Land Use and Beyond - Unraveling Environmental Determinants of Odonate Assemblages in Northeastern Algeria
Land Use and Beyond - Unraveling Environmental Determinants of Odonate Assemblages in Northeastern Algeria
a
Laboratoire de Conservation des Zones humides. Université 8 Mai 1945 Guelma, Algeria
b
Department of Ecology. University 8 Mai 1945 Guelma, Algeria
c
Department of Biology. University Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria
*Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]
as Ramsar sites, highlighting their central role in inter- velocity, substrate, helophytes, etc.) and the composi-
national conservation efforts (Samraoui & Samraoui, tion and diversity of odonates, which include a group
2008). Yet, amidst their ecological significance, their of threatened species. In particular, by assessing the
role as refuges for endangered fish, amphibians and effects of landscape cover and land use on odonate as-
aquatic insects has often been eclipsed by ornithologi- semblages, the study can help identify potential man-
cal considerations. While the importance of odonates agement strategies that can help protect and conserve
in Algerian wetlands, particularly in the El Kala region, these important organisms and their habitats in North
has been recognized since the 19th century (Sélys-Long- Africa.
champs, 1849, 1865), certain areas remain unexplored
despite published efforts (Samraoui & Corbet, 2000;
Samraoui & Menaï, 1999). Materials and methods
Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata), often referred to as Study area description
“guardians of the watershed” (Clausnitzer & Jödicke,
2004), have special ecological significance, serving as The survey was conducted in northeastern Algeria (Fig-
indicators of the health of aquatic habitat and the ad- ure 1). It focused on four different regions, each char-
jacent environment (Chovanec, 2000; Ferreras-Romero acterized by different climatic regimes, from the humid
et al., 2009). However, it is important to note some conditions of Collo (Skikda) to the semi-arid environ-
odonates act as indicators of polluted areas (Bouhala et ments of Oum El Bouaghi, Batna, and Khenchela (Bou-
al., 2019; Campos et al., 2014). They also provide vari- cenna et al., 2023).
ous ecosystem services that have provisioning, cultural, Collo, an important town, is located 71 kilometers
supporting and regulatory functions and benefit hu- northeast of Skikda. It is nestled in the Atlas-Tellian
man society (Simaika & Samways, 2008). The intricate Mountains, which stretch from northwestern Tunisia
life cycles of Odonata provide critical linkages between to northeastern Morocco. The region has a Mediterra-
aquatic and terrestrial communities (Remsburg & Turn- nean climate with distinct seasons: a hot and dry sum-
er, 2009). mer and a cold and humid winter. The average annual
Due to anthropogenic changes, habitat loss and rainfall varies between 800 and 1400 mm, while the
degradation are widespread across the Earth’s surface average annual temperature is 20.2°C (Boudemagh et
(Ellis & Ramakatty, 2008; Smith, 2007). Despite their al., 2013). Sampling in the region was carried out at five
ecological value, freshwater ecosystems in which odo- river basins (Figure 2a).
nates thrive face major challenges worldwide (Abell, Oum el Bouaghi, a wetland complex, spans the east-
2002; Brautigam, 1999). These ecosystems are among ern Hauts Plateaux. This region forms a bridge between
the most endangered on Earth and are under severe the Mediterranean Sea and the Sahara Desert and in-
threat from habitat destruction, modification and pol- cludes mountains, valleys and plateaus. The climate is
lution due to factors such as drainage, dams, water semi-arid and is characterized by an average annual
withdrawals, pollution and invasive species (Dudgeon temperature of 17.51°C and an annual rainfall of less
et al., 2006; Malmqvist & Rundle, 2002). The resulting than 350 mm. The region is dominated by steppe veg-
impacts on biota have led to a rapid decline in the struc- etation and is interspersed with temporary salt lakes
tural integrity of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems called “chotts”, “garaas” or “sebkhas”. Nine different
(Hallmann et al., 2017; Romero et al., 2021; Sánchez- wetlands were studied in this area, including chotts,
Bayo & Wyckhuys, 2019; Wagner, 2020). garaas, sebkhas, dams and four intermittent streams
A targeted research program aimed to understand (wadis or oueds) (Figure 2d).
the crucial role of odonates in North African wetlands The Aures Massif lies to the east amidst the foot-
and to develop targeted conservation strategies. This hills of the Sahara Atlas. The region lies between the
involved exploring the complex relationships between northeastern Hauts Plateaux and the southern Saharan
odonate assemblages and their environmental condi- Depression and has a wide climatic range. The north-
tions (Samraoui & Corbet, 2000). While the research ern slopes are characterized by cool winters with tem-
covered a significant part of northern Algeria, the fo- peratures below 4°C, while the southern slopes have
cus was on individual freshwater ecosystems, provid- milder winters with temperatures around 13°C. Sum-
ing insights into taxonomic richness, environmental mers are characterized by hot and dry conditions, with
influences and life history strategies. Despite the nar- temperatures ranging from 30 to 39°C (Dambri et al.,
row focus on isolated habitats, these studies provided 2020). Sampling in this region included four temporary
valuable insights into complex ecological dynamics. streams (Figure 2c) and one sebkha.
The culmination of these efforts made a modest con- Finally, the Khenchela region occupies the north-
tribution to substantial knowledge of odonate inter- ernmost tip of the Aurès massif and is located approxi-
actions in North African wetlands, as documented in mately 120 kilometers southeast of Constantine. The
various studies (Bouhala et al., 2019 and references region has different altitudes, ranging from 26 m be-
therein). low sea level (Chott Melghir) to 2169 m above sea level
This study focuses on the relationships between en- (Djebel Chelia). Sampling in the region included seven
vironmental factors (land use and cover, altitude, flow intermittent streams (Figure 2b).
