소비자와 개인정보의 역설
소비자와 개인정보의 역설
Often [overlooking / overlooked]1), but just as [an important / important a]2) stakeholder, is the consumer
who plays a large role in the notion of the privacy paradox. Consumer engagement levels in all manner
of digital experiences and communities [has / have]3) simply exploded ― and they show little or no signs
of slowing. There is an awareness among consumers, not only that their personal data helps [to drive /
어법 driving]4) the rich experiences that these companies provide, but also that sharing this data is the price
어휘 you pay for these experiences, in whole or in part. Without a better understanding of the what, when,
선택 and why of data collection and use, the consumer is often [leaving / left]5) feeling [vulnerable /
vulnerably]6) and [conflicting / conflicted]7). “I love this restaurant-finder app on my phone, but what
[happens / is happened]8) to my data if I press ‘ok’ when [asking / asked]9) if that app can use my
current location?” [Arming / Armed]10) with tools that can provide them options, the consumer moves
from [active / passive]11) bystander to [active / passive]12) participant.
Often overlooked13), but just as important a stakeholder, is the consumer who plays a large role in the
notion of the privacy14) paradox. Consumer engagement levels in all manner15) of digital experiences and
communities have simply exploded16) ― and they show little or no signs of slowing. There is an
awareness17) among consumers, not only that their personal data helps to drive18) the rich experiences
빈칸 that these companies provide, but also that sharing this data is the price19) you pay for these
넣기 experiences, in whole or in part. Without a better understanding of the what, when, and why of data
collection and use, the consumer is often left feeling vulnerable20) and conflicted21). “I love this
restaurant-finder app on my phone, but what happens to my data if I press ‘ok’ when asked if that app
can use my current location22)?” Armed with23) tools that can provide them options24), the consumer
moves from passive25) bystander to active26) participant.
28)
중요도 1 ★☆☆
A key assumption in consumer societies [has / have]1) been the idea [which / that]2) “money buys
happiness.” Historically, there is a good reason for this assumption ― until the last [few / little]3)
generations, a majority of people [has / have]4) lived close to subsistence, so an [increase / decrease]5) in
income brought genuine increases in material well-being (e.g., food, shelter, health care) and this has
produced more happiness. [However / Therefore]6), in a number of developed nations, levels of material
어법 well-being [has / have]7) moved beyond subsistence to unprecedented abundance. Developed nations
어휘 have had several generations of unparalleled material prosperity, and a clear understanding is [emerging /
선택 emerged]8): More money does bring [more / less]9) happiness when we are [living / lived]10) on a very
[high / low]11) income. [However / For example]12), as a global average, when per capita income [reaches
/ reaches at]13) the range of $13,000 per year, additional income adds [absolutely / relatively]14) little to
our happiness, while other factors such as personal freedom, meaningful work, and social tolerance [add /
adds]15) [much / very]16) more. Often, a doubling or tripling of income in developed nations [has / hav
e]17) not led to an [decrease / increase]18) in perceived well-being.
A key assumption19) in consumer societies has been the idea that “money buys happiness.” Historically,
there is a good reason for this assumption ― until the last few generations20) a majority21) of people
have lived close to subsistence22), so an increase in income brought genuine23) increases in material
well-being (e.g., food, shelter, health care) and this has produced24) more happiness. However, in a
number of developed nations, levels of material well-being have moved beyond subsistence25) to
빈칸
unprecedented26) abundance. Developed nations have had several generations of unparalleled27) material
넣기
prosperity28), and a clear understanding is emerging29): More money does bring more happiness when
we are living on a very low30) income. However, as a global average, when per capita income reaches the
range31) of $13,000 per year, additional32) income adds relatively little33) to our happiness, while other
factors such as personal freedom, meaningful work, and social tolerance34) add much more. Often, a
doubling or tripling of income in developed nations has not led to an increase in perceived35) well-being.
A key assumption in consumer societies has been the idea that “money buys happiness.” Historically,
there is a good reason for this assumption ― until the last few generations, ❶ 대다수 사람이 최저 생계
에 가깝게 살아왔기 때문에, 소득 증가는 물질적 복지(예를 들어, 음식, 주거, 의료)의 진정한 향상을 가져왔으
며, 이는 더 많은 행복을 낳았다. However, in a number of developed nations, levels of material well-being
have moved beyond subsistence to unprecedented abundance. Developed nations have had several
generations of unparalleled material prosperity, and a clear understanding is emerging: ❷ 낮은 수입으로
생활할 때는 더 많은 돈이 더 많은 행복을 가져온다는 것이다. However, as a global average, when per
capita income reaches the range of $13,000 per year, additional income adds relatively little to our
happiness, while other factors such as personal freedom, meaningful work, and social tolerance add much
more. Often, a doubling or tripling of income in developed nations has not led to an increase in
perceived well-being.
