2023 Annual Report Schiphol
2023 Annual Report Schiphol
2023
Royal Schiphol Group
Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 2
Contents
Quality of Network Quality of Life Quality of Work Quality of Service Safety first Robust organisation
page 35 page 40 page 59 page 65 page 73 page 77
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 3
on costs and growth, we decided in 2023 that we had catching we worked very well with our partners at the airport in 2023,
up to do to offer a higher level of quality to colleagues, travellers something I am proud of. We also see this reflected in the
and airlines, as we are first and foremost, a logistics company that reputation scores among local residents and people in the
must be able to rely on its assets. In the broader context in which Netherlands in general. These have risen systematically over the
Schiphol operates, we want more structural attention to be paid past year towards the level we are aiming for.
to the quality and reliability of our services.
Work well together
A quieter, cleaner and better Schiphol A proof point of our ‘working well together’ was when the
Besides the improvements made for travellers and employees, Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management surprised us
we also intensified our steps towards developing a better and suspended the experimental scheme meaning that we and
relationship with our neighbours and the environment. We our sector partners had to establish, in a very short space of time,
introduced our 8-point plan containing specific measures and what the number of flights for 2024 could be. This is however
suggestions for a quieter, cleaner and better Schiphol, including only one proof point in addition to those already mentioned
implementing a night curfew, no longer welcoming private jets demonstrating both our actions and commitment to work well
and keeping the noisiest planes away. We are in favour of a together. Our thanks go to all our partners, from cleaners to
distance-based air travel tax; the further the flight, the higher the Marechaussee officers, and from retailers to airlines. Together, we
tax. Schiphol must be quieter, cleaner and better. Firstly, because made Schiphol once again a pleasant airport for travellers and
we simply believe that this is necessary. Schiphol serves a societal workers. The turning point enabling structural improvement at
interest which includes taking good care of the neighbours and Schiphol has been made yet realistically we recognise that there's
the environment. We are very transparent on our position due still a lot to be done and along the way we will undoubtedly
to the broad public interest. Secondly, because Schiphol's value discover that more is needed than we thought. What is certain
is too great to jeopardise the public support we have. Schiphol though, is that we are on our way towards a quieter, cleaner and
is a fantastic company. Schiphol connects the Netherlands with better future and that we have no intention of turning back. 2023
the rest of the world in a unique way. Every day, the Dutch was truly a turning point of structural improvement for Schiphol.
people, Dutch companies and the Dutch economy benefit from
the extensive network of destinations that has been established Ruud Sondag
over more than one hundred years. That is something to be President & CEO of Royal Schiphol Group
proud of and to cherish. Schiphol, and with it the entire Dutch
aviation sector, needs support to continue performing that role.
That support needs to be earned, which is only possible if we
take the needs of others much more into consideration. This is
also high on the political agenda and our proposals resonate with
many parties.
3 m 1 Quality
of
Intercontinental
destinations
– Network of destinations
– Accessibility
Wellbeing
5 Reputation score
– Soil pollution
– Climate adaptation
– Noise
– Regional
development
and jobs
Human capital – Engaging with our communities
6 – Societal value
6
Intellectual capital
Quality Employee – Employment practices own
workforce UN Sustainable
of Work Promoter Score
– Diversity, equity & inclusion own Development Goals
7 24 workforce
– Employment practices value chain
(SDGs)
Natural capital Business areas
Quality On-time – Consumer and end-user
of Service Performance experience
8 59%
– Business continuity
– Cybersecurity
– Airport capacity
Financial capital
Net Promoter
Score
Aviation Commercial Alliances &
Stakeholders Participations 36
Local residents
Safety Net Safety Score – Safety and security
Airlines Passengers
first
96.2
Key risks Governance
Trends &
Developments Robust Return on Equity2 – Business ethics en corporate culture
– Supplier and procurement practices
organisation
2.9% – Financial solidity
Employees Shareholders
1 Concerns scope 1, 2 and selected scope 3 items 3 ROE including fair value changes and other one offs: 0.4%
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 6
New bikeshare programme Nature conservation permit Approval for our sustainable ambitions
A new bikeshare programme at Schiphol East In September 2023 the Ministry of In September the Science Based Targets
encourages staff to use bicycles rather than Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality initiative gives it stamp of approval to Schiphol’s
cars to cover short distances. The 150 shared grants Schiphol a Nature conservation CO2e goals for 2030 and 2050. In December
bikes are free and available at five bicycle permit (Natuurvergunning) under the Wet Schiphol, Eindhoven Airport and Rotterdam
storage facilities. Natuurbescherming ('Nature conservation act'). The Hague Airport are among the first ten
The permit provides certainty for us and for our airports in the world to recieve the highest
Towards emission-free handling surrounding environment. possible level for sustainability by Airports
With the arrival of thirty generators for parked Council International.
planes (e-GPUs) and the expansion of electric Catching up on maintenance
systems that provide fresh air on board (PCAs), Schiphol announces plans to invest three billion Experimental Regulation suspended
Higher airport charges
Schiphol takes a step forward towards emission- euros between 2024 and 2027 to catch up The government suspends the Experimental
In early November, Schiphol announces
free ground handling. on necessary maintenance and renewal of the Regulation that was announced in 2022. As
that it will not be raising the airport charges
airport's assets. Important elements of the we had already issued our capacity declaration
for 2024 by the expected 12 percent, but
Expansion electricity grid airport's infrastructure – including Pier C, the based on the maximum number of flights
by 14.8 percent. The additional increase is
RSG and network operator Liander collaborate baggage basements, climate-control systems, permitted in this regulation, Schiphol publishes
the result of a regulated process whereby
to build a new high-voltage substation. This will walkways, aircraft stands and taxiways – are due an addendum to the capacity declaration in
part of the missed revenues over 2022, as
provide Schiphol with more grid capacity as of for major maintenance or replacement. December. It states that there is room for a total
a result of less air traffic, can be offset in
2027 and make the further electrification of of 483,000 flights in 2024.
future charges.
Schiphol possible. New Social Agreement
In October, RSG, FNV and CNV reach an
agreement on the structural improvement of
Innovative baggage handling
the quality of work and on extending the
TU Delft, along with handling companies,
supplement for employees until 31 December
Schiphol and KLM, begin research into a new
2024. As a result of this agreement, Schiphol
way of working in Schiphol’s baggage halls.
remains an attractive place to work. It is a follow-
Besides the installation of lifting aids, the parties
up to the social agreement negotiated last year.
want to investigate how digital innovation can
support employees in physical work.
Concrete recycling facility
Schiphol opens its own recycling facility for
Trials to reduce ultrafine particles
concrete rubble. Concrete from renovation and New CEO
Schiphol will be conducting two trials to reduce
maintenance projects is crushed at the facility At the end of the year it is announced that
Wellness concept Holisteq ultrafine particles on the apron. The airport is
to make new concrete and foundation material. Pieter van Oord will be RSG’s new CEO
New wellness concept Holisteq opens in investigating whether an innovative installation
This material is reused in construction projects at as of 1 June 2024. He succeeds interim
Lounge 2. In their own ‘Biohacking Orb’, that cleans the air in indoor spaces next to the
the airport. CEO Ruud Sondag, who is staying on
travellers at Schiphol can choose from airfield also works outdoors. Schiphol is also
until 29 February. Between 29 February
various treatments designed to reduce taking the next step in a study into the use
and 1 June, Robert Carsouw (CFO) will be
stress and the effects of jetlag. of water droplets to remove ultrafine particles
interim CEO of RSG.
from the air.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 8
About us
and our Why
126 6 24 36 96 2.9%
TPI Intercontinental TPI Reputation score TPI Employee TPl Net promotor score TPI Net safety score TPI Shareholders
destinations (2022: 129) (2022: 6.0) promotor score (2022: 26.0) (2022: 97.3) (2022: -0.80%)
(2022: 6.8)
Key figures
EUR million unless stated otherwise 2023 2022 % EUR million unless stated otherwise 2023 2022 %
Main airport
International
Dutch airports
airports
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 12
Schiphol Group’s partnerships with these other airports in the from governments and companies, Royal Schiphol Group will put airports. Our robust financial policy seeks to safeguard the
Netherlands further strengthen our reach and impact, as do our 800,000 euros into the fund. independent financing of our business, both today and in the
international activities – which account for a substantial share of future. Schiphol Group’s core activities are concentrated within
our Group's financial results. Schiphol Group also has an interest in the airports of Brisbane and three business areas: Aviation, Schiphol Commercial and Alliances
Hobart and manages terminal and retail operations in Terminal 4 & Participations.
In 2023, Royal Schiphol Group acquired a 40% interest in at JFK International Airport in New York.
Maastricht Aachen Airport (MAA) for 4.2 million euros. This In 2023, Schiphol Airport embarked on a hiring drive in response
partnership will contribute to Schiphol Group’s aim to enhance In 2023, we announced our intention to invest three billion euros to staffing shortages in 2022. This initiative was not just about
airport sustainability, in part by enabling MAA to accelerate its in catching up on maintenance and upgrades at Amsterdam numbers, but also marked the introduction of a new fourth
development as a sustainable and future-proof airport. Electric Airport Schiphol during the coming three years (2024 - 2027) to cornerstone for our Vision: Quality of Work. This pillar
flying is a key priority, for example. An environmental fund is increase the quality of our assets. The aim of these investments underscores our commitment to ensuring the safety and
being set up to drive that ambition. In addition to contributions is also to connect the world for our stakeholders and fulfil our wellbeing of everyone working at the airport, as well as
ambition of creating the world’s most sustainable, high-quality operational efficiency. Improvements have been made to the
working environment, including a major refurbishment of
existing rest areas to make them comply with our current quality
Business model work standards. The combined impact of these efforts was
(x EUR million) significant, especially during the busy summer period. Our airport
saw remarkable improvements, with 93% of passengers passing
through security within a 10-minute window. Indeed, we will
678 continue to invest time and money to ensure that our airport
ts remains an attractive place to work.
1158 Ai s tm
en
rp
or ve 290 Schiphol Group has three shareholders: the Dutch state (69.8%),
tc In s
1
Passenger process
Increasingly, passengers check in and receive information online. Arrivals PRM Customs
Security Departures
Border control
Airline journey
Airline process
Aircraft lands at and departs from Schiphol
Schiphol Group owns, maintains and is responsible for the
safety of the runways and the terminal, as well as other
airport infrastructure. Real estate is either owned by Schiphol Fixed electrical ground power
and preconditioned air
Commercial or its occupants, and contractors carry out services
such as security and maintenance. Airlines are responsible for the Remote Aviobridge
safe carriage of passengers, baggage and cargo. B G2
A G1
Cargo
Cleaning
Catering
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 14
Our Why:
Our Why, ambition and strategy
The Dutch government decided to suspend the Experimental We want to stop flying during the night, starting in winter
Regulation until further notice on 14 November 2023. Of course, 2025-2026. By no longer allowing flights to arrive between 00:00
the minister’s decision has an impact on capacity at Schiphol. and 05:00, there will be around 10,000 fewer night flights. We
However, we had already defined the capacity declaration for the will limit the reallocation of flights to the very start or very end of
summer of 2024 based on a maximum of 460,000 flights. the night/early morning as much as possible too. In this way, we
will help our local residents get a better night’s sleep. Moreover,
That is why the minister initially asked Schiphol and partners our intention to ban private jets would prioritise commercial and
such as Air Traffic Control the Netherlands (LVNL), the essential flights in order to mitigate noise nuisance.
Royal Netherlands Marechaussee, Customs and the airlines to
determine how many flights we would be able to accommodate Our position on prohibiting the noisiest aircraft signifies a shift
in 2024, ensuring this will be done in an operationally responsible in our operational policy. We want to reduce the number of
way. The minister also pointed out that the (increasingly limited) noisiest aircraft on our premises as of 2025-2026. By tightening
availability of air traffic controllers at LVNL, due to labour market the maximum permissible daytime and night-time noise limits
shortages, will also play a role. This process has been completed. and further encouraging the use of quieter aircraft, nuisance in
Schiphol has set its new capacity for 2024 at 483,000 flights, the surrounding area will decrease. Our current airport fee system
and the slot coordinator has allocated the slots. This explains penalises noisier, more polluting aircraft, which pay up to five
why JetBlue, for example, can maintain their operations at times more in landing and take-off fees compared to quieter, less
Schiphol Airport. polluting aircraft.
In our view, the suspension of the Experimental Regulation is We are pushing airlines towards using more modern, quieter
a disappointing development that will result in local residents and environmentally friendly fleets. This approach aligns with
getting the short end of the stick. Reducing the number of our broader vision of sustainable aviation. It not only illustrates a
flights was not an end in itself for Schiphol, but there was commitment to improving the quality of life for those living near
finally clarity and certainty for our neighbours. A return to our airports, but it is also an important step towards regaining
anticipatory enforcement leads to more uncertainty, also for the the trust of employees, passengers, local residents, politicians and
aviation sector. society at large.
Trends and developments Air France-KLM take over SAS According to European Business Aviation Association (EBAA),
In November 2023, Air France-KLM acquired 20% of SAS. This fits business activation activity in Europe was at about 8% below its
The aviation sector in 2023 was a complex landscape, shaped by in with trend towards consolidation in Europe, in which weaker levels from 2022 by November 2023. This translates into 160
ongoing economic recovery, fluctuating demand, and evolving companies are being taken over by larger ones. The takeover fewer daily business aviation flights compared to 2022. The
travel patterns in the wake of the global pandemic and ongoing followed approval by a New York bankruptcy court of a rescue decrease affected all types of aircraft and most major European
geopolitical uncertainty as a result of the war in Ukraine and the plan for SAS worth 1.2 billion dollars. airports. In other regions, North America also performed worse
ongoing conflict in the Middle East. The industry, both regionally in 2023 than in 2022. Asia and Africa were the exceptions. Both
around hubs such as Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and globally, is This acquisition is likely to have a positive impact on Amsterdam these regions experienced an increase.
navigating a path marked by recovery and adaptation. Airport Schiphol. As a primary hub for Air France-KLM, Schiphol’s
traffic and connectivity could be enhanced by this takeover. Temporary cap on passenger numbers lifted
Globally, the aviation industry is contending with various The integration of SAS’s routes into Air France-KLM’s network In an important move forward, in 2023 Schiphol Airport lifted the
macroeconomic factors. Inflation and economic uncertainty promises to expand our reach, particularly in the Northern temporary cap on departing passenger numbers that was
have become key concerns, even though inflation seems to European market. introduced in 2022 to manage the long queues resulting from
be stabilising. But uncertainty affects consumer confidence and staffing shortages and ensure passenger safety. The removal of
behaviour when it comes to disposable income. This, in turn, Cargo volumes and business travel this cap signals a return towards our normal ways of working. As
affects people’s propensity to fly. And while leisure travel has In 2023, cargo volumes at Schiphol were slightly lower than in a sign of Schiphol Airport’s improved operations, we are proud
shown recovery, business travel lags. The shift to remote work and 2022. The number of cargo flights also fell. However, according that 93% of passengers are now processed through security
virtual meetings continues to impact the demand for business to the IATA, the overall global month-to-month trend was within a 10-minute time frame. As for the total passenger
travel, a traditionally lucrative segment for airlines. significant growth in the final months of 2023, growing by 8.3% number, 71 million, it reflects the airport’s regained strength and
in November 2023. According to Willie Walsh, IATA’s Director its ability to handle a high volume of travellers effectively.
General, these figures are an encouraging trend at the end of the
year, especially given the economic concerns in 2023.
2.5
We improved our efficiency: 95% of the passengers processed security
within a 10-minute time frame.
3.9 2.5 3.8 2.7 4.6 3.7 5.1 4.4 5.6 5.2 5.7 5.2 6 5.2 6.1 5.3 5.8 5.2 5.8 4.9 4.7 4 4.8 4.1
January February March April May June July August September October November December
2023
2022
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 18
2023: A turning point in improving relations with Travelling during geopolitical instability Sustainability top of mind
external workers Despite the challenges from an increasingly volatile geopolitical In 2023, the aviation industry took further steps towards a more
Staff shortages and poor working conditions in security and climate, the aviation sector demonstrated resilience in 2023, sustainable and environmentally friendly value chain. These steps
ground-handling led to a strained relationship between the maintaining an upward trend in passenger demand despite were taken against the backdrop of the latest Intergovernmental
airport and these external staff in 2022. 2023 marked a turning uncertainties in fuel prices and international travel routes. The Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report and the outcomes of
point in the resolution of these issues. This is reflected in the ACI predicts the sector will surpass 2019 passenger levels in the COP28 conference, both underscoring the urgent need for
agreement we reached with the FNV and CNV trade unions 2024, but the ongoing war in Ukraine and escalating conflicts climate action across all sectors. These global discussions have
to permanently improve working conditions, a move that sets in the Middle East have introduced uncertainty, potentially heightened awareness, highlighting how the aviation industry
a new standard in employee welfare. We have focused more impacting airline operations, cost structures, and slowing is not only a part of the climate challenge but also a crucial
on improving the working experience of these employees at growth. Particularly, the Ukraine conflict affects passenger and player in the solution. At Schiphol, we introduced our Quieter,
our airport site, promoting health, safety and positive industrial cargo routes, with closed airspace around Ukraine and Russia Cleaner, Better plan. At the heart of this plan is the realisation
relations. A significant achievement in 2023 was our success in necessitating alternative routes, influencing ticket prices and that our activities have an impact on the environment and the
solving the long-standing problem of long queues for passengers, travel times. local area. And an awareness that the drawbacks involved should
a direct result of these improved working conditions for security play a greater role in the choices we make. Recognizing this
staff. These measures reflect our commitment to the fourth Focus on nitrogen impact responsibility, we at Schiphol have committed to taking action to
cornerstone of our vision, quality of work. As a country, the Netherlands has a duty to protect nature. It is restore the balance. This commitment is a key part of our ambition
therefore necessary to reduce nitrogen emissions. Schiphol Group to change, acknowledging that we need to actively participate in
These improvements cover a number of aspects, including is committed to this goal. Our Nitrogen Action Plan outlines a creating a more sustainable future.
actively improving the physical working environment, such as range of measures to achieve this goal. Internally, for example,
rest areas and toilets, and ensuring that employees can commute Schiphol Group is reducing its nitrogen emissions through the ACI Accreditation and Science Based
to work free of charge. In addition, we are making full use of electrification of ground-handling equipment. We also promote Targets initiative
the permanent staff of security companies and adopting more and support sustainable transport to and from our airports. A milestone in 2023 was the fact that Schiphol, Eindhoven Airport
inclusive recruitment strategies, among other things to achieve and Rotterdam The Hague Airport were awarded the highest
a balanced gender ratio among security personnel. Our actions In 2023, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol received its nature permit. level of accreditation for airport sustainability by the industry
demonstrate a holistic approach that not only addresses past To obtain this permit, we had to make sure that our nitrogen association Airports Council International (ACI). The three Royal
issues, but also sets out improved principles for working together depositions in Natura 2000 sites did not exceed a historical Schiphol Group airports are among the first ten airports in the
and a new code of conduct for suppliers. These principles include reference value. To ensure this is the case, in those areas in world to achieve this level. To be eligible for this ACI accreditation,
setting minimum requirements in labour-intensive tenders to which Schiphol Group and the airlines deposit too much nitrogen, airports had to reduce their own carbon emissions by 90% or
ensure high standards of work, further demonstrating our we introduced external measures to lower the remainder of more by 2022 compared to 2010.
commitment to improving working conditions for all airport our excess emissions that could not be reduced with internal
employees and directly contributing to our success in improving measures. For these external measures, we had a strong ACI has added a new higher level to its CO2 benchmark: Level 5.
the passenger experience by effectively managing queuing times. preference for a coordinated approach, for example via the use of This ACI benchmark shows the extent to which airports around
a so-called ‘nitrogen bank’ from the government. Unfortunately, the world are reducing carbon emissions from their own ground-
these instruments were not available. As a result, we eventually based activities. Airports that achieve Level 5 certification have
decided to purchase the nitrogen rights of farms, paying farmers not only reduced their emissions by 90%, but have also achieved
fair market value for their land and/or nitrogen rights. By buying net-zero emissions. In addition, airports are actively working with
these nitrogen rights and generating more emission space, we other organisations to reduce the emissions of the whole aviation
created the conditions needed for the government to grant sector and other indirect emissions, such as traffic to and from the
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol a nature permit. airport, to zero.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 19
In 2023, the Science Based Targets initiative gave its seal of industry to accelerate CO2 reductions to remain aligned with the Emirates will be flying from Schiphol Airport partly on SAF next
approval to Schiphol's sustainability goals for Scope 1, 2 and 3 Paris Agreement, beyond current targets. year. Air France-KLM is already using it, following the purchase
emissions for 2030 and 2050. of 1.6 million tonnes of SAF in 2022. In 2023, the multi-year
Schiphol Group supports global measures through the agreement kicked in and will see Neste supply SAF over an
Net-zero emissions International Civil Aviation Organization, advocating for eight-year period, with DG Fuels, a front runner in renewable
Schiphol Group leads the TULIPS consortium, a collaborative initiatives such as a global kerosene tax or blending mandate. hydrogen and biogenic-based, synthetic low-emissions aviation
effort of 29 entities including airports, airlines, knowledge Recognising the potential limitations of these measures, we also and diesel fuel, contributing from 2027 onwards.
institutes and industrial partners that aims to accelerate the support the strengthening of EU policies. A key aspect of this is our
adoption of sustainable aviation technologies. With 25 million backing for the expansion of the EU ETS system to include long- Cleaner, quieter aircraft
euros in funding from the European Commission as part of haul flights, addressing the ‘polluter pays’ principle. Notably, 80% To address the pressing issue of noise pollution, Schiphol Group
the European Green Deal, TULIPS is an important force in of Schiphol’s CO2 emissions are generated by 20% of the flights, is encouraging the use of quieter aircraft by offering reduced
the industry’s journey towards zero-emissions and zero-waste predominantly long-haul flights. airport charges to airlines that operate these models. This policy
airports by 2030, and achieving net-zero carbon emissions in not only gives airlines an incentive to modernise their fleets with
aviation by 2050. To mitigate carbon leakage, we endorse the application of quieter, more efficient aircraft but also supports manufacturers
the CBAM regulation to aviation. Furthermore, we propose a such as Airbus and Boeing in their development of engines that
Schiphol Airport and Rotterdam The Hague Airport will serve as restructured aviation tax, dependent on distance, increasing with consume less fuel and produce fewer emissions.
a ‘living lab’ for 17 innovative projects under TULIPS, focusing on the length of the flight. The revenues from this tax should be
sustainable solutions such as hydrogen-powered vehicles, electric reinvested into the sustainability transition within the aviation Transavia has already taken a step towards sustainable aviation
and hydrogen power supply facilities for aircraft, and the use of industry. These measures collectively reflect our comprehensive by renewing its fleet with new Airbus aircraft. The first flight
circular materials. approach to not only achieving net-zero emissions but also with this new aeroplane took off on 5 January 2024. Transavia’s
driving broader systemic change in the aviation sector. decision aligns with the broader aviation industry’s efforts to
A significant part of this consortium’s work involves developing become cleaner and quieter. The new Airbus aircraft are chosen
and testing emerging ‘green’ aviation technologies, such as Sustainable aviation fuels for their quieter, more fuel-efficient capabilities, promising a
hydrogen and electric aircraft. Rotterdam The Hague Airport As part of the transition to sustainable aviation, Schiphol Group 15% reduction in fuel consumption and carbon emissions.
(RTHA) is at the forefront of this initiative, serving as a testing is involved on several fronts when it comes to promoting the Furthermore, these planes are designed to halve the noise
ground for these sustainable aviation innovations. The Fieldlab use of SAF. For example, we give airlines credit in our airline footprint, benefiting both the environment and communities
Next Aviation project, spearheaded by RTHA, is exploring new fees for using sustainable aviation fuels. Between 2022 and near airports.
propulsion techniques, including hydrogen fuel, with the first 2024, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol is contributing 15 million
ZeroAvia hydrogen-powered flight anticipated for 2025. euros towards incentives to use SAF. Airlines flying into and from In collaboration with Air Traffic Control the Netherlands (LVNL),
Schiphol Airport are eligible to take advantage of this incentive. Schiphol Airport is optimising flight paths and runway use
Complementing these efforts, Schiphol’s zero-emission airside to minimise noise disturbance. LVNL’s strategic routing allows
program is central to our sustainability vision. We have made In addition, Rotterdam The Hague Airport has an online tool for take-offs, landings, and flights along trajectories that limit
strides by transitioning to electric Ground Power Units, thereby called ‘Fly on SAF’. This digital resource allows passengers to lower noise impact on surrounding communities, particularly through
reducing emissions and ultrafine particles. Our goal is to ensure the carbon emissions of their flight by replacing fossil kerosene the use of the Kaagbaan Runway for incoming flights and
that all ground-handling operations at Schiphol are emission-free with SAF. RTHA also signed a long-term agreement with Shell in the Polderbaan Runway for outgoing ones, which traverse less
by 2030, aligning with our broader sustainability roadmap. November 2023 to start blending sustainable aviation fuel into all densely populated areas.
aircraft refuelling at RTHA from 2024. At the airport, at least 8%
However, our commitment extends beyond these initiatives. additional sustainable aviation fuel will be blended on top of the In addition to these operational changes, we are championing
Schiphol Group is actively evolving its approach to Scope 3 CO2 European blending obligation of 6%. This will help to achieve the innovative solutions such as supporting DeNoize, a startup
emissions. Indeed, we recognise the need for the Dutch aviation Dutch aviation sector's 14% target in 2030. focused on developing soundproofing technology for residential
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 20
windows. This technology holds the promise of improving the Deep Turnaround provides historical, real-time, and predictive
living conditions of local residents. insights to all stakeholders involved through a tailored dashboard
or data stream. By accurately detecting over 70 unique
Workplace quality turnaround events across 30 processes, Deep Turnaround can pre-
Schiphol’s commitment to sustainability extends to workplace empt delays, enabling proactive decision-making. This predictive
quality, with the airport taking proactive steps to ensure a safe capability is especially crucial, as traditionally, 40%-50% of
and health-conscious work environment. Initiatives to improve flight delays are attributed to turnaround activities, where
air quality at our stands and the implementation of robust safety misalignment and inefficiencies are common.
standards reflect our dedication to our employees’ wellbeing.
This includes the gradual replacement of fossil-fuel-powered Deep Turnaround is expected to reduce carbon emissions
vehicles with electric ones across various operational areas. through the detection of Auxiliary Power Unit use and optimising
Our transition encompasses a wide array of vehicles, from asset and resource management. Its implementation can lead
standard cars and delivery vans to pushback tractors and lorries. to a reduction of turnaround delays by up to 30%, improving
Additionally, more specialized equipment such as conveyor belt passenger experiences and increasing overall airport capacity
loaders, catering lifts, passenger staircases, and generators are without the need for additional stands. All these measures
also being shifted to electric models. These efforts reflect our support our Cleaner, Quieter, Better programme, affirming its
dedication not only to our employees’ wellbeing but also to commitment to becoming a more sustainable airport while
reducing carbon emissions at our airports. maintaining operational excellence.
A technology-driven landscape
In 2023, airports and airlines continued to explore and adopt
cutting-edge digital advancements to enhance the travel
experience and refine their services. Solutions such as biometrics,
facial recognition technology and CT scanners are increasingly
being introduced in airports around the world, enabling
streamlined, paperless and more efficient passenger processes.
Building on this momentum of innovation, Schiphol Airport
has also embraced a pioneering initiative, Deep Turnaround.
This program uses artificial intelligence (AI) to transform and
optimise aircraft turnaround processes for enhanced efficiency,
sustainability and performance. A notable benefit of Deep
Turnaround will be its impact on improving our on-time
performance, thereby increasing overall passenger satisfaction.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 21
SWOT analysis
Strengths Opportunities
– Resilient network of destinations – Digitalisation, artificial intelligence, automation and big data
– Strong hub position of Schiphol in Europe – International activities and partnerships
– Excellent hub facilities, i.e. one-terminal concept – Sustainable aviation and innovation initiatives
– Sustainability at our premises – Train travel synergies, e.g. train station below terminal
– Economic strength of the Randstad region and
attractiveness of airport city
Weaknesses Threats
– Capacity shortage during peak hours: terminal, – Challenging geopolitical and macroeconomic climate
stands, border control, customs, LVNL and railway station – Terrorism and cyberthreats
– Operational and sourcing model – Worsening labour market and ageing workforce
– Current state and future reliability of assets – Pressure on cargo volumes from slot allocation system
– Declining airport customer experience assessment and Airport Service – European Entry-Exit System legislation
Quality ranking – Influence of social and political debate on number of permisable air
– Perceived negative cost/service quality balance by airlines traffic movements
– Labour conditions in the baggage halls and on the platforms
– Very limited financial buffers as a consequence of COVID-19 losses
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 22
value chain.
Quality of Quality of
Life Work
Quality of Quality of
Network Service
Safety Robust
Enablers first organisation
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 23
Key initiatives include the ‘Minder Hinder’ noise reduction The past year revealed significant labour market challenges
Quality of Network programme in collaboration with LVNL. This multifaceted impacting airport operations. Key services such as security,
strategy includes using flight paths and runways that minimise passenger assistance, cleaning and ground-handling rely heavily
Maintaining a high-quality network is an essential pillar of
disturbance, and incentivising airlines to operate quieter and on efficient labour organisation. We have seen that optimal
our Vision 2050. Together with our other airports, Amsterdam
cleaner aircraft by offering reduced airport charges. The launch of functioning between the labour market and Schiphol Airport
Airport Schiphol provides and facilitates the connectivity that
our 8-point plan, ‘Quieter, Cleaner, Better’ further supports these is not a given, and we are simultaneously navigating the
is vital for an open economy such as the Netherlands. Flight
efforts and aims to create a harmonious balance between our complexities of a fluctuating labour market as well.
frequencies are on the rise again, enabling us to maintain the
airport, the aviation industry and the surrounding environment.
vast majority of our destinations and our connectivity. Indeed,
Key focus areas include implementing night closure, banning Central to our mission and a fundamental element of our eight-
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol is still high in the ‘direct connectivity
private jets and prohibiting the use of the noisiest aircraft, point ‘Quieter, Cleaner, Better’ plan is the principle that people
ranking’ of European airports, based on the 2023 Airport Industry
marking a step towards a more sustainable and community- come first. At Schiphol Group, we are deeply committed to our
Connectivity Report – though it did slip from first to second place
friendly approach to aviation at Schiphol Airport. social responsibility as an employer and as an airport operator.
in the ranking in 2023, behind Istanbul.
Our aim is not only to provide a rewarding work environment,
Schiphol Group’s sustainability strategy is further supported by but also to prioritise the well-being and development of
Schiphol Group remains steadfast in its commitment to
the TULIPS alliance, aiming to accelerate the rollout of innovative our employees.
preserving a high-quality network, a cornerstone of our Vision
technologies across the aviation sector. Our airport charges
2050. While we navigate the complexities brought on by
scheme, in effect from 2022 to 2024, includes incentives for using This includes offering fair wages, work-life balance, career
the suspension of the proposed flight movement cap, our
sustainable aviation fuels and cleaner, quieter aircraft. We are opportunities and safe working conditions until retirement,
focus remains on maintaining the connectivity crucial for the
also continuing our policy of banning the noisiest aircraft. In our underlining our commitment to putting our staff first in
Netherlands’ open economy. We will continue our discussions
capacity declaration for the 2024 summer season, we listed 87 everything we do. To further this commitment, we have
with the government, seeking a resolution that not only upholds
aircraft types that are no longer welcome at Schiphol. introduced measures such as providing rest areas and other
our network’s integrity but also prioritises the environmental
support mechanisms to improve the work environment.
footprint over the volume of air transport movements, thereby
These initiatives are critical to ensuring our license to operate as Moreover, the introduction of electric cars on airside not only
ensuring clarity and direction for all our stakeholders. We also
an airport, shifting the focus from last year’s recovery-oriented supports our environmental goals but also improves air quality for
remain committed to balancing the requirement for a high-
strategy to one that puts people first. In 2023, our priorities were our staff working in these areas.
quality network with the need to safeguard Quality of Service for
taking social responsibility and putting the needs and wellbeing
our customers, Quality of Life for local residents and wider society,
of our communities at the forefront of our operations. Our Quality of Work initiative aims to provide inspiring
and Quality of Work for our own employees.
and attractive working conditions for Schiphol’s employees,
promoting health, safety, and positive labour relations. This
includes setting an agenda for quality work policies and initiatives
Quality of Life Quality of Work through social dialogue, which is vital for supporting and
monitoring these efforts.
In line with the 2022 Social Agreement, Schiphol Group is
As outlined by our Most Sustainable Airports roadmap, Schiphol
integrating a new cornerstone into our vision: the Quality of
Group aims to operate zero-emissions and zero-waste airports by The renewal of the Schiphol Social Agreement in 2023 marked
Work. This focuses on enhancing work standards at Schiphol
2030. We also aim to uphold the principles of sustainable aviation the first time this agenda was set through social dialogue, further
Airport for everyone involved, aiming to establish it as the world's
and ensure a healthy living environment for local residents. This detailed in the ‘Employment practices value chain’ chapter.
leading sustainable, high-quality airport.
means prioritising the needs of local communities by ensuring
noise pollution remains at an acceptable level as the aviation
industry continues to grow again.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 24
Materiality analysis
Royal Schiphol Group serves a
Context Process materiality analysis
large international stakeholder
base that ranges from To achieve Royal Schiphol Group’s ambition to operate the most Royal Schiphol Group conducts a yearly materiality analysis to
passengers and sector partners sustainable and high-quality airports in the world, the material identify the impact and financial materiality. We made a number
topics that have been identified through our double materiality of revisions to the materiality analysis based on a five-step
to government authorities and assessment provide guidance to focus our sustainability efforts process: 1) evaluating Royal Schiphol Group’s key stakeholders
local residents. The double and relate to the entire consolidated Royal Schiphol Group. and value chain; 2) gathering input and scoring of impacts, risks
materiality analysis gives a and opportunities internally; 3) validation of scoring outcomes
The materiality assessment performed this year is with reference with key stakeholders; 4) determining the material topics based
comprehensive overview of to the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines, but enriched on our threshold; and, 5) validation and sign-off by the Executive
the topics that have an with two key requirements from the Corporate Sustainability Team. As part of a three-yearly cycle, next year's results will be
actual or potential impact on Reporting Directive (CSRD), to which we need to be compliant validated externally.
as of 2024. We have included financial materiality in the
our stakeholders and those methodology and reviewed and considered all material topics To determine which topics were deemed material we had an
that have an actual and in the CSRD as part of the materiality assessment. Therefore, we iterative ranking process that asked internal stakeholders to
potential financial impact on did not only deem topics material based on impact materiality but rank the material topics according to their impacts, risks and
also on financial materiality. opportunities. Respondents were also able to suggest new topics
our organisation. and validate the findings through internal rounds of validation.
Impact materiality being the (actual or potential) significant Schiphol's Executive Team subsequently acknowledged that the
impact Royal Schiphol Group has on people or the environment, material topics provide a proper account of the developments in
and financial materiality the risks and opportunities that (may) 2023 and approved their inclusion in the materiality results for
arise from a sustainability matter leading to a financial effect. 2023. The next extensive update of the materiality analysis will be
The results of the materiality analysis are presented in a butterfly performed in 2024 and will be fully in line with the requirements
figure, with two axis that represent the impact and financial of CSRD.
materiality. The materiality butterfly included in this chapter
shows how the topics score on both axes on the short- (within 1
year), medium (between 1 and 5 years), and long term (longer
than 5 years).
2023 results
24 material topics have been identified during the double Societal value is defined as the impact Royal Schiphol Group has The table on this page shows how this year's material topics relate
materiality process. Most new topics result from a more granular on stakeholders and society through economic factors such as job to those of last year and illustrates the more granular depiction
depiction of existing material topics. In 2023, two new material creation, economic role in society and societal engagement. Even of the old topics. The definition of our material topics can be
topics have been identified, Soil Pollution and Societal Value. though these topics have only been part of the materiality list found in the list of definitions; note that the definitions of our
Soil Pollution entails the emissions into soil and the prevention, since this year does not imply that they are new topics for Royal material topics have been more closely aligned to the CSRD
control and reduction of such emissions and thereby pollution. Schiphol Group; we have already been working on societal value definitions where that is applicable and possible.
and the prevention, control, and reduction of soil pollution.
The following materiality butterfly visualizes the results of the
materiality analysis for 2023. We added two new factors to the
analysis: the three time horizons of materiality and financial
materiality, as prescribed by the CSRD. On the left side of the
Material topics 2022 Material topics 2023 butterfly, the results of impact materiality are shown, taking the
Network of destinations Network of destinations time horizons into account. The right side of the butterfly show
Quality of Network the financial materiality.
Accessibility Accessibility
Energy-positive airports
Zero emission airports Although financial materiality and the time horizons were
Air pollution
Sustainable aviation Sustainable avation included in the analysis this year as part of the preparation for
Circularity CSRD, they were not further elaborated upon in explaining 'our
Circular economy results' throughout the annual report. For this year, we chose to
Water pollution
Quality of Life only focus on impact materiality in our reporting, following the
Not material in 2022 Soil pollution
content format of previous years; next year we will incorporate
Climate adaptation
the time horizons and financial materiality.
Community and noise Noise
Engaging with our communities
The topics covered in the butterfly relate to Amsterdam Airport
Not material in 2022 Societal value
Schiphol, Rotterdam The Hague Airport, Eindhoven Airport and
Employment practices own workforce
Lelystad Airport. Not all material topics are relevant to the
Quality of Work Employment practices Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in own workforce
regional airports, due to the scale and nature of their operations.
Employment practices in value chain
For this reporting year some topics are reported on only in relation
Customer appreciation Consumer and end-user experience
to Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, and not to the regional airports
Business continuity Business continuity
Quality of Service in our Group. Where a limited scope is consired, we have included
Digital innovation and cybersecurity Cybersecurity
this in the relevant chapters. In following years, and in line with
Airport Capacity Airport Capacity CSRD, the scope of reporting will be extended.
Energy-positive airports
Air pollution
Sustainable aviation
Circularity
Water pollution
Quality
Soil pollution
of Life
Climate adaptation
Noise
Societal value
Airport capacity
Safety
Safety and security
first
Business ethics and corporate culture
Robust
Supplier and procurement practices
organisation
Financial solidity
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 28
Targets 2024
We translate our long-term
An important condition of the business plan is that it meets the In the TPI Local Residents the BAS reports are excluded as a
strategy into a business plan, requirements of a sound financial policy and is robust enough to metric since this was based on a 24-month rolling average
which also incorporates the weather potential financial setbacks. The business plan also and does not reflect the current reputation of RSG. The Net
budget for the following results in a management agenda, which sets out concrete actions Promotor Score used for the TPI Passengers is replaced by the
and targets for management for the year ahead. Since 2019, Passenger Experience score. This score is more directly affected
year. The business plan Schiphol Group's target setting has consisted of the Top by underlying quality of airport touchpoints, products and
sets out how we plan to Performance Indicators (TPIs) and major deliverables, enabling services. The major deliverables are mainly linked to the Fast
achieve each of Royal Schiphol the introduction of a consistent language across Royal Schiphol Forward programme.
Group, the alignment of all Group activities and a focus on the
Group's strategic milestones. most value-adding activities. For 2024, two TPIs have been
Our Top Performance altered: Local Residents and Passengers.
Indicators represent our multi-
stakeholder approach, which
Local residents
takes into account RSG's main Network
Intercontinental destinations Reputation Score
95.6 -65%
Airlines Shareholders
On time performance within Return on Equity
top 2 1
6.5%
Employees Passengers
Employee Promoter Score Passenger Experience Score
31 3.96
Safety
Net Safety Score target 2024: 95.6
This index takes into account the percentage of days without serious 1 incidents minus the percentage of days with serious incidents 2 .
Sustainability
CO2e emissions Royal Schiphol Group target 2024: -65% 3
Decrease in CO2e emissions compared with 2019 levels, taking into account Scope 1 (natural gas and fuels used by own vehicle fleet) and selected
items of Scope 3 (natural gas used by third parties in buildings owned by Schiphol Commercial with their own environmental permits, airside
fuels, commuter traffic and business travel by own car or aircraft 4 ). Market-based emissions without Scope 2 (electricity) are used, since Schiphol
Group purchases 100% renewable electricity and the market-based method therefore better reflects our progress towards zero emissions
in 2030.
Network
Number of intercontinental destinations target 2024: 125
The number of direct intercontinental destinations for passengers and cargo 5 .
Passengers
Passenger Experience (PX) score target 2024: 3.96
The CSAT (customer satisfaction score) measures the overall satisfaction of the airport among departing and arriving passengers. At the end of
their airport journey passenger are asked “Taking everything into account, how do you rate Amsterdam Airport Schiphol overall”? excellent, very
good, good, fair or poor. The result is an average score between 1 (poor) and 5 (excellent). The higher the score, the better the experience. In
previous years the Net Promoter Score (NPS) was used. As of 2024 the PX score will replace the NPS. The PX score is more directly affected by
underlying quality of airport touchpoints, products and services. In addition, the PX score is more commonly used by other airports. 5 .
Airlines
On-time performance target 2024: within top 2 on on-time performance compared to comparable European hubs
The punctuality of outbound traffic is the percentage of commercial flights departing on time (based on the sector-wide standard D15) 5 . The
OTP is benchmarked against Charles de Gaulle Airport, Frankfrurt Airport, London Heathrow, and Munich Airport.
Local residents
Reputation score target 2024: 7.0
This score is based on qualitative reputation surveys (motivaction). In previous years, the reputation score was partly based on the Motivaction
score (80%) and partly based on the 24-month rolling average of the nuber of reporters at Bewoners Aanspreekpunt Schiphol (BAS) (20%). RSG
wants the performance indicator to reflect the current sentiment of local residents. Hence, RSG decided to exclude the BAS reports due to the
lag in this metric 5 .
Employees
Employee Promoter Score target 2024: 31
The Employee Promoter Score (EPS) measures how likely employees are to recommend Schiphol as an employer. Employees are asked: 'On a scale
of 0 to 10, how likely would you be to recommend your employer to friends and acquaintances?' Employees who give a score under or equal
to 6 are detractors; 9 or 10 are promoters. The Employee Promoter Score is determined by subtracting the percentage of employees who are
detractors from the percentage who are promoters to generate a score between -100 and 100, which is similar to the Net Promoter Score 5 .
Shareholders
Return on equity (ROE) target 2024: 6.5%
The ROE is the financial return for shareholders based on net result adjusted for fair value gains and losses on investment property and one-off
items divided by average equity 6 .
1 Serious incidents are defined as incidents that have led to death, permanent injury or hospitalisation and potential fatal incidents (near miss).
2 The scope of this TPI is Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and contractors.
3 The 2019 baseline is 160kt CO2e.
4 The scope of this TPI is the Dutch airports of Schiphol Group.
5 The scope of this TPI is Amsterdam Airport Schiphol.
6 The scope of this TPI is Royal Schiphol Group.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 31
Our
results
A brief overview of the results achieved for each priority is provided on the next page, offering Local residents
TPI Local residents: 6 (target: 7)
concise background information. The chapters relevant to each TPI will discuss these indicators
The TPI Local residents is based on the Reputation Score survey (responsible for 80% of the
in more detail. The adoption of TPIs and major deliverables in target-setting commenced final TPI score) and the number of people that filed one or several reports with Bewoners
in 2019, marking the inaugural year for this strategic approach. In 2023, this methodology Aanspreekpunt Schiphol (BAS) (responsible for 20% of the final TPI score) 6 .
persists, reaffirming the ongoing significance of TPIs and major deliverables in shaping Schiphol's Employees
strategic direction. Employee Promoter Score: 24 (target: 20)
The Employee Promoter Score (EPS) measures how likely employees are to recommend Schiphol
as an employer. On a scale from 1 to 10, employees who give a score under or equal to 6 are
TPI performance detractors; 9 or 10 are promoters. The Employee Promoter Score is determined by subtracting
Priorities the percentage of employees who are detractors from the percentage who are promoters to
generate a score between -100 and +100, which is similar to the Net Promoter Score 6 .
Safety Shareholders
Net safety score: 96.2 (target: 95) Return on equity (ROE): normalized for fair value changes and other one offs amounted to 2.9%
The percentage of days without serious incidents 1 minus the percentage of days with serious (target 4.6%). The ROE including fair value changes and other one offs amounted to 0.4% in 2023.
incidents 2 . This includes all safety-related incidents. Financial return for shareholders based on net result adjusted for fair value changes and other
Sustainability one offs, divided by average equity 7 .
CO2e emissions Royal Schiphol Group: -65% (target: -62% 3 ) 1 Serious incidents are defined as incidents that have led to death, permanent injury or hospitalisation and potential fatal incidents
Decrease in CO2e emissions compared with 2019 levels, taking into account Scope 1 (natural gas (near miss).
and fuels used by own vehicle fleet), Scope 2 (electricity) and selected items of Scope 3 (electricity 2 The scope of this TPI is Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and contractors.
and natural gas used by third parties in buildings owned by Schiphol Commercial with their 3 The 2019 baseline is 160kt CO2e.
own environmental permits, airside fuels, commuter traffic and business travel by own car or 4 The scope of this TPI is the Dutch airports of Schiphol Group excluding Maastricht Aachen Airport.
aircraft) 4,5 . 5 As of 2022 the market-based calculation method is applied, since Schiphol Group purchases 100% renewable electricity.
6 The scope of this TPI is Amsterdam Airport Schiphol.
Network 7 The scope of this TPI is Royal Schiphol Group.
Number of Intercontinental destinations: 126 (target: 125 ICA destinations)
Number of direct intercontinental destinations for passengers and cargo 6 .
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 33
Performance Network – Intercontinental destinations purpose. Notably, the majority of on-time performance (OTP) is
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (AAS) exceeded its target by serving compromised during the initial morning peak, where this impact
The TPIs are primarily centered around our operations at 126 intercontinental destinations in 2023. Despite the addition is particularly pronounced.
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (AAS) and the broader influence of four new destinations and the loss of seven, AAS maintained
of the Schiphol hub. This holds true for most topics, with the its status as a prominent airport for connectivity. While there was Employees – Employee Promoter Score
exceptions being Sustainability and Return on Equity (ROE). a slight reduction in the total number of destinations compared In 2023, the Employee Net Promoter Score experienced a
Specifically, the TPI Sustainability - CO2e emissions pertain to 2022 (129), Amsterdam Airport Schiphol continued to be a substantial surge, reaching +24 and surpassing our target of
to the emissions of our Dutch airports, excluding Maastricht leading hub. According to the ACI Airport Industry Connectivity +20. This shows an improvement from the previous year, in which
Aachen Airport. On the other hand, ROE addresses the overall Report 2023, it ranked second for direct connectivity (having we achieved a score of 7. The advancement underscores a positive
performance of the entire Royal Schiphol Group. been first in 2022) and fourth for hub connectivity (down from atmosphere that fosters pride in our organisation. Colleagues
third in 2022). Data provided by OAG positions AAS as the third- are now more inclined to recommend us as an employer,
We present our performance according to our major deliverables. largest megahub globally, following London Heathrow and JFK indicating a positive trajectory and validation that we are on
In 2023, the major deliverables were grouped into six clusters: (1) International Airport. Out of the 126 destinations served, 16 were the right path. Our performance in autonomy, employability,
Safety first, (2) Robust organisation, (3) Quality of Network, (4) exclusively dedicated to cargo operations. commitment, social security, sustainable employability, and
Quality of Life, (5) Quality of Work and (6) Quality of Service. Each team leadership, all scoring 7 or higher, reflects the positive
TPI contributes to one of these six clusters. The performance Passengers – Net Promoter Score sentiments across these crucial aspects. While we have surpassed
of our regional airports and our international activities are In 2023, the Net Promoter Score (NPS) reached +36, marking benchmarks in the first five themes, there is acknowledgment
presented in two separate chapters: Our regional airports and a significant increase of +10 points compared to 2022. This that collaboration between departments requires improvement.
Our international activities. achievement narrowly meets the target of +36 and brings the Therefore, we invest in inter-departmental collaboration to
NPS back to its pre-COVID-19 level observed in late 2019. The continuously improve as an employer.
Safety – Net safety score improvement from 2022 is attributed to enhanced perceptions
The Net Safety Score reached 96.2, surpassing the targeted of waiting times at security (due to increased staffing), check- Local residents – Reputation Score
score of 95. Despite this achievement, there was a slight decline in efficiency, staff friendliness, ease of connections for transfer The TPI Local Residents stood at 6.0, comprising two key elements.
in performance compared to 2022 (97.3) due to eight serious passengers, and overall ambience. Passengers in 2023 reported The primary factor, contributing 80% to the overall score, is the
incidents. These incidents involved injuries caused by passenger feeling more welcome, in control, and better informed than in the quarterly reputation surveys conducted by the research agency
falls, employee injuries, and accidents related to vehicles on the previous year. However, waiting times at passport control (both Motivaction among local residents. The average score obtained
airside. Safety remains the top priority, and ongoing efforts are on arrival and departure) and baggage reclaim continue to be from these surveys in 2023 was 6.7 (6.5 in 2022). The second
dedicated to enhancing safety-related systems and fostering our areas of focus for improvement. element, accounting for 20% of the total score, involves the
safety culture. number of reports filed at Bewoners Aanspreekpunt Schiphol
Airlines – On-time performance (BAS). To maintain a more representative benchmark, a 24-month
Sustainability – CO2e emissions On-time performance (OTP) was 59%, which is below the target rolling average is used. The average score at BAS declined to 3.3
In 2023, the TPI Sustainability achieved a result of -65%, of 2023 (71%). The main contributing factors to not reaching in 2023 due to a reduced number of reports during the COVID-19
surpassing the targeted -62%. The notable reduction in emissions our on-time performance target were staff shortage at ground period, which is still part of the benchmark timeframe.
can be attributed to decreased natural gas consumption at handlers, congestion at Schiphol and in European airspace and
our Dutch airports and the transition to HVO100, which various reasons outside the sphere of influence of Schiphol
became the standard fuel for airside ground operations starting (e.g. weather related delays and disruptions at outstations). The
January 2023. primary source of delays at Schiphol Airport stems from issues in
the ground handling process and runway capacity-related delays.
Our robust departure peaks contribute to an excess demand
for departure runways, despite having two runways for this
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 34
to inflation, the Social Agreement, and other Quality of Work 96.2 -65%
initiatives for which Schiphol receives no cost coverage via the
airport charges as these were already set in 2021, the target level
was not reached. The underlying net result attributable to Airlines Shareholders
On-time Performance Return on Equity2
shareholders was 102 million euros compared to the target of
178 million euros positive. 59% 2.9%
Our return was negatively impacted by cost increases within the
Employees Passengers
Aviation domain as a result of investments made in quality, Employee Promoter Score Net Promoter Score
Schiphol restoring financial resilience. Improving the financial 2 ROE including fair value changes and other one offs: 0.4%
Major deliverables
Eleven major deliverables were set for 2023, categorised in three
clusters: strategic, tactical and operational. Important progress
was realised the past year in relation to the major deliverables:
CAPEX delivery increased significantly compared to 2022,
Schiphol Group published its ‘eight-point plan’, the nature permit
for Amsterdam Aiport Schiphol was obtained and important
steps have been taken in relation to the ultrafine particles action
plan. The execution of the remaining works in relation to Pier A,
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 35
Quality of Network
Strong international
One of Schiphol Group’s priorities is always to maintain its
connections are essential superior network standard. As a central hub within our Group,
Top performance indicator Quality of Network
for an open and globally Amsterdam Airport Schiphol plays a key role in providing the Network Local residents
Reputation Score
Intercontinental destinations
connected economy such as connectivity that is necessary to the Netherlands’ thriving open
6.0
economy. We are seeing a resurgence in flight frequencies, 126
the Netherlands. In recent allowing us to maintain the breadth of our destinations and
years, Schiphol has built a overall connectivity. Notably, in the 2023 Airport Industry Safety Sustainability
2023 was a notable year for expanding our network. We 59% 3.1%
welcomed four new airlines – PLAY, Freebird Europe, Air India Network of destinations
and JetBlue – and expanded our network with seven new Employees Passengers
Employee Promoter ScoreIn 2023, the network of destinations served Scoreby Amsterdam
destinations. There were also minor reductions, with KLM ceasing Net Promoter
flights to several destinations and the bankruptcy of FlyBe. 24 Airport Schiphol shrunk in comparison to 36
last year from 313
to 305. This was mainly caused by the fact that a number of
Despite challenges such as the planned flight movement cap, cargo-only routes that were flown in 2022 did not return in 2023.
we are steadfast in our commitment to sustain a network of The total number of ‘pre-COVID’ destinations in 2019 was 332.
exceptional quality. We aim to find solutions that harmonise
our network’s integrity with environmental stewardship. This Despite its decrease in destinations, Schiphol remained a leading
approach is essential to provide clarity and direction to our airport in terms of connectivity in 2023. According to the ACI
stakeholders and ensuring the long-term sustainability of Airport Industry Connectivity Report 2023, Amsterdam ranked
our operations. second for direct connectivity (first in 2022) and fourth for
hub connectivity. A further report by travel data provider
In our ongoing effort to maintain a high-quality network, we OAG mentioned that, in 2023, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol
are equally committed to ensuring quality of service for our was the number 3 megahub behind London Heathrow and
customers and quality of life for the communities around us, JFK International Airport. Both reports suggest that Schiphol’s
including our employees. Balancing these aspects is critical to position as a major aviation hub is under pressure by the Dutch
our mission and forms the basis of our long-term strategy for a government’s capacity reduction plans.
sustainable and responsible future in aviation.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 36
Direct connectivity Network developments Unfortunately, several destinations were also cut from Schiphol’s
Ranking of top-10 European airports (ACI Airport Industry In 2023, four new airlines were welcomed to Amsterdam Airport network in 2023. KLM ceased flying to Katowice in Poland, Aarhus
Connectivity Report) Schiphol. PLAY returned in June with flights from Reykjavik, in Denmark, Muscat in Oman and Bridgetown in Barbados. China
Rank 2023 Airport Rank 2022 Rank 2019 Freebird Europe with flights from Dubrovnik, Air India returned Southern Airlines has stopped flights from Shenzhen after only six
after 23 years with flights from New Delhi and JetBlue began weeks. With the bankruptcy of FlyBe, we also lost East Midlands
1 Istanbul IST 2 5 serving Amsterdam for the first time, with flights from New York (UK) as a destination; FlyBe flew four routes from Amsterdam.
2 Amsterdam Airport Schiphol AMS 1 2 and Boston.
3 London Heathrow LHR 3 4 Traffic and transport in 2023
In total, seven new destinations were added to our network. Passengers
4 Frankfurt FRA 4 1
China Southern Airlines introduced flights from Shenzhen to The recovery of passenger numbers in the first months of 2023
5 Paris CDG 5 3
Amsterdam for a period of six weeks, replacing it with flights was not possible as the measure to limit the number of local
6 Madrid MAD 6 7 from Beijing Daxing. KLM reintroduced flights to Beijing Capital departing passengers was extended until the end of the winter
7 Barcelona BCN 8 8 after Chinese COVID-19 restrictions were lifted. In addition, season (25 March 2023). To ensure that operations during the first
8 Munich MUC 7 6 easyJet launched services from Jersey, and London Southend weeks of the summer season, including the May holidays, would
and Corendon Dutch Airlines introduced flights from Gazipasa in be able to cope with the increasing number of passengers, several
9 Rome FCO 11 9
Turkey. In December 2023, Transavia launched services to Tromsø, measures were taken to limit the number of local departing
10 Londen Gatwick LGW 9 10
Norway. In addition to these new destinations for Schiphol, passengers in the morning hours. After mid-May, there were no
various airlines launched new routes, including Montréal by Air more restrictions.
Hub connectivity
Canada, Curaçao by Corendon Dutch Airlines, Salzburg (Austria)
Ranking of top-10 airports worldwide
by Eurowings and Rovaniemi (Finland) by easyJet. By mid-May, it was possible for all airlines to operate up to the
(ACI Airport Industry Connectivity Report)
maximum capacity of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol.
Rank 2023 Airport Rank 2022 Rank 2019
Air transport movements at Schiphol in 2023 Cargo Although the total volume of freight has decreased, freighters
Movements per airline Change The total volume of freight in tonnes fell by 4.2% YTD (first half at Schiphol Airport have a higher load factor (+6%) in 2023 than
KLM 228,956 14.1% -5.9%) in 2023 compared with the same period in 2022. There are in 2022. In addition, there was 2.1% more cargo in the belly of
easyJet 35,482 10.5%
two main reasons for this. passenger flights.
160.6 113.6
-5%
0%
The new cargo strategy for Schiphol Cargo, focusing on more high-quality
and high-value cargo, will be implemented in 2024.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 38
Schiphol is developing a fully automated cargo centre, dnata with many more to follow. Corendon Dutch Airlines took delivery heighten employees’ awareness of their transport behaviour and
Cargo City Amsterdam, which will have an annual handling of their B737 MAX9 in September, with two more to follow. the impact it has on sustainability.
capacity of 850,000 tonnes by the second half of 2024.
This will strengthen the existing warehousing facilities at Airlines concerned about capacity at Schiphol The airport aims to be an attractive, vibrant and easily accessible
the airport, which also offers well-connected belly and full- A major issue for the aviation industry in 2023 was the Dutch hub. The Most Sustainable Airports 2030 roadmap shapes
freighter networks. government's planned reduction of the maximum number of the transition to smart and clean mobility, with the aim of
annual flight movements at Schiphol. With a reduction in aircraft maintaining the vibrancy and accessibility of the growing airport.
Top-10 European cargo volumes and market share in 2023 movements it is expected this will have a negative impact on the Reducing the use of fossil fuels and promoting clean transport is
Market number of destinations served from Amsterdam. key. Our bicycle policy aims to create a culture using a bicycle is
x 1,000 tonnes of cargo Change share natural, given its smart, clean and fast characteristics. We want to
Frankfurt FRA 1,828 95.0% 14.5% improve the use of bicycles, parking facilities, cycling culture and
Paris CDG 1,815 98.2% 14.4% Accessibility appreciation of cycling facilities throughout the Schiphol area
Istanbul IST 1,516 106.3% 12.0%
with the aim of reducing our Scope 3 emissions.
The recovery in passenger numbers that began post-COVID-19 in
Leipzig LEJ 1,393 92.3% 11.0%
2021 continued in 2022 and in 2023. In 2023, passenger numbers
London LHR 1,387 102.7% 11.0%
came close during the peak summer and autumn break periods of
Amsterdam AMS 1,378 95.8% 10.9%
2019, which created challenges in accommodating the increased
Liege LGG 1,006 88.2% 8.0%
traffic flows at the curbside drop-off zone. As 2023 progressed the
Cologne CGN 859 89.6% 6.8%
modal split became more balanced again, resembling 2019.
Luxembourg LUX 795 82.0% 6.3%
Milan MXP 666 93.0% 5.3% Smart and clean mobility
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol is continuously improving and
Airlines continue to increase the use of quietest modernising its landside infrastructure. These steps will help
aircraft in 2023 ensure Schiphol’s capacity once passenger numbers return
The share of latest-generation aircraft at Amsterdam has grown to normal levels. We are preparing for the future with our
strongly in recent years. In 2019 the share of latest-generation Landside Central Programme (LCP) to ensure that our airport
aircraft was only 6.0% at Amsterdam. This increased to 19.5% in remains accessible for all modes of transport. The programme Our bicycle policy aims to create a culture using bicycle is natural, given its
2023. Examples of latest-generation aircraft are the Airbus A220, was launched in 2020 to help coordinate and integrate the smart, clean and fast characterics.
Airbus A320neo, Airbus A321neo, Boeing 737MAX, Airbus A350, development of access road projects at Schiphol Centre. We are
Boeing 787 Dreamliner, Boeing 747-8 Freighter and Embraer exploring ways to further improve the landside infrastructure to Looking to the future, Schiphol will introduce zero-emission
ERJ-195-E2. This shift towards newer, quieter aircraft models keep Schiphol Centre accessible and landside safe in the coming zones at Schiphol Centre from 2026, where only trucks and vans
aligns very well with Schiphol Airport's ‘Quieter, Cleaner, Better’ years, taking into account long-term trends and developments. that do not produce harmful emissions will have access to the
policy, highlighting its commitment to reducing environmental 'logistics roads' around the terminal. This important step aims to
impact and enhancing the quality of life for nearby communities. In 2023 we further developed Schiphol GO, a smart mobility app reduce nitrogen and carbon emissions and improve air quality in
that allows Schiphol employees to choose and register their own the logistics basements.
