0596 Art and Design - 2023
0596 Art and Design - 2023
General Comments
This report presents observation made during the assessment of the Art & Design Syllabus. It covers 4
components being 0596/01 (Observation Study), 0596/02 (Interpretative Study), 0596/03 (Design Study)
and 0596/05 (Coursework). The 2023 moderation commenced on the 09-10 October with standardization.
The field moderation started on the 12th October. On commencement of the exercise, the Malepa system
experienced some technical challenges that put off centers from having all the relevant documents ready.
Though the schedule indicated that marks should have been in the system from the 4 th to the 6th October,
centers took advantage of the unfortunate system lapses and did not prepare the relevant documents
(attendance registers, summary mark sheets and order of merit) on time. Some centers were found still
marking whilst in one center candidates were still submitting works for internal moderation. This happened
whilst field moderators were already at the center.
The report overtly present findings drawn from quality of candidates’ responses through three (3) main
assessment objectives as contained in the assessment syllabus, that is knowledge with understanding,
personal investigation and development, interpretative and creative response to questions or themes from
the above-mentioned components.
Instructions to Candidates:
The examination instructions clearly state that candidates should write their names, center number,
candidate number and question number clearly on the top right-hand corner of the front of each sheet of
paper used. Some centers only wrote on the top paper whilst others wrote on the left. These instructions
are very important and should be followed for ease of identification of works in case they get detached from
others.
However, for some, labelling of scripts was not up to standard as some candidates did not fully write their
particulars as per examinations instructions, with some just labelling one sheet of paper instead of all the
used sheets. There was a worrisome trend of candidates using an illegible handwriting which made it difficult
for the examiners to capture candidates’ details.
Similarly, there was one centre which created information card for candidates’ particulars and pasted it on
the scripts, the idea did not work well as some of the cards fell off from the scripts and made it difficult to
identify the works it belonged to. Some labelling had wrong centre numbers for unified schools, candidates
used centre number for Junior Certificate whilst others used a centre number that does not exist.
Some centres continue to use staples instead of strings for binding scripts together. This is a worrisome
trend as scripts get hooked or attached to other works of other candidates. Moreover, if scripts are packaged
such that there is free play in the package used, works get to rub or scratch each other with staples, hence
compromising their quality. Centres are once more encouraged to abide to instructions on fastening work
together using a string on the top left corner.
Packaging of scripts
Botswana Examinations Council puts emphasis on packaging and labelling of scripts as it is essential for
protection and identification. Therefore, centres are provided with the necessary materials such as script
packet envelopes, boxes as well as guidelines for packaging of scripts. Centres are to observe the
following guidelines when packaging scripts:
• Candidates must write their full names, centre number and question number on each script presented
for assessment.
• Scripts for each candidate must be securely fastened together with a string at the top left-hand corner.
• Scripts for each component are to be sequentially arranged and packed in a separate envelope or
package (no packaging of all components in one box).
• The component number should match with that on the question paper for which scripts are enclosed.
• A total number of scripts packaged in each envelope/box should be indicated in each package.
• A range of candidates should also be indicated on the outside of each package used.
It is worth noting that although not entirely, there has been an improvement in most centres adhering to the
above guidelines unlike in the past. Most centres used branded boxes provided by BEC for packaging.
However, some centres used plastic bag packages and manila sheets which are not suitable to package
Art and Design scripts. Other centres left out important information like total number of candidates/scripts
in a package including the range. Another commendable effort was that in most centres, scripts were
sequentially arranged and well labelled.
(a) Description of Component: Questions are set to test the candidate’s ability to represent from
observation. Candidates must be prepared to draw or paint a subject from a choice, which include a
Human figure, Natural and man-made objects and Interior or Exterior scenes.
(b) Instruction to candidates: Candidates should make a study or studies from direct observation from
one of the following. They may consult the Art Teacher if they wish. Studies may be either the whole or
part of the subject. Small specimens or details may be enlarged.
