Alternate Can Dos, a variety of state alternate academic achievement standards were referenced to determine
appropriate classroom expectations for multilingual learners with significant cognitive disabilities and to provide context for the Alt Can Do
Descriptors. The Alt Can Dos are not exhaustive but are meant to help guide the planning and conversation around meaningful participation of
language learners in standards-based curriculum, instruction, and assessment. The descriptors are a sampling of the language expectations as
students develop in English language proficiency. The sample activities do not necessarily build on each other across proficiency levels. In fact,
the Alt Can Dos in a single strand may be on different topics to provide multiple example topics in each standard and language domain within
the interpretive and expressive modes of communication.
Identify a feeling Make a request using simple Tell about a hobby or interest Identify ways to help a Explain why something is
words and gestures classmate liked or disliked
Sort letter tiles Write their name Talk about an event from a Share information from a Recount similarities and
familiar story familiar book differences in two stories
Count to 10 Sort and count objects (e.g., Describe an object in Compare the length of two Explain how to solve a simple
toy bears) the physical world using basic classroom objects (e.g., math problem from a picture
geometric shapes ruler and pencil) or real objects
Name an attribute of an List multiple attributes of an Describe the qualities of Compare attributes of similar Describe one way people can
object (color, size, shape, object things that grow objects protect natural resources
weight, buoyancy)
Name symbols on a map Share life events or activities Sequence events or activities Share simple observations of Explain what a particular
(compass rose, roads) using visual supports community helpers community helper does
Say "no" to refuse or disagree Label emotions Describe friendly actions Ask questions to understand Add on to the ideas of others
in appropriate contexts a peer's lived experience
Use words, pictures and/or Answer who or what Compare and contrast List details that support main Create a message that
actions to demonstrate how a questions about the text characters using sentence idea recounts events or personal
character in a story is feeling frames experiences
Name the hours or minutes Compare single digit and State the value of coins using Ask questions about data on Make comparative
on a digital clock double-digit numbers a simple sentence a graph statements about data using
a picture graph
Name parts of a model that Describe the different parts Produce simple statements Compare items or substances Explain cause and effect
show what plants need to of a model about cause-and-effect using weights or measures relationships using a model
grow (e.g., water, sun) relationships in familiar contexts
Label items on a graph Provide an example from Describe community jobs Describe physical Compare and contrast
informational text based upon pictures characteristics of different differences between now and
landforms on a map the past
Match feeling words to their Identify words, symbols, or Indicate who to get help from Respond to the comments or Apply ideas from oral
representation characteristics that represent based on a description ideas of others discussions to new situations
their community
Choose correct emotion in Demonstrate understanding Determine a character’s Sequence the parts of a Describe events that occur
response to a character from of new vocabulary attributes from a text familiar story due to an action in a text
a text
Identify angles in a shape Demonstrate the sum of Illustrate division when Use an object, visual, or model Identify shapes in response
number combinations up prompted to divide into fair to demonstrate comprehension to a sentence description of
to 10 based on an oral or equal shares of fraction words such as half, defining attributes
description fourth, third, and tenth
Identify elements (e.g., Organize objects or items Follow two-step instructions Follow multi-step instructions Identify changes or
temperatures, rainfall) of data according to their descriptions to measure the weight of to create a model explanations of causal
in a graph or chart of weight presented in oral or objects relationships based on
written text descriptions of data
Identify environmental Respond to who, what, where, Match job descriptions Sequence pictures based on Compare and contrast
symbols in the school and when questions when looking (simple sentence) with oral or written texts members of the community
community at a map corresponding pictures and their roles/responsibilities
Alternate Proficiency Level Descriptors (Alt PLDs) are detailed articulations of the growth in interpretive (listening and reading) and expressive language
(speaking and writing) for multilingual learners with the most significant cognitive disabilities across five levels of English proficiency.
Alternative modes of communication can be systems or devices that support communication efforts of students with language impairments or significant
cognitive disabilities. These systems can include augmentative and assistive communication (AAC) options, such as picture books, picture cards, or computerized
speech-generating devices, to name a few (Huff & Christensen, 2018).
Communication is a social event that requires sending and receiving messages with shared understanding of meaning. The tools for communication can include
body movements, such as hand gestures or facial expressions (e.g., smiling or frowning), and symbols and sounds (e.g., grunts, phrases, and words; Huff &
Christensen, 2018).