In 2023, several airlines operated quieter aircraft, including three modes of transport to and from work and for business trips. The
newcomers in 2023; Air India with the B787-8, PLAY with the app includes a ‘work-at-home allowance’ and a ‘cycling mileage
Airbus A320neo and JetBlue with the Airbus A321neo. Other allowance’ of 30 cents per kilometres for cycling. This is a strong
airlines adding Chapter 14 aircraft included Aegean Airlines, Air incentive for employees to cycle to work or to the nearest public
Astana, Air Transat, Air Malta, easyJet, Egypt Air, ITA, SAS and transport station. Each trip generates a carbon footprint report to
Swiss. Transavia took delivery of its first A321neo in December,
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 39
Parking operations
While we encourage visitors to Schiphol to use public transport
whenever possible, ensuring good parking facilities and capacity
remains essential for our accessibility. We actively monitor
mobility trends and developments to ensure that we can meet
long-term demand. We have started the construction of a new
car rental service centre at Schiphol. The car rental service centre
can accommodate approximately 2,500 vehicles. The five largest
car rental companies at Schiphol will come together under one
At Schiphol Plaza the project has started to enhance the capacity to and roof, which will be covered by 17,000 m2 of solar panels. With
from the platforms by renewing staircases and elevators.
this facility, Schiphol is encouraging car rental companies to
switch to electric vehicles. In addition to our regular long-term
maintenance activities, we have completely renovated our staff
car park P30 with 3,300 parking spaces.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 40
Schiphol Group aims to operate the world's most sustainable 126 6.0
focus on Quality of airports. Building on our current sustainability performance, in
Top performance indicators Quality of Life
Life acknowledges our 2019 we created the Most SustainableSafety Airports roadmap. It sets Network Sustainability Local residents
96.2
of our customers and other stakeholders. These include our 59% -65% 3.1%
the Netherlands, we aim to local communities, but also society at large. Sustainability and
promote safe and responsible reducing pollution and noise disturbance
Employees
are a priority. We also Passengers
1 CO2e emissions
Airlines compared to 2019. Shareholders
air travel and safeguard the continue to examine ways to reduce noise-disturbance
Employee Promoter Score Concerns scope
levels, On-time Performance 1, 2 and
Net Promoter selected scope 3 items.
Score Return on Equity 2
24
such as offering incentives to airlines that use quieter and cleaner 59% 36 3.1%
long-term well-being of people aircraft and incentivise airlines to use sustainable aviation fuel TULIPS
and the environment. (SAF) at Schiphol.
Employees
Schiphol Group was selected in 2021 by the EU as a lighthouse
Passengers
Employee Promoter Score airport to contributeNet
toPromoter
the Green
Score Airports call. This call supports
In 2023, Schiphol Group published our eight-point plan 24 36
the objectives in our roadmap Most Sustainable Airports with
‘Quieter, Cleaner Better’. It contains eight measures to improve 25 million euros in funding and is being developed as an EU-
the quality of life for our neighbours. We continue to wide project named TULIPS, involving 32 partners. The funding
work with the government, local authorities, regulators and is part of the European Green Deal and aims to stimulate
other leading airports (including those in our Group) to innovations that facilitate the transition to low-carbon mobility
advance the sustainability agenda at a regional, national and and enhance sustainability at airports. The consortium was
international level. launched in 2022 and is supported by the fellow airports
Avinor in Oslo, SAGAT in Turin and Hermes in Larnaca, Cyprus.
In 2023, Schiphol Group received a second letter from Amsterdam Airport Schiphol will be the proving ground for 17
Dutch environmental organisation Milieudefensie, requesting an demonstrator projects resulting from the partnership between
update of our CO2e reduction plan for 2030. In response, we airports, airlines, knowledge institutes and industrial partners
shared our ‘Better and Balanced’ plan, which represents the latest in this unique European consortium. The joint programme aims
progression since the publication of our revised sustainability to accelerate the introduction of sustainable technologies in
strategy. This plan reflects our ongoing commitment to aviation, contributing to zero-emission and zero-waste airports
environmental stewardship and outlines specific steps towards by 2030 and net-zero-carbon aviation by 2050. TULIPS will
achieving our carbon reduction goals. After sharing our plan, we run until December 2025. More information is available at the
received no further response from Milieudefensie. Later in 2023 TULIPS website.
they announced that they are focusing on the financial sector. At
the beginning of 2024 it became known that Milieudefensie will Read more about the steps we are taking to improve
start a lawsuit against ING. sustainability and our achievements here.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 41
Communities: Improved balance between communities and airports in 2030, towards a good working and living SDG 8 Decent work and economic growth
environment at and around airports in 2050
– Decrease noise hindrance, improve air quality and work on community engagement. Industry innovation
SDG 9
– Adapt to climate change and restore biodiversity. and infrastructure
– Empower our strongest asset – our inclusive, diverse and motivated workforce − and offer sustainable and
SDG 11 Sustainable cities and communities
healthy workspaces.
Responsible consumption
SDG 12
and production
Energy-positive airports classified as Scope 3. Emissions generated by inbound flights to 4% target. The rating is lower than in previous years because we
our airports are included in the carbon footprint of the departing now separate renewable energy and energy efficiency.
Schiphol Group's Dutch airports Schiphol Airport, Eindhoven airport, while emissions generated during landing (3,000 feet) are Meanwhile, the percentage of renewable energy produced at our
Airport, Rotterdam The Hague Airport and Lelystad Airport are included in the carbon footprint of our airports. own sites rose to 4.0%. The energy efficiency is the result of more
still on track to become zero-emission airports by 2030. However, than 100 individual adjustments to the airport environment,
achieving our goal is more difficult due to the long lead time In general, CO₂e emissions account for about one third of the total including extending our use of LED lighting, replacing old
of projects. This includes phasing out the use of natural gas in climate impact of aviation. Non-CO₂ emissions have not yet been telecom and IT equipment, and upgrading our climate-control
all our offices and buildings. Since 2020, we have been taking quantified as further consideration is needed on how best to and heating, ventilation and air conditioning. Adjustments to the
steps along our roadmap to achieve this goal. To increase our address non-CO₂ climate impacts. climate settings have also been a improvement. The temperature
internal target, we have committed to the goals of the Dutch in the airport terminal was lowered by one degree in 2022 as a
Green Building Council and aim to align our commercial buildings Schiphol Group reports its Scope 3 carbon footprint in line with result of the energy crisis. Temperatures have also been lowered
with the climate commitments of the Paris Agreement by 2030. the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Protocol. The consolidated CO2e in office buildings and warehouses, and all climate settings have
footprint of Schiphol Group for 2022 is available. been optimised. We continued this througout 2023.
ACA Level 5 and SBTi
In December 2023, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Eindhoven In September 2023 Schiphol has obtained SBTi validation for Despite these measures, our energy consumption increased in
Airport and Rotterdam The Hague Airport (RTHA) reached the scope 1, 2 and 3 targets. 2023 compared to the previous year, but remained below the
highest level of the Airport Carbon Accreditation (ACA), level level of 2019. This is due to the continued recovery in passenger
5. To reach this level, an airport must reach and maintain a net The ACI ACA accreditation and SBTi validation show that we are numbers and the further electrification of mobility and power
zero carbon balance on scope 1 and 2, and address scope 3 taking the necessary steps towards becoming the world's most for aircraft through fixed power units and mobile electric ground
emission sources. This thus means that our absolute Scope 1 and sustainable airports. power units.
2 emissions have been reduced by 90% compared to 2010 for
Schiphol and Eindhoven and compared to 2019 for RTHA and is On track to become zero-emission airports by 2030 In 2023, the energy label was renewed for four areas of the
applying credible carbon removals for the residual emissions. In 2019, Schiphol Group introduced its Top Performance terminal. Each area showed an improvement over the previous
Indicators (TPIs), including the 'Sustainability' TPI, to monitor our label: Pier C now has a C label (previously G); T1 now has an A
The ACA certification also takes into account the work the three progress towards our 2030 zero-emissions target. The label (previously B); and Pier G now has an A+ label (previously
airports are doing with stakeholders to reduce indirect CO2e Sustainability TPI target (-62%) was met in 2023 (-65%), mainly C) and Pier E now has an A+ label (previously B). In addition, the
Scope 3 emissions in order to achieve a net-zero carbon footprint due to lower gas consumption, and HVO100 has been the default ISO 50001 (energy management) certification for all four of our
by 2050. fuel for airside ground operations since January 2023. Dutch airports was reviewed and renewed.
The majority of Schiphol Group's CO2e emissions stem from third- Going forward, we will continue with our renovation plans for
TPI sustainability 1
party (Scope 3) activities. These include aircraft landings and our buildings to phase out natural gas and continue to work with
In K tonnes CO2e
take-offs, aircraft handling and road traffic around the airport ground handlers and third parties to increase the proportion of
2023 2019 Change
site. CO2e emissions from kerosene for outbound flights are also electric ground support equipment used airside. The remaining
projects needed to decarbonise our operations will be more Royal Schiphol Group 18.02 51.2 -65%
challenging and we will also need to strengthen our energy grid Amsterdam Airport Schiphol 16.91 48.8 -65%
to support the transition to sustainability. Eindhoven Airport 0.94 1.2 -22%
Rotterdam the Hague Airport 0.13 1.1 -88%
Energy efficiency Lelystad Airport 0.04 0.1 -60%
In 2023, Schiphol Airport’s energy-efficiency rating was 4.0% 1 The TPI is based on the emissions from gas consumption, Fuel consumption, Fire
brigade emissions, electricity usage, ground support equipment and the single
based on our projected energy usage for the year, equalling our
tenant energy usage (scope 3). RSG aims to reduce emissions from these sources to
a minimum by 2030.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 43
During the year, the Netherlands tightened national legislation In 2023, we carried out technical research to support the final
on energy saving. Schiphol Group complied with the new design of the centralised thermal energy storage system that will
standards by reporting, before 1 December 2023, on the serve the Outlook and Avioport buildings at Schiphol and the
measures already taken during the year and the measures Schiphol Group head office. We also started installing heat pumps
planned for the coming years. Although a number of the energy- to prepare the buildings for the new system. The contract for the
saving measures required by the updated legislation have been project management and construction of the system has been
implemented, we still need to make improvements. The Dutch awarded and work is scheduled to start in early 2024.
authorities will start their inspection rounds in 2024; accelerating
the implementation of the necessary measures will help us make Schiphol certifies its existing commercial properties to BREEAM
progress towards our energy-efficiency goals. In-Use, an environmental assessment method that enables
property investors, owners, managers and occupiers to identify
In 2024 Schiphol Airport will also begin piloting a performance and drive sustainable improvements in the operational
contracting solution for the terminal and piers. We aim to use the performance of their buildings. In 2023, we focused on
knowledge gained from the pilot to extend the solution to the implementing the latest BREEAM In-Use assessment framework
entire terminal complex, which we hope will improve the energy for a further batch of the 10 certified buildings in our
efficiency associated with this type of contracting by between Commercial/Schiphol Real Estate portfolio. The electricity purchased by Schiphol Group comes mainly from wind,
though the amount of solar is increasing.
10% and 15%.
Energy use commercial buildings In 2023, the solar panels at Schiphol Airport generated a total
Commercial buildings Size Electricity Natural gas of 2.3 million kWh. Due to fewer hours of sunlight during the
Twelve of our Commercial Real Estate offices have an A energy (x 1,000) (m²) (kWh) (m³)
year, the yield of the existing solar panels was slightly lower than
label or higher, while the remaining two offices have a C label. in 2022, at -9.9%. The solar energy generated on site in 2023 is
Schiphol HQ (SHG) 1 34 4,678 50
The labelling system represents the theoretical energy use of shown in the 'Solar energy per airport' table below.
the buildings, but we prefer to use the Paris Proof metric of Commercial Real Estate 2 587 42,141 2,318
kWh/m2/yr, which translates gas use into kWh. Using this metric, Solar energy per airport
1 Incl. datacenter
we expect to achieve an average of 70 in 2030, 10 years ahead
2 Excl. Rotterdam Airport Real Estate (RAV) Solar energy (kwh)
of the target set by the Dutch Green Building Council. In 2023, (x 1,000) generated on site in 2023
our real estate offices already average around 114 kWh/m2/yr, Renewable energy
a 22% reduction compared to the 147 kWh/m2/yr in 2019. The Renewable energy supports our carbon reduction programmes. Schiphol Airport 2,339
significant reduction between 2019 and 2023 is mainly due to Schiphol Group's electricity comes mainly from wind farms in the Eindhoven Airport 197
implementation of gas reducing measures like installation of Netherlands, and to a lesser extent from solar farms, although the Lelystad Airport 1 -
heatpumps and ATES (gasreduction was 43% compared to 2019). proportion of solar energy is increasing. The electricity purchased Rotterdam The Hague Airport 12,072
New measures are in the pipeline. for Rotterdam The Hague Airport comes from the solar park on
Unisun solar park at RTHA 698
the RTHA airport site. In 2023, green gas will account for 17% of
Meanwhile, the new Cargo Building, 17, was introduced. The Schiphol Group's total gas purchases and 100% of the gas used by 1 Data not available for 2023, we are working on getting the correct data for 2024
building has a BREEAM Excellent rating and is designed to Eindhoven Airport, RTHA and Lelystad Airport.
support the maximum number of solar panels on its roof. It is
also gas-free thanks to an aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES)
system, has a partially wooden support structure and is designed
for easy disassembly.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 44
Air pollution have become mandatory from the moment the Nature permit The measures that have had the greatest impact are those that
took effect. reduce taxiing times, which are responsible for the majority of
Schiphol Group is committed to reducing emissions that SVHC emissions.
could have a negative impact on the air quality at our Substances of Very High Concern (SVHCs)
airport sites and in the neighbouring communities. Air quality RIVM, the National Institute for Public Health and the Finally, there are limits for VOCs, which make up SVHC,
around Schiphol Airport is continuously monitored by the Environment, determines which substances are considered relative to the maximum takeoff mass (MTOW) of the aircraft.
government; the province of North Holland has three air quality nationally to be SVHCs (Substance of Very High Concern/Zeer These emission values are strictly monitored in Schiphol's
monitoring stations in the vicinity of the airport and publishes Zorgwekkende Stoffen, ZZS). Eight of the volatile organic Handhavingsrapportage and are published annually. The VOC
its measurements online. For 2023, Schiphol met all government compounds (VOCs) found in aircraft engine emissions are also figures have shown a steady decrease over the years, thanks to
air quality requirements (based on EU Directive 2008/50/EG) for SVHCs. The substances emitted into the environment by the the airlines' investment in fleet renewal, supported by Schiphol's
this category. aviation sector, including the most important VOCs, are published policy of reducing airport charges for quieter and cleaner aircraft.
annually on the Emissions Register (Emissieregistratie.nl).
RSG's air quality policy focuses on reducing emissions from
aircraft and fossil-fuel-powered vehicles in order to limit While there are no limit values for SVHCs emitted by aviation,
substances that affect the climate, the environment and human there are occupational exposure limits for workplace exposure
health. Schiphol focuses on a number of substances because they to chemicals classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to
require special attention, such as NOx and Substances of Very reproduction. These substances have similar properties to those
High Concern (SVHC), or because there is still much to learn about classified as SVHC. The Job Safety Analysis identified a number
them, such as ultrafine particles (UFPs). of exposure situations where we have not yet been able to
demonstrate that exposure is below the limit. Measurements
Nitrogen emissions (NOx) are required to establish compliance with the guidelines. These
Schiphol Group is committed to reducing our nitrogen measurements will be carried out in Q4 2023 and Q1 2024.
emissions, an ambition supported by the Nitrogen action Once it has been demonstrated that Schiphol complies with
plan (Actieprogramma stikstof) launched in early 2020 and the guidelines, these guidelines will be incorporated into
secured in the Most Sustainable Airports roadmap. In September occupational health and safety standards to ensure the health
2023, the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and safety of employees. Air quality around Schiphol Airport is continuously monitored by the
granted Amsterdam Airport Schiphol a Nature conservation government. The province of North Holland has three air quality measuring
stations in the vicinity of the airport and publishes its measurements online.
permit (Natuurvergunning) under the Nature conservation act In addition, there is an obligation to minimise emissions for
(Wet Natuurbescherming). activities on the ground that emit SVHC (Activiteitenbesluit Art.
Ultrafine Particles (UFPs)
2.4, para. 1). Schiphol has submitted a complete Avoidance and
In the years leading up to 2023, several studies were carried
In areas where Schiphol’s nitrogen depositions exceed a historical Reduction Programma for SVHC which has been approved by the
out by external parties (RIVM), Schiphol and sector partners on
reference value, excess depositions must be mitigated. To do Environment Agency (Omgevingsdienst).
the exposure of residents and the surrounding area to UFPs
so, Schiphol is implementing a combination of internal and
(Ultrafine Particles). The results of these studies and external
external measures. In terms of internal measures, Schiphol Group There is no such obligation for emissions from aviation.
pressure, such as from the FNV, led to the establishment of a task
is reducing its own nitrogen emissions, for example through Nevertheless, Schiphol is committed to reducing SVHC emissions
force in early 2022, together with the sector parties, to carry out
the electrification of ground-handling equipment. In terms from the largest source: aircraft engines. In February 2023, TNO
further exposure and health studies among platform workers and
of external measures, third parties enter into an agreement published a study in which it calculated the emissions from Dutch
to investigate short and long-term measures to limit workers'
with Schiphol Group to lower or stop their deposition-causing airports. In this study, TNO mapped the possibilities for aviation to
exposure to UFPs and to minimise emissions.
activity in relevant areas. These internal and external measures reduce SVHC emissions, and Schiphol either has these measures
in place or already has plans to implement them in the future.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 45
In December 2022, this taskforce was renamed the Aircraft and or exposure to these emissions. Ten stationary UFP sensors have programme to minimise employee exposure to UFPs from aircraft
Diesel Engine Emissions (VDME) programme, and this sector been installed at this location to measure the amount of UFP and and diesel engines.
collaboration includes dnata, Viggo, KLM, Axxicom, Menzies, provide a baseline against which Schiphol can test the effect of
Aviapartner, Swissport, Heijmans, BAM, VolkerInfra and the various measures. VDME focus area 3: Minimising aircraft and diesel
Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management. The aim of the engine emissions
VDME programme is to minimise the exposure of employees to In July, we introduced a policy of periodic occupational health Ultimately, the reduction of VDME must be achieved by reducing
the UFPs as part of VDME in order to create a safe and healthy examinations (PAGO) enabling employees to apply for an aircraft and diesel engine emissions in the first place. This can be
working environment. To this end, three main areas of focus have examination by health professionals to determine possible health done either by keeping engines off for as long as possible, such
been identified to group together current and future actions. effects due to exposure to emissions from kerosene or diesel- as with our APU action plan, or by electrifying the vehicle fleet
powered engines. As there was no existing PAGO for aircraft and airport equipment. In order to be able to substitute certain
For all measures of the VDME programme, the sector parties emissions, it was developed by an external party at the request of diesel or kerosene emission, Schiphol is working on the provision
are regularly updated on the progress and for each measure the VDME programme/steering committee and will be organised of electricity on airside. This is a complex project, but crucial for the
a selected group of the sector is actively involved in the on a regular basis. The first PAGO was carried out in November. reduction of emissions.
development and implementation of the measures. Schiphol In addition, all information and knowledge gathered by Schiphol
plays a leading and central role in the VDME programme. In or its partners is available to employees via VDME e-learning in Auxiliary power units (APU) action plan
addition, Schiphol has received two sets of demands (Deelbesluit the Schiphol Learning Hub. This training will be updated as new Schiphol has submitted an auxiliary power units (APU's) action
1 en Voorgenomen Deelbesluit 2) from the Dutch Labour information becomes available and will be shared with all parties plan to the Human Environment and Transport Inspectorate (ILT),
Inspectorate (NLA), which it must comply with regarding the in the sector. with input from the airport’s partners, with the aim of reducing
health conditions of employees in relation to VDME. Schiphol the use of APUs by aircraft parked on the apron. APUs run on
has submitted an objection (bezwaar) to part 1 (diesel engine VDME focus area 2: Minimising employee exposure kerosene and cause harmful emissions as well as noise nuisance
emissions) and a response (zienswijze) on part 2 (kerosene to emissions for apron workers.
emissions). We are currently awaiting final decisions. At the same During the summer of 2023, Schiphol carried out a pilot project
time, Schiphol is in constant contact with the NLA about the with respiratory protection equipment to investigate which Schiphol considers reducing the use of APUs to be a priority
progress of the measures in the VDME programme that meet face masks offer the best possible protection and comfort for because it will make a concrete improvement to the health and
the requirements. continuous use. The results of the pilot led to consultations with working conditions of apron workers. It will also help to reduce
the manufacturers to further develop the equipment to achieve CO2e emissions of aviation as a whole.
VDME focus area 1: Understanding the behaviour and the best possible protection.
(health) consequences of UFPs Aviapartner, dnata, KLM and Schiphol have joined forces to
In August and September 2023, the Institute for Risk In addition, a dedicated Sustainable Ground Movement Task optimise the use of existing electric preconditioned air (PCAs)
Assessment Sciences (IRAS) conducted an exposure study with Force has been established in collaboration with the Integral units at Schiphol. This has had an immediate positive impact
all stakeholders in the sector, measuring the personal exposure Safety Management System (ISMS) partners to develop and on airside working conditions. All ground handlers can use
of airside employees over the course of a day. Employees from coordinate actions in the operational ground movement the electric PCAs. Two e-PCAs are mounted on the passenger
different functional groups wore a sensor on their uniform to processes of the ISMS partners. boarding bridge at F03 and G04, which is a new way of working
measure their exposure to UFPs during a normal working day. for the handlers and the first reactions are positive, especially
Results are expected in the first quarter of 2024. This includes the development of a new ground movement regarding the working conditions. Schiphol has ordered more
concept for 2030. It focuses on reducing and maintaining e-PCAs to ensure that all wide-body stands are equipped with
To gain knowledge about the specific UFPs at airside, a occupational risks from kerosene engine emissions at an an e-PCA by the summer of 2024. In parallel, we're working on
research laboratory was officially opened in September 2023. acceptable level, while maintaining operational safety. These e-PCAs for narrowbody stands as well.
The laboratory is located on two gates and can carry out all kinds are just a few examples of the 23 measures in the VDME
of experiments to test possible measures to reduce emissions
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 46
The text of the Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) has Our partners have also expanded their electrical equipment. Unfortunately, pre-ordered app taxi services (638.085 rides) are
been updated with further restrictions regarding the use of APUs Viggo has purchased an electric pushback for wide-body aircraft, still mostly executed by traditional fossil fuel-powered vehicles
before take-off. This update went into effect in late December and KLM has purchased a number of pushbacks for narrow-body (81%). Schiphol is working with the parties responsible for those
2023. ILT monitors the use of APUs on a weekly basis and warns aircraft. Axxicom introduced 10 electric buses to transport people services to change that towards a more sustainable outcome by
airlines if they fail to comply. Schiphol is working with handlers with reduced mobility to and from the aircraft. Combined Refuel 2026 – and plans to implement a zero-emission zone for taxi’s by
and airlines to implement the changed procedures to comply Services (CRS) made a first with the electric hydrant dispenser for 2026.
with the AIP. We have developed a campaign to raise awareness refuelling aircraft. We are proud to be working with such
among handlers and cockpit crews about why APU use must committed partners towards zero emission ground operations Equipment pooling
be minimised. and improving local working conditions. At Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, six general handlers provide
ground-handling services to airlines. Each handler currently uses
Electric equipment Clean mobility its own ground support equipment (GSE) for ramp handling and
Schiphol aims to achieve zero CO2e emissions on airside by 2030. Schiphol Group supports the use of clean mobility solutions, transports its GSE from one aircraft stand to another, even if an
By phasing out fossil fuels we will also reduce emissions of NOx, whether through its own fleet or that of companies operating on aircraft is located at a different pier.
SVHC and UFP. The majority of the fleet is already electric or the airport site.
has the best diesel engine where no electric equivalent is yet Transporting GSEs by vehicle creates unnecessary movements
available. In addition to vehicles, Ground Service Equipment Taxis on airside access roads and around aircraft stands, resulting in
(GSE) is also being replaced with electric equivalents, such as Since December 2023 100% of the taxi rides that depart from the increased congestion and safety risks. To mitigate these risks,
electric Ground Power Units (e-GPUs) and e-PCA units. This taxi stand at Schiphol airport are zero-emission. A great Schiphol, in cooperation with the ground handlers, conducted a
is being done in cooperation with the industry parties and milestone, which Schiphol has been striving to achieve over the pilot project in 2023 to test the operational feasibility of sharing
KES, with KLM and Schiphol owning the e-PCAs that the last decade, starting with the introduction of sustainable taxi- GSE between all six handlers: equipment pooling. The pilot
industry parties use. Due to innovation, delivery times and vehicles by Schiphol's official taxi concession holders Bios Group took place between January and August at six aircraft stands
required infrastructure implementations, the timeline for all GSE (ZCN), Schiphol Taxi (BBF) and Schiphol Service (Willemsen de at Pier D (D16-D28). The GSE used in the pilot included passenger
replacements is ongoing until 2030. Koning) in 2014. In the years since, the independent taxi stairs, conveyors and powerstows, all electrically powered. One
operators that are active from the taxi stand via the taxi control of the lessons learned from the pilot was that sufficient charging
foundation (STC) have also been stimulated to switch to a zero- facilities and space at and around the aircraft stands is essential
emission vehicle. A process that has now been successfully for the successful implementation of charging infrastructure,
completed. leading to a rapid roll-out at the stands. Together with the ground
handlers, we will determine the next steps to implement a more
Together, Schiphol’s concession holders operate a fleet of 177 permanent equipment pooling strategy at Schiphol Airport, with
electric taxi cabs and vans from the official taxi stand. The fleet of a focus on equipment at the stands.
the independent taxi operators includes a further 772 zero-
emissions vehicles, among which 154 electric vans and 1 Cleaner fuels
hydrogen-powered taxi. In total, 949 electric taxis are currently In January 2023, KLM Equipment Services switched all airside
operating from the official taxi stand. This number has risen equipment from GTL to HVO100 fuel in order to reduce
significantly this year, which reflects the recovery in demand for carbon emissions, in addition to the air quality benefits that
taxi services (post-Covid) and Schiphol’s ambition to strive for a GTL already offered. HVO100 is produced from biomass and
zero-emission taxi rank at the airport. Consequently, more than reduces emissions by more than 89% compared to the GTL
93% of the 868.192 taxi rides from the taxi stand were carried out production process.
by zero-emissions vehicles in 2023.
Since December 2023, 100% of the taxi rides that depart from the taxi stand
at Schiphol are zero-emission.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 47
Schiphol Group supports the use of clean mobility solutions, whether These new developments support the long-term course set
through its own fleet or that of companies operating on the airport site. out by Schiphol Group and the wider aviation sector in the
Netherlands. Our shared target is to reduce carbon emissions
Supporting electric vehicles generated by the Dutch aviation industry to 2005 levels or lower
In 2023, Schiphol implemented a charge point operator platform.
by 2030. Meanwhile, we are committed to reaching the targets
More than 300 existing and new AC chargers have been added to
set by the Paris Agreement and the Dutch Climate Agreement.
a new management software platform and are ready for future
This will include continuing to encourage measures such as
growth. In addition to these chargers, the first DC fast charger
distance-related taxiing, encouraging train travel for shorter
has been installed at Rotterdam The Hague Airport, achieving
distances, fleet renewal, increasing synthetic and bio-kerosene,
proof of concept. At Schiphol Airport we will install a multitude
and introducing hybrid/electric propulsion.
of DC fast chargers over the next few years, starting in 2024 with
the P3 shuttle bus (Q2), trucks at Truck Parking 3 (Q3) and airside
Supporting the EU Green Deal
vehicles (Q4). This important turning point provides an important
Schiphol Group supports the EU Commission’s Fit for 55 climate Flying with Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is the most effective measure on
foundation for scaling the eMobility offering to approximately the short term to succesfully decarbonise air travel and achieve the climate
package, which sets a minimal 6% SAF blending target from 2030
10,000 chargers with an expected equivalent capacity of 220 goals for 2050 and beyond.
onwards with strong increases in subsequent years. The package
megawatts by 2030.
includes a specific target for the use of synthetic fuel. The EU
Promoting production capacity and the use of SAF
Member States and European Parliament have agreed on most
We also faced capacity issues on the energy grid in 2023. A Since 2022, Schiphol Group has received a continuous supply
of the proposals of the Fit for 55 climate package to enable the
number of projects, such as the rollout of (fast) chargers, have of SAF by Neste and KLM into the storage and hydrant facility
overall target on transport fuels in 2030. The current proposal
been postponed due to these capacity problems. However, of Aircraft Fuel Supply, while in 2023 SAF deliveries were made
is to reach a 14.5% CO2e intensity improvement, which will be
further research in 2023 shows that with the deployment of smart to multiple airlines operating at Schiphol Airport, including Air
implemented across each Member State in 2024. Schiphol Group,
dynamic load balancing technologies, we can use our reserved France, Delta, KLM, Qatar, Ryanair, Transavia and United.
together with the Dutch aviation sector and Dutch government,
capacity much more efficiently. Therefore, this will become the
supports the Dutch aviation industry-wide target to achieve a
new development standard in 2024 to continue our roll out. In total, over 40,000 tonnes of SAF was delivered, making the
14% SAF blend by 2030.
airport one of the leading SAF hubs in the world.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 48
Schiphol Group partners with Port of Amsterdam, SkyNRG Supporting long-term solutions
and KLM in Synkero BV, a start-up focused on developing a In addition to promoting the use of SAF, other non-drop-in
commercial SAF production facility in Amsterdam. By 2030, sources of sustainable energy will be needed to reach net-zero
Synkero BV aims to produce 50,000 tonnes of SAF to help aviation emissions by 2050. These solutions include renewable
meet the SAF volumes mandated by EU proposals. We plan electricity and green hydrogen. Together with manufacturers
to supplement the volumes provided through the start-up by such as Airbus, Pipistrel and ZeroAvia, Schiphol Group is involved
encouraging SAF supplies from producers such as Neste, Shell in initiatives to develop the long-term infrastructure for liquid
and Argent Energy, provided sustainable and scalable feedstocks hydrogen, which is a precondition to deliver sufficient energy for
are used. aircraft that can carry up to 100 passengers within Europe or
beyond. The extreme cooling of hydrogen to minus 250 degrees
In addition, in 2023 we set up an experience centre at Schiphol Celsius requires new methods of transport and storage at airports.
Airport to increase awareness among passengers, together with
airlines and the aviation fuel industry. Meanwhile, Rotterdam The Schiphol Group will test the use of hydrogen in the TULIPs project
Hague Airport (RTHA), working with SkyNRG and CHOOOSE, has by storing it temporarily and fuelling a drone at RTHA. In 2023, Schiphol is working with a consortium that is taking steps towards the
introduced a tool to enable travellers to fly more sustainably by we continued to research different options for the storage and operational roll-out of sustainable taxiing.
replacing fossil fuels with SAF via the ‘book and claim’ principle. transport of liquid hydrogen.
to the strategic roadmap, detailing the scale-up of sustainable
taxiing until 2030. Scaling efforts will build on the learnings via
Moreover, Zenid, a consortium of various pioneering partners in These ambitions are only possible with sufficient renewable
the showcase that was executed through the two TaxiBots owned
technology and aviation (RTHA as part of RSG, RHIA, SkyNRG, energy and new supply chains. Schiphol Group has joined with
by Schiphol Airport. It is an opportunity to drastically lower fuel
Climeworks), has the ambition to build a demonstration plant the Port of Amsterdam, Tata Steel and various supply chain
consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, local UFP levels and
producing fully circular sustainable aviation fuel directly from air. partners to scale up the regional availability of green hydrogen
noise disturbance caused by ground operations.
With the technological developments necessary for building the over the coming decade. Achieving our goal depends on the
demonstration plant being uncertain in delivery, the consortium availability of renewable energy for ramping up local production,
Schiphol and KLM are continuing their collaboration on a
is reevaluating its course and direction. There is no indication on the connection to the national grid and focusing on international
European Level as part of the EU-subsidised HERON consortium,
how this consortium will develop in the future. imports to identify the areas in which the production of green
which aims to drive sustainability by reducing CO2e emissions
hydrogen is most feasible.
related to airport operations. Within the context of HERON,
New SAF incentives in the coming years
Schiphol Group successfully established sustainable taxiing as
In 2023, we continued to expand the incentive scheme The TULIPS project has set up demonstrations with green
SESAR solution. We also continue to work with EUROCONTROL
introduced in 2022 to encourage the use of SAF by airlines at hydrogen to charge aircraft and equipment and alleviate the high
to align recommendations to implement sustainable taxiing
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. In 2023, 12,500 tonnes of SAF was electricity demand at airports. In addition, RTHA and ZeroAvia
across Europe and develop European operational standards for
subsidised at the airport, more than doubling the volume of 2022. have planned a hydrogen flight from London to Rotterdam in
TaxiBot operations.
Meanwhile, the joint efforts of Schiphol Group and its partners 2024.
in the EU TULIPS project will also contribute to the scaling up of
SAF at EU airports. Some of the initiatives being explored over Sustainable taxiing Wildlife trafficking
Schiphol Group works with various sector partners as well as
the coming three years include creating new supply channels Schiphol is working with a consortium to take steps towards the
Airports Council International (ACI) to fight wildlife trafficking.
for e-fuels, enabling large-scale supply options and introducing operational roll-out of sustainable taxiing at Amsterdam Airport
As traffickers often use aircraft to smuggle their goods, airlines
potential SAF incentives at other EU airports. Schiphol. The consortium includes Corendon, dnata, KLM, LVNL,
and airports are ideally positioned to help combat trafficking by
Swissport, Transavia, TUI and Viggo. While the ambition of
training staff to recognise and deal with trafficking situations,
eliminating all avoidable taxiing-related emissions remains
raising awareness by providing information to the public and
unchanged, the consortium members have submitted an update
through partnerships in the supply chain.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 49
In 2023, we continued our activities as chair of the ACI Wildlife we use. Our goals are to achieve zero waste by 2030 and full Towards a fully circular 2050
Trafficking Task Force, including by sharing our case study on circularity by 2050. The new circular system and the programme The 2030 Roadmap helps us to become zero waste. However, with
the prevention of wildlife trafficking with our stakeholders and to implement it are currently being developed. Among other increasing resource scarcity and the risk this poses to business
fellow task force members. We also organised a workshop for things, we are planning the following initiatives. continuity, we need to embrace a circular model that makes the
ACI World Environment Standing Committee (WEnSC) members best use of material resources. To realise our new system and our
about wildlife detection scanning equipment and participated Separation rate 2050 goals, we must act now, in parallel with the implementation
in a conference on the revised EU Action Plan against Wildlife For the operational residual streams that are part of Material Flow of the 2030 Roadmap.
Trafficking 2022-2027 hosted by the European Commission. Management, the separation rate was 46.5% in 2023. Although
Meanwhile, at Schiphol Airport, we worked with retail outlets to the focus was on source separation, there was a successful post- Materials are becoming scarce and expensive due to increasing
ban the sale of packaged eel in the food stores of our lounges. Eel separation pilot from summer 2022 to April 2023, which demand, insufficient reuse and depletion of these finite
products can be bought legally in the EU but cannot be exported. increased the waste separation rate. From May 2023, it has no resources. The linear 'take-make-waste' approach depletes
longer been possible to continue post-separation in the pilot available materials and fails to maximise material value. Focusing
form. We are focusing on separation at source by encouraging on recycling alone, while maintaining a linear approach, will not
Circularity passengers to put waste in the right bin and working with deliver sufficient results. We need to manage both input and
business partners to avoid certain products (and prevent waste output in a systemic way that requires a paradigm shift in the way
In a circular economy, we aim to create, maintain and enhance from being generated). we manage our materials, recognising their inherent value.
the value of resources in harmony with the environment. There is
no waste; instead, resources continuously cycle from one use to Improving the value chain From operational residuals to
another. Each resource serves a purpose in one application and, To meet our zero-waste goals and advance our circular transition operational resources
once it has completed its role, it becomes a valuable input for by 2050, Schiphol Group must focus on optimising our value In 2023, we continued our efforts in Work Package 6 – Circular
another, higher-value use. Achieving this requires us to address chain, asset lifecycles and material flows. In 2023, we continued Airports, as part of TULIPS. Our aim is to minimise passenger
inefficiencies at every stage of the resource value chain. to apply our zero-waste and circularity policies. waste and maximise the reuse of secondary materials in
construction. Throughout the year, we measured our operational
Our approach prioritises reducing material consumption and A significant organisational development this year was teaming waste streams and assessed their environmental footprint. We
enhancing the next-life application of residual materials for up with Renewi/Seenons as our new material flow management have made two relevant results available to the public: the
future life cycles. We also aim to minimise the environmental partner for operational streams. In addition, establishing the Circularity Performance Management System and the Airport
impact of the processes and the consumption of the materials Sustainability and Energy Management team within Asset Circularity Baseline Study. These results are crucial for prioritising
Management marks a pivotal shift towards a systematic, KPI- residual streams and defining concrete, specific actions to reduce
Percentage of separated operational residual flows 1 driven circularity model, moving away from an approach that is passenger waste.
(per year at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol) driven by the project level.
75
In June 2023, we started working with Renewi and Seenons
Currently, organising data on our residual streams and at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and Rotterdam The Hague
forecasting their future trajectory poses a challenge. This year, our Airport, and with Remondis, our material flow management
50
focus is on several flagship projects that demonstrate how partner, at Eindhoven Airport. In this new approach, we treat
Schiphol is putting its circularity ambitions into practice. As the our operational residuals as materials. We have worked with
25 following examples illustrate, our primary emphasis is on partners along the value chain and collected relevant data to
preserving or enhancing the value of resources, while actively assess and prioritise streams (also in collaboration with TULIPS
44.5 50.3 48.7 52.3 46.5
avoiding downcycling and waste generation. Work Package 6).
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
We already know that residual waste, cabin waste, plastics in construction projects at Schiphol and has the greatest impact
and food waste have a big impact in terms of weight and on CO2e emissions.
environmental footprint (including CO2e), so we are taking
concrete measures to reduce these streams and increase the value At the concrete recycling plant at Zonnekruidweg at Schiphol
for their next use. For example, in addition to the introduction Airport, we will collect demolished concrete from the Schiphol
of a deposit on PET bottles (July 2021), Schiphol Airport has also ecosystem and process it into recycled concrete materials. In the
been offering a deposit on cans since 1 April 2023. Although coming years, we want to process more and more demolished
Schiphol is not legally obliged to provide return facilities, we are concrete into high-quality circular concrete. By using circular
motivated to voluntarily facilitate such initiatives in line with our concrete, we can save CO2e emissions in the polluting concrete
goal of achieving zero waste by 2030. Our goal is to offer travellers supply chain. In addition, we can secure our own supply of high-
the option to either donate the deposit or receive a 0.15 euro quality concrete for the future, which is particularly beneficial
refund via an app. We are currently exploring the feasibility of this given our project portfolio (e.g. Terminal South, Pier C).
initiative to contribute to our broader sustainability goals.
Examples of the circular transition
In addition to these actions, we are also defining the monitoring In the Checkpoint 90 project, we shifted from using traditional
system to start managing circularity. Systematic data collection, design methods to circular design principles. The Quebec Project
Doorlaatpost 90 is biobased, meaning that the construction materials,
visualisation and analysis with relevant KPIs is a framework that exemplifies this transition by adopting an integrated sustainable
predominantly wood, have a natural origin, enabling the reuse of materials
will be in place in 2024 for our operational residual streams. approach that enables the creation of a circular building using in future contruction projects.
reused materials from existing cargo buildings on-site. The
Plastic road circularity of a building is quantified using the Building Circularity Another great example is the 'Zwanenburg Runway'. This project
In 2023, we conducted a trial on airside with a road composed Index (BCI). The BCI target for the Checkpoint 90 project was 60%. ensures the operational availability of the runway for the next
entirely out of recycled plastic from our airport. Although The project successfully achieved a BCI of 68%. In particular, seven years. Major maintenance was required to ensure reliability
Schiphol itself was not dissatisfied with the results of the trial, the various secondary materials were used, including steel for the and prevent the risk of breakdowns. Assets on the runway could
organisation that developed the initiative has stopped. We are roof, doors, lighting, sanitary facilities, counters and emergency no longer be safely maintained and had to be replaced in
therefore not continuing with the test. equipment. accordance with legislation and regulations. About 60 percent of
the removed asphalt from the runway has been reused in the
Partnerships In addition to the use of secondary materials, the project newly laid asphalt and several parts, such as the fixtures, have
To measure the sustainability performance of our suppliers and emphasises forward-looking practices. Checkpoint 90 is designed been refurbished for use during upcoming projects. In addition,
partners, we are implementing the Global Sustainable Enterprise to be demountable, allowing materials to be reused in future the released materials that could not be used at Schiphol, were
Systems. This tool enables us to also select partners we work with construction projects. This approach underlines a commitment collected separately as much as possible so they can be used at
based on sustainability by actively monitoring and tracking their not only to circularity in the present, but also to sustainability and other locations.
level of circularity at product, project and overall company level. the reuse of materials for future endeavours.
In addition, the cargo apron, called Sierra, will be extended with
From construction residuals to Checkpoint 90 is bio-based, meaning that the construction three aircraft stands. Work started in 2023 and will be completed
construction resources materials, mainly wood, and other materials used in the building in 2024. Three major improvements have taken place. First, we
Circular construction materials are of natural origin. Energy is generated locally as the canopy is have reduced the thickness of the pavement foundation at the
According to our sustainability roadmap, approximately 1% of made up of over 1,100 German bifacial solar panels. – which is front of the apron by 20%. This was possible because this area has
all construction residual streams in the Netherlands come from almost enough for the building to become zero net (energy lower surface loads, saving 720m³ of concrete or the equivalent of
Schiphol. Concrete is the building material most frequently used neutral). 60 lorries.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 51
Second, we reconsidered the need for a new emergency power or activities. Schiphol has several measures in place to minimise site treatment. This year, a first flush system was installed on the
station. By looking at similar situations and data, we eliminated the impact. first phase of the new Quebec taxiway viaduct.
the need for an additional building with a diesel generator.
Measures At a busy airport, spills from equipment or activities do occur.
Third, as the aprons are used day and night, we need lights there. Schiphol is continuously improving the quality of surface water, Schiphol has put in place an appropriate system to control and
Normally we would have built 25 lights, but by defining the apron in particular by minimising the harmful effects of de-icing and ice clean up these spills as quickly as possible. Most spills are directly
more precisely we only needed 18 lights, without compromising control measures. This includes both more economical spraying cleaned after they are reported, minimising the risk of spills
on compliance and functionality. All these measures together and the use of sustainable alternatives such as potassium contaminating our surface water.
mean that we're using less material, producing fewer emissions formate. Source reduction measures focus on the more
and using less energy. economical use of both aircraft de-icing and snow and ice control Future developments
agents. Schiphol has developed a new strategy to convert the existing
storm water sewer and build a treatment plant on the airport
Water pollution Handling agents use monopropylene glycol (glycol) for aircraft in order to collect and process potassium formate contaminated
de-icing and potassium formate for ice control on asphalt. Glycol runoff from existing taxiways, runways and aprons. This will be a
At Schiphol Airport, we have a separate sewer system that has the greatest impact on oxygen demand in surface waters and long-term, 10-15-year strategy as all existing facilities will need to
transports wastewater (mainly sanitary wastewater) from is therefore collected as much as possible after aircraft de-icing be upgraded.
buildings to an on-site treatment plant. The rainwater system, through infrastructural and operational measures. Glycol is
including all rainfall from paved areas (including buildings), flows collected both at the Central De-Icing Facility and at the gates. Next year, projects on the Romeo and Sierra platforms will have a
directly to the surface water. In winter, measures to keep aircraft first flush installation.
free of ice and to keep snow and ice off taxiways, runways and Use and collection of de-icing fluids in winter 2022-2023
aprons affect the quality of surface water. The de-icing agents (mild winter)
used are biodegradable and remove oxygen from the water. Winter 2022-2023
Other risks of water pollution come from spills from equipment
Potassium formate 1,121,000 litres
Glycol 784,000 litres
Collected glycol-water mix 9,309,000 litres
Climate Adaptation Strategy Improvements have been made to Schiphol's primary water Noise
In 2022, Schiphol conducted research into the effects of the models. The stormwater model and the surface water model have
changing climate on our airports, the outcome of which was been seamlessly integrated into a single framework, improving Noise disturbance from air traffic remained a key issue in our
our Climate Adaptation Strategy. This strategy, which focuses on the airport's ability to accurately predict outcomes during various discussions with the local community in 2023. Schiphol adheres to
extreme weather events, is in line with the latest scientific findings weather events. Among the ongoing projects, the construction the agreements in place to minimise the impact of our activities
of the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) and the of Cargo Building 17 stands out as a significant effort, with on local residents, such as keeping the number of annual aircraft
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In October a substantial water storage area being excavated. At Schiphol movements (ATMs) below 500,000 in 2023 (of which 32,000 can
2023, the KNMI published new climate scenarios. These findings Centre, the completion of the drainage work on the Handelskade take place between 23.00 and 07.00). Owing to the sustained
were already incorporated into Schiphol's research in 2022 with has increased rainwater capacity. With the renovation of the impact of COVID-19, 430,842 ATMs were recorded in the 2023
the help of the KNMI. In 2023, we worked on translating the 2022 Zwanenburg Runway, the drainage systems were extended to operating year (compared to 497,303 in the pre-COVID-19 year
climate adaptation strategy to the business units. meet our new standards for rainwater capacity. 2019); 24,533 of these took place at night.
We have all observed a shift in our climate patterns: summers are Water management Reducing noise disturbance
noticeably warmer and winters milder. As global temperatures Water management at Schiphol is largely controlled by Rijnland Schiphol and Air Traffic Control the Netherlands (LVNL)
rise, we are experiencing longer drought periods during summer. Water Authority, which manages the pumps and intakes to keep are working on a noise-disturbance reduction programme
However, we are also witnessing more extreme rainfall events the polder dry or to allow freshwater in during periods of low called minderhinderschiphol.nl. The programme consists of
in both the summer and winter periods. This increase in water. The waterways are maintained by Schiphol Airport and, 44 measures to reduce noise disturbance in the region
precipitation is a direct result of the warmer air’s enhanced in cooperation with Rijnland Water Authority, we monitor the surrounding the airport, which have been put together in
capacity to hold water vapour, a consequence of ongoing global operation of the water system and take preventive and corrective consultation with local authorities and residents, as well as other
warming. Schiphol Group has been proactively implementing measures when necessary. stakeholder groups.
the measures detailed in the Climate Adaptation Strategy.
These initiatives focus mainly on water management and Addressing heat-related problems
heat mitigation. Higher temperatures and prolonged exposure to them can cause
heat-related problems. Heat is a pressing climate risk for Schiphol
In 2023, we developed a new set of asset and design requirements Group airports, but unlike flooding, it is one with which we in the
for projects dealing with climate adaptation, based on regional Netherlands have less experience. For this reason, the measures
standards. These new requirements are now being incorporated are mainly in the research phase.
into major projects such as the new baggage cellar and Pier C.
We are currently assessing the need to modify the comfort
Water storage plan requirements for hot days in the terminal buildings. Ongoing
To manage future water volumes and prevent flooding, a discussions with our main contractors are also focusing on airside
comprehensive water storage plan has been developed, with flooring considerations. We are discussing the frequency of
specific projects tailored to each drainage area within the airport implementation of existing thermal protocols and assessing their
site. This approach ensures dry conditions today and safeguards impact on future scenarios.
against future water-related challenges. We are focusing on
increasing buffer capacity, increasing storage capacity, increasing In order to adapt to the warmer climate with extreme hot days,
natural infiltration areas and speeding up water run-off. we have linked current labour laws and regulations to our 2023 Noise disturbance due to air traffic remained a central topic in our
dicussions with the local community in 2023.
Climate Adaptation Policy, resulting in a revision of the catalogue
of occupational health and safety for workers at our airport.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 54
Three measures were implemented in 2023. These included the calculation method. However, the current regulations still require Lden noise contours
introduction of a ban on the noisiest aircraft, which provides a the older NRM method, the results of which are shown below.
legal basis to ban aircraft with an effective perceived noise of -10
dB. Some examples of aircraft subtypes that can now be banned The figure ‘Lden noise contours’ depicts the contours for 2023
include subtypes of the Airbus A321, Airbus A300 Freighter and (between 1 November 2022 and 31 October 2023) as purple and
Boeing 767-200 Freighter. green lines. The contours highlight the areas where the average
noise exposure from aircraft is greater than 48 and 58 dB(a)
Another measure is the combined implementation of RECAT- respectively.
EU with Time-Based Separation. This implementation helps
us to improve the tactical hourly capacity and operational Local Community Contact Centre: A work in progress
resilience under all circumstances at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Bewoners Aanspreekpunt Schiphol (‘Local Community Contact
especially under strong headwind conditions. By maintaining a Centre’; BAS) provides local residents with information on various
high tactical hourly capacity in this type of weather, relatively topics related to the daily operation of Schiphol. The contact
more aircraft can be handled from the noise preferential centre also registers noise nuisance reports and complaints from
Polderbaan and Kaagbaan Runways, which cause relatively less local residents. The knowledge gained from the BAS reports
inconvenience to the local population than the other runways. supports our ongoing efforts to reduce noise disturbance and
improve the living environment around the airport. The website
During the year, we also completed two evaluations of measures. for Schiphol’s noise reduction programme,
The curved night approach to the Zwanenburgbaan from the minderhinderschiphol.nl , explains how BAS data is being used to satisfaction survey will be repeated annually. One of the other
north to reduce the noise impact on the residents of Assendelft develop and evaluate noise-reduction measures. improvements we are working on is transferring reports on flights
and the higher night approach to the Polderbaan. The combined to and from Schiphol made at the Rotterdam-The Hague Airport
evaluation showed that more than 75% of the traffic flew Behind the scenes, we continue to focus on increasing the counter to Schiphol’s reporting system and vice versa.
the new curved approach to the Zwanenburgbaan, which was capacity of BAS, but this remains a challenge in the tight labour The BAS website can be used to report (noise) disturbances.
significantly more than the expected 45%. This resulted in market. In 2023, BAS presented a satisfaction survey for the first These reports are registered by BAS and forwarded to Schiphol,
less noise being measured at the NOMOS measuring points in time and has taken up some of its recommendations. The LVNL, the Ministry of I&W and municipalities in the region. These
Assendelft and Castricum.
parties use the data as input for the development of policies and Engaging with our neighbours To give residents more background information on runway
measures to reduce disturbance. The disturbance reports also Direct engagement with the community is an important maintenance, we have published a summary of the runway
provide input for Schiphol's noise reduction programme 'Minder responsibility for a major airport in a densely populated area. maintenance strategy on the website, in which we have
Hinder’ and also serve as input for Schiphol Airport’s plans to be To rebuild the lack of trust our neighbours have in our sought an optimal balance between the impact on our
quieter, cleaner and better and in balance with the environment. ambitions, we need to create awareness and understanding residents, the aviation sector and the technical feasibility of the
In particular, several of the measures in the ‘eight-point plan’: the of our vision and commitments. To enhance this engagement, maintenance. In 2023, we carried out major maintenance on the
night closure, the ban on noisy aircraft and the ban on private jets. we are continuously improving our communication channels, Zwanenburgbaan Runway. We informed residents, journalists
messages and information to be relevant and transparent. We and other parties in advance about the work and its impact
Rise in number of complaints regularly update our website for local residents and send out on the surrounding area. During the maintenance, we took a
In 2023, the number of complaints (199,960) increased by our monthly newsletter with information on various topics that selected group of residents and journalists to the maintenance
15% compared to 2022, while the number of complainants affect our local residents, such as runway maintenance, noise site to explain the work in more detail. Moreover, we had the
(10,724) increased by 1,9% (within the so-called focus group). The disturbance measures and new operational procedures. Schiphol opportunity to provide De Stichting Hoogvliegers with a unique
total number of flight movements from/to Amsterdam Airport publishes a bi-weekly air traffic outlook, which contains forecasts runway drive. Looking forward we also worked on the planning
Schiphol increased by 11% in 2023 compared to the previous year. for air traffic movements and runway use. In 2023, Schiphol for the maintenance of the Kaagbaan Runway in 2024 and
For more extensive information and a detailed analysis regarding organised its traditional Neighbour Days. Schiphol welcomed started to prepare the communication campaign.
data, please visit bezoekbas.nl. 4,000 neighbours for a unique behind-the-scenes look at our
organisation and partners. Together with the Schiphol Aviation As ambassadors for the local community within our organisation,
Community (LCS), we have developed a vision for cooperation we discuss and develop measures to further reduce the impact
Engaging with our communities with educational institutions. We provide them with information on the surrounding area and set the agenda regarding the
via our 'Jij en Schiphol' website and participate in all kinds of importance of reducing the negative impact on our surroundings.
In April 2023, Schiphol Group made a strong commitment to school projects.
our neighbours by introducing an eight-point plan to be quieter, Monitoring Schiphol’s reputation
cleaner and better. In our balanced approach response of 20 June Research agency Motivaction provides regular insights into how
2023, we presented calculations using the ECAC Doc29 model, Schiphol is perceived by local residents as well as the general
which show that measures such as night curfews, phasing out public on issues such as communication, products, innovation,
private jets and banning the noisiest aircraft would improve our management and corporate social responsibility (CSR). In 2023,
neighbours’ quality of life. we observe a recovery in reputation scores showing clear
evidence of our progress in addressing the problems of the
As part of our eight-point plan, we have also proposed an previous year, such as the disruptions in operations, staff
Environmental Fund. Schiphol will provide a total of 70 million shortages, and working conditions at Schiphol. The reputation
euros (10 million euros per year), which will be used to improve score went up from a 6.5 in 2022 to a 6.7 in 2023.
the quality of life in the Schiphol Airport region. In 2023, we
finalised details about the programme and governance of the Schiphol Quality of Life Foundation
fund. The Environmental Fund is expected to be operational in The Stichting Leefomgeving Schiphol ('Schiphol Quality of Life
October 2024. Foundation') oversees three main initiatives: 1) an improvement
programme focused on area-specific projects, 2) a programme
focused on individual measures, including those aimed at
Schiphol organized its traditional Neighbour Days. The airport welcomed reducing noise-related disturbance, and 3) a funding programme
4000 neighbours who got a unique look behind the scenes of Schiphol and
its partners. focused on technology and innovation to improve the quality
of life. Schiphol has made 20 million euros available to the
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 56
foundation, with funding also provided by the province of The Schiphol Fund
North Holland and the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water The Schiphol Fund promotes sports activities. Four times a year,
Management (Ministry of I&W). it donates to public, non-profit sports associations in the area
surrounding Schiphol Airport for facilities and equipment to
In 2023, we helped approximately 50 people through the encourage more exercise. In 2023, the Schiphol Fund received
individual programmes. We also completed a number of large, 375,000 euros, of which 297,269 euros was donated to 68
area-specific projects, such as the Waterfront and the VVA site initiatives. The Schiphol Fund will have 400,000 euros at its
in Aalsmeer. These provide incentives to improve the quality of disposal in 2024. If you would like to know more about the
public space. We also made progress on innovative programmes Schiphol Fund, please visit our website.
funded by the Foundation, such as Fieldlab, an experiment
exploring options for low-noise building, and DeNoize, a pilot Engaging with stakeholders
project for new insulation technology. Schiphol engages with political stakeholders at a local, national
and international level on a wide range of topics. In addition,
we actively consult and cooperate with the Ministry of I&W, Four times a year, the Schiphol Fund donates to public, non-profit sports
the Bestuurlijke Regie Schiphol (BRS, 'Schiphol Administrative associations in the area surrounding Schiphol for facilities and equipment
to encourage more exercise.
Directorate', a partnership of 56 municipalities and 4 provinces
in the Schiphol region), the Maatschappelijke Raad Schiphol Due to the suspended Experimental Ruling, Schiphol had to
(MRS, 'Schiphol Social Council'), air traffic control (LVNL) and the re-establish the capacity for the summer season via an addendum
aviation sector. on the previously issued capacity declaration. In determining this
addendum, Schiphol took into account the capacity at LVNL,
Although Schiphol is not a formal member of the MRS, we have Royal Netherlands Marechaussee and Customs. Schiphol then
provided the MRS members with information in a number of held various talks with airlines. The outcome is that the airport is
meetings, for example on flight movement forecasts, runway planning to provide a capacity for 293.000 flights in the summer
maintenance and our eight-point plan. Both MRS and BRS season, on the condition that peak times are relieved. This means
were informed about the maintenance strategy and the major that in 2024, there is room for 483.000 flights at Schiphol.
maintenance of the Kaagbaan Runway in 2024.
Schiphol Group actively engages with local councils, aldermen
The year 2023 was a challenging year for the community and for and other regional stakeholders. Together with LVNL, we
The Schiphol Quality of Life Foundation completed a number of large, the aviation sector. At the beginning of the year, the government
area-specific projects, such as the Waterfront in Aalsmeer. organised a successful knowledge session for the BRS and their
adopted an Experimental Ruling, which is a necessary step to political representatives. The session was attended by 50 people.
The Foundation is in its final phase and will transition into a new create a legal basis for noise enforcement policy and to improve The CEOs of Schiphol and LVNL also attended a meeting in
Environmental Fund in 2024. As part of our eight-point plan, we the legal position for residents. The Ruling sets new noise Uithoorn to address the concerns of our neighbours regarding
will invest 10 million euros in this fund every year for the next limits and caps the total amount of air transport movements the maintenance of the Kaagbaan Runway.
seven years. (ATMs) per year at 460,000. However, in November 2023, the
government indefinitely suspended the Experimental Ruling. In the run-up to the early general election on 22 November,
For more information, please visit stichtingleefomgeving.nl. Schiphol is disappointed with this decision, as local residents are Schiphol engaged with the programme committees of the
again getting the short end of the stick. This makes the night political parties and political and influential stakeholders to gain
closure of Schiphol even more important, not to mention the their support for our agenda on issues such as the night curfew,
other measures in our eight-point plan, such as the ban on private Lelystad Airport and the ban on private jets. Several election
flights and the ban on the noisiest aircraft. manifestos support our commitments.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 57
At the European level, we are working closely with our partners features such as green roofs and walls help mitigate the urban
and ACI Europe. Next year's European Parliament elections will heat island effect, reducing surface temperatures and energy
take place in June, and preparations are already underway. In consumption while also supporting air purification. Beyond
the European context, we are particularly active on issues such environmental advantages, biodiverse buildings provide natural
as the European entry/exit system, expanding the development spaces that are shown to boost people’s well-being and mental
and production of sustainable aviation fuels, slot reform and health.
carbon leakage.
Embracing biodiversity in building practices aligns with
Biodiversity sustainability goals, making urban spaces more resilient and
In 2023, Schiphol Airport created a dedicated biodiversity policy conducive to healthier living. To facilitate this, Schiphol has
that captures the importance of biodiversity to the airport and created a summary of different initiatives to align designers and
its stakeholders. The policy aims to help promote, maintain and architects with Schiphol Airport’s vision for biodiverse buildings.
preserve biological diversity, which refers to the variety of life
on Earth at all levels, from genes to ecosystems. Going forward, Measuring environmental impact during the procurement Our important economic contribution includes our role in supporting
our employees and third parties will be able to use the policy process is another priority. By integrating considerations for a wide range of jobs, from high-skilled positions to those requiring
fewer qualifications.
to embed biodiversity in projects taking place at the airport site. biodiversity and adhering to eco-friendly certifications such as
A key initiative will involve adjusting our grass-mowing strategy EcoVadis, Schiphol can strategically manage risks associated with
airport, airlines and the surrounding metropolitan region,
and increasing our use of pollinator mixes. environmental impact and resource use. This approach aligns
highlights the integrated nature of its operations. This ensemble
with aviation industry regulations and underscores our
of interconnected businesses and activities not only facilitates the
A further aim is to promote biodiverse buildings by recognising commitment to responsible sourcing practices.
flow of people, goods and knowledge but also drives innovation
their multifaceted benefits. Green architecture enhances urban
and cultural exchange.
ecosystems, offering habitats for diverse flora and fauna and
contributing to local biodiversity conservation. In addition, Societal value The regional airports within Schiphol Group, including Eindhoven
Airport and Maastricht Airport, complement the main airport’s
Schiphol Airport is a key contributor to the Netherlands’ identity
services. These airports cater to regional business and leisure
as a trading country. It is also a key contributor to the nation’s
travel, supporting the concept of selective growth and focusing
success on an international level. Its extensive network and
on non-mainport destinations. This strategic approach helps
modern infrastructure make it a vital gateway to Europe and an
distribute air traffic, contributing to the overall efficiency and
indispensable hub for international commerce. Indeed, Schiphol
sustainability of the Dutch aviation sector.
is much more than an airport: it is a comprehensive ecosystem,
supporting a wide range of activities and businesses that extend
Air freight
beyond its runways.
Schiphol Airport also plays an important role in air freight.