Candidates are also expected to make a study or studies from direct observation from one of the themes
given. Studies may be of either the whole or part of the subject. Small specimen or details may be enlarged.
As the name of this paper is self-explanatory, candidates are expected to record what they see from direct
observation. In this paper candidates are also expected to engage with and develop knowledge of visual
arts, skills, techniques and processes and use of materials as they explore a range of forms, styles in the
context of the chosen question. Candidates should analyze the objects, examine their properties, think
about their potential range of meanings and form a better understanding of the composition. Candidates
are also expected to pay close attention to detail to show mastery of basic elements and principles.
This paper has four areas which are Still life Group, Natural and Man-made, Human form and
Landscape/Townscape. Each of these areas has two options making the questions eight altogether. The
candidate must choose only one question from any area of their choice. Most of the candidates chose a
question on Natural and man–made particularly question 2 (a) A vegetable/fruit sliced open to expose
the inside. Very few candidates answered the questions on Still life group, Human Form whilst Landscape
or Townscape was not attempted altogether. It is clear from the enrolment in this paper that the number of
candidates is declining each year.
There were 370 candidates who responded to this component in 2023 as opposed to 435 candidates who
set for the paper (Observational study) in 2022 BGCSE Art and Design. This translates to a decline of 65
candidates representing 14.92 %. Of all the 8 questions set some questions were answered satisfactorily
while others were poorly answered.
General Performance
The overall performance of candidates in this component was somewhat the same as that of the candidates
of 2022. The standards were neither raised nor dropped with inclusion of some archived scripts from 2022
as part of the standards used to compare performance. The significant decline of 14.92% in candidature
made it difficult to conclude on statistical comparability of performance, however, the quality of the
responses was judged to be of the same strength.
commitment and vision as they failed to show development of their ideas in a satisfactory manner.
Development of ideas lacked competence and maturity but showed some awareness and inadequate
competency.
Different centers attempted this question and the display and performance varied from one center to the
other. Generally, most candidates performed above average. They satisfactorily expressed form and
structure but some could not competently or proficiently express it. Their ability to appreciate space was
good but did not show complete mastery of this understanding as their control of media was wanting. The
dominant media used was colored pencils followed by graphite pencils. Very few candidates used paint and
ink proficiently.
3 Human Form
(a) There was no candidate who responded to the question.
4 Landscape or Townscape
(a) There was no candidate who responded to the question.
Though many candidates continue to opt for this paper, there is a lot of administrative work that centres
need to put in place especially preparation for the examination. It has been noted that candidates submitted
a smaller number of preparatory works and, at times half done. There was evidence that a lot of candidates
within the same centre shared same research ideas, hence compromising creativity.
Centres should take cognisance that whatever the choice of question, method of interpretation, or media
used; the key to success lies within the preparation period and the amount of time and effort a candidate
spends on this important aspect of assessment. Irrespective of the ability level of candidates, candidates
who do well are those who show evidence of planning and spend quality time on support works and submit
logically well thought out series of works.
General Performance
Candidates executed their responses in a number of approaches and a range of media that included pen
and ink, lead pencil, coloured pencil, water colours, and acrylic paint. Coloured and lead pencil continue to
be the most common media.
There has been a slight increase in the quality of responses this year of 2023 as compared to the previous
year with candidates having shown good artistic skills and creative ability in their chosen themes. Generally,
responses impressed with personal vision and commitment with studies demonstrating ability to organize
and express ideas visually from start to final solutions. Although a few displayed some limitations, most
candidates did a commendable effort in investigating secondary sources, using chosen media and handling
tone and colour. Most of the responses were on the competency range, and a few fell below average,
proficiency as well as expertise level in knowledge with understanding, interpretative, creative responses
and personal investigation and development. In-depth exploration of visual research other than presenting
replica of single images would be recommended to stimulate candidates’ creativity, personal interpretation
of questions, originality and interesting solutions.