서술형 밑줄 친 ❶의 우리말과 같도록 아래 단어들을 문맥과 어법에 맞게 배열하시오. [변형 없음]
대비 <보기> so / a majority / and / has / this / more / have lived / material well-being (e.g., food,
shelter, health care) / an increase / happiness / produced / genuine increases / in /
1 subsistence, / close to / of / in income / people / brought
36)
37)
중요도 2 ★★☆
We are [wiring / wired]1) more for the struggle for survival on the savannah than we [are / do]2) for
urban life. [As a result / Therefore]3), “Situations are constantly [evaluating / evaluated]4) as good or bad,
[requiring / required]5) escape or permitting approach.” In everyday life, this means [that / what]6) our
aversion to losses [are / is]7) naturally greater than our attraction to gain (by a factor of two). We have
어법
an inbuilt mechanism to give priority to [bad / good]8) news. Our brains are [setting / set]9) up to detect
어휘
a predator in a fraction of a second, [much / very]10) quicker than the part of the brain that
선택
acknowledges one has been seen. That is why we can act before we even “know” we are acting. “Threats
are [privileging / privileged]11) above opportunities,” Kahneman says. This natural tendency means that we
“overweight” [likely / unlikely]12) events, such as [catching / being caught]13) in a terrorist attack. It also
leads to us [to overestimate / overestimating]14) our chances of winning the lottery.
We are wired15) more for the struggle for survival16) on the savannah than we are for urban17) life. As a
result, “Situations are constantly evaluated18) as good or bad, requiring escape19) or permitting20)
approach.” In everyday life, this means that our aversion21) to losses is naturally greater than our
attraction22) to gain (by a factor of two). We have an inbuilt23) mechanism to give priority24) to bad news.
빈칸
Our brains are set up to detect25) a predator in a fraction26) of a second, much quicker than the part of
넣기
the brain that acknowledges27) one has been seen. That is why we can act before we even “know” we
are acting. “Threats are privileged28) above opportunities,” Kahneman says. This natural tendency29) means
that we “overweight30)” unlikely events, such as being caught in a terrorist attack. It also leads to us
overestimating31) our chances of winning the lottery.
We are wired more for the struggle for survival on the savannah than we are for urban life. As a result,
“Situations are constantly evaluated as good or bad, requiring escape or permitting approach.” In
everyday life, this means that ❶ 손실에 대한 우리의 혐오가 당연히 이득에 대한 우리의 끌림보다 (두 배)
더 크다. We have an inbuilt mechanism to give priority to bad news. Our brains are set up to detect a
predator in a fraction of a second, much quicker than the part of the brain that acknowledges one has
been seen. That is why we can act before we even “know” we are acting. “Threats are privileged above
opportunities,” Kahneman says. ❷ 이런 타고난 성향은 우리가 테러리스트 공격에 처하는 것 같은 일어날 것
같지 않은 사건들을 ‘지나치게 중시한다’는 것을 의미한다. It also leads to us overestimating our chances of
winning the lottery.
1 / naturally / than / to
32)
<보기> such as / natural / unlikely / “overweight” / caught / events, / means / a terrorist attack
33)
중요도 3 ★★☆
It is not only through our actions [that / which]1) we can give life meaning ― insofar as we can [answer
/ answer to]2) life’s specific questions responsibly ― we can fulfill the demands of existence not only as
[active / passive]3) agents but also as loving human beings: in our loving dedication to the beautiful, the
great, the good. Should I perhaps try to explain for you with some hackneyed phrase how and why
experiencing beauty can make life [meaningful / meaningfully]4)? I prefer to confine myself to the
어법
following thought experiment: [imagine / imagining]5) that you are sitting in a concert hall and [listen /
어휘
listening]6) to your favorite symphony, and your favorite bars of the symphony [resound / resounds]7) in
선택
your ears, and you are so [moving / moved]8) by the music [that / which]9) it sends shivers down your
spine; and now imagine that it would be possible for someone to ask you in this moment [when /
whether]10) your life has meaning. I believe you would agree with me if I [declare / declared]11) that in
this case you would only be able to give one answer, and it would go something like: “It would [be /
have been]12) worth it to [live / have lived]13) for this moment alone!”
It is not only through our actions14) that we can give life meaning ― insofar as we can answer life’s
specific15) questions responsibly16) ― we can fulfill17) the demands of existence not only as active18)
agents but also as loving human beings: in our loving dedication19) to the beautiful, the great, the good.
Should I perhaps try to explain for you with some hackneyed phrase how and why experiencing beauty20)
can make life meaningful21)? I prefer to confine22) myself to the following thought experiment: imagine
빈칸
that you are sitting in a concert hall and listening to your favorite symphony, and your favorite bars of
넣기
the symphony resound23) in your ears, and you are so moved24) by the music that it sends shivers25)
down your spine; and now imagine that it would be possible for someone to ask you in this moment
whether your life has meaning26). I believe you would agree27) with me if I declared28) that in this case
you would only be able to give one answer, and it would go something like: “It would have been wort
h29) it to have lived for this moment alone!”