The combination of passenger and cargo transport makes
AirPort City Schiphol
it a pivotal marketplace for logistics. Its strategic location
Schiphol Airport is an excellent example of an AirportCity: a
and connectivity have attracted European headquarters and
leading, efficient airport that operates 24/7, providing essential
distribution centres, facilitating the development of local
services to businesses and visitors alike. This non-stop operation
companies into international players. The types of goods
has an impact on the Amsterdam region, attracting international
transported via air freight from Schiphol Airport – ranging from
companies and institutions, thereby fuelling economic growth
perishable items to high-value electronics and pharmaceuticals –
In 2023 we have given biodiversity an impulse in our organisation and job creation. The concept of airport city, encompassing the
by composing a biodiversity policy that captures the importance of underscore the airport’s importance in global trade.
biodiversity on Schiphol Airport.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 58
Tourism
Tourism is another key area where we make an impact. Our
airport’s extensive network connects the Netherlands to major
global cities, driving the growth of the tourism sector. Its role as
a hub for transit and transfer passengers enhances its capacity
to connect a multitude of destinations, crucial for maintaining a
robust network. This, in turn, supports the Dutch economy, with
tourism being a considerable source of employment and revenue.
Quality of Work
Safety Sustainability
Net Safety Score CO2e emissions1
96.2 -65%
Airlines S
On-time Performance
Royal Schiphol Group places a 59%
Schiphol Group, the managing entity of Schiphol Airport, a key
strong emphasis on the Quality hub for global travel, is undergoing a major transformation to
Top performance indicator Quality of Work
of Work, acknowledging its enhance its operations and services. Building on insights from the Employees Passengers
Net Promoter Score
role not only as a social
Employee Promoter Score
Schiphol Social Agreement 2022, the leadership of Schiphol
Group has increased its commitment by introducing a fourth pillar 24 36
responsibility but also as to its overarching Vision: the Quality of Work. This initiative aims
a response to significant to redefine the essence of work at Schiphol Airport for everyone
labor market challenges. involved, contributing or our goal of becoming the world’s most
sustainable and high-quality airport.
This commitment extends
beyond Schiphol Group's direct The year 2022 brought valuable lessons about the labour
employment, encompassing market’s complexities and their effects on airport operations.
Other provisions from the Social Agreement 2022 materialized
Much of the airport’s functionality depends on labour-intensive
the entire value chain. services, including security, cleaning and ground-handling. We in 2023, including the introduction of the License to Operate for
discovered the importance of balancing labour market needs ground-handling staff and the establishment of a social standard
with the operational requirements of Schiphol Airport. Dealing for working at Schiphol. These initiatives laid the foundation for
with the changing nature of the labour market added further the Quality of Work strategy, culminating in the 'Team Schiphol
complexity to managing Schiphol’s operations. Check-In' document, outlining principles for quality of work
in tenders.
Schiphol Group recognises its social responsibility, not just as an
employer but also as a client and operator of the airport. At In October 2023, Schiphol Group and unions reached a successive
the core of this responsibility is ensuring a work environment Social Agreement, comprising two parts: the temporary
at Schiphol that is not only productive, but also safe, healthy continuation and phasing out of the labor market allowance
and appealing. We aim to restore Schiphol’s magic, creating a and the establishment of a joint Quality of Work agenda. The
place where people not only earn fair wages but also enjoy a labor market allowance was extended until September 1, 2024,
harmonious work-life balance. with a reduced allowance of 0.70 euros per worked hour from
September to December 2024, after which it will be definitively
Moving into 2023, together with the unions and sector partners, ended. Schiphol Group agreed to support and automatically
the agreements of the Schiphol Social Agreement 2022 were follow wage and payment rises in CLAs of suppliers as part of
executed. The labor market allowance of 1.40 euros per hour, its commitment to labor market dynamics outlined in the new
applicable to positions related to security, cleaning, PRM, and Social Agreement.
private bus transport, was eventually planned until September 1,
2023. An additional 'object Schiphol allowance' of 2.50 euros per
hour was secured for security staff, aiding in the recruitment of at
least 1,000 extra security personnel in 2023.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 60
regarding the retention of current employees and development development, but also to cultivate a culture where authentic
Introducing the Schiphol opportunities within the sector. Schiphol has also ensured, in conversations thrive. Together, we will build a resilient and agile
Career Hub cooperation with the five responsible security parties, that 1,250 organisation capable of meeting the challenges of the future.
new security officers have joined the sector. By joining forces,
As an employer, we recognise the importance of optimising processes and adopting a candidate-first approach,
continuous improvement to promote the happiness this great result has been achieved. Diversity, equity and inclusion
and well-being of our employees. This commitment own workforce
is essential to ensure the future resilience and social Celebrating fair compensation
responsibility of Schiphol Group as an organisation. In February 2023, Schiphol Group reached an agreement with the Given Schiphol Group’s important role in society, we
trade unions VPS, FNV and CNV Public Services on the acknowledge our responsibility to actively pursue a policy of
In 2023, we introduced the Schiphol Career Hub, an continuation of the Collective Labour Agreement (CLA). The CLA diversity, equity and inclusion (DE&I). Recognising the profound
initiative aimed at providing comprehensive insight into covers the period from 1 April 2023 to 30 September 2024. impact of our actions on our employees, we are committed to
career and development opportunities. Our aim is to creating an environment that guarantees equal treatment and
empower everyone within our organisation and the In financial terms, there was a significant shift in contractual opportunities for everyone.
industry as a whole. Recognising a real demand within wages, which increased by 8% from 1 April 2023 and by a further
our organisation to sustain the Career Hub, we are 3.25% from 1 January 2024. At the same time, we phased out the
pleased to report 30 visitors in the first two months participation scheme from 2023, which was seamlessly integrated
since its launch after the summer. Every Thursday the with the 8% salary increase. Payments for 2022 followed the usual
Career Hub is open and staffed with representatives from schedule and were made in May 2023. The traditional year-end
Recruitment, Learning & Development, Career Coaching bonus was converted into a 13th month salary, escalating from
and HR Advice. 6.75% to 8.33%.
In addition, the Career Hub organises (online) inspiration Another important agreement concerns the minimum hourly
sessions on career opportunities and related topics on wage. From 1 April 2023, the minimum hourly wage for each pay
the first Thursday of every month. In this fast-changing, grade was set at 14 euros, underlining our commitment to fair
dynamic world, learning and development are more compensation. The decisions made in the agreement were
important than ever. Schiphol Group therefore wants to reached in the context of challenging economic times and a tight We are committed to creating an inclusive and supportive environment
support all its employees in this in the best possible way. labour market. Overall, these collective agreements reflect a that embraces and empowers all individuals, regardless of background,
age, race, gender, sexual preference or other (personal) preference.
balance between addressing the financial needs of employees
and navigating the broader economic landscape. Schiphol To this end, we have made DE&I as part of our ‘Destination’.
implementing a new recruitment system, SAP SF. This new system Group’s response to the challenges of the times underlines its As DE&I reflects both society and Schiphol Airport’s customers,
should ensure that the recruitment process is simplified and the commitment to fostering a positive and equitable work we believe that these are important prerequisites for operating
candidate process is improved. The main objective is to improve environment. as a successful organisation. In addition, DE&I are important
and shorten the candidate journey. steering points in the relationship with employees and other
As we look ahead to the coming year, our focus is clear: stakeholders, especially with regard to (personal) leadership. To
Together with the Schiphol Aviation Community (LCS), we have developing strong leadership and preparing our organisation for achieve the above, we are continuously working to become an
worked hard to increase the visibility of Schiphol Airport as meaningful conversations. We are on the cusp of an exciting organisation where DE&I are self-evident to all employees, and an
an attractive place to work. Various job events were organised period of growth and transformation. With the launch of our new attractive workplace where all colleagues feel welcome and work
and the work and learning platform was further developed. In performance management system and a company-wide together in diverse and inclusive teams. We are committed to
addition to vacancies, content was also developed and described leadership programme, we aim not only to support professional creating an inclusive and supportive environment that embraces
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 62
and empowers all individuals, regardless of background, age, to celebrate the (in)visible differences of all our colleagues, the Gender split in 2023
race, gender, sexual preference or other (personal) preference, participation in the national Young Talent Award, a celebration (Per location, in % of total no. of staff)
which was confirmed this year with the start of our first full-time to mark National Diversity Day and gatherings about ‘The 7 check 100%
DE&I Business Partner. marks’ and generational differences.
In 2022, we measured the DE&I status of the organisation in During National Diversity Day, the Schiphol DE&I games were 50%
collaboration with the Netherlands Inclusivity Monitor (NIM). launched. The DE&I games consist of three games: statements, 30
Schiphol received the results in 2023. Overall, our employees rate seconds and a quiz. The games are a fun and easy way to start a 69% 31% 69% 31% 80% 20% 50% 50% 78% 22%
Schiphol as a more inclusive organisation compared to the Dutch conversation with colleagues about DE&I. This conversation is
benchmark see graph below. important because we are committed to ensuring that everyone Group Schiphol Rotterdam Eindhoven Lelystad
Other notable highlights during the year included the 13% 33% 54% 12.6% 30.7% 56.8% 13.0% 55.0% 33.0% 22.0% 50.0% 28.0% 27.5% 52.9% 19.6%
organisation of several events and DE&I talks to promote DE&I
Group Schiphol Rotterdam Eindhoven Lelystad
awareness among colleagues, including a traditional Iftar, a ‘DE&I
movie afternoon’ for colleagues and their children, a Keti Koti <30
event to commemorate the abolition of slavery in the former
30-50
Dutch colonies, the Amsterdam Pride Walk, VisAble made Visible
>50
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 63
Employment practices value chain For security staff, an additional ‘object Schiphol allowance’ of 2.50 Working conditions
euros per hour was agreed in an additional Social Agreement for Schiphol Airport, as a workplace, faces vulnerabilities and
With the fourth pillar of our Vision, the Quality of Work, Schiphol Security (in October 2022) and implemented structurally in the challenges in ensuring safe and healthy working conditions.
Group is not only assuming social responsibility, but is also sectoral collective labour agreement (CLA) for private security. For this reason, Schiphol Group and its sector partners are
facing up to major challenges in the labour market. These Both allowances supported the successful centrally organised undertaking various initiatives to improve working conditions
responsibilities and challenges relate to the people who work efforts of Schiphol Group’s recruitment team to recruit at least at Schiphol Airport. Part of the Social Agreement was a plan
at Schiphol, not only those employed by Schiphol Group, but also 1,000 additional security staff in 2023 for the security companies, to renovate all rest areas and sanitary facilities for employees
those who work for employers throughout the value chain. thus helping to solve the staff shortage in airport security. working at our airport terminal, platforms and baggage halls.
New designs for these facilities have been piloted and the first
In a complex ecosystem with a highly interdependent value chain Other provisions in the Social Agreement 2022 that were renovations have begun.
consisting mainly of labour-intensive services, the quality of work implemented in 2023 include the introduction and
is of fundamental importance. On the one hand, quality of work implementation of the license to operate for ground-handling In addition to the improvement of working facilities, more
contributes to people’s wellbeing through income security and a staff and the development of a social standard for working at fundamental working conditions were called into question. After
good work-life balance. On the other hand, quality of work leads Schiphol Airport. The latter has resulted in a document with on-site inspections, the Dutch Labour Inspectorate concluded
to quality of service in the value chain of the airport operations. ambitions for the Quality of Work strategy and the translation of that work in the baggage halls was too physically demanding,
those ambitions into a basis of assumptions for a code of conduct with too many suitcases being lifted by hand per employee. The
Labour conditions for suppliers (of labour-intensive services), laid down in ‘Team ground-handling companies and Royal Schiphol Group drew
Together with the trade unions and our sector partners, Schiphol Check-In’. These will then be the guiding principles for up a joint plan to minimise the physical strain of baggage
we implemented the agreements in Schiphol Group’s ‘Social the quality of work for requirements and award criteria in handling. Both Schiphol Group and the ground-handlers
Agreement 2022’ in 2023. Until 1 September 2023, employees tenders. have complementary responsibilities as airport operators and
in positions related to security, cleaning, PRM (Passengers with employers. By the end of April 2024, every workstation in the
Reduced Mobility) and private bus transport (on the platform) In October 2023, Schiphol Group and the unions concluded a baggage halls must be equipped with a lifting aid. Schiphol
were paid the labour market supplement of 1.40 euros per hour. follow-up Social Agreement. The new agreement consists of two Group started ordering, purchasing and implementing various
parts: the temporary continuation and phasing out of the labour types of lifting aids in 2023. In the longer term, Schiphol
market allowance, and the establishment of a joint Quality of
Work agenda.
The labour market allowance of 1.40 euros per hour worked will
be paid until 1 September 2024, and from September until the
end of December 2024 an allowance of 0.70 euros per hour
worked will be paid. After that, the labour market allowance will
be permanently discontinued. Schiphol and the trade unions
have agreed that this kind of allowance, or other primary wage
elements, belong at the collective bargaining tables of employers
and trade unions in sectors or companies. For this reason, it was
also agreed in the new Social Agreement that Schiphol Group, as
a client, will automatically support and follow up wage and
payment increases in the CLAs of its suppliers.
Quality of Service
Royal Schiphol Group aims
At Schiphol Group, our vision is to create the most sustainable and By stimulating connections between people, businesses and ideas
to provide its passengers high-quality airports in the world. This vision is underpinned by from around the world, our real estate and commercial teams
and other customers with an our commitment to delivering a seamless and engaging play a key role in enriching the local business ecosystem and
unrivalled Quality of Service. passenger experience, supported by digitally-enabled and knowledge economy. We provide our tenants with world-class
efficient airport operations. In response to the challenges of long workspaces that add value to their operations.
By harnessing digital tools security queues in 2022, we made decisive improvements in 2023,
and processes and working focusing on supporting and growing our operational workforce. Through the use of technology and data analytics, Schiphol
closely with our partners to Our strategic investment in people and technology has improved Airport continuously strives to improve the passenger experience.
service standards. This was particularly evident during peak travel Smart maintenance initiatives provide valuable insights into
introduce innovative concepts periods, such as the May and summer holidays, when we asset performance and maintenance needs. In addition, our
and services, we seek to successfully met our service targets, with 93% of passengers collaboration with the aviation chain, in particular through
orchestrate a smooth and passing through security in less than 10 minutes. the Airport Operations Centre (APOC), enables comprehensive
management of key aviation processes. This collaborative
inspiring airport experience for In 2023 we also announced a significant investment in our airport approach facilitates efficient knowledge and data sharing with
all our visitors. Network Local 2024
infrastructure and facilities. Between residents and 2027 we will be
Reputation Score
our key aviation partners, ultimately benefiting our customers.
ICA destinations
investing 3 billion euro into catching up on maintenance and
126 6.0
upgrades. This demonstrates our commitment to improving the
quality of our physical assets. Consumer and end-user experience
Safety Sustainability Network Local residents
Net Safety Score CO2e emissions1 ICA destinations Reputation Score
Our concept of quality of service extends beyond air travel. Our At Schiphol, we continuously monitor the satisfaction levels of
96.2 -65%
airports serve as dynamic hubs where people from all walks 126 6.0
our passengers and other customers as part of our efforts to
of life – travellers, business people, students and researchers – maintain a high Quality of Service.
Airlines come together. Safety Shareholders Sustainability
Passenger experience
On-time Performance Net Safety Score Return on Equity2 CO2e emissions1
59% 96.2
Top performance indicators
3.1%
Quality of Service
-65%
Schiphol Group's ambition is to return to the top three in the
Airport Service Quality (ASQ) benchmark (through which our
Employees Passengers Airlines quality perception levels are compared with the medium-to-large
Shareholders
Employee Promoter Score Net Promoter Score On-time Performance Return on Equity
hub airports in Europe). We compare ourselves to seven other
2
24 36 59% 3.1%
European hubs: Paris Charles de Gaulle (CDG), Copenhagen
(CPH), London Heathrow (LHR), Madrid (MAD), Munich (MUC),
Employees Istanbul airport (IST) and Zurich (ZRH). In 2023, Schiphol remained
Passengers
Employee Promoter Score
in last place.
Net Promoter Score
24 36
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 66
We measure the passenger experience at the key touchpoints By implementing a trolley service at departures and in the long
of our passenger journey over time. In 2023, the willingness to queues on the piers before arriving at passport control, we gave
recommend (Net Promoter Score; NPS) recovered from a decline our passengers a warm welcome by distributing food and drinks.
in 2022 caused by staff shortages in security and third parties For arriving passengers, we provided complimentary coffee,
(KMAR, ground-handlers, retail staff and food and beverage snacks and refreshments to welcome and invigorate them.
outlets) combined with high passenger volumes resulting in long
queues and waiting times. The NPS improved to +36 at the end We also piloted and rolled out our security check timeslot
of 2023 (moving average – on target). With this score, the NPS is booking system at no cost to passengers and across all our
back to its pre-COVID-19 level of late 2019. The improvement is departure security filters. Its successful implementation
due to better perceptions of waiting times at security (as a result demonstrates our commitment to improving the passenger
of more available staff) and check-in, friendliness of staff, ease experience. With up to 22% of travellers having booked a slot on
of making connections for transfer passengers and ambience. peak days since its introduction, and an overwhelming 98% of
In 2023, passengers felt more welcome, in control and better travellers expressing satisfaction, this initiative has clearly been a
informed than a year ago. Waiting times at passport control (both resounding success for both passengers and our operations, as it
on arrival and departure) and baggage reclaim remain points has also helped to divert around 7.5% of passengers away from
of attention. our busiest times, directly improving demand in the security lanes. The SSUs are part of our larger Passenger Experience Platform
concept, which is available from Schiphol to other airports as a
comprehensive solution.
Improving the passenger experience We have also continued to develop the Self-Service Units (SSUs),
In 2023, we focused on making passengers feel welcome by a passenger information kiosk that allows users to access flight Adding value for airport visitors
introducing a (Schiphol-branded) hospitality team at departures, information, locate gates and other points of interest, and even To ensure Quality of Service, we pay close attention to the
arrivals, airport piers and lounges. The core tasks of the hospitality initiate a video call or chat with an airport assistant. In 2023, we evolving preferences of our airport visitors and other customers,
specialists are to inform, guide and reassure passengers. introduced several unique features such as personalised and are constantly looking for new ways to engage and
itineraries, move-to-mobile (where a user's session continues on support those who use our services. In recent years we have
their mobile by scanning a QR code) and continuous CSAT introduced innovative retail and food and beverage concepts and
measurements to gather both quantitative and qualitative implemented solutions for a more personalised, connected and
passenger feedback. Behind the scenes, we are able to technology-driven airport experience.
orchestrate a continuous stream of feature delivery based on this
feedback. We are increasingly creating dedicated shopping experiences in
our terminal, ranging from well-known Dutch brands to lavish
The SSUs are part of our larger Passenger Experience Platform luxury experiences. Schiphol welcomed several new shops and
concept, which is available from Schiphol to other airports as a concepts. Airside, we introduced new store concepts with the
comprehensive solution. Its purpose is to provide travellers with Omega and Bruna brands. We also reached agreements with
a holistic and personalised airport experience and retail Louis Vuitton and Bulgari for store openings in 2024. In addition
recommendations that are aligned with their flight itinerary and to the introduction of several new food and beverage concepts,
tailored to their individual needs. The value of the platform lies this year saw the opening of the Bubbles Bar in Lounge 2, which
not only in the improved traveller experience, but also in the new combines luxury retail with gastronomy. On the landside, Rituals
To ensure Quality of Service, we pay close attention to the evolving revenue opportunities that can be directly exploited by an airport and Victoria Secrets reopened after renovations. In terms of
preferences of our airport visitors and other customers, and are constantly operator. food and beverage, the Dutch brand FEBO will be added to the
looking for new ways to engage and support those who use our services.
current offering.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 67
engineering process. The physical work is scheduled to take place Business continuity In 2023, analyses were carried out on control and dispatch
in 2024 and is expected to be completed by the end of 2024. centres, including back-up facilities and contingency for critical IT
Schiphol has an internal ‘calamity organisation’ that incorporates systems, as well as various security devices.
Schiphol certifies commercial real estate according to BREEAM- training activities, scenarios and governance to be applied in
NL In-Use, an environmental assessment method that enables the event of a major disruption or crisis. In 2023, our calamity Company emergency response
property investors, owners, managers and tenants to determine organisation was activated on 10 occasions for a ‘medium Between 1 January 2023 and 31 December 2023, the company
and drive sustainable improvements in the operational alert’, where there was a real disruption. The Corporate Crisis emergency response organisation of the Airport Operations &
performance of their buildings. Team met three times. The Veiligheidsregio Kennemerland Aviation Partnerships was deployed 3,792 times to respond to the
(‘Kennemerland Safety Region’; VRK) – a regional body that first alarm in the terminal building. Of these, 3,469 were first aid
In 2023, our focus was on implementing the latest BREEAM-NL coordinates the deployment of police, firefighters, ambulances, calls and 323 were fire hazard calls. In 2023, we conducted several
In-Use assessment framework for the certified buildings in our municipal authorities and other parties in the event of an exercises to improve cooperation with the internal and external
portfolio, as BREEAM standards are regularly upgraded. The incident – was involved in a number of precautionary alarms emergency services of the safety region Kennemerland.
World Trade Center (WTC) Schiphol Airport, our tallest office that ultimately did not require an actual response. There were no
building at 56,000 m2, achieved a BREEAM-NL In-Use rating of air incidents requiring an emergency response.
‘very good’ in 2022 and achieved even more points in 2023 within Cybersecurity
this ‘very good’ rating. The Avioport and Transport buildings have Most of the situations where the calamity organisation was
a BREEAM-NL In-Use ‘excellent’ rating and have improved within required involved problems with the baggage system, in total 4 Throughout 2023, Schiphol continued to prioritise secure
this range. The new Cargo Building 17 will be built to BREEAM- out of 10. Another was storm Poly on 5 July and a third incident operations, with a particular focus on cybersecurity. Our Schiphol
NL Excellent standards and will be added to the BREEAM-NL involved a power failure in Terminal 3. All the other four major Cyber Security Centre (SCSC) remained vigilant, protecting our
In-Use portfolio. disruptions were caused by ‘co-makers’, the links responsible for digital processes and sensitive data, while fostering a culture of
transport and handling in our airport’s cargo chain. Problems in resilience and awareness.
Tenant satisfaction the systems of the Royal Netherlands Marechaussee, air traffic
SRE conducts an annual Tenant Satisfaction Survey to understand control, aircraft fuel supply and Dutch Railways (NS) also led to This year, we participated in ISIDOOR, a national cybersecurity
how satisfied our real estate customers are with their rental disruptions in our processes. The main focus in all these incidents exercise, together with KLM and LVNL. This resulted in an increase
partnership and the service we deliver. In 2023, 77% of the was to ensure the safety of passengers and staff by regulating in the quality of cybersecurity, as measured by our level of
respondents described our service as either 'good', 'very good' traffic and passenger flows. participation and the results of the exercise.
or 'excellent'.
Three quick scan evaluations were carried out in 2023. The first Our anti-phishing campaign improved our technical defences
In addition, SRE conducts an annual Tenant Employee Satisfaction concerned the baggage disruption of 5 May, which resulted and staff awareness, minimising the risks associated with
Survey to understand how satisfied our tenants’ employees in some basic recommendations on baggage organisation. The phishing emails. We used innovative tools such as SafeLinks to
are with their working environment (the building they work second looked at the working and communication methods used improve our email security and strengthen our ability to deal with
in and the surrounding area) at Schiphol. In 2023, 86% of the during the storm. And the last assessed the causes of the power potential threats.
respondents described our buildings and surroundings as ‘good’, failure in Terminal 3 and made some recommendations for future
‘very good’ or ‘excellent’. This is very important to us as we want emergency power tests. We also launched a comprehensive privacy and cybersecurity
to provide an inspiring and healthy working environment for training initiative, further emphasising our commitment
everyone who works at Schiphol. Work continued on the systematic examination of business to cybersecurity. This company-wide programme, delivered
continuity risks throughout the service delivery chain. For each in an engaging microlearning format, strengthened our
specific airport process, the resources used and the impact of employees' understanding and responsible handling of
relevant disruptions are identified and potential measures to sensitive information.
further strengthen the reliability of these processes are identified.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 69
In collaboration with KLM and LVNL, we further developed the Security process achievements
ICWOS initiative, which enabled us to share critical information Our tireless efforts to improve security have not gone unnoticed.
on cybersecurity threats and developments. Our joint red- During the May holiday, 98% of departing passengers
teaming exercises proved invaluable in testing and strengthening experienced a security wait of less than 10 minutes, a testament
our collective cybersecurity resilience. Collaboration led to an to the efficiency and effectiveness of our efforts to improve
improved focus on real threats, fostered a cybersecurity aware security operations over last year. This achievement is a clear
culture, and strengthened resilience, underscoring our readiness indication of our commitment to providing a seamless and hassle-
for future cybersecurity challenges. free experience for all travellers.
Airport capacity The new MTP brings together current knowledge of trends and With the lessons learnt in 2023 and the resulting practical
developments, long-term maintenance plans, quality ambitions, acceleration of the maintenance process, major steps have been
Meeting the demands of airlines and passengers and providing sustainability ambitions, improvements in working conditions taken to address the maintenance backlog and put us on track to
a safe, sustainable, reliable and high-quality airport experience and planned developments into a clear definition of the integral meet our 2032 target. By continuing to invest in new technologies
is an ever-increasing challenge. Royal Schiphol Group is feasible capacity available. Based on demand scenarios, gaps are and innovative solutions, we expect to be able to maintain the
undertaking an extensive investment programme to support identified and asset, non-asset and digital solution directions are airport's assets in a cost-effective and environmentally friendly
our short, medium and long-term capacity needs, with several identified and tested for feasibility (operational, financial, etc.). manner, allowing us to continue to meet the increasing demands
major projects underway or in preparation. Our capacity-related The outcome of the MTP defines the development path for the and expectations of passengers, airlines and other airport
investments include the steps we are taking to improve the 10-year time horizon and provides guidance for Schiphol Group's stakeholders.
landside access road system at Schiphol Airport, as well as the development projects, including spatial planning and (large)
construction of a new pier and the redevelopment of Lounge 1. CAPEX projects. The new Pier A and southern development
Schiphol Airport is building a new pier to accommodate large
Master Plan Multi-Year Maintenance Programme and medium-sized aircraft. This pier is necessary to meet future
Schiphol Group is creating a new development framework, Proper maintenance of airport assets is essential to ensure their demand for new aircraft stands and gates. Additional stands can
spatial development strategy and land use plan to guide reliability and availability. Maintenance is determined annually be added to the pier at a later stage.
future airport developments in line with our Vision 2050 and based on the Multi Year Maintenance Programme (MYMP). From
ambitions. The Master Plan aims to enable greater integration 2022, the MYMP has focused on improving the performance of In November 2021, due to ongoing delays and an unpredictable
between infrastructure projects at Schiphol Airport and relevant the assets to support Schiphol Group's 'quieter, cleaner, better' project outcome, we terminated the contract with the former
regional developments, through specific developments such as ambition. contractors of the Pier A construction project, Ballast-Nedam and
the extension of the North-South metro line to Schiphol. The TAV (BN-TAV). We then appointed our framework contractors,
plan also aims to support sustainable aviation by defining the The interests of people, the environment and asset reliability (in Heijmans and Volker Infra, to carry out 'emergency works' to
infrastructure needed to support the transition to quieter and that order) are considered when making decisions about make the pier fully wind and weather resistant, but also to
cleaner aircraft operations. maintenance projects. This provides a practical interpretation of carry out structural reinforcements, air condition the building,
concepts such as socially responsible and sustainable resolve quality issues and complete the pier's aircraft stands to
Mid-Term Plan 2035 entrepreneurship.
In 2023, the Schiphol Group updated its Mid-Term Plan (MTP) for
the next decade and extended its outlook to 2040. The updated Due to the current maintenance backlog at Schiphol Airport, we
MTP, which is based on the Schiphol Group's strategy, focuses on decided in 2022 to accelerate the MYMP with the aim of
regaining control, improving quality and robustness, and creating eliminating the backlog by 2032. This decision is already showing
sufficient room for manoeuvre to enable the necessary renewal positive results. In 2023, the maintenance level at the airport was
projects and major maintenance work to be carried out, such as 120% higher than in 2022. Specific maintenance projects include
the renewal of Pier C and the baggage system in Hall D. The MTP repairs to walkways, security filters and baggage robots in the
also aims to prepare Schiphol Airport to facilitate the renewal terminals, as well as maintenance of airside and landside roads.
of the airline fleet with cleaner and quieter aircraft, as this will The recent increase in maintenance levels is partly due to the close
require more airside space and additional terminal, baggage and cooperation between Schiphol Airport and the private market. By
landside capacity (due to an increase in aircraft seating capacity). pooling expertise and resources at the right time, maintenance
activities can be carried out more effectively and the quality of
the assets optimised.
The new Pier A is necessary to guarantee the future demand for new
aircraft stands and gates, but also to create redundant capacity to be able
to renew or refurbish existing piers.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 71
resolve operational issues. The vast majority of these works were Led by ESAP, a consortium of construction companies SPIE and Taxiways and runways
completed by the end of 2023. Equans, the renovation will be carried out in phases to ensure The Zwanenburgbaan and surrounding taxiways underwent
the lounge remains fully operational. The first phase of the extensive maintenance in 2023 to ensure the reliability of the
Since 2023, BAM oversees the further completion of the detailed redevelopment of Lounge 1 was completed by the end of 2023. runway and to enable the installation of new LED lights. We
engineering and delivery of the construction-ready design. In This is the first step towards improving the retail experience for also carried out extensive maintenance on the taxiways to ensure
October 2023, BAM and Schiphol signed an execution contract passengers in Lounge 1 and working conditions for KLM staff with their reliability.
to finalise the construction of the pier, while BAM started the new offices in the crew centre.
preparatory and pre-construction work. In 2024, we will carry out maintenance work on the Kaagbaan
We expect to complete the Lounge 1 extension in 2024. This will and Bravo taxiway. During the runway maintenance, related
Schiphol and BN-TAV are still in dispute. BN-TAV initiated formal open up the next phase of the project, the further redevelopment projects will be carried out as well, such as a new runway
proceedings in December 2023. Schiphol has received a writ of of the existing lounge, putting the Lounge 1 project on track for intersection, maintenance of the Kaagbaan tunnel and increasing
summons on 8 December 2023 and is preparing its counterclaim completion by the end of 2025. the capacity of the electricity grid. These projects aim to improve
and statement of reply, which will be submitted ultimately on the overall safety and reliability of airside operations.
5 June 2024. Reference is made to note 25 Contingent assets and Aircraft stands
liabilities for the status on the BN-TAV claims with regards to the In 2023, maintenance was carried out on numerous aircraft Completion of dual taxiway system
construction of Pier A. stands in the Pier G, Pier E and Pier D areas. The maintenance (Project Quebec)
project included an element of electrification to support more In 2023, Schiphol Airport made further progress on a project
A further project in the pipeline remains the construction of sustainable airside operations. In addition, we initiated the that started in 2018 to convert Schiphol's Quebec taxiway into
a new terminal (Terminal South), which will help Schiphol expansion of the Sierra platform to replace cargo aircraft stands a dual taxiway system. Project Quebec aims to address two key
to meet its sustainability goals and improve the passenger displaced by the expansion of the dual taxiway system. issues: 1) making the process of directing taxiing aircraft more
experience. In 2023, Schiphol made a high-level integral design, manageable for Air Traffic Control the Netherlands (LVNL), and
where both the baggage system and the construction of the 2) ensuring that aircraft no longer have to queue on the Quebec
basement (and all its electrical and mechanical installations) will taxiway. These improvements will help to increase safety in line
be developed simultaneously. The design is developed by KLAIR with the ambitions of the Schiphol Safety Roadmap, while at the
(Kaan architects, Lamela, ABT and Ineco). In October 2023, we same time improving the quality of service for airline customers
launched a tender for a contractor to assist with the final phase and passengers.
of the development, with the contract to be awarded in the
second half of 2024. The selected contractor is also expected to Construction of Phase 1B of the project began in early 2023.
carry out the construction of the basement and its installations. Roads were removed and repositioned for the construction of
In 2024, Vanderlande Industries will also continue to design a the new security checkpoint 90, including the associated airside
new baggage system that will improve the working conditions for roads. Construction of the new taxiway system also began.
baggage handlers. In early 2024, work on Project Quebec will join the already
scheduled maintenance of the Kaagbaan Runway to complete
Redevelopment of Lounge 1 the associated infrastructure to reduce the impact on operations
In early 2023, construction has begun on the redevelopment of later in the project. The first phase of construction will be
Lounge 1 at Schiphol Airport. The project aims to improve the completed by the end of 2024. In 2025, the second phase will
experience for passengers and employers, while opening up new In 2023, maintenance was carried out on numerous aircraft stands in begin with the relocation of dnata to the new freight station,
the Pier G, Pier E and Pier D areas. The maintenance project included an
commercial opportunities for Schiphol and helping to improve element of electrification to support more sustainable airside operations. which will leave the existing freight station vacant and ready
our operational and asset performance. for sustainable demolition. These steps will create sufficient
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 72
Project Quebec aims to address two key issues: making the process of
directing taxiing aircraft more manageable for Air Traffic Control the
Netherlands (LVNL), and ensuring that aircraft no longer have to queue on
the Quebec taxiway.
Safety first
Safety is Schiphol Group's
At Schiphol Group, we aim to provide safe, secure and responsible Safety and security
number-one priority as an travel for everyone who visits and uses our airports each day. The
airport operator and one of airports in our Group face a range of day-to-day operational risks, We have a responsibility to safeguard the health of our
two key enablers that support while construction projects present further hazards to customers passengers, employees and other visitors by carefully managing
and staff. In 2023, we continued to make progress in improving our facilities and processes. Security is fundamental for safe and
the four qualities of our safety around the airport site at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. efficient airport operations.
Vision 2050. We invest in
our safety and are working To help us meet our objectives, we rely on high-quality safety
processes, but we also depend on the support of our valued Safety
to develop a strong safety partners and stakeholders, as we work towards the same goal.
culture that unites Schiphol Safety is always top of mind at a busy airport, where we work
employees and partners in a Schiphol Group also works with the Onderzoeksraad voor with a wide range of partners 24/7 throughout the year. In other
Veiligheid (‘Dutch Safety Board’; OVV) as well as external words, safety always comes first, whether at the office, on a
common objective. regulators, and we play a central role in sector-wide safety construction site, in operations or during maintenance activities.
initiatives such as the Integral Safety Management System In light of this, we set ourselves a clear target: zero safety incidents
(ISMS). As part of this integrated value chain approach, we throughout the entire year. We keep close track of our safety
cooperate closely on safety with airlines, ground-handlers and levels and safety performance at our airports through the Net
building contractors. Network Safety Score (NSS).
Local The NSS, which is one of our Top Performance
residents
ICA destinations Reputation Score
Indicators (TPIs), monitors our ongoing safety performance by
126 6.0
taking the percentage of days without serious incidents minus the
Top performance indicator Safety first
days with serious incidents. In 2023, the NSS score was 96.2 (target
Safety Sustainability value for 2023 was 95). We had 7 days with serious incidents
Net Safety Score CO e emissions
1
2
compared to 5 days in 2022. These range from traffic incidents on
96.2 -65% the platform, to trips and falls of employees as well as passengers.
A single fall resulting in injury can therefore significantly impact
Airlines the Net Safety Score. Each serious incident is investigated either
Shareholders
On-time Performance Return on Equity
2
In 2023, 3,883 (near) incidents and potentially dangerous Program (VRP) for substances of very high concern (SHVC) to the
situations were recorded in Schiphol Airport’s Incident Learning Omgevingsdienst (Environment Agency before 1 December. Safety Day
System. The data in our safety database allows us to analyse
incidents and trends and to investigate more serious incidents. EASA compliance Schiphol organises a Safety Day each year to raise
We investigated 7 incidents during the year, an important starting Schiphol Group complies with EASA regulations by regularly employees’ awareness of the importance of safety at
point for us to learn and improve the safety of our processes. undergoing internal and external audits. External audits are Schiphol and how they can contribute to a safer airport
performed by the ILT under the 48-month oversight programme environment. Schiphol’s ambition is to have zero safety
Safety management as stipulated in EU Regulation 139/2014. incidents, which means that safety must always be top-of-
Our company safety management systems outline objectives, mind for our colleagues and partners at all times.
tasks, responsibilities, authorities and working agreements for Licence to Operate for ground-handling
managing health, safety and environmental risks at Schiphol On 1 January 2023, Schiphol Group’s Licence to Operate (LtO) for Safety Day 2023 took place on 30 November, with the
Airport. All operational managers are responsible for effectively ground-handling operations came into effect. The LtO comprises theme of ‘traffic safety’. The day featured an extensive
managing safety risks in their respective processes. The Safety a set of requirements and minimum standards in the areas of programme of lectures, exercises and demonstrations
Review Board formulates policies and goals to realise Schiphol safety, sustainability, and quality, in order to safeguard and focused on traffic safety.
Group’s ‘Safe performance’ strategic objectives. enhance the quality of ground-handling. The LtO includes 16
requirements to which handlers adhere. Examples are the usages
Safety and compliance of lifting aids in the baggage area, a languages proficiency at
Schiphol Group’s Safety Leadership Principles are based on our airside and a minimum amount of self-inspections to assure a
target of zero safety incidents and they require our leaders to clean aircraft stand. Schiphol Group and its ground-handlers
set an example on safety and promote an open and just safety implemented a way of working according to the LtO in 2023,
culture. Initiatives such as safety walks, safety moments and safety overseeing compliance through inspections and audits. The
days are increasingly valued by our employees and other airport lessons learned have been incorporated into a renewed version
site workers, and are now seen as an everyday part of our work. of the LtO that came into effect in January 2024.
Compliance with HSE legislation In 2023, we conducted audits of all six generic ground-handling
Schiphol Group has formed public-private partnerships relating companies. The audits focused on aspects such as the
to inspections and supervisory duties with the Human competence of workers using our assets. Since May 2023, we have
Environment and Transport Directorate (ILT) of the Ministry also carried out 346 inspections on the use of lifting aids. While
of I&W, Rijnland Water Authority, and the municipality of the usage has seen a slight increase, we are closely monitoring it
Haarlemmermeer. These agreements cover activities such as until it reaches the desired level. If any of the 16 commitments are
monitoring threats to aviation safety, inspecting the use of not met, ground-handlers may be required to formulate a
auxiliary power units (APUs), supervising Ground-handling Corrective Action Plan and conduct a root-cause analysis. In 2023, Safety of passengers and visitors
activities and monitoring airside traffic safety. The mutual twelve of these plans were requested by Schiphol distributed In 2023, Schiphol Airport reported 373 (2022: 331) incidents
obligations of Schiphol Group and its partners are outlined among the various handlers. These plans result in measures taken involving injuries to passengers and visitors that required
through covenants: we scored a compliance percentage of by handlers, such as hiring additional staff, improving internal attention from our in-house emergency response service.
97.95% on ground-handling inspections, 96.62% on APU work processes to meet ISAGO standards, and/or adjusting
inspections and 86% on temporary obstacle inspections. agreements with employment agencies. There has been Integral Safety Management System
substantial engagement from handlers on this matter. Schiphol Safety processes between aviation organisations at Schiphol
Under the Environmental Management Act, in 2023 Schiphol expects the LtO to support an upward trend in quality of ground Airport are managed and coordinated by the Integral Safety
Group had to submit a complete Avoidance and Reduction handling at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. Management System (ISMS). This is a collaboration involving
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 75
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (AAS), Air Traffic Control the Ground Handling Safety Team One incident was classified as a potential conflict but with
Netherlands (LVNL), airlines based at Schiphol Airport and The Ground Handling Safety Team (GHST), consists of enough time and distance to prevent a serious outcome.
ground handlers. It also includes service partners, such as representatives from Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and the To further mitigate the risk of runway incursions, the RST
companies responsible for refuelling, catering and cleaning. The various ground-handling companies operating at the airport continuously targets specific behavioural and infrastructural
ISMS proposes and implements a series of safety improvement site. The team aims to minimise risks involving ground handling contributing factors.
measures that collectively form the Safety Improvement at Airside, such as the safe use of aircraft stands and service
Roadmap Schiphol, a working document aligning all parties on roads. In 2023, the GHST carried out a dedicated programme Schiphol Bird Strike Committee
shared goals. safe ground handling that included a set of ongoing actions to The Schiphol Bird Strike Committee (SBC) monitors and analyses
support a cultural change regarding safe behaviour and reduce bird strikes at Schiphol, as well as the presence and movements of
The implementation of the Safety roadmap continued risks related to ground-handling. Further actions agreed by the birds, and develops preventative strategies. In 2021, Schiphol
throughout 2023 as the ISMS partners implemented the GHST in relation to the ISMS included introducing airside safety Airport developed a risk reduction action plan, and wildlife
following safety improvements: KPIs for ground-handling companies, supported by minimum management actions are ongoing. In 2023, Amsterdam Airport
– licence to operate; performance targets. In 2023, a total of 78 incidents of aircraft Schiphol experienced 4.8 bird strikes per 10,000 air transport
– implementation of airside safety KPIs for ground-handlers; being damaged occurred during ground-handling and 24 injuries movements (2022: 8.1/10k), none of which resulted in a major
– implementation of the Safe Ground-Handling programme; due to traffic collisions occurred on the peripheral roads and incident. The reduction can be attributed to our active measures.
– equipment pooling trial; aprons at Schiphol Airport. Weather conditions were also a factor, as rain reduced the food
– action-based plan to improve lines of sight at airside on available to some high-risk bird species.
platforms and service roads; Ground Movement Safety Team
– improving the process for checking the correct stopping The Ground Movement Safety Team (GMST) consists of Taskforce Runway Safety Improvement
position for docking aircraft (single point of failure); representatives from Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and LVNL, as In 2023, a temporary taskforce, Runway Safety Improvement (RSI)
– online pushback procedure. well as airlines and ground handling companies operating at the was set up to prepare for decision-making on specific measures to
airport. The team works to prevent and reduce the severity of further reduce the runway incursion risk at Schiphol Airport. The
In 2023, ISMS launched three safety campaigns: 1. New incidents in the manoeuvring area at Schiphol Airport involving taskforce RSI consists of representatives from LVNL, Amsterdam
awareness topics as part of the campaign for pedestrians moving aircraft on the aprons by identifying mitigation measures Airport Schiphol and the airlines.
at airside, 2. ‘Welcome to my world!’, a campaign aimed and solutions to identified problems. In 2023, the GMST and
at improving communications between ground air traffic the training organisation supervised by LVNL initiated a joint Taskforce Sustainable Ground Movement
controllers and pushback drivers, and 3. A ‘safe summer’ awareness programme aimed at improving communication and The Sustainable Ground Movement (SGM) taskforce is another
awareness campaign with a focus on work pressure at airside, trust between ground air traffic controllers and pushback drivers temporary taskforce established in 2023. Its role is to analyse
where 100 posters were placed at key spots on airside and involved in the pushback process. operational concepts for ground movement in order to reduce
interactive sessions were held with workers from different kerosene emissions from aircraft.
organisations at Schiphol Airport. Runway Safety Team
The Runway Safety Team (RST) is tasked with monitoring and Taskforce pedestrian safety
The above measures were developed either by individual ISMS reducing runway risks, most notably runway excursions and In 2023, a temporary taskforce consisting of representatives
partners or sector-wide task-forces, and steered by the TOP Safety runway incursions (defined by the International Civil Aviation from the ground-handling companies and Amsterdam Airport
Action Group of the ISMS. Organization (ICAO) as the incorrect presence of an aircraft, Schiphol defined risk reduction actions to improve the safety for
vehicle or person on a surface designated for aircraft landings pedestrians at airside. As a result of this taskforce, ISMS agreed
In addition, the following committees, safety teams and task- and take-offs). The RST monitors trends and conducts studies upon two actions: provide routes through lounges and piers for
forces were active during 2023: to identify locations where runway incursions are more likely. employees working at airside and optimize pedestrian crossings
In 2023, 19 runway incursions occurred (2022: 20), of which 18 at airside.
were classified as having no immediate safety consequences.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 76
Robust organisation
Ensuring a robust, future-proof
At Schiphol Group, we regard financial stability as a key aspect of Business ethics and corporate culture
organisation is a key enabler our strong organisational framework. Our prudent yet strategic
for Royal Schiphol Group as we financial approach, aimed in particular at maintaining solid credit Royal Schiphol Group employees are expected to act with
work towards our Vision 2050. ratings, has been instrumental in navigating through economic the utmost integrity at all times. To ensure this, we have
uncertainties such as those caused by COVID-19 and the a robust compliance and integrity programme that closely
Schiphol's robustness stems operational challenges of 2022. The introduction of new airport monitors employee behaviour and seeks to prevent potential
from our strong financial base, charges for the period 2022-2024 was a crucial step in restoring non-compliance and integrity risks. Each year, we prepare an
high ethical standards and solid our financial resilience. This step is essential for navigating Ethics Annual Plan, outlining new developments and preventive
potential future (economic) uncertainties as well as the need for measures for that year, including the ongoing promotion of
organisational framework. continued investments in our airport infrastructure and process ethical behaviour and the evaluation of our culture.
efficiencies. In 2023, we reinforced our commitment to this
objective by announcing a multi-billion euro investment for the To complement our internal integrity programme, RSG has
coming three years into infrastructure and facilities at our started to develop a vision and strategy for a sector-wide
Network Local residents
Intercontinental destinations airports, in Reputation
line with Score our comprehensive maintenance plan. With ambition on integrity and social safety within the sector. This
126 6.0
this we intend to improve the quality of our assets and strengthen is part of RSG's corporate strategy as described in the Fast Forward
our commercial and international operations. This sustainable programme, the eight-point-plan and ‘people first’ perspective,
investment strategy is key to ensuring financial stability. as well as the Quality of Work work-stream.
Safety Sustainability
Net Safety Score CO2e emissions1
96.2 -65% Top performance indicator Robust organisation Schiphol Group adheres to the OECD guidelines for responsible
business conduct for multinational organisations, where
Shareholders
applicable. Schiphol is updating its human rights policy to the
Airlines
On-time Performance Return on Equity1 Responsible Business Policy, supported by human rights elements
59% 2.9% embedded in other existing company policies. With this new
policy, we are developing a human rights due diligence process in
Employees Passengers line with the EU Taxonomy.
Employee Promoter Score Net Promoter Score
24 36
In addition, RSG promotes its integrity culture by continuously Bribery and corruption
encouraging dialogue on integrity issues and open discussions on RSG incorporates anti-corruption and anti-bribery standards
integrity by facilitating and offering interactive 'dilemma game' into its compliance policies, which are consistent with the UN
sessions, as well as general and topic-specific integrity training Convention against Corruption and are designed to prevent and
throughout the organisation (starting with the ethics part of the detect corrupt practices within our organisation. This includes,
new employee on-boarding). These sessions highlight and but is not limited to, an appropriate ethics and compliance
promote RSG's culture of integrity and outline key topics such as programme and reporting mechanisms. RSG also encourages
RSG's Code of Conduct, reporting procedures, trusted persons, all employees to report any concerns regarding fraud, bribery
dialogue facilitation and our whistle-blower policy. and/or corruption through our established reporting channels
and our Speak-Up tool.
Integrity reports
Integrity reports are submitted to the Integrity Committee, which
investigates and advises on the necessary response to (possible)
As outlined in Schiphol Group's code of conduct, we want to ensure a incidents. The Committee reports to the Risk and Compliance
strong and inclusive culture of integrity, where all colleagues conduct Committee of the Executive Team on anonymised findings
business responsibly and behave ethically at all times.
regarding incidents twice a year, and on an important Integrity
topic once a year. The Committee also reports to the Supervisory
Acting responsibly in the workplace
Board’s Audit and People Committee on an annual basis. The
As outlined in Schiphol Group's code of conduct, we want to
Executive Team and RSG external auditor are updated between
ensure a strong and inclusive culture of integrity, where all
two and four times a year, though the Executive Team is informed
colleagues conduct business responsibly and behave ethically
immediately in the event of a serious incident.
at all times. Employees must refrain from unwanted behaviour,
including discrimination, sexual harassment and bullying, and
In 2023, 32 issues were reported to the Integrity Committee
comply with relevant laws on competition, public procurement,
(2022: 29), none of which concerned bribery or corruption, or
data protection, fraud, anti-corruption and bribery. We continue
material fraud. There were 7 (of which 6 relate to the same issue)
to raise awareness of these important issues throughout
reported issues relating to discrimination on the basis of gender,
our organisation.
race or ethnic origin, nationality, religion or belief, disability, age,
sexual orientation or other forms of discrimination. Appropriate
Integrity as a central part of our organisation
actions were taken.
The analysis of our annual employee survey ('My Schiphol Survey')
in 2023 focused on several topics related to integrity, including
In addition, there are no known incidents or complaints that have
'Speak Up', the exemplary role of management, the inclusiveness
resulted in material fines, penalties or damages, nor are there any
of our culture and undesirable behaviour. The results show
known human rights incidents involving RSG’s employees that
that Schiphol has taken positive steps to consolidate our robust
may have resulted in fines, penalties or damages.
integrity culture. To continue this progress, we invite Schiphol's
management to play an active role in further strengthening
our integrity culture, for example by facilitating sessions and
addressing the integrity topics from the survey in their teams.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 79
Supplier and procurement practices We call these principles Team Schiphol Check-in and they consist Social dialogue
of the following points: The knowledge and experience of our suppliers is important
In 2023, Schiphol actively worked on improving collaboration – We are one Team Schiphol, built on trust and long-term in jointly achieving responsible employment practices and
with its strategic suppliers to create a more balanced ecosystem equal relationships implementing our Quality of Work ambition. Schiphol Group
where all parties work together at Schiphol to achieve a quieter, – We continuously improve our joint operations feels co-responsible for everyone who works for us. That is a major
cleaner and better airport. – We provide high-quality service to our passengers responsibility, as over 65,000 people from different employers
– We provide jobs with fair pay, a good work-life balance and work at Schiphol. All these people work together every day to
Since the beginning of the year, our suppliers and internal staff ample development opportunities create a quieter, cleaner and better Schiphol Airport. To make
have been working hard to ensure a smooth May and summer – We do our utmost to achieve our environmental and sense of this responsibility and how we can fulfil it effectively, we
period in serving the airlines, our passengers and handling their social ambitions value the opinions and experiences of these people. In October
baggage. Measures have been taken to ensure the required – We do our utmost to create safe and healthy and November, we organised a series of ‘deep listening sessions’
service levels at times of increasing passenger numbers, especially working conditions with a broad representation of supplier employees to understand
at peak times, and in the face of significant labour shortages. how they experience their work at Schiphol Airport and what
Team Schiphol Check-in has been tested in a number of tenders suggestions they have for improvement. In 2024 we will continue
Maintaining quality of work and quality of service where trade unions have been consulted to ensure that the and deepen these sessions.
Following the social agreement reached between Schiphol and impact on employees (in terms of working conditions and
the trade unions in 2022 to introduce better working conditions working environment) is in line with these principles. Outlook for 2024
for airport staff, a key objective for Schiphol in 2023 was to sustain In 2024, we will continue to engage with a broad group of people
this agreement in both existing and new supplier collaborations. Partner events employed by Schiphol Airport and our suppliers. Our dialogues
To achieve this, we developed an ambition statement for the new To understand the feasibility and impact of Team Schiphol Check- will ensure that we continue to actively work together to create
strategic pillar ‘Quality of Work’, containing explicit deliverables in, we discussed and finalised the new collaboration principles a culture of greater equality, better communication and mutual
to achieve this strategy. We also enhanced our ambitions with our key suppliers. In September, we organised the ‘Schiphol understanding in line with Team Schiphol Check-in. Based on
for ‘Quality of Service’, prioritising the passenger experience partner events’ with our leadership team and our top 50 suppliers Check-in, concrete objectives for supplier cooperation will be
alongside our goals for service delivery to airlines. to share our ambitions in services and asset management. These jointly defined and implemented with the operational teams and
events facilitated an open dialogue about the envisaged role of together we aim for a high-quality service for travellers and a
New principles of cooperation our partners in achieving our goals and the impact of the new quieter, cleaner and better Schiphol Airport.
We have developed seven principles of cooperation for all cooperation principles. We agreed to hold annual dialogues on
parties working at Schiphol Airport to achieve our newly our strategic objectives and the development of our partnerships,
defined strategy. These principles guide us on how to work to ensure effective communication and governance structures,
consistently and constructively with our partners, but also within and to hold regular meetings to define and develop our joint
our own organisation. With these new cooperation principles, business plans. The first joint business plans were developed in
we want to emphasise a number of important issues and 2023. We have set out concrete actions and deliverables in our
create the conditions for creating a quieter, cleaner and better 2024 strategic plans to achieve these ambitions.
Schiphol Airport.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 80
Financial solidity
Royal Schiphol Group’s financial policy seeks to ensure a solid the voluntary €380 million notional debt repayment in May 2023. Revenue 2023
financial position and good creditworthiness, represented by at The rating by S&P was upgraded from 'A-' with a stable outlook to (EUR million)
least an ‘A’ rating from one or more reputable credit rating 'A' with a stable outlook. Following the upgrade, the rating at S&P 2,000
agencies. This policy is critical to maintaining the financial is now at par with the rating of Moody's (A2 with a stable outlook)
resilience needed to cope with unexpected events and to raise and compliant with Royal Schiphol Group's financial policy of
financing for necessary investments. Key elements in maintaining maintaining at least an A flat credit rating.
a good credit rating include transparency on impactful
developments, structural profitability, collection of settlement Return 1,000
income related to lost aviation revenues in previous years and Generating a positive return in a structural way is required
maintaining a leverage profile within certain boundaries. to independently raise financing and secure favourable access
to capital markets. The return requirement applied by the
Creditworthiness Dutch State in its capacity as majority shareholder in Schiphol 1,141 564 260 1,965
Strong creditworthiness is a prerequisite for safeguarding access Group is set at a minimum return on equity of 5.6%. A
Aviation Commercial Alliances Total
to liquidity and the ability to finance and execute long-term return requirement serves as a further incentive to operate cost- &
investments in capacity, operations, safety and sustainability. efficiently and generate a higher result through unregulated Participations
Schiphol raises financing independently through capital markets non-aviation activities such as real estate, parking, airport retail
and banks. concessions, and international investments and management Underlying EBITDA 2023
contracts. Mainly as a result of the ongoing traffic recovery from (EUR million)
As a result of funding actions taken in 2020 and 2021, as well as COVID-19 as well as the increased cost level due to inflation, the 750
the successful sale of the Groupe ADP shares, Schiphol has access Social Agreement, and other Quality of Work initiatives for which
to a sizeable liquidity position of 1.2 billion euros at the end of Schiphol receives no cost coverage via the airport charges as these
2023 (when including investments in short-term deposits), which were already set in 2021, the minimum return requirement was
500
was reduced from 1.7 billion euros at the start of 2023 (partly) not reached.
as a result of voluntary deleveraging efforts that took place in
Q2 2023. In addition, Schiphol has access to committed credit
250
facilities of 675 million euros which, together with the existing
liquidity position, ensures sufficient access to liquidity to deal with
potential adverse situations. 125 313 63 501
Financial performance
Schiphol Group 2023 marked
The 2023 underlying net result of Schiphol Group increased with The net result for the year attributable to shareholders amounted
a turnaround for passengers, 129 million euros from a reported loss of 28 million euros in 2022 to 13 million euros in 2023 compared to negative net result of
employees and airport's future to 101 million euros positive result in 2023. The increase in 86 million euros in 2022.
plans. The enhanced airport revenue was mainly driven by an increase in passenger numbers
and ATM's compared to 2022, a year which was still partly
services played a crucial role influenced by COVID-19 travel restrictions. Furthermore, the Revenue
in providing passengers with revenue increased as a result of a 12% increase of the airport
a positive travel experience, charges at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol as of April 2023. The Revenue increased strongly by 361 million euros (24%), rising
increase in revenue is partly offset by an increase in underlying from 1,491 million euros in 2022 to 1,852 million euros in 2023.
even though it led to a rise in operating expenses (mainly security costs, employee benefits and Higher revenue was mainly driven by an increase in passenger
operational costs. maintenance). numbers and ATMs and a 12% increase of the airport charges for
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol as of April 2023. The total number
The adjustment from underlying result for the year to the result of passengers using Schiphol Group's airports increased by 17%
for the year is mainly a consequence of developments in the real to 70.9 million (2022: 60.8 million). The overview of the various
estate market and results from financial assets and liabilities. components of the revenue (excluding intercompany revenue) is
as follows:
Market developments in the real estate sector further
deteriorated, which led to a significant decrease in the fair value EUR million 2023 2022 %
of Schiphol's real estate portfolio. The 2023 fair value loss from
investment property amounted to 151 million euros compared Airport charges 1,158 901 28.5
with a fair value loss of 192 million euros in 2022. The fair value Concessions 205 162 26.5
gains and losses relating to Schiphol’s international investments Rent and leases 194 193 0.5
in Brisbane and Hobart amounted to a fair value gain of 2 million
Parking fees 150 125 20.0
euros, compared to a fair value gain of 20 million euros in 2022
Other 145 110 31.8
due to favourable market conditions at that time.
Total Revenue 1,852 1,491 24.2
The 2023 net result was one-off impacted by the execution of
a cash tender offer on three of the outstanding EMTN notes
resulting into a 380 million euros notional repayment against a
cash settlement of 350 million euros, hence a financial gain of
30 million euros before tax. The 2022 net result was on the other
hand impacted by a net fair value gain before tax of 61 million
euros on the remeasurement of the shares in Group ADP (Assets
held for sale) less the remeasurement result on the financial
liability related to the Share buy back obligation.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 82
Airport charges The average spend per passenger on retail airside at Amsterdam well as advertising (media) activities due to more passengers
Revenue from airport charges at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Airport Schiphol increased from 12.67 euros to 13.06 euros, food arriving and departing.
Eindhoven Airport and Rotterdam The Hague Airport increased and beverage spending per departing passenger decreased from
by 29% in 2023 to 1,158 million euros. This result was driven by 6.17 euros to 6.12 euros. The improved operation at Amsterdam
an increase in the number of passengers, ATMs and an increase Airport Schiphol led to longer dwell time in which passengers visit Other income and results from
in airport charges at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol effective as of stores or consume food and drinks. investment property
April 2023.
Rent and leases Due to the recent economic developments and the rising interest
At Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, passenger numbers were up by Revenue from rents and leases increased by 1% from 193 million rates on the capital market, the market conditions for real estate
18% to 61.9 million (2022: 52.5 million), while the number of euros in 2022 to 194 million euros in 2023. This increase is were unfavourable, which contributed to a fair value loss of
ATMs also increased by 11% to 441,969 (2022: 397,646). Cargo primarily caused by the increase as a result of indexation of lease 151 million euros in 2023 (2022: loss of 192 million euros). The
volumes decreased by 4% to1.38 million tonnes compared to contracts. The increase from indexation is for a major part offset Net Initial Yield (NIY) rose substantially in the office market this
1.44 million tonnes in 2022. Revenue from airport charges at by lower service charge revenue (relating to electricity and gas past year, due to higher interest rates in the capital market and
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol increased by 251 million euros to charges). The decrease in service charge related revenue had a the lack of demand as a result of the changing environment.
1,072 million euros (2022: 821 million euros). limited impact on the EBITDA performance, as only the service This led to a fair value loss of 90 million euros. The performance
costs for vacant space retain in income statement. of the logistics real estate market is also unfavourable, but due
Passenger numbers at Eindhoven Airport increased by 9% to to the remaining high demand for logistic real estate, the NIY
6.8 million in 2023 (2022: 6.3 million) and the number of ATMs The average occupancy rate of Schiphol’s total real estate increase was less compared to the office market, causing a fair
increased by 5% to39,996 (2022: 38,143). As a result, revenue portfolio in 2023 was 94.3%, which is in line with the average value loss of 42 million euros. Fair value losses of 5 million euros
from airport charges increased by 3% to 51 million euros in 2023 occupancy rate of 94.4% during the same period last year. The were recognised on investment property under construction,
(2022: 49.5 million euros). occupancy rate is generally lower, but the second line freight due to rising yields and higher construction costs. For the land
performance compensates for this effect. positions, fair value losses of 13 million euros were recognised due
At Rotterdam The Hague Airport, the number of passengers to unfavourable market developments for this segment.
in 2023 increased by 6% to 2.2 million (2022:2.1 million), the Parking fees
number of ATMs increased by 419 to 16,191. Due to these positive Total parking revenue increased by 20% to 150 million euros in Fair value gains and losses on the real estate portfolio
developments the revenue from airport charges at Rotterdam 2023 (2022: 125 million euros). Parking revenue at Amsterdam (EUR million)
The Hague Airport increased with 4.4 million euros to 34.4 million Airport Schiphol increased by 20 million euros to 123 million 200
euros compared to 30 million euros in 2022. euros. This is attributable to an increase in the number of original
destination passengers (approximately 12.1%) at Schiphol and
100
Concessions a higher average transaction value. Staff parking increased with
Revenue generated by Schiphol Group through concessions 8% due to more subscriptions and an average indexation of
113 69
strongly increased by 27% to 205 million euros in 2023 (2022: 3.5%. A similar development was seen at Eindhoven Airport and 0
162 million euros) following an increase in passenger numbers Rotterdam The Hague Airport. -64
at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol as well as our regional airports.