5.
2. Sweep 4.Boisterou Reunion 6.Disillusionmen
Questions 1. Wilderness 3. Disintegration
Away s at the t
mall
No. entries 251 78 172 334 35 291
Question 1 – WILDERNESS
This was the third most popular choice with about 21.62% candidates who attempted it. Responses were
varied production of delicate studies, combining ideas from the starting point to the final work. The most
popular ideas and concepts were human figures showing different expressive emotions with majority
responding or opting for literal interpretation as opposed to metaphoric approach. Graphite pencil and
coloured pencils were used extensively from start of preparatory studies up to the production of final ideas.
Many had carried out their research work well which helped them to also attempt this question trying
unstructured compositions without due care in their planning even though they had very good primary
sources. Most of the work at the lower levels resorted to literal solutions dominated by substandard cartoons,
ghosts, sunset, and the predictable skulls and other surrealist imagery which were mostly blurry. The
approach of single imagery centred on the paper proved wanting in compositional organisation hence
candidates lost some marks on creativity and interpretation of the subject matter.
Candidates’ responses mostly demonstrated competency in expressing quality of form, line, shape and
structure, showing understanding of space and spatial relationships. There were some who were very good
in expressing ideas visually going to proficient and expertise level. They were able to show understanding
of surface qualities and effectively used colour and tone which resulted in aesthetically appealing and well
thought solutions. However, there were few candidates who displayed limited creative skills with weak
compositional organization. They did not thoroughly investigate original and secondary sources, hence
compromising originality.
communicating relevant mood, but the preparatory studies tended to be repetitive and lacking in imagination
and experimentation.
Question 3 – DISINTERGRATION
This question had only 14.81 % of candidates’ responses, submissions were mostly within the very good,
competent, and satisfactory attainment levels. Candidates had researched the impressionist, surrealist and
scenes showing different subjects wearing away. There were some interesting interpretations and lively
responses that depicted several conditions of disintegration. Thought-provoking compositions depicting
complex sceneries and situations were attempted with confidence and courage. Candidates used a variety
of media, and the use of paint (wet media) was attempted in this question. Average works lacked
compositional structure as candidates used single images throughout their works with a lot not showing
personal investigation and development from secondary sources. There was use of stylized imagery from
cartoons and flat dragon inspired by Chinese patterns. It was at this level that excessive use of silhouettes
and indiscriminate use of comic art was observed. This type of approach is mostly lacking in form and
structure imperative for translation of expressive ideas.
Question 4 – BOISTEROUS
This was the most popular question at 28.77 % submission and entries covered the full ability range from
awareness to expertise Compositions were generally predictable with a high use of human beings showing
different moods and emotions. Very few candidates had considered alternative subject matters like
landscapes. There was evidence of careful interpretation of themes which included not only form and
structure but also depicting feelings. Overall, the submissions had a good understanding of media,
techniques, processes and application, with some adopting a more hyper realistic and expressionistic
approach. Work in the competence range tended to lack development and investigation with candidates
submitting few unfinished works, they neglected the scintillating pictorial arrangement which is crucial in this
paper. Many candidates used pencil, pens and mostly monochrome media which seemed problematic in
terms of form, structure, tone and colour. Some good preparatory works were submitted but unfortunately
most of them did not inform the final work. The development stage was often almost neglected, and the lack
of original research also impacted on the personal and creative responses of the outcome. This question
was deceptively attractive to the weaker candidates but had trouble when it came to achieving convincing
composition and rendering human figures as they were the popular subject matter. Perversely, there were
those who managed to do well on small scale single images but fell short when they tried to combine ideas.
There was overuse of same research in this question which resulted in limited creative response as most
candidates used similar approaches, though they differed in skills and handling of media. The subject matter
was mostly depiction of human figures, that is people or couples meeting at the mall. Some responses were
basic, showing lack of understanding of the chosen theme and in-maturity in expressing and interpreting
ideas visually. Investigation of both original and secondary sources to come up with interesting
compositions was also limited.
