Personal Counselling
Personal Counselling
COUNSELLING
PERSONAL
COUNSELLING
J.M. FUSTER
CONTENTS
PART I
First Session 13
Second Session 39
Third Session 78
Fourth Session 92
Fifth Session 117
Sixth Session 129
Seventh Session 148
Eighth Session 173
Ninth Session 188
Tenth Session 199
PART II
Eleventh Session 215
Twelfth Session 227
Thirteenth Session 238
Fourteenth Session 249
Fifteenth Session 259
CHARTS
I. A model of counselling 47
II. Counselling Process 65
III. Feeling words and levels of intensity 128
IV. All skill-steps 171
APPENDIXES
I. Illustrations of counselling 273
II. Post-training test 292
III. Test in Self-Actualization 299
IV. Self-Training Programme 303
V. A way of helping the counselee to explore
further her problem situation 306
BIBLIOGRAPHY 309
INDEX OF TOPICS 315
INDEX OF SESSIONS
PART I : THE TRAINING OF COUNSELLORS
Subject-matter in each session.
I. pp. 13-38. Greetings. Self-introduction. Share expectations. What the
course offers. High quality training. Five levels of functioning. Rationale
of this training course. Time-table. Pre-training test. Background of
counselling. Questions.
II. pp. 39-77. Review, i.e., the trainer asks the students some questions to
check their correct understanding of what has been taught at the previous
session, and allow them to put questions. A counselling model. Models of
counselling. Xavier Institute of Counselling. The Counsellor. The process
of counselling. Preparatory stage : Attending. Social skills, attending
physically. Practice. Questions.
III. pp. 78-91. Review. Attitudes: respect, genuineness, concreteness.
Observing skills. Practice. Questions.
IV. pp. 92-116. Review. Empathy. Self-disclosure. Spiritual dimension.
Forgiveness. How to form the attitudes of respect, genuineness and
empathy. Listening skills. Practice. Questions.
V. pp. 117-128. Review. First stage : Responding. The skill of responding
to feeling and content. Practice. Questions.
VI. pp. 129-147. Review. Ways of responding to feeling and content. Skills
of responding: with a summary, with a question, to a silent counsellee.
Completion of the stage of responding. Comments: how to enter into the
counsellee’s frame of reference. Practice. Questions.
VII. pp. 148-172. Second Stage: Personalizing. Review. Personalizing the
problem and the goal together. Explanation of the skill-steps. Suggestions
to personalize the problem and the goal together. Comments. Practice.
Questions.
VIII. pp. 173-187. Review. Integrate other models of counselling into this
model. Confrontation. Immediacy. Questions.
IX. pp. 188-198. Review. Third stage : Initiating. Develop steps. Why the
counsellor is competent to identify steps to the goal. How to motivate
counsellee to take the first step. Formulate the first step. Comments.
Practice. Questions.
X. pp. 199-210. Review. Subsequent stage : Evaluating. How to motivate
counsellee to take the steps. A simple programme. Recycling technique.
Overall View of the model of counselling. Practice. Questions.
PART II : THE COUNSELLOR’S PERSONAL GROWTH
XI. pp. 215-226. Becoming yourself. Formation of the self-concept. The real
and the ideal self-concepts. Becoming interdependent. Practice. Questions.
XII. pp. 227-237. Review. Mental health. Stress. Adjustive resources.
Sources of stress. Sources of adjustive resources. Practice. Questions.
XIII. pp. 238-248. Review. Self-actualization. How to grow in it. Break some
structures. Be open to learn. Overcome shyness. Face growth-choice. Be
spontaneous. Assume responsibility. Experience deep joy. Be committed.
Be aware of your defence-mechanisms. Self-transcendence. Practice.
Questions.
XIV. pp. 249-258. Review. Conscience and Superego. What is
conscience.Definitions. Origin of conscience. Conscience formation. What
is Superego. Functions of the superego and functions of conscience.
Conclusions. Practice. Questions.
XV. pp. 259-270. Review. Professional ethics. Kinds of values. Breaking
professional secrecy, when? Counsellor’s relationship to counsellees and
to himself. Counsellor’s influence on counsellee. Conclusion. Questions.
My Message to you . Trainees could share what they have learned in this
course and how the new learning will help them in their life-situations.
Thank God for the gifts you have received.
PART ONE :
THE TRAINING
OF COUNSELLORS
FIRST SESSION
INTRODUCTION
Self-introduction
It will help if the trainees sit face to face in a closed circle. The trainer
starts by greeting the trainees. Then the trainer may introduce himself or
herself briefly. After this, he asks the trainees to introduce themselves
covering these three points: name, residence, type of work they are
doing. It is not advisable to ask somone to start and then the one sitting next
to him or her. It is better to respect their freedom of choice of time to do this.
Thus, the trainer could say: “anyone who would like to begin begins while
the others listen attentively. When he or she ends, another follows without
asking my permission.”
Share expectations
When the self-introduction is over, the trainees may be asked to share their
expectations of the course. Something along these lines: “when you
registered for this course you surely had some expectation or something you
would very much like to get out of this course. It will help us if you kindly
share your expectations with the group.” They follow the same procedure.
What the course offers
The trainer may share what he or she expects from the trainees in terms of
serious application and a keen desire to learn and enrich themselves. Then he
may add: “psychologists say that in the course of our lives we actualize a
small fraction of our human potential. This may be around 30 per cent. This
is sad to hear because we all could be much better persons than what we are
now, had we actualized more of our human potential. We have it within
ourselves, but do not exploit it. So, a great part of our human resources
remains dormant.”
What this course precisely teaches is a human technology of human
resource development and it trains you to help others to develop their
potential. Now, in 50 hours you cannot work wonders. But you can obtain a
good theoretical grasp of the model and, also, an initiation into the practice of
it. To achieve this goal, you will have to take the course seriously, be
attentive in class, do your homework, take an active part in the practice and,
also, practise outside of the sessions. The success of the course will depend
on your ongoing formation once the course is over.
High quality training
To achieve high quality training, you must practise this model on real
counsellees. Role-playing does not make for good training. Where to find
real counsellees? Well, when you practise as counsellor, you will have one of
your companions as counsellee. Then, he or she will speak of his or her
problem. Thus, you will be in touch with a real person and a real problem.
This offers you the opportunity to practise well the attitudes and the skills
you are learning in this course. Then the feedback is more real and to the
point.
To be a real counsellee in a big group is not easy. Some trainees become
tongue-tied. In order to facilitate this practice, it will help if everybody in the
group commits himself or herself to professional secrecy. This will create
mutual trust in the members of the group. The trainer may say: “I ask each of
you to commit yourself to professional secrecy. This means that you may not
speak to an outsider of what any trainee has shared or the way he or she has
behaved in the group. Also, that outside of the session you do not approach
any trainee and initiate the personal matter that he or she has shared in the
group.” Then the trainer solemnly asks each trainee in front of the group if he
or she commits himself or herself to professional secrecy, and he himself
does the same.
Be aware of how you feel now
One exercise that helps is this. The trainer says: “it is natural at first sight to
experience a spontaneous liking for some persons and a spontaneous dislike
for others, or just a neutral feeling. If you become aware of how you feel now
towards each trainee, you will be able to notice a positive change in these
feelings when you come to know the person more in depth.”
Five levels of functioning
Another aspect of the training is the way one relates to the group. We can
consider five levels of functioning in a group:
1. Detractor
The detractor has a very negative perception on life: all is bad, there is
nothing good, criticizes very severely, wishes to destroy everything. This
kind of person is a mental patient. Perhaps in his or her life he or she has
gone through very bad experiences and finds solace in lashing out at
everything. On a lesser degree, sometimes some trainee may behave in a
negative way. Such a person is usually an unhappy person and needs to
change for the better.
2. Observer
The observer watches what is going on and is not involved. He is like a
spectator at a football game. The observer does not profit much from the
training.
3. Participant
The participant is committed to what he is doing and does all that is
expected of him: attentive in class, does the homework, takes an active part in
the practice, clarifies his doubts and, thus, learns much.
4. Contributor
The contributor, over and above being a participant, is interested in the
welfare of the group. Thus, he will discreetly point out the strengths and
weaknesses of the training in order to keep it at a high level of quality. He is
brave to speak out but at the same time is prudent not to hurt the feelings of
anybody.
5. Leader
The leader points out the goal to be attained and identifies the steps to
achieve it. Sometimes some trainee can be a leader in the group by reminding
his companions of the goal to be achieved, or by suggesting some practical
step to reach it.
In terms of training, trainees would do well to become aware of the level at
which they are functioning at each session and try to raise it. However, they
must bear in mind that they cannot skip any level. Thus, from being a
participant they cannot pass on to be a leader without before being a
contributor.
Rationale of this training course
We learn here attitudes and skills. These two concepts are very much
linked together if we consider the skills as the outward expression of the
attitudes. This means that counselling is not just a set of techniques which the
counsellor uses at the time of counselling a counsellee. Rather, it is a way of
functioning of the person of the counsellor who has trained himself or herself
in those attitudes and, then, the skills flow from him or her with ease in
dealing with the counsellee.
This training begins with the first step, a very simple step indeed, and
proceeds to the next step, and to the next, until the whole model is learned. It
is something like learning to drive a car. The first step is to sit in the driver’s
seat and look at the wheel, the gears, the mirror, etc. Later in the training, the
learner will start the engine, and so forth.
Training supposes uniformity, or a set of rules to be learned by the trainees.
This obviously entails artificiality. The best way of learning is in the
laboratory where everything is artificial. Many variables have to be
controlled in order to study the independent variable. The learning done in
those artificial conditions is then transferred to real life situations where there
is no artificiality. Similarly, in training to do counselling, one has to follow
the discipline of training and learn step by step, until one masters the model.
Once you have learned well the model, you may adapt it to your own
personality and to the nature of the problem you are dealing with, and to the
personality of the counsellee.
It would be foolish to criticize the model before you have learned it well;
but it will be wise to assess it after you have mastered it, and then modify it
according to your knowledge and experience in counselling.
Time-table
The trainer may consult the group about the time-table to follow.
Pre-training test
Before you read this book you may wish to test your counselling skills in
relation to this model. The following example gives you an opportunity to
assess your ability to communicate in a helpful way and your ability to
discriminate helpful responses.
Imagine a young married woman, Mary, sitting in front of you. She has
come to you in the hope that you will be able to help her. In the midst of tears
she tells you her problem.
Read below what she says, then reflect and decide what you would say to
her to encourage her to open herself more fully to you. (This is your first
verbal response.) Write down the exact words you would use if you were
actually speaking to this woman.
This is what Mary tells you: “I don’t know what’s wrong with my
marriage. We seem to be quarrelling all the time. These days he doesn’t
seem to like anything I do: my work, the way I handle the children, even
the way I dress. I try very hard, but nothing, nothing seems to please
him.”
Now, before reading any further, write down your response to Mary and
put it aside.
Discrimination of helpful responses
To assess your ability to discriminate helpful responses, rate the following
counsellor-responses which might have been given to Mary. Use the
following rating scale.
1. ineffective
2. somewhat effective
3. effective
Rating Counsellor-Responses
— 1. You are saying that your marriage is not going well and your
relationship with your husband has deteriorated very much. He does not
seem to appreciate anything you do. You are doing the best you know but
without success in satisfying him.
— 2. Why do you quarrel like that? You must be patient with him and love
him.
— 3. Tell me, were you really in love before you got married?
— 4. You feel hurt because your husband is disappointed in you.
The experts gave the following ratings
Response 1 was rated 2 because it was directly related to what Mary said,
but it did not respond to the feelings expressed by Mary. Responses 2 and 3
were rated 1 because they were not responding to Mary but rather giving
advice and seeking information. Response 4 was rated 3 because it responded
to one of the dominant feelings of Mary and gave the reason for the feeling.
By comparing your ratings with the experts’ you can see where you are in
the ability to discriminate helpful responses.
Your ability to communicate helpfully
In the light of what has been said above, you may like to rate your own
response to Mary.
How do you feel now that you have your score on your current ability to
communicate helpfully and to discriminate helpful responses? If you have
done well, then you feel happy and encouraged to improve your ability in this
course; if you have done badly, then you feel a bit depressed or discouraged.
This is quite natural. But you will surely react to this feeling by reflecting that
this is a pre-course test on some-thing you may not know much about.
Therefore, resolve to take full advantage of the opportunity given to you to
learn all that this course offers on counselling and, then, the post-course test
will show your real ability in this area.
BACKGROUND OF COUNSELLING
Definition of terms
The terms ‘counselling’ and ‘psychotherapy’ will be used interchangeably
in this book. The difference between these terms is a controversial point.
However, most psychologists today would agree to a difference of degree
rather than in kind. That means that they can be placed mainly at the opposite
ends of a line, though in practice they keep shifting along that line without
any fixed limits. Psychotherapy is practised mostly by the psychiatrist, the
clinical psychologist and, sometimes, by the psychiatric social worker. The
goal of psychotherapy is to bring about a deep personality change in
psychotic and chronic psychoneurotic patients, in terms of a more effective
reorganization of the psychological processes. This requires many sessions
and it may last for months and years. Personal counselling, on the other hand,
is practised by counselling psychologists, marriage counsellors, pastoral
counsellors, teachers, parents and friends. The goal is to achieve a better
personal adjustment and growth in maturity, by stimulating the counsellee to
exploit her potential and use more of her resources. The people who go for
counselling are normal people who need help to cope with their personal
problems. The personal changes to be achieved are not as deep as in
psychotic patients. They consist mainly of a deeper self-knowledge, a change
of attitude, a modification of self-perception and a modification of the
perception of others. The length of treatment is much shorter than in
psychotherapy. That is why I say that psychotherapy and counselling are of
the same kind, in the sense that the approach and techniques are the same.
They differ in degree because of the goals to be achieved, the types of
patients, and the duration of treatment. Hence in this book, the two terms
counselling and psychotherapy will be used as meaning one and the same
thing.
Historical Background
Counselling in some way or another has been used by different people
since the beginning of mankind e.g., by parents, teachers, friends, elders, etc.
It was to the medical practitioner or family doctor that people went most
frequently. Towards the turn of the nineteenth century, medicine was not so
specialized as it is today. The family doctor was not in a hurry. He sat down
by the bedside of the patient and gave his time to listen to what the sick
person had to say. It was in those conversations that the family doctor was
faced with problems which were not the usual medical problems of fevers
and aches in different parts of the body. The problems presented by the sick
person had much to do with worries, depressions, fears, anxieties and inner
struggles. The family doctor was interested in helping his patient with these
problems also, but did not know how to handle them. As he was by training
and practice biology-oriented, he felt that there must be some underlying
pathology of the brain or the nervous system which was responsible for these
types of problems. Because these problems were of a different nature than the
ones studied in medical colleges, they were labelled mental.
Towards the end of the 19th century, the discoveries of Griesinger,
Kraepelin, Golgi, Ramon y Cajal, and others established the so called
‘organic viewpoint’ on the nature of mental illness. The brilliant
contributions of these scientists showed that the deep personality disorders
known as ‘general paresis’, ‘cerebral arteriosclerosis’, and ‘senile psychoses’,
were caused by some pathology in the brain. (‘General paresis’, is an organic
psychosis or a severe mental disorder, which is caused by the microbe of
syphilis. If this venereal disease is not successfully checked at the initial stage
or the treatment is dis-continued, syphilis develops in the organism and
reaches a stage when the microbe damages the brain of the patient. The
mental disorder which develops is called ‘general paresis’.) With these
exciting biological discoveries, it was thought that they could cure the patient
by surgically removing the pathology from the brain. This view, though
strongly supported in some cases, was not held by all medical men. The
reason was that over 50 per cent of mental patients failed to improve by these
means. This was a difficult puzzle to great thinkers, and various approaches
were adopted to find the solution. Some held firmly to the organic viewpoint
and said that further research would one day discover the pathology of those
mental disorders, which could not be detected in many patients. Other
thinkers, on the other hand, challenged the belief in brain pathology as the
sole cause of mental disorders. This new current of psychological thought
held that certain types of mental illness are caused by psychological factors.
Thus, some mental disorders might result from the fact that the patient felt
unable to cope with his inner frustrations and conflicts, and thus learned to
adopt unhealthy responses in his efforts to adjust.
Origins of counselling
The psychological viewpoint became manifest in the use of hypnosis to
treat hysteric patients. The doctor put an hysteric patient under hypnosis, who
was unable to walk due to a paralysis. In that state, he suggested to him to get
up and walk there and then. To the admiration of the observers, he got up and
walked quite well. This type of experiment proved that the disorder was not
caused by some organic pathology, but by psychological factors.
Many medical men and scientists in various countries have contributed to
the advancement of our knowledge on the nature of mental illness and how to
cure it. A significant contribution was made by Breuer. He allowed the
patient under hypnosis to talk freely about herself and her problems, and to
display considerable emotion. On awakening from the hypnotic state, the
patient felt relieved and improved. Here we see the beginning of a change in
the mode of treatment, namely, to give importance to the patient and to what
she had to say about herself, and to give her time to communicate her
feelings. This change was enhanced by Freud (1856-1939). Freud was an
Austrian. He lived in Vienna and left for London in 1939. He was the first to
dispense with hypnosis altogether and to create the conditions favourable for
the patient to relax and communicate freely her thoughts and feelings. Thus it
was Freud who discovered what goes today by the name of psychotherapy
and counselling. He demonstrated that the patient’s symptoms represented
the outcome of her attempts to meet her problems. Thus, Freud showed great
understanding and respect for the mental patient. This was quite a different
perception of the mental patient than the one most people had entertained
about her before. In this Freud had been preceded by Pinel in France in the
18th century, who had begun to change people’s views on mental patients
towards a more humane approach in the understanding and treatment of
them. According to Freud’s view, we can look upon the mental patient as a
person who is struggling hard to adjust to her environment. In this very hard
struggle she makes mistakes and adopts faulty ways of thinking and behaving
which we call symptoms. This understanding of mental illness brings the
mental patient much closer to us. It makes us accept her and bear with her
and be willing to help her as one who is sick. We too could one day meet
with a very subjectively hostile world and, in our efforts to survive, we too
might develop strange ways of thinking and behaving, which might not be
appropriate in the culture which surrounds us. Freud developed his method
‘psychoanalysis’ which dominated the field of psychotherapy for half a
century.
A great pioneer: Carl R. Rogers
A great pioneer in 1942 was Carl R. Rogers in the United States. He
rebelled against psychoanalysis because he felt that its mode of treatment was
too subjective. He objected to the psychoanalyst’s way of gathering data
about the client and of interpreting the causes of her illness according to his
favourite theory. Rogers held the view that the client is the best source of
information about herself, and that she could diagnose herself if she were
adequately helped by the counsellor. Rogers did much to shift the focus of
attention from diagnosis to the relationship between counsellor and
counsellee. He was a pioneer in doing scientific research on the process of
helping , i.e., on what is going on between counsellee and counsellor when
the counsellee is being helped effectively. He tried to pinpoint the ingredients
of the helping relationship which, according to him, is the main factor in
helping people with problems.
In 1942 Rogers published his first book, Counselling and
Psychotherapy, where you can find the ideas just presented. In 1951 he put
forward his theory of personality and offered a blueprint for counselling in
his book, Client-Centred Therapy. In 1957 Rogers published a paper, ’The
necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change’, in
which he says: “Drawing from a large theoretical context, six conditions are
postulated as necessary and sufficient conditions for the initiation of a
process of constructive personality change.”
These conditions are as follows:
1. Psychological contact between counsellor and counsellee.
2. The counsellee is in a state of incongruence.
3. The counsellor is integrated in the relationship.
4. The counsellor experiences unconditional positive regard for the
counsellee.
5. The counsellor experiences an empathic understanding of the counsellee’s
internal frame of reference.
6. The counsellor communicates to the counsellee his empathic
understanding and unconditional positive regard at least to a minimal
degree.
“If these six conditions exist,” Rogers says, “and continue over a period of
time, this is sufficient. The process of constructive personality change will
follow.”
In 1961 in his book, On Becoming a Person, Rogers modifies his
thinking in the light of research findings and reduces the above six conditions
to four conditions, three on the part of the counsellor and one on the part of
the counsellee.
These conditions are:
1. The counsellor must be congruent, that is, his words must be in line with
his feelings (congruence).
2. The counsellor must have a warm acceptance and esteem of the counsellee
as a separate person (acceptance).
3. The counsellor must have the ability to see the counsellee and her world as
the counsellee sees them (empathy).
4. The counsellee must experience herself as being fully received. That is,
that whatever her feelings, silence, gestures, tears or words, whatever she
finds herself being in this moment, she senses that she is psychologically
received just as she is by the counsellor (communication).
Summarizing, we could say that Roger's model of counselling is a two-
dimensional model. It includes the person of the counsellor (one dimension),
and the person of the counsellee (the other dimension). The counsellor must,
in his relationship with the counsellee, adopt these three attitudes of
congruence, acceptance, and empathy. He must be able to communicate them
to the counsellee. On the other hand, the counsellee must feel that she has
been fully received by the counsellor.
From the mid-forties to the late sixties, Rogers held a very influential
position in the field of counselling. His client-centred therapy or non-
directive counselling inspired many training programmes and influenced
counselling practice in various countries. We owe much to Carl Rogers for
bringing to the attention of counsellors the need to focus on the interpersonal
relationship between counsellor and counsellee.
The challenge
In 1965 Eysenck, a Psychology Professor at London University, challenged
the value of psychotherapy and counselling. He showed statistically that there
was no significant difference in the recovery between treated patients and
patients who underwent no psychotherapy at all. He pointed out that, as far as
constructive change in the counsellee is concerned and on the average, the
counsellee has as much chance of changing constructively over a period of
time without professional help, as she has with such help. These findings
created a crisis among psychotherapists and challenged them to give an
answer.
The Answer to the Challenge
The answer to the challenge covers four points:
1. To meet the challenge put by Eysenck, psychotherapists shifted the
emphasis of research studies from outcome research to process-research.
The aim was to discover what kind of persons proved successful
psychotherapists and what kind had little success. They felt rightly that this
area of research might give us a clue to answer the challenge put by Eysenck.
These studies concentrated on the ingredients of the process of
psychotheray both of successful psychotherapists and of unsuccessful
psychotherapists, i.e., their attitudes and their approach to patients. Thus,
Rogers (1967) found that helpful psychotherapists were more human in their
approach to patients, and were focusing on the here and now dynamics.
Unsuccessful psychotherapists concentrated on diagnosis and on categorizing
patients, and showed little interest in the human approach and the here and
now dynamics.
Other studies were done by Carkhuff and Berenson (1967); Berenson and
Mitchell (1969). The findings of these studies support the statement that
counsellees of counsellors who offer high levels of facilitative and action-
oriented conditions improve, while those of counsellors who offer low levels
of these conditions deteriorate.
By 'high level of facilitative and action-oriented conditions' is meant that
the psychotherapist uses the human technology taught in this book to help
counsellees.
2. In 1980 a team of psychologists summarized the findings of 475 studies
comparing patients to untreated members of a control group. After treatment,
the average psychotherapy patient was better off than 85 per cent of
comparable untreated people. The evidence overwhelmingly supports the
efficacy of psychotherapy (The New York Times Magazine, Aug. 8, 1987).
3. According to psychiatrist Scott Peck, "the essential ingredients that make
psychotherapy effective and successful are not magical words, techniques or
posture; it is human involvement and struggle. It is the willingness of the
therapist to nurture the counsellee's growth... to actually struggle with the
patient and with oneself. In short, the essential ingredient of successful, deep
and meaningful psychotherapy is love" (The Road Less Travelled, p. 186,
1980).
4. Again, according to Scott Peck, the crucial determinant of success or
failure in psychotherapy is the counsellee's will to grow or to change for the
better (Ibid, p. 320).
Conclusion. These findings suggest the answer to the challenge put by
Eysenck. It is not true to say that there is no significant difference in the
recovery between treated and untreated patients. What is being established is
that the quality of the person who functions as psychotherapist is of supreme
importance to differentiate success or failure in psychotherapy. And, also,
that the will of the patient to change for the better is very significant to the
success of psychotherapy.
Effective Counsellors
If the quality of the counsellor is the essential requirement in counselling,
then, there is a serious obligation on the part of the counsellor-trainee to
ascertain which kind of person he is. He should find out whether he is a
helpful person, i.e., one who can stimulate personal growth in others; or
whether he is unhelpful, i.e., one who with his approach discourages others
from using their own resources and thus inhibits personal growth. Obviously,
only helpful persons should assume responsibility for counselling, training
young people and, in general, for the helping professions. The thing to bear in
mind is that the counsellor in all circumstances has an impact on the
counsellee. This may be either for her improvement or for her deterioration.
There seems to be no neutral impact. Therefore, counselling may indeed be
for better or for worse.