L1 O. Beni Zid 36.9071889 6.4756389 79 Permanent L23 Jemott_2 35.6510694 7.0118417 829,2 Temporary
L2 O. Tizagbane 37.0109472 6.3748806 492 Permanent L24 Ourkis Dam_1 35.8969056 6.9274639 946,5 Permanent
L3 O. Tamanart_S1 37.0305278 6.5054389 47 Permanent L25 Ourkis Dam_2 35.8930000 6.9300667 946,7 Permanent
L4 O. Tamanart_S2 37.0489000 6.5147083 14 Permanent L26 Touzline_1 35.9376028 6.9373528 994,8 Permanent
L5 O. Kfayoun 36.9378333 6.3020306 194 Temporary L27 Touzline_2 35.9383417 6.9388472 996,6 Permanent
L6 O. Zhor_S1 36.9070333 6.3196333 28 Permanent L29 O. Zerhaib_0 35.8511000 6.3823444 798,4 Temporary
L7 O. Zhor_S2 36.9142611 6.2914694 18 Permanent L33 Tinsilt_2 35.8992306 6.4768556 785,9 Temporaire
L9 O. Guebli_S1 36.8008000 6.6651361 61 Permanent L37 L.Ezzemoul_1 35.8890083 6.5061778 791,2 Temporaire
L10 O. Guebli_S2 36.8600722 6.6151278 31 Permanent L44 O. Lazrag_1 35.3587528 6.7512194 1214 Permanent
L11 O. Gratam 36.7937250 6.6266528 108 Temporary L45 O. Lazrag_2 35.3579417 6.7536528 1201 Permanent
L13 O. Dhimine 35.9969889 7.2797194 803,2 Temporary L51 O. Ibikan_2 35.4056667 6.9662167 1110 Temporary
L14 O. Dahmen_0 36.0086889 7.2337028 817,7 Permanent L52 O. Ibikan_3 35.4120000 6.9641500 1071 Permanent
L15 O. Dahmen_1 36.0203333 7.2487500 799,3 Permanent L53 O. Ibikan_4 35.4185167 6.9502333 1038 Permanent
L16 O. Dahmen_2 36.0406778 7.2732306 779 Permanent L63 O. Rbaa_S2 35.4580333 6.5185667 1040 Permanent
L17 O. Dahmen_3 36.0533583 7.3260972 754,5 Permanent L64 O. Rbaa_S3 35.4898333 6.5354500 1011 Permanent
L18 O. Dahmen_4 36.0581139 7.3401889 746,9 Permanent L66 O. Lakhal_S2 35.3686833 6.6508500 1303 Temporary
L19 Timerganine_1 35.6486528 6.9646778 836 Temporary L67 O. Lakhal_S3 35.3807667 6.6504167 1246 Temporary
L20 Timerganine_2 35.6469194 6.9647889 835,3 Temporary L68 O. Bouilef_S1 35.6173917 6.1872972 1033 Permanent
L21 Timerganine_3 35.6450000 6.9658139 836,1 Temporary L70 O. Bouilef_S3 35.5971722 6.2145861 1000 Temporary
L22 jemott_1 35.6455667 7.0125472 832,7 Temporary L73 O. Labiod_S3 35.0504333 6.1682833 1226 Temporary
Figure 2. Four views of sampling sites: (a) O. Guebli_S1 (L9, Collo); (b) O. Ibikan_S3 (L52, Khenchela); O. Bouzina_S2 (L75,
Batna), Touzline_1 (L26, Oum El Bouaghi).
Helophyte Hydrophyte
Current Bed width Water depth
Code vegetation vegetation Substrate Land use
velocity (m/s) (m) (cm)
(%) (%)
L1 0.47 ± 0.21 4.33 ± 0.58 16.64 ± 2.2 0 0 Sand, Pebbles-boulders Forest
L2 0.47 ± 0.12 5.6 ± 0.75 21.33 ± 1.72 3 0 Sand, Pebbles-boulders Forest
L3 0.44 ± 0.25 6.68 ± 0.95 19.83 ± 5.37 0 0 Sand, Pebbles-boulders Forest
L4 0.58 ± 0.29 8.83 ± 2.82 20.83 ± 5.72 1 1 Sand, Pebbles-boulders Forest
L5 0.26 ± 0.22 1.64 ± 0.67 6 ± 5.24 3 0 Sand, Pebbles-boulders Forest
L6 0.64 ± 0.18 13.12 ± 2.57 27.33 ± 10.59 1 0 Sand, Pebbles-boulders Forest
L7 0.56 ± 0.15 8.7 ± 1.42 39.63 ± 14.66 15 0 Sand Agriculture
L9 0.65 ± 0.45 7.58 ± 1.32 14.67 ± 4.27 15 0 Sand Rural
L10 0.71 ± 0.23 11.73 ± 0.42 34.33 ± 4.89 7 0 Sand Rural
L11 0.11 ± 0.01 1 ± 0.7 2.5 ± 0.7 0 0 Sand, Pebbles-boulders Rural
L13 0.17 ± 0.22 1.5 ± 0.42 24 ± 3.28 5 2 Silt, Pebbles_boulders Agriculture
L14 0.05 ± 0.04 1 ± 0.34 16.63 ± 2.5 10 1 Sand, Pebbles_boulders Agriculture
L15 0.06 ± 0.04 2 ± 1.44 20.5 ± 4.5 3 1 Sand, Pebbles_boulders Agriculture
L16 0.06 ± 0.05 1.66 ± 0.45 28.3 ± 3.23 3 5 Sand, Pebbles_boulders Agriculture
L17 0.09 ± 0.03 8.19 ± 1.15 27.44 ± 5.59 30 1 Silt, Sand Agriculture
L18 0.47 ± 0.22 2.35 ± 0.36 23.16 ± 3.76 5 1 Silt, Sand, Pebbles_boulders Agriculture
L19 – 21.25 ± 5.15 – 40 1 Silt Agriculture
L20 – 23.54 ± 4.89 – 5 2 Silt Agriculture
L21 – 20.38 ± 3.46 – 30 2 Silt Agriculture
L22 – 30.17 ± 8.91 – 6 6 Silt, Sand Pastoralism
L23 – 26.3 ± 6.5 – 5 5 Silt, Sand, Pebbles_boulders Pastoralism
L24 – 31.75 ± 4.59 – 1 1 Silt, Sand, Pebbles_boulders Pastoralism
L25 – 25.38 ± 4.98 – 1 2 Silt, Sand, Pebbles_boulders Pastoralism
L26 – 25.36 ± 6.14 – 5 1 Silt Agriculture
L27 – 34.55 ± 5.65 – 15 2 Silt Agriculture
L29 0.064 ± 0.06 2.13 ± 0.2 14.5 ± 3.27 5 2 Silt Agriculture
L33 – 12.33 ± 3.21 – 5 1 Silt, Sand Agriculture
L37 – 18.88 ± 3.68 – 5 1 Silt Agriculture