Question 6- DISILLUSIONMENT
This was the second most popular question with 25.06 % submission with candidates scoring from
awareness to expertise. The most popular interpretation was of people depicting sorrow, disappointment,
grief and scenes of displeasure in different settings and cultural contexts. The best outcomes were of very
good figure studies placed in context with a good handling of colour to create mood and atmosphere. These
were due to extensive research from primary and secondary sources. As with other questions, candidates
in the lower mark ranges neglected the preparatory work, leaving them with little choice of images from
which to explore, combine and develop. Some simply filled their pages with repeats of single images often
copied from popular internet pictures therefore failing to manipulate or arrange personalised responses.
The weakest were additionally limited by a lack of compositional structure, use of media, techniques and
processes as well as form and structure. As it has been the trend, very few candidates used abstract art
exploring with not so common subject matters like piled objects, wood, old car and ruins. Their composition
displayed complex semi-abstract compositions showing originality, vision and commitment.
8.
2. Book 3. 4. 5. 7. 9.
1. Logo 6. Mural Repeat
Questions cover Package Advertisi Sculpture Costume Photogra
Design design Pattern
Design Design ng poster design Design phy
Design
No.
198 96 61 360 2 63 17 1233 0
entries
percentag
9.76% 4.73% 3.00% 17.73% 0.10% 3.10% 0.84% 60.74% 0.00
e
Total 2030 candidates
Majority of candidates who responded to this question ranged from just above competence to below
awareness, very few in proficiency range. This was a two-part question; the expectation was to ‘design
a logo’ and ‘show that same logo on a business card and company flier’. In some Centres, there
were instances where some candidates only designed a logo and failed to depict the exact logo to the
other part of the question (on a business card and company flier).
Designing a logo was a success to majority of candidates who attempted this question. Candidates
demonstrated in-depth investigation of original and secondary sources as well expressing quality of
form, line, shape and structure. Candidates were to then transform the same logo design expression
into a business card and a flier. However, the logo was either omitted or altered from the initial design.
This led to learners not fully responding to the question. There were changes in logo elements as
displayed from the original design. A new typeface design would be created to accommodate different
situations and candidates barely managed to apply principle of proportion and perspective where it was
mostly needed. Basically, there was clear inconsistency in regard to attempting various placement of
logo and other elements on different items. It was very evident that candidates did not give a well
thought out solutions of creatively designing for the other part of the question.
Candidates who demonstrated proficiency in displaying an informed aesthetic judgement handled tone
and colour as well as rendering form, and structure was observed. But uncontrolled free hand lettering
/ calligraphy was evident in some designs, and this compromised the intended quality.
Despite the commitment and vision in assessing a design problem from learners who did well, some
candidates were not able to complete their intended designs in all/most studies. But there were signs
of maturity and sensitivity from the visible structure to the areas they have worked on.
2 Based on Anti-poaching. Design the front and back cover of a book which include the title, the authors
name as well as the publishing company.
This was one of the lowly attempted questions. Some of the candidates who responded to this question
generally produced average designs that concentrated from above competence to awareness.
Majority of candidates managed to show the book cover designs (Front & Back covers with spine).
Responses showed understanding in rendering structure of the desired layout of a book cover.
Assessing a design problem and arriving at an appropriate solution was very satisfactory to most entries
thus demonstrating an informed aesthetic judgement.
Most of illustrations within the layout depicted some minimal ability in application of elements and
principles of design. The technique in the use of media in most designs demonstrated understanding
of form, value and texture. Very few responses managed to satisfy proficiency to expertise in relation
to performance descriptors. Their commitment in handling tones and colour in a controlled and in an
intentional manner displayed thorough development of the intended concept.