This quality of the counsellor which is labelled ‘helpful’ in the sense given
above, seems to be a natural gift. Some people, without training, possess it
and use it for the good of others. That is why we hear at times people say,
“Everybody goes to consult him or her.” Other people may have the capacity
for counselling, but they need training in order to actualize their potential.
And there are still others, even though gifted in other fields, who do not seem
in their interpersonal relations to possess this special gift of stimulating
personal growth in others. In the search for helpful counsellors, Truax and
Carkhuff (1967) found that the process of one individual attempting to help
another is not the exclusive domain of professional counsellors. Research
findings show that some lay persons with a short period of training can effect
significant constructive change in distressed people.
These research findings are reinforced by Scott Peck when he writes: “A
minimally trained lay therapist who exercises a great capacity to love will
achieve psychotherapeutic results that equal those of the very best
psychiatrists.”
Revolution in the neurosciences
The present revolution in the neurosciences is changing some of the
previously held ideas on abnormal behaviour. We are seeing less discussion
of normal and abnormal behaviour being on a continuum which differs only
in the matter of degree. Increasingly, normal and abnormal behaviour are
seen as different in kind, requiring different approaches and different
conceptualizations. A powerful influence in such trends is the growing
understanding of brain chemistry and its role in mental processes, including
those associated with various types of mental illness.
An increasing body of evidence suggests that neurotransmitters play a
crucial role in many brain disorders. These are chemical molecules that occur
naturally in the brain and spinal cord. They convey messages from nerve
cell(neuron) to nerve cell in the synaptic cleft or space between cells. The
mechanisms of transmission from neuron to neuron may be faulty in
schizophrenics. The present challenge is how to modify the genes which are
responsible for illness in the human body.
Neurotransmitters ‘dopamine’, ‘serotonin’ are involved in depression;
‘endorphines’ and ‘enkephalines’ are pain-killers and mood elevators. Both
are more powerful than morphine.
Some viruses, also, wreak havoc within the nervous system. Today many
scientists believe that some schizophrenia is the result of bio-chemical
imbalances in the brain and not of psychological factors as it was thought
before.
When chemical imbalance is implicated in such mental illnesses,
medication, not counselling is the treatment of preference, although
counselling can play a supporting role for patients and their families.
Scientists say that, “each small step forward with ‘clozapine’ must be
carefully nurtured with psychological counselling. Without it, the awakened
patients can slip back into mental confusion” (Time, 6.7.92). Again, “Most
studies show that drug treatment works best when administered along with
some form of talk therapy” (Time, 6.7.92).
When chemical imbalance is not implicated, mental health theory is
moving towards understanding behavioural problems in terms of skills which
are required in handling stress in living. Skills can be taught as a means of
eliminating interpersonal deficiencies or teaching new behaviours. Personal
competence is seen as a series of skills which an individual either possesses
or can learn through training.
Life-coping skills include cognitive and physical skills; interpersonal skills
such as initiating, developing and maintaining relationships; intrapersonal
skills such as developing self-control, tension management, relaxation,
setting goals and taking risks. Crisis is a mental state arising from stress
beyond the coping capacity of the individual.
These conceptions of life-coping skills are gaining in credibility as
research is unfolding the importance of specific types of skills.
The human technology taught in this book will enable the counsellee to
acquire the required life-coping skills.
Evolution of Counselling
We have seen how counselling started at the turn of the nineteenth century
with an understanding of the patient’s symptoms as attempts to adjust to a
hostile environment. In this light, Freud did away with hypnosis and
emphasized the interpersonal relationship between therapist and patient.
Through psychoanalysis, he stimulated the patient to communicate freely all
that was in her mind. Then he interpreted the data thus collected in the light
of his theory of development of human behaviour.
In 1942, Carl Rogers found the psychoanalytic interpretation too
subjective. He maintained that, if the therapist can create the required
facilitative conditions, the client is in a better position than the therapist to
understand herself and make her own diagnosis. The emphasis was
transferred from the therapist’s interpretation to the client’s self-
understanding.
In the late sixties, Robert Carkhuff accepted all that Rogers had to offer and
developed it further by personalizing the client’s contribution to her own
problem, changing that into a goal, and identifying appropriate and
systematic steps for the client to attain the goal, and thus solve her problem.
Present day counselling is moving towards teaching the client ‘life-coping
skills’, both intrapersonal, and interpersonal, and involving the client’s family
in the process of counselling.
Questions:
1. How did Freud understand the symptoms of mental patients?
2. Why is Freud the originator of modern psychotherapy?
3. Why did Rogers rebel against psychoanalysis?
4. What are the conditions laid down by Rogers to help counsellees?
5. What was Eysenck’s challenge to psychotherapists?
6. What is the answer to Eysenck’s challenge?
REFERENCES
Berenson, B.G. and Mitchell, K. Confrontation for Better or Worse.
Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource Development Press, 1974.
Carkhuff, R.R. and Berenson, B.G. Beyond Counselling and Therapy.
New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Second Edition. 1977.
Carkhuff, R.R. Helping and Human Relations. Vols. I and II New York:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.
Carkhuff, R.R. and Others, The Art of Helping —Trainer’s Guide,
Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource Development Press, 1977.
Coleman, J.C. Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life. Bombay:
Taraporevala, Fifth Edition, 1976.
Eysenck, H.J. ‘The effects of Psychotherapy’, Intl. J. Psychiatry, 1965.
Fuster, J.M. Helping in Personal Growth. Bombay: St Paul Publications,
1974.
Kiesler, D.J. ‘Some myths of psychotherapy research and the search for a
paradigm’, Psych. Bulletin, 1966.
Rogers. C.R. Counselling and Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin,
1942.
Rogers. C.R. Client-Centred Therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1951.
Rogers, C.R. ‘The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic
personality change’, J. Consult. Pschol., 1957, 21, 95-103.
Rogers, C.R. On Becoming a Person, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961.
Rogers, C.R. and others. The Therapeutic Relationship and Its Impact.
Madison, Wisc.: University of Wisconsin Press, 1967.
Truax, C.B. and Carkhuff, R.R. Toward Effective Counselling and
Therapy. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
SECOND SESSION
A COUNSELLING MODEL
Many people think of counselling as ‘giving advice’ or ‘offering solutions
to problems’. However, as defined in this book counselling is neither of
these. A little story will illustrate this. A hungry man comes to you for help.
You give him a fish. He eats it and feels satisfied, but tomorrow he will come
for another fish. Are you then helping him to develop himself? Certainly not.
You are creating in him a dependency on you and, so, you are inhibiting his
using his own resources. Give him, instead, a fishing rod and teach him how
to fish. Then, he will not come anymore to you, for he has learnt to use his
own resources and stand on his own feet. This is what the counselling taught
in this book is about.
Let us see what happens to the counsellee in successful counselling. When
a counsellee comes for help with a personal problem, she has to change
something in herself to solve it. This may be a change of attitude, of
perception of self or of others, of habits or in general a change of behaviour.
There is no permanent solution to a problem without some change in the
counsellee. Then, the question is:
How do we change ourselves?
Learning process: E U A
The answer is that we change ourselves through a learning process which
consists of three stages: self-exploration leading to self-understanding leading
to action. How do we know this? We have come to know this through
observation of human behaviour and personal experience. For instance, you
are given a new transistor of a make which you have never seen before. What
do you do first? You explore it looking at one side then the other, identifying
the controls for volume and stations and turning these controls one by one.
Thus your exploration leads you to an understanding of how the transistor
works. Once this understanding is clearly grasped, you readily act to adjust
the controls for the stations and volume desired.
This learning process — EUA — that we use for acquiring all kinds of
knowledge, we also use for changing our behaviours. For example, John
realizes that he is losing his temper too often and wants to control it. The first
thing he does is to explore himself by asking, “What makes me get angry so
many times?” By asking himself this and similar questions, John comes to
understand where he is in his world with respect to where he wants to be, i.e.,
controlling his temper. Guided by this clear understanding he acts to devise
steps which will take him from where he is to where he wants to be. In other
words, John explores himself to understand himself to enable himself to act
or do something to control his anger.
How can C introduce E U A in c?
Now, if we change ourselves through this learning process of E U A, then
the question is: How can the counsellor introduce and sustain in the
counsellee this learning process? The answer is: by entering into the
counsellee’s frame of reference and initiating action from within the
counsellee’s frame of reference. The term ‘frame of reference’ means the way
in which the counsellee sees herself in relation to the world around her.
The following illustrations may help to clarify these points.
A. Irrelevant Response
In the example of the pre-training test, Mary has come to you with her
problem (See p. 19). If you have listened only to what she is saying and then
offer advice, this is graphically what you are doing: Your response: “Why do
you quarrel like that? You must be patient with him and love him.”
REFERENCES
Carkhuff, R.R. and Others, The Art of Helping—Trainer’s Guide. Amherst,
Mass.: Human Resource Development Press, 1977.
SEVENTH SESSION
SECOND STAGE: PERSONALIZING
Personalizing is the second stage of the counselling process. The purpose of
this stage is to enable the counsellee to understand where she is with respect
to where she wants or needs to be in her world.
We have so far completed the first stage of responding. We have
understood where the counsellee is in her world. And we are sure we have
correctly understood the counsellee because she has validated our summary-
response at the end of that stage.
We now pass on to personalize our understanding of the counsellee. With
the nonverbal and verbal data we have gathered about the counsellee, we are
able to understand the part she plays in the formation of her problem. At this
point of counselling, we are able to bring the counsellee to accept it
constructively.
It is human to blame others when something goes wrong. Thus, a husband
says: “Things do not go well at home because my wife does not understand
me”. Could it be that things do not go well because he does not understand
her? In interpersonal relationships, it is not likely that all the blame can be put
on one side.
The likelihood is that some portion of blame rests on either side. The most
effective method to improve the situation is for the counsellee to
acknowledge the part she plays in the problem and to work out a way of
lessening or removing it altogether. Growth begins when blaming ends.
Personalizing deals only with the counsellee’s contribution to the problem,
not with the others’ contribution. However, as we shall see later in initiating,
some action may be taken to remove the injustice that has contributed to the
formation of the problem.
The meaning of personalizing, in general, is to help the counsellee become
aware of this fact, i.e., that she is playing a part in her problem.
Until the counsellee realizes that she is partly responsible for her condition,
there is little motivation to change.
PERSONALIZING THE PROBLEM AND THE GOAL TOGETHER
If the counsellee accepts your final summary response, she signals to you
her readiness to receive your personalized problem and goal response. Make
sure of her readiness, otherwise it will not help her.
1. The skill of personalizing the problem and the goal together allows
the counsellor to make the counsellee aware of her contribution to the
problem, to make her assume responsibility for what she is doing and to
change the problem into a goal.
The counsellee’s contribution to the problem or personal deficiency must
be expressed in concrete behavioural terms, if it is to be effective. This
contribution is something negative, something the counsellee is doing or not
doing. The goal is the opposite of the problem and, thus, it channels the
counsellee’s energy into something positive and constructive. Thus for
example, if Joe’s problem is that he cannot control his temper, the goal is to
control his temper.
2. The purpose of personalizing the problem and the goal together is to
make the counsellee realize quite clearly where she is with respect to where
she wants or needs to be in her world.
3. The skill-steps of personalizing the problem and the goal together
are:
— ask the counsellee: “What are you doing or not doing that is contributing
to your problem?”
— ask yourself the same question.
— use the format, “You feel...........because you cannot...........and you want
to”.
Explanation of the skill-steps
Let me explain why the question is put to the counsellee in the first
skill-step. There are several reasons:
1. The reason for this question is to stimulate the counsellee to use her
resources and contribute towards the personalization of her problem.
Counselling is about actualizing human potential. We grow as persons when
we utilise our own personal resources.
Were the counsellor to personalize the problem all by himself the
counsellee would passively receive it. That is why at this point the counsellor
gives the counsellee a chance to use her resources before he does it all by
himself.
We do not expect the counsellee to give a perfect answer to the question.
Maybe some counsellees will; if they do not, it is up to the counsellor to
supply what is lacking in the counsellee’s answer and come out with a good
response which embodies the real contribution the counsellee is making to
her problem.
2. Another reason why the question in the first skill-step is put is to prepare
the counsellee to receive constructively the personalization of the problem. If
the counsellee herself answers the question, “What am I doing or not doing
that contributes to my problem?”, the counsellor more easily can say, “Yes, I
agree with you that this is your contribution to the problem”, or “Yes, what
you say seems correct, may be we could put it this way”, and then the
counsellor improves on the counsellee’s formulation of the problem.
E.g., The counsellee personalizes her problem thus: “I feel confused
because I cannot be a good mother to my son”. The counsellor finds this
formulation too vague. So, he responds: “Yes, what you say seems correct.
Maybe we could put it this way: you feel confused because you cannot strike
a balance between leniency and strictness in bringing up your son”.
The counsellor’s formulation of the problem is in line with the counsellee’s
personalization, and yet it is more concrete. It will easily be acceptable to the
counsellee because all it does is to spell out in a more tangible way what the
counsellee has said, “to be a good mother”.
This is a more gentle and more readily acceptable way for the counsellee to
receive constructively the personalization of her problem than if the
counsellor were, without putting the question, straight away to personalize
the counsellee’s personal deficiency.
It is essential that the counsellee be prepared to receive constructively the
personalization of her problem. If she rejects what appears to be the true
personalization of the problem, then the counsellor has to go back to the
responding stage in order to get a better understanding of the counsellee, so
preparing her for the personalizing stage.
See on page 153 the example of Anne. Anne personalizes her problem thus:
c: I do not have the courage to tell him because I’m afraid of losing him.
The counsellor is not satisfied with her formulation of the problem and
responds thus:
C: Yes, I agree, you do not have the courage to tell him. Maybe we could put
it this way: You feel afraid because you cannot be honest with him and face
the consequences, and you want to.
3. It is a help to the counsellor to find that counsellee and counsellor think
along the same line. If the counsellee’s answer is quite different from the
answer the counsellor had framed in his own mind, it may open the way to
dialogue to find the true answer.
Why does the counsellor personalize the problem and the goal
together? First of all, because it is a very empathic response. The counsellee
at this stage of counselling wants to do something to remedy the situation.
Hearing the counsellor say, “and you want to”, brings out what the counsellee
really wants and communicates a deep understanding which is encouraging to
the counsellee.
Secondly, because it channels the counsellee’s psychic energy into
something positive, “and you want to” rather than leaving the counsellee
focusing her attention only on what she “cannot do”. Putting personal
deficiency and goal together is like death and resurrection, two inseparable
aspects of the same event.
In this stage we use one skill: personalizing the problem and the goal
together. Reference will be made to the example of Anne given below.
Example of Anne
The counsellee is Anne, a young unmarried woman
c: I am in love with a boy. I like him very much. I think that he is the boy for
me and want to marry him. But I had a kind of a nervous breakdown and,
perhaps, I have a predisposition to some mental disorder. I think that I
should tell him everything and feel guilty for not disclosing that to him. I do
not want to deceive him. But, if I tell him, I am afraid that he may dislike
me for it and, even, reject me completely. I am very afraid. What should I
do?
First stage: Responding
C: You feel caught in an excruciating conflict: if you don’t tell him, you feel
dishonest and guilty; if you tell him, you feel very afraid of his rejection.
c: Yes, that’s it. But what am I to do?
C: You feel confused because it’s not clear to you what should be done.
c: Yes, I do feel confused. If I do not tell him and get married to him and,
then, he comes to know of it and that I had hidden that from him before
marriage, how will he feel towards me?
C: There is a great turmoil in you because you foresee the terrible
consequences which could happen in case you do not disclose that to him.
c: Yes, I really don’t know what to do. On the other hand, if I tell him, he
may reject me completely and I could not stand that. I love him so much!
Question response
C: You are saying that you love him so much. Is this love more for your own
satisfaction than for his real happiness?
c: I never thought that way. I was too engrossed in myself.
C: You feel ashamed of yourself because your love for him is rather self-
centred.
c: Yes, I feel ashamed of myself. I feel I should also look for his real
happiness.
Summary response
C: You feel very afraid because you have found the boy for you, but he may
reject you if you are honest with him. At the same time, you do not want to
deceive him and, however hard it may be for you, his real happiness is
important to you. And you wonder what you could do about it.
c: Yes, that’s the way I feel.
Second Stage: Personalizing
Personalizing the problem and the goal together
C: What are you doing or not doing that contributes to your problem?
c: I do not have the courage to tell him because, I’m afraid of losing him.
C: You feel very afraid because, you cannot be honest with him and face the
consequences, and you want to.
c: Yes, I lack this courage.
Third Stage: Initiating
State the goal clearly and develop steps
C: Your goal is to be honest with him and face the consequences. What steps
could you take to reach the goal?
c: — I could reflect on whether I love myself more than I love him.
— I could be very honest with him and tell him. Perhaps he would appreciate
my honesty.
— I could not blame him were he to reject me. It’s better to know his mind
before marriage than after we are married.
— I shall pray for strength to be honest with him.
— I will not deceive him.
C: Your goal is to be honest with him and face the consequences. You
suggest the following steps: to reflect on whether you love yourself more
than you love him, to be very honest with him and not deceive him, not to
blame him in case of rejection, to pray for strength to be honest with him.
Is there anything else you could think of?
c: No. Nothing else comes to my mind.
C: How about asking the specialist who treated you if you are really
competent to get married? He could give advice to you. If he says ‘Yes’,
then you could tell your boy friend the truth and also what the specialist
advises.
c: Yes, this is a good idea. I will do it.
C: When are you going to ask the specialist for an appointment?
c: Tomorrow morning I’ll ring him up from my office.
Formulate the first step
C: Your first step is this: tomorrow morning from your office you will make
an appointment with your specialist to find out if you are really competent
to get married, and then report to me.
Subsequent Stage: Evaluating
When Anne comes back to report, other steps will be planned in the light of
the specialist’s opinion. Anne has to be prepared to face her boyfriend’s
reaction and, if need be, to accept the hard fact that she should not get
married.
Comments
a) We respond to the counsellee’s feeling and the reason for the feeling of
her experience, so that she may explore where she is in relation to her world.
We, then, personalize the counsellee’s problem and the goal, so that she may
understand where she is in relation to where she wants to be. In the example
above, Anne wants to be quite honest with her boy friend and face the
consequences constructively. That is her goal. That is where she wants to be.
She is now unable to do this and wishes to do it. We have personalized her
problem and her goal.
b) It takes much work to be able to go through this and it takes much
checking back. We are always going back to our feeling and content
responses. We are checking back to see if we are on the same wave-length as
the counsellee. After personalizing the goal, the counsellee expresses her
reactions. We should respond interchangeably to each of these reactions.
Example
We may say: “You are really pleased that we finally got to the core of the
problem,” “You feel pleased because we seem to have something here really
important to you.” Or, “You are a bit distressed because this does not seem to
be the crux of the problem for you.”
We are always checking back to see if we are accurate in our
understanding.
Procedure
It was said above that at the stage of responding, the counsellor should
respond at the level at which the counsellee presents herself, and not go
deeper than that. Now at the stage of personalizing, the counsellor has to go
more deeply in sharing his understanding of the counsellee. He brings to her
awareness the contribution she is making to her problem, and the goal she
should aim at. How can the counsellor do this?
If the counsellor has practised the attending, observing and listening skills,
as explained in sessions 2, 3 and 4, then he has gathered lots of verbal and
nonverbal data about the counsellee. The counsellee communicates many
non-verbal messages through her body, which are not verbally expressed.
The tone of voice, facial expression and posture reveal a great deal of how
she is feeling. What she says and does not say, the way she says it and the
emphasis she lays on certain things rather than on others, discloses very much
the kind of person she is, her values and the contribution she is making
towards her problem.
Again, if the counsellor has responded to the counsellee as explained in
session 5, and arrived at a neat summary of the counsellee’s main feelings
and their reasons, and has had it validated by the counsellee, then, the
counsellor will be in a position to detect the counsellee’s contribution to her
problem and her goal.
Internalising the Experience
At the stage of responding, the counsellee tends to place the reason for her
problem outside herself, i.e., externalizes her experience. Thus, Anne says: “I
feel very afraid because he may reject me”.
At the stage of personalizing the problem and the goal, the counsellor
stimulates the counsellee to dialogue with herself and reconsider the
statements she has made, and find out the hidden meaning behind those
statements which affect her personally. This stage helps the counsellee to
internalize her experience by finding the reason for her problem within
herself, become aware of her contribution to the problem and assume
responsibility for what she is doing or not doing. Thus, the counsellor
responds to Anne saying: “You feel very afraid because you cannot be honest
with him and face the consequences and you want to”. In this response, the
counsellor makes Anne aware of what she is not doing, i.e., be honest with
him and face the consequences, and suggests what Anne wants to do. Thus,
Anne feels confident that by changing herself she will improve her painful
situation, and this helps her to assume responsibility for it.
Helps to personalize the problem
The personalization of the problem is the crux of the counselling process,
for the success of counselling depends on it entirely. If the problem has been
accurately personalized, then the rest is easy and satisfactory results will be
achieved; if not, then counselling will end in failure.
It would seem that very few indeed have the ability to personalize the
counsellee’s problem adequately. In order to help you to do this part of the
counsellor’s work satisfactorily, the following suggestions are offered:
1. When you are thinking how to answer the question, “In what way is this
counsellee contributing to the problem?”, as mentioned in the skill-steps,
remember that the personal deficiency you now personalize as a problem, has
to be changed into a goal at the initiating stage. The problem is something
negative, i.e., something the counsellee cannot do or something she is not
doing. So, when you change this something negative into a goal to be
achieved, ask yourself: Will it be a suitable goal on which the counsellee can
work to improve herself?
In Anne’s case above, her personal deficiency could be expressed in
different ways, such as:
— You feel afraid because you cannot trust his love for you.
— You feel guilty because you cannot tell him everything.
— You feel bad because you cannot muster enough courage to disclose it to
him.
— You feel afraid because you cannot be honest with him and face the
consequences.
When all these personal deficiencies are turned into goals, we have the
following goals:
— Your goal is to trust his love for you.
— Your goal is to tell him everything.
— Your goal is to get enough courage to disclose it to him.
— Your goal is to be quite honest with him and face the consequences.
Of all these goals, the last one is the best, for it is practical and complete. It
offers her plenty of scope to work on to enrich herself in becoming more
honest and enable her to cope with the difficulties which may arise from
being honest. The first goal may turn out to be false, for the boy may refuse
to marry her. And thus, she is trusting him in vain.
In deciding which personal deficiency he is going to personalize, the
counsellor would do well to weigh the various alternatives in his mind, and
then choose the most apt. If he is not sure, he could consult the counsellee,
and the two together could make the right choice.
This discussion illustrates the difficulty the counsellor has to face in
personalizing the problem, and offers some practical help.
2. Another situation may arise in which you find that the counsellee is not
responsible for what caused the problem. For example, an administrator in all
fairness had to deny someone admission to a particular course. As a result of
this, the person denied admission has adopted an attitude of retaliation
against the administrator. This is expressed in subtle ways, though often very
unpleasant. In this case, the administrator’s personal deficiency would not be
the denial of admission but the way she reacts to this unpleasant situation, or
how far she allows the situation to affect herself, say, rendering her less
happy, losing her peace of mind, and so on.
In the example above, the administrator’s goal would be to learn how to
accept such situations peacefully as part of her job; i.e., to increase her ability
to put up with such incidents; to learn to patiently control any ill feeling
towards that person who is vexing her and to develop greater empathy
towards that person.
3. Here are other suggestions to help you in personalizing the counsellee’s
problem:
— understand the counsellee’s value system, i.e., what is very important to
her.
— compare the counsellee’s functioning in the problematic area with people
functioning effectively in the same area.
— understand what exactly prevents the counsellee from functioning well.
— utilize your own experience in living to identify the counsellee’s faulty
ways of relating to the world, such as, shyness, lack of self-control,
distorted perceptions of self and/or others, inability to foresee the
consequences of one’s actions, inability to decide, etc.
— be as specific as possible in labelling the problem.
— The situation in which the counsellee is placed may not be the cause of the
problem, but the way she perceives it or the meaning she gives to it may
create trouble.
Some persons have great difficulty in exploring and understanding
themselves. For them, it will be most effective to proceed on a tentative
course of action. This will bring valuable feedback to identify the problem
which was so elusive before.
Other examples of personalizing the problem
A. Read Appendix I, A and on reaching the second stage of personalizing
answer yourself the question, “In what way are you contributing to the
problem?”
Here are several possible personalizations of the problem:
1. You feel unhappy because you cannot be patient with irritating people.
2. You feel very annoyed because you cannot tolerate people upsetting your
schedule.
3. You feel very angry because you do not want to sacrifice your
effectiveness to other things.
4. You feel very unhappy because you cannot handle these irritating
situations in a flexible and peaceful way.
When we turn these personal deficiencies into goals, we would have the
following:
1. Your goal is to be patient with irritating people.
2. Your goal is to tolerate people upsetting your schedule.
3. Your goal is to sacrifice effectiveness to other things.
4. Your goal is to handle irritating situations in a flexible and peaceful way.
Of all these goals, no. 4 appears the most meaningful and desirable.
