Predictive Maintenance For Industrial Equipment (REPORT)
Predictive Maintenance For Industrial Equipment (REPORT)
Missing Values: Missing values were addressed using appropriate data imputation
techniques.
Categorical Encoding: Converted categorical variables, such as "Maintenance History"
and "Failure," into numerical representations (Yes → 1, No → 0).
Date Conversion: The 'Timestamp' column was standardized into a datetime format,
correcting any errors in the data.
Applied feature scaling to numerical variables like Temperature, Pressure, and Vibration
to standardize the values, ensuring that they contribute proportionately to the model's
predictions.
3. Feature Engineering
3.1 New Feature Creation
To enhance the model's predictive capabilities, the following features were engineered:
These features were designed to highlight trends and anomalies in the machine's performance,
which could be indicative of potential failures.
4. Model Development
4.1 Model Selection
Multiple machine learning models were developed and evaluated for predicting equipment
failures:
Each model was trained using an 80% training and 20% testing split of the dataset, and their
performance was evaluated using the following metrics:
4.3 Analysis
The Support Vector Machine (SVM) outperformed the other models with an accuracy of 0.60
and an F1-score of 0.67, indicating it was the most effective at both identifying and predicting
machine failures. The ensemble model, which combined predictions from Gradient Boosting and
XGBoost, provided moderate improvement over individual models in terms of precision but had
a similar recall rate.
Hyperparameter tuning was performed to optimize the performance of the models, specifically
for the Random Forest, XGBoost, and Gradient Boosting models. The results of the tuning
process are summarized below:
XGBoost showed the most significant improvement after tuning, with an accuracy of
0.55 and an F1-score of 0.55.
The Ensemble Model demonstrated consistent performance, maintaining the highest
precision and recall balance after tuning.
This method leveraged the strengths of both models, resulting in an ensemble accuracy of
0.91 with an F1-Score of 0.89, indicating improved reliability in predicting machine
failures.
7. Predictive Maintenance Strategy
1. Proactive Maintenance Scheduling:
o High-risk machines (failure probability > 70%): Immediate maintenance is
scheduled to prevent downtime.
o Medium-risk machines (failure probability 40-70%): Maintenance is scheduled
during the next operational downtime to prevent failure in the near future.
o Low-risk machines (failure probability < 40%): Continue with routine
maintenance intervals based on operational hours or manufacturer
recommendations.
2. Maintenance Intervals Based on Operational Hours:
o For machines that are not flagged for immediate maintenance, set maintenance
intervals based on operational hours. Machines with higher operational hours
should be maintained more frequently.
o Example: Machines operating 10,000 hours or more should be inspected every
1,000 hours, while machines with fewer hours can be inspected every 2,000
hours.
3. Alert System:
o Set up alerts to notify maintenance teams when:
A machine crosses a predefined failure probability threshold.
Sudden spikes in temperature, pressure, or vibration are detected.
4. Stress Factor Monitoring:
o Machines that regularly experience high operational stress (e.g., above the 75th
percentile for vibration or pressure) should have their maintenance intervals
reduced by 25%. This ensures that high-stress machines are not left unchecked for
long periods.
Scatter plots were used to display the relationship between failure probability and various
machine parameters like temperature, pressure, and vibration.
These visualizations helped identify the thresholds at which machines are more likely to
fail, aiding in the formulation of maintenance schedules.
8.3 Model Performance Charts
Confusion matrices and ROC curves for each model were plotted to visualize their
performance.
Feature importance graphs indicated that temperature and vibration were the most critical
features influencing failure predictions.
9. Conclusion
The predictive maintenance models developed for this project, particularly the SVM and the tuned
XGBoost model, provided valuable insights into machine failure patterns. Despite moderate accuracy
levels, these models can still play a crucial role in reducing downtime through early failure detection and
optimized maintenance scheduling.