3 Design a package for a new toothpaste. Create a name for the product and show how the final layout
will appear in a die-cut and in 3D.
The question requires candidates to creatively produce a flat design (in a die-cut) and a 3D (Three
Dimensional) package design. Most of the responses/designs had demonstrated competence to
proficiency in recognition of rendering aesthetic quality of the intended concept, with a few in the
awareness range.
Most of the Die-Cut designs showed some well thought out presentations. Candidates satisfactorily
managed to express form, shape, line and handled tones and colour in a more controlled and intentional
manner. However, some of them failed to translate the flat designs into 3D effects. Resizing and
positioning of some elements into various facets to depict 3D effects were barely achieved. A couple
of elements/text were either misplaced or transposed, hence not resembling the flat design (from the
die cut). The creation of a brand name and illustrations were visually appealing. However, some
candidates struggled to have readable name of the product as it was obscured by the somewhat busy
illustration. Other creative ideas were out of the ordinary (non-conventional approach), fusing mandala
patterns into the package design. This proved challenging for some responses where the illustration
and the product name could not easily communicate what the product was all about. It could be
mistaken for something different from a toothpaste.
4 Basing on the theme of your choice. Design an advertising poster for a horse race activity that is hosted
in your locality.
There was evidence of in-depth research investigation by candidates who attempted this question.
They had good design processes which easily directed them to arrive at an appropriate solution of the
design brief. Most of the candidates demonstrated competence in expressing quality of form, line,
shape and structure in a more mature and intentional manner. Basically, some commitment in
capturing details was observed throughout the production processes as shown in a series of rough
layouts of horse riders or horses in a track. A good number of candidates showed a grasp of some
technique and a few showing expertise of technique as they were rendering some various intricate and
appealing illustrations. When it comes to lettering/calligraphy, lack of sensitivity was observed in
controlling chosen media as far as rendered lettering /calligraphy was concerned. The free hand
execution of typeface was common in some calligraphic designs, and this basically compromised the
ability to express aesthetic quality even after rendering some well informed and expressive solutions.
This was common across most centres.
Very few candidates used computer as a tool to produce their designs and most of them showed some
grasp of technique in rendering effects. They had basic understanding to demonstrate competency to
proficiency in expressing quality in application of elements and principles of design. Generally,
characteristics of poster design was visible from most of the candidate’s scripts. For instance,
illustrations as well as text/calligraphy depicted some sense of harmony and thus relaying the intended
context.
Environmental Design
5 Design a sculpture based on farming that will be erected in a mall and show the site plan including
buildings/structures around the sculpture.
A very low subscription was observed. Candidates in this question were all in competency range.
The candidates demonstrated minimal ability to express quality of form and handling of tones and
colour in a controlled and intentional manner. They only showed some grasp of understanding in the
technique of rendering elements as well as principles of designing a statue, the site plan and its
immediate surrounding.
Interior Design
6 Design some illustrations for a mural that will be placed behind a Pulpit in a church. Using calligraphic
typeface of your choice, include a short verse as part of your mural.
Most of the candidate that responded to this question generally produced average designs that
concentrated from above competence to awareness. Very few managed to satisfy proficiency and
expertise range of performance descriptors.
Majority lacked in depth research investigation and development of the design problem to arrive at an
appropriate solution. Generally, the calligraphic script and illustrations lacked coherence. In some
instances, the illustrations will be well rendered with adequate ability to express form, tone but lack of
sensitivity was observed in controlling media as candidates rendered lettering /calligraphy. The free
hand and uncontrolled execution of typeface was common in some calligraphic script designs, and this
basically compromised the ability to express aesthetic judgement even after rendering some well
informed and expressive solutions (form, tone and structure) in some illustrations. This compromised
the aesthetic judgement of the intended concept.