Revenue from concessions is positively impacted by absence Other -100
-151
of COVID-19 restrictions in 2023. Contrary to 2022 all shops Revenue from other activities increased by 32% to 145 million -192
were open with full opening hours as of April 2023. The return euros, also due to the increase in passenger numbers. The increase
of passengers with destination China and Hong Kong had a is mainly driven by an increase in passengers with reduced 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
positive impact on the passenger mix resulting in a higher spend mobility, more passengers making use of premium services as
per passenger.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 83
Financial income and expenses The underlying share in the results of associates and joint ventures Net result
increased by 3 million euros, leading to a positive result of
The underlying net financial income and expense for 2023 21 million euros in 2023 (2022: 18 million euros). The fluctuations The adjustments, including the results of the investment property
amounts to 28 million euros and is in line with expectations in the share of the results of associates and joint ventures were (mainly non-cash fair value gains) and several other one-off
given the debt portfolio and cash and cash equivalent position mainly driven by an increase in the results of our international results, the net result attributable to shareholders for 2023
(2022: 78 million euros). activities, in particular Brisbane airport. Following international amounted to a result of 13 million euros (2022: negative result of
and domestic border openings in Australia and a strong pent 86 million euros). The return on equity amounted to 0.4% positive
The adjustment on the underlying net financial expense was up demand, passenger numbers have been trending higher in 2023 (2022: 2.5% negative).
in 2023 positively impacted by 30 million euros as a result of than anticipated. Although operational performance of Hobart
a one off financial income following the cash tender offer on Airport continues to be strong, net results are affected by fair Other results from financial assets and
certain EMTN notes. The net financial expenses in 2022 were value changes of their interest rate swap. Other results from financial liabilities
impacted by a fair value gain of 135 million euros on the investment properties comprise the net of fair value gain of Net financial income and expenses decrease by 18 million euros
remeasurement and loss on disposal of the asset held for sale both Brisbane airport and Hobart airport. An impairment loss of to positive 2 million euros for 2023 (2022: 16 million euros
(investment (shares) in ADP) and a financial expense resulting 1 million euros (2022: 10 million euros) was recognised on one of negative). This is mostly due to the 2022 fair value gain of
from the remeasurement of the financial liability - share buyback Schiphol's joint ventures. 135 million euros on our investment (shares) in Groupe ADP, as
obligation of 74 million euros. a result of the remeasurement in terms of IFRS 9 as well as the
recognition of the loss on disposal of the shares. Also, as a result
Underlying corporate income tax of the remeasurement of the share buyback obligation, financial
Share in results of associates and expenses to the amount of 74 million euros were recognised in
joint ventures The underlying corporate income tax amounted to 40 million 2022. The share buyback obligation (financial liability) was settled
euros in 2023 compared with 11 million euros in 2022. This in December 2022 with the acquisition of the treasury shares.
Share in results of associates and joint ventures excludes the tax impact of the adjustments from underlying
EUR million 2023 2022 % result to result with a total impact of 31 million euros for 2023 Tax impact
(52 million euros for 2022). Corporate income tax amounted to 9 million euros expenses in
Brisbane Airport 2023 compared to 58 million euros income in 2022. The 2022
Corporation Holdings 21 12 75.0 tax calculations were impacted by the non taxable fair value gain
Hobart International Underlying net result of 135 million euros and finance costs of 74 million euros from
Airport (TGHC) -3 2 >100 the revaluation of the share buy-back obligation and the assets
Other results of associates 3 4 -25.0 As a result of the developments outlined above, the underlying held for sale. For 2023, the effective tax rate was higher than
2023 net result increased by 129 million euros to 101 million the domestic income tax rate of 25.8%, mainly as a result of
Underlying result of
euros from 28 million euros loss in 2022. The underlying return on adjustments related to prior years. The effective tax rate for the
associates and joint ventures 21 18 23.5
equity amounted to 2.9% positive in 2023 (2022: 0.8% negative). 2023 financial year was 28.7% (2022: positive 42.9%).
Adjustments for:
Other results from
investment property 2 20
Impairment -1 -10
Tax impact - 5
Total adjustments 1 15 -93.3
Result of associates and
joint ventures 22 33 -33.3
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 85
Investments Movement in the consolidated Current liabilities increased as a result of an increase in the
statement of financial position short-term portion of borrowings and an increase in accruals an
In 2023, Schiphol invested 678 million euros, an increase of 53% an increase in flight tax payable.
compared to 444 million euros in 2022. There are several reasons The balance sheet total as at 31 December 2023 amounted to
for this linked to operational feasibility (capacity issues aircraft 9,254 million euros. This figure decreased by 350 million euros
stands) and manufacturability (limited capacity of terminal, compared with 31 December 2022 (9,604 million euros). Total Cash flow developments
fluctuating capacity and security capacity) and also caused equity decreased by 14 million euros to 3,433 million euros. The
by COVID-19’s aftermath. The most significant investments in decrease is a combined effect of a positive result attributable Cash flow from operating activities amounted to an inflow of
2023 are: to shareholders of 13 million euros and a negative change in 489 million euros in 2023 compared with an inflow of 353 million
other comprehensive income of 27 million euros, mainly due euros in 2022. This increase was a direct consequence of the
– development of Pier A; to translation differences. No dividends were paid during 2022 recovery from COVID-19 on an operational level during 2023.
– execution of maintenance on runway and no dividends are expected to be paid over 2023 but formal
18C-36R (Zwanenburgbaan); decision takes place in the General meeting of shareholders in Total cash flow from investing activities amounted to an outflow
– redevelopment Terminal 1; April 2024. of 349 million euros in 2023 compared with an inflow of
– development Hangar 17; 216 million euros in 2022. The outflow was mainly a result
– execution of the multi-year maintenance plan. Non-current assets increased by 139 million euros to 7,723 million of higher investments in Property, Plant and Equipment and
euros as at 31 December 2023. The increase was mainly due to repayment. The inflow of 2022 was impacted by the disposal of
Schiphol Group investments the increase of Assets under construction or development which the financial asset (shares of Groupe ADP), as well as taking into
(EUR million) increased by 297 million euros. Within investment property, account a net outflow (investments) of deposits.
1,000 recognised fair value losses of 151 million euros exceeded the
2023 capital expenditure and combined resulted in a decrease of Net cash flow from operating and investing activities (free cash
101 million euros in the balance. flow ) amounted to an inflow of 140 million euros in 2023
compared with an inflow of 569 million euros in 2022.
Current assets decreased by 488 million euros compared to 2022,
500 mainly caused by a decrease of long term deposits included in Cash flow from financing activities amounted to 406 million euros
trade and other receivables and a decrease of cash and cash negative (2022: 438 million euros outflow). The 2023 outflow was
equivalents. The decrease of cash and cash equivalents is primarily a result of the cash tender offer on three of its outstanding EMTN
a result of early repayment of certain EMTN notes following notes executed during the first half of the year, that resulted in a
the cash tender offer and capital expenditures and financing of cash outflow of 350 million euros. In addition, Schiphol repaid the
860 787 450 444 678
capital expenditures without attracting new borrowings. As at 25 million euros Namensschuldverschreibung, which matured
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 31 December 2023, Schiphol Group held 785 million euros in during the first half of the year. The 2022 cash flow from financing
cash and cash equivalents, of which 165 million euros in bank activities was impacted by the acquisition of the treasury shares by
accounts, 286 million euros in bank deposits and 334 million euros 420 million euros. Schiphol Group did not attract additional debt
in money market funds (2022 money market funds: 642 million in 2023 (2022: none).
euros). In addition an amount of 370 million euros was included
in deposited with an initial maturity exceeding 3 months (2022: Mainly as a consequence of the aforementioned developments
680 million euros). in the operating result and the positive cash flow from investing
activities, the net cash flow in 2023 amounted to an outflow of
266 million euros (2022: 131 million euros inflow). As a result, the
net amount of cash balances, taking into account exchange and
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 86
translation differences, decreased from 1,051 million euros as at The FFO/interest coverage ratio in 2023 was 6.7x positive, an first three-year charge period covered the years 2019-2021.
31 December 2022 to 785 million euros as at 31 December 2023. increase from the 4.5x negative recorded in 2022. In addition to The second three-year charge period 2022-2024 was subject to
these two ratios, the net leverage ratio (ratio of interest-bearing consultation in 2021.
In addition to these cash balances, Royal Schiphol Group has debt minus cash and cash equivalent divided by EBITDA) is
access to 675 million euros in committed and 150 million euros in applied. At the end of the 2023 financial year, Schiphol Group’s The return on aviation assets, the regulatory asset base, has
uncommitted undrawn bank facilities (2022: 675 million euros net leverage ratio stood at 7.5x. The solvency ratio for the Group been capped at the regulated weighted average cost of
committed and 150 million euros uncommitted) and 370 million over 2023 was 37.1% (2022: capital (WACC) determined for the three-year period, on which
euros in short-term deposits. 35.9%), which is above the required minimum of 30% per the the 10-year interest rate on Dutch government bonds has a
covenants of the European Investment Bank. considerable impact. This means Schiphol Group’s return on
aviation investments depends on the general development of
Financing the interest rate. For the 2019-2021 charge period, the regulated
Economic regulation WACC was 2.71% (after tax); for 2022-2024, the regulated WACC
The total amount of outstanding loans and lease liabilities is 3.21% (after tax).
decreased by 431 million euros in 2023 to 4,934 million euros Aviation activities at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and Eindhoven
(2022: 5,365 million euros). The decrease was mainly the result of Airport are regulated; the other regional airports are not The fees we charge airlines for the use of Amsterdam Airport
the voluntary cash tender offer on Schiphol’s outstanding EMTN regulated. Schiphol Group’s income is differentiated between Schiphol are set after consultation with the airlines and subject to
Notes, which reduced the total gross debt notional by 380 million regulated and non-regulated flows in what is known as a (hybrid) supervision by the Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM)
euros, and to a lesser extent the repayment of 25 million euros on dual-till system. The amounts Schiphol Group can charge are under the Dutch Aviation Act.
a Namensschuldverschreibung and 9 million euros on loans from restricted to the costs associated with primary airport operations
the European Investment Bank. At present, it is possible to raise including security and related infrastructure. Airport charges 2022-2024
funds of up to 5 billion euros under the EMTN Programme, of After consultation with the airlines, the charges for 2022-2024
which 4,037 million euros has been issued. Under the current Aviation Act, which took effect on 1 July were set on 29 October 2021, and came into effect on 1 April
2017, Schiphol Airport’s charges are set every three years. The 2022. When setting its charges for 2022 until 2024, Schiphol
In addition, Schiphol Group has an Euro Commercial Paper (ECP)
programme with a current limit of 1 billion euros. Schiphol Group
also has a number of committed undrawn facilities to the value Development of airport charges Amsterdam Airport Schiphol
of 675 million euros with BNP Paribas, ABN AMRO, ING, Natwest (EUR million)
112.4
100.0 98.6
Ratios
92.6 89.8 91.8
81.7 83.7
74.8 77.5
800 80
The most important financing ratios set out in our financing policy
are FFO/net debt, FFO/interest coverage ratios and net leverage
ratios. Funds From Operations (FFO) relates to cash flow from
operating activities adjusted for operating working capital. In 789 774 737 746 818 907 292 376 821 1,072
2023, FFO increased from 267 million euros negative to
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
446 million euros positive. The FFO/net debt ratio reached 11.8%
positive at the end of 2023 compared with 7.4% positive at the
Revenue from airport charges (EUR million)
end of 2022.
Development of indexed average airport charges normalised for Consumer Price Index (2014 = 100)
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 87
Aviation
EUR million 2023 2022 %
Schiphol's market share in passenger volume Aviation business area costs Costs per WLU (Aviation)
in top-10 European airports EUR million EUR per WLU
1,500 20 17.44
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Aviation (continued)
In 2023, the direct destinations from Schiphol totalled 305 Airport charges 2022-2024 Operational performance in 2023
in comparison to 313 in 2022. The IR rate for baggage In 2021 the charges were set for the years 2022-2024 with an Also in 2023, Schiphol still was confronted with the industry-wide
handling (amount of baggage items delayed per departing 1,000 increase of 9% in 2022 and an expected increase of 12% in effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and rapid recovery of demand
passengers) was 10.8 in 2023 (2022: 15.4). The punctuality of air both 2023 and 2024. A number of airlines and representative for air travel after the pandemic ended. Shortage of staff, both
transport movements for arrivals was 74.7% (2022: 74.9.%) and organisations have filed complaints about the charges, which within Schiphol as well as with various sector partners, resulted
for departures 58.9% (2022: 57.1%). were rejected by the regulator (Dutch Authority for Consumers & in an inability to accommodate the full recovery of passenger
Markets). A few airlines subsequently appealed to the court (CBb: numbers in the beginning of 2023. To ensure that operations
Underlying operating result College van Beroep van Bedrijfsleven). The CBb is in the process of during the first weeks of the summer season, including the May
The COVID-19 pandemic up until Q1 2022 and the rapid recovery assessing these complaints. A ruling is expected early 2024. holidays, would be able to cope with the increasing number of
in traffic thereafter had a significant impact on operations within passengers, several measures were taken to limit the number of
Aviation over 2022, but in 2023 as well. This also shows in the In October 2022, Schiphol adjusted the airport charges for 2023 in local departing passengers in the morning hours. After mid-May,
underlying operating result of Aviation, which in 2023 increased accordance with the expected increase of 12%. In October 2023 there were no more restrictions and airlines had the ability to
from a loss of 199 million euros in 2022 to a loss of 113 million Schiphol adjusted the airport charges for 2024 to an increase of operate up to the maximum capacity of Amsterdam Airport
euros in 2023. Revenue increased by 270 million euros, mainly due 14.8%. Complaints have been submitted to the regulator about Schiphol, whereby Schiphol managed to run a stable operation
to a strong recovery of the number of passengers and air traffic the adjusted increase in charges for 2024. The regulator is in for the remainder of the year.
movements (ATMs). the process of assessing these complaints. Schiphol expects the
regulator to make a decision before 1 April 2024. As of 2022, Schiphol launched numerous initiatives to reduce the
Underlying expenses increased by 170 million euros to staff shortages within the entire Schiphol ecosystem. Many of
1,016 million euros due to a combination of factors, though these initiatives continued in 2023. Next to financial incentives
mainly as a result of measures and incentives implemented by to improve labor conditions, Schiphol also continues to invest in
Schiphol Group to cope with the operational challenges that ‘Quality of Work’ in order to make working conditions at Schiphol
emerged at the start of the May holiday in 2022 as well as more attractive. As an example, the social accord as it was agreed-
initiatives to improve Quality of Work for all people working for upon in 2022, was extended in 2023. Furthermore, Schiphol
and at Schiphol. In addition, inflationary pressure also pushed up continued to invest in resting and sanitary areas for people
operational expenses significantly. working at Schiphol and also invests in various solutions to reduce
the physical strain for people working in the baggage halls.
With a fixed regulatory WACC of 3.21% (after tax), the maximum
allowed return on net assets is limited and does by far not cover These measures continue to result in a significant increase of costs
the actual cost of capital for Schiphol Group. for Aviation. Driven by the regulatory context, Schiphol Group
has limited manoeuvrability to offset these additional costs via
the airport charges, which therefore drives a lower net result
for Aviation.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 90
Schiphol Commercial
EUR million 2023 2022 %
work and travel, and the efforts are driven by (in EUR 1.000) 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022
three dedicated department teams: Parking &
Mobility Services, Commercial Terminal Services Total revenue 186 148 127 107 151 152 59 55 39 30
(encompassing Retail, Food and Beverages, Operating expenses 50 37 56 47 66 65 45 36 32 19
Financial Services, Terminal Real Estate, Privium, Underlying EBITDA 136 111 71 60 85 87 14 20 7 10
VIP, and Media) and Commercial Real Estate. Depreciation 18 17 20 20 9 6 20 19 4 5
Underlying
operating result 118 94 51 40 76 81 -6 1 3 5
Spend per departing passenger at Schiphol (in EUR) Public parking revenue Real estate average physical occupancy rate
(EUR per arriving passenger OD/NL) (in %)
2023 2022
Airside retail 13.06 12.67 10 100
5 50
2023 2023
2022 2022
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 91
Underlying operating result an occupancy of 89% (2022: 90%) and a footprint of 104,000 Commercial real estate - Offices
In 2023, the underlying operating result for Commercial sqm, the terminal offices contributed 59 million euros to Schiphol CRE achieved an average occupancy of 89% in 2023 (2022: 89%)
increased by 21 million euros to 242 million euros due to the Commercial’s total rental income in 2023. The occupancy rate for the office portfolio, which has a total footprint of 224,000 sqm.
recovery in passenger numbers (an increase of 17%). Revenue decreased slightly by 1%, as a result of renovations related Due to the high indexation, the topline increase for the office
from concessions was positively impacted by the number of shops to Skyport. portfolio was 5.4 million euros.
that were open. As a result of the COVID-19 lock down in 2021,
many shops were closed for a period of time. This extended into Our passengers remain the central focus of everything we do, Commercial real estate - Logistics
January 2022. The opening hours of the shops were impacted by and we aim to make their stay at the airport a safe and pleasant Schiphol’s logistics real estate portfolio consists of first- and
the lack of staff due to labour shortages in the market. one. We keep our eyes open for new forms of mobility and digital second-tier warehouses. In 2023, the average occupancy rate
innovations to enhance the customer experience. One of the across the logistics portfolio was consistently high at 99% (2022:
The average spend per passenger on retail airside at Amsterdam highlights in 2023 was the opening of the new Bubbles Seafood 99%), with a total footprint of 274,000 sqm. The logistics portfolio
Airport Schiphol increased from 12.67 euros to 13.06 euros, food & Wine Bar in Lounge 2. This is one of the milestones to improve contributes 36 million euros to Schiphol’s topline income.
and beverage spending per departing passenger decreased from the quality of this lounge. Over the coming years Schiphol will
6.17 euros to 6.12 euros. The improved operation at Schiphol continue to improve the quality of this lounge by introducing Commercial real estate - Land
airport led to longer dwell time in which passengers visit stores or several leading luxury (fashion) brands. CRE also owns a significant portfolio of land that is not used for
consume food and drinks. aeronautical purposes. This land is managed and leased to third
The underlying operating result of Parking & Mobility Services parties, generating total revenues of 36.4 million euros on an
Media revenue increased by 3 million euros (23%) compared to increased, from a profit of 40 million euros in 2022 to a annual basis.
2022, resulting in a net revenue of 16 million euros. Revenue profit of 51 million euros in 2023. This mainly relates to public
recovered as passenger numbers increased and the types of parking revenues and was largely driven by an increase in OD
passengers changed in comparison with 2022. With different passenger numbers (12.1%) and a higher average transaction
customer journeys it is an interesting place for brands to value. Staff parking experienced an increase of 8% as an average
communicate with the right target group. of index of 3.5% was applied and the number of subscriptions by
customers increased.
The underlying operating result of Premium Services, consisting
of Privium and the VIP service, further increased from 16 million The underlying operating result from Commercial Real Estate
euros to 24 million euros. The number of VIP passengers making decreased by 5 million euros in 2023 to 76 million euros.
use of the VIP service remained stable around 29.000 guests,
whilst the number of Privium members grew significantly, from Fair value losses amounting to 151 million euros in 2023 were
69.000 to 90,500 members by the end of the year. These recognised in comparison with a fair value loss of 192 million
services are in high demand since the operational challenges euros recorded in 2022. Rising interest rates on the capital
in previous years. markets and lack of demand caused yields to increase on the
real estate market. In line with this development, the fair value
The offices and lounges in the terminal are managed as of Schiphol's real estate portfolio decreased. Due to strong
operational assets, meaning they are mostly rented to companies tenant retention, the occupancy rate decreased to 94.3% in 2023
with activities directly linked to Schiphol’s airport processes. With compared with 94.4% in 2022.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 92
Number of passengers
(x 1,000)
40,000
26,368
21,605
17,179 17,952
20,000
6,814 6,271
2,242 2,134 2,613 2,306 2,888 2,570
Eindhoven Rotterdam The Brisbane Airport JFKIAT, New York Hobart Queen Beatrix
Airport Hague Airport (Australia) (US) (Tasmania) International
2023 Airport (Aruba)
2022
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 93
The total underlying result for Alliances & Participations International airports Other activities
amounted to a profit of 28 million euros in 2023 compared Brisbane Airport’s contribution to Schiphol’s financial results The other participations segment consists primarily of Schiphol
with a profit of 8 million euros in 2022. The increase is mostly decreased to 26 million euros in 2023 (2022: 36 million Telematics, which provides telecommunication services to
attributable to an increase in revenue of the domestic airports euros). JFK’s contribution to Schiphol’s financial results increased the airport and neighbouring locations, and Utilities, which
and lower expenses by Schiphol Telematics and Utilities. to 9 million euros (2022: 6 million euros). Hobart Airport's generates revenue by supplying electricity and gas as well
contribution to the result decreased to 1 million euros from a as water. In 2023, Schiphol Telematics' operating result was
Regional airports 10 million euro positive result in 2022. 14 million euros. The operating result for Schiphol Utilities
In 2023, Eindhoven Airport’s operating result increased by amounted to 8 million euros.
0.5 million euros, leading to a profit of 26.1 million euros (2022:
profit of 25.6 million euros). This was due to a 9% increase in the
number of passengers.
Total result of regional airports Total result of international airports Total result of other activities
(EUR million) (EUR million) (EUR million)
2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022
small for the numbers of passengers we serve. The lack of space 2023 2022 Change Passengers travelled to 54 different destinations, in 2022 there
is especially noticeable in the arrivals hall and the Non-Schengen were 57 and in 2019 48 destinations.
Number of passengers 2.2 2.1 5%
departure area. The much-needed expansion of the terminal
Direct destinations 54 57 -3
has been delayed, in part because environmental permits are Discovery of PFAS at fire brigade training site
Air transport movements 16,191 15,772 3%
delayed. Preparatory work should start in 2024, with actual In September RTHA commissioned an external consultancy
TPI Sustainability (reduction
construction in 2025. Completion is scheduled for 2027. in CO2e emissions compared company to execute soil research at the fire brigade training site.
with 2019) 0.13 0.14 -0.01 This research has shown that there are increased concentrations
Read more at www.eindhovenairport.nl TPI On-time perfromance 66.6% 68.3% -1.73 of PFAS in the soil, groundwater and ditches around the training
TPI Net promoter score 55 49.3 5.7 site. Further research is needed to understand the cause, extent
Rotterdam The Hague Airport TPI Employee promoter score 16 27.1 -11.1 and risks of the contamination. This research will start in January
Net safety score 3.1 3.4 -0.3 2024. RTHA used to extinguish fires during past incidents and
LTIF 0 16.30 -16.30 exercises with a legally prescribed PFAS-containing extinguishing
Runway incursion 8 16 -8 agent. Since 2020, thanks to an adjustment in EASA legislation
Bird strikes per 10,000 and regulations, PFAS-containing extinguishing agents are no
flight movements 4.8 4 0.8 longer used in incidents at RTHA. Since 2005, the fire brigade has
Precentage of operational only used water during firefighting exercises at the airport.
waste seperated -1 46.70% -0.47
1 Data for 2023 not available, we are working on getting the data available for 2024
Innovation and sustainability
RTHA signed a new contract with waste processing company
In the third quarter of 2023 CTSN took over as the new security
Renewi and data-driven tech company Seenons to help reach
partner. After a lengthy and complex transition process, CTSN had
the goal to become a zero waste airport in 2030 and towards
a successful start on the 1st of October.
full circularity in 2050. Thanks to the use of advanced data,
residual streams will be separated and processed using innovative
At the end of the year RTHA proudly received ACA (Airport
methods to ensure reuse and recycling and reduce emissions from
Carbon Accreditation) Level 5; the highest available recognition
waste incineration.
for the efforts made in making airports more sustainable. RTHA
In 2023, the first normal year after COVID-19, the aircraft
received the award for reducing the CO₂ emissions for its own
movements were well spread over the year, all the operational RTHA continues to work towards a zero emission airport for
activities by more than 90% and making continuous efforts to
processes functioned well and the passenger satisfaction ground activities in 2030 and has invested in more electric ground
reduce emissions throughout the aviation sector. RTHA was one
was high. vehicles and equipment. For the ground service equipment that is
of ten airports worldwide to receive the certificate from Airports
not yet electric, the fossil free HVO100 fuel is used, which has up
Council International (ACI).
To accommodate people waiting for arriving passengers, RTHA to 90% less carbon emissions compared to fossil diesel.
opened a new coffee corner in the spring, Kiosk16, on landside,
Passenger numbers and aircraft movements
located close to Arrivals. In December Rotterdam The Hague Innovation Airport (RHIA)
In 2023, 2,2 million passengers travelled to and from RTHA, which
launched a new proposition. After four years of successful
is an increase of 5% compared to 2022 and 6% more than in 2019.
In the summer Rotterdam The Hague Airport (RTHA) launched a collaboration, the next phase will focus on a community-driven
In 2023 there were 16.191 commercial aircraft movements, which
new logo and visual identity. The (digital) world has changed a lot approach, private leadership and public support. A new Executive
is 3% more than in 2022 and 3% less than 2019. On average, the
since the creation of the old logo and the visual assets no longer Board has been announced which includes Transavia, Shell, TU
load factor on board of the planes was higher in 2023 compared
fitted within these developments. Besides that, RTHA’s strategy Delft, Netherlands Aerospace Centre (NLR) and Rotterdam The
to previous years.
and positioning have been refined and the new designs are a Hague Airport.
better representation of that.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 96
RTHA has further developed its role as innovation partner with Lelystad Airport found for the flight altitude of aircraft approaching the airport
the main focus to contribute to CO₂ neutral aviation per 2050. over a distance of 30 kilometres near Lemelerveld. Regarding
The airport invests in all 3 methods of sustainable aviation: SAF, the first requirement, Lelystad Airport expects to acquire the
hydrogen and battery- electric. nature permit in the first half of 2024. Regarding the second
requirement, in December 2023, Air Traffic Control Netherlands
SAF (LVNL) sent a letter to the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water
Shell and RTHA signed a long-term agreement to blend Management (I&W), stating that closing sector 3 (a low flight
sustainable aviation fuel on all aircraft fuelled at the airport, path) is an appropriate measure (precondition 2). If Lelystad
starting in 2024. On top of the European blending mandate Airport obtains the nature permit, it will comply with the
of 6%, the airport will accelerate its efforts by setting itself a two requirements set by the Minister of Infrastructure and
minimum additional target of 8% to meet the more ambitious Water Management.
goal of the Dutch aviation sector of 14% by 2030. Using
sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is among the few measures Lelystad Airport could make an important contribution to
currently available to reduce fossil carbon emissions from fulfilling Schiphol Group's ambition to cause less hindrance to
international aviation. its surroundings, as described in the eight-points of the Quieter,
Cleaner, Better plan. One of the options is to move night flights
Hydrogen 2023 2022 Change from Schiphol to daytime flights at Lelystad Airport.
A liquid hydrogen storage facility is currently being developed to
Air transport movements 1 75,168 83,514 -10.0%
store hydrogen powered aviation in the future. Besides this, RTHA Lelystad Airport is ready for commercial aviation. All necessary
TPI Sustainability (reduction
continued hydrogen projects with Zeroavia, Conscious Aerospace in CO2e emissions compared infrastructure work was completed in 2019, including the
and Aerodelft. In 2023 we started collaborating with Hamburg with 2019) 0.04 0.03 0.01 installation of air traffic control services by Air Traffic Control
Airport, a hydrogen like-minded airport on creating a hydrogen TPI Net safety score 99.5 97.4 2.1 Netherlands (LVNL) and the Air Force Command (CLSK). The
corridor with the aim of realizing a demonstration flight in 2026. TPI Employee promoter score 11 -38 49 Lelystad Airport organisation and its business partners are fully
1 Only general aviation (GA), business aviation (BA) is reported committed and ready for take-off.
Battery-electric
An electric charging facility has been installed at the airport, Past, present and future In 2023, Lelystad Airport registered over 75,000 ATMs of GA and
which is used to charge the first electric aircraft, the Velis Electro Lelystad Airport, currently a hub for general aviation (GA), BA traffic, a decrease of 10% in comparison with 2022, caused by
from manufacturer Pipistrel. The charging facility was realized at business aviation (BA) and helicopter traffic, celebrated its 50th periods of bad weather and the higher price of fuels, for example.
one of the flight schools at RTHA and enables all pilots at the flight year of operations in 2023. In anticipation of the opening of the airport to commercial traffic,
school to get experience with electric flying. To stimulate electric all notifications of noise disturbance can be submitted to a digital
flying, RTHA will not charge landing fees for all electric flights Under the 2008 Alders Agreement, Lelystad Airport is designated counter (‘Meldpunt Lelystad Airport’). These notifications are
until 2025. as an overflow airport for Schiphol, catering specifically to non- followed up by reports that are discussed with local residents and
mainport traffic with a capacity of up to 45,000 commercial air municipalities and NGOs.
The airport fire brigade has had training on how to cope with new transport movements (ATMs) a year. The plan initially aimed for
energy carriers like battery and hydrogen. Lelystad Airport to commence this role in 2018. Sustainability and community engagement
Lelystad Airport has been designed as a sustainable airport and
Read more at www.rotterdamthehagueairport.nl The opening of Lelystad Airport for commercial air traffic has has been awarded ‘Gold’ category LEED certification. Sustainable
been postponed several times. On 24 June 2022, the political construction methods were used to build the new terminal and
decision on the opening was postponed by two years to 2024, to widen and lengthen the runway. The latter project resulted
and it hinged on Lelystad Airport fulfilling two requirements: in a savings of 500 tonnes of carbon emissions. Together with
(1) It must obtain a nature permit and (2) a solution must be
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 97
17 aviation and mobility partners, Lelystad Airport is promoting regional training centre, ROC of Amsterdam, to offer training Maastricht Aachen Airport has submitted, and is awaiting
the introduction of electric regional aviation in a collaboration initiatives for students and trainees, as well as work placements at approval for, all documentation to increase from level 2 to level 3+
called ‘Power Up’. The Power Up partners from different countries the airport with its partner companies. ‘neutrality’ in the ACI Airport Carbon Accreditation program and
are committed to supporting a new proposition for efficient, is working hard on reaching its ambition to be net zero emission
low-carbon and convenient travel to and from regional airports. Read more at www.lelystadairport.nl by 2030. The extensive collaboration with the other airports in the
They are pooling their knowledge of passenger and airport Royal Schiphol Group and regional partners provides invaluable
processes and different electric aircraft technologies. By the end Maastricht Aachen Airport insights and best practices as well as technical expertise to reach
of 2023, all airside vehicles will be fully electric, and where this goal and become a better and high quality airport
sustainable solutions are not yet available, HVO100 will be used
as fuel. HVO100 is a renewable and fossil-free fuel produced from Read more at www.maa.nl.
biomass. Its use will result in near-zero carbon emissions. Lelystad
Airport will be equipped with two charging stations for electric
aircraft to support the development of electric aviation.
Promoting local sustainable employment is one of Lelystad The full renovation of the runway at the airport and the
Airport's core values. The airport aims to recruit at least 30% associated 8 weeks closure of the airport in May and June 2023
of its workforce from within a 30-kilometre radius. Additional were a key event in 2023. This project marks the start of an
job opportunities will arise when Lelystad Airport opens for extensive program to resolve the maintenance backlog and the
commercial air traffic. Lelystad Airport also works together with transition of the airport in line with its strategy.
Stichting Campus Amsterdam Lelystad Airport (SCALA) and the
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 98
Our international activities Brisbane Airport Exciting times lie ahead for the airport. Queensland's population
is expected to grow by 16% between now and 2032, and BNE’s
The year 2023 marked a turning point for Royal Schiphol Group’s annual passenger numbers will increase by 10 million in the lead
international participations. Not only did traffic continue to up to the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Over
recover, but at several airports it exceeded the pre-pandemic the next decade, the company will invest more than 5 billion
levels of 2019. Each airport in our Group is actively engaged Australian dollars through its Future BNE long-term capital plan.
in comprehensive capital expenditure (CAPEX) programmes, The project includes upgrades, expansions and developments
furthering our commitment to develop into more sustainable, that will increase capacity, meet international safety standards,
high-quality airports. support essential services, improve the passenger experience,
enhance sustainability, make Brisbane Airport the best airport
A core element of our ‘Group of Airports’ strategy is the exchange to use and unlock commercial opportunities. Most excitingly,
of knowledge and expertise between the airports, promoting Future BNE includes the opening of the first phase of a new third
mutual learning and creating synergies. A notable milestone passenger terminal.
in 2023 was the first ‘Schiphol Academy’ training week, which
brought together a diverse group of experts from our airport Read more at www.bne.com.au
network to enhance internal knowledge sharing. This initiative,
together with our Knowledge Network and Secondment A total of 21.6 million passengers travelled through Brisbane JFKIAT (JFK Terminal 4, John F. Kennedy Airport,
Programmes, is the cornerstone of our collaborative approach. Airport (BNE) in 2023, an increase of 26% on 2022 and 90% of New York)
pre-COVID-19 traffic. International traffic saw a strong recovery,
Our diversified international portfolio made a positive driven by new routes and support from Queensland's Attracting
contribution and demonstrated its value to the Group. Further Aviation Investment Fund (AAIF), a joint airport and government
growth and diversification of our Group remains an important initiative to bring tourists and jobs back to Queensland's
focus for the coming years. visitor economy.
Participations of Royal Schiphol Group 2023 Brisbane Airport's positive workplace environment was
Airport Passenger Change Our role recognised at the 2023 Australian Business Awards and the
numbers 2023 compared to Australian HR Awards, where the airport was named Employer
2022
of Choice.
Brisbane 21.6 million + 26% Shareholding
Airport, Australia of 19.61%
Brisbane Airport is committed to achieving net-zero emissions
JFK Terminal 4, 26.4 million + 47 % Management
(Scope 1 and 2) by 2025 (amongst other activities) through the
New York, USA contract
supply of renewable energy from wind and solar projects. In
Hobart International 2.6 million + 13 % Shareholding
Airport, Australia of 35% 2023, Brisbane Airport became the first Australian airport to
Queen Beatrix 2.9 million +12 % Strategic be awarded Level 4 Airport Carbon Accreditation by Airports JFK International Air Terminal LLC (JFKIAT), an affiliate of Royal
International partnership Council International (ACI), recognising Brisbane Airport’s long- Schiphol Group, has operated Terminal 4 at John F. Kennedy
Airport, Aruba
term carbon management strategy to achieve absolute emissions International Airport since 1997. The total number of passengers
reductions and evidence of forging meaningful partnerships to passing through Terminal 4 in 2023 was almost 26.4 million,
reduce the emissions of airport partners. compared with 22 million in 2019. In January 2023, Terminal 2 at
JFK Airport was closed, and all flights of its anchor tenant Delta Air
Lines, Inc. were consolidated into Terminal 4.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 99
In 2023, JFKIAT revised its corporate strategy to align with Hobart International Airport The airport began work on a 200 million Australian dollar
the changing landscape of the aviation industry following the (121.9 million euros) upgrade of its passenger terminal. When
significant impact of COVID-19. This includes a more considered completed in 2026, the upgrade will increase capacity from
approach to decisions regarding in-house versus outsourced 1.5 million to 4.5 million passengers per year (expected to
operations, an increased focus on certain strategic issues such as be reached in 2035). It will provide a significantly enhanced
sustainability, and a dedicated effort to enhance the recognition passenger experience with more retail, food and beverage
and value of our employees. options featuring a range of local Tasmanian products.
Throughout the year, JFKIAT focused on building a strong Read more at hobartairport.com.au
community that is proud to work at T4. In Q2, another 4Excellence
Rewards and Recognition Breakfast was held to recognise Aruba Airport (Queen Beatrix International
employees who go the extra mile, with a record-breaking group Airport)
of 263 nominations from colleagues and passengers. As part
of its Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Belonging (DEIB) efforts,
the operator partnered with the LQBT Network, marched in the
Queens Pride Parade and hosted its first Juneteenth celebration.
As a result of these efforts, JFKIAT was recognised on the Crain’s Hobart Airport is the largest airport on the island of Tasmania and
New York Business Top 100 Best Places to Work list for the fourth the ninth-largest in Australia, handling 2.6 million passengers in
consecutive year. 2023. As the major gateway to an island state, Hobart Airport is a
key economic driver for Tasmania.
The operator received the 2023 Greenest Airport Terminal Award.
JFKIAT is a notable leader in sustainability and hosted several In 2023, Hobart Airport’s implementation of its people strategy
initiatives to contribute to this important goal, including a pop-up over the past three years resulted in an engagement score of
thrift shop, an exhibit of sustainability-themed artwork created 94% in its annual staff survey and a Best Workplace Award from
by Virgil I. Grissom Middle School students and a volunteer day at the survey provider. The airport also developed its first Reflect
the Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge. Reconciliation Action Plan for engagement with the Indigenous
people of Tasmania and has begun work to upgrade to an
JFKIAT continued its transformation and renovation plans with Innovate Reconciliation Action Plan. Aruba Airport, managed and operated by Aruba Airport
the introduction of self-service technology in the departure Authority N.V. (AAA), has a strategic collaboration with Royal
lounges and the renovation of its restrooms and locker Hobart Airport maintained its net-zero emissions goal and moved Schiphol Group. This partnership enables Schiphol Group to
rooms. Throughout 2024, the terminal operator will focus on from level 2 to level 3+ 'neutrality' in the Airport Carbon nominate the airport’s CEO, deliver technical support, and share
redeveloping its commercial programme and concessions, which Accreditation programme. It increased its score from 90% to knowledge and best practice.
are expected to be completed in 2026. 95% in its third year of participation in the Global Real Estate
Sustainability Benchmark. The year 2023 culminated in AAA’s growth, with an increase of
Read more at www.jfkairport.com or listen to the podcast: 12% compared to the previous year, and a remarkable recovery
T4 Talks, via your favourite podcast listening platform (Apple of 114% of its 2019 passenger traffic. The airport’s outlook is
Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon Music or the web). promising, with passenger numbers expected to grow by 4% in
2024 compared to 2023, marking a second consecutive year of
full recovery.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 100
The ambitious terminal expansion project, known as Gateway Other international activities
2030, is progressing steadily and on schedule. Construction of the Schiphol has been supporting St. Maarten Princess Juliana
first phase of the project is well underway and is scheduled for International Airport since 2019 in the reconstruction and
completion by the end of 2024. In addition, the new state-of-the- transition of the airport after Hurricane Irma. In November 2023,
art baggage handling system is on track for commissioning in the the new departure area became operational ahead of the busy
first quarter of 2025. The start of the second phase of the project, year-end period.
scheduled for the second half of 2024, will see the expansion of
the terminal facilities with the introduction of new lounge areas Royal Schiphol Group also has strategic partnerships with Incheon
and contact gate stands. International Airport (Seoul) and Beijing Capital Airports Holding
Company (CAH), focusing on knowledge exchange in areas such
In 2023, Aruba Airport will continue to implement its corporate as innovation, capital investment programmes and operational
strategy, emphasising collaborative efforts to make a significant excellence. Schiphol also has property interests in Milan Malpensa
impact. Throughout 2024, AAA will embark on a transformation Airport in Italy and Hong Kong Airport.
towards a more sustainable and inclusive airport business
model, fostering higher levels of commercial excellence and
customer satisfaction. A key element of this strategy is the
continued deployment of advanced passenger processing
technologies, including additional e-gates, new and improved
security screening equipment and additional processing capacity,
initiatives that will begin in 2023 and continue into 2024.
Governance
a reassessment of regulations regarding noise hindrance and The Supervisory Board will continue to urge the Management In October, the social agreement was renewed. Agreement was
emissions. The announcement of the capacity reduction has Board to accelerate projects in relation to sustainability. reached on pay supplement and structural improvements in
led to uncertainties within the ecosystem at the airport and relation to quality of work.
was followed by several law suits between the government Mid 2023, the Supervisory Board requested Schiphol Group to
and airlines. Schiphol Group continues a constructive dialogue conduct research into the maintenance backlog of the airport Sustainability and working conditions
with its partners and the government on how to contribute to with the aim to understand how the backlog was created, what Schiphol Group takes a leading role in sustainability within
a substantial reduction of noise hindrance and environmental Schiphol Group can learn from it and what should be done to the aviation industry, supporting more sustainable aviation by
impact on the local environment. For Schiphol Group, clarity for prevent it in the future. Foundation Crisislab was hired for this. including incentives in aviation charges, providing airlines with
the aviation sector is imperative. Therefore, in April, Schiphol The research has shown several causes for the creation of the a subsidy for Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF) and lobbying
Group presented its initiatives to become quieter, cleaner and backlog. Schiphol Group will follow this up with measures on the for structural sustainability improvements for the industry both
better by means of its ‘eight-point plan’. The plan aims to give short, medium and long term. The Supervisory Board supports within the Netherlands and Europe. Furthermore, the ‘eight-
the local environment, employees and the aviation industry a the outcome and will regularly challenge the Management Board point plan’ contains important initiatives in relation to the
clear perspective and include amongst other things a night regarding the follow-up. acceleration of becoming more sustainable.
curfew, a ban on private jets and clear limits on CO2e and
noise. Schiphol Group is actively working on the realization of The Supervisory Board acknowledges the significant strides
the plan, being part of the Schiphol Fast Forward programme. Main points of attention achieved in 2023 concerning this matter, recognizing the
Schiphol Group has also included several of the initiatives in its commendable efforts of the organisation. The Supervisory Board
response in the Balanced Approach procedure related to the Operational recovery remains confident in the organisation's commitment to ongoing
measures announced by the Dutch Cabinet, which was presented In 2022, Schiphol Group experienced severe operational issues improvement and anticipates the continued dedication and
to the Minister of Infrastructure & Water Management in June. with long queues at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol due to staff achievements in the future, but realises that a lot of work
Schiphol Group is disappointed by the announcement of the shortages, especially at security companies. The issues had a still needs to be done. Schiphol Group has developed a ‘Most
Ministry of Infrastructure & Water Management in November strong negative impact on the passenger experience, airline sustainable airports 2030’ roadmap that contains all required
2023 regarding the suspension of the Experimental Decree, operations and overall reputation of the airport. actions in the coming years to become zero emissions and zero-
which enabled the capacity reduction to 460,000 ATMs as of waste airports in 2030 (Scope 1 and 2) and net-zero-carbon
2024. This is a serious setback for the local residents and creates In 2023, remarkable progress and improvements were realized aviation in 2050 (Scope 3). Two important recognitions were
more uncertainty within the sector. in this respect. Performance during the May and summer received in 2023: the SBTi accreditation and the Airports Council
holidays was in line with expectations, only with occasional International ACA (Airports Carbon Accredited) level 5 certificate.
Schiphol Group made important progress regarding innovation disruptions primarily at the arrival process and the turnaround Schiphol Group has obtained SBTi validation for scope 1, 2 and
and project execution during the year. The redevelopment of process. The departure process demonstrated significant 3 targets. The ACI accreditation relates to the highest level for
Lounge 1 is progressing according to budget and planning, improvements compared to last year, which was the result airport sustainability, meaning a CO2e emissions reduction of own
while the Dual Taxiway System project experiences some delay of implementing standard control measures and effective operations in 2022 by 90% or more compared to 2010. It has been
but with limited consequences. Furthermore, Schiphol Group collaboration amongst the stakeholders. These accomplishments awarded to Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Eindhoven Airport
invested in the renovation of resting areas and sanitary locations underscore commitment of Schiphol Group to ensuring well- and Rotterdam The Hague Airport. The three Schiphol Group
for employees working at the airport, the further roll-out of managed operations. airports are among the first ten airports worldwide to reach
lifting aids in the baggage basement and the renovation of the this level. The Safety, Sustainability and Stakeholders Committee
fire brigade stations. In terms of innovation and sustainability, Nevertheless, several improvement opportunities have been closely monitors the progress made in the execution of the Most
Schiphol Group opened its own concrete recycling facility, is identified, which are part of the Schiphol Fast Forward sustainable airports 2030 roadmap.
taking measures to replace all diesel-powered equipment on programme and will be implemented going forward.
airside and accelerates its work in relation to ultra-fine particles.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 104
Working conditions remain an important part of sustainability. Development of the Group Nature permits
The people at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol deserve proper In November 2023, the Minister of Infrastructure & Water
working conditions and decent wages. The Supervisory Board Management announced the suspension of the Experimental After years of hard work, Schiphol Group received its nature
recognises that improvements have been made in 2023, but Decree. Schiphol Group took the Experimental Decree into permit (‘Wnb-vergunning’) for Amsterdam Airport Schiphol from
that further improvements need to be realised in 2024. The account for its capacity declaration for the summer season the Minister for Nature and Nitrogen Policy. Although the permit
Supervisory Board therefore considers it is important that of 2024, leading to a maximum of 460,000 flights in the full is still subject to appeal, receiving the permit is a significant
this topic remains an integral part of the Schiphol Fast operating year, but has published an addendum to the capacity step for Schiphol Group, as it confirms compliance with relevant
Forward programme. declaration leading to a maximum of 483,000 flights following laws and regulations. It furthermore demonstrates that Schiphol
the suspension. As part of Schiphol Group’s ‘eight-point plan’, a Group operates in line with the requirements of the Nature
As of 1 January 2024, Schiphol Group is subject to the Corporate list of aircraft types that are no longer welcome at Amsterdam Conservation Act. In addition, the permit enables the government
Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). In 2023, the company Airport Schiphol has been included in the capacity declaration. to introduce new policies for the airport, such as an Airport Traffic
worked hard to ensure compliance. Schiphol Group developed Decree containing a new approach with environmental and noise
a roadmap to become ‘CSRD ready’, linked to the company’s Despite the decision to suspend the Experimental Decree, the limits for the aviation industry.
strategy. The Audit Committee tracked progress throughout the Ministry of Infrastructure & Water Management will remain
year and some Supervisory Board members have been involved working on the Balanced Approach procedure that needs to The regional airports within Schiphol Group have also submitted
on a more structural basis as well. be followed as a consequence of the decision to reduce the an application for a nature permit, the viewpoint procedure
ATMs at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. Schiphol Group shared has been completed and the procedure is now in a concluding
The Supervisory Board encourages Schiphol Group to continue its views regarding the Balanced Approach with the Ministry. phase where questions from the competent authority are
taking a leading position in the field of sustainability and to Unfortunately, not all suggestions by Schiphol Group have been being answered.
accelerate improvements in relation to working conditions. included by the Ministry, such as a night curfew and a ban on
private jets. The Supervisory Board hopes that these measures will
Mid Term Plan still be realised in the near future.
The Mid Term Plan 2035 was discussed with the Capital
Programme, Operations & Investments Committee and the A strategic collaboration between Maastricht Aachen Airport
Supervisory Board on several occasions during 2023. The Mid (MAA) and Schiphol Group commenced. On 8 June 2023, the
Term Plan sets out the major developments required over the province of Limburg and Schiphol Group signed the collaboration
next ten years in terms of capacity, quality and safety, such as the agreement, resulting in Schiphol Group acquiring a 40% stake in
completion of Pier A, the completion of the Dual Taxiway system MAA and the province of Limburg keeping a 60% stake. With the
and the new baggage basement. The Supervisory Board provided collaboration, MAA will be able to focus on the development of
its advice on the key issues and adaptability of the plans in relation a sustainable and future-proof airport, with electric flying as one
to the financial position and important external developments, of the main priorities. In addition, the parties are committing to
such as sustainability. It is expected that the plan will be finalized a far-reaching exchange of knowledge in the areas of real estate
in the first months of 2024. and commerce.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 105
Strategic projects Dual taxiway system – Renovation of resting areas and non-passenger sanitary
Schiphol Group is currently working on phase 1B of the project, relates to an improvement of the resting areas and sanitary
Schiphol projects which aims to bolster Schiphol's remote holding capacity. Delivery locations for employees working at the airport. The project
The Supervisory Board, specifically the Capital Programme, of phase 1B is slightly delayed. Final delivery of phase 2 of the aims to improve the working conditions. The project will be
Operations and Investments Committee, has been regularly project in 2026 is not expected to be impacted. finalized by the end of 2024.
updated on ongoing projects. In April and November, the – Car rental service centre: Schiphol Group will construct
shareholders were updated on the major projects as well, in Entry-Exit System a new car rental location at Schiphol, which offers the
the presence of several Supervisory Board members. The European Entry-Exit System (EES) is a mandatory new EU- opportunity to rent electric vehicles. It will be the largest car
wide border management system, which will help to prevent rental company facility in the Netherlands, accommodating
Pier A irregular migration and protect the security of European citizens. 2,500 vehicles.
In 2023, together with new contractor BAM, Schiphol Group The project will have an impact on the passenger journey for – Renovation of Fire Brigade Stations relates to an improvement
focused on the preparatory works for the finalization of Pier non-EU citizens. The implementation of EES has been delayed of working and living conditions for the fire brigade of
A. It is expected that the completion works will start in Q2 several times, with a new formal date set on 1 November 2024. In Schiphol Group.
of 2024. The Capital Programme, Operations and Investments December 2023, the Supervisory Board approved the investment – Sierra 1: to improve safety on airside, a new runway crossing
Committee is closely involved and will continue to be in 2024. In proposal for phase 2 of the implementation of EES to ensure will be delivered, mitigating the safety risk of runway
addition, in the dispute with BN-TAV – the former contractor readiness on time. Given the complexity of the project and the crossings identified by the Dutch Safety Board (OVV).
whose contract was terminated due to ongoing delays and potential consequences for passengers, the Capital Programme, – Lifting aids: to improve working conditions for baggage
an unpredictable project outcome - formal proceedings have Operations and Investments Committee is closely involved. handlers, Schiphol Group ensures that all workplaces will
been initiated in December 2023 by BN-TAV. Schiphol Group is be equipped with a lifting aid by executing this project.
preparing its statement of defence and counterclaim, which will Southern Developments – Upgrade grid capacity: in order to secure sufficient electricity
be submitted ultimately on 5 June 2024. This process is closely The developments in relation to the Southern area of the capacity in the coming years, Schiphol Group will invest in
monitored by the Supervisory Board. airport will solve current bottlenecks in baggage and terminal increasing its grid capacity.
capacity, meet future peak capacity demand, improve the quality
Reference is made to note 25 Contingent assets and liabilities for perception and increase commercial revenues. The expected
the status on the BN-TAV claims with regards to the construction future capacity requirements are likely still valid in case of Other topics
of Pier A. an annual ATM cap of 440,000, driven by enduring peak
patterns, upgauging of aircraft and an increasing share of original Contact with the Works Council
Lounge 1 destination passengers. In October 2023, the tender for the Several members of the Supervisory Board, especially the
The redevelopment of Lounge 1 is well on its way. The project design phase of the baggage basement was published. A decision members of the People Committee and the members nominated
is a crucial junction for all passengers moving to and from regarding the terminal still needs to be made. by the Works Council, attended meetings with the Works Council.
several piers at the airport. In addition, it enables transfer These meetings were considered to be of great value and a
passengers to move from Schengen to Non-Schengen areas. The positive experience for both sides. The respective Supervisory
redevelopment of Lounge 1 aims to solve pressing capacity issues Projects that have been approved by the Board members report back to the full Supervisory Board and, if
and ensure operational continuity. Furthermore, the project aims Supervisory Board necessary, to the Executive Team on these meetings.
to bring Lounge 1 back to desired levels of sustainable and
reliable technical performance and commercial revenue. Based on the Supervisory Board Rules, investment and divestment No conflicting interest
decisions with a value exceeding 25 million euros require There were no transactions in 2023 involving conflicts of interest
Supervisory Board approval. In addition to phase 2 of the Entry- on the part of Management Board members, Supervisory Board
Exit System, six other project proposals were approved by the members, shareholders or the external auditor that were of
Supervisory Board in 2023: material significance to Schiphol Group and/or relevant parties.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 106
B. Quality Assurance personal details on each member of the Supervisory Board, please Since April 2020, Mr Bert van der Els has been appointed as
see the section ‘Corporate Governance’ of this annual report. advisor to the Supervisory Board and the Capital Programme,
Operations & Investments Committee on the basis of a
Members In making new appointments, the Supervisory Board aims to consultancy agreement with similar compensation as the
ensure the complementary expertise of its members, particularly Supervisory Board members, focusing on construction and
At year-end 2023, the Supervisory Board had three female and in relation to the fields of knowledge that are relevant to Schiphol maintenance projects and related matters.
four male members. The Supervisory Board is currently aiming Group. The fields of knowledge are listed in the Supervisory Board
to include another member and searching for a successor of Profile (Schedule 2 to the Supervisory Board Rules). The overview
a Supervisory Board member whose second term ended in below indicates the fields of knowledge represented by each Permanent education
April. The Management Board had two male members at year- Supervisory Board member.
end 2023; the Executive Team had two female and four male As part of the permanent education programme, various topics
members. Schiphol Group runs a development and leadership All members of the Supervisory Board are independent within were discussed with the Supervisory Board to provide its members
programme to ensure that both everyone can advance into senior the meaning of best practice provision 2.1.8 of the Corporate with greater insight into issues relevant to Schiphol Group.
management and executive positions. Schiphol Group aims to Governance Code. These issues include, among other things, ultra-fine particles,
achieve a balanced composition of the various bodies in terms commercial initiatives, ESG and risk management within Schiphol
of gender, cultural background, age, sexual orientation, psychical Mr Collier has the Irish nationality. The other members have the Group. Supervisory Board members also regularly participated
abilities, experience and professional background. For further Dutch nationality. in site visits to stay on top of operational, asset, security and
safety-related matters.
Year of birth and nationality 1963, Dutch 1965, Dutch 1955, Irish 1972, Dutch 1961, Dutch 1960, Dutch 1968, Dutch
First appointed in 2022 2018 2018 2023 2021 2015 2023
Fields of knowledge
1. Aviation business • •
2. Commercial • • • • •
3. Finance/Accountancy/Risk Management • • • •
4. International experience • • • • • •
5. Digitisation • • •
6. Government and stakeholders Schiphol • • • •
7. Corporate governance • • • • • • •
8. Human Resource Management • • •
9. Corporate responsibility • • • • • • •
10. Project management • • •
1 CEO experience
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 107
Supervisory Board • • • • • • •
Audit Committee • • • •(c)
People Committee • •(c) • •
Capital Programme, Operations & Investments Committee • •(c) •
Safety, Sustainability & Stakeholders Committee • •(c) •
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 108
Attendance in 2023
Attendance J.W. Winter (Chair) S.G. Brummelhuis D. Collier H.C. Figee E.van Galen R.J. van de Kraats (Vice) A.B.M. Olsson M.C. van der Laan
Meetings Meetings of the Supervisory Prior to every Audit Committee meeting, the Chair of the
Board committees Committee held a separate discussion with the CFO, controller,
The Supervisory Board met on nine formal occasions in 2023. external auditor (KPMG Accountants N.V.) and the internal
The Executive Team (including the Management Board) members Audit Committee auditor as preparation for each committee meeting. After every
attended all of those meetings. Prior to the regular meetings, The Audit Committee held three meetings in 2023. The meeting, the Audit Committee had private consultations with the
the Supervisory Board held private consultations. The various committee spoke with the Chief Financial Officer (CFO), the external auditor, which were not attended by the Executive Team
committees held 33 formal meetings in total in the course of Director Finance and the internal and external auditors on a and senior management.
2023. Please see the schedules below for a full overview of number of topics including the annual financial statements, the
the number of meetings per committee and the attendance of annual report (and quality thereof), the interim figures and the Meetings Number1
Supervisory Board members. associated press releases, the external auditor’s audit plan and
Supervisory Board 10
management letter, liquidity and solvency, inflation and the
Additional Supervisory Board meeting without 42
In addition to these meetings, the Chair and the other members weaknesses in the related tariff system, other sources of income, Management Board members attending
of the Supervisory Board discussed issues with the Executive Team (airline and passenger) claims and integrity reporting, internal Audit Committee 3
on numerous occasions. Various members of the Supervisory controls, progress and outcomes with respect to the internal audit Capital Programme, Operations & 13
Board also had contact on a number of occasions with the senior annual plan and the follow-up on audit findings. The committee Investments Committee
management of Schiphol Group and with stakeholders both furthermore prepared the Supervisory Board’s decision-making People Committee 13
within and outside Schiphol Group, including the shareholders. on the Budget and Funding Plan 2024. The internal audit plan for Safety, Sustainability & Stakeholders Committee 4
the forthcoming year was endorsed. The committee continued Total 43
to pay extra attention to enterprise risk management at both 1 These numbers only include formal meetings.
the half-year and full-year points in 2023. A deeper discussion 2 Prior to every regular Supervisory Board meeting, the Supervisory Board convenes
for one hour without the presence of the Management Board members.
took place in relation to controls within the Schiphol Commercial
business area. Also this year, the committee has paid specific
attention to ESG reporting, given the importance of the topic. ESG
is a recurring topic in the Audit Committee meetings.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 109
In accordance with auditing rules, Schiphol Group has appointed Safety, Sustainability & Stakeholders Committee Word of thanks
a new external auditor as of financial year 2024. Per proposal The Safety, Sustainability and Stakeholders Committee met
of the Supervisory Board, the shareholders appointed Ernst & four times in 2023. Much attention was paid to safety in a The Supervisory Board is wished to extend its sincere appreciation
Young Accountants LLP as the new auditor of Schiphol Group per broader sense. The committee discussed the health, safety and to the Executive Team for the achievements of the past year. We
financial year 2024 for a maximum period of ten years. environmental reports and progress in relation to Integral Safety firmly believe that the Executive Team has made significant steps
Management System, and it also reviewed safety in 2022. The in enhancing the quality of the airport, both operationally and in
Capital Programme, Operations & committee specially focused on fire safety and the ongoing terms of working conditions.
Investments Committee trajectories with the Netherlands Labour Authority. All serious
The Capital Programme, Operations and Investments Committee incidents were discussed with the committee and follow-up Our gratitude also goes out to all employees for their invaluable
advises the Supervisory Board on approval of preliminary actions were taken. The committee was updated on the progress contributions to the positive transformations realized. It is
investment decisions of all asset-related projects. The committee made in relation to the Roadmap Most Sustainable Airports, through their unwavering commitment and collaborative efforts
held monthly meetings and met thirteen times in 2023. The including target tracking and the sustainability plans for 2024. that these improvements have been possible. Their continued
main focus of the committee has been the maintenance backlog The committee also discussed the outcome of the Social Cost support is fundamental to the success of Schiphol Group.