L44 2.68 ± 0.43 14.83 ± 0.38 15.08 ± 4.56 5 1 Silt Rural
L45 2.6 ± 7.23 19.83 ± 0.57 34.33 ± 13.73 5 4 Silt Rural
L51 2.06 ± 0.79 9.16 ± 2.88 16.5 ± 8.87 4 0 Clay, Boulders Forest
L52 2.55 ± 0.51 20 ± 0 13.33 ± 3.02 3 0 Silt Rural
L53 2.98 ± 0.61 40 ± 0 13.41 ± 5.99 4 1 Clay Agriculture
L63 0.13 ± 0.04 4.043 ± 1.63 22.69 ± 4.79 20 5 Clay, boulders Pastoralism
L64 0.37 ± 0.3 3.068 ± 1.75 16.15 ± 13.29 50 20 Silt, Pebbles and boulders Rural
L66 0.35 ± 0.24 5.019 ± 1.34 16.85 ± 3.26 30 15 Pebbles, Sand and boulders Agriculture
L67 0.49 ± 0.26 5.062 ± 1.37 25.46 ± 6.29 60 20 Clay, boulders Rural
L68 0.32 ± 0.13 3.032 ± 0.69 22.11 ± 8.11 30 15 Silt, Sand and boulders Forest
L70 0.31 ± 0.11 2.058 ± 0.69 12 ± 3.9 40 10 Clay, Sand and Pebbles Agriculture
L73 0.41 ± 0.37 8.028 ± 2.22 16.22 ± 3.23 10 20 Silt, Pebbles Agriculture
walking slowly and repeatedly over all microhabitats, total abundance was calculated cumulatively for each
covering an area of 100 m² for fifteen minutes. All col- odonate species. Due to the limited sample size of
lected larvae were stored in 80% ethanol until subse- adults, their separate analysis was not considered justi-
quent sorting and identification in the laboratory. fied and the analyses focused solely on the larvae. To
ensure the robustness of our statistical analyses, we
Statistical analysis conducted an exploratory data analysis (EDA) following
the guidelines of Zuur et al. (2010). This preliminary in-
The measurements of environmental variables (flow vestigation aimed to identify potential violations of the
velocity, water depth, helophytes and hydrophytes) underlying assumptions of the statistical techniques
were averaged over the entire study period, while the used. Pairwise Pearson correlations showed strong col-
linearity between altitude and latitude. The density of the rich odonate biodiversity in our study area. Most
of helophytes also showed a high correlation with the notably, the families Coenagrionidae, Gomphidae and
density of hydrophytes. In addition, the EDA, through Libellulidae were the most widely distributed. Diver-
graphical plots, indicated potential spatial correlations sity within the Libellulidae stood out with seven spe-
for altitude, flow velocity, bed width, helophytes and cies, followed by the Coenagrionidae with five species.
hydrophytes. Lestidae and Aeshnidae ranked third with three species
Given these results of the EDA, it was decided to each. Calopterygidae, Platycnemididae and Gomphidae
exclude the covariates “latitude” and “hydrophytes” each had a single representative. Two species, Lestes
from further analyses. This step was taken to ensure virens and Orthetrum chrysostigma, were only record-
that subsequent statistical analyses were not unduly ed in their adult stage, while Erythromma viridulum,
influenced by potentially collinear or redundant vari- Boyeria irene and Onychogomphus uncatus were only
ables, thereby improving the interpretability and reli- recorded in their larval stage.
ability of our final results. A non-metric multidimen-
sional scaling analysis (NMDS) based on Bray-Curtis Abundance
dissimilarity was performed on a matrix of 37 sites
and 18 species to find a low-dimensional mapping to Among the recorded species, O. uncatus and Ischnura
Euclidean space that best preserves the rank order of graellsii were the most abundant (Figure 3a). The Tizag
the dissimilarity matrix. To account for asymmetry in bane site (L2, Collo) was characterized by exceptional
the distribution of species, a Hellinger transformation, abundance of odonates, in contrast to other streams
known for its usefulness in pre-processing abundance in the same vicinity, which had low populations (Fig-
data (Legendre & Borcard, 2018), was applied to the ure 3b). Interestingly, selected wetlands in the Oum El
relative abundances of species before performing a Bouaghi region (L19, L21-23, L26) showed a remarkable
two-dimensional NMDS. abundance of odonates, a phenomenon not reflected
Environmental vector fitting using linear regression in the streams of the Batna region, characterized by
was performed using the “envfit” function to assess lower abundance.