B. Read Appendix I, C and do the same as above.
Here are several possible personalizations of the problem:
1. You feel very angry because you cannot stop thinking that your husband
wants to annoy you.
2. You feel very hurt because you cannot understand how your husband
wants to make you suffer so much.
3. You feel very let down because you cannot stop suspecting his motives in
coming late.
4. You feel very confused because you cannot control your worrying about
your husband when there is no real reason for it.
When we turn these personal deficiencies into goals we would have the
following:
1. Your goal is to stop thinking your husband wants to annoy you.
2. Your goal is to understand how your husband wants to make you suffer so
much.
3. Your goal is to stop suspecting his motives in coming late.
4. Your goal is to control your worrying about your husband when there is no
real reason for it.
Of all these goals, no. 4 appears the most suitable for it offers her scope to
discriminate situations and train herself to be realistic. It is much more
positive than the other three goals.
C. Read Appendix I, D and do the same as above.
Here are several possible personalizations of the problem:
1. You feel very hurt because you cannot accept her rejection.
2. You feel very humiliated because you cannot accept that she can change
her mind.
3. You feel very disturbed because you place too much value on this
friendship.
4. You feel disappointed in yourself because you have failed to understand
that she is going through a crisis.
When we turn these personal deficiencies into goals, we have the
following:
1. Your goal is to accept her rejection.
2. Your goal is to accept that she can change her mind.
3. Your goal is to lessen your value on this friendship.
4. Your goal is to give her understanding.
Of all these goals, no. 4 appears the most meaningful and desirable.
Proceeding to the Initiating Stage—Assume Responsibilty
After the counsellor has personalized the problem and the goal together, the
counsellee will show satisfaction at the fitting way in which her personal
deficiency has been formulated and at the clear and practical goal she can
strive to attain. The counsellee will then feel confident that in following that
direction she will come out of the problem. And this motivates her to assume
responsibility for changing what she is not doing. Then indeed, the counsellee
is ready to pass to the initiating stage.
If, however, the counsellee does not willingly accept the counsellor’s
personalization of the problem, then he must respond to the counsellee’s
present feeling and go back to the responding stage. The reason why the
counsellee does not accept the counsellor’s personalization of the problem
may be either because the counsellor has not understood her in depth, or
because the counsellee is not prepared to accept it, even though it may be her
real personal deficiency.
Going back to the responding stage will meet either need. By accurately
responding to the counsellee’s feelings and their reasons, she will further
explore herself and a better understanding of the counsellee will be achieved
by the counsellor. At the same time, the counsellee will grow in trust in the
counsellor and thus be better prepared to receive constructively the
personalization of her personal deficiency.
If the counsellor passes to the initiating stage before the counsellee is ready
for it, counselling may end in failure and frustration for both counsellor and
counsellee.
Comments
1. Handing Control. By personalizing the problem, the counsellor is not
assessing blame or fault; rather, he is handing control and power over to the
counsellee. How is this done? The counsellee does not know what to do to
change the situation, hence she has no control over it. When the counsellor
makes her aware of a personal deficiency and of a goal, the counsellee
concretely understands what she can do to change the situation. Realizing
this, she acquires power to control the situation. There is something very con-
crete right inside herself which the counsellee can change and not something
elusive over which she has no power. Thus the counsellor hands control and
power over to the counsellee.
2. Personalizing strengths. So far, I have talked of personalizing
problems and personal deficiencies. In dealing with students, trainees,
children, you will, also, have to personalize strengths in order to stimulate
growth in them. Personalizing strengths is different from personalizing
problems. Here we point out the negative, “you cannot”. In personalizing
strengths, we emphasize the positive, “you are able”. Strengths means
specific behaviours which the person has that are contributing to success.
Thus, a young person bursts out: “See! I got it! A B. A. First Class! I was not
sure I would get it.” You could respond: “Great! You feel elated because you
have been able to achieve what you were not so sure about.” Another young
person is just returning from his stay at the hospital and says: “It’s all over! I
did not imagine I could get through that long month;” You respond: “You
feel very pleased because you have been able to endure patiently all this
month.” Another says: “Hey! I got the Cup at the elocution competition!”
You respond: “You feel very excited because you have been rated above
many others in public speaking.” Hearing from you, a significant person,
those words “you have been able to” makes the young person more aware of
her strength and, thus, she can more readily use it in life.
Summary
We have responded to the counsellee’s experiences at the level at which
she presented them, so that she could explore herself in relation to where she
was in her world. We have personalized the counsellee’s understanding of
her goals in order to facilitate her understanding of where she is in relation to
where she wants to be in her world. The personalizing stage prepares the
counsellee for the final stage of the counselling process: Initiating.
Practice
Start with yourself. Look straight at yourself in some problematic area:
personalize your contribution to the problem and your goal. Take some time
to reflect on your performance as counsellor of yourself and learn from your
mistakes.
After this experience, begin with giving three interchangeable responses in
a row to someone who comes to consult you. Once the person has left you,
reflect on your performance: Were the responses too lengthy? Were they
somewhat confused? How could you have responded better? Learn from your
mistakes and practise again with another person. As you gain in experience
and self-confidence, pass on to give six interchangeable responses. Then,
reflect again, modify what calls for a change, and practise again.
Use this method of planning, experimenting, reflecting, modifying, trying
again, in learning the personalizing skills. Here you have the advantage of the
counsellee’s validation of your responses by her acceptance or rejection of
them. If you stimulate the counsellee to collaborate with you in personalizing,
then, she will be of great help to you.
Personalization of strengths can be applied with great benefit to children,
students, employees and friends.
Questions:
1. What is the skill of personalizing the problem and the goal?
2. Why does the counsellor ask the counsellee to personalize her problem?
3. Give two reasons why the counsellor personalizes the problem and goal
together?
4. Make four suggestions to facilitate the personalization of the problem.
5. Why to personalize strengths?
6. How does the counsellor hand over control over the problematic situation
to the counsellee?
REFERENCES
Carkhuff, R.R. and Others, The Art of Helping — Trainer’s Guide,
Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource Development Press, 1977.
CHART IV
ALL SKILL-STEPS
Attending physically
— sit facing c (c=counsellee)
— lean forward
— make eye-contact
— avoid distracting behaviours
Observing
— physically : (strong, weak)
— emotionally : facial expression, posture, grooming
— interpersonally : positive, negative, neutral
Listening
— know what you are listening for
— listen for the specifics
— don’t interrupt
— don’t judge
— resist distractions
— recall tone of voice, feeling words
Responding
— integrate seen and heard, ask: If I were c how would I feel?
— identify feeling intensity and appropriate word
— confirm it with your observation of c
— find the reason for the feeling
— use: you feel..........because............
— (final summary) You feel — because –— and you wonder what you could do about it.
Personalizing problem and goal
— ask c: What are you doing or not doing that contributes to your problem?
— ask yourself the same
— use: you feel.....because you cannot......and you want to
Initiating
— your goal is...........
— ask c: What steps could you take to reach the goal? Write them down. Help c to formulate practical
and concrete steps
— read the goal and steps back to c for additional steps
— yourself add appropriate steps
— read again the goal and all the steps back to c and ask c to choose the first step
— place the first step in space and time
— use: your first step is...........
EIGHTH SESSION
INTEGRATE OTHER MODELS
OF COUNSELLING INTO THIS MODEL
Every model of counselling has its strengths and weaknesses. In Carkhuff’s
model of counselling, the skills used to stimulate self-exploration in the
counsellee are: responding to feeling, to feeling and content, with a summary,
with a question, and the final summary. In the case of some counsellees,
depending on the nature of the problem in hand, other skills from other
models would enhance self-exploration in the counsellee. They would
certainly enrich the effectiveness of the stage of Responding, if they were
integrated in this stage of the process of counselling.
Obviously, this presupposes that the counsellor is trained in other models of
counselling and is competent to use them. This is not the place to teach these
other models. But, for the sake of illustration, I shall just mention some skills
or techniques, which could be integrated into the stage of Responding. They
would help to deepen self-exploration in some counsellees.
Rational Emotive Therapy (RET)
If the counsellee is under the influence of some ‘absolutes’ or ‘musts’, such
as, “I must be first in everything I do”, “I must be liked by everybody”,
“Rejection is horrible”, “This should never happen”, etc., or, if she is telling
himself or herself something negative all the time, such as, “I am no good”,
“I can’t speak in public”, “I am going to fail”, etc., the counsellor could ask
her, “What kind of self-talk are you using?” Then he could explain to her the
irrationality of these absolutes or ‘musts’, and of a negative self-talk, helping
her to understand the negative influence they have had on her behaviour. At
the same time, she could be helped to change a negative self-talk into a
positive one.
Ellis writes: “There is not anything awful, terrible or horrible in the
universe, including rejection by someone for whom I care; there are only
serious inconveniences and frustrations, which I shall never like but which I
can definitely stand.”
Transactional Analysis (TA)
The human being adopts three approaches or ways of relating. He comes
across to others in three different ways or three Ego states:
— the child : I am not O.K., you are O.K.
— the parent : I am O.K., you are not O.K.
— the adult : I am O.K., you are O.K.
TA is the latest in analytic treatments, and not altogether different from this
line. The goal and purpose of TA is the achievement of an emancipated
Adult, an adult capable of appropriately mobilizing the Parent and the
Child, but never dominated by them. An adult who affirms and lives out the
ideal ‘Life-position’: I am O.K. — You are O.K. (Games People Play, Eric
Berne, MD; I am OK, You’re OK, Thomas A Harris, MD).
Gestalt Psychotherapy (GT)
Gestalt is a German word which means configuration, totality. We start
from the fact that our contact with reality is not complete; it is unfinished,
there are some gaps in the gestalt which need exploring and working through.
Work starts on the here-and-now-present position. From the here and now
experience, we go into deeper self-exploration and relationships with that
experience. GT uses body-language; beating a mattress; speaking to a chair;
using dreams. The belief that is healthy to let off steam no longer holds up.
Studies show that outbursts augment and perpetuate anger, like a below
blowing on fire. Anger prompts the outpouring of stress hormones, which
causes heart rate and blood pressure to rise. Suppressing rage is as bad.
Manage your motions by neither burying them nor giving in to them
(Reader’s Digest, August 2002, Temper).
Fantasy dialogues can be used to deepen the counsellee’s self-exploration
and self-understanding. Fantasy dialogues are primarily an intra-individual
approach whose purpose is to facilitate awareness of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of
the counsellee’s behaviour. E.g., in problems of inner conflict, you may ask
the counsellee to sit with an empty chair in front of her. The ‘good you’ sits
in one chair and the ‘bad you’ sits in the empty chair. They interact and
exchange places. This can be used also in problems of relationships. The
counsellee addresses her opponent who is supposed to be sitting in the empty
chair. Then they exchange places to dramatize the conversation.
These and similar dramatizations may help some counsellees to explore
themselves and realize better where they are in their worlds, and how they
feel and why.
Learning Theories (LTh)
The counsellee may be helped to realize this: you were not born with this
problem. You have learned to react that way. If we can find out how you
learned this behaviour, then it would be easier to replace it by some other
behaviour. These questions may help: When did you begin behaving this
way? How did it start? Did something happen to you around that time, say in
your social environment or whatever? Point out the connection to her
between what happened to her then and the way she behaves now.
We learn to form habits by repeating reactions which bring us satisfaction.
If you become aware of the satisfaction that way of behaving brought you,
then, you may learn another way of behaving in response to the same stimuli,
which will bring you greater satisfaction. When you experience this greater
satisfaction, this will mark the beginning of change in you, because you will
adopt the new behaviour.
It has been described above how various models of counselling can
contribute to the First Stage — Responding — of the counselling model
explained in this book. Whatever techniques the counsellor uses, all must be
directed to achieve the stage of responding. i.e., to communicate to the
counsellee a neat summary which embodies the dominant feelings and their
reasons, and present a clear picture of where the counsellee is in her world.
This summary, however, must be validated by the counsellee by saying, “this
is exactly how I feel and where I am”, or similar expressions. If this
validation is not given, then, the counsellor has to go back to responding and
come to understanding the counsellee more accurately.
This validation on the part of the counsellee is very important to make sure
that the counsellor has accurately understood the counsellee, for only then
can the counsellor pass on to the Second Stage — Personalizing.
CONFRONTATION
Confrontation
People, generally speaking, understand by ‘confrontation’ a premeditated
action on the part of an individual who accuses another and brings up
witnesses against him. Others may take confrontation to mean placing a
person face to face with some relevant facts about himself, or with some
significant person. Thus, a thief is caught red-handed and he cannot deny that
he has stolen the article.
In this model of counselling, the term ‘confron- tation’ means something
different from the above. It is not a punitive action. It is not the result of
impatience with a troublesome person in order to control him. It has nothing
negative about it. Let us be clear on this difference. Confrontation here is an
action which is initiated by the counsellor based on his understanding of the
counsellee. The counsellor observes some discrepancy in the counsellee’s
behaviour and brings it to her awareness; e.g., You say you are very happy,
yet your tone of voice is sad.
The two essential ingredients of confrontation are: first, observation of
some discrepancy in the counsellee; second, the counsellor brings it to the
awareness of the counsellee. Let us explain the terms discrepancy and why-
when-and-how the discrepancy should be made known to the counsellee.
Discrepancies can be found in many areas of the person. There are three
types of discrepancies which are most common.
(1) A discrepancy between the counsellee’s insight and her behaviour. For
example, the counsellee is a married woman who has realized her weakness
in not asserting herself in front of her husband. She has been treated like a
slave by the husband: she has to give him a detailed account of all her doings,
whom she talked to during the day, hand him the entire salary on pay day,
etc. This woman has got an insight that she should have asserted herself at the
beginning of her marriage and, even though late, she should assert herself
now. But she does nothing and continues as before. Her behaviour does not
tally with her insight.
(2) A discrepancy lying between what the counsellee is and what she wants
to be. For example, a young man comes from a family where his father was
brilliant both in the academic field and in sports. This young man wants to be
a carbon copy of his father. He tries and tries again to excel in both fields as
his father did, but he always falls short of his expectations, for he has not got
the qualities of his father. He is a different person. He tries to be someone he
can never be.
(3) A discrepancy between the counsellee’s experience of herself and the
way the counsellor experiences her. For example, due to faulty upbringing, a
girl has been made to feel that she is no good for anything. Then she joins
school and her teachers see many good qualities in her and compliment her
on her achievements. That girl will deny that she is gifted and will explain
her successes in terms of good luck. It will not be easy for her to change her
own self-perception.
Why confrontation is effective
All of us have our self-respect and our pride. We do not like to show our
weakness. We like to appear great and to be praised and admired. And so, we
use our defence-mechanisms to cover up our true selves. We even hide our
negative points from ourselves through rationalization, and present ourselves
in ambiguous ways to others, so that they may not discover the bad points in
us.
The purpose of confrontation is to reduce the ambiguity and incongruities
in the counsellee’s experience of herself, and in her communication to the
counsellor. It aims at motivating personal growth, and personal growth takes
place in a series of endless confrontations.
The power of confrontation comes from the fact that the counsellee is
forcefully brought in touch with her real self and with the responsibility of
making a far-reaching choice: either she refuses to see her real plight and
wants to carry on in the direction of decompensation, and this is frightening
to her; or she decides to give up her illusions and commits herself to
mobilizing all her resources constructively, and this is promising. When a
person is encountered in this fashion, she is compelled to be real. Hence, the
effectiveness of confrontation.
Another reason for the effectiveness of confrontation is the liberating
influence of truth. When the counsellee is confronted, she sees before her
eyes the real situation in which she is placed or the truth about herself. And
truth, even though it may be painful, sets her free from illusions and distorted
perceptions about herself. The truth about herself exerts on the counsellee a
healing influence which draws her gently by its own beauty to follow its path.
When to use it
Confrontation is not used in the stages of attending and responding, for the
counsellee is not ready to receive it constructively. It is only after the
counsellor has made the counsellee feel fully understood, respected and cared
for, that he will gauge the counsellee’s readiness to receive confrontation
constructively. Then, functioning high in empathy, genuineness, respect and
with a keen desire to help the counsellee, the counsellor can use confrontation
in personalizing the problem.
Example
Counsellee : I feel so irritated when people ask me from which part of the
country I am. I don’t believe that any race as such is superior to
another race.
Counsellor-response : You feel annoyed because people want to know at
once which community you belong to. On the one hand, you say
that all races are on the same level and, on the other, you do not like
others to know the race you belong to.
How to use it
The following point cannot be stressed enough: for confrontation to be
stimulating and motivating, the counsellor must use it in a spirit of deep
caring for the counsellee and with a great personal interest in seeing her grow
as a person. If the counsellee senses these attitudes in the counsellor she will
receive confrontation well and it will help her; if she, on the contrary,
perceives a punitive attitude in the counsellor, or a genuine way of venting
his feelings of annoyance on her, then confrontation will do harm, for it will
hurt the counsellee’s feelings without at the same time supporting her. The
counsellee may decide to give up the counsellor.
Take the risk
Confrontation, as explained above, is a risk which the counsellor takes.
This risk involves a number of possible complications. Some of the
complications are as follows: Will the counsellee have the stamina to endure
the crisis precipitated by the confrontation and to resolve it in a helpful way?
Will confrontation prove too much of a challenge to the counsellee, so that
she succumbs to it? Has the counsellor enough confidence in himself to
handle the ensuing crisis of the counsellee and help her out of it? If the
counsellee has built up a very friendly relationship with the counsellor, will
the counsellor have the courage to risk spoiling the relationship and continue
to help her?
Some counsellor may say “I don’t want to hurt the feelings of anybody.
Therefore, confrontation is not possible for me.” Think of the surgeon. He too
may be very concerned about his patient. But if he is committed to restore his
patient’s health, he will not hesitate to operate and remove the cancerous
tumour. If he does not have the courage to do that, he should not be a
surgeon. Similarly, if the counsellor is committed to the personal growth of
the counsellee, he should be prepared to go through very unpleasant
situations in order to promote psychological health in his counsellee. Often,
you cannot heal without hurting. Only the committed person can hurt in a
way that heals.
If the counsellor observes the discrepancies the counsellee has and waits
for the appropriate time, if he is keenly interested in the counsellee’s personal
growth and makes the counsellee aware of them in a spirit of understanding,
genuineness, respect and caring, then, he will be confronting the counsellee
in a growth-stimulating way. The counsellee will feel impelled to go deeper
into self-exploration or she will feel motivated to change her ways, being
faithful to her commitment.
Self-training in confrontation
We could ask, “How can one grow in the ability to confront others?”
Before answering this question, let me put a question to you: How often do
you confront yourself? You attend a personal growth seminar or make a
spiritual retreat and resolve to change some aspects of your behaviour. A
month later, you may find that you are behaving just as you did before the
seminar or retreat. Do you confront yourself, then? Do you ask yourself,
Didn’t I resolve that I would change this way of behaving? But I have done
nothing to change so far. This is self-confrontation.
The person who constantly confronts himself, improves himself and, in
turn, finds it easy to confront other people. You could try this method in your
effort to learn how to confront others.
IMMEDIACY
The word ‘immediacy’ is a technical term and has quite a different meaning
from the word ‘immediately’. Immediacy is dealing with the feelings
betweeen the counsellee and the counsellor in the here and now. A high level
of immediacy exists in the open discussion and analysis of the interpersonal
relationships occuring between the counsellee and the counsellor within the
counselling situation.
Example: the counsellee is a woman who feels uneasy with her male
counsellor, but does not dare to say this to him directly.
At some stage after several sessions, the counsellee says what follows:
c: I find it difficult to relate to my male friends.
C: What you are trying to tell me is how difficult it is for you to relate to me,
here and now.
c: Right! But I was afraid to say this to you openly because I would hurt your
feelings.
C: You felt inclined to tell me that, but fear kept you back.
c: Yes, but now the fear is disappearing.
C: You feel more comfortable with me now because you have said that
openly and my reaction has been relaxing for both of us.
c: I feel now that I can tell you how I feel towards you directly and fearlessly.
C: You feel very comfortable now because you can be your real self with me
and that peacefully. I too feel very good with you at this moment.
Immediacy overlaps somewhat with confrontation but it is different. The
difference between immediacy and confrontation is this: in confronting the
counsellee, the counsellor brings to the counsellee’s awareness some
discrepancy which he has observed in her. In responding with immediacy, the
counsellor uses the observed discrepancy in the counselllee to interpret the
here and now relationship between the counsellee and himself. Thus, in the
above example, when the counsellor responds saying, “what you are trying to
tell me is how difficult it is for you to relate to me here and now”, he has
observed the counsellee’s discrepancy between what she actually says and
what she means to say. But the counsellor, having brought this discrepancy to
the awareness of the counsellee, does not just stop here. In immediacy the
counsellor goes a step further. He uses the discrepancy in order to interpret
the interpersonal relationhsip between the counsellee and himself in the here
and now: “how difficult it is for you to relate to me”.
Immediacy, also, means that the counsellor is simultaneously aware of both
the counsellee’s feeling experience and his own feeling experience at the
present moment.
Why effective
In real life, many people have problems that centre around their
relaionships with others and many do not have the chance to work through
these problems. With a counsellor who is immediate, the counsellee has the
opportunity to work out difficulties in her ongoing relationship with him
there and then. She can learn to restructure her interpersonal relationships by
finding that it is possible to confront, to reveal herself, and to express freely
her negative and positive feelings to another human being quite safely. On
the other hand, the counsellor can help the counsellee to face the reality of
another person and adjust to that reality, by communicating freely his present
feelings towards her.
Immediacy facilitates an important learning for the counsellee, namely,
learning to communicate fully with herself and with others. Because she
dares to face the reality of herself and of others, the counsellee now uses
words that convey directly what she wants to say, rather than using
ambiguous words and twisted meaning.
When to use it
Immediacy is not used in the stages of attending and responding, for the
counsellee is not yet prepared to function at such a high level of interpersonal
relationships. It may be used at the stages of personalizing and initiating (See
Chart II).
Very often the expressions of the counsellee, whether direct or indirect,
reflect her feelings and attitudes towards the counsellor in the present
moment. The counsellor should be sensitive to these expressions and respond
to them.Then the counsellee will have her real experience clarified.
In communicating immediacy that focuses upon the counsellee’s feelings,
the counsellor may use the format, “You feel — because I ——”. But in
commuicating immediacy that focuses upon the counsellor’s feelings, he may
use the format, “I feel — because you ——”.
Questions
1. How is confrontation understood in this model of counselling?
2. How to use confrontation?
3. How to confront yourself?
4. How does Immediacy differ from Confrontation?
5. When can the counsellor use immediacy?
6. How does immediacy help the counsellee?
REFERENCES
Berenson, B.G. and Mitchell, K.M. Confrontation for Better or for Worse.
Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource Development Press, 1976.
Carkhuff, R.R. Helping and Human Relations. Vols. I and II, New York:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.
NINTH SESSION
THIRD STAGE: INITIATING
As we have seen in session VII, the personalized goal has established
where the counsellee is in her world with respect to where she wants to be. In
the example cited there, Anne cannot be honest with her boyfriend and face
the consequences, and wants to be able to be honest with him and face the
consequences. It is very clear to Anne where she wants to be. Personalizing
helps the counsellee to know where she is going. Initiating helps the
counsellee to get there. Now, the question is: How can Anne get there?
The answer is by identifying appropriate and systematic steps which will
suit both Anne’s need and resources. Systematic steps are steps arranged in
a gradual increase in the effort the counsellee has to make in reaching the
goal. Through attending, observing, listening, responding and personalizing,
the counsellor has come to understand Anne in depth and this understanding
has been validated by Anne. Thus, the counsellor is competent to identify
appropriate steps for he is fully aware of Anne’s particular need and
personal resources, and can point out the direction to follow from within
Anne’s frame of reference.
To help the counsellee effectively, the counsellor must first of all enter into
her frame of reference. Then, the counsellor is in a position to initiate action
from within the counsellee’s frame of reference. It is this that the counsellor
does at the third stage of counselling called Initiating.
1. The skill of initiating enables the counsellor to identify appropriate and
systematic steps which will take the counsellee from where she is to where
she wants to be.
2. The purpose of initiating is to motivate the counsellee to act in order
to solve her problem, by showing what can be done to reach the goal, and by
laying out specific steps in such a way that the counsellee realizes that the
goal is, in fact, attainable.
In the ‘Aeneid’, Virgil beautifully describes the boat races of the young
supporters of Aeneas around the island off the shore of Carthage. Referring to
the winning team rowing with their full force a little ahead of the others, he
says: “possunt quia posse videntur”, i.e., they can win because they feel they
can. The purpose of initiating is precisely to make the counsellee feel she
can reach the goal. It is this feeling which motivates her to strain every fibre
in her body to accomplish what she feels she can accomplish. How to create
in the counselee the good feeling that she can do it? By presenting a
goal which is very relevant to her need; by devising practical and concrete
steps that are well within her resources; and by making the first step easy to
take. When the counselee is faced with this programme of action, she will
experience the good feeling that she can do it. And she will be motivated to
take the first step.