Schiphol Group is facing and the progress realised in relation Benefit Analysis that was performed and monitored progress
to the major projects, specifically Pier A and the Entry-Exit on the Most sustainable airports 2030 roadmap. The committee Schiphol, 15 February 2024
System. The committee was updated every quarter on the keeps encouraging Schiphol Group to remain a front runner on
status and progress of the major projects. The committee was sustainability within the aviation industry and accelerate projects The Supervisory Board
consulted in relation to one major, upcoming project: the and initiatives where possible. The application for the nature Jaap Winter, Chair
Southern Developments. An extensive discussion regarding the permits was discussed extensively in each committee meeting. Robert Jan van de Kraats, Vice Chair
Mid Term Plan took place as well. In addition, the committee The committee is satisfied that the permit has now been granted Simone Brummelhuis
was informed about the strategic asset management and for Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. Declan Collier
commercial developments and opportunities. In 2023, the Chris Figee
committee reviewed, challenged and consequently advised in Elfrieke van Galen
favour of all submitted preliminary investment decisions. Medy van der Laan
People Committee
The People Committee held thirteen meetings in 2023 and
many more informal meetings relating to the search for a
permanent Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the succession
of the Supervisory Board. Other topics discussed in the People
Committee were the renewal of the social agreement, the My
Schiphol Survey results (in relation to the Employee Promotor
Score), Talent & Succession management, the newly introduced
Leadership Team of Schiphol Group and the 2024 objectives.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 110
Supervisory Board
Chair Vice-Chair
First appointed in 2022 First appointed in 2015 First appointed in 2018 First appointed in 2018
First term expires in 2026 Third term expires in 2024 Second term expires in 2026 Second term expires in 2026
– Partner at Phyleon leadership & governance – Non-Executive Chairman at Customs Support – Managing Director at Borski Fund – Chair at TCR International NV
– Chairman of the Supervisory Board at Erasmus Group since 1 July 2023 – Member of the Supervisory Board at – Chair H.M. Office at Rail & Road
Universiteit Rotterdam – Director Randstad Beheer Rabo Amsterdam – Chair at Belfast City Airport
– Board member ASR Nederland – Vice-Chairman Supervisory Board at the – Board of Advice Augeo – Senior Advisor Oaktree Infrastructure Fund (OTIF)
Continuity Foundation Goldschmeding Foundation – Board of Advice Inne – Former Chief Executive Officer of Dublin Airport
– Former Chairman of the Board at the Van – Non-executive Director of OCI N.V. – Former Member of the Supervisory Board at Authority and London City Airport
Gogh Museum – Former non-Executive Chairman of TMF Group Mediahuis Nederland – Former Chair at Aer Rianta International (ARI)
– Former Chairman of Executive Board at Vrije – Until 1 July 2023 Member of the Advisory Board at – Former Chair of European and World Board at
Universiteit Amsterdam Suitsupply B.V. Airports Council International
– Former Chairman of the Board at – Former CFO and Vice-Chair of the Executive Board – Former Council Member at the Confederation of
ADORE foundation at Randstad N.V. British Industry
– Former Board Director at London First
– Former Non-executive Director at Allied Irish Banks
(AIB) Group
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 111
Executive Team
Strengths Opportunities
– Resilient network of destinations – Potential to capture strong post-
– Strong hub position of Schiphol in Europe COVID-19 demand
– Sustainability at our premises – Position Schiphol to recover connectivity
– Economic strength of the Randstad region during period of increased hub
and attractiveness of airport city competition
– Digitalisation, automation and big data
– International activities and partnerships
– Sustainable aviation and innovation
initiatives
Weaknesses Threats
– Current operational situation at Schiphol – Challenging geopolitical and
– Capacity shortage during peak hours: macroeconomic climate
terminal, stands and railway station – Recurring pandemics in Asia and
– Operational and sourcing model other regions
– Future reliability of assets – Terrorism and cyberthreats
– Worsening labour market and
ageing workforce
– Pressure on cargo volumes from
slot allocation system
– Possible impact of nature permits
– Impact of ruling on nitrogen emissions
– European Entry-Exit System legislation
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 113
Member of the Management Board and CEO Member of the Management Board and CFO
Since 1 November 2022 Since 1 April 2021
Term expires on 29 February 2024 First term expires on 31 March 2025
– Co-Chair of the Schiphol Security and Public Safety Platform Responsibilities – Non-executive member of the Board of Directors of Brisbane Airport
– Member Supervisory Board Stichting Bevordering kwaliteit – Airport Operations & Aviation Partnerships1 Corporation PTY Ltd4
leefomgeving Schipholregio – Schiphol Infrastructure1
– Non-Executive Board Member Faerch A/S and Faerch Group Holding – Corporate Affairs2 Responsibilities
A/S (01-04-2023 – present) – Corporate Legal2 – Finance2
– Non-Executive Member of the Audit Committee Faerch A/S – Human Resources2 – IT & Data1
(01-04-2023 – present) – Safety & Environment1 – Procurement & Contracting2
– Non-Exec Board Member, Eteck Energie bedrijven (2021 – present) – Security1 – Risk & Audit2
– Member Advisory Board, Scelta Mushrooms (2013 – present) – Strategy & Airport Planning3 – Schiphol Commercial1
– Member Advisory Board, Vos Logistics (2018 – present) – Regional airports1 – Schiphol International1
– Senior Advisor to Board of Management ENECO/ Mitsubishi (2020
– present)
1)
Governance structure: Operate.
2)
Governance structure: Support.
3)
Governance structure: Plan & innovate.
4)
Any remuneration earned by Executive Team (ET) members in relation to (Supervisory) Board positions in Group companies is received by the Company and not by individual ET Members.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 114
Member of the Executive Team And Executive Member of the Executive Team and Executive Member of the Executive Team and Executive Member of the Executive Team and
Director Schiphol Infrastructure Director Schiphol Commercial Director Human Resources Executive Director Airport Operations &
Aviation Partnerships
Since 1 February 2023 Since 1 February 2023 Since 1 February 2023 Since 1 February 2023
– Board Member NGinfra – Member of Supervisory Board of – Board Member Luchtvaart Community Schiphol – Board Member Stichting Valk
– Steering committee member Eindhoven Schiphol – Board Member Nederland Distributieland (NDL)
Opdrachtgeversforum i/d Bouw – Chairman of Stichting Coosje Wijzenbeek Responsibility – Board Member Nederlandse Vereniging van
– Human Resources Luchthavens (NVL)
Responsibility Responsibility
– Airport Program Development – Schiphol Commercial Responsibility
– Schiphol Infrastructure – Airport Operations & Aviation Partnerships
– Project realization (CAPEX)
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 115
Corporate Governance
Royal Schiphol Group N.V.,
General The CEO and CFO are the statutory directors. Each statutory
also acting as Luchthaven director has assumed responsibility for a specific portfolio
Schiphol and Schiphol Group, Schiphol Group’s corporate governance structure is based on approved by the Supervisory Board.
is a public limited liability Dutch law, the Dutch Corporate Governance Code, its articles
of association and several internal regulations. The Group has On 1 February 2023, the Supervisory Board terminated the
company with a two-tier board been applying the Dutch Corporate Governance Code since employment agreement of Executive Vice-President and Chief
system ('structuurregime') and 2004 based on the ‘comply or explain’ principle. Schiphol has Operations Officer Hanne Buis due to a difference of opinion
three shareholders: the State updated its policies in line with the new version of the Corporate concerning the operational management of the airport. Despite
Governance Code 2022. Schiphol's internal regulations include joint efforts, the differences could not be bridged. The position
of the Netherlands, the the Management Board Rules and the Supervisory Board Rules, remains vacant.
municipality of Amsterdam and including charters regarding the Supervisory Board’s permanent
the municipality of Rotterdam. committees and regulations regarding conflicts of interest and The appointment of Mr Sondag as interim CEO has been
the reporting of misconduct. extended until 29 February 2024. In November 2023, it was
announced that Mr Van Oord would be appointed as permanent
All documents referred to in this paragraph are published on CEO with effect from 1 June 2024 for an initial term of four years.
www.schiphol.nl under Royal Schiphol Group, on the Investor For the period from 1 March 2024 to 31 May 2024, Mr Carsouw
Relations page. (CFO) will be appointed interim CEO.
decisions (as stated in the articles of association and internal Corporate Governance structure Royal Schiphol Group N.V.
regulations). The committee is closely involved in major
projects (including Pier A, the expansion of the Quebec Audit Committee Shareholders
taxiway, Southern Development and the Redevelopment of
Lounge 1) as well as the (general) operational and commercial Capital Programme, Operations
developments at the airport. & Investments Committee
3. The People Committee prepares and discusses the People Committee Supervisory Board
Supervisory Board’s decision-making on nominations,
appointments and remuneration. The committee also Safety, Sustainability & Plan & Innovate
engages in topics relating to diversity and inclusion as well as Stakeholders Committee
succession planning, Schiphol Group’s culture (including Management Board
Regional airports Operate
integrity) and employee-related matters. and Executive Team
4. The Safety, Sustainability and Stakeholders Committee
Support
prepares and discusses the Supervisory Board’s decisions on
safety, sustainability and stakeholder-related matters. ESG is Internal Auditor
another important topic discussed and dealt with in this
committee as well.
The committees meet independently and carry out preparatory External Auditor
work as governed by the charters, which are part of the
Supervisory Board rules. The committees report on the outcome
of their meetings in a Supervisory Board meeting. The Supervisory Diversity Policy Results of the policy
Board as a whole makes decisions based on these reports. The The following specific diversity objectives have been identified
Supervisory Board Rules, including the Committee charters, are Schiphol Group has a Diversity Policy for the Supervisory Board, to increase diversity within the Supervisory Board, Management
published on www.schiphol.nl. Management Board and senior management. The policy includes Board and senior management:
targets for both gender and cultural diversity. – Maintain gender diversity on the Supervisory Board so at least
30% of the Supervisory Board consists of women and at least
Shareholders Schiphol Group has an important societal role and therefore a 30% consists of men. At year-end, the Supervisory Board of
responsibility to actively pursue diversity and inclusion (DE&I, Schiphol Group consisted of three female (43%) and four
The share buyback obligation (financial liability) resulting from Diversity, Equity & Inclusion). To this end, Schiphol Group has male (57%) members. Schiphol Group therefore complies
the termination of the HubLink industrial cooperation agreement included DE&I in its Destination, as this Destination embodies the with this objective.
between Groupe ADP and Schiphol Group was settled in intrinsic values of the organisation. As DE&I reflect both society – the gender diversity within the Management Board so
December 2022 with the acquisition of the treasury shares, the and Schiphol Group’s customers, Schiphol Group believes that that at least 30% of the Management Board consists of
shares of which Schiphol Group still had on its balance by year- these are important preconditions for operating as a successful women and at least 30% consists of men. At year-end, the
end 2023. organisation. Moreover, DE&I are important steering points in the Management Board of Schiphol Group consisted of zero
relationship with employees and other stakeholders, especially in female (0%) and two male (100%) members. Schiphol Group
terms of (personal) leadership. therefore does not comply with this objective. Schiphol Group
believes that gender-diverse management is important for
the organisation. At year-end, the Executive Team of Schiphol
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 117
Group consisted of two female (33%) and four male (67%) Securities transactions most sustainable, high-quality airports, and our sustainability
members, which is in line with the policy. strategy focuses on the following areas: Energy positive, Circular
– Maintain the gender diversity within senior management Although the shares of Schiphol Group are not listed on a stock economy, Sustainable aviation and Communities. We collaborate
so that at least 30% of senior management consists of exchange, the company has rules regarding inside information, with partners on these themes, and senior management of
women and at least 30% consists of men. At year-end, senior holding securities and securities transactions, as the company has the departments that have the most impact regularly discuss
management consisted of six female (35%) and eleven male issued bonds under the EMTN programme, which are listed on these themes to ensure the fulfilment of sustainability ambitions
(65%) members. Schiphol Group therefore complies with Euronext Amsterdam. that transcend the individual departments. Workshops regarding
this objective. sustainability are regularly scheduled throughout the Group to
– Increase the cultural diversity of the Supervisory Board, Members of the Executive Team and Supervisory Board must create awareness.
the Management Board and senior management so that refrain from buying and selling these bonds.
by 2025, at least 15% of the Supervisory Board, the We aim to operate zero-emissions and zero-waste airports
Management Board and senior management combined The (Deputy) Company Secretary is the central officer referred by 2030 and circular and energy-positive airports by 2050.
consists of a combination of international and bi-cultural to in the rules on inside information, holding of securities and The Management Board discusses sustainability developments
members. At year-end, the Supervisory Board, Management securities transactions. The Market Abuse Regulation Committee in general and progress on the roadmap towards achieving
Board and senior management consisted of three members monitors compliance with the legislation. our 2030 goals. Sustainability is a fixed component of
that either have an international (two) or bi-cultural (one) Schiphol Group's investment strategy. As a matter of principle,
background (12%). Schiphol Group therefore does not The Insider Dealing Policy is published on www.schiphol.nl, under sustainability is, to the greatest extent possible, a selection
comply with this objective and shall continue striving for Royal Schiphol Group, on the Investor Relations page. criterion in Schiphol Group's tender processes.
greater cultural diversity.
– Schiphol Group pursues rejuvenation in the appointment The ‘Materiality Analysis’ chapter of this annual report describes
of members of the Supervisory Board, Management Sustainability the way Schiphol Group has determined its material topics
Board and senior management. Schiphol Group always for 2023 by means of impacts, risks, and opportunities.
takes rejuvenation into consideration in appointments Governance Schiphol Group’s statutory directors are ultimately responsible
and succession-planning. The President and CEO of Schiphol Group is primarily for managing the material topics and therewith managing the
responsible for sustainability. The Management Board defines impacts, risks, and opportunities. They do so by – amongst
The Diversity Policy is published on www.schiphol.nl, under Royal the sustainability vision and policy and is for that purpose assisted other things – ensuring that the material topics are on the
Schiphol Group, on the Investor Relations page. by the Supervisory Board's Safety, Sustainability & Stakeholders agenda of the formal Executive Team meetings regularly, having
Committee in this task. The sustainability programme manager broad discussions and deep dive sessions with business experts
is part of Schiphol Group's Strategy and Airport Planning regarding the material topics and discussing them during the
department, which reports directly to the President and CEO bilateral meetings with relevant directors as well. The latter
to enable Schiphol Group to effectively integrate sustainability is important since the statutory directors delegated managing
throughout the Group and to ensure its impact on strategy. the material topics to (executive) directors in the organisation.
Sustainability plays a pivotal role in all decision-making, realizing
The achievement of sustainability targets is one of the elements that it always remains a balancing act between various aspects.
of the remuneration policy for the Management Board. The The Supervisory Board supervises and advises the statutory and
Executive Director Airport Operations & Aviation Partnerships executive directors in managing the material topics. Please refer
acts as the airport manager and, in this capacity, is responsible to the Supervisory Board and Management Board Rules on our
for ensuring compliance with relevant legislation, in particular website for further details.
relating to safety and the environment. Such legislation is
often airport-specific. Our ambition is to create the world's
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 118
ACM Commitments
The five-year limitation period for the commitments offered by Schiphol Group and KLM to the Authority for Consumers and
Markets (ACM) to prevent competition risks ended in February 2023. In recent years, Schiphol Group devoted a great deal of
attention to this topic via its compliance programme on competition law. Although the commitments ended, Schiphol Group
will continue with its general compliance programme on competition law, of which the nature of risks related to discussions
with airlines, including KLM, will be an integral part.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 119
Remuneration
This remuneration report
Directors' remuneration General
sets out the remuneration
policy for the Schiphol Group The members of the Management Board of Royal Schiphol Group Schiphol's remuneration policy primarily aims to offer
Management Board and N.V. are appointed by the Supervisory Board for a term of four remuneration at a level that will attract and retain qualified
years. They are eligible for reappointment for a four-year term. and capable board members (including those from within the
Supervisory Board. organisation). The remuneration policy is also intended to
In 2023, the Management Board comprised the promote the achievement of Schiphol's objectives, as adopted
following persons: each year by the Supervisory Board, based (in part) on the
approved Business Plan. In addition to the financial objectives,
Position Term Term ends on Schiphol Group has formulated strategic and public objectives
as reflected in various ‘Top Performance Indicators’ and ‘major
Ruud Sondag CEO Second 29 February 2024 1 deliverables’, including sustainability related objectives.
Robert Carsouw CFO First 31 March 2025
Hanne Buis COO First 31 January 2023 2 The remuneration policy meets the best-practice provisions on
remuneration defined in the Dutch Corporate Governance Code.
1 The original appointment was until 31 October 2023. The Supervisory Board’s Since the majority of the shares in Royal Schiphol Group N.V. is
decision of 10 July 2023 extended the appointment to 29 February 2024. held by the State of the Netherlands, Schiphol's remuneration
2 The term of the original appointment was until 31 May 2024, but the Supervisory
Board terminated the contract per 1 February 2023. policy falls within the scope of the Nota Deelnemingenbeleid
Rijksoverheid 2022 (‘2022 state participations policy’), including
At the end of 2023, the Management Board comprised of Mr the July 2017 remuneration policy principles. The state
Sondag and Mr Carsouw. Mr Sondag is employed as CEO on participations policy and the remuneration policy principles apply
an interim basis. Mr Sondag and Mr Carsouw have a fixed-term strict standards, for instance on variable remuneration.
employment contract with Royal Schiphol Group N.V.
Position Total fixed salary (EUR) Effective 1 January 2015, no pension is accrued for tax purposes An important explanation for the decrease is that the
for the portion of the pensionable income in excess of 128,810 Management Board did not receive any variable remuneration
Ruud Sondag CEO 458,021 euros2. In conformity with general practice in the Netherlands, over the period 2020 until 2023. Also, the indexation for the
Robert Carsouw CFO 389,318 Schiphol has decided to compensate the employees concerned board members in 2023 was based on the value of the collective
Hanne Buis 1 COO 227,102 (including the Management Board members) for this reduced labour agreement increase in 2022. The increase for the collective
pension accrual. labour agreement in 2023 consisted of a higher percentage
1 Until 31 July 2023, including the notice period of 6 months. compared to 2022. Moreover, since 2021, the pension costs have
Other benefits been added to the ratio calculation. The latter effect is not large
Variable remuneration The fringe benefits consist of appropriate expense allowances, because it was also added to the gross total remuneration for all
General a company car or lease payment (including the possible use of Schiphol employees (excluding the CEO).
According to the remuneration policy, the maximum variable a driver) and allowances for telephone costs or a telephone.
remuneration amounts to 20% of the total fixed salary. The company has also taken out personal accident insurance Lastly, since 2022, the median gross total remuneration for all
The Supervisory Board determines the level of the variable and directors' and officers' liability insurance on behalf of the employees (excluding the CEO) is calculated based on the actual
remuneration which depends on the extent to which the annually Management Board members. No loans, advances or guarantees median work hours a week: 36 (the remuneration of the CEO
defined targets have been achieved. Those targets are both have been or will be granted to members of the Management is based on 40 hours a week). Based on the assumption that all
qualitative in nature (maximum of 14%) and related to the Board. Acceptance of ancillary positions requires the explicit employees work 40 hours a week, the pay ratios for 2022 and
financial results achieved (maximum of 6%). The qualitative approval of the Supervisory Board. 2023 would have been even lower.
targets include targets in the area of sustainable long term value
creation. The variable remuneration is subject to a clawback Gender pay ratios are described in the corporate
clause. Therefore the Supervisory Board has the option to adjust governance section.
variable pay retrospectively in certain cases.
1)
Fixed gross annual salary, including holiday allowance.
2)
The maximum amount for tax purposes, applicable in 2023.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 123
Risk management
Risk Management and Internal
Schiphol's approach to enterprise At Schiphol, we manage our risks at three levels, in line with COSO
Control form an integral part risk management best practice: the first level, which owns the risks and controls
of managing our business. within the business operations, operates controls to mitigate
Schiphol, with its vital role in Our company plays a vital role in the Dutch infrastructure to operational risks and defines actions to improve processes and
connect the Netherlands in a safe, secure and financially sound mitigate risks; the second level – the risk function -, which
Dutch infrastructure to connect manner. For this role, Schiphol has defined its ambition, value facilitates, supports and challenges the first level in identifying,
the Netherlands in a safe, model and objectives. A wide range of strategic, operational, monitoring and mitigating risks; and the third level, our internal
secure and financially robust financial and compliance risks could potentially prevent us from audit, which provides independent and objective assurance
achieving these objectives and ambitions. and advice to (senior) management on the adequacy and
manner, faces a broad range of effectiveness of governance and risk management.
strategic, operational, financial The objective of risk management is to ensure that we have
and compliance risks. sufficient control over our risks by continuously evaluating the Our risk appetite describes the extent to which we accept
risks and opportunities. risk in the pursuit of our objectives. Given Schiphol's vital role
in the Dutch infrastructure, we have a very low to moderate
Our definition of risk management is 'a systematic process to risk appetite.
identify, assess, manage and control potential events or situations
to provide assurance on the achievement of our objectives and Our ERM approach has three distinct elements:
top performance indicators (TPI's)'. – Strategic alignment: alignment with the value
model of Schiphol, strategic objectives and top
We have an obligation to our stakeholders to manage these risks performance indicators.
appropriately and demonstrably to, amongst others, maintain Our development and progress on values, objectives and
our license to operate, comply with the Dutch Corporate (top) performance indicators in 2023 are explained in the
Governance Code and inform our stakeholders through our section 'Our results' of this annual report.
annual report. Risk management and internal control therefore – The ERM process: completion of the ERM cycle (risk
form an integral part of the management of our business. identification, set appetite, manage, monitor and report).
The ERM (net) results are described in the following
Risk management is carried out throughout our organisation, paragraphs of Schiphol’s risk profile, including the rating of
including our partners, and at all levels. Enterprise Risk the 11 risk categories.
Management (ERM) has a Schiphol group-wide focus on our key – Risk management set-up:
risks and is aligned with Operational Risk Management (ORM). We follow a generally accepted risk management maturity
ORM is defined as risk management at business unit level, with capability model where Schiphol strives to achieve a
a more detailed focus on specific operational requirements and mature risk management set-up that enables us to achieve
laws and regulations. our objectives.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 125
Strategic
Enterprise Risk Management Process Risk management set up
alignment
– Risks identified by – Risk appetite set by – Mitigating actions – Effectiveness of – The Risk function
Quality of Vision &
the business Management Board (controls) are mitigating actions reports to the Risk
Work Strategy
– Risk dialogues with – Desired, actual and established for (controls) and & Compliance
senior management forecasted risk level identified risks action plan status Committee and 1
and risk experts in discussed with – Actions plans are are monitored thereafter to the Execution &
Structure
Quality of the business Executive team and established for across three lines: Management Board Communication
Service – Alignment of Management Board when (additional) 1. Business, and Supervisory
6 2
risk categories – Standard risk controls are needed 2. Risk function, Board on the 11
with Value Model management for (further) risk 3. Management risk categories,
– Risk categories and methodology mitigation Review and underlying risks and
Safety underlying risks are established for – Explicit mitigating Internal Audit effectiveness of
first reviewed by the 11 risk categories controls and action – Risk function, mitigating actions Talent &
Infrastructure
Risk & Compliance and underlying risks plans ownership as guardian of – ERM framework Culture
Committee and – Risk developments ERM, reviews the and cycle
5 3
agreed with the and forecasts, given effectiveness of the improvements
Robust Way of
Management action plans and risk management approved
organisation Working
Board, bi-annually controls are being process and drives – Risk Maturity
reviewed improvement Evaluated 4
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 126
Risk profile Fast forward to address the operational issues State of assets may impact passenger experience
from 2022 The majority of our risk levels for business continuity and IT
The risk profile provides context to the level of risk exposure, Schiphol launched the Fast Forward programme to improve & data risks, including cyber, remain at the same level due to
our risk environment and highlights the main areas of risk that the labor conditions and attractiveness in the whole sector provided efforts. While we are investing significantly in our
Schiphol currently faces. and to change our operating model enabling to work more airport infrastructure we still have a maintenance backlog which
closely and integrally with our partners. This enables Schiphol to currently pose a foreclosed risk towards our quality of service
Our risk exposure has decreased slightly compared to 2022. get more insight into its supply chain constraints and resolve objectives. In the Airport capacity paragraph in 'Our Results' you
Several risks still exceed our risk appetite and the outlook for 2024 issues jointly. While issues have been adequately addressed can read how Schiphol is investing to improve the state of the
does not appear to change significantly, although many measures and resolved in 2023, Schiphol will going forward strengthen assets. A calamity organisation is in place to respond quickly to an
are in place to keep our risks at the same level. Schiphol Group their operational risk management and drive better (internal) event minimizing the impact on the passenger experience.
is exposed to a number of strategic, operational, financial and control over the operations in the coming years to avoid similar
compliance risks. In the risk assessment, a number of other key operational issues. Increased airport charges to improve efficiency,
risks appear more prominent. adaptability and resilience
Attractiveness of Schiphol improved To improve our efficiency, adaptability and resilience, a major
Social and Political Debate' increases the risks to Schiphol has also regained its attractiveness for airlines and effort is being made to improve our assets over the coming years,
our connectivity ambitions passengers as the operational challenges for 2022 have been putting pressure and more risk on the delivery of the project
The risks in our network quality are reduced mainly due to resolved. Vigilance will be required to maintain sufficient staff for portfolio. The major investment programme doubles our capital
better connectivity compared to other airports. However, there all operational airport services, including the shared responsibility expenditure. In addition, our operating costs are increasing due
is uncertainty about how this will develop in the coming years. of partners. New commercial strategies have been developed to inflation, to provide better working conditions, to become
Political uncertainty and the uncertainty of government policy to further improve the attractiveness of Schiphol, including the more sustainable and to resolve short-term operational issues
(yet to be formed) increase the risk. Among other things, decisions upgrading of lounges, parking facilities and retail shops, but and to increase headcount to ensure project delivery. These
on the number of permitted aircraft movements, which are attractiveness is also expected to be impacted in the short term increases have an impact on future airport charges and put
also driven by (geo)political constraints, have an impact on as the significant asset maintenance and lounge improvement pressure on the airline consultation process.
our operations. projects may disrupt the passengers journey. The 'Consumer and
end user experience' paragraph in the Quality of Service chapter Operating model Schiphol is under revision
Better balance will be required between quality of outlines the initiatives which has and will further improve the Our operating model is under revision since 2023 to address and
life in the surrounding area and the airport airport service and our passenger attractiveness score. resolve the issues we experienced in 2022 by securing better our
Schiphol published an eight-point plan called Quieter, Cleaner, supply chain in terms of availability of people, suppliers (capacity)
Better to restore the balance between quality of life in the Working conditions are being addressed and materials, improving our quality of work and improving our
surrounding area and Schiphol Airport, in particular in relation In 2023, the focus was on improving the quality of work, including airport services. 2024 will be an interim year where a new CEO
to noise. Schiphol cares about quality of life and has strong improving working conditions and improving our employment will come on board, the Dutch government is being (re)formed,
sustainability ambitions and is working on implementing the practices. After the operational challenges in 2022, the main political and social debates around Schiphol find new agreements
Most Sustainable Airports Roadmap. In the second quarter of focus was on improving the security process together with our and new airport changes for the three years to come are being
2023, we concluded that our CO2e targets are below the current partners. Some issues, such as the impact of emissions and discussed with the airlines and set by our regulator. In this interim
targets of the Duurzame Luchtvaart Tafel (DLT). In addition, it working conditions in baggage basements, remain at risk and are year we will focus on risks surrounding our ‘infrastructure’, our
is important that the issue is sufficiently on the agenda, both being addressed through action plans. The details of our action ‘people’ while ensuring ‘regulatory compliance’.
internally and with external partners, especially in view of the plans for further improvements can be found in the ‘quality of
realization of our increased investment project portfolio. work’ paragraph in ‘our results’ section.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 127
Heatmap Risk category Risk relates to Risk Risk development in 2023 Mitigation TPI link More information
trend
vs.
2022
A. Quality of
o
Structural airline Schiphol still has good connectivity in comparison Advocating for the importance to accelerate ICA Learn how one of Schiphol
industry changes, to other major European airports. However, the revision of the EU Slot Regulation and destinations Group’s priorities is to
Network
uncertain demand, the allowable ATMs is an ongoing discussion new rules with clear limits for noise and CO2e always maintain its
competing airports, topic which gives pressure to the connectivity as emissions (8-point plan). Active engagement superior network standard
government policy it remains uncertain how our network will develop with the government to find solutions in our Quality of
setting on ATM's and slot the upcoming years. that harmonise our network’s integrity with network paragraph under
allocation mechanism environmental stewardship. ‘Our results’.
B. Quality of Life
o
Ambition and Royal Schiphol Group has strong sustainability Coming years Schiphol focusses on 1) Getting CO2e Read how Schiphol Group
progress on ambitions and works on executing the Roadmap CSRD ready; 2) Improve awareness and emissions aims to operate the world's
sustainability of airport Most Sustainable Airports. The goal is to achieve knowledge and (3) embed the ambitions and most sustainable Airports in
and aviation (Green- a zero emission and zero-waste airport by 2030. A strategy in the Schiphol organisation. Local resident our Quality of Life paragraph
house gasses/UFP/ ‘better and balanced’ plan was created to reduce reputation under ‘Our results’.
Waste/Nitrogen/ the CO2e emission and the 8 point plan Quieter, score
Noise) impacting the Cleaner Better was published to improve the quality
license to operate of life at Schiphol. In 2023 Schiphol, Eindhoven
Airport and Rotterdam The Hague Airport have
achieved to reach the highest level of the Airport
Carbon Accreditation-program.
C. Quality of
o
Airport quality of Political discussions about the shrinkage, increased Several projects have been initiated to improve On-time Understand how Schiphol
service including cost, and process times due to legislation/working the quality of services of Schiphol including performance is committed to deliver
Airport Service
the attractiveness conditions improvements have an impact on the overhaul of the train stations, the retail shops, a seamless and engaging
and capacity to airport services and its attractiveness. 2023 show the plaza, parking facilities and the lounges. Net promoter passenger experience in the
accommodate all airlines improved service levels with smooth operations score Quality of Service paragraph
and passengers during during the holiday seasons. under ‘Our results’.
peak times
D. Business
o
Disruption of critical Ramping up the capacity, including our sector The AirPort Operations Centre (APOC) On-time Read how Schiphol
business processes or partner, has been a challenge due to the tight is further intensifying the cooperation performance has an internal
Continuity
functions due to labour market. The security employee problem and exchange of data with chain- and sector calamity organisation
loss of key facilities, is resolved. However, parts of the process is not partners. To reduce future technical asset Net promoter that incorporates training
assets, utilities, IT controllable by Schiphol due to dependency on third failure, the Portfolio Planning for 2024-2026 score activities, scenarios and
infrastructure or key parties (Airlines/ Ground handlers/ KMar./ LVNL), has a focus on asset replacements (47%) governance to be applied
suppliers and services that must deal with staff shortages and the impact in the multi-year maintenance plan (MJOP in the event of a major
of regulation that has an impact on occupational 2024-2026) and beyond. disruption or crisis in
health and safety conditions. the paragraph Business
Continuity in Airport Service
under ‘Our results’.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 129
Heatmap Risk category Risk relates to Risk Risk development in 2023 Mitigation TPI link More information
trend
vs.
2022
E. IT & Data
o
IT failure or IT Schiphol is continuously exposed to cyber Improvement paths are ongoing with an On-Time Read more on how Schiphol
abuse (cyber) with attacks however due to existing mitigations increased steering and strategy 2024+ focus Performance Cyber Security Centre (SCSC)
reliability &
negative business and failover mechanisms the impact is generally on improving the basics. This will contribute to remained vigilant, protecting
availability outcome on critical limited. We foresee more risk going forward due to better control of risks. the digital processes and
Net Promoter
business processes the large (asset) maintenance program. Score sensitive data, while fostering
a culture of resilience
and awareness under the
Cybersecurity paragraph
in Airport Service under
‘Our results’.
F. Safety and
o
Serious safety and Safety and Security is fundamental for safe and We work closely with the KMAR, Dutch Net Safety Read further on how Schiphol
security incidents efficient airport operations. No major incidents Customs, private security firms, airlines and Score Group aims to provide
Security
causing casualties, occurred in 2023 and our Net Safety score was above other partners to drive compliance with safe, secure and responsible
injuries or damage our target of 95. relevant security laws and regulations in a travel for everyone who
customer-friendly, cost-efficient way. visits and uses our airports
each day under the Safety
First paragraph in the ‘Our
results’ section.
G. Quality of
Z
Offer people good Many actions have been executed to improve The recent renewal of the social agreement, is Employee Read more on how Schiphol
work and attractive our position as a preferred place to work and expected to have a risk mitigating effect due to Promoter aims to redefine the essence
Work
working conditions, the circumstances under which the work is done its formalizing impact on working conditions. Score of work at Schiphol Airport
ensuring healthy, including improving the employee journey and A Schiphol Group, including sector wide, online for everyone involved,
safe and pleasant welfare. Part of this is covered in the extension and and offline, employer branding campaign has contributing to our goal
working environment renewal of the social agreement and our total plan gone live in December 2023. In addition of becoming the world’s
with the sector for physical labour. Furthermore, we actions have been taken by investing in- and most sustainable and high-
recovered in number of people where the greatest setting in motion the first batch of baggage quality airport in the Quality
scarcity was evident (security). Last but not least our handling support devices. of Work paragraph under
employee net promotor score increased to 24. ‘Our results’.
H. Regulation &
Z
Non-compliance with We achieved to get our nature permit and are Schiphol is currently implementing a new HSE Reputation To learn more on
internal and external certain we can fulfil the requirements but political framework and organisation to manage this Score how a compliance
Compliance
codes and/or laws uncertainties and legal procedures from interest risk. Furthermore we are implementing several and integrity programme
and regulations groups could increase the risk for 2024. The monitoring mechanism to control the nature has been designed to
compliance with the environmental requirements permit requirements and noise limits. Schiphol monitor and manage
remains an area of focus. Not only because has also started to develop a sector wide compliance and integrity
complying with applicable laws and regulations is ambition on integrity and social safety. risks in the paragraph
our highest priority but also because the external Robust organisation under
supervisor continues to pay a lot of attention to Our Fast Forward programme, our eight- ‘Our results’.
this subject. point plan and the 'people first' approach
foster the ethical behavior of our employees
and partners.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 130
Heatmap Risk category Risk relates to Risk Risk development in 2023 Mitigation TPI link More information
trend
vs.
2022
I. Finance &
o
Low return on The return on our equity for 2023 is below the New airport charges, strong cost discipline and Return on Read more about the
equity, credit rating anticipated target largely due to lower pax numbers. new commercial initiatives will help to keep Equity financial solidity and
Value
downgrade(s), lack Schiphol however remains a financially healthy and this risks at par for 2024.. our financial performance
Management of liquidity and secure company with a positive return and good in 2023 in the Robust
access to capital credit rating (A/A-1). Organisation and Financial
markets, CAPEX project Performance paragraphs
selection, material in ’Our results’.
financial reporting errors
and fraud
J. Portfolio
W
Portfolio Delivery and The topmost challenge is the realisation of a large A robust and realistic portfolio planning is All TPIs Read more on how Schiphol
Project Execution fail to and complex project portfolio, increasingly focusing currently concluded for the tactical 2024 is undertaking an extensive
delivery
deliver value on time, on maintenance and replacement of existing portfolio and in Q1 2024 for the tactical 2025 investment programme to
within budget and with assets. Given the attention for environmental strategic portfolio 2026 – 2028. By monitoring support our short, medium
required quality issues, a widening future focus (beyond Nitrogen) the Portfolio 2023-2026 realisation more and long-term capacity
of this risk is expected. Construction and project intensely, early insights in constraints and their needs, with several major
resources, especially specialists, remain scarce, both solutions are obtained for current and future projects underway or in
for contractors as well as own staff resources. improvement op the portfolio delivery. preparation in the Airport
capacity paragraph under
Quality of Service in the ‘Our
W
results’ section.
K. Organisation Adapt and improve as Our operating model is under revision, In 2024, Schiphol aims to transition to a All TPIs Read further on how
an organisation addressing the problems for the short term, robust and improved supplier management Schiphol actively worked
the newly appointed CEO will further drive the model within the sector build on trust and on improving collaboration
organisation for the longer term towards new long-term, equal relationships to deliver higher with its strategic suppliers
revised goals. ‘Quality of Work and Service’ across the airport. to create a more balanced
ecosystem where all parties
A series of ‘deep listening sessions’ with a broad work together at Schiphol to
set of supplier employees took place in 2023 to achieve a quieter, cleaner and
understand how they experience their work at better airport in the Robust
Schiphol Airport and what suggestions they have Organisation paragraph
for improvement. under ‘Our Results'.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 131
No risk management or internal control system can provide an absolute safeguard against
failure to achieve corporate objectives, nor fully prevent any possible loss, fraud or breach of
rules and regulations. Furthermore, as an airport, Schiphol is susceptible to adverse weather
conditions and other natural phenomena; we cannot prevent or influence these. However, we
can ensure that the consequences remain as limited as possible. In light of the above, we
believe that the risk management and internal control systems provide a reasonable degree of
assurance concerning financial reporting risks and that the financial reporting does not contain any
material misstatements.
The Management Board declares, considering the above, that, to the best of its knowledge:
– The financial statements provide a true and fair view of the financial assets, liabilities, financial
position and profits of Schiphol Group, as well as the combined consolidated enterprises;
– The financial statements have legitimately been prepared on a going concern basis for Schiphol
Group, given its strong financial position;
– The annual report describes the material risks and uncertainties that are relevant to the
assessment of the continuity of Schiphol Group for a period of 12 months following the
publication of the report;
– The annual report provides a true and fair view of the situation on the balance sheet date and
of developments over the course of the financial year; and
– The principal risks facing Schiphol Group are described in this annual report.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 132
Socio-
economic
accountability
75
in this report regarding the indicators that are relevant to our eight Top Performance Indicators (TPIs) are directly connected to
business operations. The GRI sector supplement for airports has Vision 2050.
also been applied. Furthermore, our annual reporting is inspired
0.0
by the International Integrated Reporting Council framework as This report's Corporate Governance section outlines our
can be seen in our Value creation model as well as other elements sustainability governance structure. Our sustainability ambitions 2020 2021 2022 2023 2030
of our reporting. and goals for 2023 remain consistent, as detailed in the Quality
of Life section, illustrating our roadmap toward achieving airports.section for detailed information on Schiphol's 2023 CO2e
With the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) sustainability targets by 2030. Further information is accessible emissions.
coming into effect as of 2024, RSG has taken significant steps online at schiphol.nl and schiphol.nl/sustainability.
towards compliance with this reporting framework. Due to RSG's independent external accountant signs the auditors report
the interoperatiblity between CSRD and GRI we have taken Amsterdam Airport Schiphol accounts for the majority of Royal and provides limited assurance on selected socio-economic
the opportunity to extend our reporting in this year's annual Schiphol Group's activities. Hence, we have aligned definitions information and the allocation of the proceeds of our green
report already with metrics resulting from the CSRD. This will and reporting processes among Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, bonds as presented in this report. Comments or questions
provide a baseline and comparability in upcoming years of Rotterdam The Hague Airport, Eindhoven Airport, and Lelystad regarding the 2023 annual report can be directed by email
reporting under CSRD. As such, our non-financial disclosures is Airport to enhance comparability, clarifying any differences in this to [email protected].
based on GRI, IIRC, SDG and draws inspiration from CSRD. For report. To enhance measurability, we've maintained differences
detailed reference, please consult the GRI Content Index for the in definitions only where necessary to enhance understanding of Scope
highlighted connections between these reporting frameworks. the specific operation. While the data in the annual report is In the 2023 annual report, we report on the results achieved
systematically collected and verified for reliability, RSG in relation to the material topics as outlined in the materiality
Annual reports of state shareholdings are required to participate acknowledges that certain information may be assumption- matrix. This helps us clarify the impact and relevance of the
in the Transparency Benchmark, which is a benchmark study based. Where definitions defer from the overall definition or disclosed information to readers. In 2023, we performed the
commissioned by the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate where assumptions are made, we have disclosed this is done. materiality assessment with an updated approach in line with
Policy. RSG has been participating in the benchmark since CSRD requirements, as described in Materiality analysis. The
2006 and our 2018 annual report won the prize for the most Regarding CO2e emissions reporting, emission factors may topics in the materiality matrix relate to Amsterdam Airport
transparent annual report. Next to that, previous year's annual change yearly. We typically restate previous years' figures for Schiphol, Rotterdam The Hague Airport, Eindhoven Airport and
report was shortlisted by Ducth Financieel Dagbald for the Henri CO2e emissions for gas and fuels, aiming to achieve zero emissions Lelystad Airport. Our general approach is to include all entities
Sijthoff award, in the category non-listed organisations. in these categories by 2030. Refer to the Energy-positive that are fully consolidated in the financial statements in the
socio-economic disclosures; however in particular instances we
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 134
diverge from this approach; were this occurs, we have stated so. CSRD readiness
In 2023, no new material (dis)investments occurred that were had This annual report still falls under NFRD (Non-Financial Reporting
an impact on our socio-economic reporting. Directive) and therefore RSG applies GRI as a reporting standard
for our non-financials. Nonetheless, RSG is making efforts to
In this report, we use the names 'Royal Schiphol Group', 'Schiphol become CSRD ready by annual report 2024.
Group' or 'the Group' when referring to the entire group, and
Schiphol when referring only to (our activities at) the Schiphol In this annual report we have already used the Double Materiality
location. We have a majority stake in our Regional airports and concept for our reporting, resulting in a few existing material
a reference to the group also includes them; the exception of topics being split into multiple topics and two new material
Maastricht-Aachen Airport, where we have a minority stake. topics. We have described the process for this year and are
Our international activities and participations pursue their own reperforming this exercise again in 2024, including a external
initiatives, which are geared towards their local environment validation. Next to that, the definitions of our material topics have
but are consistent with RSG's vision. All topics included in the been finetuned to fit more closely to the CSRD definitions.
materiality matrix are relevant to our airports and other parties
in the value chain. This annual report includes information on We have already placed significant effort to introduce additional
material topics over which Royal Schiphol Group has full control. metrics related to "carbon emissions" and our "own workforce"
The performance reported in these areas also concerns our in this annual report. The definitions of these metrics are
partners in the value chain where relevant and stated. CSRD already compliant. More extensive disclosure in the
Governance section related to ESG-responsibilities of the Board
have been included and the reporting on EU Taxonomy eligibility
now extended to 6 environmental objectives. EU Taxonomy
alignment is still reported as 0% due to outstanding Minimum
Safeguards in place and lack of (evidence for) meeting technical
screening criteria.
The UN Sustainable Development Goals goals to actively support and contribute to over the following two refer to initiatives and the material topics described in the SDG
Introduced in 2015 by the United Nations, the UN Sustainable decades. Behind the 17 goals are 169 key performance indicators table for details of how we are working to contribute to the goals
Development Goals (SDGs) relate to the 17 most important (KPIs). To make our SDG approach clearer and more transparent, and to continuously improve as an organisation.
challenges facing the world towards 2030. RSG identified nine we publish the relevant KPIs for RSG in the Annual Report. Please
SDG 5 Gender equality – Diversity and Inclusion ambition Diversity, equity and
5.C Adopt and strengthen sound policies and enforceable legislation for the – 31% female employees inclusion own workforce
promotion of gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls at – Diversity, Equity and Inclusion dimensions (work groups)
all levels – DE&I measurement
– DE&I conscious recruitment strategy
– Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Board
SDG 7 Affordable and clean energy – Schiphol Group operates on 100% renewable wind energy Energy-positve airports
7.2 By 2030, increase substantially the share of renewable energy in the global – Eindhoven Airport, Rotterdam The Hague Airport and Lelystad Airport all operate on Sustainable aviation
energy mix 100% green gas
– ACA Level 5 for Schiphol, Rotterdam The Hague Airport and Eindhoven airport
SDG 8 Decent work and economic growth – Number of persons employed at Schiphol site and direct surroundings: 71,000 Employement practices
8.5 By 2030, achieve full and productive employment and decent work for all – E-NPS: 24 own workforce
women and men, including for young people and persons with disabilities, and – LTIF: 1.6 Employment practices in
equal pay for work of equal value – (International) Alliances and participations value chain
8.8 Protect labour rights and promote safe and secure working environments for – Aviation Community Schiphol
all workers – The Safety Leadership principles Safety and security
– Human rights policy
SDG 16 Peace, justice and strong institutions – Reported integrity issues: 32 Sustainable aviation
16.5 Substantially reduce corruption and bribery in all their forms – Code of Conduct Business ethics and
– Human rights policy corporate culture
Supplier and
procurement practices
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 138
2-1 Organisational details Financial Statements Yes Location of headquarters: Evert van de Beekstraat 202, 1118 CP Schiphol
Our company No
Corporate governance No
2-2 Entities included in the organzations's Financial Statements Yes
sustainability reporting Socio-economic accountability Yes
2-3 Reporting period, frequency and contact point Socio-economic accountability Yes Reporting period: 01-01-2023 - 31-12-2023 Reporting cycle: Annual
2-12 Role of the highest governance body in overseeing Governance No More detailed information can be found on our website in e.g. our Articles of
the management of impacts 2 Association, the Supervisory Board Regulations and the Mangement Board Rules.
See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/corporate-governance/
2-13 Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts Governance No More detailed information can be found on our website in e.g. our Articles of
Association, the Supervisory Board Regulations and the Mangement Board Rules.
See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/corporate-governance/
2-14 Role of the highest governance body in Governance No More detailed information can be found on our website in e.g. our Articles of
sustainability reporting Association, the Supervisory Board Regulations and the Mangement Board Rules.
See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/corporate-governance/
2-15 Conflicts of interest Governance No More detailed information can be found on our website in e.g. our Articles
of Association, the Supervisory Board Regulations and the Mangement
Board Rules. See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/corporate-
governance/Also note that among other matters, the Royal Schiphol Group Code
of Conduct contains the internal reporting regulations for misconduct and fraud
(the Whistle-blower Regulations).
2-16 Communication of critical concerns Governance No More detailed information can be found on our website in e.g. our Articles
of Association, the Supervisory Board Regulations and the Mangement
Board Rules. See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/corporate-
governance/Also note that among other matters, the Royal Schiphol Group Code
of Conduct contains the internal reporting regulations for misconduct and fraud
(the Whistle-blower Regulations).
2-17 Collective knowledge of the highest Governance No More detailed information can be found on our website in e.g. our Articles of
governance body Association, the Supervisory Board Regulations and the Mangement Board Rules.
See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/corporate-governance/
2-18 Evaluation of the performance of the highest Governance No More detailed information can be found on our website in e.g. our Articles of
governance body Association, the Supervisory Board Regulations and the Mangement Board Rules.
See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/corporate-governance/
2-19 Remuneration policies Corporate governance No
Remuneration
2-20 Process to determine remuneration Corporate governance No
Remuneration
2-21 Annual total compensation ratio Corporate governance No
Remuneration
2-22 Statement on sustainable development strategy Corporate governance No Also refer to our website https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/road-
Message from the CEO to-the-most-sustainable-airports/
2-23 Policy commitments Risk management No More information on specific policies can be found on our website e.g. :
Business ethics and corporate culture Yes – Integrity policies such as the Code of Conduct, Supplier Code and Human
Rights Policy. See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/code-of-
conduct-integrity-guidelines-compliance-and-supplier-code/
– Climate agreements, such as the
Smart and Sustainable action plan for Dutch aviation and other international
agreements. See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/climate-
agreements/
– Policy on human and wildlife trafficking. See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/
schiphol-group/page/tackling-illegal-trade-in-people-plants-and-wildlife/
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 140
2-24 Embedding policy commitments Quality of Life Yes Also refer to our Sustaining your world roadmap. See https://www.schiphol.nl/en/
Business ethics and corporate culture Yes schiphol-group/page/road-to-the-most-sustainable-airports/
2-25 Processes to remediate negative impacts Engaging with our communities Yes Also refer to our website for different grievance mechanisms:
Business ethics and corporate culture Yes – https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/code-of-conduct-
integrity-guidelines-compliance-and-supplier-code/
– https://www.schiphol.nl/en/contact-schiphol/
– https://bezoekbas.nl/
– https://www.schiphol.nl/en/page/privacy-and-cookies/
2-26 Mechanisms for seeking advice and raising Business ethics and corporate culture Yes Note that among other matters, the Royal Schiphol Group Code of Conduct
concerns 3 contains the internal reporting regulations for misconduct and fraud (the Whistle-
blower Regulations). Also refer to our website for different grievance mechanisms:
– https://www.schiphol.nl/en/schiphol-group/page/code-of-conduct-
integrity-guidelines-compliance-and-supplier-code/
– https://www.schiphol.nl/en/contact-schiphol/
– https://bezoekbas.nl/
– https://www.schiphol.nl/en/page/privacy-and-cookies/
2-27 Compliance with laws and regulations Business ethics and corporate culture Yes This topic is not included in the reporting of FY23. In preparation for upcoming
Corporate Governance No disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
2-28 Membership associations Supervisory Board No Industry association Airports Council International, World economic Forum.
Executive team No
Socio-economic accountability Yes
2-29 Approach to stakeholder engagement Material topics 2023 Yes In preparation for upcoming disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our
Socio-economic accountability Yes way of reporting for FY24.
2-30 Collective bargaining agreements No 92.2 % of employees covered by CLAs for Amsterdam Airport Schiphol.
For employees with above CLA contracts, the CLA is used as reference for the
working conditions.
Material topics
Network of destinations
15 Number of passengers handled over the course of Network of destinations Yes Amsterdam Airport Schiphol excl. transit-direct
one year, categorised according to international and Passengers: 61,887,628
domestic flights and OD and transfer passengers, European: 43,339,518
including transit-direct passengers Intercontinental: 18,548,110
OD passengers (total): 39,431,773
European OD: 29,689,136
OD Intercontinental: 9,742,637
Transfer (total): 22,455,853
European transfer: 13,650,382
Intercontinental transfer: 8,805,471
Transit-direct passengers: 3,916
AO2 Number of air transport movements over the Network of destinations Yes Amsterdam Airport Schiphol
course of one year, categorised into day and night- Air transport movements (cargo and passenger): 441,969
time flights, and commercial, non-commercial and Cargo flights (commercial): 15.969
cargo flights Passenger flights (commercial): 426,000
General aviation (non-commercial): 22,758
Night-time flights (commercial): 16,551
AO3 Cargo volume Network of destinations Yes Amsterdam Airport Schiphol: 1,378,041,974 kg
Number of ICA destinations TPI performance 2023 Yes
Accessibility
Accessibility Accessibility Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Energy positive airports
302-1 Energy consumption within the organisation Energy-positive airports Yes In preparation for upcoming disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our
Schiphol Group full value chain emissions No way of reporting for FY24.
302-4 Reduction of energy consumption Energy-positive airports Yes
305-1 Greenhouse gas emissions - Scope 1 6 Energy-postive airports Yes
TPI performance 2023 Yes
Schiphol Group full value chain emissions No
305-2 Greenhouse gas emissions - Scope 2 Energy-positive airports Yes
TPI performance 2023 Yes
Schiphol Group full value chain emissions No
305-3 Greenhouse gas emissions - Scope 3 Energy-positive airports Yes
TPI performance 2023 Yes
Schiphol Group full value chain emissions No
305-5 Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions Energy-positive airports Yes
TPI performance 2023 Yes
Schiphol Group full value chain emissions No
Sustainable aviation
Sustainable aviation fuel contribution Sustainable aviation Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 142
Climate adaptation
Climate adaptation Climate adaptation Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Air pollution
Air pollution Air pollution Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Air quality composition Air pollution Yes Air quality at Schiphol is continuously monitored by the government; the province
SDG table Yes of North Holland has three air quality meters in the vicinity of the airport and
publishes its measurements online.
Water pollution
Water pollution Water pollution Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Soil pollution
Soil pollution Soil pollution Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Circularity
Circularity Circularity Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
306-1 Waste generation and significant waste- Circularity Yes For infrastructure, we focus on circular design and the reuse of materials. Training
related impacts Quality of life Yes of staff, materials hubs and material passports are key enablers. For operational
processes, we minimise, separate and upcycle everyday catering, office and aircraft
residuals. We focus on better separation, while phasing out selected single-use
products. Furthermore, in preparation for upcoming disclosure requirements
(CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
306-2 Management of significant waste-related impacts Circularity Yes For infrastructure, we focus on circular design and the reuse of materials. Training
Quality of life Yes of staff, materials hubs and material passports are key enablers. For operational
processes, we minimise, separate and upcycle everyday catering, office and aircraft
residuals. We focus on better separation, while phasing out selected single-use
products. Waste data is obtained from our contractors and monitored internally
through periodic reporting. Furthermore, oursupplier code includes the stipulation
for our suppliers to actively contribute to our sustainability goals. Furthermore, in
preparation for upcoming disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way
of reporting for FY24.
306-4 Waste diverted from disposal Circularity Yes We aim for the high-value recycling of residual flows, which yields economic
Quality of life Yes residual value. Separated residual flows account for a total volume in tonnes. Other
information is not material. Specific other (e.g. project related) results are reported
in Waste. Furthermore, in preparation for upcoming disclosure requirements
(CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
AO6 Aircraft and pavement de-icing/anti-icing fluid used Circularity Yes
and treated by m3 and/or tonnes
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 143
Noise
AO5 Ambient air quality levels according to pollutant Energy-positive airports Yes
concentrations in microgram per m3 or parts SDG table Yes
per million (ppm) by regulatory regime
AO7 Number of people living in noise-affected areas Noise Yes
Engaging with our communities
413-1 Operations with local community engagement, Engaging with our communities Yes
impact assessments, and development programs
413-2 Operational activities with a significant (potentially) Engaging with our communities Yes The area around the airport is especially likely to experience noise disturbance
negative impact on the local environment See also: www.bezoekbas.nl
AO8 (Estimated) number of people to be voluntarily Engaging with our communities Yes Expansion of the airport in 2023 did not require any relocations of local residents.
or involuntarily relocated in connection with the
development or expansion of an airport
Reputation Score TPI performance 2023 Yes
Societal value
Societal value Societal value Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Employment practices own workforce
401-1 Number of new employees and staff turnover Employment practices own workforce Yes In preparation for upcoming disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our
way of reporting for FY24.
403-9 Work-related ill-health Safety and security Yes Number of cases of recordable work-related ill health:
Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity Cybersecurity Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Airport capacity
On-time performance TPI performance 2023 Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Safety and security
AO9 Number of animals involved in wildlife strikes per Safety Yes Bird strikes are deemed material and are reported on.
10,000 air transport movements Our regional airports Yes
403-10 Work-related injuries Safety Yes Lost Time Injury Frequency and absenteeism are deemed material and are
Our regional airports Yes reported on.
Net Safety Score TPI performance 2023 Yes
Security Security Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Business ethics and corporate culture
201-2 Financial implications and other risks and Risk Management No
opportunities due to climate change Quality of life Yes
201-4 Financial assistance received from government 7 Financial statements Yes
Number of issues reported to the Business ethics and corporate culture Yes
integrity committee
Supplier and procurement practices
Supplier and procurement practices Supplier and procurement practices Yes This topic is qualitatively reported on for FY23. In preparation for upcoming
disclosure requirements (CSRD) we will evaluate our way of reporting for FY24.
Financial solidity
201-1 Direct economic values 7 Financial Statements Yes
203-1 Development and impact of infrastructure Airport capacity Yes We invested 678 million euros in 2023. A substantial portion of this is invested in
investments and services provided primarily for Accesibility Yes improving, maintaining and optimally deploying the airport-related infrastructure.
public benefit The long-term investments contribute to the quality, accessibility and development
of the airport.
203-2 Insight into and description of significant indirect About us and our Why Yes
economic consequences, including their scale Financial solidity No
Financial performance No
ROE TPI performance 2023 Yes
1 GRi 2-9 relates to the WEF topic Quality of governing body
2 GRi 2-12 relates to the WEF topic Governing purpose
3 GRI 2-26 relates to the WEF topic Risk and opportunity oversight
4 GRI 3-2 relates to the WEF topic Stakeholder engagement
5 GRI A01-A09 are derived from the GRI Airport Operators Sector Supplement (2013)
6 GRI 305-1 relates to the WEF topic Climate change
7 GRI 201-1 , 201-4, and, 401-1 relate to the WEF topic Employment and wealth generation
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 145
Business model About us and our why Relevant human Policies pursued Business ethics and
Relevant Policies pursued Quality of life rights matters corporate culture
environmental Ebnergy postive airports Outcome of policies Business ethics and
matters Sustainable aviation corporate culture
Circularity Principal associated risks and mitigation Risk Management
Noise
Engaging with our communities Key performance indicators Business ethics and
corporate culture
Outcome of policies Quality of life
Energy positive airports Relevant anti- Policies pursued Business ethics and
Sustainable aviation corruption and anti- corporate culture
Circularity bribery matters Outcome of policies Business ethics and
Noise corporate culture
Engaging with our communities Principal associated risks and mitigation Risk Management
Principal associated risks and mitigation Risk Management Key performance indicators Business ethics and
Key performance indicators Quality of life corporate culture
Energy positive airports
Sustainable aviation
Circularity
Noise
Engaging with our communities
Relevant social and Policies pursued Quality of life
personnel matters Noise
Engaging with our communities
Safety
Robust organisation
Employment practices
own workforce
Outcome of policies Quality of life
Noise
Engaging with our communities
Safety
Robust organisation
Employment practices
own workforce
Principal associated risks and mitigation Risk Management
Key performance indicators Quality of life
Noise
Engaging with our communities
Safety
Robust organisation
Employment practices
own workforce
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 146
Alignment transhipment with rail and water transport." RSG qualifies an Manufacture, installation, and servicing of high, medium
economic activity within this category as eligible when it is and low voltage electrical equipment for electrical
As RSG does not meet the Minimum Safeguards criteria yet, fundamental to the core business - our airport's own operations: transmission and distribution that result in or enable a
0% alignment is reported on all KPI's. Not having implemented investments in our gates and terminals, security facilities, and substantial contribution to climate change mitigation (3.20)
the Minimum Safeguards yet does not lead to any legal cargo facilities. The construction of these buildings are in line with Given the impact RSG has on the electricity net in the area,
consequences, as the EU Taxonomy is a reporting regulation. the sustainability and energy-efficiency standards set out in our RSG also invests heavily in the expension and strengthening
Recognizing the importance of the Minimum Safeguards RSG strategy for energy-positive airports. Commercial facilities (e.g. of the electricity in the area. All activities following from this
has formed a working group that has been tasked to put the retail stores) have been qualified in the infrastructure category (7) involvement have been qualified as eligible activities: on the one
Minimum Safeguards in place and implement a Responsible of economic activities. hand the investments done by RSG in the electricity net, on the
Business Policy. It is critical for RSG to respect and maintain other hand the turnover resulting from this.
high awareness for human rights and good business conduct Air transport ground handling operations (6.20)
to achieve the ambition to be the world’s most sustainable and This economic activiy is included for the first time, following Construction, extension and operation of water collection,
high-quality airport. Moreover, it is in line with RSG's core values. the amendment of Annex I relating to the Climate treatment and supply systems (5.1)
The aim is to have the Minimum Safeguards in place in time for change mitigation objective:"Manufacture, repair, maintenance, Providing the investments in infrastructure and airport
reporting on EU Taxonomy alignment in FY 2024. overhaul, retrofitting, design, repurposing and upgrade, infrastructure, investments in water systems like drainage and
purchase, financing, renting, leasing and operation of equipment sewer is key. Hence we have qualified investments in such systems
and service activities incidental to air transportation (ground as eligible under this category.
Our role as an airport operator handling), including ground services activities at airports and
cargo handling, including loading and unloading of goods from Constuction of new buildings (7.1)
RSG's ambition to be the most sustainable airport in the world. aircraft." RSG has deemed economic activities eligible under this Significant part of RSG's economic activities are related to this
Our core business results in a significant potential for sustainable category when related to ground handling operations like our category, defined as "Development of building projects for
economic activities in the following EU Taxonomy activities. baggage claim center and related facilities (e.g. the lifting aids). residential and non-residential buildings by bringing together
financial, technical and physical means to realise the building
Maintenance of roads and motorways (3.4) projects for later sale as well as the construction of complete
One of the new economic activities provided under the Transition Our role as a developer of residential or non-residential buildings, on own account for sale
to a circular economy objective is defined as: "Maintenance of commercial infrastructure or on a fee or contract basis." This is mainly related due to the
streets, roads and motorways, other vehicular and pedestrian narrow definition of the 6.17 (Low carbon airport infrastructure)
ways, surface work on streets, roads, highways, bridges, tunnels, Next to RSG's core role as an airport operator, RSG has a role in and 6.20 (Air transport ground handling operations) categories.
aerodrome runways, taxiways and aprons, defined as all actions developing the infrastructure and real estate that contributes to RSG's economic activities related to the development of
undertaken to maintain and restore the serviceability and level operating the airports. The following economic activities are a commercial buildings, parking and retail facilities are covered
of service of roads". Our investments in upgrading our airport's result of this role. under this category. Next to that, RSG classifies periphiral
runways are important input to this category. construction not directly related to our airport infrastructure
Demolition and wrecking of buildings and other under this category (e.g. fire station).