the correlation between the environmental variables
(both continuous variables and centroids of the levels Species richness
of class variables) and the sample ordination. Similarly,
the function “ordisurf” was used to fit a smooth sur- A closer look at species distribution revealed that
face using a thin plate spline fit in generalized addi- I. graellsii and Anax parthenope were the most wide-
tive models (GAM) and interpolate the fitted values. spread, spanning 16 sites (Table 3). However, this dis-
To confirm the influence of significant environmental tribution pattern did not extend uniformly to the two
factors on the odonate assemblages, a permutation Maghrebian endemics, Platycnemis subdilatata (LC)
analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was performed us- and Enallagma deserti (LC). While P. subdilatata was
ing the function “adonis2” with 1000 permutations. widespread, E. deserti remained restricted to specific
The “betasurf” function was used to assess significant sites in the Hauts Plateaux. The range of species rich-
spatial variation in the dispersion of multivariate eco- ness, which ranged from one to nine, reflected the pat-
logical data. This analysis was particularly important in tern of odonate abundance. Lotic and lentic habitats in
cases where conventional PERMANOVA had difficulty the Oum El Bouaghi region proved to be the hotspots
distinguishing between location and dispersion effects of species richness, while certain wadis in the Collo and
(Anderson et al., 2006). To assess the importance of Batna regions had much lower values (Figure 4).
fitted models and to preserve the spatial dependence
between stations, we used restricted permutation Non-Metric Dimensional Scaling (NMDS)
tests where the data were shuffled with completely
randomization within blocks (regions). NMDS, vector The two-dimensional mapping by NMDS converged to
fitting and restricted PERMANOVA tests were per- a stress value of 0.06 and an R² value between the or-
formed using the ‘vegan’ package (Oksanen et al., dination distance and observed (Euclidian) similarity of
2022) in the statistical software R (R Development 0.99. The NMDS map indicated relatively distinct odo-
Core Team, 2023). nate assemblages (Figure 5) with close similarities be-
tween Collo and Khenchela, both well separated from
Oum El Bouaghi and Batna. The lentic and resource-rich
Results sites (L22, L23, L26, L27) in the Oum El Bouaghi region,
characterized by an assemblage of odonates made up
We documented 2136 individuals, including 1948 lar- of Sympecma fusca, Sympetrum fonscolombii, S. strio-
vae and 188 adults, at 40 different sites. The results of latum and Crocothemis erythraea, was separated from
our study reveal a diverse odonate group comprising 21 the rest.
species distributed in seven families. Of particular note, In addition, the NMDS ordination effectively sepa-
our results include ten Zygoptera and eleven Aniso rated the lotic habitats of Oum El Bouaghi and, to a
ptera species (Table 3), providing a detailed snapshot lesser extent, Batna, from their counterparts in Collo
Table 3. Checklist of odonates recorded in the study area with list of localities.
Figure 3. Species abundance in the study area (a); abundance of odonates in sampled localities (b).
Figure 5. NMDS Bray-Curtis ordination of odonate assemblages from four regions of north-eastern Algeria.
early correlated with the NMDS ordination, whereas lon- + Helophytes + Substrate+ Hydroperiod + Longitude), a
gitude and water depth were not (p > 0.05). In addition, restricted PERMANOVA analysis of odonate assembag-
the use of the function of ordisurf indicated a significant es of the study area suggested that only bed width (R² =
nonlinear relationship of longitude with the NMDS ordi- 0.06; p = 0.01) (Figure 6), current velocity (R² = 0.08;
nation (p < 1.9e-05; deviance explained = 61%). p = 0.03), and to a lesser extent, land use (R² = 0.23; p =
To assess the importance of the fitted model (Od 0.06) and altitude (R² = 0.03; p = 0.06) were significant
~ Land_use + Bed_width + Altitude + Current_Velocity (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Relationships between odonate assemblages and measured environmental factors: Flow velocity (ms-1): color gradi-
ent, land use: symbols, and latitude (m a.s.l.): size.
physical and biotic factors, plays a crucial role in shaping regions would have undoubtedly improved the study
community structure (Wellborn et al., 1996). Although which did not include the shallow freshwater lakes and
there is a considerable overlap in species composition brackish marshes of Numidia. Similarly, the study area
between intermittent and perennial streams (del Rosa- lacked large flood plain rivers. Expanding the study to
rio & Resh, 2000), taxa with shorter life cycles tend to exuviae and larvae in addition to adults could also pro-
dominate habitats with intermediate to short hydrope- vide a more comprehensive view of assemblage struc-
riods (Marques Pires et al., 2017a, b). tures in these wadis. Consideration of these limitations
This emphasises the importance of temporary, fish- directs future research in promising directions, such as
less habitats that develop during dry periods and pro- the study of interactions between specific environmen-
vide a unique opportunity for odonates to thrive (Dorn, tal factors and odonate life histories. It is expected that
2008; Wellborn et al., 1996). Odonate communities a thorough investigation of these interactions could re-
in intermittent habitats have species with specialised veal hidden ecological relationships and thus improve
adaptations that allow them to withstand the hot, dry our understanding of odonate assemblages.