It was evident that candidates in expertise range managed to have control in providing well informed
solutions as well as rendering forms, tone of illustrations and text/calligraphy in a more balanced way
to communicate the intended response. Application and ability to express ideas visually was of
satisfactory quality. There was evidence of maturity as candidates treated lettering/calligraphy with
some sensitivity to demonstrate an informed aesthetic judgement on their designs. Some complete
mastery of technique in use of material was displayed, providing elegant solutions. The common
responses were explored from religious stories of the bible then presented in silhouette form. Only a
few expressly used 3dimensional form and going an extra mile to show the mural in a church building
by the pulpit.
Most of the candidates who responded to this question were in competence to awareness range and it
was evident that some responses did not show maturity in assessing a design problem and arriving at
an appropriate solution of the intended idea. Some exploration of ideas in order to produce well thought
out solutions was very minimal throughout most scripts. There was barely a link from various sides of
the costume. In some instances, there was only one facet of the costume even-though the question
dictates that the final should show the front, back and side. As such the question was not fully
addressed, hence compromising the aesthetic judgement of the intended concept.
8 Using two motifs effect of your choice design a pattern suitable for blinds to be used in a lodge.
This question has the highest subscription from Design Study (0596/03). Out of 2030, a total of 1233
Candidates responded to this question, and this translate to 60.74%. More than half of the cohort
attempted this question, it was evident that a wide range of responses were mostly from awareness to
higher proficiency and fewer in expertise range. With a bulk of it in the competence range.
Expertise Range: candidates in this range showed high level of maturity in assessing a design problem
and exploration of ideas to come up with well thought out solution. This was made possible by finding
appropriate and relevant research materials which were deeply explored. Well spell-out registrations
and combination of motifs were clearly explored to express a well-informed aesthetic judgement.
Candidates paid maximum attention to the positive as well as the negative spaces within the picture
plane. Mastery of chosen media was well executed with maximum attention to finer details.
Handling of tone and colour as well as rendering form was controlled in an intentional manner and thus
ultimately managing to creatively develop and produce clear concept which addressed the question.
Others went an extra mile to show how the pattern design will appear in context.
Basically, there was evidence of commitment and personal vision in assessing a design problem and
arriving at an appropriate solution hence, producing some outstanding designs.
Despite the commitment and vision in assessing a design problem, some candidates were not able to
complete their intended designs in all of the studies or most studies. But there were signs of maturity
and sensitivity from the visible structure to the areas they have worked on.
Awareness Range: Candidates in this range demonstrated some minimal control in handling of tones
and colour as well as some grasp to express form and structure their studies. They struggled to portray
a basic layout of a convincing structure of a repeat pattern that can be used for the intended purpose.
For instance, their registration of motifs was unplanned, leaving some huge bare negative spaces.
Handling of tones and colour was minimally controlled, this resulted in portraying below average
designs. The ability to assess a design problem and explore ideas to arrive at an appropriate solution
was below satisfactory. Generally, poor workmanship was observed throughout studies, use of chosen
media, at some point demonstrated shoddiness.
Photography
9 A series of images for sporting activities in a school environment
In this component candidate are expected to complete a course of one year under the following disciplines
of Art and Design syllabus: 2D design studies, Photography, 3D design studies and Painting and Drawing.
Candidates can explore any media of their choice under any sub section of the study areas. Throughout
this period, candidates are expected to keep a workbook which relates to their chosen area or theme and
submit it for assessment with one piece of finished work completed during the same year. Nevertheless,
there were no submission/entries for Photography due to lack of material to be used across centres.
The 2023 coursework moderation started with standardisation from 9th -10th October. Teams were then
dispatched to different region to moderate from to 12th -20th October. The 5 teams reported back to BEC
for post moderation evaluation meeting on the 23rd -24th October 2023 upon completion of the moderation
exercise from 34 centres across the country.
This component has registered an insignificant increase in candidature from 3399 in 2022 to 3584 in 2023
(185 candidates) translating to 5.44 % increase.