Briefly, the two main purposes of initiating are:
a) to point out to the counsellee the specific steps which will take her to the
desired goal.
b) to motivate the counsellee to take those steps until she reaches the goal.
3. Skills used in the initiating stage.
— state the goal clearly
— develop steps to the goal
— formulate the first step
Explanation of these skills
A. State the goal clearly: “Your goal is.................”
The counsellor takes the goal from the personalized problem and goal
response and states it clearly. Anne’s personalized problem and goal is: ‘You
cannot be honest with him and face the consequences and you want to’. (See
Anne’s example in Seventh Session). The counsellor clearly states the goal
thus: ‘Anne, your goal is to be honest with him and face the consequences’.
It is very important to have that goal clearly and briefly stated. The
counsellor should use the same words as in the personalized problem and
goal.
B. Develop steps to the goal
How does the counsellor develop steps to the goal? At once after stating the
goal, the counsellor asks the counsellee: “What steps could you take to reach
the goal?” or, “What behaviours could you adopt to attain the goal?”
Example
C: Anne, your goal is to be honest with him and face the consequences. What
steps could you take to reach the goal?
The purpose in putting this question to the counsellee is to stimulate her to
contribute by using her resources. However, the counsellee’s answer may not
be fully satisfactory or complete. Then, the counsellor must supplement what
is lacking.
In order to remember well the steps presented by the counsellee, the
counsellor would do well to write them down. If some step is vague or
impractical, the counsellor through dialogue helps the counsellee to formulate
it in a more concrete way. These steps should as far as possible be behaviours
which are observable and measurable.
Example. Anne answers the question thus:
— I could reflect on whether I love myself more than I love him.
— I could be very honest with him and tell him. Perhaps he would appreciate
my honesty.
— I could not blame him were he to reject me. It’s better to know his mind
before marriage than after we are married.
— I shall pray for strength to be honest with him.
— I will not deceive him.
After the counsellee has finished, the counsellor reads them back to her in
this way:
C : Anne, your goal is to be honest with him and face the consequences. You
suggest the following steps: to reflect on whether you love yourself more
than you love him, to be very honest with him and not deceive him, not to
blame him in case of rejection, to pray for strength to be honest with him. Is
there anything else you could think of?
This question is put because after the counsellee hears the whole list of
steps presented, she may be stimulated to add something else.
In this case, Anne replies: No. Nothing else comes to my mind.
At this point, if the counsellor is not satisfied with the steps presented by
the counsellee, he should add other steps or modify some of them. Rarely will
the counsellee offer perfect and complete steps. Therefore, a good counsellor
must have something to offer to the counsellee from his personal resources.
The greater these resources are the more helpful the counsellor will be. If a
counsellor cannot offer anything practical, he will not be helpful.
Hence, the counsellor must keep broadening his repertoire of responses in
order to meet many and various situations. How can the counsellor achieve
this? Experience of life, experience of counselling people, reading, reflection
and personal experience in solving one’s personal problems will go a long
way to achieve this.
Notice here that dialogue has taken the place of ‘formats’. This is so
because at this point the counsellor has fully entered into the counsellee’s
frame of reference and is initiating from within it. However, responding to
the changing feeling of the counsellee must be kept.
Example. In Anne’s case the counsellor has something to offer her and
responds thus:
C : How about asking the specialist who treated you if it is advisable for you
to get married? He could give you good advice. If he says, ‘Yes’, then you
could tell your boyfriend the truth and what the specialist advises. I am
inclined to think that this may happen. But were the specialist to discourage
you from getting married, then, your love for your boyfriend should
strengthen. you to be honest with him and accept the fact that you are not
able to assume the responsibility of a married woman.
c : Yes, this is a good idea. I will do this.
C. Formulate the first step: “Your first step is......... .”
Once the list of steps is complete, the counsellor says:
C: Your goal is........... . The steps to reach the goal are ........... . The
counsellor reads the whole list to the counsellee. Then, the counsellor asks:
“of all these steps, which one would you like to take first?” Through
dialogue counsellor and counsellee arrive at an easy and practical step.
In order to make the first step very clear and concrete, it must be located in
space and time, i.e., the place where the counsellee will take the step, at
home, in the office, etc., and the number of days and the number of times
during the day she will practise the steps before the next interview.
Example
c: Yes, this is a good idea. I will do this.
C: When are you going to ask the specialist for an appointment?
c: Tomorrow morning I’ll ring him up from my office.
C: Anne, your first step is this: tomorrow morning from your office you will
make an appointment with your specialist to find out if you are really
competent to get married. Then come to report to me.
Review. Instruct the counsellee to review at night before going to bed her
performance on taking her first step, correct any mistakes, and resolve to do
better tomorrow. In order to motivate the counsellee to take the first step,
the counsellor could tell her: don’t focus on the goal. Focus on the first
step. Focus on what you can do; not on what you find difficult to do.
(See other illustrations of the counselling process in Appendix I).
Comments
1. It is important to bear in mind that the steps to the goal will be effective
to the degree that they emerge from the counsellee’s frame of reference and
have meaning and value for her.
2. It will help some counsellees to rehearse the first step. Take Anne in
the above example. She may feel scared to ask the specialist about her
competence to get married, for she is afraid of a negative answer. Anne must
be prepared for any eventuality by encouraging her to seek the truth about
herself and accept it. In this case the counsellor feels that Anne is competent
to get married. So, the counsellor could communicate this to Anne as a high
probability. This will encourage her.
Anne could rehearse her first step like this: the counsellor tells her, “I shall
act as your specialist now. This room is my office. Go out of the room, enter
and consult me.” Anne follows these instructions and thus rehearses the first
step. Then, the counsellor asks Anne: “How are you feeling now?” They
discuss the performance, clarify things and thus Anne becomes well prepared
and highly motivated to take the first step.
3. Steps to the goal are on various levels: physical, emotional, intellectual,
interpersonal and spiritual. Effective steps to the goal are based on the
holistic approach. The word ‘holistic’ comes from the Greek word ‘olos’
which means ‘whole’. Thus, the holistic approach means that any disorder or
emotional problem is the disorder of the whole person, and not just of a
section of the personality. Therefore, in attempting to help a person with a
personal problem the counsellor must suggest steps which cover all the levels
of her personality, i.e., biological, psychological, sociological and spiritual
levels.
Here are some examples of steps on the four levels:
On the biological level: various ways of improving the counsellee’s
physical health, such as rest, diet, vitamins, exercise, etc.
On the psychological level: training in responsiveness and assertiveness,
training in how to modify one’s attitudes. Dunbar said that, “It is often more
important to know what kind of patient has the disease than what kind of
disease the patient has.” The counsellee’s attitudes to life and to her social
environment play a major role in securing a cure.
On the sociological level: Procedures to modify the counsellee’s social
environment. This can be done either by moving away from some stressful
situation, like placing a child in a boarding school because of the tension at
home created by quarrelling parents; or by helping the parents to modify their
attitudes and their interpersonal relationships.
There are various contributing factors to the counsellee’s problem, i.e., the
part played by the counsellee and the part played by other people, or by the
injustice done to the counsellee. Thus, counselling has to deal not only with
the counsellee’s contribution, but also, as far as possible, with removing the
injustice done to the counsellee. This may be done by helping the counsellee
to appeal to higher authorities who have the power to remedy the unfair
situation. Care then, will be taken to form an objective view of the
counsellee’s contribution to the problem and that of others in the given
situation.
On the spiritual level: pray for strength and courage, trust in God, trust in
the power of the risen Lord to heal and change us, healing through
forgiveness of others and through the sacrament of reconciliation, Holy Mass
meaningfully offered in faith and love, etc.
4 Values. In developing steps to the goal, the counsellor must bear in mind
the counsellee’s scale of values, i.e., principles or norms which are very
important for the counsellee and principles and norms which are not
important. The counsellor can come to know the counsellee’s scale of values
by knowing the counsellee’s religion and culture, by observing and listening
to the counsellee.
Thus, in the above example, Anne is a good Catholic and values getting
married by the Church. Hindus and Muslims have other values. Thus, there
are big differences between counsellees. Steps to the goal must be in
agreement with the counsellee’s values. It may, also, happen that the
counsellor will have to help the counsellee to develop a sound scale of
values.
5. In the Second Session, page 39, it was said that, counselling is not giving
advice. Now the question is: What is the difference between giving
advice and suggesting steps to the goal? The advice is given from the
frame of reference of the giver, without exploring and fully understanding the
situation of the receiver. This creates a dependency in the receiver, which
inhibits her growth as a mature person, for he/she is not stimulated to use
his/her resources. In suggesting steps to the goal, the counsellor has already
fully entered into the counsellee’s frame of reference; his understanding of
the counsellee’s problematic situation has been validated by the counselee;
and has realized her specific need and personal resources. Hence the steps
suggested by the counsellor, though they originate from the counsellor’s
frame of reference, they are so to say filtered through the counsellee’s frame
of reference, meet the specific need of the counselee and are well within her
personal resources.
Questions:
1. Why is the counsellor competent to identify appropriate steps to the
counsellee’s goal?
2. How to motivate the counsellee to take the first step?
3. Why does the counsellor ask the counsellee, “what steps could you take to
reach the goal?”
4. How can the counsellor enrich his competence to suggest practical steps to
the goal?
5. How to formulate the first step?
TENTH SESSION
SUBSEQUENT STAGE: EVALUATING
The subsequent stage of evaluating is the final stage of counselling and the
most important to ensure that the counsellee does take the steps and
eventually reach the goal.
Evaluating means to review how the counsellee takes the steps to the goal;
what modifications should be introduced; how to sustain motivation in the
counsellee; how to make sure that the counsellee does reach the goal.
Evaluating must be done through dialogue between counsellor and
counsellee. In this stage the counsellor should use all the attitudes and skills
he has learned in this course. Here he should be more spontaneous and use
confrontation and immediacy. The following tips will help:
— Motivate the counsellee to take the steps to the goal in this way:
* help c to feel a sense of personal achievement in taking the steps.
* challenge her giving her responsibility for meeting the demands made on
her.
* use positive or negative reinforcers by giving her adequate recognition for
her achievements or by confronting her for her negligence.
* make her feel that she is advancing towards the goal she set to herself.
* teach counsellee to review daily her performance on her programme of
action and resolve for the following day.
— Move to the next step of the programme only upon the mastery of the
previous step. This is very important for the success of the action
programme.
— Observe the counsellee in order to determine how far the behaviour which
the counsellee is practising is constructive or destructive; how far it is
relevant to the goal; and whether the counsellee is honest with herself and
with the counsellor.
Scott Peck writes: “As soon as they (patients) realize that they will ultimately
be required by the process of psychotherapy to assume total responsibility
for their condition and its cure, most patients will drop out... Of the
minority who stay in therapy, most must still be taught to assume total
responsibility for themselves as a part of their healing. This training is a
painstaking affair as the therapist confronts the patient with their avoidance
of responsibility again and again” (The Road Less Travelled).
A very important thing to do
In using the initiating skills, it is very important that you respond to the
counsellee as she reacts to each step. If she feels happy because things are
going well, or feels confused because she doesn’t see clearly, the counsellor
must respond to all the various feelings. e.g., “Anne, you feel happy because
the first step looks helpful to you.” Or, “You feel discouraged because this
step proved to be more difficult than you had anticipated.” In this way, you
can check your understanding of the counsellee’s feelings at every stage.
A simple programme
Sometimes due to various circumstances it may not be possible to develop
an action programme as elaborated here. In this case, you could develop a
minimal action programme which consists of the goal, a simple first step and
an intermediary step halfway between the goal and the first step.
Recycling Skill
‘Recycling’ here means to start all over again with the learning process
cycle of exploration, understanding and action. As the counsellee rises to a
higher plateau in her level of functioning, she discovers new and beautiful
vistas, new insights into herself. These insights will stimulate her to want to
explore these new avenues which will take her to a higher level of self-
actualization.
This process of going back and starting again with the learning process on a
higher plateau, which has been made possible by the counsellee’s progress, is
called ‘Recycling’. This process is graphically illustrated.
Thus we see that recycling the learning process is the secret of personal
growth. The process of growing is a constant learning through exploration,
understanding and action. It is a life-long process. Growing means moving up
from one plateau to a higher plateau and to yet another. From each higher
plateau the counsellee will make heart-warming discoveries which will fill
her with joy, enthusiasm and the challenge of rising yet higher. This is the
challenge of life: either you move upwards or you go backwards. There is no
plateau in this earthly life where you can pitch your tent and rest for good.
The reward here on earth is not just self-enrichment, but the joy of helping
others to grow, by offering these skills to them, so that they too can use them
and grow themselves and help others to grow.
Counselling requires effort in the counsellee. But many counsellees are
lazy. Scott says that, “perhaps nine out of ten who begin the process of
psychotherapy, drop out” (The Road Less Travelled, p. 293). The
pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; the optimist sees the
opportunity in every difficulty.
John Paul II has something beautiful to say about life. “You must have the
courage to accept life as it is. This means loving one’s times, without vain
regrets and without mythical utopias, convinced that each one has a mission
to carry out, that life is a gift received and must be bestowed on others,
whether the times are serene or intricate, peaceful or troubled. But it is not
enough to accept life as it is. It is necessary to transform life from a self-
centred to an other-centred position. As Jesus taught us: “Love one another as
I have loved you” (Jn 15:12). Love the whole world, because we are all
brothers and sisters and each one must bear the whole of humanity in his/her
heart!” (L’Osservatore Romano, June 4, 1979).
Practice in initiating for those who cannot do the course
Perhaps you are accustomed to initiating at once without first responding to
the counsellee’s feeling experience. That is, you may be giving advice to her
as to what she should do without caring to know where she comes from and
where she is. By now you may be convinced that, speaking generally, advice
is not helpful because it is given from the counsellor’s frame of reference and
not from the counsellee’s frame of reference. And, so it is not relevant to her.
The following programme may help you to develop your initiating skills.
l. Start by using the initiating skills on yourself. Choose some weakness of
yours for this practice, e.g., controlling your temper, being kind to others, etc.
Follow the skill-steps and begin with the first step. Evaluate your
performance and use positive or negative reinforcers on yourself. Be open to
modify your action-programme in the light of your reflection on how well
you are implementing your programme. This kind of practice is very
effective, for you are both counsellor and counsellee and, thus, you are in full
command of all the aspects of the programme.
2. Practise, first, attending, responding and personalizing your responses to
the counsellee. When you feel confident that you have understood correctly
where the counsellee is and where she wants to be, then begin with a simple
programme in this way: with the help of the counsellee, set a practical goal
which is well within the counsellee’s potentialities. Then, develop together a
first step. When this has been determined, develop an intermediary step,
somewhere between the first step and the goal. Now you have a programme.
Send the counsellee off to try her first step with an appointment to come back
and report to you how it went. With the counsellee’s feedback and your own
experience, you will improve your skill in developing programmes of action.
3. As you gain experience in this, pass on to a more complex step: defining
the goal by listing the various behaviours which the counsellee will adopt to
reach the goal. This is admittedly a difficult step, for you must express these
behaviours in observable and measurable terms. Try and go as far as you can.
When you get stuck, get help from someone more knowledgeable in these
matters. When you have the list of behaviours, then rank them in their order
of complexity, and differentiate between the first step to be taken and the last
step to be completed. As you practise this technique, it will become easier for
you.
4. You could already implement some sort of a time-table with a simple
programme. However, be ready to modify it in the light of the counsellee’s
feedback to you on her performance.
5. Evaluation should be used with every programme, be it simple or
complex. The same can be said about the positive and negative reinforcers.
Application
After practising the initiating skills on yourself and gaining self-confidence
in using them, you could first apply the simple programme given above to
your charges, i.e., children, students, employees, etc. As you gain in
experience, you could enlarge the actionprogramme as explained above.
AN OVERALL VIEW OF THE WHOLE MODEL OF COUNSELLING
When a counsellee comes for help with a problem and wants to solve it, she
has to change something in herself. This may be a change of attitude, of
perception of self or of others, of habits and in general a change of behaviour.
There is no solution without some change in the counsellee. Then the
question is: How do we change ourselves?
We change ourselves through a learning process of self-exploration leading
to self-understanding leading to action. This is the human way of changing
ourselves.
Now, if the counsellee changes herself through this learning process, the
question is: How does the counsellor introduce and sustain this learning
process in the counsellee?
In order to introduce the learning process in the counsellee, the counsellor
must first of all get the counsellee interested in wanting to be counselled, or
get her involved.
The counsellor involves the counsellee in the preparatory stage called
Attending. This stage includes the social skills, and the skills of attending
physically, observing and listening, which are the outward expression of
the attitudes of empathy, genuineness and respect. By adopting these
attitudes and using these skills, the counsellor will involve the counsellee, for
the counsellee experiences the counsellor as a kind person who is interested
in her and has time for her.
Once the counsellee is involved in counselling, the counsellor introduces
and sustains in her the learning process of changing herself. The counsellor
achieves this first by entering fully into her frame of reference.
How can the counsellor enter the counsellee’s frame of reference and
correctly understand where she is?
The counsellor does this in the first stage of the counselling process called
Responding. This includes the attitudes of empathy, genuineness,
respect, concreteness, self-disclosure and the skills of responding to
content, to feeling, to feeling and content; responding with questions, making
summaries and, at the end of this stage, presenting to the counsellee a neat
summary that fully answers how she feels and why, and having this
summary validated by the counsellee.
By adopting these attitudes and using these skills, the counsellor introduces
and sustains in the counsellee the first stage of the learning process, i.e., self
exploration. Through self-exploration the counsellee comes to know where
exactly she is in her world, how she feels and why she feels that way.
Once the counsellee has reached this point, the counsellor can lead her to a
deeper self-understanding. This is done in the second stage of the counselling
process called Personalizing. This includes the attitudes of empathy,
genuineness, respect, concreteness, self-disclosure, confrontation,
immediacy, and the skill of personalizing the problem and the goal.
By adopting these attitudes and using these skills, the counsellor introduces
and sustains in the counsellee the second stage of the learning process, i.e.,
self understanding in relation to where she is in her world with respect to
where she wants to be. At this point the counsellee has become aware of her
contribution to the problem and has assumed responsibility for it, and has
clearly seen the direction she should take and the goal she should attain.
At this point the counsellee sees clearly where she is in her world and
where she wants to be, and is asking: “what am I to do to get there?”
The counsellor is competent to answer this question because he has entered
fully into the frame of reference of the counsellee, has seen her world through
her eyes, and has realized her present need and her personal resources.
Therefore the counsellor is in a position to identify relevant and systematic
steps which will lead the counsellee from where she is to where she wants to
be. This is done in the third stage of the counselling process called Initiating.
This includes all the attitudes mentioned above and the skills of stating the
goal clearly, developing steps to reach the goal and stating the first step. Thus
the counsellor introduces and sustains in the counsellee the third stage of the
learning process, i.e., action.
It is to be noticed that this stage of initiating is not only to state the goal
clearly and point out the steps to reach the goal, but also to motivate the
counsellee to take the steps in order to make sure that she does in fact reach
the goal.
This motivation is built up in the counsellee in two ways. First, by showing
clearly the goal and the systematic steps to reach it; by devising them in such
a way that they are relevant to her needs and well within her resources, and
by making the first step easy to take. Thus the counsellor creates in the
counsellee the good feeling “I can do this.” Second, the counsellor sustains
motivation in the counsellee at the subsequent stage called Evaluating, by
using positive or negative reinforcers and modifying the steps in the light of
the feedback the counsellee gives him on her performance.
Thus we see how through the counselling process of responding,
personalizing and initiating, the counsellor introduces and sustains in the
counsellee the learning process of self-exploration leading to
selfunderstanding leading to action, by which the counsellee changes her
behaviour and solves her problem, and this is what personal counselling is
about.
Termination of Counselling
The question is: When and how should the counsellor discontinue the
counselling interviews?
The counsellee is the point of reference to make this decision. As she gains
in self-confidence and in rewarding experiences, the counsellee herself may
suggest that she feels that there is no further need for her to continue coming
to the counsellor. This is a good opportunity to agree with her and to part
company in a friendly way. At the same time, the counsellor should express
readiness for future interviews, were the counsellee to feel the need to come
back.
There may be some other counsellees, however, who would like to carry on
indefinitely, for they derive a great solace from the interview. In these cases,
it will be up to the counsellor to investigate whether these counsellees are in
real need or whether they just nurse a dependency on him. In the latter case,
obviously, the counsellor will have to take the initiative in terminating
counselling, and help them to grow out of this immaturity, and learn how to
stand on their own feet. Here the counsellor will have to combine kindness
with firmness to help those counsellees effectively.
The best criterion for terminating counselling would be when the
counsellee has reached the point where she can help herself in a growth-
stimulating manner. This is certainly a great compliment to her counsellor,
and a beautiful way of terminating counselling.
Questions:
1. What is the meaning of evaluating the counsellee’s performance?
2. How to motivate the counsellee to take all the steps to the goal?
3. Explain the skill of recycling the learning process.
4. When and how to terminate counselling?
REFERENCES
Carkhuff, R.R. and others, The Art of Helping — Trainer’s Guide.
Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource Development Press, 1977.
Carkhuff, R.R. The Art of Problem Solving. Amherst, Mass.: Human
Resource Development Press, 1977.
Carkhuff, R.R. How to Help Yourself. Third Edition. Amherst, Mass.:
Human Resource Development Press. 1977.
PART TWO
Counsellor’s
Personal Growth
Introduction
Research findings support the hypothesis that success in counselling
depends on the quality of the person who does counselling. If the counsellor
functions in life at a high level, then he will be able to help counsellees to rise
to a level higher than the one at which they are functioning. But if the
counsellor functions at a lower level than the counsellee’s level of
functioning, then the counsellee will deteriorate.
All of us have certain areas of our personality which call for reform and
enrichment. If trainees apply to these areas the human technology of personal
growth which they have learned, they will greatly improve their level of
functioning and thereby become helpful counsellors to many counsellees who
are desperately looking for helpful persons.
This section is an attempt to meet this need of counsellor-trainees. The
subjects presented in this section, such as Becoming Yourself, Mental Health,
Self-Actualization, Conscience and Superego and Professional Ethics will
hopefully prove helpful to raise the level of functioning of counsellor-
trainees. Counselling is as effective as the counsellor is living effectively.
ELEVENTH SESSION
BECOMING YOURSELF
Gordon Allport defined personality as, “The dynamic organization within
the individual of those psycho-physical systems which determine his unique
adjustment to his environment”. By psycho-physical systems is understood a
person’s capacities, activities and habits on the physical, emotional,
intellectual, social and spiritual levels.
Just as you do not find two persons looking completely alike, except in the
case of identical twins, so you will not meet anyone in the whole world who
is identical to you. Each person organizes his various capacities in a distinct
way by which he is marked off from other persons. Each personality is
unique.
Biologically our fingerprints are unique; our DNA is unique; our blood
most probably is unique.
The Bible says: “Everyone of you has received a special grace”(1 Pet 4:10).
This idea should guide you in becoming yourself. You should never want
to be someone else you admire, but rather you should focus your attention on
developing your own unique personality. Then, you are at your best and
second to none.
In order to achieve this, you must form a realistic idea of who you are. This
self-concept is the pivot for psychological growth and personality
development.
Formation of self-concept
The self-concept appears early in life with the formation of a nucleus called
‘I’ and ‘Me’. The child is aware of himself as a sentient and acting entity at
about 18 months of age. So the child learns by personal experience that the
foot belongs to him and is part of him while the toy is not. The child knows
nothing about himself except what he hears others say. He keeps hearing his
name, hears his parents, teachers and companions calling him strong, smart,
pretty, good, etc. As the child has no previous data with which to compare
what others say about himself he readily accepts their judgements as to his
worth. The evaluation the child makes of himself is nothing else but a
reflection of the evaluation others have made of him. In this way the child
begins to form ideas about himself such as “I am a good boy of a respectable
family”, “I am clever”, “I am fair”, “I am this and that”, having heard others
make all these statements about him.
The child integrates these statements into one consistent pattern which is
called the ‘self-concept’. Specifically, the self-concept is one’s own
definition of one’s relationship to the environment around one-self.
Development of the self-concept
The self-concept begins to take shape in early childhood but it does not
remain static, rather it keeps adapting itself to the changing experience in a
changing environment. We shall consider now various influences responsible
for the broadening of the self-concept.
Self-esteem. As the child goes to school and joins various groups of
children in the classroom, on the playground, in the neighbourhood, he shows
his competence in some line or other, and gets recognition for his
performance from his companions and teachers. This success gives him a
feeling of importance and thus self-esteem enhances the self-concept. Not all
children achieve the same success, and thus, in evaluating themselves they
differ considerably from self-confidence in a high degree to inferiority
feelings.