Mediterranean summers (Aguero-Pelegrin & Ferreras-
Romero, 1992; Samraoui, 2009; Samraoui et al., 1998). Acknowledgments
The temporal rhythm inherent in Mediterranean aquat-
ic systems remains of paramount importance and em- We are most grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their comments
phasises the ecological dynamics that determine the and helpful suggestions. This study was supported by the Algerian
Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique
distribution of odonates and their responses to envi-
(M.E.S.R.S./P.R.F.U.).
ronmental gradients.
All of these studies expanded our understanding of
odonate responses to environmental change and shed References
light on the intricate interactions that determine their
distribution and abundance in different habitats. One Abell, R. (2002). Conservation biology for the biodiversity crisis: a fresh-
water follow-up. Conservation Biology, 16, 1435–1437. doi:10.1046/
notable observation is the marked divergence in habi- j.1523-1739.2002.01532.x
tat preferences between Anisoptera and Zygoptera, Aguero-Pelegrin, M. & Ferreras-Romero, M. (1992). Dynamics of a drag-
which emphasises the multi-layered nature of habitat onfly community in a man-made lake of the Sierra Morena, Andalu-
selection and ecological adaptation within the order sia, southern Spain (Odonata). Opuscula Zoologica Fluminensia, 83,
Odonata (Worthen et al., 2021). 1–7.
The elucidation of these relationships provides valu- Anderson, M. J., Ellingsen, K. E. & McArdle, B. (2006). Multivariate dis-
persion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecology Letters, 96, 683–693.
able insights into the habitat preferences and ecological doi:10.1111/J.1461-0248.2006.00926.X
resilience of different odonate species. These findings Apodaca, C. K. & Chapman, L. J. (2004). Larval damselflies in extreme
have significant implications for species conservation environments: behavioral and physiological response to hypoxic
efforts and help formulate informed decisions about stress. Journal of Insect Physiology, 50, 767–775. doi:10.1016/j.jins-
habitat conservation, restoration, and management phys.2004.05.007
strategies (Morrison et al., 2006). Thus, the observed Barbosa de Oliveira-Junior, J. M., De Marco, P., Dias-Silva, K., Pereira
differences between odonate assemblages in different Leitão, R., Gontijo Leal, C., Santos Pompeu, P. et al. (2017). Effects of
human disturbance and riparian conditions on Odonata (Insecta) as-
regions require a comprehensive study of the under- semblages in eastern Amazon basin streams. Limnologica 66, 31–39.
lying factors. Geographic location, land use type and doi:10.1016/j.limno.2017.04.007
stream flow are proving to be critical factors influencing Benslimane, N., Chakri, K., Haiahem, D., Guelmami, A., Samraoui, F. &
these regional differences (Walters & Post, 2011). The Samraoui, B. (2019). Anthropogenic stressors are driving a steep de-
unique assemblages of odonates in each region empha- cline of hemipteran diversity in dune ponds in north-eastern Algeria.
Journal of Insect Conservation, 23, 475–488. doi:10.1007/s10841-
sise the distinctiveness of each ecosystem and highlight 019-00133-1
the importance of incorporating these differences into Blondel, J. & Aronson, J. (1999). Biology and wildlife of the Mediterra-
conservation strategies. nean region. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
By analysing the numerous factors that influence Bonada, N., Rieradevali, M. & Prat, N. (2007). Macroinvertebrate com-
odonate diversity, we can gain a more nuanced under- munity structure and biological traits related to flow permanence
standing of the complex dynamics that shape odonate in a Mediterranean river network. Hydrobiologia, 589, 91–106.
doi:10.1007/s10750-007-0723-5
assemblages at both the habitat and landscape levels.
This comprehensive understanding, which includes an- Boucenna, H., Satour, A., Hezil, W., Taferghoust, M., Samraoui, F. &
Samraoui, B. (2023). Diversity, distribution, and conservation of
thropogenic and natural drivers, facilitates the imple- the Trichoptera and their habitats in north-eastern Algeria. Aquatic
mentation of effective management measures aimed Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 33, 502–516.
at minimising biodiversity loss (Renner et al., 2018; doi:10.1002/aqc.3931
Seidu et al., 2017). Although this study offers valuable Bouchelouche, D., Kherbouche-Abrous, O., Mebarki, M., Arab, A. &
insights, it is essential to recognize its limitations for Samraoui, B. (2015). The Odonata of Wadi Isser (Kabylia, Algeria):
status and environmental determinants of their distribution. Revue
objective interpretation. Potential limitations, such as d’Ecologie (Terre & Vie), 70, 248–260. doi:10.3406/revec.2015.1787
sampling bias or unaccounted variables, could have po- Boudemagh, N., Bendali-Saoudi, F. & Soltani, N. 2013. Inventory of Culici-
tentially influenced the results. Increasing the altitudi- dae (Diptera: Nematocera) in the region of Collo (North-east Algeria).
nal gradient, habitat heterogeneity and the number of Annals of Biological Research, 4, 94–99.