It is not only through our actions that we can give life meaning ― insofar as we can answer life’s
specific questions responsibly ― we can fulfill the demands of existence not only as active agents but
also as loving human beings: in our loving dedication to the beautiful, the great, the good. Should I
perhaps try to explain for you with some hackneyed phrase how and why experiencing beauty can make
life meaningful? I prefer to confine myself to the following thought experiment: imagine that you are
sitting in a concert hall and listening to your favorite symphony, and your favorite bars of the symphony
resound in your ears, and you are so moved by the music that it sends shivers down your spine; and
now imagine that it would be possible for someone to ask you in this moment whether your life has
meaning. ❶ 만약 여러분이 이 경우에 단지 한 가지 대답을 할 수 있고, 그 대답이 “오직 이 순간만을 위해
살아왔더라도 그럴 만한 가치가 있었을 거야!”와 같은 것일 것이라고 내가 언명한다면, 여러분은 내게 동의할
서술형 것이라고 나는 믿는다.
대비
밑줄 친 ❶의 우리말과 같도록 아래 단어들을 문맥과 어법에 맞게 배열하시오. [변형 없음]
<보기> in / with / declared / this case / that / be able to / this moment / go / give / me /
agree / one answer, / believe / worth / have / to / “It / you / if / something / been /
would / I / would / and / it / for / alone!” / like: / you / have / lived / it / would / I /
1 would only
<조건> 「가정법구문」과 「완료부정사」를 사용할 것
30)
중요도 4 ★☆☆
The process of research [often is / is often]1) not entirely rational. In the classical application of the
‘scientific method’, the researcher is supposed to develop a hypothesis, then design a crucial experiment
to test it. If the hypothesis withstands this test a generalization is then [arguing / argued]2) for, and an
advance in understanding has [made / been made]3). But where did the hypothesis come from in the first
place? I have a colleague [who / whose]4) favourite question is ‘Why is this so?’, and I’ve seen this
어법
innocent question [spawn / to spawn]5) brilliant research projects on quite a [few / little]6) occasions.
어휘
Research is a mixture of inspiration (hypothesis generation, musing over the odd and surprising, finding
선택
lines of attack on difficult problems) and rational thinking (design and execution of crucial experiments,
analysis of results in terms of existing theory). Most of the books on research methods and design of
experiments ― there are hundreds of them ― [are / is]7) concerned with the rational part, and fail [to
deal / dealing]8) with the creative part, yet without the creative part no real research would [do / be
done]9), no new insights would be gained, and no new theories would be [formulating / formulated]10).
The process of research is often not entirely rational11). In the classical application of the ‘scientific
method’, the researcher is supposed12) to develop a hypothesis, then design a crucial13) experiment to
test it. If the hypothesis withstands14) this test a generalization15) is then argued for, and an advance16) in
understanding has been made. But where did the hypothesis come from in the first place? I have a
colleague whose favourite question is ‘Why is this so?’, and I’ve seen this innocent17) question spawn
빈칸 brilliant18) research projects on quite a few occasions. Research is a mixture19) of inspiration20) (hypothesis
넣기 generation, musing over the odd and surprising, finding lines of attack on difficult problems) and rationa
l21) thinking (design and execution22) of crucial experiments, analysis23) of results in terms of existing
theory). Most of the books on research methods and design of experiments ― there are hundreds of
them ― are concerned24) with the rational25) part, and fail to deal with26) the creative part, yet without
the creative part no real research would be done, no new insights27) would be gained, and no new
theories would be formulated28).
The process of research is often not entirely rational. In the classical application of the ‘scientific method’,
the researcher is supposed to develop a hypothesis, then design a crucial experiment to test it. If the
hypothesis withstands this test a generalization is then argued for, and an advance in understanding has
been made. But where did the hypothesis come from in the first place? I have a colleague whose
favourite question is ‘Why is this so?’, and I’ve seen this innocent question spawn brilliant research
projects on quite a few occasions. Research is a mixture of inspiration (hypothesis generation, musing
over the odd and surprising, finding lines of attack on difficult problems) and rational thinking (design
and execution of crucial experiments, analysis of results in terms of existing theory). Most of the books
on research methods and design of experiments ― there are hundreds of them ― are concerned with
the rational part, and fail to deal with the creative part, yet ❶ 창의적인 부분이 없다면 어떤 진정한 연구
서술형
도 이루어지지 않을 것이고, 어떤 새로운 통찰력도 얻지 못할 것이며, 어떤 새로운 이론도 정립되지 않을 것이
대비
다.
29)