Membership and social roles. The child grows up in a certain field of
inter-personal relationships. He is a member of that family, the son of a
manager, doctor, etc., a student in that school and that class, a member of that
team or club, etc. All these social roles give him a social status, and his self-
concept is modified according to these influences. Again, the various groups
to which he belongs have their own norms of conduct showing him clearly
what is socially acceptable and what is not. In this field of inter-personal
relationships and social roles, the child is expected to play his part, and
accordingly he gets approval or disapproval for his performance, and his self-
concept is thus modified.
Communication. The chief factor in the development of the self-concept is
communication. This means the ability to see oneself through the eyes of
others. Modern theories of communication have integrated a principle of
technology called ‘feedback’. This means that communication requires in the
individual the ability to perceive the effects of his behaviour on others. Thus,
in our case, when the individual talks and acts, he should be able to notice the
evaluation that others make of him. This noticing, however, must not be
biased by one’s negative selfperception and subsequent projection on others,
but must be objective and realistic. It is through this ‘feedback’ information
about himself and subsequent modification of his own evaluation of himself
that an individual develops his self-concept. Defect in communication
prevents the development of the selfconcept, for the individual loses touch
with reality to a great extent.
This does not mean that we have to depend entirely on what others say
about us and conform to it. No. We would do well to discern the truth of their
statements and modify our behaviour accordingly. It may happen that some
people find fault with us because we do not do what they do. If what they
suggest to us contradicts our principles and what our conscience tells us, then
we should ignore their remarks and stand firmly by what we believe to be the
right way of behaving, and be brave to face the consequences.
Moral principles. As the child grows intellectually, he gets an insight into
the principles of conduct and develops his own convictions and his own
conscience as will be explained in the Fourteenth Session. It is then that the
individual learns to depend less on others and to shape his own self-concept
according to his ideas and values.
Identification. Motivated by the need for achievement, the child first
identifies himself with his father or, if a girl, with her mother. As the
environment widens more and more, he meets other models which attract his
attention. Thus one identifies oneself with a filmstar or a leader or a saint.
These ideals exert great influence in shaping one’s ideal self-concept.
Briefly, personality becomes organized and integrated by the emerging
self-concept. The self-concept emerges in the child first as the result of his
maturing in his social environment. This self-concept broadens realistically
by accepting and integrating more and more aspects of the self through
perceiving and learning, specially, through the feedback technique. Further,
the child’s self-concept as an organized pattern is strengthened by the
formation of conscience, which affords a solid basis for autonomy and self-
orientation; by a deeper insight into the forces that motivate the self to action;
by the acquisition of control over his emotions; by the awareness that some of
his wishes and ambitions and actions may be under the influence of
unconscious motivation; finally by the building up of a strong will-power
with which the self will in a changing environment achieve harmony within
himself. Harmony or poise is the opposite of imbalance. Some people are all
feelings and melt away in affection; others are dry like a stick, and are only
interested in new ideas. A person secures poise or harmony within himself by
integrating psychological processes of feeling, thinking and willing, where
feeling and willing keep pace with reason, and extremes are avoided.
The integration of psychological processes is achieved by the person
through the formation of a realistic self-concept. This, however, remains
dynamic, i.e., though substantially it remains the same, it is subject to
modification as those psychological processes bring in better information on
the various aspects of the self.
Realistic self-concept
In the process of developing the self-concept, individuals may exaggerate
their good or bad points and thus entertain a false idea or concept of
themselves. Therefore, the question is: can you form a realistic self-
concept?
This is a very pertinent question. In fact, in Riddle’s survey (1966), 52 per
cent of three thousand and ninety-six college students, boys and girls,
belonging to seventeen universities in India, stated as one of their problems
that, “I do not know enough about my aptitudes and abilities for different
kinds of work or careers.” In other words, they say that they do not know
accurately their real self, and consider this an obstacle to their personality
development.
Life offers many opportunities to test your various abilities. At home, in the
school, in the office, in the neighbourhood, in clubs and associations you find
many occasions inviting you to do something or other. Your capacities will
prompt you to respond to those invitations. Then, your performance will be
evaluated by others and they will praise you for your success or otherwise.
By following your natural impulse to try and do something, you will show
your real abilities and people will affirm you with their appreciation. This is a
realistic way of developing your self-concept.
Good friends, also, can give you objective feedback on your qualities and
achievements, and on your weaknesses as well.
Ideal self-concept
In the process of becoming yourself, the question is: How high should you
aim? What should you aspire to become? What should your ideal self-
concept be? Kierkegaard wrote, “The deepest form of despair is to choose to
be another than himself,” and “To will to be that self which one truly is, is
indeed the opposite of despair.” This is a wise saying and offers the solution
to many a personal problem. Happy people are those who want to be
themselves and contemplate goals which are well within their potential.
But the question still remains: How can you know the self which you
can truly aspire to be?
There are two answers to this question. The first answer is relatively easy to
grasp, but the second will be difficult to understand though, in my opinion, it
is better and more complete.
The first answer is this. In attempting to know that self which you can truly
aspire to be, you should avoid two extremes: the ideal self should neither be
in complete disagreement with what you are; nor should it be in complete
agreement with what you are. A considerable congruence between perceived
self-concept and ideal self-concept has been found in well adjusted people.
That is, that ideal self you aspire to be should excel your real self but only in
a considerable measure. You should, however, keep endeavouring to increase
the congruence between your perceived self-concept and your ideal self-
concept. This striving is realistic and will prove rewarding, for you are
becoming more and more yourself
The second answer will be difficult to understand for it bears not only upon
excellence in a profession or a particular field, but rather upon the whole
person functioning fully at all levels, with special reference to the spiritual
level. Here is how I see it.
God creates men and women and puts them in this world for a purpose.
This purpose varies with individuals. Speaking generally, we see in this
world that most people make a contribution to the welfare of mankind. This
contribution assumes different aspects such as rearing a family, nursing the
sick, teaching, growing food, preparing useful articles, advancing the
frontiers of our knowledge, leading people to God, and so on. All these types
of contributions are necessary for mankind to progress, and therefore all this
human activity, at whatever social level it may be, is noble and very
worthwhile.
Those who share my Christian faith know that each one of us through
baptism is a member of the Body of Christ. Each of us is a unique member
with a unique function to perform in our collaboration with Christ in his
mission: to glorify the Father and to bring divine life to all peoples. In this
collaboration with Christ we shall find the noblest thing we can do with our
lives and the highest levels of excellence we can achieve.
John Glenn and the other astronauts were not thrown into space by the
USA and left there to their fate. No. The American scientists studied in every
detail the whole flight many times, and thought of all that Glenn would
require to meet every contingency with success during the flight. It was only
after they were sure of all the possible hazards during the flight, and after
they secured adequate equipment to meet those eventualities successfully,
that they decided to send Glenn into space. Had the scientists been reckless in
that project, the whole world would have blamed them for being inhuman.
Glenn’s success was due to the scientists’ foresight and to the wealth of
America through which the necessary equipment was provided.
Similarly, Almighty God sent you into this world after He had foreseen all
the possible events during your life time. God’s foresight covered every
detail of your life, and his power provided you with all the human qualities
required to fulfil His purpose. If you give credit to the foresight of the
American scientists and to the wealth of America in preparing the astronauts
for their difficult task, why should you not accept that God can do a better job
with his perfect foresight and his infinite power in sending you into this
world?
God cherishes an idea of the kind of person He would like you to become
to fulfil His purpose, and has given you all the abilities you need to become
the embodiment of that idea. But God gave you the abilities in the bud, i.e.,
as capacities to be developed or actualized. You have to use all the means and
opportunities given you to utilize those capacities. This is the meaning of
becoming yourself. That idea in God’s mind should be your ideal self-
concept.
How can you know that self which you can truly aspire to be?
The answer lies in becoming that person which God has created you to be.
The question now is: How can you know God’s idea of you fully
developed?
You can know this through growing in a realistic knowledge of your
qualities and defects, through sincere prayer for light and through the
opportunities which God sends you. In this way you may know the direction
you should take to approach that ideal. It is something like scientific
knowledge. Science has not the last word on the nature of things. Research
points out the direction. At a given moment, scientists know only the
direction they should take to advance scientific knowledge. But this
knowledge will never reach its terminus in this world. Similarly, you do not
know exactly God’s idea of you fully developed. But the means indicated
above will help you to find the direction along which you should move. As
you progress and take the first step, the second step will appear, and so on.
You should strive to become that idea. This striving, this approaching,
this becoming that idea should be the core of your personal dynamism. You
should pool all your resources together towards the attainment of that goal.
As this goal is fully within your potential, this striving will give you the
innermost satisfaction. Any gain in that direction will give you an inner sense
of worth, of self-confidence, of doing the best thing you can do in life, for
you are all the time striving to become that self which you can truly be.
Becoming Interdependent
Just as to become yourself you depend on your parents, teachers, friends,
doctors, priests, etc., so others depend on you to become themselves.
Remember, you are not alone in this world. You are a member of the human
family. And the interaction within the universal family spread over the five
continents is very much a part of your becoming yourself and of others
becoming themselves.
The stages of development of human potential, as Carkhuff says, are
characterized by movement towards and beyond independence. From an
unactualized state of dependence upon others for learning, people move in
successive approximations towards independence where they learn how to
learn for themselves. Later they realize that while teaching others what they
have learned, they themselves are learning from others. And so they pass on
to the higher stage of interdependence.
The correlative of interdependence is solidarity, i.e., a firm determination
to commit oneself to the common good, to the good of all and of each
individual, because we are all responsible for all (John Paul II, Solicitudo
Rei Socialis, 1988).
It is of the very nature of human life to have limitations and, therefore, to
be in need of others while others are in need of you. All human achievements
are the product not of a single person but of a team of men and women. In
other words, people can grow as persons only in groups of people, in
communities and in society.
Conclusion
Becoming yourself is not an individualistic and egoistic attitude as though
you cared only for your own self-actualization. Your social dimension is as
important in becoming yourself as your vertical dimension between you and
God. You cannot become yourself all alone, just as others cannot become
themselves without you. We all become ourselves together in mutual
dependence and interdependence. Christ said, “You must love one another as
I have loved you.” If this love is very high in your scale of values, there will
be no obstacle in becoming yourself fully developed and in helping others to
do the same.
Questions:
1. How is the self-concept formed?
2. How to form a realistic self-concept?
3. How can you approximate the self which you can truly aspire to be?
REFERENCES
Carkhuff, Robert R. Toward Actualizing Human Potential. Amherst:
Human Resource Development Press 1981.
Fuster, J.M. Integrated Personality. Second Edition. Calcutta: The Little
Flower Press, 1969.
TWELFTH SESSION
MENTAL HEALTH
1. What is mental health?
We can recognize a normal person. We can, also, single out a mental
patient. Yet, it is not easy to define mental health, for norms may differ from
one culture to another. For our purpose here, we are satisfied with a
description of some of the widely accepted aspects of mental health.
— self-acceptance
— freedom from unreasonable fear and compulsions
— deriving satisfaction from one’s job
— living in harmony with one’s family, neighbours and colleagues
— being kind and helpful to others
— being reliable and dependable
— being honest with God, oneself and others
— being faithful to one’s conscience and religious duties
— capacity to play and have fun
— taking reasonable care of one’s health
— reasonably meeting one’s basic needs
— being interested in the welfare of others
— assuming social responsibilities
— being able to give and receive love
— being able to make decisions and face the consequences
Mental health is a gift of God. We realize its value when a close friend or
relative has a nervous breakdown. Mental health has to be carefully looked
after, else it will deteriorate. Hence our serious responsibility to prevent such
a thing happening to ourselves.
Mental health is not something we are given once for all: it is a job we have
to keep working at all the time. In a world of rapid change like ours, we have
to learn to modify our ways, our habits, our perceptions of people and events,
and adjust to a new physical and social environment. If we are closed to
change, we refuse to grow and enrich ourselves, and shall not be able to
survive.
If we change and try new ways, we may discover to our great joy that they
are more meaningful and rewarding than the old ones we seemed to be unable
to part with. There are certain habits that we would do well to keep, such as
the times for eating, going to bed and getting up, praying whenever possible
at a fixed time, etc. But there are other habits that call for a change, like being
too engrossed in one’s work and having no time to attend to guests or to show
interest in the work of others.
Why are mental hospitals filled with patients and why are so many people
at home leading very unhappy lives? Because they cannot cope with stress
and cannot learn to adjust to their environment. In this world of rapid change
in which we live, the question is: How can we achieve personal adjustment?
2. How can we maintain mental health?
We can maintain mental health by reducing stress and increasing adjustive
resources.
Stress. Some days in your life are fine days indeed. You get up in the
morning feeling very refreshed and looking forward to a pleasant day.
The weather is very pleasant and the breakfast is good. You feel eager to
help people and enthusiastic about your work. Things begin to move
according to your plan and you are delighted. Wow! What a beautiful day!
Yet, it is not always so. There can be many frustrations.
Then, you make great efforts to cope with the demands placed on you. The
extra effort you make to meet such demands is called stress. These
demands may come from others and from oneself. Stress is a mobilization
of the body’s defences to a perceived threat, be it physical, social or
psychological, real or imagined, that allows human beings to adapt. Stress is
described as a person’s experience of emotions that are painful, such as
anxiety, depression, anger, hostility, feeling threatened. And the means you
use to cope with stress are called adjustive resources.
There are two kinds of stress: one that generates enthusiasm for a
challenge; the other that is taken as a threat. Stress can be
understood as the body’s response to anything we perceive as
dangerous, demoralizing or demanding.
The more adjustive resources you have, the better able you are to handle
stress, and the better adjusted you are. But, if stress keeps mounting up and
your adjustive resources diminish you will be in trouble. It is something like
your bank account going down and the bills to be paid piling up. Budgeting is
required for a peaceful life. Similarly, a psychological budgeting of your
stresses and adjustive resources is essential to personal adjustment and
mental health.
We shall consider first, the various sources of stress, and then see how to
increase our adjustive resources, thereby reducing stress.
3. Sources of Stress
Stress arises at four levels: biological, psychological, spiritual and
sociological.
A. Biological level: faulty heredity, faulty temperament, low level of
energy, sickness, poor diet, lack of sleep, fatigue, etc. Some women
experience hormonal imbalance during menstruation and menopause. While
undergoing stress, the body releases cortisol, which prevents macrophages
from responding normally to infection. Other factors are blood pressure, level
of sugar in the blood.
B. Psychological level : stress is from three sources.
a) Frustration : this comes from failure to meet your own needs and wishes,
from mistakes and personal limitations; from loss of loved ones,
friends, prestige; lack of social charm; from guilt-feelings, self-
recriminations, lack of meaning in life.
b) Conflict : this arises from two incompatible needs or valued goals, e.g.,
attend to people vs undisturbed prayer; love vs hate, sexual feelings
vs restraints, honesty vs personal gain, dependence vs self direction,
obedience vs independence, fear vs positive action.
c) Pressure : is the demand made on the individual. It forces the person to
intensify his efforts, e.g., a wife has to attend to her husband, the
children, her own job and the house chores. Pressure may stem from
ambition, sense of duty, love, from competitive situations.
C. Spiritual level: stress comes from confusion about God and the purpose
of our life; from impatience and losing one’s temper; from not forgiving
those who have hurt us; from yielding to our evil inclinations and going
against our conscience; etc.
D. Sociological level: stress affecting a group of people together. Its
sources lie in such areas as unemployment, poor housing, marriage
breakdown, etc.
4. Increasing Adjustive Resources
Adjustive resources are very important in our lives, for if we cannot cope
with stress we shall become mentally ill. Therefore, we want to know what
exactly these adjustive resources consist of and how we can increase them.
Adjustive resources are holistic resources, i.e., they involve the whole
person at all levels. Yet, for the sake of clarity we shall consider them at four
levels.
A. Biological level: on the biological level, adjustive resources mean good
health and a high level of energy. Thus, you must take care of your health
with appropriate diet, rest, sleep, relaxation, etc. Take medication under
medical supervision, use tonics, vitamins when needed. Those engaged in
deskwork should do physical exercise. Yoga exercises can help. Sometimes
giving way to crying for a while can give a great relief. It is very helpful to
good health to drink plenty of water.
Physical energy is necessary in ordinary circumsstances for healthy
everyday living and professional growth. Therefore, you should take care that
you have a high level of energy.
B. Psychological level: On the psychological level, adjustive resources
mean ability to reduce stress and increase personal competence to handle a
stressful situation.
We can reduce stress and increase our competence by the following means:
1. Develop a realistic self-concept, self-image, selfperception, self-identity.
Be aware of your strengths and weaknesses. Accept yourself as God made
you, with the plan He has for you and the opportunities He gives you for
your own enrichment. This plan is gradually unfolded before you through
His inspirations in prayer, through your community and your life situation.
If you willingly accept yourself and stop envying others whom you
consider more gifted than yourself, you will reduce much stress in yourself.
2. Resolve your conflicts by taking the following steps: a) define the
problem, b) work out alternative solutions, c) decide upon the most
rewarding one, and work towards achieving it.
3. Increase your self-knowledge and self-understanding.
4. Improve your interpersonal relationships by being sincere in your dealings
with others, by being appreciative and respectful of others, by
communicating understanding of others.
5. Change your faulty ‘assumptions’ about people, such as, “I cannot trust
anybody”. Get rid of some ‘absolutes’ such as, “I must always succeed”, “I
must please everybody”. Check your self-talk, or what you repeat again and
again to yourself, such as, “I am no good”, “I cannot speak in public”, “I
shall always fail”. Correct your ‘beliefs’, for it is not the event that causes
the problem, but your belief about it. Example, A(event) — B(belief) —
C(reaction). Priya is happily married. One day of a sudden she loses her
husband in an accident (A). Priya believes that this is horrible and that she
cannot live without him(B). She may attempt suicide, or fall into a deep
depression, and lead a miserable life(C).
Nandita is also happily married, but one day her husband dies of cancer(A).
She believes that this is life and that she has to learn to adapt to a new
situation(B). Nandita struggles to learn to live without her husband and,
after some time, leads a peaceful life(C).
Notice here that the event(A) is the same in the lives of these two women.
But their beliefs(B) are different. That is why their reactions(C) are
different. Learn to hold realistic beliefs.
6. Develop a sense of humour and the ability to laugh at yourself.
C. Spiritual level: On the spiritual level, adjustive resources mean faith,
hope and love; constant turning to God in prayer; spiritual strength to
faithfully follow our conscience, to cope with trials and difficulties, to be able
to forgive those who hurt us, and to love and serve our neighbour.
D. Sociological level: On the sociological level, adjustive resources mean
competence to face difficult times in a group of people, strength to put up
patiently with unpleasant things and ability to help others to endure them.
The sources of this kind of competence are the sources of spiritual strength
mentioned above.
Conclusion
We have seen what normal persons are like and the way to achieve
normalcy, i.e., by keeping the level of adjustive resources much higher than
the level of stress in you. Just as the water-level of the reservoirs is carefully
watched and controlled so as to meet the daily needs of a city, similarly you
should watch the level of your adjustive resources with respect to the level of
your stress, if you want to maintain personal adjustment.
When you notice that you are becoming easily irritable, fatigued, losing
interest in your work, etc., understand that the level of your adjustive
resources has come down. Then, it is time to do something about it. This
something means to go to all the sources of adjustive resources mentioned
above, at the four levels, and raise the level of your personal competence.
This will automatically bring down the level of stress in you. Thus, you will
be well equipped to handle constructively the various stressful situations
which will come your way, and you will maintain mental health.
We see in this diagram that adjustive resources are ‘very poor’ on top of the
vertical line and ‘very good’ down the same line. Stress is mild to the left
side of the horizontal line and severe at the other end of the same line. When
‘very good’ adjustive resources in the person meet with mild stress, this
person is well adjusted, as shown on the dots across the lines. When ‘very
poor’ adjustive resources in the person meet with ‘severe’ stress, this person
is maladjusted, as shown also on the dots across lines. In the middle of these
two extremes there is less adjustment.
Questions:
1. Name ten of the most important aspects of mental health.
2. Define the terms ‘stress’ and ‘adjustive resources’.
3. How to bring down the level of stress?
4. How to increase adjustive resources?
5. What is the secret of mental health?
REFERENCES
Coleman, J.C. Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life. Third Edition.
Chicago: Scott, Foresman, 1974.
THIRTEENTH SESSION
SELF-ACTUALIZATION
We could say that the goal of counselling is the counsellee’s self-
actualization. Now it stands to reason that if the counsellor has to stimulate
the counsellee towards self-actualization, he must be continuously self-
actualizing himself.
Trainees must keep in mind that this aspect of the counselling situation is
extremely important. It is not so much the skills and professionalism of the
counsellor that really help the counsellee to grow, but rather the experience of
coming in close contact with a person who has himself grown. That is why I
keep repeating the motto: “Counselling is as effective as the counsellor lives
effectively.”
Shostrom in his ‘Personal Orientation Inventory’ defines self-actualization
in terms of many variables. Here are the most significant:
— fairness
— gratitude: receiving a favour
— telling the truth always
— striving for perfection
— living according to one’s values
— concern for self-improvement
— feeling guilty when selfish
— control of anger
— faith in oneself
— unselfishness
— acceptance of others
— giving without expecting returns
— freedom from others’ expectations
— acceptance of one’s weaknesses
— relying on spontaneity
— self-worth dependent on accomplishment, not on illusion
— living in terms of what I want to do
— coping with the ups and downs of life
— frankness in human relations
— ability to size up a situation
— belief in man’s essential goodness
— liking others
— risking a friendship in order to say what I believe is right
— feeling free to express warm feelings to friends
— recognition of criticism as an opportunity for growth
— realization that appearances are not terribly important
— revealing one’s weakness to one’s friends
— feeling free to be oneself and bear the consequences
— being cooperative
— realizing that trying to please the other may not be the best way to get
along
— not being ashamed of one’s emotions
— fusing sex and love
— enjoying privacy
— dedication to work
— expressing affection without expecting a return of it
When you read this definition, you get the impression that self-
actualization includes all the possible aspects of the person. This means that
self actualization is a life-process of self-improvement, which will end only
with death.
Self-actualization implies, also, that one lives in the present and is
primarily inner-directed. Inner directed means that you rule your behaviour
by your well formed conscience and your own convictions, independently of
the approval or disapproval of others. Outer directed means that you are too
dependent on the approval or disapproval of others. The self-actualized
person has formed correctly his own convictions and has a clear idea of his
ultimate goal. He is channelling all his energies towards the achievement of
his goal. In this endeavour, he thinks of others also and strives to help them
achieve what he values and considers very valuable for them. The self-
actualized person has the capacity for warm, intimate contact and is
extremely effective in living.
In the light of my Christian faith, the selfactualized person is he who is
striving to know more and more God’s plan for him and responds generously
to the lights he receives from the Holy Spirit. At the same time, the self-
actualized person realizes that God has a plan for every human being. And so
he cooperates with God in helping people to realize God’s plan for them. The
self-actualized people are the Saints: those men and women who gave
themselves fully to God and neighbour; who with God’s help became very
unselfish persons and gave themselves fully to others in order to help them to
come closer to God.
To be a self-actualized person, know yourself, your strengths and
weaknesses and accept yourself as you are; try seriously to develop your
strengths and minimize your weaknesses; profit from the opportunities for
self-improvement that come your way; learn how to get on smoothly with
others and stimulate them to grow; be honest with yourself and with others;
be responsible and reliable; control yourself and be generous with others;
have a sense of direction in life and know where you are going.
The self-actualized person is less burdened by guilts, regrets and
resentment from the past; his aspirations are tied realistically to present goals.
He is autonomous and inner-directed.
How to grow in Self-actualization
Here are some points which help you to further actualize yourselves. They
are mostly taken from, “Self-actualization and Beyond” by A.H. Maslow in
Challenges of Humanistic Psychology, by James Bugental.
1. Break some structures
Through your parents, friends, neighbours, traditions, education, culture
and the mass media, you have been building your own structures of
behaviour. You are guided by these structures and according to them you
qualify possible ways of behaving as proper or improper. It is true that many
of these structures are a great help to you, but it is true also that others are an
obstacle to your personal growth. Take for instance, Florence Nightingale. In
her time in 1854, it was not proper for a lady to join a military hospital to
nurse the wounded soldiers. She broke that structure and went to Crimea to
nurse British soldiers who had been wounded in that war. Thanks to her, we
have today the profession of Nursing which is so valuable to millions and
millions of patients the world over.