Bouhala, Z., Khemissa, C., Márquez-Rodríguez, J., Ferreras-Romero, M., Goertzen, D. & Suhling, F. (2012). Promoting dragonfly diversity in cities:
Samraoui, F. & Samraoui, B. (2019). Ecological correlates of odonate major determinants and implications for urban pond design. Journal
assemblages of a Mediterranean stream, Wadi Cherf, northeastern of Insect Conservation, 17, 399–409. doi:10.1007/s10841-012-9522-z
Algeria: implications for conservation. International Journal of Odo- Gómez-Anaya, J. A., Novelo-Gutiérrez, R. & Campbell, W. B. (2011). Di-
natology, 22, 181–197. doi:10.1080/13887890.2019.1688199 versity and distribution of Odonata (Insecta) larvae along an altitudi-
Brautigam, A. (1999). The freshwater biodiversity crisis. World Conserva- nal gradient in Coalcomán mountains, Michoacán, Mexico. Revista de
tion, 30, 4–5. Biologia Tropical, 59(4). doi:10.15517/rbt.v59i4.3420
Buchwald, R. (1992). Vegetation and dragonfly fauna – Characteristics Hallmann, C. A., Sorg, M., Jongejans, E., Siepel, H., Hofland, N., Schwan,
and examples of biocenological field studies. Vegetation, 101, 99– H. et al. (2017). More than 75 percent decline over 25 years in total
107. doi:10.1007/BF00033195 flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE, 12, e0185809.
Campbell, W. B., Novelo-Gutiérrez, R. & Gómez-Anaya, J. A. (2010). Dis- doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185809
tribution of odonate richness and diversity with elevation depend on He, J., Chu, A., Ryan, M. C., Valeo, C., Zaitlin, B. (2011). Abiotic influence
windward and leeward aspects: implications for research and con- on dissolved oxygen in a riverine environment. Ecological Engineer-
servation planning. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 3, 302–312. ing, 37, 1804–1814. doi:10.1016/J.Ecoleng.2011.06.022
doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00108.x Henrikson, B.-I. (1993). Sphagnum mosses as a microhabitat for inver-
Campos, F., Velasco, T., Sanz, G., Casanueva, P., Albuquerque, M. T. D. & tebrates in acidified lakes and the colour adaptation and substrate
Antunes, I. M. H. R. (2014). Ischnura graellsii (Insecta: Odonata). A preference in Leucorrhinia dubia (Odonata, Anisoptera). Ecography,
water pollution biovulnerability indicator – Probability mapping us- 16, 143–153. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587-1993.tb00066.x
ing spatial uncertainty. River Research and Applications, 32, 483–489. Hofmann, T. A. & Mason, C. F. (2005). Habitat characteristics and the dis-
doi:10.1002/rra.2839 tribution of Odonata in a lowland river catchment in eastern England.
Chovanec, A. (2000). Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) as indicators of the Hydrobiologia, 539, 137–147. doi:10.1007/s10750-004-3916-1
ecological integrity of aquatic systems – a new assessment approach. Kietzka, G. J., Pryke, J. S. & Samways, M. J. (2014). Landscape ecologi-
Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie, 27, 887–890. cal networks are successful in supporting a diverse dragonfly assem-
doi:10.1080/03680770.1998.11901366 blage. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 8, 229–237. doi:10.1111/
Clausnitzer, V. & Jödicke, R. (Eds.) (2004). Guardians of the watershed. icad.12099
Global status of dragonflies: critical species, threat and conservation. Lee, D.-Y., Lee, D.-S., Bae, M.-J., Hwang, S.-J., Noh, S.-Y., Moon, J.-S. & Park,
International Journal of Odonatology, 7, 111–140. https://doi.org/10 Y.-S. (2018). Distribution patterns of odonate assemblages in relation
.1080/13887890.2004.9748202 to environmental variables in streams of South Korea. Insects 9, 152.
Corbet, P. S. (1999). Dragonflies: behaviour and biology of Odonata. Col- doi:10.3390/insects9040152
chester: Harley Books. Le Gall, M., Fournier, M., Chaput-Bardy, A. & Husté, A. (2018). Determi-
Dambri, B. M., Karaouzas, I., Samraoui, B. & Samraoui, F. (2020). Con- nant landscape-scale factors on pond odonate assemblages. Fresh-
tribution to the knowledge of the caddisfly of Algeria: an updated water Biology, 63, 306–317. doi:10.1111/fwb.13065
checklist of Algerian Trichoptera with new records from the Aurès Legendre, P. & Borcard, D. (2018). Box-Cox-chord transformations for
region. Zootaxa, 4786, 221 Colchester 232. doi:10.11646/zoo- community composition data prior to beta diversity analysis. Ecogra-
taxa.4786.2.4 phy, 41, 1820–1824. doi:10.1111/ecog.03498
Deacon, C., Samways, M. J. & Pyke, J. S. (2019). Aquatic insects decline in Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurements. Lon-
abundance and occupy low-quality artificial habitats to survive hydro- don: Croom Helm. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0
logical droughts. Freshwater Biology, 64, 1643–1654. doi:10.1111/ Malmqvist, B. & Rundle, S. (2002). Threats to the running water eco-
fwb.13360 systems of the world. Environmental Conservation, 29, 134–153.
del Rosario, R. B. & Resh, V. H. (2000). Invertebrates in intermittent doi:10.1017/S03768992902000097
and perennial streams: is the hyporheic zone a refuge from drying? Marques Pires, M., Müller, N. F. D., Stenert, C. & Maltchik, L. (2020). Influ-
Journal of the North American benthological Society, 19, 680–696. ence of different riparian vegetation widths and substrate types on the
doi:10.2307/1468126 communities of larval Odonata (insect) in southern Brazilian streams.
