0426s05sol Therm
0426s05sol Therm
4/26/2005 2
4/26/2005 3
Solar thermal using concentrators
Focusing requires direct, non-diffuse component
Storage or hybridization needed to be dispatchable
Central station option -- power towers 10 – 100 MWe
Distributed mid size capacity -- parabolic troughs
1 -10 MWe
Distributed smaller scale 10 kW -1 MWe -- dishes
Medium temperature for water heating and “active”
building solar heating/cooling of buildings (HVAC)
Low temperature “passive” building solar heating
Industrial process heat
4/26/2005 4
Power tower with molten salt storage
Conventional
EPGS
4/26/2005 5
Courtesy of U.S. DOE.
Power Towers
4/26/2005 11
The Prototype Manzanares Solar
Chimney, Spain
Manzanares (south of
Madrid).
Delivered power from July
1986 to February 1989 with Figure removed for copyright reasons.
a peak output of 50 kW. Source: New York Times.
4/26/2005 12
Not very practical or economic
4/262005 14
Solar Heating of Buildings
Active Systems
Can be captured in fixed or
tracking modes using flat
plate or focusing collectors
Even with storage needs Figure removed for copyright reasons.
backup supplemental supply Source: New York Times
Early history had many
failures – robust systems now
In today’s markets are easily
supported with subsidies in
mid to high grade regions
available
Passive Systems
Vary from ancient to high
tech designs
Require integrated designs
for highest payback
4/26/2005 15
Solar Cooling of Buildings
Active solar energy
capture used to
power Rankine
refrigeration cycle
LiBr absorption air
conditioning for large
building(s)
Thermal storage may
be required
4/26/2005 18
Passive Solar
Southern openings
Thermal mass for
diurnal stabilization
Window technolgy to
accept winter and reject
summer direct radiation
Hard to characterize
and promote since all
south facing glass is
passive solar
4/26/2005 20
Solar thermal summary-- part 2
Distributed electric power generation
Requires direct normal resource, tracking and concentrating
issues
Potential for smaller scale installation using troughs and
dishes
Heat to power conversion still limits performance to 30 to
40% efficiency
Solar thermal heating
Passive and active system opportunities
Wide applicability for domestic water heating, less for space
heating and cooling
Market growth provides better service infrastructure and
more robust technology
4/26/2005 22
Value of Thermal Storage Sunlight
Storage benefits
Energy in Storage
1) Lowers LEC
2) Increases market
value Output
Power
Dispatch to meet
peak loads
mid- noon mid-
night night
operation through
Sunlight Sunlight
clouds
Energy in Storage
solar-only
‘base-load’
Capacity factors
plant
Output
Power
>70% possible4/26/2005 mid- noon mid- noon mid-
night
night night
“Solar salt”
23
Tower Technology Projections
Solar
Solar Solar Tres Solar Solar Solar Solar
One Two USA 50 100 200 220
Design Details Units 1988 1999 2004 2006 2008 2012 2018
Plant output, net MWe 10 10 13.7 50 100 200 220
# Plants built (A) Volume 1 1 1 5 22 6 1
# Plants built (B) Min Volume 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Heliostat size m2 39 39/95 95 95 148 148 148
Heliostat type Std Std Std Std Std Std Adv
Storage Duration hours N/A 3 16 16 13 13 13
Rankine Cycle
Pressure Bar 125 125 180 180 180 180 300
Live steam Temp C 510 510 540 540 540 540 640
Reheat #1 Temp C 540 540 540 540 640
Reheat #2 Temp C 540 640
4/26/2005 24
Number of staff 32 33 30 38 47 66 67
Tower Installed Cost
14,000
Aerospace Grade
Demo Scale $/kW
Water/Steam
12,000 $/kWpeak
$/kW peak = $/kW / Solar Multiple
Installed Cost ($/kW or $/kWpeak)
10,000
8,000 Commercial
Receiver size
Helio size &
6,000 volume EPGS size
Receiver
Lg. Salt Storage
size
Efficiency
EPGS effic.
4,000 Switch to salt HTF
Helio design
Demo scale
advances
Costs assuming new,
"commercial" plant is
2,000 built
0
Solar One "New" Solar Tres Solar 50 Solar 100 Solar 200 Solar 220
4/26/2005 Solar Two USA 25
Tower Levelized Electricity
Cost (LEC)
1.600
FCR=14%
1.400 FCR=8%
1.200
1.000
LEC ($/kWh)
0.800 Expensive
Prototype
(Demo) Plants
0.600
0.400
'Commercial' Plants
0.200
0.000
Solar One "New" Solar Solar Tres Solar 50 Solar 100 Solar 200 Solar 220
4/26/2005 26
Two USA
‘Commercial Plant’ LEC
0.200
FCR=14%
FCR=8%
0.180
Min Deploy (B)
0.160 Min Deploy (B)
Financial
0.140 Terms
0.120
LEC ($/kWh)
0.100
0.080
0.060
0.040
0.020
0.000
Solar Tres Solar 50 Solar 100 Solar 200 Solar 220
4/26/2005 27
USA
Heliostat Cost
Current heliostat prices
Numerous studies by
industry, labs
A.D. Little 2001 study
estimated price at $128/m2
installed (not including $5-
10/m2 for controls)
Spanish company publicly
offered heliostats for sale
at $120/m2
$145/m2 used for Solar
Tres USA
4/26/2005
Cost Reduction
28
Courtesy of SunLab (Sandia National Laboratories and NREL partnership).