The difficult point is to discern wisely which structures you should retain
and which you should do away with. Another difficulty is that it takes
courage to break a structure, for you are trying a new behaviour and you are
not sure how it will work. Hence, one has to calculate the pros and cons of
one’s adventure. But if you are always afraid of taking a risk, you will remain
with your fear and you will never grow. Therefore, you should be courageous
in going ahead and break a structure when there is a good chance of getting
personal benefits as well as benefits for others. Should it prove a failure, then,
you should be prepared to face the consequences of your actions. You can
also grow with an experience of failure. At least you can learn not to repeat
the mistake.
2. Be open to learn
Personal growth is the outcome of personal interacting with people. You
can learn from others. Your interactions with others teach you many things
about yourself and about yourself in relation to others. For example, your
degree of security with others, your degree of general knowledge, your skills
in getting on with others, your submissiveness or domination, your
cooperation with others, your positive and negative attitudes towards others,
how far you are destructive or constructive in your remarks, how far you are
selfish or unselfish, etc.
In order to learn all these things, you must be aware of your feelings,
desires, tendencies, reactions. You must reflect and analyze yourself in those
various situations. This requires honesty with yourself and a serious
determination to enrich yourself. This self-analysis and self-awareness must
be done in moderation. Too much self-analysis and selfawareness are
unhealthy and can be very harmful.
3. Overcome shyness
Personal growth requires that you do away with the self-consciousness and
shyness of adolescence. If while performing a task, you use energy on
thinking that people may dislike you and criticize you, then, you have less
energy left to give yourself fully to what you are doing with freedom and
spontaneity. Your self-consciousness prevents your personal efficiency. You
should achieve liberation from timidity and have greater spontaneity and self-
reliance, so that you are not depending so much on the approval or
disapproval of people, but rather on doing your best.
4. Face Growth-choice
Life runs through a series of choices, one after another. You are
continuously faced with a choice: Shall I do this or that? Shall I say yes or
no? Choices are of two kinds: regression-choices and growthchoices. Take a
girl who is shy with strangers. She is at home. The doorbell rings. On the sly
she looks through a side window and sees a stranger. She is then faced with
the choice: “Shall I go to open the door and meet the stranger and thus I shall
learn to talk to strangers? Or shall I remain here and let someone else go and
open the door because I am feeling shy?” If that girl makes the first choice,
then, she is making the growth-choice, for she takes the opportunity to learn
the ability of dealing with strangers, and thus she grows as a person. If she
opts for not going to open the door she is making a regression-choice, that is,
a choice that prevents her from growing in the ability to meet strangers.
This is a very simple example. You can apply it to your life situations and,
specifically, to your need for growing in some area of your personality. Every
day you are faced with growth-choices and regression-choices. It is up to you
to profit by these opportunities. Try and make some growth-choices, and
enjoy their enriching experience.
5. Be Spontaneous
Listen to your natural impulses and not only to your superego. Many
people have been brought up with the emphasis on the negative: don’t do
this, don’t do that; this is wrong; that should not be done. When faced with
various situations, such people are inclined to listen to all those prohibitions
first. There is another much more positive way of going about life. Try to
listen, also, to your spontaneous impulses and your spontaneous wishes.
There will be some of these impulses and wishes which you would do well to
follow. For example, an impulse to write a poem or an article, to sing, to act,
to do a good deed to someone, etc. These impulses are prompted by your
nature, your potential, your creative forces for something constructive and
beautiful. If you do not listen to them, you miss something in life. Obviously,
some impulses have to be controlled because they are destructive.
If you, when faced with various situations, listen to your spontaneous
impulses and wishes; discern which are creative and which are destructive;
follow the positive while controlling the negative; then, you will increase the
actualization of your personal capabilities and you will grow as a person.
6. Assume responsibility
The self-actualized person assumes responsibility for his actions. Many
people shun responsibility and when things under their care go wrong, they
blame others. All these are signs of childishness. If you want to grow as a
person, then assume responsibility for what you are doing and saying, and
face the consequences squarely and honestly. If you have been mistaken,
then, acknowledge your mistake and learn in order not to repeat it.
Responsibility is very much linked with dependability and reliability and
faithfulness. Such qualities are rare and the one who possesses them is a
beautiful person. You can improve in this area by asking an account of
yourself daily, and correcting what calls for improvement.
7. Experience joy
All of us, some times, have an experience of great joy. It may originate by
contemplating the beauty of nature, or by admiring a work of art, or by
witnessing a noble action performed by someone or by reading an inspiring
passage in a book, etc. At these moments of others-centred joy, give yourself
fully to that experience and relish it as much as you can. It will help you to
expand the boundaries of your person and enrich yourself immensely.
8. Be committed
Be about what you are about. Give yourself fully to what you are doing.
Make it a finished product. Put all your attention on it and use all your
resources to make it as beautiful as you can. Use your life, from moment to
moment, to give your best. Do not allow your attention and your energy to be
scattered over many things which are not relevant to what you are doing. You
will have to control certain thoughts, certain worries, certain memories which
forcefully encroach upon your mind and distract you from what you have to
do. This type of self-control will save for you plenty of constructive energy
which, otherwise, would go waste.
9. Be aware of your defence mechanisms
Defence mechanisms are different ways of protecting the self in face of any
threat to its worth or adequacy. Some common defence mechanisms are:
denial of reality, rationalization, gratification in fantasy, projection,
repression, regression, compensation, displacement and sublimation.
Projection enables people to disown or deny unwanted feelings, attitudes or
traits by assigning them to others.
As you grow in self-knowledge, you will become aware of your defence
mechanisms. You will realize that defending yourself does not help you to
grow, rather, it encourages you to linger on where you are. It takes courage to
face oneself squarely and to give up one’s defences. Aim at being yourself,
but yourself fully actualized.
10. Self-transcendence
Self-transcendence results not from a selfish effort to fulfil one’s desires,
but from extending beyond oneself in an attempt to realize the good of others.
Self-fulfilment can be self-centred or God-centred, i.e., you realize your own
plan or you realize God’s plan for you. Which is better?
St Irenaeus writes: “The glory of God is man fully alive; his life however is
the vision of God.” Self-actualization can fully be attained only when we live
in reference to God’s plan for each of us, and contribute to God’s purpose of
creation.
Questions:
1. Name ten of the most important aspects of selfactualization.
2. Explain the ‘growth-choice’.
3. How to become a responsible person?
4. Why recalling experiences of a deep joy is enriching?
5. What are defence-mechanisms? Why should you get rid of them?
6. How do you understand self-transcendence?
REFERENCES
Carkhuff, R.R. Helping and Human Relations, New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston, 1969.
Fuster, J.M. Helping in Personal Growth. Bombay: St Paul Publications,
1974.
FOURTEENTH SESSION
CONSCIENCE AND SUPEREGO
Introduction
The purpose of this session is to remove a great obstacle to self-
actualization, namely, the equating of conscience with superego. This
misunderstanding should be clarified, for if we behave on the assumption that
the superego unconsciously determines our choices, then we are not morally
responsible for our decisions, and moral growth is nipped in the bud. Such
unconscious determinism undermines our freedom, which is one of the main
factors in acutalizing our human potential.
We shall see, first, what conscience is and how to form our conscience.
Then, we shall explain the term superego and how it differs from conscience.
The con clusion is that we must destroy our superego in order to form a
mature conscience.
1. What is conscience?
Many people think of conscience as ‘the still voice within’. But, where is
this voice located inside us? Well, these words are a human expression of an
inner reality. Every human being is endowed by God with reason. And
reason has an inbuilt law that distinguishes right from wrong. This is called
the Natural Law. Pope John Paul II says: “The demands of the natural law are
indeed valid for every people today and always, for they are the dictates of
right reason wherein lies the essence of the natural law” (L’Osservatore
Romano, 24.5.1996).
The engineer who created the computer put an inbuilt law in it. If we
follow that law, the computer will work all right; if not, it won’t work.
Similarly, in creating a human being for a definite purpose, the Creator
inscribed in his or her heart the natural law. If we behave in accordance with
this law, we shall become what God wants us to become.
Conscience, exactly, is reason applying the natural law to a concrete
situation, and judging its goodness or sinfulness. For example, a pregnant
woman approaches Dr Fuji for an abortion. Considering that the woman has
already three children and her husband is jobless, and foreseeing the dismal
future of the unborn child, Dr Fuji feels inclined to help her to abort. But, his
reason, in the light of the natural law inscribed in his heart, tells him, “you
may not kill”. Therefore, Dr Fuji refuses to perform the abortion. Thus,
conscience tells us what is right and what is wrong.
The origin of conscience is reason, the moral law which is imprinted in
every human being, and a somewhat innate capacity for pleasing others and
avoiding doing harm to others. Both the psychic and the bodily components
constitute a person, and conscience is a function of the total person.
2. How to form one’s conscience?
The young child cannot be said to have a conscience; he has only a capacity
to develop it. He has no notions of right and wrong. He simply wants what he
wants irrespective of ethical standards. Gradually, the child will learn to
modify his impulsive behaviour through training. As he grows older, the
child develops his reason and moral judgement through education. It is
generally accepted that, between seven and eleven years, children reach the
age of reason. Then only does conscience proper begin to function, though it
is not yet fully formed.
As the reasoning power develops and greater knowledge of the moral law is
acquired, the child begins to form his own convictions. Then, the time comes
when the adolescent questions what he has heard from his parents and
decides, in the light of his reason and knowledge of the moral law, what he
should and should not do. In certain cases, he may even go against what he
has been told by his parents, for what they said was not correct. Adolescents
are known to be rebellious against their parents. Usually it is not rebellion in
the bad sense but in the good sense. Having acquired better knowledge of the
moral law and having formed their own convictions, they see clearly what
they may do and decide to do it, even though at a younger age they were not
allowed to do it. This may be very good, for it is by forming their own
convictions that adolescents grow in independence from the parents and learn
to stand on their own feet, and this is necessary to reach maturity.
When I say that we must form our own convictions in ruling our behaviour,
I do not mean that we by ourselves decide what is right and what is wrong.
This kind of decision belongs to God alone. What I do mean is that we must
rule our behaviour by our own convictions and not by what others say; but
our convictions must be formed in accordance with objective truth, i.e.,
in agreement with the correct understanding of the divine law. This divine
law is the eternal, objective and universal law by which God orders, directs
and governs the whole world and the ways of the human community; that
law, that truth that the intelligence of man can discover in the order of being.
Conscience formation is a life long task. We must realize that reason in us
does not work in isolation. It is the whole person who makes the judgement.
Now, in the person — thinking, willing, remembering, imagining, perceiving,
and feeling — all these processes are in dynamic interaction. Therefore, the
judgement of reason is under the influence of our feelings, emotions, fears,
desires, memories, etc. Hence, if we decide what is right or wrong only by
what we think, our thinking may not be correct. It may be vitiated by strong
emotions, prejudices, etc. The great challenge of life is to see that our
subjective thinking agrees with objective reality, or with the truth.
The question before us is: How to make sure that our decision on the
goodness or sinfulness of an act is correct?
Most of the times it is obvious what we should do, such as our duties
towards our family members, our neighbours and towards the job we have.
Yet, in some cases there are many difficulties to clearly distinguish good
from evil. These difficulties arise from different sources:
First, we feel inclined to do what we know is sinful. Man’s capacity to
know the truth is also darkened, and his will to submit to it is weakened.
Secondly, we are under the powerful influence of the mass media and our
social environment. What we read and hear, and perhaps see about certain
sinful behaviours, pulls us in the wrong direction. And it is very hard to go
against the current. There are many false teachers in this world of ours. We
must develop the capacity to critically assess what we read and hear, and
have the courage to do what is right in spite of criticism and ridicule from
others.
Thirdly, corruption is so widespread among us that one may wrongly
conclude that, “this is the way to go about; else, you get nowhere.” Add to
this that one’s promotion on the job may require some unfair dealings. If one
does not conform to them, one will be left out. And how many have the
courage to stand by what is right and face the consequences?
Surrounded by so many difficulties, how are we to make sure that our
subjective thinking agrees with the truth, or how are we to form our
conscience? In other words, how to find out what God wants us to do here
and now? The following points attempt to answer this question:
a. Let us listen to our conscience. Let us listen to the law God has
written in our hearts and obey it. Conscience is the most secret core and
sanctuary of a human being. There he or she is alone with God. In a
wonderful manner, conscience reveals the law of God. We shall be judged by
the way we follow, or go against, our conscience.
b. In making our decision, let us not go only by material advantages or
disadvantages. But let us keep in mind our ultimate goal, which is our union
with God and perfect happiness with Him.
c. Let us get well informed on the subject we have to decide on. Let us pray
to God for enlightenment to make the right decision and for strength to
implement it. In case of doubt, let us seek more information and, perhaps, the
help of some competent person who can enlighten us on that particular point.
d. In every religion there are certain truths and principles that we would do
well to pay attention to.
e. Catholics have a particular help in forming their conscience in the
official teaching of the Catholic Church. “The Catholic Church is by the will
of Christ the teacher of truth. It is her duty to proclaim and teach with
authority the truth which is Christ and, at the same time, to declare and
confirm by her authority the principles of the moral order which spring from
human nature itself” (Dignitatis Humanae, 14).
3. What is superego?
In psychoanalytic terms, Id, Ego, Superego, Freud considers the superego
as a sector of the psyche, which consists of two subsystems: ego-ideal and
conscience. Ego-ideal is an unconscious image of the best possible self. It is
made up of all the behaviours one’s parents considered important for winning
their approval and love. Throughout life the superego compares the person’s
wishes, impulses, phantasies and behaviours of the ego with those included in
his ego-ideal, and then rewards or punishes the self by triggering feelings of
anxiety and guilt.
Now let us see how Freud understands conscience. The child depends
completely on his parents for the satisfaction of his needs, such as hunger,
thirst, comfort, protection, etc. His sense of self-reliance and self-confidence
depends on the parents’ acceptance of him and their love for him. Thus, the
child craves for the love and approval of his parents. In order to secure their
love, the child mostly unconsciously learns to adopt those behaviour-patterns
which meet with parental approval, and to avoid those behaviour-patterns
which meet with parental disapproval. Thus parental approval and
disapproval become for the child like reward and punishment.
The child hears from the parents all the time, “do this”, “don’t do that”.
Gradually, the child begins to tell himself “do this”, “don’t do that”, even in
the absence of the parents. Thus the parents’ values both positive and
negative are internalized into the child’s psyche usually unconsciously, and
they are invested with deep emotional overtones, for they are the means to
secure parental love. These internalized commands and prohibitions
become the child’s unconscious conscience. The overwhelming
influence of this unconscious conscience derives partly from parental
prohibitions and partly from the child’s strong drives.
4. Causes of the misunderstanding
Up to the age of reason, the child rules his behaviour by the commands and
prohibitions of his parents, and by a desire to please them in order to secure
their love and avoid their punishment. In other words, the child is governed
by Freud’s superego. Therefore, up to the age of reason, the child’s
conscience is, in practice, his superego. Further, the superego, even after the
age of reason, continues to motivate unconsciously the behaviour of
adolescents and even of many adults, who have not yet reached full
psychological maturity. These facts have led some psycholgists to equate
superego with conscience. Yet, it is one thing to say that the superego
motivates the behaviour of many individuals, and quite another thing to say
that conscience and superego are one and the same thing.
5. How does conscience differ from superego?
Superego originates from ‘libido’, i.e., the form of energy used by our
instincts, such as hunger, thirst, and sex. Conscience originates from reason.
Superego works unconsciously. Conscience is essentially conscious, and acts
through reason. In using his conscience, man acts with full knowledge, full
deliberation and full consent. Man passes judgement on the evil or goodness
of an action according to the understanding he possesses of the moral law.
Superego compels unconsciously and triggers unreasonable guilt feelings. If
a person acts against his conscience, he feels guilty. But these guilt feelings
are quite reasonable, for this person knows why he feels guilty. Christians
believe that they are freed from such feelings when they turn to a forgiving
God in sorrow and repentance. Superego prevents moral growth. Conscience
fosters autonomy and maturity.
Hence, superego and conscience have a different origin, different functions,
different effects: therefore, they are different. Therefore, we rule our
behaviour by our superego or by our conscience. The two together cannot
coexist. Although, in some occasions, one may be ruled partly by one’s
superego and partly by one’s conscience.
Conclusion
If we want to have a well-formed conscience, we have to destroy our
superego, for conscience and superego cannot coexist. This process begins at
the adolescent stage. Having developed his reasoning power and acquired
more knowledge of moral laws, the adolescent questions some of the things
he was told by his parents, and may discard some of their commands.
The process of forming one’s conscience reaches its peak at the adult stage.
We adults with our well informed reason realize the reasonableness of our
parents’ instructions. Largely, we behave according to them, but for a
different motivation, i.e., not because our parents told us (our superego), but
because we are convinced that this is the right thing to do. Thus, we have
destroyed our superego and have developed a well formed conscience.
Questions:
1. What is conscience?
2. How to form your own conscience?
3. “A well formed conscience and superego cannot coexist”. Explain.
4. What reasons do you give to prove that conscience and superego are
different?
REFERENCES
Fuster, J.M. Integrated Personality. Calcutta: The Little Flower Press,
Second Edition, 1969.
FIFTEENTH SESSION
THE COUNSELLOR’S PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
Every profession has in some form or other a code of ethics. This code in
some cases may be contained in long-standing traditions which have been
accepted by the profession and which are handed down from generation to
generation. Other professions, however, have their code of ethics in black and
white so that it may be readily available to their members. Further, some
tenets of the code of ethics of some professions are protected by the legal
authority of the country. Thus for example, in the United States, “attorneys,
physicians, surgeons, priests or ministers of the gospel may not testify against
persons with respect to information originating within the context of a
confidential professional relationship except upon waiver by the person
involved.....” The reason for this privilege is that such professions come
within the immunities conferred by the privileged communication statute.
Were the law of the country not to protect such tenets of the code of ethics,
the very purpose for the existence of such professions would be forfeited.
People would not dare to confide in such men and women, and thus
professional help would not be possible.
The profession of psychologists is a more recent one. Yet, in some
countries it has already reached its state of maturity. Thus in the United
States, the American Psychological Association has its Ethical Standards of
Psychologists.
In India the profession of psychologists in its various forms such as child
psychologists, vocational guidance workers, educational psychologists,
counsellors, counselling psychologists and clinical psychologists, is growing
in strength. Already in 1959 at the national conference of the All-India
Educational and Vocational Guidance Association held in Patna, the question
was raised regarding the formation of a code of ethics for psychologists.
The present chapter is an attempt to formulate some of the guiding
principles of our profession. It is by no means complete. It aims at throwing
light on some basic issues. The author acknowledges his debt to Ethical
Standards of Psychologists of the American Psychological Association,
and to Dr C.H. Patterson.
By professional ethics is understood here a systematized body of moral
principles that guide or determine the counsellor’s behaviour in his
relationships to the counsellee, to the counsellee’s relatives, to his referring
agency, and to society in general.
More specifically, professional ethics can be understood in terms of values
that determine the counsellor’s behaviour.
It is not easy to define the term value. Different authors have touched upon
different aspects of values. For our purpose here we shall define values as
‘certain standards or general principles on which we determine our behaviour
and judge its approval or disapproval’. We may consider three kinds of
values:
1. Social values: are certain standards of behaviour determined by
society, for instance, good manners, traditions such as the wedding reception,
etc. These values differ according to races, castes, etc. And even within the
same social group these values change under the influence of modern ideas.
2. Moral values: are based in general on the dictates of right reason, and
in concrete cases on the dictates of one’s conscience. Moral principles
become known to us through innate knowledge of what is right and wrong
which God gives to every man through reason. Therefore, these dictates of
reason apply to all men independently of their race or religion. They are
objective and unchangeable because they are not man-made but God-made,
who is the author and maker of our nature and of its functioning. For
example, to worship God, to love and respect your parents, not to tell lies, not
to steal, not to kill, not to spoil your neighbour’s name, not to take your
neighbour’s wife, not to indulge in sex outside marriage, etc. These moral
values are unchangeable and apply to all men. The natural law is based on the
enduring nature of a human being. Hence, it binds every human being
everywhere.
3. Religious values: are based on a particular faith and vary according to
the tenets of that faith. Thus Catholics value the sacrifice of the Mass, Hindus
value the Vedas, Jains value avoiding the killing of animals, Parsis value
their fire temples, and Muslims value the teachings of the Koran.
The counselling profession
The counselling profession aims at helping individuals with their personal
problems. These problems often involve ethical issues.
For a time it was thought that the counsellor must keep his own values out
of counselling. Later, however, it was realized that in practice the counsellor
must deal with values since they are part of the personality of the counsellee
and the source of many of her problems. Further, it was also realized that
values influence both the goals of counselling and the methods and
techniques used to reach those goals. The American Psychological
Association’s code of ethics recognizes that “the psychologist’s ethical
standards and his professional techniques are inseparable”. That is why the
problems of values are dealt with in this book.
The counsellor, particularly in India where counsellees belong to so many
different social groups and religions, must face the problem squarely and
learn how to handle it. Directions are given below to help him in this arduous
task. For clarity’s sake, we shall consider the counsellor in his fourfold
relationship:
1. The Counsellor’s relationship to the Counsellee
(a) The counsellor must respect the values of the counsellee. However, this
respect differs according to the kind of value envisaged. Thus, if in the course
of counselling it is found that a personal problem would be easily solved by
modifying a social value of the counsellee, the counsellor could reasonably
suggest that it be modified for the good of the counsellee. The reason for this
statement is that social values are manmade and their importance is relative.
This would not be the case with moral values. Thus a counsellee cannot be
induced to steal, to indulge in masturbation, or in sexual relations outside
marriage. The reason is because these values are God-made and therefore not
subject to man’s modification. Again, religious values differ according to the
particular faith of the counsellee. The counsellor has no authority to change
these values and should respect them.
Cardinal Bea in January 1963, addressing a group of over 500 persons from
twenty-one faiths and sixtynine nations at Rome’s Pro Deo University gave a
direction regarding the problem under discussion which the counsellor will
surely find pertinent and sensible. He said: “We must accept man’s freedom,
that is, man’s right to dispose freely of his own destiny according to his own
conscience. One should always understand another man’s point of view. This
means putting oneself in his place and seeing things from the position from
which he sees them. One should also realize that reality has a thousand
different aspects, a thousand different facets, whereas the individual, even
when very gifted and intelligent, sees only one or a few. Love of truth
cautions us to bear in mind the limitations of our knowledge and also to
recognize the aspect of truth which others see.... We should recognize it
wherever we come across it.”
(b) The counsellor must keep secret the counsellee’s confidential material.
The counsellor may not reveal confidential information of the counsellee to
anyone without first securing her permission. This information, if put down
in writing, must be kept under lock and key, and be destroyed when not
needed.
The counsellor may not disclose secret information to the counsellee’s
relatives without her express permission except to avoid danger to the
counsellee herself or to others. For example, the counsellee intends to commit
suicide or a crime; in this case obviously the counsellor has to disclose this
information even though the counsellee refuses to grant permission.
Professional secrets may be revealed when the good of the counsellee
requires it. If the counsellee is of unsound mind, then the obligation to
secrecy no longer obtains regarding her guardians. When there is possibility
of serious harm to an innocent third party and the counsellee herself refuses
to reveal her mental illness, the counsellor may reveal it (Medical Ethics,
Lobo, p. 174,1980).
The counsellee should be aware that when she reveals her condition to the
counsellor, the counsellor can never be a willing accomplice to crime by an
unjustified silence (Haring, Medical Ethics, p. 203). Justice requires that in
being faithful to one’s counsellee, one cannot put in danger the welfare of
others.
The Supreme Court of India says: “Where there is clash of the two
fundamental rights: patient HIV’s right to privacy (the hospital must keep
secret) and the bride’s right to lead a healthy life, the right that would
advance the public morality would alone be entertained through the process
of court” (The Times of India, 17 August 1998).
Patterson writes: “It is generally agreed that confidential information may
be discussed with professional persons under certain circumstances... It is
customary to discuss counsellee’s problems in case conferences without
necessarily obtaining specific permission from the counsellee. It is assumed
that the counsellee is aware of the practice, and knows that records are kept
and are accessible to staff members of the agency. It appears to be desirable,
nevertheless, to request the counsellee’s permission to use the information in
case conferences if there is any question that she might not be willing.” This
attitude sounds very reasonable and commendable.
(c) Test results must be interpreted to the counsellee in a manner likely to
be constructive in her efforts to solve her problem.
2. The counsellor’s relationship to the profession
(a) The counsellor must maintain high standards of work, and not just aim
at expedience or temporary success.
According to the APA code of ethics it is unethical for a counsellor to offer
services outside his area of training and experience or beyond the boundaries
of his competence. Therefore, if a case is beyond his competence, the
counsellor must refer it to a competent person.
The counsellor should not work only to make money, but should be
inspired by the ideal of his profession, that is, to help people with their
personal problems.
(b) When a counsellor becomes aware of malpractices of other counsellors,
he should exert what influence he can to rectify the situation. On the other
hand, the counsellor should abstain from criticizing or condemning his fellow
counsellor because he uses another method or adopts another approach.