Low carbon airport infrastructure (6.17) structures (3.3)
Annex I and II related to the Climate objectives provide us with the The construction, redevelopment or upgrade of our Acquisition and ownership of buildings (7.7)
following definition: "Construction, modernisation, maintenance infrastructure often results in demolition activities in the start RSG mainly applies this category for the ownership of buildings
and operation of infrastructure that is required for zero tailpipe of projects. Economic activities related to "the demolition and by applying the definition: "Buying real estate and exercising
CO2 operation of aircraft or the airport’s own operations, and for wrecking of buildings, roads and runways, .." are therefore ownership of that real estate." Hence, rent and leases of
provision of fixed electrical ground power and preconditioned deemed eligible. commercial real estate and our terminals (e.g. retail stores) are
air to stationary aircraft as well as infrastructure dedicated to considered as eligible under this category.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 148
The EU Taxonomy definition of the eligible turnover KPI The EU Taxonomy defines the eligible CAPEX KPI as Taxonomy- The EU Taxonomy uses a significantly more narrow definition for
concerns the net turnover derived from products or services eligible CAPEX, divided by all additions to tangible and OPEX than IFRS OPEX definition that is applied in the financial
(including intangibles) associated with Taxonomy-eligible intangible assets during the financial year before depreciation, statements: only rougly 10% of our IFRS OPEX classifies as EU
economic activities, divided by the total net turnover. amortisation and any remeasurements, including those resulting Taxonomy OPEX. For reporting year 2023, RSG has analyzed the
from revaluations and impairments, for the relevant financial year composition of the OPEX and concluded that the only potential
The majority of Taxonomy-eligible turnover can be attributed and excluding fair value changes. eligible economic OPEX activities sit in the Maintanance & Repairs
to rental revenue from our real estate portofolio in line with category. This only represents 1% of RSG's total operating
economic activity Acquisition and ownership of buildings (7.7). In our analysis of eligible CAPEX we have used actual amounts expenses and are consequently deemed not material to be
The remaining part relates to revenue generated by electric for IT costs and Pier A - which constitutes our largest CAPEX disclosed for EU Taxonomy purposes. Moreover, a review of last
charging points on the airport premises, in line with economic project, while leveraging budgeted amounts for the other CAPEX year's OPEX eligibility disclosure shows a consistent insignificant
activity Infrastructure enabling low-carbon road transport and investments. The budgeted amounts were analyzed for eligible percantage eligibility (less than 1%). The conclusion to use
public transport (6.15). RSG has also evaluated its interpretation economic activites, for which we determined the percetanges of the OPEX exemption is in line with Disclosure Delegated Act
of economic activity Low carbon airport infrastructure (6.17) the total budget. These budget percentages were multiplied by 2021/2178 paragraph 1.1.3.2.
and has concluded that - given the energy efficiency of the the actuals in this fiscal year. Although this is a proxy, we see no risk
terminals - revenues resulting from VIP and Previum services can in misstatements of eligiblity percentages over these investment OPEX
be considered eligible as well. For the eligible turnover we have as only a few of these investments run over multiple years.
analyzed the actual amounts only. Absolute Proportion
The largest part of Taxonomy-eligible CAPEX can be attributed OPEX of OPEX
With a constant evolution of the EU Taxonomy, RSG encourages to the construction of Pier A and Pier C and Cargo Buildings 8
the European Commission to have a further look at the air and 17 for Amsterdam Schiphol and investments in terminal, OPEX of Taxonomy-eligible but
transportation sector. RSG's turnover is partially based on the cargo buildings and construction at Eindhoven Airport and not environmentally sustainable
airport charges to airlines and have a sustainability component Rotterdam/The Hague Airport. Next to that, we have included activities (not Taxonomy-aligned
included. We promote the use of quieter and cleaner aircraft investments in parking facilities, EV charging and taxiways activities) (A.2) €- 0.0%
because using the noisiest and most polluting planes can cost as eligible investments. The introduction of economic activity
airlines five times as much as the quieter, cleaner ones. RSG Air transport ground handling operations (6.20) has led to a
believes this contribution could become more evident with a broadening of eligible activities with our investments in the
further development in the EU Taxonomy standard. baggage facilities, lifting aids and security facilities.
Turnover CAPEX
Absolute Proportion Absolute Proportion
turnover of turnover CAPEX of CAPEX
Turnover
Criteria DNSH criteria ('Does Not
2023
Substantial Contribution Significantly Harm')
Category enabling
Economic Activities
Circular economy
Circular economy
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
turnover 2023
turnover 2022
Proportion of
Biodiversity
Biodiversity
Adaptation
Adaptation
transitional
Safeguards
Mitigation
Mitigation
Minimum
Category
Pollution
Pollution
Turnover
activity
activity
Water
Water
Code
EUR % % % % % % % Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N % E T
A. Taxonomy Eligible Activities
A.1. Environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned)
Turnover of environmentally sustainable activities
(Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N N N N N N N 0%
Of which Enabling 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N N N N N N N 0% E
Of which Transitional 0 0.0% 0.0% N N N N N N N 0% T
A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities)
Infrastructure enabling low-carbon road transport and
public transport CCM 6.15 313,222 0.0% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL 0.04%
Low carbon airport infrastructure CCM 6.17 23,998,483 1.3% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL 0.00%
Acquisition and ownership of buildings CCM 7.7 161,433,036 8.7% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL 5.57%
Turnover of Taxonomy eligible but not environmentally
sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) 185,744,741 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6%
Turnover of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) 185,744,741 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6%
B. TAXONOMY-NON-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
Turnover of Taxonomy non-eligible activities 1,666,228,534 90.0%
TOTAL 1,851,973,275 100%
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 150
CAPEX
Criteria DNSH criteria ('Does Not
2023
Substantial Contribution Significantly Harm')
Minimum Safeguards
Category enabling
Economic Activities
Circular economy
Circular economy
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
CAPEX 2022
Biodiversity
Biodiversity
Adaptation
Adaptation
transitional
Mitigation
Mitigation
Category
Pollution
Pollution
activity
activity
CAPEX
Water
Water
Code
EUR % % % % % % % Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N % E T
A. Taxonomy Eligible Activities
A.1. Environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned)
CAPEX of environmentally sustainable activities
(Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N N N N N N N 0%
Of which Enabling 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N N N N N N N 0% E
Of which Transitional 0 0.0% 0.0% N N N N N N N 0% T
A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities)
Remediation of contaminated sites and areas PPC 2.4 9,690,310 1.4% N/EL N/EL N/EL EL N/EL N/EL N/A
Demolition and wrecking of buildings and other structure CE 3.3 3,503,936 0.5% N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL EL N/EL N/A
Maintenance of roads and motorways CE 3.4 111,009,014 16.4% N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL EL N/EL N/A
Manufacture, installation, and servicing of high, medium and
low voltage electrical equipment for electrical transmission and CCM
distribution that result in or enable 3.20 12,193,924 1.8% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/A
Transmission and distribution of electricity CCM 4.9 1,916,950 0.3% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL 0.7%
CCM
District heating/cooling distribution 4.15 1,717,712 0.3% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/A
Construction, extension and operation of water collection,
treatment and supply systems CCM 5.1 10,709,086 1.6% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL 0.3%
Construction, extension and operation of waste water collection
and treatment CCM 5.3 1,605,983 0.2% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/A
CCM
Infrastructure for personal mobility, cycle logistics 6.13 0 0.0% N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL 0.4%
CCM
Infrastructure enabling road transport and public transport 6.15 10,604,950 1.6% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL 1.3%
CCM
Low carbon airport infrastructure 6.17 264,194,946 39.0% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/A
CCM
Air transport ground handling operations 6.20 49,103,207 7.2% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/A
Construction of new buildings CCM 7.1 1,549,807 0.2% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL 11.4%
Renovation of existing buildings CCM 7.2 21,554,579 3.2% EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/EL N/A
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 151
OPEX
Criteria DNSH criteria ('Does Not
2023
Substantial Contribution Significantly Harm')
Minimum Safeguards
Category enabling
Economic Activities
Circular economy
Circular economy
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Biodiversity
Biodiversity
Adaptation
Adaptation
transitional
OPEX 2022
Mitigation
Mitigation
Category
Pollution
Pollution
activity
activity
Water
Water
OPEX
Code
EUR % % % % % % % Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N Y/N % E T
A. Taxonomy Eligible Activities
A.1. Environmentally sustainable activities (Taxonomy-aligned)
OPEX of environmentally sustainable activities
(Taxonomy-aligned) (A.1) 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N N N N N N N 0%
Of which Enabling 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% N N N N N N N 0% E
Of which Transitional 0 0.0% 0.0% N N N N N N N 0% T
A.2 Taxonomy-Eligible but not environmentally sustainable activities (not Taxonomy-aligned activities)
OPEX of Taxonomy eligible but not
environmentally sustainable activities (not
Taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2) 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%
OPEX of Taxonomy eligible activities (A.1+A.2) 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%
B. TAXONOMY-NON-ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES
OPEX of Taxonomy non-eligible activities 150,829,883 100.0%
TOTAL 150,829,883 100%
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 153
Report on the review of the socio-economic reporting included in the Annual Report 2023
the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 ‘Assurance engagements other
Our conclusion than audits or reviews of historical financial information’. This engagement is aimed to obtain limited
assurance.
We have reviewed the socio-economic reporting of Royal Schiphol Group N.V (hereafter: ‘Schiphol’ or
‘the Company’) for the year ended 31 December 2023 (hereafter: socio-economic reporting) included in Our responsibilities under this standard are further described in the section ‘Auditor’s responsibilities’ of
the Annual Report 2023 of Royal Schiphol Group N.V (hereafter: the Annual Report). A review is aimed our report.
at obtaining a limited level of assurance.
We are independent of Schiphol in accordance with the ‘Verordening inzake de onafhankelijkheid van
Based on our procedures performed and the assurance information obtained, nothing has come to our accountants bij assurance-opdrachten’ (ViO, Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, a regulation
attention that causes us to believe that the socio-economic reporting included in the Annual Report with respect to independence). This includes that we do not perform any activities that could result in a
does not present fairly, in all material respects: conflict of interest with our independent assurance engagement. Furthermore, we have complied with
the ‘Verordening gedrags- en beroepsregels accountants’ (VGBA, Dutch Code of Ethics for
— the policy with regard to sustainability matters; and Professional Accountants).
— the business operations, events and achievements in that area in 2023. We believe the assurance evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
in accordance with the reporting criteria as included in the section ‘Reporting Criteria’ of our report. for our conclusion.
The socio-economic reporting consists of the section ‘Materiality analysis’ in the chapter ‘About us and
our Why’, the sections ‘Our performance in 2023’, ‘Quality of Network’, ‘Quality of Life’, ‘Quality of Reporting Criteria
Work’, ‘Quality of Service’, ‘Safety first’, ‘Robust organisation’ (paragraphs ‘Business ethics and The socio-economic reporting needs to be read and understood together with the reporting criteria.
corporate culture’ and ‘Supplier and procurement practices’), and ‘Financial performance’ (paragraph Schiphol is solely responsible for selecting and applying these reporting criteria, taking into account
‘Our regional airports’) in the chapter ‘Our Results’ and the chapter ‘Socio-economic accountability’ applicable law and regulations related to reporting.
(excluding the sections ‘EU Taxonomy disclosure FY 2023’, ‘Schiphol Group full value chain
emissions’, and ‘Green Bond Progress Report’). The socio-economic reporting is disclosed in the The criteria applied for the preparation of the socio-economic reporting are prepared with reference to
Annual Report the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI) and in accordance with the
applied supplemental reporting criteria as disclosed in the section ‘Socio-economic accountability’ of
the Annual Report.
Basis for our conclusion
The comparability of sustainability information between entities and over time may be affected by the
We have performed our review of the socio-economic reporting in accordance with Dutch law, including absence of a uniform practice on which to draw, to evaluate and measure this information. This allows
Dutch Standard 3810N ‘Assurance-opdrachten inzake maatschappelijke verslagen’ (Assurance for the application of different, but acceptable, measurement techniques.
engagements relating to sustainability reports), which is a specified Dutch Standard that is based on
KPMG Accountants N.V., a Dutch limited liability company registered with the trade register in the Netherlands under number 33263683, is a member firm of the global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 154
Materiality documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional
standards and other relevant legal and regulatory requirements.
Based on our professional judgement we determined materiality levels for each relevant part of the
socio-economic reporting. When evaluating our materiality levels, we considered quantitative and We have exercised professional judgement and have maintained professional skepticism throughout
qualitative aspects as well as the relevance of information for both stakeholders and the company. the review, in accordance with the Dutch Standard 3810N, ethical requirements and independence
We agreed with the Supervisory Board that misstatements which are identified during the review and requirements.
which in our view must be reported on quantitative or qualitative grounds, would be reported to them.
Our review included among others:
— Performing an analysis of the external environment and obtaining an understanding of
Limitations to the scope of our review
relevant societal themes and issues, and the characteristics of the company;
The socio-economic reporting includes prospective information such as ambitions, strategy, plans,
— Evaluating the appropriateness of the reporting criteria applied, their consistent application
expectations and estimates. Prospective information relates to events and actions that have not yet
and related disclosures in the socio-economic reporting. This includes the evaluation of the
occurred and may never occur. We do not provide assurance on the assumptions and achievability of
results of stakeholder dialogue and the plausibility of estimates made by the Management
this prospective information in the socio-economic reporting.
Board;
References to external sources or websites in the socio-economic reporting are not part of the socio-
— Obtaining an understanding of the reporting process for the socio-economic reporting,
economic reporting as reviewed by us. Therefore, we do not provide assurance on this information.
including obtaining a general understanding of the internal control environment, process and
information systems relevant to our review, but not for the purpose of expressing a
The Management Board and Supervisory Board’s Responsibilities conclusion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control;
The Management Board of Schiphol is responsible for the preparation of the socio-economic reporting — Identifying areas of the socio-economic reporting where a material misstatement, whether
in accordance with the criteria as included in the section ‘Reporting Criteria’ section of our report, due to fraud or error, are most likely to occur, designing and performing assurance
including the identification of stakeholders and the definition of material matters. The Management procedures responsive to these areas, and obtaining assurance information that is sufficient
Board is also responsible for selecting and applying the criteria and for determining that these reporting and appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion. These procedures included, amongst
criteria are suitable for the legitimate information needs of stakeholders, considering applicable law and others:
regulations related to reporting. The choices made by the Management Board regarding the scope of
the socio-economic reporting and the reporting policy are summarized in the section ‘Socio-economic ‒ Interviewing management and relevant staff at a corporate level responsible for the
accountability’ of the Annual Report. socio-economic strategy, policy and results;
Furthermore, the Management Board is responsible for such internal control as it determines is
necessary to enable the preparation of the socio-economic reporting that is free from material
‒ Interviewing staff responsible for providing the information for, carrying out internal
control procedures over, and consolidating the data in the socio-economic reporting;
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
The Supervisory Board is, among other things, responsible for overseeing Schiphol’s reporting ‒ Obtaining assurance information that the socio-economic reporting reconciles with
process. underlying records of the company;
We apply the ‘Nadere voorschriften kwaliteitssystemen’ (NVKS, regulations for quality management — Considering the overall presentation and balanced content of the socio-economic reporting
systems) and accordingly maintain a comprehensive system of quality management including
2
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 155
We communicate with The Management Board and the Supervisory Board regarding, among other
matters, the planned scope and timing of the review and any significant findings that we identify during
our review.
R.R.J. Smeets RA
3
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 156
Issuer | Royal Schiphol Group N.V. Issuer | Royal Schiphol Group N.V. Issuer | Royal Schiphol Group N.V.
Issue date | 5 November 2018 Issue date | 6 April 2020 Issue date | 8 September 2020
Currency | EUR Currency | EUR Currency | EUR
Tenor | 12 years Tenor |9 years Tenor | 12 years
Issued amount | 500,000,000 Issued amount | 750,000,000 Issued amount | 500,000,000
ISIN | XS1900101046 ISIN | XS2153459123 ISIN | XS2227050379
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 157
1 Concerns the book value as per 31 December 2022 and is either the fair value (investment property) or cost price minus
depreciation (operating assets).
2 Comprises of charging stations for airside e-vehicles (other than airside e-buses), charging stations for landside e-vehicles
(other than landside e-buses), energy infrastructure for the charging stations for landside e-buses and zero-emission equipment
for ground-handling.
1 Please note that our current buildings under construction will be categorised as green buildings upon completion.
1)
This section is within the scope of the KPMG assurance engagement.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 158
Impact reporting1
Green buildings
Eligible portfolio Total annual energy Total annual electricity Total annual gas Total annual CO2e Total annual electricity
Category (EUR) Share of total financing(GJ) savings (kWh) avoidance (m3) avoidance (tonnes) avoidance production (kWh)
a1 b2 c3 d4 e4 f4 g4 h4
Green buildings 1,959,230,555 5,6 99% 7 50,742 3,804,745 521,292 2,439 109,694
1)
This section is not within the scope of the KPMG assurance engagement.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 159
The above-mentioned criteria have been applied and, additionally, the following choices were made The above-mentioned criteria have been applied and, additionally, the following choices were made
in the selection of eligible assets: in the selection of eligible assets:
– The asset base as at 31 December 2023 was used. – The asset base as at 31 December 2023 was used.
– A conservative approach has been applied in determining the book value of the eligible asset – The only e-vehicles owned by Schiphol are the airside e-buses. All other e-vehicles are leased and
base to ensure that only assets covered by the energy labels are included as assets. not included in the asset base.
– For buildings currently under construction, the current value on the balance sheet is provided
under ‘Current value of expected eligible green buildings’. This means that only the value of the
part that was built as per 31 December 2023 is shown. This is the case for Pier A, Terminal Lelystad
and Cargo Station 17.
– The aquifer thermal energy storages (ATES) are not separately included as they are often
included in the value of buildings.
– No individual investments in green buildings have been included as eligible assets.
1)
LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) is the most widely used green building rating system, which provides for a framework that can be used to create healthy, highly efficient and cost-saving green buildings.
2)
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method) is a leading sustainability assessment method for, among other things, infrastructure and buildings, whereby it assesses and certifies an asset’s environmental, social and economic
sustainability performance.
3)
EPBD is the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, which is a European directive to enforce the measurement of the energy performance of buildings.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 160
Impact indicators
For the impact indicators total annual energy (GJ) savings, total annual electricity (kWh) avoidance
and total annual gas (m3) avoidance, the following methodology and assumptions apply:
– The reported values concern 2023.
– The savings and avoidances reported are consistent with the methodology of the MYA
2017-2020 (Meerjarenafspraken energie-efficiëntie) with the Netherlands Enterprise agency, a
government agency which operates under the auspices of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and
Climate Policy. Until 2020, Schiphol was required to report on the measures taken to improve
energy efficiency and the associated savings and avoidances.
– For the CO2e calculation of electricity (kWh) and gas (m3), the relevant emission factors from
www.co2emissiefactoren.nl and the Dutch Government Gazette (Staatscourant), respectively,
have been applied, which are retrieved once a year.
– A conservative approach has been adopted regarding the assumptions underlying the savings
and avoidances of office buildings.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 161
Report on the review of the Eligible Green Project Portfolio included in the Annual Report 2023
We believe the assurance evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis
Our conclusion for our conclusion.
We have reviewed the Eligible Green Project Portfolio of Royal Schiphol Group N.V. (hereafter
‘Schiphol’ or ‘the Company’) for the year ended 31 December 2023 (hereafter ‘the Portfolio’) included Reporting Criteria
in the Annual Report 2023 of Royal Schiphol Group N.V (hereafter: the Annual Report). The Portfolio is
marked in the Annual Report with a footnote (1). A review is aimed at obtaining a limited level of The Portfolio needs to be read and understood together with the reporting criteria. Schiphol is solely
assurance. responsible for selecting and applying these reporting criteria, taking into account applicable law and
regulations related to reporting.
Based on the procedures performed and the assurance information obtained, nothing has come to our
attention that causes us to believe that the Portfolio is not prepared, in all material aspects, in The reporting criteria used for the preparation of the Portfolio are the ‘Eligible investments per category’
accordance with the reporting criteria as described in the ‘Reporting criteria’ section of our report. as described in the Schiphol Green Bond Framework (2018) and Schiphol Green Finance Framework
(2020) as disclosed and further described in ‘Methodology and assumptions’ in the section ‘Green
The Portfolio is included in the section ‘Green Bond Progress Report (paragraph ‘Green bond Bond Progress Report’ of the Annual Report.
allocation reporting’) in the chapter ‘Socio-economic accountability’ as disclosed in the Annual Report.
Materiality
Basis for our conclusion
Based on our professional judgement we determined materiality levels for each relevant part of the
We performed our review on the Portfolio in accordance with Dutch law, including Dutch Standard Annual Report and for the Portfolio as a whole. When evaluating our materiality levels, we have taken
3000A ’Assurance-opdrachten anders dan opdrachten tot controle of beoordeling van historische into account quantitative and qualitative aspects as well as the relevance of information for both
financiële informatie (attest-opdrachten) (assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of stakeholders and the company.
historical financial information (attestation engagements)). This engagement is aimed to obtain limited
assurance. Our responsibilities under this standard are further described in the section ‘Auditor’s We agreed with the Supervisory Board that misstatements which are identified during the review and
responsibilities’ section of our report. which in our view must be reported on quantitative or qualitative grounds, would be reported to them.
We are independent of Schiphol in accordance with the ‘Verordening inzake de onafhankelijkheid van
accountants bij assurance-opdrachten’ (ViO, Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, a regulation
with respect to independence). Furthermore, we have complied with the ‘Verordening gedrags- en
beroepsregels accountants’ (VGBA, Dutch Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants).
KPMG Accountants N.V., a Dutch limited liability company registered with the trade register in the Netherlands under number 33263683, is a member firm of the global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 162
Limitations to the scope of our review responsive to these areas, and obtaining assurance information that is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our conclusion. The procedures included, amongst others:
The Annual Report includes other information besides the Portfolio. Our review did not extend to this
other information and this report does not provide assurance on the other information as included in - Interviewing relevant staff at Schiphol Finance Department and Schiphol
the Annual Report. Commercial responsible for the Green Bond management, reporting and providing
and consolidating the Portfolio;
Our conclusion is not modified in respect to these matters.
- Obtaining assurance evidence that the Portfolio reconciles with underlying records
of the company;
The Management Board and Supervisory Board’s Responsibilities
- Reviewing, on a limited test basis, relevant internal and external documentation,
The Management Board is responsible for the preparation of the Portfolio in accordance with the based on limiting sampling, to determine whether the information in the Portfolio is
reporting criteria as included in the section ‘Reporting Criteria’ of our report. plausible in line with the Reporting criteria
Furthermore, the Management Board is responsible for such internal control as it determines is — Evaluating the consistency of the Portfolio with the information in the annual report which is
necessary to enable the preparation of the Portfolio that is free from material misstatement, whether not included in the scope of our review;
due to fraud or error.
— Evaluating the presentation, structure, and content of the Portfolio;
The Supervisory Board is, among other things, responsible for overseeing Schiphol’s reporting
process. — Considering whether the Portfolio as a whole, including the disclosures, is clearly and
adequately disclosed in accordance with reporting criteria.
Auditor’s responsibilities We communicate with the Management Board and the Supervisory Board regarding, among other
matters, the planned scope and timing of the review and significant findings that we identify during our
Our responsibility is to plan and perform our review in a manner that allows us to obtain sufficient and review.
appropriate assurance evidence for our conclusion.
Procedures performed to obtain a limited level of assurance are aimed to determine the plausibility of
information. The procedures vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent, than for a
reasonable assurance engagement. The level of assurance obtained in a limited assurance
engagement is substantially less than the assurance that is obtained had a reasonable assurance
engagement been performed. The Hague, 15 February 2024
We apply the ‘Nadere Voorschriften Kwaliteitssystemen’ (NVKS, Regulations for Quality management KPMG Accountants N.V.
systems) and accordingly maintain a comprehensive system of quality management including
documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements, professional
standards and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
R.R.J. Smeets RA
We have exercised professional judgement and have maintained professional skepticism throughout
the review, in accordance with the Dutch Standard 3000A, ethical requirements and independence
requirements.
Our review included among others:
— Evaluating the appropriateness of the reporting criteria applied, their consistent application
and related disclosures in the Portfolio.
— Obtaining an understanding of the reporting processes for the Portfolio, including obtaining a
general understanding of internal control relevant to our review, but not for purpose of
expressing a conclusion on the effectiveness of Schiphol’s internal control;
— Identifying areas of the Portfolio where a material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error, is most likely to occur, designing and performing further assurance procedures
2
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 163
1 CO2e emissions are likely to reflect 1/3 of the climate impact of aviation. The non-CO2 emissions are not quantified yet, because further reflection on how to best address non
CO2 climate impacts is required.
2 Calculations according to the GHG protocol
3 Emission factors based on CO2emissiefactoren.nl and ACA Acert tool V7
4 Emission origins based on ACA Level 5
5 2023 emissions are not final yet, may change due to corrections on utilities
6 Total scope 3 data is reported with a one year delay
7 Use of sold goods consists of Aircraft cruise, LTO-cycle, APU, Vehicle fleet other parties, Commuter traffic employees other parties, De-icing chemicals for aircraft, Passenger
transport to Schiphol and Truck traffic to Schiphol.
8 Brisbane Airport and Hobart Airport have been included in Scope 3 category 15
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 165
1 The energy concumption and mix is based on the scope 1 and 2 fuel and electricity consumption of RSG. The information provided in the table is in line with the CSRD E1. Together
with our partners our goal is to stop the use of energy from fossil sources.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 166
Financial
Statements
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 169 Company balance sheet as at 31 December 2023 241
31 December 2023
Notes to the company financial statements 242
Consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2023 170
Consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year ended 171 Other Information
31 December 2023
Proposed result appropriation 247
Consolidated statement of cash flow for the year ended 31 December 2023 172
Independent auditor's report 248
Notes to the consolidated financial statements 173
Attributable to:
Non-controlling interests 9,352 8,962
Shareholders (net result) 12,706 -86,256
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31 December 2023
Attributable to:
Non-controlling interests 9,352 8,962
Shareholders (net result) -13,959 -33,913
Cash and cash equivalents 15 784,743 1,050,846 Employee benefits 21 44,827 41,451
Consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2023
Attributable to shareholders
Issued Non-
share Share Retained Other controlling
(in thousands of euros) Note 1 capital Premium profits reserves Treasury shares interests Total
Consolidated statement of cash flow for the year ended 31 December 2023
(in thousands of euros) Note 1 2023 2022 (in thousands of euros) Note 1 2023 2022
Result for the year 22,058 -77,294 Cash flow from investing activities
Payments for intangible assets 6 -51,950 -42,332
Income tax expense recognised in profit or loss 10 8,873 -58,124 Payments for property, plant and equipment 8, 9 -624,470 -412,058
Share in result of associates and joint ventures 11 -22,726 -32,509 Proceeds on disposal of financial assets 16 - 1,032,260
Financial income and expenses 26 -2,327 16,386 Purchased assets held for sale 14 -2,141 -9,467
-16,180 -74,247 Acquisition of associates and joint ventures 11 -6,150 -8,528
Disposal of associates and joint ventures 11; 16 - 2,712
Operating result 5,878 -151,541 Dividends received on loans to associates and joint ventures 12 - 1,011
Repayment of loans to associates and joint ventures 12 25,111 13,573
Adjustments for: Other non-current receivables received 13 - 3,716
Depreciation and amortisation expenses 5 337,661 327,042 Investments in deposits -585,000 -1,485,026
Impairment loss 5 6,486 3,983 Proceeds from deposits 895,463 1,120,060
Result on disposal of investment property 2 - - Cash flow from investing activities -349,137 215,920
Fair value changes of investment property 2 150,595 191,632
Other non-cash changes in other receivables and liabilities 472 -16,739 Free cash flow 139,534 569,226
Change in employee benefits and other provisions -5,178 2,504
490,036 508,422 Cash flow from financing activities
Repayment of borrowings 20 -383,999 -27,000
Operating result after adjustments 495,914 356,881 Dividend paid by subsidiaries to third parties -2,772 -
Proceeds from other non-current liabilities 521 680
Movements in working capital 42,458 86,100 Payment of acquiring treasury shares (settling the Share
buyback liability) 16 - -420,320
Cash flow from operating activities Cash flow from financing activities -405,574 -438,005
addition, Schiphol Group has access to 675 million of committed undrawn credit facilities with 8 Available for optional adoption / effective date deferred indefinitely:
different banks. – Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture -
Amendments to IFRS 10: Consolidated Financial Statements and IAS 28: Investments in
As a result, Schiphol Group evaluated its ability to continue as a going concern. Schiphol Group has Associates and Joint Ventures.
sufficient liquidity and committed funding available to continue to finance the ongoing operational
cash flows and the committed capital investments. From a solvency perspective, Schiphol Group will These standards have been determined to have no material impact on the financial reporting of
remain above the relevant threshold of 30%, as set out in the financing documentation. Schiphol Group.
Management therefore expects Schiphol Group to have adequate resources to continue its New standards and amended standards that are mandatory with effect from
operations for at least the next 12 months and that the going concern basis of accounting 2024 or later
remains appropriate. Schiphol Group is currently examining the consequences of other new standards and interpretations
and amendments on the existing standards listed below, which will be mandatory starting the 2024
Impairment of assets financial year or later (as stated):
An impairment assessment has been performed for the CGU's Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, – Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-Current- Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of
Eindhoven Airport, Lelystad Airport, Rotterdam The Hague Airport and the investments in associates Financial Statements
and joint ventures in terms of IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. Solely an impairment loss on CGU Schiphol – Lease liability in a Sale and Leaseback- Amendments to IFRS 16 Leases
Airport Retail was recognised during 2023 and 2022. – Supplier finance arrangements – Amendments to IAS 7 Statement of Cash Flows and IFRS 7
Financial Instruments – Disclosures
Judgement is required in projecting future cash flows for the CGU's and investments. Critical – Sale or contribution of assets between an investor and its associate or joint venture –
assumptions relate to, among other things, projected passenger and ATM growth within the Amendments to IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements and IAS 28 Investments in Associates
ranges defined in currently applicable legislation, development of the aviation charges for the and Joint Ventures
new regulatory period (2025 – 2027) at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, the settlement mechanism as
included in the Aviation Act as disclosed in note 1 Revenue, and capital expenditures. The estimate Schiphol Group has not voluntarily applied in advance new or amended standards or interpretations
of value in use was determined by using a pre-tax discount rate in the range of 7%-10%. that will not be mandatory until the 2024 financial year or later. These new and/or amended
standards are not expected to have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
New and amended standards that are mandatory with effect from 2023
The following standards and interpretations apply for the first time to financial reporting periods Intangible assets
commencing on or after 1 January 2023: Intangible assets include goodwill, contract-related assets, software and nitrogen rights. Goodwill
– IFRS 17: Insurance Contracts arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries is recognised under intangible assets. Goodwill arising on
– Disclosure of Accounting Policies - Amendments to IAS 1: Presentation of Financial Statements the acquisition of associates and joint ventures is recognised as part of the carrying amount of the
and IFRS Practice Statement 2 associate and joint ventures, using the equity method. The initial carrying amount of goodwill is
– Definition of Accounting Estimates -Amendments to IAS 8: Accounting Policies, Changes in subsequently reduced by accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill is not amortised but is tested for
Accounting Estimates and Errors impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might
– Deferred Tax related to Assets and Liabilities arising from a Single Transaction - Amendments to be impaired. Goodwill is allocated to the relevant cash-generating unit (subsidiary, joint venture or
IAS 12: Income Taxes associate) for the purpose of impairment testing.
– International Tax Reform - OECD Pillar Two Rules resulting into narrow scope amendments to IAS
12: Income Taxes Contract-related assets concern the interest in JFKIAT Member LLC acquired upon the acquisition
of activities from third parties. These contracts are measured at fair value on the acquisition
At 30 June 2023 the IFRS Interpretations Committee took 7 agenda decisions relevant for the 2023 date and subsequently against the cost price thus determined less accumulated amortisation and
annual report but internally assessed to have no impact on the reporting of Schiphol Group.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 175
impairment. Contract-related assets are amortised on a straight-line basis over the remaining term See note 7Assets used for operating activities for a more detailed explanation.
of the arrangement.
Assets under construction or development
Software includes software licences and software development. Software licenses that are acquired All capital expenditure is initially recognised as assets under construction or development, if it is
by the Group and have finite useful lives are measured at cost less accumulated amortisation and probable that the group will derive future economic benefits from them and the amount can be
accumulated impairment losses. Development expenditure on internally developed software is measured reliably. There are three categories of assets under construction or development:
capitalised only if the expenditure can be measured reliably, the product or process is technically – (a) software under development presented under Intangible assets;
and commercially feasible, future economic benefits are probable and the Group intends to and has – (b) assets under construction or development for operating activities presented under Assets
sufficient resources to complete development and to use or sell the asset. Otherwise, it is recognised under construction or development;
in profit or loss as incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, development expenditure is measured – (c) assets under construction or development for investment property presented under
at cost less accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses. Capitalised software Investment property.
is amortised on a straight-line basis over its useful life.
Software under development (category a) and Assets under construction or development for
Nitrogen rights represent the ammonia rights held by the Group to compensate a CO2 emission- operating activities (category b) are measured at historical cost including:
related activity. Nitrogen rights are initially measured at cost, a purchase price paid or the fair value – borrowing costs. This relates to interest payable to third parties on borrowings attributable to
of other consideration given. The nitrogen rights have indefinite useful life and are subsequently projects. Borrowing costs are only capitalised for projects with a duration of at least one year;
measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses. – time charged at cost to capital projects by Schiphol Group employees during the
construction stage.
See the note above and note 6 Intangible assets for a more detailed explanation.
Software under development (category a) and Assets under construction or development for
Assets used for operating activities future operating activities (category b) are not amortised or depreciated. Impairment testing is
Assets used for operating activities include runways, taxiways, aprons, car parks, roads, buildings, performed as explained in the section 'Depreciation, amortisation and impairment'. When the
installations and other assets. These assets are measured at historical cost less grants received, assets are ready for use, they are transferred at historical cost less impairments to ‘assets used for
straight-line depreciation and impairments. Historical cost includes directly attributable costs. operating activities’, which is also when the straight-line depreciation at the expense of the income
Subsequent costs are included in the asset's carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as statement commences.
appropriate, only when it is probable that Schiphol Group will derive future economic benefits from
them and the amount can be measured reliably. Accounting policies for assets under construction or development for investment property (category
c) are included under 'Investment property'.
Assets used for operating activities, with the exception of land, are depreciated on a straight-line
basis over the estimated useful life of the asset, which depends on its nature and components. Reference is made to notes 8 Assets under constructuction or development and 9 Investment
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and Property for a more detailed numerical explanation.
adjusted if appropriate.
The net result on disposals is determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount and is
recognised in the income statement as other income.
The costs of day-to-day maintenance are recognised in the income statement, and the costs of
planned major maintenance improving the existing assets are capitalised by using the component
accounting method.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 176
The book value of non-current assets is tested against the recoverable amount if there are indications
See note 11 Investments in associates and joint ventures for a more detailed numerical explanation.
of a potential impairment. The recoverable amount is the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal
and its value in use. The fair value less cost to sell is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course
Subsidiaries
of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated selling costs. Value in use is
The financial information of Schiphol Group and its subsidiaries is included in the consolidated
based on the present value of the estimated future cash flows from continuing use of an asset and
financial statements. Subsidiaries are companies that are controlled by Schiphol Group. The group
from its disposal at the end of its useful life. This test is performed at cash-generating unit level,
controls an entity when the group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 177
with the entity and is able to influence those returns through its control of the entity. The Acquisition of subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements
other shareholders’ share in consolidated equity and results is presented in the statement of An acquisition of a subsidiary, an associate or a joint arrangement is accounted for according to
financial position as non-controlling interests (part of equity) and in the income statement as profit the purchase method, under which the cost of such an acquisition is the sum of the fair values of
after income tax attributable to non-controlling interests. The results of subsidiaries acquired are the assets and liabilities transferred by the acquirer on the acquisition date, the liabilities incurred
consolidated from the date on which control commences. The financial information relating to by the acquirer to former owners of the acquiree and the equity interests issued by the acquirer.
subsidiaries that have been disposed continues to be included up to the date on which control ceases. For acquisitions of associates and joint ventures, this also includes the related transaction costs. The
In the event the company loses control of a subsidiary while retaining a financial interest, all assets identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired are initially measured at their fair
and liabilities are de-consolidated and the remaining interest is initially recognised at fair value. The value at the acquisition date. The excess of the cost of the acquisition over the company's interest in
remaining difference is recognised in the income statement. the net fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities is recognised as goodwill in the consolidated
financial statements under intangible assets (in the case of subsidiaries) or as part of the carrying
Interests in equity-accounted investees amount (in the case of associates and joint ventures). If the net fair value exceeds cost, the difference
The Group's interests in equity-accounted investees comprise interests in associates and joint is recognised immediately in the income statement. Costs relating to an acquisition of a subsidiary
ventures. Associates are those entities in which the Group has significant influence, but not control or are recognised directly in the income statement.
joint control, over the financial and operating policies. A joint venture is an arrangement in which the
Group has joint control, whereby the Group has rights to the net assets of the arrangement, rather If the acquisition is achieved in stages and leads to having control in an entity, the acquisition date
than rights to its assets and obligations for its liabilities. carrying value of the acquirer’s previously held equity interest in the entity is remeasured to fair value
at the acquisition date; any gains or losses arising from such remeasurement are recognised in the
Investments in associates and joint ventures are recognised using the equity method, meaning income statement.
that the investment is initially recognised at cost and subsequently adjusted for the company's
post-acquisition share in the change in the associate's net assets. The carrying amount of these When the Schiphol Group ceases to have control, any retained interest in the entity is remeasured
investments in associates and joint ventures includes goodwill recognised at acquisition. The to its fair value at the date when control is lost, with the change in carrying amount recognised in
company’s share in the results of associates and joint ventures over which it has significant the income statement. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently
influence is recognised in the statement of income (share in results of associates and joint accounting for the retained interest as an associate, joint venture or other financial interest. In
ventures). Cumulative movements in the net assets of associates and joint ventures are recognised in addition, any amounts previously recognised in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity
proportion to Schiphol Group’s interest as investments in associates and joint ventures. The company are accounted for as if it directly disposed the related assets or liabilities. This can result in amounts
ceases to recognise its share in the results of an associate and joint venture in the income statement previously recognised in other comprehensive income being reclassified to profit or loss.
and its share in the net asset value of that associate and joint venture immediately if this were to lead
to the carrying amount of the investment becoming negative and if the company has not entered Eliminations
into any commitments or made payments on behalf of the associate and joint venture. Investments Transactions between the company and its subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements are
in associates and joint ventures are measured as other financial interests (at fair value with changes eliminated, in case of joint arrangements and associates in proportion to the company's interest
in fair value reported through the income statement) from the date on which the company ceases in those entities, along with any unrealised gains and assets and liabilities. Unrealised losses are
to have significant influence or control. eliminated in the same way as unrealised gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence
of impairment.
Joint arrangements
The financial data of entities that qualify as a joint arrangement are recognised as either joint
ventures or joint operations, depending on the statutory and contractual rights and obligations of
each individual investor. All existing contractual agreements qualify as joint ventures. Joint ventures
are entities over which Schiphol Group and one or more other investors have joint control, and are
accounted for using the equity method.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 178
Financial assets When hedge accounting is not applied, the results are immediately recognised in the
Schiphol Group classifies financial assets in the categories of amortised cost (loans to joint ventures income statement.
and associates, trade receivables, cash and cash equivalents), financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss and financial assets at fair value (derivative financial instruments). The classification is See note 26 Management of financial risks and financial instruments for a more
based on the business model and the cash flow characteristics of the financial asset. detailed explanation.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss Loans to associates and joint ventures
The investment in shares of (listed) companies will be recognised at fair value through profit or loss The objective of loans to associates and joint ventures is to collect contractual repayments and
(finance income and expense). Net gains and losses, including any interest or dividend income, are interest. Loans to associates and joint ventures are initially measured at the fair value of the loans
recognised from the investments of shares. less attributable transaction costs, and subsequently measured at amortised cost, with differences
between the redemption value and the carrying amount being amortised over the remaining term
Derivative financial instruments to maturity using the effective interest method.
In line with the company's financial risk management, derivative financial instruments are used to
hedge the risk of changes in future cash flows mainly connected with periodic interest payments See note 12 Loans to associates and joint ventures for a more detailed explanation.
and repayments of funding resulting from movements in market interest rates and exchange rates.
The instruments used to hedge these risks are interest rate swaps and currency swaps. At inception Trade and other receivables
of designated hedging relationships, the company documents the risk management objective and The objective of trade and other receivables is to collect contractual payments and interest. Trade and
strategy for undertaking the hedge as well as the economic relationship between the hedged item other receivables are initially recognised at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost
and the hedging instrument, including whether the changes in cash flows of the hedged item and using the effective interest method, less any impairments based on the expected credit loss. In view
hedging instrument are expected to offset each other. of the generally short periods to maturity, the fair value and amortised cost of these items tend to be
virtually identical to the face value.
Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value. To the extent the hedging relationship
is effective, fair value changes on derivative financial instruments are recognised in other See note 14 Trade and other receivables for a more detailed explanation.
comprehensive income and accumulated in the hedge reserve, which is part of equity (relating
to the cash flow hedge) or it is recognised in the income statement as part of finance costs (fair Cash and cash equivalents
value hedge). The non-effective part of fair value changes is recognised in the income statement. Cash and cash equivalents are measured at amortised cost, which is normally the nominal value.
The cumulative amount recognised in the hedging transactions reserve is recycled to the income Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances, deposits held at call at financial institutions, and
statement in the same period in which the hedged transaction is recognised in the income statement. short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less that are readily
In cash flow hedging relationships, only the change in fair value of the spot element of forward convertible into known amounts of cash. Liquid investments with an original maturity exceeding
exchange contracts is designated as the hedging instrument. The change in fair value of the forward three months are excluded from cash and cash equivalents and reported under trade and other
element is accounted for as a cost of hedging, while the related costs of hedging reserve is part of receivables. Bank overdrafts are included in the short-term payables.
the hedging transactions reserve.
See note 15 Cash and cash equivalents for a more detailed explanation.
If a hedging instrument expires, is sold, terminated or exercised or ceases to satisfy the hedge
accounting criteria, hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively. The fair value gains and losses Expected credit losses
accumulated up to that date continue to be carried in the hedging transactions reserve for as long as Expected credit losses on loans to joint ventures and associates, deposits and cash and cash
the initially hedged transaction is considered to be likely to occur, and are subsequently recognised in equivalents are measured on the basis of possible situations and developments that may lead to a
the statement of income simultaneously with the realisation of the hedged cash flow. If the initially counterparty defaulting within a period of 12 months. However, if a significant change has occurred
hedged transaction is no longer expected to occur, the amounts accumulated in the hedging reserve in the credit risk, expected credit losses are based on possible situations and developments during
and the costs of hedging reserve are immediately reclassified to the income statement. the expected total lifetime of the receivable that may lead to the associate or bank defaulting.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 179
A significant increase in the risk is deemed to have occurred if payment of repayment and/or Shareholders' equity
interest is more than 30 days past due. The debtor is in default if payment is more than 90 days Issued share capital
past due. Relevant information that is accessible without undue cost or effort is used to determine The issued share capital is the amount paid up on the shares issued, up to their nominal value.
(twice a year) whether the credit risk has actually increased significantly and to measure expected
credit losses. This includes both quantitative and qualitative information as well as historical and See note 16 Issued share capital and share premium for a more detailed explanation.
prospective information.
Share premium reserve
Schiphol Group opted to base its measurement of expected credit losses relating to trade receivables The share premium reserve is the amount paid up on the shares issued in excess of their
on all possible situations and developments that may lead to default of the debtor during the nominal value.
expected total lifetime of the receivable using the simplified approach based on the lifetime
expected credit loss of the receivables. The provision amounts are derived from a provision matrix Retained profits
based on historical data on credit losses per business area. Additionally, the measurement of Retained profits are the net results (i.e. that part of the result attributable to shareholders)
credit losses is based on information accessible without undue costs and effort about current accumulated in previous years minus distributed dividends.
developments and expectations with regard to the market and significant trading relationships. The
provision covers 100% of the receivables owed by debtors that are in bankruptcy or have applied for See note 17 Retained profits for a more detailed numerical explanation.
a suspension of payments, as well as receivables older than one year.
Other reserves
Expected credit losses are reported in the income statement as part of depreciation, amortisation Other reserves are the exchange differences reserve, the hedging transactions reserve, the share in
and impairment. other comprehensive income of associates reserve and the reserve for actuarial gains and losses.
Inventories The policies on the hedging transactions reserve and cost of hedging reserve are disclosed in
Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value. The lower net realisable value ‘derivative financial instruments’. The policies on the exchange differences reserve are disclosed
is determined by an individual assessment of the inventories. Cost includes the purchasing costs of under (c) in the policy on ‘foreign currency’.
the product. The cost of inventories is based on the first-in, first-out principle. The net realisable value
is based on the expected selling price less selling costs to be incurred. See note 18 Other reserves for a more detailed explanation.
Employee benefits 2. less any past service cost not yet recognised. If, owing to changes in the pension plans, the
Schiphol Group identifies four categories of employee benefits: expected obligation based on future salary levels with respect to prior years of service (past
– short-term employee benefits; service costs) increases, the amount of the increase is recognised in full in the period in which the
– post-employment benefits; rights are granted;
– other long-term employee benefits; 3. less the fair value at the reporting date of plan assets (if any) out of which the obligations are to
– termination benefits. be settled directly. Obligations for contributions to defined contribution plans are expensed as
the related service is provided. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that
These categories are explained below, along with descriptions of the Schiphol Group employee a cash refund or a reduction in future payments is available.
benefits included in these categories.
Other long-term employee benefits
Short-term employee benefits These are employee benefits which do not fall wholly due within a year of the end of the period
Short-term employee benefits are benefits payable within a year after the reporting date in which in which the employees render the related service. At Schiphol Group, this includes, among others,
the employee rendered the service. Within Schiphol Group, this category includes wages and salaries supplementary disability benefits, long-service awards and sustainable employment budget.
(including holiday pay) and fixed and variable allowances, social security contributions, paid sick
leave, profit sharing and variable short-term remuneration. The costs of these employee benefits are The expected costs of supplementary disability benefits are recognised in full in the statement of
recognised in the income statement when the service is rendered or the rights to benefits are accrued income from the date on which an employee is declared partially unfit for work. The liabilities
(e.g. holiday pay). with respect to supplementary disability benefits, long-service awards and sustainable employment
budget are measured at the present value of the obligation.
Post-employment benefits
These are employee benefits that are due after completion of employment. They include pensions Termination benefits
and job-related early retirement benefits. Schiphol Group’s pension plan is administered by These are employee benefits payable as a result of either a decision by Schiphol Group to terminate
Algemeen Burgerlijk Pensioenfonds (ABP). The pension plan is regarded as a group scheme involving an employee’s employment before the normal retirement date or an employee’s decision to accept
more than one employer that qualifies as a defined-contribution plan because: voluntary redundancy in exchange for such benefits. Benefits under the scheme supplementing
– the members bear the actuarial and investment risks practically in full; the statutory amount of unemployment benefit are another example of termination benefits. The
– the affiliated employers have no supplementary obligation to make additional contributions in costs are recognised in full in the income statement as soon as such a decision is made. Termination
the event of a deficit at ABP, nor are they entitled to any surpluses in addition to paying the benefits are recognised at the present value of the obligation.
premium set by ABP;
– each year the premium is set by the ABP board on the basis of its own file data, with due regard See note 21 Employee benefits for a more detailed explanation.
for the prescribed parameters and requirements.
Provisions
Accordingly, in measuring the obligations arising from the pension plan, Schiphol Group merely Provisions are recognised when the group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of
recognises the pension contributions payable as an expense in the income statement. past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and
the amount can be reliably estimated. Provisions are measured by discounting the expected future
The obligation covering job-related early retirement benefits is calculated according to actuarial cash flows.
principles and accounted for using the method described in 1, 2 and 3 below. In these cases, a net
asset or liability is recognised in the balance sheet, comprising: See note 22 Provisions for a more detailed explanation.
1. the present value of the defined-benefit obligation at the reporting date, measured using the
projected unit credit method, under which the present value of the pension obligation for each
member is determined on the basis of the number of active years of service prior to the reporting
date, the estimated salary level at the expected date of retirement and the market interest rate;
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 181
Leases Assets subject to a finance lease are presented in the balance sheet as a lease receivable and
Schiphol Group as lessee measured at the present value of the minimum lease payments receivable at the inception of the
At inception of a contract, Schiphol Group assesses whether the contract is, or contains, a lease. lease (the net investment in the lease). The interest rate implicit in the lease is used to measure the net
A contract is, or contains, a lease if it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset investment in the lease. The lease payments receivable are apportioned between the finance income
for a period of time in exchange for consideration. In respect of leases right-of-use assets are and the reduction of the outstanding receivable so as to present a constant periodic rate of return
recognised representing the right to use the underlying asset as well as lease liabilities representing on the net investment in the lease.
the obligation to make lease payments. Schiphol Group does not apply the lessee accounting model
to short-term leases (a term shorter than 12 months) and leases of low-value items (an individual Assets subject to an operating lease are recognised in the balance sheet and measured according
value below 5,000 euros). Lease payments associated with short-term and low-value leases are to the type of asset. The lease payments receivable under such leases are recognised as income in
recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. equal instalments, allowing for lease incentives, in the income statement. In the case of prepaid
ground rents, the prepaid amounts received are recorded as a lease liability in the balance sheet and
The right-of-use asset is initially measured at cost being an amount equal to the lease liability, and recognised as income in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
subsequently at cost less any accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, and adjusted for any
remeasurements of the lease liability. The right-of-use assets are presented in the same line as assets Financial liabilities
of the same nature owned by Schiphol Group. If the lease transfers ownership of the underlying asset The company classifies financial liabilities in the categories of amortised cost (borrowings, trade
by the end of the lease term or if the cost of the right-of-use asset includes exercise of a purchase payables and interest payable) and designated at fair value through profit and loss (borrowings).
option, the right-of-use asset is depreciated from the commencement date to the end of the useful
life of the underlying asset. Otherwise, the right-of-use asset is depreciated until the earlier of the Borrowings
end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term. This item relates to bonds, private placements and amounts owed to credit institutions. Borrowings
are initially measured at fair value less attributable transaction costs, and subsequently measured
The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments. To determine the at amortised cost, with differences between the redemption value and carrying amount being
present value, the interest rate implicit in the lease is used. If that rate cannot be readily determined, amortised over the remaining term to maturity using the effective interest method.
the incremental borrowing rate is used. The lease liability is subsequently increased by the interest
cost on the lease liability and decreased by lease payments made. Interest expense on the lease Borrowings expected to be repaid within a year of the reporting date are presented as
liability is accounted for on a separate line within financial expenses. A remeasurement of the lease current liabilities.
liability (and similar adjustment to the book value of the right-of-use asset) can occur from a change
in the lease term, a change in future lease payments or a change in the assessment of an option See note 20 Borrowings for a more detailed explanation.
to purchase the underlying asset. Lease liabilities are presented in Other non-current and current
liabilities in the statement of financial position. Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are initially measured at fair value and subsequently measured at
Schiphol Group as lessor amortised cost. In view of the generally short periods to maturity, the fair value and amortised cost
Leases in which Schiphol Group acts as lessor are classified as either an operating lease or a finance of these items tend to be virtually identical to the nominal value.
lease. Assets where the company or one of its subsidiaries has beneficial ownership under a lease
contract are classified as operating leases. The company, or a subsidiary, has beneficial ownership Liabilities from municipal taxes such as certain types of property taxes are recognised at the
if substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership are transferred to it. Leases where obligating event.
beneficial ownership of the asset remains with third parties are classified as finance leases. Whether
a lease qualifies as a finance lease or an operating lease depends on the economic reality (substance See note 24 Trade and other payables for a more detailed explanation.
of the transaction rather than the form of the contract).
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 182
Revenue generated by security charges. For the income and expenses of these activities, the operator has
Nearly all of Schiphol Group’s activities comprise the provision of services. The Group recognises implemented an industry-standard allocation system that is proportionate and comprehensive.
revenue when it transfers control over a service to the customer. Revenue is either measured based
on the consideration consulted and set according to the Aviation Act (airport charges), specified in Under the Aviation Act, Schiphol Group must settle surpluses and deficits from specified income and
a contract with the customer (e.g. concessions, rent and leases) or based on rates published publicly expenses with the industry. Settlement takes place after the respective financial year and preparation
(e.g. parking fees). Each of the charges and rates relates to distinct services and does not contain of the financial statements of the Aviation and Security reporting segments, in accordance with
financing components. the Aviation Act and the applicable new airport charge rates. Surpluses and deficits eligible for
settlement in the airport charge rates are not presented as assets and liabilities in the balance sheet.
Revenues from the handling of flights, aircraft, passengers and baggage and from the provision of
parking space (reported as airport charges and parking fees) qualify as revenue from contracts with The regional airports are not regulated up to a five million passenger limit. Eindhoven Airport
customers. The airport charges are recognised at a point in time and parking fees are recognised over reached this limit, as a consequence of which the tariffs of this airport are regulated as of 1 April
time. Revenue from the granting of concessions and letting of investment property and retail space 2019. As is the case for Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, the airport charges at Eindhoven Airport must
qualifies as revenue from leases and is recognised on a straight-line basis over the contract period. be consulted with the airlines and must be transparent, reasonable and non-discriminatory. After
setting the rates (in this case for one year in advance only), the airlines have the opportunity to object
Total revenue represents the income from the services provided less discounts and tax (VAT and to the rates with the ACM. Unlike Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, Eindhoven Airport is not required to
excise duty). Revenue equals total revenue less the revenue from intra-group transactions. settle surpluses and deficits with the industry. No regulatory procedures apply to the setting of the
airport charges of Rotterdam The Hague Airport and Lelystad Airport as passenger numbers at these
As regards the main activities of Schiphol Group, revenue is recognised as follows: airports are below the five million passenger limit.
which may be charged to the tenant under the lease. The part of the service costs allocated to Income taxes
property investments which have not been let is recognised as an expense in the income statement. Income taxes comprise current tax payable or receivable and deferred tax. Income taxes are
recognised in the income statement unless they relate to items credited or charged directly to equity
Parking fees or other comprehensive income, in which case the tax is charged or credited directly to equity or
Parking fees are recognised over time, in proportion to the service supplied at the reporting date. other comprehensive income as well.
Parking revenues are for the most part collected immediately after the service has ended. A smaller
part is collected at the moment the service is reserved ahead online. Revenues from business parking Current tax payable or receivable
are invoiced on a monthly basis and the standard contractual payment term is two weeks. As a Current tax payable or receivable in respect of the reporting period is the tax that is expected to be
consequence of the above, with regard to the majority of revenues from parking fees, there are no paid on the taxable profit for the reporting period and adjustments to the tax payable or receivable
performance obligations as at the balance sheet date. for prior periods. The tax payable or receivable is computed on the basis of tax rates and laws
enacted or substantially enacted at the reporting date. Income taxes include all taxes based on
Other activities taxable profits and losses including non-deductible taxes payable by subsidiaries, associates or joint
Revenue from other activities mainly consists of revenue from advertising, transport of electricity, gas ventures. Current tax assets and liabilities are offset only if certain criteria are met.
and water, telecommunication services and other services and activities on behalf of third parties.
Most of this revenue qualifies as revenue from contracts with customers and is recognised over time, Deferred tax assets and liabilities
in proportion to the service supplied at the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised in respect of temporary differences between the
carrying amount of assets and liabilities according to tax legislation and the accounting policies
See note 1 Revenue for a more detailed explanation. used in preparing these financial statements. Deferred tax assets, including those arising from tax
loss carry-forwards, are recognised if it is probable that there will be sufficient future taxable profits
Operating profits against which tax losses can be offset, allowing the assets to be utilised.
Operating profit is the result generated from the continuing principal revenue-producing activities
of the Group as well as other income and expenses related to operating activities. Operating profit No deferred tax assets or liabilities are recognised for:
excludes net finance costs, share of profit of equity accounted investees and income taxes. 1. temporary differences resulting from transactions that do not qualify as a business combination
and that affect neither the result for reporting purposes nor the result for tax purposes at the
Financial income and expenses time of the transaction; and
Interest income and expense is recognised over time on a basis that takes into account the effective 2. temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures and
yield on the loans granted or liabilities. Dividends are recognised when Schiphol Group’s right to contract-related intangible assets to the extent that Schiphol Group is able to control the timing
receive payment is established. of the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will
not reverse in the foreseeable future; and
See note 26 Management of financial risks and financial instruments for a more 3. taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill.
detailed explanation.
Unrecognised deferred tax assets are reassessed at each reporting date and recognised to the extent
Government grants that it has become probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be
Government grants are recognised when there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be used. Existing deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent
received and all attached conditions will be complied with. Government grants relate to capital that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised; such reductions are reversed
expenditure or expenses recognised. when the probability of future taxable profits improves.
When the grant relates to expenses, it is presented as part of profit or loss and deducted in reporting The carrying amounts of deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated at the tax rates expected
the related expense. See note 4 Employee benefits expense. Investment grants, being government to be applicable to the period in which an asset is realised or a liability is settled, using the tax rates
contributions to capital expenditure, are deducted directly from the carrying amount of the asset. (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date and reflects
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 184
uncertainty related to income taxes, if any. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are netted if they relate Cash flow statement
to the same fiscal unity and the company at the head of this fiscal unity has a legally enforceable right The cash flow statement is prepared using the indirect method. Cash and cash equivalents within
to do so. the cash flow statement consist of all cash balances, deposits held at call at financial institutions,
and short-term highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less that
See note 10 Income taxes for a more detailed explanation. are readily convertible into known amounts of cash. Liquid investments with an original maturity
exceeding three months are reported under trade and other receivables. Given the purpose of
Foreign currency these investments (to finance capital expenditure in the short term), the movements in these
Functional currency and presentation currency investments are not reported as part of movement in working capital but as part of cash flow from
Since the primary economic environment of Schiphol Group is the Netherlands, the euro is both its investing activities.
functional currency and presentation currency. Financial information is presented in thousands of
euros, except where otherwise stated. Cash flows from short-term credit facilities are classified as cash flows from financing activities. Cash
flows in foreign currencies are translated at an estimated average rate. Currency differences on
Transactions, assets and liabilities cash and cash equivalents are separately disclosed. Income tax, interest received and interest paid,
Transactions (capital expenditure, income and expenses) denominated in foreign currencies are and dividends received are classified as cash flows from operating activities. Capitalised interest is
accounted for at the exchange rate on the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities presented consistently with interest cash flows that are not capitalised. Paid dividends are classified
(receivables, payables and cash and cash equivalents) in foreign currencies are translated at the as cash flows from financing activities.
exchange rate on the reporting date. Exchange differences arising on translation and settlement of
these items are recognised in the statement of income under financial income and expenses, with The acquisition of a group company or subsidiary is classified as a cash flow from investing activities
the exception of exchange differences on financial instruments in foreign currencies against which for the part that was paid in cash. Available cash and cash equivalents within the acquired company
derivative financial instruments are held with the object of hedging exchange risks on future cash or subsidiary are eliminated. This also applies in the case of the sale of a group company.
flows. Exchange differences on these financial instruments are recognised directly in comprehensive
income provided the hedge is determined to be effective. The ineffective portion is recognised in the Non-cash transactions are not included in the cash flow statement. Payments of lease instalments
income statement under financial income and expenses. under a financial lease contract are classified as cash flows from financing activities as regards the
part relating to redemption and as cash flows from operating activities as regards the part relating
Subsidiaries to interest.
Income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate on the
transaction date, which in practice is usually approximated using an average exchange rate. Assets See the Consolidated statement of cash flow for the year ended 31 December 2023 for a more
and liabilities are translated at the rate on the reporting date. Goodwill and changes in fair value detailed explanation.
arising on the acquisition of investments in associates are treated as assets and liabilities of the entity
concerned and are similarly translated at the rate on the reporting date. Exchange differences arising
on the translation of balance sheets and income statements of subsidiaries outside the euro zone
are recognised directly in equity under the exchange differences reserve. On disposal of subsidiaries
outside the euro zone, the accumulated translation differences initially recognised in the exchange
differences reserve are recognised in the income statement as part of the result on disposal.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 185
Critical judgements and estimates In addition each year a different part of the land positions is appraised by independent external
valuators. The best evidence of fair value are current prices in an active market for similar investment
The assumptions and estimates made in the financial statements often concern expected future property. In the absence of such information, Schiphol Group determines the amount within a range
developments. Since the actual developments may deviate from the assumptions used, the actual of reasonable fair value estimates. The underlying assumptions of these estimates are explained in
outcomes may significantly differ from the current measurements of a number of items in the more detail in the accounting policies on investment property and in note 9 Investment property.
financial statements. As a result, the assumptions and estimates used may significantly influence
Schiphol Group's equity and results. Assumptions and estimates used are tested periodically and Impairment of goodwill and non-current assets
adjusted where necessary. To a significant degree, these assumptions and estimates are based on Goodwill is not amortised, but an annual impairment test is carried out to identify if there are
past experience and on Schiphol Group's management's best estimate of specific circumstances any changes or events that could lead to an impairment of the goodwill. Other assets are tested
which – in the management's view – apply in the given context. This section discusses the principal in the case of any events or changes that call for an impairment test. The key assumptions used
areas where the measurement of items is strongly influenced by the assumptions and estimates used. to determine the recoverable amount for the different CGUs are disclosed and explained in the
Accounting Policies (Going concern basis of accounting) and note 11 Investments in associates and
Going concern assumption (forecasting) joint ventures.
Several assumptions and estimates were made by management in determining the forecasts and
different scenarios to be able to conclude on the going concern assumption of Schiphol Group. Capitalisation and allocation of costs to specific assets
Judgement is required in projecting the future cash flows, including the duration and continued All capital expenditures are initially recognised under assets under construction if they are
impact of the restrictions on the expected levels of passenger numbers and air traffic movements. expected to generate future economic benefits. A distinction is made between operating
The assumptions of the estimates are included in more detail in the Accounting Policies for the going activities and investment property. Asset used for operating activities can be subdivided into the
concern assumption. following categories:
– runways, taxiways and aprons;
Useful life, residual value and impairment of property, plant and equipment – paved areas and roads;
The carrying value of property, plant and equipment is calculated on the basis of estimates of – buildings;
depreciation periods derived from the expected technical and useful life of the asset concerned, – installations; and
and residual values. The expected technical and useful life of the asset concerned and its – other non-current assets.
estimated residual value may change under the influence of technological developments, market
circumstances and changes in the use of the asset. These factors may also give rise to the need to Taxes
recognise an impairment on assets. Estimates relate to, among other things, projected passenger and When preparing the financial statements, Schiphol Group makes every effort to assess all relevant
ATM recovery and growth within the ranges defined in currently applicable legislation, draft nature tax risks and process up-to-date tax position details in the financial statements to the best of its
conservation permit and other traffic regulations and the settlement mechanism as included in the ability. Evolving insights, for example following final tax assessments for prior years, can result in
Aviation Act as disclosed in note 1 Revenue. additional tax burdens or benefits, and new tax risks may arise. In the valuation of deferred tax assets,
particularly those concerning differences between the values of property, plant and equipment for
The estimated useful life of an asset should be reassessed if changes in circumstances occur or new reporting and tax purposes as well as unutilised tax losses in the financial statements, assumptions
information becomes available regarding the remaining useful life. The depreciation period should are made regarding the extent to which and the period within which such assets can be realised.
be the same as the expected usage pattern of the asset. See note 5 Depreciation, amortisation and This is done, for instance, on the basis of business plans. In addition, when preparing the financial
impairment expense for the impact of the change in useful life. statements assumptions are made regarding temporary and permanent differences between the
values for reporting and tax purposes. The actual situation may deviate from the assumptions used
Determining the fair value of investment property and land positions to determine deferred tax positions, due for instance to diverging insights and changes in tax laws
The fair value of buildings recognised under investment property is appraised twice a year by and regulations. See note 10 Income taxes for a more detailed explanation.
management through the deployment of independent external valuators. The fair value of land
recognised under investment property is appraised primarily on the basis of internal valuations.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 186
The management programme for these tax risks (also known as the ‘tax control framework’) is part
of Schiphol Group’s overall risk management programme. This programme serves to identify tax
risks and monitor internal controls with the aim of mitigating the tax risks. Schiphol Group has also
developed and implemented a tax planning framework. Tax risk management is facilitated by the
central control department (Finance Operations) and is part of approved Management Board policy.
This policy is based on Schiphol Group’s aim to be a trustworthy taxpayer through the application of
professional tax compliance procedures.
Provisions
Schiphol Group uses estimates and assumptions when determining the likelihood that an obligation
per balance sheet date will lead to an outflow of resources. In addition to this, assumptions are
applicable to the estimated amount of outflow of resources. For example, Schiphol recognised
an environmental provision related to soil pollution for construction projects for which soil has
been excavated. Schiphol has made an estimation of the expected expenditures related to the
decontamination. For more detailed explanations, refer to note 22 Provisions
Segment information The segment Concessions consist of granting and managing concessions for shops, food
and beverages, and service outlets (Concessions segment, generating variable revenue from
An operating segment is a clearly identifiable part of a company that engages in business activities concessions). Parking & Mobility Services is responsible for operating all car parks and generates
with associated revenues, costs and operating results, and for which separate financial information revenue from parking charges. The majority of parking revenue comes from passengers and visitors
is available that is regularly reviewed by the Management Board in order to assess the performance to the airport directly (business to consumer), with a small part being generated online through
of the segment and make decisions about the resources to be allocated to it. parking space being reserved upfront. The Commercial Real Estate segment develops, manages,
operates and invests in property at and around domestic and foreign airports. The majority of the
Schiphol Group identified fourteen operating segments, which have been combined into eight portfolio, comprising both airport buildings and commercial properties, is located at and around
segments for reporting purposes in view of the size and characteristics of the operating segments. Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. Sources of revenue include income from developing and leasing out
The eight segments for reporting purposes are grouped into three business areas: Aviation, land and buildings. The segment also makes a major contribution to the Schiphol Group results with
Schiphol Commercial and Alliances & Participations. Information relating to alliances specifically other income from property (sales, fair value gains or losses on property, and granting land leases).
associated with a particular business area is presented under the segments of that business area. The Terminal Real Estate manages and rents out the offices and business class lounges at Schiphol to third
information relating to other alliances is presented under the reporting segments of the Alliances & parties. The Other segment include activities in advertisement and media space as well as premium
Participations business area. services to passengers. Except for Premium Services and Parking, all revenue originates from services
to other companies (business to business).
The Management Board and Corporate Treasury review liabilities and financial income and expenses
at group level rather than segment level. The same rationale applies to income taxes, which are Alliances & Participations
also reviewed and monitored at group level rather than at segment level. Transactions between the The Alliances & Participations business area comprises the regional airports, international airports
segments have been consistently conducted at arm’s length over the years. Group overheads are and other activities. Airport charges, concessions and parking charges are the main sources of
allocated to the segments largely on the basis of their relative share in the direct costs of Schiphol revenue for the regional airports (Rotterdam The Hague, Eindhoven and Lelystad). The airports
Group. The system of allocations and settlements has been applied consistently over the past years. abroad (Brisbane Airport Corporation Holdings Ltd and Tasmanian Gateway Holdings Corporation
Pty Ltd) and Maastricht Aachen Airport contribute to the group result through their results as
Since Schiphol Group’s current activities are concentrated almost entirely in the Netherlands accounted for in the share in results of associates and joint ventures and through the interest
(approximately 99% of consolidated revenue in 2023 (2022: 99%)), there is no received on loans. The stake in JFKIAT Member LLC is recognised as a contract-related asset and
geographical segmentation. contributes to the group result through management fees that are recognised as part of other
revenue. The other activities mainly consist of Schiphol Telematics and Utilities. Schiphol Telematics
Aviation provides telecommunication services at and around the airport. Utilities generates revenue from the
The Aviation business area operates at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and provides services and transmission of electricity and gas and from the supply of water.
facilities to airlines, passengers and handling agents. It is subdivided into two segments: Aviation
and Security. Aviation generates most of its revenue from airport charges (charges related to aircraft
and passengers) and concession fees (paid by oil companies for the provision of aircraft refuelling
services). The source of revenue for Security consists of airport charges (security-related charges).
Schiphol Commercial
The activities of the Schiphol Commercial business area consist of the core of all commercial services,
such as consumer products, services and real estate activities. The major part of the activities is
located at and around Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. The activities of Schiphol Commercial are split
in the following segments: Concessions, Parking & Mobility, Commercial Real Estate, Terminal Real
Estate and Other.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 188
2023
(in thousands of euros) Aviation Schiphol Commercial Alliances & Participations Total
2022
(in thousands of euros) Aviation Schiphol Commercial Alliances & Participations Total
Share in results of associates and joint ventures 2 1,428 -6,771 46,180 40,837
Aviation
Aviation Security Total
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022
Schiphol Commercial
Concessions Parking & Mobility Services Commercial Real Estate Terminal Real Estate Other Total
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022
Revenue 184,104 147,108 124,727 105,239 131,414 131,888 48,300 46,226 39,411 28,966 527,956 459,427
Total assets 301,581 296,112 377,272 378,765 2,265,868 2,591,788 410,566 412,854 34,033 36,376 3,389,319 3,715,895
Total non-current assets (excl. deferred tax) 241,091 223,689 301,599 286,127 1,811,379 1,957,888 328,214 311,878 27,206 27,479 2,709,489 2,807,061
Investments in associates and joint ventures 8,076 6,519 - - 130,198 129,468 - - - - 138,274 135,987
Capital expenditure 3 33,879 15,227 36,124 18,699 25,638 97,122 35,994 15,258 3,258 5,269 134,893 151,575
1 This amount excludes expected credit losses.
2 The share in results of associates and joint ventures includes the share in profit of associates and joint ventures presented as such in the profit and loss account and the share of interest income presented as part of financial income and expenses that is attributable to
investments in and receivables on associates.
3 Capital expenditures include assets under construction for operating activities, investment properties and intangible fixed assets.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 192
Total assets 607,032 694,985 400,924 430,185 162,020 145,427 1,169,975 1,270,597
Total non-current assets (excl. deferred tax) 485,273 525,005 320,506 324,970 129,522 109,964 935,301 959,940
Investments in associates and joint ventures 330,293 346,574 - - 12,857 6,759 343,150 353,332
Capital expenditure 4 3,496 1,157 16,272 17,093 25,350 27,998 45,118 46,247
1 The other activities include revenues from Utilities (supply of gas, electricity and water) and telecommunication services.
2 This amount excludes expected credit losses.
3 The share in results of associates and joint ventures includes the share in profit of associates and joint ventures presented as such in the profit and loss account and the share of interest income presented as part of financial income and expenses that is attributable to
investments in and receivables on associates.
4 Capital expenditures include assets under construction for operating activities, investment properties and intangible fixed assets.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 193
The amount to be settled for 2023 is expected to be a deficit of around 105 - 115 million euros. The In 2023 Schiphol Group's sub reporting segment Concessions, which is part of the Schiphol
final settlement will be included and explained extensively in the Regulatory Accounts of 2023. Commercial reporting segment, had 101 effective concession contracts (2022: 105) for a range
of commercial activities at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol.
The 2023 Regulatory Accounts will be published on 31 May 2024 (at the latest). Thereafter, the
settlement will be included in the consultation of the airport charges for the period running from The following table provides an overview of the undiscounted fixed lease payments for rent
2025 till 2027. and concessions (excluding payments conditional on factors other than the passing of time, e.g.
percentage of revenue and price indices) expected to be received from these contracts, based on the
As of 1 April 2023 the airport charges increased with 12% in line with the consultation. However, current expiration date of the contracts:
a number of airlines and representative organisations submitted complaints to the regulator in
response to Schiphol’s final setting of the 2023 airport charges. The regulator (Dutch Authority for 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 >2028
Consumers & Markets) concluded in March 2023 that the airport charges and conditions as proposed
by Schiphol are in accordance with the Aviation Act. Fixed lease payments from
current contracts (in thousands 12,198 8,435 6,358 5,694 3,198 1,317
A number of airlines and representative organisations have submitted complaints to the regulator of euros)
in response to Schiphol’s final setting of airport charges 2022-2024. The regulator (Dutch Authority Percentage of contracts that
31% 17% 5% 20% 15% 11%
for Consumers & Markets) concluded in April 2022 that airport charges and conditions as proposed will expire
by Schiphol are in accordance with the Aviation Act. One complaint is partially justified, however, this
does not justify the conclusion that charges and conditions would be contrary to rules laid down by Revenue of 15 million euros from concessions included in the Aviation segment (12 million
or pursuant to the Aviation Act. A number of airlines disagree with the decision of the ACM (for both euros in 2022) and 9 million euros in the Parking segment (8 million euros in 2022) relates to
2023 and 2022) and appealed to the CBb (College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven). The CBb is in concession agreements for the third-party supply of aviation fuel and car rental services at the airport
the process of assessing the appeal. respectively. Concession revenue received from Schiphol Airport Retail B.V. (an associate of Schiphol
Group) is 26.9 million euros (2022: 20.6 million euros).
The tariffs at Eindhoven Airport have been regulated since 1 April 2019. Contrary to Amsterdam
Airport Schiphol, Eindhoven Airport is not required to settle surpluses and deficits with the industry. Rent and leases
No regulatory procedures apply to Rotterdam The Hague Airport and Lelystad Airport. (in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
Average occupancy in the Real Estate segment amounted to 94.3% in 2023 (94.4% in 2022). The Parking revenues at other locations relate to parking at the airports of Rotterdam The Hague,
following table provides an overview of the years in which the current rent and lease contracts will Eindhoven and Lelystad and are included in the Domestic Airports segment.
expire for activities at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol and Rotterdam The Hague Airport, as well as the
undiscounted fixed lease payments for rent (excluding payments conditional on factors other than As part of the business parking fees and intercompany revenue, an amount of 6.4 million euros
the passing of time, e.g. degree of use in respect of service costs and price indices) expected to be (2022: 5.7 million euros) is obtained from investment properties of the Commercial Real Estate
received from these contracts until their expiry: business area. The income is related to the objects included in note 9. Investment property.
If buildings are partially leased, the property management expenses have been apportioned based
on floor area.
Parking fees
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
120,365 100,528
2. Other results from investment property 3. Outsourcing and other external costs
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022 (in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
Gain/ (loss) on changes in fair value of buildings -131,812 -144,137 Security 287,602 193,795
Gain/ (loss) on changes in fair value of land -13,487 -11,725 Subcontracted activities 143,774 112,938
Gain/ (loss) on changes in fair value of assets Maintenance 166,157 147,589
under construction -5,296 -35,770 Hired temporary staff 87,790 57,402
Total fair value gains and losses -150,595 -191,632 Cleaning 44,923 41,623
Advisory and audit fees 45,408 33,403
Total other revenues from investment property -150,595 -191,632 Insurance and government levies 31,471 31,936
Energy and water 36,313 39,523
Fair value gains and losses
Costs related to investments 28,538 1,876
Investment property is measured at fair value. The fair value of buildings recognised under
investment property is appraised twice a year by independent external valuators commissioned by Costs related to cloud applications 7,712 22,983
the Management Board. The fair value of land recognised under investment property is appraised Commercial expenses 20,960 16,024
primarily on the basis of internal valuations. In addition, each year a different part of the land Outsourced work (IT, HR related an other) 96,803 86,810
positions is appraised by independent external valuators. Fair value gains and losses are recognised Mobility cost 26,647 22,507
in the statement of income in the year in which they arise. The assumptions applied in determining
Other expenses (such as general expenses, rents and leasing) 36,965 69,451
the market value are explained in note 9 Investment property.
Total cost of outsourced work and other
external costs 1,061,063 877,859
Due to the recent economic developments and the rising interest rates on the capital market,
the market conditions for real estate were unfavourable, which contributed to a fair value loss of
Cost of outsourced work and other external costs increased as a result of increased due to the
151 million euros in 2023 (2022: loss of 192 million euros). The Net Initial Yield (NIY) rose substantially
increased traffic numbers and the recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic in operations.
in the office market past year, due to the rise in interest rates in the capital market and reduced
demand due to the changing environment. This led to a fair value loss of 90 million euros. The
The subcontracted activities comprise a broad range of outsourced activities related to airport
performance of the logistics real estate market is also unfavourable, but due to the remaining
processes, such as the outsourcing of bus transport services, the services to people with reduced
high demand for logistic real estate the NIY increase was less compared to the office market,
mobility and the lost and found process.
causing a fair value loss of 42 million euros. Fair value losses of 5 million euros were recognised on
investment property under construction, due to rising yields and higher construction costs. For the
The expenses on configuration, customisation and development of the software, which do not
land positions, fair value losses of 13 million euros were recognised due to unfavourable market
create a resource controlled by Schiphol, are recognised as incurred expenses under the Cost related
developments for this segment.
to cloud application line. The volume of software support and development projects increase
compared to 2022, primarily driven by the external labour costs while less costs were incurred on
general investment components of IT projects.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 197
Auditor’s fees remuneration of Supervisory and Management Board members under Section 2:383c of the Dutch
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022 Civil Code, reference is made to the section entitled Related party disclosures. In this section also the
remuneration of Key Management personnel is included.
Audit of the financial statements 1,027 1,207
Other audit services 640 949
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
The auditor’s fees concern activities carried out at Schiphol Group and the consolidated group Post-retirement benefits 35,710 34,387
companies by the audit firm as referred to in Section 1(1) of the Dutch Audit Firms Supervision Act Other long-term employee benefits 3,930 3,426
and represent the fees charged by the entire network of which the audit firm is part. The audit of Termination and unemployment benefits 1,967 2,150
the financial statements includes the consolidated financial statements and the audit of the entities
Other staff costs 18,098 13,744
that are part of the consolidation. The other audit services rendered by the auditor include the
Total employee benefits 290,290 241,616
assurance report on socio-economic accountability, a review of interim financial information,
an audit of financial statements for regulatory purposes, several agreed-upon procedures for
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
regulatory purposes and NOW government grant audits and procedures for the EMTN prospectuses.
The fees of KPMG Accountants N.V. amount to 1.6 million euros (2022: 2.1 million euros) while the
Salaries 231,986 199,150
fees for activities performed by other members of the KPMG network amount to 0.1 million euros
Social charges 27,354 22,006
(2022: 0.1 million euros).
Internal hours capitalised -28,755 -22,836
NOW government grants received - -10,411
4. Employee benefits expense Total short-term employee benefits 230,585 187,909
The average number of employees at Royal Schiphol Group N.V. and its subsidiaries on a full-time
Pension charges (defined contribution plans) 34,784 33,689
equivalent basis was 2,820 (2022: 2,487).
Early retirement benefits 926 698
Schiphol Group applied for government grants (Noodmaatregel Overbrugging Werkgelegenheid, Total post-retirement benefits 35,710 34,387
NOW) for a total amount of 206.7 million euros for the 2020, 2021 and 2022 financial years. These
support grants were temporary governmental compensation for labour costs and are granted to Jubilee benefits 581 545
companies that lost a substantial amount of income due to the pandemic. Schiphol complied with
Other employee benefits 3,349 2,881
the following conditions for the 2020, 2021 and 2022 financial years regarding the NOW subsidies:
Total other long-term employee benefits 3,930 3,426
no distribution of dividends, no buy back of shares (for the operating companies of Schiphol),
no payment of bonuses to the Board and provision of training and development to personnel.
Certain aspects regarding the decrease in revenue and personnel development costs relating to the
government grants (NOW) are subject to an external audit and all audits have been finalised without
significant adjustments.
The internal hours capitalised relate to time spent by employees in the realisation phases of
investment projects. Other staff costs include training costs and travel expenses. The costs of
post-retirement benefits, other long-term employee benefits and termination and unemployment
benefits are explained in more detail in note 21 Employee benefits. For an explanation of the
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 198
Schiphol reports a disposal of 10.8 million euro, of which 9.6 million euro is a result of early retirement
of particular assets replaced during the maintenance cycle. See note 6 Intangible assets for additional
information on the amortisation of contract-related assets and note 7 Assets used for operating
activities for information on the depreciation of assets. Information on impairments is provided in
note 9 Investment property and note 26 Management of financial risks and financial instruments for
more information on the impairments related to financial assets.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 199
6. Intangible assets
Contract-
related Software
(in thousands of euros) assets ICT development Software licences under development Nitrogen rights Total
Movements in 2022
Additions - - - 34,870 - 34,870
Completions - 31,675 2,050 -24,575 - 9,150
Acquisitions - - - - 7,461 7,461
Amortisation -1,444 -12,541 -6,308 - - -20,293
Reclassification - - 107 -9,501 - -9,394
Disposals - -15 -146 - - -161
Exchange differences 1,852 - - - - 1,852
Other - - - 549 - 549
Total movements in the year 408 19,119 -4,297 1,342 7,461 24,034
Contract-related assets and reported under 'revenue from other activities'. Schiphol Group has no obligation to provide
Contract-related assets concern the interest in JFKIAT Member LLC acquired upon the acquisition of additional contributions. No indication of impairment was identified for the contract-related assets
activities from third parties. The activities comprise the service concession arrangement between the as Schiphol Group continued to receive the agreed fee during the 2023 financial year.
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (hereafter 'Port Authority') and JFKIAT LLC (a subsidiary
of JFKIAT Member LLC). Under the arrangement, JFKIAT LLC provides airport terminal-, and retail ICT development
management services in terminal 4 at JFK International Airport. It is established that, through the The category ICT development comprises the capitalised internally developed ICT applications, while
contractual provisions in the arrangement, the Port Authority has control over these activities. As a software licences comprise the externally acquired ICT applications.
consequence, the interest in JFKIAT LLC is not consolidated, but reported as a contract-related asset.
The contract-related asset is amortised on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the
arrangement, being 19.5 years. Income realised under the arrangement is for the most part fixed
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 200
Nitrogen rights
At the end of 2023, Schiphol Group held for an amount of 8.4 million euros (2022: 7.5 million
euros), nitrogen rights to compensate for the nitrogen emission activities. The nitrogen rights are
initially valued at cost and have an indefinite useful life. The recoverable amount exceeds the
carrying amount.
Contract-
related Software
(in thousands of euros) assets ICT development Software licences under development Nitrogen rights Total
Carrying amount as at 31 December 2022 29,865 46,579 2,207 45,148 7,461 131,259
Movements in 2023
Additions - - - 52,217 892 53,109
Completions - 8,797 7,847 -3,310 - 13,334
Amortisation -1,409 -14,213 -7,094 - - -22,716
Impairment - - - -195 - -195
Reclassification - - 230 -14,492 - -14,262
Disposals - -452 -160 - - -612
Exchange differences -874 - - - - -874
Other - - 480 -46 - 434
Total movements in the year -2,283 -5,868 1,303 34,174 892 28,218
(in thousands of euros) Runways, taxiways and aprons Paved areas, roads etc. Buildings Installations Other assets Total
Carrying amount as at 1 January 2022 517,853 593,687 1,117,229 956,051 313,469 3,498,289
Movements in 2022
Completions 33,372 91,853 24,686 117,019 -42,672 224,256
Depreciation -34,403 -20,040 -66,155 -121,840 -57,728 -300,166
Acquisitions 303 70 785 4,021 4,133 9,313
Disposals -4,169 - -389 -785 -362 -5,705
Reclassification -21 - 17,443 -137 240 17,526
Total movements in the year -4,918 71,883 -23,630 -1,722 -96,389 -54,776
Carrying amount as at 1 January 2023 512,935 665,570 1,093,599 954,330 217,079 3,443,513
Movements in 2023
Capital expenditure - - - - 116 116
Completions 78,144 28,737 30,653 106,938 49,919 294,391
Depreciation -36,041 -24,443 -68,780 -123,105 -51,824 -304,193
Disposals -2,572 -653 -1 -6,063 -927 -10,216
Other 0 -3,133 1,334 -245 -230 -2,274
Reclassification -93 1,298 -1,468 598 -2,558 -2,223
Total movements in the year 39,438 1,806 -38,262 -21,877 -5,504 -24,399
During the year, the following projects were (partly) completed: Runways, taxiways and aprons Paved areas, roads etc. Buildings Installations Other assets Total
Programme: Major maintenance on aprons, runsways and taxiways 30,513 14,645 4,901 55,486 6,159 111,704
Programme: Airside Maintenance 23,712 7,391 - 29,829 - 60,933
Capital programme / A-Pier 15,201 245 8,415 1,063 - 24,924
Redevelopment Terminal 1 - - 3,553 4,572 4,018 12,142
Eindhoven Airport 936 231 6,486 1,917 377 9,946
Upgrade Piers - - 3,993 525 2,960 7,478
PFOS - -7,072 - - 13,800 6,728
Safety - 4,470 134 1,138 945 6,687
Security-Sceening - - - 914 4,673 5,587
Maintenance Parking - 3,347 1,477 611 - 5,435
Rotterdam Airport -460 441 1,044 2,802 1,498 5,324
Security Surveillance - - - - 4,295 4,295
Sustainability - - - 2,702 - 2,702
Storm Water Drainage - 2,524 - - - 2,524
ST Fiber 306 1,835 - - - 2,141
Fleet management - - - 339 1,799 2,138
Fire Safety - - 1,650 427 18 2,095
Capacity Management Fiber - - - 1,643 - 1,643
Premium Services - - 969 123 295 1,387
Other 7,936 680 -1,969 2,847 9,082 18,577
Total completions during the year 78,144 28,737 30,653 106,938 49,919 294,391
In the course of 2022, 17.4 million euros of assets were reclassified from items of Investment property (in thousands of euros) Buildings Other assets Right of use assets
to the buildings used for operating activity due to the change of intended use to owner-occupied
Carrying amount as at 1 January 2023 1,791 12,958 14,749
premises and land. Schiphol reports a disposal of 10.8 million euro, of which 9.6 million euro is a result
Movements 2023
of early retirement of particular assets replaced during the maintenance cycle.
Additions - 5,754 5,754
Depreciation -248 -6,102 -6,350
Part of the assets used for operating activities as presented in the before concerns right-of-use assets.
Derecognition - -74 -74
The movement in right-of-use assets during 2023 was as follows:
Total movements -248 -422 -670
Carrying amount as at 31 December 2023 1,543 12,536 14,079
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 203
Carrying amount as at 1 January 2022 1,183,541 Capital expenditures relate to the following projects:
Movements in 2022 Capital programme/ A-Pier 153,143
Capital expenditure 333,916 Programme: Major maintenance on Apons, Runwaysand taxiways 99,206
Capitalised construction period borrowing cost 8,140 Programme: Airside Maintenance 57,076
Completed assets -230,035 Redevelopment Terminal 1 48,111
Acquisitions 1,146 Southern Development Phase 1 16,587
Disposals -717 Developments SouthEast 15,165
Reclassification 9,501 Dual Taxi System 14,627
Other -109 PFOS 13,772
Total movements in the year 121,842 Baggage Lifting Aids 12,643
Resting Areas (RASCI) 11,154
Carrying amount as at 31 December 2022 1,305,383 Masterplan Power Grid 10,142
Movements in 2023 European Entry/Exit System 9,421
Capital expenditure 577,105 BP-S-Security-Screening 8,098
Capitalised construction period borrowing cost 9,985 Digital DnA 8,029
Completed assets -301,436 Taxiway Sierra 1 7,555
Impairment -3,306 Mid Term Plan (MTP) 6,281
Reclassification 14,492 Sustainability 5,655
Other 533 Maintenance Parking 5,593
Total movements in the year 297,373 Other 74,847
Total capital expenditures in the year 577,105
Carrying amount as at 31 December 2023 1,602,756
Under the 2008 Alders Agreement, Lelystad Airport is intended to serve as an overflow airport for
The capitalisation of construction period interest is calculated by applying a percentage rate of Schiphol for non-mainport traffic. The opening of Lelystad Airport has been postponed several times.
1.06% (2022: 1.06%). A total amount of 10.0 million euros was capitalised during the 2023 financial On 24 June 2022, the political decision on the opening was postponed by two years to 2024, and
year relating to various construction projects (2022: 8.1 million euros). it hinged on Lelystad Airport fulfilling two requirements: (1) It must obtain a nature permit and (2)
a solution must be found for the flight altitude of aircraft approaching the airport over a distance
At 31 December 2023, the total carrying amount of the Lelystad Airport assets amounted to of 30 kilometres near Lemelerveld. Regarding the first requirement, Lelystad Airport expects to
97 million euros (2022: 96 million euros). This includes all assets under the following categories: acquire the nature permit in the first half of 2024. Regarding the second requirement, in December
intangible assets, assets used for operating activities, assets under construction or development and 2023, Air Traffic Control Netherlands (LVNL) sent a letter to the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water
investment property. Management (I&W), stating that closing sector 3 (a low flight path) is an appropriate measure. If
Lelystad Airport obtains the nature permit, it will comply with the two requirements set by the
Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management. On this basis, no impairment is deemed necessary
based on the current government decision to delay the opening.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 204
The construction of the new pier A is in progress. The collaboration with the construction consortium Assets under
Ballast-Nedam TAV ended in 2021. In 2022, Schiphol hired a new contractor to complete Pier (in thousands of euros) Buildings Land construction Total
A. Reference is made to note 25 Contingent assets and liabilities for the status on the BN-TAV claims
with regards to the construction of Pier A.
Carrying amount as at 1 January 2022 1,245,950 430,807 145,623 1,822,380
In the coming years, substantial investments were planned to create capacity, quality and Movements in 2022
accessibility. As a result of the pandemic, the investment portfolio has been adjusted. This also Capitalised construction borrowing cost - - 74,927 74,927
includes the postponement of the construction of the new Schiphol terminal. Management is
Completed assets 14,619 39 -17,094 -2,436
carefully assessing when to restart the project.
Fair value gains and losses -144,137 -11,725 -35,770 -191,632
Acquisitions 15,971 - - 15,971
9. Investment property Reclassification -7,600 -9,672 -1,547 -18,819
Other -685 - - -685
Buildings and land Total movements in the year -121,832 -21,358 20,516 -122,674
All building and land properties are measured at fair value. The fair value is based on the market
value, being the estimated amount for which investment property can be traded on the valuation
Carrying amount as at
date between a buyer and a seller willing to do business in an objective, arm's length transaction.
31 December 2022 1,124,118 409,449 166,139 1,699,706
The calculation of the cash flows, which is a factor in determining the fair value at which investment
property is stated in the balance sheet, takes into account the lease incentives granted. After all, the
lease incentives are recognised separately as assets on the balance sheet under other non-current Movements in 2023
receivables: 9 million euros as at 31 December 2023 (2022: 11 million euros)) and trade and other Capital expenditure 672 - 46,692 47,364
receivables 4 million euros as at 31 December 2023 (2022: 4 million euros).
Completed assets 10,625 3,770 -14,929 -534
Impairment - - -2,565 -2,565
As at 31 December 2023, 100% (2022: 100%) of the buildings and 17% (2022: 11.2%) of the land is
appraised by independent external appraisers. The remaining fair value of land is based on internal Fair value gains and losses -131,812 -13,487 -5,296 -150,595
valuations with reference to externally validated input variables. Deconsolidation -158 - - -158
Other 2,953 -1,606 1,980 3,327
Details of the result on property sales and fair value gains and losses on investment property can be Reclassification 2,264 5,187 -5,458 1,993
found in note 2 Other results from investment property.
Total movements in the year -115,456 -6,136 20,424 -101,168
All investment property classifies as a level 3 valuation. The Dutch Register of Real Estate Valuers
(Nederlands Register Vastgoed Taxateurs (NRVT)), established in October 2015, is tasked with Carrying amount as at
safeguarding and enhancing the quality of appraisers. The general conduct and professional rules 31 December 2023 1,008,662 403,313 186,563 1,598,538
and regulations of the NRVT are the new market standard appraisers have to comply with. That
standard is based on IFRS and international valuation guidelines. All our external appraisers are NRVT Measured at
members. The valuation method is described in more detail on the next page.
Cost model - - 45,602 45,602
Fair value model 1,008,662 403,313 140,961 1,552,936
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 205
Average effective contractual rental income per m2 Average market rent per m2 Average net initial yield
2023 2022 2023 2022 2023 2022
Schiphol Centre
Offices 305 303 272 277 6.6% 5.6%
Schiphol Southeast
Offices 138 138 140 140 10.3% 10.0%
Business premises 125 125 118 118 4.9% 4.4%
Schiphol South
Business premises 115 117 97 97 6.5% 6.2%
Significant assumptions used in the valuation model for land Other (includes non deductible expenses) 2,036 6.6% 897 -0.7%
The main assumptions used in the valuation of land are specified below: Income tax expense in income statement (effective) 8,873 28.7% -58,124 42.9%
Land The effective tax rate in 2023 was 28.7%(2022: positive 42.9%). There were no changes to the
2023 2022 nominal income tax rate in 2023. The rate at which an important part of the deferred tax assets
and liabilities will be settled is calculated at the current nominal rate of 25.8%. The application of
Inflation rate 2.00% - 3.90% 2.09% - 2.18% the participation exemption to the results of associates increases the effective tax rate. As the assets
Discount rate 5.75% - 8.25% 4.85% - 7.90% and liabilities related to Groupe ADP were settled in 2022, the financial year 2023 does not show
a decrease of the effective tax rate as a result of the application of the participation exemption on
results from financial assets and liabilities related to Groupe ADP. No deferred tax asset is recognised
for the unused tax losses incurred in Italy (2022: none).
As a result of finalising tax filings for the years up to and including 2021 the effects on the estimated
positions for the prior year financial statements were included during 2023. As a consequence the
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 207
tax result of previous years decreased the effective tax rate. The amount included on the other line is Due to the complexities in applying the legislation and calculating GloBE income, the quantitative
mainly a result of non-deductible acquisition related costs that result in a permanent difference due impact of the enacted or substantively enacted legislation is not yet reasonably estimable. Therefore,
to the participation exemption regulations. even for those entities with an accounting effective tax rate above 15%, there might still be Pillar
Two tax implications. The group is currently engaged with tax specialists to assist it with applying
Schiphol Group has recognised 148 million euros of assessed losses for 2022, 2021 and 2020 (after the legislation.
the set-off against the 2019 profit) financial years as a deferred tax asset in terms of IAS 12 Income
Taxes. Management revised the estimates of future taxable profits as part of the scenario forecast Income tax in the statement of income
and concluded that Schiphol Group will recover the deferred tax asset against future taxable profit. (in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
Royal Schiphol Group is in the process of assessing its exposure to the Pillar Two legislation for
when it comes into effect. This assessment indicates that, if the Pillar Two legislation would have Total income tax 8,873 -58,124
applied in 2023, Royal Schiphol Group does not expect top-up tax to be due in relation to any of
the countries where the company has been active in 2023 – being the Netherlands, Italy and USA –
given the fact that in 2023 the statutory tax rates in each of these countries are higher than the 15%
minimum rate and in 2023 the effective tax rates in each of these countries likely exceed 15% as well.
In addition, if the effective tax rate in one of the countries would be below 15%, Royal Schiphol Group
might still not be exposed to paying Pillar Two income taxes in relation to that jurisdiction. This is
due to the impact of specific adjustments envisaged in the Pillar Two legislation which give rise to
different effective tax rates compared to those calculated in accordance with paragraph 86 of IAS 12
Income Taxes.
For 2023, the average nominal tax rate of an entity operating in the Netherlands is 25.8%. The group
is in the process of assessing its exposure to the Pillar Two legislation for when it comes into effect.
This assessment indicates for the Netherlands that the average effective tax rate based on accounting
profit is 28.4% for the annual reporting period to 31 December 2023. The group might not be
exposed to paying Pillar Two income taxes in relation to the Netherlands. This is due to the impact of
specific adjustments envisaged in the Pillar Two legislation which give rise to different effective tax
rates compared to those calculated in accordance with paragraph 86 of IAS 12 Income Taxes.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 208
Income tax calculated at the nominal rate 5,405 25.8% 3,287 34.6% 135 27.9% 8,827 28.5%
Income tax calculated at the nominal rate -37,561 25.8% 2,939 34.5% 460 27.9% -34,162 25.2%
Deferred tax in the statement of financial position tax liability) or termination of the aviation activities (resulting in higher costs for tax purposes
The following main differences in valuation for tax and reporting purposes can be distinguished: because compensation will only be obtained up to the carrying amount for reporting purposes).
– Assets used for operating activities and assets under construction are measured at cost both for Schiphol Group is not authorised to sell the land for operating activities, forecasts of future cash
reporting purposes and for tax purposes. The balance sheet for tax purposes equates the cost flows do not suggest that impairment losses will be necessary and it is unlikely that the activities will
with the market value as at 1 January 2002, whereas the balance sheet for reporting purposes be terminated.
equates the cost with the (lower) historical cost; On some of the assets used for operating
activities fiscal and commercial depreciation are calculated with different depreciation terms. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are netted if they relate to the same fiscal unity and the company
– For tax purposes, the depreciation of both commercial buildings and operational buildings is at the head of this fiscal unity has a legally enforceable right to do so.
limited to the so-called base value. The base value is 100% of the WOZ value (i.e. the value under
the Valuation of Immovable Property Act); (in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
– Property investments and derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value for
Deferred tax assets (fiscal unity)
reporting purposes and at cost for tax purposes;
Assets used for operating activities 69,192 168,156
– Property investments are depreciated for tax purposes (with a residual value of 25%) but not for
Assets under construction or development - 55,600
reporting purposes;
Derivative financial instruments and borrowings 1,530 -2,256
– Borrowings in foreign currencies are measured at the closing rates on the balance sheet date for
Employee benefits 2,948 3,509
reporting purposes and at cost at the rate applicable at the time of borrowing for tax purposes;
Investment property 75,301 -118,854
– Interest expenses are not deductible in any year if the interest expense exceeds a defined
Contract related assets - 1,677
threshold related to fiscal EBITDA. The non deductible interest expenses can be deducted in later
Non-deductible interest 1 26,493 41,335
fiscal years;
– The valuation of certain employee benefits provisions is different for tax purposes and reporting Unutilised tax loss 1 148,415 182,448
– The valuation of the contractual interest in JFKIAT is different for tax purposes (measured at cost) Deferred tax assets (outside fiscal unity)
and reporting purposes (revalued at the time of expansion); Investment property 1,283 -2,020
– Long-term land leases received in advance are recorded as a lease liability for reporting purposes.
For tax purposes, they are treated as a sale. Deferred tax liabilities (outside fiscal unity)
– Cloud based software is for reporting purposes included in the income statement when the cost Contract-related assets -13,307 -13,739
are incurred. For tax purposes the amounts are capitalised and amortized on a straight-line basis. Derivative financial instruments and borrowings -55 -
Cloud based software is included in the assets used for operating activities deferred tax position. -13,362 -13,739
– Right-Of-Use assets with the corresponding liability are not recognised for tax purposes. For both
the asset and the liability a deferred tax position is recognised and netted for reporting purposes. Total deferred tax 311,800 315,856
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised in the statement of financial position respect of all Non-current (settlement is not expected) 144,493 104,902
these differences. Non-current (expected to be recovered or settled after more
than 1 year) 140,269 187,166
Under IAS 12 Income Taxes, a deferred tax asset must be recognised if it is probable that sufficient Current (expected to be recovered or settled within 1 year) 27,038 23,788
taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilised. 311,800 315,856
However, it is impossible to estimate the moment when the deferred tax assets relating to certain 1 In order to provide more accurate information, the deferred tax asset on the non-deductible interest and the deferred tax asset
for unutilised tax losses are being presented separetly from the 2022 financial year.
operating assets will be realised, because the difference in the values for reporting and tax purposes
will be realised only in the event of a sale (resulting in a lower profit for tax purposes and a lower
income tax liability), impairment (resulting in higher costs for tax purposes and a lower income
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 210
The movements in deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities during the year were as follows:
Carrying amount as at 1 January 2022 171,933 55,600 -171,637 6,483 5,004 -11,712 - 198,666 254,336
Movements in 2022
Deferred tax recognised in the income statement - - 51,408 281 - -350 1,148 20,193 72,680
Deferred tax recognised in equity - - - -9,020 -1,495 - - - -10,515
Reclassification -3,777 - -645 - - - 40,188 -36,411 -645
Total movements in the year -3,777 - 50,764 -8,739 -1,495 -350 41,336 -16,218 61,520
Carrying amount as at 31 December 2022 168,156 55,600 -120,874 -2,256 3,509 -12,062 41,336 182,448 315,856
Movements in 2023
Deferred tax recognised in the income statement -11,532 - 39,235 329 -561 -561 -16,041 -5,860 5,008
Deferred tax recognised in equity - - - -3,928 - - - - -3,928
Reclassification -87,432 -55,600 158,224 12,097 - -313 1,197 -28,173 0
Other movements - - - -4,767 - -369 - - -5,136
Total movements in the year -98,964 -55,600 197,459 3,731 -561 -1,243 -14,844 -34,033 -4,056
Carrying amount as at 31 December 2023 69,192 0 76,584 1,475 2,948 -13,306 26,492 148,415 311,800
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 211
Income tax recognised in equity The income tax liability is calculated on profit for fiscal purposes, allowing for permanent differences
The tax effects of the movements in equity, via comprehensive income, are as follows: between the profit as calculated for reporting purposes and for tax purposes. The income tax liability
on fair value gains and losses which are not processed immediately in the income tax return is
(in thousands of euros) Before tax Deferred tax After tax recognised in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Final tax assessments have been imposed and settled
for the tax years prior to 2020. Tax filings have been submitted up to and including 2021. The foreign
Exchange differences -11,425 - -11,425 income tax payable relates to local US and Australian taxes.
Changes in fair value on hedge transactions -2,994 -3,928 -6,922
Remeasurements of defined benefit liability -4,088 - -4,088 Differences between the income tax paid according to the cash flow statement and the income tax
recognised in the statement of income concern additions to and withdrawals from deferred tax
Share in other comprehensive income
assets and liabilities, estimation differences between taxable amounts in provisional and final tax
of associates -4,230 - -4,230
assessments and settlements in respect of previous years.
Total unrealised 2023 -22,737 -3,928 -26,665
Impairment - -547
A complete list of associates and joint ventures has been filed with the Amsterdam Chamber of
Share of OCI -4,230 21,528
Commerce. Schiphol Group is not directly liable for the obligations of associates.
Exchange differences -7,147 -2,997
Total movements in the year -6,397 52,981 Of the interests held by Schiphol Group in associates and joint ventures, only those in Brisbane
Airports Corporation Holding Ltd and Tasmanian Gateway Holdings Corporation Pty Ltd can be
regarded as material.
Carrying amount as at 31 December 280,623 287,020
No significant acquisitions, capital contributions or capital repayments were made by Schiphol 2023 2022
any independent directors) and certain other resolutions (e.g. on adoption of, amendment to or For the period ending 31 December 2023, it was concluded based on the assessments performed that
departure from the business plan, acquisitions, financing of the company, appointment of the CEO no impairment is required for Hobart Airport and Brisbane Airport. The recoverable amount of each
and important transactions that exceed the applicable threshold), which require a majority of 75%. investment will exceed the invested capital. In line with the other CGUs, the impairment analyses
Such a majority is only possible if the resolution has the unanimous consent of all shareholders. for Hobart Airport and Brisbane Airport are based on the business plans and long-term forecasts
provided by local Management.
The following page contains a breakdown of the assets and liabilities, as well as a reconciliation with
the recognition in Schiphol Group's financial statements. The accounting policies applied are based International travel restrictions were eased in early 2022 in Australia , leading to an increase in
on Schiphol Group's accounting policies, or figures have been adjusted where necessary. international traffic at both airports. This upward trend continued in 2023.
The carrying amount of associates at 31 December 2023 includes 68 million euros (2022: 70 million When comparing Hobart Airport’s performance with the business case used in the most recent
euros) of goodwill relating to BACH. The carrying amount of the joint ventures at 31 December 2023 impairment analysis, the performance in 2023 is slightly above expectations. The business plan and
includes 121 million euros (2022: 125 million euros) of goodwill relating to TGHC. The amount of forecasts include the revised strategy, an updated terminal expansion programme, as well as new
goodwill of both entities in Australian dollars has not changed but is subject to conversion to the aeronautical and commercial forecasts. However, changes in the developments of the airport can
reporting currency at each reporting date. result in an adjustment of the assumptions used in the analysis, which might result in an impairment
of the investment. Management is reviewing the developments and possible impact on the business
The share in the results of associates in 2023 includes a positive result of 21.2 million euros from case in a timely manner.
BACH (2022: 30.1 million euros loss) and 2.6 million euros negative result from TGHC (2022:
7.6 million euros positive result), including the adjustments relating to the difference in the Since Hobart Airport was acquired in 2019, the year before COVID-19 outbreak, the investment has
accounting policies in respect of the measurement of Property, Plant and Equipment (Assets used for not gained a large amount of headroom between the recoverable amount and carrying value since
operating activities). its acquisition. As a result, any future recoverable amount calculation, and potential impairment
trigger, remain sensitive towards developments in interest rates and corresponding discount rates.
The shares of both Brisbane Airports Corporation Holding Ltd and Tasmanian Gateway Holdings
Corporation Pty Ltd are not listed on a stock exchange. Brisbane Airport expects passenger volumes to recover to 2019 levels by 2024 (domestic) and 2025
(international). The fair value of Brisbane Airport has increased significantly since the time of the
Several external sources of information indicate the possible existence of impairment, such as an investment, and the airport has sufficient headroom in the impairment analysis. Therefore, the
increase in discount rates due to the increase in interest rates. Pursuant with IAS 36 Impairment of investment is not sensitive to potential impairments.
Assets and the Impairment Policy of Schiphol Group, all investments in subsidiaries, associates and
joint arrangements have been assessed for possible impairments by Schiphol Group.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 214
Associates and joint ventures 12. Loans to associates and joint ventures
Brisbane Airport 1 TGHC 1
(in millions of euros) 2023 2022 2023 2022 (in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
Income statement
Carrying amount as at 1 January 136,159 143,171
Revenues 501 325 43 36
Operating expenses -346 -97 -24 -26
Interest income and expenses -107 -101 -11 2 Movements
Depreciation, amortisation Accrued interest 7,050 7,085
and impairments -98 -101 -9 -8
Amortisation 812 812
Income tax -38 -26 -2 -4
Dividend received - -1,011
Result from continuing operations 88 66 4 10
Other exchange differences -3,013 -546
Other comprehensive income 6 132 5 -8
Payments received -25,111 -13,556
Financial position Other movements -2,756 204
Fixed assets 4,114 4,254 403 402 Total movements in the year -23,018 -7,012
Current assets 100 62 7 5
Cash and cash equivalents 95 51 8 15
Carrying amount as at 31 December 113,141 136,159
Non-current liabilities 2,813 2,953 284 281
Current liabilities 304 252 100 115 The loans to associates and joint ventures relate to the Redeemable Preference Shares (RPS) held
Equity 1,192 1,163 33 25 by Schiphol Group in BACH and Loan Notes in TGHC. The Loan notes held in TGHC are a mixture of
Equity attributable to owners interest-bearing and interest-free loan notes. The maturity date of the loan notes is 31 May 2030.
of the Company 1,192 1,163 33 25
The interest-bearing loan notes will accumulate and pay interest set at 50 basis points above the
%-share 19.61% 19.61% 35% 35%
weighted average cost of senior debt for the TGHC Group.
Group's share % of equity 234 228 12 9
Goodwill 76 70 121 125
The RPS for BACH carries entitlement to cumulative (accumulated) dividends. The maturity date of
Other adjustments -91 -71 -22 -14
the RPS is 1 July 2031 and the annual dividend rate is 7.6% (2022: 7.6%).
Carrying amount as at
reporting date 219 227 111 119
Under the contractual terms, the RPS and loan notes are classified as a loan to an associate and
1 Based on the audited financial statements as at 30 June 2023
joint venture and the dividends on these shares and interest on loan notes are treated as financial
income. During 2022 and 2021, BACH did not distribute any dividends or interest due to the adverse
effects of COVID-19 on the airport. In 2023, cash was received to settle the accrued dividend and
interest amounts from previous years. Additionally, in 2023, interest amounting to 1.7 million euros
was received from TGHC (2022: 1 million) and a capital repayment to the amount of 2.8 million euros
(4.6 million Australian dollars) was received on the interest-free loan notes (2022: 12.8 million euros).
For fiscal purposes the interest imputation on the interest-free loan notes is calculated at 3.2%.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 215
RPS and loan notes are measured at amortised cost and, as there has been no significant change 14. Trade and other receivables
in credit risk, expected credit losses are determined on the basis of possible situations and
developments that may lead to a counterparty defaulting within a period of 12 months. The change (in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
in expected credit losses is reported under costs of depreciation, amortisation and impairment.
Cash deposits 370,000 680,000
Since September 2019, a natural hedge has existed between the currency risk relating to this Trade receivables 226,917 139,726
long-term receivable and EMTN borrowings issued in 2019 denominated in AUD with related Value-added taxes 29,336 20,834
exchange differences being recognised in the income statement. The same applies to the loan notes
Accrued income 67,030 41,920
held in TGHC which were acquired in October 2019.
Prepaid expenses 25,555 24,827
The fair value of the loans to associates and joint ventures (including accumulated dividend) on Other loans to associates 1,998 2,001
31 December 2023 amounts to 114.5 million euros (2022: 100.5 million euros) and the effective Lease incentives 3,513 3,624
interest rate is 8.4% (2022: 8.37%) for the RPS for BACH and 5.2% (2022: 2.4%) for the Interest- Assets held for sale 11,553 9,467
bearing Loan Notes in TGHC. The fair value is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash
Other receivables 9,755 45,947
flows at current market interest rates available to the borrower for similar financial instruments.
Total trade and other receivables 745,657 968,346
The balance in cash deposits amounting to 370 million euros as at 31 December 2023 (2022:
13. Other non-current receivables 680 million euros) relates to deposits whose original maturity exceeds three months. The average
interest rate on the deposits reported under trade and other receivables as at 31 December 2023 was
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
2.9% (2022: 1.8%).
15. Cash and cash equivalents 16. Issued share capital and share premium
Cash and cash equivalents amounted to 785 million euros as at 31 December 2023 (31 December The authorised share capital as at 31 December 2023 is 142,960,968 euros divided into 300,000 class
2022: 1,051 million euros). This includes deposits with an original maturity of less than three months A shares and 14,892 class B shares, with a nominal value of 454 euros each. 171,255 of the class A
amounting to 286 million euros and money market investments amounting to 334million euros. The shares and 14,892 of the class B shares have been issued.
average interest rate on the deposits reported under cash and cash equivalents as at 31 December
2023 was 3.2% (2022: 1.8%). The class A and class B shares carry the same rights, except for the right to amend the Articles of
Association. An amendment to the Articles of Association can only be adopted at a General Meeting
Cash deposits for the amount of 370 million euros as at 31 December 2023 (2022: 680 million of Shareholders at which all the class A shares in issue are represented, by a majority of at least
euros) whose original maturity exceeds three months are classified as part of note 14 Trade and four/fifths of all the votes cast. The General Meeting of Shareholders may resolve to withdraw all the
other receivables. The cash balance contains 5.5 million euros of bank guarantees provided. A bank class B shares in issue by an absolute majority of the votes cast.
guarantee amounting to 2.3 million euros relating to payment commitments in connection with
the ‘Storage in Underground Tanks’ order has been granted to the province of North Holland. The shareholders’ interests are as follows:
Additionally, a bank guarantee of 3.2 million euros has been granted to TenneT TSO B.V. for the
connection to the150kV-station Rozenburg-Zuid. (number) (in thousands of euros) (in %)
For a more detailed explanation on the credit risk, please refer to note 26 Management of financial Shareholder:
risks and financial instruments. State of the Netherlands 129,880 58,966 69.77%
Municipality of Amsterdam 37,276 16,923 20.03%
Municipality of Rotterdam 4,099 1,861 2.20%
Total Class A shares 171,255 77,750 92%
There were no changes in the issued share capital and the share premium in 2023.
The treasury shares consist of the 14,892 class B shares of Royal Schiphol Group N.V. that were
bought, in December 2022, by Schiphol Group from Groupe ADP as a result of the expiration of
the cooperation agreement and cross-shareholding of Schiphol Group with Groupe ADP for a total
consideration of 420 million euros . Per IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation, the treasury shares
are deducted from Schiphol’s equity until the shares are cancelled or reissued. Schiphol’s AGM will
determine what to do with the treasury shares.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 217
Movements in 2023
18. Other reserves Exchange differences -11,425 - - - -11,425
Currency and interest hedge JPY
Exchange Actuarial loan payable
differences Hedge Share in OCI gains and Exchange differences on
(in thousands of euros) reserve reserve of associates losses Total hedged borrowings - 14,004 - - 14,004
Deferred tax on fair value changes on
Balance at 1 January 2022 9,978 -29,239 -20,688 -8,958 -48,907
hedged borrowings - -3,613 - - -3,613
Fair value movements on derivatives - -25,292 - - -25,292
Movements in 2022 Deferred tax on fair value movements
Exchange differences -817 - - - -817 on derivatives - 6,525 - - 6,525
Currency and interest hedge JPY Other movements - -4,775 - - -4,775
loan payable
Hedging of cash flow interest-
Exchange differences on rate risk -
hedged borrowings - 10,343 - - 10,343 Recycling cash flow hedges to profit
Deferred tax on fair value changes on and loss - 8,294 - - 8,294
hedged borrowings - -2,669 - - -2,669
Deferred tax on recycling cash flow hedges - -2,065 - - -2,065
Fair value movements on derivatives - 15,178 - - 15,178
Currency hedge AUD loan receivable
Deferred tax on fair value movements
Other comprehensive income associates - - -4,230 - -4,230
on derivatives - -3,916 - - -3,916
Equity movement associates - - - - -
Hedging of cash flow interest-
rate risk Actuarial gains and revaluations - - - -4,088 -4,088
Recycling cash flow hedges to profit Tax effect on actuarial results - - - - -
and loss - 9,722 - - 9,722 Other -
Deferred tax on recycling cash flow hedges - -2,435 - - -2,435 Total movements in the year -11,425 -6,922 -4,230 -4,088 -26,665
Currency hedge AUD loan receivable
Other comprehensive income associates - - 21,528 - 21,528 Balance at 31 December 2023 -2,264 -9,938 -3,390 -7,637 -23,229
Actuarial gains and revaluations - - - 6,904 6,904
Tax effect on actuarial results - - - -1,495 -1,495 Exchange differences reserve
Other - The exchange differences reserve recognises exchange differences arising on the translation of the
Total movements in the year -817 26,223 21,528 5,409 52,343 net investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates outside the euro zone.
Balance at 31 December 2022 9,161 -3,016 840 -3,549 3,436 Hedge reserve
The hedge reserve recognises movements in the fair value of derivative financial instruments used in
cash flow hedges, net of deferred tax assets and liabilities. It also includes the differences arising on
the translation of loans at closing rates. In both cases, recognition in the hedging transactions reserve
requires that the hedge is determined to be effective. In cash flow hedging relationships, only the
change in fair value of the spot element of forward exchange contracts is designated as the hedging
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 218
instrument. The change in fair value of the forward element is accounted for as a cost of hedging and
is part of the hedging transactions reserve.
Further information on the restrictions on the distribution of reserves can be found in note 29
Shareholders' equity in the company balance sheet. The tax effects of the movements in equity, via
other comprehensive income, are explained in note 10 Income taxes.
The following hedging instruments and relationships are recognised in the hedge reserve. If the
hedging has an impact on the income statement, it is indicated in the table below.
20. Borrowings
The fair value is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash flows at current market interest Of the total loans, an amount of 128.3 million euros has been drawn in Japanese yen (JPY 20 billion).
rates available to the borrower for similar financial instruments. To calculate the value of loans that In line with the financial risk management policy, a fixed EUR/JPY cross-currency swap has been
are actively traded in a public market, the quoted prices are used. contracted to hedge the changes in cash flows of the JPY denominated loan. The hedge transaction
corresponds to all relevant characteristics of the critical terms of the respective loan, such as maturity,
Schiphol Group has a Euro Medium Term Note (EMTN) Programme. Under the programme Schiphol timing, amounts and frequency of cash flows. The hedge is accounted for as cash flow hedge and was
Group can raise funds of up to 5.0 billion euros as required, provided the prospectus is updated fully effective.
annually. The prospectus was updated in May 2023. The covenants of the EMTN programme
provision that a 'change of control' in combination with a 'downgrade below investment grade' Schiphol Group has put in place an interest rate swap of 180 million euros to swap fixed interest rate
triggers early redemption. There was no obligation to do so in 2023. As at 31 December 2023, payments for floating interest rate payments. The swap mirrors the payments of Schiphol Group’s
borrowings under the programme totalled 4,013 million euros (31 December 2022: 4,409 million outstanding 2025 bond (XS23333391303). Under the swap, Schiphol Group receives a fixed coupon
euros), of which 1,750 million euros (2022: 1,750 million euros) specifically relate to green bonds. and pays a floating interest rate of three-month Euribor + a spread. The fixed coupon received under
the swap is identical to the coupon paid under the 2025 bond. With this swap, Schiphol Group is
In May and June 2023, Schiphol Group executed a liability management exercise by way of a Cash hedging the fair value movements of the bond.
Tender Offer on its outstanding 2025, 2026 and 2027 EUR Notes, which resulted in the repayment
and cancellation of a total notional amount of 380 million euro. The hedge is accounted for as fair value hedge and first became effective in 2022. As market interest
rates change over the term of the bond, the fair value of the bond will change. Schiphol Group applies
Schiphol Group has a number of facility agreements with the European Investment Bank ("EIB") for a hedge accounting to the fair value hedge relationship. Schiphol Group designated the hedging
total original amount of 900 million euros, of which a part has been repaid. As per 31 December 2023, relationship as a fair value hedge. An amount of 2.4 million euros was recognised as part of the
610.6 million euros is outstanding. Schiphol Group repaid 9 million euros in 2023. No additional change in fair value of the bond as at 31 December 2023 (2022: 4.5 million euros). Schiphol Group
facilities were drawn. Schiphol Group could be obliged to redeem the loans early if (in addition to the shall discontinue hedge accounting prospectively only if the hedging relationship ceases to meet the
usual circumstances) other loans are repaid early or the book value of equity declines below 30% of qualifying criteria as set out in IFRS 9 Financial Instruments. Termination of the hedge is expected
total assets. Additional security will be demanded if the credit rating drops to BBB or lower (S&P) or to occur on the bond maturity date. At the termination of the hedge, the hedging relationship shall
to Baa2 or lower (Moody’s). The loan agreement also contains a ‘change of control’ clause. be terminated. In case of full prepayment of the bond, any fair value hedge adjustment will go
immediately to profit or loss. Please also see note 26 Management of financial risks and financial
Schiphol Group has three loan agreements with KfW IPEX-Bank for a total outstanding amount of instruments for a detailed explanation.
290 million euros with a weighted average maturity of three years. No new facilities were entered
into during 2023. The current portion of borrowings at 31 December 2023 of 306.1 million euros (31 December 2022:
31 million euros) is recognised under current liabilities.
Borrowings under the EMTN programme, the ECP programme, the EIB facilities and the KfW facilities
are not subordinated to other liabilities. Schiphol Group has access to 675 million euros in committed In 2023, Schiphol Group met the agreed covenants included in the various contracts. The most
and 150 million euros uncommitted undrawn bank facilities. relevant covenant is a financial covenant in relation to solvency, which is included in the financing
contracts with the European Investment Bank whereby this solvency ratio must be higher than 30%.
Eindhoven Airport has loan facilities in place for a total of 110 million euros to finance the future The solvency ratio for Royal Schiphol Group over 2023 was 37.1% (2022: 36%). The average interest
capital expenditure and manage working capital swings. At 31 December 2023, no funding was rate of outstanding borrowings in 2023 was 1.6% (2022: 1.4%).
drawn under these facilities. The covenants are met as at 31 December 2023.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 221
The remaining terms of the borrowings as at 31 December 2023 are as follows: The movements in borrowings during the year were as follows:
EMTN programme 4,013,428 -2,824 4,016,252 1,244,700 2,771,552 Carrying amount as at 1 January 2022 5,383,598 6,299 5,389,896
European Investment Bank 610,642 209,000 401,642 284,142 117,500
KfW IPEX-bank 289,860 99,959 189,901 189,901 - Movements in 2022
Namensschuldverschreibung - - - - - Fair value movement -4,448 - -4,448
Other borrowings 5,368 - 5,368 - 5,368 Transferred to current liabilities -51,581 51,581 -
Total borrowings 4,919,299 306,135 4,613,163 1,718,743 2,894,420 Repayments - -27,000 -27,000
Exchange differences -11,398 - -11,398
Other movements 3,124 32 3,156
Total movements in the year -64,302 24,613 -39,690
Carrying amount as at
31 December 2022 5,319,296 30,912 5,350,208
Movements in 2023
Fair value movement 1,906 - 1,906
Transferred to current liabilities -658,564 658,564 -
Repayments - -383,999 -383,999
Exchange differences -20,824 - -20,824
Other movements -28,650 658 -27,992
Total movements in the year -706,133 275,223 -430,910
Carrying amount as at
31 December 2023 4,613,163 306,135 4,919,298
For more details regarding the fair value movement, please refer to note 26 Management of financial
risks and financial instruments.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 222
21. Employee benefits The table below gives an overview of actuarial assumptions and estimates applied. Given the
minimal impact, a significant variance in the balance sheet position as a result of other assumptions
Post- Other long- is unlikely.
employment term employee Termination
(in thousands of euros) benefits benefits benefits Total
Actuarial assumptions and estimates
Carrying amount as at 31 December 2023
31 December 2023 31 December 2022
Provision 23,255 21,572 - 44,827
Discount rate 3.1% - 4.1% 3.1% - 4.1%
Liability in the balance sheet 23,255 21,572 - 44,827
Return on plan assets 3.52% 3.2%
Inflation 2.5% (subsequent years: 1.5%) 2.5% (subsequent years: 1.5%)
Carrying amount as at
31 December 2022 General salary increase 2.5% (subsequent years: 1.5%) 2.5% (subsequent years: 1.5%)
Provision 20,589 20,862 - 41,451 Life expectancy Royal Dutch Actuarial Society’s (AG) Royal Dutch Actuarial Society’s (AG)
generation mortality table AG2022, generation mortality table AG2022,
Liability in the balance sheet 20,589 20,862 - 41,451 corrected with Mercer experience corrected with Mercer experience
mortality table mortality table
Post-employment benefits consist of pension plans and job-related early retirement benefits. Other Individual pay 3.0% (to age 36), 3.0% (to age 36),
long-term employee benefits consist of long-service awards, disability benefit supplements and rises, depending 2.0% (to age 47), 2.0% (to age 47),
on age 1.0% (to age 56), 1.0% (to age 56),
sustainable employment budget. As at 31 December 2023, 0.1 million euros (2022: 2.7 million euros) 0.0% (to age 70) 0.0% (to age 67)
included in the other long-term employee benefits relate to the unemployment provision that was Incapacity risk Derived from national inflow and Derived from national inflow and
recognised as part of the restructuring provision. outflow WGA for larger employers outflow WGA for larger employers
Termination probability,3.13% 3.13%
The movements in post-employment benefit liabilities during the year were as follows: average over all ages
22. Provisions The timing of the outflow of resources for the total amount of the provisions outstanding per
balance sheet date is uncertain except for an amount of 16.5 million euros (2022: 2.6 million euros)
Decommissioning Environmental recorded as part of the environmental and decommissioning provisions, which is expected to be
(in thousands of euros) provision provision Other Total settled within a two-year time frame.
Carrying amount as at 1 January 2022 7,126 20,859 4,600 32,585
The decommissioning provision of 9.2 million euros (2022: 6.9 million euros) relates to obligations in
Movements in 2022 respect of demolition and or repair work after the use of the asset.
Addition to provision - - 27,343 27,343
Use of provision -225 -1,589 -9,029 -10,843 Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) contamination of the soil was detected during excavations in
the context of development projects at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. PFOS is a form of PFAS. The
-225 -1,589 18,314 16,500
environmental provision of 24.3 million euros (2022: 19.2 million euros) concerns the expenditures
to be incurred in connection with the temporary storage and decontamination and/or depositing of
Carrying amount as at
31 December 2022 6,901 19,270 22,914 49,085 the contaminated soil.
Movements in 2023 The category 'Other Provisions' amounts to 5.1 million euros as at 31 December 2023 (22.9 million
Addition to provision 2,280 11,520 3,948 17,748 euros as at 31 December 2022) and includes topics such as the cost compensation, a project relating
Use of provision - -6,494 -20,693 -27,187 to noise reduction (“Project Geluidsreductie”) and claims received from companies providing services
Release to profit & loss - - -1,037 -1,037 to Schiphol.
2,280 5,026 -17,782 -10,476
Carrying amount as at
31 December 2023 9,181 24,296 5,132 38,609
23. Other non-current liabilities Financial lease liabilities relate to the lease of various right-of-use assets used for operating activities,
including operational and employee vehicles, office space, a warehouse and multifunctional office
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022 equipment. To determine the lease liability, the interest rate implicit in the IFRS 16 Leases was used.
If that rate could not be readily determined, the incremental borrowing rate was used. As such, the
Prepaid long leases 85,199 86,895 weighted average rate applied is 2.18% (2022: 1.73%).
Lease liabilities 8,529 9,392
Derivatives 3,074 4,665 (in thousands of euros) Buildings Other assets Total
Unrealised profit on contribution in kind 2,269 2,269 Liability < 1 year 198 5,551 5,749
Other 142 141 Liability 1 year and < 5 years 1,415 7,114 8,530
Prepaid long leases are rent instalments which Schiphol Group has received in advance on land
For information on derivatives, see note 26 Management of financial risks and financial instruments.
leases to third parties. This item is recognised through profit or loss over the term of the underlying
contracts. Prepaid long leases include an amount of 3.6 million euros relating to lease incentives
(2022: 3.8 million euros).
The balance in unrealised profit on contribution in kind relates to land contributed to GEM A4 zone
West C.V. Is 2.3 million euros as per 31 December 2023. In accordance with the accounting policies,
the profit on the contribution of land should be treated as unrealised to the extent this profit relates
to our share in the entity the land is contributed to.
Schiphol Group has put in place an interest rate swap of 180 million euros to swap fixed interest rate
payments for floating interest rate payments. The swap mirrors the payments of Schiphol Group’s
outstanding 2025 bond. The hedge is accounted for as fair value hedge and was effective in 2023.
An amount of 1.6 million euros was recognised as part of the change in fair value of the swap as at
31 December 2023. Please also see note 26 Management of financial risks and financial instruments
for a detailed explanation.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 225
24. Trade and other payables 25. Contingent assets and liabilities
Accruals include, among other things, settlements for the cost compensation mechanism. After adjustments, the settlement of 2022 amounts to 92.6 million euros receivable. The settlement
is divided into 3 parts: a traffic and transport related part of 85.0 million euros receivable, a non
The deferred income includes mainly income from rent and leases for which Schiphol Group has traffic and transport related part of 1.2 million euros receivable and an interest part of 6.4 million
already received consideration although the services still have to be provided (contract liability). euros receivable.
Prepaid long leases include an amount of 1.3 million euros relating to lease incentives (2022: The settlement of 2022 is spread out in three equal parts to be incorporated in the airport charges
1.3 million). 2024 - 2026. As a result, the final airport charges as of 1 April 2024 will increase on average
with 14.8%.
Further details on the financial instruments can be found in note 26 Management of financial risks
and financial instruments. One complaint has been submitted to the regulator (Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets)
about the adjusted charges for 2024. At the moment, the regulator is in the process of assessing this
Commitments complaint. Schiphol expects the regulator to take a decision before 1 April 2024.
Contribution to environmental fund
As part of the eight-point plan, Schiphol Group proposed an Environmental Fund. Schiphol Group The amount to be settled for 2023 is expected to be a deficit of approximately 105 to 115 million
will provide a total of 70 million euros (10 million euros per year), which will be used to improve euros. The final settlement will be included and explained extensively in the Regulatory Accounts
the quality of life in the Schiphol Airport region. In 2023, Schiphol Group finalised details about the of 2023.
programme and governance of the fund. A new foundation will be established in 2024 as a successor
of the Schiphol Quality of Life Foundation. The board of the foundation will be independent of The Regulatory Accounts 2023 will be published on 31 May 2024 (at the latest). Thereafter, the
Schiphol Group. The foundation will be funded by Schiphol Group on a yearly basis based on an settlement will be included in the consultation of the airport charges in coming years, that is, in the
approved budget that contains both organisational costs and program costs for that year. On a yearly period from 2025-2027.
basis a maximum amount of 10 million euros will be available for funding.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 226
As of 1 April 2023 the airport charges increased with 12% in line with consultation. However, Total 2022 < 1 year > 1 year and < > 5 years
a number of airlines and representative organisations submitted complaints to the regulator in (in thousands of euros) 5 years
response to Schiphol’s final setting of airport charges 2023. The regulator (Dutch Authority for
Commitments relating to:
Consumers & Markets) concluded in March 2023 that the airport charges and conditions as proposed
by Schiphol are in accordance with the Aviation Act. Security, maintenance and cleaning 1,057,084 471,448 553,471 32,165
Development of Schiphol 489,840 409,161 80,000 679
A number of airlines and representative organisations have submitted complaints to the regulator Development of Lelystad Aiport 12,076 1,093 4,962 6,021
in response to Schiphol’s final setting of airport charges 2022-2024. The regulator (Dutch Authority
Electricity and gas 42,313 18,615 23,698 -
for Consumers & Markets) concluded in April 2022 that airport charges and conditions as proposed
Rents and leases (operating lease) 3,454 1,231 2,224 -
by Schiphol are in accordance with the Aviation Act. One complaint is partially justified, however,
this does not justify that charges and conditions would be contrary to rules laid down by or pursuant Other capital projects 5,916 2,250 3,666 -
to the Aviation Act. A number of airlines disagree with the decision of the ACM (for both 2023 and Total 1,610,683 903,798 668,020 38,865
2022) and appealed to the CBb (College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven). The CBb is in the process
of assessing the appeal. Long-term partnership between Dutch construction firms and Schiphol Group
In January 2019, Schiphol contracted BAM, Heijmans and VolkerWessels group companies for
Contamination by extinguishing foam the maintenance, renewal and construction of new infrastructure and real estate at the airport.
In July 2008, the Rijnland Regional Water Authority collected PFOS-contaminated extinguishing The total estimated value of the assignment is 2 to 3.5 billion euros for a maximum period of 9
foam, released during an incident at a KLM hangar in Schiphol-Southeast and stored it in reservoirs years. The commitments under these contracts as at 31 December 2023 are mainly included under
made available by Schiphol. Control measures were taken around the reservoirs to prevent the 'Security, maintenance and cleaning' and 'Development of Schiphol' in the table included in the
further spread of PFOS. KLM, Schiphol and Rijnland each financed a third of the costs of the control section commitments.
measures taken, without any party acknowledging its responsibility for the damage incurred. The
control measures are still operational and these operational costs are financed by KLM, Schiphol Schiphol Area Development Company N.V. (SADC)
and Rijnland (each a third), the total amount of approximately 0.3 million euros for the period 2023 Schiphol Group participates directly, and indirectly through the collaborative venture Schiphol Area
(2022: 0.2 million euros). Anticipated expenses for 2024 are expected to align closely with those Development Company N.V. (SADC), in land holdings in the vicinity of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol.
incurred in 2023. SADC's objective is to develop business locations and supporting infrastructure projects around the
airport. One of these land holdings concerns the A4 Zone West area. Schiphol Group has a future
Commitments arising from (long-term-) contracts obligation to contribute 2.6 million euros as a limited partner's contribution, to be increased by
Total 2023 < 1 year > 1 year and < > 5 years financing and acquisition costs, to fund the contributionof land to GEM A4 Zone West C.V. by the
(in thousands of euros) 5 years municipality of Haarlemmermeer.
Commitments relating to: BN-TAV claims with regards to the construction of Pier A
Security, maintenance and cleaning 676,404 506,804 124,989 44,611 On 29 November 2021, Schiphol terminated the contract with the contractor (a joint venture
Development of Schiphol 600,849 571,463 29,386 - between Ballast Nedam and TAV Construction - BN-TAV) for the construction of Pier A. The
Development of Lelystad Aiport 20,080 1,554 5,054 13,472 termination was done in an amicable way, whereby a controlled hand over of the construction site
has taken place from BN-TAV to Schiphol. A new contractor was appointed to finish the construction
Electricity and gas 14,283 14,283 - -
of Pier A.
Rents and leases (operating lease) 19,221 3,869 15,352 -
Other capital projects 4,863 4,863 - - In February 2023 BN-TAV has submitted a final account to Schiphol, containing contractual interim
Total 1,335,700 1,102,836 174,781 58,083 claims for extension of time, unlawful termination and miscellaneous claims of subcontractors, as
well as claimed variations to the contract (meerwerk). The total claim amounted to 282 million euros.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 227
In December 2023 Schiphol received a writ of summons. The total amount claimed in the litigation Extending the North/South line will encourage sustainable connectivity at a regional, national and
procedure amounts to 154 million euros, excluding subcontractor claims. international level. It will create space in the Schiphol tunnel, which can then be used by both
national and international trains. The latter is important so the train can serve as an alternative to
In return, Schiphol has submitted to BN-TAV a first counterclaim of 93 million euros for delay air travel on short distances. Moreover, it will reinforce Schiphol as a multimodal hub by bringing
damages, costs of rectifying defective work, additional costs and recoverable costs. This claim only together public transport, cars and planes.
covers the period up to termination. In July 2023 a second interim counterclaim has been submitted,
covering the costs of repairing defects and the “extra over” cost to complete post-termination up to Other contingent assets and liabilities
the end of 2022, with a value of EUR 44 million euros. In the beginning of 2024, the post-termination Other claims against Royal Schiphol Group N.V. and/or its subsidiaries have been filed, and there are
counterclaim will be updated to include the period up to the end of 2023. The finalisation of disputes which are yet to be settled. All claims and disputes are being contested and the company has
Schiphol's counterclaims is dependent on the completion of the project. taken legal advice on them. However, as it is impossible to predict the outcomes with any certainty,
it is not yet clear whether any of the cases will result in actual liabilities for the company and/or its
The start of legal proceedings has not changed Schiphol’s view on the claims position and as a result group companies. Accordingly, no provisions have been recognised in the balance sheet in respect
no change to a contingent liability as at 31 December 2023. of these claims and disputes.
Boswandeling (Televerde) claim The company has also brought claim(s) against third parties and has disputes pending in which it is
Televerde B.V., as part of the Boswandeling Joint Venture, has a claim against the municipality of the claimant. Since it is not yet clear whether these cases will be resolved in the company's favour, no
Haarlemmermeer. Any (financial) contribution resulting from the claim will be used for developing related receivables have been recognised in the balance sheet.
the northern area of the motorway A9.
Soil contamination
PFAS contamination of the soil was detected during excavations in the context of development
projects at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. Since 2017, local legislation is in place that requires Schiphol
to clean PFAS-contaminated soil when the contamination causes environmental risks. 2019 also
saw the introduction of national-level legislation on this issue. The changed local legislation of
2019 and 2020 does not change the way we have to deal with PFAS-contaminated soil. Schiphol
has recognised a provision for the decontamination of the land on which construction work will
take place in the near future. No provision is recorded for potential PFAS contamination under
existing assets.
In 2023 Schiphol has continued and formalized it’s collaboration. While the Dutch national
government has proposed to finance the exploration phase. The project organisation of MIRT
OVAH has started the tender process to attract consultants to help with the exploration phase in
September 2023. The joint partners of governmental bodies and private organisations expect to
decide upon a preferred alternative by the end of 2025.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 228
26. Management of financial risks and financial instruments in BACH, loan notes in TGHC and EMTN borrowings denominated in AUD with related exchange rate
differences being recognised in the income statement.
Financial income and expenses
The table below contains a breakdown of financial income and expenses. Capitalised A financial gain of 30 million euros is included in Other results from financial liabilities in relation
construction interest comprises interest charges incurred during the construction phase of large to the execution of a cash tender offer on three of the outstanding EMTN notes resulting into a
investment projects. 380 million euros notional repayment against a cash settlement of 350 million euros.
Total financial income and expenses 2,327 -16,386 Schiphol Group manages the currency risk on borrowings which are not naturally offset by an asset
in the same currency by using currency forward and swap contracts. The financial risk management
Exchange differences on loans to associates concern the Redeemable Preference Shares (RPS) of policy is that virtually 100% of the expected cash flows are hedged, with the condition that
Brisbane Airport Corporation Holdings Ltd (BACH) and the Loan Notes of Tasmanian Gateway hedging costs need to be proportionate to the risk being hedged. As at 31 December 2023, 7.0%
Holdings Corporation Pty Ltd (TGHC), the ultimate holding company of Hobart International Airport of group financing had been drawn in foreign currency: one loan with a carrying amount of
held by Schiphol Group. Under the terms and conditions these shares are not considered to be part 128.3 million euros (JPY 20 billion nominal value) and three loans with an aggregate carrying amount
of the net investment in the associate. Consequently, exchange differences are accounted for in the of 219.4 million euros (AUD 355 million nominal value) compared with 6.8% of total borrowings (one
income statement. As from 2019, a natural hedge exists between the currency risk related to RPS held
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 229
loan with a carrying amount of 142.3 million euros and a nominal amount of JPY 20 billion and three net position for that party will also decrease. Under the cash collateral agreement, the difference
loans with a carrying value of 226.2 million euros and a nominal amount of AUD 355 million) a year between the market value of the swap and the applicable maximum net position is paid weekly
earlier. The JPY position is fully hedged by means of a EURJPY cross-currency swap. As the hedge is through the bank.
assessed to be effective, movements in the exchange rate will not affect the results relating to these
borrowings. The effect on equity is temporary (only for the duration of the hedging transaction) As at 31 December 2023, the maximum net position of JPMorgan amounted to 10 million euros
and amounts to 7.4 million euros positive in 2023 (after deferred tax) (2022: 7.7 million euros). The (10 million euros as at 31 December 2022) and the maximum net position of Royal Schiphol Group
borrowings in AUD serve as a natural hedge for the RPS of BACH and loan notes of TGHC held by to 10 million euros (5 million euros as at 31 December 2022), while the market value of the swap
Schiphol Group. was approximately 7.4 million euros positive (32.7 million euros as at 31 December 2022) at Schiphol
Group. As at 31 December 2023, Schiphol Group had no liability to JPMorgan.
Schiphol Group has a number of strategic investments in activities outside the eurozone; of these,
the net investments recognised in the balance sheet under ‘associates and joint ventures’ and The interest rate shown against the cross-currency swap is the fixed rate at which interest is payable
'contract-related assets' are affected by a translation risk. In accordance with the policy, the currency to the counterparty, for which interest at the variable (or fixed) rate that Schiphol Group in turn has
position relating to Schiphol Group’s net investments in activities outside the eurozone, totalling to pay on the loans concerned is receivable from the counterparty.
360 million euros as at 31 December 2023 (377 million euros as at 31 December 2022), is not hedged.
As translation differences on these positions are recognised as part of the translation reserves, they Price risk
do not directly impact the results. In 2023, the negative effect on equity amounted to 11.4 million Price risk is the risk of fluctuations in the value of assets and liabilities as a result of changes in market
euros, leading to a decrease of the translation reserve from 9.1 million euros as per 31 December prices. Schiphol Group is affected mainly by the price risk on property investments which it recognises
2022 to 2.2 million euros negative as per 31 December 2023. at fair value. This fair value is influenced by supply and demand and movements in interest rates and
the rate of inflation, which is the basis for the Net Initial Yield (NIY). An average increase of 10%
The Redeemable Preference Shares and Loan Notes which Schiphol Group owns in BACH and TGHC in the NIY on offices and commercial buildings demanded by property investors would reduce the
respectively are reported as part of the 'loans to associates and joint ventures'. As from 2019, a value of those properties by a total of approximately 120.7 million euros (2022: 109.4 million euros).
natural hedge exists between the currency risk relating to this long-term receivable and EMTN A 10% decrease in the NIY would increase the value by approximately 146.3 million euros (2022:
borrowings issued in 2019 denominated in AUD with related exchange differences being recognised 128.1 million euros). Under the accounting policy, in that situation profitability before tax would fall
in the income statement. by the same amount.
Schiphol Group’s risk (counterparty risk) in respect of the cross-currency swap is mitigated by a cash
collateral agreement with JPMorgan, which results in a maximum net position for both parties that
depends on the parties’ credit ratings. If the credit rating of either party is reduced, the maximum
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 230
Interest-rate risk the hedging relationship as a fair value hedge. Schiphol Group shall discontinue hedge accounting
Interest-rate risk is divided into a fair value interest-rate risk and a cash flow interest-rate risk. prospectively only if the hedging relationship ceases to meet the qualifying criteria as set out in IFRS
9 Financial Instruments. Termination of the hedge is expected to occur on the bond maturity date.
Fair value interest-rate risk is the risk of fluctuations in the value of a financial instrument as a result of At the termination of the hedge, the hedging relationship shall be terminated. In the case of full
movements in the market interest rate. Schiphol Group has limited financial assets that attract a cash prepayment of the bond, any fair value hedge adjustment will go immediately to profit or loss.
flow interest-rate risk but is affected by fair value interest-rate risk on its fixed-interest borrowings.
If market interest rates fell by an average of 0.5% point, this would lead to an increase of 26 million 2023 2022
euros (0.6%) in the fair value of borrowings (2022: 29 million euros and 0.5%). An average increase
Change in fair value of derivative 1,591 4,665
of 0.5% point in market interest rates would lead to a fall of 24 million euros (0.5%) in the fair value
Change in fair value of liabilities for ineffective assessment (hedged items) (1,480) (4,500)
of borrowings (2022: 28 million euros and 0.6%). Schiphol Group’s policy is to draw at least 50% of
borrowings at fixed interest rates, if necessary by using derivatives. As at 31 December 2023, 93% of Net profit / (loss) recognised in profit or loss statement 111 164
borrowings were fixed-interest, excluding subsidiaries and associates (31 December 2022: 93%).
Credit risk
The cash flow interest-rate risk is the risk of fluctuations in the future cash flows of a financial Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument fails to fulfil its obligations,
instrument as a result of movements in market interest rates. Cash and cash equivalents, a 170 million causing the other party to suffer a financial loss. Schiphol Group’s counterparties in derivative
euros loan with the EIB and a 180 million euros fixed to floating interest rate swap attract cash flow financial instruments and liquidity transactions are restricted to financial institutions with high
interest-rate risk. creditworthiness ratings (a minimum S&P credit rating of A) and the net position for each
counterparty may not exceed 200 million euros. The maximum net position as at 31 December 2023
Schiphol Group has put in place an interest rate swap of 180 million euros to swap fixed interest rate was 146.7 million euros (200 million euros as at 31 December 2022). At year-end 2023, Schiphol
payments for floating interest rate payments. The swap mirrors the payments of Schiphol Group’s Group has a counterparty risk exposure of 75 million with AAA rating and 825 million with A rating
outstanding 2025 bond. Under the swap, Schiphol Group receives a fixed coupon and pays a floating bank facilities. The cash and cash equivalents are divided between different counterparties in order
interest rate of 3-month Euribor + a spread. The fixed coupon received under the swap is identical to meet the maximum net position per counterparty.
to the coupon paid under the 2025 bond. With this swap Schiphol Group is hedging the fair value
movements of the bond. At 31 December 2023, trade receivables amounted to 227 million euros (31 December 2022:
140 million euros), after a provision for expected credit losses of 8 million euros (31 December
The hedge is accounted for as a fair value hedge and first became effective in 2023. As market 2022: 8 million euros) and including 4.8 million euros in security deposits received (31 December
interest rates change over the term of the bond, the fair value of the bond will change. Schiphol 2022: 5.2 million euros). Expected credit losses are measured based upon all possible situations
Group applies hedge accounting to the fair value hedge relationship. Schiphol Group designated and developments that may lead to default of the debtor during the expected total lifetime of the
Interest rate swap ING Bank 0.00% EUR 180,000 22-4-2025 3,074 4,665
3,074 4,665
Recognised in the balance sheet under:
Non-current liabilities 3,074 4,665
Current assets / liabilities - -
3,074 4,665
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 231
receivable. This is primarily derived from a provisions matrix based on historical data on credit losses Liquidity risk
per business area. Liquidity risk is the risk that Schiphol Group will have difficulty in raising the funding required to
honour its commitments in the short term. Careful liquidity risk management means that Schiphol
Additionally, the measurement of credit losses is based on information accessible without undue Group maintains sufficient liquid resources and has access to sufficient funding in the form of
costs and effort about current developments and expectations with regard to the market and promised (and preferably committed) credit facilities and the EMTN programme. The financing
significant trading relationships. The provision covers 100% of the receivables owed by debtors that policy is also aimed at reducing the refinancing risk. See note 20 Borrowings for further information
are in bankruptcy or have applied for a suspension of payments, as well as receivables older than on available facilities. In connection with liquidity risk, Corporate Treasury manages the cash pool
one year. through which several of the subsidiaries’ bank balances are managed and netted for optimum
balance management.
Schiphol Group holds RPS in BACH and Loan Notes in TGHC. Please see note 12 Loans to associates
and joint ventures for additional information. BACH indicated that no dividends or interest will be All items below are displayed with the remaining maturity based on the date of redemption or
paid out for the 2020, 2021 and 2022 financial years as a result of the negative impact of COVID-19 settlement agreed with the counterparty. The amounts are gross and undiscounted, and include
on the airport. The dividends and interest receivable that were accrued for in terms of the agreement estimated interest payments. Schiphol Group’s policy is that no more than 25% of liabilities may have
have been paid out. There is no indication of an increase in the credit risk. TGHC has not paid out a term of less than one year. As at 31 December 2023, this figure was 6.3% (31 December 2022: 0.6%).
dividends in 2023 (1 million euros in 2022). A capital repayment to the amount of 2.8 million euros
was received on the loan notes (2022: 13 million euros). Total 2023 Contractual <= 1 year > 1 year > 1 year but > 5 years
(in thousands of euros) cash flows <= 5 years
Parties using services from Schiphol Group are first assessed for creditworthiness. Depending on the Borrowings 4,919,298 4,919,298 306,135 4,613,163 1,718,743 2,894,421
outcome of this assessment, they may be required to provide security in the form of a bank guarantee Trade payables 196,090 196,090 196,090 - - -
or deposit to limit the credit risk. As at 31 December 2023, Schiphol Group holds 38.7 million Lease liabilities 14,278 14,278 5,749 8,529 8,529 -
euros in bank guarantees and security deposits (31 December 2022: 38.6 million euros). Koninklijke Interest payable 31,664 31,664 31,664 - - -
Luchtvaartmaatschappij N.V. (KLM) has an individual balance in excess of 80.4 million euros (2022: Accruals 138,420 138,420 138,420 - - -
33 million euros). The following table provides more details on the provision for bad debt and
Total 5,299,750 5,299,750 678,059 4,621,691 1,727,272 2,894,421
ageing analysis:
Total 2022 Contractual <= 1 year > 1 year > 1 year but > 5 years
Weighted Gross (in thousands of euros) cash flows <= 5 years
average carrying Loss Carrying
(in thousands of euros) loss rate amount allowance amount Borrowings 5,350,208 5,350,209 30,912 5,319,296 1,978,255 3,341,041
Trade payables 195,033 195,033 195,033 - - -
Current (not past due) 0.0% 151,559 -27 151,532
Lease liabilities 14,856 14,856 5,465 9,392 9,392 -
1-30 days past due -0.5% 61,398 -287 61,111
Interest payable 30,196 30,196 30,196 - - -
31-60 days past due -2.5% 5,626 -140 5,486
Accruals 168,097 168,097 168,097 - - -
61-90 days past due -6.6% 2,065 -135 1,930
Total 5,758,390 5,758,391 429,702 5,328,688 1,987,647 3,341,041
91-180 days past due -24.2% 2,079 -503 1,576
181-365 days past due -46.0% 2,100 -967 1,133
>365 days past due -59.5% 10,146 -6,038 4,108
Bankruptcies -83.7% 250 -209 41
-3.5% 235,223 -8,306 226,917
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 232
Financial instruments can be classified as follows, according to the measurement policy applied: Fair value
Fair value Fair value
Amortised cost through
through equity disclosure
(in thousands of euros) Level 1 Total 2022 profit and loss
Fair value
Fair value through Fair value Borrowings 1 3,745,528 3,745,528 - - 3,109,115
(in thousands of euros) Level 1 Total 2023 Amortised cost through equity profit and loss disclosure
Borrowings 2 1,900,020 1,604,680 - 295,340 1,462,945
Borrowings 1 3,488,077 3,488,077 - - 3,137,012 Borrowings 3 - - - - -
Borrowings 2 1,608,934 1,431,221 - 177,713 1,368,813 Finance lease liabilities 2 - - - - -
Derivative Derivative
financial instruments 2 3,074 - 3,074 - 3,074 financial instruments 2 4,665 - 4,665 - 4,665
Trade payables n/a 196,090 196,090 - - 196,090 Financial liability - Share
Interest payable n/a 31,664 31,664 - - 31,664 buy back obligation 2 - - - - -
Liabilities 5,327,839 5,147,053 3,074 177,713 4,736,653 Trade payables n/a 195,033 195,033 - - 195,033
Interest payable n/a 30,196 30,196 - - 30,196
Loans to associates 2 -113,141 -113,141 - - - Liabilities 5,875,441 5,575,436 4,665 295,340 4,801,952
The fair values are recalculated at the end of each reporting period. Depending on the input used, Total 3,835,845 3,568,556 -28,051 295,340 2,773,270
the established fair value falls into one of the following levels: 1 For financial instruments that are not reported at fair value, the level of fair value hierarchy included below relates to the fair value
– Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; disclosed for this financial instrument.
– Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or information based on
or supported by observable market inputs;
– Level 3: Unobservable inputs used to determine the fair value of an asset or liability.
Level 2 measurements are determined using various methods and assumptions based on market
conditions on the reporting date. The fair value of these financial instruments is determined on the
basis of the present value of the projected future cash flows converted into euros at the relevant
exchange rates and the market interest rate applicable to Schiphol Group on the reporting date.
The nominal value is assumed to approximate the fair value of loans to associates, trade receivables,
cash and cash equivalents and trade payables.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 233
‘Funds From Operations’ is calculated specifically for the purpose of determining the financial ratios
and differs from the cash flow from operations calculated in the consolidated cash flow statement
in accordance with the reporting policies, in the Consolidated statement of cash flow for the year
ended 31 December 2023. FFO is the cash flow from operating activities adjusted for operating
capital. In 2023, FFO increased from 267 million euros to 446 million euros.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 234
1 The State of the Netherlands owns 14% of the shares in Air France-KLM SA. Royal Schiphol Group and Air France-KLM are therefore regarded as related parties as both companies are government-related entities.
There are a number of subsidiaries and joint ventures in which Schiphol Group holds an interest The material related parties are included in the table above.
which results in either significant influence but no decisive control or exercising joint operational and
policy control. These subsidiaries and joint ventures are designated as related parties.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 235
Sections 8.7 and 8.17 of the Aviation Act impose constraints on the development and use of
Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. The Airport Traffic Decree lays down rules for airport use and stipulates
limits for noise levels, air pollution and risks to public safety. The Airport Planning Decree defines
the airport zone and the restrictions governing the use of the airport and the surrounding area.
The Aviation (Supervision) Regulations define the rules concerning safety on the airport grounds.
As of July 2017, the new Aviation Act became effective, which includes changes with respect to the
consultation on and settlement of tariffs. This means that as of 2018, Schiphol set the tariffs for every
three-year period.
There are two lines of supervision on the airport operation of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol.
One line of supervision concerns preventing abuse, by the operator, of its position of economic
strength. The body responsible for this supervision is the ACM. The supervision relates to the charges
and conditions fixed by the operator pursuant to Section 8.25d of the Aviation Act to be charged to
the airport users in the subsequent year.
The other line of supervision involves the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management and
relates to the operation of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, for which a licence has been granted
pursuant to Section 8.25 of the Aviation Act. The operator reports to the minister on the operation
of the airport at least once every three years, with special reference to capital expenditure that is
important to the development of the airport. The ability to foster the mainport status of the airport,
to the extent that the operator is able to influence that status, is particularly dependent on the
development of the airport infrastructure in the medium and long term.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 236
Committees
All members of the Supervisory Board also receive an annual expense fee of 1,697 euros (2022: For more information on the Supervisory Board, refer to Supervisory Board.
1,643 euros) on top of the remuneration for Supervisory Board members referred to above. No
shares, share options, loans, advances or guarantees have been or will be granted to members of the
Supervisory Board.
Mr. Figee and ms. Van der Laan joined the Supervisory Board of Royal Schiphol Group on 11 April
2023. On the same date mr. Olsson stepped down after two terms.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 237
During 2022 Key Management personnel consisted of the Management Board and the Supervisory
Pension Board. The Key Management remuneration can be displayed as follows:
Variable Pension costs Other Severance
(x EUR 1) Salary
remuneration costs
(supplementary) payments1 pay Total 2022
(x EUR 1) 2023 2022
L.M. Sondag 73,934 - 5,656 10,837 8,408 - 98,835
Salary 2,429,797 1,684,894
D.A. Benschop 2 443,604 - 33,935 73,736 34,405 - 585,679
Variable Remuneration 303,532 -
R.J. Carsouw 377,064 - 31,519 39,303 37,633 - 485,520
Pension Costs 148,040 115,763
B.I. Otto 3 157,380 - 13,133 20,309 10,052 377,064 577,939
Pension Costs (supplementary) 135,552 176,515
H.L. Buis 377,064 - 31,519 32,329 15,380 - 456,293
Other Payments 197,982 105,877
Total 1,429,046 - 115,763 176,515 105,877 377,0642,204,265
Severance Pay 202,616 377,064
1 The stated amounts mainly concern (share of) allowances to the management board members that can be considered as Total 3,417,519 2,460,113
remuneration. In a situation where such a share of an allowance can be considered as (indirect) remuneration then the share is
both valued and accounted for here. The method employed by the fiscal authorities is the starting point for the value stated.
2 D.A. Benschop was President & CEO until 31 October 2022. For further details, please refer to Management Board remuneration.
3 B.I. Otto was Membger of the Management Board & COO until 31 May 2022.
The remuneration of Management Board members is disclosed in accordance with Section 2:383c of
the Dutch Civil Code. Periodic remuneration comprises the total of gross salary and holiday pay.
Based on the Supervisory Board's assessment of the extent to which the targets were achieved, the
short-term incentives as presented in the table above have been charged to the result for 2023. The
total variable remuneration for the Management Board over the year 2023 is determined to be 15%
of the respective members' fixed salaries.
Mr. Sondag was appointed as President & CEO as of 1 November 2022 for an initial term of one year.
At the request of the Supervisory Board, it was decided to extend Mr. Sondag’s interim period until
ultimately 29 February 2024.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 238
Subsidiaries
Direct / indirect The abridged balance sheet for the minority interest in Eindhoven Airport N.V. excluding the interests
Registered in interest in % of Schiphol Group is presented below.
Kappé sells perfumes, cosmetics, sunglasses and pharmacy products in fifteen shops at Schiphol
Amsterdam Airport. With this acquisition, Schiphol wants to further develop the business, continue
to invest in these shops and look to the future with new stores and concepts. Continuity for
the shops and for employees is key. Furthermore, Schiphol is focusing on the already initiated
professionalisation of Kappé and the cooperation with commercial partners. In the long term, the
acquisition will allow Schiphol Amsterdam Airport to flexibly allocate the available square metres,
with room for innovation and an improved shopping experience for passengers.
The purchase consideration amounted to 50 - 52 million euros and consists of cash paid. The
purchase price allocation has yet to take place given the closing accounts are still under preparation.
It is expected that the majority of the excess purchase consideration will either result in goodwill or
contract related assets.
Lelystad airport
On the 30th of January 2024 the majority of the Dutch Parliament voted against the opening of
Lelystad airport for commercial flights. This is, however, not a decision. When a decision against
opening of Lelystad becomes irreversible it will have a significant impact on amongst others the
carrying amount of Property, Plant and Equipment of Lelystad airport.
Other
There are no other reportable events after the balance sheet date.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 240
Revenue - -
(in thousands of euros) Note 31 December 2023 31 December 2022 (in thousands of euros) Note 31 December 2023 31 December 2022
Subsidiaries Equity in the consolidated balance sheet comprises an exchange differences reserve, an other
Companies over which Royal Schiphol Group N.V. is able to exercise control or which Royal Schiphol financial interests reserve and a hedging transactions reserve. These reserves (recognised collectively
Group N.V. effectively manages are stated at net asset value determined by measuring the assets, in the company financial statements under ‘Other reserves’) are also presented as part of company
provisions and liabilities and results according to the policies applied in preparing the consolidated equity since they similarly restrict the ability to distribute the reserves.
financial statements. If the share of losses attributable to Royal Schiphol Group N.V. exceeds the
carrying amount of a subsidiary, losses over and above that amount are not recognised unless Royal Notes to the company balance sheet and income statement
Schiphol Group N.V. has given guarantees to the entity concerned or other commitments have been Where the notes to the company balance sheet and income statement are not materially different
entered into or payments have been made on behalf of that entity. In that case, a provision is made from the notes to the consolidated balance sheet and income statement, they have not been
for the consequent liabilities. Results on transactions with subsidiaries are eliminated in proportion repeated. See the notes to the consolidated balance sheet and statement of income for the items
to the interest in the entities concerned, except where the results arise on transactions with third concerned. This also applies to the disclosures on contingent assets and liabilities in note 25 as well
parties. Losses are not eliminated if there are indications of impairment of the assets concerned. as management of financial risks and financial instrument in note 26.
The revaluation reserve (Section 2:390(1) of the Dutch Civil Code) is maintained for unrealised fair
value gains on individual items of investment property (land and buildings) held by companies
forming part of Schiphol Group. Additions to this reserve are made through the profit appropriation,
after allowing for corporate income tax. On the sale of investment property, the amount of the
revaluation reserve for the property in question is transferred to other reserves.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 243
Carrying amount as at
31 December 2022 3,777,330 - 3,777,330
Movements in 2023
Result for the year 33,156 - 33,156
OCI Movement -4,230 - -4,230
Translation differences -11,425 - -11,425
Changes in the hedging
transactions reserve 6,228 - 6,228
Other movements -13,634 - -13,634
10,095 - 10,095
Carrying amount as at
31 December 2023 3,787,425 - 3,787,425
Subsidiaries are the wholly-owned subsidiaries of Schiphol Nederland B.V. or Schiphol International
B.V., with the exception of Eindhoven Airport N.V. Section 2:403 of the Dutch Civil Code applies to
Schiphol Nederland B.V.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 244
Net Result
Issued Revaluation Other Financial
(in thousands of euros) share capital Share premium Treasury shares Retained profits Other reserves reserve statutory reserves Year Total
Carrying amount as at 1 January 2022 84,511 362,811 - 1,765,688 -48,907 981,781 230,766 104,671 3,481,321
Movements in 2022
Appropriation of result for previous year - - - 104,671 - - - -104,671 -
Distribution of dividend - - - - - - - - -
Exchange differences - - - - -817 - - - -817
Movements in hedge reserve - - - - 26,223 - - - 26,223
Net result - - - - - - - -86,256 -86,256
Addition statutory reserves - - - 328,063 - -394,284 66,221 - -
Other comprehensive income from associates - - -420,320 420,320 21,528 - - - 21,528
Actuarial gains and revaluations after taxation - - - - 5,409 - - - 5,409
Total movements in the year - - -420,320 853,054 52,343 -394,284 66,221 -190,927 -33,913
Carrying amount as at 31 December 2022 84,511 362,811 -420,320 2,618,741 3,436 587,497 296,986 -86,256 3,447,408
Movements in 2023
Appropriation of result for previous year - - - -86,256 - - - 86,256 -0
Distribution of dividend - - - - - - - - -
Exchange differences - - - - -11,425 - - - -11,425
Movements in hedge reserve - - - - -6,922 - - - -6,922
Net result - - - - - - - 12,706 12,706
Addition statutory reserves - - - 88,080 - -112,669 24,589 - 0
Other - - - - - - - - -
Other comprehensive income from associates - - - - -4,230 - - - -4,230
Actuarial gains and revaluations after taxation - - - - -4,088 - - - -4,088
Total movements in the year - - - 1,824 -26,665 -112,669 24,589 98,962 -13,959
Carrying amount as at 31 December 2023 84,511 362,811 -420,320 2,620,567 -23,229 474,828 321,575 12,706 3,433,449
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 245
The other statutory reserves comprise the reserve for intangible assets and the reserve for 32. Income taxes
investments in associates.
This note contains details on items in the company-only financial statements with regard to income
Given the legal obligation to recognise a Revaluation reserve and Other Statutory reserves, an tax, being income tax recognised in the statement of income, deferred taxes recognised in the
amount of 88 million euros was added to Retained profits (2022: 328 million euros added) and Other statement of financial position and current tax positions in the statement of financial position.
Statutory Reserves and subtracted from the Revaluation reserve in 2023.
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022
Proposed result appropriation
No dividends will be paid out for the 2023 and 2022 financial years. Result before tax 7,049 -94,395
The liabilities for employee benefits relate to the Management Board of Royal Schiphol Group N.V.
Share in results of associates and
and concern the net liabilities in respect of the short-term incentives. See the notes on Remuneration
joint ventures - 0.0% - 0.0%
for Management Board members in the consolidated financial statements for further details.
Share in results of subsidiaries -8,554 -121.4% 32,016 -33.9%
Changes in corporate income tax rate
31. Current liabilities Participation exemption on results from
financial asset and liability (Groupe ADP) - 0.0% -15,801 16.7%
(in thousands of euros) 2023 2022 Other (includes non-deductible expenses) 1,079 15.3%
Group companies 3,172,685 2,723,064 Income tax expense in income
Accruals 24,041 21,838 statement (effective) -5,657 -80.2% -8,139 8.6%
3,196,726 2,744,902 The 2022 deferred tax asset in 2022 amounting to 15.7 million euros relates to unutilised tax losses
(due to company operating losses). This deferred tax asset is within the group reclassified to Schiphol
See note 3 Outsourcing and other external costs to the consolidated financial statements for a Nederland in which the total deferred tax position relating to the tax loss carry forward of the Dutch
breakdown of auditor's fees. fiscal unity is reported. The deferred tax liability amounts to 2.3 million euros (2022: 1.4 million euros)
and relates to erivatives.
Please refer to the consolidated tax note for a detailed description (note 10 Income taxes).
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 246
D. Collier
C. Figee
E. van Galen
Other Information
1. Without prejudice to the provisions of Section 2:105 of the Dutch Civil Code, the profit according
to the financial statements prepared by the Management Board shall be added to the reserves unless
the General Meeting of Shareholders resolves to make profit distributions according to a proposal
by the Management Board approved by the Supervisory Board.
2. The General Meeting of Shareholders shall decide the appropriation of the amounts thus reserved
according to a proposal by the Management Board approved by the Supervisory Board.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 248
Report on the audit of the financial statements 2023 included in the Annual Report
Our opinion
In our opinion: The company financial statements comprise:
— the accompanying consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial 1. the company balance sheet as 31 December 2023;
position of Royal Schiphol Group N.V. as at 31 December 2023 and of its result and its cash 2. the company income statement for the year ended 31 December 2023; and
flows for the year then ended, in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards as endorsed 3. the notes comprising a summary of the accounting policies and other explanatory
by the European Union (EU-IFRS) and with Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code; information.
— the accompanying company financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial
position of Royal Schiphol Group N.V. as at 31 December 2023 and of its result for the year Basis for our opinion
then ended in accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
We conducted our audit in accordance with Dutch law, including the Dutch Standards on Auditing. Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described in the ‘Our responsibilities for the audit of
What we have audited the financial statements’ section of our report.
We have audited the financial statements 2023 of Royal Schiphol Group N.V. (‘Schiphol’ or ‘the We are independent of Schiphol in accordance with the ‘Verordening inzake de onafhankelijkheid van
Company’) based in Schiphol. The financial statements include the consolidated financial statements accountants bij assurance-opdrachten’ (ViO, Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, a regulation
and the company financial statements. with respect to independence) and other relevant independence regulations in the Netherlands.
Furthermore, we have complied with the ‘Verordening gedrags- en beroepsregels accountants’ (VGBA,
The consolidated financial statements comprise: Dutch Code of Ethics).
1. the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2023; We designed our audit procedures in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole
2. the following consolidated statements for the year ended 31 December 2023: the statements and in forming our opinion thereon. The information in respect of going concern, fraud and non-
of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flow; and compliance with laws and regulations, climate-related risks and the key audit matters was addressed in
this context, and we do not provide a separate opinion or conclusion on these matters.
3. the notes comprising material accounting policy information and other explanatory
information. We believe the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
opinion.
KPMG Accountants N.V., a Dutch limited liability company registered with the trade register in the Netherlands under number 33263683, is a member firm of the global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee.
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 249
• Materiality of EUR 15 million Materiality significantly changed compared to last year when we used the average consolidated
• 0.8% of Revenue for the year 2023 revenue over the 5-year period 2018-2022 as benchmark, as the revenues for the year 2022 were still
partially impacted by the COVID-19 related travel restrictions. The revenues for the year 2023 are no
longer impacted by this and represent the revenues of the normal, continuing operations of the
Group audit Company. Therefore we determine it appropriate to base our materiality on the revenues for the year
2023 instead of an average over multiple years. We have also taken into account misstatements and/or
• Audit coverage of 93% of total assets possible misstatements that in our opinion are material for the users of the financial statements for
• Audit coverage of 93% of revenue qualitative reasons.
We agreed with the Supervisory Board that misstatements identified during our audit in excess of
EUR 0.75 million would be reported to them, as well as smaller misstatements that in our view must be
Risk of material misstatements related to Fraud, NOCLAR, Going concern and Climate risks
reported on qualitative grounds.
• Fraud risks: we identified the presumed risk of management override of controls and risk on
tendering and contracting of operational assets and further described these in the section
‘Audit response to the risk of fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations’. Our audit
procedures did not reveal indications and/or reasonable suspicion of fraud that are considered Scope of the group audit
material for our audit. Schiphol is at the head of a group of components. The financial information of this group is included in
• Non-compliance with laws and regulations (NOCLAR) risks: no reportable risk of material the financial statements of Schiphol.
misstatements related to NOCLAR risks identified.
Our group audit mainly focused on component Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, with significant activities
• Going concern risks: no risks identified on the use of the going concern basis by management. within the business areas Aviation and Schiphol Commercial for which we have performed audit
• Climate-related risks: no risk of material misstatement for the financial statements identified. procedures ourselves.
We have made use of the work of another auditor for a selected foreign activity, being the investment
in the associate Brisbane Airport Corporation Holdings Ltd., within the business area Alliances &
Key audit matters Participations. We have prepared instructions with procedures to be performed and evaluated the
• Valuation of investment in Hobart Airport outcome of the procedures performed by the other auditor including a review of the findings reported to
us.
• Valuation of investment property
For other group entities, including the activities at Hobart International Airport Pty. Ltd., Terminal 4 of
• Revenue from regulated airport charges
JFK IAT, Eindhoven Airport, Lelystad Airport and Rotterdam The Hague Airport, we performed specific
audit procedures ourselves. For the residual population not in scope we performed analytical
procedures in order to corroborate that our scoping remained appropriate throughout the audit.
By performing the procedures mentioned above at group components, together with additional
procedures at group level, we have been able to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence about
the group’s financial information to provide an opinion about the financial statements.
2
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 250
The audit coverage as stated in the section summary can be further specified as follows: Management override of controls (a presumed risk)
Total assets Risk
Management is in a unique position to manipulate accounting records and prepare fraudulent
89%
Audit of the complete
1%
Audit of specific
4%
Specified audit
financial statements by overriding controls that otherwise appear to be operating effectively.
Our response
reporting package procedures
—
items
We evaluated the design and the implementation of internal controls that mitigate fraud risks,
such as processes related to journal entries. In case of internal control deficiencies, where we
Revenue considered there would be opportunity for fraud, we performed supplemental detailed risk-
based testing.
—
93% 0% 0%
We performed a data analysis of high-risk journal entries intended to identify unusual
combinations of accounts from CAPEX with a direct impact on the operating result. Where we
identified instances of these journal entries or other risks through our data analytics, we
Audit of the complete Audit of specific Specified audit
reporting package items procedures performed additional audit procedures to address each identified risk, including testing of
transactions back to source information.
— We evaluated key estimates and judgments for potential bias by management, including
Audit response to the risk of fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations retrospective reviews of prior years’ estimates, such as for the key audit matters ‘Valuation of
In chapter ‘Risk management’ of the ‘Governance’ section of the Annual Report, the Management investment in Hobart Airport’ and ‘Valuation of investment property’.
Board describes its procedures in respect of the risk of fraud and non-compliance with laws and — We incorporated elements of unpredictability in our audit, including in our asset verification
regulations. The Supervisory Board reflects on this assessment. procedures, challenging of different inputs of the impairment models, in testing completeness
of the flight database and by performing data analytics on the revenue-to-cash cycle.
As part of our audit, we have gained insights into Schiphol and its business environment and
Schiphol’s risk management in relation to fraud and non-compliance. Our procedures included, among
other things, assessing Schiphol’s (supplier) code of conduct, integrity reports and its procedures to
investigate indications of possible fraud and non-compliance, publicly held information in relation to
negative publicity, correspondence with supervisory authorities and regulators, legal confirmation
letters and other positions (‘nevenfuncties’) held by the Management Board and Supervisory Board
members. Furthermore, we performed relevant inquiries with the Management Board, Supervisory
Board and other relevant functions, such as Corporate Risk and Audit Services, the Compliance &
Ethics Officer and the Legal Counsel.
As a result from our risk assessment, we identified the following laws and regulations as those most
likely to have a material effect on the financial statements in case of non-compliance:
• Dutch Aviation Act;
• European tendering regulation;
• Environmental regulation.
We rebutted the presumed fraud risk on revenue recognition, because of the lower complexity and
absence of judgment in accounting for all revenues and the involvement of third parties in the revenue
processes.
Based on the above and on the auditing standards, we identified the following fraud risks that are
relevant to our audit and responded as follows:
3
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 251
Tendering and contracting of operational assets The outcome of our risk assessment procedures did not give reason to perform additional audit
procedures on management’s going concern assessment.
Risk
Potential conflicts of interest when awarding major contracts or when deciding on scope changes Audit response to climate-related risks
regarding operational assets. Schiphol has set out its ambition in which their operations will be zero-emission and zero-waste by
2030 and to function as an energy-positive and fully circular organisation by 2050 in the section ‘Our
Our response
Why, ambition and strategy’ in the Annual Report, including its eight-point plan towards a quieter,
cleaner and better Schiphol. Further, in section ‘Quality of Life’ in the Annual Report, Schiphol
— We evaluated the design and implementation of internal controls related to the awarding of describes its commitment to reaching the targets set out in the Paris climate agreement, which are
contracts and scope changes and controls designed to ensure adherence to EU tender translated into the 2019 Klimaatakkoord ('Dutch Climate Agreement').
requirements. We also evaluated the controls around project risk management, including
segregation of duties, and project progress assessment. Management has updated its detailed risk assessment, against the background of Schiphol’s business
and operations and position in the aviation sector, how climate-related risks and opportunities and
— We performed test of details on a selection of predefined high value scope changes and Schiphol’s own ambitions could have a significant impact on its business and could impose the need to
variation orders (to the extent applicable). adapt its strategy and operations (climate adaptation). Management has considered the impact of both
— We assessed the developments in the ongoing discussion and legal procedures regarding the
transition and physical risks on the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework, for example on assets used for operating activities, such as runways and
termination of the contract with the previous main contractor of the A-Pier to evaluate the
baggage cellars.
completeness of provisions, if any, and the appropriateness of the related disclosures.
Management prepared the financial statements, including considering whether the implications from
Our evaluation of procedures performed related to fraud and non-compliance with laws and regulations climate-related risks and ambitions have been appropriately accounted for and disclosed.
did not result in a key audit matter. As part of our audit we performed a risk assessment of the impact of climate-related risk and
We communicated our risk assessment, audit responses and results to the Management Board and the Schiphol’s ambitions in respect of climate change on the financial statements and our audit approach.
Supervisory Board. Our audit procedures did not reveal indications and/or reasonable suspicion of fraud In doing this we:
and non-compliance that are considered material for our audit.
• assessed management’s assessment and made inquiries of management and the Audit
Committee of the Supervisory Board. We obtained an understanding of the assessment
Audit response to going concern against the background of Schiphol’s business and position in the aviation sector and of the
potential impact of climate-related risk and opportunities on Schiphol’s financial statements
The Management Board has performed its going concern assessment as included on page 174 of the
and Schiphol's preparedness for this;
financial statements and has not identified any going concern risks. Our main procedures to assess the
Management Board’s assessment were: • evaluated potential climate-related fraud risk factors such as the CO² TPI impacting the
variable remuneration of the Management Board and have not identified climate-related
• we considered whether the Management Board’s assessment of the going concern risks
fraud risks for the financial statements 2023;
includes all relevant information of which we are aware as a result of our audit;
• made use of KPMG climate risk experts to assist in understanding how climate-related risks
• we analysed Schiphol’s financial position as at year-end and compared it to the previous
and opportunities may affect the entity and its accounting in the financial statements 2023.
financial year in terms of indicators that could identify going concern risks;
• we inquired with the Management Board on the key assumptions and principles underlying Based on the risk assessment procedures performed above we found that climate-related risks have
no material impact on the current financial statements under the requirements of EU-IFRS and no
the Management Board’s assessment of going concern risks;
material impact on our key audit matters.
• we inspected the financing agreements in terms of conditions that could lead to going
Furthermore we have read the ‘Other information’ in the Annual Report with respect to climate-related
concern risks, including the term of the agreements and any covenants;
risks and considered whether such information contains material inconsistencies with the financial
• we analysed whether the headroom of the ratios included in the financing agreements is statements or our knowledge obtained through the audit, in particular as described above and our
sufficient or if it gives rise to the risk of the covenants in the financing agreements being knowledge obtained otherwise.
breached.
4
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 252
5
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 253
Revenue from regulated airport charges Report on the other information included in the Annual Report
In addition to the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon, the Annual Report contains
Description
other information.
The airport charges for Amsterdam Airport Schiphol are regulated and represent 58% of revenue.
Based on the following procedures performed, we conclude that the other information:
Schiphol publishes the tariffs and conditions on its website annually after consultation with the
aviation sector. Schiphol is partly dependent on airlines for the accuracy of passenger data
(numbers and their composition, where the distinction between departing local passengers and
— is consistent with the financial statements and does not contain material misstatements; and
transfer passengers affects the tariff to be used).
The risk of material misstatement in the revenue from regulated airport charges as a result of an
— contains the information as required by Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code for the
management report and other information.
incorrect classification of passengers in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition
policies is considered a key audit matter due to the significance of revenue to the financial We have read the other information. Based on our knowledge and understanding obtained through our
statements. audit of the financial statements or otherwise, we have considered whether the other information
contains material misstatements.
Our response
By performing these procedures, we comply with the requirements of Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch
Our testing procedures included: Civil Code and the Dutch Standard 720. The scope of the procedures performed is less than the scope
of those performed in our audit of the financial statements.
— We evaluated the design, implementation and operating effectiveness of internal controls
related to the completeness of registrations of passenger numbers and their composition, as The Management Board is responsible for the preparation of the other information, including the
obtained from third parties, and evaluated the design and implementation of internal controls information as required by Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code.
on the tariffs used.
— We carried out substantive audit procedures consisting of analytical analyses of airport Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
charges, including a trend analysis on the amount of passenger-related fees per period. We
performed a number of detailed tests on the source data used for this analysis, such as flight Engagement
movements and passenger numbers per flight.
We were initially appointed by the General Meeting as auditor of Royal Schiphol Group N.V. on 10
— We used data analytics to determine that revenue from airport charges, via accounts February 2014, as of the audit for the year 2014 and have operated as statutory auditor ever since that
receivable, leads to cash receipts. For accounts receivable at the balance sheet date, we also financial year.
assessed this based on subsequent cash receipts.
No prohibited non-audit services
Our observation
We have not provided prohibited non-audit services as referred to in Article 5(1) of the EU Regulation
We found Schiphol’s revenue recognition to be appropriately applied based on the classification of on specific requirements regarding statutory audits of public-interest entities.
the passengers.
6
Consolidated Notes to the consolidated Company Notes to the company
Contents financial statements financial statements financial statements financial statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 254
Responsibilities of the Management Board and the Supervisory Board for the
financial statements
The Management Board is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial
statements in accordance with EU-IFRS and Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code. Furthermore, the
Management Board is responsible for such internal control as management determines is necessary to
enable the preparation of the financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error. In that respect the Management Board, under supervision of the Supervisory
Board, is responsible for the prevention and detection of fraud and non-compliance with laws and
regulations, including determining measures to resolve the consequences of it and to prevent
recurrence.
As part of the preparation of the financial statements, the Management Board is responsible for
assessing the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Based on the financial reporting
frameworks mentioned, the Management Board should prepare the financial statements using the
going concern basis of accounting unless the Management Board either intends to liquidate the
Company or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. The Management Board
should disclose events and circumstances that may cast significant doubt on the company’s ability to
continue as a going concern in the financial statements.
The Supervisory Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process.
7
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 255
Supplementary
information
Historical summary
(in millions of euros, unless
otherwise indicated) 2023 2022 2021 20201 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Balance sheet
Non-current assets 7,723 7,585 7,512 7,852 7,446 6,512 6,040 5,818 5,646 5,413
Current assets 1,531 2,019 2,378 1,428 350 861 615 608 759 415
Total assets 9,254 9,604 9,891 9,280 7,797 7,373 6,655 6,426 6,405 5,829
Equity 3,499 3,506 3,531 3,777 4,372 4,136 3,978 3,860 3,716 3,453
Provisions 68 71 82 100 104 106 79 57 56 57
Non-current liabilities 4,726 5,436 5,846 4,521 2,721 2,474 2,225 2,172 2,021 1,987
Current liabilities 962 591 433 883 599 656 373 337 612 334
Total equity and liabilities 9,254 9,604 9,891 9,280 7,797 7,373 6,655 6,426 6,405 5,830
1 Comparative figures before 2020 have not been restated due to a change in definitions. Reference is made to the notes on the next page.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 257
Ratios 2
Operating result as % of revenue 0.3 -10.2 -17.8 -77.1 24.5 24.4 24.6 29.3 35.5 27.3
(Underlying) Return on average equity
to shareholder in % (ROE) 3 2.9 -2.5 3.0 -13.8 8.3 7.0 7.2 8.2 10.4 8.0
Return on Average Capital Employed in
%4 0.5 -1.3 -1.6 -8.1 7.5 7.2 7.2 8.2 10.1 8.4
FFO/Net debt in %5 11.8 7.4 -0.6 -3.9 20.5 18.7 21.6 22.8 22.0 26.5
FFO interest coverage ratio 6.7 4.5 0.7 -0.6 7.5 6.6 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.4
Net Leverage 6 7.5 10.1 n/a -18.5 3.8 38.9 35.2 34.9 37.0 35.0
Personnel
Average effective full-time 2,820 2,487 2,474 2,711 2,519 2,324 2,180 2,063 2,000 2,039
equivalent employees
1 Comparative figures before 2012 have not been restated due to adoption of IFRS 11.
2 For definitions, reference is made to Key figures unless stated in the notes below.
3 Before 2020, ROE is calculated as net result attributable to shareholder / average total equity to shareholder.
4 Operating result + result and interest associates / average of equity + interest-bearing debt.
5 Before 2020, FFO / Total debt was calculated as funds from operations (cash flow from operating activities before changes in working capital) / interest-bearing debt.
6 Before 2020 Net leverage was calculated as (Interest-bearing debt - cash and cash equivalents*) / EBITDA. *Cash and cash equivalents for this calculation include deposits > 3 Months.
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 258
Glossary
8-point plan Quieter, Cleaner, Better is given every opportunity to come up with innovative, out-of-the looked at from all angles. With CT security scanners, passengers
Eight specific measures that Schiphol believes are necessary for box solutions, if applicable do not have to take their laptop or liquids out of their hand
an airport and aviation sector that are more in balance with luggage anymore
the world around them. With these measures, Schiphol wants to Bird strike
provide perspective for the local community, employees and the Bird strikes are incidents in which dead birds or bird remains are EBIT
aviation sector. found on an aircraft or a runway, and for which it can reasonably Earnings before interest and tax
be assumed that the strike occurred within the airport boundaries
Air transport movements EBITDA
Commercial air transport movements (not carried out by the BPVS Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation
military, police, etc.) Public-private platform: Beveiliging en Publieke Veiligheid
Schiphol (Security and Public Safety Schiphol) Full freighter destination
Airport Carbon Accreditation Effective from 2018, full freighter destinations are defined as
Benchmark for the Airports Council International (ACI) sector BREEAM examples of more than 100,000 kilogrammes of cargo being
association. This benchmark helps provide insight into airports’ Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment being shipped to and from a destination in at least ten
efforts to reduce CO2e emissions Method (BREEAM) certification is awarded by the Dutch Green frequencies during a single year
Building Council
BAS Ground noise
The Local Community Contact Centre (BAS) is the information Business area Ground noise is low-frequency noise-producing vibrations that
and complaints centre to which local residents can address their A functional cluster of activities within the Schiphol can cause disturbance. It is perceived differently from ‘regular’
questions and complaints concerning air traffic at Amsterdam Group organisation noise, and is more often felt than heard. Low-frequency noise is
Airport Schiphol. BAS is a joint initiative of Air Traffic Control the produced by aircraft taking off on the runway
Netherlands (LVNL) and Amsterdam Airport Schiphol Catchment area
Area from which passengers travel to and from Amsterdam Hub airport
BCI Airport Schiphol by road or rail A large airport where continental and intercontinental flights are
BCI (Building Circularity Index) is a way to determine the available. Schiphol is the hub for KLM and (codeshare) partners
circularity, by taking into account, among other things, the CO2e emissions
circularity of the products that form a building, the origins and A carbon dioxide equivalent or CO2 equivalent, is a metric Hub connectivity
future possibilities of materials used, and the possibilities of measure used to compare the emissions from various greenhouse Hub connectivity measures the number of connecting flights per
disassembly. BCI is in line with the definition of Alba concepts gases based on their global-warming potential. By converting week that can be facilitated by the hub airport in question - taking
amounts of other gases to the equivalent amount of carbon into account minimum and maximum connecting times, and
Best Value dioxide with the same global warming potential. weighting the quality of the connections by the detour involved
Best Value (Procurement Performance) is a method for organising and connecting times
large tenders. The aim is to find the expert that is most capable of CT
carrying out the project at the lowest possible cost throughout its 3D Computer Tomography, makes use of computer-processed HVAC systems
lifecycle (‘total cost’). Best Value assumes that it is not the client combinations of X-ray measurements in such a way that a HVAC stands for heating, ventilation and air conditioning
but the contractor who is the expert. This means that the expert three-dimensional image is generated, which can be rotated and (including cooling)
Contents Introduction About us and our Why Our results Governance Socio-economic accountability Financial Statements Royal Schiphol Group - 2023 Annual Report 259
www.schiphol.nl
www.schiphol.nl/annualreport
Editors
Royal Schiphol Group, Schiphol, the Netherlands
Narrative Labs, The Hague, the Netherlands
Photography
Royal Schiphol Group, Schiphol, the Netherlands
Cover picture
On the cover: Moustafa Al Shebini, team leader at handling
company Aviapartner, at the lifting aid in baggage hall South.