Preparedness
Almost all centers were ready for the moderation exercise except for a few; most of them had their
documentation at the Chief Invigilators office as expected while a few had their documents at departments.
In one center candidates were still submitting works for display and internal moderation. This caused delay
of the moderation exercise which had to commence late at 1230 instead of 0830 as the moderation team
had arrived at the said Centre. The Chief Invigilator was made aware of the consequences of the
unreadiness of the Centre for moderation exercise. Display rooms for the said Centre did not have working
lights and its highly important for the rooms to have working lights as this can have a bearing in the judging
of artefacts. There are centers which are still using pencils to do their clerical work instead of a pen.
Cancellations and overwriting were observed in some centres. There were some inaccurate entering of
information in Order of Merit. One common mistake was where some candidates were omitted in the Order
of Merit. This resulted in centres been ordered to redo Order of Merit hence taking more time for the external
moderation to resume.
Owing to the technical issues around the Malepa system, some centers did not prepare Order of Merit form
and external moderation teams had to wait for Senior Teacher I (Art & Design) to prepare it and thus causing
some delay in commencement of moderation exercise. Evidence of miscalculations on individual marking
sheets and or incomplete distribution of marks were also picked in some centres and the errors were duly
attended to.
Display
All the centres had displayed the candidates works in numerical order and all works numbered for easy
identification. Natural light was also satisfactory to allow viewing of details in all the works. There was one
centre that did not display artworks against the walls or display boards due to lack of space. The works were
just placed flat on the tables and congested. However, the centre was encouraged to improve on display of
artworks for better appreciation of artefacts during assessment. There was one centre which displayed
some of the works way down with folio books on the floor. That made it difficult to access the works. Works
displayed at that level are mostly deprived of lighting and the moderators find it difficult to give them a fair
assessment. Moderators are there forced to move the work to a place where they can be accorded the
fairness they deserve.
The general performance of this candidature was somewhat better than that of the previous year with an
insignificant improvement in responses of candidates in the competence range. This could be attributed to
well worked out workbooks and final pieces. It is equally worth noting that coursework is teacher aided and
has more time for candidates to sharpen their skills, redo the works and or correct mistakes as it is done
over a period of a year.
Some centres marked high works very high while in some centres most of the works on the average to
below average were marked extremely low with some even awarded half of the appropriate mark. The
moderation teams gave them an opportunity to remark using the standards and they aligned well. This
seriously impacted on the time of the external moderators as they are to proceed to the next centre upon
completion of the exercise.
Inconsistency in marking of works was noted from a couple of centres and this ordered some guided
remarking on some works. Generally, this was common from centres that did not use National Standards
to align their marking or individual marking by teachers within the centre. Some modules were under scored
or over scored and the external moderating team ordered some centres (with the guidance from National
Standards) to re-adjust or normalise their marking. Though not common in most centres, some wrong
calculations on distributed marks within Candidate Record Cards were observed in some centres. One
centre had few Candidates Record Cards that had total mark captured yet without distribution on various
domains.
Generally, internal moderation was in accordance with national standards for assessment even though
some centres awarded marks that were out of range causing scaling in the ranges of + or -5 marks. This
casts doubts on the credibility of some internal moderation. This was however done after the center was
ordered to remark but could not come close to the prevailing national standards. Some centres submitted
works without any identifiable supporting sheets or work folio whilst some submitted only the support work
or work folio without final piece. In some centres candidates who did not have workbooks were unreasonably
scored higher than those who have submitted both the artefact and the workbook. This is not in line with
the scheme of assessment.
The scheme of assessment states categorically that “All coursework consists of one finished piece and a
workbook.” Under description of papers (Coursework-school based assessment), the assessment syllabus
is crystal clear that “During this course, candidates should keep a workbook, which relates to the chosen
area and submit this workbook for assessment with the one piece of finished work completed during the
year. Centres should conform and comply to this requirement for assessment.