Communication modes refer to a consolidated and more inclusive way of defining the four traditional language domains of listening, reading, speaking, and
writing in the WIDA English Language Development Standards Framework’s Language Expectations and Proficiency Level Descriptors (WIDA, 2020). Specifically,
the WIDA ELD Standards Framework consolidates the four language domains into two communication modes: interpretive and expressive.
Conveyed expressions refers to information that is shared through acts of communication, such as oral, written, or sign language; images; voice; body
positioning; or symbols on augmentative and assistive communication devices or sounds.
Cross-disciplinary language is used in the Word/Phrase Dimension of the Alt PLDs. This term refers to common academic language used across content areas.
Examples of this kind of general academic language include analyze, evaluate, critique, and identify. (In the 2012 edition of the WIDA ELD Standards Framework,
this term was labeled as specific language.)
Discipline-specific language is used in the Word/Phrase Dimension of the Alt PLDs. This term refers to how language is used in distinctive ways within each
discipline or field. For example, words like substitute and intersect have particular meanings for mathematics; defense and goal have meanings specific to physical
education. (In the 2012 edition of the WIDA ELD Standards Framework, this term was labeled as technical language.)
Everyday language is used in the Word/Phrase Dimension of the Alt PLDs. In some ways similar to Tier 1 language, this term refers to non-technical language,
such as puppies instead of canines,or plussing instead of addition. (In the 2012 edition of the WIDA ELD Standards Framework, this term was labeled as general
language.)
Interpretive communication mode includes reading, listening, and viewing. For multilingual students with the most significant cognitive disabilities, the
expectations for the interpretive mode include processing, understanding, interpreting, and evaluating spoken language, symbols, written language, and text in a
variety of situations (Christensen, Mitchell, & Burton 2021).
Key Language Uses refer to the four broad patterns of academic language used across content areas (Narrate, Inform, Explain, Argue) within the WIDA ELD
Standards. They are defined in the following ways:
• Narrate: Language to convey real or imaginary experiences through stories and histories. Narratives can serve many purposes, including to
instruct, entertain, teach, or support persuasion.
• Inform: Language to provide factual information. As students convey information, they define, describe, compare, contrast, organize, categorize, or
classify concepts, ideas, or phenomena.
• Explain: Language to account for how things work or why things happen. As students explain, they substantiate the inner workings of natural,
human made, and social phenomena.
• Argue: Language to justify claims using evidence and reasoning. Argue can be used to advance or defend an idea or solution, change the audience’s
point of view, bring about action, or accept a position or evaluation of an issue.
Language is a structured and shared form of communication, such as spoken and written words, figures, characters, and gestures, or a combination of these.
Language includes rules that dictate word order, tense, social use, and these apply differently depending on the culture in which the language is used (Huff &
Christensen, 2018).
Mode refers to a meaning-making system that includes such elements as oral and written language, symbols, charts, tables, graphs, images, videos, voice, body
positioning, and sounds. See communication modes.
Multilingual learners with the most significant cognitive disabilities are students in the K–12 educational system who have been identified as English
learners per federal guidelines and who have one or more disabilities that significantly limit their intellectual functioning and adaptive behavior as documented in
their individualized education programs (IEPs; Christensen, Gholson, & Shyyan, 2018).
Representing is an expressive mode of communication to create meanings using images, graphic representations, movement, video, graphics, or other visual
means.
Christensen, L., Mitchell, J., & Burton, K. (2021, November 13). The development of alternate can do descriptors for ELs with the most significant cognitive
disabilities [Conference presentation]. Indiana Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (INTESOL) Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
Huff, L., & Christensen, L. L. (2018, September). The role of language and communication in the education of English learners with significant cognitive disabilities
(ALTELLA Brief No. 7). University of Wisconsin–Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research, Alternate English Language Learning Assessment project.
http://altella.wceruw.org/resources.html
Shafer Willner, L., Kray, F., & Gottlieb, M. (2021). What’s the same and what’s been updated in the WIDA English Language Development Standards Framework,
2020 Edition. MinneTESOL Journal, 37(2). https://minnetesoljournal.org/whats-the-same-and-whats-been-updated-in-the-wida-english-language-
development-standards-framework-2020-edition/
WIDA. (2020). WIDA English language development standards framework, 2020 edition: Kindergarten–grade 12. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin
System.
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON