Solr202301026 Sup 0001 Suppdata s1
Solr202301026 Sup 0001 Suppdata s1
Chenxi Zhao, Bowen Liu, Fuyan Chen, Jiaxin Gao, Xinan Shi,* and Daocheng Pan*
State Key Laboratory of Featured Metal Materials and Life-cycle Safety for Composite
Structures; Guangxi Key Laboratory of Processing for Non-ferrous Metals and
Featured Materials; MOE Key Laboratory of New Processing Technology for
Nonferrous Metals and Materials; School of Resources, Environment and Materials,
Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Before After
FTO
ITO
Figure S1. Photograph of plain FTO (a and b) and ITO (c and d) electrodes before (a
1
FTO-Before FTO-After
ITO-Before ITO-After
Figure S2. The sheet resistance measurements of plain FTO (a and b) and ITO (c and
d) electrodes before (a and c) and after (b and d) the selenization at 530oC for 15 min.
2
40
Current density (mA/cm2)
30
20 0nm MoO3
10nm MoO3
15nm MoO3
10 20nm MoO3
25nm MoO3
0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Voltage (V)
Figure S3. J-V curves of the best CIGSSe solar cell device on FTO substrate
3
40
Current density (mA/cm2)
30
PCE=14.83%
20
VOC=0.59 mV
JSC=35.81 mA/cm2
10 FF=69.71%
0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Voltage (V)
Figure S4. I-V curve and the correspoding photovoltaic parameters of the best spin-
4
1.0 40
34.66 mA/cm2
20
0.4
Rearside 10
0.2 5.1
0.0 0
400 600 800 1000 1200
Wavelength (nm)
Figure S5. EQE and integrated Jsc curves as well as the band gap of CIGSSe solar cell
5
Table S1. The photovoltaic parameters of the best CIGSSe solar cell devices
with/without MoO3 interface layer.