A case of malpractice would be that of a counsellor coaching applicants for
the army, navy, etc., in taking psychological tests.
(c) A counsellor should not normally accept for counselling a person who is
receiving psychological assistance from another professional worker, except
by agreement or after termination of the counsellee’s relationship with the
other professional worker.
3. The counsellor’s relationship to referring bodies
It is courtesy to inform the referring person or agency that the counsellee
kept the appointment and is continuing counselling or has been referred to
another agency. No confidential information may be imparted to them as has
been said above in 1 (b)
4. The counsellor’s relationship to himself
The counsellor has a right to his private life and to relaxation. Therefore, he
may not accept telephone calls after a certain hour. He should leave the
problems of counsellees in the office, and not allow them to interfere with his
happiness at home.
The counsellor should not encourage dependency in the counsellee, and
much less a dependency that makes unreasonable demands on his time,
activities, etc. See page 200 Scot peck.
The counsellor should not entertain too high an expectation in his
counselling practice. He should realize that he is not expected to help each
and every counsellee. He must be ready to accept his limitations without a
sense of frustration. Again, he should be satisfied with success to some
extent, and not be too idealistic in his work and too demanding in his results.
5. The counsellor’s influence on the counsellee
The counsellor has not to teach the counsellee a system of values or a
philosophy of life. This is the task of parents and priests, and is beyond the
scope of the counsellor. It is true, however, that the counsellor does impress
his system of values on the counsellee for he influences the counsellee more
by what he does than by what he says. Again, the counsellor cannot be
indifferent to social, legal or moral wrong, and must favour the good. As
Biestek says, “(the counsellor’s) attitude, even if unexpressed, will be felt
intuitively by the counsellee; it serves as a source of strength and support for
her. In the nonjudgemental attitude he (counsellor) does not relinquish his
own sense of values, his personal and social ethics. He cannot remain
interiorly indifferent to standards contrary to his own if he is to maintain the
integrity of his own personality. He must remain true to them. He does not
become moralistic, but he has a right to his own sense of social, moral, and
spiritual values personally and professionally.”
The counsellor not only should be aware of and maintain his right to his
own moral attitudes and values, but should sometimes express them also in
the counselling relationship since he should be himself in his relationship
with the counsellee. However, if the counsellee will decide to adopt an
unethical course of behaviour, the counsellor should not condone it, but after
expressing the implications of such behaviour should respect the counsellee’s
freedom of choice.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it can be said the counsellor should have his own system of
values or philosophy of life and act according to it in his relationship with the
counsellee. However, he must not impose his views on the counsellee.
Rather, he has to respect the counsellee’s system of values, her integrity, her
freedom and her right to live freely her own destiny according to her own
conscience.
Questions:
1. How do you understand ‘values’? How do you classify them?
2. Why the counsellor may not suggest to the counsellee to change a moral
value?
3. What should the counsellor’s attitude be towards a counsellee who holds
values contrary to his own values?
4. In which case may the counsellor disclose a professional secret?
5. What is meant by ‘the counsellor’s relationship to himself’?
REFERENCES
American Psychological Association. Ethical Standards of Psycholgists,
Washington, Author, 1953.
Biestek. F.P. ‘the non-judgemental attitude’, Social Case Work, 1953, 34,
235-239.
Cardinal Bea quoted in The Examiner, 26 Jan. 1963, Bombay.
Patterson, C.H. Counselling and Psychotherapy: Theory and Practice,
New York, Harper, 1959.
Fuster, J.M. ‘The Counsellor’s Professional Ethics’ J. Voc. Guid. 1963.
My message to you
When I am writing these lines at the end of the book, I feel very close to
you, reader, man or woman; Asian or African or European, American or
Australian; rich or poor; Catholic or non-Catholic. In the light of my
Christian faith, I perceive you as a child of God with a unique personality and
a unique mission in life. My keen wish is that you understand yourself in
depth as to where you come from and where you are going, and that you
exploit your human potential in fulfilment of your God-given mission in life.
I very much wish that you make the contribution which is expected of you in
God’s plan by recycling the learning process over and over again, and that
you help others to do the same in order that they, also, make their own
contributions.
APPENDIXES
APPENDIX I
ILLUSTRATIONS OF COUNSELLOR’S
SKILLS AND THE COUNSELLING PROCESS
A
The counsellee, a professional woman, is a widow with children.
c: I have experienced a problem for some time which I have not been able to
overcome yet. As a matter of fact, it happened this morning. The problem is
that when things do not go the proper way — the way I expect them to go,
then I raise my voice to a high pitch which disturbs the other members of
my family. Quite often, I am ticked off by my son for losing my ‘cool’. He
says my voice is heard by all the neighbours and he sees no reason why the
people around should know about what is happening in our home. This
makes me really unhappy.
First stage: Responding
C: You feel very disturbed because the situation gets out of hand and your
son comments on it.
c: For instance this morning, just as I was leaving for work, the window
cleaner arrived. Despite several attempts in the past to explain the situation,
he continues to come at an inconvenient time. I work Mondays to Saturdays
and he is expected to come on a Sunday which is the only day I am home.
Instead he continues to come on a weekday causing me undue confusion.
My immediate reaction was to shout loudly emphasising my problem. My
son was angry with me. He asked me to stop shouting, told me to get my
priorities right and to get off to work because I was late. I had obviously
angered him very much because I could literally see his veins bulging. I am
extremely disturbed over this and I just wish I could keep above this
situation. But with the roles I have to play I succumb to these outbursts, not
by choice but largely by compulsion.
C: You feel humiliated because your own son is able to rise above the
situation and you are not.
c: Similar situations arise when my servant continues to go against my
instructions, e.g., I warn her to be careful with water especially due to the
water shortage and to turn off the tap when not needed. She blatantly
continues to let the water overflow.
C: You feel very unhappy because repeated irritating situations upset your
timetable and make you lose your temper.
c: Yes, I do feel very unhappy because of my outbursts. I want to be calm,
cool, and rise above the situation.
Summary response
C: You are a very busy person and have to play many roles. You value
efficiency highly in all these roles. So, when these irritating situations
interfere with your schedule, then, you feel very frustrated and wonder what
you could do about it.
c: Yes that’s it.
Second Stage: Personalizing
Personalizing the problem and the goal
C: In what way are you contributing to the problem?
c: I talk too much. I should try to be silent and talk less.
C: You feel very unhappy because you cannot handle these irritating
situations in a flexible and peaceful way, and you want to.
c: Yes, I want to. But what am I to do?
Third Stage: Initiating
C: Your goal is to handle irritating situations in a flexible and peaceful way.
What steps could you take to reach the goal?
Counsellor and counsellee together identify the following steps:
— do some serious reflection on your values, whether efficiency and
effectiveness are more important to you than relating well to others.
— try to understand their difficulties and shift your attention from yourself to
them.
— find other ways of doing things, e.g., delegating work.
— find time for relaxation and rest.
C: Which of these steps would you like to take first?
c: Reflection.
C: You are saying that you want to seriously reflect on your values. When
and where are you going to do this?
c: At home every day for ten minutes before going to bed.
First step
C: Your first step is to take ten minutes at home every day before going to
bed and reflect on your values, trying to understand whether you should
value good relationships with others more than efficiency in your roles.
After a week you could come back and let me know how you have got on.
B
The counsellee is a Religious Sister who has a problem with another Sister.
c: About six years ago, my friend seriously misunderstood me. She came up
to me, shouted very angrily and then made off. At that time I couldn’t say
anything to her. After some time I went and told her how I felt. She was
very sorry for having misunderstood me. After that she tried to make up to
me. But, for myself, I cannot relate to her as I used to.
First Stage: Responding
C: You feel sad because the relationship with your friend was broken.
Although you have out-wardly re-established the friendship, you cannot
relate to her as you used to.
c: I’m glad that I took the initiative and made things clear. But I haven’t got
over the hurt feeling.
C: You feel upset because you still feel hurt.
c: Yes, she has made it clear that she can’t understand how sensitive I am.
C: You feel worried because she has failed to understand you.
c: After that incident, her dealings with other people sometimes remind me of
the way I feel about her. She tries to be very fond of me, but I am neither
able to trust her nor have a close relationship with her.
C: You feel concerned because she tries to be your close friend but you
cannot respond to her in the same way.
c: I have tried to respond to her in the same way, but I have not succeeded. I
wonder if I could do something more about it.
Summary response
C: You feel very sad because the relationship with your friend was broken.
You have made efforts to re-establish the friendship and this has changed
her behaviour toward you. In fact, she tries to show you that she is a close
friend and puts great trust in you. But you find it difficult to relate to her as
closely as you did before. Yet, you would like to do something more about
it.
c: Yes. That’s the way I feel.
Second stage: Personalizing
Personalizing the problem and the goal
C: In what way do you think you contribute to your problem?
c: Though I have tried, my attempts have failed, because I can’t trust her. All
this makes difficult to build up a close relationship between us.
C: You feel very sad because you cannot trust her anymore, and you want to.
c: Yes.
Third stage: Initiating
C: Your goal is to trust her. What steps could you take to reach this goal?
c: — I could try to understand her.
— I could communicate this problem to her.
— I could appreciate her more.
— I could accept her love for me.
C: Your goal is to trust her. The steps suggested by you are: to understand
her, communicate this problem to her, appreciate her, and accept her love
for you. Is there anything else you could think of?
c: No, not right now.
C: I have this to offer you: consider that your friend is limited just as you are.
So in her weakness she hurts you, but she has also strengths and the
potential to change herself and grow in understanding of you, and be very
faithful to you. Why don’t you give her another chance?
c: Yes, you are right. I never thought that way. She surely has the potential to
change herself, for she has already shown something of it. It will take some
time to consider her in this light and change my attitude towards her.
C: Fine. This should help. How about asking the Lord in prayer to help you to
become more like Himself. He forgives you and He trusts you.
c: Yes. I could do this.
C: Of all the steps we mentioned, which one would you like to take first?
c: I’d like to reflect for some time on her potential to change.
C: You are saying that you’d like to reflect for some time on her potential to
change. When exactly and where will you do this?
c: Every day for five minutes in the morning before Mass.
Stating the first step
C: Your first step is to take five minutes every day in the morning before
Mass to reflect that your friend has weaknesses and also the potential to
change herself. Come back and let me know how you have got on.
C
The counsellee is a married woman.
c: Whenever my husband decides to come home late, he never bothers to tell
me and this worries me a lot.
First stage: Responding
C: You feel hurt because whenever your husband comes home late, he does
not take the trouble to tell you.
c: And I feel more hurt because he knows that I worry. And he knows how
upset I get. In spite of that, I think, he gets a thrill out of not ringing me.
C: You feel mad at him because he seems to enjoy harassing you like this.
c: I cannot understand why when a person loves another person he would
want to hurt her like that.
C: You are bewildered because you don’t see how your husband’s love for
you can go together with his wilful disregard for the way you feel.
c: Yes, there have been occasions when I have even phoned hospitals! I have
also phoned the police to try to trace his car. When I told him this, it didn’t
seem to bother him at all. He still doesn’t tell me when he’s going to be
late.
C: You feel very annoyed with your husband because he seems utterly
unconcerned with the agony you go through while waiting for him to come
home.
c: Sometimes he makes the excuse that he could not reach a phone. But I
know that’s not true.
C: You feel cheated by your husband because the excuses he gives are not
valid.
c: I feel that because this happens so often there is a motive behind it and that
he just wants to hurt me.
Question response
C: You feel astonished because your husband is, to all appearances,
intentionally doing that just to hurt you. Could it be that he is annoyed with
you because you worry unnecessarily?
c: He has said that to me, but how can I avoid worrying when he is so late?
Summary response
C: You feel very annoyed with your husband because he doesn’t take the
trouble to tell you when he’s going to be late even though he knows you
worry. He even offers phoney excuses when you confront him. All this
confuses you, for if he loves you, how could he allow himself to hurt you
like this. And you wonder what you could do about it.
c: Yes, I think that you’ve put it very well.
Second stage: Personalizing
Personalizing the problem and the goal
C: What are you doing or not doing that is contributing to your problem?
c: I worry too much.
C: You feel confused because you cannot stop worrying about your husband
even though there seems to be no real reason for it. You want to stop
worrying.
Third stage: Initiating.
C: Your goal is to control your worrying when there is no real reason for it.
What steps could you take to reach the goal?
c: — I could try to understand him better.
— I could find out what is in me that displeases him.
— I could accept the fact that he likes to come back late.
— I could stop finding fault with him.
— I could trust him more.
C: Your goal is to control your worrying when there is no real reason for it.
The steps suggested by you are: to understand him better, to find out what
is in you that displeases him, to accept the fact that he likes to come late, to
stop finding fault with him, and to trust him more. Is there anything else
you could think of?
c: No. That is all I can offer.
C: Very good. I think that all these steps are very relevant. Which of these
steps would you like to begin with?
c: I could find out what is in me that displeases him.
C: You are saying that you could find out what is in you that displeases him.
How are you going to do this and when and where?
c: I could take ten minutes at home each day before lunch when I am alone
and really reflect on this.
Stating the first step.
C: Your first step is to find out what it is in you that displeases your husband.
Spend ten minutes at home every day before lunch to reflect on this point.
Would you like to do this every day for a week and then come to tell me
about it?
D
The counsellee is a bachelor.
c: After a long time I had a chance to visit a good friend of mine. We had
kept in contact by letter. I was really excited about visiting her. She
arranged for me to stay at her home and to show me around. But all the
time I was there she seemed very cold and distant.
First stage: Responding
C: You feel deeply hurt because she has rejected you.
c: Yes! I never thought this could happen. She has changed completely. She
was so indifferent, actually avoiding being with me.
C: You feel very upset because she no longer relates to you in the same way.
c: I felt so desperate that I asked her, “Have I hurt you in any way?” She said,
“No! It’s something in me that I don’t want to talk about.”
C: You feel very disappointed because she does not want to talk to you about
it.
c: She does not seem to trust me any more.
C: You feel very hurt because she does not want to confide in you any longer.
c: What hurts me most is that she has rejected me and I do not know why.
C: You feel puzzled because she keeps you guessing what that ‘something’
could be.
c: Why are women like that? Why can’t they say things straight?
C: You feel mad because she acts so strangely that you cannot understand
her.
c: Right! If she does not want to share with me that ‘something’, at least she
could give me the reason why she doesn’t want to tell me.
Summary response
C: You were very excited to meet your friend after a long interval. However
you were soon deeply hurt because she seemed to be cold and distant
towards you, actually avoiding being with you. You felt desperate because
you did not know why she behaved in this way. Even when you asked her,
she refused to confide in you the real reason. This made you feel mad at her
and shattered the friendship and you wonder what you could do about it.
c: Right! That’s it!
Second stage: Personalizing
Personalizing the problem and the goal
C: In what way do you feel you might be contributing to this problem?
c: I am looking at it from my side only. Perhaps she is going through a crisis.
C: You feel desperate because you cannot understand that she is going
through a crisis and you want to understand her.
c: Yes, I do want to understand her.
Third stage: Initiating
Stating the goal clearly and identifying appropriate steps to the goal.
C: Your goal is to understand her. What steps could you take to reach the
goal?
c: — I should realise that she is going through a crisis.
— I should give her time to get over it.
— I should not take her words as being hostile to me.
— I could pray for her.
— I should think that she may have been confused in responding to me and
hesitant about disclosing the real reason to me.
C: Your goal is to understand her. The steps which you have suggested are: to
realise that she may be in a crisis, to give her time to get over it, not to take
her words as hostile to you, to pray for her and to think that she may have
been confused and hesitant about disclosing the real reason to you. Is there
anything else you can think of?
c: Yes. I remember that she never complained against me and that she did
everything possible to make me comfortable during my stay with her.
C: Besides the steps you have mentioned, how about forgiving her for her
coldness to you?
c: Yes. I am ready to forgive her.
C: Well, then your goal is to understand her. Of all the steps we have
indicated, which one would you like to take first?
c: Understanding and forgiving her, and praying for her.
C: You are saying that you want to understand and forgive her, and to pray
for her. How, when and where will you do this?
c: When I get up in the morning I shall spend five minutes consciously
thinking about her, trying to understand and forgive her and to pray for her.
Formulate the first step.
C: Your first step is everyday when you get up in the morning, you will take
five minutes to reflect, understand, forgive her, and pray for her. Come
back and report to me next week.
Counsellee’s reactions and Counsellor’s interchangeable responses.
c: Well, now I see the whole thing quite differently and it looks better to me.
I do forgive her.
C: You feel compassionate towards her now because you have begun to
understand her.
c: Yes! She was so confused and tense that I cannot blame her. She will get
over it with time.
C: You feel hopeful because you begin to see how you can actually get where
you want to be: understanding her.
c: I feel good now that I have sorted out all these things with you and found
out what I should do.
C: You feel peaceful now because it is clear to you the step you should take.
Everyday when you get up in the morning you are going to take five
minutes to understand and forgive her, and to pray for her. Then you are
going to come back to see me.
E
The counsellee is a married woman in India.
c: I was quite upset yesterday. My old servant is taking things easy and is
being rude to me. I find it difficult to take that from her.
First stage: Responding
C: You feel disturbed because your senior servant does not respect you.
c: It’s a thing that I cannot accept from her, since she has been with me for
over four and a half years. She really is a nice person, quite mature,
efficient and understanding. It’s only when some other servant comes into
the room that I find her acting very strangely.
C: You feel shocked because such a nice person behaves so disrespectfully
towards you in front of other servants.
c: I really do not know what to do with her. She has gone away about fifteen
times and always comes back. I take her back because I know that my child
and my house are safe with her. Nowadays it is very difficult to find a
reliable servant.
Summary response
C: The situation at home is becoming very trying for you, because this
servant comes and goes as she pleases and is rude to you in front of other
servants. Yet, when she is there you know that your child and home are
safe. It’s difficult to find such a reliable servant.
c: Sometimes I am boiling inside at having to do all the work and watch her
taking it easy and doing as she pleases.
C: You feel furious because your servant is not doing what she is supposed to
do and you have to do her work.
c: At times I feel sorry for her. I know, however, how to handle her. Take
today, I am keeping my distance from her. But I wish these things did not
happen.
C: You feel competent because you can manage her. But all these disturbing
incidents create a very tense atmosphere in your home.
c: Yes. Just the other day she left home and was absent for a few days. And I
did not know when she would come back. How can I go on like this?
C: You feel perplexed because you are not sure that you should tolerate her
for so long.
c: Yes! Her erratic behaviour, leaving me and coming back as she pleases,
worries me very much. If we could agree and help each other, it would give
me peace of mind and security in the home.
End of responding with a final summary
C: Nowadays it is very difficult to get a reliable servant. You have a woman
servant who can take care of your child and you feel safe with her in the
home. But she has begun to be rude to you in front of other servants and she
upsets you very much with her erratic behaviour. You wonder whether you
should dismiss her or, rather, keep her and try to improve her relationship
with you.
c: Yes! That’s what it is.
Second stage: Personalizing.
Personalizing the problem and the goal.
C: What are you doing or not doing that is contributing to your problem?
c: I am not trying to improve my relationship with her.
C: You feel frustrated with yourself because you cannot build up a good
relationship with your servant, and you want to.
c: Yes. This is what I want.
Third stage: Initiating
Stating the goal clearly and developing steps to the goal.
C: Your goal is to build up a good relationship with your servant. What steps
could you take to reach the goal?
c: I should try to understand her and her situation, e.g., what makes her run
away.
I should think about my relationship with her, my ways of treating her.
C: Your goal is to build up a good relationship with your servant. The steps
suggested by you are: to understand her and her situation, e.g., why does
she run away? And to think about your relationship with her and the way
you treat her. Is there anything else you can think of?
c: No, not just now.
C: You are saying you could examine your ways of relating to her. Perhaps
we could specify this further and say: watch yourself when talking to her,
observe your language, your tone of voice, your attitude towards her,
whether you make her feel you appreciate her and respect her.
c: Yes, that’s a good point. I must make her feel appreciated and respected by
me.
C: Your goal is to build up a good relationship with your servant. Of all the
steps we have mentioned, which one would you like to take first?
c: To reflect and to ask myself, what is it in me that makes my servant act
disrespectfully towards me in front of other servants?
C: You are saying that you are going to reflect and ask yourself, what is it in
me that makes my servant act disrespectfully towards me in front of other
servants. When and where are you going to do this?
c: After lunch I am free, so I could take ten minutes to reflect and ask myself
this.
Stating the first step
C: Your first step is to take ten minutes every day after lunch to reflect and
ask yourself, what is it in me that makes my servant act disrespectfully
towards me in front of other servants. After a week you could come back
and let me know how you have got on.
APPENDIX II
POST-TRAINING TEST
Just as at the pre-training stage you took a test to find out where you were
in relation to this model, so now at the post-training stage you will want an
opportunity to measure your progress in counselling using this method. If you
really want to profit from this test, you should read the instructions as they
are given.
Part I: A test on the ability to communicate in a helpful way.
Write down two responses to the following counsellee:
1. an interchangeable response.
2. a personalized problem and goal response, and initiate the first step.
The counsellee is a young married woman in India.
Counsellee: There is no peace at home. My husband is over-domineering
and very jealous. I have to hand him the entire salary on pay day, give a
detailed account of my doings and mention all the men I have spoken to
in his absence. It’s unbearable! I never wanted to marry him, but he
insisted so much and threatened me in so many ways that I was forced
to yield. I realize now that I should have asserted myself then. If I do not
now claim my rights, and if I’m not ready to face the consequences now
life for me will be impossible.
Write down the exact words you would use if you were actually speaking to
the counsellee.
Part II: A test on the ability to discriminate helpful responses
You may assess your ability to discriminate helpful responses in this way:
read the following counsellor-responses which might have been given to this
counsellee. In your notebook enter your rating of the effectiveness of that
response. Use the following rating scale.
1 : ineffective
2 : somewhat effective
3 : effective
4 : very effective
The counsellee is a businessman in India.
Counsellee: I’ve just started my own business in this city, after much
planning and capital expenditure. Now I’m finding that I’m being
approached by various government officials and dealers with requests
for bribes and arrangements for irregular sales transactions. Operating
on the black market and giving bribes, etc., is against all my principles,
and yet I find that a number of these individuals could put very real
obstacles in the way of the success of my business. They seem inclined
to do just that if I don’t oblige them. I don’t know whether I should
remain true to my principles and risk losing the business or give in to
their demands and, in effect, lower my own standards just to keep the
business going.
Counsellor-responses
............. 1. In other words, you are facing a difficult choice, whether to run
your business by indulging in these unethical practices or not.
............. 2. You feel frustrated because operating a successful business in this
city seems to require the adoption of unethical practices which goes
against all your principles.
............. 3. It’s all part of the system here—why worry about it?
............. 4. You are feeling very discouraged because you cannot decide
which is more important to you — a high ethical standard in life or a
successful business, and you want to be able to make this decision. Your
first step might be to explore your set of values — make a list of all the
things that you consider important to your happiness and well-being in
life. Then arrange this list in order of priority and use this information to
help you make your decision.
How to check your ratings
In the Table below, you may check your ratings against the experts’ ratings
in this way:
1. Enter your ratings in the appropriate column.
2. Without regard to whether the difference is positive or negative, write
down the difference between each of your numerical ratings and each of the
experts’ ratings.
3. Add up the difference between rating scores. You should have four scores,
one for each response.
4. Divide the total of the difference between rating scores by 4. The result is
your post-training test score on discrimination of helpful responses.
The Table below shows how you can obtain your score on your ability to
discriminate helpful responses. E.g., if you gave Response 1, a rating 2, then
the difference between your rating and the expert’s is 0. This means that you
agree fully with the expert. If all your ratings agree fully with the expert’s,
then you have acquired the ability to discriminate helpful responses.
If, however, there are some differences, you may like to know how much,
on the average, you disagree with the expert. To answer this question, you
must enter the differences in the appropriate column, add them up and divide
them by 4. The result is your average difference from the expert’s ratings.
If your score for each response deviates from the expert’s by only 1, you
may feel satisfied: else you would do well to re-read the pertinent pages.
Here are the reasons for the experts’ ratings. Response 1 was rated 2
because it was directly related to what the counsellee said, but it did not
respond to the feelings expressed by the counsellee. Response 2 was rated 3
because it was an accurate response to where the counsellee is in terms of
both content and feeling expressed. Response 3 was rated 1 because it was
totally irrelevant to the counsellee’s expression. Response 4 was rated 4
because it was an accurate response to where the counsellee is, where he
wants to be and how to get from where he is to where he wants to be. By
suggesting a specific first step that the counsellee could take towards the
achievement of his goal, this response provided both understanding and
concrete direction.