Most works presented were above average to proficiency. Some centres presented pattern designs in a
more functional approach. Patterns were produced on paper and then transferred onto either fabric material,
bedding products, aprons, hence addressing the issue of vocational understanding. In one of the centres,
there was interesting woodwork in the form of architectural design, where candidates constructed road
network design, sports stadium design. Candidates showed good control in manipulating the used material.
Generally, candidates’ pictorial organization showed understanding of space and spatial relationships in
two and three dimensions. Low subscription was observed in paintings category and handling tones in a
controlled and intentional manner within this discipline was just minimal.
was observed throughout the centers. Some candidates displayed critical and reflective thinking skills as
they communicated highly personal and individual responses and solutions. However, there is observation
that some centers still lack originality in the works presented and candidates turn to reproduce research as
they are throughout the exploration stages and worse in the final work. The expectation is that candidates
should use research to explore ideas, applying any thought processes, combine and come up with unique
compositions, this approach is impacting negatively on creativity. In some instances, candidates just do
paste ups of research and there is not connection or exploration of that research with what they are working
on.
Most of the candidates were working on similar themes and solutions were almost the same throughout the
centers. In some centers candidates continue to recycle the same research materials and share them
ultimately producing somehow similar concepts or ideas with a slight variation on compositional structure
and media usage. It is evident that the geographical location of some centers has a major influence in the
response and projects presented by candidates. The community culture and general traditional artifacts or
activities of that community are reflected in the artworks. As a result, most of the research materials used,
though in most cases secondary, is based on the community. Candidates continue to use secondary
research with little evidence that they took photographs themselves. In most cases research was
reproduced as it lacked application of any thought processes thus impacting negatively on creativity.
It is worth mentioning that some centres extensively explored their research to a higher level, hence
producing good workbooks that show the development of ideas from start, development to refining of ideas.
It was evident that the candidates performance was concentrated from above average to exceptional range.
This was due to the commitment level in the development of ideas leading to the desired concepts
throughout the workbooks. This was made possible by the found appropriate and relevant research material
which was deeply explored with mastery to the chosen media and ultimately managing to creatively develop
and produce clear concepts of the intended ideas. Handling of tone/colour as well as rendering form was
controlled in an intentional manner. And thus, basically producing workbooks that show the build-up of ideas
leading to the production of the final piece, hence successful in assessing a design problem and arriving at
an appropriate solution to the intended idea.
Some candidates focused on the reproduction of research and other images through the skillful rendering
of relevant materials but were less able to explore alternative ideas to progress their work. Other candidates
demonstrated a strong and original concept but did not have the ability to refine their skills to deliver a
creative final outcome. Candidates in the lower mark range demonstrated limited research skills from either
primary or secondary sources with some at times not showing where the final outcome had come from.
Candidates had primary research pasted with little exploration done to show development of ideas leading
to an appropriate solution. In some centers a common approach of the workbook was noticed but there is
lack of explorations and investigation on the ideas presented or chosen ideas to come up with sensible
compositions.
Conclusion
The inconsistency observed in marking is a worrying factor unlike in 2022 which marking was done better.
It is seriously challenging for the moderation exercise if remarking is done as this leads to external
moderators finishing very late whilst they are expected to be at another center the following day. Centers
are encouraged to use the availed national standards as that will minimize variations. It is very important for
the teachers in different centers to mark as a team to avoid disparities in the internal and external marks.
Painting and drawing continue to be the most popular in centers followed by 2D design mostly in the form
of pattern, poster and 3D design more especially crafts. Centers are advised to use the BGCSE Art and
Design standards to avoid the inconsistency in marking which was observed in some centers. It is important
that marks awarded are based on what is presented as it was noted that internal moderation is susceptible
to influence by other factors such as the candidate’s behavior, or the teacher’s preference of a particular
area of the subject. This was said by teachers mostly when ordered to remark.