Díaz-Paniagua, C. & Aragonés, D. (2015). Permanent and temporary Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia, 32. doi:10.1590/s2179-975x2520
ponds in Doñana Natioanl Park (SW Spain) are threatened by dessica- Marques Pires, M., Stenert, C. & Maltchik, L. (2017a). Partitioning be-
tion. Limnetica, 34, 407–424. doi:10.23818/limn.34.31 ta-diversity through different hydroperiod lengths reveals predomi-
Dorn, N. J. (2008). Colonization and reproduction of large macroinverte- nance of nestedness in assemblages of immature odonates. Effects of
brates are enhanced by drought-related fish reductions. Hydrobiolo- pond hydroperiod on odonates. Entomological Science, 20, 318–326.
gia, 605, 209–218. doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9355-7 doi:10.1111/ens.12263
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z.-I., Knowler, Marques Pires, M., Stenert, C. & Maltchik, L. (2017b). Effects of wetland
D. J., Lévèque, C. et al. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, hydroperiod length on the functional structure of assemblages of
threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews, 81, Odonata. Austral Entomology, 58, 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/
163–182. doi:10.1017/S1464793105006950 aen.12312
Ellis, E. C. & Ramankutty, N. (2008). Putting people in the map: anthropo- Márquez-Rodríguez, J., Samraoui, B. & Ferreras-Romero, M. (2023).
genic biomes of the world. Frontiers in the Ecology and the Environ- Effect of forest fires on Mediterranean Odonata assemblages.
ment, 6, 439–447. doi:10.1890/070062 International Journal of Odonatology, 26, 27–35. https://doi.
Ferreras-Romero, M., Márquez-Rodríguez, J. & Ruiz-Garcia, A. (2009). org/10.48156/1388.2023.1917199
Implications of anthropogenic disturbance factors on the Odonata Médail, F. & Quézel, P. (1997). Hot-spots analysis for conservation of
assemblage in a Mediterranean fluvial system. International Journal plant biodiversity in the Mediterranean Basin. Annals of the Missouri
of Odonatology, 12, 413–428. doi:10.1080/13887890.2009.974835 Botanical Garden, 84, 112–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399957
4 Mittermeier, R. A., Gil, P. R., Hoffman, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mitter-
García, N., Cuttelod, A. & Abdul Malak, D. (Eds.) (2010). The status and meier, C. G. et al. (2004). Hotspots revisited: earth’s biological richest
distribution of freshwater biodiversity in Northern Africa. Gland, Swit- and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Chicago, Il: University of
zerland, Cambridge, UK, and Malaga, Spain: IUCN. Chicago Press for Conservation International.
Gasith, A., Resh, V. H. (1999). Streams in Mediterranean climate re- Morghad, F., Samraoui, F., Touati, L. & Samraoui, B. (2019). The times
gions: abiotic influences and biotic responses to predictable sea- they are a changin’: impact of land-use shift and climate warming on
sonal events. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 51–81. the odonate community of a Mediterranean stream over a 25-year
doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.51 period. Vie et Milieu – Life and Environment, 69, 25–33.
Morrison, M. L., Marcot, B. G., Mannan, R. W. (2006). Wildlife-habitat Samways, M. J. (1989). Taxon turnover in Odonata across a 3000 m altitu-
relationships: Concepts and applications. Third Edition. Washington, dinal gradient in southern Africa. Odonatologica, 18, 263–274.
D.C.: Island Press. Samways, M. J. & Steytler, N. S. (1996). Dragonfly (Odonata) distribution
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & patterns in urban and forest landscapes, and recommendations for
Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Na- riparian management. Biological Conservation, 78, 279–288. https://
ture, 403, 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501 doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00032-8
Oksanen, J., Simpson, G., Blanchet, F., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. Sánchez-Bayo, F. & Wyckhuys, K. A. G. (2019). Worldwide decline of the
et al. (2022). Vegan: Community Ecology Package, R package version entomofauna: a review of its drivers. Biological Conservation, 232,
2.6-4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan 8–27. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020
R Development Core Team (2023). R: a language and environment for Sato, M. & Riddiford, N. (2008). A preliminary study of the Odonata of
statistical computing (Version 4.3.2). R Foundation for Statistical S’Albufera Natural Park, Mallorca: status, conservation priorities and
Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://cran.r-project.org bio-indicator potential. Journal of Insect Conservation, 12, 539–548.
Raebel, E. M., Merckx, T., Feber, R. E., Riordan, P., Macdonald, D. W. & doi:10.1007/s10841-007-909-5
Thompson, D. J. (2011). Identifying high-quality pond habitats for Seidu, I., Danquah, E., Nsor, C. A., Kwarteng, D. A. & Lancaster, L. T. (2017).
Odonata in lowland England: implications for agri-environment Odonata community structure and patterns of land use in the Atewa
schemes. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 5, 422–432. https:/doi. Range Forest Reserve, Eastern Region (Ghana). International Journal
org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00178.x of Odonatology, 20, 173–189. doi:10.1080/13887890.2017.1369179
Remsburg, A. J., Olson, A. C. & Samways, M. J. (2008). Shade alone re- Sélys-Longchamps, E. de (1949). Les libelluliens. In: H. Lucas (Ed.), Explo-
duces adult dragonfly (Odonata: Libellulidae) abundance. Journal of ration Scientifique de l’Algérie. 3 (Animaux Articulés). pp. 115–135.
Insect Behavior, 21, 460–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-008- Sélys-Longchamps, E. de (1965). Odonates de l’Algérie. Bulletin de l’Aca-
9138-z démie d’Hippone, 1, 31–34.