Now, in the light of the above explanations of the experts’ ratings and of
the two counsellor-responses with their ratings given below, evaluate your
own communication response using the rating given on p. 293
Counsellor-responses:
Ratings
3 Interchangeable response: You feel very unhappy because your husband
forced you to marry him against your will and now he makes your life
miserable. At the same time, you feel helpless in front of him, but are
convinced that you should do something.
4 A personalized problem and goal response, and initiated first step: You feel
very annoyed with yourself because you are not able to assert yourself in
front of your husband and you want to. Your first step will be to talk the
whole thing over with me and together find out ways to help you to build up
courage to assert yourself.
Measure your progress
To measure your progress in training in counselling, compare your scores
on the pre-training test, both in communication and in discrimination, with
your scores on the post-training test. If you have mastered all the counselling
skills explained in this book, your responses will substantially agree with the
counsellor-responses given above. If so, congratulations! You have
understood this model well. Your task will now be to consolidate these skills
and improve them further by using the ‘recycling skill’ as explained in tenth
session. If there are substantial discrepancies between your responses and
those counsellor-responses above, then, you will want to re-read those
relevant chapters to improve your present understanding of the model.
Scale for life
To rate your responses in the future, you may wish to use the following scale
given by Carkhuff in The Art of Helping III, Page 192:
Basic Helping Scale
Level
1 Nonattending
2 Attending
3 Attending and Responding
4 Attending, Responding, and Personalizing
5 Attending, Responding, Personalizing and Initiating
Each counsellor-behaviour leads to an important counsellee-activity.
Attending leads to counsellee-involvement. Responding facilitates the
counsellee’s exploration. Personalizing deepens the counsellee’s
understanding. Initiating enables the counsellee to act constructively.
APPENDIX III
TEST IN SELF-ACTUALIZATION
J.M. Fuster, S.J., M.A. (Psy. USA), Ph.D. (Psy.)
Self-actualization means here exploiting your own human and spiritual
potential and using it to help others.
Ratings: 1= none
2= somewhat
3= average
4= much
5= very much
The significance of your ratings depends on your honesty in rating yourself.
So, do not allow yourself to be carried away by the desire to place yourself in
good light; rather, be objective and truthful.
Enter your ratings in the blank spaces provided in front of the item
numbers:
___1. Can you communicate to yourself how you are feeling and why you
feel that way?
___2. Can you communicate to others how they feel and why they feel that
way?
___3. Are you realistically aware of your strengths and weaknesses?
___4. Do you learn from your own mistakes and criticisms of others?
___5. Are you open to new perspectives in self-development?
___6. Do you have a well grounded sense of self-confidence?
___7. Are you aware in what way you yourself are contributing to the
creation of your problems?
___8. Do you turn your contribution to your problem into a goal, and devise
practical steps to attain it?
___9. Do you keep reviewing daily your performance in taking the steps to
the goal?
___10. Are you very eager to do what God wants you to do?
___11. Can you voice your views on what is right and wrong that are
unpopular?
___12. Can you make decisions according to your values and bravely face the
consequences?
___13. Can you be composed and kind even in trying moments?
___14. Can you delay gratification to pursue goals?
___15. Do you foster a sense of humour?
___16. How far are you reliable and dependable in your dealings with others?
___17. Can you admit your faults and apologize for them?
___18. Can you smoothly handle multiple demands?
___19. Are you interested in the welfare of others?
___20. Do you assume your social responsibilities?
___21. Are you able to give and receive love?
___22. Can you forgive those who have hurt your feelings and try to forget
the hurt?
___23. Do you live according to your values?
___24. Are you sensitive to the feelings of others and willing to attune with
different people?
___25. Do you accept others as they are?
___26. Can you give without expecting returns?
___27. Can you cope with the ups and downs of life?
___28. Do you always tell the truth?
___29. Can you risk a friendship in saying what you believe is right?
___30. Can you settle disputes through negotiation and persuasion in order to
cooperate and maintain teamwork?
___31. Do you accept yourself as you are?
___32. Are you free from unreasonable fears and compulsions?
___33. Do you derive satisfaction from your job?
___34 Are you living in harmony with your family, neighbours and
colleagues?
___35. Do you appreciate other religions and also what is good in them?
___36. Are you honest with God, yourself and others?
___37. Are you faithful to your conscience and religious duties?
___38. Do you show gratitude for favours received?
___39. Can you play and have fun?
___40. Do you take reasonable care of your health?
___41. Do you live by faith and trust in God’s great love for you?
___42. Can you adjust well to changing circum-stances?
___43. Can you understand and appreciate another’s point of view?
___44. Do you love your neighbour as you love yourself?
___45. How far are you unselfish in your dealings with others?
___46. Are you more inner directed (i.e., behaving according to your own
convictions), rather than outer directed (i.e., depending much on the
approval of others) ?
___47. Do you love yourself?
___48. Can you assert yourself constructively?
___49. Do you daily thank God for all the good things He has given you, and
apologize to Him for your faults, with a firm resolve not to repeat them?
Total score: (Add up your scores)
Interpretation of the total score:
60% to 69% – 147 to 170 : Good
70% to 79% – 171 to 195 : Very good
80% to 89% – 196 to 219 : Excellent
90% to 100% – 220 to 245 : Exceptional
APPENDIX IV
SELF-TRAINING PROGRAMME
J.M. Fuster, S.J., M.A. (Psy., USA), Ph.D. (Psy.)
If you want to become an expert in using the Human Technology that you
have learned in the course, in order to help others to actualize their human
potential, here is a programme that will show you how you could achieve
this.
First: Select an area of your personality which you want to improve.
Second: Explore yourself in this area by asking yourself: How do I feel in
this area and why do I feel this way? Write down the various feelings and
reasons that come to mind. When you sense that you have understood where
you are in that area, make a final summary that includes the main feelings
and their reasons. Read it aloud to yourself, and listen to your body for its
approval or disapproval, i.e., whether it clicks or, not. If it clicks, then move
on to personalizing your problem.
Third: Ask yourself: In what way am I contributing to my problematic
situation? Write down the answer, using the forma: I feel—because I cannot
—and I want to.. Read it aloud to yourself and see if your body clicks. If it
does not, try another response until it does click. Then pass on to initiating.
Fourth: Turn what you cannot do into a goal, and write it down: My goal is
____ (the opposite of the problem). Ask yourself what steps you could
take to reach this goal. Write them down. Read aloud to yourself the whole
list of steps and see if they are practical and well within your resources. Then
select the first step you are going to take. See that it is relatively easy to take
it in order to motivate yourself to take it. Place it in time and space and tell
yourself. My first step is____ (write it down).
Fifth: Start on your action-programme. How? When you get up in the
morning; resolve to take the first step. Figure out the various occasions
during the day when you will take this step.
Sixth: At night, before going to bed, or at some other convenient time,
review your performance, how you have practised that step. If you failed to
take it, then confront yourself by telling yourself: I resolved that I would
practise this step, but I have not. Why? Find the reason for your failure, and
resolve to practise it the next day.
Seventh: Once you have mastered the first step, take another step from that
list and do the same as you have done with the first step.
Eighth: Once you have reached the goal, choose another area of your
personality which you want to improve, and use the same method you have
used to master the first step. We call this Recycling the Learning Process.
Life is not static; it is dynamic, i.e., either you move forward or you go
backward. There is no standing still. The sky is the limit.
The self-training programme requires self-discipline, a firm determination
and a strong willpower. Many people are weak in these areas. Sincere prayer
asking God for help and courage will go a long way to empower you to use
this self-training programme effectively. I wish you all success.
Ninth: As you keep practicing this self-training programme, you will keep
actualizing your own human potential and you will be more effective to help
others to do the same. Thus you will become an expert at using this human
technology for the benefit of all those who come to you for help.
Please note that this is a programme that needs time. You may take several
days to complete the Second and the Third stages. There is no hurry. Take
your time, but be firm and determined.
Tenth: Again, when you have counselled someone, after the session ask
yourself: how did it go? Notice the mistakes you have made. Such as, giving
advice, not communicating understanding by labelling the feeling correctly
and giving the reason for the feeling, etc. Then, resolve not to repeat the
mistake at the next interview. This is the way to become an expert.
APPENDIX V
A WAY OF HELPING THE COUNSELEE TO EXPLORE FURTHER
HER PROBLEM SITUATION
In my book, Personal Counselling, to stimulate the counselee to explore
her problem situation, I offer only the skill of responding to feeling and
content. After using this skill, many counselees need help to go further into
the exploration of the problem situation. How to achieve this’?
I suggest a few questions that will help here. I give an example of a true case.
A lady came to consult me. She appeared to be very agitated.
I shall use “c” for counselee and “C” for counselor.
c : Can the devil appear in church?
C : (I do not answer the question; instead, I put a question to initiate
exploration and say) What makes you ask this question?
c : When I go to church I see huge black figures like the devil moving on the
walls and this scares me very much.
C : Do you see the same figures at home?
c: Yes, I do.
C: When did you start to see these figures?
c : About three months ago.
C : So before that time you never saw these figures. What happened to you
about that time?
c : I had an eye operation.
C : These black figures you see are the effect of the operation. Many people
after an eye operation see similar black figures. They will disappear after
some time. So, leave the devil alone! and have patience for some time.
My first question was: What makes you ask this question? Next question: Do
you see the same figures at home? The next question: When did you begin to
see these black figures? The next question: What happened to you at that
time?
Another example. Suzi comes for counselling.
c: I get angry very often and this creates a lot of trouble for me.
C: You feel upset because this anger spoils your interpersonal relations.
c: Yes, but I do not know why I get so angry.
C: When did you begin to get so angry?
c: In early childhood.
C: You were not born like this. You have learned it through some
experiences. Can you recall when you began to get so angry?
c: I saw my dad getting angry very often and, thus, he got what he wanted.
C : So you learned a way of getting what you wanted by getting angry and
this gave you some satisfaction. And because of this satisfaction you
repeated the same behaviour of getting angry when you wanted something,
and thus you created the habit.
c: So I understand now how I got this habit, but it creates many problems.
Final summary response.
C: You feel disturbed and anxious now because you realize that this habit of
getting what you want by getting angry spoils your interpersonal relations,
and wonder what you could do about it.
c: This is what I want.
Personalizing the problem.
C : You feel very anxious because you cannot get rid of this anger and you
want to.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aspy, D.N. and Roebuck, F.N. Kids Don’t Learn from People They Don’t Like. Amherst, Mass.:
Human Resource Development Press, 1977.
Berenson, B.G. Belly-to-Belly and Back-to-Back; The Militant Humanism of Robert R. Carkhuff,
Amherst, Mass: Human Resource Development Press, 1975.
Berenson, B.G. and Carkhuff, R.R. The Sources of Gain in Counselling and Psychotherapy. New
York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 1967.
Berenson, B.G. and Mitchell, K.M. Confrontation: For Better or Worse. Amherst, Mass.: Human
Resource Development Press, 1974.
Bugental, J.F.T. The Search for Authenticity. New York: Holts, 1965.
Buhler, C. Values in Psychotherapy. New York: Free, 1962.
Carkhuff, R.R. Helping and Human Relations. Vols. I and II. New York: Holt, Rinehart and
Winston, 1969.
Carkhuff, R.R. The Development of Human Resources. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,
1971.
Carkhuff, R.R. and Others, Cry Twice. Amherst Mass.: Human Resource Development Press, 1974.
Carkhuff, R.R. and Berenson, B.G. Beyond Counselling and Therapy. New York: Holt, Rinehart
and Winston, Second Edition, 1977.
Carkhuff, R.R. and Berenson, B.G. Teaching as Treatment. Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource
Development Press 1976.
Carkhuff, R.R. and Others, The Art of Helping—Trainer’s Guide. Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource
Development Press 1977.
Carkhuff, R.R. The Art of Problem-Solving. Amherst, Mass. Human Resource Development Press,
1973.
Carkhuff, R.R. The Art of Programme Development, (How to Help Yourself) Amherst, Mass.:
Human Resource Development Press, 1974.
Carkhuff, R.R. and Others, The Skills of Teaching: Interpersonal Skills. Amherst, Mass.: Human
Resource Development Press, 1977.
Carkhuff, R.R. Helping Begins at Home. Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource Development Press,
1976.
Carkhuff, R.R. and Becker, J. W. Toward Excellence in Education. Amherst: Carkhuff Institute of
Human Technology, Inc., 1977.
Carkhuff, R.R. The Art of Helping III. Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource Development Press, Third
Edition, 1977.
Carkhuff, R.R. Toward Actualizing Human Potential. Amherst, Mass.: Human Resource
Development Press, 1981.
Coleman, J.C. Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life. Bombay: Taraporevala, Fifth Edition, 1976.
Fromm, E. The Art of Loving. New York: Harper, 1964.
Fuster, J.M. Psychological Counselling in India. Bombay: Macmillan, 1969.
Fuster, J.M. Integrated Personality. Calcutta: The Little Flower Press, Second Edition, 1969.
Fuster, J.M. Helping in Personal Growth. Bombay: St Paul Publications, 1974.
Fuster, J.M. Como Potenciar la Autorrealizacion. Spain: Mensajero, 1977.
Fuster, J.M. Techniche di Autorealizzazione. Rome: Borla, 1979.
Fuster, J.M. ‘Training Courses in Personal Counselling’, International Journal for the Advancement of
Counselling, Vol. 2, No. 1 1979, University of Utrecht. Holland.
Ginott, H.G. Between Parent and Child. New York: Macmillan, 1965.
Ginott, H.G. Between Parent and Teenager. New York: Macmillan, 1965.
Lindgren H.C. and Fisk, L.W. Psychology of Personal Development. New York: John Wiley and
Sons. 1976.
May, Rollo The Art of Counselling. New Delhi: Rupa and Co. 1993.
Mussen, P.H. Conger, J.J. and Kagan, Child Development and Personality. New York: Harper and
Row, Fourth Edition, 1974.
Rogers, C.R. and Others, The Therapeutic Relationship and Its Impact. Madison, Wis.: University
of Wisconsin Press, 1967.
Scott Peck, M. The Road Less Travelled London: Arrow Books, 1990.
Siegel Bernie S. Peace, Love and Healing. London: Arrow Books, 1990.
Stone, H.W. Crisis Counselling. Philadelphia, Pa.: Fortress. 1976.
Traux, C. B. and Carkhuff, R.R. Toward Effective Counselling and Therapy. Chicago: Aldine,
1967.
PUBLICATIONS BY THE AUTHOR
1 ‘Sex education’, J. Educ. & Psychol., Baroda 1959.
2 ‘The role of parents in the personality development of the child’. The Examiner, Bombay, 1960.
3 ‘The counsellor’s attitudes’, J. Voc. Educ. Guid., Baroda, 1961.
4 ‘Sex education’, Social Action, New Delhi, 1962.
5 ‘A study of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule on Indian students’, J. Soc. Psychol. (USA),
1962.
6 Success in College (pp. 32), St Xavier’s College, Bombay 1962.
7 ‘Psychological Counselling in India’, Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 1963.
8 ‘The need for psychological counselling and its present position in India’, Internat. Mental Health
Research Newsletter, 1963.
9 ‘The self-concept approach to personal adjustment’, J. Soc. Psychol. (USA), 1963.
10 ‘The counsellor’s professional ethics’, J.Voc. Guid., Baroda, 1963.
11 Development of Indian Norms for the EPPS, 1963 (Published in the following book, chapter 6).
12 Psychological Counselling in India. (pp. 261) Bombay Macmillan, 1964.
13 Student Services Manual, (co-author). The United States Educational Foundation in India, 1965.
14 A Critical study of the recommendations of the Education Commission on Guidance and
Counselling (1964-1966). A chapter in Educational Perspective in Modern India. Jesuit
Educational Association of India, New Delhi, 1967.
15 ‘Control of social desirability in personality inventories’, J. Voc. Educ. Guid., Bombay, 1967.
16 Integrated Personality. (pp. 88) Xavier Publications, St Xavier’s College, Calcutta, 1967.
17 Development of Indian Norms for the Kuder Preference Record, 1968 (Unpublished).
18 Integrated Personality. Second Edition, Xavier Publications, 1969.
19 Development of Indian Norms for the Otis-Lennon Test of Intelligence (Unpublished).
20 A survey of college student attitudes on boy-girl relationship and of sex education. Times Weekly,
Bombay, 1971.
21 ‘My Experience with T Groups in India’. Paper read at the Conference on Sensitivity Training, held
in New Delhi, April 1969, at the Department of Business Management and Industrial Administration,
Delhi School of Economics.
22 Helping in Personal Growth.(pp. 180) St Paul Publications Bombay, 1974.
23 Como Potenciar la Autorrealizacion (pp. 150) Mensajero, Spain, 1977.
24 Techniche di Autorealizzazione. (pp. 133) Borla, Roma, 1979.
25 ‘Training Courses in Personal Counselling’, Intl. J. for the Advancement of Counselling, Vol. 2, No.
1, 1979, Utrecht.
26 Growing in Christ. Fourth Edition (pp. 240) ST PAULS, Bombay, 1997.
27 Personal Counselling. Eleventh Edition (pp. 310) ST PAULS, Bombay, 1996.
28 Love As I Love. Second Edition (pp. 95) ST PAUL, Bombay, 1993.
29 The Journey of Faith (pp.59) ST PAULS, Bombay 1989.
30 Hold my Hand and Lead Me On. Second Printing. (pp. 42) Asian Trading Corporation, 1993.
31 A Path to God for All. Second Printing, (pp. 58). Asian Trading Corporation, Bombay, 1995.
32. Sons in the Son (pp. 48) ST PAULS, Bombay, 1992.
33 How to keep in Touch with God (pp. 71) ST PAULS, Bombay, 1997.
34 Call to Christian Maturity (pp. 136) ST PAULS, Mumbai, 2002.
Abnormality, 62
Accept life as it is, 203
Acceptance,
of counsellee, 80
of others, 263
of self, 221, 227
Adjustive resources, 229, 232
Advice not helpful, 39
Allport, G.W., 215
American Psychological
Association, 260
code of ethics, 259
criteria for selection of
clinical psychologists, 54
Assume Responsibility, 166
Attending Physically, 71 f
Attitudes,
of counsellors, 78f
of pople towards mental patients, 26
training in, 103
Awareness of spiritual dimension of the person, 98
Background of counselling, 22 f
Basic skills in counselling, 45
Becoming youself, 215 f
Blocks to self-exploration, 136
Breuer, 25
Carkhuff, R., 52
Caution in self-disclosure, 98
Challenge of Eysenck, 30
Chart I : a model of
counselling, 47
Chart II : counselling
process, 65
Chart III : feeling words and levels of intensity 128
Chart IV : All skill-steps 171
Client-centred therapy, 27
Communication and
development of the
self-concept, 216
Communication, how far with c, 83
Community resources, 63
Concept of self, 215 f
Concreteness, 85 f
Confidentiality, 263 f
Confrontation, 177 f
of self, 183
Conscience, 249 f
Counselling,
definition of, 48
present trend of, 36
process of, 65
Counsellor’s,
approach to c, 58
influence on c, 267
limitations, 61
Culture, respect of, 263
Courage to face life, 203
Defence mechanisms, 247
Definition of Personal Counselling, 48
Development of
personality, 215
Discipline skills, 71
Displacement, 247
Effective counsellors, 32
Empathy, 92
Endorphins, 34
Ethics of counselling, 259
Evolution of counselling, 36
Eysenck, 30
Faith in c’s potential
to change, 80
Feelings, 104
training in handling them, 108
Feeling words, list of, 128
Forgiveness of others, 102
of self, 105
Frame of reference, 121
how to enter into, 136
Freud, 26
Functioning at a high level, 31
General paresis, 24
Genuineness, 82
why effective, 83
Giving advice and suggesting steps, 197
Growth-choice, 244
Handing control to c, 167
Helps to personalize
the problem, 160 f
Holistic approach, 195
Immediacy 184 f
Initiating, 188 f
Insight into one’s needs, 56
Internalizing the
experience, 159
Kierkegaard, 221
Learning process, 39
Levels of functioning,in a group, 15
Limintations of counsellors, 61
Listening,
skills of, 109
art of, 112
Major mental disorders 62
Mental health, 227
Models of counselling, 49
use of other models, 173
Motivation, 189, 199
Motto of counselling, 213
My message to you, 269
Needs of counsellors 56
Neurosciences, 34
Neurotransmitters, 34
Nonverbal communication 71
Observing skills, 88
Organic viewpoint, 24
Origins of counselling, 25
Overall view of the
model, 205
Personal Orientation
Inventory, 238
Personality, 215
Personalizing, 148
Personalizing strengths, 168
Physical fitness, 71
Process of counselling, 65
Professional ethics, 259
Projection, 247
Psychotherapy and
counselling, 22
Rationale, 17
Rationalization, 247
Recycling skill, 201
Referral, 61
Regression, 247
Rehearsing steps, 194
Rejection, 247
Repression, 247
Respect, 78
Responding, 117
at c’s level, 130
exercises of, 122
to feeling and content, 130
to several feelings, 141
to silent c, 144
with a question, 133
with a summary, 132
Responsibility, 245
Revolution in the
neurosciences, 34
Risk in confronting c, 182
in self-disclosure, 96
in personal growth, 242
Rogers, C., 27
Scale of counsellors’
functioning, 298
Scott Peck, 31, 33, 200
Self-acceptance, 215, 221, 227
Self-actualization, 238
Self-concept, 215
Self-confrontation, 183
Self-disclosure, 96
Shostrom, 238
Silent c, 144
Skill-steps all together, 171
Social skills, 70
Special personalization
of problems, 162
Spiritual dimension
of the person, 98
Steps to the goal,
how to devise them, 190
Stress, 229
Sublimation, 247
Subsequent stage, 199
Superego, 254
Sympathy,
why not helpful, 93
Termination of counselling, 209
Tests,
pre-training, 18
post-training, 292
Values, 260
Virus, 34
Ways of responding, 129
to feeling and content, 129
with a question, 133
with a summary, 132
When to pass on
to personalizing, 135
Why ask c in personalizing
the problem, 150
Why personalize problem
and goal together, 153
Copyright © 1988, The Bombay Saint Paul Society
ISBN 81-7108-057-8
Cover: Manoj Pal
PREFACE
To the Thirteenth Edition
In this edition I have added new material: Test in Self-Actualization and Self-
Training Programme. This test gives you an idea of how much, you as a
trainee, have actualized your human and spiritual potential. The Self-training
Programme is for those who after the counselling course want to become
more effective counsellors. Only by endless self-training can you become an
expert.
For the sake of clarity I use "he" wherever I mean counsellor in this edition,
and "she" for counsellee. This is only for the sake of clarity. I strongly
believe in the equality of the human dignity of both sexes.
I wish to thank all my trainees — 2,237 of them! — who interacted with
me in the 158 counselling courses I have conducted in 9 countries. I also
thank all those who have helped me in bringing out this edition. May God
bless you abundantly.
J.M. Fuster
Xavier Institute of Counselling
St Xavier’s College Campus
Mumbai– 400001
6
8
9
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
213
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
317
318
319
320
s
c
s
C
s
c
s
C
s
s
s
c
C
The elements of this integrated model of counselling are included in the
following Chart:
CHART I
A MODEL OF COUNSELLING
Counsellor’s Attitudes: Respect, Genuineness, Concreteness, Empathy,
Self-disclosure, Confrontation, Immediacy.
Preparatory Stage Central Stages
Counsellee’s
Learning Process: Get involved Self-exploration Self-understanding Action
t
t
t
s
s
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
* For a fuller understanding of the spiritual dimension of the human person in the light of the Catholic
Faith, see the author’s books, Growing in Christ and Love as I Love in the bibliography at the end of
the book.
CHART III
FEELING WORDS AND LEVELS OF INTENSITY
Levels of
intensity Happy Sad Angry Scared Confused Strong Weak
Excited Hopeless Furious Fearful Bewildered Potent Overwhelmed
Strong Elated Sorrowful Seething Panicky Trapped Super Impotent
Overjoyed Depressed Enraged Afraid Troubled Powerful Small
Cheerful Upset Annoyed Threatened Disorganized Energetic Incapable
Mild Up Distressed Frustrated Insecure Mixed-up Confident Helpless
Good Down Agitated Uneasy Foggy Capable Insecure
Glad Sorry Uptight Timid Bothered Sure Shaky
Weak Content Lost Dismayed Unsure Uncomfortable Secure Unsure
Satisfied Bad Put out Nervous Undecided Durable Soft
RECYCLING
E
1st Cycle
A
U
2nd Cycle
E
A
U
3rd Cycle
E
A
U
4th Cycle
E
¥
Factors Determining Personal Adjustment
Very poor Adjustive resources Very good
¥
Mild Stress Severe
Well adjusted
Less adjusted
¥
Maladjusted
¦
TABLE
Your Expert Difference
Response Rating Rating Between Ratings
1. .............. 2 ................
2. .............. 3 ................
3. .............. 1 ................
4. .............. 4 ................
Total .......................
Divide —— = Your post-training discrimination score
4
INDEX OF TOPICS
INDEX