Remsburg, A. J. & Turner, M. G. (2009). Aquatic and terrestrial drivers of Simaika, J. P. & Samways, M. J. (2008). Valuing dragonflies as service pro-
dragonfly (Odonata) assemblages within and among north-temper- viders. In: A. Córdoba-Aguilar (ed.), Dragonflies: model organisms for
ate lakes. Journal of the North American benthological Society, 28, ecological and evolutionary research. pp. 109-123. Oxford, UK: Oxford
44–56. https://doi.org/10.1899/08-004.1 University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230693.003.0009
Renner, S., Périco, E., Dalzochio, M. S. & Sahlén, G. (2018). Water body Smith, B. D. (2007). The ultimate ecosystem engineers. Science, 331155,
type and land cover shape the dragonfly communities (Odonata) in 1797–1798. doi:10.1126/science.1137740
the Pampa biome, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Journal of Insect Con-
servation, 22, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-0042-8 Smith, B. D., Villalobos, J., Perron Mary, A. C., Sahlén, G., Assandri, G.,
Vilenica, M. et al. (2022). Chapter 18 Odonata assemblages in hu-
Resh, V. H., Reynoldson, T. B. & Rosenberg, D. M. (2002). Trichoptera of man-modified landscapes. In A. Córdoba-Aguilar (Ed), Dragonflies
the Fraser River catchment, British Columbia, Canada, and their ap- and Damselflies: Model organisms for ecological and evolutionary
plicability to a large scale water quality monitoring program. Proceed- research (2nd edn). pp. 247–260. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
ings of the 10th International Symposium on Trichoptera, 15, 51–70. doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898623.003.0018
Riservato, E., Boudot, J.-P., Ferreira, S., Jovic, M., Kalkman, V. J., Schnei- Tachet, H., Richoux, P., Bournaud, M. & Usseglio-Polatera, P. (2010).
der, W., Samraoui, B. & Cuttelod, A. (2009). The status and distribu- Invertébrés d’eau douce – systématique, biologie, écologie. Paris,
tion of dragonflies of the Mediterranean Basin. Gland, Switzerland: France: VNRS Editions.
IUCN. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2009.18.en
Taylor, N. G., Grillas, P., Al Hreisha, H., Balkiz, Ö., Borie, M., Boutron, O. et
Rocha-Ortega, M., Rodríguez, P. & Córdoba-Aguilar, A. (2019). Spatial and al. (2021). The future for Mediterranean wetlands: 50 key issues and
temporal effects of land use change as potential drivers of odonate 50 important conservation research questions. Regional Environmen-
community composition but not species richness. Biodiversity and tal Change, 21, 33. doi:10.1007/s10113-020-01743-1
Conservation, 28, 451–466. doi:10.1007/s10531-018-1671-2
Wagner, D. L. (2020). Insect declines in the Anthropocene. Annual
Romero, G. Q., Moi, D. A., Nash, L. N., Antiqueira, P. A. P., Mormul, R. P. Review of Entomology, 65, 457–480. doi:10.1146/annurev-en-
& Kratina, P. (2021). Pervasive decline of subtropical aquatic insect to-011019-025151
over 20 years driven by water transparency, non-native fish and stoi-
chiometric imbalance. Biology Letters, 17, 20210137. doi:10.1098/ Walters, A. W. & Post, D. M. (2011). How low can you go? Impacts of a
rsbl.2021.0137 low-flow disturbance on aquatic insect communities. Ecological Ap-
plications, 21, 163–174. doi:10.1890/09-2323.1
Samraoui, B. (2009). Seasonal ecology of Algerian Lestidae (Odonata).
International Journal of Odonatology, 12, 383–394. doi:10.1080/138 Wellborn, G. A., Skelly, D. K. & Werner, E. E. (1996). Mechanisms cre-
87890.2009.9748352 ating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. An-
nual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 337–263. doi:10.1146/
Samraoui, B., Boudot, J. P., Ferreira, S., Riservato, E., Jovic, M., Kalkman, annurev.ecolsys.27.1.337
V. J. et al. (2010). The status and distribution of dragonflies. In: Garcia,
N., Cuttelod, A. & Abdul Malak, D. (Eds.), The status and distribution Worthen, W. B., Fravel, R. K. & Horne, C. P. (2021). Downstream changes
of freshwater biodiversity in northern Africa. pp. 51–70. Gland, Swit- in odonate (Insecta: Odonata) communities along a suburban to ur-
zerland: IUCN. ban gradient: untangling natural and anthropogenic effects. Insects
12, 201. doi:10.3390/insects12030201
Samraoui, B., Bouzid, S., Boulahbal, R. & Corbet, P. S. (1998). Postponed
reproductive maturation in upland refuges maintains life-cycle conti- Zalidis, G., Mantzavelas, A. L. & Gourvelou, E. (1997). Environmental
nuity during the hot, dry season in Algerian dragonflies (Anisoptera). impacts on Greek wetlands. Wetlands, 17, 339–345. doi:10.1007/
International Journal of Odonatology, 1, 118–135. doi:10.1080/1388 BF03161423
7890.1998.9748100 Zuur, A., Ieno, N. I. & Elphick, C. S. (2010). A protocol for data exploration
Samraoui, B. & Corbet, P. S. (2000). The Odonata of Numidia, northeast- to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology & Evolu-
ern Algeria. Part I: Status and distribution. International Journal of tion, 1, 3–14. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.X
Odonatology, 3, 11–25. doi:10.1080/13887890.2000.9748133
Samraoui, B. & Menaï, R. (1999). A contribution to the study of Algerian
Odonata. International Journal of Odonatology, 2, 145–165. doi:10.1
080/13887890.1999.9748126
Samraoui, B. & Samraoui, F. (2008). An ornithological survey of the wet-
lands of Algeria: important bird areas, Ramsar sites and threatened
species. Wildfowl, 58, 71–98.